►
From YouTube: Arts & Culture Committee Meeting 09192023
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
B
E
E
B
D
G
H
Up,
which
is
like
pretty
good
turnout.
A
B
B
K
A
B
A
B
F
A
B
L
Welcome
everybody,
we're
actually
I
know
you
think
it
looks
like
nobody's
here,
but
we
have
plenty
of
people
to
start.
We
get
everybody's
attention.
L
But
we
are
going
to
get
going
because
we're
gonna
try
to
get
all
the
way
through
this
in
two
hours,
which
is
a
stretch
but
we're
gonna.
Do
it
we're
gonna,
do
it
so,
hopefully
everybody
had
time
to
read
it
and
and
again
so
we
know
I,
think
Kevin's.
The
perfect
person
who's
been
saying
this,
but
we
know
that
everybody
might
not
like
every
single
piece
of
this,
but
we're
hoping
we
can
get
enough
consensus
that
we
can
kind
of
move
forward
by
the
end
of
the
meeting
and
call
this
our
final-ish
report.
L
Okay,
so
now,
Kevin
and
I
are
going
to
be
looking
for
hands
up
to
see
if
people
are
okay
with
what's
here,
if
you
have
things
raise
it,
let's
do
it
and
we're
going
to
handle
it.
Just
like
we
did
the
last
time,
which
is
we're
going
to
make
edits
in
live
time,
so
you'll
be
able
to
see
them.
Okay,
so
I
think
Kevin.
What
else.
C
That's
it.
The
biggest
thing
we
have
here
is
that
we've
been
trying
to
be
consistent.
Every
meeting
we've
had
we've
asked
for
a
consensus
of
the
group.
We've
got
a
consensus
all
the
way
along
we'll
do
it
again,
but
really
what
we're
doing
today
is
going
over
stuff
we've
already
done
and
we're
doing
that
on
purpose,
because
we
want
to
make
sure
that
we've
got
our
eyes
dotted
in
T's
Crossing,
there's
no
consternation
again.
C
If
we
as
a
team
are
not
behind
us,
we
got
problems
so
we're
looking
for
everybody
to
be
behind
it,
because
we've
got
such
a
diverse
group
of
folks.
Here,
that's
in
very,
very
important
for
us
to
happen,
but
that's
what
we've
been
doing
all
along
so
I
feel
good
about
it
and
I
think
we're
ready
to
start
the
process
just
real
quickly.
Joy
is
going
to
stand
up,
we're
going
to
start
at
eight
we're
going
to
go
back
to
one
in
terms
of
the
strategies.
C
M
N
O
M
M
O
O
M
Soon,
last
week
go
ahead.
Yes,
no
and
I
just
wanted
to
clarify
that
the
printouts
that
we
put
on
the
tables
are
the
redlined
versions
you
received
last
Friday,
so
that's
what's
there
in
case
you
want
to
have
that
referred
to
what
we're
showing
you
up
here
is
the
clean
versions
with
just
a
few
additional
things
that
a
few
folks
have
contacted
us
about
in
the
last
couple
days,
or
there
are
one
of
two
things
we
noticed,
and
so
that's
what
you
see
here
in
track
changes.
M
O
Talk
about
substantive
changes
as
opposed
to
typos
or
commas.
There
weren't
too
many
typos,
there's
mainly
around
commas
and
movement
of
commas
and
those
types
of
things.
So
we
won't
necessarily
go
through
those
okay.
Okay.
So
since
we
are
on
priority,
eight
I
am
going
to
go
straight
to
strategy.
M
C
M
Two
that
has
all
the
change
right
and
so
we're
not
going
over
those,
because
those
are
the
ones
that
the
Steering
group
agreed
to
on
September
12th,
but
we
just
wanted
to
have
those
around
in
case.
Anyone
wants
to
refer
to
what
was
sent
out
and
doesn't
have
their
own
copy.
These
right
here
are
some
changes
that
Meg
reached
out
with
yesterday,
and
so
that's
what
you
see
in
blue
and
track
changes,
you
can
see
right
Meg.
O
So
yes,
so
looking
at
action
number
two,
for
example,
you
see
individual
professional
developments
replaces
increased
teaching
time.
So
essentially
the
sentence
becomes
or
the
action
becomes
create
unique
fund
for
Arts
educators,
not
Arts
education,
to
apply
for
technical
assistance,
grants
for
materials,
comma
supplies
to
decrease,
to
decrease
out
of
pocket
expenses
and
individual
professional
developments
period.
O
M
Might
be
helpful
for
where
I'm
trying
to
go
to
stuff
but
but
I
will
just
I
will
just
zoom
in
on
first
sure.
Is
this
much
better
yep.
O
Then
there
are
some
kind
of
commonalities,
for
example,
that
action
bullet
points
you'll
see:
we've
removed
City
the
business
common
throughout,
especially
in
this
priority.
It's
a
position,
that's
not
generally
designated
City.
It
is
instant
Arts
education
coordinator
to
help
Foster
comma,
manage
and
encourage
inclusion
of
Arts
Educators
for
the
big
change
for
them.
The
change
is
the
elimination
of
City.
O
Q
I'm,
sorry,
can
we
go
back
to
action
to
that
sentence,
I'm
a
little
confused
by
create
unique
fun
for
Arts
Educators
to
apply
for
technical
assistance,
grants
for
Material
supplies
to
decrease
out-of-pocket
expenses
and
individual
professional
time
decrease
individual
professional
time?
Is
that
what
it's
trying
to
say.
S
O
T
Q
I,
don't
think
it's
a
problem
with
what
it's
saying,
what
I'm
saying?
Is
it
the
way
it
reads
now
you
don't
think
that
four
is
with
it.
It
almost
seems
like
the
decreases
with
it,
so
maybe
either
we
can
put
create
unique
fun
for
individual
professional
development
and
and
to
apply
for
yada,
yada,
yada
I,
don't
know,
but
I
feel
like
the
way
it
reads
now
is
very
confusing.
R
I
totally
agree:
do
we
need
materials
and
supplies
are
those
different
like?
Could
you
could
you
do
what
what
she's
saying
and
and
put
individual
professional
development
first
and
then
and
supplies
to
decrease
out
of
pocket
expenses
and
just
take
materials
out
of
it?
It
just
seems
like
I,
don't
know
what
the
difference
between
materials
and
supplies
is.
E
O
O
L
S
O
So
we
are
going
to
continue
through
moving
as
quickly
as
we
possibly
can.
The
next
changes,
as
I
said
the
tenor
of
the
Arts
education
coordinator.
We
know
what
the
reasoning
behind
is
just
the
position:
okay,
next,
the
next
strategy,
so
that
was
strategy,
two
right
or
straight
three.
Three.
O
O
L
K
Number
strategy:
number:
five:
if
you
can
go
the
outcomes
for
strategy
number
five.
K
There's
some
really
confusing
language.
On
the
first
bullet
point,
I
tried
to
retain
more
burgeoning
artists
to
the
region
through
their
increased
incomes,
creatives
will
contribute
even
more
to
the
Region's
economy.
K
K
S
Finding
their
footing,
I
mean
is
speaking.
K
G
L
M
I
think
it's
I
think
there's
well
Meg
you're
the
you're,
the
chair
who's
present
for
this
task
force,
but
to
me
I
see
that
as
those
finding
their
footing
referring
to
the
emerging
artists
because
they're
emerging,
so
they
haven't,
found
their
footing
yet
they're
not
established
I,
don't
know
if
that
would
say
that
it'd
be
much.
B
M
S
S
I,
just
don't
see
the
I,
don't
see
that
reflected
here,
but
I
mean
the
priority
still
says:
Foster
collaboration
cooperation
through
the
creative
ecosystem
and
with
other
sectors,
but
I
don't
see
a
list
anywhere
on
this
page
of
other
sectors
as
examples,
but
maybe
I.
Remember
that
we
had
that
conversation
about
the
health
care
sector
or
the
I.
M
Yeah,
we'll
just
add
that
back
in
where
we
did
add
that,
after
the
the
August
22nd
meeting
I
believe.
K
This
I
I
submitted
this
in
writing
Prius,
so
you
you
can
have
it
there,
but
I.
