►
From YouTube: 8-2-22 City of Boulder Planning Board Meeting
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
A
A
A
B
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
A
A
E
E
A
H
H
H
A
A
A
H
A
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
H
H
J
J
I
E
E
E
I
I
I
pb,
mark
mcintyre:,
qa
questions,
yeah,
okay,
all
right,
then
staff,
question
then.
E
E
E
I
I
Cob,
elaine
mclaughlin:.
You
know
it's
important
to
note
that
the
tmp
has
a
vision
plan
and
it's
adopted,
but
it's
ultimately
implemented
through
things
like
the
design
and
construction
standards,,
the
dcs,
so
to
the
extent
that
the
the
regulations
that
were
on
the
ground
at
the
time,,
this
was
approved,
get
implemented.
I
E
L
A
A
Pb
john
gerstle:
okay,,
so
I
think
at
this
point
we'll
invite
the
applicant
to.
I
A
C
G
G
M
M
M
M
M
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
A
Pb
john
gerstle:
to
you,
you
may
recall
that
mark
had
a
couple
questions
for
you,
that
and
george
to
to.
Could
you
respond
to
them.
G
G
G
A
J
M
M
M
Amanda
johnson
oz:
very
recently,.
You
know
our
capital
partner
was
blackstone
and,
through
them,.
You
know
various
pension
funds,,
but
every
thing
we
do
in
every
jurisdiction
has
always
been
very
long
term,,
and
that
is
absolutely
our
independent
border.
As
well,,
which
is
you
know,
long
term
ownership.
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
J
J
M
M
M
M
M
M
N
N
N
N
N
O
N
N
N
N
N
N
O
I
I
N
N
N
L
E
E
E
E
E
G
G
E
E
G
G
G
E
Pb
mark
mcintyre:
right
is
there.
E
P
E
E
E
G
G
G
G
Q
Pb,
ml
robles:
for
you
all,
but
the
project.
Q
L
Cob,,
charles
ferro
(he/him):,
it's
a
great
question.
I'm
well
thanks!
So
much
for
that,
regardless
there'll
be
required
to
meet
whatever
energy
and
building
codes,.
We
have
on
the
books
at
the
time
they
actually
apply
for
their
permit.
So.
L
Q
I
Q
Pb,
ml
robles:
right,
okay!
Well,
that
was
my
that
was
my
question-
that
there
had
been
some
changes
and
that
they
were
accommodated.
I
would
just
like
to
also
just
make
a
comment.
I'm
looking
at
the
rooftop.
Q
Q
Q
A
D
D
D
D
D
D
Lynn
segal:
plan
sub
community
plan,
I'm
opposed
to
it.
I'm
opposed
to
major
growth
and
expansion
in
boulder,
and
especially
in
housing,,
because
this
changes
and
increases
our
jobs,
having
in
balance,
and
so
that's
what
I
would
encourage
about
the
you
know.
The
health
sciences
development
here
and.
D
Lynn
segal:,
so
you
know
it,
we
don't
have
the
rec
centers,
we
don't
have
the
libraries,,
we
don't
have
the
place,
we
don't
have
the
fire
support,
we
don't
have.
D
D
D
C
A
Q
Q
Q
E
E
E
N
N
N
N
Pb,
laura
kaplan:,
so
just
so
that
they
understand
their
options
and
the
future
of
this
area
of
town,.
They
said
they're
in
it
for
the
long
haul.
I
think
that
would
be
a
good
thing
for
them
to
understand,,
but
I
am
more
than
happy
to
support
this
extension
and
if
it
goes
forward
as
planned,,
I
will
be
delighted.
J
A
A
E
K
N
A
A
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
Cob,
kathleen
king:
master
plans
are
one
of
the
tools
in
the
cities
toolbox
to
help
implement
the
boulder
valid
comp
plan.
The
comprehensive
flood
and
stormwater
master
plan,
in
turn,
will
inform
and
be
implemented
through
the
city's
capital
improvement
program,
as
well
as
development
codes
and
standards.
O
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
Cob
joanna
bloom
(she/hers):
along
those
same
lines,.
The
plan
makes
recommendations
to
enhance
outreach
with
a
particular
focus
on
targeting
traditionally
hard
to
reach
populations,,
and
this
is
an
area
of
continual
improvement
and
but
the
plan
recommends
a
focus
on
tailoring
messaging
to
reach
specific
audiences.
S
S
S
S
S
S
Cob
joanna
bloom,
(she/hers):
and
there's
kind
of
a
persistent
thought
that
funding
is
the
main
limiting
factor
associated
with
pacing
of
implementing
some
of
these
projects,
however,.
From
our
experience
we
run
into
staffing
and
engagement
related
constraints,
well
before
we
experience
funding
limitations.
S
S
S
A
A
Pb
john
gerstle:,
but
a
couple
questions,,
maybe
for
joanna
one,
is,
I
think,
would
be
useful
if
you
could
go
into
the
levels
of
service
that
are
described
in
the
in
this
comp.
