►
From YouTube: 3-13-23 Transportation Advisory Board Meeting
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
B
A
A
A
A
A
A
Veronica
son,
cob:
the
person
presiding
at
the
meeting.
shell,
enforce
these
rules
by
meeting.
Anyone
who
violates
the
question
and
answer
function
is
enabled..
It
will
be
used
for
individuals
to
communicate
with
myself..
It
should
only
be
used
for
technical
online
platform,
related
questions,
only.
A
B
C
Tila
duhaime,
tab:
thanks,
ryan..
I
wasn't
here
for
part
of
the
meeting,,
so
I
just
plan
to
stay
on
the
approval..
I
have
no
substantive
changes,
but,,
like
with
the
the
I
had
in
reviewing
the
minutes,,
and
it
was
during
the
part
I
wasn't
here
was
on
agenda
item
for
about
the
millennium
property
at
1,340
by
20
eighth
street
said
the
questions
for
tab.
Will
included.
do.
does
tab
support
the
proposed
amendment
to
the
b
brc
transportation
connections?
Plan?
was
any
amendment
discussed,
voted
on,
approved??
Is
there
any
like
resolution?
language?
That's
missing,
here?.
E
E
F
D
B
Tila
duhaime,
tab:
substantive,
input,
but
I
don't
know
that
we
were
asked
for
it..
I
had
questions
in
reading
the
menu,
and
in
reading
the
memo,
and
then
seeing
the
questions
for
tab
outlined
here
in
the
minutes.
it
does
appear,.
We
were
asked
to
weigh
in
on
whether
we
propose
whether
we
oppose
an
amending
the
b
or
c.
E
E
C
B
B
B
B
B
B
G
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
A
A
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
A
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
Lynn,
segal:
the
congestion
all
over
the
place,,
and
this
is
being
pushed
big
time,
and
you
guys
need
to
have
some
say
about
it.,
no,
on
on
scokes
development,
at
twenty-second
and
pearl
and
no
on
walnut.
This
is
not
helping
the
missing
middle,
and
it's
also
super
expensive
housing,
and
it's
actually
market
rate..
It's
only.
J
A
B
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
Scott
schlecht,
cob:
resources
required
to
plow
all
of
the
hundreds
of
miles
of
residential
roadways
in
the
city
of
boulder
are
well
beyond
what
can
be
staffed
and
funded
with
existing
resources..
After
reviewing
input
from
this
initial
round
of
engagement,,
the
project
will
consider
changes
to
program
service
levels,,
including,
but
not
limited,
to,
expansion
of
snow
clearing
on
residential
streets.
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
daniel
sheeter,
cob:,
the
primary
material.
for
this
random
engagement
is
an
on
demand,,
open
house
and
corresponding
questionnaire
that
launched
on
february
seventeenth.
hope
you
all
have
had
a
chance
to
review
it..
The
open
house
uses
the
same
as
re
story,
map
platform
as
the
open
house
for
the
baseline
road
transportation
safety
project.
Last
fall.
L
L
L
L
Daniel
sheeter,
cob:
next
slide,
please.
daniel
sheeter,
cob:,
the
open
house
has
been
publicized
through
city
of
boulder
social
media
channels,
as
well
as
city
newsletters
and
insight
boulder
news.,
and
we're
also
doing
that.
Last
final
re
communications.
push
this
week
to
direct
the
community
to
the
website.
L
L
L
L
Daniel
sheeter,
cob:
the
challenges
of
snow
clearing,,
responsibility
for
private
streets,
which
fall
outside
of
transportation
and
mobility,
department,
jurisdiction.
and
finally,
that
the
methods
of
program,
communications
and
requesting
service
are
not
well
connected
with
people
who
need
the
service.
The
most.
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
B
B
B
B
L
L
K
K
B
C
C
Tila
duhaime,
tab:
so
first
time
I've
seen
the
city
do
something
like
that.,
so
I
think
I
thought
was
terrific,
really
really
appreciated.
It,
and
I
don't
know
if
the
words
gotten
out,
or
it
was
the
postcard,,
but
it's
pretty
significant..
The
number
of
impressions
you've
had
on
this.
so
well
done,.
I
mean
I'm
very,
very
impressed
with
that.
C
Tila
duhaime,
tab:.
I
think
the
only
question
that
that
that
raised
for
me
going
through
all
of
that
information
was..
I
wasn't
aware
that
we,,
like
other
cities,,
get
cute
names
for
us,
no
clouds.,
and
so
there
was
one
that
kept
showing
up
in
pictures,
and
I'm
forgetting
what
the
name
was.,
but
do
they
all
have
names,.
And
where
can
I
find
out
what
they
are?.
K
C
C
Tila
duhaime,
tab:.
So
if
the
city
streets,
as
the
responsibility
of
the
city
to
pay
for,
and
the
taxpayers
to
pay
for,
and
buses,
some
of
them,
we
can
pay
for,
and
some
of
them.
