►
From YouTube: 7-19-22 City of Boulder Planning Board
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
A
A
B
B
B
A
C
C
C
C
C
A
D
D
A
A
A
A
A
Pb,
john
gerstle:
proposed
by
the
city
council,.
So
if
you
have
any
comments
on
those,
please
wait
and
until
we
have
the
public
hearing,
comment:
sections
on
those
specific
items.
Otherwise
we're
eager
to
hear
what
you
have
to
say
to
us
on
any
other
issue
and
brenda
will
be
managing
this
section
of
the
meeting.
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
F
A
A
A
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
Cob:
ali
rhodes
she/her:
a
focus
on
engagement
with
the
community.
The
parks
and
recreation
advisory
board
is
the
the
board
specifically
appointed
by
council
on
matters
related
to
parkland
and
parks,
and
recreation
operations
has
been
heavily
involved
throughout
the
process
to
bright
input
and
guidance..
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
Cob:
ali
rhodes,
she/her:
we've
added
key
performance
indicators
to
help
us
hold
true
to
the
work
that
we
say
that
we
were
going
to
do.
We
did
we've
added
an
executive
summary
that,
in
your
version,
is
not
yet
translated
to
spanish,
but
will
be
in
its
entirety,
and
we've
also
added
a
glossary
in
work.
Cited.
J
J
J
J
J
Cob:,
ali
rhodes
she/her:.
This
also
outlines
the
work
we
need
to
do
to
ensure
that
our
systems
are
able
to
provide
the
data
driven
decisions
and
system
that
our
community
expects.
So
with
that
overview,
I'm
going
to
hand
you
to
our
project
manager,
regina
elsner,
to
talk
about
where
we
are
and
where
we're
going.
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
Regina
elsner:
bpr:,
this
graphic
ties
together.
The
total
financial
picture
for
bp
are
the
column
on
the
left
represents
bp,
ours,
current
funding
levels
as
determined
by
2020
2016
through
2019
averages
we
intentionally
excluded,
2020
and
2021.
Due
to
the
incredible
variance
we
saw
on
funding
due
to
the
pandemic.
K
K
K
Regina
elsner:
bpr:
increases,,
we
continue
to
fall
behind
on
basic
operations,
maintenance,
capital,
repair
and
refurbishment.
Maintaining
only
the
current
level
of
funding
will
require
difficult
conversations
with
the
community
about
right
sizing,
our
core
services
and
the
expectations
from
the
community.
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
Regina
elsner:
bpr:
rent
looking
at
how
we
are
investing
and
renovations
of
our
parks
in
our
playgrounds.
Looking
at
restrooms
and
thinking
about
specifically
our
urban
canopy.
And
how
do
we
continue
to
focus
on
the
health
of
the
urban
canopy
and
all
of
the
ecosystem
services
that
that
canopy
provides.
K
K
K
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
L
K
K
K
K
K
J
Cob:,
ali
rhodes,
she/her:
owner,
add
just
one
note
on
that:
the
how
of
that
ml
is
that
the
tool
we
used
was
developed
out
of
a
planning
institute
in
california
and
it's
a
multi
step
process,.
The
first
step
that
we
facilitated
with
this
was
just
talking
about
values
for
parks
and
recreation,
system.
J
J
J
J
J
Cob:,
ali
rhodes,
she/her:
ridiculous
rocky.
I
thought
I'd
be
able
to
get
away
and
just
like
play
it
cool
but.
J
J
J
L
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
L
J
O
O
O
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
A
A
A
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
A
J
J
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
A
A
K
K
K
A
A
A
K
K
K
J
J
A
J
A
Pb,
john
gerstle:,
I
had
one
other
point
that
I
just
wanted
to
inquire
about,
and
that
is
dealing
with
the
level
of
service,.
You
have
to.
A
A
J
J
A
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
R
R
R
R
F
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
E
E
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
A
Pb,
john
gerstle:
thank
you.
pb,
john
gerstle:,
any
other
comments.
