►
From YouTube: City of Charleston Council Meeting - June 18, 2019
Description
City of Charleston Council Meeting - June 18, 2019
B
C
Turn
my
microphone
on,
but
if
we
could
all
just
take
a
few
moments,
we
over
the
years
have
had
a
number
of
tragic
incidents
occur
and
around
this
period
of
time
of
the
year
at
a
manual
as
well
as
tonight,
we
will
be
at
the
memorial
for
the
firefighters
who
we
lost
as
well
of
the
nine
Charleston
nine.
So
I
would
ask
that
we
all
just
take
a
moment
if
we
can
and
remember
those
remember
their
families
will
let
us
be
let
you
the
Lord,
be
with
them
during
this
period
of
time.
B
All
right,
thank
you
all
for
being
with
us
this
afternoon
and
thank
to
Council
for
accommodating
your
schedule
to
meet
early
so
that
we
can
all
attempt
to
be
at
the
Charleston
9
memorial
service
this
evening
at
7
o'clock,
which
is
out
at
1807
Savannah
Highway,
and
it
does
start
promptly
at
7
o'clock
before
we
start
and
I
know.
Most
folks
know
this,
but
just
in
the
very
most
unlikely
event
that
we
would
need
to
evacuate
the
premises.
These
are
our
two
main
exit
doors
out
of
this
room.
B
There
is
one
exit
door
to
my
room
to
the
room
on
my
right
and
then,
if
that
were
to
occur,
please
do
not
use
the
elevator
but
take
the
two
stairways
down
and
then
the
one
stairway
out
the
front
very
unlikely
that
would
occur.
But
just
so
everybody
knows
the
way
out
in
case.
We
need
to
get
out
of
here
quickly.
So
first
I'd
like
to
share
with
y'all
a
proclamation
regarding
national
homeownership,
Month
and
I'd
like
to
ask
James,
Mathers
and
Adele
board
and
council
member
of
Mitchell
and
Gianna
Shaw
Johnson.
B
If
fiallo
here
to
join
me
up
here
on
the
podium
each
year,
the
city
of
Charleston,
along
with
the
federal
government,
recognizes
the
month
of
June
as
home
ownership
month.
It's
an
important
recognition
as
it
highlights
the
impacts
and
the
benefits
of
homeownership
in
our
community.
This
year
is
part
of
the
celebration
of
homeownership
month,
I'd
like
to
recognize
two
organizations,
meadows,
think
I,
think
of
a
metal
construction
company
and
borders,
Borden,
Construction,
Company,
Inc,
the
men
esteem
asset
matters
construction.
B
Actually,
in
this
case
they
did
the
design
they
designed
the
newly
constructed
homes
located
in
Ashley
bill
Mary
bill
of
the
team
included,
Thomas
Sweeney
and
Jeremy
Tate.
Both
attended
neighborhood
meetings
with
the
housing
staff,
engaging
the
community
in
the
process
and
securing
all
kind
of
a
neighborhood
impact,
while
they
design
these
beautiful
homes
that
were
just
completed
building
west
of
the
Ashley
and
then
Adele
Borden
with
Borden
construction
right
behind
me.
Here
he
brought
the
designs
that
metters
created.
He
brought
them
to
life.
B
He
and
his
team
executed
the
construction
of
the
homes
and
ensured
they
were
well
actually
ahead
of
schedule
and
I'd
like
to
commend
both
of
these
organizations
for
their
remarkable
work
in
actually
build
Maryvale,
neighborhood
and
throughout
Charleston
community
through
their
job.
Well
done.
These
two
organizations
have
really
helped
some
families
and
and
I.
Think
part
of
the
lesson
we
all
have
learned
is
that
a
home
ownership
is
one
of
the
real
benchmarks
to
gaining
economic
security
in
this
country
in
this
world.
B
So
if
I
may
now
read
you
the
proclamation
itself,
whereas
national
home
ownership
month
is
a
time
to
recognize
the
many
benefits
of
homeownership
to
our
families.
Our
communities
in
our
nation,
whereas
for
generation
of
Americans
owning
a
home,
has
been
an
essential
element
in
cheating
the
American
dream.
As
home
ownership
is
often
the
foundation
of
security
and
prosperity
for
families
and
communities
and
serves
as
an
enduring
symbol
of
our
freedom.
B
Whereas
the
city
of
Charleston
its
mayor,
our
city
council,
we've
dedicated
ourselves
to
the
provision
of
creating
and
preserving
affordable
housing
through
the
implementation
of
long
term
affordability,
covenants
and
each
year,
national
homeownership
month
is
celebrated
in
the
United
States,
who
encourage
the
benefits
of
owning
and
maintaining
a
home.
This
year's
theme
and
sustainable
homeownership
provides
an
opportunity
to
play
upon
the
impact
of
owning
a
home
has
on
household
wealth,
neighborhood
stability
and
the
nation's
broader
economic
health.
B
Now,
therefore,
I
John
J,
Declan
burg,
mayor
of
the
city
of
Charleston,
hereby
proclaim
June
2019
as
home
ownership
month
in
the
city
of
Charleston.
In
addition
to
these
fine
companies
in
their
representatives,
mr.
Borden
and
mr.
Mathers
I
want
to
shout
out
to
our
Community
Development
Committee
that
a
councilmember
Mitchell
heads
up
and
our
somewhat
remarkable
Housing
and
Community
Development
Department,
led
up
by
Miss
Fiona
Shaw
Johnson
and
could
y'all
join
me
in
giving
them
all.
Congratulations.
B
So
next
I
would
like
if
Battalion
Chief,
David,
Griffin
and
Fire
Chief
Dan
Correa,
would
would
join
me
up
here.
We
also
have
a
proclamation
commemorating
the
Charleston
nine
vite.
You
all
the
join
us
this
evening
as
we
remember
and
honored
the
Charleston
nine
members
of
the
Charleston
Fire
Department,
who,
as
we
all
know,
lost
their
lives,
battling
a
fire
at
the
sofa
super
superstore.
B
This
proclamation
will
be
read
there,
but
if
you
will
indulge
me,
I
would
like
to
read
it
here
at
Council
as
well,
so
that
it
will
be
a
part
of
our
City
Council
record
for
this
day,
whereas
the
city
of
Charleston
and
the
Charleston
Fire
Department
gathered
today
to
commemorate
the
anniversary
of
the
tragic
loss
of
nine
Charleston
firefighters
on
Monday
June
18th
2007,
the
Charleston
Fire
Department
lost
nine
brave
firefighters
who
were
battling
a
devastating
blaze
at
a
furniture
store
on
Savannah
Highway.
Just
after
7:00
p.m.
B
on
that
fateful
day,
firefighters
responded
to
a
call
that
a
trash
fire
had
started
on
a
loading
dock
behind
the
store,
the
flames
intensified
as
the
fire
spread
rapidly
through
the
roof
of
the
building,
and
there
were
16
firefighters
in
the
building,
as
the
showroom
filled
with
smoke,
preventing
them
from
deploying
to
a
more
secure
area.
Shortly
before
8:00
p.m.
the
roof
collapsed
and
nine
of
Charleston's
firefighters
perished
and
whereas,
at
the
time
the
sofa
super
store,
fire
marked
the
deadliest
firefighter
disaster.
B
Since
the
9/11
terrorists
attacks
and
the
first
loss
of
life
on
duty
in
the
city
of
Charleston,
Fire
Department
since
1999,
and
whereas
because
of
the
remarkable
bravery
of
these
nine
men,
the
city
of
Charleston
began
an
extensive
effort
to
improve
and
modernize
every
aspect
of
the
fire
department
from
code
enforcement
to
specialized
training.
Whereas
the
city
of
Charleston
and
its
citizens
are
now
safer
due
to
the
sacrifice
that
was
made
by
the
Charleston
nun
and
their
loved
ones.
B
B
Now,
therefore,
I
John
J,
Tekken
Bart,
mayor
of
the
city,
on
behalf
of
all
of
our
citizens
and
city
council,
hereby
extend
to
the
family
and
friends
of
the
Charleston
and
this
expression
of
sincere
regret
for
their
loss
and
hope
that
they
will
continue
to
find
comfort
and
the
memories
of
their
loved
ones,
brave
and
heroic
lives
and
achievements,
and
I'd
like
to
call
on
a
Chief
Dan
Courier.
If
he
would
like
to
make
any
remarks
chief.
D
We
use
a
phrase
in
the
fire
service
and
it's
simply
never
forget,
and
it's
a
reminder
that
we
always
need
to
honor
the
sacrifices
of
those
who
came
before
us
and
we
need
to
make
sure
that
everything
we
do
points
to
what
they
were
willing
to
do
for
us
without
even
being
asked.
It
means
a
lot
that,
at
the
highest
levels
of
leadership
in
this
city,
that
the
phrase
never
forget
is
embraced
and
I
appreciate
it.
B
Thank
You
chief
next
we
have
four
public
hearings:
I'll
call
on
customer
Christopher,
Morgan
of
our
planning
department
to
come
forward
and
make
the
presentation
about
each
of
these
and
then
we'll
ask
the
public,
as
you
come
forward
to
please
make
comments
pertinent
to
each
matter
that
you
like
and
I,
respectfully
ask
you
limit
your
remarks
of
two
minutes
and
please
state
your
name
and
address
before
addressing
the
council.
Thank
you
very
much.
Mr.
Morgan
Thank.
E
You
mr.
mayor
members
of
council,
the
first
item
in
the
public
hearings
is
number
e1
276
coming
Street,
it's
a
request
to
go
from
diverse
residential,
dr
2f,
to
general
business.
This
is
a
residential
structure
that
is
at
the
corner
of
Street
and
the
cross.
Now
it's
an
older
structure.
It
was
there
well
before
the
Crosstown
expressway
it's
on
a
block
that
is
more
or
less
exclusively
residential,
as
exemplified
by
the
yellow
zoning
indicators,
except
for
down
at
the
corner,
but
with
lime
street,
where
there
is
a
corner
store.
E
E
We
have
a
closer
up
view
of
the
house
again
adjacent
to
the
right-of-way,
and
there
is
a
view
of
the
house
from
the
street.
It's
been
renovated
in
the
last
few
years
as
a
driveway
to
the
right,
and
there
is
some
parking
on
the
street.
There
I
think
some
of
that
may
have
been
changed
recently
and
this
is
cross
the
street
other
residential
structures
in
the
area
and
there's
the
subject
property
looking
at
it
to
the
south
from
the
septum
of
Clark
Parkway.
And
this
was
at
our
Planning
Commission.
F
My
name
is
Sid
boon.
Gorman
mcnair
of
100
Calhoun
Street
I
represent
the
owner
of
276.
You
look
at
that.
Drawing
up
there
every
the
blue
can
have
short-term
rental.
The
paint
can
have
short-term
rental,
and
only
the
yahwah
is
restricted
to
the
r2f.
Three
of
the
six
houses
are
inhabitable
on
the
east
side
of
coming
street
and
in
the
houses
that
are
on
st.
Philip's
street
to
the
to
the
east
and
then
pink
they're
on
a
short.
The
width
of
street
is
very
small.
It's
not
conducive
to
general
business.
F
It's
not
gonna
be
general
business.
The
most
it
can
be,
is
short-term
rental
or
remains
like
a
2d
r
2f.
The
zoning
is
backwards
on
this
property.
The
property
in
yellow
on
the
east
side
of
coming
should
be
general
business,
so
they
could
have
short-term
rental,
or
they
should
be
a
provision
that
you
could
have
short-term
rental.
Look
at
my
look
at
the
house.
If
you
put
that
up
that
my
client
did
look
compared
to
what's
on
that
street,
that
brick
house
is
boarded
up.
F
G
Mr.
mayor
council,
council
members,
my
name
is
Marian
Hawkins
I'm,
president
of
the
Canon
Borrelia
beretta
sociation.
This
is
in
our
neighborhood.
The
applicant
is
a
speculator.
He
bought
this
property
two
years
ago
as
part
of
a
portfolio
he's
been
operating
illegally
as
a
STR.
Even
up
until
the
last
few
weeks
he's
his
counsels
come
before
a
Neighborhood
Association.
We
voted
unanimously
against,
it
he's
come
before
PCA
and
he
was
denied
there
and
Planning
Commission
and
now
council,
our
neighborhood
is
it
has
a
balance
of
short-term
and
permanent
residents.
G
I
would
and
we
have
lots
of
short
term,
but
those
are
in
commercially
zoned
properties
and,
and
we
have
plenty-
and
this
is
D
r2f-
we
have
a
constant
stream
of
people
asking
to
up
zone
from
dr
to
F
to
LV
or
commercial.
This
was
set
a
terrible
precedent.
Our
neighborhood
is
against
it,
and
I
would
ask
that
you
would
vote
unanimously
against
it.
Thank
you.
B
I
E
K
Not
approve
it,
so
I'm
going
on
danube
associates
on
that
to
me
that
air
is
very
dangerous,
because
right
from
that
house,
you
turn
right
into
going
to
the
r2i
26
and
anybody
backing
up.
They
got
to
be
very
careful
because
if
you
look
at
that
traffic
they're
coming
down
coming
street,
it's
very
rough
people
here
into
my
lesson
and
I
watch
it
all
the
time
ice
is
very
dangerous.
K
K
L
M
M
Towards
the
cars
that
are
getting
on
there,
so
can
we
fix
the
signs
getting
on
there,
so
the
traffic
continues
to
merge
onto
the
sub
team
of
Clark
when
it's
rush,
it's
both
dangerous
and
it
creates
a
backlog
of
traffic
way
back
I
mean
way
back,
so
we
need
at
least
two
signs
there
on
our
property.
They'd
courage,
people
just
to
keep
going
it's
safe
to
merge
in
because
it
just
it
is
disastrous
over
there.
So.
M
B
You
it's
funny
that
you
should
mention
that
I
have
this
memory
of
my
cousin
used
to
complain
about
that
very
sign,
and
this
dates
back
before
the
new
bridge
was
built
and
they
were
only
you
know
certain
bottlenecks
to
get
on
the
old
bridge,
and
it
would
just
incensed
him
to
no
end
that
people
would
stop
there,
even
though
the
sign
was
it
keep
moving.
Councilmember
Jack.
I
Mr.
Morgan
could
clarify
for
us
for
the
record
that
if,
if
we
would
choose
to
give
this
a
GP
zone
instead
of
what
it
currently
is,
there's
there's
no
restriction
on
general
business
in
this
neighborhood
right,
so
it
wouldn't
necessarily
always
be
a
short-term
rental.
If
that
were
the
intention
of
the
current
owner,
that's.
E
E
O
E
Shop
term
rental
property,
Phillip
Street
for
four
decades
as
far
as
I'm
aware
at
least
3040
years
has
been
had
general
business
along
it,
and
so
in
the
cannon
borough
area
with
the
short-term
rental
overlay.
That's
in
that
area,
those
are
eligible
for
short-term
rental.
There
was
a
property
on
line
street
the
property-
that's
in
blue
that
was
Ruiz
owned.
E
Probably
almost
ten
years
ago
it's
not
been
developed
yet,
but
it's
my
understanding,
an
affordable
housing
development
will
be
going
there
at
some
point,
but
that
property
would
be
eligible
for
short
term
rental
by
virtue
of
its
zoning.
But
then
the
all
the
properties
that
are
in
yellow
would
not
be
so.
O
E
B
E
E
Apparently
was
actually
privately
held,
the
right-of-way
was
privately
held,
and
so
the
applicants
have
asked
to
have
that
zoned.
They
they
purchased
it
and
they've
asked
to
have
its
own
general
business
as
the
surrounding
property
is.
They
are
in
the
process
of
redeveloping
the
older
industrial
buildings
that
are
in
this
area
for
office
uses
and
have
been
making
huge
improvements
in
the
area,
the
right-of-way
that
they
would
get
sown.