We
rely
on
volunteers,
and
then
250.,
the
sidewalks.
well,
you
know,
we'll
spend
some
enforcement
dollars,.
Maybe
if
a
neighbor
rats,
you
out,,
but
we're
not
really
going
to
spend
much
effort
or
money.
C
C
Tila
duhaime,
tab:,
so
thanks
for
the
work
that
you've
done,
and
I
look
forward
to
better
treatment
of
pedestrians
in
the
future.,
and
I'm
I'm
hoping
that
this
really
is
an
informative
exercise
for
you
to
be
able
to
sort
of
better
prioritize
where
we're
spending
money..
But
from
for
the
moment,
I
was
just
thrilled
to
to
learn
more
about
what
was
going
on.
E
Triny
willerton:
thank
you.
well,.
Thank
you
so
much
for
the
presentation..
I
echo
my
colleagues,
and
I
just
wanted
to
add,
and
I
mean,.
I
guess
this
is
more
like
a
a
dream
with
that,
and
then
anything
I
mean,
I'm
seeing
that
there's
a
75%
ploughing
of
the
bike
paths
and
the
multi-use
paths.
and
I
mean,
is
there
any
way
that
we
could
get
additional
funding
or
allocate
funding.
So
that
number
goes
up
to
100,.
Considering.
K
K
K
L
L
L
E
B
Ryan
schuchard,
tab:,
but
tila
duhaime,
tab:
again
it
was
up
again.,
but
if
you
want
to
go
first,,
that's
okay..
Thank
you..
I
guess
I
the
other
question
I
had
is,.
What
is
the
plan?
For?
follow
up,,
since
we
have
had
so
many
contacts
and
views
from
people,
and
you
know
500
or
so
have
have
submitted.
C
C
Tila
duhaime,
tab:
and
in
a
related
vein,
I
know
if
10
of
your
plows
have
been
named,.
I
I
count
looking
at
my
postcard,
but
there's
21
total.,
and
so
that
maybe
leaves
an
opportunity
to
ask
people
for
input.
On.,
you
know,
the
next
cute
name..
That
might
be
a
good
way
to
engage
them
as
we
continue
on
the
process.,
because
we
have
11
more,
we
might
be
able
to
name.
L
L
L
L
L
K
K
K
K
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
Ryan
schuchard,
tab:,
I
I
think,
there's
an
interesting
distinction,
and
this
might
be
worth
like
interrogating
or
talking
with
the
public
about..
There's
a
distinction
between
this,,
the
the
the
peaky
few
days
where
we
have
big
storms
and
the
things
that
they
need
to
happen
during
storms
and
immediately
after..
B
B
B
B
B
Ryan
schuchard,
tab:.
So
I
guess
that's
my
ryan
schuchard,
tab:.
It's
not
going
to
be
very
articulate,,
but
just
the
thought
I
would..
I
would
offer
to
staff,
to
maybe
think
about,
or
at
least
help
the
public
understand
when
you,
when
they're
getting
input,
that
there's
different
phases
of
when
our
operations,,
at
least
with
respect
to
the
the
the
storms
that
we're
handling,
and
I.
my
sense
is
that
there
a
lot
of
the.
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
K
K
K
L
L
B
Ryan
schuchard,
tab:
thanks,,
daniel.,
ryan,
schuchard,,
tab:,
okay.,
ryan,
schuchard,,
tab:
number..
We
had
a
second
question.,
I
didn't..
Maybe
people
have
taken
that
on,,
but
just
for
good
measure.,
our
second
question
was,.
Does
the
board
have
any
questions
about
the
engagement
activities
and
feedback
received
to
date?.
B
B
L
L
L
L
L
B
B
B
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
B
B
B
B
Ryan
schuchard,
tab:
that
is,
will
give
you
that
vote.
is
that
ryan
schuchard,
tab:
that?
okay?
devin
joslin,,
cob:
sure.
yeah,,
that
that
sounds
great.,
ryan,
schuchard,,
tab:,
okay,,
great
tab,
colleagues,!
Let's,
why
don't
we??
Why
don't
we
do
that?,
then?
Maybe
start
if
there's
any
questions
for
devin
and
and
and
we
could
do
discussion
after
that.
E
E
B
N
Devin
joslin,
cob:,
core
arterial
network
is
certainly
a
complementary
thing
to
the
vision,
0
action
plan,
and
of
course,.
The
emphasis
of
that
is
to
install
a
lot
of
those
protected
bike
lanes
along
our
major
arterial
corridors..
So
I
think
that's,
maybe
part
of
the
reason
why
it
wasn't
explicitly
mentioned
within
the
plan.
B
F
F
F
F
N
N
O
Charles
alexander:
related
to
some
of
those
systemic
counter
measures
that
devin
described.
the
way
the
action
plan
describes
them
is
first
to
implement
these
across
the
high-risk
network,
then
implement
them
at
other
locations..
So
it
is
intended
that
discretion
is
applied
across
the
system,
but
in
terms
of
order
of
implementation,,
the
high
risk
network
would
go
first.