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
J
J
J
J
J
J
L
L
Q
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
K
K
L
L
K
K
K
L
L
O
Pb
mark
mcintyre:
okay,
thanks
john,
so
I
think
the
first
thing
I
want
to
say,
as
I
second
the
accolades
that
laura
spoke
to.
O
O
O
O
O
O
Pb
mark
mcintyre:
and
so,
as
we
should,.
Those
are.
Those
are.
Those
are
great
things,
so
my
comment
is
I'm
going
to
play
to
type
here,
is
about
transportation
and
and
fees
and
that
sort
of
thing,.
So
I
I'm
not
suggesting
changes
to
the
plan
at
this
late
date,,
but
I
do
urge
you
and
your
team
and
your
department.
O
O
O
O
O
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
A
A
A
A
Q
E
A
L
A
A
E
J
A
A
A
A
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
Cob,
kathleen
king:
the
amendment
identified
seven
parcels
along
western
avenue
and
the
north
end
of
the
55th
and
arapahoe
station
area
and
creates
a
trigger
for
when
rezoning
of
these
properties
should
be
considered.
So
I
know
there's
a
lot
of
interest
in
this,,
so
we
can
take
a
look
at
these.
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
Cob,
kathleen
king:
and
that's
that
felt
quick,,
but
that
completes
the
staff
presentation.
We
can
move
into
any
clarifying
questions
and
the
public
hearing
and
then,.
I
have
a
slide
with
suggested
motion
language
if
needed.
S
A
L
L
L
S
S
S
S
S
S
E
Pb,,
laura
kaplan:
sorry,
too
many
mute
buttons
in
too
many
screens,
hi
hi
kathleen,.
Thank
you
for
that
presentation
and
I
appreciate
that
many
of
my
questions
were
incorporated
in
in
your
presentation,.
So
thank
you,.
I
do
have
a
few
questions
before
we
get
to
the
public
testimony
and
the
board
discussion.
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
Pb,
laura
kaplan:
and
did
they
raise
concerns
about
having
housing
to
their
south
across
the
railroad
tracks
at
any?
At
any
point
before
it
went
to
city
council
on
may
17th,
because
the
first
thing
I
heard
about
it
was
johnny
joseph
hotline
post
on
may
10,
which
was
after
planning
board
considered
it.
S
S
S
E
E
E
pb,,
laura
kaplan:
a
date,
I'm
sorry.
pb,,
laura
kaplan:.
No,
my
my
my
mistake,.
I
thought
you
were
looking
at
it
and
I
know
that,,
like
the
chamber,
had
organized
some
sessions
with
business
and
property
owners
in
the
area
and
did
this
concern
come
up
during
any
of
those
sessions
hosted
by
the
chamber.
S
S
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
A
E
Pb,,
laura
kaplan:.
Thank
you.
One
of
the
points
that
was
raised
by
city
council
was
around
the
fact
that
this
is
a
pharmaceutical
manufacturing
plant
and
that
that
could.
S
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
S
E
E
S
E
E
E
E
E
E
S
S
E
E
E
S
E
E
Pb,,
laura
kaplan:
is
it
when
cordon
farmer
plants
ceases
operations,
is
it
when
they
apply
for
demolition?
Permit?
Is
it
when
the
facilities
actually
demolished?
Does
there
have
to
be
a
new
plan
for
new
facilities
admitted?
Do
they
have
to
be
actually
constructed
like?
What
is
what
would
the
trigger
be.
S
E
E
E
L
Pb,
ml
robles:,
I
appreciate
all
your
answers
to
lower
their
kathleen.
I
think
there's
there's
a
lot
of
complexity
here
that
we're
just
trying
to
unravel.
I
only
have
two
questions,
so
my
understanding
of
the
reason
for
the
amendment.
L
L
L
L
L
L
S
S
S
L
L
A
O
Pb
mark
mcintyre:
thanks,
so
I'm
gonna
go
cut
to
the
chase
for
me
here
all
right,
and
say
I
asked
procedurally
if
we.
O
O
P
E
E
E
T
T
T
T
A
A
A
T
T
E
E
T
T
A
A
Pb
mark
mcintyre:
great,
thank
you.
