►
From YouTube: City of Charleston James Island Creek Task Force 1/7/20
Description
City of Charleston James Island Creek Task Force 1/7/20
A
A
A
A
Okay
well
hearing
none
there.
I
think
we'll
go
right
on
to
our
working
group
updates
and
I'm
I'm
glad
to
report.
I
think
they've
been
working
on
some
stuff
since
our
last
meeting,
so
if
we
could
just
start
with
ashley
with
technology,
our
technology
work
group
ashley.
You
want
to
give
us
a
report
on
what
y'all
been
up
to.
E
Hey
mayor,
so
we
haven't
met
since
our
since
the
main
stakeholder
meeting
that
we
had
back
in
november,
but
the
group
has
all
the
entities
have
executed
the
moa,
and
so
that's
been
done
and
matt
or
and
or
brett
may
want
to
talk
more
about
the
actual
scope
of
the
testing.
That
they've
been,
I
guess,
finalizing
with
wolfport.
F
Yeah,
actually
I
can.
I
can
start
out
at
least
if
brettsoni
can
certainly
jump
in
and
correct
some
of
my
areas
as
brett's
been
doing
most
of
negotiating,
but
I
think
for
the
technical
group
we
set
ourselves
some
goals
at
the
first
meeting,
which
were
basically
to
compile
some
of
the
common
data
sources,
which
cws
provided
some
information
the
psd
sent
in
for
some
information.
We
kind
of
compiled
septic
tank
locations,
water
and
sewer
line
locations,
the
different
jurisdictions
and
what
type
of
land
uses
are
within
the
basins.
F
We
kind
of
have
a
common
common
data
picture
now
for
the
both
the
technical
group,
as
well
as
the
other
groups
to
consider
moving
forward.
We
did
approve
through
all
three
entities,
the
memorandum
of
agreement
for
collaborative
monitoring
and
prepared
a
monitoring
plan
that
we'll
be
submitting
to
dhec,
probably
in
the
next
week
or
so,
for
each
entity
to
start
that
tmdl
compliance
component
and
then,
as
ashley
mentioned,
we've
just
about
finalized
the
negotiations
off
of,
what's
contained
within
the
moa.
F
To
actually
do
the
monitoring
and
sampling
work
with
wolpert,
so
that's
being
finalized
over
the
next
week
or
so
will
involve
basically
the
regulatory
minimum
of
wet
weather
sampling,
but
also
we
have
additional
sampling
in
there
for
dry
weather
conditions.
We
want
to
get
a
better
picture
of
what's
going
on
in
the
area.
We
have
some
sampling
in
there
for
basic
characterization
of
what
is
the
source.
What
is
it
like?
F
The
likely
source
of
the
contamination,
whether
it's
human
or
animal,
a
few
other
few
other
things
you
can
write
down
with
microbial
source
tracking,
and
then
we
have
basically
the
ability
to
add
in
additional
sampling
sites
as
those
become
potentials
I
mean
mark
mark
and
some
other
people
have
been
looking
and
talking
with
property
owners
and
looking
at
options
of
where
we
could
possibly
source
or
cite
additional
sampling
locations
and
we'll
be
building
that
in
as
we
collect
our
data.
So
it's
it's
a
good
start.
Now
we
need
to
set
some
additional
goals.
C
F
Yeah,
we
certainly
can.
The
monitoring
point
is
actually
one
of
those
things
when
you
open
it
up.
That
looks
like
a
relatively
simple
form
document.
They're,
not
the
submittal
component
is
not
that
complicated.
I
mean
it's
easy
for
me
to
say
that,
but
it's
not
that
complicated,
but
we
will.
We
will
send
that
out
as
we
get
it
we're
just
doing.
C
Great
and
then
mr
mayor
well,
well,
I
just
I'm
thinking
of
it.
I
think
I
owe
liz
and
certainly
the
technical
group,
my
apologies.
I
know
that
I
call
this
working
group
technology
the
first
couple
of
times
I
I
helped
draft
the
agenda.
I
thought
I
corrected
it
for
the
new
year,
but
evidently
I
didn't
so
I
apologize,
but
it
is
the
technical
group,
not
the
technology
group,
technical.
A
A
G
H
You
know
letter
that
goes
out
to
people
to
sort
of
remind
them
because
per
dhec
recommendations.
You
know
these
tanks
should
be
inspected
every
one
to
two
years
and
typically
speaking,
serviced
or
pumped
every
three
to
five
years.
