►
From YouTube: City of Charleston Smokestack Committee Meeting 12/17/20
Description
City of Charleston Smokestack Committee Meeting 12/17/20
A
A
A
Yeah,
so
I
I
guess
you,
you
represent
the
foundation,
charleston
historic
foundation
in
this
matter
and
glad
to
have
you
as
a
part
of
it,
and-
and
maybe
you
heard
by
way
of
your
absence
or
or
that
or
the
change
up
from
mr
clement
to
you
since
you
weren't
here
last
time.
We
we
asked
you
to
do
most
of
the
work
and
be
our
chairman.
B
So
whatever
you
need.
A
All
right:
well,
you
want
to
run
the
meeting
for
us
here
this
afternoon.
B
Sure
do
we
we
have.
I
guess
I
wanted
to
make
sure
that
we
have
everyone
who
we
need
present.
E
B
Okay-
and
we
have
miss
campbell
here-
signed
on
he's.
B
Hey
good
afternoon
and
then
mr
granada
and
looks
like
we
have
miss
anderson
here
and
mr
macelon,
so
the
the
commission
is
here
absent,
mr
mitchell,
I
don't
know
if
you
guys
do,
we
want
to
hold
on
for
a
minute
see
whether
he
can
be
located.
Or
would
you
like
to
proceed,
mr
mayor.
A
Well,
I
think
liz
is
trying
him
right
now.
A
B
Okay,
well
excellent.
I
guess
this
thing
is:
is
this
meeting
broadcast?
I
guess,
mr
mayor?
Are
there
people
watching
it.
A
Has
a
public
meeting
and
it's
been
recorded
as
well,
so
that
folks
will
be
able
to
come
back
and
listen
to
it
if
need
be,.
B
Okay,
well,
I
guess
just
for
the
benefit
of
the
public
good
afternoon.
Everyone.
My
name
is
william
applegate
and
honored
to
be
serving
as
the
chair
on
this
commission
to
look
at
the
smokestacks
and
obviously
it's
a
very
interesting
part
of
our
city
and
this
these
stacks
had
been
obviously
decommissioned
back
in
the
50s
and
the
city
and
the
people
of
charleston
have
been
working
to
preserve
them
for
over
six
decades
and
now
we're
a
little
bit
at
a
crossroads
and
trying
to
figure
out
how
to
deal
with
them.
B
We've
got
a
wealth
of
information
that
has
been
provided
by
some
of
the
people
here
on
the
committee
and
there's
just
a
lot
to
look
into
so
I
know
we
have
an
incredible
amount
of
information
to
review
and
to
go
over
and
to
consult
and
to
analyze
and
as
we
analyze
what
we're
going
to
do
and
give
the
commission
an
opportunity
to
make
a
recommendation
to
the
city-
and
I
know
that
goes.
B
We
have
big
picture
issues
here.
Looking
at
the
storm,
water
and
flooding
in
this
area,
the
grace
you
know,
bridge
corridor
being
super
important
part
of
the
city.
So
you
know
what
we
do
here
is
very
important
and
it's
exciting
opportunity-
and
I
know
the
city's
been
studying
this
issue
hard
for
for
four
or
five
years.
B
As
far
as
how
do
we
manage
these
issues,
and
so
we
look
forward
to
getting
all
the
information
that
we
can
get
our
hands
on
and
being
able
to
make
a
very
thorough
and
smart
decision,
hopefully
to
preserve
the
the
smokestacks
and
and
to
preserve
this
important
part
of
the
city.
B
So
with
that,
we
we
have
on
tonight's
agenda
or
this
afternoon's
agenda,
hopefully
review
and
update
that
we're
gonna
be
able
to
get
from
mr
bennett
as
far
as
a
lot
of
work
he's
done,
and
hopefully
we're
going
to
be
reviewing
some
of
the
proposals
and
estimates
that
the
city
has
collected
over
the
years
as
well
as
some
of
the
funding
sources.
B
B
I
guess
the
first
thing
of
order
we
need
to
do
here
is
to
review
and
approve
the
november
19th
meeting
minutes,
and
you
know
I
guess,
for
the
process.
If
somebody
could,
since
I
wasn't
here
but
and
asked
some
I'll
I'll.
F
B
Can
if
everyone
has
reviewed
the
minutes
and
then
if
someone
could
make
a
motion
in
a
second
a
move
for
approval?
B
Okay,
thank
you.
Councilwoman
del
chapo
has
moved
for
approval
of
the
minutes.
Has
everyone
had
a
chance
to
review?
Do
we
have
a
second.
A
Honestly,
I
didn't
see
him
but
I'll
I'll
go
with
councilmember
del
chapo's
assurance
that
they
accurately
reflect
our
our
meeting
from
before.
B
Okay
was
that
a
second,
mr
masalan.
C
H
A
B
Aye,
okay,
great
thank
you.
We
have
approved
the
meeting
minutes.
B
And
then
you
know
we
were
going
to
confirm
everyone
is,
has
received
the
the
inspection
reports,
as
everybody
in
the
commission
receive
the
inspection
reports
got
it
okay
and
I
guess,
as
a
housekeeping
matter.
I
guess
I
do
want
to
make
sure
at
some
point
that
we
can
circle
up
and
maybe
I'll
send
an
email
later.
But
I
want
to
make
sure
that
if
there's
any
information
that
anybody
on
the
commission
doesn't
have,
I'm
still
kind
of
piecing
together
make
sure
I
have
everything
we
need.
B
And
now
we'll
move
to
the
main
part
of
the
show
here,
mr
bennett,
if
you
want
to
please
present
your
your
updates
and
comments
on
the
report.
D
I'll
be
glad
to
I'm
good.
Thank
you,
mr
chairman.
Let's
see,
let
me
I'm
going
to
do
this.
If
I
may,
I've
got
a
I've
got
a
brief
group
of
slides
that
I
I'd
love
to
I'd
love
to
use.
If
I
I
don't
know
whether
let
me
see
if
I
can
simply
share
my
screen
from
right
here,
if
I
can,
that
would
be
the
simplest
and
and
if
not,
I
might
have
to
ask
you
to
figure
out
how
to
give
me
permission
now.
D
It
turns
out
the
the
host
has
has
to
the
host
has
to
give
me
permission,
ms.
D
Great
great,
thank
you.
Let's
see
if
that
worked.
Oh,
my
goodness,
yes,
okay,
share
screen
number
one
good!
Is
everybody
looking
at
pictures
of
of
the
cracks.
D
Wonderful,
okay,
good
the
what
what
I'd
I'd
like
to
do
is:
first,
the
even
before
we
go
into
where
we
are
on
this
thing
in
in
terms
of
the
reports
that
we
got
back
from
international
chimney
on
their
inspection,
that
there
were
no
surprises
there.
The
I
think
we
we
pretty
much.
We
we
we've
gotten.
D
We've
we've
seen
that
the
south
chimney
is
in
the
internal
liner
is
in
slightly
better
condition
than
that
of
the
north
chimney,
but,
but
likewise
quite
damaged
and
and
and
also
excuse
me.
Also.
It's
significant
risk
that
if,
if
it
were
to
collapse
it
could
it
could
take
out
the
the
shell
of
the
chimneys,
which
would
be
a
very
dangerous
situation.
D
So,
in
any
case,
let
me
go
ahead
and
and
go
on
in
and
talk
about
what
I
think
is
most
important,
which
is
how
do
we
move
forward
and
the
what
we've
we've
been
charged
with
doing?
D
Is
this
we've
been
charged
with
developing
a
set
of
a
set
of
drawings
and
specifications
for
the
repair
work
on
these
chimneys
for
the
restoration
of
the
chimneys,
and
we
are
going
on
that
now
and
we
have
what
I'll
do
is
run
you
through
the
current
status
of
that
and
we'll
we'll
show
you
the
where
we
think
and
I'm
gonna
have
to
move
the
camera
over
here.
D
Okay
and
I'll
show
you
what
the
what
the
schedule
looks
like
and
what
cost
estimates
look
like,
and
and
at
this
stage
we
have
cost
estimates
that
we
ourselves
have
presented
have
developed
for
the
for
the
city
back
in
september.
We
have
additional
cost
estimates
from
international
chimney
or
updated
cost
estimates
from
international
chimney
and
and
we'll
we'll
share
all
of
this
okay
and
then
I'll.
Stop
for
questions
it's.
D
As
you
know,
we've
got
two
chimneys
one
from
the
1930s
one
from
the
1940s
they've
been
evaluated
by
a
number
of
firms
we
have
completed
at
this
stage:
conceptual
design
for
restoration
of
those
chimneys
we've
we're
in
the
design
development
phase,
which
is
a
phase
where
we're
doing
a
lot
of
calculations
and
and
coming
up
with
the
the
general,
the
the
more
specifics
of
the
approach
to
the
to
making
this
making
sure
this
chimney
stand
and
our
next
phase
and
actually
we're
already
starting
into
that
is
the
contract
document
space
where
we
develop
the
actual
drawings
and
specifications
that
will
go
out
to
bidders
and
and
so
we'll.
D
We'll
look
at
that.
The
let's
look
at
the
review
of
the
construction
work.
That's
going
to
be
required!
D
We're
going
to
demolish
the
liners
of
the
chimneys,
we're
going
to
repoint
the
interior
repair,
the
exterior
install
the
vertical
tie
down
straps
within
the
chimneys
and
re-point
the
exterior
shell
of
the
chimneys
and
install
horizontal
new
horizontal
bands,
remove
the
old
ones
re-point
any
areas
that
were
missed
because
of
the
bands
and
then
do
a
bunch
of
smaller
tasks
and
I'll
go
over.
This
okay,
first,
this
is
one
of
the
existing
chimneys.
Only
one
of
the
two
is
shown
right
here,
but
there
are
two
of
them.
D
Of
course,
our
first
thing
we'll
have
to
do
a
contractor
will
have
to
do,
is
to
go
in
and
remove
the
the
liners
that
are
there
now
demolish
those
lawyers.
That's
going
to
be
a
pretty
tricky
operation,
because,
if
you
you
all
saw
pictures
last
time
of
the
liners
and-
and
you
know
that
they're
they're
very
close
to
to
failure
in
some
places,
the
the
bricks
have
already
started
peeling
away
at
some
places,
some
of
them
have
already
fallen.
D
If
we
have
a
failure
of
that
liner,
that
will
that
would
that
that
would
cause
the
whole
thing
to
peel
off
and
and
collapse.
It
really
has
stands
a
real
serious
potential
for
taking
out
this.
D
The
shell
of
the
of
the
chimneys
either
one
of
the
chimneys,
and
that
would
be
there
would
be
a
catastrophic
failure
if
that
were
to
happen,
and
so
the
we
realized
that
we
cannot
get
in
there
and
simply
just
push
bricks
until
they
until
they
fall
it'll,
be
a
a
matter
of
disassembly
and
the
people
who
do
it.
D
Do
this
kind
of
work,
one
on
my
international
chimney,
headset
or
now,
icc
commonwealth
is
the
name
of
the
company,
but
they
said
they've
they've
actually
had
one
of
these
chimneys,
where
they
were
quite
concerned
that
this
was
gonna
happen
and
that
they
were
going
to
have
a
catastrophic
failure
of
the
liner,
and
so
they
were
actually
disassembling
from
a
bucket
hanging
from
a
cable
on
a
crane
and
and
sure
enough.
