►
From YouTube: Charlotte Moves Task Force - October 13, 2020
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
B
C
D
B
It
may
be
represented
in
public
survey,
but
our
survey
was
only
offered
in
english.
E
I
know
I
took
the
survey,
but
I
I
can't
remember
because
it
was
a
while
back,
but
when
you
ask
the
question
you
know:
do
you
support
more
transportation?
If
it's
asked
in
a
vacuum
like
that,
you
know
it's
like
asking
somebody.
Would
you
like
more
money,
but
then
what
do
you
have
to
do
to
get
it
so?
Did
we
ask
the
question
of
what?
What
were
you
willing
to
pay?
E
Are
you
willing
to
pay
more
taxes
in
order
to
have
different
modes
of
transportation
and
increase
transportation,
because,
honestly,
I
think
that's
a
bigger
and
better
question
than
just
it's
like
motherhood.
Of
course,
we
all
want
better
transportation.
It
comes
down
to
what
do
we
have
to
pay
for
it
and
is
it
affordable.
F
Maybe
I
can
quickly
jump
in
so
there
are
two
surveys,
one
that
I
believe
mr
may
is
talking
about.
Is
the
public
survey
that
we
did
and
we
sent
to
all
of
you
we're
coming
to
that
that
had
over
1200
responses
and
we're
going
to
summarize
that
for
you,
this
was
done
by
alg,
not
by
the
city,
and
the
purpose
of
this
was
not
necessarily
about
the
cost
of
transportation,
but
rather
to
determine
people's
interest
in
public
transportation.
F
Despite
the
coronavirus
pandemic,
a
number
of
you
had
brought
that
up
during
our
may
and
june
meeting
that
are
weak,
considering
the
impact
of
kobe
19
on
mobility
during
this
process.
So
we
wanted
to
take
this
private
polling,
which
surveyed
501
residents
of
those
four
counties
to
determine
interest.
There
will
be
a
follow-up
survey
which
will
happen
and
will
be
presented
to
you
at
your
november
meeting,
which
will
ask
the
question
that
you
are
asking
right
now.
How
much
will
it
cost?
H
Yes,
so
I
just
had
a
quick
question
ben.
So
in
charlotte
we
have
a
a
unique
challenge
with
being
50th
in
the
nation
upper
mobility,
and
I'm
wondering
if
in
your
survey,
because
I
know
it's
pretty
broad
in
the
questioning
and
the
results
that
we
just
received.
But
in
that
is
it
able
to
be?
Is
it
dynamic
enough
to
be
unpacked
to
where
we
can
see
how
transportation
could
move
the
needle
in
changing
our
ranking
and
upper
mobility?.
B
That's
a
a
broader
modeling
question
that
gets
into
a
whole
host
of
other
economic
factors.
That's
just
you
know
really
outside
the
scope
of
what
we
do,
but
what
we
can
tell
you
is
that
the
majority
of
people
do
think
it
will
benefit
them.
B
How
exactly
how
we
can
quantify
that
brings
in
a
whole
bunch
of
other
variables,
but
it
also,
but
it
did
specifically
say
that
they
think
it
will
impact
and
improve
their
local
businesses,
something
that
all
sort
of
feeds
into
what
we're
talking
about,
but
I
couldn't
couldn't
then
use
it
to
model
the
exact
economic
impact.
H
C
Well,
I
I
actually
thought
some
of
that
survey
did
speak
to
the
question
of
quality
of
life,
that
it
was
more
than
just
an
economic
issue
that
it
was
something
that
would
improve
their
chances
economically
and
otherwise.
I
think
you
touched
on
it
a
little
bit
in
there.
I,
I
was
actually
surprised
to
see
that
almost
two-thirds
of
the
people
agree
that
their
quality
of
life
might
be
improved
by
that,
and
that
has
to
mean
when
you
talk
about
quality,
it
means
across
a
spectrum
of
economic
mobility
and
things
of
that
nature.