So
I
don't
want
to
be
hard
nosed
about
this,
but.
O
O
O
O
A
A
A
T
T
T
A
A
E
E
S
Cob,
kathleen
king:
horse
trading
and
in
land
use,.
I
think
that
you
know
what
I
described
at
the
council
meeting
is
that
we
have
had
a
long
and
intentional
community
process
for
this
plan,
and
so
I'm
revising
what
areas
would
be
considered
for
change
or
making
new
or
different
land
use.
Recommendations.
S
A
A
S
L
S
S
L
L
L
Pb,
ml
robles:
however,,
it
needs
to
be
done,,
but
I
think
that
that's
an
important
thing,,
because
if
you
did
put
all
this
attention
to
getting
this
the
way
it
is
in
this
booklet,
then
it
makes
sense
to
not
just
say
okay,.
Now
it
is
there.
It's
like:
okay,
let's,
let's
honor
what
was
done,
thank
you.
C
C
C
Kristofer
johnson,
cob:,
but
certainly
would
be
you
know,
open
to
changing
that
land
use
in
the
future
as
those
as
those
heavy
manufacturing
uses
may
change
over
time.
So
just
to
clarify
there
there
have
not
actually
been
any
changes
proposed
as
part
or
or
in
response
to
the
city
council,
amendment.
C
C
E
E
E
E
Pb,,
laura
kaplan:
councils
amendment
would
change
is
the
fact
that
the
land
use
plan
that's
being
adopted
at
the
same
time,.
The
changes
to
the
bcp
land
use
plan
do
not
include
that
one
area,,
even
though
it
is
still
designated
as
mixed
use
to
god
in
the
sub
community
plan.
Is
that
what
I'm
understanding.
A
S
S
S
A
E
E
E
E
E
Pb,
laura
kaplan:
and
we
can
deal
with
it
at
that
stage
down
the
road,
so
I'm
not
able
to
proactively
prohibited,.
I
accept
that,,
but
I
do
want
to
point
out
that
I
think
that
councils
language
is
less
protective
of
residential
than
what
I
had
written,,
so
it
my
understanding
that
correctly
kathleen.
S
Cob,
kathleen
king:.
I
think
that
is
one
way
to
interpret
it,.
I
think
you
know
my
understanding
of
how
zone
one
and
two
are
established
is
really
related
to
this.
S
S
A
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
Elliot
dickerson:,
thanks
again
for
all
your
hard
work
on
this
plan,,
please
feel
free
to
reach
out
to
me
I'll,
send
an
email
to
the
planning
board,
email
or
to
clinton,
see
our
president,.
We
know
it's
a
very
complex
technical
topic,,
but
something
that
just
lets.
Everybody
know
that
there
will
be.
G
F
U
U
U
U
U
U
F
F
F
F
F
E
Q
F
F
F
F
F
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
F
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
F
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
F
X
X
X
X
Jonathan
singer:,
the
idea
of
coming
to
a
nuisance
is
that
courts
will
give
deference
to
the
longest
standing
legally
zone
operation
first.
So
when
an
operation
is
already
in
existence,,
the
noise
light
and
traffic
nuisances
that
are
reported
by
newly
located
residents
will
be
thrown
out
by
the
courts.
X
X
X
F
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
E
A
S
A
E
T
A
S
P
P
P
P
Pb,
lisa
smith:,
I'm
being
careful
what
I'm
saying:
so,
like,,
I
might
get
scolded
by
some
of
you,,
but
I
wouldn't
recommend
this
for
boulder
but
like
when
you
look
at,
for
example,
we're
not
trying
to
be
new
york
city,.
But
you
look
at
cities
like
new
york
city,.
You
can
see
an
interesting
example
of
a
fairly.
P
P
P
P
P
L
Pb,
ml
robles:
and
if
we
go
back
to
our
east
boulder
sub
community
plan
and
look
at
the
east
boulder
place
types
and
that's
where
we
see
and
that's
where
the
hundred
and
80
unit
count
came
from.