The
thing
did
that's
exactly
what
happened.
D
The
liner
collapsed,
it
took
out,
took
out
part
of
the
chimney
and
they
were
left
sitting
in
a
bucket
up
in
the
air
and
held
by
a
crane
with
with
no
chimney
beneath
them,
and
so
it's
it
is
a
particularly
risky
operation.
Doing
that.
So
we,
after
that's
done,
though,
the
the
interior,
the
of
that
exterior
shell,
is
going
to
have
to
be
repointed
all
the
way
around
on
the
interior.
F
D
Then,
after
that,
we'll
repair
the
cracks
in
the
exterior
shell
of
the
of
the
chimney
as
you
as
you
saw
on
the
very
first
slide
as
a
matter
of
fact,
the
there
we
go
there
are
there's
severe
cracking
in
there.
As
a
matter
of
fact
this
and
this
these
are
remnants,
and
here
we're
seeing
the
same
thing.
These
little
pieces
of
of
steel
are
remnants
of
the
ladder
that
used
to
go
up
the
outside
of
the
shell
and
was
and
was
cut
off
well
that
that
that
ladder
corroded
the
corroded
pretty
badly.
D
Unfortunately,
when
this
was
done,
they
didn't
take
the
it
didn't,
take
the
pieces
out
and
and
and
they've
continued
to
fracture,
the
outer
shell.
Let
me
run
forward
and
catch
up
to
where
we
were
okay,
so
that
that
is
going
to
have
to
be
repaired
and
that
will
involve
taking
out
some
bricks
and
replacing
those
then
we'll
install
vertical
straps
inside
the
chimneys,
and
here
you
can
see
yeah.
These
will
be
steel
straps
down
in
down
in
the
chimneys,
and
these
straps
will
will
be
tied.
D
As
a
matter
of
fact,
let's
see
that's
pretty
hard
to
see
down
here,
but
these
straps
will
actually
be
tied
down
into
the
into
the
base
into
the
pile
cap
at
the
at
the
base
of
the
chimney.
That's
about
12
or
13
feet
underground
and
those
are
going
to
be
there
to
resist
overturning
of
the
chimney
in
either
wind
or
seismic
event.
D
D
Stainless
steel
bands
that'll
have
a
much
greater
life
than
what's
there
now
and
those
will
be
about
every
five
feet
going
up
the
chimney
roughly
the
same,
spacing
that's
there
now
and
then
we'll
go
back
in
and
remove
the
existing
bands
after
the
new
ones
are
in
place
and
holding
everything
together,
we'll
remove
the
old
ones
and
and
we'll
come
back
in
and
we'll
repoint
the
masonry
where
those
used
to
be
then
there'll
be
a
number
of
small
things.
D
That'll
that'll
need
they'll
need
work
after
that,
we'll
have
to
install
a
new
roof.
Actually,
we
won't
install
a
new
will
reinstall
the
existing
roof
that
we'll
be
taking
down
and
we'll
have
to
replace
the
the
steel
there's
some
steel
in
several
places.
Here
you
can
see
it
over
in
this
area.
D
You
can
see
it
here,
that's
in
very
bad
condition
and
and
it's
doing
a
lot
of
damage
a
lot
of
structural
damage
to
the
to
the
masonry
down
at
the
entry
and
we'll
so
after
that,
steel's
replaced
we'll
repair
the
masonry
we'll
install
an
access
door,
so
we
can
get
in
in
the
future.
D
We'll
fill
the
base
with
with
flowable
fill,
which
is
just
a
very
weak
concrete
because
we'll
need
to
add
a
lot
of
weight
down
there
and
to
help
resist
overturning,
and
we
will,
if
need
be,
repair.
The
foundation.
D
We've
looked
pretty
carefully
at
this
and
we
don't
believe,
there's
any
foundation
damage,
but
in
reality
we're
gonna
actually
have
to
go
down
and
do
some
inspection
down
there
just
to
just
to
confirm
that
that
we
don't
have
a
problem.
Okay,
let's
look
at.
Let's
look
at
this
I
want
to
talk
about.
I
want
to
every
owner
wants
to
know
how
long's
this
going
to
take
and
how
much
is
it
going
to
cost
and
most
owners
really
don't
care
at
all
about
all
the
stuff.
D
About
how
long
is
it
going
to
take
and
how
much
is
it
going
to
cost?
Let's
go
through
this
okay
right
now,
we've
done
the
conceptual
design,
we've
repriced,
the
we've
done
we're
doing
design
development
drawings
and
in
january
we'll
be.
We
will
finish.
The
design
development
drawings
we'll
be
well
into
the
contract
documents,
the
drawings
and
specs,
and
you
guys
will
have
the
joyful
task
of
making
a
recommendation
to
the
city
go
or
no
go.
D
That
is
go
with
a
demolition
or
go
with
a
restoration
and-
and
we
will
not
at
that
time
in
january-
have
bids
the
contract
documents
will
not
be
that
we're
not
going
to
be
able
to
get
the
contract
documents
completely
ready
for
bidding
and
get
them
out
to
bid
and
get
bids
in
all
before
you
guys
have
to
make
a
recommendation,
but
we're
going
to
continue
to
update
pricing
so
that
you
have
a
real
good
idea
as
to
what
to
expect
the
contract
documents
will
be
out
to
bid
after
that,
and
I
suspect
that
it
will
be
a
number
of
weeks
generally.
D
We
we
figure
somewhere
in
the
neighborhood
of
three
to
four
weeks,
once
the
full
contract
documents
are
available
before
before
bidders
will
actually
give
the
city
their
prices.
It'll
take
the
city
a
while
to
to
have
a
contract
prepared
and
and
and
signed
with
a
with
a
contractor,
and
by
sometime
in
april.
I
is
my
expectation.
The
city
will
have
a
contract
for
construction,
with
a
notice
to
proceed
and
mobilization
by
the
contractor
in
may.
D
If
the
city
says,
we
want
to
demolish
these,
these
chimneys
right
now
we're
getting
we're
getting
a
an
anticipated
total
construction
time
of
about
seven
months
about
three
months
to
go
in
and
remove
the
liners
in
the
chimneys
and
about
another
four
months
to
go
in
and
take
the
chimneys
down
that
would
take
roughly
june
to
december,
or
if,
if
the
city
says,
we
want
to
go
ahead
and
do
the
restoration
work
on
the
chimneys,
the
the
that's
a
total,
a
roughly
11-month
project,
they're
still
going
to
have
to
go
in
first
and
take
those
liners
down,
and
the
good
thing
is.
D
The
good
thing
is
that
the
very
first
job
is
in
taking
the
liners
down,
and
that
is
something
that
will
be
done
june
july
august.
Well,
before
we
get
into
the
height
of
the
hurricane
season.
They
are
the
most
dangerous
thing
there
and
they
will
be
down
and,
and
everything
will,
every
everything
in
this
work
is
is
designed
so
that
the
further
we
go
into
the
project,
the
safer
it
becomes
and
and
so
we're
we're
focused
on
very
first
thing.
Let's
make
this
as
safe
as
possible.
D
So
when
we,
as
we
start
getting
into
the
latter
parts
of
construction,
we
have
significantly
reduced
risk
of
a
serious
problem
by
the
time
we
get
into
september
october
november.
D
Costs.
Excuse
me.
D
D
One
of
them
was
at
2.8
million
another
one
sec
or
just
above
2.8
million
a
second
one
was
just
below
2.8
million,
and
a
third
one
was
about
2.3
million.
These
were-
and
I
want
to
point
this
out,
because
this
is
really
important.
D
These
were
construction,
cost
estimates,
and
I
realized
that
back
in
september
the
city
said.
Well,
let's
not
forget
that
we
also
have
to
deal
with
a
total
project
here,
not
just
the
construction
cost
and
I'll
go
into
that
just
a
minute,
and
so
the
city
actually
had
some
high
higher
figures.
D
I
think
on
some
of
this
in
in
going
in
now
rough
order
of
magnitude
costs,
we've
gone
to
before
we
gone
to
one
company
that
had
not
disassembled
a
chimney
before,
and
we
had
these
figures
of
point
six,
six
tenths
of
a
million
in
in
talking
with
international
chimney
that
has
done
this
before
they've
said.
We
think
that
this
is
actually
about
a
1.4
to
1.5
million
dollar
total
cost.
D
If
we
take
those
chimneys
down
to
the
ground
and-
and
they
said
this
is,
this
is
what
we
think
it
actually
is
going
to
cost.
If
we
do
restoration
work
on
these,
we
think
we're
looking
at
the
2.6
to
2.7
million.
D
I
mentioned
a
minute
ago
that
these
are
construction
costs,
project
costs,
and
I
don't
know
how
many
of
these
the
city
has.
Mr
mayor,
I
think
you
are
probably
in
a
better
position
than
than
I
or
maybe
mr
most
is,
and
maybe
I'll
knock
on
the
door
for
both
of
y'all
to
ask
for
a
little
bit
of
help
with
this.
Some
of
these
are
realistic
costs
for
the
city.
Some
are
not,
but
certainly
we
know
that
a
project
cost
would
include
construction
cost
plus
if
there
are
any
financing
costs,
plus
any
fundraising
costs.
D
I
know
that
I
know
that
when
we
met
a
month
ago
with
this
group,
the
instruction
was
that
that
the
half
the
cost
would
have
to
come
from
somewhere
else,
and
so,
if
there
are
fundraising
costs,
then
certainly
those
go
into
a
project
cost.
D
If
there
are
relocation
costs
for
local
residents
at
critical
times
during
the
construction,
when
anything
is
particularly
risky,
then
then
that
would
those
would
be
those
costs
would
go
into
a
project
cost,
as
would
any
loss
of
use
cost
for
the
saint
julian
divine
community
center,
and
then
there
are
also
direct
costs
that
the
city
has
traffic
control
security.
D
That
kind
of
thing
I
have
talked
more
than
enough,
I'm
going
to
be
quiet
and
stop
and
take
questions
and
comments,
and
and
say
thank
you
all
for
for
letting
me
talk
for
for
for
just
a
minute
or
two
for
a
few
minutes,
councilwoman
del
chapel,
I
saw
your
hand
come
right
up.
Yes,.
D
I
D
No,
I
I
can't,
but
it's
a
wonderful
question,
and
why
don't
I
take
it
back
to
a
couple
of
different
sources.
I
I
do
know
this.
I
know
that
when
we
were
talking
with
a
local
demolition
company
that
had
not
disassembled
a
chimney
before
when
we
were
talking
with
them
back
in
the
end
of
the
summer
and.
D
D
It's
gone
forever
in,
in
any
case
the
if,
when
they
they
were
quite
concerned,
and
they
they
first
came
up
with
one
price
based
on
scaffolding,
the
outside
or
another
price,
based
on
based
on
putting
a
scaffolding
on
the
chimney
and
working
their
way
down,
they
realized
boy,
there's
a
tremendous
amount
of
risk
with
that,
then
they
then
they
came
up
with
a
price
of
scaffolding.
D
The
whole
exterior
and-
and
I
think
they've
also
realized
at
that
time-
that
that
the
that,
if,
if
we
lost
a
chimney,
it
would
take
out
the
scaffolding
too,
and
so
there
was
a
lot
of
risk
associated
with
that
approach.
I'll
be
honest,
I
don't
remember
where
they
finally
ended
up
in
terms
of
their
thoughts
on
risk.
