►
From YouTube: Charlotte Moves September Meeting
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
B
B
So
I
may
I
may
call
on
some
of
you.
You've
all
been
appointed
to
this
task
force
for
a
reason,
and
I
want
to
make
sure
that
we
hear
from
everybody
and
hear
all
of
your
ideas,
comments
and
questions
before
we
get
started
again.
I
want
to
have
tyler
remind
us
of
where
we
started
and
where
we're
going.
C
Thank
you
very
much
mayor
again
good
evening
again,
everyone
so
good
to
see
all
of
you
virtually
this
slide
is
really
more
of
a
reminder
slide.
It's
in
terms
of
what
we're
charged
with.
We
definitely
do
have
an
end
goal
here,
and
that
is,
we
are
expected
to
deliver
something
to
may
and
council
and
the
community
at
the
end
of
december
of
this
year.
C
If
you
will,
if
you
remember
in
the
invitation
letter
that
went
to
all
of
you
back
in
february,
inviting
you
to
be
part
of
this
task
force,
there
were
a
couple
of
things
that
were
highlighted
in
that
letter.
One
of
them
was
to
talk
about
multi-modality,
not
just
about
railroad
balls
but
also
greenways,
paired
bike.
It's
really
very
people,
mobility
and
then
also
that,
at
the
end
of
the
day,
we
deliver
what
we
call
a
transformational
mobility
initiative
or
program
to
the
mayan
council.
C
But
while
this
group
is
meeting
with
their
specific
goals
to
engage
the
community
to
review
plans
to
look
at
and
assess
funding
needs
as
well
as
mobility
needs,
we
are
also
staff
continues
to
present
this
initiative
to
different
groups.
So
you
see
on
there
the
charlotte
regional
transportation
planning
organization
we've
presented
to
them,
we're
going
to
present
to
them
again
in
this
month
and
then
actually
in
october,
we're
going
to
present
to
the
metropolitan
transit
commission.
C
Next
week
we've
presented
to
the
mecklenburg
delegation
we've
presented
to
the
inter-governmental
relations
that
has
joined
council
county
commission
members.
We
also
presented
this
on
september,
2nd,
I
believe,
to
the
county
board
of
commissioners.
So
staff
continues
to
make
those
concurrent
presentations
and
receiving
feedbacks
from
all
these
policy
makers
and
elected
officials.
C
We
continue
to
also
meet
with
alliance
the
business
alliance
with
regards
to
the
infrastructure
series.
While
we
are
also
meeting
with
the
group
metro,
mobility
coalition,
that's
been
put
together
by
sustained
charlotte
and
I
believe
some
of
you
have
spoken
with
sustained
charlotte
already.
So
again,
I
will
remind
you
of
this
every
time
we
have
this
meeting.
So
if
anyone
is
asking
questions,
we
can
be
consistent
with
how
we're
responding
and
very
important
that
we
continue
to
see
this
platform
as
an
opportunity
for
civic
engagement.
D
Yes,
thank
you
mayor
and,
like
last
month,
I'd
like
to
start
by
saying
thank
you
to
the
task
force
members
for
your
thoughts
and
collaboration
on
this.
We've
been
very
impressed
with
this
group
and
your
dedication
to
the
work
and
also
with
your
intelligence,
around
transportation
planning
issues.
We
won't
be
able
to
fully
capture
everything
that
you
told
to
us
and
this
quick
overview
so
we'll
count
on
you
all
to
chime
in
as
we
go
through
these
slides
and
I'll
pause
a
couple
of
times
to
give
you
an
opportunity
to
do
that.
D
We
also
hope
that
you'll
see
that
the
issues
your
groups
were
wrestling
with
in
the
homework
are
reflected
in
the
state
of
mobility
report
that
stephen
will
introduce
later.
So
we've
done
our
best.
To
summarize
what
we
heard
from
you,
and
just
like
last
month,
we've
also
included
some
specific
quotes
from
each
of
your
groups
responses.
So
let's
dig
in
next
slide.
D
Some
folks
talked
about
creating
different
types
of
transportation
choices
and
establishing
dedicated
facilities
for
those
different
modes
of
transportation.
Some
groups
focused
on
safety
and
moving
from
a
car,
centric
city
to
a
more
multi-modal
and
equitable
city.
I
think
it
was
interesting
that
multimodality
and
equity
is
something
that
came
through
in
nearly
every
group's
comments.
D
Access
to
opportunity
was
also
another
theme,
and
then
one
thing
that
I
thought
was
particularly
interesting
was:
there
was
sort
of
a
tension
between
some
groups
talking
about
encouraging
us
to
be
innovative
and
original
versus
following
best
practices
from
other
cities,
and
I
I
don't
think
that
was
intended
to
be
mutually
exclusive,
but
it
could
be
a
good
source
of
conversation
later
on.
D
If
we
choose
to
dig
into
that,
I
was
also
struck
that
a
couple
of
different
groups
used
the
term
disruptive
as
a
way
to
describe
transformational
and
it
was
used
in
a
positive
senses
and
disrupt
patterns
of
inequity,
to
disrupt
car
centric
thinking
and
to
disrupt
stereotypes
around
who
takes
transit.
Next,.
D
Slide
so
this
is
a
quote
from
carl
ken
tammy
and
william
talking
about
what
transformational
meant
to
them:
broad
connectivity
and
access
to
reliable
transportation
for
all
residents
across
charlotte.
They
were
one
of
the
groups
that
pointed
to
using
best
practices
from
other
growth
cities.
Next
slide.
D
This
from
chris
eric
janet
and
pedro-
and
I
think
this
comment
was
grounded
in
some
history
around
how
transportation
has
been
used
in
our
past
and
a
desire
to
shift
that
thinking
and
alter
the
way
that
we
invest
in
transportation
in
the
future
next
slide.
D
The
second
question
that
we
posed
to
you
all:
actually,
I'm
sorry
mayor
again.
Let
me
pause
there
and
see
if
there's
any
reactions
to
some
of
that
content.
From
the
first
question.
B
Our
transportation
system
needs
to
shift
away
from
when
they
were
shifted
away
from
the
original
content
and
that
highways
strip
park,
neighborhoods
and
segregated
neighborhoods
became
a
theme,
and
that
was
that
came
from
chris
our
example.
E
F
I
didn't
hear
the
full
question:
it
was
partially
neutered
your
honor,
so
I
didn't
hear
the
first
part
of
the
question.
B
B
How
our
our
system
of
mobility
in
the
past
was
used
to
achieve
certain
social
goals,
one
of
them
being,
from
my
perspective,
a
real
negative,
and
that
is
the
segregation
of
communities
and
setting
them.
Apart.
Do.
F
Sure
the
the
history
of
urban
development
and
highway
development
comes
straight
out
of
the
1930s
laguardia
hired
robert
moses
to
help
design
highways
in
new
york
and
his
pro.
His
objective
was
to
create
levittown
and
other
suburban
communities
and
to
ensure
that
the
focus
was
on
the
vehicle
not
on
the
people
he
disrupted.
New
york
city
tore
through
sections
of
a
city
that
were
primarily
minority
and
that
model
had
been
followed
to
almost
every
other
city
around
the
country.
F
And
so
when
we
look
at
urban
construction
and
and
the
use
of
highways,
they
were
designed
to
keep
particular
neighborhoods,
redlined,
neighborhoods,
under-resourced,
neighborhoods
out
of
the
way
and
and
to
allow
access
to
suburban
communities
where,
where
which
created
white
flight
and
all
of
the
other
issues.
And
so
as
we
look
at
what
we're
trying
to
do.
I
wanted
to
be
sure
that
we
had
not
forgotten
that
that
structural
racism
and
disenfranchisement
that
pre-exists
our
attempts
to
try
and
create
a
global,
welcoming
and
equitable
city
thanks.
B
B
B
E
B
E
Eric
I
just
would
like
to
add
to
pedro's
comment
that
you
know
that
system
also
asks
our
residents
to.
You
know
that
barrier
to
own
a
vehicle.
You
know
that
cost
up
front
is
is
part
of
the
divide
and
you
think
back
to
the
250
000
residents,
who
don't
drive
what
we're
saying
to
them
today.
Bringing
it
forward
to
today
is
if
you
want
to
be
mobile,
you
have
the
the
the
bar
for
achieving
that
is
to
be
able
to
afford
that
car.
So
it's
it's
a
barrier
there
as
well.
E
So
I
just
you
know
that
that
mindset
you
know
of
what
we're
developing
and
what
we're
asking
subconsciously
and
most
of
what
our
residents
need
to
have
in
order
to
be
successful,
and
I
think
that
the
next
transportation
system
needs
to
not
require
residents.
You
know,
create
an
artificial
barrier
force.
B
D
So
the
second
question
that
we
asked
you
all
to
dig
into
what
outcomes
and
community
benefits
would
you
expect
to
see
20
years
from
now,
as
a
result
of
the
transformational
mobility
network?
Improved
safety
is,
is
one
that
came
up
for
several
groups,
an
increase
in
quality
of
life
metrics
for
all
neighborhoods.
D
Several
groups
were
very
mindful
of
the
connection
between
growth
and
land
use
planning
on
the
one
hand
and
transportation
planning.
On
the
other
hand,
sustained
an
inclusive
economic
growth
and
and
inclusive
was
an
area
of
focus
from
the
group
that
contributed
that
comment.
D
A
lot
of
you
are
still
very
conscious
of
the
scale
of
this
conversation
and
how
we
reach
out
to
the
broader
region
and
develop
a
deeper
sense
of
collaboration
among
cities,
towns
and
other
actors,
like
ncdot
developers
and
our
residents,
and
then
I
think,
a
comment
that
I
thought
was
insightful.
That
sort
of
underscores
all
of
this
is
that
we've
been
speaking
a
lot
in
qualitative
terms.
D
So
far,
in
our
conversations
together
at
some
point,
we
need
to
shift
and
establish
more
quantitative
metrics
that
articulate
these
expectations
and
give
more
specificity
to
to
the
goals
that
we
have
in
mind.
Next
slide.
D
So
this
from
david
ernie,
kiba
and
raquel
the
outcomes
sort
of
in
a
nutshell
for
them
that
they
would
like
to
see
safer
roads,
less
pollution,
less
congestion,
better
mass
transit
and
a
healthier
place
to
live.
I
think
pretty
succinct
and
profound
there
next
slide
from
bill
danielle,
david
and
stefania
ability
for
people
to
move
about
without
requiring
a
single
occupancy
vehicle
that
piggybacks,
I
think,
on
on
some
of
what
we
just
heard
from
pedro
and
eric
next
slide
from
aaron
geraldine,
nick
and
reggie.
D
B
B
I
did
have
a
question:
how
do
you
begin
to
measure
success
in
the
system?
How
to
is
it
something?
Is
it
a
gut
feel
that
we
think
more
and
more
people
are
riding
transit,
riding
bikes
and
walking
more?
Is
there
a
way,
maybe
I'm
asking
the
professionals
here?
How
do
we
set
goals
to
say
we've
been
successful?
