►
From YouTube: City of Charlotte Zoning Meeting - November 18, 2019
Description
Full zoning meeting of the Charlotte City Council from November 18th, 2019.
A
B
A
Note
that
we
have
several
vacant
seats
tonight,
I
think
that
this
change
in
weather
has
been
tough
on
a
number
of
our
colleagues
and
so
they're
out
tonight.
So
we
will
have
a
few
things
that
will
be
paying
more
attention
to,
because
I
want
everyone
to
be
aware
of
our
rules
of
procedure
in
our
and
the
case
of
anything
to
be
approved,
it
requires
six
votes,
and
so
when
we
have
four
people
missing
and
seven
around
the
Dyess,
you
know
that
that
means
that
six
still
have
to
on
vote.
It's
not
a
majority.
A
It's
not
that
we
have
where,
as
long
as
you
have
a
majority
of
those
present,
it
requires
that
we
have
six
votes.
So
in
some
cases
we
will
be
looking
to
make
sure
that
we
followed
our
own
rules
about
that.
So
with
that
I'd
like
for
us
to
think
a
moment
about
what's
coming
up,
our
council
does
not
require
or
ask
that
you
decide
to
work
with
us
when
we
are
trying
to
solemnize
our
proceedings
through
pair
prayer
or
expression
of
thought,
and
this
evening.
A
I
would
like
to
do
that
before
we
have
our
Pledge
of
Allegiance,
which
I'd
like
for
everyone
to
stand
as
we
go
through
the
Pledge
of
Allegiance,
but
we're
beginning
on
the
seasons
of
Thanksgiving
and
tomorrow
is
giving
Tuesday
in
this
city,
and
there
are
so
many
people
in
our
city
that
haven't
had
the
chance
to
participate
in
the
economy
in
a
way
that
allows
them
to
have
a
place.
That's
warm
to
sleep,
but
they
can
go
to
our
children,
have
where
our
children
have
books
in
their
bedrooms
and
parents
to
read
to
them.
A
Many
of
our
agencies
that
provide
food
and
substance
to
those
that
do
not
have
the
ability
to
have
it
so
on
this
time,
as
we
think
about
what's
coming
ahead,
I'd
like
for
all
of
us
to
understand
gratitude
means
not
only
being
grateful
for
ourselves
with
being
responsible
for
allowing
others
to
experience
that
same
opportunity
for
gratefulness
and
as
a
city.
We
often
do
it,
but
this
time
reach
a
little
bit
deeper,
do
a
little
bit
more.
So
I
would
appreciate
any
thoughts
that
you
can
give
to
that.
J
K
A
You
so
tonight
is
our
zoning
meeting
a
heavily
prescribed
methods
that
we
have
to
address
the
issues
of
land
use
in
our
city,
so
tonight
we're
going
to
have
applications
that
have
been
submitted
to
the
planning
staff
for
review,
and
there
are
two
types
of
items
on
our
agenda.
We
have
decisions
and
our
hearings
on
decisions
or
cases
where
we've
already
had
a
public
hearing.
A
The
zoning
committee
has
made
a
recommendation
to
the
council
and
we
are
voting,
and
so
there's
no
one
signed
up
to
speak
during
that
time,
but
on
the
items
that
would
be
separate
items
that
we
have
are
the
hearings
and
on
our
hearings.
I
hope.
Anyone
that
wishes
to
speak
has
already
had
a
opportunity
to
come
down
and
sign
up
with
miss
Kelly.
If
you
haven't,
please
come
down
and
I'll
keep
talking,
while
you're
filling
out
your
paperwork.
A
What
we
have
when
we
have
a
hearing
is
that
there's
a
staff
presentation
on
the
petition
that
has
been
presented,
the
petitioner
and
those
in
favor
get
three
minutes
to
present
an
argument
for
the
petition
unless
we
have
people
that
are
against
the
petition
sign
up
to
speak.
If
there
is
staff,
opposition
or
people
that
opponents
that
are
signed
up,
the
petitioner
gets
ten
minutes.
Those
expressing
opposition
gets
ten
minutes
and
the
petitioner
gets
a
two-minute
rebuttal
to
either
the
staff
or
to
the
opponents
that
are
signed
up.
A
We
have
tonight
on
rezoning
petition,
2019
o-72,
a
person
signed
up
against
that
on
petition,
2019
0
8
8.
Again
there
is
someone
in
opposition
to
that
petition.
2019
0,
9
8
a
petition
one
that
I'm
most
concerned
about
agenda
item
32
petition,
2019
106.
We
have
8
people
signed
up
against
that
petition,
and
that
is
a
hearing.
A
A
We
also
look
at
our
decision
times
and
we
usually
find
about
10:00
or
10:30
that
if
we
haven't
gotten
to
your
item
that
we
would
delay
that
until
the
next
at
another
date
and
so
we'll
look
at
that
and
see
where
we
stand.
I'm
encouraged
that
we
can
get
through
the
entire
agenda
tonight.
So,
let's
think
positive
thoughts
about
being
able
to
finish
everything.
A
That's
in
our
meeting
at
this
time,
I'd
like
to
actually
introduce
our
zoning
committee,
which
is
a
committee
of
appointed
citizens
that
are
part
of
our
Planning
Commission
and
it's
established
in
a
way
that
they
have.
They
advise
us
on
decisions
that
on
the
hearings
that
are
being
asked
for,
and
they
give
us
their
recommendation.
This
time,
I'd
like
to
talk
with
our
zoning
committee,
chair,
Sam
Spencer,
and
ask
him
to
introduce
his
committee.
Thank.
L
You
very
much,
madam
mayor,
thank
you.
Marin
Thank,
You
council
I
am
Sam
Spencer,
chairman
of
the
zoning
committee
of
the
Planning
Commission,
allow
me
to
introduce
my
fellow
committee
members,
Cosi
Watkins
Phillip
Gusman
Victoria,
wasa,
K,
Foyle
and
McClung
Nancy
Wiggins
and
John
Hamm.
The
zoning
committee
will
meet
Tuesday
December
3rd
at
5:30
p.m.
here
at
the
Government
Center.
At
that
meeting,
the
zoning
committee
will
meet
to
discuss
and
make
recommendations
on
the
petitions
that
have
public
hearings
tonight.
The
public
is
welcome
at
that
meeting.
L
But
please
note
it
is
not
a
continuation
of
the
public
hearing
is
being
held
here
tonight.
Prior
to
that
meeting,
you
are
welcome
to
contact
us
to
provide
input.
You
can
find
our
contact
information
and
information
on
each
petition
on
the
city's
website
at
Charlotte
planning,
org,
Thank,
You
America.
Thank.
A
You,
sir,
with
that,
when
we
get
our
agenda
the
week
prior
to
tonight,
we
are
confined.
There
are
changes
that
are
requested,
and
so
we
have
several
deferrals
and
I'm
gonna
read
and
ask
our
council
to
vote
to
approve
the
list
of
deferrals
that
we
have
and
these
deferrals
do.
We
have
to
do
the
decisions
and
hearings
in
one
motion.
You
could
do
them.
A
If
you
came
for
any
of
these
items
that
I
talked
about,
or
here
the
number
of
the
petition
feel
free
to
know
that
you
can
go
home
and
watch
some
football
or
something
like
that.
Okay,
the
first
item
for
deferral
to
December,
16th,
I'm
gonna
read
the
first
four
items:
I
deferred
until
December
the
16th.
The
first
one
is
petitioned:
2019,
100,
Matt,
Connelly,
Pike,
Partners.
Llc.
A
Next
item
is
item:
11
2019
0,
71,
FH,
sunset,
Road,
LLC,
the
3rd
2019
0,
90
Culp,
wrote
materials
deferral
and
that
the
last
deferral
until
dese
of
decisions
until
the
December
of
16th
is
2019
0
9
for
Andrew
Parker.
The
next
two
decisions
are
being
deferred
to
the
next
Monday
meeting
of
the
council:
November
the
25th
2019
0
97
ardent
acquisitions
and
2019
0
9
9
pounds
Moser.
Those
decisions
again
will
be
heard
on
DS
November,
the
25th.
K
B
A
Adopt
the
deferrals
any
discussion
on
any
of
them
hearing
no
discussions
all
in
favor
say
aye
any
opposed.
Okay.
Now
that
means
that
we're
going
to
begin
with
our
decisions,
council
votes
again
and
I
tell
you.
It
takes
six
approvals
to
adopt
or
take
action,
and
we
also
follow
the
army
state
requirements
that
we
also
approve
or
adopt
the
action
of
the
change
in
zoning.
But
we
also
approve
the
zoning
committee
statement
of
consistency
that
we
will
have
on
the
screen
that
you
will
see
as
well.
A
We
will
see
on
our
monitors
so
the
first
item
that
I
have
for
a
decision
is
agenda.
Item
number
five
am
I
on
the
right
page,
let's
see
by
Harper
communities
for
approximately
1.7
acres
in
district
3
on
South
Tryon
Street,
the
current
zoning
is
single-family
residential
eight
units
and
mixed-use
development
conditional.
The
proposed
zoning
is
urban
residential,
conditional
rezoning
committee
and
the
staff
recommend.
Approval
of
this
petition.
Do
I,
have
a
motion
to
approve
the
petitioner
adopt
the
zoning
committee
statement
of
consistent.
A
We
have
a
motion
and
a
second
is
there
any
discussion
hearing
no
discussion.
All
in
favor,
please
raise
your
hands
any
opposed,
that's
unanimous
of
r7.
The
next
item
is
item
number
six,
and
this
is
petition:
number
2019,
zero,
zero,
nine
by
Joseph
Rhodes
for
approximately
16
acres
on
the
east
side
of
a
DS
Ford
Road
in
district
2.
The
current
zoning
is
single-family
residential
in
the
general
business
and
the
proposed
zoning
is
multi-family
conditional
on
the
zoning
committee.
A
I'm
recommended
approval
of
this
petition
and
the
staff
as
well,
but
there
have
been
some
changes
to
the
petition
that
occurred
since
the
zoning
committee
vote,
and
so
what
we
do
as
a
council
is
decide
whether
or
not
we
should
send
that
back
to
the
zoning
committee
or
if
the
changes
were
in
did
not
require
a
substantial
change
in
the
position
recommended
by
the
Zoning
Commission.
So
may
I
have
a
motion
on
a
petition
for
this
one
to
that
it
was
not
sufficient
change
that.
O
I
A
G
B
A
J
A
A
G
Thank
You
mayor
so
first
I
know
many
council
members
have
gotten
some
emails
from
text.
We've
got
a
petition
in
front
of
us
here
from
the
community.
Any
community
members
are
here
tonight.
Petitioner
is
also
here
tonight.
This
is
a
petition
we
had
a
hearing
on
back
in
June,
we've
deferred
this
petition
four
or
five
times
on
through
the
summer
in
the
early
part
of
the
fall
I'll
be
Franklin
this.
When
this
petition
came
to
hearing
it
was,
it
was
half-baked
at
the
time.
G
In
my
opinion,
on
it
was
mentioned
at
the
hearing,
we've
had
a
couple
community
meetings.
Six
since
then,
and
I
commend
the
community
for
being
involved
at
that
point.
To
really
start,
you
know
asking
the
right
questions
and
kind
of
halting
some
of
our
slowing
down
the
process
a
bit
to
understand
what
was
coming
to
this
part
of
a
DS
Ford
Road.
G
There
were
some
requests
from
the
community
on
some
around
language
around
limiting.
Was
this
going
to
be
a
for
sale,
community
or
for
rent
community
and
limiting
language,
including
language
about
short
or
long
term?
Rentals
I
do
I,
didn't
know
the
developers
it
added
in
in
bullet
point
I
under
architectural
standards,
about
limiting
the
long
term
rentals
to
six
months
and
below,
with
the
understanding
that
our
legal
capacity
kind
of
goes
to
that
extent,
and
we
can't
I
can't
know
what
a
future
HOA
might
do
in
this
development.
G
Another
other
concerns
about
traffic
Beatty's
forward
is
kind
of
a
parallel
to
77
for
folks
coming
out
of
the
northern
part
of
the
county,
I
appreciate
the
developer,
adding
some
improvements
along
Beatty's
Ford
on
their
site,
frontage,
not
just
for
turn
lanes
and
for
widening
of
roads
to
help
couple
with
what
we're
trying
to
have
make
with
some
city
investments
around
sidewalk
improvements.
I
know,
that's
the
community's
concerns
about
business
and
then
part
of
this
being
already
zoned
for
business
has
not
been
addressed.
There's
no
business
or
retail
component.
G
In
this
there
were
no
renderings
in
the
original
site
plan.
We've
got
five
site
plan
amendments
and
revisions.
Later
we've
got
some
renderings
that
show
some
design
intent.
Appreciative
of
that
there's
concern
about
guest
parking,
there's
always
concerned
about
parking
in
this
city,
and
so
therefore,
I
feel
we've
kind
of
tried
to
find
some
middle
ground
here
with
the
community
and
with
the
developer.
The
clubhouse
was,
in
my
opinion,
the
last
sticking
point.
G
G
I
feel
that
over
many
many
months,
many
deferrals
many
we've
sent
this
back
to
zoning
committee
twice
already
multiple
site
plan
revisions
that
this
is
this
128
townhomes
wild,
dense,
I,
think
some
of
this
density
will
help
support
the
need
and
recruitment
for
other
some
of
the
desired
retail
and
commercial
use,
particularly
as
this
site
is
just
a
little
bit
up
from
lady's
floor
and
sunset,
a
large
commercial
corner.
So
that's
my
intent
to
support
it
and
why
I'm
recommending
approval
tonight,
understanding
that
and
I
want
to
be
clear.
E
P
P
There's
there's
no
commitment
on
a
square
footage
to
the
clubhouse
that
they've
they
just
put
it
they've
committed
to
construct
one.
They
haven't
committed
to
a
square
footage
that
probably
didn't
under
no
exactly
what
size
they
would
potentially
build,
but
they
don't
have
a
commitment
to
an
actual
size
just
that
they
would
construct
on
so.
E
P
And
typically,
we
have
projects
that
just
say:
they'll
provide
an
on-site
amenity
that
could
be
a
pool
that
could
be
a
clubhouse
with
different
things
that
they
provide
for
the
community,
and
a
lot
of
it
depends
on
what
the
product
type
is
they're
going
to
go
after
or
what
their
marketing
is
going
to
be
for
that
type
of
project
and
what
type
of
menu
they
may
end
up
with.
So
they
just
again
committed
to
the
clubhouse
itself.
What's
going
to
be
in
there
and
what
size?
That's
that
hasn't
been
committed
to
right.