E
General
business
would
not
have
buildings
on
it
would
just
be
used
for
parking
areas
and
still
have
areas
to
maneuver
and,
and
things
like
that,
and
staff
and
Planning
Commission
have
reviewed
this
and
felt
comfortable
with
it
recommended
for
approval.
I
believe
I
may
have
a
aerial
image.
You
can
see
some
of
those
industrial
buildings
there
on
the
right
that
have
the
industrial
use
has
gone
away,
and
now
they
are
becoming
office
uses
and
going
to
have
a
good
many
jobs
up
in
this
area
of
the
neck.
I.
B
P
Thank
You
mayor
the
council,
my
name
is
Trey
Thompson
I'm,
a
lawyer
with
Hall
boots
Smith
in
Mount,
Pleasant
111,
Coleman,
Boulevard
I
have
the
privilege
today
of
appearing
before
you
with
anchor
sign
principal
and
president
Hank
Chavis
anchor
sign
is
a
true
homegrown
Charleston's
success
story.
Hank
and
his
partner
David
Jackson
started
a
small
canvas
business
out
of
the
Ashley
marina
and
have
grown
it
into
a
national
sign
business
manufacturing
and
installing
the
signs
for
national
companies.
Many
of
the
names
that
you
would
recognize
now
I
want
to
walk
out.
F
T
Just
received
the
consciousness,
this
is
regarding
regular
Acushla.
This
is
regarding
recusal,
miss
regarding
accusal
by
the
mayor.
I
just
received
a
letter
from
sister
general's
office
on
Saturday
took
five
days
to
get
there
from
DC
Saturday
and
week
from
the
department
regarding
Department
education,
Noel
DeFrancisco
and
the
the
question
is
on
it.
On
the
front
of
the
thing
is
I've
made
tons
of
public
comments
for
DHEC
the
Army
Corps
engineers,
the
EPA
in
the
neck
area
for
years
as
a
former
bza
member?
T
So
let's
see
a
recusal
come
forward
when
I'm
sitting
on
my
porch
and
have
a
list
of
all
these
public
safety
interests.
You
take
that
one
to
it
from
the
Supreme
Court.
You
pick
that
up
all
this
public
safety
interest
and
you
can
get
the
mr.
shade
as
well
I'm
the
public
safety
question.
He
thinks
it's
a
joke
and
I'm
something
to
laugh
at
I.
T
Take
this
very
seriously
to
have
ruled
rule,
19
and
29
from
lawyers
in
this
town
lawyers
in
this
city,
to
put
this
together
on
these
recusal,
but
the
interest
in
real
estate
in
this
area,
they're
making
a
lot
of
money
up
there.
For
example,
you
look
at
you,
look
at
what's
gonna
decorate
with
Dominion
right
now,
with
Dominion
and
they're,
settling
with
the
Attorney
General
at
149
million
dollars
on
a
two
billion
dollar
deal.
I
made
public
comment
on
that
at
the
Iowa
Hall
2012.
T
You
won't
be
laughing
and
playing
your
games
across
the
street.
This
is
serious
business
for
people
in
this
community
who
are
poor
and
have
no
power
to
these
lawyers
who
are
getting
paid
with
the
mail
now.
He
know
why
he
recusing
himself.
He
got
direct
interest
in
this.
That's
why
he's
recusing
himself
tonight
I
suffered
an
appalling
grievance
because
of
it
I'll
be
able
to
retain
counsel
necessary
to
defend
myself
and
my
businesses
and
reading
the
area.
Thank
you
for
your
time.
Thank.
U
Name
is
Charles.
Hudgens
would
just
like
to
reiterate
his
comments.
My
family
owns
machinist
incorporated.
That
is
also
right
on
the
corner
of
that
property
and
just
like
anchor
silent.
We
have
trucks
coming
in
and
making
deliveries
and
pulling
into
this
the
same
area
not
quite
the
same
size
but
and
volume,
but
we
do
have
quite
a
bit
of
trucks
coming
in
on
this
area
making
delivery.
So
we
would
still
have
the
same
same
issue.
Yes,.
V
I
researched
this,
the
attorney
for
the
owner
or
purported
owner
whatever
you
want
to
call
it
of
these
roads,
they
were
shown
to
be
private.
When
there
was
original
dedication
of
Richland
village,
they
claim
to
be
able
to
do
things
with
the
roads.
I,
don't
have
any
opinion
on
that
right
now.
This
zoning
I
asked
I
asked
for
it
actually
because
it's
currently
unknown.
V
So
if
they
are
private
roads
and
they
can
do
things
within
those
right-of-ways,
they
have
unlimited
capacity
to
do
whatever
they
want
within
those
right-of-ways
once
their
zone
they're
at
least
limited
to
whatever
that
zoning
category
is
now
again,
I'm,
not
saying
they
own
the
roads.
I
don't
have
an
opinion
on
that.
V
This
doesn't
enable
them
to
develop
the
roads
if
there's
other
interests
in
those
roads
that
prevent
the
development
of
the
roads.
But
it
does
take
the
property
from
what
is
currently
unknown,
right-of-way
to
zoning
category
so
right
now
it's
unlimited
they
can.
They
could
do
whatever
they
want
with
those
rights
of
way
and
that's
the
reason.
I
asked
this
to
be
reserved
council.
B
H
I'm,
just
confused
now,
probably
more
so
than
I,
was
before,
because
if
we
as
a
city
made
the
recommendation
or
put
this
on
on
here
for
a
public
hearing,
I
would
think
that
we
would
have
got
some
information
about
it
before
it
came
here
tonight,
because
this
is
even
more
confusing
now,
because
they
believe
that
the
applicant
has
made
a
recommendation
that
we
have
working
on
this
road
when
in
actuality.
The
city
has
made
this
recommendation
and
we
don't
know
whether
or
not
the
private
landowner
has
rights
to
do
parking
on
it
or
whatnot.
H
So
now,
I'm
really
confused
about
about.
What's
going
on
here,
because
I
was
going
to
say,
I
think
that's
a
good
idea
for
these
business
owners,
who
are
good
Charleston
companies
and
have
worked
really
hard
for
a
long
time
to
meet
with
who
I
thought
was
the
applicant,
which
would
have
been
the
developer
when
in
actuality
it
was
the
city.
So
maybe
we
need
to
get
some
clarification
on
on
what
exactly
is
going
on
here
and
whether
or
not
the
applicant,
if
it's
the
city,
that
the
commercial
developer
have
any
any
interaction
with
the
city?
H
About
making
this
rezoning
or
anything
like
that,
because
I
totally
understand
the
point
that
these
business
owners
are
making,
you
know
they're
doing
really
great
work
for
the
city
of
Charleston.
But
if
we
have
some
sort
of
private
property
issue,
then
we
need
to
tackle
that
as
well
and
I
think
that
should
have
been
handled
before
it
came
here
to
us-
or
at
least
us
get
to
get
it
some
feedback
of
what
the
issue
is
here
so
I
don't
know.
Maybe
we
can
get
some
more
information
on
that,
because
now
I'm
pretty
confused
councilmember.
K
I
spoke
with
a
couple
people
pretends.
It's
I
had
a
lot
of
calls
to
turn
into
this,
because
all
this
is
the
district
that
I
represent
and
I'm
just
going
to
ask
for
the
furl
for
this
until
everyone
can
get
together
on
it,
the
fraud,
what
kind
of
a
solution
that
we
can
come
up
with
with
this
property,
because
those
businesses
are
back
there,
but
then
I
have
a
lot
of
problem
in
Rosemont
with
the
trucks
coming
through
there.
K
Now,
as
these
developments
going
on
with
it
with
a
526
or
whatever
they
doing
up
there.
So
I,
don't
think
the
one
have
met
with
the
Neighborhood
Association
yet
because
they
are
Armand
great
for
the
summer
actually,
but
we
needed
everyone
need
to
get
together
on
this
to
see
how
we
can
come
up
with
a
good
plan
and
make
sure
that
the
companies
that's
there
is
not
going
to
be
pushed
out.
K
K
Nice
is
something
able
to
I'm
gonna
put
some
signs
up
in
there
because
we
have
some
other
things
going
on
in
that
area,
so
that
area
is
very
sensitive
to
me
and
I
know
they'll
be
coming
here
and
they'll
be
beating
me
up
and
everybody
else's
in
this
area
because
of
Rosemont.
The
way
Roy's
mother
is
going
on
now,
so
I
believe
that
we
need
to
get
together
with
everyone
and
concern,
and
then
we
try
to
iron
this
out
and
Comp
a
solution.
K
So
I'm
gonna
ask
for
deferral
for
this,
and
also
I
spoke
with
our
Jacob
that
anything
that
it's
on
district
4,
that's
coming
in
district
4,
there's
another
where
and
all
this
rezoning
I'm
asking
to
take
it
out
of
the
rezoning
right
now
until
I
get
chance
to
be
able
to
grass
myself
for
on
it,
because
also
rezoning
that
we
have
in
here
on
just
before
I'm,
not
aware
of
it
and
some
of
them
that
I
already
spoke
about
before
that
should
not
be
on
there
anyway.
That's
on
there!
K
M
You,
okay,
mr.
Thompson
I,
just
got
a
few
questions
of
you.
A
mine
you'd
seem
to
know
a
lot
about
this.
Alright,
so
it
looks
like
this
will
get
deferred,
but
when
it
comes
back,
I
got
a
few
questions
so
the
end
of
that
road
until
the
developer
came
and
bought.
It
was
a
right-of-way
that
unbeknownst
to
at
least
your
clients
was
privately
held
right
by.
M
W
Name's
my
name's
Hank
Chavis
I'm,
the
president
excellent.
We
think
it
was
a
city
that
sorry
that
road
is,
it
continues
down
past.
Our
the
rest
of
our
buildings
is
what
I
understand
state
maintained.
So
I
don't
know
if
the
state
was
maintaining
the
portion
that
we're
talking
about
or
the
city
and
was.
M
X
W
M
About
to
create
a
mess
for
ourselves
here,
if
we
don't
do
this
right,
because
we
now
have
a
right-of-way
that
was
heretofore
public,
although
privately
owned,
it's
got,
among
other
things,
utilities
underneath
it
easement
and
for
you
all
I
mean
access
for
you.
All
I
mean
it's
it's
kind
of
a
big
fat
mess.
Have
you
done
a
title
search
on?
It
is
any
button
later,
so
we
try.
Have
you.
P
V
I
haven't
done
an
official
title
search
but
I've
gone
through
and
read.
The
documents
back
to
the
creation
of
Richland
village
is
created
while
it
was
in
Charleston
County.
This
is
above
Mount,
Pleasant
Street,
so
that
wasn't
in
the
city
until
I
think
it
was
in
1975
all
this
was
here
before
that
check.
I
checked
with
the
county
and
they
don't
have
any
record
that
it's
ever
been
maintained
or
used
by
the
county,
and
just
so
everyone
understands
any
street
or
Road
in
the
city
of
Charleston
is
unknown.
V
We
don't
we
don't
zone
it
and
Zoning
is
more
restrictive
than
UNH's
owned.
So
zoning
is
a
limitation
on
the
use
of
lands.
The
reason
I
I
liked
kinloch
or
Payne
Street.
All
these
we've
done
in
the
past.
If
we
don't
own
it
and
somebody
tries
to
use
it
while
it's
unknown,
they
can
they're,
not
there's
no
height
limitations.
There's
no
use
restrictions,
there's
no
lot
development,
there's
no
lot
standards
or
anything
like
that.
That
might
be
within
some
overlay
zones,
but
there's
no
base
zoning
district
for
this
property.
M
But
one
of
the
things
that
we
could
do
and
should
do
I
need
to
at
least
look
at
is
to
see
whether
or
not
we've
got
at
a
very
minimum,
some
form
of
ease
and
buy,
prescription
and
use,
and
and
just
because
they
went
paid,
their
$50,000
have
now
changed
title.
There
are
still
some
issues
going
out
there.
I
mean
I'd,
certainly
want
to
know
what
the
utilities
think
about
this
and
their
access
I'd
like
to
know
what
we
think
about
this.
M
What
the
county
thinks
about
this,
that's
our
tarmac
over
there
that
we've
all
paid
for
and
in
the
end
we
don't
want
to
slow
anything
down,
but
we
don't
want
to
slow
them
down
and
we
certainly
don't
want
in
the
end,
to
have
a
bunch
of
parking
along
there,
which
creates
forget
about
access
issues.
It
creates
a
public
safety
issues.
I'd
love
to,
or
the
police
chief
has
to
say
about
this.
What
the
fire
department
has
to
say
about
this.
This
has
got
a
whole
lot
to
it.
M
We
need
to
defer
this
I
agree,
but
we
need
to
go
to
work.
Let's
get
a
title
search
on
that.
Let's
find
out
what
the
water
system
has
to
say
what
Danny
Kass
says.
His
team
has
to
say
what
the
county
has
to
say
and
whether
or
not
regardless
of
the
private
transaction,
that
we
are
still
either
as
a
city
or
county
have
some
form
of
easement
over
the
top
of
that,
then
we
can
then
take
care
of
this
parking
issue
everybody's
happy
and
we
don't
let
a
developer
control.
M
B
V
I
You
mr.
mayor
I,
totally
associated
myself
with
councilmember,
Griffin
and
Mitchell,
and
now
seeking
to
put
even
more
meat
on
the
bones
of
what
just
seems
like
we're
missing
a
lot
of
the
rest
of
the
story.
I
think
we
should
definitely
defer
this
and
get
to
work
as
council
members
seeking
says
in
terms
of
trying
to
put
all
the
moving
parts
together,
because
my
understanding
of
as
we
continue
to
foster
redevelopment
as
we
move
up
the
peninsula.
We're
gonna
run
into
all
of
these
sort
of
anomalies
that
are
no
longer
anomalies.
I
They
they
need
to
have
some
framework
by
which
we
can
rely
on
the
recommendations
of
our
legal
team
to
make
the
land,
as
you
know,
tight
and
prescribed
as
possible,
but
in
the
process
of
trying
to
do
that.
It
was
like.
We
have
one
little
piece
of
the
elephant
and
we
didn't
have
the
bigger
story
of
what
was
going
to
be
the
real-world
ramifications
of
trying
to
rezone
this
land
without
having
the
actual
use
plan,
and
so
I
I.
C
P
C
C
C
P
B
O
C
X
O
Building
on
what
councilman
the
Sea
Kings
had
brought
to
our
attention,
we
a
next
is
the
portion
of
this
property
back
I,
think
75,
77,
so
I'm.
My
other
question
on
this
is:
is
this
a
sort
of
an
unusual
circumstance
dealing
only
with
some
of
them
Avenue
or
are
there
other
situations
along
this
corridor
on
between
King
Street
extension
and
I
26
that,
while
we're
doing
this
work
and
we're
talking
to
all
these
entities,
the
Dominion
energy,
the
Fire
Department
police
department,
whoever
else
may
be
involved
in
this
process?
O
Are
there
other
areas
like
this
that
we
need
to
be
looking
into
to
see?
If
this
is
this
a
unique
situation
with
just
one
strip
of
land,
about
an
acre
or
so
or
does
this
extend
and
other
properties
along
the
way
in
this
particular
commercial
industrial
type
area?
And
that's
what
I
think
that
is
really
examining
this?
Maybe
perhaps
it'll
be
a
good
opportunity
to
us
examine
more
of
this
property
law
in
this
area
in
the
Rosemont
area,.
Y
Y
My
name
is
Yvonne
smiles
and
I
represent
my
moral
Missionary
Baptist
Church
in
153,
Alexander,
Street
Charleston,
now,
I'm,
not
sure.
How
far
is
this
extending
we
have
property
back
here
along
a
little
bit
beyond
Rosemont,
and
we
receive
this
led
about
the
rezoning
we're
using
it
as
cemetery
property.
Is
that
going
to
be
involved
in
this
rezoning
area?
No.