B
B
Is
there
a
way
to
measure
that
measure
that
are
there
goals
that
we
would
set
and
if,
if
the
goal,
for
example,
was
to
end
up
with
only
50
of
the
people
making
car
trips
as
opposed
to
80
to
90,
now
what
amount
of
light
rail
do
we
have
to
build?
What
amount
of
bike
trails
we'd
have
to
build
to
achieve
that?
C
Maybe
I
can
speak
to
that
mayor
before
task
force,
jumps
or
maybe
scott
can
add
to
that
as
well.
I
think
if
we
can
reduce
or
even
totally
zero
out
pedestrian
fatality
on
our
roads,
that's
one
way
to
measure
that
so
maybe
year
by
year,
how
much
reduction
we
have
in
pedestrian
fatalities
are
two.
We
have
a
goal
in
our
strategic
energy
action
plan
to
be
a
carbon
neutral
city
right
by
so
and
so
here.
C
So
as
we
track
that
how
much
percentage
of
reduction
in
emissions
are
we
having
that
results
in
better
air
quality?
C
If
people,
if
we
can
have
go
from,
I
think
the
average
headways
are
between
our
boss
services
right
now
is
roughly
between
45
to
60
minutes.
If
people
can
ride
bosses
and
those
bosses
come
every
10
to
15
minutes
or
or
rail
that
right
now
it's
about
nine
minutes
or
so.
If
we
can
get
that
to
be
three
five
minutes
and
people
know
they
don't
even
need
to
look
at
their
phones
before,
in
other
words,
frequencies
get
better
on
our
system.
C
If
we
can
say
that
we
move
down
to
about
50
or
so
of
people
who
use
automobile
versus
those
who
drive,
I
think
those
are
ways
by
which
you
can
measure,
but
also
one
way
that
we
can
measure
is
on
the
equity
spectrum
that
people
are
really
able
to
get
better
paying
jobs
simply
because
there's
a
means
of
transportation.
That
gets
them
there
right
because
they
are
limited
by
that.
So
maybe
that's
a
way
to
start
it
off
from
a
technical
point
of
view.
H
Taiwo,
it's
betty.
The
mayor,
betty
doster,
wanted
another
factor
to
be
to
reduce
the
commute
time
when
the
time
or
you
know
cart.
You
know
you
mentioned
it
in
the
bus
or
rail,
but
also
the
drive
time.
So
if
you
have
fewer
cars,
the
ones
that
do
still
have
to
drive-
or
I
mean
we
will
always
have
cars-
you
know
reducing
that
commute
time
is
an
important
factor.
I
would
assume
to.
I
Measure
this
is
sonya
I'd
like
to
add
to
that
when
you
start
talking
about
the
electrical
vehicles
and
just
as
betty
said,
reduce
the
amount
of
cars
on
the
road.
One
of
the
things
that
we
could
measure
from
the
health
standpoint
is
the
quality
of
our
air.
I
I
think
you
would
say
charlotte's
center
city
campus.
They
had
a
exhibit
on
the
side
of
the
building
where
they
were
measuring.
I
guess
the
air
quality.
I
can't
remember
what
it
was,
but
anyway,
that's
something
that
could
be
measured
and
one
other
thing
that
that
struck
me
in
when
we
were,
as
we
were
going
through
this
process
was
the
upward
mobility
of
charlotte's
ranking.
I
We
were
like,
I
think,
50
out
of
50,
and
so
I'm
thinking
that
the
the
things
that
we're
doing
regarding
transportation,
like
you
just
said
earlier,
about
getting
better
jobs
that
that
our
ranking
we've
been
something
that
we
could
could
could
see
some
immediate
results
from
as
far
as
that's
concerned.
Those
are
two
things
I
just
wanted
to
lay
out
on
the
table.
This
that
may
be
measurable.
B
J
Yes,
I
think,
if
you
go
back
to
the
mission
statement
of
mayor
by
lyles,
it
comes
down
to
improving
the
environment.
We
talked
about
measuring
air
quality,
taking
cars
off
the
road
that
that
could
come
down
to
a
measurable
about
how
many
cars
are
on
the
road
or
time
spent
at
a
light
and
then
improving.
J
And
then
she
talks
about
a
healthy
city,
not
sure
how
you
exactly
measure
healthy
city,
but
it
would
be
a
good
way
to
kind
of
say
this
is
where
we're
at
and
we
want
to
make
it
healthier
by
10
or
20
percent.
The
same
thing
with
cars
off
the
road
and
the
last
one
is
providing
input,
opportunities
for
walking
and
biking
and
at
the
carolina
thread
we
just
measured
the
number
of
people
that
were
on
the
trails
by
just
indicators.
J
I
You
can
I
can
I
jump
in
again
getting
back
to
the
what
you
were
talking
about
the
biking
and
the
trails
and
being
able
to
measure
our
through
our
health
system.
You
know
we
could
look
at
some
see
how
the
it
may
be
long
range,
but
we
could
look
at.
I
don't
know
if
we'll
be
able
to
say,
there's
a
direct
correlation,
but
it
would
be
good
if
we
could
do
that.
I
More
people
riding
bikes,
more
people
walking
the
air
quality
in
the
city
measuring
whatever
that
is
in
the
city,
the
all
those
things
affecting
us.
As
far
as
our
bottom
line
in
our
health,
our
health
exam,
our
examinations.
I
F
F
F
E
Eric
one
thing
I
would
add
in
our
and
the
task
force
recommendation
to
mail
via
lyles
is
that
maybe
we
make
sure
some
of
the
local
metrics
such
as,
and
I
know,
with
bike
counting-
could
be
expanded
throughout
the
city.
So
we
know
more
more
levels
of
biking
that
is
happening
and
built
into
the
ass
for
the
infrastructure
and
that
could
go
along
with
additional
accounts
for
transit
use
as
well,
and
maybe
the
trails
and
greenways.
E
I
think
you
know
that
should
be
built
into
the
whole
ask
of
this
transformational
network,
because
in
order
to
know,
if
we're
successful,
we
need
to
know
what's
being
counted
and
as
far
as
you
know,
some
of
the
larger
items
like
quality
of
life.
You
know
50
best
cities
to
move
to
or
retire
to,
we'll
let
the
national.
You
know,
polls
and
scales,
and
let
you
know
once
we
do
this,
that
they
will
fall
in
order
and
we
could
use
those
as
additional
metrics
as
well.
E
K
I
also
think
we
should
think
about
the
innovation
side
of
this,
and
you
know
the
charlotte
region
is
a
growing
tech
technology
hub
and
when
you
think
about
an
integrated
mobility
system,
you
know
an
increased
usage
of
people
using
apps
various
apps
to
plan
their
different
trips,
you
know,
could
be
another
indicator
of
time
efficiency
and
how
connected
the
region
is
based
on
where
they're
going.
B
Thank
you
all
for
that
feedback.
Anybody
else.
There
is
an
interesting
comment
that
aaron
geraldine,
nick
and
reginald
made
regarding.
Oh,
you
see
it
on
the
screen.
There
more
people
are
taking
different
modes
of
transportation
because
it's
convenient,
that's
probably
something
that
sticks
in
my
mind,
convenient.
L
Mr
major,
this
is
raquel
lynch.
I
think
the
the
number
of
metrics
indicators
that
we
share
are
really
important.
L
One
outcome
that
is
behavioral
in
nature
and-
and
it
becomes
part
of
how
we
build
and
expand
our
city
would
be
great
to
see-
is
to
see
that
when
we
actually
develop
or
we
plan
to
grow
and
develop
this
community,
we
will
not
develop
any
community
without
a
multimodal
transportation
in
mind.
So
I
think
that
will
be
a
great
indicator
not
only
of
what
we
value,
but
how
we
now
plan.
L
G
You
mayor
this
is
bill.
If
I
may
add,
I
started
typing
it
and
I
was
unsuccessful,
but
there
are
a
lot
of
reasons
we
move
around
on
the
face
of
the
earth.
The
commute
that's
been
mentioned
is
simply
one
of
those
reasons
represents.
Maybe
a
third
of
the
trips
that
are
made
on
a
daily
basis
and
the
other
trips
are
made,
for
many
other
purposes,
to
school,
to
recreation,
to
take
a
child
somewhere
for
additional
opportunities
and
that
you
that
brings
us
back
to
the
land
use.
G
You
cannot
hope
to
make
purposeful
trips
on
foot
or
on
bike
if
those
destinations
are
not
close
to
you
not
for
a
large
number
of
people,
at
least
so
we
have
to
think
again
about
scattering.
We
see
this
with
the
the
dearth
of
fresh
foods
in
some
parts
of
our
community.
People
can't
get
to
those
opportunities
without
going
long
distances,
so
think
about
how
we
distribute
the
land
use
as
well.
F
There
is
you're
wrong,
there's
one
other
comment
I'd
like
to
make,
and
that
is-
and
I
and
I've
mentioned
this
before
it's
it's
that
last
and
first
mile.
That
bill
was
mentioning
is,
is
how
that,
last
and
and
that
last
mile,
that
first
mile
is
critical,
particularly
for
the
other
abled
members
of
our
community.
B
That
10
minute
walk
is
crucial
in
terms
of
what
you
connect
to,
and
it
is
very
crucial.
I
don't
know
how
far
some
whether
it
should
have
been
a
five
minute
walk,
but
ten
minutes
seems
to
be
crucial
and
I
can
look
quickly
at
any
map
in
this
city
and
there
are
large
numbers
of
people
who
are
not
even
close
to
10
minutes
to
some
form
of
transit.
B
Thanks
for
bringing
up
the
fact
that
elderly
people
might
think
of
10
minutes
as
being
the
outer
limits
of
how
far
they
can
go
to
get
to
a
system
anyway,
it
is
not
easy.
It
is
not
a
cakewalk
to
measure
how
successful
we
can
be,
but
we
can
try
to
achieve
those
goals
in
a
way
that
will
make
the
system
truly
transformational.
M
Mayor
may
have
one
comment:
maybe
I
missed
this
one,
but
one
thing
is
just
getting
a
representative
sample
of
our
people
and
surveying
them
a
customer
satisfaction.
How
was
the
customer
experience
that
would
be
a
good
way
of
knowing
we
are
successful
or
not.
I
wish
I
could
who's
talking.
This
is
this
is
reg
henderson
from
lowe's
hi
reg.
B
I'll
tell
you
what
you
can
do
to
help
me
all
of
you,
as
you
begin
to
speak,
can
you
just
say
your
name
again
and
that
will
that
will
help
me?
Some
of
you
are
sending
it
in
and
I'm
catching
it,
but
we're
struggling
with
this
virtual
thing,
but
I
like
the
conversation
as
it's
going
forward,
but
just
tell
me
who
you
are
when
you,
when
you
speak
up,
can
we
move
on?
D
Thank
you
mayor,
so
the
the
third
question
on
your
homework
was
to
try
to
help
us
work
through
how
we
might
fill
up
each
of
these
major
categories
that
we
suggested
to
you
all
last
month
with
potential
programs
and
projects.
