►
Description
City of Charleston Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee 1/21/21
A
A
B
We
didn't
have
any
public
comment
come
in.
However,
I
do
see
this
seven
four,
two
zero
numbers,
so
I'm
not
sure
if
that's
a
citizen
or
if
that's
one
of
you
all
that's
on
the
phone,
so
just
wanted
to
be
respectful.
If
there
is
any
public
comment.
B
First
of
all,
I'm
happy
new
year
to
you
all
and
good
to
see
everybody
in
the
new
year,
as
many
of
you
all
are
familiar
with,
but
I
feel
like
I
need
to
just
make
sure
I
rehash,
especially
with
some
changes
county
has
made
the
transportation
sales
taxes
is
as
of
now
the
primary
way
we,
as
municipality,
are
able
to
get
small
dollar
items
for
various
different
projects,
specifically
for
intersections
and
biped.
B
There
is
dollars
that
are
also
attributed
to
resurfacing,
but
those
are
predetermined
by
a
grading
process
the
county
uses.
In
my
first
year
we
were
still
able
to
submit
streets
for
them
to
evaluate,
but
now
they
do
their
own
grading
system.
So
we
don't,
we
do
no
longer
submit
in
streets.
I
do
sometimes
check
in
on
certain
streets
that
I
do
feel
need
to
be
taken.
Prioritized
rosemont
is
an
example.
That's
currently
being
resurfaced
this
last
week
into
this
week,
but
really
primarily
the
projects
we
submit
are
with
intersection
projects
and
biped
projects.
B
B
The
the
three
primary
things
that,
over
the
last
two
years
that
have
changed
in
terms
of
the
stipulation
that
the
county
uses
in
their
evaluation
is
one
that
they
are
no
longer,
including
right-of-way
costs
into
the
projects
that
are
submitted.
What
what
they
mean
by
that
is
say
if
we
as
a
municipality,
ask
for
intersection
improvement
and
it
requires
you
know,
taking
up
nearby
property
or
or
right-of-way,
that's
not
public.
B
The
cost
of
that
would
be
on
the
requesting
entity.
It
would
not
be
included
in
the
scope
of
what's
awarded
to
us
to
execute
on
the
project,
and
so
they
want
us
to
take
that
into
consideration
in
terms
of
what
we
asked
for
an
example
of
that
is
fleming
road.
The
sidewalks
on
that
corridor
would
require
some
right-of-way
aspects,
and
so,
if
something
was
awarded
there,
it
would
be
on
the
city
to
figure
out
how
to
navigate
whatever
right-of-way
costs
or
negotiations
are
for
such
a
piece
to
come
to
fruition.
B
The
other
piece
is
that
they
are
really
emphasizing
accident
data
crash
data
at
various
different
areas.
That's
something
that
we
have
not
been,
including
in
our
application
but
they're,
using
that
as
as
a
major
force
for
how
they're
going
to
determine
what
is
and
isn't
rewarded
so,
for
example,
right
at
magwood
where
that
unfortunate
accident
occurred
right,
that's
an
intersection.
We
had
actually
asked
for
last
year.
B
It
wasn't
awarded,
but
one
of
the
things
that
wasn't
included
in
our
application
last
year,
which
we
will
make
sure
of
this
year,
is
the
actual
accident
data
for
that
area.
So
cbd,
they're,
not
on
here
today,
but
lieutenant
mcfadden,
did
send
me
some
updates
and
said
that
she
was
with
us
in
spirit
and
they've,
been
very
helpful
with
making
sure
we'll
have
that
data
within
those
applications.
B
The
other
piece
is
that
we
can
no
longer
submit
any
projects
without
a
cosign
of
support
via
a
letter,
and
so
we
are
in
the
process
of
sending
notifications
to
all
of
our
city
council
members,
and
it
just
so
happens
with
the
list
of
projects
that
we
are
submitting.
There's
at
least
one
project
in
every
council
member's
district
that
we're
submitting
for
and
so
we'll
be
soliciting
their
letter
of
support
co-signing.
B
The
project
as
a
part
of
the
application
as
well,
so
I
wanted
to
give
you
that
background
part
of
review
process
that
we
decided
to
do
internally.
As
usual,
we
are
city
staff,
planning,
public
service
parks,
tnt
and
others
get
together
review
the
list
that
we
submitted
last
year.
B
What
was
awarded
what
was
not
awarded,
but
we
want
to
continue
to
push
for
what
may
fall
off
the
list
and
what
may
need
to
be
added
from
citizen
requests
and
otherwise
over
the
last
year,
and
so
part
of
the
process
that
we
thought
was
important
was
running
the
list
by
you
just
so
that
you
get
a
chance
to
see
what
we're
submitting
and
and
what,
where
our
mind
is
at
in
terms
of
that
thought,
process
and
or
answering
any
questions
or
concerns
that
you
might
have.
B
The
next
steps,
from
here
after
informing
you
all,
will
be,
as
I
said,
getting
the
support
letters
out
to
council
members,
retrieving
those
packaging,
everything
together
and
hopefully
sending
in
all
of
our
applications
on
february
1st
for
county
to
then
evaluate
any
questions
that
you
all
have
about
the
list
of
projects
that
we
intend
to
request,
or
just
the
tsd
process.
In.
A
General
keith,
this
is
matt.
I
just
have
one
question
so
it
on
the
agenda.
It
says
informational,
which
means
that
this
committee,
at
this
meeting
today,
cannot
request
additional
projects.
B
B
As
I
did
it
as
informational
as
I
didn't
expect,
this
is
something
necessary.
That's
regularly
voted
on
by
through
the
committee,
but
I
felt
like
it
was
important
to
put
this
list
in
front
of
you
all
for
for
vetting
as
well,
so
making
sure
there
was
nothing
that
we
might
have
been
missing
in
our
review
or
giving
clarity
to
things
that
we
are
requesting
and
and
why
so
I
wanted
to
make
sure
we
did
that.
C
So
keith
is,
is
the
numerical
thing
with
this
a
priority,
meaning
number
one
is
the
first
priority
too,
or
is
they
just
arbitrary.
B
D
Tst,
I
have
two
questions
for
you,
keith
one
is:
do
you
need
support
letters
in
addition
to
getting
them
from
council
members?
I
ask
because
several
of
these
projects,
as
you
know
there
are
there-
are
citizens
who
will
be
very
excited
to
see
these
listed,
and
so
I
can
snag
some
citizen
support
letters.
If
that
would
be
helpful,
I'm.
B
Not
going
to
say
no
today,
okay,
I'm
not
going
to
say
no
to
that,
because
I
think
the
thing
that
I
appreciate
but
but
can
get
frustrating
if
you
notice
something
certain
project
is
near
and
dear
to
your
heart,
is
that
the
county's
review
process
is
really
non-political,
so
you
know
they're
plugging
the
project
in
based
on
based
on
the
numbers.
