►
From YouTube: Charlotte City Council Zoning Meeting - May 18, 2020
Description
This is the May 2020 Zoning meeting for the Charlotte City Council. Thanks for joining us.
For more information go to www.CharlotteNC.Gov
A
Good
evening,
everyone
this
is
mayor,
vie
walls
today
is
May
the
18th
and
we
are
conducting
our
zoning
meeting
and
I
call
this
meeting
to
order
and
welcome
all
of
you
who
are
watching
us
on
either
the
government
Channel
the
city's
Facebook
page
or
the
city's
YouTube
page.
We
want
to
especially
thank
the
media
for
participating
with
us
in
this,
as
well
as
all
of
our
residents
tonight.
Zoning
meeting
is
a
virtual
meeting,
that's
being
conducted
in
accordance
with
the
electronic
meeting
statutes
and
those
requirements
of
notice,
access
and
minutes.
A
I
also
want
to
remind
the
council
that
all
votes
will
be
taken
by
roll
call
verbally
today,
from
the
all
the
way
from
the
hearings
closing
every
state.
Every
vote
will
be
a
roll
call
vote
so
before
I
begin,
I
want
to
say,
happy
birthday
to
councilmember,
Mitchell,
I
baked
him
a
cake,
but
I
would
probably
eat
it
all
myself,
and
that
wouldn't
be
a
good
thing.
So
we
all.
B
D
G
A
A
Think
he
has
a
better
plan
than
that.
Mr.
Drake's,
we
begin
our
meeting
with
an
invocation
followed
by
the
Pledge
of
Allegiance.
The
invocation
is
made
by
a
council
member
intended
to
solemnize
our
proceedings,
and
we
understand
that
we
have
religious
religious
diversity
in
our
community,
including
those
without
a
religious
faith.
So
tonight
we've
asked
council
member
winston
to
give
our
invocation
or
words
of
expression.
H
Yes,
Tamayo
so
bear
with
me:
I
might
have
some
camera
shovels
been
shutting
out
for
some
reason.
Tonight,
I
will
read
a
passage
from
revelant
Reverend
Martin
Luther
King,
the
junior
speech
titled,
the
other
in
America.
It
is
particularly
poignant
in
this
time.
I
want
to
discuss
the
race
problem
tonight
and
I
want
to
discuss
this
very
honestly.
I
still
believe
that
freedom
is
a
bonus
you
receive,
but
telling
the
truth.
H
You
shall
know
the
truth
and
the
truth
shall
set
you
free
and
I
do
not
see
how
we
will
ever
solve
the
turbulent
problem
of
race
confronting
our
nation
until
there
is
an
honest
confrontation
with
it
and
a
willing
search
for
the
truth
and
a
willingness
to
admit
the
truth
when
we
discover
it
and
so
I
went
to
use
as
a
title
for
my
lecture
tonight's,
the
other
America
and
I
use
this
title
because
they
are
literally
to
America.
Everything
in
our
country
has
this
kind
of
dualism.
H
This
schizophrenia,
whatever
so
many
parts
and
every
city
ends
up
being
two
cities
rather
than
one.
There
are
two
Americas
one.
America
is
beautiful
for
the
situation
in
this
America.
Millions
of
people
as
the
milk
of
prosperity
and
the
honey
of
equality
flowing
before
them.
This
America
is
to
have
the
type
of
millions
of
people
who
have
food
and
material
necessities
to
their
body,
culture
and
education
for
their
minds,
freedom
and
human
dignity
for
their
spirit
in
this
America
children
grow
up
in
the
sunlight
of
opportunity,
but
there's
another
America.
H
This
other
America
has
a
daily
ugliness
about
it.
That
transformed
the
buoyancy
of
hope
into
the
fatigue
of
despair
in
this
other
America.
Thousands
and
thousands
of
people
walk
the
streets
and
search
for
jobs
that
do
not
exist
in
this
other
America.
Millions
of
people
on
the
horse
to
live
in
the
Merriman's
bill
restricting
housing
conditions
where
they
do
not
have
the
privilege
of
calling
Walter
club
having
wall-to-wall
carpeting
hands,
but
all
too
often
they
end
up
with
wall-to-wall
rats
and
roaches.
Almost
40%
of
the
Negro
families
of
America
live
in
substandard
housing
conditions.
H
In
this
other
America,
thousands
of
young
people
type
of
an
opportunity
to
get
an
adequate
education
every
year.
Thousands
finish
high
school
reading
out
of
seventh,
eighth
and
sometimes
ninth
grade
level,
not
because
they're
dumb,
not
because
they
don't
have
the
native
intelligence,
but
because
the
schools
are
so
inadequate,
so
overcrowded
so
devoid
of
quality
so
segregated.
If
you
will
that
the
best
in
these
minds
can
never
come
out.
Probably
the
most
critical
problem
in
the
of
the
America
does
the
economic
problems.
H
There
are
so
many
other
people
in
the
other
America
who
can
never
make
ends
meet
because
their
incomes
are
far
too
low
if
they
have
income
and
their
jobs
are
so
devoid
of
quality,
and
so
in
this
other
America
unemployment
is
a
reality
and
underemployment
is
a
reality.
Now.
Let
me
finally
say
something
in
the
realm
of
the
Spirit
and
then
I'm
going
to
take
my
sheep.
H
Let
me
say
finally
that
in
the
midst
of
the
hollering,
we
have
got
to
come
to
see
that,
however
much
we
dislike,
the
destinies
of
white
and
black
America
are
tied
together.
Now
the
races
don't
understand
this
apparently
darkness.
That's
needs
are
tied
together
and
somehow
we
must
all
learn
to
live
together
as
brothers
in
this
country
or
we're
all
going
to
perish
together
as
fool's.
H
Our
destinies
are
tied
together,
whether
we
like
it
or
not,
culturally,
and
otherwise,
every
white
person
is
a
little
bit
Negro
and
every
Negro
is
a
little
bit
like
our
language,
already
music
or
material
prosperity,
and
even
our
food
or
the
amalgam
of
black
and
white
and
brown
John
Donne
was
right.
No
man
is
an
island
and
the
tide
that
filled
every
man
is
a
piece
of
the
continent,
a
part
of
the
main,
and
he
goes
on
towards
the
end.
Today.
H
A
C
A
You
thank
you.
Mr.
Mitchell
and
I
want
to
recognize
that
we
have
a
zoning
committee
members
that
are
on
this
call
and
can
call
in
or
watching
this,
but
we're
recognized,
but
I
want
to
recognize.
Sam
Spencer,
who
is
the
chair
of
the
zoning
committee,
is
on
the
phone
and
will
be
able
to
address
questions
as
we
go
through
the
hearings
and
can
ask
questions
that
the
other
members
of
the
zoning
committee
would
text
or
send
to
him
on
any
given
petition.
So
with
that
did
I
hear
someone.
A
So,
thank
you,
I'm.
Sorry,
it's
hard!
It's
it's
really
a
virtual
meeting.
It's
sometimes
tough
to
hear
so.
I
want
to
begin
to
have
an
understanding
of
our
zoning
process.
It
begins
with
applications
submitted
to
the
planning
staff
for
review.
There
are
two
types
of
items
that
we're
actions
were
taken
today
we
will
have
decisions
on
hearings
that
have
already
been
held,
and
the
zoning
committee
has
made
a
recommendation
to
us
and
then
we
will
also
have
hearings
that
we
have
people
that
signed
up.
There
was
a
deadline
by
9
a.m.
A
On
the
hearings
we
do
have,
we
did
ask
people
to
sign
up
and
support
or
in
opposition.
We
have
two
hearings
on
our
agenda
tonight:
item
number
22
as
well
as
item
number
26,
where
we
have
people
speaking
in
opposition
to
the
petition
I
would
hope
that
those
who
are
watching
or
on
the
phone
right
now,
particularly
on
petition
number
20:19
one
one
four.
A
On
item
number:
twenty
five
petition:
twenty
twenty
2000,
seven
we
have
one
speaker
against,
and
so
that
should
be
manageable
after
the
hearings,
I
want
to
just
say
we
will
have
the
staff
give
us
a
short
presentation.
We
will
have
to
open
and
close
every
public
hearing
by
roll
call
vote,
and
then
the
petition
will
go
to
the
zoning
committee
of
the
Planning
Commission
for
review
and
recommendations.
Generally,
we
try
to
end
by
10:00
p.m.
A
and
I
would
hope
that
that
would
be
our
goal
and
planning
staff
has
told
me
that
if
we
can
do
that,
we
would
have
actually
almost
gotten
caught
up
with
and
getting
our
back
on
a
regular
schedule.
So
before
we
go
to
actual
decisions
on
other
items,
I
would
like
to
recognize
David
Pettine
from
the
zoning
staff.
Thank.
O
You,
madam
mayor
I,
just
wanted
to
take
a
few
moments
with
everybody
to
recognize
one
of
our
staff
members
and
planning
development.
That's
gonna
be
retiring
at
the
other
month,
Kent
main
Kent,
a
lot
of
you
to
have
seen
presented
meetings
he's
not
with
us
this
evening,
because
we're
going
virtual
here,
but
I'm
sure
he's
out
there
watching
us.
O
A
Thank
you,
sorry,
I'm
sure
you'll
be
recognized
by
many
of
your
colleagues
and
friends
before
this
is
all
done
and
over.
Thank
you.
So
the
first
thing
I
need
is
a
motion
on
the
deferrals
and
we
can
do
these
all
in
one
motion,
so
I
will
read
them
and
make
sure
that
everybody
has
them
as
and
you
can
mark
them.
In
the
agenda
item
number
three
petition:
2019,
zero,
zero.
Six
is
a
withdrawal
of
a
petition.
Can
we
combine
the
withdrawals
with
the
yes.
A
A
C
P
M
N
A
A
15
petition,
2019,
146
deferral
until
all
of
these
deferrals
are
until
June
the
15th,
so
I
would
just
say
that
will
I
won't
say
the
update
again
June
15
items,
16
petition,
2019
166,
can
note
sorry
item
17,
petition,
2019,
168,
sunset,
real
estate
and
land
item;
18,
petition,
number
20,
19,
179,
Ron,
Staley
of
Verde
homes,
item
19,
20
2000
to
the
Drake
for
company
item
23,
20
2000
for
Boulevard
real
estate
advisors.
So
if
I
can
have
a
motion
for
the
deferral.
Q
A
R
R
A
L
C
F
R
A
Will
not
be
sending
this
back
to
the
zoning
committee,
so
this
is
a
rezoning
petition,
2019
120
126
by
Harris
and
Tucker
for
approximately
four
tenths
of
an
acre
along
17th
and
North
Davidson
Street,
it's
in
district
1
current
zoning
is
r8
proposed
recommended
zoning
is
r2?
U
R?
U
2
urban
residential
conditional.
The
staff
and
the
petitioners
recommend
adoption
of
this
petition.
Do
we
have
a
motion
to
accept.
N
A
Q
Q
A
M
M
A
A
F
R
A
All
right
so
now
that
we
don't
have
to
send
that
back.
That
motion
passes.
This
is
for
this
petition.
Approximately
1/2
acre
allocated
1118
Parkwood
Avenue
current
zoning
is
r5.
The
proposed
zoning
is
urban
residential
conditional.
The
staff
and
the
zoning
committee
recommend
approval
of
this
petition.
Do
I
have
a
motion
or.
A
C
A
L
L
N
A
Hodge
Mira
massaged
Mira,
yes,
I
said
yes,
okay,
I
could
not
hear
you
sorry
all
right.
So
that
item
is
approved.
Agenda
item
number
629
as
a
petition
2019
171
by
Anthony
Kuhn
for
approximately
two
and
a
half
acres
at
300,
North,
Tryon
Street,
the
current
zoning
is
i2
and
the
proposed
zoning
is
transit,
oriented
development,
urban
center.
The
zoning
committee
and
the
staff
recommend
a
pool
of
this
petition.
Do
I
have
a
motion
to
adopt
or
a
little
brief.
A
C
J
J
Q
Q
A
You,
the
next
item,
is
item
number
7,
2014,
2019
172
by
Sharon
Academy
properties
for
approximately
4
acres
located
on
the
northeast
corner
of
cibola
and
which
would
drive
the
current
zoning,
a
single-family
residential
four
units
per
acre,
the
proposed
it's
institutional.
The
zoning
committee
and
staff
recommend
approval
of
this
item.
Is
there
a
motion
to.
A
Motion
and
a
second
any
discussion,
all
in
favor
Mayor,
Pro
Tem
Iseult;
yes,
mrs.
Mira;
yes,
mr.
Mitchell,
yes,
mr.
Winston,
yes,
mr.
Egleston,
yes,
mr.
Graham,
yes,
miss
Watlington;
yes,
miss
Johnson,
yeah,
mr.
Newton,
yes,
mr.
Bukhari,
mr.
Driggs
I
think
sometimes
I
wonder
if
we
could
exclude
the
motion
makers
from
the
roll
call
vote
and
just
Asuma
yes,
but
I
don't
see
the.
A
A
The
next
item
is
item
number
eight
petition,
2019
176
by
the
airport
for
approximately
79
acres
on
the
east
side
of
Steel
Creek
Road.
The
current
zoning
is
r3
with
an
airport
overlay.
The
proposed
zoning
is
i2
with
airport
overlay.
The
zoning
committee
and
the
staff
recommend
approval
of
this
item.
May
I.
Have
a
motion
come
second.
A
C
I
R
A
Bukhari,
yes,
mr.
Drake's.
Yes,
that
motion
passes,
that
decision
passes.
Item
number
nine
AB
rezoning,
petition,
2019
178
by
DRB
group
for
approximately
11
acres
located
on
the
east
side
of
Razzles.
Fair
rode
on
the
car
zoning
is
general
industrial
conditional.
The
proposed
zoning
is
urban
residential
commercial
conditional.
The
zoning
committee
voted
6
to
1
to
approve
this
petition
and
staff
recommends.
Approval
of
the
petition.
Do
I,
have
a
motion
motion
and
a
second
any
discussion.
C
J
M
M
M
A
Motion
passes
agenda
item
number
10,
zoning
decision,
2019
181
by
clay,
Cooper,
whoa,
Cooper
Development.
This
one
needs
a
motion
not
to
send
back
to
the
that
the
changes
that
have
been
made
goodbye.
Thank
you
all
right.
So
we've
have
a
motion
in
a
second
Mayor
Pro
Tem
ISIL.
Yes,
mrs.
Mira
miss
mr.
Mitchell,
yes
mr.
Winston,
yet
mr.
eggleston,
yes,
mr.
Graham,
yes,.
J
C
C
A
A
Q
J
L
L
L
L
A
Item
passes
and
agenda
item
11,
I'm
zoning
decision,
2019
183
by
Rhino
partners,
coffee
approximately
a
quarter
of
an
acre
located
on
the
west
side
of
the
plaza.
The
current
zoning
is
general
business
with
pedestrian
overlay,
and
the
proposed
zoning
is
general
business,
pedestrian
overlay
optional.
The
zoning
committing
the
staff
recommend
approval
of
this
petition
do.
A
I
J
M
N
A
You
all
right,
the
next
petition
is
item
number
12
was
this
one
that
was
it's
12
was
not
deferred
right,
okay,
so
this
is
petition
2019
185
by
freedom,
communities,
approximately
one
and
a
half
acres
located
on
the
south
side
of
Tuckasegee
Road.
The
current
zoning
is
a
single-family
residential
five
units.
An
acre.
The
proposed
zoning
is
urban
residential
commercial,
conditional
district.
The
zoning
committee
and
the
staff
recommend
approval
of
this
petition.
Do
I
have
a
motion
to
accept
the
zoning
committee
statement
as
our
own
go
move?
A
J
J
S
A
That
line
a
lot
that
decision
is
approved.
The
next
one
is
item:
13,
petition,
20
2006
by
Charlotte
planning,
design
and
development.
Our
plan,
our
our
team
for
approximately
a
half
acre
look
west
of
pecan
Avenue
north
of
Independence.
It's
in
district
1.
Current
zoning
is
none
and
they're
asking
for
zoning
of
b2
general
business,
pedestrian
overlay,
the
zoning
committee
and
the
staff
recommended
approval
of
this
petition.
Is
there
a
motion
in
a
second
any
discussion?
All
in
favor?
Sorry,
Mayor,
Pro
Tem?
Yes,
mrs.
Marin,
miss
Miller
mr.
Mitchell,
yes,.
C
J
M
T
A
So
those
are
all
of
the
uncounseled
decisions.
For
today
are
this
meeting.
We
are
now
going
to
go
to
the
section
of
our
hearings
and
the
first
item
that
we're
going
to
hear
our
two
were.
The
first
two
items
are
text,
amendments
that
have
been
submitted
by
our
planning
department,
Charlotte
planning,
design
and
development.
A
The
first
one
is
to
modify
the
Tod
transit-oriented
development
requirements
to
provide
greater
flexibility,
address
unintended
consequences,
provide
consistency
between
sections
at
missing
standards,
update
selected
standards
revived
the
revised
administrative
authority,
correct
any
inaccuracies
and
prior
I'm
write-ups,
and
update
the
section
references,
modify
and
PE
d
applicability
regulations
as
related
to
Tod,
update,
delete
and
add
definitions
and
graphic.
The
staff
recommends
approval
this
document.
N
A
O
T
Members
of
the
council
we're
proposing
the
Tod
text
amendment
and
just
to
bring
it
back
a
little
bit.
As
you
recall,
last
April
you
approved
four
new
transit
oriented
development
zoning
districts.
We
followed
that
up
by
proactively
with
something
over
1500
parcels
of
land
along
the
blue
line
transit
core
in
what
we
call
the
Tod
alignment
designing
to
get
the
right
zoning
on
the
ground
to
implement
the
board
that
has
been
using
the
new
ordinance
as
well
as
design
professionals
and
property
owners.
T
T
So
the
reason
we're
doing
this
or
what
the
purpose
of
this
text
amendment
is
is
only
said.
The
modified
Tod
development
requirements
to
update
and
delete
definitions
and
graphics,
and
we
also
need
to
modify
our
pad
applicability,
section,
correct
and
oversight.