So
just
as
a
reminder,
those
six
categories
were
rapid
transit,
a
bus
priority
system,
our
greenway
network,
our
pedestrian
system,
our
bicycle
network
and
our
roadway
network
next
slide.
D
So
here's
some
of
what
we
heard
about
that
rapid
transit
category
prioritizing
light
rail
was
a
common
theme
among
all
of
you,
with
high-capacity
regional
corridors,
also
being
something
that
several
groups
mentioned.
A
couple
of
groups
mentioned
something
that
we
haven't
talked
about
to
this
point,
which
is
a
high-speed
rail
linking
charlotte
to
other
cities.
Well
beyond
our
region.
D
D
Some
groups
noted
that
we
need
more
and
better
bus
shelters
as
a
way
to
make
riding
the
bus
more
convenient
and
similarly,
a
desire
to
be
able
to
track
buses
in
real
time
as
a
way
to
make
riding
the
bus
more
convenient
and
appealing
next
slide.
D
Within
the
greenway
network,
there
was
talk
about
the
cross
charlotte
trail
that
that
north-south
spine,
but
also
not
ignoring
the
rest
of
the
greenway
network,
that
mecklenburg
county
and
the
city
have
planned
to
complete
that
network
and
then
also
connect
to
the
broader
carolina
thread
trail
system
that
extends
beyond
the
county.
Next
slide.
D
For
the
pedestrian
network,
we've
already
heard
a
little
bit
about
this
today,
focusing
on
connections
that
complete
first
and
last
mile
gaps
in
our
network.
There
was
some
conversation
about
how
might
we
use
shared
use
paths
as
both
pedestrian
and
bike
infrastructure?
D
It
also
includes
e-scooters
and
bike
share
and
other
things.
It's
a
pretty
broad
term
in
your
eyes
and
something
that
seemed
to
fall
within
this
bucket
commuting
was
a
big
focus
of
this.
I
think
we
have
a
really
strong
greenway
system,
that's
used
for
recreation,
and
there
was
a
recognition
among
you
all
that
recreation
isn't
the
only
thing
that
we
should
be
shooting
for
with
our
bike
network.
We
need
to
be
able
to
support,
commuting
and
also
focusing
on
facilities
for
all
ages
and
abilities
next
slide
within
the
roadway
network.
D
There
was
definitely
a
focus
on
safety,
mention
of
pedestrian
safety
and
intersections,
in
particular,
a
couple
of
groups.
I
thought
were
very
insightful
in
recognizing
that,
because
of
our
historic
patterns
of
development,
we
don't
have
a
regular
and
connected
street
grid
like
a
lot
of
our
peer
cities.
Do
and
that's
something
that
challenges
us
from
a
connectivity
standpoint
so
stitching
together
that
street
grid
and
building
new
streets
to
increase
connectivity
is
something
that
you
all
brought
up.
D
Maintenance
again
was
another
topic
within
this
bucket,
and
then
a
group
mentioned
a
desire
to
redesign
maybe
some
of
our
roads
through
residential
areas
to
be
less
like
highways
and
more
about
moving
people,
and
then
some
suggestions
for
roads
that
might
fall
into
those
types
of
categories
next
slide,
and
then
this
last
slide
just
like
last
month,
we
included
a
sort
of
a
catch-all.
These
are
other
key
thoughts
that
didn't
fit
neatly
into
the
other
prompts,
but
that
we
thought
baird
mentioning
to
you
all.
The
this
first
comment.
D
Ensuring
operations
and
maintenance
budgets
keep
pace
with
whatever
expansions
and
facilities
and
services.
I
thought
was
another
great
comment
that
that
you
all
brought
forward
more
thinking
around
the
transit
system,
as
it
relates
to
our
fare
structure
is.
Is
there
an
aspiration
or
a
need
to
rethink
that
in
the
future?
How
can
we
shift
perceptions
of
transit
and
then,
lastly,
which
may
be
a
good
segue
to
what
kelly
is
going
to
walk
us
through?
D
B
B
Guess
we
got
some
examples
of
that
with
the
three
cities
that
we
examine:
austin,
broward,
county
and
nashville
in
terms
of
how
their
bond
referendums
went
forward,
but
I
was
just
wondering:
does
anybody
on
the
task
force
have
or
could
put
forward
an
example
of
a
city
that
really
has?
B
I
don't
want
to
use
the
word
transformational,
that's
our
word,
a
great
transit
system,
new
york
or
cleveland
or
atlanta.
Does
anyone
want
to
speak
to
a
city
that
they
went
to
that
they
were
actually
impressed?
E
Yes,
mayor,
it's
eric,
I
would
have
to
say
it's
a
close,
close
neighbor,
but
I
think
on
this
continent,
vancouver
british
columbia
would
be
probably
the
gold
star
in
this
hemisphere.
As
far
as
you
know,
it's
transportation,
it's
modeshare
goals,
they
were
surpassed
and
they
moved
the
bar
up
higher
to
achieve
them
to
push.
You
know
further
in
in
splitting
walking
and
biking
and
transit
from
car
ridership.
So
I
think
that
would
probably
be
my
best.
B
That's
pretty
good,
I
visited
vancouver
last
year
and
I
must
say
I
didn't
pay
any
attention
to
a
system
as
much
as
I
paid
attention
to
the
convenience
of
getting
to
some
locations
that
I
wanted
to
get
to,
and
it
wasn't
very
difficult
to
do
and
obviously
we
had
no
automobile
to
to
use.
So
it
was
pretty
good.
It's
good
that
you
point
that
out.
Is
there
anybody
else?
Carl.
J
Yeah,
I
spent
quite
a
bit
of
time
in
portland
oregon
and
it
just
amazed
astounded
me
that
they
have
over
300
some
miles
of
greenway
biking
trails
and
I
think
charlotte's
at
58
or
60,
or
something
like
that.
J
I
mean
it's
just
an
amazing
and
then
the
max
system,
which
is,
I
think,
seven
or
eight
lines.
Now.
You
can
basically
move
around
the
whole
city,
get
to
the
airport
along
the
riverfront
and
cross
back
over
and
then
go
east
or
west,
and
they
have
14
bridges
across
the
willamette
river
and
almost
all
of
them
have
bicycle
paths
added
to
the
bridges
hanging
off
the
bridges.
J
They
actually
built
a
floating
dock
system
because
they
couldn't
figure
out
how
to
go
along
the
river,
so
they
said
screw
we're
just
going
to
build
a
floating
dock
system
that
goes
up
and
down
the
river
and
bikes
go
on
it
and
you
just
cannot
barely
get
on
these
trails.
On
on
the
weekends
I
mean
it's
just
and
the
bike
trails
themselves
have
have
light
systems.
So
when
you
come
up
to
it,
it'll
sense
you're
coming
and
stop
the
traffic,
and
so
it's
extremely
safe
and
it
connects
the
whole
town
is
connected.
J
You
can
live
in
happy
valley,
clackamas,
it
doesn't
matter
where
you
can
get
around
town
and
every
max
has
places
to
hang
your
bikes
inside
so
they're
safe
and
it's,
I
think,
it's
kind
of
a.
I
think
I've
been
to
vancouver
too
it's
amazing.
They
have
the
three
three
bike
lanes,
one
for
rollerblading,
one
for
scooters
and
one
for
biking,
and
it's
they've
just
got
a
planned
system.
K
K
I
was
saying
carl,
I
moved
here
to
charlotte
from
portland.
I
lived
there
for
five
years.
Amazingly,
I
never
got
on
a
bike.
You
have
to
be
like
a
road
warrior
to
and-
and
I
was
not-
but
I
did
take
advantage
of
the
max
and
the
streetcar
and
the
light
rail-
and
you
know
I
would
agree
the
integrated
system
that
they
have
there-
the
pedestrian
paths
I
mean
that
they
had
the
first
bridge.
K
Maybe
it
was
the
last
project
that
the
that
the
federal
government
had
technically
earmarked
funds
for,
but
basically
didn't
allow
cars,
but
buses
bicycles,
pedestrians,
light
rail,
could
all
go
on
to
this
bridge,
and
so
it's
a
very
well
connected
region.
Even
beyond
the
city
limits.
N
Mayor
gantt,
thank
you
taiwa
for
the
invitation.
It's
a
privilege
to
be
here.
As
you
said,
in
your
opening
remarks,
anything
transformational
has
got
to
be
large
in
scale
and
the
funding
and
financing
options
they're
going
to
be
big
as
well,
and
this
evening's
presentation
is
going
to
be
an
overview
of
how
the
city
is
both
traditionally
funded
and
finance
mobility
projects
and
provide
examples
of
opportunities
for
us
to
be
innovative.
N
I
think
the
way
I'm
looking
at
this
is
kind
of
showing
you
the
tools
in
the
toolbox,
but
reminding
you
we're
going
to
need
more
tools,
so
keep
an
open
mind
and
I've
been
told
that
this
kind
of
information
is
really
dense.
I
find
it
fascinating,
but
if
we
need
to
stop
probably
in
the
middle
and
do
some
questions,
then
I
think
that
might
make
some
sense.
N
So
I'm,
okay,
great,
so
any
successful
mobility
strategy
will
have
to
combine
options
that
produce
enough
money
to
support
the
obligations
and
have
the
support
of
the
community
and
mobility
funding.
Is
complex.
Funds
come
from
different
revenues
through
many
sponsors,
but
the
big
three
are
the
federal,
the
state
and
the
local.
N
The
federal
government
has
an
essential
role
and
historically
kind
of
always
has
in
supporting
construction
and
expansion,
mobility,
funding,
the
future
size
and
strength.
The
federal
program
is
unclear,
that's
because
obviously
the
current
climate
in
washington,
dwindling
recedes
from
fuel
taxes
and
a
lack
of
consensus
on
the
goals,
but
at
the
same
time
we've
seen
over
the
last
several
years.
The
federal
government
has
expanded
low-cost
interest
loans
for
highway
and
transit
projects,
federal
loans
and
financing
options
do
help
supplement
the
federal
grants.
N
The
grants
have
provided
significant
funds,
but
they
require
a
lot
of
local
and
state
commitment
and
they're
extremely
competitive,
the
state
and
not
just
north
carolina.
All
states
are
often
focused
more
on
highway
projects
and
while
the
federal
government
has
an
established
grant
program,
the
states
generally
regionally
and
opportunity
based-
and
we
know
for
sure,
that
the
federal
and
state
awards
will
not
cover
the
cost
of
whatever
plan
we
come
up
with.
We
will
have
to
raise
revenue.
N
We
will
need
local
dollars.
I
think
I'm
going
to
say
that
every
time
we
turn
a
slide,
we
need
options
and
then
what
I
mean
by
financing
versus
funding,
I
think
the
easiest
way
to
define
that
is
financing
is
the
process
which
we
get
the
money
funding
is
how
we
pay
that
process
back.