So
having
sort
of
that
annual
communication
will
will
help
with
that
and
the
only
other
thing
that
I'll
I'll
mention
that
I
think
will
be
of
interest
sending
it
off
to
be
published
either.
H
I
think-
and
I
don't
know
if
somebody
from
d
heck
is
on
here
and
wants
to
speak
to
that,
but
that
that
is
to
you
know
in
the
process
of
of
becoming
a
regulatory
process,
for
people
to
be
able
to,
you
know,
apply
for
a
permit
for
a
living
shoreline
to
stabilize
their
their
shoreline.
You
know
using
oysters
or
vegetation,
etc
and
we'll
be
working
with
dnr
and
dhec
and
nature
conservancy
and
a
host
of
other
folks
to
really
provide
tools
that
will
help.
D
I
H
D
D
H
Sure,
yeah,
that's
a
that's
a
great
point
and
I
definitely
think
that's
something
that
the
outreach
committee
or
education
committee
emily
would
what
I
can't
remember
what
we're
calling
ourselves,
but
is
you
know,
raising
awareness
of
of
you
know
the
resources,
and
so
I
think,
there's
a
lot
of
potential
for
that.
So
thank
you
and
really
you
know.
The
objective
of
the
website
is
to
be
very
robust
and
to
have
really
every
I
mean
you're
buying
land.
You
can
go
to
that
website
to
get
information.
H
You
live
in
a
native
american
tribal
territory.
You
can
go
to
that
website.
To
get
information
I
mean
it's
really
meant
to
have.
I
mean
we
really
tried
to
think
of
every
possible
case
scenario
that
you
could
run
into,
but
I
agree
for
most
people.
You
know
they
really
need
to
know
like
what
am
how
do.
I
know
that
my
septic
tank
is
failing
or
what
are
things
I
need
to
not
put
down
my
drain
or
those
types
of
things
right.
J
Yes,
I've
been
talking
with
chris
wanamaker
about
that
today
and
he's
going
to
be
getting
me,
those
those
addresses
for
the
properties
based
on
jurisdiction,
and
we
can
mail
out
something
you
know
just
to
have
people
aware
that
you
they
need
to
be
taken
care
of
these
issues
and
if
something
pops
up
you
know,
maybe
we
can
take
it
a
step
further.
But
yeah
we've
got
that
information.
Oh.
A
C
I
I
just
one
follow-up
question
that
occurred
to
me
as,
as
kim
was
talking
about
the
you
know,
the
great
information
for
septic
tank
owners
and
especially
signing
on
filling
out
their
own
information.
So
they'll
they'll
have
some
sort
of
reminder,
or
whatever
it
was
you
you
said,
would
come
back
to
them.
I
it
occurred
to
me
and
I'm
not
a
septic
owner,
but
I
know
a
lot
of
people
have
neglected
their
septic
clean
outs
and
you
know
probably
it's
out
of
sight
out
of
mind.
C
If
it's
working,
they
don't
worry
about
it
and
it
it's
occurring
to
me
that
to
just
ask
ask
the
question
on
how
do
we
assure
people
that,
if
they
self-disclose
that
you
know
they
have
a
septic
and
they
know
for
sure
they
haven't
been
cleaning
it
out?
It's
not
some
sort
of
finable,
offense
or
any
sort
of
fee.
You
know
revenue
source
for
the
jurisdictions
to
come
back
on
them,
and
I
don't
I
don't
know
if
we
want
to.
C
H
Yeah
and
that's
a
great
point
and
kind
of
one
of
the
sort
of
I
don't
know
niches.
I
think
that
that
clemson
and
some
of
the
other
education
organizations
find
themselves
in
find
ourselves
in.
Is
that
because
we're
not
a
regulatory
authority,
you
know
because
I'm
I
don't
work
for
dhec,
there's
there's.
A
K
I
know
that
there
were
some
questions
about
whether
or
not
we
could
get
everything
together
for
the
2021
funding
cycle
or
not.
I'll
be
honest.
I
you
know,
I
don't
know
all
the
ins
and
outs
of
this,
but
I
do
think
that
this
is
something
worth
pursuing
and
putting
our
heads
together
and
coming
up
with
a
with
a
good
plan
on
that.
So
maybe
that's
something
we
can
all
get
together
and
talk
through.
Maybe
after
this
meeting
or
something
with
the
with
the
relevant
folks,
we've
got.
K
We've
got
that
and
you
know,
as
we
continue
our
discussion
about
these
septic
systems
and
getting
together
a
plan
for
how
we
address
this.