B
Y
Z
Z
L
P
It's
it's
an
interesting
situation
right
because
when
that
transaction
went
through,
certainly
the
folks
that
were
involved
in
it
believed
that
that
was
a
right-of-way
and
provided
two
ingress
and
egress.
It
just
turned
out
again,
as
this
development
has
moved
along,
the
developers
figured
out
that
that
property
was
privately
held
tracked
down
to
heirs
and
bought
the
property,
presumably
and
a
quitclaim
kind
of
deal
for
fifty
five
thousand
bucks,
and
so
that's
where
we
are
now
it
I
mean
it's
got
a
black
top
over
the
top
of
it.
It's
got.
P
You
know
street
signs
by
all
accounts
really
until
we
received
the
notice
of
this
hearing.
We
didn't
even
know
that
that
there
was
a
movement
underway
to
either
have
it
zoned
or
that
it
was
even
in
this
situation.
So
that's
another
reason
why
we're
here
today,
I
guess
in
somewhat
amount
of
force,
just
because
we
think
that
there's
is
more
to
talk
about.
L
Thank
you,
mister
McWeeny,
I
understand
you
know,
move
to
bring
some
silver
Zee
civilization
to
this
method.
Yes,
sir,
but
I'm
wondering
whether
the
city
needs
to
step
up
stronger,
we're
talking
about
public
access,
bats
are
used
for
eminent
domain
and
instead
of
defer
non
zonings
and
reasonings,
and
things
like
that
I
think
we
ought
to
come
up
with
the
strongest
bet.
We
have
eminent
domain.
The
public
has
a
right
for
ingress
and
egress.
There
I
was
talking
to
councilman
C,
kings
and
I
said
well.
L
This
is
before
I
found
out
that
this
was
supposedly
privately
owned.
I
said:
well,
we
just
put
no
parking
zones
up
there
and
then
that's
when
he
quietly
whispered
to
me
that
this
is
supposedly
private,
there's
nothing
private
about
that
street.
So
if
there's
a
time
for
us
to
bring
clarification
of
this
one,
especially
at
least
taxpayer
dollars
have
gone
into
the
blacktop
taxpayers
dollars.
If
CPW
has
water
and
sewer
lines,
we
got
electrification
up
in
it,
maybe
even
gas
lines.
We
need
to
protect
the
public
investment.
L
L
It's
too
easy
to
go
in
and
keep
this
public
and
this
property
in
the
public
domain.
So
I
don't
think
we
need
to
fool
around
when
people
come
with
underhanded
tactics
in
the
neighborhood
government
is
supposed
to
protect
the
people
and
that's
what
we
here
for
so
that's.
My
I
would
like
to
add
that
to
your
deferral,
it's
being
part
of
the
process
of
we
coming
back
with
something.
Let's
come
back
with
something:
that's
gonna
work.
Yes,.
V
Sir,
and
just
so
you
know,
I
did
when
the
owners
attorney
contacted
me,
I,
think
sort
of
just
like
kinloch
Court
I've
sent
a
long
list
of
things,
which
is
the
people
whose
access
would
be
cut
off.
You
need
permission
for
them
to
the
extent
they're
on
either
side,
because
I
don't
think
we
can
create
a
non-conforming
lot
or
allowances
creates
a
non-conforming
lot.
You
need
to
check,
which
is
the
same.
We
do
with
all
of
our
roads
if
we
abandon
them.
Whether
or
not
this
is
public
or
private.
V
L
L
K
This
IX
for
deferral,
because
I
wasn't
really
aware
of
it.
Till
I
met
redness
on
the
read
my
agenda
when
I
got
back
in
town
and
when
I
know
this
I
know
we
have
the
problems
that
I
haven't
real
smart
anyway.
Now
there's
a
lot
of
problems
when
I
rose
mark
because
big
trucks
coming
through
the
community
itself
and
they're
arguing
about
that
every
day,
because
the
trucks
doesn't
have
anywhere
else
to
go,
and
that
was
a
dangerous
thing.
K
A
lot
of
kids
on
the
scale
I
know
but
big
trucks
in
Rosemont,
because
they're
coming
from
some
of
the
loud
new
ones,
close
it
come
around
into
the
community.
You
see
so
with
this
happening.
I
know
you
have
some
people
living
right
near
some
of
your
labs.
Some
houses,
they're
gonna
lady,
had
called
me
on
yesterday
that
she
lives
right
there,
nessam
of
your
Avenue
and
she
works
for
the
Planning
Department
for
the
City
of
Norfolk
and
she
was
living
in
thirties
thirty
years.
So
she
called
me
on
yesterday.
K
It
was
required
about
this
in
acquiring,
but
some
other
things
that's
going
on
in
that
particular
area.
So
this
is
why
I
said
I
would
have
it
deferred
deferred
it's
what
everyone
could
get
together
and
see
exactly
how
we
can
come
up
with
some
mechanism
to
try
to
solve
this
issue.
If
we
can't
leave
us,
you
know
extended
something
else,
but
absolutely
it's
public
access.
You
have
to
have
done
so
this
is
why
I
had
to
have
a
deferral.
K
M
Very
briefly,
thank
you.
Just
a
couple
things
I
mean
I.
Think
one
of
the
things
that
we
do
the
title
search.
We
may
not
have
to
expend
money
for
this
because
we
may
have
some
kind
of
easement
by
prescription.
I
have
a
question
for
mr.
Lindsey.
Mr.
McQueen,
he
brought
up
a
point
that
that
zone
property
protects
the
citizenry
better
than
UNH's
own
property,
but
if
someone
comes
in
and
makes
an
application
to
do
whatever
they
want
to
do
on
that
land
and
the
property
is
unsewn.
Z
M
M
Given
all
of
the
things
we've
just
talked
about
all
of
them,
so
I'm
gonna
vote
to
defer
I
think
we
did
should
jump
on
this,
though,
and
in
fairness
that
people
just
spent
255
grand
and
if
the
worst-case
scenario
is
we
got
to
go
through
the
eminent
domain
process.
We
now
know
what
the
scope
of
that
eminent
domain
proceeding
is
because
they
dissipate
fifty
five
grand
for
it.
M
So
we're
not
looking
at
millions
and
millions
and
millions
of
dollars
we're
looking
at
fifty
five
grand
which
I
suspect
between
the
county,
the
city,
the
CPW,
the
electric
company,
private
investors
and
all
the
like.
We
can
probably
come
up
with
some
money
to
take
care
of
that.
I
suspect
that
there's
probably
a
pathway
forward
to
make
sure,
because
it's
not
just
the
fact
of
access
I,
think
they
all
are
worried
about
it's
the
quality
of
the
access
and
that's
what
we
need
to
think
about
all
right
got
it.
B
E
Yes,
sir,
this
is
a
three.
It
also
relates
to
the
four.
This
is
the
kinloch
court
right-of-way.
This
is
a
right-of-way
that
would
be
absorbed
into
the
adjoining
properties
because
it's
being
abandoned,
this
is
off
Meeting
Street.
The
recommendation
is
to
zone
property
in
the
manner
in
which
it's
been
zoned
on
either
side,
which
is
with
limited
business.
It
is
also
part
throughout
the
city.
E
The
peninsula
also
has
a
amusement
and
Recreation
Service
overlay
zone
everywhere
on
the
peninsula,
so
that
zoning
would
need
to
be
put
on
it,
and
this
has
been
to
Planning
Commission
and
was
recommended
for
approval
as
well.
It's
a
little
bit
different
from
that
previous
situation,
in
that
this
is
property
that
would
just
be
absorbed
by
the
adjoining
owners.
E
B
Q
B
Discussion
all
in
favor,
please
say
aye
and
he
opposed
the
eyes.
Have
it
next?
Is
the
approval
of
our
City
Council,
the
minutes
from
May
14
2019,
only
we're
deferring
on
May
28
any
additions,
deletions
improvements,
all
in
favor,
please
say
aye
and
you
opposed
the
eyes.
Have
it
next?
Is
our
citizens
participation
period,
we've
got
a
short
list
and
in
the
interest
of
time,
but
being
fair,
I.
Think
we'll
ask
you
to
keep
your
remarks
to
two
minutes.
Please
and
a
madam
clerk
will
call
your
name.
B
T
The
department
education
has
called
me
every
name
in
the
book
on
a
national
level.
What
I
did
was
I
went
to
school
in
the
Maryland
DC
area,
so
in
terms
of
the
issue
of
women
and
children,
and
particularly
white
women
and
white
children,
I
have
no
interest
in
such
a
negative
position
to
ward
white
folks
in
that
kind
of
way,
but
I'm
deeply
concerned
about
the
historical
legacy
of
being
wrong
about
black
people
and
white
folks
in
this
state
and
in
this
country.
T
But
if
you
an
error
regarding
that
is
rule,
19
and
rule
20
of
the
Supreme
Court
precedes
your
petition
for
extraordinary
writ
a
procedure
on
a
certified
question.
Tony
Barbee
the
story
of
me
many
years
ago.
The
story
right
here
in
2001
I
put
my
name
on
this
and
it
came
back
very
negatively
and
so
therefore
I'm
on
the
record
for
that
and
I'm,
not
gonna
pay
a
lawyer
for
that
experience.
T
I
will
not
pay
an
attorney
to
be
called
a
that
will
never
happen
ever
in
this
state
ever
I'm
deeply
disappointed
annoying
that
I
went
to
school
in
the
Maryland
DC
area
and
my
best
friend
came
down
and
told
me
what
was
being
said
about
me
down
here
with
white
folk
and
some
black
people
too,
and
this
I'll
say
care
my
father
for
years
in
that
house
he
was
sick.
Now
the
u.s.
marshals
tell
her
salsa
to
come.
Get
me
I'm
right
here
went
over
there
five
times
the
whole
year,
London
whip,
Anthony,
G
briny.
T
Looking
for
this
is
serious
Fitness
me
I,
don't
care
I,
don't
care
who
the
man
is
and
leave
you
the
hell
for
black
folk
stating
country
I,
don't
give
it
a
minute
I,
don't
care!
Good
man
who
the
governor
is
the
history
is
that
deep
you're
gonna,
write
books
and
do
movies,
but
you
sterling
in
in
the
eyes
are
many
people
in
this
state.
You
blame
me
for
what
I
said
four
years
ago
regarding
Manuel
I
stamp.
Anything
I
said,
and
the
time
is
definitely
up.
Sister
Lee
dad.
A
X
Giving
message
of
concern
last
City
Council
meeting
we
were
in
here
talking
about
Calhoun
statue
and
he
sits
between
two
churches,
the
Lutheran
Church
and
the
Citadel
Church,
and
we
got
the
statue
107
feet
up
an
air.
What
would
happen
if
people
would
sit
in
churches
throughout
the
world
for
century
with
the
image
of
an
african-american
man
as
savior
of
the
world
before
them?
What
would
it
do
to
the
mind
of
the
world's
children?
What
would
happen
to
the
world?
X
Children
could,
under
a
figure
of
a
particular
race,
presented,
pitiable
and
inflamed
and
in
pain,
padmi,
the
savior
of
the
world.
So
what
we
are
saying?
What
if
we
had
a
black
man
up
there
like
that
and
saying
that
that
man
is
God
like
we
did
the
picture
of
Christ
the
prophet
of
God
and
made
him
a
black
man
and
put
him
in
a
hundred
twenty
seven
feet
in
air?
What
would
that
do
today?
My
saintly.
AA
To
get
in
front
of
you
all
and
thank
you
all
I
know
several
of
you
had
other
commitments,
but
thank
you
to
council,
member
Jackson
and
councilmember
Lewis
for
attending
our
sober
streets.
Gathering
related
to
this
very
issue.
We
are,
we
are
losing
citizens
and
it's
completely
avoidable,
due
to
people
driving
under
the
influence
and
hitting
folks
and
and
not
sticking
around
and
rendering
aid.
So
I
want
to
thank
you
for
considering
that
I
hope
that
moves
forward
and
we're
able
to
pass
that
into
ordinance
and
very
grateful
to
you
all.
Thank
you.
Y
Y
What
are
we
going
to
rezone
it
to
six
years
ago?
I
was
on
a
committee
that
they
wanted
to
rezone
back
their
van,
and
we
had
problems
with
that
and
now
it's
coming
up
again
and
my
question
is
why
what
does
that
entail
for
the
cemetery
back
there
for
the
people
that
are
coming
to
see
their
loved
ones?
Why
rezoning
that's
only
the
questionnaire.
AB
AB
With
these
big
SUV,
you
can't
see
low
to
Euro
coming
out
these
step,
not
in
the
street,
and
a
car
hit
and
I
was
action
us
for
the
last
past
five
years
or
so
second
thing,
my
biggest
concern
is
yesterday
we
had
an
incident
right
back
again,
thus
more
than
five,
we
had
an
incident,
it's
not
by
David
Jones.
We
have
staff
that
go
on
MLK
pool
at
5:30
in
the
morning
they
were
not
notified
of
the
incident
happened
and
they
were
walking
in
the
dark.
AB
Going
up
to
this
fool
open
up
this
boat
breathing
get
a
call
from
the
police
department.
We
didn't
get
a
call
from
no-mind
up
the
let
these
folks
know
that
leave
when
they
home
going
in
this
dock,
to
open
up
this
pool
in
the
morning
time.
No
one
was
there
that
was
to
incident
less
than
24
hours.
Yesterday
we
had
to
lock
the
kids
on
our
cell
know.
Welcome
the
police
department
stop
by
the
park
and
see
well
listen.
They
were
shooting
a
block
away,
get
the
kids
on
the
stage.
AC
B
A
A
Q
I'm
only
here,
but
my
sister
came
by
Sunday,
she
didn't
ever
meet
a
letter,
but
she
told
me
something
about
razani,
my
mother's
arm
love
that
94
Reed
Street,
and
we
wanted
to
make
sure
that
the
rezoning
of
that
area
wasn't
will
have
anything
to
do
at
her
house
94.
She
just
turned
90
years
old
and
from
my
understanding
it
was
grandfathered
in
already.
So
that's
what
I
just
trying
to
find
out
what's
going
on
with
it.
A
H
On
what
mr.
Jones
said
about
the
incident
near
the
pool
he,
he
called
me
and
a
couple
other
council
members
this
morning
and
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
whenever
we
have
an
incident
like
that
near
a
city,
playground
and
we've
got
kids
running
around
and
there's
somebody
with
a
gun
or
shooting
that
we
have
at
least
somebody
out
of
the
right
Department
but,
more
importantly,
so
moving
the
police
department
that
goes
and
checks
on
those
kids
I
mean
if
anytime,
that
there's
a
situation
within
a
mile
or
two
of
a
school.
H
H
I
mean
gun,
violence
is
is
very,
very
scary
and
I
just
would
hate
for
any
of
our
kids
to
be
subject
to
to
that,
and
whether
or
not
it's
an
I
don't
know
if
the
stuff,
if
the
suspects
been
captured
or
I
mean
you
just
never
know,
but
I
think
councilmember
Mitchell
wanted
to
say
some
wall
on
that.
But
I
was
definitely
a
little
bit
disturbed
about
that.
Thank.
K
Was
the
essential
number
Metro?
It
must
be
uneven.
Constants
on
yesterday
they
had
a
shooting
I
think
was
a
turn
into
a
fight
and
they
were
shooting
all
over
the
place
on
yesterday
when
they
are
near
the
public,
housing
and
I
stopped
one
of
the
offices
and
asked
him
what
was
going
on,
he
said
was
the
shooting,
so
they
had
but
20
offices
around
Harris
Street
rondelay
there
in
that
sauce
Street.
It
was
canvassing
the
public
housing
at
that
time
and
my
granddaughter
was
there.
K
K
So
that's
when
I
went
out
and
I've
talked
to
some
of
the
officers,
but
I
didn't
know
if
they
went
over
to
the
through
the
park
house
or
not,
but
they
were
all
over
there,
mostly
down
by
Harris
Street
in
that
area
and
Nassau
Street
and
canvassing
the
whole
public
housing.