If
you
can
see
on
the
screen
some
examples
of
how
the
actual
ordinance
will
be
adjusted,
you
can
see
some
deletions
and
some
new
additions,
removing
graphics
and
so
forth.
Like.
T
So
what
this
text
amendment
does
it
really?
It
focuses
on
nine
general
categories
of
modifications,
we'll
have
just
blown
through
them.
It
provides
a
different
clarity
regulations.
It
provides
greater
flexibility.
That's
missing.
Standards
addresses
unintended
consequences
of
the
new
Tod
ordinance.
It
provides
consistency
between
sections,
but.
T
The
corrects
inaccuracies
revises
administrative
authority
that
updates
and
revises
graphics
and
updates,
ads
and
deletes
of
emissions,
but
the
you
do
advisory
committee
or
the
OAC
has
been
involved
with
us
as
we've
crafted
this
text,
amendment
they've
been
briefed
on
it
and
been
provided
an
opportunity
to
provide
their
comments
and
feedback,
and
several
committee
members
have
done
so,
and
their
comments
have
been
incorporated
into
our
proposed
text.
Amendment
that
your
own
we're
hearing
about
tonight.
T
A
N
A
J
R
A
A
Now
we
come
to
item
21
I'm
rezoning,
petition,
2019
113
by
the
Charlotte
Mecklenburg
Housing
Authority
for
a
text
amendment
this
text,
amendment
as
Helly
italic
heli
tops
limited
as
an
accessory
use,
I'm
assuming
that's
where
you
can
land
a
little
helicopter
accessory
used
a
lot
with
one
prescribed
condition
in
the
mixed
use.
Development
district
staff
recommends
approval
of
this.
We
have.
We
do
not
have
speakers
signed
up.
Are
we
I'm?
Sorry?
We
do
have
one
speaker,
we
have
one
speaker
sign
up.
Does
the
staff
want
to
present
any
material
before
the
speaker?
No
thirds?
A
A
U
Will
you
want
me
to
start
yes,
madam
mayor,
madam
mayor
pro-tem,
members
of
council,
as
I
become
a
child
Carmichael
here
on
behalf
of
the
Tichenor,
the
request.
As
you
stated,
it's
just
I
had
housetops
limited
as
an
accessory
use
in
the
mud.
Zoning
district,
allowing
housetops
would
be
consistent
with
allowing
hello
stops
and
other
office
business
and
industrial
districts
in
Charlotte
and
hell
stops,
as
accessories
are
allowed
from
office
and
business
districts
they're
allowed
in
institutional
districts,
research,
districts
and
industrial
districts.
U
A
health
institutions
allowed
in
mud
under
your
current
ordinance,
so
it'd
only
be
logical
that
the
helipad
would
also
be
allowed
in
much
my
sense
without
knowing,
of
course
is.
This
was
just
probably
an
oversight
when
the
ordinance
was
drafted.
I,
don't
know
that
that
sense,
because
it's
allowed
in
so
many
other
business
and
office
districts,
I'm
happy
to
answer
any
questions.
I
A
O
I'm
not
aware
of
any
concerns
from
a
staff
standpoint.
If
there's
something
you
know
limited
direction.
That
we'd
like
to
continue
to
look
at
between
the
hearing
and
and
a
final
decision
to
see
if
there's
any
refinement,
that
needs
to
be
done
to
specify
that
it's
for
office,
buildings
in
mud
or
buildings,
of
a
certain
height
and
mud.
We
can
certainly
take
a
look
at
that,
but
I'm
not
aware
of
any
concerns
that
have
been
brought
up
to
this
point
at
a
staff
level.
N
A
H
Q
U
Not
I'm
not
aware
of
any
problems
that
we've
had,
but
the
current
language
of
the
lorentz
other
than
in
the
petition
that
you're
going
to
hear.
Next,
you
would
need
them.
You
would
need
the
text
movement
in
order
to
accommodate
a
hospital
in
mud.
It
has
the
hot
Rama
Center
that
requires
the
ability
to
land
and
edit
helicopters
and
and
and
and
have
patients
come
my
way
of
helicopters.
U
Yeah,
thank
you.
That's
that's
right,
yeah
and
if
you
can,
if
a
health
institution
is
allowed
in
mud,
at
least
to
me,
it
seems
logical
that
a
limited
helipad
would
also
be
allowed
because
hospitals
care
for
patients
who
have
experienced
severe
trauma,
and/or
transport
of
my
weight,
Impala
kept
helicopters.
So
yes,
I,
would
agree
what
you
just
said.
A
K
K
K
Having
limited
helicopters
near
residential
I
realized
that
the
zoning
designations
are
listed
here,
but
is
there
any
proximity
in
proximity,
considerations,
I,
think
about
noise
and
the
noise
ordinance
when
it
relates
to
the
airport,
but
with
helicopters?
What
protects
will
protect
the
resident
from
having
helipad,
essentially
in
their
backyard
and
I'm
being
hyperbolic?
Is
there
anything
else
that
will
protect
our
neighborhoods.
O
That'd,
be
something
we'd
have
to
take
a
look
a
little
bit
further
into
and
give
you
some
feedback
in
a
follow-up
report.
I,
don't
know
the
hell.
Stop
ordnance
off
the
top
of
my
head
so
be
certainly
certainly
happy
to
look
that
up
and
give
you
some
information
back,
but
a
lot
of
the
other
districts
where
these
are
allowed
do
allow
residential
uses.
So
it's
certainly
something
there.
O
U
S
V
S
D
A
N
A
The
motion
passes.
The
next
item
is
agenda
number
22.
The
petition
is
2019
114
by
the
charlotte-mecklenburg
Hospital
Authority.
The
location
is
approximately
70
acres,
bounded
by
Scott
East
Moorhead
and
little
Sugar
Creek
sin
district
1.
The
current
zoning
is
office
office,
conditional
neighborhood,
business,
general
business,
single-family,
residential
and
multi-family
residential.
The
proposed
zoning
is
mud.
Mixed-Use
development
option
with
5-year
vested
rights
staff,
recommends
approval
of
this
petition.
A
Among
upon
resolution
of
several
outstanding
lish
issues
related
to
environment
and
requested
technical
provisions,
I
believe
that
we
have
approximately
20
people
signed
up
to
speak
and
there
is
a
pup.
There
is
a
group
for
and
again
so
there
would
be
10
minutes
for
each
side.
I
am
going
to
read
the
names
of
the
groups
of
four,
and
then
the
clerk
will
begin.
Once
we
get
to
the
first
person
that
we
would
have
speak,
they
will
start
with
10
minutes
when
that
10
minutes
is
timed
out
now.
Just
because
I
want
to
be
very
careful.
A
We
have
a
group
of
people
that
have
signed
up
and
they're
approximately
12
people
signed
up
an
opposition
and
I
understand
that
several
people
have
decided
that
they
just
wanted
to
sign
up,
but
there
would
be
people
that
would
speak,
but
because
we
have
to
be
fair
and
because
I
don't
I'm,
not
I'm.
Privy
to
this
information
agreement,
I'm
gonna
read
out
that
complete
list
and
the
three
people
or
if
anyone
wants
to
speak
I,
will
go
in
the
order
that
they
have
in
madam
clerk.
Do
they
have
the
listing
of
the
signup
sheet?
A
No
man
without
the
signup
sheet,
so
I'm
just
gonna
make
a
ask
those
questions
to
make
sure
that
everybody's
here,
because
this
is
a
virtual
meeting
and
we
can't
see
everyone
gathered
in
the
chamber
and
I
want
to
be
as
fair
as
possible
with
the
with
everyone
having
the
opportunity
to
be
heard.
So
the
have
a
reef
staff
presentation,
following
that,
the
first
speaker
that
we
have
sign
up
is
Mary
ghertner.
The
second.
A
This
is
in
favor,
John
Carmichael,
followed
by
saju
joy,
Bennett,
Thompson,
Colin,
Lane,
Ryan,
Lewis
and
C
Blakeney,
so
I
will
be
calling
on
miss
Gartner
to
is
the
first
person
and
mr.
Carmichael,
and
the
remaining
of
the
group
has
ten
minutes
altogether.
So
I
don't
know
if
you
are
all
aware
of
each
other,
but
hopefully
that
can
be
worked
out
in
advance
all
right,
so
I'm
gonna
call
them.
Mr
patanè
for
a
staff
redo
all.
O
Right,
thank
you,
madam
mayor
petition,
2019
114,
70
acres
out
in
the
Dilworth
and
area
and
on
Kings
Drive
area
as
well.
This
is
the
atrium
campus
main
campus,
the
Midtown,
the
current
zoning,
as
we
discussed
at
several
different
zoning
districts
on
at
Oh,
oh
six
b,
one
b,
one
ped
B
to
bed
r6
and
r22
MF.
The
petition
itself
is
proposing
to
go
to
meadow,
so
all
the
70
acres
would
be
consolidated
into
one
zoning
district.
That
would
be
a
mud,
optional
district.
O
Greenway
uses
residential
after
five
units
breaker
and
residential
up
to
22
units
per
acre,
there's
also
a
small
portion
of
the
site
which
is
located
in
the
pet
overlay,
and
the
meadow
would
supersede
that
pet
overlay,
but
some
of
the
design
standards
would
still
be
incorporated
as
a
result
of
that
mud,
mud,
zoning
district.
So
the
petition
itself
is
broken
down
into
eight
development
areas.
We
noted
that
petitioners
development
areas
E&F,
are
really
devoted
only
to
open
space
and
tree
save
area.
So
there's
no
real
development
that'll
go
on
in
those.
O
They
are
dedicated
just
to
open
space
and
trees,
say
there's
some
maximum
gross
fluor
areas
involved.
425
multifamily
dwellings
are
being
proposed
within
the
site,
also
some
detached
duplex,
triplex
or
quadruplex
units.
There
also
a
provision
for
the
helipads
should
that
text
amendment
that
we
just
heard
on
petition
113
be
approved.
O
In
a
brief
moment,
there's
also
buffers
and
landscapes
adjacent
to
the
single-family
uses,
and
the
petition
also
commits
to
Greenway
improvements
during
construction
long
as
well
as
the
detour
route
during
some
of
those
improvements
in
a
minimum
of
three
accessible
connections
from
the
site
to
the
Greenway,
which
is
runs
right
in
front
of
the
campus.
As
you
can
see,
these
just
give
you
an
highlight
of
the
development
areas.
D
and
H
are
the
ones
that
mainly
along
Kings
Drive,
along
with
B
and
portions
of
a
and
then
e
and
F.
You
can
see.
O
Are
those
open
space
and
tree
save
areas.
We
do
have
a
potential
open
space,
intrusive
area,
along
with
some
BMP
areas
there
right
by
the
Greenway
next
development
area,
H
and
that's
just
like
I,
said
a
breakdown,
and
you
can
see
the
Greenway
improvements
with
that
red
arrow
down
towards
the
bottom
of
the
the
colored
part
of
the
map,
they're.
O
Just
the
visual
view
of
some
of
the
landscape.
Buffers
that
would
be
proposed.
I
know,
there's
also
been
some
discussions
ongoing
discussions
with
some
of
the
residents
in
these
areas
about
the
landscape,
buffers
and
the
type
of
trees
and
vegetation
that
that
would
be
proposed
to
be
planted
there
I'll.
Let
the
petitioners
speak
to
any
developments
that
have
occurred
since
this
plan
has
come
in
again.
A
lot
of
those
discussions
have
been
ongoing
even
up
through
this
past
Friday.
O
So,
like
I,
said,
I'll
defer
to
the
petitioner
on
some
of
those
and
just
to
give
you
some
ideas
of
traffic
impact
analysis.
There
was
a
TI
a
done
for
this
project
with
substantial
improvements
that
would
be
proposed.
They
did
study
22
intersections
so
I'm,
going
to
turn
it
over
quickly
to
Felix
over
gone
with
C
dot.
So
you
can
walk
you
through
some
of
those
from
the
TI
a.
W
Thank
you
Felix
over
around
with
T
dot.
To
give
you
some
bearings,
let
me
see
if
I
can
get
my
cursor
out
here
to
give
you
some
bearings
you've
got
Kings
drive
on
the
on
the
top
part
of
the
slide.
You
have
Moorhead
runs
east-west
and
then
you've
got
Kenilworth
and
Scott
that
run
parallel
to
each
other.
You
have
East
boulaert
that
runs
east-west
and
then
you've
got
the
sheer
Creek
Greenway
that
runs
along
the
site.
W
W
W
W
The
development
will
provide
multimodal
improvements.
It
will
provide
vehicle
or
capacity
and
petition
improvements
at
several
intersections
within
the
site
and
around
the
site.
The
petition
is
going
to
pre
construct
and
why,
in
the
current
multi-use
path
for
the
little
Sugar
Creek
Greenway,
which
is
the
arrow,
the
blue
arrow,
that's
running
north-south.
W
W
About
that,
the
loop
road
will
connect
at
Scott
Avenue
right
here,
it's
it's
where
the
current
driveway
connection
is
located
also
as
part
of
the
loop
road.
They
are
going
to
provide
a
multi-use
path
that
will
connect
in
this
neighborhood.
If
you
can
see
my
cursor
to
the
new
share,
Creek
Greenway,
that's
gonna
get
reconstructed.
W
O
All
right,
Thank,
You,
Felix
staff
does
recommend
approval.
This
petition
upon
resolution
of
outstanding
issues
related
to
environment
and
believe
requested
technical
revisions,
so
just
some
minor
things
that
we
need
to
run
through
again.
This
plan
has
been
somewhat
fluid
and
lots
of
ongoing
discussions
between
staff
CDOT
to
the
community,
as
Felix
mentioned,
that
realignment
of
Loop
Road
is
something
that
just
came
about
late
last
week
and
into
today.
So
again,
this
is
a
you
know,
a
lot
of
moving
parts,
but
staff
does
recommend
approval
of
this
petition.
O
A
U
U
A
U
X
A
U
B
A
A
M
Q
A
U
You
so
much
I'm,
madam
mayor,
madam
mayor
platoon,
members
of
council
design
committee,
I'm
john
carmichael
with
me
tonight,
or
dr.
joy,
a
trans
chief,
medical
officer
and
our
rezoning
team
next
slide.
The
subject
site
is
the
Carolinas
Medical,
Center
main
campus
and
certain
Chasen
parcels
of
land.
This
request
is
the
result
of
atriums
need
to
modernize
and
update
its
facilities
next
slide.
U
Dr.
joint,
this
shows
the
ages
of
some
of
the
facilities.
Dr.
joy
will
speak
to
this
in
a
moment
next
slide.
This
is
a
video
than
Pitt
that
depicts
there
should
be
a
prior
slide.
This
is
a
video
that
depicts
some
of
the
proposed
improvements,
including
those
to
the
Jason
little
Sugar
Creek
Greenway.
B
Q
Z
Like
to
begun
begin
by
telling
you
why
atrium
Carolinas
Medical
Center
is
such
an
amazing
place
above
all,
we're
here
to
serve
our
community
and
our
passion
for
caring
for
people
is
what
drives
our
team
every
day.
Cnc
cares
for
the
most
critically
ill
patients
in
our
region
and
we
take
pride
in
our
ability
to
deliver
the
most
advanced
care
for
any
and
all
who
arrive
at
our
door.
We
are
the
goatees
in
our
region
for
health,
related
crises
and
emergencies
such
as
the
köppen
19,
and
we
handle
them
seriously
efficiently
and
effectively.
Z
Each
year
we
see
more
emergency
visits,
hospital
admissions,
babies
delivered
surgeries
and
organ
transplants
than
any
other
Hospital
in
the
state
of
North.
Carolina.
Here
are
some
of
the
other
reasons.
We
need
a
new
bed
tower
and
rehabilitation
hospital
number
one.
Our
facilities
are
outdated
as
mr.
Carmichael
shared
there
are
seconds
of
our
hospital
that
are
over
70
years
old,
so
we're
proud
of
that
standing
care.
Z
We've
delivered,
but
medical
advancements
require
different
spaces
than
70
years
ago,
even
30
years
ago,
when
many
of
our
buildings
open
the
equipment
to
care
for
the
most
complex
cardiac
procedures,
for
example,
require
the
size
equivalent
of
two
of
our
rooms.
Today,
our
current
operating
rooms
are
40%
smaller
than
the
industry
best
practice
with
infrastructure.
That's
at
the
end
of
its
useful
life,
for
example,
our
a
MRI,
a
cutting-edge
machine
used
in
brain
surgery
can't
fit
in
any
of
our
current
operating
rooms
and
using
multiple
types
of
equipment
during
a
single
case
is
challenging.
Z
Z
We
even
had
to
add
a
temporary
tent
expansion
to
handle
the
koban
19
community
needs
number
three.
The
halo
effect
of
new
facility
improves
our
reputation
and
chance
to
recruit
and
retain
the
best
providers.
This
allows
things
like
our
advanced
coded
surge
forecasting,
as
well
as
the
in-house
laboratory
testing
that
we
had
available
because
of
our
specialists
who
work
with
atrium
health.
Z
It
allowed
us
to
anticipate
the
volume
increases,
as
well
as
the
rapid
turn
time's
for
testing,
that
other
parts
of
the
country
really
didn't
even
have
this
enabled
us
to
keep
our
community's
head
low
and
could
serve
PBE.
Our
plan
is
to
totally
redesign
patient
care.
The
patient
care
space
to
fix
these
issues
in
care
forget
greater
number
of
more
complex
patients.
Z
How
are
we
gonna?
Do
that
we're
flexible
floor
plans
that
will
provide
adaptability
to
care
for
patients
with
different
needs
with
larger
spaces
that
allow
clinicians
and
equipment
to
reach
a
patient
will
have
universal
room
design
that
will
prevent
errors
that
can
occur
when
providers
work
in
a
non-standard
environment,
transportation
of
patients
and
families
and
visitors
that
will
be
kept
separate
from
we're
patient
we're,
teammates
providers
and
resources
are
transported.
Z
Finally,
and
most
importantly,
we
strive
to
deliver
the
best
and
most
outstanding
patient
and
family
experience.