Just
I,
don't
know
if
it's
more
than
just
substantive
but
I
think
we
talked
about
a
lot
of
these
strategies
refer
to
what
the
new
governance
structure
is
going
to
be,
and
sometimes
we
refer
to
it
as
the
Arts
and
Advisory
Board
leadership.
Sometimes
we
refer
to
it
as
the
new
governance.
L
B
L
L
You're
going
to
see
both
the
new
governance
structure
and
the
Arts
and
Cultural
Advisory,
Board
and
and
different
places,
and
they
are
two
different
things
we
have
as
of
now
about
nine
months,
left
on
our
on
our
work
plan
yeah
for
The,
Advisory,
Board
I'm,
not
crying
I'm,
sorry,
and
so
during
that
time
there
are
some
things
that
this
board
will
be
doing,
including
getting
more
clarity
around
the
new
governance
structure.
At
some
point,
the
new
governance
structure
is
the
carries
the
ball
so
you're
going
to
see
them
both
okay.
C
Yeah
we
have
what's
in
priority
two,
but
I
mean
like
who's
on
it,
those
kinds
of
things
you
know
we
don't
have
names
and,
and
that.
K
C
K
M
L
L
C
O
C
S
Just
to
me,
that's
a
little
vague
I,
don't
know
that
we're
going
to
end
up
changing
it
tonight,
but
I'm
just
calling
attention
to
in
cross-sector
collaboration.
You
would
hope
those
Partners
if
they
are
multi-million
billion
dollar,
Industries
or
whatever
that
they
would
be
putting
some
money
into
the
funding
Carlos.
T
M
Are
literally
talking
about
about
action,
one
welcome
Carlos
welcome
Carlos,
so
we
are
on
our
priority
seven
strategy,
one
we're
going
backwards
and
in
in
numerical
Wars,
so
we're
on
action.
One
Maggie
were
just
saying
that
you
would
hope
that
the
folks
who
were
involved
in
those
other
sectors
are
involved
in
the
funding
and
while
you're
settling
Carlos
Alexis
I
I
will
just
share
what
I
recall
from
our
conversations
in
the
task
force.
M
E
So
now
I'm
confused
these
the
collaborations.
Are
you
saying
Meg
they're
between
an
Arts
organization
and
then
a
part
of
the
business
sector
or
two
arts
or
or
you
know
it
says
fun.
Collaborative
multi-year
initiatives
between
two
or
more
organizations
is
the
intention
two
or
more
Arts
organizations,
because
we
wouldn't
need
to
fund
an
organization.
I
mean
a
partnership
between
Banks.
E
E
U
Yeah
sorry
I
just
was
trying
to
land
in
this
space,
but
I
think
originally,
the
thought
was
that
you
know
for
these
collaborations
to
happen,
funding
funding
structures
like
needed
to
be
in
place,
and
that
and
emphasis
in
that
it
to
be
a
multi-year
thing,
because
collaboration
takes
takes
time
to
marinate
and
so
on.
U
The
reality
is
I.
Think
when
we
look
at
this
strategy,
we
also
there
was
the
question
that
are
we
just
talking
about
our
artistic
groups
or
we're
talking
about
all
the
potential
collaborations
that
expands
the
the
use
and
meaning
of
the
Arts,
and
we
sort
of
open
the
language
there,
a
little
bit
and
so
I
think.
As
far
as
I
recall,
it's
a
little
bit
of
both
but
we're
talking
about
taking
an
active
role
into
funding
multi-years.
U
Instead
of
that
will
open
this
space
for
that
kind
of
collaboration,
also
to
happen
that,
and
also
just
between
artistic
groups.
I,
don't
know
if
that
is
too
broad
or
too
big
or
too
vague,
but
I
think
that
was
kind
of
the
thinking
behind
it,
but
the
Genesis
of
it
all
was
we
want.
If
we're
talking
about
collaborations
across
sector,
we
got
to
think
a
little
bit
more
strategic
in
like
in
the
planning
of
that
to
be
multi-year
and
that
there
is
funding,
secure
or
funding
directed
to
those
Endeavors.
That
was
the.
Why.
E
I
love
the
multi-year
funding
funding
right,
I
feel
like
there's.
There's
I
don't
want
to
get
into
the
finer
points.
I
don't
want
to
be
this
guy
tonight,
but
there's
funding
it
and
then
there's
encourage
there's
encouraging
the
relationship
between
sectors
and
arts.
Organizations
that
word
fund
is
just
tripping
me
up
because
I'm
all
for
funding
relationships
between
Arts
organizations
that
are
multi-year
and
all
that.
But
if
there's
a
if
there's
a
third
party
private
entity,
that's
getting
into
relationship
with
an
Arts
organization,
hopefully
they're
the
funder
and
we're
not
giving
Private
Industry
funds.
C
Right,
so
let
me
see
if
I
can
clear
this,
so
if
you
just
the
issue,
is
two
or
more,
and
you
have
the
word
organizations
there.
So
there's
there's
multiple
ways
of
looking
this.
It
could
be
Arts
organizations,
but
I
think
what
I
heard
you
say
Carlos
is
that
pigeon
holds
it
a
little
too
much
and,
and
so
I'm
I
want
to
make
sure
is
that
correct.
Did
I
say
that
right.
Is
that
the
reason
why
the
word
Arts
is
not
in
front
of
organization.
U
To
open
it
up
a
little
bit
more
because
that
was
a
thought
that
gave
me
one
of
these
sessions.
So
in
response
to
that,
we
kind
of
took
that
word
away.
But
now
the
question
is
probably
nothing
that
certainly
what
could
happen
if
you
don't
incentivize
it
somehow
so.
M
Can
I
get
oh
I
just
want
to
point
out
because
I
think
it'll
be
helpful
to
this.
So
we
found
the
language
that
that
changed
the
versioning,
and
so,
if
you
can
see
the
gray
highlighting
up
in
the
strategy
statement
that
now
has
the
language
that
we
added
in
on
in
that
meeting
that
you're
referencing.
M
So
now
it
says,
incentivize
and
enable
cross-sector
collaborations
within
the
creative
ecosystem
and
with
other
sectors
in
parenthesis,
such
as
Healthcare
manufacturing,
education,
Social,
Service
Etc,
through
funding
and
technical
support
and
I
and
and
those
of
you
who
were
there
for
the
August
22nd
meeting
will
recall.
We
drafted
that
language
as
a
group.
L
C
C
V
K
W
Can
I
ask
a
question:
yeah
I've
got
a
question
about
in
strategy
two,
the
third
outcome
of
requiring
three
percent
to
be
paid
to
be
used
for
marketing.
Does
that
cover
every
operating
Grant
we
make?
Even
if
it's
not
for
events,
it's
just
to
help
the
institution
survive.
L
W
K
I
It's
not
just
there's
there's
to
increase
The
Branding
and
the
messaging
around
the
Arts
Community.
It's
going
to
take
every
single
person
involved
and
I
think
we
saw
that
with
the
way
that,
with
the
taxes
you
know
not,
everybody
did
their
fair
share
and
promoting
that
piece.
So
this
is
intent
on
kind
of
putting
the
requirement
in
place
that
you
are
doing
your
fair
share
to
advertise
and
Market.
There's
no
exception.
L
L
Y
An
action
or
a
tactic,
so
it's
in
a
so
that's
that's!
My
first
flag
is
like
where,
if
you
want
it
to
be
an
accident,
I
think
you
might
want
to
move
it
over,
but
you
could
have
an
outcome
B
that
all
Arts
organizations
are
are
doing.
It
are
doing
marketing
Communications
at
three
percent
or
above
as
an
outcome,
but
right
now
you're
acts
anyway.
It
doesn't
matter.
However,
you
want
to
whatever
you
want
to
do
with
that.
I
think
right.
K
Right,
I,
I,
didn't
think
I,
don't
think
I
think
what
we
meant
was
that
we
would
like
to
see
that
recipients
of
Arts
and
culture
funding
use
three
percent
of
the
grant
for
marketing
and
Communications
I.
Y
Yeah
I'm
hearing
two
things
from
your
group:
it's
and
I'm
I'm
I
can
see
I'm
not
attached
to
this,
but
because
you
have
it
listed
as
an
outcome,
you
want
it
to
be
something
that
occurs
after
an
action
right
after
some
activities.
