►
Description
City of Charleston Ad Hoc Rules Advisory Committee 9/8/2022
A
B
Okay,
well,
we
can
dispense
with
some
of
the
uh
initial
business,
then
um
so
I'm
going
to
go
ahead
at
5
12
and
call
the
ad
hoc
rules
advisory
committee
meeting
to
order
for
september
8th
originally
slated
for
5
p.m.
And
I
would
appreciate
if
we
could
get
started
with
agenda
item
1,
which
is
an
invocation,
and
I
would
just
ask
for
a
moment
of
silence
and
everyone
to
keep
the
royal
family
in
the
united
kingdom
and
your
thoughts
and
prayers
as
queen
elizabeth
did
pass
away.
This
morning.
B
C
B
B
D
Or
I'll
take
it,
I
believe
the
uh
proposed
revisions
are
attached
to
the
agenda
um
and
I'm
hoping
this
accurately
reflects
our
conversation
a
few
months
back,
but
what
it
is
spelling
out
basically
is
any
council
member
who
would
like
to
add
an
item
to
the
agenda.
Would
first
go
through
council
communications
as
a
discussion
item
wherein
uh
council
would
discuss
and
if
they
wanted
to
move
forward,
they
would
push
it
toward
the
appropriate
committee
for
vetting.
D
The
committee
would,
I
believe,
advise
us
to
draft
an
actual
ordinance.
Jennifer,
please
jump
in
here
and
correct
me.
If
I'm
wrong.
Thank
you
there.
It
is
all
I
have.
Is
my
cell
phone
today
trying
to
read
these
so
here
we
go
uh
so
first.
Yes,
it
was
started
in
council
communications
on
the
city
agenda
council
would
direct
staff
to
draft
the
proposed
ordinance
so
there
we
go
to
be
considered
by
the
appropriate
standing
committee.
So
uh
at
that
point
by
majority
of
council
we
would
be
as
staff
directed
to
draft
a
proposed
ordinance.
B
So
julia
does
that
give
in
this
proposal.
Does
it
give
your
office
enough
time
to
based
on
this
draft
the
ordinance
if
it
comes
through
communication,
you
know,
obviously
I
think,
there's
usually
a
consultation
process.
um
Then
if
it
meets
the
vote
uh
threshold,
uh
your
office
would
work
on
drafting
it.
D
You
know-
and
I
think
it's
going
to
be
on
case
by
case.
Obviously,
if
it's
a
larger
piece
of
legislation,
we'll
speak
up
during
the
council
meeting
and
ask
for
additional
time
for
the
you
know.
So
when
you
direct
us,
you
tell
us
to
come
back
in
a
certain
amount
of
time.
um
I
figured
if
we
leave
it
clean
like
it
is
here.
It
gives
you
some
discretion
as
council
to
make
those
decisions.
B
Yeah,
I
was
going
to
say
it's
because
there's
not
any
time
frames
in
there.
I
think
it
allows
for
the
discussion
to
kind
of
dictate
what
we
think
the
appropriate
time
frame
uh
would
be,
whether
it's
the
next
committee
meeting
or
it's
the
following
month's
committee
meeting
or
that
type
of
thing
um
you
know
so
I
do.
I
do
think
that
that's
um
leaving
up
to
the
case
by
case
is
probably
better
um
than
spelling
out
immediately
because
it
could
be
if
something
did
come
forward
um
that
got
added
to
the
agenda
on
you
know.
B
C
Thank
you
chair.
um
I
missed
the
first
meeting,
so
I
may
may
be
asking
a
question
that
has
already
been
addressed,
um
but
in
the
bolded
underline
it
says
this
city
council
may
then
direct
staff
to
draft
the
proposed
ordinance
to
be
considered
by
the
appropriate
standing
committee.
Is
there
a
vote
that
we
will
take.
B
um
So
we
wanted
to
make
sure
that
there
was
a
process
by
which
staff
could
understand
clearly
delineated
as
a
law
right,
because
this
is
going
to
be
in
the
ordinances
um
how
things
have
to
happen
um
so
that
there's
not
kind
of
the
questions
of
well.
I
want
an
ordinance
to
be
considered
by
this
committee,
and
so
I'm
going
to
you,
know,
email,
julia
and
ask
for
uh
this
to
be
coming.
You
know
type
up
an
ordinance
when
there's
not
even
any
indication
that
council
or
a
committee
wants
to
consider
it.