D
I
do
know
that
that
icc
commonwealth
said
that
their
approach
is
that
they
would
go
down
inside
the
chimney
in
the
basket
and
would
work
in
such
a
way
that
they
would
be
actually
bracing
the
brick
as
they
worked
their
way
down.
I
D
That
that
their
approach
was
that
they
would,
they
would
brace
it
in
such
a
way
that
they
would
prevent
its
collapsing
catastrophically
all
they
would.
They
would
do
everything
they
could
to
you
know,
then
you
know
this
is
they're,
never
any
guarantees
and
stuff
like
that.
Of
course,
yeah,
and
you
know
we
all
know
that
construction
is
dangerous,
plain
and
simple,
and
it
really
is,
and-
and
I've
been
reminded
of
that
unfortunately,
several
times
and
mr.
D
I
Sure,
thank
you.
So
I
don't.
If
there
is
any
kind
of
you
know,
data
around
that
that
can
be
shared
and
then
the
str,
those
vertical
straps
that
you
were
talking
about,
do
those
become
permanent
or
they're
just
there.
While
you
do
the
work.
D
No,
no,
no,
those
are
permanent
and,
and
those
are
there
and
and
they'll
be
connected
into
the
shell.
Okay,
we're
going
to
connect
them
into
the
shell
at
many
spots,
and
you
know
we're
looking
somewhere
in
the
neighborhood
of
every
two
to
five
feet.
D
Up
the
up
the
shell,
each
one
would
be
connected
and
the
objective
with
those
is
this
brick
masonry
will
carry
compression,
but
it
does
not
carry
tension
which
is
pull
it
just
doesn't
do
it
and
and
the
severe
wind
calculations.
D
The
hurricane
calculations
show
that
if
we
had
a
hurricane
that
gave
us
the
kind
of
wind
that
that
our
building
codes
today
require
us
to
design
for
those
chimneys
would
not
survive,
they
would
they
would
tip
they
would
they
would
have
tension
in
them
and
they
they'd
collapse,
and
so
this,
these
steel
straps,
will
prevent
that
they're
in
there
specifically
to
tie
the
top
half
of
the
chimney
down
to
the
pile
cap.
Okay,
okay,
yeah!
D
J
Hi,
my
name
is
latonya
gamble.
If
we
were
to
restore
the
chimneys,
how
long
before
they
would
need
repair
again.
D
D
D
Yeah
miss
gamble.
It's
the
chimneys
are
going
to
need
maintenance,
but
my
objective
is
that
they
would
never
need
in
the
lifetime
of
anyone
on
this
call
the
this
level
of
work
again.
You
know
we
sometimes
say
in
our
business
in
our
firm
that
and
it
happens
pretty
regularly.
We
find
that
when
we're
doing
major
structural
work
on
stuff,
we
are
generally
working
we're
doing
the
kind
of
work
that
hasn't
been
done,
usually
in
well
over
a
hundred
years.
D
Now
in
these
chimneys,
that's
not
the
case
they're,
not
that
old,
but
but
our
objective
is
that
we
do
the
kind
of
work
that
that
will
mean
that
no
one's
going
to
have
to
do
this
level
of
work
again
within
the
lifetime
of
anybody
here,
70
to
100
years
now,
the
chimneys
will
need
maintenance,
they're
going
to
need
repointing
from
time
to
time
the
we're
going
to
have
to
refill
in
the
gap
around
the
top
of
those
small
straps
on
the
outside
of
the
chimneys.
A
You
craig,
I
appreciate
the
presentation
and
work
you've
done
on
this
already.
A
I
did
have
a
couple
of
questions
and
and
just
following
up
first
on
on
the
comments
already,
I
I
think
the
question
councilmember
del
chapo
is
very
important
to
get
some
sense
of
the
risk
when
that
deconstruction
occurs,
just
to
think
about
whether
the
street
should
be
closed
or
or
and
all
that
those
kinds
of
things-
and
I
guess
that
almost
goes
without
saying,
but
that's
a
real
important
consideration
to
to
to
me
to
us
just
from
a
safety
point
of
view.
A
Yes,
sir,
and
and
ms
gamble's
question,
I
I
hear
your
response,
but
just
from
considering
the
whole
cost
for
the
city,
it
would
be
helpful
to
at
least
have
some
projection.
Will
you
know
every
10
years
you
got
to
do
this
every
20
years.
You
got
to
do
that.
You
ought
to
check
on
this
because
we
we
don't
want
to
get
in
this
situation
again
I
mean
nobody
ever
prescribed
to
the
city
since
they
were
built
in
the
30s
and
40s.
A
Thirdly,
I
did
want
to
ask
you-
and
I
think
you
mentioned
you-
you
thought
that
the
southern
one,
the
one
we
have
the
report
on
now-
is
in
a
little
better
shape
than
the
northern
northern
one.
Is
that
correct.
A
One
thought
that
had
been
brought
up
at
the
last
meeting,
I
believe
or
some
comment
along
the
way,
was
the
possibility
of
keeping
one
and
taking
one
down.
So
if
you
were
to
keep
one
which
one
would
it
be
and
number
two
on
the
pricing,
is
it
as
simple
as
dividing
both
of
those
costs
in
half
and
dividing
and
adding
those
two
things
together,
which,
if
I
do
it,
I
come
to
about
two
million
dollars.
A
You
got
a
net
cost
on
the
demo
of
about
750
per
stack
and
we
got
a
a
net
of
about
1.3
million
per
stack
to
deconstruct.
Is
it
simple?
Is
it
as
simple
as
saying
750,
plus
1.3
would
be
the
projected
cost?
If
you
took
one
away,
you
kept
one.
D
It's
well
I
I'll
go
ahead
and
and
I'll
take
each
of
the
each
of
the
questions
in
terms
of
in
terms
of
street
closures.
Yes,
sir,
that
there
are
there
are,
there
will
be
a
need
for
street
closures,
and
and-
and
there
will
be
critical
there'll-
be
also
a
need
at
times
to
close
the
saint
julian
divine
community
center,
and
I
can
conceive
of
critical
times
when
we
would
even
ask
residents
not
to
be
in
their
houses
at
certain
critical
times
and
for
short
periods.
D
I
don't
see
that
as
a
I
don't
see
that
as
happening
for
any
protracted
period.
B
C
C
D
The
and
realistically
the
the
riskiest
time
is
when
we
disassemble
that
liner
that's
the
riskiest
time
in
each
chimney.
So
yes,
now
second
question.
Mr
mayor
maintenance
schedule,
you
know
I
I
agree
with
you
that
that
maintenance
schedules
are
absolutely
wonderful.
Enforcing
them
that
is
doing
them
is.
D
D
I
would
see
a
need
to
do
an
internal
inspection
of
the
chimney-
oh
maybe
every
five
to
ten
years,
and
I
would
see
a
need
to
do
a
to
do
repointing
work
on
the
chimney,
probably
every
20
or
30
years,
and
so,
but
I
I
think
it's
important
that
we
that
we
do
spell
that
out
and
in
such
a
way
that
it
that
it
can
be
maintained.
D
Fine.
Finally,
in
answer
to
your
question,
what
if
we
keep
one
well
the
costs
that
we
had
up
here
a
few
minutes
ago,
where
we
talked
about
rough
order
of
magnitudes
of
demolition
at
1.4
to
1.5
million
and
restoration
at
2.6
to
2.7
those
were
not
additive.
D
The
restoration
cost
did
include
the
did
include
the
internal
disassembly
of
the
liners,
and
so
so
it
was
an
either
or
not.
Of
both
hand.
C
D
If
I
had
to
reach
up
and
grab
a
number,
I
would
say
I
would
say
my
guess
is
going
to
be
somewhere
in
the
neighborhood
of
60
to
65
percent
of
of
of
the
cost
of
keeping
two
of
them.
But
that's
boy.
That's
just
reaching
up
and
grabbing.
D
But,
but
that
that
really
is
just
a
guess:
let's
see
that
I
think
that
handled
all
three
were
there.
Other
yeah
did
someone
else
have
a
hand
up,
and
yes,
sir.
G
Mitchell
said
yeah,
so
even
if
you
keep
both
versus
one,
you
don't
see
me.
The
the
price
gonna
make
too
much
difference.
D
Yeah,
it's
it's
yeah!
It's
it's!
Probably
I'm
I'm
going
to
reach
up
and
say
it's
somewhere
that
that
we
really
are
probably
in
the
to
65
percent
range,
just
to
do
one,
because
there's
a
lot
of
mobilization,
cost
with
getting
down
and
just
getting
on
site
and
doing
the
work.
G
Then,
secondly,
even
when
the
work
is
being
done,
if
it's
going
to
be
done
or
not,
the
with
the
residents
around
that
area
might
have
to
be
moved.
You
have
to
probably
secure
that
area
and
you
also
have
a
business
there
that
you're
going
to
have
to
probably
close
for
a
while
or
whatever
the
case
may
be,
and
they're
going
to
lose
business
there
too.
So
I
don't
know
who's
going
to.
G
You
know
even
take
that
up
if
they
want
someone
to
pay
for
them,
losing
the
business
for
the
business
aspect
aspect
there,
which
is
hannibal's
restaurant
yeah
and
so
you're
gonna,
probably
have
to
close
that
whole
area,
because
you
have
that's
right
next
to
the
smokestackers.
If
you
make.
F
F
D
These
are
important
questions
they
really
are.
I'm
trying
to
remember
councilman
mitchell
is
is
hannibal's.
Does
I
can't
remember,
does
it
fall
within
that
roughly
200.
G
D
I
don't
see
the
likelihood
that
they're
going
to
be
that
there's
going
to
be
a
long-term
closure
of
residences
in
that
area
or
of
the
business
in
that
area.
What
I
see
is,
I
see
it
well
to
give
you
some
idea
when
we
did
a
there's,
I'm
not
going
to
name
the
project,
but
there's
a
1920s
building
here
in
town,
concrete
building
that
everybody
knows
and
it's
about
six
or
seven
stories.
D
High
and
a
few
years
ago
we
had
to,
we
had
to
replace
some
of
the
basement
columns
and
some
of
the
first
floor
columns
in
that
six
or
seven
story
building
and
what
that
meant
was
we
had
to
go
up
to
the
second
floor,
grab
the
columns
and
lift
one
at
a
time,
lift
a
column
about
one
to
two
hundredths
of
an
inch
and
then
go
in
and
put
a
new
column
up,
underneath
it
and
and
when
we
did
that
we
actually
required
that
everybody
get
out
of
the
building
for
a
few
hours
at
a
time.
D
D
G
G
You
know
we
can't
project
exactly
what's
going
to
happen,
you
know
we're
trying
we're
just
talking
about
it,
but
we
don't
know
what's
going
to
happen
when
they
start
working
on
it,
it
might
be
when
they
start
pulling
bricks
down
like
trying
to
put
some
you
know
inside
of
it
trying
to
restore
it,
something
else
might
fall,
and
I'm
just
my
thing
was
always
a
safety
factor
for
the
people
in
that
area.
G
That
close
proximity
to
that
smoke
stack,
and
that
was
my
main
issue,
because
I
didn't
want
one
brick,
nothing
to
fall
on
anyone
around
there
and
have
them
in
my
conscience,
and
that
was
my
dilemma
on
this
dealing
with
the
smokestack
period.
You
know
and
that's
that's
why
I
look
at
it
very
seriously
when
it
comes
to.