We
can
we
want
inviting
healing
spaces
with
more
light
and
better
design.
We
will
learn
from
our
former
patients
and
design
around
their
experiences.
So
in
summary,
as
mr.
Winston
referred
to
dr.
King
speech,
our
destinies
aren't
tied
together.
Charlotte
is
a
world-class
City.
We
want
it
to
be
the
very
best
and
to
continue
to
provide
world-class
health
care,
the
type
of
care
our
city
needs
and
deserves.
Z
We
are
proud
of
our
history
and
of
the
care
we
deliver
to
our
patients
and
Families.
This
project
allows
us
to
continue
our
mission.
This
investment
back
into
our
community
will
allow
us
to
take
care
of
friends,
families
and
neighbors
for
decades
to
come.
Thank
you
for
allowing
me
this
opportunity
to
speak.
A
U
You
will
have
to
brown
town,
so
we're
gets
skip.
Some
slides
next
slide
next
slide.
Next
slide.
Next
slide.
Next
slide.
Next
slide
next
slide.
One
more
slide.
Next
slide.
I
just
want
to
talk
about
some
of
the
changes
to
the
plan.
We've
had
many
meetings
with
area
residents.
We
thank
them
for
their
time,
developing
their
ideas.
Next
to
Kings
Drive,
we
reduce
the
maximum
Heights.
Excuse
me:
we
stepped
down
the
heights
from
250
feet
to
200
feet
into
40
feet
towards
Kings
Drive
next
slide.
U
Developing
the
area
H
is
the
next
slide.
This
is
southern
edge
of
the
site.
We
reduced
the
height
of
the
buildings
through
150
to
100
ounce,
the
buildings
from
hundred
feet
to
60
feet
the
40
feet
towards
the
exterior
boundary
lines,
remove
parking
structures
as
an
allowable
use,
remove
the
connection
from
the
Greenway
Trail
to
lombardi
next
slide.
U
U
The
loop
roads
been
realigned
from
the
green
to
the
purple,
as
Felix
mentioned
and
found
view
would
not
connect
to
the
campus
as
a
result
of
this
development
next
slide,
the
veterinary
g,
we
worked
harder.
The
DC
VA
we
divided
up
there
G
in
the
four
areas
designated
is
g1
through
g4
and
we've
limited
the
uses
on
g2,
g3
and
g4,
most
specifically
limited
to
residential
uses
in
area
g4.
U
S
S
AA
AA
A
while
back
I
was
headed
into
Old
City
Hall
by
Louise
hexamers,
when
I
ran
across
a
young
woman
with
a
very
bloody
chin
holding
her
baby,
who
also
had
blood
on
each
was
clearly
in
distress.
I
suggested
we
go
into
the
police
station
for
help.
Initially
she
said
no
saying
she
had
to
catch
some
other
adults
to
get
the
baby
to
daycare
out
on
the
plaza.
When
I
asked
her
what
happened,
she
said
she
tripped.
AA
He
felt
that
he's
off
the
bus,
I
convinced
her
to
go
inside
the
pindy
spacing,
and
then
the
paramedics
were
called
to
help
relative.
An
officer
assured
the
young
woman.
He
would
give
her
alive
became
care
and
asteroid
Keibler.
She
said
it's
really
health
care
at
the
main
campus.
This
atrium
HealthCare
employee
had
to
take
at
least
two
buses
to
be
per
child
to
get
think
here
and
then
a
third
bus
just
to
get
to
work.
At
the
end
of
the
day,
she
had
to
do
everything
in
Reverse
my
common
system.
AA
If
it's
turned
the
plan,
425
Walton
family
units
of
housing
on
February
12th
on
the
hill
were
community
association.
The
atrium
representatives
standard
is
quoted
in
the
minutes
that
anything
element
would
he
worked
for
spouses
most
recently
they
clean
announced.
It
would
raise
its
minerals
for
$13.50,
so
think
about
this
in
full
time
and
minimum
rail
employee,
its
roof
ripped
healthcare,
it's
twenty
eight
thousand
eighty
dollars
annual
and
will
not
be
able
to
afford
very
housing
and
cream
plans
to
ball.
That's
just
not
right.
AA
I
support
these
healthy
needs,
but
they
should
be
carefully
planned
to
survive.
It's
an
accomplished
drinking
from
30%
any
provides
you
workforce
development
housing
to
help
address,
charlatan
and
liberal
housing
needs
as
a
Vargas
employer
in
Charlotte.
Each
reap
health
care
has
an
obligation
to
be
positive
this
week.
Thank
you
very
much.
U
S
U
A
Right,
thank
you
very
much.
Mr.
Carmichael,
but
yeah
I'm
gonna
read
a
list
of
the
people
that
have
signed
up
to
speak
against
and
I.
Don't
know
how,
if
this
is
organized
or
not,
but
we'll
do
our
very
best
to
keep
to
the
ten
minutes.
There
will
be
some
need
for
some
people
to
either
speak
for
45
seconds
and
be
done
or
if
you're
going
to
have
a
longer
speech
some
coordination
of
how
this
is
done.
Otherwise,
not
everyone
will
be
heard
all
right.
A
So
I'm
out
in
opposition
to
this
petition,
I
have
Deborah
Edwards,
less
I'm
apologizing
if
I
mispronounce,
any
name
Leslie
Leslie
on
farmen
and
Roberta
Foreman
Robert,
Lintz,
Betsy,
Turner,
Lee,
Teeter,
Mary,
shuns,
John,
DeShawn's,
crisp,
Dula,
Suzanne,
robichek,
Don,
Kelly,
Effie,
Kelly
and
Kara
judge.
Is
there
anyone
on
this
call
that
would
like
not
to
speak
if
you're
on
the
phone.
B
A
Gonna
have
to
unmute
you
so
I
can't
ask
that
question.
So
excuse
me,
I
thought
I
could
would
be
able
to
do
that.
So
we'll
just
start
with
Debra,
Edwards
and
I
will
try.
I
will
say
when
two
minutes
are
up
at
each
after
every
two
minutes,
we'll
let
the
clerk
announce
two
minutes
gone
another
four
minutes
down
just
so
we
can
make
sure
everyone's
aware
all
right,
miss
Edwards,
Debra
Edwards.
A
AB
Thank
you,
Mary
council.
Before
you
start
the
time
not
a
mare,
Imagi
say
that
I
will
be
speaking
on
behalf
of
most
of
those
people
on
your
list.
We
thought
that
there
would
just
be
three
of
us
speaking
Robert
Lance,
Lee,
Teeter
and
myself.
You
just
mentioned
a
car
judge.
We
have
not
coordinated
with
her
I
apologize
for
that
I'll
do
my
best
to
speak
very
quickly
and
leave
her
a
little
time.
AB
My
husband,
Michael
and
I,
and
our
two
daughters
live
on
Mountain
View
Street
on
the
hospital
southern
border,
basically
between
the
hospital
and
East
Boulevard
we're
a
longtime
Charlotte
residents,
we
own
a
local
small
business
and
we
manufacturing
plant
with
managed
to
keep
open
during
the
pandemic,
with
all
65
of
our
most,
mostly
our
employees.
Having
just
three
or
four
minutes
at
a
virtual
hearing
to
defend
the
neighborhoods
phones
seems
incredibly
inaccurate,
inadequate,
so
I
am
the
more
than
twenty
other
households
that
I'm
representing
tonight
created
and
submitted
a
detailed
position
paper
to
you.
AB
We
pray
you'll.
Take
the
time
to
read.
We
know
you're
very
busy.
It's
not
that
long
about
four
written
pages
and
some
really
simple
but
informative
maps
because
of
time
limitations,
I'm
going
to
show
you
just
three
of
those
tonight.
The
first
slide
here
is
our
residential
neighborhood
as
it
existed
in
1970
greetin's,
the
neighborhood,
the
resin
Red's
the
hospital.
AB
Our
paper
shows
you
map
by
map
map
decade
by
decade
the
hospitals
kind
of
strategic
creep
into
this
neck
decade
into
this
neighborhood
we'll
skip
over
all
of
those
to
go
to
the
next
slide,
which
was
the
neighborhood
in
2020.
The
pink
is
the
strategically
acquired
properties
by
the
hospital
and
then,
if
you
go
to
slide
three,
that
is
what
our
neighborhood
will
look
like.
AB
If
these
thirty-three
residential
properties
are
resumed,
the
fact
is
that
atrium
has,
for
decades
used
an
outdated
wall
to
buy
and
hold
these
homes
without
paying
property
taxes,
keeping
many
of
them
empty
three
years,
letting
stone,
dilapidate
and
driving
down
surrounding
property
values.
Now,
if
that
isn't
bad
enough
now,
this
rezoning
converts
over
half
the
residential
properties
to
mine
and
if
that's,
not
bad
enough,
they're
dis
first
remaining
eight
properties,
those
last
few
people's
you
see,
give
them
total
control
of
the
residential
area.
AB
A
treeless
checkerboarding
of
our
neighborhood
has
created
a
complete
monopoly
on
the
remaining
privately
held
homes.
Basically,
nothing
can
or
will
happen
in
this
area
without
atrium.
This
total
control,
not
only
their
own
property,
but
mine
and
my
neighbors
as
well
will
be
exacerbated
by
this
rezoning.
It's
all
subsidized
by
the
city
and
our
own
tax
dollars.
Look.
We
accept
that
the
end
is
near
for
the
few
remaining
homes
in
this
area.
You
might
as
well
accept
it
too,
but
we
don't
want.
AB
AB
You
I'm
about
to
finish
up
that
plan
requires
atriums
cooperation,
but
you
should
wonder
as
I
do
why
they're
not
actively
engaged
in
such
a
legacy
building
opportunity.
The
fact
is
that
city
ordinance,
section
9.85
window
basically
requires
council
to
ask
these
questions,
so
we
don't
oppose
the
hospitals
community
to
grow.
Dr.
AB
Joyce
speech
was
compelling,
but
we
ask
that
you
delay
your
ruling
until
you
get
a
deeper
understanding
of
what's
really
going
on
here,
that
this
rezoning,
the
contingent
on
atrium
working
with
the
neighborhood
on
something
that's
better
for
the
neighborhood
and
the
whole
community,
as
well
as
the
hospital
and
otherwise
development
areas.
Ef
and
G
should
be
removed
from
their
resulting
petition
so
as
to
retain
their
residential
area.
Thank
you.
Thank.
A
AC
AC
Liu
excellent
hello,
and
thank
you
for
your
time
tonight
tonight
I'm
is
speaking
on
behalf
of
over
30
residents
and
homeowners
on
South
Kings
Drive
on
the
east
side
of
the
atrium
property,
who
all
strongly
opposed.
The
current
version
of
this
rezoning
request.
I
agree
with
Deborah
that
the
current
plans
and
zoning
proposal
that
you
see
tonight
are
not
reflective
of
considerate
planning.
Our
overarching
argument
is
that
decisions
in
this
design
are
being
made
to
optimize
to
the
impact
on
the
hospital's
bottom
line
and
not
unpreserved
in
the
quality
neighborhoods
that
surround
it.
AC
Contrary
to
mr.
Carmichael's
claims,
they
are
not
addressing
our
biggest
concerns
with
this
rezoning
request
as
residents
on
South
Kings
Raj.
Our
primary
concern
is
with
the
proposed
building
height
of
the
new
hospital
bed
tower.
Nowhere
else
in
the
city
of
Charlotte
is
City
Council
approving
buildings
of
this
height
so
close
to
residential
properties.
Please
do
not
make
this
the
first
case
in
which
you
do
that.
We
would
like
to
see
the
maximum
building
height
in
all
of
development
area,
D
reduced
to
200
feet.
AC
We've
made
this
request
numerous
times
of
the
a
route
3
of
Representatives,
but
they
refuse
to
yield
because
of
the
impact
on
construction
cost
of
the
project.
Second,
we
believe
this
rezoning
request
represents
an
insufficient
step
down
on
the
east
side
of
the
property.
We
request
that
you
only
approve
this
rezoning
petition
if
a
tree
makes
Stemmons
the
40-foot
max
height
buffer
up
to
250
feet
into
the
property
on
the
east
side
of
development
area
D.
AC
AC
A
G
My
name's
Lee
Teeter
I
live
at
1716
Lombardi
circle
with
my
wife
and
two
kids.
My
wife
bought
the
property
in
1995
after
we
got
married
I
designed
the
house
and
took
about
two
and
a
half
years
to
build
the
house
and
put
everything
we
wanted
into
the
house,
and
so
now
we've
got
a
tremendous
amount
of
dollar
investment
time
investment.
G
We
have
major
concerns
that
the
atrium
rezoning,
which
they
have
done
some
things
to
make
it
better.
It's
still
gonna
be
a
negative
impact
on
our
residential
retail
value
of
our
home
and
the
neighbors.
Also
we've
got
several
neighbors
on
the
street.
There's
a
renovated
your
homes,
but
substantial
money
in
it.
We've
got
to
seminary
high-end
condo.
G
Buildings
have
been
put
in
the
past
few
years
and
one
of
them's
right
beside
my
house.
They
still
have
two
units,
as
they
can't
sell
and
they
keep
I
think
they've
been
trying
to
sell
it
for
a
year
and
we
got
a
house
down
the
street
that
has
had
two
contracts
fall
through
because
they
found
out
what
atrium
was
getting
ready
to
do
them.
But
these
monster
buildings,
behind
our
houses
and-
and
just
you
know,
take
away
from
the
residential
neighborhood
feel
we've
got
people
to
vault
houses
within
the
past
year.
G
Now
the
wish
they
hadn't
because
they
feel,
like
the
the
neighborhood's
gonna,
be
ruined
with
all
the
changes
that
are
going
on.
There's
been
tremendous
amount
of
stress
and
strength,
but
on
all
the
neighbors,
because
they're
concerned
about
what
kind
of
marketability,
if
they
need
to
sell
the
house
who's
gonna
buy
it
he's
gonna
pay
them.
The
replacement
cost
on
what
it's
going
to
take
to
buy
another
house
with
similar
quality
and
construction
materials
and
size
that
they
can
afford
and
deal
worth
neighborhood,
and
so
a
lot
of
screening
needs
to
be
done.
G
A
That's
the
ten
minutes
I
mean
I
was
informed
that
misjudge
that
mr.
Lentz
was
speaking
for
carriage.
So
I
know
that
there
are
a
number
of
people
that
signed
up
and
we're
not
able
to
speak,
but
our
rules
are,
we
try
to
get
it
organized
in
virtual
meetings.
That's
a
little
bit
more
difficult
to
do
that
so
I
hope
you'll
understand,
but
we
do
our
very
best.
So
now
we
would
open
up
the
council
members
for
questions
and
I
believe
that
I'm.
U
U
You
just
a
couple
things
one
in
response
to
mr.
Lantz
who
we
spoke
with
as
recently
as
this
morning.
I
did
not
clean
in
my
presentation
that
we
had
resolved
all
their
concerns.
What
I
said
was
we've
had
many
many
many
meetings
that
we've
made
changes
to
the
plan
in
an
effort
to
address
concerns.
I
understand
that
he's
concerned
about
the
Heitmann,
though
that
others
are,
and
so
there
are
things
that
we
have
tried
to
do
to
address,
concerns
that
were
able
to
do
and
there's
some
things
that
we
have
not
been
able
to
do.
U
But
I
want
to
make
that
clear
that
I
did.
We
didn't
represent
that
his
concerns
were
or
alleviated
in
terms
of
the
helipads.
We
spoke
with
him
again
this
morning,
mr.
Letts,
and
we're
looking
at
some
sound
mitigation
measures
that
we
will
follow
up
with
him,
which
we
will
obviously
do
in
terms
of
miss
Edwards.
We
have
made
concessions
and
work
with
the
DC
to
restrict
the
uses
in
debuffing
area
G
and
develop
Mary
E
and
the
button
area
F,
so
is
the
best
preserve
the
character
of
that
neighborhood.
U
One
thing
we
did
do
early
on
was
put
in
our
notes
that
there
would
not
be
a
connection
to
fountain
view
from
Loop
Road
until
such
time
and
all
of
the
Lots
on
the
fountain
view,
if
they
ever
are,
are
redeveloped
for
multifamily
or
non-residential
uses,
at
which
time
the
developer
of
that
project
could
make
a
connection
to
Loop
Road
and
that's
something
that
that's
seeped
out
on
it.
We
also
worked
in
connection
only
it
with
the
realignment
of
lead
right
on
Scott
Avenue.
We
understand
there
are
some
concerns.
U
We'll
continue
to
have
discussions,
I,
don't
think
anybody
would
could
look
colliculi
and
say
we
haven't
been
available
and
haven't
made
ourselves
available
to
talk
about
concerns.
We
will
continue
to
do
to
that.
Likewise,
they
have
made
themselves
available.
So
that's
not
a
paddle,
not
back.
That's
just
a
recognition
of
the
effort
that
everybody's,
but
into
this.
Those
are
those
are
sort
of
my
thoughts
on
what
this
presented.
Barrett.
A
Thank
you
for
having
those
thoughts
on
your
two
minutes
are
up
I
just
wanted
to
remind
anyone
watching
this
that
anyone
in
this
community
can
submit
written
comments
to
the
clerk
until
tomorrow
at
11:59,
so
it
has
to
be
before
12
o'clock
noon
tomorrow,
I'm
at
midnight,
sorry
Kim,
I
can't
read.
What's
on
my
own
writing,
and
so
what
we
would
like
to
suggest
is
that
here
is
the
website
city
clerk
at
Charlotte,
NC,
gov
city
clerk
at
Charlotte,
NC
gov.
I
Thank
you,
madam
mayor,
and
thank
you
to
all
of
the
speakers
tonight.
This
site
is
very
interesting
because
it's
got
borders
far
from
each
other
that
have
very
different
sets
of
concerns.
So
I
know
it's
been
complicated
for
everybody
involved
to
try
to
address
concerns
on
one
side
of
the
site
that
might
be
entirely
different
than
concerns
on
the
other
side
of
the
site,
but
certainly
do
appreciate
the
John
and
that
team
have
continued
to
try
to
make
progress
on
addressing
those
and,
as
some
of
them
likely
will
not
be
addressed
completely.
