►
From YouTube: City of Charleston Council Meeting - October 9, 2018
Description
City of Charleston Council Meeting - 10/9/2018
B
And
let
the
record
show
maybe
that
councilmember,
Sheila,
moody
and
Jackson
are
here,
but
maybe
just
indisposed
for
a
minute.
Okay,
so
I
would.
If
y'all
would
like
to
join
us.
I'd
like
to
ask
council
member
shade
to
introduce
a
special
guest
to
lead
us
in
a
invocation
and
Pledge
of
Allegiance
Thank.
C
You
ver
members
of
council
of
my
authority,
I've
invited
Reverend,
dr.
Eric
Childers
to
lead
us
in
prayer
tonight,
he's
a
senior
pastor
at
st.
Matthews,
Lutheran
Church
he's
been
here
since
August
2016.
He
lives
in
my
district
with
his
family,
he's
been
around
to
other
parishes
and
North
Carolina
and
Virginia.
Wherever
would
you
please
lead
us.
D
In
the
name
of
the
Father
and
of
the
son
of
the
Holy
Spirit
I'm,
and
then
let
us
pray
Almighty
God
we
lift
before
you
all
who
govern
this
holy
city
of
Charleston.
May.
Those
who
hold
power
understand
that
it
is
a
trust
from
you
to
be
used
not
for
personal
glory
or
profit,
but
for
the
service
of
the
people
drive
from
us
cynicism,
selfishness
and
corruption,
grant
in
your
mercy
just
and
honest
government
and
give
us
grace
to
live
together
in
unity
and
peace.
Lord
God,
you
call
your
people
to
honor
those
in
authority.
D
Help
us
elect
trustworthy
leaders,
participate
in
wise
decisions
for
our
common
life
together
and
serve
our
neighbors
in
local
communities,
bless
the
leaders
of
our
land
that
we
may
be
at
peace
among
ourselves
and
a
blessing
to
other
nations
of
the
earth.
It
is
in
your
holy
and
precious
name
that
we
pray,
amen,
amen,.
B
Welcome
so
first
y'all
I'd
like
to
recognize
members
of
the
mayor's
Youth
Commission,
who
are
with
us
this
evening,
high
school
students
from
around
Charleston
County,
who
worked
with
me,
the
mayor
and
with
city
staff,
to
identify
issues
that
impact
our
community
and
then
they
worked
so
hard.
They
put
on
an
annual
summit
last
couple
of
years,
it's
been
at
the
Citadel
and
they
invite
all
the
public
and
and
some
private
high
schools
from
around
Charleston
County
and
hundreds
of
kids
come,
and
we
have
a
really
meaningful
conversation
and
and
seminars.
B
If
you
will
on
various
topics
that
they
choose,
that
they
choose
that
are
important
to
youth
in
our
community.
They
also
serve
as
volunteers,
they're,
amazing
group
of
young
men
and
women.
They
are,
in
fact
the
future
City
Councilman
and
mayors
of
and
council
women
and
leaders
of
this
community
and
years
to
come
so
I
have
a
few
certificates
that
I'd
like
to
share
I.
Think
you
have
them.
Don't
you.
F
B
B
B
A
B
A
B
So
part
of
their
punishment
and
no
involvement
was
to
ask
him
to
come
and
witness
the
City
Council
meeting,
and
so
thank
you
all
for
coming
and
get
a
first-hand
view
of
what
we
do
here.
Did
you
catch
some
of
our
Ways
and
Means
Committee
or
y'all?
Just
came
up
so
stick
around
for
a
little
bit.
You
would
anybody
you
like
to
speak
for
the
group
and
and
makes
a
few
comments.
You're
welcome
to.
G
H
H
What
we
are
is
we're
basically
a
high
school
group
of
students
around
the
low
country
that
want
to
represent
the
other
wishes
of
the
other
high
school
students.
We
have
a
summit
at
the
end
of
the
year
and
we
also
like
to
get
involved
in
different
activities
throughout
the
city
and
involve
ourselves
with
other
committees
throughout
the
city
to
try
to
maximize
the
voice
of
the
high
school
students
of
Charleston.
B
I
Good
evening
my
name
is
Kevin
hi
I'm,
the
owner
of
walkaway
stays.
We
specialize
in
short
term
and
long
term.
Furnished
rentals
in
Charleston
I've
been
in
business
for
more
than
12
years,
when
I
started,
Airbnb
didn't
even
exist.
I
was
also
the
fourth
listing
ever
on
VRBO
for
the
city.
Charleston
I've
told
this
council
before
about
my
great
reservation.
Regarding
the
recently
passed
ordinance,
it
was
rushed
through
without
any
thought.
The
reason
I
say
any
thought
is
because
the
short
term
task
force
had
no
industry
experts
and
was
not
unanimous
in
their
recommendations.
I
As
a
matter
of
fact,
I've
been
told
that
the
great
there
was
great
dissension
between
many
of
the
people
on
the
task
force
and
some
of
them
even
stopped
going.
The
reason
I'm
here
tonight
is
it's
apparent
that
even
you
have
realized
what
a
bad
ordinance
you
passed
just
a
few
months
ago.
It's
not
fair,
it's
unenforceable
and
it
will
ruin
the
fabric
of
the
city.
It's
astonishing
to
me
that
the
Preservation
Society
is
in
favor
of
this
ordinance.
I
If
they
truly
understood
the
long-term
effects
of
what
it
means,
I'm
sure
they
would
change
their
mind.
The
cannon
borough
le
purr
ordinance
is
a
great
example
of
community,
come
together,
working
with
City,
Council
and
passing
to
sustainable,
enforceable
ordinances,
and
it
would
work
everywhere
in
Charleston.
It
has
been
a
great
showcase
and
highly
successful.
The
recommended
changes
that
I've
now
seen
almost
mimic.
What
the
short
term
over
Lavery
is
restricting
whole-house
short
term
rentals
to
commercially
zoned
properties
makes
all
the
sense
those
areas
are
designed
for
exactly
this.
I
If
a
homeowner
wants
to
do
it
residents,
there
is
already
ordinance
in
place
with
the
bed-and-breakfast
ordinance
also
changed
in
the
cannon
borough
le
borough
area,
I'm
100%
in
favor
of
regulating
this
very
important
industry
to
Charleston,
but
it
has
to
make
sense,
trying
to
micromanage
a
property
owner,
isn't
the
way
to
do
it.
I
would
encourage
you
to
abolish
the
ordinance
and
to
extend
this
successful
cannon
barrel
overlay.
Unfortunately,
given
the
lack
of
time
with
you,
I
can
knock
over
the
idiotic
existing
rules
but
I'm
available
to
any
of
you
at
any
time.