Comprehensive
plan.
A
S
S
S
S
S
S
B
B
A
S
S
A
Q
Q
S
S
S
S
Q
Q
Q
S
S
S
S
T
Q
Pb,
ml
robles:,
because
I
guess
I'm
thinking
about.
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
S
S
S
S
Q
R
Pb,
sarah
silver:
and,
and
thanks
joanna
for
this.
So
just
first
a
comment
to
me.
I'll
just
see
you
know
emily.
You
may
not
recall
this,,
but
the
plan
for
the.
R
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
R
S
S
R
R
S
S
S
S
Cob
joanna
bloom
(she/hers):,
for
when
we,
when
we
incorporate
infrastructure
resilience,
that
means
that
we're
not
having
to
pay
for
something
that
we've
already
built.
This
cost
benefit.
Analysis
applies
to
the
private
property
damage,
that's
avoided,,
but
the
end,
am.
I
did.
I
say
any
of
that.
Wrong.
B
R
R
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
S
S
S
A
S
S
S
S
S
A
E
E
E
E
E
E
S
E
S
S
S
S
S
E
S
S
Cob
joanna
bloom
(she/hers):,
currently
there
yeah
so
currently,
and
water
quality
will
manage
the
storm
water
quality
group
will
manage
that
position,
and
partly
because
they
have
overlap
with
some
of
the
natural
green
spaces
and
the
invasive
weed
component,.
That
is
sometimes
associated
with
green
ways..
E
A
A
A
S
S
S
S
S
S
T
Vicki
scharnhorst:,
I
have
a
couple
of
if
it's
helpful,,
one
of
the
things
that
the
cw
g
really
underscored
and
we
agreed
with
them-
is
to
just
stay
current
with
the
science,
so
that
it
aligns
with
what
joanna
was
speaking
to,.
But
that
was
very
important,
and
I
think
that's
a
valid
element,
and
then
the
other.
T
T
A
S
S
U
U
U
U
A
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
A
A
N
R
R
R
R
C
Pb,
lisa
smith:
yeah,
similar
overall,
you
know
I
just
fully
support
it.
I'd
also
like
to
understand
the
funding
option
or
funding
suggestions,
a
little
bit
better.
C
Pb,
lisa
smith:,
yeah
so
kind
of
similar
to
what
others
have
said,
very
much
in
support,
and
then
I'd
like
to
understand
what
our
role
is
around
recommending
funding
and
kind
of
get
a
temperature
check
from
other
board
members
on
what
level
they
would
recommend.
If
that's
something
we
should
be
doing.
A
S
S
S
N
C
C
R
R
E
Pb
mark
mcintyre:,
okay,
thanks.
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
Cob
joanna
bloom,
(she/hers):,
so
anyway,
we
are
at
the
action
level.
We
are
recommending
division,
level,
and
that
is
really
driven
by
pacing.
All
of
these
projects
are
still
going
to
be
on
the
list.
S
T
T
Vicki
scharnhorst:,
you
know,.
We
got
a
lot
of
help
from
the
finance
department
and
looking
at
those
but,
again
in
20
$22,
and
this
won't
be
lost
on
you,
guys
that
there's
over
$350
million
of
estimated
capital
improvements,,
and
so
the
idea
and
the
conversation
that
we
heard
from
the
cw
g
was
very..
T
T
N
N
N
S
N
N
N
S
N
C
Pb,
lisa
smith:,
you
know
it's
going
to
happen
again
so,
and
climate
change
is
just
going
to
accelerate
all
of
this,
so.
C
Pb,
lisa
smith:
yeah,
I'm
not
looking
forward
to
paying
a
higher
water
bill,.
You
know,
I
don't
think
it's
about
that,.
I
think
we
need
to
keep
the
focus
on
equity,,
but
unfortunately
I
think
this
is
sort
of
like
finding
out
the
foundation
of
your
house
needs
work.
And,,
like
you,
just
have
to
get
it.
Done.
C
C
R
R
R
S
S
S
R
S
S
R
T
T
Vicki
scharnhorst:
but
yeah
the
current
model
and
what's
in
the
current
plan
that
you
would
be
discussing
and
voting
on,
it's
a
table
in
that
chapter
shows
past
increases
of
7%
and
then
it's
been
an
average
giuliana
had
that
right,
and
then
12%
recommended
for
the
next
couple
years.
Okay,
so
it's
12%.
S
C
T
Vicki
scharnhorst:
just
for
clarity
there,,
so
I
apologize.
I
can't
share
my
screen,
but
there's
a
figure
shown
in
the
document
which
provides
the
rate
increases
back
to
2003,
and
so
the
average
joe
and
as
it
right,
the
average
since
20
since
2000,
so
it
was,,
we
had
the
big
race
and
70
of
the
75%
increase,
in.