You
know:
what's
the
accident
data
is
there
support?
B
You
know,
you
know,
is
that
requesting
entity
bringing
match
dollars
to
the
table,
et
cetera,
et
cetera,
and
so
I
am
not
going
to
say
no
to
additional
support
letters.
I
would
just
say
that
thomas
I
do
the
county
has
been
nice
and
you
know
their
staff
are
wonderful
with
me,
so
they
you
know.
If
we
were
a
couple
of
days
late,
they
wouldn't
they
wouldn't
mind,
but
I'm
trying
my
best
to
be
on
time
with
submitting.
B
So
if
there
are
things
on
there
that
we
we
get
support
letters
from
from
different
citizens,
I
definitely
welcome
it
michael
mathis,
in
my
office
as
point
person
for
cst,
so
that
would
be
the
person
to
send
those
letterings
to.
D
Okay
and
what,
as
part
of
that,
when
would
you
need
letters
by
to
make
sure
that
you're
making
the
deadline
we'll.
D
Okay
and
then
my
my
other
question,
was
it
doesn't
I'm
not
asking
to
have
it
necessarily
be
on
this
list,
but
just
sort
of
swirling
around
for
future
lists
if
there
could
be
consideration
to
to
figure
out
improvement
to
cross
savannah
highway
from
the
greenway
to
get
over
to
glenn
mcconnell,
so
that
would,
I
guess,
either
be
an
intersection
improvement
at
savage
or
at
ashley
town
center,
one
of
those
to
get
folks
safely
across
and
then
continuing
in
the
bike
lane
or
sidewalk.
B
B
It
up
real,
quick
if
y'all
bear
with
me.
B
Yeah,
so
this
is,
this
is
old,
but
it's
still
referenced
in
terms
of
and
and
I
haven't
been
told
what
exactly
improvements
are
going
to
be
there.
But
this
is
on
you
know,
county's
website,
but
savages
one
of
and
ashley
townsend
at
drive
are
two
of
the
intersections
that
are
supposed
to
be
getting
improvements
in
that
48
million
dollar
project.
Now,
what
exactly
is
happening
there
that
hasn't
been
presented
to
me,
but
debbie
probably
has
that
I
will
double
check
one
other
thing
and
I'll
be
sending
this
out
soon.
B
They
just
sent
this
to
us,
but
county
gave
us
a
just
a
breakdown
of
some
of
the
updates
on
some
of
their
projects
and
again
I'll,
be
sending
this
out
to
council
and
we'll
send
this
out
to
you
all
as
reference
as
well
bear
with.
B
So
there
is-
and
I
forgot
about
this-
so
there
is
the
savage
road
sidewalk
project
on
the
west
side
of
savage
from
u.s
17
to
castlewood
boulevard
and
then
from
castlewood
intersection
to
henry
teklenberg
drive.
B
So
there's
work,
that's
happening
along
that
piece:
the
capacity,
the
savannah
highway
capacity
improvement
project
according
to
county's
report
that
they
sent
me
this
week.
They
submitted
a
letter
of
coordination.
You
know
for
letter
of
intent,
that's
specifically
for
the
avondale
area
and
those
improvements.
B
They're
gonna
try
to
figure
out
what
that
path
forward
is
on
that
specific
thing
in
late
february,
but
I
can
double
check
with
them
about
the
overall
project
and
what
that
looks
like
from
there.
But
the
both
of
those
intersections
you
mentioned
are
included
in
the
scope
of
the
u.s
17
corridor
project.
B
What
we
did
try
to
do
not
to
be
labor,
but
what
we
did
try
to
do.
We
thought
we've
gotten
success
with
getting
funding
for
improvements
right
at
the
greenway
and
intersecting
with
various
different
roads
and
because
in
the
asheville
bridge
project
you
know
we
have
wapu
and
the
greenway,
which
was
a
part
of
that
funding.
We
thought
it
made
sense
to
ask
about
other
different
locations
that
are
raised,
crosswalk
or
tape.
A
speed
table
or
other
rffb's
could
be
applicable
there.
So
great,
I
saw
a
couple
other
hands.
B
Okay,
so,
like
I
said,
our
aim
is
to
be
on
time
with
submitting
this
listing
and
getting
money.
They
usually
have
gotten
back
to
us
about
what
has
gotten
funded
in
the
you
know
mid
to
late
summer
period,
so
around
the
july
time
frame
is
usually
when
they've
gotten
back
to
us.
So
I'll
definitely
report
back
on
as
to
what
has
and
hasn't
been
funded
from
there.
A
Keith,
if
this
is
matt,
if,
if
we
have
other
suggestions
to
include,
should
should
we
just
send
you
an
email,
so
you
and
your
staff
can
vet
those,
or
do
you
feel
like
we
need
discussion
on
them
at
this
meeting.
A
Just
only
50.,
no
I'm
I'm
thinking
of
the
magnolia
magnolia
road,
there's
no
crosswalk
for
the
bikeway
to
my
recollection,
there's
no
crosswalk
crossing
magnolia
and
there
was
all
that
nice
new
work
on
the
bikeway
itself,
but
I
don't
think
there's
a
crosswalk
at
magnolia
so
and
katie.
You
may
know
better
than
anybody
about
that.
A
I
think
it's
called
murray
drive
so
that
one
day
we
can
work
towards
the
crosswalk
across
old
town
road
at
south
lunabar
drive.
A
So
I
don't
know
if
this
is
a
time
and
place
to
put
it
on
there,
but
it
doesn't
seem
like
I
mean.
B
A
B
B
B
I
don't
know
if
that'll
be
receptive
for
the
county,
but
part
of
the
reason
of
that
was
to
get
flipping.
Road
done
is
going
to
be
1.2
million,
that's
more
than
half
of
what
they're
allocating
for
the
entire
county,
so
it
just
falls
so
low
on
the
priority
list,
for
funding
doesn't
make
sense
for
us
to
make
such
a
request.
Knowing
that
you
know
that
the
probability
of
it
getting
funding
is
is
pretty
low,
so
I
think
we
had.
B
We
were
trying
to
be
real
with
ourselves
too
about
what
would
and
wouldn't
be
funded,
and
so
you
know,
I
think
that
was
part
of
the
thought
process.
I
don't
think
it's
a
it.
C
B
One,
if
you
don't
mind
sending
me
a
quick
note
on
that,
one.
A
Yeah
and
that,
maybe
that's
something
that
you
can
handle
internally
with
your
crews,
but
I
just
figured
I'd
mention
that.
A
B
Yeah
and
I'll
introduce
this,
we
have
phil
or
cash
is
from
our
planning
department
and
has
been
an
extreme
help
to
me
on
a
number
of
different
issues,
but
most
specifically
with
bike
share
and
micro
mobility,
as
you
may
or
may
not
know,
we
are
in
the
final
year
of
the
contract
for
bike
share
in
the
city
of
charleston
final
extension
year.