Then,
when
I
got
the
call
this
morning
about
7:30
this
morning,
saying
they
had
a
homicide
that
someone
got
shot
on
Howard
Street
in
almost
the
same
area,
Nayak
Smith
related.
It
say
they
don't
know
if
it
was
related.
K
Yet
there
was
still
do
an
investigation,
but
that
just
is
two
back
to
back
so
I
totally
I
met.
We're
gonna
have
to
do
some
upbeat
in
that
area
that
whole
area
on
that
particular
public
housing,
the
area
of
Nassau,
Street,
Jackson,
Street,
Howard,
Street
and
round
the
park
these
street
and
to
beef
up
the
area
around
there
and
be
more
visible
in
that
area,
because
I
said
they're.
K
Kids
in
that
area,
we
have
camp
in
that
area
going
on
with
young
people
in
that
particular
area,
and
we
don't
want
to
see
the
incident
happen
so
there
they
told
me
that
it's
gonna
start
beating
up
an
area
and
have
more
visibility
there
in
that
area.
But
I
didn't
know
that
didn't
contact
anyone
at
the
at
the
park
or
not
I
didn't
you
know,
hear
that
yet
so
I
have
particularly
that
part
of
it.
Yes,.
K
AD
You
mr.
mayor,
you
know,
with
with
me
having
two
kids
I
had
to
you
know,
got
a
middle
school
student
if
something
happens
anywhere
with
Charleston
County,
that's
associated
with
her
I
get
an
alert
immediately
on
my
phone
and
I
get
an
email.
When
my
oldest
daughter
was
a
student
at
the
College
of
Charleston
I
get
what
they
call
a
cougar
alert.
If
anything
happened,
I'd
immediately
get
a
phone
call
and
an
email
also
from
the
College
of
Charleston,
and
my
suggestion
may
be
that
we
do
that
at
least
with
our
city
employees.
AD
J
Doing
something
like
that
happens
near
fall.
We
have
to
have
a
policy
with
the
supervisor
whoever's
in
charge
of
the
fall
who
ever
tried
to
that
particular
plot
need
to
know
that
they
need
to
get
kids
off
the
clock
when
it
lockdown
Parks,
Department,
Laurie
and
a
me
to
be
notified
and
make
sure
it
talks
on
lockdown.
Until
an
officer
comes
over
and
say
it's
Claire,
let
the
children
as
well,
because
Public
Safety
is
very
important,
especially
follow
children.
So
we
don't
have
a
written
policy
I
think
we
need
to
have
one.
Thank.
B
You
all
right
any
further
comments.
We're
gonna
move
right
that
parlays
right
into
our
Committee
on
Public
Safety
Council
member
shape.
Oh
I'm!
Sorry,
yes,
number!
I
we
need
to
resend
the
road
with
respect
to
the
second
third
reading
of
a
bill
that
we
inadvertently
passed
last
time.
It
needs
to
go
through
the
Planning,
Commission
and
then
come
back
here
for
a
second
and
third
reading
can
I
have
a
motion
to
rescind
we
see
yeah
any
discussion,
all
in
favor,
say
aye
any
opposed
the
eyes.
O
You
mr.
mayor
members
of
council,
first
of
all,
we
deferred
items
list
of
the
C
G
in
an
H.
We
got
an
update
on
the
hurricane
storm
predictions
by
the
way,
this
is
the
30th
anniversary
of
Hurricane
Hugo,
coming
up
in
September
9
to
15,
named
storms
of
those
four
to
eight
of
them
will
be
a
high
storm
of
way
than
74
miles
an
hour
strength
and
to
the
for
them
will
be
a
major
hurricane.
O
We
do
not
have
anything
in
Charleston,
City
or
Charleston
County
that
has
qualified
anything
more
than
a
category
one
storm,
and
that's
we
have
the
discussion
about
that
and
what
we
may
may
not
be
able
to
do
concerning
awning,
more
suitable
shelters
in
the
tri-county
area
outside
of
Dorchester,
roughly
County,
going
on
to
item
number
B
dealing
with
the
fire
department
policy
and
practice
of
abandoned
and
damaged
homes.
I
had
met
with
the
chief
and
then
resealed
give
us
an
update
on
the
number
of
abandoned
homes.
O
Structures
in
the
city
of
Charleston
I
was
somewhat
surprised
by
this
number.
Since
2010,
we
had
400
building
structures
that
were
classified
as
abandoned.
We're
down
to
250
of
those
the
problem
and
addressing
this
issue
is
that
these
homes
become
a
safety
hazard.
These
structures
become
a
see
if
you
had
that
either
there
are
this
way
because
of
just
neglect
or
fire
damage,
or
they
have
done
some
other
kind
of
catastrophe.
It's
happened
to
that
property.
O
Item
C
was
the
third
item.
D
we
receive
the
report.
We
had
a
as
have
the
first
of
this
month:
125
firearms
stolen
from
unlocked
vehicles,
and
that's
the
only
ones
we
know
about
that's
the
ones
that
have
been
reported
as
firearm
stolen,
but
unattended
unlocked
vehicles.
That's
a
problem
because,
as
we
know,
the
deals
those
gonna
show
up
somewhere
and
another
car,
maybe
the
drugs
related
or
a
a
Collins.
O
We
kicked
around
some
ideas
and
what
we
may
may
not
be
able
to
do
to
try
to
have
better
enforcement
to
get
people
educated
on
their
responsibilities
either.
Take
that
gun
out
of
the
car
and
you
go
home
at
night
make
sure
that
that
car
is
locked,
but
some
process
that
we
can
address
going
into
making
sure
those
guns
and
all
better
secured
to
be
in
a
very
long
discussion
about
the
placement
of
safety.
Sros
is
a
cheap
present
cheap.
O
In
Charleston
County,
we
had
a
team
of
18
s
s
s
RTS,
and
this
is
something
that
was
created
under
chief
Mullen
several
years
ago
as
a
the
team
of
officers
who
are
highly
trained,
highly
specialized
officers
that
room
around
unannounced
to
the
schools,
and
they
are
there
to
protect
all
students,
not
just
public
schools,
but
political
schools
and
private
schools
that
it
covers
all
the
areas
in
Charleston
and
in
Berkeley
County
as
well,
make
sure
I
got
these
numbers
right.
As
of
today,
we
have
40
SROs
assigned
to
our
public
schools.
That's.
O
AE
Have
52
schools
of
that
we
have
11
SROs
full-time
in
each
of
our
high
schools
and
middle
schools,
which
includes
Daniel
item
James,
Island
charter
school
and
a
Daniel
Island
school.
We
have
two
officers
at
West,
Ashley,
high
school,
so
of
those
11
all
of
our
middle
schools
and
high
schools
have
an
office
or
full-time
assign
to
at
West
Ashley
high
school.
In
addition
to
that,
we
have
18
officers
assigned
to
the
school
safety
response
team,
which
is
made
up
of
six
clusters
of
three
officers
each
that
handles
the
remainder
of
the
schools.
O
And
so
the
discussion
that
the
mayor
has
been
involved
in
along
with
members
from
Charleston
County
and
with
the
Johnson
County
School
Board,
is
to
change
these
numbers
around
and
we
will
discuss
the
funding
component
of
this.
So
my
40s
are
oz
would
then
include
all
the
schools,
including
elementary
schools,
reduce
a
number
of
SS
RT
officers
from
18
to
12
in
the
middle
and
high
schools
will
maintain
11
officers
in
middle
and
middle
and
high
school
and
then
17
and
elementary
schools
with
three
supervisors.
O
AE
O
O
This
the
county
and
the
school
board
have
a
different
fiscal
year
than
we
do.
We
start
in
January.
They
start
in
on
July
the
1st
so
as
we're
going
through
this
process
about
funding
in
negotiating
with
the
County
School
Board
and
the
Sheriff's
Office
as
to
how
the
place
these
other
additional
SROs
into
our
elementary
school,
and
so
no
action
was
taken
on
that.
But
this
was
just
for
discussion
purposes
that
will
be
wrestling
with
sometime
in
the
near
future.
O
AE
A
great
question,
thank
you.
So
let
me
back
up
a
little
bit.
This
is
a
painful,
difficult
discussion
right.
There's
a
lot
of
people
have
a
lot
of
emotion
around.
This
we've
had
some
devastating
events
that
have
occurred
around
our
country,
but
I'll
start
out
a
little
bit
with
what
a
lot
of
people
are
reacting
to.
AE
What
happened
in
parkland
was
not
a
lack
of
an
SRO.
They
had
an
SRO
that
SRO
was
not
well
trained,
was
not
well
equipped
was
not
well
led;
they
did
not
have
good
training,
they
didn't
have
what
we
do
here
in
this
city
they're
there
their
policy
did
not
compel
officers
to
go
in.
There
was
a
tremendous
amount
of
failures
on
the
intelligence
or
lack
thereof,
of
a
follow-up.
There
was
red
flags
everywhere
on
that
event
that
lasted
forever,
and
there
was
failures
that
were
endless.
AE
We
could
actually
recreate
that
by
just
putting
an
SRO
in
a
school
and
saying,
okay,
we're
done.
We
did
that.
We
have
a
gun,
we
have
an
officer
there,
on-site
everybody
should
be
happy
now
and
walk
away.
That
is
not
the
answer
to
this
challenging
issue
and
I
think
we
have
to
be
thoughtful.
We
have
to
be
evidence-based.
We
had
to
make
decisions
based
on
what
is
the
best
use
of
our
resources
and
just
putting
an
SRO
in
a
school
is
not
going
to
accomplish
that.
AE
We
learned
that
from
parkland,
so
we
can't
have
s
rose
in
every
one
of
our
schools
all
the
time.
The
Hercules
model,
which
is
what
NYPD
currently
does
I
just
had
dinner
and
went
to
a
conference
with
the
chief
and
NYPD
Jim
O'neill
and
asked
him.
Are
they
still
using
that
model?
And
the
answer
is
yes?
Well.
New
York
has
some
experience
in
this
they've
experienced
vehicle-borne
incidents,
they've
experienced
stabbings,
they've,
experienced
shootings
and
they've
experienced
explosions
and
other
type
of
terrorist
rule
terrorist
events,
many
of
them,
in
fact,
they've
done
a
lot
of
research.
AE
They
do
not
cover
the
entry
schools
and
they
have
I
think
a
very
good
deployment
model
in
ours
in
large
part
based
on
that
model.
So
that's
what
we've
been
doing.
What
I
would
say
is
that
we
have
to
listen
to
our
constituency
and
there
is
a
very
loud
voice.
I
can
tell
you,
I've
been
hearing
it
since
I
got
here.
This
conversation
is
not
new.
AE
This
time
last
year
in
April,
when
I
first
got
here,
I
sat
down
with
and
have
met
on
many
occasions
with
the
CEO
and
with
the
superintendent
and
with
Michael
riding
back.
They
want
SROs
in
every
school.
In
the
county
we
have
private
schools.
We
have
a
whole
variety
of
different
schools
that
we
have
said
from
day,
one
that
we
have
responsibility
for
protecting.
They
don't
particularly
share
that
responsibility
or
that
perspective.
AE
So
this
is
a
painful
debate
that
we
need
to
have
I.
Don't
think
anybody
wants
our
children
to
not
have
the
greatest
levels
of
protection
and
responsiveness
to
me,
the
number
one
and
most
important
component
to
a
successful
outcome
where
all
of
our
kids
are
safe
and
they
have
a
great
learning
environment
is
the
relationship
that
we
have
with
the
schools
and
I
would
like
to
think
that
we
have
a
very
good
relationship.
How
that
benefits
itself
and
outcomes
is
when
somebody
calls
on
the
weekend.
AE
They
call
at
night
they
call
and
on
a
holiday
when
there's
an
event,
there's
something
on
social
media.
There's
a
parent
there's
a
principal
there's,
an
administrator
there's,
somebody
that
shares
a
concern
that
we're
responsive,
that
we
drive.
What
we're
doing
that.
We
follow
up
on
that
that
we're
trustworthy,
that
we
have
that
relationship
that
regular
communication,
that's
probably
more
than
you
wanted
to
hear,
but
I
think
that
this
is
a
discussion
that
needs
to
be
had.
How
do
we
best
protect
our
kids?
AE
It's
a
combination
of
a
lot
of
things
and
I.
Think
where
we
got
to
is
there's
a
lot
of
people
now
and
it's
not
a
new
thing.
The
one
a
sorrows
in
the
elementary
schools,
some
departments-
do
it
some,
don't
somehow
accommodations
like
what
we
do.
I
think
we
have
a
good
model,
I
think
it's
it's
it's
something
that
has
been
working
very
well
and
again.
It's
it's.
In
large
part.
Our
success
is
based
on
our
relationships,
our
training,
our
policies,
our
leadership,
our
equipment,
all
of
our
officers
in
SS,
RT
have
long
guns.
AE
S
S
The
the
elementary
schools
to
me
are
completely
different
and
the
security
around
those
schools
is
completely
different
than
that
around
middle
and
high
school,
the
threat
in
middle
and
high
school
is
kind
of
with
them.
These
are
kids
that
would
have
guns
that
these
are
kids
that
are
on
social
media.
These
are
kids
that
are
doing
that
kind
of
stuff,
and
that's
why
you
have
an
SRO
there
to
deal
with
those
kids
at
that
level.
All
the
high
schools
you've
seen
where
there's
been
an
incident
that
I
can
think
of.
S
There
was
really
a
student
that
was
dysfunctional
or
upset
that
went
into
that
school
and
and
caused
all
that
mayhem
at
the
elementary
level.
It's
completely
different,
there's
a
whole
different
mindset.
In
my
opinion,
what
you
want
in
an
elementary
school
is
you
want
a
rock-solid
barrier
around
that
school?
You
want.
You
want
to
be
sure
that
you're
watching
or
trying
to
penetrate
that
barrier,
because
those
kids
are
not
causing
all
the
mayhem
inside
it's
people
from
outside.
Trying
to
get
into
that
school,
so
you
want
to
be
sure
doors
are
locked.
S
You
want
to
be
sure
that
fences
are
up.
You
want
to
be
sure
that
that
gates
are
secure
and
and
also
that
police
officer
when
they're
there
can
also,
you
know,
build
a
relationship
with
the
students.
So
when
I
first
heard
this
argument
starting
and
it
seemed
like
the
wave
was
just
riding
over
us
and
I'm
thinking-
we
may
be
doing
this
right
and
we
may.
S
We
may
have
the
right
answer,
but
just
to
put
an
SRO
there,
we
got
to
be
sure
that
they've
got
a
whole
different
mindset
than
the
SRO
at
the
at
the
high
school
or
middle
school
I.
Don't
know
whether
I
mean
I'm,
not
a
police
officer,
but
most
people
look
at
a
police
officer
and
say
well
that
police
officer
can
do
everything
that
the
police
are
supposed
to
do.
You
all
are
trained
to
do
different
stuff.
I
mean
you
got
a
lot
of
stuff.
You
do
with
these
police
officers
in
these
schools.
S
AE
S
And
I
think
it's
because
they
don't
understand
exactly
the
role
of
the
different,
the
different
officers
and
anyway,
I'm
concerned
that
you
know
we're
spent
all
this
money
and
we
may
be
spending
it
actually
at
the
wrong
in
the
wrong
way.
The
other,
the
other
part
that
doesn't
seem
to
get
a
lot
of
attention.
I
think
it
does
maybe
at
the
county
level,
but
on
at
the
school
level,
is
they're
really
focused
on
the
public
schools.
That's
really
their
correct.
That
is
right
and
so
West
actually
I
mean
we
have
Alan
stone.
S
Hebrew
Academy
would
be
a
very
lucrative
target.
I
would
think
we
all
really
be
watch
that
Porter
gown,
it's
Elementary
in
high
school.