You
know,
like
I
always
say,
a
human
being
versus
those
type
things,
and
you
know.
D
Yeah
well
councilman
mitchell,
you're,
you're,
absolutely
right
that
it's
it's
no
matter
what
we've
got
a
life
safety
issue
that
we
have
to
deal
with.
C
F
B
D
B
Mr
bennett
is
there
a
way
that
you
can
study
and
and
get
back
to
the
commission
just
some
idea,
some
clarity
to
the
councilman's
question
on
on
timing
of
potential
closure,
or
you
know.
D
D
D
D
Yeah
I'd
be
glad
to,
and
let
me.
D
Okay,
yes,
so
the
the
timing
on
the
serious
life
safety
issues
during
construction,
in
particular.
A
Would
it
be
likely,
when
you
do
that
deconstruction
of
the
inner
liner
that
they
do
one
stack
and
then
the
other?
I
mean
from
a
timing
point
of
view.
I
guess
it
gets
down
to
the
contractor
a
little
bit.
Is
it?
Is
it
feasible
or
recommended,
or
not
recommended
to
try
to
do
them
both
at
one
time.
C
A
Understand
that's
when
your
highest
risk
is,
it
is
kind
of
getting
all
over
with
at
the
same
time,
if
you
were
doing
them
or
if
you
did
one,
you
got
that
same
issue
when
you
come
back
to
do
the
other.
You
know.
D
Yeah,
well,
you
know
it
it's
it's
a
real
good
point:
oh
yeah
yeah.
There
are
two
sides
to
this
coin.
One
is
that
you've
got
you've,
got
significant
risk
in
two
areas
that
you're
going
to
have
to
watch.
At
the
same
time,.
F
D
Would
make
me
a
little
nervous,
but
but
but
the
I
I
and
so
there
there
is,
that
downside
there's
also
the
there's
also
the
good
side
to
it,
though,
that
that
you
are
certainly
inconveniencing
anyone
locally
for
much
less
total
time,
and
I
think
that's
worth,
I
think,
that's
worth
pursuing.
D
There's
no
doubt
in
my
mind
that
it
would
be
more
expensive
because
they'd
have
to
have
two
cranes
and
working
and
they'd
there'd
be
much
more
equipment
on
site,
but
you
know
it
makes
good
sense
to
minimize
the
problems
that
you're
going
to
cause
for
everybody
in
that
area.
It
really
does
and
councilman
mitchell.
I
I
I
think,
that's
that
that's
the
kind
of
thing
that
is
well
worth
looking
at
with
respecting
the
the
fact
that
nobody
in
that
area
wants
to
be
grossly
inconvenienced.
B
Miss
campbell,
you
might
be
muted,
unmute
yourself.
J
You
said
that
the
timeline
would
be
probably
june
through
december.
Will
that
impact?
What
stage
would
we
be
during
hurricane
season?
Is
that
the
start
of
the
project.
D
Well,
it
depends
on
the
path
taken
and
I'm
gonna
look
back
over
at
my
notes
over
here
for
a
minute
and
as
as
a
matter
of
fact,
I'm
gonna
if
the
chairman
will
allow
me,
I'm
gonna
share
this
screen
again
for
just
a
moment
and
then
there
we
go
one
share
and
I'm
gonna
probably
forget
to
unshare
it.
So
I'll
have
to
be
reminded,
mr
turner,
but
yeah.
D
If
we
look
at
if
we
look
at
a
demolition,
we
would
be
june
july
august
that
we
would
be
taking
the
liners
down.
D
If
we
look
at
a
restoration,
it
would
be
june
july
and
august
that
we
would
be
taking
the
liners
down,
and
that
is
unquestionably
the
riskiest
part
of
the
of
the
work.
And
when
we
get
those
liners
down,
we
will
have
significantly
reduced
the
risk
of
a
very
serious
problem
in
hurricane
season
and
but
because,
if
it's,
what
would
have
brought
the
liners
down
is
the
movement
back
and
forth
in
a
wind
event
in
a
hurricane
of
the
of
the
chimneys.
D
So
so
we're
going
to
significantly
increase
safety
by
getting
the
liners
down
june
july
and
august
before
the
worst
of
hurricane
season
hits.
I
think
the
peak
of
hurricane
season
is
in
late
september.
My
recollection
is
that
september
20,
some
odd
is,
is
the
peak
point
in
hurricane
season.
D
D
K
F
K
A
couple
of
questions
that
that
occur
to
me
first
on
the
safety
issue
that
councilman
mitchell
raised
are
there?
Are
there
any
other
alternatives
to
this
procedure?
That
would
improve
that
and
and
again
you
know
how
little
I
know
about
engineering,
but
is
there
another
approach
that
would
be
safer
than
this
one
that
you
can
think
of.
F
D
I
I'm
not
aware
of
it.
I
I'm
confident
of
one
thing:
I'm
confident
that
that
the
guys
who
do
this
work
want
to
make
absolutely
sure
that,
when
they
are
up
there
that
they
are
as
likely
as
is
absolutely
possible
to
come
home
that
night,
they
have
every
incentive
to
make
sure
that
and
and
the
company
does
too
the
company.
That's
doing
this
because
there's
nothing
worse
than
losing
people
in
a
construction
accident.
D
K
F
K
F
D
We
actually
went
to,
I
believe
it
was
a
couple
of
local
demolition
contractors,
but
I
you
know
it
was
back
in
the
summer,
and
this
is
christmas
and
but
my
recollection
was
that
there
was
no
one
to
whom
we
spoke
locally,
who
had
actually
disassembled
a
similar
industrial
chimney
and.
K
And
then
my
last
question
kind
of
ties
in
with
that,
based
on
what
you
know,
if,
if
we
go
out
regionally
or
nationally
or
they're
sorry,
I
got
I'm
sorry.
K
D
I
I
I
think,
we'll
get
several
bidders.
My
gut
feel
is
that
there
will
be
well,
I'm
pretty
confident
at
least
two
and
maybe
three
or
four,
or
even
five
or
six
companies
that
that
that
would
be
interested
in
this
project.
D
I
think
there'll
be
some
who
will
be
better
qualified
than
others,
and
I
think
it's
going
to
be
particularly
important
to
us
that
we
that
we
actually
write
into
our
specifications
that
that
any
company
bidding
on
this
has
got
to
show
us
that
they
are
qualified
to
do
this
work
that
they
actually
have
done
it
before,
and
that
this
is
not
a
first
time
for
them.
B
B
Did
you
consider,
I
guess
all
of
the
the
different
options
as
it
relates
to
you
know,
for
example,
inside
the
the
in
the
interior
as
far
as
repairing
the
interior
and
repointing
are
there?
Are
there
cheaper
alternatives
putting
in
sort
of
like
a
mortar
sleeve,
as
opposed
to
putting
in
vertical
bands?
Is
there?
Are
there
different
options,
not
just
in
that
one
area,
but
throughout
the
project
it
seems
as
if
you've
constructed
a
a
plan.
B
D
Yes,
sir,
that
there
is-
and
I
it's
not
one-
I
recommend,
but
but
there
are
alternative
approaches
and
one
of
the
one
of
the
approaches
that
that
that
we
considered
or
there
were
there
were
two
approaches
that
we
considered
that
both
involved.
D
Well,
let's
see
one
one
approach
involved:
sliding
a
sleeve
steel
sleeve
down
inside
the
chimney-
and
I
am
we
looked
at
that-
I'm
not
convinced
that
we
could
get
a
a
good,
a
good
connection
between
that
sleeve
and
the
outer
shell
in
a
way
that
would
that
would
actually
accomplish
the
objective
that
we've
got
one
way
to
get.
D
That
connection,
of
course,
is
to
is
to
fill
the
fill
the
void
between
the
steel
sleeve
and
the
outer
shell,
with
some
sort
of
a
a
mortar,
in
this
particular
case,
that's
particularly
difficult,
because
there's
so
much
weight
that
we'd
be
adding
and
that
we
grossly
overly
overload
the
foundations.
D
D
We
ourselves
have
not
used
that
approach
and
mr
applegate,
I
I
actually
attend
every
year,
the
the
association
for
preservation
technology
conference
and-
and
I
usually
try
and
take
everybody
in
my
office
to
that
some
years.
It
seemed
it's
one
year's
in
canada,
then
the
next
two
years,
it's
somewhere
here
in
this
country,
such
an
important
conference,
the
the
the
preservation
engineering
technical
committee
of
that
group
raises
pretty
regularly.
D
How
can
we
possibly
educate
the
other
engineers
here
in
this
country
who
are
doing
this
kind
of
work,
but
don't
understand
what
a
terrible
thing
that
does
to
the
buildings
and
what
an
immense
amount
of
damage
it
causes
and-
and
we
go
back
and
forth
about
how
can
we
educate
people
about
that?
D
We've
worked
on
buildings
where
we've
had
to
go
in
and
do
major
structural
work
on
the
buildings,
and
I
can
think
of
one
case
about
20
years
ago,
where
we
had
where
we
had
to
do
over
a
million
dollars
worth
of
work
on
the
building,
because
the
the
the
the
brick
outer
veneer
of
the
building
had
grown
to
the
concrete
frame.
D
The
two
had
been
tied
together
and
it
had
broken
the
connection
between
the
two
and
we
had
a
98-foot
high
brick
flag,
that
flapped
in
the
breeze,
and
you
can
imagine
the
safety
problems
associated
with
that
and
and
the
what
happens
is
brick
grows
over
its
lifetime.
Now
this
brick
has
already
grown,
but
concrete,
shrinks
and
any
new
concrete
that
you
would
spray
onto
the
inside.
D
D
I,
as
I've,
told
a
few
people,
I
said
when
you
do
that.
You've
just
signed
a
death
warrant
for
the
building.
B
Well,
thank
you
very
much
for
that.
Mr
granada.
C
B
H
F
H
Is
you
know
when,
when
looking
at
your
design,
craig
and
going
through
it,
I
know
there's
the
preservation
side
right,
preserving
it,
but
also
you
talked
about
the
design
and
adding
the
the
elements
that
will
bring
the
structure
closer
into
compliance
building
codes
and
making
paper
right
for
events
in
the
future
yeah
and
exactly
where
we
are
today
right.
That
was
what
wasn't
what
wasn't
thought
of
back
when
these
were
built,
and
so
I
guess
I
guess
I
just
you
know.
K
H
You
could
re
reiterate,
or
just
what
we've
been
talking
about
your
design
and
what
you
you're,
offering
that
that
is
part
of
it
is
the
preservation,
though,
but
it's
also
about
making
these
stats
safe
to
at
least
to
the
point
much
closer
to
to
withstand
some
of
the
events
that
we
expect
and
expect
in
the
future.
It's
all
part
of
this
right,
it's
not
just
you
know,
preserving
it,
making
sure
it's
maintained,
but
also
bringing
that
structure
much
closer
into
code.
Compliance
and.
D
F
D
Mr
granada,
the
the
objective
with
the
vertical
straps
that
we
would
put
inside
the
chimney,
the
steel
straps
would
be
that
we'd
be
able
to
handle
the
overturning
loads
that
come
with
wind
and
seismic
too,
and
and
we're
sizing
those
for
that.
For
that
loading
and-
and
in
this
case
it's
it's-
a
wind
loading
that
is
most
severe
because
we're
going
to
lighten
this
structure
severely
significantly,
rather
and
and
so
those
would,
those
would
would
prevent
the
overturning
and
and
prevent
the
loss
of
the
top
50.