B
Let
me
be
specific
of
it,
so
we
are
obligated
to
go
back
out
to
bed
no
matter
what
this
year,
that
contract
ends
in
november,
which
means
we're
gonna
have
to
work
expeditiously
to
do
that,
but
I
think
it
also
opens
the
door
for
a
larger
conversation
about
micro
mobility
in
the
city
and
what
that
can
look
like.
Yes,
council
has
prohibited
scooters.
B
Yes,
we
have
some
challenges
with
the
accommodation
zone
and
how
that
affects
low-speed
vehicles,
but
I
think
there's
a
lot
of
opportunities
for
us
to
explore
and
this
rfp
process
will
allow
us
to
get
there.
What
I
thought
was
important
again,
because
I
don't
want
to
assume
what
you
all
do
and
don't
know.
I
thought
it
was
important
for
a
fellow
to
kind
of
give.
You
know
you
know
a
quick
five-minute,
dog
and
pony
show
of
where
we've
come
from
with
blackshare.
B
How
did
that
come
about
some
of
the
good
things
that
have
come
out
of
it,
and
otherwise,
just
so,
you
all
have
a
baseline
of
it.
We
will
be
pulling
on
you
all
in
the
in
the
very
near
future
for
assistance
on
on
how
we
approach
this
new
rfp
process,
and
so
we
thought
it
was
important
to
give
you
this
baseline
of
information,
so
everybody's
on
the
same
page.
E
Thank
you,
yeah
some
slides
I'll
bring
up
here
in
a
second
we'll
quickly.
E
E
E
Okay,
is
everybody
seeing
my
screen
excellent?
Okay,
I'm
gonna
go
through
these
fairly
quickly.
There
are
a
bunch
of
slides.
Some
of
them
are
kind
of
detailed,
so
I'll
go
through
them
quickly
for
the
sake
of
time,
but
we
can
always
go
back
if
anybody
has
any
questions
about
them
or
if
keith
you
feel
like,
we
need
to
stop
on
one
and
and
have
further
comment
on
it.
We
can
do
that
feel
free
to
chime
in
on
at
any
time,
and
certainly
if
you
have
questions
as
I'm
going
through
this,
anybody
feel
free.
E
So
we'll
kick
it
off
so
bike
share
in
charleston.
We
we've
got
a
pretty
long
history
now
going
back,
you
know,
probably
about
10
years.
You
know
to
the
very
beginning
and
I'll
give
you
just
a
brief
kind
of
overview
of
kind
of
what
we
were
thinking.
As
far
as
you
know,
bike
share
and
our
goals.
You
know
what
it
does
for
charleston
as
we
were
considering
bike
share
years
ago.
The
main
things,
of
course,
are
the
obvious
ones.
E
You
know
reducing
traffic,
you
know
giving
people
more
options
promoting
healthy
lifestyles
and
of
course
you
know,
the
city's
image
is
is
was
important
in
bikes
here
from
the
beginning
and
still
is
branding.
E
Of
course,
of
the
bike
share
became
a
very
important
aspect
of
holy
spokes
in
charleston,
just
some
of
the
back
up
for
bikes
here
in
charleston
early
on,
were
you
know
our
tourism
management
plan
in
2015,
which
kind
of
occurred
around
the
same
time
we
were
considering
rfps
for
for
bike
share
in
charleston,
and
then
we
also
had
an
expert
in
transportation
who
was
very
well
versed
in
bike
share
in
other
cities,
gabe
klein.
E
We
brought
him
in
in
2014
and
he
had
a
lot
of
great
suggestions.
Recommendations
for
the
city,
especially
on
the
peninsula
and
bike
share
and
other
micro
mobility
options,
were
part
of
that.
Just
real
briefly.
Some
of
the
milestones
2011
we
had
some
bike
share,
studying
done
that
kind
of
moved
us
on
into
an
rfp
process.
In
the
2014.
E
E
Now
was
this
operator
they
launched
in
2017
and
then
of
course,
they've
been
trucking
along
since
then,
with
a
few
changes
here
and
there
and
we'll
go
into
more
detail
of
course,
now
2021
we're
in
the
last
year
of
our
contract
with
with
gotcha
or
the
you
know
in
the
operators.
I'll
say
since
there
have
been
some
changes
and
we'll
go
into
that
as
well,
so
we'll
be
looking
for
a
new
contract
soon
or
a
new
rfp.
E
Soon,
just
some
of
the
details
and
I'll
quickly
go
through
these,
but
back
in
2011
around
then
we
we,
we
started
getting
a
lot
of
inquiries.
You
know
requests
from
businesses,
nonprofits
other
entities,
organizations
that
were
interested
in
providing
bikes
here
in
charleston,
some
some
were
for-profit
some
non-profit
and
of
course
it
was
an
exciting
time
for
bikes.
Here
you
know
it
was
happening
in
some
of
the
big
cities
in
america
and
throughout
the
world,
and
you
know
we
were
looking
at
bike
shares
as
a
possibility
for
charleston.
E
We
did
have
a
graduate
student
in
the
city
who
I
believe
she
was
in
from
mit.
She
did
a
vehicle
sharing
feasibility
study
kind
of
a
white
paper
for
us.
It
was
very
detailed
kind
of
in-depth
study
that
gave
us
an
idea
of
what
we
might
could
expect
for
for
bike
sharing
car
sharing
and
other
types
of
mobility
sharing
in
charleston
the
charleston
market.
It
wasn't,
I
would
say,
not
a
rosy
picture
given
the
market
and
our
density
and
other
factors,
our
transportation
system
here
in
charleston.
E
So
there
was
some
skepticism
about.
You
know
how
it
would
work
in
charleston.
You
know
how
it
could
be
funded
and
you
know
whether
whether
we
could
get
it
to
succeed,
so
we
had
enough
interest
in
it.
I
believe
that
we
eventually
decided
we've
got
to
make
this
a
fair
and
equitable
equitable
process.
E
So
we
launched
an
rfp
process
in
2014..
It
was
a.
It
was
a
rfp,
probably
modeled,
on
some
of
the
bigger
cities,
portland
washington
dc
chicago-
that
had
already
released
some
or
had
launched
their
systems.
Of
course,
those
were
much
bigger
cities.
There
were
a
lot
of
comparisons.
E
You
know
for
cities
the
size
of
charleston,
so
we
didn't
have
a
lot
to
go
on,
but
anyway
we
did
launch
in
20,
or
we
did
some
issue
at
rfp
in
2014
we
got
three
submittals.
They
were
all
pretty.
You
know
kind
of
your
typical.
You
know
your
power
powered
dock
technology
was
kind
of
second
generation
bike
share
technology.
E
We
would
reissue
an
rfp
with
a
little
more
specifics
about
what
we
wanted
in
charleston,
especially
you
know
more
of
a
flexible
system
that
had
more
kind
of
third
generation
technology
of
smart
bikes
and
not
necessarily
you
know,
docks
that
were
less
flexible
and
had
to
connect
to
power
and
stuff
like
that.
