►
From YouTube: City of Charleston Ways & Means Meeting - May 28, 2019
Description
City of Charleston Ways & Means Meeting - May 28, 2019
B
C
C
B
All
right,
second
time,
agendas,
approval
of
minutes,
but
we're
gonna.
Actually,
the
clerk's
office
ass
will
defer
both
of
those
items
and
texts
until
next
meeting,
so
we'll
take
up
bids
and
purchase
his
next
item
three.
Is
there
a
motion
for
approval?
Okay,
any
discussion?
Yes,
sir,
come
from
shearling
I.
E
B
Need
for
discussion
hearing
none
all
those
in
favor
signify
by
saying
aye
those
opposed.
You
know
as
having
item
for
its
traffic
transferable
group
of
consulting
services
for
twenty
three
thousand
five
hundred
dollars
in
discussion.
All
those
in
favor
signify
by
saying
aye.
Those
opposed
and
I
was
having
item
fives
Office
of
Cultural
Affairs
move
or
three
thousand
dollars.
B
So
I
can
grant
any
discussion
all
those
in
favor
signify
by
saying
aye
those
opposed
as
having
item
six
recreation,
but
is
summer
feeding
program
any
discussion,
all
those
in
favor
signify
by
saying
aye
those
opposed
eyes.
Have
it
item
7th,
Police
Department,
any
discussion,
all
those
in
favor
signify
by
saying
aye
those
opposed
eyes
have
it
item:
8,
Sparks
and
capital
projects,
approval
to
brief
Demetri
Park,
floating
dock
change
order,
number
5
any
discussion,
all
those
in
favor
signify
by
saying
aye
those
opposed.
Let's
have
an
item:
9
stormwater
management.
F
F
F
F
G
We're
in
the
design,
scope
right
now
for
the
preliminary
engineering
will
likely
have
a
scope
at
either
the
next
council
major
the
one
after
that,
with
bringing
a
council
for
approval
for
the
design
fee.
At
that
point,
we
move
it
is
to
design
and
permitting
yeah
it's
likely
gonna
be
a
year.
So,
if
designing
permitting
before
we
can
do
construction
work.
F
H
From
Mitchell
you
know,
I
got
concur
with
that.
Also
because,
like
everyone
knows
that
I
lived
right
there
on
that
corner
and
been
there
for
what
now
35
years
and
it
was
flooding
ever
since
I
was
there
and
we
have
a
school
there,
which
is
a
Charleston
Catholic
school
arm.
You
know
and
they
have
problems.
When
that
flooding
has
happen,
you
should
see
the
way
is
backed
up
even
with
kids
there
and
it's
a
safety
is
really
safety
of
our
problem.
There,
too,
with
the
kids
coming.
H
You
know
at
the
school
there
with
the
dark,
Catholic
churches
there,
but
more
importantly,
it's
a
safety
mechanism
for
everyone
to
just
see
the
cars
that
have
been
lost
right
there
on
that
corner,
with
the
flooding
and
going
through
the
flooding.
I
had
people
living
behind
me
on
Vincent
Street
that
lost
their
cars
right
there
because
they
didn't
drive
and
it
was
there.
But
the
water
came
up
so
high
and
came
up
so
quickly.
They
didn't
get
a
chance
to
move
it
and
they
lost
the
vehicle
because
of
that
flood.
H
So
this
was
going
on
a
long
time,
even
back
since
the
70s.
So
we
need
to
get
some
relief
and
start
doing
it
now
and
start
beautifully
of
going
other
places
and
I
understand
everyone
looking
for
flooding
and
looking
for
relief,
but
that
was
going
on
ever
since
I
was
in
school
and
we
need
to
try
to
start
working
on
that
now.
H
I
know
that
I
was
on
the
Committee
on
the
selection
committee,
but
we
need
to
start
getting
something
done
now
quickly
as
soon
as
possible
and
not
waiting
to
get
that
get
dissolved
in
that
particular
area.
I
think
that
would
help
a
lot
of
these
areas,
even
some
eating
streets,
if
you
get
the
trainings
done
that
way,
so
I
hope
that
beware
on
this
look
at
that
very
serious.