J
76
Dee,
Harris
I've
been
there
since
2011
and
last
year.
They
warned
me
about
feeding
the
cats
so
and
there's
about
to
put
me
out.
So
they
gave
me
an
extension,
so
I
will
try
to
save
some
money,
so
I
could
move
on
back
to
North,
Carolina,
so
low
and
because
I
came
down
here
to
get
on
my
feet
and
a
lot
of
deaths
been
in
the
family.
J
You
know
10
some
deaths
in
heaven,
some
mom
family
members
and
I
like
to
say
that
they
did
evict
me
I
had
a
notice
in
my
door,
all
those
xxx
and
I
supported
it
on
the
27.
To
give
me
ten
more
days
and
I'm
66
years
old
and
I
have
healthy
issues
and
I
snap
out
at
the
pot
last
night,
I
was
snoozing
I
had
my
cell
phone
charging
it
up.
If
somebody
started
taking
housing.
Is
the
cause
of
this
and
pushing
me
out
at
my
age
for
feeding
the
cat?
I?
J
Have
a
love
enough
to
feed
the
cats
they're,
not
they're,
abusing
even
there's
a
population
of
the
cats
in
our
community,
which
was
there
when
I
moved
there,
but
I
had
enough
know
the
fetal
stress
on
my
table
and
also
our
dying
food,
some
time
and
the
kids
to
follow
me.
All
the
weights
must
stop.
Yes.
Yesterday,
the
other
night
they
followed
me
I
say
you
can't
go.
You
can't
go
up.
J
He
back,
you
know
that's
on
some
food,
the
other
night
make
sure
the
ate,
and
you
know
what
Jesus
I'm
a
god-fearing
woman
I
wish
this
out.
The
people
in
the
neighborhood
I
go
treasure
and
put
stuff
in
my
suitcase
on
the
sidewalk
for
the
less
fortunate
for
the
less
fortunate
and
therefore
poor
people
down
in.
J
L
Scroll
event
is
raging
and
well
good
to
see
you
thereby
is
not
wise.
The
Holy
Quran
sent
chapter
two
verse
nine
to
nineteen
big
deal,
wine
and
Emma
Fenton
them
is
great
sin
and
some
benefit
for
man,
but
the
sin
is
greater
than
the
benefit
Charlson.
We
must
work
to
remove
this
demon
from
ourselves
join
matter.
We
have
the
solution
to
do
it,
Charleston
why
we
teach
our
babies
to
learn
the
ABC
in
school
then
plays
ABC
on
the
door
of
a
whiskey,
store
and
big
red
dots
then
tell
us
not
to
drink
and
drive.
M
Good
evening
Leah
Farrell
with
the
Preservation
Society
of
Charleston.
Well,
we
understand
it's
deferred.
We
want
to
address
the
proposed
amendments
to
the
short
term
rental
ordinance.
We
were
stunned
to
see
this
premature
proposal
only
a
few
months
after
enforcement
began
and
with
every
indication
from
city
staff
that
it's
on
its
way
to
successful
implementation.
M
Similarly,
we
anticipated
a
productive
dialogue
regarding
the
possible
changes
to
the
Planning
Commission
override.
Again,
we
were
surprised
to
see
it
on
the
agenda
before
next
week's
meeting
was
even
at
you
know,
opportunity
to
take
place,
although
now
deferred
these
two
items
point
to
a
common
theme.
It
feels
like
it's
an
apparent
disregard
to
the
public
process.
Any
changes
to
the
STR
ordinance
must
be
vetted
through
the
task
force,
with
ample
opportunity
for
public
engagement
and
similarly,
the
Planning
Commission's
Authority
should
not
be
eroded
with
the
stroke
of
and
the
Preservation
Society
has
continued.
M
N
Good
evening
folks
been
a
fun
day
just
a
few
thoughts.
You
know,
there's
a
saying
that
says
those
that
can't
do
teach
also
my
part,
is
those
that
can't
teach
work
for
the
government
and
then
you
get
into
you
know
good
times
like
this,
where
I
call
it
ascension
by
attrition
the
good
people
leave
and
I'm
just
wondering.
What's
going
on
in
the
city,
I
have
run
into
more
problems
lately
and
I
could
believe.
N
When
we
had
the
evacuation
couple,
city
officers
were
supposed
to
the
crowd.
Once
the
officer
was
down
at
Davidson
Road.
Where
did
17
is,
and
the
traffic
light
was
backing
up
traffic
all
the
way
to
526
the
county
had
to
come
out
and
start
directing
traffic
same
thing
of
fatal
accident.
Last
Saturday
I
think
117.
That
was
the
same
written
burger.
The
toyota
dealership
caused
17
to
be
shut
down,
and
what
do
they
do?
They
push
all
the
traffic
over
to
Glenn
McConnell
now
I'm
tell
you.
N
Nobody
thinks
what
happens
beyond
moving
traffic,
the
lines
on
the
lights
on
17
another
morning
at
7:15
or
not
synchronized.
They
were
out
of
whack
the
light
at
these
ferry
and
Glenn
McConnell
is
entirely
too
long
for
the
direct
these
ferry
part
in
the
afternoon
to
get
traffic
off
Glenn
McConnell,
because
they
let
five
cars
go
so
that
800
can
sit.
Thank
you.
Let's
get
some
decent
people
in
here.
Thank.
B
B
So
poignant,
Lee
over
the
last
40
years
after
their
own
experiences
in
the
50s,
with
devastating
floods
and
and
with
flooding
in
the
Delta
region
of
the
Rhine
River
over
the
last
20
years.
But
their
history
goes
goes
way
back
and
I
found
this
so
interesting.
You
know
how
we
sometimes
show
that
old
map
of
Charleston
and
how
it's
so
different
200
years
ago,
particularly
the
peninsula,
because
we
filled
in
and
had
all
that
kind
of
activity
going
on
gaining
land,
even
the
whole
low-battery
was
was
all
filled
in
area
right.
B
B
So
I
mean
we
are
the
low
country,
but
at
least
for
the
most
part,
where
we're
slightly
above
sea
level,
they're
third
of
their
whole
country's
below
sea
level,
and
this
was
so
fascinating
that
they
really
rolled
out
not
just
I
mean
the
hospitality
in
terms
of
meeting
with
government
officials
and
and
everybody
involved
with
managing
water.
Over
there
we
visited
a
water
board,
they
call
them
water
boards
and
it's
a
it's
a
separate,
distinct
division
of
government.