I
But
I
think
this
been
progress
made
even
in
the
last
couple
of
days.
I
do
also
want
to
thank
the
donor
community
association,
Land
Use,
Committee,
Valerie,
Preston,
Ellen
Citarella
and
that
whole
team.
They
have
spent
countless
hours
working
with
John
and
the
atrium
team
there
to
also
try
to
get
all
of
those
concerns
voiced
and
addressed
and
I.
I
I
Right
now
of
the
DCA
is
kind
of
formally
agnostic.
They
have
not
taken
a
four
or
a
good
stance
on
this
petition.
Another
pleased
with
some
of
the
product
progress
that's
been
made,
hoping
to
see
a
little
more,
particularly
as
it
relates
to
building
standards,
landscape
plans,
traffic
construction
plans
and
commitments
and
I
know
as
well
and
speaking
with
mr.
winds
this
weekend
and
then
John
Carmichael
I
think
some
progress
has
been
made
in
terms
of
tightening
up
the
allowable
areas
that
maximum
height
and
mr.
Lynch
discussed.
I
I
think
that
line
has
been
duped
back
away
from
the
residences
to
some
degree
and
I
would
encourage
mr.
Carmichael
in
the
folks
at
atrium
to
see
if
they
can
tighten
that
up.
Even
more.
Certainly,
we
understand
that
with
development,
this
scale
there's
got
to
be
some
allowance
for
adjustment
terms
of
a
little
bit
of
as
mr.
Owens
called
it
legal
room,
but
certainly
if
their
intention
is
to
fill
the
building
where
they've
indicated
they
intend
to
build
a
building.
I
think
mr.
I
Wentz
and
his
neighbors
would
be
satisfied
with
that
large
plea,
but
again
just
look
like
some
more
certainty,
so
as
much
certainty,
as
can
be
provided
within
reason,
I
think
is
not
not
an
unreasonable
ask
from
mr.
Lewis
in
the
Kings
Drive
folks.
So
again
just
appreciate
everybody
continuing
to
work
on
all
this
and
would
encourage
John
to
continue
that
engagement
with
the
BCA
and
with
those
neighbors,
because
I
think
that
we're
not
quite
there
but
I.
I
K
E
E
E
U
E
U
Well,
the
the
plan
currently
allows
us
mr.
Lloyd
said
250
feet
a
portion
of
developing
area
D,
which
is
located
on
the
east
side
of
the
property
closest
to
its
right
by
little
Sugar
Creek,
and
it's
closest
to
the
kingster
outside
of
the
site,
the
200
I'm.
Looking
at
a
plan
now
they're
there
three
hide
envelopes.
There's
a
40-foot
high,
download
buses
to
the
little
Sugar
Creek
granite
is
it's
it's
probably
about
30
feet
and
death
and
there's
a
200-foot
high
down
below
and
then
it
bumps
up
to
there's
a
250
foot
high
number
one.
U
The
250
foot
height
on
blood
is
about
154
feet
from
the
creek
and
according
to
this
plan
is
about
221
feet.
From
the
back
of
one
of
the
Lots,
the
cross
channel
Kings
drive
across
a
little
Sugar
Creek
from
site.
Mr.
Lance
is
asking
that
the
building
be
pushed
back
further
to
the
west,
and
we
are
looking
at
that
as
we
speak.
He
also
would
like
the
building
to
go
down
from
250
to
200.
U
E
Thank
you.
Mr.
Carmichael
I
look
forward
to
your
follow-up
email,
but
the
details
in
terms
of
the
height
and
other
requests.
It
looks
like
they're
having
progress
that
have
been
made
and
I
hope
that,
before
it
comes
for
in
a
pool
I'm
hoping
that
there
would
be
a
negotiation
that
would
address
the
concerns
that
have
been
raised
by
residents
so
that
we
can,
you
can
get
their
approval
as
well.
Thank
you
mr.
Palmer.
Thank.
Y
A
N
AD
We've
had
that
question
a
couple
times
in
some
of
our
public
hearings
or
public
meetings
rather,
and
we
can
produce
that
information
for
you,
councilman
Driggs,
about
the
specific
numbers.
I,
don't
have
them
off
the
top
of
my
head,
but
a
lot
of
times
this.
It
can
be.
You
know
fairly
unpredictable
just
pending
that
it's
it's
a
accidents
that
happen
in
different
reasons
that
people
come
in,
but
we'll
be
happy
to
pull
out
information
together,
ensure
that
I'd.
F
V
AE
A
AE
A
AE
F
F
U
This
is
John,
Carmichael,
can't,
remember,
Johnson
and
and
Ron.
You
correct
me
if
I'm
wrong,
but
I
think
the
difference
is
in
moving
further
to
the
south.
It
does
get
closer
to
the
residents
on
Kings
drive
because
and
the
residences
on
Kings,
Drive
or
essentially
South
East
from
the
current
helipads
and
then
the
new
ones
would
be
more
due
west.
Is
that
right,
Ron,
so
they're,
closer
Katherine,
Johnson
yeah.
AE
I
mean
I
would
say
that
the
I
mean
there's
a
helicopter
route
today
that
does
come
through
campus
and
does
it
south
over
the
area
that
were
in
question
new
hello?
Stop.
So
you
know,
flight
paths
of
the
law.
Choppers
do
occupy
that
space
today.
So
as
far
as
the
noise
consideration,
I
would
say
that
what
we're
proposing
should
be
somewhat
equivalent
do
what
is
currently
the
state.
H
Yeah
yeah,
thank
you.
I
have
a
couple
questions.
One
I
want
to
thank
the
petitioner
for
figuring
out
how
to
realign
Loop
Road
to
Romany
Road
I.
Think
that's
something
we
talked
about
when
we
met
I
have
a
question
for
one
of
the
homeowners:
that's
both
if
there
is
already
a
helipad
at
the
hospital.
Why
are
you
again
a
new
helipad?
How
would
that
affect
you
differently?
Mr.
AB
A
A
AC
AC
I'm
off
me
yeah.
Thank
you.
Thank
you,
mr.
Winston,
for
your
question.
It
actually
impacts
us
quite
greatly
as
they
smellier
they're,
going
to
be
moving
to
helipads
in
a
direction
that
puts
them
almost
directly
closer
to
our
house,
although
they
said
approximately
500
feet
that
makes
it
proximately
500
feet
closer
to
our
homes.
However,
the
second
factor
is
that
currently
the
helipad,
there
are
two
or
three
buildings
that
are
taller
than
the
current
helipad
that
are
between
our
home
and
the
existing
helipad.
AC
H
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
Okay,
I
have
a
question,
also
push
that
I
clearly
see
the
homeowners
concerns
about
the
encroachment
of
areas
E
and
F
I,
wonder,
and
this
rezoning
is
split
up
into
so
many
sections.
If
we
broke
those
sections
at
these
hypothetically,
if
these
sections
were
broken
up,
it's
a
separate
plan
use
this
decision.
With
the
recommendations
change.
We
have
talked
about
up
the
encouragement
of
zones
into
other
zones
in
different
land
use
decisions.
O
Those
conversations
continued
even
outside
of
just
at
a
staff
level
with
atrium
and
the
folks
that
live
in
that
fountain
view
and
and
garden
terrace
area
of
the
petition,
and
that's
where
the
petitioner
and
atrium
came
back
and
said
well,
we'll
put
a
and
F
really
only
devoted
to
open
space
and
trees
saved.
So,
essentially,
no
development
would
be
occurring
in
ENF
as
it
stood
when
we,
you
know,
had
the
initial
zoning
that
was
proposed
and
they
had
other
uses
outside
of
just
open
space.
O
The
staff
did
have
some
general
concerns,
I'm,
not
sure
what
that
would
have
done
in
terms
of
our
recommendation,
because
again
those
concerns
got
addressed
fairly
quickly.
I
was
really
during
the
first
round
of
revision,
so
you
know
we
felt
that
that
was
a
good
commitment
to
showing
no
development
and
enf
just
to
kind
of
maintain
some
buffering
between
the
residences
in
the
hospital.
So
that's
where
we
ended
up
with
with
those
two
development
errors
being
just
open
space
and
trees
safe.
So
I'm
not
sure
that
fully
answered
your
question,
but
again
yeah.
H
I,
don't
I,
don't
think
it
does
I
think
you
might
have
added
a
condition
if
somebody
had
come
in
that
they
wanted
to
read
them
that
those
sections
ENF
the
mud,
but
they
would
still
only
keep
a
treat
they
outside
of
no
other
division,
the
other
outside
of
not
having
the
rest
of
the
land-use
decisions
on
our
doorstep.
Would
that
change
the
recommendation.
O
O
Well,
I
mean
I
think
if
we
looked
at
those
individually,
we'd
have
to
take
a
look
at
them
individually.
They
were
initially
like
I
said
proposed
to
do
some
higher
density
development.
If
those
came
in
now,
they're,
currently
zoned
I
think
I'm,
looking
at
r5
and
they're
recommended
for
uses
that
are
fairly
well
consistent
with
single-family
residential.
O
O
D
U
AF
Q
D
D
Free,
atrium,
I
appreciate
all
the
work
that
atrium
and
the
petitioner
has
done
to
try
to
meet
the
needs
and
the
various
needs
of
the
neighborhood
I
do
wish
that
we
had
a
better
process
to
be
able
to
look
at
the
whole
plan
and
say
clearly.
The
atrium
campus
is
going
to
be
a
major
part
of
Dilworth
and
absorbs
character
for
years
to
come.
Much
like
you
know,
Mayo
Clinic
is
in
Rochester
or
Baptist,
Hospital,
Nashville,
and
so
as
I
think
about
that
parcel
of
land.
D
It
would
have
been
nice
to
see
some
kind
of
discussions
with
potential
property
developers,
the
residents
or
whatever,
to
have
some
kind
of
a
discussion
on
what
that
could
look
like
that.
Not
only
fits
into
the
plans
for
atrium,
but
for
the
neighborhood
so
that
it
transitions
nicely
into
something
that
does
it
might
not
be
the
character
of
the
neighborhood
now,
but
it
could
be
the
character
of
where
the
neighborhood
wants
to
go.
So
I
do
ask
that
you
continue
to
have
conversations
with
the
dca
with
neighbors
about
what
that
could
potentially
be.
D
I
am
an
uncomfortable
with
approving.
If
you
were
just
to
take
that
and
rezone
it
and
say
here's
what
it's
not
gonna,
be
that
wouldn't
make
any
of
us
very
comfortable,
but
you
have
taken
some
of
the
conditions
out
so
I
appreciate
that,
but
I
still
would
like
to
know
a
little
bit
more
about
what
developed
that
area.
G
would
be
for
atrium
in
the
future.
In
any
conversations
you've
had
to
develop
the
property,
you
do
own
as
it
transitions
the
neighborhoods
and
then
my
my
second
question
has
to
do
with
the
helicopter
landing
pads.
A
AD
Would
be
two
on
the
new
facility,
the
new
tower
and
the
three
that
are
on
the
existing
facility
would
continue
to
remain
there.
I
think
pediatric
flights
would
continue
to
go
on
over
closer
to
Levine,
Children's,
Hospital
and
trauma
flights
would
come
in
on
the
top
of
the
new
tower
so
that
they
would
be
able
to
quickly
be
transported
down
to
operating
rooms
and
intensive
care
areas.
AD
AD
C
D
U
A
Right
mr.
Carmichael
I'm
gonna
add
my
question
to
the
list.
I
really
appreciate
the
development
of
the
housing
surrounding
the
area,
but
miss
Gartner
makes
a
great
point.
If
you
talk
about
who's
going
to
be
working
there
and
I'm
sorry,
we
need
to
get
some
muting
going
on
somewhere,
but
who's
going
to
be
working
for
the
hospital
and
the
opportunity.
We
are
so
very
much
interested
in
having
affordable
housing
for
people
that
are
working
and
what
really
I
would
really
like
for
you
to
take
a
look
at
the
number
of
units.
A
The
apartments,
as
well
as
the
quadruplex
is,
and
duplexes
and
triplexes
that
you
are
discussing
and
to
have
a
commitment
to
our
overall
goals
of
affordability,
especially
with
the
number
of
hospital
employees
that
we
have
that
are
still
at
the
1350
and
on
an
hour.
I.
Just
really
believe
that,
as
we
are
doing
the
zoning,
the
only
way
that's
going
to
be
possible
for
us
to
actually
have
people
work
and
live
in
our
city
is
that
we
use
as
many
tools
as
we
have
to
create
affordability
for
people
that
are
working
everyday.
A
I
A
N
A
Bukhari
mr.
Newton
miss
Johnson
yeah,
miss
Watlington,
miss
Watlington,
yes,
mr.
Graham,
yes,
mr.
Egleston
could
all
the
other
members
say
now,
because
we
have
six
all
right.
We
all
could
the
remaining
group
say
I
and
then
we
have
we
have.
The
motion
will
pass.
Thank
you
very
much
all
right.
So
thank
you
very
much.
We
will
now
go
to
item
number
24
petition,
2019
177
by
encore
real
estate
for
approximately
seven
acres
on
prosperity
and
old,
Ridge
Road.
It's
in
district
4.
The
current
zoning
has
urban
residential
conditional
and
neighborhood
services.
A
O
You
2019
177
is
in
the
prosperity,
prosperity,
Village
area,
overage,
Road
prosperity,
Church,
Road,
Ridge
Road.
We
did
have
a
rezoning
property
right
next
door
here,
we'll
talk
a
little
bit
about
that
as
we
go
through
this
petition
as
well.
This
petition
itself
is
currently
signed,
you
are
conditional
and
they
are
proposing
a
moto
mix,
juice,
optional,
zoning
district
for
this
project.
The
prosperity
Hux
plan
which
was
adopted
in
2015
does
recommend
residential
office
and
retail
for
this
site.
O
And
what
we're
looking
at
with
this
petition
is
a
mix
of
79
single-family
attached
townhomes
we've
got
about
15,000
square
feet
of
commercial
uses,
one
remote
drive-thru
service
for
a
financial
institution
or
bank.
We
do
have
that
unused
residential
units
may
be
converted
to
some
additional
square
footage
and
some
of
that
unused
commercial
square
footage
can
also
be
converted
to
some
residential
units
so
long
as
it
doesn't
exceed
a
hundred
additional
units.
So
we
do
some
optional
provisions
about
parking
and
maneuvering
between
the
proposed
building
for
the
site
and
some
of
the
park.
O
Excuse
me
from
the
parking
maneuvering
area
be
screened
from
network
required
streets.
Milo
walls
are
landscaping
and
we'll
also
do
the
same
with
the
remote
drive-through.
We
do
have
transportation
improvements,
the
dedication
of
right-of-way
and
also
some
architectural
standards,
which
includes
restrictions
on
building
the
limitations
on
building
heights
and
modulations
to
the
building
facades
to
create
a
little
bit
more
visual
appeal.
So
this
petition
itself,
as
you
can
see,
Ali
G
or
alleyway
B
here-
will
tie
into
that
property
next
door.
O
So
if
we
go
back
to
the
slide
right
before
here,
you
can
see,
we've
got
this
large
mixed-use
area
of
residential
office
and
retail.
So
with
this
petition,
as
we
said,
we're
looking
at
some
single-family
attached,
townhomes
and
commercial,
the
petition
next
door
was
more
multifamily
with
apartments
and
some
ground-floor
retail.
O
So
we
do
have
a
nice
build
out
of
a
commercial
mixed
use
office,
retail
residential
area
that
was
envisioned
by
the
plan,
so
I
feel
that
we
are
maintaining
that
consistency
with
the
prosperity
Hux
plan
and,
as
the
mayor
mentioned,
staff
does
recommend
approval
of
this
petition.
It
is
consistent
with
the
prosperity,
Hux
plan
and
we
do
get
that
mix
of
residential
office
and
retail
in
this
area
and
along
with
that
petition
that
was
approved
last
year
next
door.
So
again
we
should
have
a
nice
mixed-use
note
at
this
intersection.
A
Right
we
have
four
people
signed
up
to
speak
in
favor
of
this
petition,
so
the
four
people
will
have
three
minutes
to
speak.
I
have
will
Russell
mr.
Russell
mr.
Colin
brown
Pat
do
Boris
and
Eddie
more
so
I,
don't
know
if
you
are
group,
but
I'd
like
to
go
ahead
and
begin
with
mr.
Russell
three
minutes.
Mr.
Russell.
AG
Ma'am,
madam
the
Colin
brown
on
behalf
of
the
petitioner
petitioners
on
the
call
with
me
will
rustle
of
the
prosperity
Village
area
association
did
sign
up.
He
signed
up
to
speak
in
favor
I
think
there
were
a
couple
transportation
comments
that
he
wanted
to
make.
So
I
don't
want
to
step
on
his
toes,
but
if
will
is
not
here,
I
will
go
ahead
and
get
started
with
our
presentation.
Good
up,
good
overview
from
Dave.
Our
petitioner
is
encore
real
estate
investment
package,
renters
and
Cullen
Hawkins
are
on
the
call.
If.
Y
A
Y
AG
AG
A
AG
To
the
east
of
the
property,
Alliance
residential
reason
is
developing
apartment
community,
and
so
what
we're
doing
here
is
really
filling
out
the
last
piece
of
the
puzzle.
This
final
quadrant,
the
property's
currently
zoned
you
are
had
called
for
some
mixed
youth
development.
The
plan
that
we're
showing
the
area
plan,
as
you
can
see
here,
shows
an
area
and
ripoff
work.
Mixture
of
residential
uses
of
this
density,
as
well
as
some
commercial
uses,
so
I
think
on
course,
planned
for
for
sale,
townhomes
and
some
limited
commercial
is
really
consistent
with
the
area
plan.
AG
If
you
can
see
on
the
image
here,
this
is
the
approved
Alliance
rezoning
next
door,
and
then
we've
tried
to
connect
these
two,
so
you
can
see
when
these
projects
are
combined.