So
you
might
want
to
rephrase
this
as
to
your
your
desires
that
in
five
years,
let's
say
all
the
Arts
organizations
are
spending
over
three
percent
of
their
budget
on
marketing
Communications.
Y
Y
L
I
Actually
goes
against
kind
of
the
I
mean
it.
You
guys
are
getting
more
into
operating
budget
than
them.
Ours
was
around
the
conversation
that
we
were
having
from
hearing
from
artists
that
they
were,
depending
on
other
people
to
do
their
marketing
for
them
for
their
own
show
for
their
whatever
and
we're
like.
No,
if
you're
a
business,
you
do
your
own
marketing.
So
that's
one
of
the
reasons
I
think.
I
That's
where
it
kind
of
is
an
outcome,
because
if
we're
going
to
invest
as
a
community,
our
tax
paying
dollars
and
our
corporate
philanthropy
into
developing
this
kind
of
communication
plan,
it
can,
it
cannot
be
supported
unless
all
the
artistic
institutions
and
artists
are
doing
their
fair
share.
You're
never
going
to
have
enough
money
for
one.
You
know
for
an
agency
to
do
it.
So
I'm
not
I,
think
require
I
feel
strongly
about
when
it
comes
to
a
grant
for
a
specific
event
show
performance,
because
it's
all
about.
We
talked
in
the
beginning.
I
It's
all
about
filling
seats,
it's
all
about
selling
tickets
and
filling
seeds,
and
you
can't
do
that.
If
people
don't
know
that
you
have
it
now,
if
we
want
to
talk
about
operating
later
and
that's
a
go
down
the
road,
that's
fine,
but
but
you
know
the
outcome
would
be
and
I
don't
think
it
really
falls
under
the
action,
because
the
action
is
all
around
like
an
overall
strategic
Charlotte
cultural
marketing
plan-
and
this
is
an
outcome
that
now
we
have
an
expectation
that
there's
accountability
among
artistic
institutions
and
artists
to
do
their
fair
share.
I
O
K
Think
she's,
saying
I
think
she's
saying
it's
an
outcome,
because
what
what
we
want
to
what
what
our
group
wanted
to
see
is
that
three
percent
is
being
used
at
least
of
these
of
these
entities.
These
organizations
and
individuals
that
are
receiving
arts
and
culture
grants
and
funding
that
at
least
a
three
percent
are
doing
it.
So
maybe
maybe
a
a
good
compromised,
Middle
Ground
here
is
to
just
take
out,
require
all
but
put
recipients
of
arts
and
culture,
Grant
and
funding
to
use.
K
Three
percent
of
you
know
blah
blah
blah
so
that
essentially
go
ahead.
Sorry
I'm
just
saying
so
that
if
we're
saying
that
that,
through
these
action
items
that
we're
having
the
left-hand
side,
what
we're
trying
to
get
to
is
a
place
where
you
know
an
outcome
is
at
least
three
percent
is
being
used
for
marketing
and
communication.
M
Question
slash
observation
on
two
aspects
of
that:
one
is
that
the
as
I
read
this.
That
outcome
wouldn't
wouldn't
be
an
outcome
of
the
strategy
which
is
about
a
comprehensive
plan.
I
understand
that
that's
a
desired
outcome,
I'm
wondering
if,
because
this
has
more
to
do
about
it's
tied
to
funding
right,
it's
tied
to
funding
and
how
the
funding's
used,
which
is
a
little
bit
more
like
that's
more
kind
of
tends
to
be
nested
under
priorities.
M
Two
and
three,
whereas
the
strategies
that
are
under
priority
six
are
more
about
the
research
and
the
development
of
the
comprehensive
plan
for
communications,
marketing,
Etc,
and
so
with
that
it
doesn't
necessarily
specifically
relate
to
funding
it's
more
like
in
in
line
with
the
plan
that
comes
out,
then
there
would
need
to
be
like
a
funding
practice,
or
you
know
that
that
goes
along
with
that
that
probably
lives
somewhere
else
and
you
know,
live
somewhere
else.
So
that's
one.
M
The
other
one
is
just
like
my
one,
my
own,
just
from
my
own
background,
not
to
speak
for
anyone
else
in
the
room,
who's
doing
Arts,
funding
or
marketing,
but
I
know
that
at
least
when,
when
we
would
look
at
how
much
a
marketing
budget
you
know
was
allocated,
we
would
we
would
look
for
it
to
be
higher
like
closer
to
10
or
something
so
just
the
question
being
around
it's
sort
of
like
a
combo
of
is
three
percent
enough,
or
is
that
something
that's
a
recommendation
that
comes
out
of
the
plan
that's
being
developed
in
this
strategy
like
would
the
would
the
plan
maybe
actually
yield
a
suggestion
for
what
amount
should
be
used
for
used
for
marketing
yeah,
because
I
know
last
I
know.
M
K
K
You
know
the
the
the
entities
and
organizations
that
are
being
funded
their
their
sources
of
funding
and
maybe
like
an
outcome
of
that
of
one
of
those
strategies,
is
to
have
a
certain
percentage
that
or
or
if
you
don't
want
to
put
a
percentage
just
ensuring
that
marketing
and
communication
is
funded
because
I
see
what
you're
saying
it
doesn't
tie
directly
to
any
of
those
action
costs
on
the
left
hand,
side,
but
I
think
we
still
would
like
to
see
that
it's
in
at
some
point
in
the
plan
right.
I
I
mean,
if
you
look
at
all
the
outcomes,
I
mean
all
the
outcomes.
The
the
purpose
of
the
outcomes
was
to
tie
back
to
the
underlying
philosophy
that
it
is
everybody's
responsibility
to
Market.
So
you
talk
about.
We've
got
leveraging
corporate
communication
channels,
leveraging
government
incentive
programs.
I
You
know
public
art
programs,
so
at
some
point,
even
if,
if
we
move
it
to
somewhere,
it's
tied
to
funding-
you
know
with
neither
here
nor
there,
but
there
still
needs
to
be
something
in
the
outcomes
that
says
that
that
if
we
go
through
this
exercise,
that
is
designed
to
gather
data
and
and
embrace
the
entire
Community
to
create
a
branding
strategy
that
everybody's
kind
of
like
okay,
that
there's
a
commitment
from
everybody
to
support
it
and-
and
that
needs
to
be
in
the
outcomes
in
some
way,
shape
or
form.
Yeah.
Z
So
I'm
viewing
this
as
two
different
things
and
just
trying
to
get
clarity
because
April,
when
you
talk
it
to
me,
it
seems
like
you're
talking
about
sector
the
entire
life.
Everyone
needs
to
be
advocating
for
and
marketing
the
sector.
But
in
here
it
talks
about
you
know,
event
artist,
performance,
so
I
think
about.
If
David
received
a
grant,
are
you
saying,
as
it
states
right
now,
three
percent
excuse
me
of
that
needs
to
go
towards
marketing
his
exhibition
or
10
or
whatever
that.
Z
M
May
I
make
a
oh
Julie
and
I
have
a
combo
suggested
at
it,
which
is
just
a
slight
edit
that
might
address,
might
capture
what
you
just
said
is
like
what,
if
it
just
says,
recipients
of
Arts
and
Cultural
grants
or
funding,
etc,
etc.
Use.
M
Well,
wait:
what
was
it
it's
like
hold
on
we'll
use?
Well,
it
could
say
something
like
will
adequately
market
and
communicate
the
event
artist
for
performance
and
be
adequately
funded
to
do
so
so
a
version
of
that
which
provides
both
for
the
fact
that
they
need
to
be
adequately
funded
to
do
so.
Otherwise,
how
would
they
do
it,
but
also
it
requires
it
says
that
they
will
do
the
funding,
but.
M
S
M
Structure,
no
I
think
the
organization
would
know
I
mean
at
least
in
my
experts,
like
organizations
often
would
know
what
they
how
they
would
like
to
Market,
but
sometimes
they
don't
have
the
funding
to
be
able
to
Market
in
the
way
that
they
would
like
to
do
so.
It's
not
that
they're
if
it's
under
marketed
or
communicated
at
least
just
speaking
from
my
own.