So,
if
you
think
of
when
you
go
and
buy
a
house
typically,
you
would
get
a
mortgage,
but
maybe
you've
got
a
friend
who
wants
to
give
you
a
loan.
That's
the
financing,
how
you
are
paying
that
back.
N
You
know
if
you
are
depending
on
lottery
winnings
or
if
you
have
job
earnings,
that
revenue
is
the
funding
source.
So
on
that
slide
there,
these
are
the
the
sources.
The
city
has
typically
used
to
finance
mobility
capital
projects.
The
first
is
general
obligation
bonds
when
we
issue
general
obligation
bonds,
that's
the
full
faith
and
credit
of
the
city.
N
So
while
we
typically
use
property
tax
revenues
to
pay
it
back,
it's
any
available
dollar
of
the
city-
that's
not
committed,
it's
typically,
a
lower
risk
and
lower
interest
rates,
which
would
you
know,
results
in
lower
financing
costs.
When
we
issue
geo
bonds,
we
must
get
voter
approval
via
referendum.
N
N
The
government
has
programs
that
provide
low
interest
loans
to
fund
mobility
projects,
as
I
mentioned
before,
there
is
competition
for
these
loans,
and
these
loans
are
also
as
we've
currently
used
them
again,
backed
by
the
full
faith
and
credit
of
the
city,
and,
as
we
learned
from
the
blue
line
project,
the
greater
the
local
match,
the
more
likely
it
is
to
get
approved
for
one
of
these
loans
on
the
next
slide,
when
I
say
innovative,
I
don't
just
mean
we're
creating
innovative
new
ideas.
Some
of
these
ideas
are
just
new
to
charlotte
in
the
region.
N
N
Of
course
that
requires
state
authorization,
but
I
don't
think
it's
unheard
of.
Second:
is
revenue
bonds,
the
city
issues,
revenue
bonds
for
water,
storm
water
for
airport,
for
all
of
its
enterprise
funds?
These
bonds
are
specifically
secured
by
the
revenue
of
the
system,
so
the
airport
revenue
pays
for
airport
bonds.
Water
revenue
pays
for
water
bonds.
If
those
revenues
fall
short,
the
city's
general
revenues
are
not
pledged.
N
So
if,
for
some
reason
the
airport
never
flew
another
flight
and
the
money
never
came
in
the
city's,
not
on
the
hook
for
the
airport
debt
in
a
lot
of
other
cities
in
states,
the
most
common
form
of
funding
transit
projects
is
sales
tax
revenue
bonds.
Currently
we
don't
have
the
authority
at
the
state
level
to
issue
sales
tax
secured
bonds.
This
is
something
that
we
would
need
to
look
at.
N
N
Pardon
me:
oh
transportation,
infrastructure,
finance
and
innovation
act
which
I'm
pretty
sure
I'm
gonna
give
him
credit.
Regardless
obama
did
it.
I
don't
know
if
he
really
did,
but
I'm
pretty
sure
he
did,
but
it
was
loans
to
fund
a
portion
of
projects
at
low
interest
costs.
So
we
used
it
on
the
blue
line.
N
N
B
F
B
B
O
Sorry
mayor
this
is
geraldine
gardner.
I
just
have
a
quick
question
for
kelly
about
the
innovative
financing
tools
slide
kathy,
I'm
new
to
north
carolina,
but
I
was
just
wondering
if
this
is
a
state
that
allows
for
tax
increment
financing
districts
and,
if
that's
something
that
you
all
have
looked
at
as
a
possible
tool.
O
N
B
P
Yes,
I
was
wondering
part
of
the
the
opportunity
zone
conversation
about
a
year
ago
and
there
were
some
investors
that
suggested
that
that
they
were
investing
heavily
in
opportunity
zones
in
the
form
of
transit
investment,
and
I
wanted
to
ask
had
that
been
an
avenue
or
resource
that
had
been
researched
by
the
the
city.
N
To
the
extent
of
my
knowledge
of
opportunity
zones
is
the
is:
it
provides
private
developers
to
kind
of
borrow
at
a
lower
tax
rate,
because
we
are
a
government
we're
already
tax
exempt,
so
there
would
be
no
benefit
for
the
city
to
be
in
that
pot,
but
I
don't
know
because
it's
a
private
enterprise.
I
don't
know
how
successful
there
have
been
in
the
development
side.
Here
I
don't
know
tai.
If
you
know
any
any
opportunity
zones.
P
Well,
the
example
that
the
group
that
was
presenting
used
was
a,
I
think
they
did
a
project
in
in
boston.
If
I'm
not
mistaken,
and
it
was
a,
it
was
a
streetcar
project
and
they
were
investing
in
it
in
that
way,
and
so
they
were
using
their
capital,
their
capital
to
invest
in
areas
that
were
considered
to
be
opportunity.
Zones
whereby
you
know
the
return
on
their
investment
could
yield
certain
tax
benefits.
B
I
That
that
this
is
this
is
sonya,
that
kind
of
feeds
into
a
narrative
that
I've
been
kind
of
like
and
now
small
groups
have
been
kind
of
touting.
All
along
is
because
I
look
at
like
companies
like
lowe's.
J
B
N
Again,
okay,
so
next
slide,
I
guess
so.
We
talked
about
financing.
Let's
talk
about
funding
when
we're
looking
at
new
funding
sources,
it's
really
best
practice
for
any
time.
You're
doing
anything.
Financing
wise
is
to
kind
of
just
develop
evaluation
criteria
or
guard
rails
to
make
sure
the
long-term
goals
of
the
project
are
being
met.
So
these
are
the
ones
that
we
kind
of
operate
under
when
it
comes
to
funding
sources
and
they're
fairly
self-explanatory
potential
revenue.
How
much
revenue
will
the
source
yield?
Is
there
going
to
be
enough
money
to
make
debt
payments?
N
And
when
we
look
at
potential
revenue,
we
look
at
the
natural
constraints
or
limits
to
the
amount
of
money
that
can
be
generated,
stability
and
predictability?
This
is
a
required
component
for
planning
and
budgeting.
Some
sources
are
going
to
fluctuate
from
year
to
year,
where
others
are
more
reliable.
N
Obviously,
equity
is
pretty
self-explanatory.
N
We're
not
burdening
one
group
unfairly,
political
feasibility,
and
by
that
I
don't
just
mean
political
support,
but
all
stakeholders
is
the
public
going
to
be
accepting
of
the
funding
options
and
we
expect
to
do
that
kind
of
work
through
surveys
and
public
consultations
and
honestly,
this
task
force,
I
think,
shows
the
commitment
that
we
have
to
making
sure
this
is
feasible
and
then
geography,
as
we
talked
about
is
the
revenue
source
city
county,
multi-county
regional.
What
does
it
look
like
so
next
slide
as
we
look
at
the
traditional
local
funding
sources?
N
Obviously,
property
tax
is
one
that
we've
relied
on.
It's
extremely
stable
funding
source
the
challenge
for
me,
maybe
not
for
you
guys
as
much
as
you're
competing
with
other
city
priorities
there,
the
sales
tax
currently
in
charlotte,
there's
the
one-half
local
sales
tax,
that's
funding,
transit
investments
through
cats.
N
N
The
registered
motor
vehicles
tax
within
the
city
of
charlotte
there's
an
assessed
30
dollar
fee,
which
is
currently
at
its
statutory
maximum
authorized
by
the
state.
Most
of
the
revenue
that
is
collected
goes
to
cats
for
their
maintenance
of
operations,
efforts
and
operational
support.
Well,
not
a
super
robust
revenue
source
we're
not
just
funding
capital.
We
have
to
think
o
m
costs
this.
N
That's
just
the
opportunity
to
get
revenue
from
advertising
on
vehicles
or
stations
sponsorshipped
on
greenways
limited
potential,
additional
revenue,
but
there's
a
lot
of
different
places.
You
could
put
it
so
if
you're
thinking
about
who
is
it
blue
class
blue
shield,
who
has
the
shared
bikes
here
all
of
those
dollars
start
to
matter
when
you
think
of
all
the
opportunities
there
farebox.
N
So
additional
revenues
from
fair
increases
very
difficult
to
predict
because,
as
you
increase
the
fares,
there
is
some
ridership
that's
going
to
fall
off
and
determining
that
delta
can
be
difficult
once
you've
figured
it
out
and
you're
comfortable
with
it.
It's
usually
pretty
level
but
making
those
predictions
is
difficult,
and
then
you
have
to
go
back
to
the
guiding
principles
and
we
have
to
be
thoughtful
about
maintaining
equity
and
affordability
for
customers
when
we're
contemplating
fare
box
revenues
next
slide.
N
So
the
next
one
I
think,
based
on
your
previous
comments,
the
ones
you
guys
are
most
interested
in
and
transit,
oriented
development
or
the
tod
fees.
These
would
apply
to
new
development.
Potentially
revenue
is
dependent
on
the
amount
of
the
development
occurring
in
the
region,
and
the
predictability
here
is
also
highly
variable,
depending
on
how
it
would
be
applied
in
the
amount
of
qualifying
development
that
occurs.
N
We
have
the
authority
we
have
designated
tods,
we
haven't
come
up
with
a
way
to
monetize
them.
Yet
I
think
there's
opportunity
here,
but
it's
really
project
specific
and
without
the
details
of
a
designated
project,
it's
really
hard
to
kind
of
quantify.
What
that
looks
like
land
sales
leases
swaps,
again
very
projects,
specific
the
revenue
would
be
minimal,
dependent
on
location
and
other
economic
factors,
and,
frankly,
the
purpose
of
the
land
would
likely
create
a
debate
depending
on
who
the
owner
was
I'm
thinking.
N
If
it's
city
owned
land,
we
have
a
lot
of
priorities
here.
I
could
see
a
cat
fight
over
if
it's
for
affordable
housing
or
for
mobility.
It's
nice
to
have,
but
it's
not
going
to
be
a
huge
generator.
I
think
where
we
see
the
most
opportunity
is
what
we
call
value
capture
district,
which
is
really
the
same
thing
as
tiff.
N
It's
also
called
project
development
financing,
depending
on
what
state
you
live
in,
but
it's
all
tiff
and
it's
the
area
surrounding
potentially
a
station
or
whatever
your
project
area
is,
and
you
value
the
property
at
a
value
and
whatever
increment
is
generated
off
of
it
goes
to
either
repay
the
debt
or
capital
cost.
Whatever
your
purpose
is
it
kind
of
requires
whoever's.
N
Whoever
is
building
in
that
area
around
is
going
to
have
to
pay
for
being
in
that
area,
and
it
could
be
moderate
to
a
really
large
potential
revenue
windfall
over
the
end,
but
it
is
dependent
on
the
project
area
and
the
initial
revenue
projections
are
difficult
to
predict
because
it's
not
stable
at
first.
You
don't
really
know
the
growth
is
going
to
show
up,
especially
when
you
look
at
times
like
this,
where
no
one
thought
covid
was
coming,
but
when
you're
borrowing
money
you
have
to
pay
it
back
regardless.
