►
From YouTube: 8-8-23 Planning Board Meeting
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
Vivian
castro-wooldridge,
cob:.
We
want
everyone
to
know
that
the
city
is
striving
into
the
vision,
co-created
by
city,
staff
and
community
for
productive,,
meaningful,
and
inclusive
civic
conversations.,
and
we
would
also
like
the
public
to
know
that
we
have
worked
with
the
community
to
develop
these
expectations
for
meetings
and
the
visions
really
designed
to
promote
free
conversation
and
dialogue.,
while
also
helping
ensure
that
everyone
who
participates
feels
emotionally,
physically,
safe
and
welcome..
B
Vivian
castro-wooldridge,
cob:,
we
wanna
show
we
make
space
for
different
viewpoints
in
our
meetings,
because
we
do
believe
that
leads
to
more
informed
decision
making
next
slide,
please.,
and
we
have
a
lot
of
information
on
our
website
about
the
productive,
atmosphere's
vision.
number..
We
have
a
number
of
rules
of
decorum
that
are
found
in
the
boulder
revised
code,
and
we
have
some
general
guidelines
that
are
advisory
in
nature
to
share
with
all
of
our
meeting
participants..
We
ask
that
all
remarks
and
testimony
raised
tonight
be
related
to
city
business.,.
B
B
Vivian
castro-wooldridge,
cob:,
obscenities,,
racial
epithets,
and
other
speech
and
behavior
that
disrupts
the
meeting
or
otherwise
makes
it
impossible
for
us
to
continue
in
the
moment
is
prohibited,,
and
we
do
also
ask
that
participants
identify
themselves
by
their
first
and
last
name
so
that
we
may
call
on
you.
and
we
know
who
is
providing
input
next.
Slide.
B
Vivian
castro-wooldridge,
cob:
so,,
as
I
mentioned,.
We
need
a
full
name
associated
with
each
person's
participation
in
the
meeting.
and
it
looks
like
not
all
people
have
their
full
name..
So
if
you
plan
to
speak.,
please
change
that.,
you
can
right
click
on
your
name,
or
you
can
send
it
to
me
in
the
qa.
and
I'm
happy
to
change
it
for
you.
B
Vivian
castro-wooldridge,
cob:
there's
no
pre-existing
list
for
signing
up..
So
if
you're
in
the
meeting,
we
welcome
you
at
the
appropriate
time
to
raise
your
hand,,
which
will
let
us
know
that
you
would
like
to
speak,-
and
you
can
do
this
by
looking
at
the
horizontal
menu
with
3
clickable
items,
and
if
you
click
on
the
hand,
icon,
it'll
raise
a
hand
next
to
your
name.
B
B
B
D
E
Lynn,
segal:
and
the
one
of
those
ones
with
the
cantilever
thing
and
brick
next
to
it.,
and
these
guys
are
adding
onto
their
place,
and
they
wanted
another
12
feet
because
of
the
setback
which
I
said,
yes,
go
for
it
because
they're
giving
a
bigger
house.
those
houses
were
about
1,600
feet..
I
guess
I
was
saying
1,000,,
but
I
was
thinking
back
in
time,
and
you
know.
E
E
E
E
E
Lynn
segal:,
so
the
thing
that
I
wanted
to
say
it's
negative,
though,
is
about
fruit
house,
and
that
is,
that
fruit
house
was
supposed
to
be
built
into
95
units..
To
my
understanding
this
would
be
in
excess
of
50
million
dollars
or
something,,
and
so
it
isn't
a
good
deal
that
we
got
8
million
instead
of
3
on
inclusionary
housing..
It's
a
bad
deal,,
because
3,
11
walked.
E
B
A
A
A
A
A
A
Pb,
sarah
silver:
make
a
motion,
or
to
an
emotion,
or
talk
separate
motion..
I
mean,.
We
figure
that
out
and
again,
a
reminder..