So
anyway,
we
we
did
relaunching
our
rfp
in
2015.,
we
did
get
six
submittals,
they
were,
most
of
them
were
pretty
good.
E
I
think
what
separated
the
one
that
we
ultimately
selected,
which
was
gotcha,
was
the
that
that
they
were
local
company,
that
that
scored
a
lot
of
points
among
council
members
staff
business.
Folks,
I
think
you
know
that
was
a
big
sell,
the
flexibility
of
their
system,
which
was
the
smart
bikes.
It
was
so
big
technology,
they're,
locking
an
app
system
on
the
bikes
and
their
hubs,
you
know,
were
just
basically
bike
racks
with
signage
that
allowed
you
to
put
them
in
more
places
than
than
you
might
with.
E
The
older
technology.
Gotcha
also
had
already
kind
of
built
relationships
and
partnerships
in
charleston,
with
their
submittal
and
and
some
funding
was
involved.
And
then
you
know
we
moved
forward
with
what
gotcha
is
as
the
selected
operator
for
for
our
first
bike
share,
and
that
was
2016.
E
We
did
the
selection
in
march,
through
september
16
we
did
contract
negotiation
with
gotcha,
which
involved
mostly
hub
analysis
kind
of
where
we
would
put
the
hubs
kind
of
laying
out
what
our
our
city
role
was
in
this
contract
and
what
their
responsibility
as
the
operator
were
and
then,
of
course,
branding
and
design
would
ended
up
being
a
kind
of
a
big
deal
towards
the
end
of
our
contract.
Discussion,
then,
towards
the
end
of
let's
see,
2016.
E
We
ended
up
going
to
council
and
and
subcommittees
of
council
for
approval
and
ended
up
doing
a
little
bit
more
work
with
the
branding
and
design
of
the
hubs
and
design
of
the
bikes
and
branding
of
the
pikes
on
into
april
of
2017,
which
led
us
finally
to
launch
the
system
in
may
of
2017..
E
The
some
of
the
basics
of
the
contract
that
we
we
ended
up,
agreeing
to
with
gotcha,
were
that
it
this.
This
was
a
private
operation.
It
was
privately
owned
and
privately
funded,
or
at
least
funded
through
the
company
in
you
know,
in
where
they
who
they
partnered.
With
for
funding,
you
know
also
mattered,
and
in
this
case
it
was
musc
who
provided
much
of
that
initial
funding
for
getting
bikeshare
off
the
ground
in
charleston.
E
So
the
some
of
the
aspects
of
the
agreement
with
gotcha
some
of
the
more
important
aspects
were
that
it
was
first
of
all
a
three-year
agreement.
Of
course,
those
three
years
ended
in
2020
or
2019,
and
we
did
a
one-year
extension
in
november.
2019
did
a
second
one-year
extension
in
last
year
and
last
november,
and
then
we
in
the
contract
also
made
it
such
that
gacha
was
responsible.
E
You
know
for
for
basically
the
entire
operation.
Now
the
city
did
help
in
selection
of
right-of-way.
You
know
process
of
putting
hubs
in
the
right
subway
which
what
ended
up
being
a
pretty
big
task.
Given
you
know,
charleston's
constraints,
you
know,
especially
in
the
historic
district
and
of
course
we
wanted
to
make
it
clear
that
the
city
was
not
liable
in
any
way
for
the
program.
There
wasn't
any
real.
E
There
wasn't
money
exchanged
between
the
city
and
gotcha,
you
know
coming
or
going,
and
then
you
know,
of
course,
the
gotcha
use
their
partnerships
for
funding
and,
of
course,
user
fees,
membership
fees
for
operation
of
the
system,
so
I'm
gonna
go
through
some
of
the
hub
selection
real
fast.
I
just
wanted
to
give
you
an
idea
of
kind
of
what
it
took
to
to
get
us
to
the
point
we
could
launch.
You
know,
because
the
hub
site
selection
was
was
a
pretty
trying
process.
E
So
anyway,
you
know
we
had
some
basic
criteria.
We
wanted.
We
wanted
to
look
at
you
know,
of
course
we
needed
flexibility,
and
you
know
we
knew
that
the
locations
would
have
to
be
an
in
a
mix
of
rights,
of
way,
public
property
parks,
streets,
sidewalks
and
private
property
in
some
cases
and
other
state
or
or
government-owned
property,
such
as
in
uic
and
college
of
charleston.
E
The
all
of
the
locations
had
to
be,
or
at
least
the
ones
on
public
property
had
to
be
approved
by
public
service
departments,
director
of
traffic
transportation
department
and
the
city's
design
review
committee,
and
that's
an
internal
city
board
that
looks
at
design
of.
Basically
anything
that
goes
in
on
public
property,
including
streets.
E
B
E
Use
nacto
standards
just
kind
of
as
a
as
a
basis
for
jumping
off
and
on
criteria
for
selecting
our
sites,
and
we
started
going
in
depth
into
locations
that
we
felt
were
necessary.
You
know
would
put
kind
of
fuel
demand
for
the
the
bike
share
and
you
know
we
looked
at
a
lot
of
places.
This
happened
to
be
one
I
think
that
was
was
not
selected
was
on
government
property,
but
this
was
the
king
and
queen
county
parking
garage.
They
ended
up
doing
something
different
with
this
space,
but
we
we
got
hubs
nearby.
E
We
looked
at
a
lot
of
locations
throughout
charleston,
it
was.
It
was
difficult
because
there
there
just
aren't
a
lot
of
space.
There
isn't
a
lot
of
space
on
the
streets
and
the
rights
away
in
charleston,
so
many
of
them
we
did
end
up
putting
in
in
parks
and
other
spaces
that
were
publicly
owned.
There
were
a
few
privately
owned
ones
as
well.
So
just
this
is
just
a
list
of
some
of
the
criteria.
We
were
basing
our
analysis
on.
E
F
E
Some
gis
analysis
for
rating
all
of
the
places
that
we
were
looking
at.
We
did
a
lot
of.
We
did
some
pretty
heavy
analysis
with
census
data.
Just
looking
at
where
people
were
what
kind
of
demographics
we
were
seeing
on
the
peninsula,
which
was,
of
course,
where
the
system
was
going
to
start.
We
looked
at
income
levels
of
neighborhoods
and,
of
course,
you
know,
fight
commute
statistics
for
census,
block
groups
weighed
in
as
well,
not
not
as
big
a
factor
as
kind
of
proximity
to
destinations.
E
As
I
mentioned
towards
the
end
of
our
contract
negotiations,
branding
of
the
bicycle
itself
brand,
you
know
the
name
of
the
bike:
the
color,
the
hub
design,
the
rack
design,
the
signage
all
of
that
had
to
be
worked
out
had
to
be
approved,
or
at
least
the
the
racks
and
the
and
the
signage
by
our
drc
committee,
the
bikes
themselves.