Is
that
moving
swiftly
with
it?
This
may.
I
For
these
projects,
because
every
dollar
that
we
garner
from
a
grant
of
an
essence
saves
money
in
our
stormwater
fees,
so
we
go
to
do
more
projects
that
we
know.
We
need
to
do
and
so
I'm
very
pleased
to
advise
counsel
that,
just
yesterday
we
were
approved
for
a
half-million
dollar
grant
for
this
project
by
the
South
Carolina
rural
infrastructure
grant
fund
that
we
approved
that
grant
application
just
a
few
months
ago,
and
if
we're
successful
with
additional
portion
of
the
expense
for
the
project
from
from
this
HMG
p
grant.
F
I
B
J
J
B
G
This
is
the
saltmarsh
mitigation
aspect
for
what's
actually
phase
four
of
the
project.
The
work
going
on
phase
four,
so
it's
being
performed
in
Phase
three
in
preparation
for
that
phase,
four
work.
Basically,
this
project
is
working
with
the
National
Forest
Service
to
balance
out
the
material
on
a
facility
that
floods
somewhat
during
tides
that
it
would
be
fully
flooded
during
tide
DeForest
that
the
trees
on
the
property
then
return
it
to
a
natural
salt
marsh.
What
happened?
Basically,
as
they
were
doing
the
the
work
on
the
property.
G
There
was
a
combination
of
an
issue
where
they
couldn't
burn
material
on
site
because
of
some
Forest
Service
requirements
at
the
time,
and
then
there
was
additional
material
within
sort
of
the
furrows
on
those
those
pine
tree
froze
for
plantations
tree
plantations
that
resulted
in
more
material
than
we
expected.
So
we've
actually
piled
all
the
material
up
quantified
the
material
on
site.
This
is
just
the
cost
to
remove
that
extra
material
from
the
site
so
that
it'll
flood
properly
and
create
salt
marsh.
So
it
should
be
the
only
change
order
for
this
mitigation
project.
B
For
our
discussion
here,
none
all
those
in
favor
signify
by
saying
aye.
Those
opposed
I
just
have
it
item.
12
is
public
service
approval
contract
with
JLA
in
the
amount
of
$40,000
taxes,
city's
representative
during
design
construction
of
Magnolia
PUD
discussion,
all
those
in
favor
signify
by
saying
aye
aye
those
opposed
yeah.
Let's
have
it
item
13
stormwater
management,
approval
of
work,
authorization,
number
1a
econ
with
a
common
amount
of
two
hundred
thirty
one
thousand
two
hundred
two
dollars
in
discussion,
all
those
in
favor
signify
by
saying
aye
those
opposed
as
having
item
14.
K
Thank
You.
Mr.
chairman,
we
had
a
very
rigorous
real
estate
committee
meeting,
I'm,
just
I'll,
just
tell
the
body
that
all
of
these
items
were
approved
unanimously
by
the
committee
and
I'm
just
going
to
go
down
them
and
maybe
say
a
little
bit
about
each
one.
Is
that
if
anybody's
got
any
questions
afterwards
that
we
can
vote
overall
as
one
package
is
that
that.
K
All
right,
I'll
make
a
motion
that
we
approve
at
the
end.
Okay
item,
a
that
rid
of
that
church
force.
Plateau
was
approved,
items
be
an
item
C
both
dealt
with
some
low-lying
property
of
yellow
line
property
of
granting
some
easements
and
rather
than
a
fee
simple,
but
there's
some
other
stuff
that
the
owners
are
going
to
do
there
so
item
C
had
there
was
a
easement
that
was
given
to
a
building
that
was
never
recorded
back
when
it
was
done,
and
so
we're
kind
of
cleaning
that
up
and
putting
that
on
the
record
item.
K
D
is
the
operating
agreement
and
the
development
of
the
visitor
center
to
the
CBB,
we're
turning
that
over
we've
already
set
aside
2.6
and
the
hospitality
fund
for
that
we're
going
to
do
another
2.9
in
2020
and
basically
the
CVB
will
take
over
the
Convention
and
Visitor's
Bureau
will
will
renovate
it
and
several
things
we
had
a
lengthy
discussion
over
that
it'll
be
a
ten
year
at
least,
and
some
other
parking
issues
that
come
along
with
that
too.