B
It
has
its
own
taxing
authority,
so
they
tax
and
their
sole
purpose
is
managing
water
and
so,
rather
than
dealing
following
County
or
some
political
lines
that
water
boards
follow
the
drainage
basins
and
which
makes
sense
right
so
they're
21
in
the
country
and
they
have
elected
officials.
So
this
was
fascinated
me.
They
started
doing
the
water
board's
by
elected
representatives
in
the
year
1222.
B
So
almost
eight
hundred
years
they've
been
using
a
democratic
process
to
manage
water
in
the
Netherlands
and,
if
you
think
about
it,
it's
likely
the
oldest
democratic
institution
continually
operating
on
the
planet
hurt
his
the
water
boards
of
the
Netherlands
that
deal
with
managing
water.
I
just
found
that
fascinating,
but
will
maybe
put
together
a
presentation
because
we've
collected
all
our
pictures
and
stories
mark
well,
Burt
did
a
terrific
job
putting
this
together
and-
and
it
was
just
a
very
beneficial
trip.
Now.
B
I
did
peel
away
the
last
a
couple
of
days
this
past
weekend
and
went
back
to
our
it's,
not
official,
but
I
will
bring
to
Council
at
a
future
date.
Some
official
agreement
to
make
Flay
our
friends
a
twin
or
sister
city
kind
of
arrangement
with
them,
because
we
truly
now
have
a
long-standing
and
in
great
relationship.
So
they
invited
me
in
a
little
contingent
from
Charleston
once
again
to
honor
us
at
this
fair
that
they
had
nearby
the
town
of
Flair
in
Normandy.
B
But
it's
a
regional,
fair
and
and
it's
almost
a
hundred
thousand
people
attend
this
thing.
And
so
here,
for
example,
is
this
supplement
newspaper
they
had
and
it's
it's
all
about
Charleston.
We
were
the
honoree
at
this
huge,
fair
in
Normandy
this
past
weekend
and
there's
just
page
after
page
of
stories.
The
first
one
is
about
the
history
of
how
Charleston
helped
Flair
in
1948
after
World
War
two
for
those
that
don't
remember
or
know
the
central
square
in
the
town
of
Flair
has
named
the
plots
to
Charleston
after
our
city
for
helping
them.
B
Here's
this
picture
of
Mayor
Marcin,
who
went
over
there
in
1948
to
deliver
the
supplies
and
so
on,
and
they
wanted
to
get
a
taste
of
Charleston
cuisine
and
Charleston
music
and
so
I
I've
selected
a
few
folks
to
go
with
which
meet
me
over
there.
One
was
Rodney
Scott
who
had
received
James
Beard
Award.
B
You
know
for
his
barbecue
and
we
stayed
up
all
night
the
night
before
the
fair
and
cooked
hog
on
a
pit
that
he
made
and
we
were
serving
a
full
court
barbecue
with
with
williamsburg
county
style,
vinegar
sauce
too
much
in
Norman's,
and
it
was
quite
fitting
to
be
old.
I
gotta
tell
you,
it
was
a
lot
of
fun
and
then
we
were
playing
a
little
jazz
music
for
him
as
well.
B
So
they
really
got
a
a
sample
of
Charleston,
but
their
hospitality
and
friendship
to
us
is
incredible
and
one
last
thing:
I'll
share
I'm
at
the
fair
and
that's
loudspeakers
going
out
about
our
pavilion.
There
are
ten
doll,
and
this
eighty
year
old
gentleman
found
me
speaking
in
French
and
I
had
an
interpreter.
My
French
is
hidden
bad
I'm,
all,
but
not
great.
B
He
he
sought
me
out,
because
when
he
was
eight
years
old,
he
lived
in
flair
and,
in
fact
received
supplies
from
the
city
of
Charleston,
and
he
came
to
thank
me
and
it
was
really
touching
and
that's
the
kind
of
special
relationship
we
have
with
this
kind
of
small
town
in
France.
It's
R,
it's
very
nice,
so
I
want
to
share
that
with
you.
Okay,
yes,
sir.
G
F
We're
here
again
about
the
arm,
we
work
at
the
city
market.
We
hear
again
about
the
heat
situation.
We
got
an
update
from
the
manager
saying
that
they
were
going
to
put
some
gas
lines
in
the
market
and
we
were
just
a
big
concern
about
the
gas
lines.
To
tell
you
the
truth,
because
we
as
vendors
feel
as
though
the
little
mr.
heaters
that
we
were
talking
about
at
their
last
meeting,
we
came
to
would
have
been,
would
be
safer
for
us
than
the
gas
lines.
F
We
don't
know
if
you
mr.mayor
know
about
the
gas
line
situation
and
we
just
think
that
the
gas
lines
would
be
very
dangerous
for
the
vendors
down
there.
So
we
just
can't
take
just
the
situation,
see
if
there's
any
other
route
that
we
can
take
to
use
some
type
of
other
heating
for
the
market.
Mm-Hmm.
A
B
Tree
well,
I'd
be
happy
to
set
up
a
meeting
with
you
and
our
folks
that
are
have
this
plan.
I
J
synchron's
burn
I,
don't
know
Jason's
here,
but
if
you'd
get
with
him
and
we
will
set
up
a
meeting
with
you
tomorrow,
the
next
day
the
you
know,
the
the
project
is
already
kind
of
in
place
as
you
as
you
know,
and
you
know
for
various
reasons
gas
was
selected
to
be
you
know.
The
preferable
way
is
certainly
on
a
long-term
basis.
B
It's
less
expensive
gases
and
electric
heat,
but
you
can
do
gas
or
electric
one
or
the
other,
and
and
after
some
evaluation
we
we
chose
to
stick
with
the
gas.
I
mean
folks
been
using
gas
and
in
Charleston
a
long
time
for
for
Heat.
It's
I
like
to
have
a
gas
heater
for
my
house.
I'll
tell
you
that,
but
why
don't
y'all
get
together
with
Jason
mourn?
Go
go
over
that?
Yes,.
B
All
right
anybody
else
well
so
next
under
petitions
and
communications,
is
the
matter
of
the
appointment
of
Jerome
Heyward
to
the
Charleston
County,
a
Aviation
Authority.
We
have
a
motion
to
approve
in
a
second
I
would
like
to
entertain
an
amendment
to
the
motion
if
I
may
already,
just
because,
even
though
there's
an
agreement
in
place
for
for
mr.
B
Hayward
to
be
removed
from
from
litigation,
the
judge
has
not
signed
the
order.