As
Dave
mentioned,
you've
really
got
a
quadrant
here.
Okay,
we
have.
The
chick-fil-a
is
some
retail
on
the
corner
north
of
that
you
can
see
on
this
slide
now
you
see
this
is
where
we're
combining
in
the
tech
for
sale.
Townhome
uses
a
little
bit
of
commercial
in
the
corner,
and
this
image
to
the
east.
Y
A
A
F
Thank
you
I
wanted
to
say
that
mr.
Russell
I've
had
some
discussion
with
the
I
believe
was
with
the
previous
petition,
and
this
is
an
issue
with
the
street
network
that
the
the
area
Association
has
been
talking
about
for
a
while
I've
met
with
DDOT
and
I
hope
to
meet
with
CDOT
again,
so
we
can
try
to
get
this
resolved.
We
cut.
That
is
a
safety
concern
for
the
the
neighborhood.
There
is
an
exit
from
the
shopping
center
and
it's
just
a
really
tricky
area.
A
F
S
Q
A
AG
A
Everyone
else
please
say
aye
aye.
Thank
you
very
much
all
right,
so
that
hearing
is
closing.
We
go
to
our
next
petition
item
25
petition,
20
20-0
27
by
the
City
of
Charlotte
and
Crosland
southeast,
and
this
is
location,
we're
all
very
familiar
with
78
acres
of
the
former
Eastland
mall
site,
located
near
the
intersection
of
Sharon
Andy
and
central.
That's
in
district
5.
A
The
current
rezoning
is
business,
1,
SC
shopping
center
development,
CC
mud
of
b1
CD,
but
the
proposed
zoning
is
mud,
Oh,
mixed-use
development,
optional,
with
mixed
residential
innovation
with
five-year
vested
rights
we
have
in
this
area.
We
have
three
speakers
for
and
one
against,
so
there'll
be
ten
minutes
allowed
for
each
side.
O
There
we
go
currently
there's
a
mix
of
zoning
districts
out,
they've
got
b1
CC
commercial
center
mud,
o
b1,
C
D,
and
the
proposed
zoning
is
to
unify
all
the
zippered
zoning
districts
into
one
mato
districts
and
then
one
mx2,
innovative
district
and
we'll
go
through
where
those
two
districts
would
fall
on
this
project.
Here
in
just
a
few
slides.
The
adaptive
future
land
uses
from
the
Eastland
area
plan,
which
is
from
2003,
does
recommend
a
mix
of
single-family
multi-family
office
and
retail
uses
for
most
of
the
site.
O
Overall,
as
you
can
see,
we've
got
a
couple
different
development
areas
for
this
project.
You've
got
development
areas
1
&
2,
which
would
be
where
the
mud,
optional,
zoning
districts
would
be
placed,
and
then
development
area
3,
is
on
the
back
side
of
the
site.
That
would
be
the
mx2
innovative
district,
and
that
would
be
where
we
would
have
our
residential
component
for
this
project.
Overall,
we've
got
a
pretty
wide
mix
of
uses
with
residential
and
then
mud,
which
would
include
commercial
office,
hotel,
athletic
fields
and
buildings
operational
buildings.
O
We
do
have
a
transit
facility
and
cats
operations
out
there,
as
well
as
some
public
parks.
We
did
some
prohibitions
within
this
conditional
plan.
Those
are
car,
washes
automobile
service
stations
and
then
also
eating
and
drinking
entertainment
establishments.
Establishments
with
accessory
drive-through
windows
would
beyond
what
is
permissible
and
the
optional
provisions
would
be
prohibited.
You
know
again,
those
would
be
optional
provisions
also
for
signage,
innovative
provisions
for
mx2
area,
which
includes
some
flexibility
in
their
street
cross
sections.
O
So
they
can
create
a
little
bit
more
of
a
dense
urban
framework
out
there,
and
then
we've
got
some
design
guidelines
and
planned
architectural
elements
along
Main
Street,
which
is
a
focal
zone
and
development
area
1,
which
would
be
reminiscent
of
an
urban
Main
Street.
Then
we
have
pedestrian
connections
to
plazas
parks
and
other
focal
points
within
the
project.
There's
also
a
dedication
of
two
acres
for
a
public
park
which
would
be
subject
to
Park
and
Rec
funding.
O
There
was
also
a
traffic
impact
analysis,
that's
being
worked
on
for
this
project.
It
will
study
18
different
intersections
and
look
at
both
the
external
network
in
red.
You
can
see
those
intersections
are
identified
with
the
numbering
out
there
and
they
range
all
the
way
from
Albemarle
Road
up
to
the
Laurel
Lake
Road
and
not
to
farm
pond
Lane,
and
then
we're
also
looking
at
how
those
impacts
would
interact
with
the
existing
street
network
or
the
proposed
street
network,
which
is
in
blue.
O
So
again,
those
are
some
of
the
traffic
study
elements
that
we'll
be
looking
at
as
a
part
of
just
this
petition,
but
also
as
part
of
the
process
that
would
kind
of
be
current
are
concurrent
with
this,
which
would
be
some
of
the
commitments
with
the
development
agreement
between
the
different
partners
involved
in
the
project.
Overall
staff
does
recommend
approval
of
this
petition
upon
some
resolution
of
some
outstanding
issues
which
are
related
to
transportation,
environment,
some
site
and
building
design.
O
It
is
consistent
with
the
scenario
plans,
vision
for
the
area,
which
is
a
mix
of
single-family
multifamily
uses
as
well
as
office,
and
retail.
This
plan
does
have
all
of
those
elements
involved
and
again.
Staff
does
recommend
approval
of
the
petition
and
we'll
be
happy
to
answer
questions
following
presentations
from
the
public.
AG
Ma'am,
madam
mayor
Colin
brown,
on
behalf
of
the
petitioners
for
the
ACE
Eastland
mall
site,
our
presentation
could
come
up
we'll
get
started
on
that
they've
provided
a
good
overview,
I
think
everyone's
familiar
with
the
Eastland
mall
site
joining
our
team.
Today,
the
petitioners
in
this
rezoning
petition
or
the
City
of
Charlotte
in
crawls
and
southeast
in
cinema
from
Crosland,
is
on
the
call
and
available
to
answer
questions.
Sorry.
S
AG
AG
I
mentioned
the
petitioners
in
the
reason
petition
are
the
City
of
Charlotte
and
crawls
in
Southeast.
Tim
sediment
from
crawling
southeast
is
on
the
call
and
can
answer
questions
before
we
dive
into
the
rezoning
and
Dave
did
a
really
good
job.
I
just
wanted
to
remind
everyone
that
the
rezoning
is
just
one
piece
of
the
Eastland
mall
puzzle.
This
is
a
multi-faceted
project
that
will
have
a
lot
of
other
public
steps
in
the
process.
I've
gotten
feedback
from
some
members
of
council
and
some
members
of
the
community
about
other
questions.
AG
Questions
about
MLS
here,
questions
about
public
funding
for
the
development
questions
about
the
open
air
market
in
the
skate
park,
and
so
I
just
wanted
to
reiterate
from
everyone
tonight.
This
is
just
a
hearing
on
the
reasoning
and
the
purpose
of
the
rezoning
is
to
create
an
entitlement
framework
to
allow
a
broader
development
redevelopment
of
the
Easton
mall
project.
If
council
decides
to
approve
this
rezoning,
nothing
in
the
proposed
rezoning
would
prohibit
a
skate
park
or
an
open-air
market.
AG
Nor
would
it
commit
any
funds,
nor
would
it
ensure
that
a
MLS
event
facility
can
come
to
this
location.
So
just
want
to
remind
everyone.
This
is
a
just
the
rezoning
process
and
we're
really
trying
to
set
out
the
entitlement
framework,
so
the
cross
and
southeast
team
in
the
City
of
Charlotte
has
spent
many
months
without
reach
with
the
community
to
come
up
with
a
vision
for
what
could
happen
at
Eastland
law.
AG
What
you
see
on
the
screen
now
is
an
illustration
of
that
video
one
of
the
concepts
was
to
have
a
true
mixed-use
community
that
would
include
all
types
of
residential
uses:
commercial
uses
like
retail
and
office
active
open
spaces
connecting
this
all
greets
a
space
and
a
robust
street
and
pedestrian
network.
One
of
the
real
ideas
was
to
have
an
activator
for
the
site.
That
could
be
something
like
sports,
and
so
this
was
division
long
ago
before
we
started
having
any
more
conversations
about
MLS.
AG
So
the
idea
that
we're
working
on
here
is
how
do
we
a
rezoning
document
to
allow
this
type
of
development
to
occur?
This
is
a
look
at
the
property.
We
have
a
large
portion
of
the
property
owned
by
the
City
of
Charlotte,
smaller
portion
and
by
Willow
Lake
partners.
There
have
been
a
lot
of
questions.
The
movement
school
on
the
western
side
of
the
site
will
remain.
AG
The
existing
saying
this
is
what
I
wanted
to
talk
about.
We
talked
about
visions
for
the
site
on
some
of
the
zoning
has
been
in
place
since
the
1970s.
The
bulk
of
the
site
is
a
b-1
SCD,
which
is
the
b1
shopping
center
district,
and
so
I
wanted
to
remind
everybody,
the
current
zoning
on
the
property.
This
is
a
look
at.
It
was
a
70s
80
era.
AG
Mall,
if
you
can
see
this
is
this,
is
the
current
zoning
on
the
site
is
to
have
a
large
mall
with
up
to
1.1
million
square
feet
of
retail
and
large
circus
parking?
So
I
think
you
know
folks
are
concerned
about
what
is
becoming.
What
we
need
to
do
is
this
is
this
is
equated
useful
for
no
one,
and
so
what
we
really
need
to
do
is
remove
this
antiquated
regional
mall
rezoning
and
create
a
framework
to
allow
that
vision
that
I've
showed
you
earlier.
AG
The
city
has,
and
many
stakeholders
have
been
working
on
this
process
frankly
for
years,
one
of
the
first
steps
in
the
process
was
the
Eastland
area
plan.
You
see
that
on
the
screen
now
and
that
calls
for
a
mix
of
uses
on
the
site,
single-family
multifamily
retail
in
office,
and
so
this
rezoning
plan
is
is
consistent
with
that.
AG
The
rezoning
plans
is
in
front
of
you
now,
we've
broken
up
into
three
development
areas
and
I
do
want
to
point
out,
as
dates
mentioned,
we're
using
two
different
zoning
districts,
we're
using
the
mud
district,
a
mixed-use
development
district
with
auctions,
which
you
see
that
a
lot
so
that
the
two
development
areas
fronting
on
Central
Avenue
have
that
mud
zoning
to
accommodate
a
variety
commercial
uses.
The
easternmost
portion
would
see
being
a
more
traditional
mixed-use
development.
AG
Sorry,
the
westernmost
portion,
the
easternmost
portion
is
where
we
had
those
active
uses
and
the
ideas
that
that
could
look
today,
a
Sports
Complex.
So
one
of
the
reasons
we
break
in
that
development
area
out
is
in
the
area
to
the
west.
We've
asked
for
some
optional
provisions
like
enhanced
lighting,
enhanced
signage,
so
that
we
could
accommodate
something
like
that.
Should
it
come
to
fruition
on
the
northern
parcel
closer
to
the
boulevard.
AG
Lake
neighborhood
I
wanted
to
point
out
we're
using
the
mx2
innovative
district
there
and
that
that
area
that
is
a
more
residential
zoning
district
and
we
committed
that
only
residential
uses
would
be
allowed
in
that
area.
We've
got
some
innovative
provisions
in
that
area
to
plan
for
a
more
contemporary
street
network,
have
more
of
a
neo-traditional
mix
of
streets
to
have
a
more
comfortable
feel.
So
the
mud
optional
request
that
we're
looking
for
are
for
some
innovative
signage,
some
lighting
that
could
be
associated
with
a
sports
entertainment,
complex.
AG
We've
got
some
flexibility
of
parking
and
maneuvering,
and
we
have
some
flexibility
for
drive-thru
uses
now,
unlike
the
old
zooming
in
the
air
which
frankly
allows
drive,
throughs
much
like
you'd
see
up
the
central
lab
in
the
corridor.
Get
the
mud
zone
is
very
restrictive.
On
that
we're
asking
for
permission
to
use
three,
and
as
they've
mentioned
only
one
of
those
would
be
for
a
restaurant
and
in
the
mx2
district.
Our
innovative
requests
are
for
our
street
networks
and
some
sidewalks
to
bring
the
homes
a
little
bit
closer
as
three
feel
more
comfortable.
AG
A
A
X
X
We
understand
that
a
lot
of
great
apartments
were
built.
People
wanted
to
live
here,
but
then,
when
it
closed,
it
was
quite
a
blow
to
II
Charlotte
that
was
a
decade
ago
and
there's
been
increasing
discontent
among
the
residents
and
among
the
neighborhoods
feeling
that
there
hasn't
been
enough
effort
in
supporting
our
needs
in
this
part
of
town.
We've
had
challenged
schools,
large
low
in
apartment
complexes,
lack
of
week
a
lack
of
job
opportunities,
and
it
seems
like
we
were
given
one
more
thing
with
this
closure
that
we
just
had
to
overcome.
X
A
AG
A
A
S
AH
AH
AH
Weeks
ago,
a
month
ago,
I
tried
to
get
in
touch
with
the
rezoning
stamp
or
I
was
told
when
I
called
now
the
zoning
chair
for
my
neighborhood
for
many
years
I
know
the
number
three
362
apart
by
heart
and
could
not
get
in
touch
with
anyone
in
the
rezoning
step
and
kids.
Instead,
they
kept
saying
well,
you're
gonna
have
to
talk
to
Todd's
along
I
finally
had
to
find
out
and
talk
to
people
like
and
I.
AH
Thank
him
for
all
the
service
campaign
to
try
to
find
out
who
was
in
charge
of
this
particular
rezoning.
So
I
had
problems
with
that.
I
live
in
Windsor
Park.
The
neighborhood
has
gone
up
left
and
right.
So
the
question
is
as
you're
telling
people
like
mr.
Driggs
did
last
summer.
At
some
point
he
said
that
this
land
was
barely
able
to
be
given
away.
My
question
is:
how
much
is
it
currently
worth,
especially
since
the
article
says
you
pay
13
point
million
dollars
to
give
you
an
idea
on
ACORN
Street.
AH
There
were
two
prop
a
corner
that
will
worth
$200,000.
They
cut
the
backyard
to
put
another
one
by
right
and
that
has
property
values
for
three
houses
that
have
sold
for
a
total
of
1
million
dollars
on
Terry
wood
across
the
street.
For
that
they
took
one
house
bulldoze
that
the
land
cost
was
approximately
ninety
thousand
dollars
per
house.
Those
houses
are
going
to
yield
about
a
million
dollars
in
Trump,
not
property,
tax
property
value
across
the
street,
from
that
on
North,
Sharon
Tammany.
AH
AH
City
when
they
asked
when
these
individuals
ask
excuse
me,
but
how
much?
What
are
you
going
to
use
it
for
they
said
you
know
what
we
don't
really
have
to
tell
you
by
wall.
Then
they
call
the
City
Court
back
and
said.
Well,
he
says
we
can
get
it
to
you,
tax-free
and
and
I'm,
not
sure
whether
they
meant
from
the
bulldozing
in
the
houses
whether
they
were
trying
to
get
it
from
condemnation
or
so
forth.
But
these
are
the
closes.
AH
This
one
doesn't
work
and
another
one
doesn't
and
that's
how
the
city
wants
to
purchase.
These
people
have
told
me
that
Pat
Montfort
once
said
go
ahead
and
let
the
land
increase
some
in
the
Eastland
area,
Susan
Lindsay
before
she
died.
I
spent
some
time
with
her
talking
about
useless.
She
knew
that
the
land
was
going
to
increase
I'd
like
to
talk
a
little
bit
more
about
the
request
for
proposal
during
this
time
period
and
I
listened
to
miss
Mayfield.
AH
Actually,
there
saying
excuse
me:
since
we're
going
to
go
ahead,
we
will
not
be
able
to
probably
get
a
been
already
contracted
by
this.
Yet
when
it
came
out,
they
had
a
perfect
or
complement,
which
they're
now
calling
an
activator,
which
makes
me
question
on
land
use.
Was
everybody
given
a
fair
shot
to
be
an
activator
and
what
requirements
that
city
stay
use,
if
only
one
person,
if
four
people
applied
and
then
they
started
to
break
it
apart?
AH
AH
I
had
no
problem,
10
or
15
years
ago,
asking
the
City
of
Charlotte
to
limited
housing
in
our
areas,
I
written
articles
that
have
gotten
in
the
Charlotte
post
for
the
front
page
from
various
neighborhood
groups,
where
we've
gotten
blurbs
and
said
you
know
why
you
just
keep
dumping
it
on
us
and
that's
been
a
problem.
So
when
we
don't
know,
we
tend
to
make
bad
decisions
and
I
believe
this
could
be
one
of
them
when
you
don't
deal
a
with
the
housing
issue,
so
everyone
knows
what
they
said.
AH
I
personally
believe
that
everyone
should
have
an
idea
of
what
it's
a
responsibility
for
all,
not
just
the
low-income
neighborhoods
I
attended
one
of
these
conferences
where
mr.
Santino-
and
this
was
a
little
cafe
and
I-
asked
them.
I
said
how
much
money
is
it
going
to
take
for
you
guys
to
get
on
board?
This
was
before
temper
and
he
said
well,
it'll
be
in
the
tens
of
millions.
AH
Now
in
the
paper
he
says
it's
a
hundred
ten
million
dollars,
but
there's
no
idea
where
the
money
is
going
to
go
for
what's
the
split,
which
leads
me
to
believe
that
we
will
be
asking
to
vote
for
this
petition,
but
at
the
same
time
we
will
not
know
what's
coming
to
our
area,
especially
which
we
do
not
have
at
this
point.
It's
just
just
by
curiosity.
How
much
time
do
I
have
look.
AH
AH
So
the
question
is:
did
the
city,
what
did
the
city
do
to
use
places
like
Uli
and
I'm,
not
sure
if
I
got
the
abbreviations
or
a
request
for
four
folk
proposals
or
to
see
what
the
potential
work
for
us
to
be?