If
the
vote
on
a
motion
is
3
3
at
this
point,
since
there's
only
6
of
us
here.
that
will
be
considered
a
motion
to
deny,
and
it
will
be
sent
off
to
city
council
for
their.
A
A
A
F
A
Pb,
sarah
silver:
yes.,
but
why
don't
we??
Why
don't
we
see
how
we
do?
First
before
we
start
trying
to
like
negotiate
a
solution
to.
I
just
wanted
to
make
sure
that
any
failed
motion
was
not
an
automatic
denial.,
so
it
sounds
like
that
is
not
the
case.
and
thank
you.
that
answers
my
question.
thank
you.
A
G
G
C
Laurel
witt,,
cob:,
yeah.,
and
so
in
our
rules
of
procedure,.
It
says,
that
an
affirmative
vote
of
4
more
board
members
required
to
pass
a
motion
approving
any
action,.
Any
agenda
item
requiring
a
vote
of
the
planning
board
is
denied,
if
it
does
not
receive
affirmative
voter
4
or
more
so
here,.
Since
there's
6.,
if
you
split
33
that
it
would
be,,
I
don't
know.
yeah,
right?.
I
appreciate
that
clarification.
thank
you.
A
A
H
I
H
H
H
H
Danica
powell,
trestle
strategy,
group:,
so
just
to
reiterate
our
tdm
plan
and
parking
reduction.
we're
based
on
a
lot
of
data..
We
have
our
traffic
engineers
here
to
talk
about
this.,
but
what
we
wanted
to
just
really
reiterate
is
that
for
anyone
who
does
choose
to
have
a
car,,
we
will
sell
parking
spaces.
H
H
H
Danica
powell,
trestle
strategy
group:,
and
we
also
will
be
having
towing
contracts
and
the
there
is
a
parking
district
to
the
south
of
us,
which
our
residents
would
not
be
eligible,
for,
as
well
as
we
have
talked
to
all
of
our
neighbors,
who
do
have
privately
manage
parking
lots
about
our
intention
to
not
impact
them.
next
slide.
H
H
Danica
powell,
trestle
strategy
group:
and
for
those
of
folks
who
decide
not
to
have
a
car,.
We
have
these
incentives,
you
provides.
p.
cycle
and
eco.
pass..
The
new
thing
that
we
wanted
to
show
you
is
that
we
have
been
in
discussions
with
commutify
who
will
manage
the
alternative
transportation
fund..
We
have
also
doubled
that
because
we
feel
that
is
appropriate
for
this
project,
and
we
are
committing
to
one
year
of
management
with
commutify.
it's
similar
to
what
the
city
of
boulder
is
doing
with
their
mobility.
Card.
I
Sar+
architects:,
so
we
we
really
appreciate
the
substantial
discussion
and
feedback
that
we've
heard
to
date
from
planning
board..
We
even
went
back
to
re-watch
the
previous
planning,
board,
city
council,
hearings,,
the
design
advisory
board,
review
meetings,
and
what
we
heard
were
3
main
concerns..
So
one
focused
on
twenty-eighth
street
being
an
entry
or
gateway
into
the
city
of
bulk..
I
I
I
Sar+
architects:
in
response
to
these
concerns,
we've
made
pretty
substantive
changes
to
the
design.
emphasizing
this
28
street
frontage.
we've
reduced
the
mass
and
height
at
both
the
northeast
and
southeast
corners,
relocated.
The
main
entry,
created
a
way,
finding
element
along
twenty-eighth
street,
introduced
additional
breaks
in
massing
to
help
scale
down
the
facade,
and
incorporated
a
variation
and
massing
and
materiality
and
additional
detail.
I
I
Sar+
architects:
on
the
next
slide.
We
see
the
entry
sequence
and
the
previous
location,
how
it
was
recessed
off
of
the
front
along
twenty-eightth
street,
and
the
new
location
is
much
more
prominent,
and
brings
that
activity
of
the
resident
common,
a
common
areas
and
leasing
and
lobby
more
front
of
house,
and
focused
on
28.