D
Roughly
of
the
of
the
chimney.
The
horizontal
bands
around
the
outside
would
carry
the
shear
in
seismic
events,
and
so
we've
we
really.
D
They
not
only
tie
together
where
we've
had
where
we've
had
splits
down
the
down
the
chimneys,
but
also
gives
significant
capacity
for
seismic
events.
Yeah
yeah.
They
really
do
and.
F
D
We're
we'll
be
able,
I
believe,
to
design
for
the
full
current
wind
loading
as
far
as
seismic
there
there's
some
actual
requirements
that
we
never
will
or
very
likely
unable
to
be
unable
to
meet
on
a
technical
basis
for
for
a
seismic,
because
we're
required
to
have
reinforcing
in
the
joints
every
every
16
inches,
and
I
I
I
think,
the
with
the
with
the
with
the
bands
every
five
feet
we're
going
to
get
the
sheer
capacity
we
need
yeah
and
good.
L
D
It
would
probably
actually
be
my
gut
feel
is.
It
would
be
a
more
expensive
approach.
I
I
think
we'd
probably
be
looking
at
at
more
money
to
do
that.
D
Not
only
is
the
steel
for
doing
that
pretty
expensive,
but
then
you've
got
to
make
sure
that
if
you
do
fill
that
that
space
between
the
sleeve
and
the
outer
shell,
that
you've
got
to
make
sure
that
you've
got
you,
you
don't
blow
out
the
shell.
D
D
D
You
know
others.
B
M
Chairperson,
I
I
did
have
one
comment
that
I
wanted
to
kind
of
bring
up
here.
So
you
know
craig
brought
up
a
good
point
about
having
good
qualifications
when,
when
it's
time
to
bid
this-
and
that
is
very
important
and
time
obviously
is
very
important
as
well
too.
We
just
have
to
be
careful
if
we
put
too
many
restrictions
or
if
we
tell
them,
you
know
you
have
to
use
two
cranes
or
it
needs
to
be
done
in
a
certain
time
span.
That
has
a
tendency
to
drive
up
the
cost.
F
G
D
B
Okay,
then,
thank
you
so
much.
Mr
bennett
appreciate
it
all
your
work
on
this.
I
guess
next
on
the
agenda
was,
and
we
may
have
kind
of
covered
a
lot
of
this,
but
edmond
I
don't
know
if
you're
going
to
chime
in
on
this,
I
guess
understanding
and
appreciate
I'm
new
to
a
lot
of
this
and
may
know
less
than
everyone
else
on
this
call.
B
I
know
there's
there's
discussion
about
the
payment
for
this
and
how
it's
paid
for
and
whether
the
city
pays
the
the
entire
amount
to
to
preserve
this
property,
and
I
don't
assume
we
will
have
some
further
discussion
about
that
with
within
this
commission
and
in
doing
so,
I
think
it
would
be
important
for
us
to
understand
against
all
the
different
proposals
and
estimates.
B
I
think
it's
clear
to
us
at
this
point
from
what
I
understand
that
mr
bennett
has
presented
the
most
comprehensive
and
thorough,
complete
estimate,
but
I
know
that
or
understand
that
there
may
have
been
estimates
and
proposals
that
date
back
four
years
or
so,
and
maybe
a
variety
of
different
kind
of
pricing
options.
Is
that
something
that
edmund
you're
prepared
to
educate
us
on
today.
M
I
I
don't
have
that
information,
but
but
I
can
respond
this
way.
We've
been
engaged
with
bennett
preservation
for
some
time
now
and
what
you're
referring
to
is
cost
estimates
that
they've
developed
over
time
and
it's
you
know
it's
like
sharpening
a
pencil
as
we
were
getting
further
and
further
into
this
process.
We
were
developing
more
and
more
precise
cost
estimates
and
there
was
an
estimate
that
was
very
early
on
that
you
know
on
our
staff.
We
have
a
construction
estimator
in
capital
projects
and
we
reviewed
the
numbers
and
we
just
we
disagreed
with
it.
M
M
Yeah,
I
think
one
to
add
to
that
a
little
bit
more
too.
You
know.
One
item
is:
is
the
type
of
scaffolding
system
so
really
there's
there's
three
ideas
that
are
out
there.
There's
there's
the
crane
with
the
basket,
which
is
the
safest
of
all
them.
There's
a
swing,
scaffolding
which
basically
hangs
or
it's
strapped
around
the
chimney
and
it
uses
tension
and
you
can
lower
it
down
over
time
and
then
they're
scaffolding,
the
whole
entire
system
and
each
one
has
benefits
and
drawbacks
scaffold.
B
Okay,
well,
thank
you,
evan
all
right,
and
I
don't
know
edmund
if
you,
if
you
plan
to
to
do
this
or
if
there's
somebody,
mr
mayor,
who
you
have
who
is
going
to
present
for
us
again
as
part
of
our
duty
here,
is
to
determine
the
cost
and
then
the
funding
of
it.
A
I
do
want
to
ask
edmund
one
question
before
I
begin
edmond
of
the
existing
st
julian
divine
budget
and
after
taking
out
I,
mr
bennett,
you
kindly
noted
all
those
other
expenses
that
the
project
costs
you
you
left
yours
out.
Oh
you
would.
A
After
we
take
care
of
contract
with
with
bennett,
how
much
do
we
have
left
in
the
project
budget.
A
That
that
sounds
about
right.
So,
first
of
all
a
few
few
things,
if
I
may,
mr
chairman,
and
our
task
force
members,
this
matter
of
the
smokestacks,
has
always
been
part
of
a
larger
project.
A
The
renovation
of
the
saint
julian
divine
center,
which
we
rededicated
about
a
week
ago,
and
if
you
haven't
been
in
the
building,
please
go
in
there.
It's
really
transformational
what
we've
done
and
with
the
the
side
facing
east
bay
street,
and
we
rearranged
the
restrooms
on
the
first
floor.
So
you
could
enter
them
without
the
rest
of
the
center
being
open,
so
they're
going
to
be
available
to
the
public,
who
not
only
in
the
neighborhood,
if
needed,
but
also
for
visitors
who
are
going
up
and
down
the
ravenel
bridge.
A
A
So
I
do
want
to
remind
everyone
that
when
city
council
approved
the
measure
to
even
form
this
task
force,
it
specified
that
a
half
of
the
funds,
whatever
recommendation,
be
made,
that
half
and-
and
you
might
say
it
was
aspirational,
but
that
half
of
the
funds
be
come
from
the
private
sector
or
from
philanthropy,
and
so
it
it
was
not
the
intention
honestly
of
counsel
to
foot
the
whole
bill.
For
this
I'll
be
honest
with
you.
I
just
want
to
put
that
out
there.
The
first.
A
A
So
the
likely
candidate
is
in
fact,
as
you've
mentioned,
that
tax,
increment
finance
or
tif
district.
We
call
it
the
cooper
river
bridge
tiff
district.
Now
the
history
of
that
is,
we've
only
had
one
bond
issuance
so
far
for
that
district,
which
was
about
two
years
ago
of
12
million
dollars
and
in
fact,
2.25
two
and
a
quarter
million
dollars
that
went
into
the
renovation
of
st
julian
divine
center,
of
which
700
is
left,
came
from
that
first
bond
offering
so
2.25
has
already
gone
into
st
julian
devine
from
from
the
tif
district.
A
Now
it's
our
estimate
that
next
year
we'll
be
able
to
float
an
additional
12
million
dollar
or
so
a
bond
from
the
district
so
to
to
make
sure
we
get
the
biggest
bang
for
our
buck.
We,
we
probably
wouldn't
do
it
until
after
april,
when
we
get
the
updated
annual
information
from
charleston
county
about
the
evaluation
of
the
district
and
how
well
it
did
this
year.
A
We
could
do
it
sooner,
but
it
would
be
better
to
probably
wait,
so
we
might
could
do
a
little
more
than
12
million.
So
here's
here's
the
tough
part
of
all
of
this,
and-
and
I
guess
this
task
force
will
have
to
consider
in
its
recommendation.
But
clearly,
city
council
ends
up
making
the
decision.
At
the
end
of
the
day,
I
I
asked
our
staff
to
to
go
through
the
district
and
look
at
all
the
public
infrastructure
improvements
that
that
we
kind
of
already
know
about
that.
We
would
want
to
occur.
A
Other
improvements
to
to
park
space,
including
the
potential
formation
of
the
low-lying
park
that
was
conceptual
plan,
was
presented
to
council
the
other
night,
further
support
for
our
affordable
housing
efforts,
other
street
and
sidewalk
and
park
improvements
in
the
district,
in
addition
to
the
low
line
and-
and
I
hate
to
tell
you
that,
without
going
through
all
of
that
line
by
line-
and
admittedly
they're
just
really
swag
estimates
they're
not
based
on
engineering
documents
or
specific
plans,
so
some
of
them
are
pretty
broad,
but
the
wish
list
totaled
65
million
dollars-
okay,
65
million
dollars
a
good
bit
of
it-
was
for
drainage.
A
I
mean
drainage.
Improvements
are
really
expensive
and,
and
the
low
line
requests
over
time
is
is,
is
a
lot
of
money
as
well,
so
you
got
12
million
dollars
next
year.
Council
will
be
able
to
allocate
and
spend
you
got
a
wish
list.
That's
going
to
be
much
higher
than
that
now
over
time,
the
tif
district
will
keep
producing
income.
I
forget
how
many
more
years
are
on
this
district,
maybe
15
years
so
over
time.
A
You
know
if
I'll
be
honest
with
you:
it'll
probably
generate
65
million
over
the
whole
lifetime
of
the
district,
but
you
know
we
we
can
only
generate
what
we
can
generate.
You
know
a
piece
at
a
time
so
next
year
we
estimate
we'll
be
able
to
spend
12
million
dollars
and
that
will
from
the
district,
and
it
will
be
up
to
council
to
review
those
priorities
and
make
a
decision
of
of
where
to
spend
the
money.
A
So
I
did
some
easy,
quick
math
on
what
craig
said
in
response
to
my
question
and
even
the
the
better
case
scenario
of
60
percent
craig.
If
I'm,
if
my
math
is
correct,
the
the
project
to
keep
one
and
take
one
away
would
be
2.34
million,
but
likely
a
little
more
than
that
if
you,
if
it
was
65
right.
A
So
I
must
say
just
my
own
back
of
the
envelope
math
there's
not
a
lot
of
savings
in
doing
one-on-one,
I
mean
it
seems
to
me
pretty
clear:
you
either
take
them
both
away
or
you
keep
them
both
it's
just
not
that
kind
of
difference
in
the
money
and
we've
got
700
000
in
the
project.
A
You
know
if,
if,
if
council,
if
this
task
force
recommends
and
and
council
were
to
allocate
we'd
need
an
additional
approximate
600
000
in
order
to
demolish
them
and
we'd
need
an
additional
1.9
million
to
just
round
it
up,
we
need
an
extra
couple
of
million
dollars,
I'm
sure
with
some
other
expenses
like
craig
says
that
will
be
added
to
the
project
costs.
We
will
roughly
easily
need
2
million
additional
dollars,
so
I
mean
I,
I
think
it
would
be
a
very
worthwhile
endeavor
to
restore
and
save
the
smokestacks.
B
Thank
you,
mr
mayor.
I
guess
I
guess
for
now.