O
Charles
alexander:
funding
needs
beyond
what
the
city's
got
got
money
for
become
available..
I
think
projects
all
along
the
high
risk
network
can
can
effectively
take
priority..
I
mean.
there
might
be
other
reasons
why
why
other
locations
sort
of
comment
at
a
higher
position,
or
or,
you
know,
align
in
position.,
but
so
I
think
it's
on
one
hand
it's
full
for
implementation
in
the
near
term,,
but
also
a
tool
for
implementation
in
the
long
term,.
As
the
city
attracts
regional
state.,.
C
C
C
C
C
N
N
Devin
joslin,
cob:,
and
I
will
tell
you
that
c.
dot
devin
joslin,
cob:
is
also
in
the
process.
believe
it
or
not.
they're
they're
ahead
of
us
on
something,
and
that
is,
they're
looking
at
changes
to
speed
limits
as
well.,
so
we've
actually
partnered
with
them
on
a
project
to
review
the
speed
along
portions
of
south
broadway
from
baseline
to
the
city,
limits.
N
N
O
O
O
Charles
alexander:
okay,,
so
so
sorry,
tila,
back
and
forth
there
to
make
sure,.
I
answer
the
question
correctly..
So
since
senate
bill
8
basically
gives
a
control
of
the
signals
within
the
city
of
boulder
on
the
state,,
how
a
system
to
the
city,
in
terms
of,,
you
know,
a
lot
of
their
operational
characteristics
and
maintenance,
and
devin
might
correct
me
on
some
of
the
specifics
of
that,,
but
it
gives
the
city
a
pretty
good
amount
of
leverage
in
terms
of
decisions
about
like
where
left,
turn
lanes,
or
I'm
sorry.
O
Charles
alexander:,
unilateral
per
se,,
but
a
lot
more
influence..
So
typically,
I
would
say
that,
where
you've
got
sba
signals,
you've
got
a
lot
of
influence
for
change.
devin
mentioned
the
other
side
of
that
related
to
speed
limit
setting,,
which
I
think
is
usually
the
other
thing.
we're
often
running
up
against,.
But
it's
exciting
to
see
some
change
in
those
areas
as
well.
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
N
O
O
Charles
alexander:,
the
systemic
safety
analysis,,
isn't
attempting
to
sort
of
arbitrate
what's
right
or
wrong
in
terms
of
risk
factors.,
it's
really
trying
to
understand
where
there
is
correlation
between
something
in
the
built
environment
and
crashes
that
happen
particularly
fatal
and
serious
injury
crashes..
So
that's
really
all
it's
looking
for..
Is
there
a
correlation
between
these
2
things
or
not.
O
Charles
alexander:,
to
that
point?,
the
the
there's,
not
necessarily
the
the
intended
interpretation
of
something
showing
up
as
a
risk
factor.
is
not
that
the
solution
to
that
is
the
opposite
right?.
So
in
some
cases
you
know
that
that
maybe
is
is
intuitive,
where
you
know
the
the
higher
speed
corridors,
right?.
So
that
shows
up
as
a
risk
factor.
obviously,.
If
we
could
lower
the
speeds
on
the
corridors,.
You
know
that
that
sort
of
mitigates
the
risk
factor
and
and
sort
of.
O
O
Charles
alexander:,
but
what
we,
what
we
did
find,
and
and
the
appendix
that
it
talks
to..
This
looks
through
the
you
know,,
exploring
that
mathematical
relationship
between
these
risk
factors
and
fatal
and
serious
injury,
crashes,,
and
then
the
spatial
relationship
as
well
is
that
you,
you
do
have
a
a
fair
number
of
crashes
that
occur.
Sort
of
for
the
reasons
that
you
describe
where,
where
there
are
crashes
between,,
you
know
a
driver
and
a
vehicle
and
a
bicyclist
or
in
some
cases,
a
pedestrian
on
a
multi-use
path.
O
Charles
alexander:,
so
the
the
intent
of
identifying
those
virus
network
streets
is
then
to
ask
the
question,
okay,,
if
that,
if
that
is
an
underlying
issue,,
what
are
the
solutions
to
that?
not
to
suggest
that
they
would
be
removed??
And
that's
where
those
7
different
crash
types
sort
of
come
into
the
the
fold
of
of
aiming
to
a
mitigate
the
risk
associated
with,
with
the
presence
of
that
risk.
Factor.
C
C
O
O
Charles
alexander:
and
then,,
you
know,
really.
We
we
poured
through
every
single
one
of
those
corridors
and
all
the
crashes
that
happen
that
5
year
period
to
identify
those
7
crash
types.
and
you
know.
sure
enough,.
One
of
those
7
relates
to
crashes,
our
multi-use
pass,
and
then
we've
got
the
associated
counter.
Measures..
Does
that
make
sense
so
specifically
on
multi-use
pads
at
intersections
with
streets.,
yeah,
driveways
and
minership.?