E
I
mean
I
appreciate
the
commitment
that
petitioner
has
made
and
in
working
with
District
Council
member
I.
Think
that's
a
good
step,
but
I
think
need
more
details
on
how
it
will
be
used.
Is
it
going
to
be
what
amenities
will
be
provided?
What
is
the
construction
timeline?
What
is
the
square
footage
of
that
I
think
those
are
some
important
details.
I
think
we
need
at
least
I
need
before
before
approving
this.
J
D
Thank
you,
madam
mayor
David
question.
One
of
the
outstanding
issues
was
the
site
and
building
design.
We
had
a
note
in
there
Amandla
site
plan
to
add
the
following
note:
garage
doors,
visible
from
public
or
private
streets
shall
minimize
the
visual
impact
by
providing
a
setback
of
12
to
24,
inches
from
the
front
wall
plane
and
additional
architectural
treatment
such
as
translucent
windows
or
projecting
elements
over
the
garage
door.
Why
was
that
rescinded?.
P
I'd
have
to
go
and
follow
up
with
you
and
talk
to
our
urban
design
folks
to
see
if
that
was
something
they
pulled
off
as
just
more
of
a
request
and
they
weren't
able
to
accommodate
it
based
on
just
the
building
design,
type,
typically,
architectural
standards.
We
have
to
be
a
little
bit
cautious
about
how
detailed
we
get
on
some
of
those
even
with
a
conditional
plan.
They
still
have
to
be
voluntarily
accepted
by
the
applicant,
so
we
can
always
ask
for
them.
P
They
can
also
always
say
that
they
don't
necessarily
agree
to
provide
architectural
standards
even
through
the
conditional
process.
So
that's
something
that
again
I'd
have
to
provide.
You
follow
up
if
we
had
an
opportunity,
but
at
this
point,
since
we're
up
for
decision
I,
don't
have
a
direct
answer
from
design
standpoint
why
that
was
rescinded
other
than
that
may
have
been
something
the
applicant
just
couldn't
commit
to
based
on
the
product.
They
were
providing.
A
D
As
a
general
rule,
I
tried
to
support
the
council
district
representatives
because
they're
the
ones
that's
at
the
meetings
and
as
council
member
dr.
Harlow
noted
there
were
a
number
of
concerns
that
came
from
residents
in
the
community
that
all
of
Council
received
with
some
very
specific
concerns,
and
there
the
challenge
that
I
is
what
I
always
talk
about
and
that's
impacting
intent
without
having
some
clarifying
language,
even
though
they
have
done
a
lot.
They
have
addressed
everything
that
staff
as
I've
talked
to
dr.
Harlow.
There's
been
a
number
of
revisions.
D
There's
still
some
concern
and
it's
difficult
for
me
not
to
hear
the
concerns
of
the
residents,
because
we
have
seen
what
displacement
does.
We
know
that
City
of
Charlotte
has
language
in
place
and
correct
me
if
I'm
wrong,
where
we
can
have
up
to
six
individuals
living
in
a
household
and
that's
considered
a
family.
We
know
Airbnb
are
real.
We
know
that
we
don't
have
language
really
around
Airbnb
s.
D
We
know
that
we're
seeing
a
lot
of
transition
and
what
builds
a
neighborhood
is
owner
occupancy,
because
then,
hopefully
you
have
a
tie-in
and
to
making
sure
that
community
is
successful.
It
would
be
difficult.
I
believe
there
that
dr.
Harlow
may
step
to
the
side
to
reach
out
to
the
petitioners
to
see
potentially
other
pearl.
It
would
be
very
difficult
for
me
not
to
hear
the
concerns
of
the
community
that
have
come,
including
from
a
former
elected
who
served
on
this
body
as
well.
D
Regarding
this
petition
will
be
hard
for
me
to
support
this
petition,
as
is-
and
that
is
acknowledging-
that
a
lot
of
work
has
been
done,
but
I
think
we
don't
always
ask
not
necessarily
the
right
question,
but
the
impactful
question
as
far
as
what
could
the
potential
impact
of
the
neighborhood
be,
if
you're
not
going
to
identify
owner-occupied
from
the
very
beginning,
if
you're
going
to
say
that
we
will
commit
to
a
clubhouse,
but
you
don't
give
the
design
standards.
Is
this
a
clubhouse
that
has
running
water
that
has
a
partial
kitchen
or
a
kitchen?
D
Is
it
going
to
be
accessible
to
the
residents
at
for
certain
hours
is
what
are
the
requirements
and
when
we
have
this
precedent,
then
we
Oh.
If
we
were
to
move
forward,
then
we
open
up
the
door
for
future
projects
to
come
in
with
very
little
information
and
for
them
to
go
back
and
say
well
on
this
petition.
You
didn't
require
all
of
that.
You
just
trusted
the
process
and
then,
if
it
doesn't
happen,
then
future
councils,
not
we
cuz,
counting
down
three
weeks,
so
future
council
would
then
be
having
that
conversation
about.
F
We
get
a
on
these
third
Mondays.
You
know
we're
supposed
to
make
land-use
decisions
in
the
best
use
of
land
and
interest
of
the
community
and
not
make
a
decision
necessarily
just
based
on
the
project.
I've.
Full
disclosure
I've
never
really
liked
this
project.
I,
don't
think
it's
the
first
iteration
as
it
would
seem
pretty
hat
baked
I
hear
the
concerns
of
the
neighbors
and
the
neighborhood's
grateful
for
the
organized.
F
Displaying
of
your
concerns
I
think
some
of
these
concerns-
I,
don't
necessarily
agree
with
one
of
those
things
is
completely
enclosing
in
insecure
gate
community.
Actually,
this
is
one
of
the
reasons
I
think
I'm,
probably
going
to
vote
against
this
I.
Do
not
think
we
should
build,
be
building
more
dead-end
streets
along
babies,
Ford
Road-
and
this
is
what
this
this
plan
calls
for.
Q
P
P
Those
amenity
packages
aren't
even
decided
on
by
the
Builder
until
they
know
what
product
they're
going
to
put
on
the,
and
that
then
helps
to
dictate
whether
they're
going
to
provide
a
pool
or
it's
going
to
be
taught
lots
or
really
depends
on
what
their
marketing
strategy
is
for
the
product
in
a
lot
of
cases.
So
that's
why
we
don't
often
see
as
much
commitment
on
that
side
of
a
project
as
we
do
the
actual
homes
or
the
actual.
You
know
buildings
themselves,
so
it
in
this
case
I
do
understand.
P
Q
Q
To
them
are
now
threatening
to
to
derail
that
I
think
that's
it's
just
a
super
bad
precedent
that
that
tells
the
development
community
out
there
who
does
give
us
a
lot
of
concessions
a
lot
of
times,
because
we
work
hard
with
them
in
the
community
to
find
them.
It
tells
them
we're
not
we're
not
really
open
for
business
and
the
last
several
months
of
hard
work
and
concessions
that
may
not
actually
result
in
in
a
good-faith
effort.
So
I
think
it's
a
really
bad
a
really
bad
precedent
for
us
to
be
selling
okay.
G
A
G
Good
deal
so
I'm
not
a
count,
so
I
know
we
don't
have
six
votes
here.
This
is
this
is,
as
you
mentioned
earlier
mayor,
we
have
a
short
short
short
team
and
then
the
votes
matter
more
a
little
bit.
I
will
say
this
to
respond
and
I
appreciate
everyone
kind
of
you
know
engaging
in
this.
Often
you
know
most
of
our
petitions.
You
know
the
decisions
pretty
much
just
fly
and
so
I
do
appreciate.
Everyone
engaging
in
this
I
think
that
there
are
some
good
points
that
are
that
are
raised
right.
G
We
know
that
there
have
been
a
lot
of
commitments
that
have
been
made,
many
of
which
were
brought
up
by
the
community.
Those
were
met.
We
got
some
specifics.
It
sounds
like
that.
I
think
it's
giving
some
heartburn
to
some
council
members
around
particularly
around
this
Clubhouse
around
its
size.
It's
the
mission,
its
dimensions,
its
location,
how
its
programmed
all
of
those
things
I
I'm,
not
sure
how
much
of
that
we
can
demand
or
what
not
but
I
understand
that
that
those
are
concerns,
and
so
I
want
to
do
this
mayor.
G
If
I
can,
if
possible,
to
withdraw
the
motion,
this
will
not
pass
it
in
for
those
out
here.
If
we
took
a
vote
right
now,
if
there's
not
six,
those
two
denied,
nor
is
there
six
votes
to
approve
it,
which
means
it
essentially
gets
deferred.
So
I
just
want
to
withdraw
the
motion
to
approve
and
just
move
to
defer
the
petition.
So
it
seems
that
there's
some
questions
and
I
hope
that
doesn't
be
my
parting
gift
to
you.
G
A
A
Okay,
we're
going
to
item
agenda
item
petition,
number
twenty
19-0
32
by
us
developments
for
approximately
fourteen
point:
seven
acres
on
the
northwest
side
of
highway
29
north,
it's
outside
city
limits,
it's
currently
zoned,
single-family
and
multi-family,
and
the
proposed
zoning
is
multifamily
conditional
for
17
units
per
acre.
The
zoning
committee
and
the
staff
recommends
approval
and
while
mr.
Phipps
is
not
here,
he
I
think
has
worked
and
feels
comfortable
with
the
petition.
So
is
there
a
motion
to
approve
the
petition
and
adopt
the
zoning
statement
of
consistency,
move
to
adopt
any
rules.
J
A
We
have
a
motion
and
a
second:
is
there
any
discussion
hearing,
none
all
in
favor,
say
aye
any
opposed.
Now
we
can
get
to
2019
just
0:49
by
paulo
holding
companies
for
approximately
nine
acres
on
the
north
side
of
Queen
City
Drive,
and
it
is
currently
it's
in
district.
Three
residential
multifamily
is
the
current
zoning
for
seventeen
units
per
acre
and
the
request
is
mixed-use
development,
optional,
the
staff
and
the
Zoning
Commission
recommend
approval.
Is
there
a
motion
to
approve
the
petitioner,
adopt
the
zoning
committee
statement
of
consistency
will
to
approve
an
adult?
A
A
All
right.
The
next
item
is
petition:
2019
desk
0:51
by
joyce
in
green
for
approximately
point
six
acres
located
on
the
east
side
of
West
Sugar
Creek
at
Lindley
circle,
and
it's
is
in
district
2.
The
current
zoning
is
residential
for
three
units
per
acre.
The
proposed
zoning
is
institutional
conditional.
The
zoning
committee
and
the
staff
recommend
approval.
Is
there
a
motion
to
approve
the
petition,
adopt
the
Zoning
Commission
committee
statement
of
consistency,
move.
A
Motion
and
a
second
is
there
any
discussion
hearing,
none
all
in
favor,
say
aye
all
right.
Any
opposed
item
number
10
is
2019
0
6
8
by
blue
south,
approximately
six
acres
located
on
the
east
side
of
China
Grove,
Church
Road,
it's
in
district
3.
The
current
zoning
is
for
units
of
residential
per
acre.
The
proposed
zoning
is
8
units
of
single-family
residential
part
acre.
The
staff
and
the
zoning
committee
recommended
this
petition.
Is
there
a
motion
to
approve
as
the
petition
and
adopt
the
zoning
committee
statement
of
consist
will
to
approve
and
adopt?
D
I
do
want
to
take
our
two
natee
to
thank
the
petitioner.
There
was
a
number
of
number
of
conversations
that
were
held
with
the
Sterling
community
in
austerely
neighborhood
and
the
neighborhood
president,
as
well
as
the
residents
did
send
a
letter
of
support.
I
hope.
My
colleagues
also
received
it
for
this
petition,
but
wanted
to
acknowledge
that
there
was
a
lot
of
communication
with
the
residents
in
the
neighborhood
for
this
petition.
Thank
you.
A
The
motion-
please
say
aye.
Thank
you.
Item
number
11
well
deferred
item.
12
is
our
next
item,
which
is
petition:
20,
1907
8
by
charter
properties
for
approximately
39
acres
on
the
north
side
of
Johnson,
olia
Road
and
the
sin
district
for
the
current
zoning
is
three
residential
units
and
acre
and
the
requested
deserve
a
residential
conditional.
The
zoning
committee
and
the
staff
recommend
approval.
Is
there
a
motion
to
adopt
the
petition
and
adopt
the
Zoning
Commission
statement.
D
A
Motion
a
second:
is
there
any
discussion,
very
none
all
in
favor,
please
say
aye
all
right.
The
next
item
is
item
13
petition,
20
19-0
84
by
Lake
Mathur
or
approximately
1,
approximately
two-tenths,
of
an
acre
located
on
Graystone
Road.
It's
in
district
1.
The
current
zoning
is
4
units
residential
per
acre
and
the
requested
zoning
is
urban
residential
conditional
zoning
committee
and
the
staff
recommend
approval
of
this,
and
it
is
do
we
have
a
motion
to
approve
and
adopt
the
zoning
committee
statement.
A
The
next
item
is
petitioned
item
14
petition,
20,
19-0,
80
seven,
and
it's
for
approximately
13
acres
located
on
the
west
side
of
Harrisburg
Road.
It's
in
district
5,
it's
single-family
residential
for
three
units,
an
acre
going
to
eight
units
per
acre
for
single-family
residential,
the
zoning
committee
and
the
staff
recommend
approval
of
this.
Is
there
a
motion
to
adopt
the
approve
the
petition
and
adopt
the
zoning
committee
statement
of
consistency
to.
A
A
All
right,
so
that's
deferred.
Okay.
The
next
item
is
16,
which
is
not
deferred
petition,
2019
desk
0
to
91
by
Raymond
Adams
for
approximately
two
tenths
of
Institute
acres,
located
on
the
north
side
of
McLean
Road
in
district
4
from
single-family
residential
three
units
in
April
to
six
units,
an
acre,
the
zoning
committee
and
the
staff
recommends
approval.
Is
there
a
motion
to
approve
and
adopt
the
zoning
committee.
A
We
have
a
motion
any
discussion,
all
in
favor,
please
say
aye
next
item
item
17
is
deferred
until
December,
the
16th
item
18
as
deferred
until
November.
The
25th
item
19
is
deferred
until
November
the
25th.
So
the
next
item
that
we
have
is
agenda,
item
number
20
petition,
2019
1
0
by
the
City
of
Charlotte
I
am
NOT
going
to
read
all
of
the
locations.
You
can
see.
A
Tod
urban
center
Tod
neighborhood
center
and
Tod
community
centers
and
Tod
transit
oriented
development
transitional.
The
zoning
committee
recommends
approval.
The
staff
recommends
approval
of
this
petition.