B
G
Yeah
mary,
thank
you
and-
and
it
was
perfect,
they
let
william,
we
always
fight.
G
We
usually
end
up
wanting
to
talk
at
the
same
time,
but
his
question,
and
then
your
follow-up
mayor
was
exactly
what
I
was
going
to
point
out
was:
maybe
you
if
we
do
the
follow-up
poll,
maybe
identifying
or
defining
for
folks
in
that
poll,
what
quality
of
life
is,
because
it's
just
it's
very
interesting
to
see
how
high
the
numbers
are
in
other
aspects,
but
that
question
had
the
lowest
in
terms
of
agreeing
with
and
the
highest
and
disagreeing
with,
and
I
just
didn't
know
if
folks,
when
they
were
answering,
that
question
really
understood
that
spectrum
of
what
could
benefit
them
and
maybe
just
rewording
that
so
folks
can
understand
or
re-asking
the
question
to
break
it
down
and
into
the
different
factors
of
that
spectrum.
G
That
would
impact
their
life,
because
you
might
get
a
little
bit
different.
A
different
percentage
of
agree
agreement
or
disagreement
with
it.
C
I
That,
yes,
thank
you
mayor
to
that
slide.
So
I
want
to
start
first
of
all
by
thanking
the
the
task
force
members
for
helping
us
to
distribute
this
survey.
We
launched
it
the
day
of
your
august
meeting
and
and
just
closed
it
out
this
morning,
and
we
have
had
a
really
great
response.
Ty
well
mentioned,
we've
had
over
1200
participants,
collectively
folks
have
invested
over
225
hours.
I
In
taking
the
survey,
there
were
33
questions
focused
on
issues
around
transportation,
equity,
post
pandemic
mobility,
different
trade-offs
between
types
of
transportation
and
then
just
general
questions
around
mobility,
behaviors
and
preferences.
I
You
all
have
seen
a
snapshot,
an
early
snapshot
of
these
results
before,
and
so
I'm
not
going
to
spend
a
lot
of
time
going
through
all
of
the
results
really.
The
the
purpose
of
bringing
this
forward
to
you
all
tonight
is
just
to
illustrate
some
alignment
with
what
you
just
saw
from
ben
with
the
alg
poll.
I
We
did
on
this
survey
test
just
to
see
if
there
were
preferences
among
different
types
of
trade-offs.
So,
for
instance,
more
than
80
of
the
participants
in
this
survey
said
that
they'd
be
willing
to
accept
modest
increases
in
travel
times,
if,
if
it
were
in
exchange
for
making
charlotte
streets
safer
for
all
users,
the
top
two
changes
that
the
public
indicated
they
would
like
to
see
are
more
convenient
public
transportation
and
more
travel
options.
I
81
percent
of
folks
said
they'd
like
to
walk
more
76
percent,
said
they'd
like
to
travel
more
by
bus
or
light
rail
and
safety
and
convenience
were
the
top
two
reasons
for
participants,
not
walking
biking
or
taking
transit.
More
often
for
everyday
trips,
we
asked
about
some
broad
thematic
types
of
things
in
the
survey
again.
I
think
the
the
thing
to
underscore
on
this
slide
is
just
that:
we're
seeing
a
lot
of
alignment
between
what
we
have
heard
from
you
all
on
the
task
force
and
what
we
have
heard
in
the
survey.
I
I
We
tried
to
gauge
the
anticipated
impact
of
kovan
19.
Of
course,
this
is
a
bit
of
an
apples
to
oranges,
because
we're
talking
about
observed,
behavior
pre-pandemic
versus
anticipated
what
people
expect
their
behavior
might
be
in
post-pandemics.
So
this
does
not
reflect
real
world
observation.
This
is
just
what
people
reported
to
us
as
their
anticipated
behavior.
Once
we
emerge
into
a
post-pandemic
reality.
I
What
folks
said
is
that
there's
a
decrease
about
13
percent
decrease
in
the
number
of
people
who
expect
to
drive
alone
to
work
five
or
more
days
a
week
and
an
11
increase
in
the
number
of
people
who
walk
or
ride
a
bike?