I
I
I
Sar+
architects:
and
then
just
looking
at
additional
details
and
seeing
the
side
by
side
elevations.,
you
can
compare
the
the
before
and
after,
and
reduction
in
the
height
on
both
the
north
and
south
ends,.
Having
a
way.
finding
portal.
Entry.
really
brings
a
sense
of
presence
and
entry
onto
this
elevation.
I
H
A
A
J
L
Kurt
nordback,
pb:
thanks..
I
really
appreciate
the
moving
the
entry
way
out
close
to
28
street..
I
think
that
makes
a
lot
of
sense..
I
had
one
question,
though
it
seems
like
the
handicapped.
Access
now
really
is
coming
from
the
north
side,
as
opposed
to
east
side..
Did
you
consider
moving
the
handicapped
parking
spaces
to
that
north
side
to
make
them
closer
to
that
entry?
Way?.
I
Sar+
architects:,
having
presence
on
that
northeast
corner,
where
we
were
able
to
locate
the
the
staircase
and
entry,
so
that
there's
an
entry
from
the
north,
and
then
also
front
from
the
east,
facing
28..
So
there
there
will
be
a
direct
route
for
stairs
coming
up
from
the
north,
and
then
a
ramp
that
that
routes
from
the
handicap,
up
to
the
main
entry.
M
M
M
N
N
N
N
N
N
Gdorolek:,
I
think
we've
given
quite
a
bit
to
to
landscaping
in
that
zone..
So
it's
a
balance,
right?,
it's
a
balance
of
of
providing
that
public
access,,
but
also
providing
public
seating
areas.,
but
it
it
is
very
much
intended
to
be
public..
There
are
no
fences
or
anything.
blocking
you
from
that
area.
thought
so..
I
think
that
was
the
main.
N
A
A
Pb,,
sarah
silver:,
sorry
it
was
a
little.,
I'm
sorry.,
I
don't
know
who's
speaking
and
I've
made.
I've
made
an
error,,
which
is
you
all
need
to
re.
Acknowledge
your
name.
speak
your
name
before
you
speak.
So
we
have
that
on
record,
and
I
don't
know
who
just
spoke,,
but
it
was
very
garbled..
So
if
you
could
repeat
what
you
just
repeat
your
name
and
repeat
what
you
just
said,,
that
would
be
very
helpful.
I
M
M
I
I
Sar+
architects:,
especially
the
multi-use
path,
we've
have.,
most
of
the
amenity
program,
will
be
along
the
the
multi-use
path,,
so
there'll
be
the
club
room
and
fitness
room
and
highly
activated
common
spaces
for
the
buildings
along
that
multi-use.
Path.,
so
there'll
be
a
a
strong
indoor
outdoor
connection
between
the
program
in
the
building,
and
then
the
multi-use
path.
I
I
I
H
H
O
Cody
gratny,
jva:,
I'm
cody
grabbing
with.
jb,,
hi,
everybody!.
One
thing
I
was
going
to
say:
is,
ml,.
I
think
your
question
was,:
where
do
the
connection??
So
I
think
we
actually
have
the
west
connection,,
which
is
the
north-south
multi
use
path
along
the
western
property
line..
That's
well
quote
wide,
and
that's
per
the
city's
transportation
and
master
plan..
So
that's
what
that.
O
Cody
gratny,
jva:
multi-use
path
is
on
the
west
side.
and
then
the
one
that
amy
was
talking
about
that
goes
through
buildings,
2
and
3..
That's
the
smaller
one
that
isn't
a
multi
use
path.,
but
we
are
having
public
access
through
it.
and
that's
this
one
that
is
up
right.
Now.,
thanks,,
whoever's
showing
it.
O
Cody
gratny,
jva:
and
then
we
have
the
third
one,,
which
is
the
multi
use
path
in
between
building
1,,
one
and
2,,
and
that's
the
one
that
kind
of
weave
through
the
courtyard
kind
of
as
amy
was
discussing.
and
that's
12
foot
wide
as
well.,
and
then
we
obviously
have
the
12
foot.
multi
use
path
on
28
street
as
well..