Even
though
the
city
of
Charleston
and
North
Charleston
has
agreed
to
the
wording
and
and
all
like
that,
and
so,
if
it's
okay
with
counsel
I,
would
like
your
permission
to
give
me
the
approval
to
send
the
appointment
on
in
suggest,
subject
to
our
receipt
of
the
order
from
the
judge.
Is
that
acceptable?
C
O
B
O
Sorry,
yes,
Vanessa's
gonna
yell
at
me
following
earlier
years
of
us
following
our
last
meeting,
the
city
filed
an
order,
a
proposed
order
of
dismissal
with
the
court,
with
the
consent
of
both
mr.
Hayward
and
the
North
Charleston
attorneys,
and
in
that
proposed
order
of
dismissal,
it
was
agreed
that
he
would
abandon
all
of
his
claims
against
the
city
that
he
would
be
dismissed
with
prejudice
and
also
to
the
extent
that
he
had
any
rights
that
he
was
not
assigning
those
to
the
city
of
North
Charleston.
O
As
I
said
that
was
agreed
to
by
both
mr.
Hayward
and
the
North
Charleston
attorneys.
The
judge
has
not
yet
signed
the
order.
We
don't
there's
an
upcoming
status
hearing
it
in
front
of
the
court
on
October
24th.
That
would
be
something
that
we
would
expect
would
be
taken
up
at
that
hearing,
and
we
fully
anticipate
that
the
order
will
be
signed
at
that
time,
but
I
think
the
mayor's
requesting
that
the
approval
be
contingent
upon
the
judge
signing
that
order
of
dismissal
with
prejudice
and.
C
B
B
Yeah
all
right,
so
we
have
a
motion
to
improve
contingent
on
the
receipt
of
the
order.
Any
other
discussion,
all
in
favor,
please
say
aye
any
opposed
the
eyes
have
it.
Next
we
have
a
short
presentation
regarding
the
forest,
acres,
drainage
improvement,
project,
miss
cabinets
and
I.
Think
we
have
a
little
video
of
the
show.
You
want
to
get
ready
for
that
and
Steve
buckets
with
us
he's
our
project
manager
for
this
award-winning
project
and.
P
B
R
S
Well,
the
high
priority
flooding
issues
that
we
had
in
the
city:
Charleston
West
Ashlee's,
the
the
Forest
Acres
neighborhood
over
the
years.
There
have
been
repetitive
losses
to
the
properties
and
the
flooding
has
significantly
hindered
pedestrian
and
vehicular
traffic
in
2011,
the
city
of
Charleston,
hired
Thomas
and
Hutton.
S
To
perform
a
study
of
the
problem
which
developed
into
the
forest
acres,
drainage,
improvement,
project
project
elements
include
removal
of
existing,
outdated,
outmoded
and
undersized
form
water
pump
station,
the
installation
of
dual
8
foot
by
10
foot
and
5
foot
by
8
foot
box,
culverts,
installation
of
new,
open
channel
and
maintenance
shells,
the
proper
equipment
access
improvements
to
existing
ditches,
installation
of
trash
racks
near
the
outfall
to
clear
out
floatable
solids
and
improvements
to
the
West
nationally
bike
way
from
the
playground.
Road
to
st.
Andrews
Boulevard
project
was
completed
in
the
fall
of
2017.
P
Just
want
to
add
steve
has
been
the
project
manager
on
this
project
and
it
takes
a
lot
of
interaction
with
the
public
to
make
one
of
these
projects
go
smoothly
and
to
try
to
keep
you
all
from
getting
as
many
calls
as
we
can.
Steve
has
also
working
on
the
spring
fishburne
project
anyway
in
the
Market
Street
project.
So
he's
doing
a
great
job
for
us
and
just
want
to
give
him
a.
P
Good
project
requires
a
good
design
engineer
and
Thomas
and
Hutton
really
performed
outstandingly
on
this
project.
We
went
from
having
a
pump
station
to
a
system
now
that
it's
completely
passive
and
not
relying
on
power
and
one
of
the
things
we
learn
from
the
Dutch
is
that
all
projects
need
to
have
dual
purpose
right
and
they
have
to
have
a
be
resilient
infrastructure.
P
What
you
saw
here
was
a
lot
of
what
we
saw
open
channels
open
boxes
so
that
the
water
can
flow
freely
so
that
we
can
see
what's
going
on
there
and
then
a
bike
path
across
the
top
and
landscaping
to
make
it
look
nice
and
make
people
want
to
be
there.
So
some
of
those
elements
that
we've
learned
practice
right
here
in
Charleston
already
and
I
just
want
to.
Thank
you
all
for
supporting
us
and
for
helping
to
make
that
happen,
and
you
too,
mayor
check
on
bird.
B
T
You,
mr.
mayor,
so
this
is
just
a
brief
update
to
all
of
you
about
the
recent
changes
that
have
been
made
at
the
board
of
architectural
review.
I'm
gonna
talk
about
what
we
did,
why
we
did
it
and
then
what's
not
working
and
what
is
working
ahead
of
any
changes
that
we
may
bring
to
you
for
for
the
ordinance
improvement.
T
So,
first
of
all,
as
some
of
you
probably
remember
a
few
years
back,
we
took
a
number
of
steps
to
begin
studying
the
board
of
architectural
review
and
the
actions
that
you
all
took
were,
first
of
all,
to
split
the
var
into
two
boards.
We
also
overhauled
the
whole
height
system,
downtown
and
change
from
height
and
feet
height
by
stories.
T
We
created
guidelines
for
the
VAR
which
they'd
never
had
before,
and
we
updated
the
overall
ordinance
itself
and
the
reason
that
we
did
that
was,
first
and
foremost,
to
make
sure
that
we
were
getting
better
buildings
in
the
city
of
Charleston.
We
were
looking
at
the
boxy
new
big
buildings
that
were
coming
downtown.
We
were
not
in
keeping
with
the
character
of
downtown
Charleston,
so
we
wanted
to
give
the
board
new
tools
to
make
the
buildings
more
in
keeping
with
our
city.
T
The
other
thing
that
we
we
knew
that
we
needed
to
do
with
some
streamline
the
process
for
the
applicant
to
make
it
more
predictable
and
that's
why
we
created
guidelines
for
the
VAR.
Now
the
whole
projects
are
con,
a
kind
of
a
new
urgency
when
we
begin
the
disputes
that
we
had
about
the
Sargeant
Jasper
ruling,
which
threatened
the
very
existence
of
the
board
itself,
and
we
had
to
modify
the
ordinances
to
protect
the
board
and
make
sure
that
their
powers
would
be
solidified
for
future
generations
to
protect
downtown
now.