Let
me
open
up
just
questions
to
the
mayor
as
it
relates
to
the
tif
funds.
K
I
had
a
question:
I'm
not
sure
if
it
falls
into
this
category
or
not,
but
I'll
ask
it
and
if
it
doesn't,
somebody
can
tell
me
that
it
won't
hurt
my
feelings,
but,
as
I
understand
mr
bennett's
report,
the
cost
to
demolish
things-
and
I
agree
with
you,
mr
mayor-
I
think
saving
them
would
be
a
laudable
thing
to
do,
but
the
cost
of
demolishing
them
would
be
a
million
four
to
a
million
five
roughly
and
the
cost
to
save
them
about
a
million
more
and
so
not
knowing
anything
about
municipal
finance.
K
But
I'd,
be
curious
for
the
mayor
or
for
councilman,
mitchell
or
or
councilwoman
del
capo
is
the
idea
that,
if,
if
this
committee
recommends
not
to
save
them,
that
that
y'all,
the
city
would
be
looking
for
the
private
sector
to
raise
half
the
money
to
demolish
them,
because
it
seems
like
that's
kind
of
a
sunk
cost,
either
way
whether
they're
saved
or
they're
demolished.
It
seems
like
it's
going
to
cost
a
million
four
to
a
million.
G
Well,
on
oneness,
we
were
looking
at
the
total
package
so
far
that
we
have
to
relocate
people
in
that
area,
if
anything
happen,
or
even
when
they
start
repairing
these
smokes
back
out
with
the
demolition
and
that's
going
to
be
another
cost.
That's
not
that
we
don't
have
in
this
particular
budget
so
far
as
would
be
talking
about
suppose
the
smoke
stack
that
would
be
additional
money
that
even
the
city
would
have
to
come
up
with.
G
So
when
I
first
heard
about
the
smoke
stack,
my
thing
was
that
hey
you
know
I
rather
see
the
smoke
stack
if
they
want
to
do
it,
tear
down
because
putting
money
in
something
that
is
not
doing
nothing
for
the
community,
but
my
the
community
wants
the
smoke
stack
to
stay,
so
I
went
along
with
the
community.
Let's
do
it,
but
we
came
with
the
consensus
that,
if
we're
going
to
do
that
and
keep
this
birth
smoke
stack,
we
don't
have
the
money
there
to
to.
G
You
know
to
repair
all
the
smokes
that
both
smoke
stacks.
So
we
said
we'll
put
50
percent
of
the
money
to
repair
this
to
keep
both
smoke
stacks.
There
so
that's
how
that
came
about
with
the
smoke
stacks.
You
know,
keeping
it
and
repairing
it,
and
I
want
to
go.
I
went
along
with
my
colleague
and
with
along
with
the
people
in
my
community,
which
is
the
east
side
community
and
they
wanted
to
see
it
preserved.
G
So
once
they
wanted
to
see
a
preserve
I'd,
say
I'm
the
councilman.
Okay,
I'm
going
along
with
it,
but
I
say
it's
going
to
be
a
cost
factor
and
I
said
bill
could
bring
money
from
the
tip
pulled
money
from
the
tip
was
the
male
alluded
to
and
not,
but
I
told
them
in
the
beginning
and
I'll
be
frank
with
that-
that
I
would
not
take
money
from
drainage
and
I
would
not
take
money
from
affordable
housing
to
do
this.
G
A
So
john
I'll
I'll
also
respond
by
saying
that
I
certainly
hear
where
you're
coming
from
and
and
no
it
was
not
the
intention
of
the
city
to
ask
for
private
philanthropy
to
help
us
in
the
event
we
demolish
the
smoke
stacks.
I
get
that
but
consider
this
if
they're
demolished,
then
we
have
no
more
maintenance
or
liability
in
the
future
if
we
preserve
them.
A
We're
committing
this
city
for
generations
to
come,
even
though
mr
bennett
says
the
cost
would
be
reasonable
compared
to
what
we're
doing
now,
but
every
20
years
you
got
to
repoint
them
every
year
you
got
to
inspect
them
at
some
point
down
the
road
you're
going
to
have
to
rebuild
them.
So
I
I
mean
we
we
do.
We
we
are
taking
on
that
responsibility
for
the
future.
B
Yeah,
I
guess,
since
we're
we're
in
this
discussion
like
a
couple
things,
I
guess
I'd
ask
about.
B
Oh
well,
thank
you
yeah.
I
guess,
as
we
study
this
and
again,
that's
part
of
the
obviously
the
devils
and
the
details
here
is
trying
to
study
it.
There's
some
suggestion
that
I
mean,
obviously
it's
a
breaking
with
somewhat
of
the
charleston
tradition
as
far
as
ownership
of
our
properties
that
we
all
have
to
preserve
historic
properties
and
this
city
I
mean
we've
been
preserving
and
spent
lots
of
money
over
the
last
65
years.
Preserving
these
smokestacks.
B
Wouldn't
it
be
appropriate
for
us
to
be
considering
that
as
a
source
as
we
study
this
is
that
a
source?
So
we
can
understand
that
in
how
we
would
be
able
to
get
funds
because,
as
I
understand
our
job,
it's
to
potentially
make
a
recommendation
and
then
determine
where
the
funding
may
come
from
and
if,
in
fact,
the
funds
are
there
in
the
tif.
That
would
seem
like
an
excellent
solution
to
our
issues.
A
Well,
yeah,
but,
as
I
just
described,
there
are
more
needs
than
there
are
funds
available
right
now
and
if,
if
you
just
to
take
my
example,
if
we
were
to
allocate
another
million
next
year,
then
st
julian
devine
property,
this
one
look
property
within
a
big
district
would
have
received
three
and
a
quarter
million
dollars.
A
You
know
well
over
10
15
about
15
of
the
total
allocation
from
this
whole
district.
So
it's
receiving
a
sizable.
It's
already
received
two
and
a
quarter
million.
It's
it's
gotten
a
sizable
chunk
from
the
tif
district
already,
and
you
know,
in
addition
to
the
drainage
and
the
affordable
housing,
I
can
tell
you
there
we're
already
getting
advocates.
A
A
Okay,
particularly
the
foundation
and
the
society
who
are
more
familiar
with
these
kinds
of
things,
are
there
other
preservation
grants,
or
is
there
some
fancy
tax
credit
out
there?
That
could
be
utilized
where
we
can
somehow
pass
through
a
historic
preservation,
tax
credit
someone
if
you
all,
can
think
of
some
other
way
other
than
the
tif
district.
It
sure
would
be
helpful.
B
And
I
think
that's
you
know,
I
think
that's
a
great
point,
mr
mayor,
and
definitely
something
that
is
obviously
you
know
something
that
we
need
to
study
in
detail,
and
I
think
you
know
whether
it's
again
I
mean
you
know
if
it
ultimately
involves
a
sale
of
the
property
to
someone
who
will
preserve
it
as
as
as
necessary
within
the
directives
of
the
you
know,
the
city's
architectural
you
know
guidelines
that
we've
all
lived
by
then
I
think
you
know
we'd
have
to
consider
that
too,
and
you
know
I
guess
that
goes
to
all
of
what
we're
focused
on
is
trying
to
make
sure
we
can
do
what
we
need
to
do.
B
J
I'm
getting
the
hang
of
it
slowly,
but
surely
I
guess
my
question
was,
as
the
mayor
has
implied,
that
we
sh
the
public.
The
private
sector
should
help
raise
the
additional
funds
for
the
smokestacks
and
say
this
task
force
agree
with
that.
What
happens
if
we
fall
short?
What
happens
to
the
project
of
that
goal?
I
mean
like
say
if
that
was
one
of
the
options
and
we
tried
to
raise
the
money
and
we
did
not
get
the
money.
Then
what
happens
to
the
project
to
the.
B
Smokestacks,
please
councilwoman
you're,
all
mute
too
so.
I
So
if
we-
and
this
was
actually
in
our
minutes
from
our
last
meeting,
what
was
presented
and
accepted
from
counsel
as
far
as
kind
of
the
rules
and
expectations
of
this
task
force-
and
it
says
directly
in
the
event-
funding
is
unable
to
be
secured
or
it
is
determined.
It
is
not
feasible
to
restore
the
smokestacks.
I
F
I
Same
adoption,
the
city
be
responsible
for
no
more
than
50
of
the
total
cost,
including
design
and
engineering
of
such
restoration,
and
I've
already
had
conversations
with
private
sector
who
would
be
willing
to
come
forth
and
they've
reached
out
to
me.
I
haven't
reached
out
to
anybody.
I
I
haven't
done
any
fundraising
efforts,
so
I
don't
think
that's
a
big
ask
and
I
don't
think
it's
impossible
to
do,
but
to
answer
to
the
mayor's
point,
we
only
have
some,
you
know,
there's
only
so
much
money
to
go
around
and
my
goodness
so
council
member
mitchell
can
tell
you
the
same
thing
since
birth.
The
east
side
has
flooded
like
crazy
and
it
continues
to
affordable
housing.
You
know,
so
how
do
we
best
manage
all
of
these
things
that
are
needed
and
and
right
in
that
one
area?
I
So
I
don't
think
unrealistic.
Expectations
have
been
set
upon
this
task
force
at
all,
and
this
is
what
was
agreed
upon
and
said.
This
is
what
we
need
to
do
and
we
don't
have
time
on
our
side
to
study
things
in
depth.
That's
what
has
been
done
up
to
this
point,
and
now
we
have
roughly
a
month
to
bring
forth
to
counsel
what
the
recommendation
is
and
and
what
that
looks
like
and
where
those
funding
sources
are
etc.
B
And
just
if
I
can,
I
did,
I
did
want
to
put
this
on
the
agenda.
There's
been
just
conversations
and
that
I've
had
and
some
some
concern
just
for
me
getting
up
to
speed
and
and
hearing
from
some
other
folks
that
it
was
as
we
look
at
all
the
information,
it
does
appear
that,
obviously
these
recommendations
were
made.
B
You
know
four
or
five
years
ago
that
we
needed
to
get
in
here
and
do
this
stuff,
and
obviously,
we've
survived
without
issue
these
these
four
years
and
it
seems
as
if
we
may
need
you
know
whether
it
be
60
days
whatever
to
to
get
this
done,
that
with
covid
the
holidays,
christmas,
the
and
I'm
kind
of
jumping
ahead.
It's
where
the
next
item
on
the
agenda
was
timeline,
but
we
just
it
seems
like
we
may
need
some
additional
time
to
be
able
to
make
a
final
recommendation
one.
B
So
we
can
make
sure
we
have
these
again
funding
sources
if
that's
the
best
way
to
do
it.
If
that's
something
we
can
do
or
we've
looked
at
every
single
option.
So
I
just
I
bring
that
up.
I
I
did
want
to
talk
about
the
last
suggestion
about
what
happens.
I
would
assume
that
again,
if
it,
if
we
didn't
get
some
private
source
of
funding-
and
this
did
go
in
front
of
the
bar-
I
mean
it.
I
would
assume
that
you
know,
based
on
my
experience.
B
It
would
require
the
city
to
to
to
preserve
these
these
buildings,
and
so
then
you're
stuck
in
the
same
boat,
but
you've
dragged
it
out
and
increased
the
danger.
So
I
just
throw
that
out
there.
It
just
seems
like
the
fallback
is
that
the
city
is
going
to
have
to
do
it.