So
those
are
our
connections
through
our
site.
North-South.
M
H
H
Danica
powell,
trestle
strategy
group:
to
the
south
of
the
creek.,
we're
keeping
those
cottages
and
keeping
those
businesses.,
so
those
would
be
nonprofit
daycare,
commercial,
uses.
and
then,
in
the
main
floor
of
the
building,,
we
are
doing.
a
lot
of
public
facing
amenity
space.
and,
I
believe,
there's
a
small
commercial
space
along
the
multi
use.
Path.
is
that
correct.
H
A
A
A
A
A
G
G
G
L
L
L
L
Kurt
nordback,
pb:
and
I
think
the
greater
articulation
of
that
east
elevation
really
helps,
and
certainly
stepping
down,,
particularly
on
the
south,
and
which
I
think
was
a
a
a
significant
concern
among
the
board..
I
think
that
will
make
just
for
a
much
more
attractive
building,,
as
viewed
from
28
street,
from
the
multi-use
path,
there,
and
so
on..
So
I
think
it's
a
a
significant
improvement.,
I'm
sorry
to
lose.
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
Ml
robles,
pb:
the
design
guidelines
in
that
packet
are
timeless..
They
may
be
old,
but
they're
timeless.
they're
talking
about
experiences
for
people.
they're,
talking
about
making
a
cohesive
hole
out
of
our
commercial
center.
they're
talking
about
creating
it.
they're
there..
It
is
literally
the
center
of
boulder.
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
A
G
G
G
G
Mark
mcintyre,
pb:
is
mark
mcintyre,
pb:,
based
on
the
applicants,
open
space,
calculations,
and
just
the
general
site
design
by
moving
the
path
to
the
north,,
making
a
safer
for
cyclists
across
the
bridge..
It
creates
this
much
bigger
lawn
that
is,
that
is,
quote
public
space,
and
I
do
have
a
condition
drafted
to
make
sure
that
that
would
remain
public
space
and
be
considered.
G
M
Ml
robles,
pb:
being
so
careful
about
that
long,
because
you
have
been
about
that
path,
and
it
being
public,
and
the
conversation
that
I
brought
up
with
the
concern
with
you
know:
people
wanting
to
move
in
there
and
put
up
tents
and
that
sort
of
thing.
and
promptly
being
reminded,.
This
is
private
space.
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
A
A
A
A
A
A
F
Laura
kaplan,,
pb:
so
ii,
don't
think
that
there
are
any
picnic
facilities
there.
now
that
are
open
to
the
public..
I
could
be
wrong
about
that,,
but
my
experience
with
the
millennium,
passing
by
on
the
creek
path,
is
that
there's
a
tennis
center
there.?
I
don't
play
tennis.,
there's
a
dome
there
that
looks
like
it's
for
private
events.,
but
ii
have
not
been
invited
to
any
of
those.
F
Laura
kaplan,
pb:,
and
so
for
me..
It
is
not
public,
space,
right?!
It's
some
place
I
pass
by
when
I'm
on
the
creek
path.
I've
been
to
the
fish
observatory.,
that's
public.,
if
they're,
adding
creek
access..
That
seems
like
an
additional
public
amenity.
if
they're,
adding
a
dog
park
and
a
pickle
ball
court,.
Those
seem
like
additional
public
amenities.
F
Laura
kaplan,
pb:
beyond..
What
is
there
now,
which
some
folks
may
not
think
is
a
fair
exchange
for
the
tennis
courts
and
the
whatever
the
past
historical
friday
night
club
uses
were,,
but
I
do
think
that
they
they
have
accounted
for
some
public
amenities..
I
also
note
that
that
regency
shopping
center
to
the
north.
F
Laura
kaplan,
pb:
has
all
kinds
of
opportunities
for
people
to
get
some
take.
Out.
you
can
get
thai.,
you
can
get
indian.,
you
can
get
ice
cream.,
you
can
get
cakes..