E
um
I
I
think
this
is
a
really
good
policy.
um
I
thought
about
it.
It's
you
know
kind
of
a.
I
think
we
talked
about
a
bunch
of
stuff
at
the
first
meeting,
um
but
I
think
this
is
good
because
it
it
still
allows
the
committees
to
have
to
talk
about
the
policy
before
we
direct
um
staff
to
to
actually
draft
an
ordinance
right.
So
they
can.
E
The
committee
chairs
still
have
their
full
purview.
They
can
have
the
discussion
on
what
they
want
the
policy
to
be.
They
can
bring
the
policy
to
the
full
body
to
see
you
know
to
kind
of
start
gauging
whether
it's
actually
going
to
be
worth
bringing
it
up
uh
at
a
full
city,
council
meeting
worth
directing
staff
resources
to
drafting
it,
um
and
then
they'll
then
have
another
chance
to
workshop
the
actual
language
of
the
ordinance
before
it
gets
back
to
us.
So
to
me
this
is
a.
This
is
a
really
good
policy.
F
B
C
um
This
is
just
one
route
for
ordinances:
to
get
to
to
council
agenda
or
is
this?
Is
this
the
preferred
route?
I
guess
my
question
is
focused
on
on,
for
example,
everything
we've
got
on
with
hark
right
now.
um
Hopefully
soon
some
of
those
recommendations
are
going
to
start
coming
to
council.
The
plan
is
for
those
recommendations
to
be
funneled
through
the
standing
committees.
B
So
the
way
from
the
first
discussion,
we
had
kind
of
talked
about
three
ways
that
things
uh
come
to
council.
So
this
is
in
no
way
abrogates
the
mayor's
prerogative,
as
the
executive
officer
of
the
city
to
place
an
ordinance
on
an
agenda
right.
So
that's
that's
kind
of
one
route,
um
but
then,
as
things
percolate
up
from
uh
our
advisory
commissions
and
other
bodies
in
the
city,
uh
those
then
end
up
going
to
kind
of
a
committee
of
first
instance.
B
If
you
want
to
think
of
it
that
way
or
they
can
come
to
council
from
those
particular
commissions
or
other
bodies,
because
not
everything's
in
commission
and
uh
and
then
those
can
be
placed
uh
through
the
mayor's
prerogative
on
the
agenda
as
well.
This
is
for
more
um
council
or
council
member
directed
um
items
that
would
otherwise
be
just
kind
of
one-offs
that
we
would
want
to
see
come
to
uh
council
like
whenever.
B
Whenever
we
want
to
uh
an
issue
comes
up,
it
could
be
localized,
it
may
not
be,
um
but
the
council
member
feels
that
it's
worthy
of
discussion
and
then
would
like
to
see
um
it
get
referred
to
committee.
This
is
the
the
process
by
which
that
we
can
actually
spell
out
what
that
is,
which
it
was
always
kind
of
informal.
B
But
um
you
know,
based
on
on
my
experience,
I
think
other
members
experience
there
wasn't
a
formalized
process
and
it
was
beginning
to
burden
staff
which
obviously
we
don't
want,
um
and
also
when
a
member
of
the
public
would
ask
me
like
how
how
does
an
ordinance
get
adopted,
and
I
couldn't
really
tell
him,
because
it's
not
spelled
out
um
you
know,
so
it
it
in
no
way
aggregates
the
mayor's
authority.
But
this
is
if
it's
a
council,
member-initiated
ordinance.
G
Thank
you,
mr
chairman.
um
I'm
thinking
an
item
c.
I
think
the
last
sentence
should
be
first.
Should
there
be
no
appropriate
committee
for
assignment
the
majority
of
council
may
direct
as
opposed
to
a
council
member
may
bring
up
a
pool's
audience.
The
first
thing
the
councilman
should
do,
or
the
amendment
council
should
do,
is
see
what
appropriate
commit
standing
committee.
This
goes
in
front
of
um
that
should
be
the
first
thing
now,
if
it
doesn't.
Obviously
you
know
have
a
standing
committee
that
it
would
be
appropriate.
G
Then
I
guess
you
know
you
would
bring
it
to
council,
and
then
we
decide
whether
you
know
the
senate
to
staff
whatever,
but
um
so
I
I
like
it,
but
I
just
think
that
sentence
should
be
first
and
then,
um
when
we,
uh
I
thought
part
of
this
got
back
to
uh
councilmember
bowden's
uh
concern.