I
know
we've
talked
a
little
bit
earlier
on
this
meeting
about.
You
know
public
information,
but
also
you
know
the
county's
got
an
ordinance
on
the
books
right
now
requiring
mandatory
connections.
K
I
certainly
don't
want
to
put
anyone
on
from
the
county
on
the
spot
right
now,
but
I
think
that
at
some
point
it
would
be
a
good
idea
to
get
sort
of
the
latest
from
the
county
in
terms
of
how
they're
interpreting
that
ordinance.
I
know
the
attorney
general's
office
has
kind
of
weighed
in
on
that
issue.
K
That's
something
else!
That's
out
there
I
mean
there's,
there's
a
there's
sort
of
a
legal
regulatory
approach
to
this
that's
being
taken
as
well,
and
that's
what
we've
got
on
those
topics,
I'm
just
reading
through
my
notes.
From
our
last
meeting,
there
was
also
a
discussion
about
some
of
our
policy
subcommittee
members
coordinating
with
dhec
a
little
bit
regarding
whether
there's
a
more
kind
of
coordinated
approach.
We
can
take
to
this.
K
In
other
words,
you
know
we
we
do
a
little
recon
with
regards
to
kind
of
what
they're
looking
for,
and
we
can
sort
of
reverse
engineer
our
plan
and
application
and
strategy
to
sort
of
fit
what
they're
trying
to
do,
because
there
seem
to
be
some
pretty
strong
indications
that
they
want
to
do
some
work
in
this.
In
this
watershed
and
by
the
way,
if
I'm
mentioning
anything
here
that
somebody
has
more
information
on
wants
to
jump
in,
I
see
emily
shaking
her
head.
G
Yeah
happy
to
do
it
so
right
before
the
holidays,
andrew
and
I,
along
with
representative
wetmore
and
senator
sen,
had
a
really
good
follow-up
conversation
with
the
staff
from
dx
319
program.
They
walked
us
through
all
of
the
questions
that
are,
we,
I
think,
compiled
at
our
last
policy
group
meeting,
just
to
get
a
little
bit
more
information
about
availability
of
funding
the
next
couple
years.
G
What
they're,
looking
for
in
applications,
how
it
works
with
in-kind
services
being
used
for
the
match,
and
we
got
some
really
positive
answers
and
feedback
also
got
a
better
understanding
of
the
timeline.
So
essentially,
what
they
indicated
to
us
is
at
the
end
of
the
day.
If
we
do
have
a
watershed
plan
in
place,
we
would
need
to
have
that
submitted
at
the
beginning
of
may.
G
So
I
think
in
our
minds
it's
giving
us
potentially
a
little
bit
more
wiggle
room
than
we
realized
we
may
have
had
initially.
So
I
I
do
think
it
makes
sense
to
start
having
a
serious
discussion
about
whether
or
not
we're
pursuing
this
path
with
terra
con.
I
know,
patrick,
you
have
more
information
on
that.
You
can
provide
to
the
group,
but
all
that's
to
say
in
that
conversation
with
dhec,
they
again
reiterated
that
they
have
funding
that
they
would
like
to
allocate
to
the
charleston
region.
G
So
in
my
mind,
that
is
just
the
signal
to
us
that
we
should
try
and
at
least
get
something
in
place,
and
if
it
doesn't
happen
this
year
it
doesn't
happen,
but
I
don't
think
there's
any
harm
in
moving
forward
on
some
of
these
initial
steps.
Patrick,
do
you
want
to
jump
in
with
more
of
the
information
on
the
terracon
side
of
things.
L
Sure,
good
afternoon,
everybody
thanks
emily.
That
is
good
news
from
dhec.
So
y'all
remember
the
last
conversation
we
had
about
this.
The
procurement
was
one
of
the
big
challenges.
Right
was
this
springtime
319
application
deadline
and
the
jurisdictions
and
cws
have
their
processes,
and
that
takes
longer
than
the
amount
of
time
we
had
and
the
plan
itself
cost
approximately
forty
thousand
dollars
to
put
together
and
talking
to
terracon
about
this.
They
are.
You
know,
a
large
engineering
firm
that
most
of
you
are
probably
familiar
with
as
a
matter
of
business.
L
If
we
don't
do
it
until
2022,
that's
great
too,
and
we
won't
have
to
find
the
forty
thousand
dollars.