N
Those
revenue
sources
are
a
lot
more
volatile
and
the
other
thing
I
didn't
put
up
there,
because
it
kind
of
violates
my
own
principles,
but
I
think
it
can
be
meaningful
is
private
funds.
I
think
what
you
saw
in
2018,
which
was
the
first
year
that
the
city
put
a
50
million
dollar
bond
referendum
out
there
for
housing.
You
saw
the
private
sector,
show
up
with
a
50
million
dollar
match
and
that's
money,
that's
real
money
and
it
matters,
and
I
don't
know
how
you
quantify
it.
N
I
come
from
a
very
large
city
and
there
was
a
billionaire
who
liked
to
ride
his
bicycle
and
he
didn't
like
to
share
his
bike
path
with
pedestrians,
so
he
donated
15
million
dollars
to
build
a
bike
lane
on
the
walking
trail.
There
are
people
who
have
money
and
want
to
give
it.
So
it's
not
something
to
be
cavalier
about,
because
it
can
be
become
something,
and
the
next
slide
is
just
meant
to
show
next
slide.
N
B
Q
C
B
Q
Thank
you
mayor.
I
just
wanted
to
raise
a
point
to
when
we
were
talking
about
private
donors
that,
if
you
circle
back
for
those
that
are
new
to
charlotte
before
we
had
the
transit
center,
we
used
to
catch
the
bus
at
the
corner
of
trade
and
trying
later
on
hugh
mccall,
who
worked
at
trade
and
trying
at
the
now
bank
of
america
center
did
finance
eight
believe
it
was
eight
and
a
half
million
dollars
to
build
the
transit
center.
Q
We
know
today
just
a
few
doors
down
where
we
now
catch
the
bus.
So
definitely
charlotte
has
been
huge
benefactors
of
private
investment
in
our
transit
and
other
projects.
So
just
a
nod
to
the
fact
that
private
investment
has
gone
a
long
way
in
getting
things
built
around
charlotte.
Thank
you.
B
Thank
you
for
that
input.
You're
right,
I
was
that
shows
how
old
I
am.
It
goes
way
back.
I
I
remember
the
whole
episode.
In
fact,
our
architectural
firm
did
the
design
other
comments
on
the
financing
lots
of
options
out
there.
When
we
start
thinking
about
the
magnitude
of
this
billions
of
dollars,
we
may
be
taking
from
lots
of
different
buckets.
Is
it
possible
kelly.
B
B
So
I
feel
much
more
comfortable
that
publicly
generated
financing
really
reaches
and
seeks
to
reach
the
entire
community.
That's
not
to
say
that
we
ought
to
be
turning
away.
Someone
who
wants
to
put
a
billion
dollars
in
this
because
they
like
riding
bikes
in
a
certain
location
if
they
put
the
bikes,
if
they're,
supporting
the
bikes
from
a
plan
that
was
generated
by
the
municipality
or
the
regional
authority
or
whatever
going
forward.
B
B
R
Mayor
this
is
steven
stansberry.
I
think
that
was
a
really
great
presentation
and
good
dialogue
and
kelly.
Thank
you
for
digging
in
and
helping
us
at
least
know
a
little
bit
more
about
how
it
is
that
we
go
about
funding
these
projects
over
time.
It
seems
like
some
logical
next.
Steps
for
us
is
to
do
a
little
bit
more
homework
on
behalf
of
the
task
force,
and
so
one
of
the
things
we've
been
talking
about
as
a
team
to
your
earlier
question
is:
are
there
other
things
that
we
could
learn
from
peer
communities?
R
It's
one
thing
to
have
a
strategy:
a
set
of
projects,
it's
another
charge
for
us
that
we've
clearly
been
given
to
identify
how
we
might
proceed
with
at
least
some
logical
steps
with
which
to
financially
support
them,
and
so
we're
going
to
need
to
dig
in
deep,
like
kelly,
suggested,
investigating
a
bit
more
about
innovative
financing
options.
It's
pretty
clear
after
listening
that
we
don't
have
all
the
tools
necessary
to
be
successful
right
now.
R
That
means
we
may
need
to
send
people
on
that
journey
with
the
responsibility
of
helping
us
to
establish
those
tools
and
then
next
to
maybe
do
the
same
with
the
funding
options
here
locally,
and
you
know
we
keep
throwing
around
these
terms
like
regional
authority.
I
think
that
those
are
all
tied
together
with
a
and
b
at
the
end
of
the
day.
R
I
would
fully
expect
that
our
recipe
for
success
includes
all
three
of
those
items
in
tandem
together,
so
be
looking
from
us
as
a
technical
team
to
be
bringing
that
back
to
the
task
force
and
subsequent
meetings.
B
That
will
be
very
helpful.
Eric
did
you
want
to
make
a
comment.
E
Yeah,
yes
mayor,
I
just
put
in
the
in
the
chat
that
it
may
be
helpful
too,
just
to
see
separating
out
some
of
those
options
that
we
have
the
the
low
hanging
fruit,
the
the
ability
to
do
ourselves
and
then
separate
out
the
other
ones
that
are
going
to
require
more
work.
Steven
was
kind
of
mentioning
that
would
need
state
approval
or
creation
just
to
see
what
that
is
compared,
and
then
the
other
point
was
just
you
know
doing
this
funding
using
multiple
options.
E
Obviously,
I
think
would
make
sense.
We
just
want
to
make
sure
that
I
think
it's
evenly
distributed,
maybe
in
a
way
that
you
know
you
don't
feel
like
the
residents
wouldn't
feel
the
that
the
burden
yeah
or
overburdened
by
it
if
you're,
if
it's
done,
maybe
in
a
correct
way,
we
can
use
some
of
these
tools,
add
some
tools
and
do
it
in
a
way
that
it's
not
it's
almost
unfelt
and
is
not.
B
K
Mayor,
I'm
sorry,
this
is
janet
lavar.
I
have
one
more
question.
It's
maybe
more
of
a
process.
Question
can
you
just?
Can
we
talk
a
little
bit
more
about
the
responsibility
of
this
task
force
in
in
the
funding
piece?
I
I
appreciate
that
kelly
really
distilled
that
for
us
in
simple
terms
and
feel
more
assured
that
steven
is
going
to
be
the
technical
expertise
for
this
body,
because
I'm
not
sure
that
I
feel
fully
confident
in
being
a
funding
or
finance
expert
when
it
comes
to
transportation
mobility
plans.
K
But
can
you
just
give
us
a
sense
of
how
much
of
the
responsibility
this
group
will
have
in
making
the
recommendations
for
funding.
B
B
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
we
made
one
that
was
well
thought
out
or
as
good
as
we
could
make
to
them,
for
something
that
will
be
transformational
and
that
they
understand
the
relationship
between
transformational
and
cost
and
our
recommendation
now
at
that
point
the
mayor
says
good
work
task
force.
B
B
We
don't
get
to
some
proposition
put
before
the
community
until
the
latter
part
of
2021,
and
if
I
can
bet
you
that
most
of
2021
is
going
to
be
dealing
with
how
we
fund
it
that's
going
to
be
the
issue,
it's
not
going
to
be
the
quality
of
the
plans
and
what
we're
putting
forward
it
is
going
to
be
how
we
fund
it
and-
and
I
hope
this
task
force
will
help
to
continue
to
influence
it
by
the
recommendation.
We
make
general
dean.
S
B
S
I'm
not
sure
five
I
would
think
one
to
three
would
be
would
be
more
reasonable.
Five
would
be
great,
but
that's
probably
too
long
to
put
off
the
goals
that
we
that
we
want
to
achieve
from
this
task
force.
I
I
think
one
year
is
possibly
unrealistic
if
we're
going
to
do
something
as
big
as
what
we're,
as
the
things
we're
discussing
right
now,.
B
All
right,
thank
you
for
that
comment.
We
have
geraldine.
O
Yes,
mr
mayor,
sorry
about
that,
I
just
put
into
the
chat
that
you
know
we'd
welcome
at
central
atlanta,
regional
council,
the
opportunity
to
help
the
team
coordinate
the
kind
of
evaluation
of
the
regional
authority
concept
to
help
better
align
with
the
work
that
we're
doing
and
connect
beyond.
O
I
think
what
I
always
come
back
to
with
this
group
is
how
we're
defining
regional-
because
you
know,
is
that
regional
mecklenburg
is
it
regional
sort
of
our
definition
of
region,
which
is
nine
counties
and
around
charlotte?
Is
it
janet's
definition
of
regional
which
includes
south
carolina
and
I
think
14
counties?
You
are
janet,
so
I
think
helping
to
really
define
what
we're
meaning
by
regional
and
then
how
that
translates
into
a
governance
structure.
I
think
we're
definitely
open
to
the
conversation.
O
It
just
has
to
be
aligned
with
all
the
other
efforts
to
talk
about
these
issues
regionally.
So
I
just
want
to
put
that
on
the
table
that
were
we'd
love
to
talk
about
that.
B
Thanks
for
that
insight,
geraldine,
the
question
of
regional
is
an
issue,
but
I'm
not
sure
our
charge
is
really
to
look
at
this
county
first
and
make
sure
that
we're
doing
something
that
ties
into
what
connect
beyond
may
be
doing
and
beyond,
but
the
funding
that
I'm
speaking
of
now,
unless
we
go,
I
think,
to
an
authority
which
is
going
to
be
a
totally
different
kind
of
challenge
involving
a
larger
region.
B
My
charge
is
to
look
at
the
at
the
county.
That
would.
O
Be
right,
so
that's
super
helpful,
mr
mayor,
sir,
are
you
so
just
a
point
of
clarification
when
stephen
on
the
previous
slide
said
regional
authority
was
that
mecklenburg
county
or
just
help
me
understand
how
you
all
were
using
the
word
regional
there?
So
we
can
maybe
my
comments,
a
new
point,
if
you're
just
talking
about
mecklenburg
county,
I
just
I'm
not
clear,
I'm
not
sure.
B
Whether
we
would
even
end
up
with
an
authority-
and
I
I
think
I
don't
want
to
get
you
too
far
off
track
with
some
new
structure
that
we
may
be
recommending
to
the
council.
That
may
be
a
possibility,
I
think,
for
our
purposes.
I
I
need
to
keep
thinking
about
the
county
and
letting
central,
ionic,
council
and
others
know
exactly
what
we're
thinking
about
and
coordinating
what
they're
thinking
about,
and
if
this
ends
up
being
something
bigger
which
brings
into
play
other
governments
in
the
region,
then
I
think
so.
B
B
E
Yes,
I
I
just
wanted
to
make
a
response
to
david's
comment
about
you
know.
Maybe
this
might
be
aspirational
to
accomplish
anything
by
2021
and
I
think
you
know
growth
is
not
waiting.
The
people
are
we
going
to
stop
people
from
coming
to
charlotte?
I
don't
think
that's
going
to
happen.
We
don't
want
that
to
happen,
so
I
think
you
know
we
need
to
start.
E
Maybe
a
phased
approach
might
work
the
same
thing
with
the
comments
just
a
minute
ago
about
is
this
charlotte
mecklenburg,
multiple
counties?