Because
all
I've
heard
of
in
so
many
different
places
is
bet
is
about
that?
The
area
is
not
doing
great.
We
are
doing
great
I
want
to
see
course
over
North
Sharon
Amman.
During
this
time
period,
as
I
told
you,
I
was
the
one
who
started
the
housing.
AH
Locational
was
what
became
the
housing
locational
ordinance.
The
building
would
eat
up
homes,
even
though
staff
had
known
about
that.
I
went
to
one
of
the
meetings
where
I
came
in
with
materials,
I
stood
up
and
told
Tracy,
Dobson
I
said
you
know.
It's
not
fair
for
you
to
try
to
push
this
thing
through
in
two
to
three
weeks.
That's
what
mr.
mattnewton
said
and
I
said.
You
really
need
to
go
ahead
and
have
a
full
30-day
now
going
to
what
the
newspaper
said.
AH
Do
you
take
a
look
at
what
was
in
the
paper
where
people
feel
that
there
should
be
some
sort
all
temporary
stop
at
this
point
of
not
only
because
of
that,
but
because
of
the
copán
of
what's
going
on
is
where
the
chances
of
this
actually
going
to
be
built,
and
how
is
this
going,
but
also
from
the
standpoint
of
with
temper
sports,
whether
it's
built
or
not,
he
built
something
in
Rock.
Hill
he's
also
gone
ahead
and
his
I
other
property
for
this
stadium.
I.
Understand
that
that's
what
he's
doing
he's
building
his
wealth?
AH
The
question
is:
are
we
looking
to
the
forward
forward
to
the
future
like
he
is
fulfilling
the
stadium's
down
the
road,
how
we
gone
ahead
and
actually
looked
and
said?
Okay,
this
is
what
the
newspaper
said:
I've
laid
out
some
things:
can
we
go
ahead
and
look
at
way
when
phase
two
of
opening
up
would
be
and
have
a
community
meeting?
That's
all
I'm
asking
for
so
if
I
would
play-
and
this
is
the
only
part-
I'll
have
a
little
bit
of
fun.
AH
Q
AH
A
That's
your
10
minutes.
Thank
you
for
your
comments
and
we're
gonna
ask
mr.
Sullivan
to
use
the
last
two
minutes
of
the
for
the
people
that
spoken
tore.
The
petition
technical
difficulties
got
Lois
for
a
little
allowance
here
because
he
had
signed
up
in
advance
to
speak.
So
he'll
have
two
minutes
to
speak
mr.
Sullivan.
A
V
As
you
as
well,
thank
you
and
I
appreciate
all
that
you
and
the
City
Council
are
doing
through
these
very
difficult
times
and
I.
Thank
you
for
allowing
me
to
come
and
speak
with
you
in
favor
of
moving
this
project
forward
myself
on
behalf
of
myself,
be
my
co-chair
of
Cathy,
Kenzie
and
all
of
Sharla
days.
Thank
you.
I
think
that
it's
it's
important
to
note
that
our
organization
basically
came
into
existence
because
of
the
concerns
around
Isla
mall,
and
this
goes
all
the
way
back
to
the
late
Institute.
V
Think
that
that
is
what
we
have
here
through
a
number
of
meetings
through
a
number
of
my
business.
That
seems
like
I've,
been
to
about
25
meetings
over
the
last
two
years,
but
if
there's
been
even
further
of
that
and
there's
a
lot
of
different
projects
moving
forward,
look
very
promising-
they
never
quite
made
it
this
far
and
I,
don't
I
think
a
lot
of
us
because
it
wasn't
quite
the
right
fit.
V
We
feel
very
comfortable
with
this
plan
that
crossing
South
East
is
moving
forward
with
I'd
sent
a
letter
to
you
all
business
from
us
over
the
weekend.
I
appreciate
the
responses
that
individual
individuals
got,
but
one
thing
that
I
noticed
when
our
meeting
was
held
on
Thursday
to
discuss
issues
that
individuals
had
brought
up.
Regarding
slowing
this
process,
there
was
a
term
patient
anticipation,
and
that
is
something
that
I
think
it
is
hard
to
put
a
value
on
it's
hard
to
say
that's
it.
V
But
if
you
have
been
working
this
project
as
long
as
we
have,
that
is
the
term.
We
have
been
patiently
anticipating
this
and
to
add
the
last
moment
because
of
all
the
issues
that
we
are
having
to
address
now
to
slow
this
product
process.
There
I
do
not
think
this
prudent
and
I
would
ask
you
to
move
forward
with
it.
Thank
you
all
for
allowing
me
to
speak.
Thank.
AG
Yes,
ma'am,
madam
mayor
I,
don't
know
in
my
experience
in
the
city
if
I've
seen
a
development
project
that
has
taken
longer
to
come
to
fruition
on
this.
So
it's
a
thrill
challenge
to
imagine
slowing
it
down
now
that
we
had
some
real
excitement
and
some
momentum
about
the
project.
Our
team
is
equally
as
frustrated
that
we
cannot
meet
with
people
in
person,
but
I
do
feel
like
the
outreach
that
has
taken
place
on
that
has
allowed
even
greater
engagement.
AG
But
if
we
were
doing
traditional
meetings,
we
were
scheduled
to
do
a
traditional
community
meeting
for
this
rezoning
petition
on
March
12th.
We
had
a
space
that
would
hold
250
people.
We
were
unable
to
execute
that
meeting
due
to
the
coated
circumstances,
but
have
done
more
of
these
online
outreach
and
we
believe
that
conservatively
based
on
the
feedback
we're
getting.
We
have
at
least
700
unique
engagements
that
have
taken
place.
AG
The
way
that
we've
rolled
these
out
online
people
are
able
to
to
watch
them
at
their
convenience,
they're
not
having
to
get
a
babysitter
and
come
out
and
see
us
on
a
Tuesday
night.
So
we
feel,
like
there's,
been
robust
engagement
in
process
and,
as
I
mentioned
at
the
outset,
this
is
just
one
piece
of
the
puzzle.
I'm
mr.
prasena
mentioned
the
number
of
his
concerns,
but
I
just
want
to
remind
him
and
the
rest
of
council
that
those
concerns
are
not
being
decided.
AG
As
part
of
this
rezoning
petition,
we
are
taking
a
vital
step
in
moving
east
and
mall
Ford,
and
this
rezoning
set
that
framework
the
city
continues
to
own
this
property.
Other
agreements
and
approvals
will
be
necessary
to
execute
on
that.
So
I
don't
want
anyone
to
think
that
this
hearing,
or
hopefully
about
next
month.
It
is
the
end
and
answers
all
those
questions
because
it
does
not.
We
are
creating
the
framework
for
you
to
make
some
more
important
decisions
as
we
move
forward.
Thank
you
for
your
time
this
evening,
Thank.
A
H
Okay
leaves
my
hand
up,
but
I
do
have
questions
to
any
nothing
like
yes,
so
I
just
agreed
with
one
thing
that
mr.
Brown
said.
While
it
is
correct
that
land
use
decisions
will
set
up
futures
debts,
the
conditional
rezoning
process
is
where
the
City
Council
members
get
to
work
with
developers
to
advocate
on
behalf
of
our
constituents.
In
this
case,
the
City
Council
is
also
the
petitioner
and
had
so.
We
have
incredible
leverage
on
this
project
with
that
stat
said
that
has
stated
that
the
public
park
is
contingent
on
County
funding.
H
S
A
Johnson
I'm
not
sure
that
I'm
mr.
Winston
I'm
not
sure
that
staff
can
ants
address
a
policy
question
because
generally
Parks
and
Recreation,
who
are
part
of
the
trade-off
that
we
did
with
a
number
of
agreements
with
this
county.
Those
may
change
but
I
think
those
are
council.
We
council
approved
policies
once
we
entered
into
an
interlocal
agreement
to
move
Park
and
Recreation
to
for
both
operations
and
development,
the
rest.
Now
being
that.
H
In
the
overall
policy
of
maintaining
parts,
but
when
we
deal
with
rezoning,
we
make
petitioners
or
a
part
of
part
of
that
those
negotiation
can
be
that
developers
and
petitioners
commit
to
open
space
and
certain
amenity,
and
we
are
a
petitioner
here.
Why
are
we
not
committing
to
do
that
public
park.
A
I
don't
know
the
answer
to
that
I
think
that's
an
answer
for
us.
The
council,
I
was
gonna,
say
your
colleagues
and
myself
to
address
so
I
think
that's
a
question
that
we
have
to
raise
on
a
forum
where
the
elected
officials
can
have
a
discussion
around
it
and
that's
certainly
something
that
can
be
done
all
I
know.
Is
we
have
an
existing
agreement
that
the
staff
would
be
following
on
that
area
right
now,
so
I
don't.
H
Think
I
agree
that
we
should
talk
about
it
because
I
think
we
refer
to
it.
The
apples
to
oranges
conversation
we're
talking
about
a
rezoning
and
the
commitment
that
a
petitioner
is
going
to
make
to
the
community,
so
I
think
we
should
make
that
commitment,
regardless
of
what
other
policy
arrangements
have
to
be
met
to
fulfill
that,
but
I
think
we
should
make
that
commitment,
germane
to
a
land
use
decision
well,.
A
We're
gonna
have
some
workshops
and
some
money
discussions
later
on
and
I
think
that
you're
perfectly
willing
I
agree
with
you
there.
It's
just
what
I
was
proud
to
point
out.
Is
they
are
working
with
what
exists?
What
you're
asking
is
something
that's
different
and
and
and
part
of
a
resulting
petition.
It's
just
right
now.
We
need
to
figure
out
a
way
for
that
discussion
to
be
held
among
your
colleagues.
A
H
A
H
H
A
A
E
S
I
I
That's
a
sign
of
progress
on
this
site
and
I'm
glad
to
see
that
we
are
finally
moving
the
ball
forward
and
a
lot
of
those
conversations
about
what
David
temper
might
or
might
not
do
or
how
we
might
or
might
not
be
involved
in
that
and
things
of
that
nature.
There
will
undoubtedly
be
a
time
for
those
I.
Don't
think
that
time
is
now,
as
this
Brown
pointed
out,
the
zoning
on
this
site
being
for
a
large
regional
mall
is
something
that's
never
going
to
be
built
on
that
side
again.
I
I
So
I
think
the
city
certainly
should
be
a
during
that
and
I
think
the
partnership
there
is
its
city
on
land
and
it's
going
to
be
dominated
for
a
part,
and
this
current
County
Commission
has
demonstrated
a
much
stronger
commitment
to
parts
and
so
I
think
that
they
would
find
a
way
to
make
that
work
and
the
BC
letter,
but
certainly
appreciate
all
the
work
on
this
and
glad
to
see
it
moving
forward
for
the
benefit
of
all
these
Charlotte.
Thank.
A
E
So
finally,
this
has
come
a
long
way,
as
we
have
heard
from
residents
who
have
lived
in
this
area
for
decades.
They
have
been
waiting
for
us
to
get
to
this
step
and
even
farther-
and
this
is
the
first
time
we
have
come
this
far
and
I
do
not
want
asked
you
now.
The
late
I
understand
the
concerns
that
were
raised
by
mr.
Vincent
around
what
will
development
look
like
for
the
site
and,
as
mr.
O
The
other
would
allow
us
to
have
one
it
does.
You
know
have
that
language
in
there
that
it
would
be
developed
subject
to
funding
by
Mecklenburg
County,
but
there
is
a
set-aside
of
two
acres
for
a
public
park
location
that
would
be
determined
during
permitting
they
also
committing
to
a
multi-use
path
that
will
connect
out
of
existing
schools
facility.
That
CMS
operates.
So
that's
also
part
of
the
open
space
plan,
but
they
will
have
that
two
acre
dedication,
that's
in
the
notes,
and
that
would
be
part
of
the
rezoning
plan.
Thank.
E
You
so
again,
as
our
staff
mentioned,
this
does
not
preclude
us
or
in
any
way
suggest
that
we
are
not
committed
to
our
open
space
or
farm.
That
discussion
will
continue,
but
I
do
not
want
us
to
have
that
discussion
at
the
cost
of
delaying
this
process.
Our
residents
have
been
waiting,
as
I
mentioned
earlier,
for
a
long
time
to
bring
catalyst
for
this
part
of
our
city,
because
there
are
so
many
residents
that
are
having
to
go
outside
of
the
district
to
find
a
job.
E
D
The
this
tonight
sets
the
land-use
rules,
but
does
that
so
a
little
bit
on
what
councilmember
as
me,
Renee?
Does
it
prevent
us
at
some
point
of
saying,
actually
we'd
like
a
little
bit
more
than
two
acres
for
a
public
park
or
would
like
to
widen
the
multi-use
path?
Is
that
prevent
us
from
having
those
discussions
going
forward.
A
D
A
Also
wanted
to
address
the
idea
that,
whenever
we're
doing
any
kind
of
public
funding
and
projects
we're
certainly
going
to
be
holding
a
number
of
in
citizen
engagements,
it
may
be
a
little
bit
different
as
we
go
forward.
We
don't
know
but
I
think
that
one
of
the
lessons
we've
learned
it's
better
to
always
talk
about
even
the
things
that
are
difficult
to
do
so
that
everybody
has
a
complete
understanding.
So
I
have
appreciation
for
people
coming
in
and
saying
well,
I
just
need
to
know
and
I
would
say
to
mr.
A
A
A
A
J
A
I'm
trying
I'm
trying
to
Ria's
like
maybe
this
is
okay,
so
all
right.
So
the
next
petition
that
we
have
is
petition
20
2003
by
Fairview
Builders
for
approximately
three
tenths
of
an
acre
on
the
southern
intersection
of
seagull
and
been
every
in
Belmont
District
one.
The
current
zoning
is
heavy
industrial.
The
request
it's
awning
is
urban
residential
conditional.
We
have
one
speaker
for
so
we'll
have
the
staff
give
us
a
overview
and
then
mr.
Brown
will
speak.
We'll
have
three
minutes.
O
Q
A
O
Right,
thank
you
located
here
in
the
Belmont
neighborhood
at
Van,
every
streets,
Eagle
Avenue.
The
petition
is
proposing
our
you
are
to
see
D
rezoning,
it's
currently
zoned
industrial.
This
is
a
petition
that
is
looking
to
do
some
era.
Urban
infill,
the
Belmont
area
revitalization
plant
from
2003,
does
recommend
single-family
uses
at
up
to
five
dwelling
units
per
acre.
O
Lane
commits
to
some
architectural
standards,
including
some
residential
connections,
to
the
sidewalk,
along
with
raised
average
sidewalk
rate
from
12
inches
to
24
inches
also
provides
each
unit
with
a
stoop
porch
facing
each
public
right
away
to
kind
of
provide
a
little
bit
more
of
a
pedestrian
framework
to
these
units
and
also
recesses
garage
doors
visible
from
the
public.
Right-Of-Way
staff
does
recommend
approval
this
petition.
We
do
have
a
few
outstanding
issues
that
we're
looking
to
work
through
between
now
and
decision.
O
A
AG
Can
be
very
brief
on
this
one
Dave
did
a
really
good
job
on
overview.
I'll
point
out.
One
thing:
that's
neat
about
this:
these
are
three
existing
Lots
and
so
here's
our
site
in
Reed
with
a
star
on
it,
three
existing
Lots.
What
the
petitioner
plans
to
do
is
is
leave
those
Lots
as
they
are
and
essentially
build
a
duplex
on
each
of
the
Lots,
which
kind
of
maintains
the
the
rhythm
and
the
feel
of
that
Street,
as
you
can
see
on
three
sides,
is
surrounded
by
a
newer,
townhome
development.
AG
So
we
think
the
duplex
is
here
a
really
a
nice
fit
for
the
area
happy
to
have
staff
support.
We
had
we
work.
This
was
the
last
in-person
community
meeting
we're
able
to
have
had
good
attendance
there
and
we
have
attended
a
virtual
community,
meaning
for
the
Belmont
Neighborhood
Association
I
think
they
like
the
concept
what
the
development
team
is
done.
They
have
asked
us
to
consider
some
additional
architectural
features.
We
will
have
an
ongoing
conversation
with
them
and
I
think
bring
some
of
that
back
in
our
work
plan
here.
I
A
AJ
A
Mitchell's,
a
yes,
mrs.,
Mehra,
Mayor,
Pro
Tem.
Yes,
all
right,
mrs.
Mira,
yes,
okay,
then
I
think
we
have
six.
Thank
you
all
right.
The
hearing
is
closed.
Our
next
item
is
on
item
agenda:
item
number
27
petition,
2020
0:10
by
Christ,
the
King
Lutheran
Church
for
approximately
15
8.8
acres,
located
south
of
trying
Street
West
to
steal
Croft
Parkway,
it's
in
district
3.
The
current
zoning
is
single-family
residential.
The
proposed
zoning
is
institutional
staff,
recommends
approval
of
this
petition.
A
O
Yo
Creek
Road
just
a
bit.
It
is
currently
zoned
r3.
It
does
have
an
institutional
use
currently
on
it,
so
we
just
have
an
institutional
use
operating
as
in
our
three
use,
which
is
allowed.
Currently
they
want
to
look
forward
to
go
and
expand
some
of
their
operations
of
the
church
itself
to
allow
a
daycare
facility.
That
is
something
that
isn't
permitted
as
part
of
that
r3
zoning,
even
though
it
does
allow
the
church.
O
That
component
is
not
consistent
with
the
current
r3
zoning,
so
this
petition
is
just
a
conventional
petition
requesting
that
institutional
zoning
district.
It
is
consistent
with
the
steel
Creek
area
plan
from
2012,
which
recommends
institutional
land
uses,
so
all
things
line
up
there
so
with
that
staff
does
recommend
approval
this
petition
again
it
is
conventional,
so
no
outstanding
issues
and
there's
site
plan
to
consider
just
and
happy
to
answer
any
questions
on
this
one
we
do
have.
Mr.