You
can
go
to
flower,
child..
There's
a
greek
cafe.,
there's
a
lot
of
stuff
that
you
can
get
in
that
regency
regency
shopping
center.!
That's
just
a
few
steps
away
and
carry
it
down
and
have
a
picnic
on
the
lawn
if
you
want..
So
I
think
that
that
space
can
still
function
as
a
public
space
as
it's
designed.
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
Laura
kaplan,
pb:,
so
I
did
appreciate
the
changes
that
the
applicant
made
that
I
thought
they
were
listening
to.
Us.,
I'm
not
going
to
repeat
the
wonderful
things
that
mark
and
kurt
noted
about
how
it
was
responsive
to
some
of
our
input..
As
you
all
know,,
I
was
voted
in
favor
of
approval.
last
time
I
intend
to
vote
in
favor
of
approval
again..
So
that's
where
I'm
at.
A
F
Laura
kaplan,
pb:
point
here?,
laura
kaplan,
pb:.
Can
we
go
ahead?
and
can
we
go
ahead
and
put
a
motion
on
the
floor
to
approve
the
applicant's
project.
discuss
conditions,
one
by
one,
and
vote
on
them,,
and
I
don't
care
if
we
vote
on
them,
one
by
one,
or
vote
on
them
as
a
package.?
If
we
put
a
motion
on
the
floor
and
get
it.
A
F
F
A
F
C
Laurel
witt,
cob:
yeah,
thanks.
thanks
so
much,
laura,
with
the
city
attorneys
office
to
introduce
myself
earlier.
so
more.
and
either
way
works..
I
think
that
laura's
process
is
the
is
one
of
the
ways
that
we
do
it.
Through.
roberts
was
order
creating
amendment
based
on
each
condition.,
and
I
think
your
idea
was
to
discuss
them
before
it
goes
to
the
amendment.
Process.
so
either
way
works.
A
A
A
A
Pb,
sarah
silver:,
we
have
a
second.,
kurt
nordback,,
pb:,
yes,,
sir.
pb,,
sarah
silver:.
I
got
lots
of
pb,
sarah
silver:
mark
seconded
it.,
pb,,
sarah
silver:
okay,.
So
now
we
can.
it's
open
for
discussion..
I
would
suggest,.
If
you
have
conditions
now,
would
be
the
time
to
raise
them
as
an
amendment.
A
A
G
G
A
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
C
C
A
C
C
A
Laurel
witt,
cob:
so
you,
as
the
motionmaker
had
a
second
and
then,.
Now
that
motion,,
the
original
motion,
is
up
to
the
board,.
So
it's
the
board's
motion.
so
now
mark
comes
in
and
gives
this
motion..
So
in
order
for
it
to
be
adopted,,
somebody
has
to
second,,
and
then
you
vote
on
whether
it's
going
to
be
included.
C
A
G
A
G
G
G
C
G
A
F
Laura
kaplan,
pb:
can
I
make
a
suggestion,
mark?.
Instead
of
trying
to
talk
about
public
spaces
and
semi
public
spaces.,
I
would
leave
the
paragraph
about
public
spaces
such
as
the
boulder
creek
path
on
the
lawn
to
the
south..
I'd
leave
that
alone.
and
this
one,
I
would
just
say,
instead
of
saying,
semi
public
spaces,,
just
use
your
language
that
you
use
later
on,
saying
active,
program,
recreational
uses.
F
F
F
G
A
C
G
G
G
G
G
G
A
G
G
G
F
Laura
kaplan,
pb:,
you
know,
in
keeping
with
our
procedures,
that
any
amendment
has
to
correspond
to
a
criterion
that
we
think
is
not
met
unless
we
have
this
amendment..
Unless
we
have
this
condition..
I
do
think
that
mark's
amendment
is
consistent
with
9,
2,,
14,,
roman
numeral,,
one
that
talks
about
providing
for
the
balance
of
private
and
shared
areas
for
residential
uses
and
common
open
space.