I
don't
think
there's
anything
that
would
maybe
stop
expanding
in
the
future,
adding
to
the
authority
or
whatever
the
organization
is.
I
think
we
things
could
be
built
over
time,
but
we
have
to
start
sooner
and
we
cannot
wait
any
longer
on
these
these
these
projects-
and
I
I
think,
maybe
even
we
bring
some
of
these
tools.
We
identify
some
of
the
low-hanging
fruit
we
get
those
before
the
voters.
E
Maybe
we
do
one
or
two
of
the
ones.
Next
year
we
could
work
on,
then
we
could
have
maybe
another
initiative
if
we
need
to
if
we
we
communicate
to
the
public
that
this
is
not
a
one
and
done
kind
of
thing.
You
know
that
it's
what
we
can
do
in
this
a
period
of
time.
We
have
given
everything
we
just
went
through
in
2020.
E
Maybe
you
know
that
would
be
a
a
compromise
if
you
want
to
call
it,
but
maybe
a
smarter
way
of
approaching
just
starting,
adding
and
expanding
forward
with
financing
with
organizations
with
the
region.
So
just
my
opinion
on.
S
Thank
you
eric,
mr.
If
I
can
respond
to
eric,
I
I
I
love
that
idea.
I
think
bite
size
chunks
is
a
great
suggestion,
because
I
think
what
we're
talking
about
here
from
a
comprehensive
perspective
is
huge
and
it
needs
to
be
huge
and
it
needs
to
be
comprehensive.
S
What
we're
talking
about
is
securing
funding
and
approval
for
that
funding,
both
from
from
local
and
state
authorities
and
and
it
would
probably
help
some
federal
funds
in
there
too,
and
these
are
things
that
it's
going
to
take
convincing
lawmakers
in
raleigh
that
this
is
you
know
worthy
of
funding
and
that
there
is
buy-in
from
the
broader
community.
S
So
eric
to
your
point,
I
think
you're
right
and
I
think
if
we
could,
if
we
could
pick
this
apart,
you
know
piece
by
piece
start
start
small,
get
bigger,
get
bigger,
get
bigger
and
tui
and
tui
are
able
to
to
realize
the
the
comprehensive
nature
of
this
plan
would
be
great.
S
But
but
I
do
think
that
if
once
we
get
our
arms
around
what
this
is
ultimately
going
to
look
like
and
what
we
want
to
accomplish,
we
really
need
to
start
thinking
about
how
we
approach
the
funding
for
it
and
what
pieces
do
we
want
to
work
towards
you
know
in
in
in
the
immediate
future,
and
then
what's
our
goal,
for
you
know
a
year,
two
three
four
five
years
down
the
road
and
and
work
towards
that.
You
know
probably
probably
in
to
your
point
eric
in
smaller
but
impactful
pieces.
B
I
of
course
I
got
the
feeling
here
that
that
people
may
have
different
ideas
about
what
this
thing
is
going
to
cost,
and
I,
I
feel
more
comfortable
with
the
discussion
on
how
hard
is
it
going
to
be
to
do
this
after
we
get
some
sense
as
to
what
this
is
going
to
cost,
and
I
I
I
think
if
we
allow,
if
we
allow,
if
we
put
the
cart
before
the
horse,
we're
gonna
we're
in
some
trouble,
let's
find
out
what
it's
going
to
cost
and
then
to
start
to
decide
whether
we're
going
to
be
needing
to
do
this
in
chunks
or
pieces
or
phases
or.
B
R
Yes,
see
you
great
great
okay,
so
this
has
been
great
dialogue.
I'm
going
to
try
an
interest
of
time,
introduce
this
topic
fairly
quickly
and
just
sort
of
recognize
that
we're
building
as
we
go
on
this.
This
task
force
initiative,
and
I
know
that
in
recent
meetings,
we've
we've
almost
asked
you
to
become
very
quick
experts
about
all
of
our
transportation
plans
here
in
charlotte
and
not
just
to
be
familiar
with
what
they
represent,
but
also
even
the
projects
that
are
contained
within
them.
R
And
I
I
continue
to
thank
you
for
the
time
and
attention
that
you've
given
to
that
it.
It
doesn't
go
unnoticed
and
I
think
this
past
month
you
began
to
get
a
flavor
for
how
challenging
it
can
be
to
take
on
the
task
of
assembling
a
transformational
mobility
network,
because
it
means
something
different
to
all
of
us,
and
I,
if
I
were
you,
I
would
want
more
information.
R
It's
it's
hard
to
make
decisions,
there's
trade-offs
and
there's
kind
of
things
that
are
in
the
background
that
you
know
are
going
to
be
informing
decisions
as
we
go
and
and
so
with
last
month's
homework.
R
Clearly,
you,
you
probably
found
yourselves
wondering
a
little
bit
more
about
current
trends
and
information
and
I
hate
to
say
it,
but
you're
probably
going
to
see
what
I'm
sharing
with
you
tonight
and
wish
you
had
it
about
30
days
ago,
but
we
recognize
that
we
need
to
continue
to
feed
information
that
is
relevant
to
your
process
and
in
all
candor.
R
We
could
have
generated
an
exhaustive
existing
conditions
report,
but
we
weren't
real
certain
about
how
much
utility
it
would
have
offered
you,
and
so.
Instead
we
had
the
opportunity
to
listen
very
closely
to
the
themes
that
you
have
begun
to
articulate
as
being
kind
of
the
driving
forces
behind
how
we
might
progress
towards
identifying
a
transformational
mobility
network.
R
R
I
know
that
we've
emailed
it
to
all
of
you,
but
I
want
to
introduce
you
to
the
document
and
generally
how
it's
organized,
and
we
would
hope
that
you
might
see
it
as
a
resource
as
we
continue
forward.
So
you
may
be
talking
with
some
of
your
friends
and
co-workers
about
the
work
that
you're
doing
on
the
task
force
and
maybe
sometimes
struggling
at
finding
the
exact
words,
and
we
wanted
to
also
aid
in
that
discussion.
R
R
That
likewise
speaks
to
some
of
our
community
characteristics,
as
well
as
our
travel
characteristics
and
and
that's
an
unhelpful
piece
of
information,
because
we
continue
to
hear
many
of
you
point
out
about
history,
about
land
use
about
upward
mobility
and
access
to
opportunity,
and
so
that
whole
first
section
really
begins
to
set
the
stage
for
that
now.
The
second
section
has
many
traditional
transportation
elements
that
you
would
expect
to
see
as
background
information
about
how
we
travel,
where
we're
traveling,
how
long
it
takes
us
to
travel.
R
But
it
also
begins
to
speak
to
things
like
what's
the
relationship
of
that
travel
to
jobs
and
what's
the
relationship
between
jobs
and
access
to
some
of
our
more
pertinent
travel
modes
like
transit,
and
so
I
would
hope
that
you
find
that
there's
a
wealth
of
information
about
that.
And
then
lastly,
we
continue
to
challenge
ourselves
to
learn
from
other
communities
and
so
we've
offered,
albeit
brief,
but
a
concise
set
of
peer
communities
against
a
series
of
benchmarks.
R
So
with
that,
I'm
just
going
to
quickly
scroll
through
here
for
the
benefit
of
the
audience,
so
that
you
can
kind
of
see
that
this
setting
the
stage
is
is
documenting
all
the
driving
forces
that
we
need
to
be
cognizant
of
as
we
move
forward.
I
think,
with
every
meeting
as
much
as
we
want
to
say
this
is
about
three
things:
it's
really
about
a
dozen
things
and
it's
complicated,
and
we
know
that
so
we've
done
our
best
to
try
to
showcase
those
things
ranging
from
safety
all
the
way
to
health
and
everything
in
between.
R
I
think
that
you'll
also
see
that
the
emerging
trends
begins
with
that
acknowledgement
that
so
many
of
you
often
reference
which
is
the
history
of
our
city
in
in
large
part,
many
modern
cities.
And
so,
while
we're
not
going
to
dwell
in
the
past,
we
need
to
know
how
we
got
to
where
we
are
today,
and
that
becomes
incredibly
helpful.
R
But
I
think,
if
you
only
have
a
few
moments
to
scan
through
this
document,
you'll
find
that
the
sections
about
the
ark
and
the
wedge
are
incredibly
helpful
in
understanding
who
we
are
and
what
we
are
as
a
community
right
now,
and
I
want
to
also
suggest
to
you
that
we
want
to
make
this
easy.
So,
as
you
move
through
the
document,
we've
isolated
the
wedge,
so
that
you
can
see
it
on
all
of
the
maps,
we're
trying
to
think
ahead
and
also
think
about
how
we
might
want
to
use
the
document
as
well.
R
A
really
quick
reminder
about
the
ark
and
the
wedge
and
a
simple
way
to
say
this
is
that
the
greatest
degree
of
diversity
in
our
community
exists
within
this
general
arc.
It's
no
coincidence
that
much
of
that
ark
is
interrupted
by
large
transportation
facilities,
in
particular
interstates
and
freeways.
R
We
keep
talking
to
you
also
using
some
planning
terms
like
mode
split
and
mode
share.
We
owe
it
to
you
to
explain
that
to
you
in
greater
detail,
and
so
we've
got
a
whole
section
in
here,
entitled
travel
patterns
and
mode,
and
when
you
see
sov
we're
talking
about
single
occupant
vehicles,
these
are
people
driving
in
their
cars,
and
so
the
big
takeaway
that
we've
referenced
several
times
is
that
almost
77
percent
of
us
when
driving
when
you
know
traveling
to
and
from
work
or
driving
alone,
and
we
know
that
that's
one
metric.
R
It's
not
a
single
motivation
for
us,
but
it
certainly
is
something
for
us
to
pay
attention
as
we
contemplate
setting
targets
and
goals.
There's
a
lot
of
information
in
here.
That
is
not
necessarily
transportation
related,
but
it's
community
characteristics
and
they're
tied
together.
I
think
all
of
us
would,
after
reading
this
agree,
that
transportation,
land
use
and
equity
and
prosperity
are
all
tied
together,
and
so
we've
begun
to
document,
not
just
about
who
lives
where.
R
But
what
are
the
cost
burdens
that
we
experience,
depending
where
we
live
in
charlotte
and
that's
directly
related
to
things
like
housing
cost
in
wages
and
a
handful
of
other
critical
data
points
and
critical
needs
are
clearly
things
that
are
important
to
us,
and
we
know
that
there's
priorities
here,
not
just
to
be
able
to
commute
well
to
and
from
work,
but
to
also
have
access
to
all
the
things
that
make
living
here,
both
an
enjoyable
and
prosperous
thing
for
all
of
our
residents
and
so
we're
looking
at
things
like
how
much
access
we
have
and
what
are
our
choices
for
getting
to
and
from
hospital
health
care,
recreation
parks,
open
space
and
the
like
and
there's
a
lot
of
information
in
here
that
I
think
you'll
find
that's
incredibly
interesting.