So
I
would
love
you
know,
given
that
the
whole
group
has
voted
to
pursue
the
plan
and
we
have
a
free
plan
on
the
table.
I
would
love
it
if
we
could.
You
know,
take
advantage
of
that
and
check
that
box.
So
when
the
right
opportunity
comes
up
with
319
we're
ready
to
go
right,
I,
like
this
price.
There.
M
Mr
mayor,
this
is
sandy.
Also,
I
think
worth
bringing
up
is
that
we
confirmed.
I
know
that
kathy
woolsey
had
some
questions
about.
You
know.
How
much
can
we
actually
get
out
of
this?
I
think
miss
jackson,
councilwoman
jackson,
also
wanted
to
know
how
much
can
we
get
if
we're
going
to
have
to
put
any
money
into
it
and
how
the
matches
are.
There
is
no
set
amount
that
they
will
give.
I
mean
they
it's
it's
federal
money
that
comes
in
regularly.
M
They
said
that
it
has
waxed
and
waned
over
the
years,
but
it
is
generally
a
good
bit
of
money
and
that
our
area
is
due,
and
she
even,
I
think,
sent
some
example
or
samples
that
you
know
from
other
areas.
I
know
andrew
was
the
one
taking
all
the
great
notes
on
this,
and
it
was
right
before
the
holidays,
but
but
anyway,
I
was
highly
encouraged
because
I
think
we're
looking
at
big
dollar
figures
potentially
and
we
may
not
get
everything
we
ask.
Well
we're
probably
going
to
get.
M
You
know
a
pretty
good
bit,
so
I
would
love
to
try
and
go
ahead
and
push
it
forward.
For
this
year
and
like
everybody
else
said,
if
it
doesn't
work,
we
can
do
it
for
next
year
now
there
was
a
specific
way
that
we
needed
tara.
I
guess
you
calling
you're
calling
it
okay
to
do
to
handle
their
whatever
they're
doing,
because
for
us
to
be
able
to
even
try
and
use
it
as
a
match.
There
was
some
way
we
have
to
finagle.
A
M
Not
that
I
can
see,
I
was
very
excited.
They
had
several
people
on
there.
They
wanted
to
help
the
very
next
day
they
emailed
us
some
ideas
and
thoughts
and
different
things
that
we
can
use
as
much
money
that
we
may
not
have
thought
about.
So
I
I
would
definitely
think
that
this
is.
This
looks
like
a
golden
opportunity
right.
N
Quick
question:
sorry,
emily
did
we
follow
up.
I
know
that
at
the
end
of
that
dhec
call
they
gave
us
the
name
of
the
local
watershed
plan
person.
I'm
sorry,
I
don't
remember
what
his
name
was,
but
I
would
just
want
to
make
sure
that,
hopefully
we
could
credit
this,
even
though
it's
an
in-kind
contribution
instead
of
an
actual
dollar
outlay,
maybe
simultaneously,
while
we're
signing
agreements
with
terracon
emily.
N
D
This
is
mayor,
woolsey,
spencer,
um's,
point
about
you
know
as
we
sign
agreements
with
terracon.
You
know
I
don't
know
what
kind
of
agreement
we
have
to
sign
to
get
a
gift,
but
that's
a
question
in
my
mind,
is
who
signs
this
agreement?
You
know
this
is
a
recommending
body
that
doesn't
sign
agreements.
L
D
M
I
don't
know
that
they
do.
We
just
want
to
make
sure
we
get
credit
for
it.
I
just
remember
in
our
discussion
that
was
an
issue
the
way
that
that's
going
to
be
phrased
or
handled.
If
we
want
credit
for
that,
40
000,
we
have
to
handle
it
the
correct
way.
So
we
do
need
to
find
out
if
water
keeper's
going
to
be
the
contract
sign
or
he
may
need
you
know,
they
may
also
need
to
be
the
leader
and
they
can
they
just
don't
have
administrative
staff.
G
A
All
right
so
emily
can
we
rely
on
you
and
andrew
maybe
check
those
boxes
of
questions
that
this
arose.
But
unless
I
hear
some
objection
here
that
we
have
consensus,
that
we
only
support
a
water
keeper,
accepting
a
donation
from
terracon
to
create
for
us
a
watershed
management
plan
that
sound
good
everybody.
A
N
And
so
I
actually
raised
this
water
quality
task
force
to
the
septic
team.
On
our
last
call,
I'm
going
to
continue
to
kind
of
work
on
that
grant,
since
it
was
one
that
I
had
started,
and
so
I
just
wanted
to
make
you
all
aware
of
that
as
a
potential
resource
and
also
source
of
information
as
they.