Three
or
more
days
a
week,
so
just
general
trends
there
of
more
diversified,
commutes
folks
who
used
to
drive
to
work,
maybe
five
days
a
week,
are
now
having
split
mode
weeks
and
may
expect
to
be
teleworking
or
doing
some
other
things
in
the
future.
I
J
This
is
david
ward.
I
have
a
quick
question.
Mayor
was
the
the
statistics,
the
13
increase
or
I'm
sorry,
the
30
decrease
in
folks
who
anticipate
driving
by
themselves
to
work
five
days
a
week
and
the
11
percent
increase
in
folks
who
may
take
ultra
transportation
was
that
based
on
a
five-day
work
week,
or
was
that
based
on
folks
who
thought
they
might
be
working
from
home
a
few
days
a
week,
teleworking,
etc?.
I
Good
question:
so
we
we
asked
the
question:
how
many
days
per
week,
do
you
drive
to
work
before
the
pandemic
and
how
many
days
per
week,
do
you
expect?
Do
you
expect
you'll
drive
to
work
after
the
payment.
I
Okay,
right
respondents
did
have
the
option
to
answer
up
to
seven
days
a
week,
depending
on
their
job
situation
or
or
commute
pattern.
But
generally,
what
we
saw
is
that
that
13
decrease
from
folks
who
indicated
five
or
more
days
a
week
that
they'd
be
driving
along
to
work.
I
C
You
all
right,
thank
you,
scott.
I
can
quickly
jump
in.
F
Again,
that's
okay!
I
just
want
to
say
again
that
we
we
know
that
when
people
see
numbers
you're,
always
very
careful,
you
want
to
dive
deeper
and
we
understand
that
what
I
will
do
will
be
to
summarize
the
questions
of
the
private
polling
and
share
those
with
you,
but
I
would
not
be
able
to
share
the
answers
with
you
because
they
are
private,
the
private
nature
of
the
polling,
but
we
will
get
you
the
questions.
F
So
you
see
that,
but
I
also
want
to
remind
you
that
we
did
not
ask
the
number
question,
because
we
want
to
present
that
to
you
first
and
once
we
start
talking
numbers
then
at
the
next
polling,
which
could
really
be
a
focus
group
exercise.
Frankly,
we
will.
We
will
share
that
result
with
you
again
at
a
subsequent
meeting.
So
we
can
compare.
F
To
improve
upward
mobility
and
also
to
as
a
form
of
economic
development,
and
so
that's
a
good
thing
for
us
and
then
the
next
polling
will
build
on
that
when
we
start
asking
for
for
numbers
and
then
we'll
bring
that
back
as
well.
So
thank
you.
If
you
have
any
other
questions
that
you're
not
sharing
with
us
tonight,
we
definitely
will
be
glad
to
respond
to
that
later
on
or
after
this
meeting.
Thank.
C
You
stephen:
are
you
ready
to
talk
about
the
state
of
mobility
report
and
that
homework
assignment
that
we
we
gave
to
the
task
force.
K
Appreciate
seeing
everyone
here
again
tonight
as
you're
all
familiar,
we
generated
a
state
of
mobility,
summary
report,
it's
about
40
pages,
rougher,
give
or
take
a
page
of
facts,
figures,
maps
just
some
thoughtful
information.
K
So
in
many
ways
we
hope
that
this
may
have
become
a
central
repository
of
of
information,
for
you
is
certainly
no
replacement
for
doing
a
deeper
dive
on
some
of
those,
but
I'm
not
going
to
go
through
the
whole
40
pages.
Obviously-
and
I
know
one
of
the
homework
assignments
was
for
you
all
to
peruse
through
that
at
your
leisure
and
to
focus
in
on
areas
with
which
you
had
some
some
interest.
There's
a
lot
of
topical
sort
of
information
represented.