R
R
N
S
T
A
Pb,
john
gerstle:,
I
have
to
say
that
I
think
this
is
interesting,,
but
it's
not
complete,
in
the
sense
that
we're
only
talking
about
increases,,
whereas
I
I
believe
it
makes
more
sense
for
us
to
be
talking
about
absolute..
T
T
A
C
C
N
N
N
N
N
C
C
C
C
A
C
C
E
E
E
S
S
E
C
C
C
A
A
A
A
A
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
S
J
J
J
J
N
N
N
Pb,,
laura
kaplan:.
We
are
recommending
division
level
of
funding.
So
with
that
in
mind,,
I
move
to
recommend
to
city
council
acceptance
of
the
comprehensive
flood
and
stormwater
master
plan
and
approval
of
the
boulder
valley,
comprehensive
plan,
comprehensive
flood
and
stormwater
master
plan.
Summary.
A
J
J
R
Pb,,
sarah
silver:,
I
don't
think
we're
allowed
to
abstain.
That's
my
recollection
from
a
is
that
correct
hello,.
We
either
have
to
vote
yes
or
no.
H
J
E
E
Pb
mark
mcintyre:,
okay,
so
having
served
on
a
green
ways,
advisory
committee,
for
a
couple
years
and.
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
R
R
A
N
U
N
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
C
C
C
E
E
C
C
C
C
C
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
A
J
E
E
E
Pb
mark
mcintyre:
vote
on,
emotion,
can
say
so,
and
if
no
one
says
so,,
then
we
don't
need
to
take
a
vote,,
because
this
obvious
emotion
would
fail
or
wouldn't
have
a
second,,
but
we
do
operate
under
robert's
rules
and
so
just
moving
on.
When
there's
a
motion
on
the
floor,
I
don't
think
is
procedurally.
J
A
A
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
X
X
X
X
X
Samantha
bromberg,
city
of
boulder:
examples
of
the
variety
projects
underway
under
the
amps
program
umbrella,
so
we'll
be
talking
about
parking
pricing
strategy
and
residential
access
management,.
But
this
just
gives
you
the
idea
of
everything.
That's
going
on,
and
some
of
the
future
and
initiatives
as
well.
X
X
Samantha
bromberg,
city
of
boulder:
lastly,
over
the
course
of
this
year,
we've
also
been
working
on
introducing
a
discount
for
income.
Qualified
residents
on
the
neighborhood
parking
permit.
That
was
in
the
city
manager
rule
that
we've
revised
that
was
included
in
the
packet
in
tonight's
planning
board.
Beckett.
X
Samantha
bromberg,
city
of
boulder:,
so
here's
our
2023
amps
roadmap,
so
under
the
residential
access
management
program,
will
continue
to
increase.
Permit
pricing
in
the
hopes
of
eventually
achieving
cost
recovery,,
as
I
mentioned,
and
also
will
be
implementing
that
discount
program,
which
I
also
mentioned.
X
X
X
X
X
W
Q
Q
Q
Pb,
ml
robles:
you
either
didn't
have
to
pay
or
you
had
to
pay
if
you
were
a
visitor,.
So
what
I'm
curious
about,
and
I
guess,
this
is
a
question
as
much
as
anything
is.
Is
there
thinking
regard
regarding
trailhead
access
and
poking
that
acknowledges.
Q
Q
Q
X
X
X
X
W
W
W
W
Q
X
X
X
E
E
E
E
E
X
X
W
W
W
W
W
W
R
R
Pb,
sarah
silver:
city
workers
and
tourists
and
evening
goers
and
everyone
else,,
and
we
don't
have
driveways
the
way
you
might
you
might
mark,.
I
think
that
it's
not
all
about
trying
to
limit
the
number
of
cars
driving
on
our
roads.
There's
a
lot
of
other
needs
that
have
to
be
or
needs
that
have
to
be.
E
W
A
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
A
A
R
C
R
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
Q
C
C
C
C
J
J
C
Q
Q
Pb,
ml
robles:
and
I'm
wondering
if
the
board
would
be
interested
in
considering
an
earlier
start.
I
did
attending
the
boulder
county
planning
commission
meetings
and
they
started
for,
and
it's
really
quite
civilized.
It's
really
nice
to.
Q
J
V
V
V
V
V
R
R
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
N
Pb,,
laura
kaplan:.
Can
I
colloquy
on
that
and
say
one
option
is
rather
than
trying
to
time
it,
which
can
be
difficult
when
we
have
call
ups
and
we
have
no
idea
if
somebody
is
going
to
have
questions
on
a
call
up
for
the
items
that
we
do
know,
for
example,.
This
staff
presentation
is
a
20
minute,
presentation.
N
E
E
Pb
mark
mcintyre:,
you
know
if
someone
said,
I
think,
that's
another
thing.
20
minutes
like
no
way
this
parking
we're
going
to
take
an
hour
on
this
so
anyway,
I
would
encourage
it
as
well,
and
time
estimates
and
it
does
help
the
chair
kind
of
hold
the
meeting
to
some
sort
of
schedule.