If
anybody's
got
some
questions,
we'll
try
to
answer
those
item.
K
B
C
On
behalf
of
the
family,
I'd
like
to
say
thank
you
and
council
member
Mitchell,
the
garden
district
with
Ben
Z
fangy
represents
the
president.
Our
legal
department,
in
particular
our
real
estate
department,
actually
really
put
a
lot
of
work
into
this
and
even
represented
us
at
the
county.
So
I
think
that
I
would
be
remiss
if
I
didn't
formally.
Thank
all
the
folks
that
made
this
happen.
I,
of
course,
and
thanking
the
county
to
have
a
garden
with
a
68
Calhoun
Street
address
to
me.
C
Miss
Jackson
is
worthy
of
such.
In
addition,
mr.
mayor
I
think
some
time
ago,
you've
put
forward
the
signage,
the
Susie
Jackson
way,
underneath
the
street
signs
and
the
family
again
is
thankful
to
you
for
putting
that
forward
so
that
they
both
can
be
done.
At
the
same
time
again
thanks
folks,
we
really
appreciate
it.
K
Thank
You
mr.
Gregory,
so
that
item
item
was
approved.
Item
G
was
that
agreement
that
lease
a
license
agreement
between
the
Port
Authority
and
the
Senate
about
some
oyster
shells,
and
so
that
was
approved
item
H
was
the
amendment
of
lease
between
the
city
and
the
Charleston
Tennis
LLC.
We
had.
We
went
over
that
agreement
pretty
carefully
and
didn't
we
didn't.
We
make
a
couple
tweaks
to
that
agreement,
modified
it
a
little
bit
for
the
bar
counselor
to
add
to
the
agreement
and
the
people
that
were
there
were
everything.
K
K
There
is
pay
a
hundred
thousand
dollars
a
year
for
ten
years
and
will
receive
850
square
feet
of
office,
space
we'll
get
up
to
350
parking
spaces
and
that
we're
allowing
the
contractor
or
I
guess
the
developer
to
use
sub
guard
agreement
for
their
bonding
rather
than
having
to
put
up
odds.
So
we
thought
that's
a
better
better
way
to
go.
That
was
that
was
IJ
was
the
sublease.
We
approved
that
k
that
well
k,
L
and
M.
K
K
Oh
is
some
access,
some
easement
access
and
those
were
approved.
P
is
the
agreement
for
another
one
of
those
houses
to
be
sold
over
at
Maryville
at
Seville.
Those
of
you
that
maybe
didn't
come
to
that
ribbon-cutting.
Those
are
absolutely
spectacular.
Homes,
I
think
this
is
the
fifth
one.
Is
it
not
mr.
mayor
the
fifth
house
that
we've
needed
for
the
fourth
one
I'm,
not
sure,
but
we
got
a
couple
more
so
we'll
be
seeing
those
there's
total
of
seven.
There
was
one
annexation
on
woodland.
K
Shore
Road
that
was
approved
and
item
are,
was
the
discussion
regarding
the
Richardson
property
over
on
Camp
Road,
and
we
basically
asked
our
real
estate
people
to
to
secure
an
appraisal
all
that
we're
looking
at.
That
is
maybe
some
affordable,
housing
or
whatever,
but
tried
to
buy
that
property
and
said
mr.
racial
thing.
So
with
that,
madam
clerk
I
would
make
the
motion
that
we
approve
all
those
items.
Second,
all.
J
A
couple
of
questions
for
you,
mr.
chairman,
maybe
maybe
mr.
mayor
item,
D
the
approval
of
the
agreement
between
the
city
and
the
visitors
bureau
I
know
that
we
have
started
reassigning
some
of
the
displaced
city
employees.
What
are
our
plans
to
continue
those
efforts
because
I
know
we've
got
several
employees
city
employees
that
work
there.
Some
long,
tenured
employees
and
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
all
of
them
will
be
a
reassigned
and
that
nobody's
going
to
lose
their
jobs
over
this.
K
But
we
we
asked
about
that
by
the
standing.