You
know
experiences
with
organizations,
it's
not
because
they,
you
know
it
has
more
to
do
with
the
resources
being
available
to
Market
it
as
much
as
they
would
like.
V
B
M
P
Okay,
so
just
from
my
experience,
working
with
small
organizations,
but
also
as
an
individual
artist
again
just
to
support
what
Priya
just
said,
it's
not
that
small
organizations
don't
have
like
they
don't
want
to
Market
it's
just
having
the
capacity
and
the
funds
to
do
it
so
being
supported
in
that
way
and
number
two
as
an
individual
artist.
There
are
some
grants
that
you
get.
That
is
specifically
let's
say
to
buy.
E
Here
so
I
I
love
the
spirit
of
this,
because
marketing
is
a
best
practice
but
I
it
for
the
reasons
Milan
bricks
brought
up
and
other
things.
Maybe
it
doesn't
need
to
be
stated
here
and
it
needs
to
be
in
the
fine
print
of
grants
that
come
out
because
grants
always
have
you
know
we
require
if
we
give
it
a
granted.
The
infusion
fund
that
you
put
the
nice
chunky
logo
with
900
other
logos.
You
know
every
time
you
get
a
grant.
E
There
are
requirements,
I
think
that
maybe,
as
a
spirit
thing,
we
need
to
write
down
that
as
these
different
grants
come
out,
there
should
be
a
marketing
component
to
the
ones
where
it
matters
if
it's
for
a
public
event
or
it's
for
an
offering
or
it's
for
a
product.
Yes,
if
it's
for
to
buy
materials
for
a
printer,
there's
nothing
to
Market
there,
but
but
the
spirit
of
it
in
my
mind,
is
marketing
is
almost
always
the
last.
E
The
last
thing:
that's
that's
thought
of
or
funded,
and
you
know
just
in
my
capacity
we
get
press
releases
for
an
event
the
day
of
the
event
and
so
through
education
and
through
what
we
require
or
what
is
required
in
a
grant.
I
think
that
marketing
piece
should
come
through
that
way,
because
it's
just
not
being
done
and
then
Krista.
You
brought
up
an
excellent
point.
I,
don't
think
that
that
we
should
require
people
to
promote
this,
the
sector,
but
by
them
promoting
their
event.
E
It's
constantly
out
there
that
there
are
things
going
on
in
it
by
act
in
in
aggregate
talks
about
the
sector
and
I
think
in
that
way.
But
if
we
don't
ask
for
marketing-
and
we
don't
require
in
some
require
in
some
way
or
form-
that's
people
that
aren't
looking
for
it
are
going
to
say.
I
know
that
was
happening.
I
didn't
know
there
were
a
lot
of
things
going
on
in
the
market.
So
it's
a
good
point.
V
Yeah,
so
you
know
one
of
the
things
we
heard
a
lot
in
the
hearing
sessions
earlier
on
was
you
know:
I
mean
induced
artists,
small
organizations
saying
that
they're
so
little
unrestricted
funding.
There's
it's
all
project
grants
and,
as
you
all
know,
a
lot
of
major
entities
are
going
to
trust
based
granting
the
idea
that
the
recipient
organization
is
the
best
judge
of
how
to
use
the
money.
So,
while
three
percent
is
not
a
big
big
chunk,
I
think
this
kind
of
goes
against.
V
The
spirit
of
you
know:
it's
still
restricted
funding
and
if
each
task
force
you
know
added
their
own,
things
about,
like
10
percent,
should
go
to
equity
work
or
five
percent
should
go
to
collaboration,
I,
think
I.
Think
the
in
principle
I
think
that's.
This
is
not
the
right
direction
too,
or
the
right
approach.
K
Can
I
make
a
suggestion?
I
think?
Maybe
are
we?
If
you
look
at
strategy
number
four
of
priority
number
one.
It
seems
like
that's
where
this
type
of
language
should
come
in,
because
it's
all
about
building
the
capacity
of
the
ones
being
funded
and
like
if
you
look
at
those
outcomes
like
develop
arts
and
culture,
specific
business
curriculum
with
measurable
outcomes
model
for
supportive
administrative
Services.
K
There's
like
all
these
things,
that
we
want,
those
that
are
getting
funded
to
do-
and
maybe
we
just
put
in
you
know,
dedicate
you
know
a
certain
percentage
of
funds
for
marketing
and
communication.
It
seems
like
that
might
be
the
more
logical
place
to
put
it
in
not
specify
a
percent
I
mean
I,
don't
remember
what
three
percent
I
don't
think
we
were
like
it
has
to
be
three
percent.
That
was
just
like
a
number
so.
M
K
Okay,
yeah,
if
you
look
at
like
the
outcomes
there
right,
develop,
arts
and
culture,
specific
business,
curriculum
and
I
think
that
could
just
go
as
like
a
fourth
or
what
is
that
fifth
bullet
point
there
of
you
know.
Even
thank
you,
encourage
or
encourage.
O
V
M
K
K
Q
Haven't
had
a
15-year
career
in
marketing
and
communication,
specifically
for
nonprofits,
but
at
heavy
arts
and
culture
focus
the
interesting
thing
about
it
is
when
we
think
about
grants
they
hardly
ever
support
marketing
and
Communications,
and
the
challenge
with
that
is.
Then
we
have
to
use
whatever
money
that
we
have
in
order
to
promote
the
thing
that
the
grant
is
funding
right,
and
so
whatever
the
scale
is,
even
if
it
is
three
percent.
Let's
say
you
get
a
three
thousand
dollar
Grant
right.
Q
That's
three
hundred
dollars
quite
Rihanna
right
that
something
can
be
done
with
that
right
and
I
and
I
do
think.
If
we
are
trying
to
create
something
different
if
we
are
trying
to
create
and
fill
gaps
that
that
have
all.
If
we
are,
we
trying
to
create
gaps,
I'm
sorry
fill
gaps
that
have
already
been
in
the
sector.
Q
When
it
comes
to
funding,
so
if
we
don't
do
something
different,
we'll
be
right
back
here
and
we
have
to
Market
no
matter
what
size
we
are
so
I
think
including
this
somewhere
as
a
requirement
encourages
funders
as
well
as
individuals
and
organizations
to
put
their
money
in
order
to
actually
amplify
what
they're
trying
to
do.
Q
Y
Y
You
include
that
language
around
under
priority
six
strategy,
2
under
strategy,
four
or
five,
where
you
say,
develop
and
Implement
an
annual
arts
and
culture
Communications
plan
or
develop
and
implemented
annual
arts
and
culture
plan
media
plan
budget,
including
you
know,
allocating
you
know
three
percent
of
Grant
dollars
for
organizations
to
marketing,
including
requiring
I'm
not
opposed
to
that
restricting
dollars
to
marketing.
But
just
my
only
thing
is:
is
that
I
don't
know
if
you
get
to
what
your
outcome
is
without
stating
it
as
an
action
to
be
done?
Y
That's
my
and
so
I
think
the
outcome
we're
all
wanting
is:
is
better
marketing
and
branding
so
that
we
get
more
people
using
their
dollars
to
buy
and
consume
and
participate
in
art.
I'm.
Sorry,
let's
use
the
the
word
you
don't
like,
but
you
see
like.
So
that's
what
I'm
saying
I
just
I.
Just
I'm
really
with
you
I
just
want
it
to
be
a
strategy
or
an
action
clearly
stated
and
then
you're
trying
to
get
to
an
outcome.
S
Meg
yeah,
yeah,
I
I
agree
with
Charles
about
the
outcome
and
the
action
and
I
think,
though,
that,
because,
as
Krista
said,
that
Communications
plan
is
really
about
the
sector
and
not
about
individual
events
that
it
does
belong
here
and
I
would
say
it
belongs
as
part
of
the
action
number
four
action
number
four
right
now
says:
increased
earn
Revenue
by
organizations
and
artists.
First
of
all
like
how
are
you
going
to
do
that
I
mean
that's
that
doesn't
tell
us
anything
about
how
anybody's
going
to
do
that.