When
you
know
the
issue
came
from
community
development.
I
think
community
development
met
on
a
thursday
and
the
following
tuesday.
G
G
An
example
of
something
that
comes
from
a
committee,
an
audience
that
comes
from
a
committee
standing
committee-
comes
to
keeping
giving
council
more
time
to,
in
particular
members
who
are
not,
and
obviously
for
the
mayor's
amendment,
all
standing
commitment,
council
members
who
were
not
a
part
of
the
standing
committee
to
have
appropriate
time
to
review
and
ask
their
questions
prior
to
it
hitting
the
floor
of
city
council.
How
does
this
ordinance
accomplish
the
concern
that
councilmember
bowden
had
and,
I
think,
very
legitimate?
I
felt
the
same
way.
G
G
Well,
let
me
give
a
suggestion:
one
that
came
up
uh
that
night.
You
know
when
something
passes
uh
the
planning
commission
rezoning
uh
it
didn't.
It
doesn't
come
to
the
next
council.
I
think
it's
30
days
before
it
comes
to
uh
the
council,
so
we
council
members
have
from
when
the
planning
commission
votes
on
it
almost
a
month
before
it
comes
forward
to
um
council.
Now
one
of
the
problems
with
that
is,
if
it's
something
urgent,
that's
time
sensitive
or
even
the
mundane,
you
know
that
we
really
don't.
G
We
don't
want
to
hold
up
the
purchase
of
uh
uh
a
sanitation
truck
because
of
that
right.
So
um
that's
the
trick,
but
I'm
just
wondering
if
we
can,
if
something
can
be
found
from
how
um
changes
to
our
ordinance
come
forward
from
the
planning
commission
to
us,
there's
certainly
ample
time
prior
to
it,
hitting
a
council
member's
agenda.
Can
we
do
something
similar
when
something
in
particular
that's
a
huge
change
for
the
city?
G
B
Well,
thank
you
councilmember
warren
and
I
and
I
definitely
uh
agree-
and
I
think,
there's
a
way
to
uh
parse
some
language
where
we
uh
exclude
ways
and
means
right,
because
that
has
to
come
immediately
to
council,
where
we
can
exclude
that
but
come
up
with
some
language
that
would
uh
allow,
for.
I
would
call
it
like
a
cooling
off
period.
You
know
that
or
a
review
period
or
something
to
that
effect.
um
But
I
saw
mayor
teklenberg
and
then
councilmember
bowden.
F
F
Just
so
a
future
council
wouldn't
be
confused
to
think
that
this
was
the
only
way
to
you
know,
bring
something
forward.
So
that's
one
thing,
and
then
I
was
curious
um
julia.
It
says
in
a
that
no
ordinance
shall
have
the
force
of
law
until
it
has
been
read
two
times
on
two
separate
days,
but
the
way
we
do
it
now
we
read
it
three
times
total
on
two
separate
days
right.
Is
that
correct.
D
A
Yes,
so
I
I
think,
there's
a
separate
portion
of
the
code
that
addresses
three
readings.
I
think
this
is
just
trying
to
say
that
so
it's
it's
in
the
rules
that
you
can
do.
You
can
have
a
not
in
this
section,
but
that
you
can
have
second
and
third
reading
at
the
same
meeting.
This
is
just
saying
that
you
have
to
have
these
six
days
in
between
so
like
you
can't
have
a
a
council
meeting
on
tuesday
and
then
have
a
special
counsel
meeting
that
thursday
to
get
it
second
and
third
reading.
F
E
E
D
D
E
um
I
I
I
think
this
gets
at
that
at
least,
and
I'm
interested
in
why
the
community
development
example
wouldn't
have
been
solved
by
this,
where
the
the
policy
idea
that
underlies
it
needs
to
go
to
uh
counsel
first
before
the
actual
language
gets
drafted.
So
what
was?
I
guess
different
about
that
example
that
wouldn't
have
been
hit
by
this
amendment.
D
Well
c,
specifically
talks
about
proposals
that
are
driven
by
council
members
right
reaching
out
to
staff
asking
to
get
things
done.
The
issue
with
the
fair
housing
ordinance
was
that
it
actually
came
through
the
community
development
committee
and
came
out
as
a
committee
report
and
request
for
first
reading,
so
it
wouldn't
have
been
captured
in
c.
