►
Description
City of Charleston Ad Hoc Rules Advisory Committee 3/09/2023
C
B
All
right
has
been
moved
them
properly
seconded.
Is
there
any
discussion
on
this
item?
If
not
all
those
in
favor,
please
signify
by
saying
aye
aye
aye
aye
any
opposed
all
right,
the
eyes
have
it.
The
minutes
are
deferred
I'd
like
to
move
to
our
outstanding
business
that
we
have,
which
is
the
deferral
from
Council
related
to
the
appointments
process,
so
with
that
I
will
open
it
up
for
some
discussion.
D
D
B
A
A
There
was
a
recommendation
from
councilman
appal
that
perhaps
by
removing
the
line
city
council
should
have
the
responsibility
to
approve
such
recommended
appointments
no
later
than
the
second
meeting
in
January.
That
would
alleviate
his
concern
that
we
are
somehow
binding
counsel
to
a
future
legislative
act
or
decision
by
state
law.
So
we
can
certainly
work
with
that
language
in
some
way
to
remove
that
that
concern.
What.
B
D
C
D
C
This
is
a
very
popular
meeting.
Time
sounds
like
I
tell
you
man,
so
what
so?
What
I
was?
What
I
was
suggesting?
It
says
as
written
now
or
the
I
guess
the
proposal-
oh
yeah,
perfect,
so
city
council
shall
have
the
responsibility
to
approve
such
recommended
appointments
no
later
than
the
second
meeting
in
January,
okay
yeah.
It
would
alleviate
any
concern
whatsoever
if
it
said
City,
Council
should,
or
May
is
probably
a
little
a
little
passive.
F
D
B
C
A
C
A
E
E
A
It's
not
necessarily
a
constitutional
issue.
It's
the
question
of
state
law
as
to
whether
or
not
this
is
binding
future
councils
to
a
legislative
act
by
saying
they
had
to
approve
something
by
a
certain
date,
I
mean
we
could
say
they
shall
have
the
responsibility
to
vote
on
such
recommendations
no
later
than
that
would
be
cleaner.
D
B
B
A
B
B
D
You
don't
have
60,
you
don't
have
too
much
to
better
part
of
two
months.
I
guess
do
we
he
recommends
in
December.
We
can
convince
with
him
one
another
back
around
again
by
January.
If
a
vacancy
comes
available,
I
mean
you
know,
somebody
leaves
lose
whatever,
unfortunately
dies,
then
that
appointment
can
be
done.
C
D
B
D
B
F
Raise
a
question
so
if
you
vote
doesn't
mean
you
necessarily
approve,
and
so
you
might
run
beyond
the
time
of
you
know,
to
approve
a
particular
committee
or
chair
so
could.
Could
we
have
a
little
caveat
also
that
you
know
if,
if
some
approval
is
not
reached,
that
the
prior
committee,
members
and
chairman
continue
to
serve
until
I
agree.
D
E
D
F
Do
I
agree
with
that
I
want
to
get
to
a
situation
which
I
think
somebody
mentioned
at
one
of
our
meetings
that
you
know
if
you
ended
up
with
some
kind
of
standoff
and
and
we've
got
to
do
business
we
got
to
have
these
committees
in
place
to
conduct
business,
so
I
I
don't
want
to
be
without
my
committees.
You
know.
A
B
A
D
D
D
A
C
B
C
C
A
D
C
D
F
D
That's
a
good
point:
yeah,
it's
a
real
good
point:
I!
Guess
you
put
a
caveat
in
there
until
you
know,
listen
I
got
to
tell
you
what
I
wanted
to
try
to
create
was
more
conversation
between
the
13
people
involved.
That's
what
I
want
to
do.
Okay,
yeah
and
so
I
mean.
How
do
we
do
that
so
I
guess
in
the
case
of
a
new
bear.
D
D
E
I
mean
why
don't
you
just
say
this:
the
mayor
at
the
first
meeting
in
January
she'll
recommend
appointments
to
the
standing
committees.
City
councils
have
a
responsibility
to
vote
vote
on,
recommend
appointments
no
later
than
the
second
meeting
in
January
between
the
first
and
second
meeting
January
the
previous
committee
to
exist.
You
know
the
the
previous
council's
committee
shall
continue
to
exist.
It
sounds
I,
think
the
mayor
elect
issue
and
it
just
for
that
first
couple
of
weeks,
which
are
really
organizational
meanings
in
many
way
anyway.
B
C
C
F
My
own
experience
over
the
last
seven
years
has
been
first
meeting
in
December
we're
just
all
consumed
with
the
budget.
I
I
really
personally
didn't
have
the
time
or
take
the
time
to
even
think
about
committee.
Appointments
till
after
Christmas
and
I
got
a
little
bit
of
down
time
to
think
and
I
don't
have
my
days
off
full
of
meetings
so
anyway,
that's
that's
just
my
own
personal
experience
with
it.
D
I
agree
with
the
mail
for
a
good
great
point:
I
agree
with
Rick
said
and
I
go
get
it
done
in
January.
If
it's
in
the
event
of
a
new
mayor,
you
know
we
used
to
do
it
in
January
anyway.
I
was
just
trying
to
create
more
time
for
discussion.
You
know
you
still
can
have
that
time
for
this
guy.
Thank
you.
It
doesn't
have
to
be
written
in
the
audience
Etc.
D
F
Okay,
so
I'd
put
the
word
two
responsibility
to
vote:
sorry,
fourth
line
and
then
y'all
you
got
them
on
that
highlighted
portion.
The
Committees
from
the
previous
Council
will
continue
to
meet
right
until
the
new
recommendations
are
approved,
I
hate
to
get
technical,
but
you
could.
You
could
have
a
council
member
who
who
didn't
run
for
reelection
or
didn't
get
reelected
so
so
you,
you
gotta,
put
some
kind
of
word
to
cover
cover
that
scenario.
I.
D
A
D
B
B
D
Input
on
this
I
really
do
sincerely
I
want
to
thank
my
councilman
Bowden
and
councilman
Jim
and
Brady
and
Richard
I
mean
we
all
pushing
in
the
right
direction.
On
this
one
I
I
know
it
was
uncomfortable
at
least
to
even
have
this
discussion
but
prayerfully
on
the
other
side,
we'll
all
feel
more
involved
going
forward,
so
I
I
really
sincerely
want
to
and
I
want
that
to
be
in
the
minister.
B
D
One
other
person,
I
need
to
think
remember.
We
spoke
to
Jennifer
in
the
previous
meeting
and
Jennifer
told
us
about
some
of
the
Committees,
and
maybe
one
of
them
I
think
had
seven
people
on
so
the
tweaking
and
there's
the
languages
that
she
actually
have
offered
in
this
too.
So
thank
you,
Ms
cook,
for
your
input
as
well.