It's
not
the
it's,
not
the
path,,
the
entrance
and
exit
and
the
the
path
gateways
and.
C
C
tila
duhaime,
tab:,
but
that
there
are
vulnerable
users
concentrated
on
those
with
use
pads,,
and
we
know
that
the
vulnerable
users
are
much
more
and
disproportionately
likely
to
be
killed
or
seriously
injured
in
a
collision
with
a
motor
vehicle,
right?.
And
so
it's
not
the
multi's
path.
Problem.,
it's
the
vulnerable,
user.
versus.
C
Tila
duhaime,
tab:
£8,000
car
problem.,
tila
duhaime,
tab:.
So
if,
if
been
for
the
sake
like
I,
I
read
this
stuff.
and
yeah,,
I
did
not
read
the
gosh,
56
with
all
crashes
and
that
huge
box..
I
can't
even
blow
it
up
big
enough
to
see
the
damn
thing,
but
the
green
and
orange
and
yellow
and
red
huge
shirt,.
You
know
I,
I
cats
off
on
all
the
analysis.
C
Tila
duhaime,
tab:,
but
not
everyone's
gonna,
be
like
me
and
read
through
all
the
nitty,
gritty
details,
and
so
to
the
extent
that
a
casual
reader
will
pick
it
up
and
say,
oh,
multi-use
pads
are
a
risk,
factor.
I'm.,
going
to
avoid
those
or
whatever
we
need
to..
We
need
to
do
our
best
to
avoid
that
impression.
At
all
costs
on
on
this,,
you
know.
C
C
C
C
C
C
Tila
duhaime,
tab:
and
I
don't
recall
if
the
results
of
any
of
that
analysis
yielded
anything,
or
if
they
got
reported
to
tab..
So
if,
if
bill
is
on
a
listening,,
I'm
curious
if
you
can
shed
any
light
on
what,,
whether
we
learned
anything
from
that
that
would
inform
the
mitigations
that
we're
considering.
now,
in
this
vision
to
your
action.
Plan.
N
M
M
M
C
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
B
B
B
Ryan
schuchard,
tab:
there
ryan,
schuchard,,
tab:
presentation,
or
the
slides,,
and
I'm
just
there..
There's
no
nice
presentation.
got
me
thinking
about
this.
This
aspect
of
I
guess.
partly..
Is
there
any
implication
of
this
plan
for
snow,
so
nice?,
but
I
guess
is
more
generally..
Is
there
any??
I
don't
know
anything
else..
It's
been
done
on.
N
N
N
N
N
O
O
O
Charles
alexander:
and
generally,
you
know,,
we
a
couple
of
things
that
we
found.
One
is
that
the
number
of
days
in
a
typical
year
in
in
colorado's
climate,,
where
that
is
a
a
contributing,
factor,,
just
sort
of
lens
itself,,
you
know,
downwards,
and
from
upstate
new
york,,
you
know,
the
snow
stays
on
the
ground
once
it
falls
for
5
months,
right,
so
that
that
time
period
is
longer
versus
the.
O
O
Charles
alexander:,
serious
and
fatals
actually
tend
to
go
down
proportionally,
because
you
have
a
lot
more
people
staying
at
home,
and
you
also
have
people
driving
at
a
slower
rate..
So
that's
what
we
found
on
a
regional
scale..
We
didn't
look
through
this
effort,,
whether
or
not
that
that
was
repeated
or
different
in
boulder..
But
that's
the
only
thing.
I've
got
additive
to
what
devin
provided.
B
B
B
B
N
N
B
Ryan
schuchard,
tab:,
okay,,
great.,
so
yeah,.
This
is
just
the
the
over,
the
over
the
2
and
nothing
further.
okay,
thanks
for
clarifying.,
that's
all
right..
Can
I
jump
in,
brian?.
I
had
a
similar
question
on
on
these
like
this:.
Is
this
this
slide
that
you're
showing
now
is
the
same
as
figures
10
and
11
on
page
32
and
33
at
the
draft
report.
C
C
Tila
duhaime,
tab:
graphs,
confused
as
well.,
so
I
can
try
to
explain
that
again.
well,.
I
don't
necessarily
need
to
have
it
explained
to
me
at
the
moment.,
I'm
just
thinking
about
who's,
going
to
read
this
and
look
at
it.
and
what
are
they
going
to
get
from
it??
So
just
consider
whether
we
need
to.,
because
if
you're
confusing
me
and
ryan,
you're
going
to
be
confusing
a
whole
lot
of
people.
yeah,.
That's
that's
all.
thank
you..
Sorry,
ryan,
go
ahead.
B
N
N
N
E
N
N
B
B
F
Becky
davies,
tab:,
yeah,,
thanks.
well,,
I
didn't
say
for
yeah,.
I
think
it's
a
really
great
document..
I'm
really
excited
about
this
vision.
0
action,
plan,!
I
you
know.
really,.
I
love
the
improvements
over
the
past
version,
and
it's
just.