You
know
Blessed
Sacrament
church
school
over
there.
Okay,
all
these
private
schools,
those
are
citizens
of
this
city
and
taxpayers
and
they
pay
school
taxes
too,
but
they're
not
the
same
element
of
concern
at
the
school
level.
In
my
opinion
that
there
is
and
I'm
not
trying
to
slam
the
school's,
because
that's
their
doing
what
they're
supposed
to
be
doing,
but
we
got
to
watch
out
fall.
AE
If
I
could
just
add
to
that
not
to
sidetrack
us,
but
I
was
listening
intently
as
I
always
do
and
I
like
the
idea
of
the
alert
system
and
I
and
will
follow
up
on
that.
I
think
that's
a
good
idea,
but
we
have
finite
resources
and
what
are
we
focusing
those
resources
on?
We
just
had
a
shooting
on
Harris
Street.
Yesterday,
a
16
year
old
was
shot
doing
landscaping.
We
just
had
a
homicide
this
morning
about
5:50
this
morning.
AE
We
will
be
in
need
to
be
focused
on
that
in
all
the
areas
and
all
the
discussion
that
just
happened
today.
If
you
were
to
look
at
our
elementary
schools
and
say
how
many
calls
for
service
have
we
had
in
the
last
five
years
and
each
one
of
them,
Mike
Mike,
my
guess,
would
be
close
to
zero.
If
not
zero
doesn't
mean
it's
not
important
and
doesn't
mean
it's
not
part
of
our
mission.
AE
Space
doesn't
mean
it's
something
that
we
shouldn't
be
intimately
and
very
concerned
about,
but
I
can
tell
you
there's
a
very
loud
voice,
there's
a
cry
and
and
and
that
is
to
have
an
SRO
in
every
elementary
school.
If
you
said,
hey
chief,
what
do
you
think?
Would
you
like
to
do
this
I'd
say
sure
I've
talked
to
Chiefs,
you
haven't
in
elementary
schools,
it's
a
great
fit.
The
schools
love
it.
You
know
the
officers
enjoy
it.
AE
Mount,
Pleasant,
North
Charleston
and
the
County
Sheriff's
in
the
other
areas
of
the
county
have
them
in
the
elementary
schools.
That's
the
model
that
a
large
part
of
Charleston
County
is
adhering
to.
We've
resisted
that
until
now,
we've
kind
of
open
that
conversation,
I
think,
would
be
an
accurate
way
of
putting
it.
That's.
I
You
thank
you
chief
and
thank
you,
everyone
I
now
that
I've
listened
to
you
in
particular,
and
the
other
council
members
they
spoke
ahead
of
me.
I
mean
my
first
question
because
of
my
information
of
Metellus
day
was
what
I
read
in
the
newspaper
and
it
seemed
like.
We
were
sort
of
succumbing
to
that
wave
of
thinking
that
I
as
a
bolder
parent,
but
I
have
two
teachers,
one
at
the
College
of
Charleston
and
one
at
Wando.
High
School
is
about
to
transfer
to
teacher
Porter
gab
next
year
and
so
I
always
think
about
it.
I
The
school
setting
and
I
was
very
impressed
when
I
took
some
time
to
understand
our
model
compared
to
the
typical
putting
officer
in
in
every
school.
My
father
was
an
elementary
school
principal
in
a
different
time,
but
it
was
during
the
civil
rights
era
and
in
the
Chicago
area,
so
they
always
had
safety
at
the
top
of
concerns
for
the
administrators
and
he
always
felt
like
it
was
sort
of
the
leftovers
that
were
assigned
to
the
toughest
schools.
Just
because
you
can't
have
an
officer.
I
I
The
pent-up
demand
that's
being
asked
of
us,
but
at
the
same
time,
be
strong
work
Charleston
in
ways
that
the
rest
of
the
region
has
come
to
see
us
in
some
different
aspects
of
our
maturity
and
our
authority,
and
our
you
know,
differences
as
a
community,
so
I
don't
think
we
should
necessarily
succumb
to
the
way,
but
I'm
very
glad
to
hear
you
say
that
we
haven't
made
up
our
minds.
I.
I
Think
it's
a
huge
budget
decision,
I
mean
I
remember
last
year
during
the
budget,
I
wanted
to
increase
our
budget
million
and
a
half
dollars
by
raising.
You
know
a
millage
point
on
tax,
on
the
property
tax
and
and
and
we
couldn't
find
that
money
so
we're
talking
about
a
lot
of
you
know
significant
sacrifices
we'd
have
to
make
out
of
our
budget
this
year.
We're
gonna
be
honoring,
something
that
isn't
necessarily
coming
from
us
systemically
I
say
you.
AE
AD
You
mr.
mayor
I,
after
the
public
Metro
public
safety
committee,
I
did
a
little
searching
and
found
a
grant.
That's
potentially
available
I,
don't
know
whether
whether
you
know
and
I
may
not
have
given
this
working
enough
time
to
look
at
that
and
see,
but
I
just
wanted
to
see.
If
anything,
it's
coming,
that
are
we
eligible
as
a
city
to
apply
for
that
it
was
a
little
gray
there.
So
I
didn't.
O
H
Everybody's
made
some
really
really
good,
constructive
comments
here,
and
you
have
to
praise
our
residents
first
for
wanting
more
safety
because,
let's
be
honest,
one
school
shooting
is
too
many
and
unfortunately
it
seems
like
we
turn
on
the
news
every
other
day
and
something's
happening
at
some
and
some
in
our
country
and
unfortunately,
with
that
outside
problem.
It
doesn't
matter
what
kind
of
school
it
is,
whether
it's
elementary
middle
high
school
college.
H
You
know
you
can
fix
that
situation,
there's
been
times
where
you
get
the
middle
score
higher
and
there's
there's
drugs
that
happened
to
be
in
the
school
and
having
an
officer
there
that
you
have
the
ability
to
correct
the
issue
right
away.
Luckily,
in
elementary
school
you
know
we
don't
necessarily
have
those
problems,
but
we
still
have
people
in
this
world
that
are
looking
to
harm
others.
H
And
so,
even
if
we
can't
find
the
money
to
put
an
officer
in
every
school
or
I'd
hate
to
say
that,
because
anything
Public
Safety
wise,
we
always
seem
to
find
the
money.
You
know
we
just
always
have
and
we
always
try
everything
we
can
to
put
safety
first.
But
if,
for
some
reason
the
the
consensus
was
we're
not
going
to
put
an
officer
in
every
school,
we
we
still
need
to
take
the
advice
of
what
councilmember
moody
is
saying
and
have
maybe
an
officer
on
patrol
go
and
check
doors
at
the
schools.
H
Why
they're
out
patrolling
or
find
some
way
to
make
sure
that
that
school
is
as
safe
as
possible?
So
you
know
what
I'm
saying
is
everybody
just
made
some
really
really
great
points?
And
yes,
I
agree
with
the
accounts
from
everybody.
There's
a
different
differentiation
there
between
and
out
of
a
true
adolescent
in
elementary
school,
and
once
you
hit
that
that
maturity,
age
and
the
sort
of
vices
and
other
problems
that
we
face,
but
we
have
got
to
make
sure
that
our
parents
and
our
loyal
residents
of
Charleston
when
they've
seen
kid
to
school.
H
You
know
we
just
celebrated
Mother's,
Day
and
Father's
Day
the
last
couple
months.
You
know
I,
don't
think
there's
more
of
a
pride
endure
than
being
a
parent
right,
and
so
their
concern
is
the
safety
of
their
kids
as
they
go
to
school.
That's
something
that
we
have
to
make
sure
that
we
take
every
effort
to
ensure
that
their
kids,
when
they
step
foot
in
those
doors,
we're
doing
everything
we
can
to
keep
them
safe.
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
B
S
A
budget
question
I
know:
councilmember
shade
was
giving
a
lot
of
19
and
40,
and
all
this
kind
of
stuff
I
don't
know
how
much
money
are
we
getting
now
from
and
from
the
school
district
I
know
they
reimburse
some
level
on
the
SRO
people
they
give
us
nothing
on
the
SSR
T's,
and
particularly
nothing
for
private
schools.
Is
that
so
there
was
a
number
that
was
thrown
at
1.9
million
or
something
is
that
net
of
I
mean
I'm,
assuming
our
number
from
them
would
go
up.
Yes,.
AE
So
I
think
I
can
answer
that
and
then
all
that
ami
added
correct
me
if
I
miss
anything
everything
he
just
said
is
correct
and
so
on
average
and
an
officer's
salary
fringe,
etc
is
about
$100,000
in
all
streets.
It's
around
there.
It's
a
number
we've
been
using
just
to
make
it
easy.
So
if
we
were
to
say
we're,
gonna
cover
18,
Elementary
School's
tomorrow
and
you
add
a
supervisor
and
whatever
that's
kind
of
where
that
number
came
from
generally
there's
different
ways
to
go
about
this.
AE
If
we
were
to
cover
all
18,
we've
said
that
we
would
take
six
of
the
18,
so
you
still
have
12s
SRT
you'd
still
have
that
model.
You
take
those
six
and
transition,
those
to
the
elementary
schools.
The
sheriff's
have
agreed
to
take.
We've
asked
them
and
there's
some
funding
I
think
for
the
first
year,
perhaps
to
take
six
sheriff's
and
do
it
until
we
can
take
over
and
then,
as
already
been
stated
by
council
member
said,
their
budget
is
July,
so
they
they
have
some
money
to
to
begin.
AE
But
in
terms
of
longevity
and
the
tale
to
that
and
what
that
looks,
like
long
term,
I
think
Amy's
trying
to
be
all
encompass
with
that
number,
and
so
we
have
some
ways.
We
could
do
something:
September
1,
which
would
be
much
less
and
and
the
mayor
is
not
committed
to
any
of
those
numbers
and
certainly
not
anywhere
near
that
number.
So
that
number
is
just
something
that
Amy
I
think
is
thrown
out.
S
AE
D
J
We
know
those
conversations
will
have
to
come
up
again
for
another
day,
but
the
cluster
offices
that
we
got
now
just
like
councilman
Louise,
say
we
have
a
lot
of
private
schools.
They're
covered
not
only
just
elementary
schools
but
they're
covering
private
schools.
So
we
take
these
officers
away.
We
got
to
look
at
some
way
to
try
to
help
these
private
schools
either
citizens.
J
So
that's
another
conversation
for
nothing.
The
other
thing
in
the
councilmember
report
for
Public
Safety
Committee
two
weeks
ago,
but
we
had
bad
weather,
they
concentrated
on
downtown,
but
did
you
have
a
new
Calhoun
Street
I've
said
it
I
said
it
and
I
said
I'm
gonna
say
it
again
when
this
shut
down
the
September
car
expressway
all
that
traffic
they're
coming
from
West
Ashley,
let's
go
ahead,
Ashley
Avenue
and
that
traffic
won't
come
down
the
street
and
that
traffic
is
going
on
King
Street
to
huger.
J
But
when
you
did
speed
to
spread
it,
they'll
have
nowhere
to
go
they're
gonna
turn
now
and
they're
going
the
King.
They
come
down
King
the
line.
Then
they
get
the
King
in
line.
It's
flooded.
So
how
people
this?
The
me
offset
oh
and
they
open
it.
They
need
to
take
a
good
look
at
her
waited
cinema
spread.
This
sat
down
September
Club
two
weeks
ago
and
everybody
traffic
the
camera
off
426.
J
They
sent
it
to
Carolina,
Street,
Carolina,
the
King
and
King
to
lie,
and
then
one
one
person
from
public
safety
within
two
hours
slow
down,
King
Street.
It
was
only
one
quiet
supervisor
truck
came
to
that
speed,
nobody
from
Public
Works
and
utility,
nobody
from
storm
water,
no
water
from
Police,
Department
I
said
on
that
corner
for
two
hours
on
the
corner.
Carolina
came
so
we
need
to
look
at
when
we
talk
about
flatter
Street
and
directing
traffic
from
from
off
of
26th
the
common
application
fee.
J
We
better
look
at
getting
this
flight
and
problem
saw
on
the
corner
line
and
King
on
the
corner,
King
and
Eugene.
We
don't
had
to
causes
turning
over
already
flooded
on
King
and
Lime
Street
18
cars
flooded
out
had
to
be
pushed
and
opposed
to
choreo
parking
lot
and
gentlemen
and
ladies,
the
weather
is
coming.
The
weather's
coming
we've
been
talking
about
the
protection
for
storm
coming,
so
we
got.
We
got
a
city,
we
are
one
setting.
J
We
need
to
stop
concentrating
on
just
downtown,
but
we
need
to
concentrate
on
getting
people
out
of
the
city
when
they're
trying
to
go
ma
Pleasant
either
go
to
north
Joseph
hard
to
get
him
out
of
the
city
way
in
September
caucus
lockdown.
This
is
serious,
very
serious
that
says
Public
Safety
looked
at
it.
I
just
want
to
mention
it.
The
whole
public,
Public,
Works
and
utility
think
about
it
too,
because
we
got
to
I
know
we're
working
on
some
plane
we're
just
getting
back.
You
know
just
come
to
the
line.
J
Street
come
from
the
King
Street
as
y'all.
Let's
see
what
I'm
talking
about
y'all
think
y'all
think
I'm
lying
smaller,
but
I'm
serious.
So
we
know
we
tweak
we're
looking
for
something
very
tail.
What
happened
in
that
King
Street
corridor?
And
we
don't
get
some
of
this
water
problem
downtown
broad
suite
of.
O
B
This
is
another
fallacy
of
this
whole
conversation
is
a
requesting
these
eighteen
SROs,
but
they're.
Just
the
non
charter.
Public
schools
I
mean
just
the
non
charter,
public
schools
right,
and
so
you
also
have
what
I
consider
public
charter
schools
that
aren't
being
included,
and
that's
why
the
intense
need
for
us
to
continue
a
robust
school
safety
response
team
like
we
have
in
place
now
so
I
think
this
discussion
could
go
on
for
some
time.
So
I'm
gonna
refrain
from
from
further
comment.
L
AE
I
think
again,
I
think
there's
a
lot
of
people.
If
I
asked
you
do
you
want
to
bag
all
of
course,
you're
gonna
say
yeah
I'll
take
one
yeah.
If
I
asked
you
as
a
parent,
would
you
like
an
asteroid
you're
all
a
bunch
of
school
course,
you're
gonna
you're
gonna,
ask
for
that.
You're
gonna
demand
that
and
that's
a
sense
of
what's
occurred
in
the
county.
The
county
school
board
has
said:
we
want
an
astro
in
every
elementary
school
there's,
not
funding
for
that.
AE
But
that's
what
everybody
wants,
and
so
I
would
argue
that
what
we
have
been
doing
and
that
mayor
has
argued
that
and
defended
it
and
and
I
think
very
strongly
supported,
as
have
all
of
you,
because
we
had
this
conversation
collectively
last
year
that
the
SSR
tea
program
is
actually
working
very
well.
The
feedback
from
the
principals
from
the
parents
and
I'll
add
also
along
the
lines
of
again
our
relationship
with
the
schools
which
to
me
is
paramount
that
I
have
listened
and
said.
AE
What
else
can
we
do,
and
we
did
over
the
last
six
months,
create
an
off
duty
detail
at
the
elementary
schools.
Sheriff's
still
gay,
we
took
a
and
we
didn't
fully
have
officers
all
the
time,
but
we
had
a
much
greater
presence,
so
very
low
cost
comparatively
and
it
had
a
presence.
The
beauty
of
SSR
T
and
our
relationship
is,
if
you're
a
principal
and
you
say:
hey,
we
have
a
concern
boom.
You
get
three
officers,
we
have
an
issue
with
traffic
boom,
you
get
five
officers,
we
had
a
fight,
we
had
a
shooting
it.