T
So
the
staff
have
been
meeting
regularly
and
tracking
the
progress
after
the
six
month
period
started,
and
since
we
adopted
this
a
little
over
a
year
ago,
the
VA
are
large
when
we
split
it
into
two
has
reviewed
162
buildings
and
the
VA
are
small,
has
reviewed
355,
and
these
are
the
things
that
we've
observed
that
need
more
work,
and
this
is
what
we're
gonna
come
back
to
you
about,
and
this
is
only
gonna.
Be
very
brief.
Just
got
a
few
more
quick
things,
the
first
these
are
coming
technical.
This
is
what
needs
work.
T
The
first
is
the
issue
of
the
height
to
width,
ratio
of
houses
that
or
the
rocket
house
provision
we
created
something
in
the
new
ordinance
updates,
its
prevent
houses
for
being
very
tall
and
vertical.
You
know
an
out
of
character,
we're
seeing
these
houses
that
are
just
you
know,
stacked
up,
stacked,
up,
stacked
up
and
and
sort
of
wedged
into
the
neighborhood,
and
the
challenge
here
is
interpreting
this.
This
component
of
the
ordinance.
T
Do
you
measure
the
height
from
the
curb
or
from
the
ground
or
from
the
first
finish
floor,
and
then
on
the
top
of
the
building?
Where
do
you
stop
the
measurement
so
the
matter
of
interpreting
that
needs
clarification?
The
second
thing
is:
what's
called
the
subordination
clause
and
this
states
that
additions
to
new
buildings
have
to
be
subordinate
to
the
main
building.
That's
on
the
property-
and
this
is
something
that's
been
a
matter
of
continued
difficulty
for
us
to
interpret
and
implement
so
we're
gonna
get
more
clarity
on
the
subordination
Clause.
T
The
third
thing
is
the
definition
of
architectural
merit.
We
gave
the
board
the
ability
to
award
height
for
the
first
time
now.
They
also
have
the
ability
to
remove
height,
but
we've
limited
that
so
we
gave
the
board
the
ability
to
go
down
a
little
bit
and
up
a
little
bit
in
the
case
of
architectural
merit,
but
the
problem
is
that
it's
very
difficult
to
decide
what
is
architectural
a
meritorious.
So
we
need
to
bring
additional
criteria
to
define
what
architectural
merit
means
and
the
the
fourth
thing
is
that
there
are
throughout.
T
This
is
a
big
ordinance
update,
big
text
update
and
there
are
a
number
of
clerical
errors
throughout
the
ordinance,
spelling
errors,
numerical
errors
and
also
language
that
just
awkwardly
awkwardly
worded
and
that
as
we've
worked
or
that
we
realize
that
needs
clarification.
Okay,
they're
clerical
errors,
so
those
are
the
four
primary
things
that
we
know
need,
updates
and
improvements,
and
we're
going
to
bring
to
you
as
soon
as
we
get
them
written
now.
These
are
the
things
that
are
working
really
well.
T
The
first
thing
is
that
you
know
the
the
VAR.
The
workload
is
huge
and
if
we
had
not
done
this,
if
we
had
not
split
the
board
into
two,
we
would
not
be
able
to
operate
today.
It
would
not
have
been
possible.
The
BA
our
meetings
would
have
gone
on
into
the
wee
hours
every
single
night.
The
whole
system
would
have
to
halt.
We
couldn't
be
doing
this
with
the
workload
we
have
if
we
had
not
split
the
boards,
so
that
was
in
retrospect.
T
The
best
thing
we
possibly
could
have
done,
I,
don't
think
we
could
have
kept
up
with
the
workload
if
we
hadn't
done
that,
and
we
also
added
an
additional
staff
member
to
help
the
what
a
ground
to
a
halt.
Otherwise,
the
other
thing
is
that
we
feel
that
we
really
have
protected
the
board
from
legal
challenge,
and
that
has
been
a
major
stuff.
That's
allowed
everyone
to
proceed
with
confidence,
so
that
has
just
been
incredibly
beneficial.
T
We
capped
the
agenda,
the
number
of
agenda
items
for
each
meeting
and
we
are
at
the
max
at
almost
every
meeting
by
the
way,
but
we
have
a
provision
that
moves,
affordable,
housing
to
the
front,
any
project
with
affordable
housing
does
that
and
that
is
working
that
is
successful
and
we're
gonna
continue
to
look
at
other
ways
to
streamline
affordable
housing,
as
you
know,
but
that
amendment
has
really
worked
for
us
now.
Last
thing:
I'll
wrap
up
with
us.
These
are
our
next
stops.
The
first
thing
is
that
we're
gonna
meet
with
our
partners.
T
In
the
preservation
community,
as
well
as
our
legal
staff,
to
review
these
components
and
make
sure
that
we
are
still
working
with
our
partners
to
ensure
quality,
we're
gonna
bring
those
amendments
to
you
and
our
goal
is
to
broaden
you
with
all
that
information
ahead
of
time
before
you
get
to
a
vote.
This
is
a
you
know:
it's
BA
our
stuff,
so
it's
kind
of
inherently
complex.
T
We
want
to
get
all
of
you
that
information
well
ahead
of
time
and
be
available
to
answer
any
questions
that
you
may
have
about
that,
and
the
last
thing
is
that
this
won't
be
the
last
time
that
we
do
this.
We
know
that
we've
got
to
continually
update
the
ba
ordinance
and
monitor
it
to
improve
it.
So
this
won't
be
the
last
time
we
update
it.
T
We're
gonna
continually
do
this
until
we
feel
like
we
have
it
dialed
in
and
its
really
working
perfectly,
but
with
that
said,
you
know,
I
think
that
this
has
been
very
successful
and
that
we
do
have
technical
things
that
have
to
be
updated,
but
it
overall
has
been
a
major
improvement.
So
with
that
said,
I
think
that
we're
going
to
be
not
the
next
meeting,
but
the
meeting
after
that
bringing
you
these
ordinance
amendment,
that's
our
goal.
Any.
T
So
applications
that
we
don't
the
var
doesn't
know
word
permanence,
that
some
of
the
building
aspects,
the
department,
but
the
board
does
review
new
applications
and
that's
just
simply
a
function
of
the
housing
market
and
the
construction
market,
which
generally
is
at
an
all-time
peak.
So
the
more
the
more
people
are
building
the
more
applications
are
in
front
of
the
board.
U
Just
have
a
background,
curiosity
question:
I
guess:
I
think
it
was
well
my
husband
and
I
were
we
were
transitioning
our
residency
here
that
you
had
Andres
Duany
come
to
the
city
and
from
what
I
remember
reading
during
that
time,
because
I've
been
familiar
with
that
esteemed
gentleman,
a
long
time
in
my
career
in
Virginia,
but
I
know
that
it
was.