K
There's
about
you
know:
10
11,
different
kind
of
planning
themes
represented
on
this
slide,
which
kind
of
speaks
to
why
we
assembled
the
information.
I
want
to
be
very
clear
that
once
again
that
not
meant
to
be
an
exhaustive
set
of
outcomes,
because
we've
got
a
lot
of
work
yet
to
come
in
the
strategic
mobility
plan
that
will
lead
us
to
that.
But
let's
take
a
look
at
the
next
slide.
I
thought
it
might
be
helpful
as
we
entertain
a
conversation
a
little
bit
more
about
some
of
those
findings.
I
K
Bit
of
reading
of
the
tea
leaves,
if
you
will,
and
so
I'm
I'm
extracting
bits
and
pieces
of
this
selectively
on
purpose.
You
may
find
other
things
to
be
of
greater
value
to
you
and
we
certainly
look
forward
to
hearing
those
comments
from
you.
Just
a
few
things
about
general
travel
characteristics,
you'll
see
on
the
left
part
of
this
slide
that
there's
items
here
that
really
relate
to
our
travel
experience.
K
This
is
kind
of
what
we
endure
in
our
daily
lives
as
residents
and
workers
here
in
charlotte,
some
things
about
how
long
it
takes
us
to
travel
or
how
much
we
might
spend
on
transportation
and
and
I'll
tell
you
that,
generally
speaking,
these
numbers,
you
can
react
to
them,
but
they're
probably
not
very
meaningful
if
you
don't
compare
them
against
other
places
and
and
other
variables
about
the
overall
health
of
a
city
and
or
the
experience
of
a
household.
K
And
so
I
want
to
be
very
cautious
about
what
the
absolute
numbers
might
mean,
but
I
do
want
to
point
out
a
few
things
when
you
look
at
that
24.6
minute
average
commute
time.
You
know,
generally
speaking,
that's
not
awful
right,
but
there
are
people
who
experience
much
longer,
commutes
and
in
in
our
community,
and
there
are
some
that
have
some
very
small
commutes.
K
So
there's
a
broad
range,
that's
represented
in
that,
but
to
offer
you
a
comparison
when
we
looked
at
the
pure
cities
that
we
assembled
between
charlotte
austin,
minneapolis,
nashville
and
denver,
and
we
could
add
five
or
ten
more
to
that
list.
This
is
just
a
subset,
we're
the
longest
right,
we're
we're
trending
towards
longer
commute
times
rather
than
plateauing
or
shorter
commute
times.
It's
just
a
piece
of
information.
It
doesn't
mean
that
we're
in
dire
straits,
but
it
definitely
is
one
piece
of
information.
That's
worth
contemplating.
K
You
know
the
other
thing
that
I
noticed
in
that
same
box
really
was
that
worse
about
37
of
us
are
spending
more
than
30
minutes
a
day
in
our
commute,
and
I
think
that
you
know
for
the
land
use
planners
in
the
room.
That's
largely
representative
of
some
of
the
spreading
out
that
has
occurred
historically,
obviously,
the
farther
away
we
have
to
travel
to
and
from
the
more
time
we're
going
to
spend
likely
on
that
journey
and
you'll
see
a
number
here
about
the
average
household
cost.
K
When
it
comes
to
transportation,
there's
been
some
fantastic
work.
That's
been
done
by
cdot
revolving
around
a
vision,
zero
effort,
an
initiative
to
bring
fatalities
down
to
zero,
because
one
death
is
unacceptable.
K
Now,
why
is
that
important?
It?
It
actually
isn't
an
opportunity,
because
if
you
know
that
only
10
percent
of
your
streets
are
so
dangerous
that
these
are
the
places
where
all
of
our
fatalities
are
occurring.
It
allows
you
to
bring
focus
potentially
to
a
program
or
to
your
capital.
Investments
such
that
they
align
with
that
mission
to
improve
safety
for
all
it'd,
be
much
more
difficult.