AE
You
know,
we've
had
some
issues
in
some
of
our
communities,
you
don't
just
get
one
you
get
whatever
you
need.
We
have
that
relationship
where
that
responsive,
whatever
it
takes,
is
what
we'll
do,
and
we
do
that
often,
but
to
just
say
to
be
able
to
say
we
have
one
every
where
that's
the
debate.
There's
a
lot
of
people
are
demanding
that
that
happened
and
that's
a
that's,
a
difficult
ask
and
it's
very
costly.
AE
B
O
My
best,
but
I
just
wanted
to
come
back
and
close.
The
circle
oh,
but
I
did
want
this
discussion
to
come
before
the
Public
Safety
Committee
in
for
council
have
a
robust
discussion
about
this
subject
and
I
know
we'll
be
following
this
back
on
public
safety
and
I
know
we'll
be
following
this
back
on
our
ad-hoc,
the
budget
committee,
but
I
just
want
to
make
it
just
a
real
some
real,
quick
points.
All
our
children,
as
has
been
said,
are
our
priority,
including
those
who
are
in
the
private
schools,
the
public
schools
or
charter
schools.
O
We've
got
to
cover
all
of
them,
not
just
the
ones
in
our
traditional
public
schools.
We
do
have
a
limited
amount
of
resources.
We
don't
have
a
well.
That
goes
all
the
way,
deep
with
a
little
bit
of
resources
and
the
one
thing
that
we
have
not
said
a
lot
about.
That's
what
we
need
to
just
point
this
out.
We
have
a
highly
professional
Police
Department.
We
have
a
wonderful
chief.
We
have
a
wonderful
staff
at
some
point
in
time.
O
We've
got
to
listen
to
them
and
they
know
what
they're
doing,
and
we
got
to
put
our
faith
and
trust
in
and
how
they're
proceeding
with
this
and
I
support
them
completely
on
that
matter.
I'm
gonna
jump
ahead
to
the
last
saying
that
we
talked
about
and
we
made
a
recommendation
concerning
what
Zimmerman
had
brought
up
in
the
public
comment.
Part
on
the
issue.
O
With
this
hit-and-run
with
kcj,
we
discovered
there
was
a
loophole
regarding
a
vehicle
that,
if
it's
hits
an
object,
that's
not
a
vehicle
that
is
not
lawful
and
an
injury
is
not
involved.
Then
that
person
that's
not
having
legal
responsibility
to
stop.
So
what
we're
recommending
is
and
is,
for
our
legal
advisors,
prepare
an
ordinance
to
close
that
loophole
so
that,
regardless
of
the
of
the
injury
that
one
person
may
suffer
from
a
collision
with
another
vehicle
that
that
vehicle
operator
to
stop,
if
they
hit
a
bicyclist,
they
hit
a
rickshaw.
O
AE
So
can
I
have
just
one
update
on
the
cameras,
I
think
councilmember
Mitchell,
or
somebody
mentioned
the
cameras
they
were
were
not
working
yesterday.
They
are
working
now.
I
just
got
briefed
this
morning.
I
had
the
same
concern
and
there
is
a
there
about
ten
years
old,
the
line
of
sight
with
the
trees
and
a
whole
lot
of
issues
that
you
know,
I
don't
need
to
get
into,
but
they
have
been
addressed
and
it's
there.
They
have
been
up
and
working
since
yesterday.
All
right
thank.
E
L
L
You
know
the
mayor
executed
tree
protection
agreement.
This
one
that's
been
around
a
good
while
we
have
a
good,
comprehensive
solution
and
passed
unanimous
I
know
mr.
cassis
and
his
team
is
here
in
case.
You
all
want
to
address
any
issues
directly
to
him.
So
I
would
ask
the
privileged
that
we
make
a
motion
to
pass
item
P.
B
This
is
the
agreement
with
Dominion
energy
regarding
tree
trimming
pruning,
but
I
would
also
point
out
to
council
that
includes
the
formation
of
undergrounding
task
force,
because
the
ultimate
solution
in
our
neighborhoods
that
have
beautiful
trees
is
try
to
get
the
utility
lines
underground.
Okay
and
the
system
we've
had
in
place
for
some
time
has
been
a
little
cumbersome
and
slow,
and
so
we're
going
to
get
a
group
together.
That
will
have
some
responsibilities
over
this
matter
and
help
to
move
it
along
councilmember
moody.
We.
L
S
AC
N
N
M
Thank
you,
Miss
Marron
I
was
gonna
mention
this
yesterday.
It
slipped
my
mind.
I
know
that
the
Public
Works
Committee
has
a
lot
on
their
plate,
currently
with
everything.
That's
going
on
in
the
city
and
I
see
mr.
Casas
yes
sitting
here
in
this
conversation
about
Rivlin,
Terrace,
I,
think
one
of
the
things
that
would
be
good
at
least
quarterly,
if
not
more
often
is
to
put
on
public
works,
an
update
on
where
we
are
with
various
undergrounding
projects
in
the
city,
because
there
are
some
that
have
been
talked
about
something
on
the
books.
M
The
one
that
comes
to
mind
is
an
sandbar
I'll
post,
a
gilyard
Center,
so
probably
a
good
idea
to
start
thinking
about
that
and
where
we
are
with
these
projects,
so
we
can
have
some
information
and
see
if
there's
something
we
can
do
to
push
some
of
them
along
all
over
the
city.
So
if
we
can,
do
you
mind
putting
that
as
part
of
the
agenda,
that
would
be
great.
B
L
AF
The
Army
Corps
of
Engineers
is
reviewing
our
MOA
with
the
State
Historic
Preservation
Office
that
they
requested
in
support
of
that
permit
application,
which
is
the
last
stage
to
get
that
that
permit
completed
and
then
CWS
were
finalizing
our
plans
for
their
their
utility
relocation
work
as
part
of
that
project.
At
the
same
time,
we
do
have
an
emergency
repair,
contactor
qualification
request
currently
being
advertised
so
that
when
we
have
these
emergency
repairs
have
been
coming
up
in
more
frequency.
AF
We
have
a
group
of
firms
that
we
can
get
prices
and
work
with
on
those
repair
projects
along
those
lines.
The
brick
arts
rehabilitation
pilot
project
we've
talked
about
trying
to
do
the
arch
from
the
runs
from
coming
down
to
trad
and
Logan.
That
project
we're
working
on
the
qualifications
package
now,
and
we
should
have
that
ready
to
go
out
within
a
month
or
so
as
well
on
that
on
that
project,
Forest
Acres
phase
two.
AF
We
had
a
productive
discussion
with
AT&T
this
week
last
week
with
the
Duck
Bank
relocation
versus
alternate
design
scenarios
as
the
two
options
for
how
we
move
that
project
forward.
Regarding
the
conflict
with
the
duck
banks
on
that
unplayed
ground
road
and
we've
moved
to
substantially
complete
on
our
property
acquisition.
We
have
one
remaining
owner
who
has
agreed
to
the
tentative
offer
we've
extended,
so
we're
finalizing
that
work
as
well.
AF
We
do
have
the
potential
to
get
phased
to
be
finished
roughly
in
line
with
being
advertised
for
phase
two,
a
so
we're
trying
to
see
if
we
can
accelerate
phase
two
be
a
little
bit
to
have
both
of
those
come
out
for
bidding
at
the
same
time
period.
Potentially
the
Market
Street
project
we're
addressing
TRC
comments.
Those
are
mostly
being
submitted
as
we
speak
that
most
mostly
minor
comments
regarding
striping
plans,
landscaping
and
stormwater.
We
also
are
working
with
CWS
to
finalize
their
plans
for
their
utility
work
on
that
project.
AF
At
that
point,
we'll
be
able
to
provide
the
plans
to
Dominion
to
be
able
to
underground
the
power,
hopefully,
along
that
project
on
an
MoU
we
have
with
Dominion
the
Central
Park
wamba
drainage
model.
We
had
our
initial
site
visits
by
the
modeling
team
last
week,
which
actually
timed
out
well
with
the
significant
rainstorm
that
we
had
so
that
they
got
good
field
data
from
that
and
we'll
have
some
some
good
input
initially
into
the
survey
needs
and
the
rest
of
that
model
creation.
AF
The
Hickory
Farms
diversion
channel
the
design
is
moving
to
the
TRC
process
and
property
acquisition,
Aug
King
drainage
improvement,
so
that
the
scope
negotiation
is
done
with
the
consultant
at
this
point
for
the
project.
I
think
if
I
understand
the
procedures
right
that
will
come
to
the
July
meeting
now
for
Public,
Works
and
utilities,
then,
depending
on
what
we
have
from
the
block,
works
Utilities
Committee,
then
we
would
come
to
the
August
meeting
potentially
for
ways.
It
means
to
be
able
to
award
that
contract.
AF
In
terms
of
the
floodplain
report,
we
did
complete
our
damage
assessment
training.
We
had
47
staff
that
were
updated
in
our
training
session
preparation
for
hurricane
season,
so
that
really
gets
us
a
much
more
thorough
assessment
team
than
we've
had
in
years
past.
Based
on
the
significant
numbers
of
structures
we
have
within
the
base
flood
of
the
special
flood
hazard
area
in
the
city,
where
technically
we're
required
to
inspect
every
one
of
those
properties.
AF
When
we
have
a
major
event,
we've
also
completed
our
first
round
of
demolitions
on
the
FEMA
buyout
properties
and
we're
looking
at
moving
into
the
second
round
of
demolitions.
As
soon
as
we
can
clarify
a
remaining
property
on
property
acquisition,
and
we
have
contacted
FEMA
and
had
some
discussion
regarding
ways.
We
could
break
out
base
flood
elevation
requirements
for
different
types
of
properties
or
damage
that
we're
still
awaiting
a
formal
response
from
them
on
earth.
And
at
this
point.
H
And
mr.
fountain,
just
to
kind
of
reiterate
what
we
talked
about
yesterday,
we
are
going
to
plan
a
public
meeting
in
West
Ashley
for
the
Hickory
Farms
project.
Now
that
we're
getting
down
to
the
nitty-gritty
with
that
project
to
make
sure
that
all
of
the
homeowners
understand
what
the
design
looks
like
and
what
the
actual
process
of
of
that
you
know
you
and
I
had
talked
about
doing
that,
and
we
can
plan
for
that
in
July.
Also,
mr.
H
mayor,
just
to
reiterate
what
we
talked
about
yesterday,
that
will
have
some
public
comment
periods
opening
up
in
July.
Once
we
get
the
dates
finalized
in
location,
about
what
the
future
of
the
Bridgepoint
property
will
look
like
and
also
the
Dutch
are
going
to
be
involved
and
that's
going
to
be
a
sort
of
a
big
priority
with
how
they
look
at
their
plan
and
how
that
integrates
with
ours
and
just
some
feedback.
H
I
passed
along
that
information
just
to
the
shadow
moss
residents
last
night
and
have
already
received
a
ton
of
positive
feedback
that
the
neighborhood
wants
to
be
at
those
meetings,
they're
going
to
come
full
force.
So,
the
sooner
the
better
that
we
can
get
those
dates
and
location
and
get
that
spread
out,
that's
going
to
be
a
really
really
productive,
successful
meeting
between
the
residents
and
city
staff.
Thank
you
absolutely.
M
AF
So
we
will
be
ready
within
a
month
for
bid.
The
question
is:
do
we
wait
for
the
Army
Corps
engineer
permit
to
determine
if
there
be
an
alterations
to
the
bid?
If
we
move
forward
with
a
bit
and
then
there
is
something
where
we
have
to
change
design,
of
course,
that
would
open
back
up
to
change,
orders
and
requests
in
the
contractors.
At
that
point,
I
mean.
AF
There's
an
agreement
we
had
a
council
brought,
we
brought
to
Council
and
council
approved
a
memorandum
with
the
State
Historic
Preservation
Office,
regarding
how
the
low-battery
wall
street,
as
historic
structure,
Jeremy
Corbyn
here
part
of
their
permit
requirement,
is
that
that
was
their
last
function
that
they
were
required
to
complete
their
review.
However,
the
review
is
technically
open
to
any
aspect
of
the
project
while
they're
completing
it.
M
AF
AF
L
Well,
the
homestead
exemption
was
sent
back
to
council
for
a
little
bit
more
legal
work
to
be
done
on
it,
so
that
was
providers,
information
and
the
agreement
between
the
city
and
I
think
this.
Does
it
sit
location,
property,
clutch,
deferred,
that's
deferred
of
a
preferred
in
committee,
so
should
be
deferred
aknowledge
in
about
fine.
With
that,
that's
the
end
of
my
fixed
end
of
our
report.
Thank
you.
Mister
thank.
B
AD
Our
advice
and
vice
chairman,
we
also
had
councilman
shade
and
councilman
Marvin
Marvin
Wagner
were
there,
but
since
oh
I'm,
sorry
and
Councilman
Griffin
was
there
so
I.
But
I
would
like
to
call
on
director
krons
Burt
if
he
would,
since
he
gave
us
updates
on
most
of
these
things.
During
our
committee
meeting.
AG
Good
evening,
I
have
there's
a
long
list
on
here.
I'll
try
to
get
through
these
as
quickly
as
I
can.
If
you
have
any
specific
questions,
just
ask
me:
probably
we
won't
hit
all
of
them
because
all
of
them
don't
have
updates.
Only
some
of
them
are
will
be
coming
off
the
list.
The
next
time
you
see
them
so
going
through
the
starting
with
number
four,
the
$10.99
Meeting
Street.
AG
We
have
completed
our
structural
analysis
of
the
building
and
the
consultants
have
told
us
what
the
use
is
going
to
be
based
on
the
the
ratings
and
the
category
of
use,
especially
with
regards
to
the
gym
so
that
we're
we're
gonna
have
to
move
the
gym
downstairs.
The
architects
are
working
on
floor
plans
right
now
and
we'll
be
finishing
up
some
of
that
stuff
soon,
so
we
can
get
it.
J
AG
J
AG
Sorry,
I'm
I
said
I'm
a
meeting
street.
My
apologies
going
down
to
number
five
Mina
Municipal
Golf
Course,
so
the
consultant
indicates
that
has
plans
for
the
golf
course
renovations
are
near
complete
we're
waiting
on
a
wetland
and
property
line,
verification
from
the
permitting
agencies,
while
the
wetland
certifications
once
complete,
a
TRC
application
will
be
submitted,
and
once
the
project
is
approved
and
fully
funded
will
then
enter
into
a
RFP
for
construction.
So
I
don't
have
any
updates
on
the
fundraising
efforts,
but
I
know
that
the
private
group
is
actively
working
on
that
front.
AG
AG
So,
coming
on
down
update
on
the
Charleston
battery,
so
there's
been
a
lot
of
talk
about
the
battery.
We
are
continuing
work
with
the
project
that
the
school
district
is
working
on
the
surcharge
and
field
project.
We
are
going
to
be
doing
some
other
work,
maintenance
work
to
the
grandstands
and
the
visitor
stands.
D
AG
AG
AG
The
burden
is
in
their
court
at
which
time,
if
this
well,
let
me
back
up
the
school
districts
is
finishing
their
plans
for
the
field
layout.
Once
we
see
if
the
professional
soccer
field
can
fit
in
stony
field,
then
that
would
and
then
the
battery
could
actually
make
certain
upgrades
that
they
would
need
to
meet
the
FIFA
soccer
standards.
It
would
come
to
public
hearings
and
City
Council
for
approval,
so
they
have
a
long
way
to
go.
We're
not
stopping
with
our
work,
but
they
are
out
there
doing
some
stuff.
L
You
leave
that
up.
Mr.
man,
I
guess
committee
members
in
the
event
that
they
deal
falls
through.
It
seems
like
that,
in
that
stadium,
on
that
property
salts
in
the
cell,
do
we
have
a
plan
B
acquire
some
of
that
equipment
if
their
deal
falls
through
because
it
is
gonna,
be
towing
down,
makes
sense
to
get
a
scoreboard
and
seats
and
concession
equipment.