It
was
reported
that
he
had
made
that
suggestion
about
splitting
the
two
boards
and
you
know
giving
you
the
confidence
that
that
was
going
to
be
a
vast
improvement.
U
T
It's
a
good
question.
This
whole
the
whole
process
was
an
outgrowth
of
our
work
with
them.
We
don't
have
budgeted
money,
then
this
calendar
year
to
work
with
them,
but
it
is
something
that
we
would
like
to
do
in
the
future
and
we
do
think
that
their
work
was
tremendously
guided
the
whole
process
and
we
would
like
to
circle
back
around
with
him,
but
we
don't
have
budgeted
money
for
this
calendar
year
to
do
that.
Right.
P
U
A
U
T
So
we're
looking
for
a
time,
maybe
around
one
of
our
already
scheduled
workshop
sessions
when
council
does
its
workshops
to
bring
planning
commission
in
the
other
thing
that
I'm
doing
is
engaging
legal
staff
just
to
make
sure
there
are
state
law
parameters
around
how
you
all
interact
with
the
Planning
Commission
to
make
sure
we
don't
run
afoul
of
any
rules,
but
yet
we're
going
to
getting
that
done
as
soon
as
possible
in
accordance
with
PCs
schedule.
So
it's
gonna
happen.
B
B
P
I
think,
just
a
couple
weeks
ago,
we
just
reported
that
jmt
is
working
on
the
project.
They
owe
a
support
or
a
report
within
the
next
couple
of
weeks,
but
we
have
not
received
that
report
yet
so
as
soon
as
I
get
some
something
more
definitive
from
jmt
about
their
recommendations,
and
we
can
go
ahead
and
share
it
with
you.
P
B
We
need
the
three
of
us
need
to
circle
up
on
that.
Yes,
sir,
okay,
all
right
any
other
questions
for
Lauren,
while
we
got
her
hearing,
none
back
to
our
committee
report
on
ways
and
means
they've
got
a
motion
to
adopt
on
the
second
day
discussion
all
in
favor,
please
say:
aye
any
opposed
the
eyes
have
it
next
or
our
bills.
Up
for
second
reading.
A
B
A
B
U
Mayor
I
think
I
would
like
to
make
a
just
a
follow-up
comment
to
that
that
it
is
deferred
now.
But
since
we
just
heard
that
we
probably
won't
have
a
meaningful
discussion
with
the
Planning
Commission,
you
know
a
month,
maybe
two
months,
I
think
that
we
should
agree
not
that
we
can
set
a
timeline,
but
that
this
is
such
an
important
amendment
that
we,
our
ordinance
change,
that
we
would
not
take
it
up
until
we've
had
that
meeting
with
the
Planning
Commission,
so
I'm.
Just
putting
that
on
my
my
comments,
you.
B
E
On
this
ordinance,
I
would
like
to
separate
the
King
Street
part
of
it,
thanks
Ricardo
from
the
rest
of
it
on
this
part.
Here,
that's
the
only
one
I
was
involved
in
on
the
King
Street
thought.
So
I
spoke
to
the
attorneys.
He
said.
We
can
separate
that
with
a
comment
for
two
different
on
this
one
to
the
King
Street
expanded
along
Kings
to
King
Street
corridor,
and
then
you
have
the
the
Ottoman,
as
requested
by
councilmember,
are
wearing.
E
I
want
to
make
another
statement.
I
know
a
lot
of
people
are
jumping
on
these
wondering
why
one
didn't
ride
one.
Then
why
and
I
mentioned
this-
that
this
was
this
came
before
when
he
first
started
with
the
short-term
rental
and
I
was
trying
to
get
that
in
place
on
the
King
Street
cause
of
the
crisis.
It
was
all
in
a
it
wasn't
going
into
a
community
was
inspecting.
The
community
was
infection
in
the
so
far
as
the
housing
stock
nice.
It
was
all
all
of
them.
E
This
one
was
on
the
phone
King
Street
extension
King
Street.
So
this
is
why
I
went
back
to
it
and
I
thought
about
it,
and
I
went
and
drove
down.
Casey
I
was
coming
how
many
apartments
over
stores
and
restaurants
I
said
nobody
would
live
there
with
the
family,
so
I
decide.
That's
why
I
came
back
and
did
that
it
meant.
E
You
know
the
amendments
to
that
to
modify
to
include
that
into
the
short
term
real
along
a
street
only
not
in
the
communities
only
along
King
Street
if
they
meet
the
parking
requirement
and
that's
what
I
stipulated
this
was
whole
should
have
been
a
nip
when
we're
first
approved
the
short
term
rental,
but
they
say
well,
let's
pull
up
on
everything
and
that's
we
didn't
took
that
year.
They
cooled
it
and
when
we
approved
they
start
under
in
the
law.
Suppose
what?
If
we
paint
when
you
came
first,
we
ran
about
so
then.
E
This
is
why
I
came
back
and
I
spoke
to
him.
So
then
see
I
said
well.
If
we
have
modified,
I
won't
put
that
in
there.
So
that's
why
it's
in
there,
but
I,
don't
want
people
to
get
jump,
be
jumping
and
say
old,
constant
misses
doing
this.
In
that
know,
this
was
should
have
been
there
from
the
beginning.
This
is
not
taken
away
housing
stock
because
I
wouldn't
want
to
live
on
top
of
our
restaurant
with
my
family.
This
is
not
going
in
the
community.
This
is
only
in
a
commercial
area.
E
This
is
strictly
commercial
and
that's
why
the
a
bizarre
when
I
came
up
and
do
it
and
some
people
was
calling
me
and
say:
oh
somebody
got
to
me:
I
must
be
talking
to
someone
I
like
I'm
in
someone's
pocket.
That's.
Not
me
forget
about
that.
If
you
come
to
me,
this
is
something
that
I
did
and
I
drove
that
see.
I
live
on
King
Street,
so
I
know
about
King
Street
and,
like
I,
tell
people
I
grew
up
here
on
King
Street.
E
You
know
back
in
the
50s
when
a
lot
of
people
here
was
not
even
here
so
either
can
tell
me
about
how
the
city
of
Charleston
was.
It
changes
a
lot
yes,
but
this
is
only
because
something
I
notice
and
I
think
this
should
be
done.
This
happy
this
is
the
only
type
property
would
be
under
6%.
So
far,
there's
concern
on
long
there,
Kings
before
ago,
Alton.