There
is
a
man,
have
a
motion
to
approve
the
petition
and
adopt
the
zoning
committee
statement
of
consistency
as.
Q
A
A
statement
I
just
wanted
to
make
sure
mr.
Eagleson
is
at
home
and
he
feels
really
really
bad
and
we
encouraged
him
to
stay
at
home.
So
the
rest
of
us
would
not
feel
really
really
badly,
but
he
did
send
a
statement,
and
this-
and
it's
a
very
he
wanted
me
to
be
sure,
to
read
it.
So,
on
behalf
of
councilmember
Egleston,
his
statement
in
1898
Edward
Dilworth
Ladder,
created
what
was
in
essence
the
first
transit
oriented
development
in
Charlotte
when
the
trolley
ran
down
South
Boulevard.
A
The
new
Tod
should
respect
the
founders,
vision
for
the
integration
of
transit
and
residential
life
in
the
early
streetcar
suburbs
of
Dilworth
and
Wilmore.
Our
historic
districts
are
an
asset
to
the
city
of
Charlotte
and
it
is
imperative
that
we
protect
them.
The
78th
demolitions
last
year
in
Dilworth
alone
are
raising
concerns
in
the
neighborhood
for
the
pressures
this
rezoning
places
on
the
historic
districts,
the
borders
of
Dilworth
and
Wilmore
will
have
both
Tod
and
historic
district
overlays
on
the
same
properties.
A
Due
to
this
conflict,
it
is
critical
that
the
historic
district
overlay
supersede
the
Tod
district
with
respect
to
size,
scale,
massing
height
and
architectural
style.
Despite
this
concern,
I
am
supportive
of
this
Tod
rezoning
overall
and
grateful
for
the
tireless
work
of
staff
in
developing
and
refining.
It
I
encourage
my
colleagues
to
support
this
petition,
in
my
absence,
submit
it
by
Larkin
Eggleston
for
reading
at
this
into
the
minutes
of
this
meeting.
So
we
have
a
motion
and
a
second
is
there
any
further
discussion?
Mr.
Winston
I
think.
F
Councilmember
Eccleston
might
have
got
a
the
ears
off
a
little
bit,
but
it's
around
the
same
decade,
but
I
just
want
to
put
folks
that
are
watching
out
there
and
I've
been
paying
attention
to
a
many
of
the
many
decisions
that
we've
made
in
Prior
weeks
and
months.
This
is
why
we've
made
changes
to
things
like
street
maps.
The
urban,
the
urban
tree
ordinance,
the
those
things
are
culminating
here,
and
hopefully
this
is
a
living
document.
F
We'll
probably
have
to
make
changes
and
adjustments
as
we
go
on,
but
it's
going
to
create
the
type
of
development
around
our
transit
lines,
like
the
blue
line,
like
the
future
of
the
Silver
Line
in
ways
that
we
want
and
in
really
the
way
that
the
community
deserves
transit
corridors
to
be
developed.
Those
things
did
not
happen
when
the
first
part
of
the
Blue
Line
was
made,
and
we
are
trying
to
correct
that.
F
So
this
is
a
very
important
step
and-
and
if
you
take
all
the
other
steps
that
we've
made
over
the
over
these
past
months,
you
see
a
real
comprehensive
approach
and
a
change
to
the
way
land
gets
developed
and
we
have
to.
This
is
not
the
end.
We
have
to
continue
to
do
this
throughout
our
city.
This
is
a
huge
rezoning
that
we're
doing
right
now,
but
it
is,
is
still
only
a
very
minor
part
of
the
overall
acreage
that
we're
gonna
have
to
consider
for
the
future
of
the
city.
F
A
G
G
You
know
these
zoning
classifications
in
and
around
the
even
future
station
areas
now
I'm
down
the
road
to
continue
to
provide
particular
predictability
to
neighbors.
So
often
we
get
community
members
coming
down
and
telling
us
about.
You
know
what
requests
they
might
want
and
developments
and
things
around
height
and
architectural
standards
and
design
and
setbacks.
This
gives
very
distinct
and
detailed
detailed
to
those
to
those
requests
and
I
think
that
that
helps
serve
the
community
better.
So
when
petitioners
and
developers
do
come
in,
you
kind
of
have
a
sense
of
what
already
is
coming.
G
This
is
an
encouragement
also
for
folks
to
continue
to
get
involved
in
our
comprehensive
planning,
even
if
you're
not
around
a
light
rail
station,
because
that
same
type
of
predictability
and
design
and
Street
network
and
and
architecture
is
coming
to
all
neighborhoods.
We
want
you
to
know
what
Charlotte
is
going
to
look
like
for
the
next
30
to
40
to
50
years
see
our
planning
director
is
nodding
his
head.
This
is
it's
we're
undertaking
a
mass
undertaking
here.
G
This
is
just
one
might
not
minor,
but
a
major
step
in
that,
but
there's
more
more
to
come.
If
you
haven't
heard
about
our
comprehensive
plan,
2040
comp
plan,
that
is
every
every
parcel
in
Charlotte
we're
looking
at
to
say,
hey
how?
What
do
we
want
to
go
here
if
it
can
be
developed
so
open?
A
plan
on
supporting
this
today.
I
think
this
is
great
work
by
the
staff
to
get
us
there.
I
know
we
had
thousands
of
people
participating
across
dozens
of
community
engagement
sessions.
A
R
A
Opposed
with
that,
we're
ready
to
go
to
item
21,
I'm
petition,
2019
119
by
rkw
builders
for
approximately
two
three
tenths
of
an
acre,
the
North
Alexander
Street.
It
is
in
district
1.
It
is
single-family
residential
with
eight
units
conditional
and
it
is
moving
to
single-family
residential
five
units
per
acre
and
we
have
a
zoning
committee
and
a
staff
recommendation
to
adopt
this.
Do
we
have
a
motion
to
adopt
and
approve
the
zoning
committee
state.
S
A
The
last
decision
that
we
have
this
evening
is
agenda
item
22
by
for
tradition,
2019
122
by
beacon
partners
for
approximately
39
acres
located
on
the
west
side,
both
Statesville
Road,
it's
in
district
2.
The
current
zoning
is
light
industrial
conditional
and
the
proposed
zoning
of
slight
industrial.
The
zoning
committee
and
the
staff
recommend
approval
of
this
item.
Is
there
a
motion
to
adopt
the
petition
and
adopt
the
zoning
committee
statement
of
consistency.
K
A
This
is
the
section
of
our
agenda.
We
now
go
to
the
hearings.
All
decisions
are
done,
but
I
do
want
you
to
know
that,
while
we're
having
the
hearings,
each
council,
member,
that's
absent,
will
have
the
opportunity
to
watch
this
on
Facebook
YouTube
as
well,
pull
it
up
on
our
city
site
at
any
time,
so
that
they
will
be
able
to
hear
the
petitions
and
we've
got
two
newly
elected
members
that
will
be
sworn
in
in
December.
Renee
Johnson
is
here
who
was
sitting
in
on
these
petitions
as
well
as
Victoria
Watlington.
A
Do
Renee
is
in
district
4
and
Victoria's
in
district
3,
and
they
join
us
tonight
to
go
through
the
hearings
that
they
will
eventually
support
or
not
so
alright.
With
that,
let's
see
our
first
hearing
of
the
night
is
deferred.
Item
23
by
Novant
is
29
item
24
is
deferred,
go
to
27,
okay
item
27
is
our
first
hearing
for
petition
2018
150
by
TDC
Greenville
for
approximately
five
point:
two
acres
on
the
west
side
of
Statesville
Avenue
in
district
2.
The
current
zoning
is
neighborhood
business.
A
The
proposed
zoning
is
mixed-use
development
optional,
with
five-year
vested
rights
staff,
recommends
approval
upon
resolution
of
several
issues
around
transportation,
land
use
and
technical
revisions.
Dave
is
going
to
present
this
to
us
and
we
have
three
speakers
signed
up
to
support
it:
Matt
Langston,
Ricky,
Woods
and
Anthony
Foxx,
so
we'll
go
ahead
and
have
the
staff
presentation
and
I
did
not
know
that
Reverend
cannon.
A
P
Right.
Thank
you.
Madam
mayor
petition.
2018
150
is
just
a
little
over
five
acres
located
at
Stateville
Avenue,
as
you
can
see,
just
between
Callahan,
Street
and
Oakland
have
the
proposal
itself.
Existing
zoning
is
currently
b1.
The
proposed
zoning
is
a
mud
conditional,
mixed-use
development.
They
are
asking
for
five-year
veteran,
so
it
is
something
we've
asked
them
to
consider,
remove
them
from
the
plan,
as
they
may
have
been
a
holdover
from
what
it
was
considered
a
mixed-use
project.
P
But
again
we
think
that's
something
we
can
continue
to
talk
through
with
the
petitioner,
the
adopted
future
land
use.
The
Central
District
plan
does
recommend
retail
uses
for
the
site.
However,
GDP
policies
do
study
the
site
and
look
at
recommendations
that
consider
over
17
dwellings
per
acre.
So
there's
really
once
you
get
over
that
17
dua
there's
not
necessarily
a
cap,
it's
just
make
sure
the
site
is
designed
appropriately
and
integrates
well
with
the
surrounding
neighborhoods
and
community.
Just
to
get
over
that
17
dua.
We
feel
that
proposal
has
done
so.
P
We
do
have
residential
only
uses
allowed
within
the
mud
district
up
to
2
50
units
maximum
height
of
65
feet,
except
where
there's
some
height
restrictions
along
Callahan,
which
you
can
see.
I
really
are
just
right
in
this
front
portion
where
you've
got
some
single-family
residences
on
the
other
side,
do
have
a
street
construction
for
parts
of
the
site,
architectural
standards,
internal
network
for
sidewalks,
and
then
there's
some
other
commitments
for
lighting
as
well
as
some
other
sidewalk
widths.
We're
parked
cars
may
be
involved
along
that
new
street.
P
That's
constructed
staff
does
recommend
approval
the
petition
Ponson
resolution
of
outstanding
issues
related
to
transportation,
some
technical
revisions.
It
isn't
consistent
with
the
central
plan
that
recommends
retail
uses.
However,
and
when
we
look
at
the
petition,
the
residential
units
do
complements
the
camp
North
End
redevelopment,
which
is
just
one
block
really
northeast
along
Statesville,
provides
that
potential
residence
for
opportunities
to
get
to
that
area
for
recreation,
arts,
dining
options.
Gdp
does
support
the
density
over
17
dua
does
commit
to
some
enhance
architecture
as
well
as
some
pedestrian
amenities.
P
The
conditional
notes
do
recognize
the
context
of
the
community
limiting
height
in
that
area
of
single-family
homes
along
Callahan
Street,
and
it
does
align
with
the
central
district
plans.
Policy
of
providing
opportunities
for
higher
density
infill
in
appropriate
locations
throughout
the
district
staff
did
feel
that
this
was
an
appropriate
location
and
I.
Please
note
that
it
would
have
revised
the
adopted
future
language
so
that
district
plan
from
retail
to
residential
uses
over
22
dua
for
the
site
and
we'll
be
happy
to
answer
any
questions
following
the
petitioners
presentation.
P
A
O
Mayor
and
members
of
the
council-
thank
you
for
being
here
tonight
and
to
allow
us
to
make
this
presentation
I'd,
like
to
start
by
thanking
staff
staff,
has
usually
been
very
professional
and
very
patient
and
working
with
this
rezoning
petition,
the
property
location
of
staff
has
indicated
is
at
the
sexual
Statesville
Road
and
Oakland
Avenue.
It
is
directly
across
from
the
North
camp
in
sight
and
it
is
in
the
Greenville
neighborhood
there.
The
site
is
unique:
it
presented
several
challenges
to
a
developer.
O
Those
challenges
included
environmental
challenges.
This
is
a
brownfield
site.
It
is
pursuant
to
a
brownfields
agreement.
You
hear
a
little
bit
about
dinners
requirement
or
desire
that
brownfield
site
be
developing
uses
that
allow
and
limit
the
number
of
people
they
have
to
deal
with
on
the
agreement
and
that
played
a
factor.
There
are
water
sewer
extensions.
There
are
road
improvements
to
be
made
with
regards
to
the
site.
There
is
a
extension
of
Polk
Street
that
we
would
like
to
maintain
as
a
private
street.
The
city
has
requested
that
that
be
made
public
at
some
point.
O
With
regards
to
the
current
zone,
it
is
b1,
as
you
can
see,
the
b1
zoning
does
allow
for
robust
uses
site
with
approximately
155
multifamily
units
and
some
commercial
units
we're
proposing
but
Oh
for
this,
a
mud,
C
d-four
the
site
that
will
go
to
a
250
dwelling
unit,
count
with
no
commercial
to
be
a
place
on
the
site.
From
this
rezoning,
the
regional
name
process
you
can
see,
we
held
a
number
of
community
meetings.
O
January
of
this
year,
we
held
a
community
meeting
with
the
neighbors,
and
we
held
a
second
meeting
in
September.
Those
are
reflected
in
the
neighborhood
reports.
They've
been
provided
to
you
and
I'm
happy
to
see
that
there
is
no
opposition.
The
proposed
rezoning
plan
is
before
you,
as
can
be
demonstrated
from
this
site.
Note
that
there
is
no
retail.
The
retail
component
is
not
before
you
tonight
and
this
essentially
a
the
rear
portion
of
that
site.
You
can
see
the
street
infrastructure.
There
will
be
a
street
that
will
be
built.
O
It
will
be
built
to
a
believ
public
street
standards
that
will
connect
Oh
blonde
and
and
in
Statesville
Road.
We
talked
a
little
bit
about
the
Bloods.
Only
one
thing
I
will
add
is
that
there
will
be
a
10%
number
of
the
units
reserved
for
workforce
housing,
I'll,
stop
right
there
and
there's
an
elevation
of
site
I'm
blessed
to
be
between
two
members
of
the
clergy,
Reverend
cannon
and
Reverend
I
think
they're
blessing
this.
This
petition,
that's
before
you
tonight,
all.
A
G
G
I
saw
that
one
of
the
outstanding
items
was
the
planting
strips
the
sidewalk
and
a
third
sidewalk
complaining
strips
I'll,
be
asking
the
petitioner
to
do
that
from
Oak,
Lawn
and
Statesville
intersection
all
the
way
down
to
the
end
of
the
parcel
Dave
or
is
they
just
because
the
retail
part
is
not
actually
a
part
of
the
petition?
Are
we
breaking
up
the
sidewalk
that
way
in
the
request
or
the
essent
completed
all
the
way
through
yeah.
P
G
G
B
K
E
F
T
Matt
Langston
with
land
works,
Design
Group,
we've
done
some
preliminary
studies
of
the
site,
I
mean
at
the
proposed
site
development
site
plan
that
you
see
there
is
fairly
intense
I.