We.
AG
Don't
right
now
the
school
district
is
working
on
upgrading
the
scoreboard.
That's
there.
We
don't
have
any
project
identified
to
get
the
that
big
Jumbotron
from
them
you
they
have
indicated
in
the
past
that
they
have
lots
of
equipment
and
kitchen
equipment
and
stuff.
We
don't
have
any
room
for
it:
the
facilities,
the
spaces
in
stony
field
or
just
locker
rooms.
There's
no
there's
in
the
concession
buildings
are
really
just
small
hallways
that
the
school
district
serves
hot
dogs
out
of
yeah.
L
I
understand
that,
but
I
mean,
if
we're
gonna
renovate
this
bill
and
obviously
we're
not
gonna
renovate
it
for
the
previous
use,
we're
gonna
renovate
it
for
future
uses
so
again,
I
think
a
plan
B.
If
this
equipment
is
gonna,
go
south
of
the
border,
you
know
again.
If
they
deal
doesn't
work
and
I
mean
I,
know
we're
trying
to
be
supportive
of
them
and
every
wing.
But
somehow,
let's
say
a
dozen
work,
it
still
seems
like
there
may
be
an
opportunity
there.
AG
We
could
evaluate
what
they
have
to
see
if
we
could
use
it
somewhere,
so
I'll
try
to
get
through
quick.
Well,
the
two
residences
on
Woodland
Road
Park
property
have
been
demolished.
This
is
a
piece
of
land
on
Woodland
Road,
a
West
Ashley
that
was
purchased
many
years
ago
as
a
Greenbelt
park,
and
so
it
was
just
the
next
step
in
getting
that
thing,
cleaned
up
and
better
for
the
neighborhood.
AG
R
AG
Then
apparently
Park
this
is
a
joint
project
with
the
town
of
James
Island.
There's
a
contract
being
developed
right
now
that
should
be
coming
to
you
and
a
soon
to
be
determined,
consul
meeting
for
approval
longer
exchange
agreement.
As
you
all
know,
you
voted
for
this
one
to
go
through.
We
are
working
on
our
due
diligence
to
make
this
project
happen.
As
soon
as
we
get
right
now
we
have
surveying
happening.
AG
You
approved
a
contract
for
professional
services
at
your
last
council
meeting,
we're
going
to
enter
into
the
analysis
of
what
can
and
could
be
done
there
as
far
as
a
waterfront
facility,
at
the
point
where
we
get
a
permit
for
that
dot,
the
land
will
be
transferred
to
the
city,
and
we
will
continue
down
that
road
on
the
project.
Yes,
sir,
because.
M
I
think
yesterday,
when
we
asked
we
passed,
we
approved
$700,000
for
the
dock
and
for
improvements
to
the
dock
and
I
had
asked
councilmember
Gregory
at
the
time
where
we
were
with
this
agreement.
I
me
somewhere
towards
getting
this
agreements
done
in
place
before
we
start
spending
a
whole
bunch
of
money
and
I
mean
this
is
post
litigation
right,
so
we're
sort
of
in
that
gray
zone
of
post
litigation
trying
to
resolve
this
thing.
No.
AC
But
then
the
second
step
is
that
once
the
permit
is
approved
and
the
parties
agree
on
the
park
design,
then
within
30
days
the
HOA
can
raise
the
property
to
the
city
and
then
that's
where
things
take
off.
After
that,
it's
going
to
be
construction
of
the
the
docks
with
the
fingers
and
and
the
the
park
then
is
public
park.
And
so
yes
to
answer
your
question,
it's
been
resolved
and
we're
moving
forward
so
and
the
budgets
been
there
for
a
while.
AC
AG
AG
The
school
districts
is
moving
along
their
surcharge
project.
The
seal
field
that
settled
approximately
a
half
a
foot
already
so
gravity
is
doing
its
work,
WPA
L,
which
is
the
whopper
Park
site.
While
we
were
sitting
here,
we
have
a
selection
committee
member
that
went
to
the
mayor,
so
that
project
will
be
advertising
for
an
RFP
soon
for
professional
services.
AG
There's
a
couple
of
other
things
here:
Corinne
Jones,
community
garden,
Clemson
students
have
constructed
their
garden
shed
and
the
Charleston
Parks
Conservancy
was
working
with
us
in
the
parks
department
to
do
a
layout
plan
and
construct
that
community
garden,
David
Daniel
Holland
neighborhood
park
for
complete
and
open
Ferguson,
Village
Portland
Lu,
complete
and
open.
So
those
are
the
items
for
the
updates.
Any
questions.
I
have
I'm.
B
AG
Mcgregor
has
asked
that
to
be
placed
on
the
agenda
for
a
update
in
the
next
community
committee
meeting.
We
have
a
page-turner
this
week
with
the
consultants,
so
construction
documents
should
be
nearing
completion
where
we
can
get
it
out
for
a
bit
for
advertise
for
a
bid.
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
Thank.
AG
R
H
B
H
H
Soccer
does
this
sound
yeah?
The
reason
why
I
asked
for
this
to
be
put
on
the
agenda,
because
I
saw
an
article
and
was
taken
aback
when
it
it
almost
seemed
like
the
article
was
stating
that
they
were
definitely
going
to
be
playing
this
upcoming
year
at
stony
field
and
I
was
taking
it
back
for
a
couple
reasons:
number
one
we
can't
play
on
stony
field,
the
upcoming
season
at
all.
H
You
know
any
sports
football
or
anything
like
that,
but
number
two
I
think
it's
important
to
note
that
no
decisions
regarding
the
battery
Charleston
battery
coming
to
stony
field
have
been
made
at
this
time.
There
have
been
some
you
know
preliminary
discussions
about
what
it
would
take
to
have
it
done,
but
before
a
decision
like
that
was
made,
we
would
have
to
have
a
public
hearing,
and
the
neighborhood
would
would
definitely
want
to
weigh
in
on
this
semi
stony
field,
as
we
talked
about
this
yesterday,
is
a
cultural
icon
of
Charleston.
H
S
H
H
I
mean
there's
no
denying
that,
but
it
almost
seems
like
every
time
we
put
a
little
bit
of
work
in
a
study
field
and
everybody
wants
to
use
it
and
there's
only
so
much
it
can
take,
and
we
know
that
you
know
the
raising
of
the
field
is
more
of
a
temporary
thing
is
not
gonna,
be
I
mean
in
a
few
years.
We
may
have
to
do
it
again.
I
mean
that
field
is
gonna.
Continue
over
time.
H
To
sink,
I
mean
it's
like
you
said
it
was
built
on
a
landfill
I
mean
there
are
gonna
have
to
be
some
really
long-term
answers
that
we
make
you
know,
but
it
almost
is
like
what
are
they
gonna
do
for
us?
You
know
what
are
they
going
to
give
back
to
us?
They
want
to
use
the
field
I,
get
it
they're,
gonna
bring.
H
H
We've
got
to
get
something
back,
so
if
they're
will,
if
they
want
to
use
this
field
and
the
Neighborhood
Association,
and
that
area
is
okay
with
it
and
the
community
and
the
public
hearings
go
well
and
FIFA
and
whoever
else
has
to
weigh
in
on
it,
then
at
that
point
I
mean
you
know,
there
has
to
be
some
sort
of
agreement,
one
of
the.
How
are
they
going
to
make
this
feel
better
and
help
us
make
sure
that
this
field
never
ever
goes
away
and
actually
counts?
H
Well,
he
was
gonna
have
to
know
about
it,
regardless
anyways
I
just
wanted
to
make
those
comments,
because
I
I
just
think
it's
important
that
that
people
that
live
over
in
that
area
and
in
or
around
that
field
understand
that
no
decisions
have
been
made.
The
discussions
have
been
extremely
preliminary
and
there's
still
a
lot
of
hurdles
to
before
week.
Something
like
that
could
ever
happen.
Thank.
J
Wait
until
all
of
the
goshi
Asians
and
public
hearings,
because
the
word
on
the
street
is
just
three
black
Council
members-
they
just
don't
want
this
happen
with
the
battery.
So
I
glad
you
made
this
comment.
I
brought
it
up
from
the
beginning,
wait
see!
What's
gonna
happen,
you
know
that
y'all
know
what
my
thank
you.
AD
M
You
mr.
mayor
of
the
Committee
on
traffic
and
transportation
met
today
at
2
o'clock
to
take
up
the
important
issue.
Actually,
it
is
an
important
issue
of
entering
into
a
Memorandum
of
Understanding
between
the
city
of
Charleston,
Berkeley
County
and
the
Department
of
Transportation
to
install
a
traffic
light
at
the
corner
of
Clements,
Ferry,
Road
and
Beresford
Ron.
It's
hard
to
believe
to
take
the
committee
to
do
that,
but
we
did
it.
We
did
approve
entering
into
the
MOU.
M
We
will
be
the
first
of
the
three
entities
to
sign
into
this
MOU
you'll
next
go
to
Berkeley
County.
If
they
don't
have
any
changes
and
will
go
to
the
VOT,
if
they
do
have,
any
changes
will
come
back
to
us.
It's
a
traffic
light
for
those
of
you
like
me
who
believe
that
every
time
a
traffic
light
goes
up,
our
quality
of
life
goes
down
as
part
of
that
MOU.
There
will
not
be
another
traffic
light
within
a
quarter
mile,
north
or
south
of
that
light.
So
I
guess
that's
good
news.
M
It
did
bring
up
a
debate
that
I
understand
it
going
on
for
some
time
amongst
the
communities.
The
residential
communities
up
along
that
corridor
and
access
along
Clements,
Ferry,
Road
I
think
that's
an
ongoing
conversation
that
continued
after
we
had
our
TNT
committee
meeting
today
with
mr.
Lindsey
and
mr.
M
Benjamin,
so
traffic
light
coming,
it
looks
like
if
we
can
get
the
County
on
board
and
get
the
d-o-t
on
board
issues
with
residents
up
there
that
we
need
to
make
sure
we
keep
an
eye
on
as
we
get
access
off
of
Clements
Ferry,
Road
in
and
out
of
a
very
busy
corridor.
So
with
that
I
do
believe.
We
need
approval
of
this
council.
So
we
send
this
memorandum
on
to
Berkeley
County
all.
C
Just
want
to
thank
committee,
and
mr.
Benjamin
for
working
on
this
item.
Neighborhood
in
particular,
has
been
really
begging
for
a
light
at
the
center
section,
for
I
mean
it's
been
at
least
four
or
five
years,
and
there's
been
a
number
of
developments
that
have
occurred
right
around
that
area
that
have
threatened
the
ability
for
us
to
have
a
light
at
that
intersection.
Subsequently,
that
will
make
a
connection
to
the
other
side
of
the
road
as
well.
That
will
ultimately
end
up
being
a
new
fire
station
in
that
same
area,
so
anyway,
I.
C
B
You
and
and
I
would
like
to
point
out
also
that
the
the
other
side
of
the
intersection
is
where
the
proposed
relocation
of
Enterprise
Drive
will
be,
which
is
where
our
future
fire
station
will
go
and
how
important
this
is
for
Public
Safety
for
up
and
down
Clements
Ferry
Road
for
access
from
our
new
fire
station
when
that
gets
built.
So
it's
important
to
the
city,
public
safety
as
well
any
further
discussion,
all
in
favor,
please
say
aye
and
opposed
the
eyes.
Have
it
X
is
our
Committee
on
ways
and
means.
A
A
And
if
you
look
at
the
bottom
of
your
page,
there
was
an
approval
to
authorize
the
mayor
to
execute
a
transfer
agreement
that
was
also
deferred
councilmember
white.
The
record
will
show
voted,
nay
on
the
management
agreement
with
west
edge
route,
and
then
there
was
an
item
that
was
denied.
It
was
the
request
for
the
facility
use
agreement.
A
The
city
would
allow
the
Charleston
area
Regional
Transit
Authority
to
utilize
43
Sumar
right,
so
we
have
to
do
all
of
these,
so
we
don't
vote
on
them
and
then
there
was
another
one
that
dealt
with
the
optimization
of
the
mayor
to
execute
a
memorandum
of
agreement
for
the
city
and
Leucadia
post
properties.
That.
B
A
C
M
AA
O
A
B
Any
further
discussion,
all
in
favor
of
those
of
that
report,
as
amended
police,
say
aye
any
any
opposed
the
eyes
have
it
now.
I
did
I
want
to
commend
councilmember
white
and
share
with
all
of
council
just
a
few
renditions
here
of
an
important
matter
that
was
just
approved,
which
is
the
construction
of
the
Daniel
Island
Recreation
Center,
and
this
shows
a
floor
plan
of
the
facility
which
will
be
nearly
22,000
feet,
including
a
full
gym
and
even
a
whole
additional
gym
space
and
in
the
in
the
meeting
room
over
to
your
right.
B
But
I
just
wanted
to
share
how
how
handsome
I
think
this
building
is
and
what
a
great
asset
it
will
be
to
the
city.
Here's
another
angle
of
it,
and
this
shows
the
inside
corridor
already
planned
as
to
how
it
will
be
designed
and
and
even
decorated,
I
guess
and
there's
a
nighttime
view.
It's
going
to
be
handsome
facility,
a
great
addition
to
the
city,
so
councilmember
white.
Thank
you
for
your
leadership
and
thank
you
for
all
of
council
support
for
this
matter.
It's
been
a
long
time
coming.
Councilmember
Sheila,
yeah.
AD
I
just
wanted
to
mention
mr.
mayor
that
yeah
this
is
located
on
Daniel
Island,
but
the
way
our
rec
department
works
in
the
way
our
school
leagues
work
a
lot
of
times
using
city
facilities.
Everyone
in
the
city
will
enjoy
that
and
I
just
say
that
from
having
a
child
to
plays
athletics
and
spends
a
lot
of
time
right
now
at
the
Daniel
Island
school,
since
we
don't
have
a
sit
facility.
So
this
goes
to
help
all
of
our
constituents.
It's
not
just
for
Daniel
Island,
absolutely.
C
Want
to
thank
again
I
said
yesterday,
I'll
say
it
again.
Thank
you
all.
My
colleagues,
a
mayor
for
y'all
support
staff.
Who's
worked
on
this
a
long
time
coming.
The
community
is
going
to
benefit
as
a
whole,
not
just
Daniel
Allen,
to
your
point
and
I
would
say
that,
as
you
all
do,
have
your
your
opportunity
to
come
out
to
Daniel,
Island
and
children
to
come
and
play
in
the
facility
make
sure
to
stay
and
have
lunch,
spend
a
little
money
support
our
businesses
on
the
island.
C
O
O
AA
B
A
E
B
We've
got
a
motion
to
approve
one,
two,
four,
five,
six
and
seven
any
discussion
all
in
favor,
please
say
aye
any
opposed
the
eyes.
Have
it
now
for
third
reading
a
ratification
vote,
any
discussion
all
in
favor,
please
say:
aye
the
eyes
have
it
next
we
have
two
items
up
for
first
reading:
they're
related.
This
is
we've
seen
this
matter
before,
but
we
had
a
joint
meeting
of
City,
Council
and
and
the
Planning
Commission,
and
we
reviewed
a
lot
of
parcels
and
city
staff
upon
that
joint
meeting
came
up
with
some
recommendations.
B
I've
already
heard
that
there's
a
few
properties
that
the
owners
have
come
forward
and
would
like
some
more
consideration
about
the
rezoning
of
their
properties,
and
so
we'll
have
to
take
those
into
consideration.
But
the
overall
intent,
of
course,
was
trying
to
you
know
if
it's
a
duck
call
at
a
duck,
if
it's
heavy
industrial,
that
it
ought
to
be
heavy
industrial
and
not
residential,
and
so
we
were
trying
to
make
make
that
demarcation,
sort
of
a
speak
between
industrial
zoning
in
our
city
and
particularly
for
residential
and
kind
of
separate,
the
two.