D
F
A
A
A
So
this
is
the
code
section
that
addresses
how
we
do
the
the
three
readings
of
our
ordinances,
um
the
other
section
that
you
know
I
don't
know-
if
maybe
you
want
to
combine
these
two
sections,
but
the
section
that
we're
looking
at
amending
is
entitled
adoption
of
ordinances
and
how
they
um
are
adopted
by
council.
Maybe
these
two
sections
need
to
be
combined,
but
this
has
all
the
information
about
how
we
handle
the
passage
of
those
ordinances
right
now
that
first
section
was
just
saying
that
you
need
to
have
two
meetings
in
between.
A
B
So
would
it
be
possible,
then,
in
the
other
section
that
we
were
just
discussing
a
through
c?
Would
it
be
possible
in
a
to
reference,
2-46
and
just
take
out
the
stuff
that
talked
about
the
two
readings
and
just
say
something
the
effect
of
following
the
procedures
as
outlined
in
municipal
code,
section
2-46.
B
G
I'm
gonna
be
going
in
in
september,
and
uh
I
certainly
would
like
to
have
council
members
who
are
not
on
that
committee.
You
know
to
have
appropriate
time
to
kick
that
one
around
before
um
coming
to
the
floor
council.
I
don't
think
it's
that
much
of
a
change,
but
everybody
should
be
aware
of
what
it
is
now
with
the
proposal
just
for
the
change
to
be,
but
um
anyway,
so
again
that
that
piece
about
um
we're
concentrating
on
things
that
are
um
that
really
fit
a
standing
committee.
G
B
Could
we,
then,
I
think,
to
solve
that
problem?
Could
we
insert
something
maybe
section
d
um
that
mentions
that
uh
committee
meetings
occurring
within
six
days
of
a
duly
scheduled
council
meeting
uh
any
items
up
for
first
reading
from
or
referred
for,
first
reading
from
the
committee
would
have
to
have
one
council
meeting
a
lapse
in
great.
G
A
B
What's
the
emergency
control,
though,
for
if
something
needs
to
immediately
be
placed
on
the
agenda
like
something
passes
out
of
committee,
it
needs
to
go
direct
to
council.
Do
we
leave
that
up
to
the
mayor's
prerogative,
or
is
it
if
it?
You
know,
by
unanimous
vote
of
the
committee,
it
can
be
placed
on.
G
B
G
D
A
As
long
as,
if
it's
just
applying
to
ordinances
getting
proposed
by
um
council
members,
you
just
don't
want
to
get
annexations
held
up
because
real
estate
public
works,
public
safety,
they're
all
going
to
be
meeting
before
council,
and
so
any
ordinances
that
are
going
to
those
committees
would
be
going
out
in
that
agenda
packet
before
the
committees
have
actually
met.
So
I
mean
they
may
in
fact
end
up
making
amendments
at
the
meeting
yeah.
I.
D
B
A
It
would
mean
that
you
would
have
to
if,
if
you
applied
this
new
rule,
you
would
you
wouldn't
be
able
to
consider
any
ordinances
from
public
works
at
the
council
meeting
the
next
day.
You
would
have
to
wait
for
the
next
meeting
two
weeks
from
now
and
during
the
summer
you
would
have
to
wait
for
the
meeting
a
month
from
then.
So
that's
the
only
you
know,
issue.
E
E
Would
that
be
handled
by
the
administration
being
able
to
put
those
things
directly
from
committee
on
to
the?
Because
to
me
those
aren't
those
aren't
council
member
proposed.
Those
are
things
that
come
to
us
from
staff
on
an
agenda
and
we
consider
and
then
they
go
on
to
the
um
on
the
directly
onto
the
city
council
agenda.
B
So
julia
is
there
a
way
to
come
up
with
like
an
elastic
clause?
That's
like
I'm
just
obviously
not
a
lawyer
in
spitballing,
but
like
something
that
would
say
that
matters
requiring
immediate
attention
from
counsel
are
exempted
or
something
to
that
effect.
That's
kind
of
the
the
catch-all
and
then
it
allows
for
some
discretion
kind
of
like
the
necessary
and
proper
clause
in
the
constitution.
D
B
A
Mr
chairman,
councilmember
waring
has
his
hand
up,
but
would
it
be
easier
just
to
apply
it
to
apply
that
timeline
only
to
ordinances
proposed
by
a
council
member?
Because
if
you
exempt
ways
and
means
that
doesn't
mean
that
you
know
you
could
have
an
ordinance,
that's
proposed
by
a
council
member
that
ends
up
going
through
ways
and
means.