F
That
is
available
for
use
by
both
residential
and
non
residential
uses..
I
think
what
mark
is
trying
to
do
here.
Is,,
just
make
sure
that
that
balance
is
maintained
into
the
future.,
and
so
I
do
find
this
to
be
consistent,
and
a
good
assurance
that
this
condition
will
that
this
provision
of
site
review
will
continue
to
be
met..
So
I
am
supportive.
M
M
Ml
robles,
pb:,
I
can
read..
I
can
read
what
that
says,,
since
projects
are
designed
to
human
scale
and
promote
the
safe
and
vibrant
pedestrian
experience
to
the
location
of
building
frontages
along
public
streets,,
plazas,,
sideways,,
sidewalks,
and
paths,,
and
through
the
use
of
building
elements,,
design,,
details,
and
landscape
materials
that
include
without
limitation,
the
location
of
entrances
and
windows
and
the
creation
of
transparency
and
activity
at
the
pedestrian
level.
M
M
C
C
Laurel
witt,
cob:
have
a
site.
Review
criteria
would
be
met..
It
is
required
by
the
code
that
they
meet,
that
criteria
staff
is
laid
out
in
their
memo
about
how
they
meet
you
to
the
required
criteria
that
apply.,
if
you
think
they
don't
meet
the
criteria,,
then
we
can
add
a
condition
that
changes
or
have
them
do.,
xy.
and
z.
things
to
meet
that
criteria.,
but
they
do
have
to
meet
the
site
review.
Criteria.
C
M
M
M
M
A
A
A
A
C
C
M
M
Laurel
witt,
cob:,
that's
that's
what
I'm
trying
to.
I'm
trying
to
think..
If
you're,
I
don't
know,
if
you're
I'm
I'm
I'm
I'm
I'm
I'm
I'm
I'm
I'm
I'm!
I'm!
I'm!
I'm!
I'm!
I'm!
I'm!
I'm!
I'm!
I'm!
I'm!
I'm!
I'm!
I'm!
I'm!
I'm!
I'm!
I'm
not
sure.
If
I'm
going
to
the
point
where
I'm
going
to
be
able
to.
A
Pb,
sarah
silver:,
where
there
are
pedestrian
pads.,
the
height
of
the
building,
can
only
be
x,
so
that
height
and
with
our
estimation,
more
human
scale
like
that
would
be
a
condition
that
could
would
then
be
a
solution..
Your
solution
to
the
problem
that
you've
identified
in
terms
of
meeting
criteria.
laurel
had
to
work,
had
responded
to
in
my
question.
M
M
M
A
A
L
C
L
C
Laurel
witt,
cob:,
so
laurel
witt,
cob:,
the
what
I'm
hearing
is.
The
public
spaces
are
defined
on
the
plan
as
both
easement
and
non
easements.
Area.
there's
a
couple
of
drawings
that
show
in
the
written
statement
where
the
different
public
spaces
are
and
where
they
overlay
the
easement.,
but
it
is.
this
language
as
written
is
clear
and
enforceable.
F
F
F
L
L
A
G
A
G
G
Mark
mcintyre,
pb:
a
revised
written
statement
that
describes
the
management,
programming
and
hours
of
operation
for
public
spaces
that
include
public
rights
of
way
and
access,
easements
that
are
shaded
in
yellow
and
described
as
public
space
on
the
site.
Plan,
on
page
135
of
160,
part
a
of
the
july
1123,
planning
board
packet,
public
spaces,,
such
as
the
boulder
creek
path
and
the
lawn
to
the
south
of
the
path.
G
G
G
F
Laura
kaplan,
pb:,
I
just
wanted
to
speak
to
ml's
concerns
and
say,
ml,.
I
think
that
you
have
one
other
option
besides
denial,,
which
is,,
if
you
know
again,,
if
there's
some
tweak
that
you
wanted
to
propose
that
would
make
the
project
meet
this
condition
of
having
a
safe
and
vibrant
pedestrian
experience.