Thank
you.
There's
an
opportunity
to
save
one
of
the
existing
trees.
We'll
certainly
do
that.
You
know
the
the
balance
of
the
site
is
gonna
remain
b1
zoning,
which
will
be
ready
for
retail
development
regardless
of
this
zoning,
but
when
we
can
save
trees.
A
A
Okay
item
28
is
deferred.
The
next
petition
is
petition:
2019,
zero
72
by
art
and
acquisitions
for
approximately
38
acres
of
located
on
the
north
side
of
Cannon
Avenue,
it's
in
district
4.
The
single
is
currently
zoned
single-family
residential
with
four
units
per
acre
and
the
requested
zoning
is
urban
residential
conditional.
The
staff
recommends
approval
upon
resolution
of
issues
of
our
building,
height
transportation
and
environmental
issues.
A
In
this
case
on
item
29,
we
have
a
speaker
against,
and
so
we
would
have
ten
minutes
for
the
petitioner
and
ten
minutes
for
the
speaker
in
a
opposition
and
with
that
I'd
ask
the
Dave
to
present
it
to
us
and
then
following
a
mr.
Carmichael,
will
you
organize
the
petition?
Thank
you
and
then
miss
Lib
Willard,
miss
Willard
are
you
here
and
if
you
want
to
come
down
so
that
you
don't
have
so
far
to
travel
after
the
staff
petition
you'll
be
up
next.
Okay,
mr.
poutine,
thank.
P
P
Just
to
give
you
a
context
of
the
site,
you
can
see
the
interstate
Sugar
Creek
run
north-south
here
or
east-west
actually
in
interstate
85,
just
to
the
south
of
the
site.
Current
zoning
is
our
four
single-family
residential.
The
requested
zoning
is
that
you
are
two
conditional
adopted
future
land
use
for
the
site
from
the
northeast
district
plan
does
recommend
multifamily
for
the
majority
of
the
site.
P
There
is
a
small
portion
that
is
still
recommended
for
industrial,
so
there's
a
portion
of
the
request
that
is
inconsistent
with
the
adopted
area
plan,
but
the
majority
of
the
site
is
zoned
for
are
recommended
for
multifamily
uses,
which
this
petition
proposes.
The
proposal
itself
does
request
up
to
350
residential
dwelling
units
would
be
a
mix
of
those
single-family
detached
and
single-family
attached
units
or
a
combination
thereof.
Building
heights
are
limited
to
40
feet.
There's
50
foot
buffer
adjacent
to
the
single-family
residential,
which
would
be
mainly
to
the
north.
Here.
P
Right
away
for
upgrading
streetscape
along
Canada
Avenue
will
be
dedicated,
as
well
as
extending
internal
local
residential
streets
and
then
access
to
the
site
via
Cannon
Avenue
and
West
Sugar
Creek
Road,
as
well
as
some
future
stub
connections
to
an
Ida
Road
as
well
as
part
of
this
petition
staff,
does
recommend
approval
upon
resolution
of
some
outstanding
issues
related
to
building
height
transportation
and
environmental
issues.
As
we
said,
the
petition
is
consistent
for
the
multifamily
portion
of
the
site.
There
is
a
small
portion
that
is
inconsistent
for
that
industrial
piece.
F
U
You
so
much
council,
member
Winston
members
of
council
and
the
zoning
committee
I'm
John
Carmichael
here
on
behalf
of
the
petitioner
art
and
acquisitions
with
me
tonight,
or
Tyson
Riley
of
the
petitioner
of
Matt
Langston
of
Lane
works
design.
As
Dave
said,
the
site
contains
about
38.8
three
acres
located
on
the
north
side
of
Cannon
Avenue,
just
west
of
the
intersection
of
Canada
Avenue
and
equipment
drive,
and
it's
just
west
of
the
West
Sugar
Creek
Road,
85
interchange.
U
This
is
a
so
I
got
aerial.
The
site
you've
got
non-residential
uses
located
to
the
south
across
Cannon,
Avenue,
you've
got
non-residential
uses
to
the
northwest,
you've
got
single-family
uses
to
the
north
and
some
to
the
east.
Although
I'm
going
to
show
you
a
Sony
map
in
a
moment
and
then
you've
got
non-residential
uses
to
the
southeast,
but
the
site
is
undeveloped,
as
we
speak
here
as
we
are
here
tonight.
This
is
the
parcel
that's
recommended
for
industrial
uses
under
the
area
plan,
and
this
is
the
parcel
the
it's
about.
U
This
is
about
thirty
seven
point:
eight
acres
recommend
it
for
a
multi-family.
The
site
currently
is
owned,
are
four
to
the
the
west.
You've
got
a
two
zoning
and
are
four
zoning
to
the
south.
You've
got
B
to
C
D
and
B.
Two
zoning
to
this
portion
of
the
east
you've
got
b2
zoning
and
then
you
to
the
these
three
Lots
here
and
then
the
parcels
to
the
north
you've
got
our
four
zoning.
So
you've
got
industrial
single-family
business
around
here
and
then
you've
got
our
four
to
the
east
into
the
this.
U
Is
the
land
use
map
multifamily
for
the
vast
majority
of
the
site,
once
again,
industrial
recommendation
for
this
one
acre
piece
of
the
site:
you've
gotten,
but
you've
got
industrial
recommendations
to
the
West
business
to
the
South
business
for
most
of
the
eastern
border,
multifamily
for
the
remainder
of
the
eastern
border
and
then
our
four
to
the
north.
This
is
the
Northeast
District
plan
requesting
that
the
site
be
rezone.
U
From
our
four
to
your
two
CD
coming
up,
326
single-family
attached
townhome
units,
we
will
submit
a
revised
plan
that
reduces
the
requests
from
350
units,
so
326
will
also
eliminate
single-family
detached
as
a
proposed
use,
which
does
help
with
traffic
generation
because
it
doesn't
generate
as
many
trips
as
detached.
So
the
overall
density
would
be
about
8.4
units
per
acre.
You
will
note
the
staff
analysis
that
they
do
state
that
it's
less
intense
that
would
than
what
would
be
recommended
under
the
northeast
district
plan.
U
So
the
site
plan
I'm
going
to
share
with
you,
has
not
been
filed,
but
it
will
be
filed.
This
is
a
much
more
detailed
and
specific
site
plan
than
what's
currently
on
file.
This
has
been
shared
with
the
community.
This
will
be
a
part
of
the
petitioners
revised
rezoning
plan
that
will
be
filed
with
the
planing
staff
on
Monday
November
25th
access
into
the
site
would
be
from
Cannon
and
Sugar
Creek.
U
By
way
of
a
new
public
street
connected
by
the
petitioner,
the
street
runs
from
cannon
all
the
way
to
the
Sugar
Creek
Road
also
be
served
by
internal
colonel
private
streets
and
private
drives.
As
dave
said,
an
8
foot
clean,
stripping,
eight-foot
sidewalk,
will
be
installed
along
Cannon
Avenue,
a
50
foot
wide
Class
C
buffer
would
be
established
on
the
northern
edge
of
the
site.
U
The
exterior
40
feet
of
that
buffer
would
be
undisturbed,
except
that
the
petitioner
could
plant
supplemental
landscaping
materials,
so
the
exterior
40
feet
would
be
undisturbed
and
you'd
also
have
a
50-foot
classi
buffer.
Here
at
the
southwest
corner
of
the
site,
a
Mecklenburg
County
asked
the
petitioner
to
convey
a
minimum
2
acre
portion
of
the
site
to
the
county
for
a
future
public
park.
There's
a
gap
in
neighborhood
parks
in
this
area.
U
Petitioner
has
worked
with
the
county
and
has
agreed
to
convey
more
than
2k
2
acres
of
the
site
to
the
county
for
the
public
park
and
the
public
park.
It
doesn't
show
up
here
very
well,
I
apologize,
it's
it's
the
area
within
the
pink
line
and
I'm
tracing
it
here
with
the
pointer.
Just
does
not
show
up
that
well
and
I
apologize,
but
that's
a
plus
or
minus
5
acres
that
would
be
conveyed
to
the
county.
The
county
asked
for
it.
The
county
would
have
to
officially
accept
it.
U
We
know
of
no
reason
why
they
wouldn't
we've
worked
through
this
site
plan
with
Kevin
Brickman,
Burke,
County
and
kevin
has
approved
the
site
plan
with
respect
to
the
the
the
layout
of
the
future
public
park.
The
park
would
essentially
be
a
passive
public
park,
except
there
could
be
a
small
playground
and
picnic
shelter.
The
petitioner
would
construct
pedestrian
trails
on
the
site
and
those
pedestrian
trails
are
represented
by
these
white
dashed
lines.
There
would
be
8
foot
wide
asphalt
trails
built
to
county
standards.
U
Whether
or
not
the
park
accepts
that
conveyance,
the
petitioner
would
construct
the
trail.
So
if
the
public
park,
this
petitioner
would
still
construct
the
public
trails,
approximately
24%
of
the
site
would
be
devoted
to
tree,
save
open
space
and
public
park.
The
maximum
height
of
the
townhome
units
is
40
feet.
The
petitioners
rezoning
plan
does
can
contain
architectural
standards.
The
plants
honor
has
undergone
an
evolution
since
we
first
filed
it.
The
densities
been
in
create
decrease.
Excuse
me
from
525
to
425
to
350
and
now
326
units.
U
Another
change
since
we
filed
was
the
park
conveyance
and
then
a
building
along
the
northern
edge
of
the
site
has
shifted
away
from
the
northern
edge
then
eliminated,
and
then
the
the
design
of
the
pump
or
the
the
layout
of
the
public
street
is
changed
on
this
site
plan.
At
the
request
of
CDOT,
plain
staff
does
recommend
approval.
We
appreciate
their
support.
We've
had
three
meetings
with
the
community
and
then
we
had
a
smaller
meeting,
but
the
residents
of
Royal
Oaks.
We
certainly
appreciate
their
tenants
and
participation
in
the
meetings.
K
A
V
And
a
Royal
Oaks
neighborhood
is
just
right
there,
the
north.
You
can
see
my
street
right
there
on
Pine,
Drive
and
I
am
speaking
personally.
That
I
am
for
the
development,
but
I
do
how
I
did
have
a
serious
concern
with
the
lack
of
clarity
in
the
revised
site
plan
that
was
sent
to
us
on
a
Friday
John.
Carmichael
did
speak
to
that
today
and
I
will
say
that
in
the
last
public
meeting
the
developers
did
state
that
they
would
be
building
about
312
to
315
townhomes.
V
V
V
A
V
V
The
clarity
of
the
site
plan
is
something
that
is
important
to
me.
As
a
citizen
I,
do
we
do
deserve
to
have
a
more
concrete
way
of
trusting
those
who
are
building
our
neighborhoods
in
our
city,
rather
than
just
a
good
faith
commitment
and
the
site
plan
is
the
only
way
for
US
citizens
to
really
know
what
is
going
in
and
to
hold
the
developers
to
what
they
say.
V
They're
going
to
do,
and
I
basically
was
coming
here
today
to
ask
for
just
to
support
and
and
but
also
to
ask
for
a
more
clear
and
detailed
site
plan.
So
thank
you.
Oh
I'm,
sorry,
one
last
thing:
our
neighborhood
has
a
number
of
meetings
to
learn
and
understand
this
process
and
I
we'll
say
that
we
are
not
totally
unified.
Some
agree
with
this
seem
to
agree
with
the
petition
and
the
development
is
some
do
not
so
okay.
Thank
you.
Thank.
W
Council
I
think
one
of
the
first
times
I
talked
to
this
particular
council
was
on
behalf
of
darada
and
so
I
feel.
As
long
as
the
developers
are
meeting
the
concerns
of
Royal
Oaks
I
want
to
be
in
support
of
this,
because
this
is
the
type
of
project
it's
going
to
help
that
downtown
the
rider
become
what
we
all
know
it
can
be.
The
bones
are
there
we
need
more
rooftops
to
support
the
type
of
things
that
we
want
and
I
know
there
are
people
it's.
W
There
are
gonna,
be
people
who
are
sad
to
see
the
trees
go
and
because
it
is
a
beautiful
piece
of
pristine
land
I'm.
Sad
to
see
it
go
too
if
this
is
approved,
that
said,
I
think
they've
done
a
really
good
job
of
tree
save
and
ultimately
it's
going
to
this.
This
project
is
gonna
help
the
rider
grow,
the
way
it
needs
to
grow.
We
can't
have
the
coffee
shop
or
the
the
places
to
go.
W
One
of
the
big
problems
I've
heard
is
from
so
many
people,
my
age
and
younger,
is
that
they
have
to
go
somewhere
else.
Besides
the
rider
to
do
the
things
they
want
to
do
and
something
like
this
will
put
people
in
our
neighborhood
who
have
disposable
income
to
spend,
which
then
will
hopefully
attract
the
type
of
retail
and
that
we
hope
to
have.
So.
Thank
you
for
hearing
me
and
I
hope
that
you
will
approve
this.
Thank.
K
M
To
the
rezoning
petition,
RP
20,
1972
I've
provided
some
information
on
dry
retention
ponds.
You
can
look
at
the
site
above
and
see
that
there's
a
large
amount
of
dry
retention
pond
on
this
site.
This
is
an
outstanding
issue
of
concern
to
some
members
of
the
Royal
Oaks
community.
The
proposed
development
it's
currently
planned
would
contain
five
of
these
ponds
scattered
across
the
site.
M
The
ponds
have
the
potential
to
require
HOA
fees
above
and
beyond
the
standard
fee,
since
they
require
weekly,
monthly
and
yearly
maintenance.
They
pose
health
and
environmental
hazards,
and
children
may
be
particularly
impacted
by
the
safety
issues
that
come
with
them.
I
know
that
many
new
developments
have
these
dry
retention
ponds.
However,
the
large
number
for
this
development
is
indicative
that
there
are
too
many
townhome
units
at
this
point
320
and
that
had
that
have
been
proposed
for
this
particular
site.
M
The
site
is
totally
wooded
and
has
two
major
headwater
streams
of
the
little
Sugar
Creek,
which
flows
through
the
heart
of
Charlotte.
Why
do
I
do
not
oppose
townhomes
on
the
site?
I
strongly
urge
you
to
improve
this
development
only
with
a
significant
decrease
in
the
number
of
units.
One
such
development
in
Steele
Creek,
which
is
almost
identical
in
size
and
does
not
contain
any
streams,
was
just
approved
for
only
204
homes.
I've
included
this
information
about
this
in
your
package.
M
K
A
You
we
will
have,
we
will
provide
this
information
to
our
staff.
