►
From YouTube: City of Charleston Committee on Public Safety 5/21/2021
Description
City of Charleston Committee on Public Safety 5/21/2021
B
Okay,
that's
my
head:
heavenly
father
has
become
here
to
do
the
business
for
the
city
of
charleston,
let
us
all
be
building
and
what
we
are
here
to
do
and
making
things
safe
for
everyone
in
the
city
of
charleston,
even
our
young
people,
and
that's.
Why
we're
here
today
and
hope
that
everyone
would
agree
to
what
we
are
doing
in
your.
A
A
C
D
D
And
if
you
look
at
our
ordinances,
we
don't
address
any
situation
like
this.
With
a
mobile
food
vendor
on
private
property,
we
only
address
mobile
food
vendors
on
city
owned
property.
So
what
this
is
is
an
amendment
to
that
particular
ordinance
to
add
mobile
food
vendors
operating
on
private
property
so
that
we
can
control
the
hours
of
operation,
specifically
we're
looking
to
shut,
shut
them
down
at
1
30
in
the
morning
when
the
bars
are
letting
out
to
prevent
crowd,
build
up
on
the
area
of
king
street.
D
D
A
D
Correct
it's
under
section
big
b,
vending
of
food
drinking
reading
material
within
the
central
business
district
and
then
little
d.
Right
now
it
says
a
mobile
food
vendor
may
operate
outside
the
hours
of
8
a.m
to
no
later
than
1
30
a.m.
We'd
like
it
to
read
no
mobile
food
vendor
shall
operate
outside
the
hours
of
8
a.m,
to
1
30
a.m.
A
E
D
A
D
F
A
F
G
Julia,
I
think,
that's
when
the
most
of
the
bars
start
doing
last
call
at
1,
30
and
they're
trying
to
get
people
out
before
they
close
at
two,
and
the
goal
was
to
try
to
coordinate
the
close
that
that
was
the
last
call
so
that
when
they
leave
the
bars
at
1
30,
they
don't
congregate
on
the
street.
At
the
food
at
the
food
vendors.
D
B
B
A
G
A
F
H
B
A
A
F
A
F
A
A
I
H
D
A
I
I
C
C
Well,
I
think
that
was
put
in
there
and
again
this
track,
something
that
greenville
did.
I
think
it
was
put
in
there
initially,
because
we
heard
that
a
lot
of
the
brick
and
mortar
folks
didn't
appreciate
the
mobile
food
vendors
being
near
near
their
businesses.
For
various
reasons,
so
I
mean
we
could
do
an
all
an
all-out.
You
know
100-foot.
E
E
A
F
A
E
A
A
All
right,
just
a
second
of
that
amendment.
Second,
any
questions
about
this
any
further
discussion.
All
right
call
for
the
question.
All
those
in
favor
of
this
added
amendment
signify
by
saying
aye
any
opposed
eyes
happen
all
right
now.
Can
we
move
on
to
item
number
four
yeah,
all
right
and
who's
going
to
handle
item
number
four.
C
C
This
curfew,
which
is
modeled
after
colombia's,
applies
to
children
or
youth
under
the
age
of
17.,
and
basically
it
would
be
unlawful
for
the
juvenile
to
remain
in
a
public
place
to
remain
in
a
motor
vehicle,
that's
parked
or
to
remain
on
the
premises
of
a
bar
or
restaurant
corner
store
within
the
central
business
district
after
12
and
before
six
now,
there's
some
other
prohibitions
with
it.
But
there
are
exceptions,
and
the
exception
is
if
a
parent
or
person
responsible
for
the
juvenile
is
with
them.
C
If
the
juvenile
is
engaged
in
employment
or
is
returning
to
or
from
another
his
home
or
other
lawful
activity
and
or
if
the
juvenile
is
attending
an
activity
sponsored
by
school,
church,
civic
organizations,
things
of
that
matter,
the
I
think
the
police
can
speak
to
why
it's
thought
that
this
would
be
an
effective
tool.
I
think
the
really
easy
rationale
is
that
they've
seen
children
very
young
who
basically
did
not
need
to
be
on
the
streets
past
midnight,
but
I'll
turn
it
over
to
anyone
from
the
police.
A
A
B
B
I
spoke
to
the
chief,
I
spoke
to
the
chief
earlier
and
I
was
telling
we
have
to
make
sure
that
we
put
this
out
put
this
out
to
let
people
know
exactly
what
it's
all
about,
because
we
don't
want
the
aclu
to
be
coming
after
us
for
something
else
and
talking
about
you
know
discrimination
or
whatever
the
case
may
be.
So
he
said
yes,
a
good
idea.
B
He
said
never
thought
about
that,
but
I
know
it
could
happen
because
you
know
as
he's,
because
he
knows
that
I'm
out
there
all
the
time-
and
I
hear
things
so
you
have
to
be
very
mindful
with
that.
I
don't
have
a
problem
with
the
ordinance
itself,
but
just
you
have
to
be
mindful
of
that.
If
it
comes
through
we'll
be
able
to
answer
those
questions
and
we're
doing
it
only
for
sickness
of
our
young
people
in
the
community
and
trying
to
keep
them
safe
and
keep
everybody
else
safe.
So
we
have
to
be
ready.
A
Okay,
I
think
it's
a
good
idea
as
well,
and
if
this
works
fine,
if
we
have
to
amend
it
later
or
we
send
it
later,
so
we
could
address
that
as
well.
But
I
think
the
whole
purpose
of
this
thing
is
to
address
what
happened
a
couple
of
weeks
ago
and
to
address
future
issues.
I
think
when
the
subject
starts
rolling
around
this
may
become
more
of
a
problem,
so
I
welcome
this.
A
G
A
A
B
A
J
J
B
A
No,
I'm
glad
to
have
you
all
right.
Let
me
let
me
finish.
Let
me
finish
with
the
vote,
all
those
afraid
of
saying
this
by
saying:
aye,
alright,
any
opposed
all
right.
Nine.
The
motion
carries
lieutenant
anything
you
want
to
add:
we've
voted
on
it.
I
think
we
understand
what
we're
trying
to
accomplish
here,
and
I
think
this
gives
you
another
tool
to
address
those
issues
that
we've
been
wrestling
with
on
king
street
yeah.
J
We
don't
have
anything
to
do
with
them
if
there's
no
offense,
whereas
this
will
give
us
an
option
to
get
out
with
them
and
you
know
encourage
them
to
leave.
If
we
have
to
do
further
action,
you
know
that
we
have
the
option
of
handling
them
to
their
parents
and
just
with
how
many
people
have
been
involved
lately
from
different.
J
J
Neither
of
you
groups
should
be
out
here
because
you
know
we
have
the
curfew
in
place
and
in
light
of
the
last
couple
events,
you
know
between
shooting
stabbings
and
we
caught
juveniles
in
a
car
with
you
know
four
guns
we
just
kind
of
had
an
uptick,
and
I
think
this
would
be
a
great
option
to
help
us
have
additional
tools
and
a
way
of
kind
of
handling.
Some
things
we
need
to
handle.