Is
that
most
not
all
those
employees
are
part-time.
Employees
are
not
any
full-time
that
have
all
the
benefits
that
might
occur.
There
might
be
some
college,
kids
and
some
other
stuff,
but
they're
all
part-time
employees
don't
get,
maybe
20
well
less
than
30
hours,
so
they
don't
have
any
benefit.
And
basically
what
I
was
told
by
mrs.
Hill
was
that
any
of
those
people
that
needed
a
job
want
a
job.
There's
plenty
of
room
at
the
hospitality
industry
to
get
him
a
job.
So
I
thought.
E
Are
a
lot
of
them
are
full-time
so
right
now
three
of
them
there's
there's
11,
so
three
of
them
are
our
place
somewhere
else.
There's
six
or
five
that
are
pending
placement
and
one
person
will
be
retiring
and
the
other
two
one
of
them
is
looking
for
our
job
on
her
own
has
not
really
asked
for
help
and
the
other
one
we're
still
working
on.
So
most
of
them
are
progressing
nicely
to
find
play
other
areas
in
the
city
or
they're,
finding
other
jobs
or
they're
deciding
to
retire,
so
most
of
them
will
be
taking.
C
J
E
J
K
That
employ
is
no
longer
with
us,
but
but
what
we,
what
we
have
decided
there
we're
going
to
contribute
that
HUD
analysis
all
10
years,
and
that's
really
that's
actually.
The
second
hundred
thousand
so
don't
confusion,
but
our
efforts
over
the
digital
quarter
are
to
the
charleston.
Digital
recorder
has
been
responsible
for
our
tech
industry
in
this
community
and,
if
not
for
that
group,
our
technology
would
not
be
where
it
is
today.
So
we're
going
to
support
that
if
we
have
a
need
for
this
space,
but
we
would
love
to
let
somebody
else
have
it.
I
Thank
You
mr.
chairman
I
I,
mostly
just
wanted
to
give
a
couple
of
shoutouts.
This
is
probably
the
longest
real
estate
agenda
that
we've
had
since
I've
become
mayor,
and
it
just
so
happened
that
the
stars
align
and
folks
that's
why
we
were
a
little
late
getting
up
here.
It
was
really
appropriately
a
long
meeting,
because
we
had
a
lot
of
items
and
very
important
items
to
cover
summarize
by
chairman
moody,
but
the
the
staff
work
that
went
into
all
this
coming
all
that
together
at
the
same
time,
was
really
remarkable.
I
I
Francis
Cantwell
was
working
from
folly
beach,
so
just
the
effort
on
staff
on
staffs
part
was
really
amazing
and
beyond
that,
I
wanted
to
shout
out
to
Justin
Fiera
for
bringing
back
to
our
attention
the
need
for
these
real
estate
agreements
for
the
extension
of
the
low
line
and
that
had
not
been
completed
to
date
and
they're
really
important
connections
for
the
low
line
both
coming
south
to
get
to
Wolfe,
Street
and
going
east
to
get
over
to
Meeting
Street.
So
that
was
very
important.
I
L
You,
chairman
I
know:
we've
had
a
long
meeting
I
just
on
item
eights,
which
is
the
shortest
item
agenda
on
there
in
terms
of
words,
but
I
know
it's
a
complicated
deal,
I'm
interested
in
where
we
are
what
the
terms
of
that
deal
are
between
the
Tennis
Center
and
the
city,
and
then
I've
got
a
couple
questions.
If
someone
just
give
me
a
basic
outline
on
where
we
ended
up
with
that,
I
have
two
questions
and
I
know:
there's
representatives
here,
I'm
not
trying
to
churn
up
a
pot
of
anything
here.
L
K
K
B
M
It's
the
management
agreement
and
under
the
agreement,
the
Tennis
Center
had
the
right
to
obviously
manage
the
center
exclusively
operate.
The
volvo
tennis
events
and
conduct
other
events
there
they
paid
up
to
ten
thousand
dollars
a
year
reasonably
necessary
structural
maintenance
and
in
exchange,
the
city
paid
an
annual
management
fee
which
in
2014
was
two
hundred
and
twenty
five
thousand
dollars.