A
D
G
C
G
C
F
G
B
F
Correct
correct,
I
guess
I
would
like
to
make
a
um
a
more
general
observation,
and
maybe
this
is
stating
something
that
that's
obvious
and-
and
I
support
what
we're
doing
here,
because
I
I
believe,
uh
even
though
we
have
a
strong
mayor
form
of
govern
government
in
the
city
of
charleston,
that
council
members
who
would
like
to
propose
any
idea
for
an
ordinance
ought
to
have
the
opportunity
to
regardless
of
whether
the
administration
agrees
with
them
with
the
idea
or
not.
But
um
you
know
somebody
can.
F
The
other
way
is
for
for
a
council
member
to
call
the
mayor
and
say
hey
mayor,
I
got
a
good
idea,
you
know
what
do
you
think
about
so-and-so
and
you
know
if
the
mayor
agrees,
then
we
can
bring
him
forward.
You
know
just
letting
you
know,
I
don't
know
what
mayor
riley
would
have
thought
about
this
uh
um
provision
right
here.
uh
Councilmember
waring.
G
F
G
You
had
a
difference
with
that.
I
had
a
different,
you
know,
council,
a
majority
council
was
for
it
and
we
were
caught
up
in
something
that
had
us
trapped
from
the
late
1930s.
You
know
all
the
way
to
this
moment
so
but
again
the
system
worked.
I
think
it
took
a
little
while,
but
it
worked
so
yeah.
I
appreciate
your
latitude,
but
I
too,
um
you
know
when
that
piece
came
from
community
development.
I
think,
mr
mill,
you
you
you
had
that
meeting.
It
was.
G
B
D
So
are
we
still
on
the
same
page,
despite
what
I
thought
I
heard
what
jennifer
cook
just
said,
and
it
almost
feels
like
d,
is
not
necessary
if
we're
going
to
keep
it
just
council
member
driven,
but
I
also
I
mean
I
feel
like
we
need
to
cooling
off
period,
section
d
for
things
that
come
straight
out
of
committee.
So
let
me
try
and.
D
Review
period
right
and
um
I
will
jennifer
and
I
will
bat
it
around
with
rick
and
we'll
come
back
I'll,
send
you
guys
something
to
take
a
look
at
and
we'll
see
if
we
can
pass
muster
and
I'll
make
these
other
varying
changes
that
um
were
mentioned
as
well.
The
title
change
uh
the
majority
of
council
referencing
2-46,
we'll
get
all
that
to
you.
G
B
G
B
So
at
the
last
meeting
we
had
discussed
the
concept
of
including
a
consent
agenda
on
uh
the
council
agenda,
so
that
uh
items
that
are
uh
generally
not
um
or
I
should
say
items
that
generally
would
pass
with
unanimous
support
the
minutes.
Things
of
that
nature
um
could
be
dispensed
with
in
the
agenda,
um
rather
than
have
them
be
completely
separate
line
items
understanding
that
the
consent
agenda
process,
if
any
member
objects
to
an
item
on
a
consent
agenda.
That
item
may
be
pulled
out
for
separate
consideration.
B
G
I
I've
been
on
boards
and
things
that
had
that
and
but
usually
those
those
are
kind
of
private
situations.
The
only
thing
that
I
think
with
going
out
consent
agenda,
almost
uncontested
would
probably
be,
as
you
said,
the
minutes
are
maybe
bids
and
purchases,
but
because
of
the
public
input
process,
I
don't
know
that
we
can
put
a
half
a
dozen
things
and
an
experience
that
I've
had.
It's
usually
been
a
ceo
that
uh
and
his
executive
or
the
c-suite
that
determines
what
goes
on
in
set
agenda.
G
So,
for
example,
if
you
had
a
finance
committee,
okay,
the
finance
committee
reported
sent
out
to
the
board
members
and
that
would
be
on
the
consent
agenda.
If
no
one
had
any
questions
about
the
finance
committee
after
reviewing
their
boardroom
package,
it
brought
package
that
would
be
on
the
concentrate.
But
if
there
was
one
item
on
that
finance
committee
report,
you
can
as
count
as
councilman
brady
says
you
can
pull
that
out
to
discuss
that
item.
But
the
remainder
of
the
report
would
go
forward.
G
So
um
but
when
I
look
at
the
city
council
agenda,
as
I
say
so
much
of
it
is
really
for
the
transparency
to
the
public.