You
know
we're
only
about
six
months
into
the
study,
so
we're
still
pretty
pretty
early
on.
N
One
of
the
things
I
also
want
to
mention
was
that
they're
doing
a
legal
review
of
sort
of
authority
to
enact
these
sorts
of
requirements,
and
so,
if
we
have
specific
legal
questions
like
the
tie-in
or
other
things,
we've
actually
got
the
benefit
through
that
group
of
a
pro
of
a
law
professor
in
north
carolina
who'll,
be
who's
being
funded
through
this
grant
and
is
completely
willing
to
work
on.
You
know
on
questions
that
that
benefit
both
both
this
project
and
that
project.
K
You
know
the
mandatory
connection
issue
if
it
becomes
something
we
can
do
from
a
legal
standpoint,
we
got
to
know
where
the
infrastructure
is.
We've
got
to
understand,
which
you
know,
properties
are
potentially
eligible
for
this
tie-in.
So
I
think
that
by
by
bringing
all
this
stuff
together,
as
we
continue
to
have
these
conversations-
that's
that's
where
we'll
want
to
be,
but
but
yeah
I
mean
at
the
end
of
the
day.
I
think
that
this
is
something
we
ought
to
think
about,
because
you
know
education
is
great.
K
Information
is
great,
but
at
the
end
of
the
day,
we
may
need
to
like
start
really
focusing
on
specific
properties
and
using
all
the
tools
at
our
disposal
to
get
people
to
connect
to
modern
infrastructure,
to
hopefully
eliminate
these
problems.
Keep
the
you
know
what
out
of
the
water
simple
as
that.
So
that's
the
report
of
the
policy
committee.
Thank
you.
I
Mr
mayor,
this
is
ken.
The
only
thing
I
would
like
to
report
to
the
group.
I
think
we've
mentioned
in
the
last
meeting
that
we
do
have
a
conference
call
scheduled
next
week
with
andrew
and
our
lab
staff
manager
in
the
private
contract
lab
that
we've
selected
to
do
the
water
quality
work.
You
remember,
charleston,
water
and
our
board
committed
five
thousand
dollars
of
funding
to
do
some
additional.
M
A
A
Report
and
and
that
contribution
to
the
effort
ken
we
really
appreciate
it,
and
so
so,
with
that
kind
of
report
setting
the
stage,
I'm
just
going
to
open
the
floor,
if
anybody
has
anything
notable,
even
if
it
didn't
come
from
one
of
the
committees
that
they
want
to
report
to
the
group,
the
floor
is
open.
Anybody
got
anything
for
us.
B
B
I
guess
talking
about
if
it
would
be
possible
for
them
to
fly
along
the
edge
of
the
marsh
and
and
take
pictures
and
see
if
there
was
some
temperature
differences,
and
I
thought
january
and
february
would
be
a
good
time
because
the
water
would
be
cold
and
the
water
coming
out
of
the
septic
tank
would
be
warmer.
Then
he
started
asking
me
technical
questions
like
how
warm
or
how
cold-
and
I'm
like-
I
don't,
really
know,
but
so
I
guess
I
might
have
to
find
that
report
that
was
made.
B
I
guess
it
was
in
bluffton
and
look
at
that
too,
but
he
seemed
to
be
open
to
it
and
we
actually
haven't
even
talked
this
over
with
the
chief
or
the
district
manager.
I
just
kind
of
ran
it
by
him
to
see
if
we
could
figure
out
whether
we
could
do
it
yet,
but
I
I
think
it
would
be
an
inexpensive
way
again.
Another
in-kind
thing
and
it
would
be
good
training
for
our
firemen
to
practice.
B
With
this
drone
too,
I
think,
undoubtedly
we
might
have
to
find
a
body
or
something
in
a
marsh,
so
it
might
be
good
for
that,
but
so
anyway,
just
let
you
know
that
they're
thinking
about
it
and
we're
gonna
try
to
find
a
place
to
launch
and
and
kind
of
buzz
around
the
marsh
and
see.
What's
going
on
great.
A
A
A
A
M
Oh
okay:
well,
no,
the
only
thing
that
I
was
thinking-
and
this
is
a
stretch
I
know
since
it's
been
in
the
plans
for
a
while,
but
I
think
part
of
the
problem
with
ellis
creek
likely
could
be
generated
from
upstream
like
near
the
ame
apartments,
where
there's
constantly
always
issues
there,
and
I
don't
know
if
we
can't
get
some
credit
for
doing
all
the
work.