R
But
there
was
already
reference
this
evening
to
that
upward
mobility
report,
where
charlotte
does
rank
50th
out
of
the
50
largest
cities
in
the
u.s
and
and
a
lot
of
that
is,
is
influenced
by
a
number
of
variables.
But
knowing
where
jobs
are
located.
Helps
us
begin
that
discussion
and
literally
inventorying,
where
our
greatest
density
of
jobs
is
located
in
our
community,
is
one
moment
in
time
for
us
to
contemplate
how
we
proceed.
In
that
conversation,
I
think
it's
worth
noting
here.
R
That's
not
exclusively
the
solution,
but
it
is
part
of
the
dialogue,
and
so
we
want
to
be
sure
that
we're
understanding
that
we
do
a
lot
of
spatial
analysis
and
work
like
this,
which
is
just
a
fancy
way
of
saying
how
close
are
people
to
different
features,
and
we've
done
so
with
respect
to
access
to
transportation
and
in
particular,
access
to
some
of
our
more
affordable
options
for
transportation.
Be
that
walk
bike
and
transit.
We
wanted
that
to
be
easily
accessible
for
you
and
once
again
travel
time.
R
You
mentioned
some
of
you
tonight
even
discussions
about
how
long
does
it
take
for
us
to
commute
and
and
what
does
that,
compare
to
other
places
and
then
how
do
we
translate
time
to
dollars?
And
so
all
that
information
is
in
here
and
hopefully
that
will
become
something
that
helps
feed
your
thoughts
as
we
move
through
the
remainder
of
this
process.
R
As
I
mentioned,
I'm
not
going
to
go
through
the
entirety
of
this,
but
I
hope
I've
given
you
enough
flavor
to
to
maybe
stimulate
your
interest
to
read
this
if
not
covered
in
cover,
at
least
thematically
for
the
areas
with
which
you
have
the
greatest
interest,
and
I
I
did
mention
earlier
that
we
wanted
to
also
give
you
a
comparative
analysis
as
well.
R
We
have
some
experience
with
and
it's
really
interesting
the
information
that
we
were
able
to
generate
through
this
process
and
you'll
find
that
there's
not
any
one
community
that
exhibits
just
a
perfect
scenario
and
we
have
our
own
externalities
and
some
of
these
other
communities
we've
looked
at
have
their
own
challenges
as
well,
and
so
I
think
that
there's
something
to
be
learned
from
that,
but
you'll
note
that
there's
some
comparisons
to
charlotte
austin,
minneapolis,
nashville
and
denver
consistently
throughout
with
that.
I'm
going
to
leave
this
just
simply
with
the
request.
R
B
Thank
you
stephen.
This
has
been
very,
very
helpful
and
given
how
diligent
this
task
force
has
been,
I'm
sure
that
there
will
be
some
more
questions
generated
by
the
time
we
get
to
the
october
13th
meeting,
but
very
well
done
scott.
You
and
stephen
we're
gonna.
D
Thank
you
mayor,
so
next
on
our
agenda.
We
want
to
walk
you
through
some
of
the
early
results
from
the
public
survey.
That's
out
and
then
kick
it
back
over
to
you
all
to
chime
in
with
some
live
polling
that
steven's
going
to
walk
us
through.
D
So
just
as
a
reminder,
we
have
this
public
survey
out
now
it
is
live,
there's
33
questions.
Hopefully
you
all
have
taken
it
so
you're
familiar
with
this.
Those
questions
are
focused
on
transportation,
equity,
mobility,
after
covet
19
trade-offs
between
different
types
of
transportation,
and
then
the
mobility,
behaviors
and
preferences
of
our
residents,
we've
gotten
about
a
thousand
responses.
D
To
date,
our
results,
our
respondents
to
date,
are
skewing
a
little
bit
younger
within
cohorts
of
of
25
to
45
years
old,
they're,
also
skewing
towards
people
who
identify
as
white
or
caucasian
and
skewing
slightly
female
that
age
and
racial
skew
was
not
atypical
for
surveys
like
this,
especially
in
the
earlier
weeks
of
distribution,
but
we
think
it's
also
a
challenge
to
us
as
staff
and
and
to
you
all
as
task
force
members
to
do
a
little
bit
better.
D
You
all
represent
a
broad
and
diverse
set
of
voices
across
our
city
and
and
we
need
your
help,
distributing
the
survey
to
all
of
the
various
communities
that
we
serve.
So
part
of
your
homework
for
next
month
is
to
help
us
distribute
the
survey.
So
please
send
the
survey
out
to
your
personal
and
professional
networks
to
neighborhood
leaders,
to
faith
communities
to
ngos
to
anyone
else
who
you
can
think
of
that
can
help
us
to
achieve
a
more
diverse
and
representative
sample
of
responses.
D
So
now
I'm
going
to
walk
you
through
some
of
the
highlights
from
these
early
responses.
This
first
question
is
about
the
different
challenges
that
we
are
facing
now
from
a
mobility
standpoint.
As
a
reminder,
it's
also
a
question
that
relates
directly
back
to
the
vision
statement
for
us
that
was
established
in
the
2040
comprehensive
plan
effort,
and
you
can
see
here
in
terms
of
priorities.
Safety
and
equity
are
consistently
at
the
top.
D
I
think
that
reinforces
a
lot
of
what
we've
heard
from
you
all,
also
towards
the
top
are
issues
of
connectivity
and
sustainability
next
slide
and
again,
I'm
just
bringing
this
up
on
the
screen.
So
you
can
see
the
the
six
things
from
that
question
relate
directly
to
the
the
six
themes
that
are
underlined
from
our
vision,
statement:
safety,
equity
sustainability,
connectivity,
prosperity
and
innovation.
D
We've
been
asking
a
question
about
how
easy
residents
feel
it
is
to
travel
in
charlotte
by
different
modes
of
transportation
by
and
large
folks
think
that
driving
a
car
is
easier
than
any
other
mode
in
charlotte.
Right
now
that
that
shouldn't
come
as
a
big
surprise
to
us,
followed
by
taking
light
rail,
walking,
e-scooters,
bicycle
and
then
bus
next
slide.
D
This
is
the
question
that
hones
in
on
part
of
that
transportation
equity
story.
We
want
to
know
how
our
residents
think
about
where
we
spend
our
money
and
we've
gotten
some
really
strong
support
for
the
idea
that
the
city
should
focus
transportation,
investments
on
improvements
for
the
populations
that
are
the
most
vulnerable
and
have
the
greatest
need
for
affordable
transportation
options.
D
D
This
was
one
of
those
questions
and
I
think,
has
some
interesting
early
results,
we're
obviously
not
post
pandemic
yet.
So
I
want
to
point
out
that
this
reflects
expected
behavior
as
opposed
to
observed
behavior,
but
what
respondents
are
telling
us
is
that
there's
about
a
13
decrease
right
now
in
the
number
of
folks
who
expect
that
they
will
be
driving
alone
to
work
five
or
more
days
a
week
next
slide.
D
Similarly,
there's
about
a
10
increase
in
the
number
of
respondents
who
are
telling
us
they
will
walk
or
ride
a
bike
at
least
three
or
more
days
a
week
again.
This
is
expected,
as
opposed
to
observed,
behavior
it's
it's
sort
of
just
our
way
of
trying
to
begin
to
measure,
preferences
and
behaviors
around
this
issue
of
post-pandemic
mobility
next
slide.
D
So
with
that,
I'm
going
to
kick
it
over
to
stephen
to
navigate
us
through
a
little
bit
of
live
polling.
That
will
compare
your
attitudes
and
sort
of
measure
how
aligned
we
are
as
a
task
force
with
some
of
the
other
questions
that
we
asked
as
a
part
of
the
public
survey.
R
All
right
great,
so
I'm
back
I'll
tell
you
that
we're
using
you
a
little
bit
as
a
guinea
pig
tonight
so
bear
with
us
we're
gonna
beta
test.
This
I've
only
got
three
questions.
This
won't
take
long,
but
we
want
to
be
sure
that
we're
not
missing
opportunities
to
find
more
innovative
ways
to
interact
with
you,
as
we
continue
to
be
virtual.
R
So
one
of
the
questions
that
we
asked
in
the
survey
related
to
the
following,
and
what
I'd
love
for
you
to
do
when
you
logged
in
tonight
there
was
an
email
that
was
sent
to
you,
and
I
know
we
we
added
on
screen.
We
asked
folks
to
log
on
to
us
either
a
web
browser
on
your
computer,
or
you
can
do
this
on
your
smartphone
or
your
tablet.
It'll
work
just
as
easily,
but
it's
that
poll
ev.com
forward,
slash
amp
812.,
and
it's
probably
going
to
ask
you
for
your
name.
R
You
can
skip
that
if,
if
that's
something
that
you
prefer
to
offer,
that's
fine,
but
we're
not
asking
for
it
this
evening.
This
is
just
more
of
a
test,
but
right
now,
essentially,
what
we've
done
is
we've
created
a
portal
that
allows
you
all
to
weigh
in
on
a
question,
and
so
we
should
be
open
for
for
polling
at
this
moment
and
we're
going
to
run
through
three
of
these
and
the
first
question.
This
is
all
three
of
these
come
from
the
survey.
R
I
support
investment
in
walking,
biking
and
transit
options
right
to
and
I'm
cover
up
because
you
essentially
get
to
choose
two
of
these.
Now
you
may
be
a
big
fan
of
all
of
them,
but
I
want
you
to
think
about
the
two
that
most
resonate
with
you.
Residents
depend
on
affordable
and
equitable
mobility
choices.
R
It
encourages
economic
development,
it
supports
environmental
stewardship,
it
promotes
personal
and
public
health
and
safety.
Just
widening
roads
isn't
a
good
way
to
manage
growth.
More
people
on
foot
bike
and
buses
means
fewer
cars,
and
I
don't
support
increasing
investment,
walk
bike
or
transit,
and
so
this
is
the
moment
where
the
technical
team
is
crossing
their
fingers.
We've
got
anxiety.
Is
the
tech
technology
working
for
us
and
with
any
luck
we
should
begin
to
see
some
some.
R
R
All
right-
and
so
you
can
see
how
this
is
going
to
work
so
in
real
time
as
you
are
voting,
we'll
start
to
see
responses
and
after
a
moment
or
two,
it
tends
to
log
all
of
your
answers
fairly
quickly.
You
don't
have
to
worry
about
making
a
mistake.
It's
only
going
to
record
the
last
vote
that
you
might
generate
last,
and
so
it's
kind
of
foolproof
from
that
perspective,
but
let's
just
take
a
look
at
these
quick
results
and
see
how
we
compare
it
looks
like
about
34
of
you
selected.
R
The
first
one,
which
was
residents,
depend
on
affordable
and
equitable
mobility
choices
and
owning
a
car.
Quite
frankly,
is
expensive
and
the
second
most
frequently
voted
item
was
it
supports
environmental
stewardship
and
air
quality
still
a
lot
of
movement
there,
but,
generally
speaking,
those
are
the
spikes
we're
seeing.