K
You,
mr.
mayor,
just
to
the
extent
that
this
is
gonna
be
segregated,
separated,
I,
don't
know
if
councilmember
Mitchell
has
in
mind
actually
including
a
map
along
with
what
your
portion
is,
but
I
know
we
generally
don't
get
these
ordinances
till
the
Wednesday
before
Tuesday
meeting
but
I
know.
Mr.
McQueen
he's
been
working
this
sooner.
You
can
get
this
to
us
the
better,
because
there
is
a
lot
of
talk
about
this
for
sure
we
all
read.
K
Q
Q
Maybe
that's
what
this
understanding
is,
but
most
of
these
items
that
are
here
just
like
your
piece
of
property,
that
you're
referring
to
council
are
visible,
it's
kind
of
a
one
out
and
there's
several
of
these
things
that
are
kind
of
one
offs,
that
when
you
look
at
the
ordinance
and
look
at
all
the
ramifications,
it's
it
it's
really
not
changed.
My
understanding
is
is
really
not
supposed
to
change
the
ordinance
that
much,
but
every
time
you
pass
an
ordinance,
a
moratorium
or
anything
like
that.
Q
And
so
that
was
my
understanding
of
what
this
was
trying
to
do
and
not
really
change
the
ordinance,
but
take
some
of
those
things
out
and
let
them
go
ahead
and
try
to
to
to
be
an
operation.
So
when
this
9
month
period
ends
that
we
have
had
a
way
of
of
testing
some
of
what
we're
doing,
because,
once
that
nine
months
has
gone-
and
we
put
this
infirm
ordinance,
I
think
we're
I
think
we're
going
to
really
be
not
stuck
with
it.
Q
But
that's
what
we're
gonna
have
to
live
with
and
and
just
for
example,
I
know
that
the
task
force
struggled
with
this
50
years
is
50.
You
know
right
is
42
minutes
not
enough.
60
too
many,
and
so
then
they
came
up
with
this
whole
thing
about
a
National
Register
now
think
about
it
for
a
minute.
The
way
I
was
looking
at
it.
That
seemed
like
a
fairly
decent
way
of
distinguishing
some
of
this
stuff.
If
you
had
a
National
Register,
you
could
be
a
short-term
rental
with
the
facts
that
were
there.
Q
But
how
would
you
apply?
This
I
mean
we
applied
in
a
short-term
rental.
If,
if
you
had
something
like
the
I,
don't
know
Wentworth
house
on
one
side
of
the
street,
it's
on
the
National
Register
and
you
got
a
place
right
across
the
street
because
it's
not
on
the
National
Register,
it
wouldn't
qualify.
Q
So
what
the
city
is
doing
is
making
somebody
do
something
to
join
some
organization
or
do
something
to
be
there,
and
maybe
that
shouldn't
the
case
I
mean
why
wouldn't
it
work
for
lawyers
or
you
know,
I
made
you
two
guys
practice
across
the
street.
If
you're
in
a
historic
building,
you
can
practice
law
and
you
can.
Q
B
We
certainly
will
have
that
debate
when,
when
this
comes
back,
I
would
personally
hope
that
we
wait
a
little
while
before
comes
back
because
respectfully,
some
of
these
proposed
changes
do
substantially
change
the
existing
ordinance
and
we
can
amend
an
ordinance
at
any
time
in
the
future
and
a
future
council
can
amend
an
ordinance
in
the
future.
But,
for
example,
the
last
two
provisions
here
by
eliminating
the
requirement,
the
residents
in
category
1,
2
3,
short-term
rentals,
which
is
basically
everybody
remain
on
the
property.
While
guests
are
present.
B
That's
a
substantial
change
in
essence,
we'd
be
back
to
looking
at
the
situation
where
people
would
be
buying
properties
just
in
order
to
have
a
short-term
rental
in
our
city
and
it
becomes
a
separate
class
of
real
estate
and
investment,
real
estate
property,
and
it
would
have
a
huge
impact
on
on
affordability
and
availability
of
housing
in
in
our
community
and
I.
Do
want
to
share
an
example
with
you.
B
They
don't
turn
over
very
often,
but
she
had
three
openings
and
she
had
numerous
applicants,
because
the
rent
of
the
units
is,
you
know,
less
than
a
thousand
dollars,
they're
pretty
nice
units,
even
though
they're
mobile
homes-
and
it
was
stunning
to
her
that
all
three
new
tenants
were
coming
to
her
trailer
park
because
they
had
been
displaced
from
their
former
single-family
residence
because
their
properties,
they
were
in
North
Charleston,
not
in
Charleston.
But
this
is
just
the
effect
this
can
have
their
former
residents.
B
I
know
it's
restrictive,
but
but
don't
forget
that
it
actually
legalized
short
term
rentals
in
the
city
of
Charleston
and
other
than
cannon
burg
Elliott
birth,
where
before
they
were
completely
illegal.
So
so,
let's
consider
just
taking
this
a
step
at
a
time
a
little
slowly.
Let's
we
had
our
first
nine
cases
go
to
Municipal
Court.
Just
yesterday
they
were
all
upheld
so
to
speak.
B
Convictions
I
think
it
was
one
deferral
for
some
some
reason,
but
we're
just
starting
down
this
path
and
we
need,
as
we
tried
to
share
with
you
at
last
count,
maybe
some
some
more
time
to
see
what
the
numbers
are.
Gonna
shake
out
to
be
and
how
well
the
enforcement
goes
so
I'm
glad
to
defer
and
have
plenty
of
discussion
about
this.
But
I
would
ask
council
to
consider
very
carefully
some
of
the
provisions
that
had
been
proposed
here
that
that
I
think
what
would
really
harm
this
ordinance.
Councilmember
Shay.
V
Briefly,
the
two
things
I
wanted
to
point
out
number
one
is
that
obviously
a
lot
of
work
was
on
the
front
end
of
this
by
the
way,
the
task
force
and
and
if
we're
going
to
make
any
changes
to
it.
I
do
think
that
we
need
to
make
sure
that
we
have
enough
time
and
enough
data
and
understanding
of
the
effects
so
that
we're
not
sort
of
a
knee-jerk
reaction
to
changes
so,
and
we
just
heard
to
two
meetings
ago,
I
guess
from
our
planning
staff
that
we
didn't
really
have
enough
data.
V
Yet
so
they
didn't
even
have
enough
information
yet
to
give
us
good
guidance,
so
I
do
think
we
need
to
take
a
deep
breath.
Let's
make
sure
that
before
we
have
a
knee-jerk
reaction,
because
what
inevitably,
if
you
make
quick
decisions,
you're
trying
to
legislate
based
on
certain
circumstances
or
individual
circumstances,
we
can't
do
that.