That's
going
to
be
performed
under
central
park
as
part
of
in
kind
as
well.
M
Right
there
right,
because
whenever
the
storm
water
is
over
overtakes,
the
sewer
system,
that's
when
there's
a
problem,
so
I
think
we
could
maybe
figure
out
a
way
to
tie
some
of
that
in
yeah.
There's
just
just
a
thought,
but
I
think
a
lot
of
the
pollution
easily.
I
could
see
it
being
generated
from
up
that
direction.
F
Yes,
matt
fountain,
I
mean
we,
we
can
certainly
take
a
look
at
it.
Part
of
the
challenge
with
319
and
tmdl
watersheds
is
exactly
this.
This
situation
that
things
that
the
regulatory
required
as
part
of
the
tmdl
program
are
generally
not
eligible
for
319
funding,
because
they're
trying
to
say
you're
already
obligated
to
do
this
work,
so
we're
not
going
to
provide
you
additional
funding
towards
your
doing
of
this
work.
F
That's
where
often
entities
like
using
the
water,
keeper
and
clemson
and
kind
of
going
above
and
beyond
kind
of
minimum
minimum
regulatory
required
activities
have
a
lot
of
advantage
for
319
option,
but
the
capital
project
work
is
somewhat
outside
of
a
traditional
319
approach.
It's
really
not
a
like
a
constructed,
bmp
or
something.
So
it's
something
we
can
look
at
it's
it's
definitely
more
complicated
than
it
would
be
in
a
normal
watershed
and
then
just
a
like
a
303d
listed
impaired
water
or
something
along
those
lines.
M
Okay,
well-
or
at
least
maybe
psd-
can
get
some
credit
for
putting
in.
I
don't
know
what
they
call
it,
but
it
was
some
type
of
apparatus
that
would
stop
storm
water
from
infiltrating
the
sewer
system
and
heavy
downpours
that
that,
I
think
possibly
we
could
use,
because
that
that
that
keeps
the
sewage
from
getting
in
you
know
or
get
getting
there
and.
F
N
F
M
C
Thank
you.
I
I
it
occurred
to
me
and-
and
I
give
matt
fountain
credit
for
this,
but
I
think
when
we
were
talking
about
goal
setting,
it
was
more
about
having
each
of
the
working
groups
establish.
You
know,
goals
that
then
we
could
make
sure
our
synergistic
and
you
know
giving
the
whole
task
force
effort
some
momentum
for
the
rest
of
the
year.
C
So
maybe
we
could
just
ask
each
of
the
working
groups
to
come
back
with
a
couple
of
goals
that
you
agree
are
the
most
important
or
the
you
know
the
low-hanging
fruit.
However,
you
decide
are
the
things
that
you
want
to
put
your
working
group
efforts
toward
and
then
we
can
just
have
that
sharing
at
our
next
meeting
and
make
sure
that
we
can
see
a
logical
fit.
C
A
Well,
that
makes
sense,
and
and
honestly
it
might
just
be
the
things
that
they're
already
kind
of
working
on,
but
if
I
could
ask
ashley
and
andrew's
not
here
so
emily
and
ross
as
you
all
meet
between
now
and
the
next
meeting,
you
know
give
us
a
little
goal.
Setting
that
that
you'd
like
to
accomplish
for
21
that'd,
be
great
just
to
keep
us
all
focused
that'd,
be
great
all
right.
C
C
A
So
our
next
meeting
will
be
march
18th
and
same
time.
Four
o'clock,
I
presume
we'll-
still
be
zooming
in
and
to
be
honest
with
you
to
get
such
a
diverse
group
together,
even
when
covid's
over
with,
if
that
suits
everyone,
I
think
this
is
a
great
way
efficient
way
for
us
to
continue
to
meet
yeah.
Let's
just
keep
that
up
in
the
meantime,
don't
let
the
fact
that
we
we
just
meet
quarterly,
get
in
the
way.
A
If,
if
we
need
to
hear
something,
you
know
what
I
think
we've
got,
the
network
with
everybody's
email
addresses.
If
anybody's
got
a
particular
report,
they
want
to
share
or
take
action
on
something
like
like
the
the
watershed
management
plan
or
or
something
that
comes
up,
that
we
need
to
do
between
meetings.
Let's,
let's
don't
let
a
quarterly
meeting
get
in
the
way
of
progress.