So
this
is
telling
me
you
found
the
buttons
and
we're
receiving
your
votes
and
that's
a
good
thing.
Let's
go
ahead
and
take
a
look
at
our
next
question
in
the
interest
of
time.
So
we're
going
to
do
this.
R
The
same
way
and
it'll
take
just
a
moment
to
refresh
your
screen,
but
in
a
moment
you
should
have
a
new
question
on
your
tablet
or
your
screen.
That
essentially
says
our
primary
streets.
Think
of
those
as
our
larger
order,
streets
or
bigger
streets
should
be
redesigned
to
be
safer
for
all
users
and
promote
walking,
biking
and
riding
transit
and
we're
simply
asking
how
much
do
you
agree
with
that
statement?
R
R
And
at
some
point
what
we'll
be
doing
is
and
within
the
next
couple
of
weeks,
we'll
close
the
public
survey
and
we'll
generate
a
summer
report
for
you,
so
you
don't
have
to
read
all
the
data
in
its
raw
format.
We'll
distribute
that
to
you
in
advance.
So
there
may
be
some
discussion
about
it.
There
might
be
something
we
learned
through
that
process.
I
would
think
that
we'll
probably
find
something
incredibly
insightful,
but
I'm
not
seeing
a
whole
lot
of
folks
disagreeing
with
the
statement.
R
In
fact,
it
looks
like
we
all
tend
to
agree
in
some
way
shape
or
form
that
this
is
a
good
idea,
but
you
know
sometimes
those
kinds
of
questions
are
kind
of
easy
to
lend
your
support
to,
and
you
have
to
ask
a
bit
harder
question
to
see
how
we
really
feel
about
it,
and
so
I'm
going
to
ask
a
follow-up
to
that.
Which
essentially
is?
R
Would
you
be
willing
to
accept
a
modest
increase
in
travel
delay?
In
other
words,
it's
going
to
take
a
little
bit
more
time
in
order
to
make
charlotte's
streets
safer
for
all
users.
I
think
what
you'll
find
is
that
everything
we
do
in
transportation
has
got
a
trade-off
associated
with
it.
So
the
idea
of
building
something
that's
perfect
is
really
outside
of
our
grasp,
but
we
have
to
aspire
to
something,
that's
better
and
we
get
to
decide
what
is.
R
Yeah-
and
we
intentionally
left
that
vague
if
we
were
doing
a
scientific
kind
of
poll
for
this,
the
way
we
authored
it
in
the
survey
was
we,
we
talked
about
our
arterials
right,
the
the
larger
order
of
streets
kind
of,
I
think
one
easy
way
to
say
this
would
be
our
busiest
of
streets
and
our
multi-lane
streets.
R
R
R
I
think
what
you're
proving
to
us,
though
tonight,
is
that
this
technology
is
something
that
may
work
well
for
us,
especially
when
we
need
to
see
what
the
task
force
is
thinking
as
a
collective,
and
so,
with
your
permission,
we're
probably
going
to
continue
to
investigate
ways
with
which
we
might
leverage
this
in
future
meetings.
But
with
that,
that's
pretty
much
all
I
had
for
you
tonight.
I
want
to
thank
you
for
your
time.
B
Mayor,
thank
you
stephen,
very,
very
interesting.
Did
you
share
anything
about
how
the
sentiment
of
the
task
force
aligns
with
the
preliminary
results
of
the
survey
that
you
are
we
I
can
take
that.
I'm.
D
D
D
So
this
was
the
first
question
that
we
just
asked
you
all
support
investment
in
walking
biking
and
transit
options,
because
your
top
three
answers
were
the
equity
answer.
Residents
depend
on
affordable
and
equitable
mobility
choices.
That
is
the
top
answer.
We've
been
getting
from
the
community
as
well.
D
D
Yes,
unless
anyone
knows
otherwise
that,
if
you're
taking
the
survey
anytime,
someone
takes
it.
The
the
responses
and
the
questions
are
exactly
the
same
and
in
the
same
order.
Okay,.
D
Thanks
for
that
that
feedback-
let's
go
to
the
next
slide-
oh
I'm
sorry,
sir
you're,
already
on
the
next
slide.
This
was
the
next
question
that
we
all
asked
you
do.
We
think
that
some
of
our
larger
streets
should
be
redesigned
to
be
safer
for
all
users
and
promote
walking,
biking
and
writing
transit.
The
community
at
large
about
90
percent
of
respondents
either
agree
or
strongly
agree.
D
I
think
we
had
100
agreements
on
the
task
force
so
generally
seem
to
be
in
alignment
there
as
well
next
slide,
and
then
this
was
the
slightly
harder
question
which
is:
do
you?
You
still
agree,
even
if
you
would
have
to
accept
a
modest
increase
in
travel
time
in
order
to
make
our
streets
safer
for
all
users,
you
all
were
remarkably
close
to
this
as
well.
D
I
believe
your
answers
were
84
yes,
16
now
as
compared
to
82,
yes,
18,
no
from
the
community.
So
I
think
the
good
news
is
that,
at
least
on
these
three
questions,
which,
admittedly,
is
a
small
sample
size-
we're
seeing
some
pretty
close
alignment
between
you
all
as
a
task
force
and
the
early
results
that
we
are
getting
right
now
from
the
community.
B
B
Let
me
just
read
you
some
of
what
we,
what
we
got
can't
read
all
of
them,
but
one
comment
that
came
in
was
to
be
a
truly
urban
city.
We
must
invest
in
transportation
that
suits
individuals
of
all
social
economic
backgrounds,
and
that
seems
to
be
in
alignment.
B
B
See
christoph's
spieler's
recent
book,
trains,
buses
and
people
most
other
cities
like
san
francisco,
dallas
and
many
cities.
Others
have
had
huge
multimodal
investments,
but
have
not
done
a
good
job.
Building
the
connectivity
interesting
point,
and
all
of
this
is
coming
from
somebody.
I
think
we
all
know
martin
zimmerman.
M
B
C
B
October
13th,
yes,
martin,
it
will
be
made
available
after
october.
13Th,
okay
was
that
all
that.
P
B
From
the
public
yeah,
okay,
all
right
tai,
can
you
tell
us
something
about
homework
number
three
and.
C
Okay
schedule.
Thank
you
once
again.
Thank
you
very
much.
I
was
paying
attention
to
both
youtube
and
facebook
and
you
had
almost
60
people
listening
into
your
conversations
this
evening.
So
that's
that's
almost
consistent
with
what
you
had
last
time
as
well.
So
I
think
that's
very
helpful.
Thank
you
very
much
after
stephen
made
the
presentation
on
the
state
of
mobility.
C
I
deliberately
held
back
sending
this
to
you
earlier
today,
because
I
did
not
want
to
load
you
with
so
many
documents
or
confuse
anyone.
So,
but
after
I
made
this
presentation
and
framed
the
content,
I
emailed
that
to
all
of
you,
it's
a
42-page
document
very
easy
to
read.
I
got
it
earlier
this
afternoon.
I
was
able
to
go
through
it,
perhaps
because
I'm
familiar
with
some
of
the
numbers
but
very
fascinating,
and
it's
likely
to
generate
a
lot
of
conversations.
C
So
we're
not
going
to
ask
you
to
be
in
any
group
this
time,
we're
just
going
to
ask
you
to
individually
read
now.
That
does
not
mean
you
cannot
reach
out
to
somebody
else.
Please
feel
free
to
reach
out
to
another
member
of
the
task,
force
and
tweet
us
together.
If
you
want
to
or
even
call
us
and
ask
questions
but
feel
free
to
yellow
mark
highlight
and
make
key
points
that
you
will
bring
up
for
discussions
on
october
13th,
you
don't
need
to
send
anything
ahead
of
time.
Just
pretty
much.
C
Just
read
this
on
your
own
and
provide
information.
The
second
and
kind
of
just
share
information
with
us
on
october
13..
The
second
part
of
the
homework
is
the
charlotte
moves
public
survey.
As
scott
said
earlier,
we've
got
almost
1
000
respondents
so
far
would
like
you
to
share
this
with
your
network.
Every
one
of
you
belongs
to
a
group,
whether
your
fellow
employees
or
others
in
your
neighborhoods.
If
you're
in
a
homeowner's
association,
group
or
community
group,
please
feel
free
to
share
that
survey
link
with
your
network.
C
We
want
to
get
as
many
responses
as
possible
to
this
survey,
so
those
are
the
two
pieces
of
your
homework
and
this
is
really
on
your
own,
and
so
we
we
know
that
you're
really
committed
to
this.
So
we
we
look
forward
to
asking
questions
and
listening
to
deliberations
on
october
13th.
C
I
think
there's
a
next
slide
also
that
I'd
like
to
pay
attention
to,
before
I
hand
off
to
mayor
gan
one
of
the
things
that
we
were
discussing
earlier
and
there
was
a
lot
of
conversation
around
2021
or
move
it
further,
but
down
the
line
somewhere
in
october
or
november,
we'll
be
sharing
with
you,
some
polling
data
that
we
are
also
doing
to
gauge
community
interest.
And
so
you
know
just
resolve
your
questions
for
for
that
time.
C
But
we
will
definitely
be
sharing
some
information
with
you,
because
we're
also
asking
folks
regionally
about
2021
and
and
all
of
that,
so
we'll
have
more
information
to
share
with
you
in
terms
of
what
the
public
sentiment
is
about
that,
but
part
of
the
process
going
forward
is
when
we
meet
with
you
on
october.
13Th
we'll
be
talking
about
mode
shift
once
again,
technical
term
like
steven
said,
but
we
will
be
talking
about
that.
We'll
share
the
map
of
the
transformational
mobility
network.
C
What
that
looks
like
october
13
is
that
additional
date,
and
then
october
22nd
will
come
back
with
in
terms
of
cost
as
well.
So
again,
this
is
very
informational
and
this
information
will
be
available
on
the
charlotte
moves
website.
Thank
you.
Thank.
B
You
tai
and
again
I
want
to
say
thank
you
to
the
task
force.
B
I
think
we've
we've
covered
a
lot
of
ground
tonight
and
I
I
have
a
sense
that
that
you're
recognizing
more
and
more
the
the
degree
of
analysis
we
need
to
get
into
both
from
the
standpoint
of
what
what
what
a
transformational
mobility
network
is
all
about
and
the
more
important,
equally
important
issue
of
how
we're
going
to
fund
it
and
those
additional
meetings
that
have
been
placed
on
the
calendar
are
much
needed
and
I
hope
you
feel
the
same
way
so
october
13th.
B
We
look
to
see
you
again
and
I'm
just
impressed
with
the
level
of
participation
and
attendance
by
all
of
you
in
these
virtual
settings.
I
I've
been
pushing
the
city
and
pushing
tai,
particularly
they
say.
Look.
I
really
would
like
to
see
some
of
these
folks
face
to
face.
B
Thank
you
and
I
hope
we've
been
reasonably
respectful
of
your
time
and
thank
you
again
see
you
on
the
13th
of
october
good
night.