I
can
really
see,
you
know,
through
this
plan
like
that,,
the
link
between.
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
G
D
F
F
F
F
F
F
N
N
Devin
joslin,
cob:
I'll
just
call
it
the
photo
enforcement
bill,,
and
so
that
is
one
thing
that
you
know,
tab
and
council,.
You
know
you
could
potentially
sort
of
lobby
and
and
get
behind
that,
making
those
changes,,
because
that
would
give
us
more
flexibility.
and
how
we
operate.
The
photo
radar
ban
and
conduct
photo
enforcement
in
the
city.
B
E
N
N
N
C
C
C
Tila
duhaime,
tab:,
I
I
was
confused
because
we
just
described
in
the
glossary
of
vertically
separated
bike,
lane.
and
reading
that
definition,.
It
actually
sounds
more
like
an
example
of
one
physically
protected
bike
lane.,
but
we
don't
define
protected
bike,
lane,
or
physically
protected
bike,
lane
anywhere.,
and
so
I
would
really.
C
Tila
duhaime,
tab:
to
me
a
vertically
separated
by
claiming
the
kind
of
thing
that
we
tried
to
do
on
north
broadway,,
where
the
bike
lane
itself
is
separated,
vertically.
and
you're.
Talking
about
a
vertical
separation
in
the
buffer
area,
at
least
the
way
the
definition
is
written.,
so
I
think
we
can.
we
can.
C
C
C
Tila
duhaime,
tab:,
with
each
other
and
with
the
public
about
it..
I'm
not
sure
that
the
responsible
party
column
in
the
action
plan
is
terribly
useful,
because,
most
it's
you
know
it's..
I
think
it's
probably
a
hold
over
from
the
last
one,,
and
most
of
them
are
transportation
and
mobility,,
and
sometimes
it's
just
transportation,,
and
even
I
don't
know
what
the
difference
is.
There.
C
Tila
duhaime,,
tab:
and
obviously,.
If
we're
talking
about
enforcement,,
obviously
pd.
is
going
to
be
a
partner,,
so
I
think
it
might
make
it
look
cleaner
and
easier
to
read
and
shorten
it
a
bit
if
we
don't
include
that
column.
and
then
finally,
on
on
the
action
plan
chapter,,
it
comes
way
at
the
end,
and
I
understand.
we're
describing
sort
of
where
we
were,,
where
we
are,
when
our
priorities
are,,
how
we
built
it.
we're
kind
of
going
phonologically.
C
C
Tila
duhaime,
tab:
what
we're
proposing.
and
then,
when
people
want
more,,
you
know
and
say
to
like,,
see
page
54
for
like
more
detailed
description
of
these
items.
but
you're,
taking
too
long
to
get
to
the
punchline
on
this
action
plan,,
because
it's
it's
all
the
way,
down.
what?,
chapter,
5
or
something.,
so
consider
putting
it
up
front
or
an
executive
farm
summary
or
moving
it
out.
Earlier.
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
N
N
Devin
joslin,
cob:
and
there
are
a
number
of
recommendations
in
that
report
as
far
as
okay..
So
so
I
miss
folk
there,
but
you've
seen
it,.
So
I
I
have
seen
the
report,
and
we'll
just
say
there
are
additional
mitigations
that
are
recommended..
I
don't
know,
natalie,
if
you've
got
anything
else
to
add.
D
C
C
C
N
N
C
Tila
duhaime,
tab:
well,.
Maybe
I
used
a
bad
example
because
I
was
trying
to
not
re-raise
grand
view
and
broadway.,
but
I
was
really
thinking
of
brand
view
and
broadway.
if
we
say
when
we
see
this
potential
for
these
crashes,
multi-use,
proofs,
multi-use
path,
crashes
of
these
2
varieties,
and
both
of
them
exist.
at
this
intersection,
that's
being
worked
on
right
now,.
C
N
E
B
B
B
B
B
C
B
B
C
B
B
Ryan
schuchard,
tab:
natalie.
did
you?,
did
you?
wanna
natalie
stiffler,
cob:,
so
I
I
was
just
going
to
help
introduce
it.
samantha,
from
community
vitality,
is
here
to
provide
the
update
on
the
ramp
by
them,,
and
it's
under
matters
this
month,
as
it's
just
a
briefing
for
you,
and
they'll
be
coming
back,
and.
D
P
Bromberg,
samantha:
we've
identified
new
areas
of
interest,,
including
the
east,
to
our
neighborhood,,
which
is
met
all
criteria,
and
is
ready
for
the
next
steps
to
determine
a
systematic
and
data-driven
approach
to
propose
regulations
for
non
permit
parking
and
permitted
zones.
We've
engaged
with
bill
cowan
of
fox
subtle
to
lead
this
work.
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
F
F
C
P
P
M
M
C
C
C
C
B
C
C
Tila
duhaime,
tab:
zones,,
because
I
know
a.
an
an
an
important
part
of
our
previous
discussion
was
assessing
whether
the
npp.
is
performing
as
it
is,
or,
you
know,
as
as
intended,,
because
you
guys
use
the
word
spill,
over,
which
I
think
community
vitality
has
been
careful
to
not
use
for
a
couple
of
years..