But
each
year
it
had
a
three
percent
escalator
and
now
the
amount
is
about
two
hundred
and
fifty
thousand
two
hundred
and
sixty
thousand.
M
M
M
Also
within
three
years.
The
Tennis
Center
agrees
to
spend
at
least
nine
million
dollars
in
capital
improvements
and
at
the
end
of
those
three
years
or
when
the
improvements
are
made.
Whichever
sooner
the
city
couple
things,
the
city
has
a
right
to
impose
a
$1.00
per
head
or
per
ticket
fee
for
every
event,
and
that
one
dollar
would
go
to
a
special
fund
for
maintenance
at
the
Tennis
Center
and
also
at
that
point,
the
management
fee.
M
285,000,
plus
a
hundred
and
sixty
thousand
and
each
year
there
would
be
a
3%
escalator
added
to
those
two
numbers
for
the
term
of
the
agreement
and
Amy
and
Matt
have
more
specifics
on
the
year
by
year.
Obligation
of
the
city.
As
a
result
of
that,
the
Tennis
Center
has
to
receive
city
approval
of
any
capital
improvements
over
$200,000.
M
The
term
will
extend
for
42
years
to
2061.
However,
the
city
does
have
an
option
of
terminating
it
after
33
years.
However,
at
that
point
the
city
would
be
required
to
buy
out
the
remainder
of
the
management
lease,
and
the
cost
of
that
would
be
three
point:
six
five
million.
So
at
three
hundred
and
six
300
600
and
fifty
three
hundred
six
six
500.
C
K
L
M
Currently,
no
provision
in
the
lease
that
expressly
provides
for
the
Tennis
Center
to
buy
this
property
from
the
city.
However,
there
is
a
general
provision
that
talks
about
selling
the
the
property,
and
there
are
obviously
some
some
requirements
there.
That
says
the
Tennis
Center
has
to
consent
under
circumstances
to
doing
that.
Obviously,
if
we're
going
to
be
selling
it
to
them,
that
would
not
be
an
issue,
but
there's
nothing
specifically
in
there
about
selling
it
to
the
Charleston
Tennis
Center.
Let.
L
Me
just
say:
I'm
going
to
vote
in
favor
of
this.
It's
complicated
I
think
it's
good
for
the
city
to
turn
this
over
to
professional
management
company.
It
has
experience
in
doing
this,
I
mean
oh,
no,
mr.
Moran
is
staying
involved.
Mr.
Navarro
has
stepped
up
his
game
and
I
see
some
of
the
representatives
here,
but
I
do
think.
This
is
an
example
of
here
we
are
in
the
city.
L
We
have
an
entrepreneurial
team,
that's
ready
to
go
and
run
our
Center
as
a
business,
which
we
should
be
always
thinking
about
and
I,
just
not
sure
what
the
advantage
to
the
city
is
long
term
of
hanging
on
to
ownership
really
name
only
and
sort
of
dinking,
along
with
these
fees,
rather
than
one
point
turning
it
over
putting
it
on
the
tax.
When
we
have
a
lot
of
other
things
that
we
need
to
be
looking
at
and
thinking
about
so
I'm
gonna
vote
in
favor
of
this
I
think
it's
at
some
point.
L
We
ought
to
think
about
particularly
this
property.
There's
some
others
too.
When
we've
got
someone,
who's
got
the
capacity
to
purchase
outright
a
facility.
That
is
a
great
public
benefit,
but
we
have
turned
it
over
to
a
private
company
to
run
it,
why
it
wouldn't
be
out
there
in
that
realm
and
we'd
turn
our
attention
to
doing
some
other
things
rather
than
hanging
on
to
property,
so
vote
for
this,
it's
complicated,
I
think
a
sale
would
have
been
the
better
way
to
go
and
still
something
we
should
think
about
long
term.
Thank
you.
So.
N
N
B
B
One
thing
I
think
is
important.
Remember
is
that
facility
is
not
just
what
is
the
main
stage?
The
facility
is
actually
I
would
guess,
the
largest
concentration
of
tennis
courts,
including
clay
courts
owned
by
the
city
in
the
city
of
Charleston,
much
of
which
they
the
program
that
they
do.