There'd
be
a
couple
of
things
on
there,
but
beyond
bids
and
purchases
which
is
kind
of
like
automatic,
you
know
we
vote
on
it
again.
The
minutes
we
vote
on
it
like
that,
but
I
I
don't
know
that
um
um
you
know
on
city
council
agenda
you
may
be
able
to.
G
I
don't
even
know
if
you
can
put
you'd
have
to
eliminate
the
report,
because
real
estate
is
part
of
ways
and
means
you
may
be
able
to
put
ways
and
means
on
there.
But
real
estate
is
part
of
that.
I
don't
know
I
the
public
foot
part,
I
think,
gets
um
kind
of
lost
in
the
consent
agenda
thing.
I
think
it's
a
good
idea,
but
when
you
look
at
the
items
that
are
not
automatic
and
requires
public
input,
I
think
that
kind
of
happens
on
city,
council
and
items
that
can
be
placed
there.
E
I've
been
trying
to
pay
really
close
attention
to
the
things
that
may
have
been
included
in
some
sort
of
consent
agenda,
since
uh
you
propose
it,
and
I
think
it's
a
really
good
idea,
um
except
that
I
think
we
move
so
quickly
through
them
as
it
is
um
that
in
you
know,
in
consideration
of
uh
limited
staff
resources,
um
I
don't
see
it
as
something
that's
totally
necessary
um
and
that's
you
know,
and
that's
that's
really.
My
only
input
is
that
it's.
E
This
just
seems
like
something
that
is,
um
you
know,
maybe,
in
a
in
a
perfect
world
we
could
combine,
but
um
not
being
able
to.
You
know,
sit
here
and
enumerate
the
things
that
should
automatically
be
included
in
there
that
we
all
agree
on
um
it's
just
you
know
I
I
hate
to
burden
uh
legal
with
one
more
thing,
considering
when
we
meet
on
tuesday,
we'll
probably
give
him
50
more
things
to
deal
with.
B
Okay,
yeah,
I
mean
I'm
fine,
fine
scrappy
and
I
definitely
agree
councilmember
waring
that
um
I
mean
we
could
technically
move
ways
and
means
in
there,
but
I
think
just
from
the
the
flow
of
it
and
there's
also,
you
know,
have
been
moments
where
we've
had
ways
and
means
that
people
will
reserve
what
they're
going
to
say
for
city,
council
and
whatnot.
So
I
mean
I
don't.
I
don't
necessarily
think
that
would
be
included.
B
F
If
I
may
comment
since
we're
talking
about
it,
um
just
based
on
council
member
waring's
example
of
like
a
finance
committee
and
and
a
lot
of
our
um
council
business
is
taking
hearing
the
reports
from
the
different
committee
standing
committees
and
um
but
oftentimes,
there
are
a
number
of
items
on
coming
from
each
committee
that
aren't
really
even
voted
on
necessarily
they're
just
reported
on,
and
so
I
think
for
transparency's
sake
at
council.
It's
important
to
have
those
reports.
F
um
You
know
agenda.
I
I've
been
wrong
a
number
of
times
since
I'm
the
mayor
in
both
ways.
I
I
there'll
be
some
items
saying:
oh
my
god
we're
going
to
talk
about
that
for
an
hour
and
it
passes.
You
know,
and
nobody
says
something
and
then
something
that
I
think
is
like
a
no-brainer
and
everybody's
going
to
pass.
You
know
we
end
up.
You
know
having
a
long
discussion
about
it.
So
it's
I
gotta
tell
you.
My
experiences
is
pretty
unpredictable.
F
B
All
right,
well,
I'm
happy
to
uh
without
objection.
We
can
just
kind
of
set
that
one
aside
for
again
uh
at
such
time
that
council
may
decide
to
take
that
matter
up.
Should
it
come
forward
again
all
right
uh
with
that,
I
don't
have
anything
else.
Does
anyone
else
have
any
matters
to
come
before
the
ad
hoc
rules
committee
before
we
adjourn.
D
G
D
B
Thank
you,
miss
copeland,
and
thank
you,
everyone
for
your
input
and
taking
time
on
a
thursday
evening,
and
uh
I
will
get
with
madame
clerk
uh
and
madam
deputy
corporation
council
on
scheduling
the
follow-up
meeting.
Once
we
have
the
language
uh
that
we
all
talked
about,
and
we
can
get
this
thing
to
council
soon.
Hopefully,.