We
have
a
stormwater
stormwater
control
group,
but
the
county
has
also
stream
Management
Group,
so
we'll
get
both
of
those
groups
to
follow
up
to
the
report
that
you've
given
us
for
the
rezoning
on
the
ponds
and
how
they're
used
in
the
streams
so
Dave
we've
got
a
number
of
these
documents.
If
you
get
this
make
sure
you
get.
P
A
J
T
T
Number
of
stormwater
ponds
is
driven
by
watershed.
When
you
have
a
Ridge
part
of
the
water.
Goes
this
way
part
of
the
water
goes
that
way.
You
can
only
divert
a
small
amount
of
water
out
of
this
watershed
into
that,
and
you
know,
I
mean
from
from
a
sheer
site,
efficiency
standpoint
having
one
large
stormwater
pond
is
more
efficient,
but
what
we've
shown
is
based
on
the
landform
and
based
on
people
walking
going
in
the
direction
that
it's
going
now
in.
U
Terms
of
the
density
I
don't
have
the
mr.
Willard
was
referring
to
I
think
it
was
around
six
and
a
half
units,
an
acre
I'm,
not
positive
I,
don't
want
to
misstate
that
this
plan
is
more
dense.
Part
of
the
goal
of
the
developer
is
to
have
a
for
sale
product
that
is
in
more
reach
of
citizens
and
have
an
alternative
to
townhomes
and
Notah
and
other
parts
of
the
tab.
The
community
that
or
not
is
in
reach.
So
that's
so
the
fewer
units
make
that
more
difficult.
U
K
H
F
Just
for
the
petitioner,
we
go
back
into
the
whole
conversation.
Part
of
the
conversation
you
were
having
the
county
in
the
parks
to
be
completely
honest,
I
missed
it
because
I
was
commenting
to
my
colleague
over
here
about
the
north.
Western
portion
of
this
petition.
I
have
concerns
for
just
from
looking
at
it.
F
You
know
I,
just
think
of
families
moving
their
young
kids
right.
Knowing
that
area
where
those
kids
gonna
go,
you
know
after
school,
you
know
it's
pretty
cut
off
from
any
kind
of
amenities.
You
know
it
seems
like
a
situation
where,
when
we
think
about
how
we're
building
neighborhoods
and
developing
neighborhoods
for
people
that
grow
up,
they
should
they
should
have
a
be
able
to
have
a
full
life
in
it
from
the
places
that
they
call
home.
F
But
if
you
they
go
north
and
west,
this
an
industrial
zone,
they
go
south
that
walk
into
you
know
for
lack.
Almost
you
know
the
frontage
of
an
interstate.
They
go
east,
there
isn't
much
there
what's
what
is
going
to
be
there?
So
kids
aren't
just
in
an
environment
where
they're
getting
in
trouble
because
there's
nothing
around
their
home
to
serve
them.
Well,
part
of
this
I.
U
Can
you
see
this
outline
in
pink
it's
hard
to
see?
It's
basically
the
would
be
conveyed
to
the
county
for
a
public
park.
The
park
would
include
the
trail
system.
You
see
here
and
white
and
then
right
here
you
can't
really
see
it
because
the
brightness
of
the
lights
shining
on
the
screen,
but
there
would
be
a
playground
and
a
picnic
shelter
more.
A
little
more
active
use
for
that
portion
of
the
park,
so
that's
that's
what
would
happen
with
the
park
now
they
have
the
distance.
H
U
And
I
want
to
make
sure
the
park
the
county
would
have
to
count
summer
once
and
haptics
they've
asked
for
the
conveyance,
but
in
the
rezoning
process
they
don't
accept
it.
They
have
to
go
to
commission
County
Commission
bill,
but
accept
it,
but
we
know
no
reason
why
they
wouldn't
and
the
Commission
the
petitioner
would
pay
for
the
trail
system
that
would
be
installed
within
the
park
site.
The
county
would
pay
for
the
picnic,
shelter
and
the
playground.
K
E
E
P
You
yeah
I,
believe
she's
spoke
with
some
of
our
swimwear
folks
in
the
past.
Doug
is
that
no
okay
I
know
she's
emailed
staff
quite
a
few
times
on
some
of
those
items
on
if
they
were
just
to
rezoning
or
if
they
got
sent
to
any
of
the
other
staff
that
looks
into
some
of
those
items
we'll
be
happy
to
look
at
it
for
a
follow-up
reform
and
provide
that
to
you
guys
we'll
get
that
back
next
month.
J
A
For
29
acres
on
the
west
side
of
Hood
Road,
single-family
residential
is
currently
three
units
per
acre
and
they
like
to
go
to
eight
units
per
acre.
The
staff
recommends.
Approval
must
have
attained.
A
few
would
start
us
out.
We
have
no
speakers
for
this
Oh
us.
We
have
two
speakers,
one
for
and
one
against,
for
this
petition.
P
This
petition
is
a
residential
component
of
that.
So
generally
is
consistent
with
the
recommendations
and
notes
in
that
plan.
Even
though
we're
not
getting
a
mix
of
uses,
we
are
getting
residential
uses
as
a
component,
so
the
staff
does
recommend
approval
the
petition
again.
It
is
consistent.
This
is
a
conventional
request.
We
don't
have
any
site
plan
or
conditional
notes
for
consideration,
so
be
happy
to
take
any
questions
following
the
petitioner
and
public
presentations
and
pick
it
up
from
there.
We.
A
X
Good
evening,
madam
mayor
of
council
and
zoning
committee
members,
it's
a
pleasure
to
speak
before
you
before
9
p.m.
as
I
usually
seem
to
be
the
property
that
includes
that
this
rezoning
includes
is
actually
41.
Acres
total
about
15
acres
of
it
is
an
area
that's
proposed
for
a
Greenway
and
some
stream
buffers.
So
there's
really
only
about
26
acres
of
Belle,
pelea
land
left
and,
as
David
pointed
out,
the
Rocky
River
area
plan
recommends
the
land
use
of
eight
homes
per
acre
and
that's
what
the
petition
was
filed
for.
X
However,
after
some
further
discussions
with
councilman
Newton
regarding
some
area
residents,
concerns
and
some
concessions
by
the
property
owner
we're
actually
reducing
the
rezoning
request
to
r6
instead
of
r8,
which
will
reduce
the
number
of
homes
on
the
property.
By
about
a
third
with
the
Greenway
dedication
area
taken
out
or
including
degree,
we
dedication
and
the
overall
property
the
actual
density,
when
you
figure
it
all
in
of
the
overall
property,
there's
only
going
to
be
about
four
homes
per
acre.
X
So
it's
not
a
very
dense
property,
even
though
the
petitions
for
r6,
in
addition
to
the
Greenway
dedications,
we're
currently
working
with
cidade
and
NCDOT
of
a
meeting
later
on
this
week,
with
some
adjacent
property
owners
to
work
on
a
hood
road
improvement
plan
for
the
property.
For
that
section.
Hood
Road,
right
in
front
of
the
properties
there,
as
well
as
to
ensure
that
there's
a
road
connections
through
all
coordinated
connections
and
and
intersections
along
Hood,
Road
and
I'll
turn
the
rest
of
my
time.
Over
her
all.
Y
Concerns
have
arisen
due
to
the
rezoning
period
petition,
2,
0,
1,
9,
0,
8,
8,
JD
SLCC,
based
upon
your
review
you're,
stating
that
the
rezoning
will
correlate
with
the
rocky
river
plan
and
from
my
understanding,
this
plan
hasn't
totally
been
completed
and,
however,
with
this
rezoning
proposal,
congestion
is
my
main
concern
for
the
said
area.
This
area
was
originally
set
up
for
our
three
zoning
and
they
are
presently
two
lane
roads
on
hood,
the
plaza
Robinson,
Church
and
rocky
river.
Y
If
this
rezoning
is
passed,
what
allows
me
is
the
congestion
we
will
receive
due
to
the
increase
in
housing.
Has
the
JD
SL
LLC,
along
with
the
council,
taken
into
consideration
the
actual
now
computerize
amount
of
traffic?
Our
area
will
receive.
I
asked
this
question
because
of
the
congestion
of
Rocky
River
Road,
and
there
are
only
homes
in
this
area
which
presently
has
two
lanes.
We
have
two
new
developments
in
the
plaza
on
the
plaza
presently.
They
only
provide
the
widening
of
the
road
for
those
developments.
Y
If
the
City
Council
does
give
this
a
passing
vote,
I
would
be
inclined
to
a
siege,
ADSL
LLC
work
with
the
cdlt
by
providing
financial
dollars
to
ensure
our
roads
are
wide
and
for
the
entire
length
of
the
road
and
I
just
add
in
a
turning
lane.
We
have
all
these
developers
coming
to
Charlotte
making
money.
Why
can't
they
provide
financial
dollars
for
our
infrastructure
instead
of
our
city,
raising
tax
dollars,
which
will
be
needed
to
accommodate
all
these
developments?
X
X
My
understanding
is
is
will
be
working
on
a
joint
improvement
plan
that
will
stretch
for
a
long
section
of
Hood
Road
along
there
and
again
we're
working
on
connections
through
to
the
other
neighborhoods
to
make
sure
that
it's
not
just
all
dumped
out
on
Hood
Road
and
once
again,
the
by
going
to
our
six
by
reducing
it
from
r8.
Our
six
we're
actually
gonna,
be
a
little
under
four
units
per
acre
for
ohms
break
or
on
the
overall
property
I'll
be
glad
to
take
any
questions.
Do.
C
I
wanted
to
thank
mr.
Stringfellow
for
for
meeting
with
me
being
willing
and
open
to
work
with
me
and
heed
the
concerns
of
the
community.
So
this
is
mrs..
Campbell's
concerns
are
not
new.
You
know
we
hear
about
the
congestion
and
the
increased
traffic
on
Hood
Road,
Plasma
extension,
Robinson,
Church
and
Harrisburg
Road
I.
Think
what's
important
to
note
here
is
that
in
this
instance,
this
would
constitute
so.
C
The
property
in
the
area
is
a
very
hot
commodity
right
now
and
we're
seeing
that
through
a
lot
of
the
rezoning
that
have
come
in
from
this
council,
this
would
actually
constitute
a
down
zoning
compared
to
what
we
would
otherwise
see,
which
means
fewer
units
and
I
think
the
case
can
be
made
significantly
fewer
units.
I
would
be
interested
to
know
a
little
bit
more
about
how
so
so
what
we're
hearing
right
now,
mr.
X
Or
three
well:
the
current
zoning
is
r3.
The
overall
density
on
the
property.
There's
a
good
section
lawn
there
that
the
County
Parks
is
requested
for
a
Greenway
dedication.
So
when
you
factor
all
that
in
the
overall
density
is
about
four
units
per
acre
and
we
will
be
dedicating
that
area
to
the
requested
area
to
County
Parks
and
as
prior
rezoning
petition
pointed
out,
I
mean
they
request
it.
But
then
they
have
to
also
accept
that.
But
we
intend
to
donate
all
that
section
that
they've
requested
as
Greenway.
X
C
Not
significantly
or
barely,
if
at
all
different
than
what
we
would
see
by
rights.
Having
said
that,
I
would
be
interested
to
learn
a
little
bit
more
about
how
that
would
impact
traffic
entitlements
and
I
would
be
interested
in
following
up
with
you,
miss
Campbell
to
out
to
talk
a
little
bit
more
about
this
as
well.
That's
all
I
have
all.
E
E
This
actually
adds
a
manatee
to
the
neighbors
in
the
area
in
terms
of
the
Greenway
access
and
I
see
this
as
a
cross
point
for
this
petition.
In
addition
to
even
to
mr.
Newton's
point,
this
does
not
add
love,
density
and
I.
Actually,
like
the
plan,
that's
been
proposed
for
this
so
but
I
do
look
forward
to
addressing
miss
Campbell's
questions
about
overall
plan
for
the
area,
not
just
specifically
for
this
petition,
but
overall,
what
are
we
doing
to
invest
in
that
area?
So
I
think
in
the
fall
of
report.
E
A
J
A
You
okay,
so
the
next
petition
is
item
number
31.
It
is
for
eight
acres
located
on
the
north
side
of
Randolph
Road
in
district
one
current
zoning
is
single-family
five
units
per
acre
and
the
requested
zoning
is
neighborhood.
Services
staff
recommends
approval
of
this
petition.
We're
going
to
have
the
staff.
Z
A
P
You
2019
zero,
nine,
eight
just
over
eight
acres,
okay,
it's
just
off
a
Randolph
Road
and
Sam
Drennen
I
have
Sam
Jenna
running
here,
Randolph
Road
running
from
the
front
of
the
site.
This
project
is
sitting
just
the
puple
parcels
are
moved
from
Randolph
and
the
current
zoning
is
r5.
The
proposed
zoning
is
for
NS
neighborhood
services.
P
The
central
district
plan
does
recommend
single
multi-family
residential
uses,
as
well
as
Greenway
recreational
uses
for
the
site,
so
the
portion
frontage
closest
the
Sam
Drennen
excuse
me,
is
recommending,
like
I,
said,
for
a
single-family
multifamily
and
the
rest
for
Greenway,
so
the
petition
itself
is
inconsistent
with
a
portion
of
it
and
then
consistent
for
another
portion
where
we
have
the
residential
component.
Overall,
the
proposal
has
two
development
areas,
both
a
and
B
that
would
collectively
contain
up
to
12,500
square
feet
of
medical
offices
and
then
25
attached
dwelling
units.
P
There's
medical
offices
be
one-story,
while
the
attached
residential
would
be
40
feet,
which
is
typical
height
for
our
residential
zoning
districts,
no
less
than
40%
of
those
dwelling
units
will
be
reserved
for
buyers
who
are
eligible
for
house
Charlotte.
It
does
propose
removal
of
the
existing
radio
tower
on
site
and
we
go
back
to
the
aerial.
P
For
that
Greenway
improvement
staff
does
recommend
approval
upon
resolution
about
standing
issues
related
to
environment
and
site
and
building
design,
as
well
as
some
transportation
revisions.
It
is
consistent
overall
with
the
central
district
plan
for
portions
of
the
site
for
the
residential
units
at
eight
dua,
as
well
as
the
Greenway.
However,
we
do
have
that
in
consistence
with
the
adopted
plan
for
that
acreage
going
to
an
office
of
medical
use.
However,
it
is
consistent
with
the
overall
context
of
the
area
where
you
do
have
medical
offices
within
that
small
area
learn
along
Sam
Drennen.
P
So,
even
though
it's
inconsistent
with
the
plan,
it's
inconsistent
general
with
the
context
of
some
of
the
existing
development.