For
example,
if
it
was
50
of
our
streets,
but
it's
only
10.,
and
so
we've
got
an
opportunity
to
do
something,
but.
K
And
so
when
we
talk
about
commuting
you'll
see
that
our
sov,
the
single
occupant
vehicle,
that's
those
of
us
choosing
to
drive
alone,
is
about
76.6,
that's
fairly
precise.
Obviously
we
start
using
decimals
here,
but
you
can
see
the
breakdown
of
the
remainder
of
those
trips,
and
here
again
I
don't
think
there's
anything
to
be
learned.
K
We
have
to
start
beginning
to
look
at
at
modeshare
as
a
place
with
which
we
might
want
to
pay
some
attention
as
we
contemplate
strategies
in
the
future.
Let's
take
a
look
at
the
next
slide.
Okay,
just
one
more
slide
of
observations
here
and
really.
This
has
to
to
deal
primarily
with
equity
and
access
to
opportunity.
K
K
It's
a
place
with
which
is
experiencing
disproportionately
a
lot
of
challenges
with
respect
to
things
like
housing,
cost
travel,
time
and
access
to
opportunity,
and
so,
for
those
reasons,
it's
important
for
us
to
continue
to
examine
that
data
with
a
close
lens.
But
when
you
look
at
things
like
cost
burden,
I
want
to
be
very
clear
about
how
we
might
define
that
your
cost
burden
actually
has
a
fairly
technical
definition.
K
It's
not
just
a
characteristic
or
or
an
adjective,
it's
effectively
being
defined
as
those
communities
that
are
spending
more
than
35
percent
of
their
household
income
on
housing,
and
so
just
a
very
quick
analysis
concluded
that
households
in
the
ark
that
our
cost
burden
are
23.6
percent
when
considering
housing.
But
when
we
look
outside
the
arc,
it
drops
all
the
way
to
4.5.
K
K
I've
done
a
lot
of
work
in
austin
and
in
nashville
and
even
in
denver,
and
I
always
kind
of
assumed
that
our
cost
of
living
was
fairly
on
par
with
those
places,
and
it's
easy
to
surmise
that
if
you're
only
looking
at
one
one
indicator,
whether
that's
housing
or
transportation.
But
when
you
put
those
two
together
all
of
a
sudden
we're
starting
to
see
some
things
that
draw
some
concern
about
our
ability
to
continue
to
be
competitive
and
vibrant.
K
And
so
that's
why
planners
are
continuing
to
talk
about
these.
These
these
statistics
in
ways
that
are
bringing
new
meaning
to
how
we
think
about
transportation
and
the
influence
of
transportation
on
our
community
well-being,
not
just
in
one
geography
but
the
overall
sustainable
health
of
our
city,
and
so
with
that
there's
just
a
little
bit
of
information
that
I
think
maybe
allow
some
perspective
about.
Why
we
assembled
the
kind
of
information
that
we
did.
K
I
know
that
was
a
really
quick
overview,
but
I'm
hoping
with
that
that
maybe
we'd
go
to
the
next
slide
and
and
just
get
to
the
homework
assignment,
because
what
I
think
about
the
information
is
really
not
as
important
as
what
you
all
think
about
it,
and
so
we
gave
you
a
really
simple
assignment
compared
to
past
meetings,
where
I
know
it
took
hours
to
do.
But
this
one
was
really
simply.
K
What
did
you
see
in
the
data
so
that
first
question
what
surprised
you
most
about
the
state
of
mobility
in
charlotte
and
then
a
follow-up
for
those
of
you.
Who've
already
had
some
opportunities
to
read
the
last
section,
where
there's
a
strong
comparison
between
peer
communities,
we're
curious
about
what
you
read
into
that
comparison
as
well
and
with
that
mayor
I'll
turn
things
back
over
to
you.
L
I
had
some
questions
as
I
looked
at
the
different
comparisons
on
one
of
the
things
that
really
jumped
out
at
me
was
the
connectivity
index,
which
is
an
issue
near
and
dear
to
me.