City
residents,
get
discounted
city
rates
for
being
able
to
use
those
those
courts,
and
if
we
were
to
sell
that,
we
would
lose
that
right
and
we
would
lose
every
one
of
those
courts
as
far
as
being
able
to
provide
recreational
programming
to
citizens.
B
L
A
fair
point:
I
mean
there,
you
know
it.
That's
also
a
plot
of
land,
that's
carvable
I
mean
you
could
have
the
big
tennis
facilities
any
of
the
tennis
courts,
buy
it
so
I
just
think
it's
something
to
look
at
I
mean
you
know.
The
big
part
of
that
facility
is
by
and
large
used
for
big
public
events.
I
get
it
it's
fun
to
put
kids
in
there
and
do
all
sorts
of
things
in
the
big
stadium.
The
tennis
courts
are
different
issue,
but
I
mean
seems
to
me.
J
You
both
made
great
points
here.
I
agree
with.
You
I
think
that
at
some
point
we
have
to
look
at
selling
this
facility
because
we're
not
going
to
be
able
to
afford
to
for
the
maintenance.
At
some
point.
You
know
in
a
city
where
we're
constantly
looking
for
funding
sources
everywhere,
and
we
have
to
put
so
much
emphasis
on
flooding.
You
know
we
can't
afford
big
expensive
projects
like
this.
One
eventually
just
don't
see
how
we're
gonna
be
able
to
keep
up
with
the
maintenance
and
I
know
the
company.
J
That's
running
it
now
the
organization
and
they
have
such
a
love
for
tennis
I
have
a
hard
time,
believing
that
they
would
ever
not
work
with
the
city
to
allow
us
to
use
those
facilities,
but
sustainable
I,
just
don't
see
how
we're
gonna
be
able
to
keep
up
with
it
long-term
and
eventually
we're
gonna
have
to
make
a
tough
decision,
I
think
as
a
group
about
whether
or
not
we
can
keep
maintaining
this
facility
or
what
we
should
turn
it
into
an
opportunity
for
us
to
put
some
money
elsewhere.
Thanks
and.
B
And
I
specifically
requested
that
the
dollar
per
ticket
be
added
into
this
agreement
for
exactly
what
you
just
pointed
out,
because
ultimately
we
have
to
create
revenue
streams
from
a
fiscal
standpoint,
because
today
we
don't
even
have
a
fiscal
policy
that
mandates
maintenance
of
our
facilities.
This
facility
currently
has
eight
million
dollars
in
deferred
maintenance,
but
so
I
specifically
requested
we
put
that
dollar
in
there
per
ticket.
Is
that
our
discretion?
But
it's
likely
we
will.
B
We
will
initiate
that,
but
over
the
term
of
the
contract,
this
will
basically
create
some
where
they
estimate
around
four
and
a
half
million
dollars.
So
it's
starting
to
do
exactly
that,
starting
to
think
about
and
think
before
we're
thinking
about
being
able
to
maintain
the
assets
that
we
have,
because
it's
expensive
as
a
Waggoner
did.
A
A
quick
follow-up
on
that
I
knew
that
there
was
a
large
number
of
the
first
maintenance
items
out,
and
so
that
begs
that
offer
okay,
what
is
the
annual
maintenance
fee
for
that
facility
and
how?
How
bad
is
it?
If
it's,
you
know,
you
just
said
the
number
of
eight
million
right.
Okay,
if
we
have
an
asset
and
we're
not
taking
care
of
it,
maybe
we
shouldn't
have
that
asset
at
all
yeah.
You
know,
that's
that's
my
world!
That's
the
accounting
world
that
I
live
and
it's
gonna
fall
down.
B
I
would
live
if
that
theory
holds
true.
We
need
to
sell
every
parking
garage,
we
own
I
agree.
The
amount
of
deferred
maintenance
and
facilities
of
the
city
owns
is
staggering,
and
today
we
don't
have
a
fiscal
policy
in
place
that
dictates
that
we
maintain
our
assets
to
the
degree
we
need
to.
That's.
That's!