That's
out
there,
and
approval
of
this
petition
will
revise
that
future.
Land
Use
Plan
from
that
Greenway
and
residential
to
a
mix
of
Greenway
uses,
as
well
as
some
of
the
office
that
would
be
on
the
site,
so
need
to
provide
a
little
update
to
that
land-use
plan.
So
I'll
be
happy
to
take
any
questions
following
the
petitioners
in
public
presentation
go
from
there.
Thank
you.
AA
Good
evening
mayor
members
of
City
Council
members
of
zoning
committee,
I'm
Keith
nicknamed,
was
more
Van,
Alen
Jeff
Brown
of
our
firm
and
I,
or
assisting
flagship
LLC.
The
facts
of
health
care.
Properties
LLC,
with
this
petition
with
me
here
tonight,
representing
the
petitioners,
thorne
Bochy
and
Charles
Campbell,
with
flagship
and
also
Julie
Porter
with
the
Housing
Partnership.
The
development
of
this
site
is
a
partnership
between
flagship
healthcare
properties
and
housing
partnership.
The
housing
partnership
will
be
developing
the
residential
component
of
the
site,
the
20
up
to
25
townhomes
that
they
have
mentioned.
AA
As
he
mentioned,
the
eight
acres
zoned
r5
will
be
removing
the
am/fm
that's
located
on
the
site.
I
do
want
to
turn
the
mic
over
to
thorne
and
and
and
Julie,
so
they
can
speak
a
little
bit
about
their
respective
companies
and
then
I'll
finish
the
presentation
and
will
be
available
to
answer
questions
all.
AB
You,
my
name,
is
thorne
passage:
I'm
vice
president
of
development
for
flagship
healthcare
properties,
no
problem.
We
are
a
fully
integrated
commercial,
real
estate
firm
and
we
focus
exclusively
on
healthcare.
We
only
manage
and
develop
properties
throughout
the
whole
southeast,
but
it's
always
great
to
have
an
opportunity
to
do
a
project
in
our
own
backyard.
AB
AC
They
mean
I'm,
Julie,
Porter
and
president
the
housing
partnership.
The
housing
partnership
is
celebrating
its
30th
year
anniversary
here
in
Charlotte,
providing
affordable
housing,
creating
vibrant
communities
and
providing
opportunities
for
strong
futures.
The
Housing
Partnership
supports
this
rezoning
effort.
The
developer
flagship
healthcare
properties
has
donated
a
portion
of
the
property
to
our
organization
to
create
a
for
sale
development
with
up
to
25
attached
town
stud
townhome
style
units.
It
is
likely,
based
on
current
site
plans
that
16
to
17
townhomes
will
ultimately
be
developed
on
the
site.
AC
The
Housing
Partnership
is
reserving
40%
of
the
total
number
of
townhomes
developed
for
house
Charlotte
eligible
homebuyers.
As
a
reminder,
house
Charlotte
allows
household
incomes
up
to
a
hundred
and
ten
percent
of
area
median
income
and
has
a
maximum
purchase
price
of
230
thousand
for
newly
constructed
homes.
AC
This
this
project
is
located
in
the
Grier
Heights
neighborhood
and
it
is
facing
significant
home
price
increases.
Currently,
there
are
two
other
for-profit
market
rate
developers
who
are
developing
townhomes
in
the
area.
In
one
case,
those
townhomes
are
selling
in
the
Upper
300s
and
in
another
they
are
selling
in
the
mid
to
upper
400s.
The
housing
partnerships
development
will
allow
low
and
moderate
income
families
to
achieve
the
dream
of
homeownership
and
realize
that
economic
opportunities
it
provides.
AA
Thank
You
Julie.
Thank
you,
thorne,
it's
as
quickly.
Just
to
summarize
eight
acres
proposed
zoning
will
allow
the
development
of
a
single-story
medical
office
building
and
parking
for
adjacent
office
buildings
as
well.
The
townhomes
for
for
sale
that
miss
Porter,
mentioned
here
at
the
Don
in
development
area
be
and
and
access
will
be
from
Sam
Drennen
here
located
here.
The
site
has
some
frontage
on
Sam
Drennen,
and
then
there
will
be
buffers
provided
adjacent
to
the
existing
residential.
AA
We
do
have
a
letter
of
support
from
this
adjacent
property
owner
and,
as
Julie
mentioned,
we
have
been
in
touch
with
the
Greer
Arts
Neighborhood
Association,
and
been
and
they're
aware
of
the
development
we
believe
they
are
generally
supportive.
We
are,
as
Dave
mentioned,
dedicating
a
portion
of
the
site
to
County,
Parks
or
Mecklenburg
County
for
a
future
Greenway
and
we're
also
providing
a
future
access
to
that
future.
Green
Wave
from
Sam
Drennen
through
the
site
to
that
portion
of
the
site
and,
as
Julie
mentioned,
also
40
percent.
AA
N
Good
evening,
mayor
and
councilmembers,
my
name
is
Charlotte
Davis
I'm,
an
attorney
with
off
at
Kerman,
a
law
firm
here
in
town,
formerly
horik
Talley,
and
we
represent
Greenman
Zhai
associates,
which
is
an
adjacent
property
owner
to
this
site,
and
I
am
here
on
their
behalf.
They
have
a
couple
concerns,
but
they
wanted
to
make
clear
that
their
concerns
are
with
the
commercial
part
of
this
and
not
the
affordable
housing.
They
do
believe
that
the
affordable
housing
would
be
great
for
the
area
and
the
neighborhood.
N
The
first
concern
is
a
traffic
concern
related
to
the
entry
and
exit
point
for
this
proposed
site.
Currently
it
hooks
on
to
a
driveway
that
is
currently
solely
used
for
entry
and
exit
into
the
Greenman
parking
lot,
and
the
agreements
are
concerned
that
there's
going
to
be
an
uptick
in
traffic
from
the
commercial
property,
and
certainly
if
that
parking,
that
is
around
the
commercial
property,
is
going
to
be
used
for
adjacent
businesses
which
I
believe
the
petitioners
just
mentioned.
N
You
know
there's
a
very
narrow
entry
point
there.
So
there's
a
bottle
in
that
concern
and
obviously
a
backlog
of
traffic
onto
sam
Drennen
and
possibly
out
onto
randolph,
depending
on
the
busyness
of
the
commercial
property,
and
the
agreements
have
concerns
about
their
clients
getting
in
and
out
their
patience,
getting
in
and
out
of
their
property.
Regarding
that,
and
also
for
the
neighborhood
traffic
affecting
Billings
fill
Elementary,
which
is
right
up
the
street.
N
You
know,
and
in
addition
to
that,
they
are
concerned
that
the
or
there
I
guess
questioning
why
the
entry
and
exit
point
couldn't
be
adjacent
to
their
entry
and
exit
point,
as
opposed
to
carrying
at
the
very
front
of
it
in
order
to
reduce
some
of
those
traffic
concerns.
The
second
concern
that
they
have
is
related
to
water
displaced.
N
A
AA
You,
mayor
I'll,
let
mr.
passage
speak
to
or
just
so
quickly,
so
in
terms
of
access.
We
are
aware
of
agreements
concerned
with
access.
We
have
worked
very
closely
with
C
dot
on
the
design
of
this
access
point
to
not
interfere
with
the
current
access
point
to
the
agreement
property.
They
do
have
an
access
easement.
AA
We
have
been
respectful
of
that.
The
petitioner
has
met
with
them
on
several
occasions
to
discuss
how
that
access
seasons
would
work
in
this
design
is
a
result
of
those
meetings
to
make
sure
that
our
access
to
Sam
Drennen
is
is
at
the
right
location.
It
does
need
to
line
up
with
sandalwood,
which
is
across
San
Drennen.
So
that's
part
of
the
restrictions
here,
I'll,
let
Brian
Crutchfield
our
engineer
to
address
the
issues
of
stormwater.
AD
Good
evening
I'm
Brian
Crutchfield
with
Timmons
group
the
civil
engineer
for
a
flagship
on
this
project.
As
you
can
see
on
the
plan,
we've
identified
a
couple
of
areas
for
stormwater
control
measures
on
this
particular
property,
both
adjacent
to
the
residue
component
in
the
commercial.
We
fully
intend
to
comply
with
the
city's
post-construction
stormwater
ordinance,
so
all
impervious
areas
would
be
directed
to
those
treated
per
requirements
and
released
free
and
clear
of
transporting
across
the
greenland's
property.
AA
I
guess
we
will
be
happy
to
discuss,
continue
to
discuss
the
access
season
with
mr.
agreement
to
see,
if
there's
any
modifications
that
can
be
made
but
again
well.
What
we
believe
has
been
designed
is
what
what
will
work
for
the
site
and
CDOT
may
be
able
to
also
help
with
that
we
did
do
traffic
counts
at
all.
The
driveways
proceed
outs
request
to
make
sure
again.
The
added
traffic
would
not
be
a
negative
impact
and
they're
comfortable
with
what
we've
proposed.
Okay.
F
AC
A
Last
week
we
had
an
announcement
of
an
additional
five
hundred
thousand
dollars
available
to
teachers,
firefighters,
medics,
Polk's,
as
well
as
police
officers,
and
this
is
the
kind
of
product
that
we
look
very
much
to
having
that
assistance
available.
It's
up
to
$30,000
teachers,
police
officers,
firefighters
and
medics
personnel.
We
would
encourage
you
to
think
about
this
kind
of
opportunity
and
support.
We
want
to
have
home
ownership
in
our
neighborhoods
as
much
as
possible,
and
this
additional
amount
from
the
federal
home
advisory
bank
in
Atlanta
will
make
a
huge
difference
and
doing
that
I.
Just.
F
Wants
that,
as
always,
is
encouraging
to
hear
the
public
excuse
me,
businesses,
private
businesses
and
philanthropic
groups
and
nonprofits
coming
together
to
figure
out
market
solutions
to
this
problem.
It
can
be
done.
I
swear
two
years
ago,
when
we
were
running
for
this,
we
was
people
were
saying
that
this
can't
be
done,
so
it's
always
encouraging
them
to
find
creative
solutions,
and
with
that
I
make
a
move
to
close
public.
A
Second,
all
in
favor
say
aye
guys
get
together,
and
so
we
know
it's
going
on
or
you
guys
know
what's
going
on
all
right.
The
next
item
on
our
agenda
is
petition
number
32
again.
This
is
the
petition
that
we
have
one
two
three
eight
people
signed
up
to
speak
against,
and
six
people
signed
up
to
speak
for
so
I'm,
hoping
that
some
Keith
would
you
organize
this
and
I?
Don't
know
who
might
be
in
the
against
group,
but
if
you
guys
would
think
about
that.
So
this
is
petition.
A
P
Wood
court,
north
of
Mallard,
Creek,
south
of
prosperity,
Church.
Just
to
give
you
an
idea
at
some
of
the
existing
uses,
we
have
a
Dunkin
Donuts
gas
station
Bank
of
America
Financial
Center,
some
other
commercial
uses
both
within
the
site
and
surrounding
the
site.
The
existing
zoning,
as
we
mentioned,
was
Neighborhood
Services.
This
is
a
site
plan
amendment
to
that
neighborhood
services
plan.
That's
in
place.
P
The
University
Research
Park
area
plan
from
2010
does
recommend
office,
and/or
retail
uses
for
the
site,
so
that
proposal
itself
that
site
plan
amendment
would
amend
the
plan
that
was
in
place
limited
to
retail
and
restaurant
uses
for
this
parcel.
So
we
would
look
to
add
an
additional
EEE
use
on
this
parcel
eating.
Drinking
entertainment.
Establishment
would
provide
for
additional
ramp
for
improve
handicap
access
across
tribal
court.
Six
thousand
square
feet
of
retail
space
does
prohibit
drive-through
windows,
architectural
standards
and
limits
external
lighting
and
Animax
building
height
of
40
feet.
P
Staff
does
recommend
approval
upon
some
technical
revisions
that
need
to
be
addressed
on
the
site
plan
for
transportation
them
early.
The
timing
of
improvements.
It
is
consistent
with
the
University
Research
Park
area
plan
and
again
the
petition
does
cover
a
portion
of
larger
existing
commercial
development.
Does
do
the
plant
does
note
that
the
location
between
residential
communities
and
university
research
park,
the
area
should
continue
to
grow
and
serve
the
community.
P
The
NS
district
has
provided
to
provide
uses
that
directly
serve
the
neighborhood
and
the
area
high-visibility,
provides
easy
access
for
Mallard
Creek
Church
Road
and
lends
itself
to
this
type
of
retail
office
and
service
uses,
and
then
the
petitions
ban
on
drive
the
uses
does
respect
the
community's
wishes
and
increases
the
walkability
for
the
area.
So
again,
staff
does
recommend
approval
and
will
be
happy
to
take
any
questions
following
the
presentations.
A
AA
You
mayor
members
of
the
City
Council's
members
own,
a
committee
Keith
nickname
with
more
Van
Alen
assisting
red-red
of
north
carolina
LLC,
the
petitioner
up
for
this
site
with
me
tonight
represented
petitioners.
Darren,
Benson
and
Michelle
Benson
are
tho
the
owners
and
operators
of
red
28,
as
Dave
mentioned
slightly
under
an
acre,
currently
zoned
ns.
This
is
a
ns
site
plan,
amendment
to
add
retail
and
restaurant
uses
to
the
previously
approved
plan
for
the
site.
It
would
limit
the
square
footage
to
6000
square
feet.
AA
We
will
be
submitting
a
revised
plan
to
Dave
to
address
the
one
outstanding
issue
again,
a
simple
request
to
really
add
restaurant
uses
and
retail
uses
to
the
site.
I
think
there
has
been
some
misunderstanding
about
the
type
of
restaurant.
This
is.
This
is
a
unique
restaurant
that
offers
some
some
different
type
of.
AA
A
AA
AE
Thank
y'all
for
your
time.
I
know
it's
been
a
long
day,
I
trying
to
make
it
as
fast
as
possible.
My
name
is
Darren.
Vinson
I
started
this
almost
eighteen
years
ago
in
Noda
as
a
bookstore
owner,
and
since
then
we
added
the
bar,
we
added
food
and
we
still
kept
on
our
books
and
what
I
think
a
lot
of
people
are
opposed.
Is
we
also
offer
hookahs?
AE
The
thing
is
I.
Do
understand
anybody
concerns
I
know.
Some
people
are
very
passionate
about
what
this
hookah
thing
is
all
about.
We
do
everything
with
city
regulations,
with
this
new
spot
that
we
want
over
on
Drive
wood.
There
are
some
major
changes
that
we
are
doing
and
the
reason
why
we
want
this
move.
