►
From YouTube: 5-2-23 Planning Board Meeting
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
B
B
A
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
B
D
D
D
D
E
E
Hella
pannewig
city,
attorney's,
office:,
yes,,
far.,
hella
pannewig
city,
attorney's
office:,
so
I
prepared
this
slide
show.,
but
I'm
hella
pannewig
city,
attorney's,
office:,
I'm
happy,
and
I'm
happy
to
go
through
the
entire
slide
show,
or
to
do
this
more
in
a
conversation,
in
a
manner..
If
you
have
questions,,
you
can
ask
those
questions.
E
E
E
E
E
G
E
E
E
E
E
E
Hella
pannewig
city,
attorney's
office:.
So
what
if
there's
not
general
consensus??
If,
if
you
feel
like
more
former
rules
should
be
considered,,
then
one
of
you
could
ask
for
that
object
and
ask
that
in
a
particular
instance,
you
actually
follow
the
the
proper
form
of
procedures,
and
that
can
be
requested
by
just
one
board.
Member.
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
Hella
pannewig
city,
attorney's
office:,
what
do
you
use?
motions,
for?,
hella
pannewig
city,
attorney's
office:?
The
planning
board
generally
uses
a
motions
practice
to
make
a
decision
on
cause..
They
do
additional
applications,,
but
also
in
your
legislative
function..
When
you
make
recommendations
on
changes
to
the
land,
use,
code.
E
E
Hella
pannewig
city,
attorney's
office:,
to
make
a
motion..
The
motion
maker
has
to
have
the
floor,
and-
and
this
is
actually
one
of
the
rules
under
the
board
rules..
That
is
also
a
typical
rule
under
robert's
rules,
and
somebody
obtains
the
floor
by
being
recognized
by
the
chair
to
speak,
and
that
it's
that
person.
E
E
E
E
A
A
A
H
E
E
E
E
Hella
pannewig
city,
attorney's
office:,
so
before
the
the
question
is
stated
by
the
chair,,
the
motion
remains
the
motion
of
the
motion
maker,.
So
the
motion
maker
can
change
the
motion.
and
other
board.
Members
can
suggest
what
we've
mostly
been
considering
friendly
amendments,
and
because
the
motion
is
not
yet
the
motion
of
the
board,.
The
motion
maker
could
accept
the
friendly
amendment
or
reject
it.
E
E
E
Hella
pannewig
city,
attorney's,
office:
so,,
stating
the
question,
turns
the
motion
over
to
the
board
that
makes
it
the
board's
motion..
How
do
you
state
the
question
that
the
the
chair
can
say
something
like
it
is
moved
and
seconded
that,
and
then
repeat
the
exact
motion,
language,
and
that's,.
I
think,
the
most
formal
way.
E
Hella
pannewig
city
attorney's
office:
to
follow
robert's
rules.,
hella
pannewig
city
attorney's,
office:
however,
reading
through
robert
rules,
the
exact
motion.
language
is
not
necessary
if
the
board
share
things
that
really
the
language
of
the
motion
is
clear
to
everybody
who
is
going
to
vote
on
it.
E
E
E
E
E
A
E
E
E
E
Hella
pannewig
city
attorney's,
office:
well,,
the
motion
has
been..
The
question
has
been
stated,.
The
motion
is
the
motion
of
the
board..
Does
anybody
have
an
objection
to
this
friendly
amendment?
and
if
nobody
has
an
objection,,
then
you
can
move
forward
and
accept
that
as
an
actual
amendment
to
the
motion.
E
E
E
E
I
I
I
E
A
E
E
A
E
D
D
A
A
A
G
G
G
E
E
G
G
G
G
L
L
Pb,,
laura
kaplan:,
somebody
used
the
wrong
word.,
they
they
meant
to
say
tuesday,
and
they
said
wednesday,
or
they
did
the
wrong
date,
or
they
they
used
a
word
that
was
in
precise,,
and
someone
wants
to
sharpen
it
up..
But
it's
it's
not
a
a
substantive
addition,
or
a
substance
of
change
to
the
meaning
of
the
motion.
L
Pb,,
laura
kaplan:,
that
that
was
my
understanding
of
what
a
friendly
is.
and,
if
you
want
to
make
a
substantive
change,,
add
another
another
chunk
of
something,
or
take
a
piece
out
of
the
motion
that
happens
under
the
amendments
that
have
to
be
seconded
and
debated.
In
order
before
you
go
back,
to
approve
or
or
deny,
the
motion.
L
Pb,,
laura
kaplan:,
that
that
was
my
understanding.
What
a
friendly
amendments
purpose
was.!
If
we
want
to
just
cut
out
the
friendly
amendments
and
treat
everything
as
an
amendment.
I'm:
okay.
with
that,,
I
think
it
will
slow
us
down
a
little
bit,,
but
we
could
try
that.
and
then,.
If
we
see
it
in
practice
and
don't
like
it,,
we
could
go
back
to
the
friendly
amendment.
Concept.
E
E
Hella
pannewig
city,
attorney's,
office:,
characterized
hella
pannewig
city,
attorney's,
office:,
friendly,
amendments,
and
and
then
really
in
it's
a
tool
to
get
something
done,
quickly.
if
it
shouldn't
generate,
debate
without
having
to
go
through
all
of
the
different..
You
know
all
of
the
different
steps
of
the
motion
to
an
end.
A
A
A
E
E
A
A
E
A
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
A
A
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
A
E
E
G
G
E
E
E
E
G
G
G
E
E
E
I
L
E
E
I
I
I
E
E
E
Hella
pannewig
city,
attorney's
office:,
didn't
agree
with
how
one
of
the
review
standards
reads,
or
something
like
that..