B
That's
a
just
eight,
that's
a
global
issue
that
needs
to
be
addressed,
but
I
can
tell
you
that
when
we
sat
down
in
the
ad-hoc
committee-
and
we
started
going
through
line
item
by
line
item,
the
things
that
need
to
be
addressed
and
what
we
were
able
to
actually
fund
from
a
city's
perspective,
we
got
down
to
okay,
tell
us
what
the
like
safety
event
items
are,
and
those
are
the
things
that
we
had
to
prioritize
life
safety.
That
was
a
priority.
That's
a
problem
and
that's
a
problem.
O
O
Why
don't
we
sell
the
battery?
That
sounds
ridiculous
right,
because
it's
a
wonderful
public
speech,
but
all
to
enjoy
not
just
Charlestonians
everybody
in
America
near
and
afar
from
abroad.
One
thing
that
makes
Charleston
unique
are
the
public
spaces
that
we
have
Daniel
Island
is
not
a
private
island.
It
is
chocolate
for
all
to
enjoy.
O
It
took
a
lot
of
effort
as
far
as
maintenance.
If
we
built
it,
we
certainly
can
maintain
it.
We
have
it
and
you
know,
issue
about
a
dollar
added
to
the
ticket.
How
many
other
venues
in
particular
public
venues?
We
can
do
that
easily.
We
can
get
rid
of
it,
but
let
me
see
you
get
it
that
right.
Let
me
see
you
replace
so
I
understand
privatization,
but
when
it
comes
to
public
access,
the
various
venues
in
around
the
Charleston
area
that
we
know
we
cannot
replace
in
the
moment
it
gets
privatized.
O
The
price
goes
up,
in
particular
for
the
small
people
in
this
community.
It's
a
mystique,
so
are
they
some
items
we
could
jettison?
We
could,
but
that
was
the
economic
impact
issue
for
the
state
of
South.
Carolina
I
said
it
enough.
Our
committee
meetings,
when
the
Family
Circle
Cup
decided
to
pull
out
a
Hilton
Head,
the
governor
governor
Hodges
Secretary
of
State
al
CVB,
the
mayor,
everybody
jumped
quick
because
we
wanted
an
economic
impact
to
remain
in
the
state
of
South
Carolina.
O
It's
a
quick
action
is
behind
me
Raleigh
and
his
team
and
the
CVD
great
teamwork
got
it
put
on
Daniel
Island.
We
all
know
what
was
on
Daniel
Island.
When
that
stadium
came,
we
knew
how
many
people
were
living
in
indirectly
because
of
the
amenities
in
and
around
it's
one
of
the
finest
places
in
America.
But
you
know
what
government
invested
first.
So
when
it
comes
to
what's
gonna
stay
quiet
on
this
one,
but
I
couldn't
stay
quiet.
O
Something
had
to
be
said.
The
easy
thing
to
do
would
be
to
jettison
it,
but
look
at
the
public
loss
to
the
public
realm,
not
only
the
Charleston,
but
everybody.
We
share
that
wood
around
the
world.
People
literally
come
from
around
the
world
to
visit
that
Stadium.
So
if
we
could
bill
it,
we
we
have
to
keep
a
bill
that
we've
gotten
ourselves
short.
O
B
You
frankly
and
I
would
say
not
only
it's
really
not
necessarily
just
the
ability,
but
it's
a
responsibility.
We
can't
just
build
things
and
let
them
fall
apart.
You
know
we
have
to
build
them.
We
have
to
maintain
them
and
they've
got
to
be
held
up
to
a
standard
that
we
all
would
be
proud
of.
Nobody
wants
to
walk
into
a
facility,
that's
owned
by
City
Charleston
ago
I'm,
a
little
bit
embarrassed
that
our
city's
name
is
on
top
of
this
building.
B
We've
got
to
be
focused
on
that,
and
it
goes
well
beyond
the
Tennis
Center.
So
all
right,
any
further
discussion,
all
right.
All
right,
I
think
we
got
a
motion
already
on
the
floor,
all
those
in
favor
signify
by
saying
aye
those
opposed
now
as
have
it
is
there
any
more
business
coming
for
this
committee
will
stand
adjourned.