F
F
M
M
M
M
M
G
A
A
G
M
M
G
G
A
A
A
A
M
G
G
G
G
G
G
F
Q
Q
Q
M
M
Q
Q
Q
A
A
L
Kurt
nordback,,
pb:,
elevation,,
and
so
far
as
I
can
tell,
that
is
not
continued
around
the
building.,
but
one
thing
that
might
help
with
that
to
meet
that
goal
is
to
continue
that
definition
line
all
the
way
around
the
building..
The
other
thing
is
also
a,
as
shown
in
the
the
new
renderings.
there's
different
material
for
the
first
floor,,
which
I
think
also
relates
to.
M
M
M
M
Pb,,
sarah
silver:,
how
long
is
our
break
going
to
be??
I
just
wanted
to
say,.
If,
if
ml.
is
going
to
change
that
condition,
number
3
about
setting
off
the
fourth
floor
of
the
and
talking
about
the
top
of
the
building,,
I
would
specify
the
number
of
the
building
that
you're
talking
about
and
the
elevation,.
Unless
you
mean
all
buildings
and
all
elevations.
F
M
A
A
M
M
Q
Q
Q
Brad
mueller,
cob:,
hmm,,
brad,
mueller,,
cob:
and,
of
course,
it's
up
to
the
board
to
decide
whether
to
continue
this
conversation
on
design
or
not..
You
know,
in
again
a
hearing
process..
I
think
the
applicant
has
made
it
clear
that
they're
hoping
for
a
final
decision,
tonight.
and
many
of
you
on
the
board-
have
expressed
that.
M
Ml
robles,
pb:
to
articulate
ml
robles,
pb:
how
often
seating
spaces
should
be
included!.
How
many
covered
areas
where
treatment.
I
mean
that
that
that's
a
design.
I'm
and
I'm
only
talking
about
the
public
spaces,
I'm
not
talking
about.,
we
about
building
changes.,
I'm
talking
about
the
public
spaces
as
mark
articulated,.
What's
yellow?
on
that?
on
that
plan?.
M
M
A
A
C
C
C
C
C
C
A
C
C
P
Shannon
moeller,
cob:,
I
can
go
through
it
real
quick..
Can
you
all
hear
me?
alright?
okay,
wonderful.,
I'm
shannon
molar
with
the
planning
department.
I'll
go
through
these
real
briefly
here
with
you..
So
these
are
the
conditions
of
approval
we
originally
recommended
with
changes
identified
in
red.
P
A
C
Laurel
witt,
cob:
yeah.
and
then
at
the
very
end,.
If
it's
okay,,
just
adding
this
language,
and
I'll
put
it
in
in
the
chat.
So
you
can
see
it.
so
we're
gonna
do
what's
called
adoption
by
reference.,
so
say
the
motion.
and
then,,
including
the
amendments
proposed
by
staff
to
incorporate
the
supplemental
materials
into
the
conditions
of
approval.
C
C
A
C
A
C
A
pb,
sarah
silver:,
making
a
motion
to
approve
site
and
use
review.
Application.
lur.
202-20-0020ne.
as
amended
at
the
august
eighth,
2,02023,
planning
board
meeting
and
the
proposed
amendment
to
the
bvrc.
transportation
connections
plan.
Adopting
the
staff
memorandum
is
finding
the
fact,,
including
the
attached
analysis
of
review
criteria,,
including
the
amendments
proposed
by
staff
to
incorporate
the
supplemental
materials
into
the
conditions
of
approval.
A
C
C
M
M
M
A
Q
M
ml,
robles,
pb:-
and
I
you
know
ii,
don't
know.,
you
may
or
may
not
have
heard
me
talk
about
the
probably
one
of
the
highest
building
standards
available
out
there
right
now
that
it's
for
commercial
and
residential,
and
they're
doing
what
they
do
around
the
country.
they're
doing
it
in
looseville,,
which
is
they
build
a
little
structure
according
to
the
highest
code.