S
But
this
is
a
way
you
could
do
it
in
a
way
you
can
do
it
or
hopefully,
is
by
increasing
their
capacity
to
Market,
whether
they're,
individuals
or
organizations,
so
something
like
increase,
earn
Revenue
by
organizations
and
artists
through
increased
capacity
for
marketing
programs
and
projects
or
products
or
whatever
I
mean
maybe
or
as
a
letter
underneath.
If
we
want
to
do
letters
a
b
and
c
but
yeah
I
think
it's,
it
is
part
of
the
effort
to
increase
earned
revenue
is
through
marketing,
yeah.
K
I
agree,
I
think
I
think
you
could
say:
increase
earn
Revenue
by
encouraging
and
supporting
you
know,
dedication
of
funding
for
marketing
and
Communications
yeah.
C
C
Number
three
individuals
and
groups
must
be
responsible
for
their
marketing,
and
that
doesn't
mean
they
don't
go
out
and
get
someone
else
to
do
it
for
them.
But
they've
got
to
have
that
as
a
part
of
their
DNA
and
number
four
I
put
down.
Is
that,
as
we
put
these
words
together,
we're
basically
saying
encouraging
and
supporting
the
marketing
the
thing
that
I
want
us
to
be
cautious
of
when
we
put
in
the
outcomes,
absolutes
and
what
I
mean
by
that
is
all
grants.
C
So
that
tells
me
if
I
want
to
Grant
an
artist's
supplies
they
either
can't
take
that
Grant
or
I
can't
give
it
to
them,
because
three
percent
is
not
my
budget.
Doesn't
allow
me
to
do
three
percent
for
market
and
I.
Don't
think
that's
what
anybody
is
trying
to
do
so.
I,
just
caution
us
to
be
careful
with
absolutes
and
the
last
thing
I'll
say
on
that
before
we're
going.
E
Going
to
make
one
last
suggestion-
and
this
gets
to
what
you
just
said:
Kevin:
can
it
not
be
recipients
of
grants
for
public
events
and
and
or
installations
that
way
it's
qualifying
it?
You
would
Market
something
that
the
public
can
come
to.
You
would
not
Market
a
supply
or
training
based
like
Grant
like
if
you
get
our.
If
you
get
an
artist
support
Grant
from
the
ASC
or
the
technical
support
Grant,
you
would
need
to.
C
M
T
And
we're
probably
done
with
this
point
but
in
my
mind,
increasing
earned
revenue
and
marketing
are
they
should
coexist?
But
if
you
don't
have
the
business
skills,
the
planning,
the
knowledge,
which
is
what
I
think
we
were
trying
to
get
at
here,
you're
not
going
to
be
able
to
Market
it
anyway.
So
I
think
that
I
feel
like
those
are
two
separate
things
and
we're
trying
to
just
sort
of
shove
to
ideas
together
that
are
certainly
complementary,
but
I,
don't
think
you
can
increase,
earned
arrival
to
new
Alone
by
supporting
marketing
right
can.
M
M
K
Or
you
could
just
right
before,
buy
put
including
so,
including
one
of
the
ways
is
by
encouraging
and
supporting
dedication
of
marketing
Communications
or
you
can
make
it
itself.
M
X
M
We
have
everyone's
attention.
Please
hello.
Can
we
have
everyone's
attention,
please
so
that
we
can
finish
this
point.
Thank
you
that
you
all
is
a
task
force
identified,
which
is
that,
in
addition
to
the
marketing
being
critical
to
to
increasing
Revenue
earned
Revenue,
there's
that
communication
piece
that
you
also
referenced
I,
think
you
know
in
over
the
course
of
your
conversations,
that's
bigger
than
that
it
could
lead
to
contributed
Revenue
it
just.
M
It
also
contributes
to
the
awareness
and
value
of
arts
and
culture
in
the
community,
and
so
I
would
say
that's
where
I
might
hesitate
to
tie
it
just
to
the
earned
Revenue
comments.
C
K
K
M
I
can
I
can
explain
that
just
from
having,
because
we
asked
that
task
force
that
question
so
wait
is
Matt
still
in
the
room.
No,
he
had
to
go
so
that
what
was
meant
by
that
was
that
there
would
be
kind
of
teams
sort
of
in
the
community,
so
not
necessarily
part
of
the
governance
structure
or,
but
you
know
basically
folks
who
are
committed
to
implementing
the
strategy.
Who
would
be
supporting
the
implementation
of
this
piece
so
just
to
clarify.
M
M
K
M
K
K
M
That's
what
I'm
hearing
right
do
is
there
anything
we'd
want
to
add
to
that
column
right
to
kind
of
to
buffer
to
basically
beef
up?
What's
what's
there
since
there
currently
are
not
arts
and
culture
support
teams,
my
suggestion
would
be.
We
could
move
Arts
organizations,
basically
the
first
two
bullets
that
are
under
Partners.
We
could
move
that
into
the
leaders
column
if
we
think
that
those
are
logical
folks
to
participate
in
this
strategy.
W
W
No
I
just
I
envision
first
place.
There
is
free
transportation
from
certain
institutions,
mainly
senior
citizen
institutions,
to
the
Arts
in
that,
but
I'm,
just
I'm,
just
kind
of
saying.
Okay,
to
who
I
mean
if
we've
got
a
small
exhibit
on
the
west
side
of
Charlotte?
Is
that
going
to
be
part
of
it?
I
mean
it
just
seems
it
kind
of
far-reaching
question.
If
you
want
to
be,
you
want
to
be
adventuresome
like
this.
As
you
say,
then
fine
I,
just
I.
W
C
So
I
think
the
idea
here
as
it
relates
to
part
of
the
strategy
and
transportation,
has
been
talked
about
for
many
many
years
as
long
as
I've
been
involved
in
in
the
Arts.
Putting
it
here
just
continues
to
highlight
it.
We're
not
saying
it's
going
to
happen
day,
one
it's
going
to
be
for
everything,
and
this
leaves
it
open
enough.
I
mean
they
didn't
say,
create
free
transportation
for
every
arts
program.
C
M
C
C
S
E
M
To
what
you
just
there
does
not,
there
does
not
have
to
be
one
person
or
entity
leading
all
of
this,
because
you,
if
you
look
at
the
specific
actions
that
could
be
generate,
that
could
the
Genesis
of
that
could
come
from
a
particular
organization
itself,
working
with
the
funder,
the
Genesis
of
it.
One
of
these
could
come
from
a
funder,
who's
interested
in
supporting
that
the
I
think
the
way
these
are
phrased
or
intended
to
be
like
get
in
where
you
fit
in
right.
P
Cats
is
on
there,
so
it
just
kind
of
answers
the
question
of
like
create
free
transportation
and
we
we
have
vehicles
that
go
all
over
the
city
anyway.
So
it's
it's
I
know
this
is
a
very
I
know
it's
more
complicated
than
that,
but
we
kind
of
have
the
answer.
There,
I'm
saying
exactly
I'm
reading
I'm
reading
it
as
that
yeah.
J
C
U
Cass
is
just
a
partner,
can
you
oh,
my
God?
Can
you
go
through
strategy?
Two
I
just
want
to
know
the
dollar.
Sorry.
M
O
J
M
M
U
That
just
real
quick,
yes
strategy,
too
just
yeah
it's
as
we
have
had
an
experience
in
trying
to
develop
a
mobile.
You
know,
unit,
I,
I,
think
the
dollar
signs
should
should
be
increasing
that
one
and
probably
decrease
in
the
number
one.
U
You
know
in
the
the
one
that
said,
create
a
directory
and
then
they
create
a
mobile
arts
and
culture
program
it
it.
It
takes.
That's
my
suggestion:
it
takes
not
only
device,
and
you
know
what
are
we
talking
about
in
terms
of
mobile
units,
but
if
we're
talking
about
Performing
Arts,
there's
an
infrastructure
that
will
be
required,
that
will
cost
some
money,
and
then
you
know,
programming
and
so
on
and
so
forth.
It's
just
a
larger
amount
of
money
than
what
I
think
we
are
envisioning
or
referring
to.
There
bless.
M
M
K
M
Q
I
had
a
question
about
priority
for
strategy.
Three.
Q
Q
Q
Q
Guess
my
question
is:
right,
like
we
say,
prioritize
local
artists,
yes,
but
that
doesn't
necessarily
mean
it's
going
to
be
inclusive,
too
right
or
diverse
and
who
is
who
is
prioritized?