There
was
question
about
whether
the
city
actually
had
any
any
control
over
that
you
know
at
all,
given
that
it
was
not.
You
know
owned
by
the
city.
E
It
wasn't
explicit
in
the
in
the
contract
that
you
know
we
control
design
of
the
bike
since
they're
vehicles
and
not
a
fixed,
you
know
thing
in
the
rights
away
or
on
public
property,
but
we
did.
Of
course
we
were.
The
city
was
heavily
involved,
especially
the
mayor
and
council
members,
in
the
ultimate
design
of
the
bikes
and
this
this
was
not
the
final
design,
but
is
an
example
of
kind
of
the
process
we
went
through.
This
is
one
iteration.
E
This
is
just
a
brief,
detailed
look
at
some
post-launch
milestones.
Of
course
they
launched
in
may
with
about
28
hubs,
initially
100
bikes,
but
that
was
that
was
a
brief
period.
E
It
was
just
to
get
the
the
process
going
and
they
quickly
added
up
all
the
other
bikes
up
to
250,
which
is
about
where
we
are
now,
and
you
know
I'll,
go
into
some
more
details
about
the
some
metrics
of
the
system,
but
you
know
within
within
the
month
and
year
we
knew
we
had
a
pretty
successful
system,
maybe
more
so
than
anybody
expected
in
may
2018.
E
The
just
ride
program
of
holy
spokes
in
partnership
with
non-profits
such
as
charleston
moves
enough
pie
and,
of
course,
city
involved
was
launched,
and
this
was
an
effort
to,
of
course
bring
in
more
riders,
especially
those
were
underserved,
those
with
low
and
medium
median
income
that
to
to
be
able
to
bring
in
those
riders
into
the
system.
We
need
to
offer.
E
E
Excuse
me,
keith
and-
and
maybe
katy
would
have
more
details
about
this,
but
if
you
have
any
questions
about
that,
I
can
go
in
there
in
no
further
detail.
Excuse
me.
E
We
also
placed
one
in
kind
of
the
north
central
area,
which
was
king
and
grove
street
at
the
food
lion
right
across
from
the
charter
school
for
math
and
science,
and
we
placed
one
at
the
bridgeview
apartments
which
is
in
the
very
is
it's
in
the
neck
area
of
the
peninsula,
and
there
was
one
more.
Can
anybody
remind
me
where
that
one
was.
D
You
got
them,
we
wanted
to
place
one
more
and
collect
survey
data
from
just
ride
users
and
where
they
would
like
to
see
another
one
gotcha.
Couldn't
they
weren't
placing
new
additional
hubs.
They
were
simply
moving.
E
B
There
was
one
there
was
one
at
bridgeview
and
we
had
to
do.
There's
still
some
corrections.
We
need
to
do
there,
but
gotcha
had
removed
that
because
of
the
lack
of
use
and
otherwise,
but
the
city
felt
very
differently
about
that,
and
so
the
just
ride
program
actually
really
better
bike.
B
Ship
partnership
had
approached
the
city
regarding
the
project
and
full
disclosure
helped
create
that
program
when
it
first
started
and
usually
they
would
have
cities
apply
for
that
funding,
but
then
that
year
they
changed
and
said
that
they
wanted
nonprofits
to
participate,
and
thankfully
enough
pi
and
charleston
moves
were
a
great
help
in
in
that,
but
it
kind
of
showed
the
blind
spot
within
the
bike
share
program
that
there
wasn't
a
pre-existing
equity
component
to
how
they
implemented
bike
share,
and
this
grant
kind
of
exposed
that
opportunity
to
do
that,
but
also
where
they
needed
to
be
better.
G
D
G
B
G
B
And
so
I
know
you
have
more,
maybe
we
give
you
a
few
more
minutes
a
couple
more
minutes.
We
get
into
the
question
piece
because
I
think
you
bring
up
one
of
the
things
steve
that
I
think
is
going
to
be
important
for
us
is
that
you
know
there
was
a
heavy
lift
to
get
this
bike
share
introduced.
B
It
was
different,
it
was
changed
and
there
was
some
resistance,
but
I
think
in
in
true
fashion
show
and
tell
spoke
loudly
of
what's
more
than
possible,
and
but
it
also
showed
where
there
were
some
gaps,
and
I
think
we
as
the
city
want
to
make
sure
that,
in
approaching
what
microtransit
looks
like
moving
forward,
that
those
gaps
are
are
explicitly
iterated
in
in
the
type
of
partnerships
that
would
come.
You
know
to
the
city,
so.
E
Yeah
I'll
briefly
go
through
some
of
these
other
slides
and
we'll
we'll
get
to
some
questions
at
the
end
yeah.
So,
basically,
you
know
there
had
been
some
changes
in
the
ownership
and
leadership
of
the
bike
share
system.
The
operators
of
the
system
excuse
me,
and
these
happened
fairly
recently,
and
you
know
within
the
past
year
and
a
half
or
so,
and
we
can
go
into
more
detail
if
you
like,
but
I'll
just
try
to
get
through
these
fairly
quickly.
E
We
we
did
have
you
know
a
a
major
change
to
gotcha.
In
fact,
gotcha
is
now
now
no
longer
gotcha
they
had
been,
but
I
think
now,
they're
they're,
vote
mobility
and,
of
course
this
is
happening
at
a
time
when,
when
we're
in
the
last
year
of
the
contract
with
gotcha,
so
that
you
know
there's
a
lot
of
opportunity.
Obviously,
for
you
know
us
to
look
at.
E
You
know
with
a
new
rfp
which
you
know
will
be
forthcoming
this
year.
If
we
are
to
continue
bikes
here
beyond
november,
when
our
contract
would
expire
with
with
gotcha
or
bolt
just
real
briefly,
you
know
the
system,
you'll
probably
know
it
pretty.
Well,
you
know
it's.
E
This
is
just
the
current
system
is
basically
32
hubs
right
now,
a
little
bit
more
than
had
had
been
launched
originally,
but
as
as
mentioned
anytime,
there's
a
new
hub
been
placed,
it's
been,
you
know
more
like
it
was
divided
rather
than
a
new
hub,
as
it
simply
was
moving
some
of
the
bikes
around,
and
you
know
this,
you
know
the
flexibility
of
the
system
allowed
gotcha
to
be
able
to
do
this,
which,
which
was
a
good
thing.
E
It
could
put
things
in
areas
that
we
needed
them
and
maybe
remove
them
from
areas
we
didn't,
but
you
know,
essentially,
you
know
they
offered
memberships
at
the
daily
three
day.
Monthly
annual
memberships,
like
most
systems,
would
and
of
course,
as
you
know,
musc
is
kind
of
the
primary
partner.
You
know
and
funding
partner
of
the
system-
and
this
was
a
partnership
made
between
gotcha
and
musc.