O
AG
Yes,
ma'am
on
behalf
of
the
petitioner:
this
is
an
existing
church
Christ,
the
key
in
the
area
that
happened
to
be
developed
or
three
zoning,
there's
some
different
things
you
like
to
do
on
the
site,
including
a
cafe,
and
so
we
think,
reasoning
to
an
institutional
use,
makes
perfect
sense
for
a
church.
It's
consistent
with
the
land
use
plan,
so
I
think
very
straightforward.
A
S
M
P
R
R
J
A
Six,
everyone
else
say:
yes,
thank
you
all
right.
The
next
item
that
we
have
is
item
number
20
item,
28
petition,
2020,
0-0,
2
9
by
Jayco,
or
Jack
Hoch
acquisition
for
approximately
one
acre
at
the
intersection
of
distribution
and
Donovan
streets.
Sin
district
3,
the
current
zoning
is
transitory
and
a
development
mix
used
optional
on
the
proposed
zoning
is
transit,
oriented
development
transit,
neighborhood
center.
We
have
mr.
Brown
to
speak
to
this
and
we'll
follow
the
past
pattern.
All.
O
The
petition
itself
is
currently
zoned
Tod,
it's
the
Tod
M
optional,
so
it's
one
of
our
previously
existing
Tod
districts
that
wasn't
converted
due
to
that
optional
provision
being
on
the
site.
The
petitioner,
in
this
case,
is
looking
to
just
rezoning
to
one
of
our
new
conventional
Tod
districts,
which
is
Tod
NC.
It's
a
conventional
plan
and
conventional
request.
So
there's
no
conditions
or
site
plan
associated
with
it.
It
is
consistent
with
the
New
Bern's
transit
station
area
plan
from
2008.
O
Again
this
would
have
likely
been
part
of
the
realignment
if
it
wasn't
for
the
the
optional
provisions,
but
staff
does
not
have
any
concerns
about
the
request
to
go
to
Tod
NC
again,
it
is
consistent.
We
do
recommend
approval
and
we'll
be
happy
to
answer
any
questions
following
mr.
Brown's
presentation.
AG
A
L
L
A
R
T
R
A
Right
so
we're
now
on
petition
number
29
for
approximately
its
petition,
2019
170
by
James
Dorf,
for
approximately
for
a
quarter
of
an
acre
located
in
the
eastern
intersection
at
the
Eastern
Eastern
shonrock
Drive,
it's
in
district
1,
the
current
zoning,
his
neighborhood
businesses,
businesses
and
the
proposed
zoning.
His
neighborhood
services
staff
recommends
approval
of
this
and
we
have
on
the
staff
presentation
followed
by
the
petitioners
representative,
mr.
Anthony
Foxx.
So
we'll
start
off
with
the
staff
and
then
mr.
Fox.
O
Okay,
thank
you.
Madam
mayor
2019.
170
is
located
on
the
plaza
and
shamrock.
It
is
currently
zoned
b1,
as
we
had
mentioned,
and
it's
going
to
a
neighborhood
service
district
was
a
conditional
district
by
Nature.
So
there
is
a
site
plan
and
conditions
to
be
considered
with
this
petition.
It
is
can
under
the
Central
District
plan
from
1993,
it
does
recommend
retail
uses
for
the
site.
O
This
proposal
itself
is
a
prohibit
and
auto
centric
use,
such
as
an
accessory
Drive
through
windows
and
gas
stations
that
would
not
be
compatible
with
the
surrounding
residential
uses,
as
well
as
other
residential
uses
in
provide
an
eight
foot.
Planing
ship,
six
foot
sidewalk
along
the
frontage,
so
we'll
get
some
Street
frontage
upgrades
along
the
plaza
there
and
also
committing
to
full
cut
off
type
lighting
for
both
freestanding
attached
lighting
fixtures.
That's
to
help
with
some
of
the
residential
adjacency
that
says
part
part
behind
this
site.
The
staff
recommendation
is
for
approval.
O
O
A
Fox
he
doesn't
have
to
address
this
when
I
guess
you
know
he
he
would
have
to
send
a
bill
and
it
probably
wouldn't
get
all
right.
So
is
there
any
question
for
the
staff
we
have?
No
speakers
signed
up.
No
questions
for
the
staff.
Can
I
have
a
motion
to
close
of
second
okay,
so
miss
ISIL,
Mayor,
Pro
Tem,
all
right,
mrs.
Mira,
yes,
miss
mr.
Mitchell
is
a
yes
mr.
Winston
yeah.
AJ
I
L
I
A
Cool,
thank
you.
Alright
agenda
item
number
30
and
this
one
mr.
Fox
does
have
an
opportunity
to
speak
for
three
minutes.
So
I'm
will
have
the
staff
review
of
20
ssin
20
2000
8
by
RK
Investments
Charlotte
LLC.
This
is
for
almost
5
acres
on
the
west
southwest
side
of
reins
Road
sin
district
2.
The
current
zoning
is
single-family
residential.
The
proposed
zoning
is
urban
resident.
Conditional
staff
recommends
approval
on
resolution
about
standing
issues.
Mister
team,
if
you
will
start
off
in
the
mr.
Fox,
ok.
O
Yes,
20
2000
8,
as
we've
mentioned
just
under
5
acres
on
Range
Road.
The
current
zoning
is
our
3.
They
are
looking
to
go
to
a
you
are
to
conditional
district.
You
can
see.
There
is
some
existing.
You
are
to
some
r12
MF
CDR
8,
MF,
C
D
in
this
general
area.
You
are
to
is
actually
just
adjacent
to
this
piece
as
well.
This
petition
is
actually
going
to
tie
in
with
that
petition,
we'll
get
into
that
in
just
a
moment.
O
This
is
part
of
the
North
Lake
area
plan
which
in
2008
that
plan
does
call
for
single-family
residential
it
up
to
four
dwelling
units
per
acre.
As
you
can
see
throughout
this
general
area
over
time,
we've
seen
a
difference
in
some
of
the
land
uses.
There
we've
gotten
a
little
bit
more
density
in
this
area
than
that
plan
at
a
division
from
2008.
But
again
that
seems
to
be.
You
know
something
that
we've
seen
on
both
sides
of
Rheims
Road
and
continuing
with
this
petition.
O
With
this
petition,
we
do
have
some
interconnectivity
with
that
piece
just
to
the
south
of
it
off
of
proximity.
Drive
Napa,
Oak
Drive.
This
project
would
tie
into
that
existing
multifamily
project,
so
we
get
a
consistent
bit
of
land
uses
between
the
two.
This
proposal
itself
does
allow
up
to
84.
Multifamily
units
to
maximum
height
is
47
feet
of
the
buildings.
We
do
have
that
existing
access
from
Silvercrest
Drive
and
proximity
Drive
that
would
tie
into
that
existing
project.
Just
next
door
continue
that
eight
foot
planning
strip
and
six
foot
sidewalk
along
reims
Road.
O
We
do
have
some
existing
driveway
encroachments
that
will
have
to
maintain
on
this
property.
That's
just
on
the
back
side,
it's
kind
of
just
falling
off
the
slide
here,
but
we
will
maintain
some
existing
driveway
encroachments
for
this
property.
Otherwise,
we'd
have
some
land
lock
situations
there.
We
do
have
architectural
standards
that
are
being
committed
to
and
that
building
elevations
will
not
have
blank
walls
greater
than
20
feet.
Also,
some
amenity
areas
with
pathways
seating
areas
and
some
ornamental
landscaping
staff
does
recommend
approval
this
petition.
We
do
have
some
outstanding
issues
to
work
through.
O
It
is
inconsistent,
as
we
mentioned,
with
the
2008
North
Lake
area
plan.
However,
the
some
of
the
existing
development
that's
going
on
within
this
area
and
the
adjacency
just
next
door,
the
ability
to
kind
of
tie
in
to
that
project
and
have
a
little
bit
more
of
a
continual
project
between
these
two
we
thought
was
a
reasonable
transition.
We
do
recommend
approval
and
we'll
be
happy
to
take
any
questions
following
the
petitioners
presentation.
AJ
Right
all
right,
mayor
members
of
council
zoning
committee
members.
First
of
all,
thank
you
for
your
service
and
I'd
like
to
also
thank
staff
for
their
working
with
my
client.
Arkaid,
invest
investors
on
this
on
this
exciting
project.
If
you
can
flip
the
slide,
our
key
investors
are
local
fruit
that
are
native
Charlatans.
They
saw
a
digit
in
the
North
Lake
area
and
they
went
through
the
next
to
you
in
that
position.
Next
slide.
AJ
With
this
petition,
we
did
hold
the
community
meeting
I'm
happy
to
say
that
no
one
attended
I
have
talking
spoken
with
Lani
Newsom
in
the
neighborhood
when
the
neighborhood
leaders-
and
he
is
in
support
of
the
petition
next
slide,
the
residents
that
Brookline
were.
They
were
a
vision
of
the
my
clients
when
they
took
on
this
project.
They
brought
this
property
out
of
foreclosure
in
2013.
It
was
a
failed
neighborhood.
AJ
They
came
up
with
a
vision
and
transition
that
neighborhood
to
a
vibrant
neighborhood
that
has
single-family
and
multi-family
homes
that
property
now
and
also
shares
a
you
of
you
are
to
zoning
designation
next
slide.
It
was
a
tremendous
success
story.
Next
slide,
you'll
see
that
is
the
residence
in
Brooklyn
and
you
look
on
the
right
corner.
You'll,
see
where
some
diverse
in
family
residential
homes
are
being
still
being
built
in
that
property
across
from
the
street.
Is
the
proximity
North
development
next
slide?
AJ
The
proximity
north
was
a
2035
class,
a
unit
class
apartment
development
that
continues
that
Brooklands
the
residence
at
Brooklands
next
next
slide.
This
proposal
of
pins
to
the
proximity
north,
similar
architectural,
similar
structures,
utilizing
some
existing
infrastructure
improvements
to
a
pin
to
that
and
just
adds
two
more
units
to
that
to
that
development
next
line.
This
is
the
proximity
north
apartment,
architectural
renderings,
next
slide
again
as
as
they
mentioned,
this
is
a
property.
AJ
AJ
Go
to
the
if
you
go
to
the
next
slide
next
one-
and
this
is
these-
are
the
two
builders
and
they
will
have
84
units
42
each
of
each
building
next
slide,
and
this
is
a
site
plan.
One
thing
interesting
about
the
site
plan:
it
does
maintain
a
open
space
on
the
front
of
the
property,
so
the
property
is
since
its
back
off
of
regrowth
and
next
slide
and
that's
the
elevations
that
will
match
the
existing
units
there
next
slide
and.
A
J
J
R
R
I
A
Next
item
on
our
agenda
is
petition
number
31,
petition,
2020
0:15
by
McShane
partners
for
approximately
a
quarter
of
an
acre
located
on
the
eastern
side
of
Park
Drive
I'm--it's
in
district
1.
The
current
zoning
is
multifamily
residential,
for
is
that
43
units,
an
acre,
43
units,
an
acre
and
proposed
zoning-
is
mixed-use.
Development.
Optional
staff
recommends
approval
of
our
resolution
of
outstanding
issues,
we'll
have
the
staff
and
present
we
have.
A
O
Thank
you,
madam
mayor
20
20015.
Just
under
quarter
of
an
acre,
it's
tucked
back
on
Park
Drive,
just
off
of
Clement
in
7th
Street
and
Lamar
Avenue.
The
existing
zoning
is,
as
we
mentioned,
our
43
M
F
they're.
Looking
at
moto,
you
can
see,
we've
got
some
mud,
oh
just
adjacent,
to
this
piece
really
on
both
sides
on
the
long
side
of
this
odd
shaped
parcel,
and
then
on
that
point,
the
triangle
there
on
Park
you've
got
moto
existing
and
in
both
of
those
areas,
and
this
would
continue
that
moto
zoning
along
Park
Drive.
O
It
is
part
of
the
very
vital
ization
plan
from
2011.
We
do
recommend
residential
office
uses
for
the
subject
site.
This
petition
itself
proposes
a
6600
square
foot
office
building.
We
do
have
residential
dwelling
unit
over
the
office
itself.
It
does
provide
propose
to
provide
parking
via
two
spaces
on
the
site
and
some
recessed
spaces
on
Park
Drive,
as
well
as
some
lease
spaces
and
bicycle
parking
on
the
site
is
also
doesn't
limit.
Building
height
to
50
feet.
Four
inches
does
provide
some
architectural
design.
Standards,
prohibits
eating
drinking
entertainment
establishments
as
a
permitted
use.
O
So,
even
though
it's
allowed
in
mud,
this
petition
would
prohibit
that
as
part
of
this
development
do
propose
ingress
and
egress
off
Park
Drive
in
an
existing
alleyway,
as
well
as
the
new
six-foot
sidewalk,
an
8
foot
planning
strip.
The
petition
is
consistent
with
the
area
plan
for
office
residential
land
uses.
However,
some
of
the
potential
retail
uses
would
not
be
consistent
with
the
plan.
However,
we
do
still
feel
comfortable.
O
We
have
that
ete
prohibition
that
be
part
of
the
conditions
of
the
plan,
so
we
do
feel
like
that's
a
good,
a
good
prohibition
in
the
conditional
notes
and
we
do
recommend
approval.
Just
some
outstanding
issues
to
work
through
related
to
land
use,
transportation
at
site
and
building
design
have
a
feel
confident.
We
can
continue
to
work
through
those
between
now
on
the
decision
and
we'll
be
happy
to
take
any
questions
following
presentations
from
the
petitioner.
Alright,.
AK
A
AK
P
F
I
Just
one
note
and
ask
I
guess
if
the
notes
in
our
book
are
correct,
this
building
is
celebrating
its
100th
birthday
this
year
and
I.
Don't
know
that
it's
necessarily
historically
significant
architectural
Eeyore
in
the
story
of
Charlotte
but
I
would
encourage
the
owners
of
the
building
to
contact
Stewart
grain,
the
folks
at
the
Historic
Landmarks
Commission
and
at
least
allow
them
the
opportunity
to
document
the
building
or
get
any
information
or
materials
or
things
from
it.
I
A
H
A
Of
that
important
thinking,
okay,
we
had
mr.
Winston
said
that
was
a
great
idea.
Is
there
any
any
further
questions
by
the
council
hearing?
None
mr.
eggleston,
all
right!
We've
got
a
second,
please,
okay,
a
second
to
that.
We
somebody
second
it
thank
you.
So
miss
Mayor
Pro
Tem
closed
the
public
hearing;
yes,
mrs.
Mira
mr.
Mitchell,
yes,
mr.
Winston
yeah.
H
I
A
Right,
our
next
petition
is
item
number
32,
20
2008
level
by
mr.
Gosar
I,
believe
that
would
be
correctly
saying
it.
Approximately
1.3
acres
located
west
of
Margaret
Wallace
Road,
it's
in
district
5.
The
current
zoning
is
our
residential
four
units
per
acre
urban
residential
conditional
is
the
requested
zoning
and
the
staff
recommends
approval
of
home
resolution
about
standing
issues,
and
then
we
have
the
petitioner
to
speak
at
following
the
staff
presentation.
A
O
You,
madam
mayor
20,
2011,
1.35
acres,
it's
on
Margaret
Wallace
road
between
Glen
Verde
and
Melrose
Cottage
Drive.
This
petition
is
currently
zoned
r4
they're
looking
to
go
to
a
you
are
one
conditional
district.
The
petition
itself
is
part
of
the
district
East
District
climate
from
1990
does
recommend
single-family
up
to
four
dwelling
units
per
acre.
However,
due
to
the
date
and
age
of
this
plane,
we
do
use
general
development
policies
to
evaluate
any
increase
in
density.
O
The
policy
guidelines
for
this
did
allow
for
believe
up
to
six
units
per
acre
for
this
project,
so
we
would
be
within
the
guidelines
for
the
general
development
policies.
Even
though
we're
outside
of
the
district
plan
recommendation,
we
would
have
consistency
with
that
GDP
just
to
talk
a
little
bit
about
the
project
itself.
The
project
proposes
up
to
seven
single-family
detached
dwellings.
O
We've
got
40
foot
building
heights,
maximums
committed
to
which
is
typical
of
a
single-family
zoning
district
that
we
do
have
construction
of
improved
streetscape
along
Margaret
Wallace,
as
well
as
screening
on
the
west
north
and
eastern
property
lines.
That
way,
we'd
have
a
little
bit
of
a
buffer
between
the
existing
single-family
attached
and
the
single-family
homes
on
Glen
Burnie
Court.
We
also
have
cut
off
fixtures
for
any
lighting
and
architectural
design
guidelines,
including
raised
entryways
and
useable
porches
and
Stoops
staff
does
recommend
approval.
O
This
petition
upon
resolution
of
outstanding
issues
related
to
transportation,
environment,
siting
building
design.
Again,
it's
inconsistent
with
the
single-family
dwelling
units
up
to
four
four
dwelling
units
breaker
excuse
me,
but
it
is
consistent
with
the
general
development
policies
for
up
to
sixth
welling
units.
Breaker
and
again,
staff
does
recommend
approval
and
we'll
be
happy
to
take
any
questions
following
a
pres
tation
from
the
petitioner.
All.
AK
Thank
you,
madam
mayor
councilmembers.
I
wanted
to
take
this
opportunity
to
thank
the
staff
for
working
with
us
through
the
different
reviews
and
iterations
and
getting
the
final
plan
out
there
and
I
wanted
to
mainly
be
here
to
answer
any
questions,
or
any
clarifications
are
needed
on
this
particular
project.
All.
L
With
you,
as
we
proceed
through
this
process
in
the
coming
month,
I
did
receive
an
email
from
the
community,
and
I
will
be
following
up
on
that
as
well.
My
question
revolves
around
the
environmental
issue.
Under
our
outstanding
issues
in
our
materials
I
wanted
to
ask
where
it
is
the
stormwater
convenience
conveyance
on
site
and
and
then
maybe
follow
up
regarding
storm
water
impact.
If
you
have
any
information
on
that,
yeah
I
mean
what
what
would
occur
in
it.
Maybe
we
can
talk
a
little
bit
more
offline
about
what
would
occur
here.