I
Well,
with
with
all
due
respect,
just
to
say,
because
nothing's
happened
so
far
doesn't
mean
that
we
have
time
on
our
side,
I
mean
you
know
I
can
say
well,
you
know
for
44
years.
I've
never
been.
You
know
I've,
never,
cracked,
my
skull,
it
doesn't
mean
I'm
never
going
to
so
I
mean
that
just
is
such
a.
I
You
know,
baseless
argument
and
again
when
we
look
at
the
recommendations
from
mr
bennett,
who
is
a
more
than
highly
skilled
engineer
and
as
somebody
who
works
with
architects
and
engineers
all
day,
you
know
40
hours
a
week.
This
is
my
career.
I
What
these
folks
know
is
is
beyond,
and
I
trust
his
recommendations
implicitly
and
the
safety
of
the
community
and
of
these
workers
is
of
utmost
importance
and
the
way
that
he's
structuring
this
and
putting
himself
up
against
what
is
a
really
tight
timeline
to
do
construction
documents
and
all
this,
these
things
take
you
don't
even
understand
the
hours.
These
types
of
things
take.
I
The
timeline
that
he's
giving
us
is
aggressive
and
it's
designed
to
keep
his
people
as
safe
as
possible.
I
do
not
feel
comfortable
going
to
council.
The
second
week
in
january
and
saying
hey,
I
know
we
were
supposed
to
come
to
you
by
now,
but
I
need
another
60
days.
I
do
not
feel
comfortable
doing
that.
I
won't
speak
for
my
fellow
council
members
serving
on
this
task
force,
but
that
will
not
get
support
from
me.
L
Oops
yeah,
may
I
ask
one
other
question:
this
is
deborah
anderson
again.
My
mother
would
always
say
that
the
only
dumb
question
is
the
one
you
don't
ask.
So
is
it
totally
impossible
that
city
council
can
you
come
together
to
see
if
maybe
there's
a
little
more
that
you
can
give,
especially
with
additional
funds,
possibly
coming
in
in
a
moment
towards
this,
so
the
private
side
doesn't
have
to
raise
50
percent.
A
I
I
think
the
order
of
things
endeavor
will
be
that
council
is
looking
for
this,
for
this
task
force
to
first
make
a
recommendation
and
then
it
will
review
its
funding
opportunities
with
the
tif
district
and
and
make
a
decision
from
there.
But,
mr
chairman,
I
did
want
mr
granada
to
address
the
comments
you
made
about
the
b.a.r
and
the
inevitability
of
of
the
restoration.
H
Yeah,
that
was,
you
know
we
had
discussions
when
when
we
started
reading
these
reports,
you
know
the
existing
condition,
the
condition
that
that
has
deteriorated
over
time
and
done
this
to
this
point,
and
it
gave
me
pause
on
how
I
wrote
the
the
order
to
to
the
city
regarding
the
stats
and
after
talking
to
craig
multiple
times
and
talking
to
preservation
multiple
times
I
wrote
it
just
like
it
is
that
they
need
to
come
down
and
that's
why.
H
I
think
this
is
an
aggressive
time
time
schedule
that
that,
as
time
goes
on,
we
run
the
risk
for
the
neighborhood
and
everybody.
That's
in
that
area,
any
given
time
of
a
real
public
risk,
and
so
the
order's
there
I
don't
need
to
have
bar
approve
anything
based
on
on
my
authority
to
take
something
down.
That's
that's
a
a
risk
of
public
safety,
and
that's
that's
how
the
word
is
written
to.
So
just
so
you
understand
is.
A
Based
upon
the
new
reports
that
you've
seen
now
as
a
result
of
being
on
this
task
force,
and
would
you
change
your
assessment
at
all?
No.
H
Sir,
I
I
mean
I,
I
think
I
think
it
just
only
validates
what
we
reported
to
us
all
up
to
this
point,
that
it
is
becoming.
You
know
it
has
progressed.
It
is
getting
to
a
point,
especially
I'm
probably
going
to
say
this
wrong.
The
the
north
stack
is
worse
than
the
south
stack.
I
hope
I
got
that
right
that
one
you
know
is
you
know,
something's
going
to
happen
at
some
point.
It's
just
a
matter
of
when
and
and
what
causes
it
it
will
happen.
H
I
surely
want
to
be,
and
again
this
was
a
decision
sitting
there
thinking
about
this
letter.
What
side
do
we
want
to
be
on
and-
and
we
chose
this
side,
and
so
I
just
want
to
make
sure
everyone
understand.
That's
why
we're
here?
That's
why
there's
this
aggressive
timeline?
H
You
know-
and
I
tried
to
hold
back
on
the
fundraising
and
the
time
taking
to
raise
those
funds
or
request
those
funds
from
the
private
side
and
raising
funds.
I
don't
know
if
there's
a
time,
I
don't
see
a
timeline
given
of
when
that
you.
F
H
F
B
B
Were
doing
your
presentation,
it
seemed
to
suggest
that
you
would
think
we'd
you'd
go
to
contract
in
april,
or
something
like
that.
I
don't
have
it
memorized,
but
is
that?
Would
that
would
that
be
given
some
time
to
the
commission
at
all
any
leeway
from
january
15th?
That,
just
being
you
know
what
your
predictions
were,
trying
to
make
sure
we
have
everything
accounted
for.
D
Yeah
that
that
was
based
on
the
idea
that,
in
that
the
the
contract
documents
would
go
out
to
bid
in
february
and
that
roughly
a
month
later,
the
city
would
have
a
final
price
and
could
start
putting
together
a
contract
for
construction
and
getting
that
through
council
and
that
that
that
contract
for
construction
would
would
be
signed
in
roughly
april
and
a
notice
to
proceed
be
given
in
may
now,
where
the
task
force
force
fits
in.
With
that.
D
I
I
don't
know,
but
I
I
really
wasn't
focusing
on
where
the
task
force
fits
in
as
much
as
I
was
focusing
on
just
experience
in
how
long
it
actually
takes
to
get
a
contract
pull
together.
How
long
it
takes
working
backwards,
how
long
it
takes
to
to
actually
bid
the
project
and
also
how
long
it's
going
to
take
me
to
to
finish
those
contract
documents
and
get
them
out
the
door
so
that
they
can't
be
bid.
D
L
A
Let
me
draw
it
out
this
way.
If
I
may,
how
many
folks
would
like
to
see
the
stacks
restored
versus
demolished.
A
So
I
think
that's
clear
we
would
all
like
to
see
them
restored
now.
It
just
gets
down
to
the
money,
and
I
can
tell
you
that
the
city
doesn't
like
to
sign
a
construction
contract
which
we
were
hoping
would
be
done
by
april.
Unless
it
knows
that
it's
got
the
money
to
do
the
job.
We
don't.
L
Like
the
sign,
I
didn't
mean
to
cut
you
off,
but
that
is
why
I
said
as
a
task
force:
let's
make
a
decision,
you
know
either
we
are
going
to
do
it,
we're
not
because
we
will
need
the
time
and
the
councilwoman
said
that
she
has
the
individuals
on
the
private
side
who
are
ready
to
move
forward
with
putting
funds
up.
I
look
at
like
this.
It
seems
like
such
a
waste
of
money
to
spend
all
of
that
money
and
just
tear
those
things
down.
L
They've
been
around
I'm
one
that
grew
up
on
that
east
side
and
literally
my
parents
have
a
business
right
down
the
street
from
the
smokestacks.
I
saw
them
all
my
life,
the
historical
value,
the
landmark
there's
a
lot
to
it
and
some
people
might
think
well.
Is
it
worth
it?
Well,
I
think
it
is
so
if,
if
we
as
a
task
force
can
come
together,
we
don't
need
a
lot
of
time
to
make
this
decision.
L
A
Well,
well,
it
it
seems
to
me
and-
and
my
vote
would
be
yay,
but
I
guess
with
the
condition
that
council
put
on
us,
that
what
we
would
be
recommending
is
that
we
take
on
a
fundraising
campaign
to
to
raise
some
money
to
help
the
city
get
to
get
the
job
done.
G
A
And
I
I
I
would
respectfully
say
we
want
some
commitment
of
funds
by
april,
but,
mr
chairman,
you
might
be
able
to
find
some
tax
credit
way
or
something
I'm
glad
to
sell
the
stacks
to
somebody
if
they
can
get
a
you
know
a
tax
credit
by
owning
them
or
what
you
know.
If
there's
some
fancy
way
to
do
this,
that
would
help
us
achieve
the
value.
That's
that's
fine,
it
doesn't
all
have
to
be
somebody
writing
a
check.
Maybe,
but
could
could
you
mentioned
you
could
help
us
explore
those.
B
Well,
I
I
and
maybe
I'll,
tell
you
that
I'm
I'm
working
on
that
as
we
speak,
mr
mayor
and
I
you
know
I'd
like
to
see
if
we
can
figure
something
out,
you
know
I,
the
lawyer
in
me
kicks
in,
and
I
get
concerned
about
a
lot
of
things
here.
So
that's
this
short
time
frame
is
difficult
and
again,
obviously
I
appreciate
that
the
council
has
made
a
decision
in
many
ways,
respect
that,
obviously
just
again
the
lawyer
kicks
in
and
having
worked
in
some
preservation
as
well.
B
The
idea
that
we
have
some
precedent
here,
that's
set,
obviously
gives
me
a
concern,
so
I'd
love
to
see
a
way
where
you
know
we're
just
looking
at
all
the
issues,
and
I
just
want
to
make
sure
I
understand
them
and
that's
why
councilwoman
del
chopra
was
concerned
about
the
time.
Is
it's.
It's
really
been
me
trying
to
get
up
to
speed
quickly
and
in
in
understanding
that
this
is
all
very
difficult
in
a
short
period
of
time.
I
agree
with
miss
anderson
that
sounds
like
if
the.
B
If
the
job
of
the
task
force
is
simply
to
vote
on
whether
to
to
preserve
the
smoke
stacks,
I
I
know
I
could
easily
articulate
now,
maybe
unnecessarily
the
reasons
to
do
that,
and
it
sounds
like
we
might
even
have
100
agreement
on
that
that
that
is
what
everybody
here
would
want
to
do
without
question.
So
it
simply
boils
down
to
this
funding
issue,
and
you
know
I
would
I
wouldn't
mind
a
little
more
from
you,
mr
mayor,
if
you
could
just
to
help
your
directive
as
it
relates
to
the
task
force.
B
What
you
think
our
presentation
is
that
meets
the
as
councilwoman
suggested,
the
a
deadline
of
say,
july,
15
january
15th,.
A
A
I
would
respectfully
ask
mr
chairman,
and,
and
and
john
particularly,
you
all
are
representing
the
preservation
society
and
the
historic
foundation,
who
you
know,
we're
very
passionate
about
this
issue
and
coming
to
to
council.
Both
of
your
organizations
offered
to
to
help
fund
additional
studies
and-
and
my
comment
at
the
time
was,
you
know,
rather
than
help
fund
additional
studies.
Let's
just
get
on
with
the
business
hire
mr
bennett
to
to
figure
out
what
the
best
safest
way
to
preserve
them
is
and
and
any
fundraising
that
occurs.