E
Although
the
city,
I
think,
and
city
leadership,
were
involved
in
discussions
with
musc
originally,
this
is
just
something
I
found
interesting
that
the
first
month
of
the
system,
we
just
pulled
some
numbers
for
comparison
in
charleston.
You
know,
based
on
our
our
population
and
the
size
of
our
system.
E
We
ended
up
having
you
know
many
more
trips
and
miles
than
than
most
other
systems,
even
some
of
the
bigger
city
systems
in
their
first
months,
and
we,
we
felt
confident
moving
forward
that
first
month
that
the
the
system
would
be
successful
this.
These
are
some
hub
stats.
You
know-
and
this
is
something
that
we
can
pull
directly
from
the
system-
the
back
end
sort
of
access
to
the
soby
website,
which
has
you
know
a
lot
of
stats.
E
A
lot
of
system
stats,
including
hubs,
bikes,
trips,
membership,
stats
that
that
we
might
be
interested
in
just
a
note
that
consistently
over
the
years,
the
fish
burn
hub
fish
burn
lot
hub
over
by
it's.
It's
musc's
parking
lot
near
the
river
dog
stadium
has
consistently
been
the
highest
kind
of
totals
in
and
out
as
far
as
you
know,
kind
of
the
demand,
the
second
highest
has
typically
been
customs
house.
It's
a
pretty
large
hub,
obviously
in
the
thick
of
historic,
district
and
kind
of
a
major
tourism
area.
E
So
there's
a
lot
of
visitor
use
there,
but
just
wanted
to
give
you
all
example
of
what
we
can
pull
from
hub
stats.
You
know
some
what
what's
occurring
at
these
stat
stations,
just
an
example
of
the
soby
system.
This
is
their
website,
some
screenshots,
that's
the
kind
of
the
computer
and
a
similar
app
on
your
phone.
E
This
is
a
screenshot
from
something
we
can
get
from
the
back
end
of
the
website.
This
is
sort
of
a
heat
map.
In
this
case,
I
think
it
was
over
a
couple
of
weeks
use
as
you
can
see.
The
the
trips
you
know
are
all
over
the
peninsula
of
charleston,
which
is
obviously
you
know
what
was
intended,
but
there
are
also
some
trips
across
the
bridge.
E
There's
some
quirks
in
the
system
that
show
some
water
trips,
which
you
know
some
of
them,
may
actually
have
taken
the
water
taxi
over
and
that
may
be
what
this
is.
But
we've
also
seen
some
some
weird
system
quirks
that
put
bikes
out
in
the
bay
or
you
know
in
the
harbor
in
the
river
that
sort
of
sorts
of
thing
anyway.
E
Just
to
give
you
an
idea
of
some
of
the
statistics
of
the
program
after
year,
one
they
had
nine
thousand
active
members,
four
million
calories
burned.
Just
a
note,
I
think
we
were
aiming
for
a
thousand
calories
burned.
You
know
from
users
in
the
first
year
or
I'm
sorry,
not
a
thousand
a
million
in
the
first
year,
and
we
ended
up
quadrupling
that
number
in
the
first
year.
They
also
provide
some
other
statistics.
You
know
money
saved,
you
know
versus
owning
a
vehicle
or
a
car.
E
The
unique
trips
in
the
system
ended
up
being
about
50
000
in
the
first
year,
the
total
miles
almost
half
a
million,
and
then,
of
course,
you
can
see
year
three
continuing
to
go
up
and
then
all
time
up
till
today
the
system
has
recorded
185
000
unique
trips
currently
has
22
000
active
members,
maybe
not
all
of
them.
That
active,
but
at
least
is
a
good
sign
that
there's
active
membership
keeps
on
growing
and,
of
course,
the
total
miles
have
been
logged
about
almost
half
a
million
as
well.
E
In
about
what
about
three
and
a
half
to
four
or
four
years.
I
guess
and.
E
Yeah,
so
as
we're
looking,
you
know
this
year
into
the
future.
What
our
rfp
would
consist
of
these
are
some
considerations
and
keith
keith
can
obviously
go
into
more
detail
about
what
he
might
be
looking
for,
the
new
rfp,
but
some
of
the
things
we've
discussed
are
you
know
what
you
know:
what
about
an
expansion
of
the
geographic
footprint?
Of
course,
you
know
expanding
off
of
the
peninsula
to
other
parts
of
the
city
has
always
kind
of
been
something
we
wanted
to
do,
and
we
may
have
that
opportunity
now.
E
E
The
opportunity
for
expansion
of
you
know,
partnerships
sponsorships
and
you
know
funding
you
know
possibly
public
funding
or
grant
funding
for
bikes
here
to
to
make
it
even
better.
And
of
course
we
have
the
opportunity
to
expand
to
all
parts
of
our
population.
E
You
know
anybody
that
we
feel
needs
to
have
the
opportunity
for
access
to
transportation.
E
At
any,
you
know
that
that
may
not
be
able
to
to
pay
for
the
normal
membership
rates,
so
we're
looking
at
all
all
parts
of
the
population
and
of
course
you
know,
the
big
question
is
you
know:
should
this
be
expanded
beyond
just
bikes?
What
other
micro
mobility
options
are
there
for
charleston?
What
what
should
we
be
looking
at
and
so
that's
kind
of
jumping
off?
E
I'm
sure
there
would
be
comments
and
questions
and,
and
then,
if
keith,
if
you
have
any
comments
further,
then
I'll
turn
it
over
to
you.
B
No
thank
you
phillip.
I
know
there
was
a
lot
of
information
for
you
all,
but
I
I
wanted
you
all
to
be
have
a
sense
of
the
journey
of
bike
share
in
the
city
and
because
it
definitely
will
be
pulling
on
on
you
all,
as
a
committee
and
and
probably
some
of
you
more
individually
as
we
try
to
jump,
start
the
rfp
process
and
and
and
getting
some
things
down
and-
and
you
know,
making
sure
that
there's
the
appropriate
overlap.
B
So
we
can
be
good
to
go
with
still
having
micro
mobility
in
the
city
at
the
close
out
of
of
2021
into
2022..
D
I
know
you,
you
had
the
data
layer
pulled
in
to
analyze
hub
locations
based
on
bike
commuters,
but
did
you
also
happen
to
or
and
if
not
could
you
add
in
the
data
layer
for
this
time
around
looking
at
who
who
doesn't
have
access
to
a
motor
vehicle?
D
That
might
be
a
better
data
point
to
utilize
for
something
like
bike
share
and
any
other
micro
mobility
right.
E
E
You
know
the
you
know:
vehicles
per
household
type
thing,
and
you
know
there
there
are
some
neighborhoods,
of
course,
and
we're
probably
aware
of
which
ones
those
are
that
would
have
a
lower
number
of
vehicles
available
to
their
households
and
can
can
of
course,
target
those
neighborhoods
for
for
more
hubs,
and
you
know
yeah,
so
yeah
katie,
I
mean
just
to
answer
your
question
yeah.