So
how
can
we
be
intentional
about
that
in
this
particular
strategy?
I
guess
is
my
question.
I
don't
have
a
necessary
have
an
answer
to
it,
but
I'm
just
posing
that.
C
C
M
We
have
problems,
yeah
I,
don't
know
priority
for
it.
We
well
Joanne,
so
you're
a
co-chair,
sorry
I'm,
putting
you
on
the
spot.
That's
because
your
co-chair
of
this
task
force.
C
N
N
O
Q
I
think
the
answer
she
stood
out
to
me:
that's
all
it
just
it
really
just
stood
out
to
me
and
and
I
think.
What
really
spark
did
was
a
situation
that
I
saw
online
too,
where
someone
an
organization,
was
really
excited
about
posting,
how
they
they
prioritized
local
artists,
but
it
was
two
white
local
artists
and
then
someone
chimed
in
and
was
like.
Well,
when
do
I
was
a
Latino
whatever
whatever
it
was
just
it
was
a
whole
big
thing,
whatever
I
just
was
observing
it
right.
Oh
yes,
that's
true!
N
Again,
I
think
when
we,
when
we
say
local
artists,
we
are
very
intentionally
inclusive
about
all
of
our
local
artists.
So
if
that
that
is
the
intention
of
it
just
to
make
sure
we
serve
local.
P
As
far
as
Leaders
or
potential
Partners
I
don't
see
any
theater.
Where
is
on
here.
P
This
we're
talking
about
priority
for
strategy.
One
is
that
right
leaders.
P
M
But
so,
but
actually.
P
M
M
C
Y
I'm,
so
sorry,
we're
like
whoa
I
want
to
talk
about
what
we're
talking
about
right
now
and
all
I
wanted
to
say
was.
Would
we
take
the
auditing
body
whatever
we
want
to
call
it
and
put
it
as
a
partner
or
leader
inside
of
this
one,
therefore,
and
then
make
two.
You
know
some
sort
of
reference
that
I
mean
I
was
trying
to
think.
If
you
could
put
a
little
star
reference,
you
know
C
priority
number
three.
You
know
as
it
relates
to
this
or
something
like
that.
But
if
you
have
that
body.
O
M
And
to
maybe
add
to
that,
like
yes,
auditing
body
as
a
partner
and
then
I
think,
there's
also
the
governance
structure
that
has
The
Advisory
groups
that
also
focus
on
making
sure
that
priority
three
happens.
So
I
don't
know
if
we
would
want
to
put
that
as
a
partner
or
a
leader
for
this,
because
both
things
are
part
of
priority.
Three.
M
F
Hold
on
before
we
do
that,
can
we
actually,
we
talked
about
local
or
sorry
churches
that
we're
going
to
use
houses
of
worship
to
be
more
inclusive
of
religion.
Q
C
K
Ahead
before
we
move
on
for
priority
four:
are
we
still
on
priority
four
still
on
priority
four?
Okay,
a
couple
of
things:
pre
I,
don't
know
if
you
got
the
written
comments
that
I
submitted
today,
no.
K
Makes
sense
a
couple
of
the
things:
I'm
not
I'm,
not
talking
about
anything
little
minor
things,
but
the
the
ones
that,
where
I
suggested
language
changes,
it
might
be
helpful
to
just
pull
it
up.
Joy
I,
don't
know
if
you
want
to
pull
it
up
because
well
so
priority
number
four
that
I
think
we
need
to
reword
the
outcomes.
K
This
will
help
like
what
are
we.
What
are
we
saying?
This
will
help
my
suggestion
to
make
it
sound,
like
an
outcome,
was
to
say,
prioritized
art
spaces
and
facilities
for
local
artists,
so
basically,
which.
M
So
it's
the
same
one
if
you
guys
look
up
at
this
screen
and
I'm
just
highlighting
in
Gray
right
the
section,
the
phrase
that
Nick
is
talking
about
change.
K
Two
to
four
so
probably
at
the
very
beginning
there
so
prioritize
art
spaces
of
facilities
for
local
artists.
Oh
okay,.
Q
I
K
No
to
display
and
curate
artistic
work
so
change
there
to
Artistic.
So
you
saying
who
it
is
that
you're
talking
about
that,
would
directly
engage
artists
so
take
out
them
and
make
it
artists.
B
G
M
P
M
Okay,
let's
shall
we
add
I,
know
well,
yeah
and
I
think
what
I'm,
let's
see
Joanne
you
can
confirm
or
correct.
This
I
think
this
list,
you
guys
were
thinking
you're
thinking
of
folks
that
currently
have
space
so
meaning
existing
spaces,
and
so
should
we
Milani
saying,
let's
add
some
existing
theater
spaces.
P
No,
just
people
who
are
I
know
what
the
intention
is,
and
that's
not
what
the
the
problem
is.
It's
just
the
when
we
like
are
listing
leaders
and
potential
Partners
I
know
that
folks
from
the
theater
local
theater
are
going
to
be
like
where,
where
are
we
in
here
yeah.
D
The
office
Center
has
got
multiple,
you
got,
you
got
at
least
two
theater
companies
inside
Papa.
N
I
I
understand
what
you're
saying,
though
you
want
to
microphone.
N
I
I,
do
understand
what
she's
saying,
and
maybe
that
is
something
we
can.
We
can
kind
of
add
in
there
because
you're
saying
that
you
need
organizations
to
partner
with
that
have
space
that
can
accommodate
right
that
can
accommodate
bringing
in
other
theater
groups
or
supporting
other
theater
groups.
Well,.
P
M
Yeah
can
is
this
okay,
I've
also
I
figure
if,
while
we're
noticing
theaters
missing
so
was
dance
and
we
also
have
dance
spaces.
In
addition
to
I
know,
there
are
other
dance
organizations
that
have
spaces
too.
So,
if
we're
adding
do
do,
does
do
these
two
bullet
points
that
are
new.
Do
they
capture
the
thought.
V
S
M
M
N
M
V
Going
back
to
what
melody
was
saying,
so
what
was
the
decision
about
ensuring
that
you
know
the
historically
marginalized
communities.
O
O
There
was
a
change
that
was
adding
boom
to
the
list
of
performance,
I'm,
sorry
to
potential
Partners.
So.
O
O
G
O
That
answers
the
question
of
what
the
auditing
body
is,
so
in
your
last
now
mind
you
I
would
love
for
those
to
speak
to
it,
but
I
might
what
we
understood
this
to
be
is
defining,
because
this
is
a
body
that
doesn't
yet
defines
what.
M
Right,
maybe
we
just
leave
it
as
auditing
body
and
I
think
the
description
around
it,
given
how
we've
addressed
some
other
things
could
be
addressed
as
a
footnote
on
this
page,
where
the
definition
appears
does
that
work
for
this
task
force
Yeah,
so
basically
up
here,
I
think
we
could
put
it
up
here
where
auditing
body
first
appears
in
the
strategy
statement.
Okay,.
Y
M
M
That's
I
will
defer
to
the
the
task
force
to
to
share
with
us
to
answer
that
question.
Second,.
AA
Y
Y
AA
Y
Y
V
Wasn't
even
there
before
yeah
so
yeah?
No,
you
know
we
kind
of
struggle
with
groups
which
already
have
pretty
diverse.
You
know
that
was
programming
or
membership
or
you
know
server,
diverse
Community,
but
yeah.
This
is
no
way
comprehensive
list,
but
yeah,
but
the
idea
is
to
partner
with
organizations
already
doing
the
work.
M
Appropriate
right,
maybe
I,
would
suggest
along
those
lines.
It's
one
bullet
that
is
Grassroots
arts
and
culture
organizations
and
in
parenthesis,
if
there
are
some
representative
organizations
that
are
on
this
list
and
others,
because
we
get
into
a
very
tricky
space,
there's
no
way,
we
could
possibly
name
all
the
organizations.
But
we
are
trying
I
think
what
I
get
a
sense
of
is
that
you're
trying
to
give
a
flavor,
but
we
we
can't,
which
I
provide
I,
understand.
AA
Yeah
I
feel
like
I,
don't
want
to
be
like
in
five
years
like
well.