C
C
C
M
P
P
C
C
M
B
B
B
B
P
P
B
B
B
P
P
B
C
B
B
B
B
B
B
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
Tila
duhaime,
tab:
to
my
mind,,
someone
coming
and
parking
for
3,
h,
and
then
coming
and
moving
their
car
to
another
available.
Space,
is
not
really
a
problem..
If
there's
another
available
space.
in
fact,,
there's
the
the
regulations
are
assuming
that,.
You
know
we
need
to
have
roughly
40,
or
at
least
20%,.
C
Tila
duhaime,
tab:
block,
and
if
the
person
is
gonna
go
to
the
effort
for
the
sake
of
free
parking,
to
walk
a
few
blocks,
park,
their
car,
then
come
back
in
3,
h
and
move
it,
and
they
can
find
another
space..
And
it's
it's
not
such
a
hassle
that
they're,
you
know,
looking
around
for
parking,,
and
I
don't
know
that
that's
happening.
C
C
Tila
duhaime,
tab:
to
mitigate..
I
myself
have
gotten
a
ticket
for
parking
twice
near
my
son's
school
when
he
was
in
elementary
school,,
because
I
came
for
a
an
assembly
in
the
morning,,
and
so
I
I
saved
for
more
than
5
min,
and
I
got,
you
know
it
was
noted,,
and
then
I
came
to
pick
him
up..
I
think
he
was
sick
that
day,
and
then
I
got.
C
Tila
duhaime,
tab:
a
ticket,
and
it
didn't
seem
like
what
we
were
trying
to
avoid
doing
so..
I
think
there
are
a
lot
of
ways
that
we
ought
to
be
a
little
bit
more
flexible,
and
can
be
more
flexible
about
how
we
allow
to
happen.,
and
I
think,
we've
we've
learned
a
lot
from
how
the
how
the
city's
done
it
in
the
past
camp
has
been
great.
E
C
M
M
P
Bromberg,
samantha:
right?
til
is
right..
That
was
something
that
was
identified
back
in
the
revitalizing
access
and
boulder
work
of
2019
and
2020,
and
was
it,
and
still
is,
a
priority
for
ramp.
and
so
we're
following
a
prescribed
plan
that
was
set
in
place
to
raise
the
permit,
pricing
over
time
to.
P
P
F
Becky
davies,
tab:,
you
know
I
I
feel
like
it's
been
all
this
work
has
been
done
to
create
this
data-driven
program.
and
so,.
You
know.,
let's
use
the
data,,
and
you
know
I
don't
know
what
the
cut
off
is
exactly
in
that
for
deciding
where
to
stop
looking
at
adjacent
blocks..
But
I
do
think
this
while,,
you
know,.
We
don't
necessarily
need
to
abandon
petitions
all
together..
I
do
think.
F
F
F
F
F
B
B
Ryan
schuchard,
tab:.
I
suppose
I
agree
with
ryan
schuchard,
tab:
to
you,
love
it
even
in
stronger
terms,
about
not
being
a
huge
fan
of
the
the
residential
program.
I
know..
I
know
these
programs
exist
in
other
cities.
boulders,
not
really
when
it
does
it,,
but
in
general
I'm
just.,
I'm
just
not
a
huge
fan.
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
C
Tila
duhaime,
tab:
brian,,
real,
quick
just
to
respond
to
your
first
point,,
which
I
can,.
I
totally
agree
with
about
sort
of
encouraging
unnecessary
vehicle
use
and
storage
on
our
streets,,
just
to
be
clarified,
though,.
That
this
program
is
already
here,
and
they're.
Asking
us
how
to
tweak
it.,
and
I
have
even
more
problems
with.
C
B
M
B
Q
R
Nicole
speer:,
that's
totally
fine.,
I'm
also
with
you
for
the
long
haul,,
so
I'm
gonna
write
it
out
with
you.
but,
anyway,
thank
you..
I
just
came
out
of
the
dr.
cog
sub
regional
forum,
this
morning,
and
well
this
afternoon,
staff
had
recommended
maybe
fun
to
give
you
all
an
update
on
on
where
we're
at
coming
out
of
that..
So
just
as
a
reminder
for
anybody
listening
that
doesn't
remember
that
about
the
dr.
cog,
separational
forum.
R
R
R
Nicole
speer:
that
was
recommended
to
us
for
funding
to
design
that
lanes
along
highway,
119,
and
so
at
the
last
minute.
They
generously
offered
to
give
up
about
1.4
million
dollars
in
funding
that
we
were
about
to
recommend
for
that
project.
so,,
thanks
to
quick
thinking
by
our
staff,
garrett,
slater
and
jane
samson,
and
then
alex
hydrite
in
the
county
are
a
highly
scored
but
not
fully
funded,
fulsome,
straight,
multi
modal
study
got
an
extra
$400,000
of
that
funding.