We.
E
We
definitely
have
the
opportunity
to
do
further
analysis
and
or
or
put
this
analysis
on
to
a
future
operator
and
they
and
then
they
of
course
give
us
what
their
proposal
is.
B
And
the
layering
of
the
comfortable
multimodalism
well
over
80
percent
of
the
folk
who
utilize
our
existing
transit
system,
don't
own
a
car
and
so
they're
getting
to
their
stops.
Some
other
way
walking
biking,
you
know
getting
a
ride
whatever
that
might
be,
and
so
one
of
the
things
pittsburgh
did
this.
Both
their
transit
system
access
card
and
the
bike
share
system
access
card
are
one
in
the
same,
so
people
were
able
to
get
from
mode
to
mode
seamlessly
right,
it's
those
type
of
things.
D
If
it's
helpful-
and
I
you
probably
have
already
seen
this-
but
the
usda
has
a
really
good
data
set
where
they've
analyzed
populations
by
zip
code
and
by
block
of
who
who
do
not
have
access
to
a
motor
vehicle
and
then
how
far
away
they
are
from
grocery
stores
and
other
things.
It's
from
2015
census
data.
So
things
have
changed
a
little
bit
in
some
of
the
charleston
neighborhoods
that
that
we've
looked
at.
But
it
could
be
a
helpful
tool
because
I
think,
probably
all
of
us
would
know
off
the
top
of
our
heads.
H
Yeah,
I
think
my
question
was
on
technology
customer
service.
What's
changed
since
2015-16,
because
this
is
potentially
a
new
generation
of
bikes
that
could
be
part
of
the
next.
You
know
iteration
of
this,
so
I'd
be
curious
to
know
what
that
is
and
what
were
they
complaints
or
what
were?
What
can
we
do
to
make
it
the
use
of
it
easier
make
it
more
seamless
like
the
idea
of
the
whole
mention
with
pittsburgh?
H
That's
wonderful!
You
know
we
could
use
the
same
card
for
a
bus
as
you
use
for
a
bike,
but
is
there
anything
else
also
that
could
be
made?
That
would
be
what
I
would
be
looking
at.
If
I
was
reviewing
an
rfp
is
how
do
we
get
who's
proposing
the
most
the
most
high
quality
ease
of
use.
B
B
You
know
we
were
essentially
focused
on
the
downtown
area,
but
because
of
all
the
things
that
are
coming
up
regarding
bike
path
because
of
usage
rate,
and
otherwise,
even
in
some
of
the
data
that
gotcha
was
keeping
about
traveling,
you
know
a
lot
of
folk
who
were
making
that
trip
over
to
west
ashland,
despite
how
hard
it
may
be
to
get
over
there
right
and
otherwise,
utilizing
usage
of
the
bike,
the
greenway
and
the
bikeway
regularly
with
it
as
well.
B
So
daniel
island
has
been
asking
for
it
for
some
time
as
well.
So
what?
What
does
spike
should
look
like
in
that
regard,
and
a
part
of
that
conversation
that
some
cities
have
looked
at
is
what
is
monetizing
of
the
curve?
Look
like
right,
so
some
cities
have
actually
stipulated
a
cost
per
unit.
That's
used
for
their
for.
B
What's
what's
introduced
for
there's
some
cities
that
have
introduced
multiple
different
forms
of
micro,
mobility
from
different
companies
and
there's
some
cities
that
have
used
just
one
company,
the
information
and
the
data
sharing
is
very
different
as
well.
B
You
know
we're
going
to
have
to
revisit
the
conversation
of
whether
we'll
continue
with
how
we
have
our
station
design
or
if
dockless
is,
is
a
part
of
that
or
not
that
the
fact
that
so
many
systems
have
moved
towards
e-bikes.
B
Is
that
something
that
that
we
want
to
consider
as
well
and
then
and
then
a
lot
of
things
around
you
know
how
equity
is
is
now
being
put
at
the
forefront
of
introducing
a
micro
mobility
is
is
something
that
I
want
to
explore
as
well,
and
I
think
the
other
piece
is
that
some
of
these
private
entities
are
partnering
with
cities
to
help
in
the
effort
for
the
infrastructure
aspect.
Right,
it's
hard
to
tell
somebody
go,
get
on
a
bike.
B
Go
you
know,
use
a
trike
or
whatever
that
is,
and
the
infrastructure
is
not
there.
It's
introduced
it
as
well,
and
so
there's
been
some
partnerships
to
push
in
that
regard
too.
So
I
do
think
that
we
do
have
an
opportunity
to
really
cater
what
will
work
for
charleston
and,
I
think,
there's
way
more
options.
I
think
one
of
the
challenges
that
we're
going
to
have
to
wrestle
with
is
with
that
philip
brazed
is
we're
not
going
to
be
looking
at
a
local
loca.
B
We
may
not
have
a
local
option
right,
there's
some
that
are
kind
of
looking
into
that
for
certain
mobility
options,
but
that's
gonna
be
a
piece.
That's
gonna
be
interesting.
B
B
Okay
more
to
come
on
this,
but
but
just
wanted
to
make
sure
we
gave
you
all
that
that
helping
of
information
they're
happy
to
take
questions
offline
or
things
that
might
come
to
mind
from
there
as
we
go
into
this
process
and
we'll
be
sure
to
keep
you
all
well
informed
about
progress
on
this.
A
B
I
do
think
so
I
will
say
I
I
will,
depending
on
how
the
committee
I'll
let
the
committee
decide.
A
Any
seconds
all
right:
okay,
thank
you
hearing
that
we'll
table
that
until
the
next
meeting,
when
more
people
are
present.
Thank
you,
including
our
council
members,
keith
agenda.
Item
number
five
is
the
director's
update.
B
Yeah
I'll
say
one
one
small
piece
about
four
is
that
there
are
some
of
you
who
I
would
like
to
make
sure
we
get
get
reappointed
and
we
do
have
two
vacancies.
Jave
you've
been
awesome
being
on
the
committee.
You
represent
one
of
those
neighborhood
representatives.
There
is
another
vacancy
for
an
additional
person.
B
That's
that's
coming
from
specifically
representing
our
neighborhoods
and
there's
also
a
vacancy
for
somebody
who
represents
communities
of
special
needs
would
love
to
have
those
represented,
and
I
also
would
prefer
to
bring
if
those
individuals
exist
which
they
do,
but
if
those
individuals
are
for
serving
on
the
committee,
sorry,
who
would
like
to
bring
both
those
individuals
and
reappointments
simultaneously,
I
prefer
to
do
that
versus
piecemealing.
That
so
would
definitely
love
to
do
that.
B
In
february
we
do
plan
to
have
a
tnt
meeting
in
the
in
the
first
week
of
february.