You
guys
were
not
in
that
original
list,
like
we've
already
been
curious,
like
how
did
the
Thrive
organizations
right
get
in
and
so
I'm
bringing
it
up.
I
represent
the
Guild
of
Charlotte
artists,
the
artist
group
and
we're
kind
of
Grassroots
we're
encompassing
we're
local
we've
been
around
so
yeah.
That's
why
I'm
bringing
it
up
so
so,
if
we.
Q
M
M
C
E
V
O
V
So
yeah
I
know
you
know
I
think
I
think
that's
a
great
point,
but
you
know
I
think
in
our
strategy.
Three,
you
know
we
are
what
you're
suggesting
is
to
always
kind
of
do
a
survey
of
the
ecosystem
and
make
sure
that
you
know
we
are
always
discovering
and
including
organizations
that
have
been
left
out.
So
one
of
one
of
the
main
things
you
are
proposing
is
to
make
sure
that
you
know
it's
not
the
same
few
people
who
always
gets
included.
N
V
Interested
I
think
we
already
that's
what
is
one
of
our
priorities
or
one
of
our
strategies
already
I
mean
I,
think
it's
strategy,
three
right,
forgetting
the
numbers.
O
V
AA
AA
M
Well,
I
I,
don't
know
about
so
Kevin
I
think
the
amendment
to
that
is
they're
yeah
they're,
specific
none
of
the
other
lists
are
this
long
in
terms
of
specific
organizations
so
they're.
It's
true
that
we
have
name
specific
organizations
throughout
the
document,
but
a
lot
of
those
are
literally.
Those
organizations
are.
AA
T
Can
I
ask
a
quick
question,
just
a
clarification
question
so
is
the
intent?
These
are
organizations
that
we
can
point
to
that
are
doing.
Some
of
this
work
is
that
what
the
potential
Partners
yes.
P
Stop
I
mean,
let's
add
your
group
or
some
of
the
groups
and
then
add
also
a
footnote.
It
says,
and
this
is
not
and
like
the
com,
you
know
this
will
like.
E
The
whole
document,
too,
is
suggestions,
we've
put
people
down
as
leaders
and
and
partners
without
having
to
do
asking
them.
So
all
of
this
is
a
suggestion
you
know,
but
it,
but
it
has
to
have
that
necessary
meat
on
the
bone,
because
if
we
just
said
people
will
lead,
the
next
question
is
who's.
Who
are
those
people
so
and.
AA
AA
M
G
O
AA
Must
be
already
CLT
and
the
Guild
of
Charlotte
artists.
E
Did
last
thing
why
why
are
City
of
Charlotte
in
the
county?
I
should
have
noticed
it
before
why
they
have
computers
and
partners.
M
Of
Charlotte
and
Mecklenburg
County
they're,
showing
up
in
both
places
most
of
the
most
of
the
document
we've
they
really
an
organization
needs
to
only
be
in
one
column
or
the
other.
They
don't
need
to
appear
in
both
leaders
and
partners.
Right,
so
I
would
suggest.
If
the
group
is
okay,
we
can
remove
them
from
partners
and
leave
them
in
leaders,
because
this
is
about
a
growth
front.
O
O
Strategy
that
actually
was
it
is
priority
number
two
strategy
number
three:
it
is
listed
in
the
advanced
in
chapter
five,
but
it
was
deleted
from
when
we
are
accepting
from
the
implementation
plan.
So
you
see
it
in
front
of
me.
The
business
strategy
number
three
shifts
the
decision
making
for
funding
direction
of
the
Arts
sector
to
be
more
inclusive
and
transparent,
so
that
strategy
number
three.
M
Right,
it's
not
in
that
one
yeah.
So
this
is
one.
We
noticed
that
in
the
in
the
last
version,
when
we're
finalizing
things,
we
accidentally
deleted
this,
but
so
to
refresh
everyone's
memory.
This
was
agreed
upon
at
the
end
of
the
August
22nd
Steering
group
meeting,
the
Steering
group
agreed
to
move
this
strategy,
which
had
been
previously
under
the
Equitable
support
priority
to
move
it
under
strata
a
priority.
Two
excuse
me
to
create
that
stronger
link
between
priority
two
and
the
equity
activities.
K
Go
right
ahead.
All
right
number
strategy,
number
one,
one,
two,
three
four
fifth
outcome
bullet
I
have
no
idea
what
that
is
is
trying
to
say.
Maybe
you
can
help
me
with
that
yeah
there
you
go
so
that
one
shorter.
M
Meant
so
that
means
that
the
because
the
model
is
leveraging
existing
entities,
it
will
take
less
time
to
establish
that.
C
K
M
O
AB
AB
K
M
C
C
M
Existing
I
think
well
I,
just
I
just
to
go
back
to
the
I
think
the
reason
the
task
force
said
that
and
I
think
I'm
going
back
to
I
think
something
Bob
that
you
had
mentioned
in
the
task
force.
Conversations
is
I,
think
that
gets
to
this
piece
about
the
leader
and
support
staff,
which
were
like
some
of
the
gaps
I'm
just
saying
I.
Think
that's.
Why
I
think?
That's
why
the
task
force
included
that
language
but
I
feel.
K
M
K
W
Yeah
on
strategy,
two
in
number,
two
and
three
I
thought
and
again
I
missed
a
meeting,
so
maybe
it
got
changed
back.
We
had
said
that
the
word
centering
was
not
what
we
wanted.
M
Centering,
it's!
If
you
look
up
here,
it's
in
Gray,
where
my
cursor
is
right.
C
M
M
We
can
change
the
word.
Do
you
remember
what.
C
W
Because
I
wasn't
here
for
that
one:
that's
why
it's
possible
that
the
the
task
force
decided
to
go
back
but
I
think
the
discussion
was
that
that
was
too
strong.
It
kind
of
implied
that
that
was
the
be
all
end-all
and
so
I
think
that
there
ought
to
be
a
word
that
definitely
says
equities
got
to
be
part
of
the
consideration,
but
it
shouldn't
imply
that
that's
that
the
center
of
the
universe.
Q
L
P
I'm
trying
to
remember
I
think
our
our
group
is
very
much
wanting
that
we
Center
it
is
about
I
mean
maybe
I'm
suggesting
you
know.
This
is
again.
This
is
the
vision
and
the
and
the
boldness
that
we
want
to
Express
right
and
it's
not
just
a
suggestion
like
hey.
P
Maybe
if
we
can
include
it,
but
it
is
in
in
our
eyes,
front
and
center
for
a
sustainable
plan
for
the
next
10
to
20
years,
and
so
I
I,
don't
I
I,
don't
know
I
mean
like
the
rest
of
the
folks
out
there.
Our
group
doesn't
see
it
too
strong,
like
it's
not
like
a
strong
like
we're,
not
overbearing
I.
E
V
Q
W
Q
C
It
so
let
me
I'm
trying
to
go
back
because
I
remember
the
discussion
we
had
and
I
thought
we
and
David
I,
don't
know
if
you
can
help
me
on
this
I
thought
we
left
centering
in
there
and
also
wanted
to
add
the
footnote
about
number
three,
because
neither
one
of
those
were
in
there
I
thought
in
the
beginning.
Now
someone
got
to
help
I,
don't
know
if
you
remember
I.
AB
M
AB
O
C
W
Remember
the
way
that
that
came
about
is
Priya
gave
us
a
draft,
and
it
was
her
word
and
that
when
we
discussed
it,
she
said
well,
I
don't
feel
strongly
about
the
word
and
we
just
discussed
going
in
another
direction
again.
I
want
Equity
there.
I
don't
want
anybody
to
mistake
that
okay,
but
you
can
read
that
as
saying
hey,
we
don't
we
really
care
more
about
the
distribution
using.
W
V
W
Know
Equity
is
one
of
those
charged
words
but
I'm
not
arguing
about
the
equity
word.
I
I
just
think
centering
is
too
strong
and
honestly,
if
I'm
in
the
minority
go
for
it,
I
mean
I'm,
not
gonna,
I'm.
M
Trying
to
go
back
to
that
asking
task
force
to
those
conver
going
back
to
the
conversation
you're
talking
about
David
and
Bob
I'm
thinking
was
it
that
we
added
in
diversity
and
inclusion.