It's
one:
it's
because
we're
expanding
our
kitchen,
we're
actually
like
reducing
our
area
for
hookah
use.
So
if
you're
not
into
hookah-
and
you
don't
want
to
do
it-
you
won't
smell
it,
you
won't
see
it.
AE
AE
So
that's
you
know
the
main
reason
why
we
want
this
move
but
right
at
28.
On
a
quick
note,
it's
a
social
environment
over
24
percent
of
our
clientele
coming
they're
coming
they're,
almost
five
to
seven
days
a
week
and
that's
not
exaggerating
it's
so
big.
It's
a
family
and
we've
been
doing
it
for
many
years
and
anyways.
A
AF
Very
hard
to
sum
up
how
great
of
an
establishment
this
place
is
in
such
a
short
amount
of
time.
You
see
professors
and
students
from
UNCC
coming
over
there
to
do
the
work
during
the
day.
There
are
networking
events
we
promote
entrepreneurs,
it
is
a
really
great
environment,
very
diverse,
welcoming
for
everybody.
We
have
discussion
groups
ranging
from
politics
to
relationships,
aren't.
AF
K
AG
Good
evening,
I'm
divita
Jackson
want
to
say
hi
to
mayor
miles
and
city
council
for
this
opportunity
to
speak
on
behalf
on
right
at
28th.
I
see
some
familiar
faces
out
there.
For
those
that
know
me,
I'm
a
local
advocate
and
the
owner
jazz
is
not
kidding.
I'm
there
three
times
a
week,
it's
a
safe
space,
safe
haven.
AG
For
me,
community
events
I
do
like
the
hookah
aspect,
but
hookah
is
not
harmful
and
again
with
that
new
building
it'll
be
in
a
separate
situation,
separate
areas
you
will
have
to
deal
with
that,
it's
more
about
employing
and
empowering
the
community
and
as
Charlotte
is
changing
and
people
are
trying
to
find
safe
spaces
to
go.
I
think
this
is
something
the
community
really
really
needs,
especially
in
that
area,
especially
for
young
folks,
the
age,
demographics
believe
it
or
not
are
between
twenty
to
forty
five
you'll
see
50
year
olds.
AG
In
there
we're
doing
our
work.
We
work
from
home
it's
a
little
bit
of
a
co-working
space,
so
many
advantages
for
the
community.
So
again,
my
name
is
davina
Jackson
and
just
advocating
on
behalf
of
Reddit
28th
and
the
importance
of
this
establishment
to
our
community
over
10
years
in
our
community.
Thank
you.
AH
There
is
more
so
about
networking
is
more
so
about
meeting
people
and
becoming
greater
I've,
become
a
better
man
in
the
community
as
well
having
a
nonprofit
that
helps
out.
You
know,
because
of
red
at
28,
so
I
am
for
red
and
I
am
for
what
red
is
about
and
I
think
that
a
lot
of
other
people
can
speak
for
that
as
well.
Thank
you.
AA
AA
S
Alright,
so
good
evening,
mayor
and
council,
my
name
is
Richmond
Baker
and
I'm,
representing
the
malaria
initiative
group,
which
is
basically
a
group
of
communities
in
the
University
City
area,
I'm,
here
to
speak
in
opposition
to
this
particular
petition,
so
about
ten
to
fifteen
residents,
met
with
the
petitioner
several
months
ago
to
hear
their
plans
for
the
area
as
we
are
excited
to
have
meaningful
development
in
that
spot.
Considering
it's
partially
built
out.
Initially,
the
petitioner
described
an
experience
similar
to
a
malaise.
Everybody
knows
what
I
Malays
French
bakery
is
yep
I'm,
Elise
yeah.
S
If
I've
said
it
wrong.
Yeah-
and
you
know
everybody
loves
that,
but
but
several
of
our
residents
kind
of
did
their
homework
and
they
started
pressing
the
owner
on
the
hookah
aspect
of
it
because
he
didn't
mention
it
to
us
at
all,
and
so
we
kind
of
pressed
him
on
it
and
we,
we
also
did
more
of
our
homework
by
looking
up
the
history
of
that
location
that
they
currently
have.
So
currently
they
have
a
place
about
two
miles
away
from
this
location.
S
basically,
the
police
have
set
up
DUI
checkpoints
in
the
parking
lot
of
this
facility
of
the
current
location,
which
is
two
miles
away.
So
during
the
conversation
the
petitioner
was
less
than
forthcoming
about
the
Hoka
aspect
of
the
bar
and
also
the
crime
aspect
of
the
bar
that
they
currently
have.
The
petitioner
was
also
less
than
forthcoming
about
the
negative
effects
of
hookah
I've
heard.
Several
of
them
say
that
it's
not
bad
for
you.
All
you
got
to
do
is
go
to
the
CDC's
website
type
in
hookah.
It'll.
S
Tell
you
exactly
how
bad
it
is
for
you
I'm
also
concerned,
and
some
of
our
residents
are
also
concerned
about
just
how
it
targets
relatively
young
people.
They
said
22,
whatever
I
think
the
bar
allows
18
year-olds
to
kind
of
go
there
and
a
lot
of
these
hook
of
flavors
they're,
very
they're
kid
friendly
right,
I'm,
not
saying
that
little
kids
will
be
there,
but
we're
not
really
supporting
that
necessarily
of
the
petition
to
us
again.
S
The
petitioner
did
not
provide
a
provide,
a
clear
reason
as
to
why
they
are
moving
two
miles
further
into
a
residential
area.
They
did
state
that
they
do
get
a
lot
of
their
customers
from
the
college.
We
really
do
believe
that
a
facilities
such
as
this
should
be
located
in
a
place
that
is
more
conductive
to
having
nightlife,
because
this
is
a
really
a
nightlife
type
of
a
thing
and
we're
thinking
more.
The
downtown
University
City
area
really
closer
to
the
blue
line
closer
to
the
clock.
S
The
college
is
where
something
like
this
belongs
not
deeper
into
the
Mallard
Creek
area,
which
is
where
they
want
to
move
it
and
another
thing
that
we
are
not
real
clear
on
we've.
Never
so
this
is
the
only
drawing
that
we've
ever
seen
of
what
they're
planning
on
doing
they're
like
yeah
there's
this
plot
of
dirt.
We
want
to
put
a
building
there.
We
don't
know
what
it's
gonna
look
like.
S
We
don't
know
if
it's
gonna
have
proper
ventilation,
there's
residential,
so
there
are
apartments
directly
across
the
street
from
where
they
want
to
put
it
the
place
where
they
have
it
right
now.
There
are
no
apartments
very
close
by
we
don't
know.
What's
gonna
happen
from
if
this
is
approved,
what's
going
to
happen
to
air
quality
in
that
area,
I
know
that
places
every
once
in
a
while
I
go
to
cigar
bars
and
things
that
nature
they're
required
to
have
to
have
special
ventilation.
S
I,
don't
know
if
this
is
going
to
be
required
for
this
particular
location.
We
are
very
interested
in
this
because,
again
it's
across
from
the
housing,
and
we
want
we're
concerned
about
our
residents
and
their
air
quality.
We
do
not
feel
that
this
will
be
the
highest
and
best
use
of
the
land,
and
it
is
not
a
good
location
for
hookah
bar
we're
asking
that
you
reject
this
particular
petition
and
I
know
if
you
guys
wanted
to
add
something
to
it.
AI
Hi
I'm
Janice
Wilson
I
am
a
homeowner
and
parent
in
culvert
park,
which
is
just
south
of
this
area.
Walking
distance,
really
I
have
friends
who
enjoy
hookahs
and
I
have
no
problem
with
the
Entrepreneurship
aspect
of
him.
Wanting
to
open
a
business
like
that,
I,
don't
feel
that
this
is
the
area.
This
is
a
community
of
neighborhoods
families
and
hookah
bars.
Fine
success,
even
restaurants,
just
having
who,
because
I
don't
want
to
just
call
them
hookah
bars,
are
where
entertainment
venues
are
or
where
nightlife
exists.
In
fact,
the
University
City
Walk
is
gonna.
AI
We're
looking
forward
to
the
expansion
of
that
and
I
think
you
could
host
a
number
of
locations
for
a
restaurant
such
as
this,
but
to
be
so
close
to
residential
families,
schools,
Mallard,
Creek
Elementary,
you,
prime
to
south
of
this
apartment,
complex
that
they
are
in
front
of
Mallard
Creek
Elementary
School
is
my
backyard
literally,
it's
just
not
the
right
location
and
the
doctors
offices
that
are
there,
the
Harris
Teeter.
That's
there
and
looking
forward
to
you
know
we
have
pharmacies
and
we
used
to
have
a
wonderful
Whole,
Foods,
Market
prosperity,
church
partners.
AI
That's
a
new
group
up
in
energy,
so
they
they're
building
a
park
just
down
the
street
off
prosperity.
Church,
it's
just
not
a
speakeasy
bar
area
and
I
am
familiar
where
their
current
location
is.
It's
I'm
here
because
of
the
story
that
was
in
the
news
this
weekend
about
the
unfortunate
events
that
took
place.
AI
It
just
kind
of
said:
look
if
I'm
gonna
say
something
I,
better,
say
it
and
stop
waiting
for
you
guys
to
show
up
on
my
news
and
then
want
to
be
mad
about
it,
but
I
would
certainly
support
them
in
a
more
appropriate
part
of
our
area.
We
have
Northlake
Mall
to
the
to
the
West.
We
have
the
city
centers
there
to
the
east
and
and
north
of
that
you
know
we
have
Birkdale
crossing
there's
just
a
lot
of
other
places
that.
R
R
Roy
Kellerman
I
lived
on
the
corner
of
a
pinewood
ring
and
creature
crowed
and
ride.
Would
court
Mylene
was
all
around
but
been
there
since
early
night
in
1964
and
I've
been
in
a
long
time
a
lot
of
changes
and
we
have
a
great
neighborhood
I,
helped
develop
that
land
with
David
Campbell,
and
we
promised
by
the
years
ago
that
that
would
be
an
office
spot
for
an
office
building
and
we
have
a
great
Indian
restaurant
right
there.
R
They
closed
early
afternoons,
family-style
family
at
restaurant,
and
this
is
just
open
to
ATM
music
tea
of
a
belly
dancing
he's
gonna
keep
going,
they
gonna
have
it
all
their
museum
services,
gonna
have
a
portion
of
it
for
family
and
still
part
of
it.
Gonna
be
difficult
children,
family
half
of
its
gonna,
be
for
the
the
cooker
bar
who
could
work,
but
I
am
very
much
against
this.
Thy
neighbor
have
been
there
a
long
time
and
I
want
been
a
few
more
years.
R
A
AJ
Very
next
door
of
that
project,
where
he
is
building
it.
It's
part
of
the
neighborhood.
We
are
still
part
of
the
neighborhood
very
next
door.
We
have
children
activities
there
every
day,
Taekwon
those
after
school.
They
occur
summer
camps
and
we
really
don't
want
a
place
like
polka
bar,
where
this
will
definitely
put
the
children
under
stress
and
the
parents
would
probably
take
the
children's
away
from
there
and
the
neighborhood
covenants
prevent
from
such
business
to
be
established
there.
The
petitioner
did
not
do
any
due
diligence.
Look
at
the
neighborhood
covenants.
AJ
A
AK
Name
is
Ashe
janata
I'm
a
neighborhood
store,
also,
and
all
I
would
ask
you
guys
just
before
you
do
anything
about
this,
go
ahead
and
search
on
a
red
28.
What
it
is.
Look
at
the
pictures
on
website.
It's,
not
restaurant,
it's
not
a
restaurant.
It's
a
hookah
bar
it's
taking
our
kids
safety
away.
That's
mostly
the
safety
issue
for
this
issue.
AA
Thank
You
mayor
I
would
like
to
emphasize
that
this
site
is
already
zoned
for
commercial
uses.
There
are
a
number
of
commercial
uses
surrounding
the
site,
as
was
mentioned,
restaurants,
gas
stations-
restaurants-
here,
restaurants,
here
Bo
teams-
here
there
is
a
bank
here,
gas
station
here,
more
commercial
here
office.
Here
we
do
have
multifamily
across
the
street.
This
is
a
restaurant
within
an
enclosed
building.
We'll
follow
all
regulations
in
terms
of
fumes
and
vapors
and
vapors.
Hookah
is
an
option.
It's
not
a
requirement.
When
you
come
to
the
restaurant,
it's
an
option.
AA
It's
a
unique
offering
that
makes
this
a
different
atmosphere.
There
was
one
incident
at
Jazz's
other
facility
on
Mallard,
Creek
Road.
That
was
a
close
to
three
years
ago.
It
was
an
unfortunate
incident.
There
are
other
restaurants
at
that
same
location
that
also
have
stay
open
late.
Some
of
those
incidents
may
have
been
as
a
result
of
that
again.
One
incident
in
how
many
years.
AE
AA
AE
I'll
be
quick,
we
did
take
out
a
loan
for
that
land
about
a
year
ago,
and
you
know
Bank
came
and
offered
us
a
great
opportunity
to
which
we
thought
wasn't.
What
we
think
is
a
really
great
opportunity
and
to
move
upstream
and
expand
our
brand.
That
was
one
incident.
There
are
other
people
like
wildlings
to
steal
from
the
two
o'clock
in
the
morning,
because
sometimes
on
a
Friday,
it
might
be
a
more
african-american.
Of
course
it's
easy
to
point
the
finger,
but
it's
not
like
that.
AE
It's
a
safe
haven
place
and
we
are
we
opening
actually
in
Greenville
South
Carolina
this
coming
weekend.
It's
a
restaurant
we
and
we're
using
the
same
model,
a
small
room
where
you
can
actually
use
hookahs
at
just
so
that
people
who
don't
use
hookahs
can
still
come
and
enjoy
themselves
and
not
worry
about
the
whole.
Who
can
all
experience.
A
Sony
anything
else
that
you'd
like
to
get
to
us.
Mr.
McBaine
knows
how
to
reach
out
anything
that
you
wanted
to
send
to
us.
Let
us
know
you
can
reach
it,
Duke,
sending
it
to
the
clerk's
office.
Okay,
all
right!
So
are
there
questions
for
the
staff
or
the
petitioner
or
the
opponents
yeah
I
have
questions.
J
A
E
P
K
A
Q
Q
C
AL
A
AL
AL
There
is
a
Zaxby's
and
the
Mattress
Firm
lined
up
there,
and
this
is
for
the
parcel
just
next
to
that
it
was
part
of
a
19,
let's
the
19-yard
1992
rezoning
for
a
garden
center,
and
it
is
proposed
now
for
neighborhood
services
to
provide
a
location
for
retail
uses,
including
drive-through
restaurants
and
such
as
that.