I
believe
that
meeting
is
february,
so
I'm
not
going
to
get
it
first
first
meeting
in
february,
but
if
there
are
individuals
that
fit
those
two
vacancy
spaces
would
love
to
be
able
to
engage
them.
Please
holler
at
me
offline.
So
we
can
move
that
forward
and
I
love
to
package
that
together.
So
I
did
want
to
make
that
that
piece
clear.
B
The
other
things
about
coordination
with
other
committees,
vice
chair
chairs
and
otherwise
I'll
table
that
until
the
next
meeting,
but
I
don't
want
to
get
that
small
piece
now
really
quick
updates,
because
some
some
of
you
have
been
involved
in
these
one
is
project
700
crosswalks
again.
This
is
a
partnership
with
scdot
to
improve
signalize
intersections
for
pedestrian
safety,
that
the
city
started
with
a
pilot
of,
and
now
has
effectively
addressed
about
142
locations
in
the
tri-county
area.
B
We
have
additional
intersections
that
we've
asked
for
including
some
that
you
all
have
asked
us
to
ask
for
to
do
again.
The
way
this
partnership
worked.
This
works,
the
city
pays
for
my
department
pays
for
the
signal
plans
for
the
intersection,
and
then
the
state
dot
pays
for
the
rest
of
the
of
the
basic
city
infrared
as
crosswords
ada
compliance
and
pedestrian
signals.
That's
really
what
the
the
three
pockets
it's
primarily
coming
to.
So
these
are
the
intersections
that
are
coming
up
to
be
addressed
that
fit
into
that
scheme.
B
Courtney
at
dowdy,
which
is
a
combination
with
some
county
support
and
then
rutledge
at
vanderbilt
as
well,
so
wanted
to
make
sure
you
had
those
we
basically
have
received.
B
The
construction
plans
from
the
the
firm
and
sadlt
is
in
the
midst
of
making
their
final
review
and
then
determining
when
they'll
start
getting
to
those
intersections.
Other
thing
wanted
to.
Let
you
all
know,
thanks
to
you
all,
we
were
able
to
do
that
shutdown
of
south
market
street.
It
was
beyond
successful,
wanted
to
just
give
you
quickly
the
numbers
from
that
from
august
15
2020
until
christmas
day
from
nine
to
five.
B
Throughout
that
entire
of
time,
there
was
approximately
between
142
and
155
000
pedestrians
and
cyclists,
that
traveled
through
that
area
that
were
counted
on
that,
and
so
just
so
the
highest
month
was
october,
we're
between
about
51
and
56
000
counted.
So
definitely
thank
you
all
for
pushing
for
that
would
love
to
see
how
we
can
make
that
happen
in
a
number
of
different
other
spaces.
B
I
will
say
the
key
without
market
was
the
support
of
both
the
brick
and
mortar
and
the
market
vendors
and
allowing
that
so
the
business
community
support
is,
is
really
what
moves
a
lot
of
the
boulders
out
of
the
way
for
that
to
happen,
but
just
want
to
make
sure
I
gave
you
that
update
the
other
great
update
is
regarding
our
people.
Pedal
plan
in
brigade
street
brigade
street
construction
is
starting
on
january
25th.
B
As
a
reminder,
this
will
be
the
first
protected
bike
infrastructure
in
the
city's
history
connecting
from
bridge
your
navy
all
the
way
to
the
low
line.
I'm
really
excited
about
this
project.
It
was
a
lot
of
work
and
and
dollars
that
the
city
is
putting
into
it
in
combination
with
sadot
and
their
resurfacing
project.
B
So
it's
definitely
been
a
partnership
to
get
those
done
so
protected
bike
lanes
with
buffers,
rapid
beacon,
flashes
with
concrete
boat
belts
at
meeting
in
brigade
street
and
otherwise
in
full,
full
paving
of
through
the
intersection
of
the
entire
area,
even
some
a
little
bit
of
drainage
work
as
well.
B
I'm
so
glad
about
that
project,
moving
forward
and
taking
plan
and
making
that
into
reality
from
there
there
was
a
couple
of
updates
that
cbd
wanted
to
speak
about,
but
I'll
defer
those
until
they
come
back
to
the
next
meeting,
but
just
wanted
to
give
you
all
those
quick
updates,
any
questions
on
those
or
other
things
that
need
to
be.
I
need
to
be
paying
attention
to.
G
B
I'm
hoping
it
sets
a
precedence
too.
I
think
you
know
I'm
unapologetic
about
showing
my
cards
in
that
regard.
I
see
you
know
what
happened
in
myrtle
beach
and
also
what
we're
trying
to
do
is
setting
some
precedence
in
terms
of
what
that
looks
like
with
the
state
d.o.t.
So
hopefully,
that's
just
the
beginning.
A
Well,
in
south
carolina,
the
odds
are
stacked
against
us,
but
you're
doing
a
great
job
and
city
staff
are
doing
a
great
job,
as
are
the
advocacy
groups
like
charleston
moves,
so
I
guess,
if
there's
no
other
questions,
I
appreciate
everybody's
time
today.
Are
there
other
questions
before
we
return.
B
Comment
one
other
reason:
I
apologize
man,
one
other
piece,
if
you
don't
mind
giving
me
a
call
after
this
regarding
sanders
road,
please.
F
Well,
I
just
had
one
quick
question.
I
a
while
ago,
like
a
couple,
maybe
a
year
or
two
ago
there
was
talk
of
having
a
dedicated
bike
lane
under
the
overpass
along
ug
street,
headed
towards
east
bay
meeting,
and
I
don't
know
I
mean
there's
a
lot
of
construction
going
on
there.
Is
there
anything?
I
don't
know
if
it's
still
going
to
be
able
to
do
that
or
I
just
because
I'm.
B
So
the
work
that's
happening
there
is
unfortunately
not
biped.
It's
it's
actually
cws
who
moves
as
as
they
see
fit
through
our
streets.
Sometimes.
B
Currently,
it's
a
capital
project,
that's
being
planned
out.
That
project
sits
within
the
parks
division
as
a
project,
that's
being
executed,
so
I
can
double
check
with
them
about
updates
on
timeline.
The
original
design
was
to
yes
go
along
eugene
all
the
way
through
east
bay.
B
That
project
essentially
has
been
cut
in
half
because
of
funding
pieces,
so
the
first
million
of
that
is
supposed
to
go
to
the
first
portion
of
fuji
and
there's
still
some
design
work.
Community
outreach
work
that
needs
to
be
done.
Matt
compton
at
the
parks
department
is
the
project
manager
there,
so
he
can
give
an
update.
B
C
B
It's
still
a
real
project,
still
an
important
east-west
connection,
still
a
part
of
the
people
pedal
plan
and
definitely
part
of
capital
projects.
B
And
I
think
you
just
put
matt's
email
in
the
chat.
A
Thanks
gervais
thanks
kitty,
thanks
steve,
do
we
I
we
had
a
motion
to
adjourn.
Do
we
have
a
second.