Does
that
sound?
Is
that
ringing
a
bell
I
I?
Remember
there
being
some
conversation
where
we
I
think
we
may
have
talked
about
diversity,
Equity
inclusion
was,
did
we
expand?
The
phrase
is
that
what
happened
there
I'm.
W
Just
also
trying
to
write
I,
don't
I,
don't
remember,
because
it
was
at
the
toward
the
end
of
the
meeting
and
we
were
trying
to
get
the
structure
together,
but
again,
I
don't
want
to
I
I.
Don't
want
to
spend
a
lot
of
time
we're
already
over
I.
Don't
want
to
spend
a
lot
of
time
if,
if
I'm,
the
only
person
who
feels
that
way,
let's
go
go
forward,
go
to
one
really.
Q
Quickly,
you
might
not
be-
and
they
just
not
say
anything
but
centering
only
shows
up
twice
throughout
this
entire
30
40,
something
page
document
right
and
so
I
think
it's
important
that
it
sets
the
tone.
This
is
priority.
One
is
that
correct
priority,
two
yeah:
it
sets
the
tone
because
yeah,
yes,
Equity,
the
word
Equity
can
be
very
uncomfortable
for
people
right
and
that's.
Okay
and
that's.
Okay,
I
think
that
removing
centering.
Q
Q
We
want
to
ensure
and
coordinate
ongoing
delivery
of
Equitable,
accessible
and
inclusive
funding,
so
I'm
not
sure
if
removing
centering
changes
anything
per
se
but
I
also
don't
think
that
it
adds
I,
don't
I,
don't
know
what
I'm
trying
to
say:
I
just
I,
don't
know,
I
think
that
what
I
would
say
in
my
work
is:
let's
sit
with
with
it
being
uncomfortable
and
understand
and
figure
out
why
it's
uncomfortable
for
us.
Y
T
Was
just
gonna
say
I,
think
of
when
we're
thinking
of
centering
Equity
I
think
that's
the
north
star.
That
is
how
we
want
to
think
about
this
framework,
and
it
doesn't
it.
In
my
opinion,
it's
not
either
or
it's
both
and
and
by
really
thinking
about
how
we
send
her
equity
and
lean
into
that.
We
can
make
this
ecosystem
even
stronger
in
the
future,
especially
when
it
relies
on
funding
and
capacity
building.
It.
Q
B
V
W
X
X
The
focus
is
ours,
the
focus,
of
course
Equity
is
all
over,
but
the
when
you
when
we
use
the
word
Center,
it
basically
focuses
that
is
your
primary
focus
is
how
the
translation
is
so
as
long
as
we
leave
the
equity
in
there
and
then
not
use
the
word
Center.
That
means
everything
is
centered
around
it
and
I
think
that
is
where
the
misconceptions
of
the
award
will
be
used.
X
O
I
think
you
just
actually
came
up
with.
Do
you
mind
repeating
one
more
time
what
you
just
said,
what.
X
B
X
W
Q
P
C
W
W
C
Like
occurred
over
the
over
there,
so
we're
fine
with
the
word
Focus,
with
a
focus
on
equity
versus
the
word
Center
and
the
thinking
at
least
my
thinking,
I
think
I.
Think
they're
with
the
word
sinner
I,
see
multiple
definitions
of
that
around
here,
which
I,
don't
think
will
create
the
clarity
and
the
importance
of
equity.
C
I.
Think
the
word
Focus
is
a
much
clearer
word
in
terms
of
the
intention
that
we're
trying
to
do
I,
I'm
concerned.
The
word
Center
would
not
give
it
the
importance
that
we
were
trying
to
give
it.
When
we
talked
about
this
I
think
the
word
Focus
gives
us
more
clarity
at
least
gives
me
more
clarity
in
terms
of
it.
So.
L
C
L
L
Okay,
are
you
counting
yeah.
Q
Q
C
R
C
We
get
consensus
on
the
word
prioritize.
L
B
O
AB
L
N
L
Guys
might
get
the
words
we're
all
okay,
we've
got
enough
votes
on
prioritizing
word
priorities;
okay,
so
so
here's
where
so,
let's
talk
about
where
we
are
about
it,
because
I
think
people
starting
to
walk
out
the
door
yeah
yeah
and
we
were
hoping
we
would
finish
this
tonight,
but
I
understand
that
people
need
to.
L
So
maybe
we
should
ask
the
question
Joy
about
one
and
see
how
much
conversation
we
think
we
need
to
have
on
one.
Are
we
done
with
two
yeah
everybody's
okay
on
two?
Okay:
let's
see
what
we
need
on
one,
because
if
we
need
a
lot
of
time,
we're
going
to
have
to
we're
gonna
have
to
pun,
we're
gonna
have
to
punt
and
meet
again.
L
O
So
on
one
we
actually
did
not
receive
any
substantive
changes.
The
of
the
changes
were
around
kind
of
spellings
and
moving
acronyms.
L
Okay,
so
let
me
ask
you
before
people
start
leaving,
because
we
really
would
like
to
vote
on
this
tonight.
Anybody
have
anything
that
gives
them
heartburn
on
one
I'm
hearing
an
absence
of
anything
that
bothers
so
so
can
we
go
forward
on
one
as
it
stands?
Is
everybody
okay
with
that
thumbs
up?
Okay,
okay!
L
So
now
we'd
like
to
have
a
motion
to
support
this
plan
with
the
steering
committee
here,
but
The
Advisory
board
has
to
be
the
ones
that
do
the
vote,
so
we
need
every
Advisory
Board
member
to
vote
on
this.
Is
anybody
on
the
steering
committee
have
any
other
input
because
then
The
Advisory
Board
does
have
to
vote
to
make
this
real.
C
Just
for
clarity
for
the
steering
committee
for
steering
committee
folks
is
that
since
we're
a
quasi-government
body,
the
the
actual
Advisory
board
has
to
vote,
and
that's
so
we're
not
being
rude.
We're
just
kind
of
trying
to
go
through
this
process
versus
you
know.
Julia
will
kick
us
out
if
we
don't
do
this.
L
So
I
want
to
thank
everybody.
This
has
been
a
Monumental
evening.
Yes,
it's
not
over
we'll
be
meeting
again.
Thank
you.
L
So,
thank
you
particularly
the
steering
commitment.
C
C
And
just
you're
going
to
throw
up
the
chart
real,
quick
on
what's
next
I
think
as
people
are
getting
ready
to
get
up
and
leave,
but
but
again,
I
also
want
to
thank
you
and
understand
that
this
is
really
not
the
end.
It's
more
the
beginning.
It's
a
lot
of
work
to
be
done
so
go
through
that
real,
quick.
M
Yep,
so
next,
after
today,
as
a
Cindy
was
saying
with
the
lore
team,
we
will
finish
well,
we'll
obviously
Implement
those
things
that
we
just
agreed
to
today,
the
ones
that
still
remain
doing
graphic
design,
creating
that
executive
summary,
which
will
be
similar
to
what
we
did
for
the
state
of
culture
report,
the
short
version,
that's
kind
of
easier
to
digest,
and
then
the
exact
timing
of
then
presenting
this
to
council
is
a
little
bit
TBD
we're
working
with
the
manager
on
what
that
timing
is,
but
we
anticipate
that
it
will
likely
happen
soon
in
in
October.
M
M
7Th-
oh
sorry
about
that.
Thank
you.
It
is
October
17th
yeah,
sorry!
This
is
on
the
printout
of
when
the
next
Our
advice,
Advisory
board
meeting.
Thank
you.
Okay,.
C
H
M
O
M
C
A
C
N
G
R
G
O
M
M
B
O
Right
but,
for
example,
there's
one
thing
that
I
when
that
whole
priority
six
language
that
we
moved
and
then
you
encouraged
them
blah
blah
blah,
yeah
I,
think
you
did
it
appropriately,
where
you
added
a
new
strategy,
yeah
action,
but
an
actions
right
into
action.
I
think
he
did
that
appropriately,
but.
A
B
E
G
B
O
But
anyway
it
seems
like
I
think
I
could
do
some
time.
O
M
Okay,
great
job,
thank
you.
Do
you
want
to
have
a
debrief
tomorrow
or
Not
Just.