Then
the
approval
of
the
development
project
is
a
different
subject
than
the
code
change
that
you're
also
discussing..
So
if
one
of
you
said,,
these
are
2
different
subjects,
right.
E
E
L
Pb,,
laura
kaplan:,
so
this
is
really
interesting,
and
thank
you
for
helping
us
understand.
This,
hella..
I
do
think
that
this
idea
of
what
is
a
different
subject
might
be
somewhat
controversial
at
times..
You
know
that
the
the
the
time
that
this
board
struggled
the
most
with
how
to
make
the
motion.
L
L
Pb,,
laura
kaplan:,
some
folks
might
have
seen
as
a
different
subject,
and
some
folks
might
have
seen
as
the
same
subject..
So
I
don't
want
to
debate
that
here
and
now..
I
think
that
valid
arguments
could
be
made
either
way.,
but
if
we,,
if
we
did
treat
it
as
a
single
subject,
here,
here's
the
question
that
I
have.
L
L
L
E
L
Pb,,
laura
kaplan:
several
parts
that
are
capable
of
standing
as
a
complete
proposition
if
the
others
are
removed.,
but
somebody
sees
their
vote
on
those
2
things
as
linked..
Is
it
still
kosher
to
separate
them
and
vote
separately
and
just
understanding
that
that
will
affect
people's
votes.,
or
does
that
mean
it's
inseparable?.
E
E
E
L
L
L
L
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
G
J
E
E
G
G
E
G
E
L
E
E
F
E
L
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
A
A
E
E
E
E
A
D
D
Brad
mueller,
cob:,
so
recommended.,
motions.
language,
as
it
says,
is,
is
just
that
it's
just
a
recommendation.
and
I
will
share
with
you
that
I've
seen
the
evolution
of
this
in
jurisdictions
over
the
years
to
where
it's
a
very
scripted
thing
right?.
We
we
give
you
a
motion,
that's
very
precise.
and
says.
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
A
G
G
G
G
G
A
A
A
A
A
A
E
E
E
I
I
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
I
I
Pb
ml
robles:,
I
am
hearing
that
there
is
a
difference
between
discussion
and
debate,
and
the
debate
has
more
to
do
with
where
there
are
a
point.
Opposing,,
maybe
positions
that
one
wants
to
make
about
what
I
don't
know.
anyway.
no,,
I
agree..
We
have
to
keep
our
key
issues..
I
think
they're
they're
vital
to
keeping
this
on
track.
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
L
Pb,,
laura
kaplan:
no,.
I
don't
have
additional
questions
at
this
time.
but.
hella,.
If
you
feel
comfortable.,
I
would
love
it.
if,
when
you
share
this
with
us,.
You
include
your
back
pocket
slides
that
we
didn't
have
time
to
go
over,,
which
is
totally
fine.,
but
I'm
sure
contain
really
interesting
information..
So.
E
E
A
H
E
E
E
Hella
pannewig
city,
attorney's
office:,
you,
you,
don't
really
follow,
and
hella
pannewig
city,
attorney's
office:.
It's
been
my
desire
to
get
those
updated
for
a
long
time,
and
I
just
never
got
into
it,
and
the
board
that
always
has
a
busy
agenda..
But
that's
one
of
the
things
I've
been
talking
with
laurel
about,
and
we're
hoping
to.
E
E
E
Hella
pannewig
city
attorney's
office:
that
the
city
manager
had
at
the
time..
But
now
the
code
has
been
amended
to
allow
virtual
rules,
and
at
some
point
this
board
will
get
to
decide
how
to
meet
in
the
future,.
Whether
it's
going
to
be
an
in-person
meeting
or
virtual
meeting,
or
a
hybrid
meeting,,
and
the
rules
should
adequately
address
that,
and
not.
H
G
G
A
A
G
G
G
G
G
E
E
E
E
D
D
D
D
D
D
G
G
G
G
E
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
A
K
G
G
A
A
A
A
L
Pb,,
laura
kaplan:
and,
as
we
discussed
at
our
last
meeting.,
it
seems
like
this
is
an
appropriate
time
to
follow
up
to
that
letter..
As
conditions
have
changed
a
bit,.
We
want
to
update
counsel,
and
let
them
know
how
much
we
appreciate
some
of
the
changes
and
clarifications
we're
seeing
from
staff
that
are
moving
in
the
direction
of
what
planning
board
had
recommended
in
our
april
fifth
letter.
L
L
J
J
J
Pb,
lisa,
smith:
and-
and
I
wonder
if
it
might
pb,
lisa
smith:,
be
a
little
more
impactful
if
it
were
a
little
more
pippy,.
But
I
also
don't
want
to
drag
us
down
and
towards
nothing,,
because
I
don't
think
that's
a
great
use
of
our
time..
So
yeah,
that
that's
my
feedback..
I
don't
know
if
other
people.
J
J
L
L
L
Pb,,
laura
kaplan:,
so
I
I
agree.
it's
kind
of
long,
and
if
folks
want
to
tighten
it
up,,
we
certainly
can
work
on
that
either.
here
and
now
it's
only
7,
39,
I
mean..
This
is
like
a
super
short
meeting
for
us,
and
we
do
need
to
avoid
serial
meetings.
so
either
we
can
take
it
offline
and
work
in
committee
to
tighten
it
up
and
bring
it
back
to
the
next
meeting,,
which
I
think
is
in
2
weeks..