R
Nicole
speer:
and
then
just
a
couple
of
other
things
that
you
all
may
be
interested
in
hearing
about.,
they
came
out
of
the
recommendations.
Today.,
the
other
1
million
dollars,
went
to
a
super
flex,
demand
response,
transit
service.,
that's
going
to
help
out
some
of
the
areas
in
southeast
boulder
county
that
haven't
really
received
much.
R
R
Nicole
speer:,
it
seemed
especially
relevant
to
boulder
that
we're
recommending.
there's
a
feasibility
study
moving
forward
for
a
lafayette
lewis,
so
boulder
bike
way,
just
really
exciting..
There
is
a
south
boulder
road,
bus.
rapid
transit
study
from
lafayette
kind
of
near
the
wow
museum..
If
folks
know
where
that
is.
R
Nicole
speer:
to
table
mesa
and
broadway.
and
then
there's
going
to
be
a
countywide
strategic
transit
transit
plan
to
help
us
think
more
holistically
about
our
regional
transit
goals.
Training..
I
think
you'll
be
really
excited
about
this
one,,
especially
a
boulder
county,
vision.
0,
safe
routes
to
school
action.
Plan.,
that's
going
to
help
us
come
up
with
some
goals
and
strategies
for
improving
kids
safety
when
they're,
walking
and
biking
to
and
from
school.
R
Nicole
speer:
and
then
a
little
bit
of
money
for
the
highway.
well,
a
little
bit..
It's
like
3
million
dollars
for
the
highway
119
bikeway
from
the
nywat
buster
up
a
transistation
to
airport
road,,
and
then
we
also
approved
a
wait
list
of
projects
that
will
be
funded.
If
and
when
some
of
those
other
funds
become
available.
R
R
Nicole
speer:
money
for
the
thirtieth
street
multimodal
improvements
in
the
colorado
avenue
project..
So
next
steps
are
that
the
dr.
cog
advisory
group
is
going
to
look
these
over
in
april,
and
then
the
list
of
of
recommended
projects
will
come
to
dr.
cog
and
august
for
final
approval..
So
it's
moving.
B
B
R
D
D
Natalie
stiffler,
cob:
with
that,
you
know,
I'll,
just
dive
right
in..
This
is
some.
Some
of
these
are
kind
of
screen,
grabs
from
the
racial
equity,
plan.
and
many
folks
kind
of
ask
this
first
question
around
the
city's.
racial
equity.
work
around..
Why
lead
with
racial
equity.?
And
you
can
see
here.
D
D
Natalie
stiffler,
cob:,
so
you
probably
have
all
seen
this
graphic..
I
feel
like
it's
used
a
lot
in
kind
of
the
transportation
and
equity
space.
so
just
to
highlight
here
for
equity,,
we're
really
focused
on
giving,,
giving
everybody
what
they
need
to
help
them
be
successful
and
meet
them
where
they
are.
D
D
D
D
D
Natalie
stiffler,
cob:,
which
provides
guidance
for
how
the
city
can
understand
the
rule.,
systemic
and
institutional
racism
has
played
in
perpetuating
current
racial
inequities..
The
plan
also
provides
guidance
for
how
city
staff
and
departments
can
build
awareness,,
address,
and
equity,
and
support,
inclusion
and
diversity
and
programs,
policies
and
decision
making.
D
D
D
D
D
D
Natalie
stiffler,
cob:
and
that's
really
geared
towards
folks
that
are
going
to
be
implementing
that
in
the
work
that
they're
doing,
and
you
often
hear
from
our
staff
about
the
ways
that
they're
implementing
the
racial
equity
instrument
into
projects,
for
example,,
with
snow
and
ice
control,
tonight,
or
the
snow
and
ice
review
program
tonight..
You.
D
D
D
D
Natalie
stiffler,
cob:,
the
first
significant
step
in
the
process,
is
to
perform
a
departmental
assessment
which
will
be
starting.
This
year,,
which
includes
a
gap,
analysis
and
a
plan
to
understand
what
the
department
is
already
doing,
to
address
racial
equity
and
identify
and
recommend
specific
strategies
for
implementation
and.
D
D
Natalie
stiffler,
cob:
departments
are
encouraged
to
start
small
and
apply
jedi
concepts
concurrently
with
more
formal
planning
and
integration..
In
addition
to
that
or
more
on
the
jedi
work,
we've
developed
a
team
with
our
utility,,
our
colleagues
and
utilities,,
and
our
business
services
division.
D
D
Natalie
stiffler,
cob:
and
then
other
areas
flagged
for
evaluation
as
part
of
the
assessment
of
recruiting
and
hiring
practices
and
cip,
considerations.
and
then
other
work
in
the
school
area
includes
adjusting
delivery
methods
and
addressing
language
access
issues
to
reach
a
broader,
more
diverse
audience
through
our
ongoing
engagement,
activities.