The
current
zoning
again
is
b1
conditional
and
that's
the
same
zoning
for
the
other
sites
along
here,
but
it's
very
specific
now,
so
it
is
proposed
for
an
NS
zoning
district.
AL
At
this
time,
the
adopted
future
land
use
here
from
the
east
district
plan
from
about
a
little
before
that
time
was
for
residential.
It
was
Rees
owned
in
92,
and
so
it
has
been
zoned
for
commercial.
It
still
has
a
believe,
a
house
on
it.
At
this
point,
the
proposal
is
for
a
single
principal
building
that
will
allow
all
uses
in
the
district,
including,
as
I,
say,
a
drive-through
kind
of
a
restaurant
I
justified
for
an
outdoor
patio.
AL
It
also
provides
for
joint
access,
as
you
can
see,
on
the
site
plan
here
to
those
other
parcels
that
are
all
interconnected
beyond
there
as
well.
It
also
does
provide
for
a
multi-use
path
and
planting
strip
along
the
front.
There
are
architectural
design
standards
as
well,
and
lighting
would
be
capped.
Staff
is
recommending
apropos
an
approval
of
this
particular.
There
are
still
some
outstanding
transportation
issues
related
to
that
interconnected.
AL
Lot
situation,
these
other
three
are
are
all
served
by
a
single
driveway
in
and
out,
and
this
proposed
is
one
more
driveway,
so
we're
looking
for
either
a
relocation
to
a
little
bit
further
away,
or
else
just
relying
upon
the
single
connection
other
than
that
it
is
consistent
with
the
retail
use
for
the
area.
It
is
consistent
with
the
other
retail
along
the
area
and
does
align
with.
AL
U
You,
madam
mayor
members
of
council
in
the
zoning
committee,
I'm
john
carmack,
we're
here
on
behalf
the
petitioner
mall
road
partners.
Mr.
jeff
watson,
with
the
petitioners
with
me,
Kent
did
a
very
thorough
job
of
going
through
the
site
plan
and
in
the
request,
once
again,
it
is
zoned
as
we
sit
here
tonight,
b1
CD.
It
was
part
of
a
couple
properties
that
were
zoned
for
a
garden
center
garden
center
was
never
constructed.
U
The
site
is
next
to
a
Reilly's,
Auto
Parts
and
got
a
Zaxby's
and
a
couple
of
the
commercial
uses
to
the
east
and
then
a
power
center
to
the
south.
The
request
is
to
resign.
Allow
a
single
building
that
can
contain
247
square
feet.
All
uses,
allow
the
neighborhood
services
and
we're
happy
to
answer
any
questions.
There
are
some
transportation
issues
that
are
mr.
Watson's
working
with
C
dot
and
n
CDT
NCDOT
on,
and
we
hope
to
have
those
resolved
in
a
timely
fashion.
A
F
U
AL
This
is
right
now
it's
owned
are
three
single-family
again,
it's
13
acres
and
it's
sort
of
an
odd
location,
because
it's
on
Neil,
Road
and
IBM
Drive
sort
of
it
is
with
sort
of
surrounded
on
all
sides
by
other
property
that
is
owned
by
IBM,
with
a
relatively
small
connection.
Point
that
actually
makes
it
out
onto
Neil
Road.
You
can
see
it
is
a
big
treed
area
as
a
part
of
a
larger
treed
area
across
the
street,
across
Neil
Road,
or
is
a
big
school
complex,
there's,
also
residential.
AL
Industrial
park
at
one
point
but
was
rezone
for
residential,
and
this
is
again
proposed
for
residential.
It's
going
from
proposed
to
go
from
R
3
to
R,
8
multifamily
and
a
conditional
and
the
Northeast
district
plan
originally
or
does
recommend
residential
at
up
to
four
units
per
acre.
The
general
development
policies
do
support
an
increase
in
density
up
to
eight
units
per
acre.
What
is
proposed
is
92,
duplex,
triplex
and
or
attached.
You
know
essentially
townhouse
dwelling
units.
AL
There
is
essentially
one
way
and
at
this
location
where
it
does
actually
meet,
the
street
5%
of
the
units
are
proposed
for
affordable
housing,
which
I
believe
the
applicant
will
tell
you
about.
Sidewalk
is
proposed
along
Neill
Road.
There
are
architectural
standards
provided
walkways
and
connections
are
provided
for
as
well,
and
in
addition,
we
have
asked
for
and
gotten
stub
streets
in
all
directions
so
that
if
and
when
the
rest
of
this
property
does
develop,
that
it
will
have
some
kind
of
connectivity
in
the
future.
AL
We
do
recommend
approval
upon
resolution
of
a
few
outstanding
issues.
It
is
inconsistent
with
the
plan
in
terms
of
the
four
units
per
acre,
but
the
general
development
block
policies
do
support
this
density,
and
so
they
are
providing
the
kinds
of
pedestrian
environments
that
are
appropriate.
There
is
a
school
there.
There
are
apartments
there,
so
it
is
served
by
other
services
as
well.
The
approval
will
revise
the
adopted
future
land
use
from
four
units
per
acre
to
eight
units
per
acre.
A
A
AM
Thank
you,
ty
Schafer.
Thank
you
for
your
time.
Madam
mayor
council
members,
zoning
committee,
members
I'll,
be
represent
the
petitioner
Jay
s
and
Associates
Inc
James
Scruggs
is
here
this
evening
for
the
petitioner
Colin
Brock
with
block
design,
is
here
they're
the
civil
engineers
and
Lansky
Architects
on
the
project.
AM
AM
The
request
is
that
it
be
rezone
to
the
r8
multifamily
conditional
zoning
district
would
contain
up
to
92
duplex,
triplex
and
townhome
units.
The
density
would
be
right
about
it's
seven
units
per
acre,
the
current
mix
proposed,
would
be
63,
townhomes,
22,
Plex,
nine
triplex
units.
The
petitioner
is
committing
to
reserve
a
minimum
of
5%
of
the
units
on
the
site
for
buyers
at
or
below.
AM
A
Q
J
Q
A
J
A
K
K
AL
Is
a
single-family
lot,
its
0.33
acres
located
on
Pine
Crest
Road
Pine,
Crest
Avenue,
and
this
is
just
off
of
Commonwealth
Avenue
and
the
existing
zoning
is
Oh
to
office.
It
is
a
single-family
house
looks
like
a
single-family
house,
but
it
is
zoned
right
now
for
office
use,
and
the
proposal
is
to
take
it
to
our
for
single-family
residential.
This
is
located
directly
behind
repo
records,
which
is
fronting
on
Commonwealth
Avenue,
and
you
can
see
that
there's
owning
generally
around
it
is
r4.
Even
this
b1
strip
right
here
is
single-family
houses.
AL
J
F
Need
rezoning,
petitioned,
2019,
one
one:
six
by
Billy,
Graham
Evangelistic
Association,
approximately
one
and
a
half
acres
located
on
the
north
side
of
Billy
Graham,
parkway,
east
of
Westmont
Drive
and
south
of
Wood
Ridge
Center
Drive
in
Council
District.
Three.
The
current
zoning
is
our
seventeen
multifamily
residential
with
the
proposed
zoning.
I
1c
g
light
industrial
conditional.
It
doesn't
look
like
we
have
any
speakers
in.
E
AL
Right
so
this
is
one
point:
four,
seven
acres,
it's
on
the
north
side
of
Billy
Graham
Parkway,
so
there's
Billy,
Graham
Parkway.
If
you're
familiar
with
the
area
here,
is
the
farmers
market
down
here
across
the
way.
This
is
provides
the
main
entrance,
as
you
come
off,
of
Billy
Graham
into
the
Billy
Graham
library,
which
is
just
to
the
left
of
Westmont
Drive
there
to
the
north
is
a
wastewater
treatment
plant
to
the
east.
AL
AL
Office
and
residential
and
industrial
land
uses
the
existing
zoning
is
a
multi-family
right
now,
so
the
intent
is
to
allow
for
cultural
facilities,
religious
institutions,
warehousing
researching
research
needs.
It
is
essentially
intended
by
Billy
Graham
Park
Billy,
Graham
library,
as
sort
of
storage
for
other
things,
but
this
will
also
open
the
door
in
the
future
for
them
to
use
it
for
other
purposes,
related
to
the
Billy
Graham
library
as
well.
AL
There
are
a
number
of
prohibited
uses,
outdoor
storage,
eating
drinking
and
entertainment,
shopping,
centers,
personal
services,
and
you
can
see
the
list
there
high
limits
the
number
of
buildings.
The
access
would
be
off
of
Wood
Ridge,
Drive,
Woodridge,
Center
Drive
on
this
side,
rather
than
this
side,
which
would
probably
be
a
little
more
intense
and
difficult.
There
is
a
six-foot
sidewalk
and
eight-foot
planting
strip
planned
for
the
area
and
the
architectural
standards
include.
A
variety
of
uses
recommend
approval
for
this.
It
is
consistent
with
a
central
district
plan.
AL
Z
He
was
unable
to
make
it
good
evening,
mayor,
Lyles
members
of
council
members
of
the
zoning
committee.
Thank
you
for
your
time
this
evening,
I'm
working
with
Jeff
Brown
and
the
Keith
corporation
to
represent
the
Billy
Graham
Evangelistic
Association
on
this
rezoning
Kent
did
a
very
thorough
job
and
he
mentioned
it's
consistent
with
the
adopted
land
use
policy
staff
supports
and
there
are
no
outstanding
issues.
So
I'm
here
to
answer
any
questions
are.
A
J
P
Right,
thank
you,
madam
mayor
2019.
120
petitioners.
You
mentioned
by
Titan
partners.
It's
about
eight
and
a
half
acres,
just
on
the
north
side
of
wilkinson
boulevard
bounded
by
Wilkinson
and
West
Moorhead
Street
in
the
area
here
of
subtle,
Ave
West,
Moorhead,
Berryhill,
remail
Road.
The
petition
itself
is
currently
zoned
I
to
general
industrial.
They
are
proposed
to
go
to
a
Tod
CC
district.
The
adopted
future
land
use
in
the
Bryant
Park
land-use
and
streetscape
plan
does
recommend
a
mix
of
office
retail
residential
uses
on
the
site.
P
The
site
is
also
within
less
than
a
quarter
mile
from
proposed
future
transit
station
for
the
cat,
Silver
Line.
So
in
consideration
of
where
those
stops
would
be
I
believe
there's
one
at
the
center
lab
area
proposed
and
also
want
it.
Remounts,
so
we'd
have
essentially
two
future
transit
stops
for
the
Silver
Line
within
close
proximity
to
this
site.
We've
had
several
mud
o
rezoning
in
the
vicinity.
As
you
can
see
on
the
zoning
map,
you've
got
several
mud
optionals.
P
We
had
a
few
that
aren't
even
reflected
that
have
come
in
since
then
that
are
on
this
frontage
here
of
West
Moorhead
Street,
so
we're
seeing
a
I
guess
the
redevelopment
of
this
area,
as
we
found
out
more
about
the
Silver
Line
in
regard
to
Wilkinson
Boulevard
and
some
of
the
stops,
and
we
had
conversations
about
this
petition.
Knowing
that
we're
suggesting
a
mix
of
uses
Tod
supports
mixed
use,
type
of
development,
we
have
future
stations
that
would
be
within
very
close.
Proximity
of
this
staff
work
to
the
petitioner
to
recommend
a
Tod
CC
district.
P
We
feel
that
would
implement
the
mix
juice
land-use
recommendation
as
well
as
never
met
the
future
investment
in
the
Silver
Line
and
continue
out
the
redevelopment
of
this
area
in
the
context
of
what
we're
already
seeing
through
those
mud,
optionals.
So
staff
does
recommend
approval
this
petition.
It
is
consistent
with
the
Bryant
Park
land-use
and
streetscape
plan
again
because
of
its
proximity
to
the
proposed
Silver
Line
and
within
two
stops
that
are
in
close
proximity
of
it.
We
felt
the
Tod
CC
was
an
appropriate
district.
E
A
A
P
P
Thank
you,
madam
mayor
2019
121.
Just
over
one
acre
on
West
Boulevard
and
Nobles
I
have
just
a
little
bit
in
from
Holabird
Lane.
The
site
currently
is
vacant.
It
is
currently
zoned
b1
CD,
which
is
neighborhood
business,
gets
a
conditional
zoning
district.
This
petition
is
proposing
to
just
take
it
to
a
conventional
b1
zoning
district.
So
again
we're
looking
at
a
CD
removal
and
just
go
into
a
conventional
b1,
District
adaptive
future
land
use
for
the
area
is
record,
is
recommended
for
retail
land
uses
from
the
site.
P
That's
per
the
central
district
plan,
which
was
adopted
in
93
staff,
does
recommend
approve
of
this
petition.
It
is
consistent
with
the
retail
land
use
recommendation
and
it's
consistent
with
that.
It's
also
the
site
is
already
zone
for
a
convenience
store,
which
is
something
that
the
petitioner
did
talk
about
as
a
potential
use
under
that
b1
CDs
owning
the
really
the
challenge
with
that
CD
zoning
district
is
it's
it's
more
tied
to
the
parcel
that's
across
West
Boulevard.
P
Here
it's
actually
was
a
little
convoluted
on
what
the
relationship
was
between
the
CD
on
the
south
side
of
West.
Boulevard
is
in
comparison
to
the
site,
that's
being
considered
for
rezoning
this
evening,
but
there
was
obviously
some
relationship
to
where
that
CD
plan
carried
over
to
this
area
on
West
Boulevard.
P
So
again,
we're
also
trying
to
clean
up
a
little
bit
of
what
we
found
to
be
a
bit
of
a
convoluted
scenario,
with
the
CD
plan
that
was
originally
adopted
and
going
to
a
b1
district
which
would
still
support
the
Land
Use
Plan
and
would
leave
behind
his
owning
district.
That
was
compatible
with
what
the
land-use
recommendations
were,
that
adopted
area
plan.
So
again,
staff
does
recommend
approval.
They
happy
to
answer
any
questions
that
you
may
have.
AN
AN
Written
better
and
I
bought
the
property
while
ago
for
my
uncle
here
at
the
property
70s,
and
he
had
I
did
for
me
to
do.
I
have
a
salon
now
myself.
He
wanted
to
continue
my
business,
so
I'm
thinking
about
building
a
salon
on
that
property
right
there
and
a
gas
station
too
and
I
want
to
see
that
neighborhood
improve
and
it's
a
great
neighborhood
I
want
to
see
the
improvement
in
the
neighborhood
I
wanted
to
kind
of
make
it
more
modern
and
create
jobs,
and
they
they
played
as
well.