We
cannot
legislate
for
one
one
property
versus
another.
V
It's
the
second
thing,
I'll
point
out,
and
probably
the
best
thing
about
this
ordinance
is
that
it's
probably
and
I
think
it's
the
only
ordinance
that
we
even
have
on
the
books
that
we
can
do
that
and
that's
let
we
can
legislate
and
make
rules
specific
to
different
parts
of
the
city
which
we
can't
with
any
other
ordinance.
We
have
it's
sort
of
a
you
know.
One
size
fits
all,
but
with
this
we
have
separate
categories.
V
So
the
more
restrictive,
quite
frankly,
I,
don't
think
they're
gonna
see
you
know,
taking
the
the
opportunity
to
have
the
owner
not
present
I,
don't
think
that's
gonna
be
met
on
Daniel
Island,
with
with
with
much
success
either
so
I
just
think.
We
need
to
take
a
deep
breath.
Let's
make
sure
we
had
good
information
before
we
move
forward,
but
didn't
let's
make
sure
that
we
also
don't
try
to
bring
it
to
this
council
to
debate
and
spend
you
know
all
the
time
and
end
up
going
nowhere,
let's
bring
it
back
to
the
task
force.
V
C
This
is
more
of
a
procedural
question.
Mr.
mayor
Phoebe
Susan
can
help
us
with
this
part
of
it.
So
it's
customer
white
alluded
in
councilman
moody
alluded.
This
went
from
a
task
force
team
Dyess
with
the
Planning
Commission,
and
then
it
came
back
to
us
and
we
had
I
think
it
workshop
or
two
in
between
all
of
that.
So
if
we
make
amendments
or
proposed
amendments
to
this
ordinance,
what
process
we
need
to
follow
regarding
going
back
to
planning
or
about
to
this
task
force
to
do
this,
I
would.
O
Certainly
go
back
to
the
Planning
Commission,
no
question
about
that.
The
task
force
was
something
that
I
think
Jacob
we
did
voluntarily.
Is
that
right
that
we?
So
we
impose
that
task
force
on
ourselves,
because
we
wanted
that
input
I
mean
if
you
sent
it
back
to
the
Planning
Commission,
it
could
be
with
a
recommendation
to
send
it
to
the
task
force
again,
but
it
would
definitely
certainly
in
the
shape
that
it
is
right
now
there
are
huge
substantive
changes
to
the
original
ordinance,
so
they
they
would
meet.
O
C
Reason
I
bring
that
up,
because
we
heard
the
public
comment
from
somebody
earlier
that
there
was
confusion
on
the
task
force.
It
was.
The
industry
was
not
properly
represented
on
the
task
force.
I'm
just
wondering
some
of
the
questions
that
have
come
up
because
I
too
had
some
concern
about
parts
of
West
Ashley,
but
a
not
residential
parts,
and
so
you
may
have
a
carve
out
a
special
exemption
here
and
there,
but
for
the
most
concern
we
want
to,
we
want
to
maintain
the
integrity
of
our
neighborhoods,
particularly
West
Ashley.
C
So
my
my
question
was
whether
or
not
those
issues
about
the
industry
not
being
represented,
or
there
was
some
confusion
by
the
task
force
members
or
frustration
I'm
not
trying
to
rehash
it.
So
I'm
not
trying
to
reinvent
the
wheel
on
this,
or
that
would
be
prudent.
The
some
of
the
questions
have
come
back
at
need
to
be
addressed
by
this
task
force.
I
mean
this
is
a
very
complicated
and
we
spend
a
whole
lot
of
time.
C
Completing
this
almost
a
full
year,
debate,
enos
and
as
the
mayor
mentioned-
I
mean
that
the
one
thing
that
we
don't
want
to
lose
sight
of,
this
ordinance
made
legal,
something
that
was
illegal
completely
before
I
mean
we,
you
cannot
have
short-term
rentals
period
and
we've
created
a
niche
niche
for
under
certain
special
conditions
that
you
can't
have
a
short-term
rental.
So
some
of
the
questions
seem
to
be.
We
want
to
turn
the
knob
a
little
bit
laugh
a
little
bit
right
to
address
these
concerns
about
some
property.
C
O
The
task
force
that
was
serving
before
has
has
finished
their
work.
They
made
a
recommendation
to
planning
and
to
this
council.
So
if
City
Council
wanted
to
direct
that
the
task
force
that
a
task
force
be
formed
to
consider
amendments
that
can
be
done
again.
That
was
something
that
the
city
voluntarily
did.
It
was.
G
O
U
You
I
don't
want
to
believe,
or
anything
I
just
wanted
to
react
to
a
couple
of
the
comments
that
have
been
made
tonight,
because
I
do
agree
that
this
deserves
deferral
and
deserves
a
lot
of
deliberation.
It
deserves
all
the
study
and
the
learning
curve
that
we're
currently
on
so
I
would
I
would
support
what
councilmember
white
said
about
making
it
a
deliberative
anything
that
we
would
do
to
amend.
U
This
should
be
deliberative
and
from
from
a
position
of
having
learned
from
what
we've
just
done,
and
so
I
would
agree
that
if
we
do
have
a
task
force
reconvened
that
we
should
also
make
sure
that
we
check
in
with
our
now
new
set
of
enforcement
experts
that
were
standing
up
to
to
enforce
this.
So
we
should
not
even
be
making
decisions
until
we've
consulted
with
with
our
team
of
enforcement
officers
as
well,
but
mayor
to
be
fair.
U
I
just
wanted
to
react
to
something
that
you
said
earlier
about
interpreting
that
what
I
would
consider
very
broad
brush
changes
and
I.
Don't
agree
with
them
that
they're
at
all
appropriate
at
this
point
in
time
and
maybe
never
but
I,
do
think
to
be
fair
to
councilmember
wearing
since
he's
not
here
to
respond
to
you
that,
just
by
saying
that-
and
it
will
still
be
a
4%
owner
has
to
be
documented-
and
you
know
agreed
to
that-
that
that
is
the
person,
that's
making
the
application
and
receiving
a
license.
U
So
by
saying
that
a
person
doesn't
have
to
be
at
home
in
order
to
rent
out
the
restricted
number
of
bedrooms
to
the
fourth
four
occupants
that
the
ordinance
is
gonna
continue
to.
Allow
I,
don't
think
it's
fair
to
make
that
public
statement
to
say
that
that's
necessarily
going
to
already
now
be
a
six
percent
owner
I.
Don't
think
that
was
councilmember,
Waring's
intent
in
my
discussion
of
this
with
him
after
we
all
saw
this
last
week.
So
I
want
to
be
on
the
record
about.