That's
where
we
see
the
designations
proposed,
which
are
innovative
tape
to
d
non-residential
on
the
western.
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
Pb,
ml
robles:,
so
that
we
move
the
housing
out
of
the
area
of
concern.
I
don't
know
what
percentage
of
you
know,
people
are
concerned
about
it,
but
enough
people
to
bring
it
to
the
table
at
this
late
hour.
I
think
that
that
would
solve
the
problem
in
a
way
that.
L
L
L
L
Pb,
ml
robles:.
So
that's
my
suggestion.
I
don't
think
there's
a
right!
There's
a
wrong,.
I
think
there's
just.
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
S
Cob,
kathleen
king:
right
so
when
I
described
that
I'd
be
hesitant
to
make
a
land
use
map
change,,
and
I
am
going
to
pull
back
up
the.
S
S
S
S
S
S
L
Pb,
ml
robles:
mm-
I
know
it's
nice
and
tidy
to
have
these
kind
of
conceptual
diagrams
either
way
they
are,.
But
it
looks
to
me
like
those
blocks
of
blue
on
the
west.
L
L
L
L
A
L
E
E
S
S
S
S
S
E
S
E
S
S
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
O
O
O
Pb
mark
mcintyre:,
google
maps,,
and
so
I
actually
written
in
five
ish.
I
put
together
a
couple
slides
and
I'd
like
to
share
my
screen,
and-
and
I
think
this
is
a
book
written
okay.
Just
to
show
a
little
bit
of
my
thinking
on
on
a
map
is
that
ok,
with
that.
O
pb
mark
mcintyre:,
so
my
little
google
sheet
thing
is
kind
of
can
be
kind
of
jumping
but
anyway.
So
the
area
that
we're
talking
about
this
is
the
google
aerial
view
of
it,
coordinate
pharma
here,.
This
is
an
industrial
manufacturing
zone
across
several
railroad
tracks,.
We
have
proposed
housing.
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
Pb
mark
mcintyre:
mixed
use,
residential
restaurant
retail
on
the
lower
level
housing
above
with
the
railroad
tracks.
Directly,,
you
know
2030
feet
through
the
building
are
the
railroad
tracks
and
the
fact
that
tracks
are
closer
to
this
building,,
then
than
anything
out
by
5050,
and
they
are
right.
There.
O
O
O
O
O
O
A
A
A
F
F
F
A
A
E
Pb,
laura
kaplan:
john,
it
sounds
to
me
like
we
may
have
at
least
four
possibly
five
votes,
if
we
want
to
make
it
unanimous
and
therefore
a
stronger
decision
to
do
what
mark
is
suggesting,,
which
is
to
adopt
the
esports
community
plan,.
Except
for
this
amendment
that
talks
about
this,.
These
parcels.
E
E
P
P
P
P
P
P
L
Pb,
ml
robles:
thank
you,
thank
you.
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
S
S
O
O
O
O
E
E
E
E
L
L
O
L
L
E
O
A
E
E
E
E
Pb,
laura
kaplan:
and
that
this
will
not
become
a
slum
and
that
this
will
not
be
substandard.
Housing
for
people
have
lower
means,,
but
that
this
will
be
an
attractive
and
safe
addition
to
the
east,
boulder,
so
community
plan
and
that,
as
the
planning
board,.
We
do
believe
that
that's
what
we
are
doing.
A
E
M
E
E
E
S
L
L
S
T
E
O
T
E
L
L
P
P
P
P
T
E
P
L
L
L
A
E
E
T
L
A
A
B
B
B
E
E
E
E
D
B
B
B
S
E
A
Q
Q
A
A
A
P
Pb,
lisa
smith:
yeah,,
I
think,,
so
I
thought
I
mean.
I
know
it's
been
a
little
thicker
than
desire,
but
I
thought
were
pretty
efficient
and
everybody
is
kind
and
respectful
to
each
other
and
council
man
real,
like
a
real
landed,,
but
I
think
about
continuing
the
height
of
is
the
right
place
to
go
and
I'm.