O
And
I'll
have
to
defer
that
question
over
to
folks
on
our
stormwater
group
be
happy
to
follow
up
with
them
following
this
meeting
and
get
some
more
information
from
them.
Maybe
if
we
need
to
sit
down
and
schedule
some
time
to
just
kind
of
catch
up
with
them,
either
on
the
phone
or
virtually
councilmember
knew
and
be
happy
to
do
that.
So
we
can
try
and
get
those
questions
answered
between
now
and
the
decision
for
you
and.
A
O
At
a
conventional
request
here
we're
going
from
a
beedi
conditional
plan
and
some
i1
zoning
as
well
as
some
are
three
single-family
residential
zoning
to
just
an
O
two
general
office,
zoning.
So
again,
no
conditions,
no
site
plan
to
be
considered
for
this
one.
The
southwest
district
plan
in
this
area
from
1991
does
recommend
office
land
uses
for
this
site
in
the
surrounding
general
area.
So
we
are
consistent
with
that
land
use
recommendation
for
the
plan.
O
L
A
AA
A
F
C
A
Right,
the
next
petition
is
item
34
2020
0:24
by
dominion,
Realty
partners
for
approximately
1.8
acres
located
south
of
Fairview
east
of
Berkeley
downs.
It's
in
district
6,
the
current
zoning
is
office
and
the
proposed
zoning
is
mixed-use.
Development,
optional
staff
recommends
approval,
we
have
the
staff
presentation
and
we
have
mr.
Brown
and
Miss
grant
from
I.
Don't
know
if
they're
representing
the
petitioner
as
well
as
Hilary
Larsen,
who
is
it,
has
signed
up
to
speak
so
we'll
keep
going
all.
O
You,
madam
mayor
20
2024,
is
on
Fairview
Road.
That's
just
about
one
point:
eight
and
a
quarter
acres.
The
site
itself
is
just
located
here
within
the
South
Park
Mall
area.
It
is
an
existing
building
that
we
are
looking
to
do.
Some
redevelopment
of
the
current
zoning
is
for
a-1.
The
proposed
zoning
is
a
mud
optional
district.
The
site
itself
is
part
of
the
South
Park
area
plan,
which
does
recommend
single-family,
multifamily
and
office
uses
for
the
site.
The
residential
density
recommendation
with
those
uses
would
be
20
dua.
O
The
site
itself
is
looking
at
325
multifamily
units,
so
that
density
would
because
of
the
size
of
the
site,
we're
looking
at
about
a
hundred
and
seventy
seven
units
per
acre.
But
again
this
is
part
of
an
integrated
residential
project.
Within
the
building
itself,
we've
got
up
to
1500
square
foot
of
non-residential
uses
on
the
ground
floor.
The
building
is
also
185
feet
in
height,
which
is
65
feet
greater
than
mud
standards
allow.
So
then,
one
of
those
optional
provisions
is
to
allow
that
increase.
O
It
is
consistent
with
some
of
the
existing
building
heights
that
have
been
developed
in
the
area.
Recently,
so
staff
feels
that
that's
a
generally
appropriate
request.
We
do
have
a
24
foot
setback
which
would
allow
for
some
new
sidewalk
with
six
foot
side
walking
in
an
effort
to
preserve
some
of
the
existing
trees
along
Fairview.
We
also
are
getting
a
financial
support
for
pedestrian
improvements
as
part
of
the
South
Park
loop
trail
then
also
some
contributions
to
the
Charlotte
Housing
Trust
Fund.
O
We
have
a
bus,
waiting
pad
and
shelter
that
would
be
enhanced
on
Fairview
Road,
as
well
as
some
of
the
Eco
access
from
some
shared
driveways
and
turn
lanes.
If
we
allow
get
some
property
owners
within
the
area
to
agree
to
some
underlying
easements,
we
do
have
minimum
five
hundred
square
feet
of
open
space
feature
at
the
corner
of
Fairview
Road.
So
we'll
have
an
open
space
element
on
the
corner
of
the
property.
O
We
do
have
architectural
design
standards
and
then
again
that
optional
provision
for
increased
building
height
and
then
just
a
language
about
not
allowing
or
requiring
doors
be
recessed
when
they're
at
least
12
feet
in
a
clear
zone.
So
again,
just
some
standard
optional
provisions,
except
for
that
height
increase
that
we
talked
about
a
little
bit
earlier,
just
to
go
through
the
proposal
itself.
You
can
just
kind
of
get
an
idea
of
the
architectural
render
for
the
building
along
Fairview
Road,
not
some
of
the
sidewalk
improvements
that
would
be
included.
O
There's
a
parking,
a
four
level
parking
deck
that
you
can
see
proposed
in
this
general
area.
Here
and
again,
overall
staff
does
recommend
approval.
There
are
actually
no
outstanding
issues
associated
with
this
conditional
site
plan.
It's
time
of
hearing,
as
we
stated,
is
consistent
with
the
recommend
recommendation
for
a
mix
of
uses
for
the
area.
However,
it
does
exceed
that
residential
density,
but
as
we're
looking
for
an
urban
infill
development
in
this
area,
a
staff
did
feel
that
it
was
within
good
urban
form
in
context,
and
we
do
recommend
approval.
AI
I'll
consolidate
the
time,
I
think
the
council
and
Sony
committee
you've
been
having
a
long
time
tonight,
so
thank
you.
Bridget
grant
and
I've
been
pleased
to
work
with
Dominion
Realty
partners
on
this
project.
Dominion
Realty
is
a
leading
signature
developer
of
mixed-use
projects
and
it's
in
fact,
in
the
process
of
completing
a
project
near
ramier,
Bearden
Park
in
the
Center
City.
AI
This
next
slide
I
think
will
show
a
little
bit
of
the
location
of
the
site
in
the
context
of
what
days
already
reviewed
and
again
we're
pleased
to
have
the
staff
support
and
the
cidade
supporters
of
the
petition
this
this
next
slide
is
important
and
they've
mentioned
this.
A
critical
feature
for
South
Park
Peppard
subway
has
been
this
loop
trail
by,
and
this
chose
the
site
in
the
context
of
that
will
please.
AI
The
Dominion
Realty
has
also
netted
this
and
it's
providing
contribution
of
$150,000
to
the
support
of
the
loop
trail,
which
I
think
will
also
be
a
key
feature
for
the
pedestrian
walkability,
not
only
for
South
Park
but
all
to
into
the
project
as
well.
This
next
slide
gives
you
a
little
flavor
of
the
existing
streetscape
Dave's
referenced.
Those
efforts
will
be
made
to
preserve
those
existing
the
tool
trees
move
on
to
the
next.
AI
If
I
could
the
next
slide
but
then
show
you
some
of
the
benefits
I'm
not
going
to
go
through
these
interests
of
time,
but
I
do
want
to
highlight
the
community
engagement
that
person
we've
been
involved
in
for
a
number
of
my
working,
particularly
with
the
leadership
of
the
South
Park
Association
of
neighborhoods,
and
we
appreciate
all
of
their
time
and
energy
we've
had
a
lot
of
great
dialogues.
We
appreciate
the
leadership,
support
and
you've
received
a
letter
from
Hillary
Larsen,
but
we
will
not
have
speak
tonight,
but-
and
we
appreciate
counselor
McCrory
as.
AK
AI
AI
Right
so
this
was
the
site
plan,
as
I
mentioned,
and
you'll
see
the
efforts
of
pedestrian
upon
Fairview
and
possible
improvements
that
we
might
be
able
to
make
on
the
circulation.
The
next
slide
also
highlights
some
these
same
types
of
efforts
that
are
not
going
to
make
the
site
plan
come
alive
and
the
broader
fabric
of
South
Park.
Furthermore,
of
this
next
one
again
we'll
wrap
up
here,
gives
you
a
player,
a
flavor
of
the
elevations.
Again.
AI
A
R
R
This
is
an
organization
that
honestly
I
count
myself
as
a
district,
rep
very,
very
lucky,
to
have
and
be
able
to
work
with
and
so
much
so
that,
in
many
of
your
other
districts,
we've
made
connections
and
had
conversations
so
that
we
can
share
the
practices
of
really
organizing
multiple
neighborhood
association,
different
things.
And
that's
why
you
see
a
lot
of
these
outcomes
that
we've
made
over
the
last
three
years
in
progress.
R
Be
it
the
loop
that
you
saw
a
picture
of
there
and
and
what
that
can
do,
but
also
paired
with
so
many
other
things
that
are
happening
because
of
that
groups,
great
work
and
because
of
the
private
sector
and
the
development
petition.
Community's
work
as
well
all
collaborating
so
I
just
want
to
thank
everyone
for
the
hard
work.
I
want
to
particularly
thank
these
petitioners
here
or
committing
to
and
seeing
the
value
of
the
loop
and
putting
it's
not
just
a
one-way
sponsorship
and
contribution
in.
R
We
have
to
figure
out
congestion
in
this
part
of
town,
all
plus
it's
out
with
this
part
of
town,
particularly,
and
this
is
how
we
make
it
more
walkable,
more
liveable,
connecting
live,
work
and
play,
and
we
don't
have
a
lot
of
solutions
other
than
this
right
now,
and
it
is
something
that
is
very
exciting
and
I'm
excited
for
the
future
of
South
Park.
So
I
give
a
lot
of
kudos
to
these.
These
petitioners
here
or
doing
that,
but
also
for
understanding
the
importance
of
what
is
an
unprecedented
building.
R
This
is
about
as
I
understand
it
outside
of
Uptown
one
of
the
highest
buildings
of
this
nature,
outside
of
Uptown,
so
understanding
that,
but
understanding
that
contributions
being
made
to
affordable
housing
and
our
trust
and
the
importance
of
all
that
it's
just
hands
down
some
great
work.
I
know
over
the
next
month.
There
will
be
other
things
to
complete.
R
They
definitely
wanted
to
just
thank
everyone
for
bringing
once
again
a
lot
of
pre-work
to
the
table,
so
there's
a
lot
of
a
unified
voice
in
asking
the
district,
rep
and,
ultimately,
the
broader
council,
on
what
to
do.
What
to
vote
on,
hopefully
that
will
finish
out
strong
over
the
next
March.
Alright.
H
H
I
A
A
A
We
have
a
petition
2020
0
25
by
sun
cap
property
group
for
approximately
26
acres,
located
on
the
eastern
side
of
Millhaven
lane
south
of
sunset.
It's
in
district
2,
it's
a
currently
zoned
as
a
commercial
center.
The
requested
rezoning
is
light.
Industrial
conditional
staff
recommends
approval
upon
resolution
of
some
revisions
that
are
needed
and
we
have
the
staff
presentation,
miss
grant
and
Paxton
Haller
to
speak
in
favor
of
the
petitioner.
O
Excuse
me,
20
20
25
is
about
25
acres,
just
under
20
26
acres.
So
we're
continuing
our
numbers
theme
this
evening.
Just
off
of
Millhaven
Lane,
south
of
sunset
road
and
Statesville
Avenue.
You
can
see
we're
kind
of
bounded
between
mill,
Haven
and
States
will
run
in
parallel
up
to
sunset.
With
this
site.
The
site
itself
currently
is
zoned
CC
for
a
commercial
center.
The
proposed
zoning
is
for
an
i1
conditional,
which
is
light
industrial.
The
Northeast
district
plan
from
96
does
call
for
retail
uses
for
this
site.
O
The
petition
itself,
it
proposes
up
to
425
thousand
square
feet
of
warehousing
warehouse,
distribution,
manufacturing
and
office
uses,
does
have
some
prohibited
uses
such
as
outdoor
storages,
outdoor
storage,
edes,
retail
shopping,
centers,
auction
sales,
automobile
truck
and
utility,
trailer
runner,
etc.
So
a
lot
of
the
less
desirable
uses
that
would
be
part
of
that
district
have
been
written
out
from
this
plan.
We
also
are
looking
at
a
thirty
seven
and
a
half
foot
buffer
around
the
periphery
of
the
site.
O
To
give
us
some
additional
screening
and
buffering
from
some
of
the
adjacent
uses,
we
will
get
upgrades
to
Millhaven
Lane
with
an
8
foot,
planting
strip
and
six-foot
sidewalk
along
that
road,
as
well
as
left
turn
lanes
on
Millhaven
into
the
site.
We
also
are
getting
construction
of
a
proposed
public
road
between
Statesville,
road
and
Millhaven
Lane.
That's
this
proposed
public
street
a
that
will
run
between
the
two
and
provide
a
connection
between
these
two
roads.
O
Access
will
be
all
familiar
van
Lane
in
Statesville
Road,
and
we
do
have
a
minimum
one
prominent
street
facing
entrance
to
each
public
street
and
it's
specific
as
well
as
asbestos
specifications
on
building
materials.
Excuse
me:
it's
been
a
long
evening.
We
do
recommend
approval
of
this
petition
palm
resolution.
Some
outstanding
technical,
technical
issues
related
to
transportation.
That's
mainly
has
to
do
with
striping
along
Millhaven.
O
As
we
had
stated,
the
petition
isn't
consistent
with
the
Northeast
district
plan,
but
staff
did
feel
that,
due
to
some
of
the
existing
uses
and
continuing
development
of
this
area,
the
location
and
proximity
close
to
the
interchange
with
85
and
sunset
Road,
we
do
feel
it
was
a
reasonable
request
to
consider.
We
do
recommend
approval
and
we'll
be
happy
to
take
any
questions
out
following
presentation
from
the
petitioners.
AF
I'm
gonna
go
ahead
and
did
a
great
job
on
the
presentation,
so
I'm
gonna
go
ahead
and
jump
ahead.
As
he
mentioned,
we
got
about
a
25
acre
site
and
a
lot
of
planned
benefits
that
he
featured,
but
on
our
next
little
we're
gonna
make
some
additional
changes
and
the
effort
to
get
everything
a
little
more
context
sensitive.
They
include
commitments
to
locate
service
and
loading
areas
to
the
interior
of
the
site.
Multiple
buildings
are
developed.
AF
AF
We
had
a
required
community
meeting,
it
was
actually
the
last
face-to-face
in
person
and
community
meeting
I
was
able
to
participate
in.
We
continue
to
work
with
the
adjacent
neighbors
and
we
continue
to
do
so
through
the
construction
and
development
process.
We
included
design
standards
that
committed
to
the
building
materials
and
commitment
to
site
orientation
and
details
and
in
terms
of
certainty
of
development.
Unlike
conventional
zoning,
we've
established
maximum
square
footages
and
identify
those
uses
that
are
less
desirable
for
the
site.
AF
A
J
A
Else
is
yes.
Thank
you
all
right.
Item
number
36
is
a
rezoning
petition,
20-20-20
0:28
by
naysha
weaver
for
approximately
five
point,
three
acres
located
at
the
intersection
of
Monroe
on
the
western
side
of
the
property.
It's
in
district
5.
The
current
zoning
is
single-family
residential
with
three
units
per
acre.
The
proposed
zoning
is
institutional
staff,
recommends
approval
of
this
petition.
We
do
not
have
a
speaker,
so
the
staff
presentation
and
then,
if
the
council
has
questions.
O
Piece
of
property
right
at
the
corner
across
from
the
school
and
the
developing
areas
right
there
around
Wallace,
Road
and
Conference
Drive.
This
existing
church
is
looking
to
rezone
again
from
an
r3
single-family
residential
to
an
institutional.
This
one
I
did
get
a
little
confused
with
our
residential
zone
churches
going
institutional
earlier
I'd
mentioned
one
that
was
looking
for
a
daycare
use
and
mr.
Brown
had
corrected
and
said
they
were
looking
for.
More
of
some
cafe
uses
and
other
things.
This
one
is
looking
to
add
a
daycare
to
the
site.
Again.
O
O
But
again
when
we
look
at
institutional
zoning
districts
recommendations,
we
don't
see
those
in
all
of
our
plans
and
they
don't
usually
fall
in
line
with
some
of
those
recommendations,
but
this
uses
would
be
consistent
with
what's
going
on,
existing
out
there
and
what's
being
proposed,
would
fit
within
the
general
context
of
the
area
staff.
Does
recommend
approval
this
petition?
It
is
a
conventional
petition,
so
again
no
planner
conditions
to
be
associated
with
it.
Well,
it
is
inconsistent.
O
A
I
K
A
A
N
A
Yes,
thank
you
all
right
petition
agenda
item
number
37
petition,
20
20-0
31
by
the
creek
Kids
Zone
Wow,
approximately
three
acres
located
on
the
western
side
of
Sugar
Creek
north
of
Cushman.
It's
in
district
1.
The
current
zoning
is
institutional
conditional
and
the
proposed
zoning
is
institutional.
Staff
recommends
approval
of
this
petition
and
we
don't
have
any
speakers
so
we'll
go
ahead
and
let
the
staff
do
their
thing
all.
O
Right,
thank
you,
madam
mayor
20,
20
31,
our
last
petition
of
the
evening,
just
over
three
acres
is
on
West
Sugar
Creek
Road,
currently
zoned
institutional
CD,
the
petitioner
is
requesting
to
just
zone
out
of
that
conditional
district
and
just
go
to
a
conventional
institutional
district,
give
them
a
little
bit
more
flexibility
with
the
property
and
be
able
to
do
some
things
on
the
property,
with
the
existing
use
that
wouldn't
be
permitted
under
that
condition.
Staff
doesn't
have
any
concerns
with
what
they're
requesting
or
loss
of
any
of
those
conditions.
O
As
part
of
that
old
CD
plan,
it
is
consistent
with
the
Central
District
plan,
which
does
recommend
institutional
uses
for
this
site
likely
based
on
the
existing
use
that
had
been
there.
The
adapted
land
use
policy
actually
was
amended
by
that
2004
rezoning
to
institutional.
So
that's
where
we
get
that
plan
consistency
again,
staff
doesn't
have
any
concerns
with
the
request
to
zone
out
of
those
conditions
into
just
a
conventional
institutional
district.
It
is
consistent
with
the
plan
recommendation.
Like
I
said,
we
do,
recommend
approval
and
be
happy
to
answer
any
questions
on
this
one.