A
So
the
city
has
taken
on
the
expense
to
to
have
additional
assessments,
done
additional
studies,
the
engineering
done
and-
and
I
would
respectfully
ask
that
you
all
go
back
to
your
two
organizations
and
and
and
see
what
the
temperature
is,
what
the
commitment
level
is
be
it
through
grants,
tax
breaks
or
cash
contributions
to
to
help
us
set
a
fundraising
goal
of
at
least
a
million
dollars
to
assist
the
city
and
getting
this
job
done,
and
and
if
we
can
come
back
with
it
with
a
straight
face,
a
good
faith
effort
to
raise
that
money.
A
I
think
that
would
be
a
fine
commitment
and
a
fine
recommendation
to
city
council
that
we
we
want
to
restore
those
tax,
we
want
to
save
them,
and-
and
this
is
how
we're
going
to
get
it
done-
we're
going
to
ask
the
city
to
commit
x,
more
dollars
and
and
we're
going
to
go
out
and
we're
going
to
try
to
raise
x
dollars.
And
maybe
after
you
talk
to
your
organizations,
you
come
back
and
say
we
can
do
better
than
that
or
we
can
task
force.
Mr
mayor,
we
only
feel
like
we
can
get.
A
B
Please
miss
campbell.
J
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
we
do
go
on
record.
You
know
that
we're
going
to
make
a
decision,
but
we
are
setting
a
president-
and
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
our
neighborhood
is
setting
a
president
for
historical
buildings,
and
is
this
going
to
be
the
future
of
the
city
that
the
you
know
when
historical
buildings
are
in
danger
that
the
city
do
have?
And
you
know
the
private
sector
does
the
other
half.
J
H
H
To
thank
you,
sir.
You
know
this
is
just
thinking
out
loud
that
and
there
might
be
no
political.
H
There
might
not
be
any
advocate
to
this,
but
if,
if
the
the
impending
risk
is
the
the
internal
fire
brick
right
taking
that
down-
and
I
know
this-
this
is
again
a
cost
of
sequence-
and
I
I
know
and
emily's
probably
losing
his
mind-
we're
gonna
say
this,
but
if
we,
if
we've
spent
the
money
to
take
this-
and
we
already
talked
about
this-
to
take
down
the
internal
sleeve
shaft
as
we
it
and
reduce
the
risk
quite
a
bit,
I
believe,
as
we
try
to
allow
more
time
to
find
the
funds
and
make
it
and
fix
and
restore
the
rest
of
it.
H
Is
there
any
sense
to
that
of
making
sense
to
that
or
not?
I
just
wanted
to.
I
mean
to
think
about
that.
I
know
there's
this
time
piece
here
and
we
all
want
to
present
and
preserve
these,
and
that,
if
is
there
any
benefit
to
that
cost
timeline,
I'm
just
throwing
it
out
there.
H
At
the
same
time,
we
still
have
this
ticking
time
bomb,
but
it's
really
the
inner
lining
that
that
is
the
biggest
concern
and
if
and
I
think,
about
the
demolition
taking
it
down
or
preserving
it,
you
got
to
take
the
liner
down
either
way
right
and
that
cost-
and
I
just
don't
know
if
there's
something
in
there-
that
benefits
both
sides.
A
H
D
D
Area
yet
it
it
does
significantly
cut
risk.
There's
no
question
about
that
and.
F
D
It
it
cuts
risk
in
a
in
what
I'd
have
to
call
a
a
low
threshold
event.
D
D
And
so
you
know
it
really
is
a
good
point.
D
F
K
Me
and,
and
what
I
would
would
say
and
and
mayor
and
everyone
thanks
for
the
dialogue,
is
very
helpful
for
for
me,
as
a
representative
of
the
society,
I
I
I
think,
like
everybody,
we
would
love
to
see
these
preserved.
As
far
as
the
ask
you
know
the
financial
commitment,
I
certainly
would
need
to
go
back
to
my
group,
my
constituency,
and
talk
to
them
about
these
things,
and
so
I
don't
outrun
my
coverage
and
and
tell
you
where
we
are,
but
but
in
terms
of
of
timing.
K
If
we,
if
we're
gonna,
pull
all
this
together
and
and
you
know
to
jump
ahead
a
little
bit,
it
seems
like
we
need
to
try
to
figure
out
a
way
to
get
back
together.
Sometime
between
now
and
early
january,
I
guess
to
report
back
on
the
ask
and
perhaps
on
a
couple
assignment
homework
assignments.
Mr
bennett's
gotten.
So
we
can
see
where
we
are.
I
guess
I'll
throw
that
out.
There.
I
I
So
if
we
did
it
late
that
week
of
the
fourth
or
the
very
first
part
the
week
of
the
11th,
that
we've
had
conversations
with
each
of
our
stakeholders
and
we
have
a
better
understanding
of
what's
going
on
and
we
come
to
a
consensus
and
put
together
what
will
be
presented
to
council-
and
you
know,
is
that
enough
time
for
folks
I
mean
I
know,
that's
that's
a
that's
more
than
enough
time
for
me
to
just
pick
up
the
phone
and
make
a
couple
phone
calls,
but
I'm
not
sure
other
people's
schedules.
B
G
G
I'm
going
to
push
even
if
this
doesn't
happen,
I'll
have
to
push
with
my
colleague
on
council.
If
I
have
to
do
anything
else
else
differently,
since
my
constituent
thought
and
at
the
beginning
I
said
that
we
didn't
need
to
have
the
smoke
stacked
in
the
beginning.
My
constituents
wanted
community
wanted
and
we
said
we
voted
to
do
the
50
I'll
have
to
fight
hard,
even
if
I
have
to
kind
of
prolong
something
there
with
my
colleagues.
G
I
talk
to
my
colleagues
pertaining
to
this
because
they
know
how
adamant
I
get
when
certain
things-
and
I
do-
I
don't
talk
that
much.
I
don't
ask
for
things,
but
certain
times
certain
things
happen
in
the
in
these
african-american
community,
and
so
when
it
comes
to
that
point
and
if
I
have
to
push
it
further
on
khan's
council
for
time,
I'm
going
to
have
to
do
what
I
got
to
do.
So.
That's
all
I'm
saying
in
that.
In
essence
of
that
I
know
we
are
asking
for
this
money.
G
We
don't
have
that
money
in
our
budget.
We
don't
have
it
we're
trying
to
raise
it
become
after
the
50
percent.
But
if
it's
going
to
take
a
little
time
or
another
week
or
whatever
the
case
may
be,
I
don't
have
to
do
what
I
have
to
do
so
far.
The
community
is
concerned
because
I'm
going
to
be
the
one
have
to
answer.
No
one
else
help
I
have
to
answer,
but
except
me.
G
So
this
is
what
I'm
saying
in
essence
right
now,
so
I'm
just
throwing
out
front
right
now
that
I'm
gonna
have
to
fight
hard
for
the
community
for
the
east
side
community
and
what
they're
looking
for
and
what
they're
asking
for,
and
that's
all
I'm
saying
you
know.
So
that's
just
that's!
Gonna,
be
it.
A
So
so
the
only
question
I
would
have
about
the
date,
mr
chairman,
would
be
that
in
the
event
that
we
I
mean,
time
is
a
bit
of
the
essence
and
then
the
event
that
we
can
come
to
a
consensus
on
on
the
recommendation
the
week
prior,
the
first
full
week
of
january.
So
if
we
met
on
the
6th
rather
than
the
13th
and
we
all
agreed,
this
is
what
we
want
to
tell
council.
We
could
go
ahead
and
let
them
know
on
january,
the
12th
when
we
meet
on
the
12th
and
and
get
going.
A
K
With
the
holidays,
I'm
concerned
just
for
my
group
that
that's
going
to
be
a
very
tight
time
schedule.
C
K
But
but
again,
we'll
certainly
do
our
best
to
work
as
quickly
as
we
can
because,
as
I
said,
we're
very
supportive
of
what
council
councilman
mitchell
just
said,
and
and
we
like
to
try
to
do
our
best
to
do
what
we
can
do.
A
Right
so
the
the
sooner
we
can
all
be
on
the
same
page
and
and
then
I'm
just
thinking
already
about
that
contract
in
in
april
and
the
demolition
in
june
july
and
august
I'd
rather
move
sooner
than
later,
and
and
then
have
the
demo
in
august
september
october.
If
you
follow
me,
so
I'm
I'm.
B
Yeah
and
and
mr
mayor,
I
I
would
guess
to
comply
with
our
duties
here
I
mean
if,
if
anyone
you
know
within
the
commission,
you
know
becomes
aware
of
information
or
funding
sources,
or
you
know
things
that
we
can
begin
to
consider
in
the
meantime.
That
would
probably
be
great.
If
we
want
to
do
some
sort
of
email
share
or,
however,
it
would
be
appropriate,
I
don't
know,
but
that
could
be
very
helpful.
B
So
you
know
it
sounds
like
we
may
all
have
a
lot
of
work
to
do
and
and
a
lot
of
things
everyone's.
You
know
thinking
of
the
right
way
to
solve
this.
This
thing.
K
Yeah
and
and
I'll
just
ask,
because
I'm
I'm
not
typically
in
this
environment
is,
is
there
any
reason
why
we
can't
share
information
without
having
a
formal
task
force
meeting
like,
for
instance,
if
mr
bennett
has
something
that
he
wants
to
share
that
he
or
mr
most
or
somebody
can't
just
send
it
out
to
us
without
us
having
a
formal
meeting
or
do
we
need
to
meet
to
do
that?.
K
B
Did
anyone
else?
Could
anybody
else
weigh
in?
I
know
we
were
kind
of
throwing
an
idea
out
there
that
might
not
suit
y'all's
schedule.
Would
does
the
13th
sound
possible
for
anyone
else?
I
know
that
john
said
yes
and
councilwoman
del
chapo
said
yes
was
that
work
for
you,
mr
mayor.
A
I've
got
a
meeting
at
5
30
that
day,
so
if
we
could
meet
it,
a
four
you
know
and-
and
let
me.
A
L
You
would
be
available
yes
and
and
holding
back
too,
because
I
know
I
was
talking
today,
but
most
definitely
yes.
I
just.
I
just
know
that
if
we
drag
it
out,
it's
it's.
Let's
spend
the
holidays,
thinking
about
what
we'd
like
to
see,
and
then
we
have
13
days
into
the
new
year
to
come
together
and
let's
just
make
a
decision
so
that
we
can
move
forward.
B
Excellent
council
and
mitchell
would
that
be
appropriate
for
you,
okay,
for
you.
B
Okay,
mr
bennett,.
D
I
don't
know,
sir,
that
I'm
going
to
be
available
that
day,
I've
got
a
tentative
jobsite
visit
over
in
atlanta
that
wednesday,
thursday
and
friday,
but
I
don't
know
that
there's
going
to
be
a
whole
lot
more
information
that
you're
going
to
need
from
me
at
that
time
either,
and
so
I.
B
L
D
My
big
concern
is
that
is
that
some
of
the
others
are
working
on
this
project
are
listening
into
this,
and
and
not
a
one
of
them
is
really
half
as
much
fun
as
I
am
to
be
around
when
they're.
J
B
All
right:
well,
it
sounds
like
we
we
are
on.
Thank
you
all
so
much
for
bearing
with
me
and
for
all
educating
me
on
all
these
issues
and
appreciate
it
and
hope
everyone
has
a
very
happy
holiday
and
gets
a
little
couple
days
off
and
stays
safe
and
healthy.
J
Lot
going
on,
I
don't
want
you
to
see
everything
I
I
will
let
you
know.
I
don't
have
my
schedule
yet,
but
I
think
it
will
be
okay.