K
I
have
not
met
with
the
the
community
and
they
were
on
the
Upper
Peninsula.
You
go
up
to
foot
well,
14
still
12
stories.
They
would
score
the
meat
with
the
meat
protection
Neela
T,
which
is
in
Mumford
Street
back.
There
is
that's
a
lot
of
homeowners
back
there
and
if
you
have
that
12
going
up
to
12
stories,
there
you're
gonna
hide
that
community
they're
gonna
be
traffic
there
and
that's
not
gonna
happen.
K
The
rest-
and
that's
not
me,
but
take
it
out
at
this
time
if
you
have
to
revisit
that
again
until
I,
can
get
my
hands
on
and
meet
with
these
meet
with
the
people
in
the
community,
the
file
exactly
what's
going
on
and
till
they
meet
with
the
community
and
let
them
know
what's
gonna
happen
if
they're
rezoning
all
these
properties
in
that
area,
so
long
say,
there's
no
problem
with
that.
They
kinda
council.
B
Kind
of
related
number
one
is
to
remove
the
residential
entitlement
from
light
and
heavy
industrial
zone
district,
basically
and-
and
then
number
two
takes
those
parcels
that
we
reviewed
parts
of
by
parcel
at
our
joint
City
Council
zone,
Planning
Commission
meeting,
where
we
made
this
a
judgment
that
this
parcel
actually
does
make
sense
to
have
some
residential
use.
So
then
we
asked
staff
to
assign
some
appropriate
zoning
so
that
those
parcels
could
could
maintain
a
residential
entitlement.
I
I
I
My
concern
is
related
to
the
fact
that
we
never
have
enacted
any
changes
to
the
Upper
Peninsula
ordinance,
where
our
goal
was
to
increase
the
opportunity
or
the
requirement,
essentially,
as
as
properties
were
going
to
be
redeveloped
in
the
U
P
category
for
workforce
housing,
so
that
that
that
ordinance
that
has
been
deferred
for
several
months
now
has
expired.
Officially,
as
a
bless
of
as
of
today,
we
don't
have
it
to
revisit
today.
I
It's
still
deferred,
and
so
I
would
just
like
to
clarify
that
if
we
are-
and
we
are
changing
some
of
these
industrial
properties
to
AUP
designation
so
now
that
they
would
be
resumed
if
assuming
that
they
don't
come
in
for
any
actual
concept
plan
or
site
plan
approval
or
anything
that
would
have
to
further
their
actual
request
of
how
many
stories
they're
wanting
to
build
or
the
details
of
their
yupi
development.
We
would
still
have
the
opportunity
of
requiring
them
to
do
something
about
workforce.
I
L
Z
In
regards
to
the
Upper
Peninsula
sign,
we
were
just
discussing
it.
The
change
regarding
affordable
housing
was
made
to
the
Upper
Peninsula
zoning.
There
were
other
discussion.
There
were
discussions
about
other
items
which
were
not
made
in
regards
to
that,
but
the
standard
investing
rights
apply
in
terms
of
timing
and
the
UPN
everywhere
else.
M
I
C
C
The
second
thing
is
I
was
at
the
joint
Planning
Commission
meeting
and
had
the
opportunity
to
go
through
discussion,
and
we
did
certainly
go,
but
very
you
know,
block
by
block
parcel
by
parcel,
but
one
of
the
things
that
I,
don't
know
is
happened,
and
maybe
it
has.
Some
people
had
mentioned
that
they
don't
want
to
be
included
in
this
change.
Is
that
I
think
we
find
ourselves
when
we
make
changes
like
this
I
think
to
open
ourselves
up
for
litigation
potentially
and
so
in
something
like
that.
C
C
It's
hundreds
and
hundreds
of
parcels,
it's
it's
manageable
number
I,
think
the
right
thing
to
do
to
respect
property
owners
rights
is
to
go
and
have
those
property
owners
have
a
discussion
whether
we
bring
them
collectively
together,
one
by
one,
whatever
the
case
may
be,
but
have
them
agree
to
this
I
didn't
agree
to
the
zoning
change,
because
some
of
these
things
do
make
sense.
I
mean
again,
you
know
when
we
take
all
of
us
or
those
who
could
make
it
plus
Planning
Commission.
We
have
a
discussion
about
making
appropriate
changes.
C
I
think
that
you
know
I
don't
want
to
think
that
my
time
was
wasted
or
anyone
else's
time
was
wasted
when
we
went
through
that
exercise.
But
at
the
same
time,
I
do
think
role
of
property
owners.
I
think
we
need
to
go
directly
to
them
and,
quite
frankly,
have
them
sign
up
for
the
change
and
then
I
think
that
also
does
hopefully
eliminate
the
ability
for
the
city
it
open
itself
up
to
litigation
when
we
make
changes
like
this,
so
that
would
be
my
recommendation
I.
You
know
as
it
stands.
C
The
motion
on
the
floors
tonight
I
will
support
the
motion
because
I'm
not
prepared
to
vote
on
this
as
it
stands.
If
there
was
a
motion
to
defer,
I
would
have
supported
that
too,
as
well,
but
again,
if
they're
still
after
whatever
happens
this
evening,
there's
still
some
energy
around
making
some
of
these
changes,
then
my
recommendation
is
to
communicate
with
these
property
owners.
One
on.
X
C
A
B
AD
You
you
know:
I
looked
at
some
of
these
TMS
numbers
of
where
they
were
located.
Some
in
my
district,
the
ones
particularly
that
start
with
three
five
six
is
about
seven
of
them
that
are
going
that
we're
looking
at
light
industrial
to
general
business.
Those
are
all
around
that
cross
town,
church
area
right
there
at
V,
Sperry
and
the
problem
is
Li,
allows
19.4
dwellings
per
acre.
General
business
includes
twenty
six
point.
AD
Four
and
we've
got
a
lot
of
construction
going
on
up
there,
and
we
just
we
just
can't
support
that
with
our
current
infrastructure
right
now.
It's
it's
a
mess
right
now
course
we're
ridin,
Glenn
McConnell,
but
but
I
can't
support
this
just
because
the
infrastructure
is
not
in
place
to
put
26.4
dwellings
per
acre
there
when
we
have
it
currently
it
at
nineteen.
H
First,
first
off
I
want
to
thank
the
mayor
for
bringing
this
issue
up,
because
I
do
think
that
anytime
that
we
can
simplify
our
zoning
is
a
little
bit.
You
know
it's
a
good
idea
to
look
at
here's
what
I'm
concerned
with
about
this
and
here's.
Why
I
think
we
should
probably
support
this
or
to
support
this
tonight
here?
Is
this
denial
because
I
think
that
this
needs
some
work?
We
need
to
treat
all
these
properties
separately.
We
don't
need
to
lump
them
all
together.
H
You
know
we
had
a
couple
of
homeowners
come
up
here
tonight
with
letters
and
they're
like
eh
I'm,
really
concerned
I'm
getting
agree.
Zoning
I,
don't
know
anything
about
it.
I
got
this
letter
in
the
mail.
I
need
more
information
and
that
that
to
me
is
a
red
flag.
I
looked
at
their
faces
and
they
were
legitimately
concerned
and
very
scared,
because
the
first
thing
that
comes
to
mind
when
people
see
rezoning
is
that
they're
going
to
get
down
zoned.
H
We
don't
want
to
do
that.
Councilmember
Mitchell
says:
well,
let's
take
district
4
out.
We
can't
really
do
that.
That's
more
of
a
spot
zone.
We
can't
we
can't
do
that
either,
so
we
need
to
start
fresh
on
this
and
what
I
did
is
you
know
when
this
issue
first
came
up,
I
went
and
met
with
the
entity
that.
AD
H
It
affected
the
most,
which
would
be
the
Port
Authority
and,
as
we
all
know,
the
Port
Authority
is
going
through
some
changes.
We
have
a
new
terminal
coming
to
the
Charleston
area,
the
Leatherman
terminal,
which
is
going
to
be
the
biggest
container
terminal.
It's
going
to
be
bigger
than
the
cuando
terminal
that
we
have
now
Charleston
is
going
to
be
the
deepest
Harbor
on
the
East
Coast.
H
Because
of
that,
because
of
that
changing
landscape
with
the
maritime
industry,
we're
gonna
have
some
opportunities
to
do
some
mixed
use
things
up
in
that
area
up
in
that
that
northern
part
of
the
peninsula
and
the
Port
Authority
is
gonna
they're
going
to
be
probably
some
opportunities
for
them
to.
Maybe
how
should
I
say
it
sell
some
of
their
property
on
the
peninsula,
down
there
near
Union,
Pier
and
some
other
areas,
which
would
then
create
more
tax
money
for
Charleston,
because
that
property
will
then
not
be
state
property.
H
We
bring
the
organization's
at
the
table,
including
the
Port
Authority.
Is
we
need
to
do
everything
we
can
to
work
with
them
when
we're
effecting
that
we
can
bring
some
private
warehouses
to
the
table
as
well
and
say
hey?
How
is
this
going
to
affect
you,
but
at
the
same
time
we
need
to
meet
with
the
realtor's,
the
homeowners,
the
Metro
Chamber
and
but
then
we
also
need
to
take
an
opportunity
to
meet
with
the
individual
homeowners.
H
I've
heard
that
gentleman
who
said
I'm
here
on
behalf
of
my
90
year
old
mother
tonight-
and
you
know
they
just
haven't-
had
enough
time
to
really
digest
this,
and
we
have
had
it
on
our
agenda
for
a
year
and
it's
been
deferred
and
deferred
and
deferred.
I
think
the
best
thing
to
do
is
to
just
start
all
the
way
over
get
it
off.
Have
our
staff
look
at
it
again.
H
You
know
anytime
you're
talking
about
increasing
density
in
Church
Creek,
that's
a
bad
idea
right
now
and
I
get
why
we're
trying
to
do
it,
because
we
approve
the
TIF
district
in
Church
Creek
and
we're
trying
to
get
commercial
development
out
there
and
I
hear
that.
But
you
see
that's
a
catch-22
there.
So
how
do
we
solve
that
issue?
We're
not
going
to
be
able
to
solve
it
tonight
and
we're
not
going
to
solve
it
in
two
weeks
with
the
deferral
so
I'm
gonna
support
the
rejection
of
this
tonight.
H
B
It
should
have
some
residential
use
so
and
and
I
admit
to
you
all
that
there's
some
some
even
weave
that
we
noticed
everybody
with
a
with
a
letter
that
some
some
better
communication
could
occur.
Number
one
number
two
there's
some
property
owners
who
legitimately
came
forward
and
said:
hey
gee,
you
know
I'm
not
on
your
list.
I
should
have
some
residential
entitlement
and
you're
about
to
take
away
my
residential
entitlement.
We
ought
to
consider
all
those
so
on
this.
This
was
that
reset.
B
If
you
will
and
I
would
respectfully
ask
entertain
a
motion
to
defer
the
matter
so
so
that
we
can
meet
with
these
property
owners,
as
council
member
white
suggests
one
on
one
and
and
involved
those
other
folks,
I
still
think
long-term.
It
makes
sense
from
a
planning
point
of
view
for
us
to
you
know,
have
industrial
uses
set
for
industrial
use
and
not
for
residential
use
and
and
councilmember
Sealy.
B
You
probably
have
a
good
point
that,
given
the
allowance
for
residential
density
in
general,
business
may
be
limited,
business
would
have
been
a
you
know,
might
be
a
better
selection
for
that
transfer
of
those
properties
over
there.
So
we
just
need
to
dig
in
a
little
and
look
at
the
properties,
one
one
by
one.
I
can't
remember
where.
L
Mr.
mill,
with
all
due
respect,
it's
read:
number
one:
an
ordinance
to
men,
chapter
54
of
the
code
of
city,
Charleston's
and
parentheses,
zoning
ordinance
to
remove
residential
uses,
nursing
and
personal
care
uses
and
school
uses
from
light
industrial.
It
goes
on
when
you
talk
about
removing
residential
uses.
You
talk
about
removing
communities,
that's
what
we're
talking
about,
and
this
lady
that
came
and
I.
Thank
you
for
coming
as
representative
of
the
small
people
that
don't
have
a
voice
in
this.
They
shouldn't
be
removed.
L
They
have
the
right
to
be
there
and
they
should
be
able
to
remain
and
the
concern
that
councilmember
Mitchell
has
about
wait
a
minute.
My
people
hadn't
been
informed.
Other
people
in
district
4
you're
right
about
that,
but
a
deferral
is
not
going
to
do
that.
This
is
just
wrong.
This
needs
to
go
back
and
go
away
and
be
redrawn.
L
Councilman
Lewis
said
I,
don't
know
months
and
months
ago,
but
it's
it
resonated,
not
repeated
it
to
others.
This
is
the
last
frontier
if
we
don't
create
some
affordable
housing
on
residential
uses
in
areas
that
allows
it
and
we
don't
have
a
blanket
just
elimination
of
it.
I
understand
the
need
for
heavy
industrial,
but
you
know
there
was
a
time
when
I
would
I
would
think
one
of
the
most
impactful
uses
of
any
piece
of
land
with
the
landfill
who
would
want
to
live
on
the
landfill.
L
L
This
is,
this
is
a
blanket
use
amount
and
the
truthful
part
about
it.
The
small
people,
the
small
communities
that
you
trying
to
fight
for
councilmember,
Mitchell
and
Lewis
will
be
squeezed
up.
That's
what's
going
to
happen
when
the
residential
piece
is
now
would
be
considered.
Grandfathered
they're
gonna
be
squeezed
up
and
that's
not
Charleston.
L
B
B
So,
for
example,
a
chemical
manufacturing
facility-
and
we
do
have
one
of
those
in
the
city
of
Charleston-
you
know
they
would
remain
heavy
industrial,
then
there's
no
residences
there
now.
So,
if
there's
some
property
that
that
is
already
zoned
light,
industrial
or
heavy
industrial
that
happens
to
have
some
residential
use
right
now
or
even
we
think,
would
be
a
good
place
for
residential
use.
That's
what
number
two
is
all
about,
so
so
so
we're
not
disrupting
and
displacing,
but
we're
we're.
You
know
letting
that
chemical
company
continue
exist
in
heavy
industrial
zoning
right
now.
B
L
B
O
So
I'm
gonna
vote
to
support
the
the
denial
of
this
ordinance,
but
I
don't
want
the
denial
of
this
to
to
end
this
discussion,
because
I
think
the
mayor's
point
is
something
we
need
to
take
in
consideration,
which
is:
we've
got
to
identify
some
of
these
areas
that
are
wide
industrial
or
heavy
industrial
and
make
sure
that
they
maintain
that
character
and
I
grew
through
councilmen
were
wearing.
We
do
have
several
places
in
the
community
that
have
mixed
uses
in
there.
We
need
to
maintain
that
character
as
well.
So
it's
worthy
of
our
discussion.
O
C
Remember,
like
one
quick
comment:
I
do
want
to
point,
I
mean
a
lot
of
work
went
into
this
and
I
staff.
You
know
they
really
tremendous
amount
of
time.
You
know
going
but
again
once
again,
I
think
the
key.
If
the
function
here
is
listless
just
over,
let's
just
make
sure
we
over
communicate
with
property
owners
and
those
are
affected.
I
think
that
that'll
solve
a
lot
of
our
problems
in
the
future.
Yes,
sir.
B
A
A
B
A
B
L
Before
me,
I
think
up
on
what
councilman
White
said.
Yes,
we
had
a
very
good
process
in
the
doo-wop
district,
where
people
could
opt-in
and
opt-out
and
I
caused
that
involve
County
properties
and
city
properties.
That
may
very
well
work
in
this
particular
situation
here
with
property
owners
how
to
have
a
right
to
opt-in
and
opt-out,
but
anyway,
I
throw
that
out.
There's
a
suggestion
going
forward.