D
D
Natalie
stiffler,
cob:
next
slide,
natalie
stiffler,
cob:
for
goal,,
for
we
continue
the
practice
of
engaging
with
our
community
connectors..
The
transportation
and
mobility
department
has
really
kind
of
been
a
leading
department
in
this
work
over
the
last
many
years
since
we
develop
our
community
connectors
program..
So
you
often
hear
about
how
we're
engaging
with
our
community
connectors
and
the
work
that
we're
doing.
D
D
D
Natalie
stiffler,
cob:,
beginning
to
plan
for
the
development
of
the
department.
social
equity
plan..
Each
department
will
develop
their
own
rich
racial
equity,
plan,
and
then,
continuing
to
apply
all
the
tools
and
instruments
and
working
with
our
community
connectors
program
around
all
the
various
projects
and
programs
that
we're
doing.
D
D
B
E
E
Q
D
D
F
F
F
Natalie
stiffler,
cob:
permeating
throughout
all
the
the
work
that's
being
done.,
so
thanks,
yeah,,
our
I
mean,.
I
think
our
like
really
kudos
to
the
department
staff.
everyone
I
feel
like,
has
just
kind
of
welcomed
it
with
open,
arms,
and
really
understand
just
how
important
it
is
and
how
it
really.
B
B
B
B
B
B
Ryan
schuchard,
tab:,
I
don't
know.,
be
supportive.,
I'm
not
sure
if
it's
a
very
particular,,
it's
definitely
not
a
particular
question.,
but
I'm
just
noticing,
like
looking
through
the
milestones
and
wondering
if
there's
a
point
where
we
get
to,.
You
know
here,
hey,
community,
who
you
know
here,,
here's
here's
some
tools
that
you
can
expect
to
use,
or
how
how
we
will.
B
D
D
Natalie
stiffler,
cob:,
even
if
it's
from
like
a
technical
analysis,
space
around
the
racial
equity
index
that
you
saw.,
you
know
that
showed
up
in
the
bins,
visions
or
action
plan,.
I
think,
just
being
able
to
support
that
work
is
valuable.
and
hopefully,.
That
kind
of
answers
your
question,
and,
if
others
have
anything
to
add,,
feel
free.
B
B
B
C
B
B
B
B
D
D
D
Natalie
stiffler,
cob:
february
tab
meeting,,
and
we
had
talked
about
that.
We
would
follow
up
with
some
ways
to
just
address
things
that
weren't,
you
know,
hugely
capital
intensive.,
but
to
try
to
improve
the
situation
on
north
broadway,.
So
some
of
the
things
we
had
identified
were
completing
the
final
striping
of
the
bike
facility
that
to
clearly
demarcate
the
on
street,
parking.
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
Natalie
stiffler,,
cob:
and
so
natalie
stiffler,
cob:,
really
kind
of
staff's
recommendation
was
that
if
that
was
something,,
if
parking
removal
was
something
that
wanted
to
be
pursued,
that
that
really
would
be
something
for
planning
boarding
council
to
consider.
As
part
of
the
an
amendment
to
the
north,
boulder
subcommittee,
plan.
N
B
B
B
B
D
D
B
B
B
Ryan
schuchard,
tab:
and
they
could
just
do
that,
and
that
would
unlock
some
of
the
potential
here
that
seem
like
a
pretty
important
part
of
the
puzzle.
I'm:
just:
yeah.
well,,
I
should..
So
I
should
say,
you
know,
amending
the
subcommittee
plan
would
essentially
become
a
work
plan.,
item:
right?,
so.
D
D
D
F
F
F
F
D
Natalie
stiffler,
cob:,
I
mean
I
can
try.,
so
I
mean
I
think
it's
all
just
everything..
It
comes
down
to
trade
off
conversations,
right?,
and
so
the
precedent
around
subcommittee
plans
is
that
they
have
an
engagement
process
that
allows
multiple
voices
in
the
community
to
have
a
seat
in
the
process
and
to
voice
their.
D
D
D
D
F
Becky
davies,
tab:
yeah,,
I
think
so..
What
I'm
here
is
maybe
like,,
but
there
isn't
necessarily
like
an
an
ordinance.
There
isn't
a
rule
that
certain
community
there
isn't
like
a
certain,
or
or
maybe
there,,
maybe
maybe
planning
to
say,
oh,
no,.
We
do
have
to
buy
ordinance..
We
have
to
engage
in
this
way
before
we
could
change
this
section
of
parking.
F
F
F
F
F
D
D
D
F
F
E
E
E
E
D
D
E
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
Ryan
schuchard,
tab:
wider
mandate
coming
from
councils
direction.,
but
I
I
could
be
wrong,
and,
and
maybe
there
is
something
that's
more
codified
or
a
legal
reason,
that,
withstanding
the
way.,
but
but
either
way.
I
I'm
guessing
a
lot
about
people..
I
have
this
question,
too,
and
this
may
or
not,
you
know,
fall
within
the
transportation
department,.
So.