Now
this
is
street
connectivity.
L
The
critical
needs
access
map
seemed
to
be
pretty
good
for
people
in
the
ark,
and
all
of
that
I
think
sort
of
reflects
back
on
when
the
city
of
charlotte
grew
and
in
what
form
it
grew
as
it
grew
sort
of
within
the
route.
Eight
route.
Four
excuse
me
area
that
was
sort
of
pre-full
workforce
with
women
pre-suburbia,
and
it
sort
of
brings
me
to
a
conclusion
on
this.
That
reinforcing
connectivity
may
yield
better
access
and
better
use
of
different
modes
as
much
as
actually
adding
more
money
to
just
those
modes.
C
Okay,
interesting,
very
interesting.
Okay,
anybody
want
to
comment
on
bill's
comment.
C
G
Eric
yes
mayor,
I
guess
one
of
the
things
that
really
caught
me.
Besides,
you
know.
Some
of
the
things
we
already
covered
was
the
population
growth
for
charlotte,
and
it
got
me
thinking.
You
know
we
have
the
the
peer
cities
that
are
currently
at
our
levels
and
where
we
sit
today,
but
then
I
was
thinking
you
know
since
2000
to
2020.
G
We
grew
about
over
50.
So
if
we
continue
even
at
that
rate
and
we
double
our
population
by
2040,
what
will
we
look
like?
And
we
should
be
at
least
looking
at
what
cities
who
are
at
that
range
today
and
preparing
for
that
for
our
future
as
well,
just
to
see
where,
where
they,
what
with
their
spending,
what
have
they
done
with
transportation?
What
have
they
done
with
housing?
G
And
you
know
and
take
a
look
at
that-
I
just
you
know
looked
at
houston
is
one
of
them
they're
at
2.3
million
today
and
chicago
2.6.
Were
you
know
and
they're?
That's
the
number
four
and
three
I
think
cities
in
the
country
population.
G
So
that's
what
we're
looking
at
in
20
years,
getting
up
to
that
level
of
population
that
should
all
scare
all
of
us
right
now
looking
at
if
we're
we're
that
growth
and
where
we're
going,
and
we
really
need
desperately
need
to
look
at,
you
know
best
practices
for
those
cities,
not
just
the
peer
cities
but
where
we're
going
in
the
future
and
what
they've
done
with
their
investments
and
planning.
So
that
was
just
one
thing
that
got
me
thinking
by
looking
at
at
some
of
the
numbers
and
the
report.
G
Nothing
else
really
shocked
me
too
much.
I
you
know
see
charlotte
either
at
the
bottom
of
where
we
need
to
be
with
the
pair
cities
or
winning
in
the
in
the
wrong
direction
and
having
the
highest
level
of
you
know,
commute
time
or
you
know
some
other
metrics,
you
know,
but
last
and
walk
score
and
bicycle
score
were
second
to
last
in,
and
you
know,
I
think,
looking
at
other
cities
that
have
improved
their
modeshare
even
in
in
our
peer
city
of
minneapolis.
G
If
you
look
at
what
their
percent
of
walking
is,
that
looks
to
be
one
of
a
pretty
large
percentage,
and
I
also
know
vancouver
british
columbia
their
the
way
they
surpassed
their
goal
in
modeshare.
Was
you
know
more
than
doubling
the
the
percent
of
the
population
walking?
So
I
think
that
might
be
a
key
take
away
from
this
by
looking
at
the
numbers
and
and
what
we
can
improve
upon.
E
One
of
the
things
this
is
ken
may
one
of
the
things
I
looked
at
when
I
was
looking
at
the
report
was
what
maybe
was
not
in
it
versus
what
was,
and
you
know
that
is
when
compared
to
the
pure
cities,
what
do
they
pay
on
a
per
capita
basis
for
transportation?
E
We
have
a
two
and
a
half
billion
dollar
plus
budget
in
charlotte
and
about
200
million
of
it
goes
to
transportation,
so
less
than
10
percent
and
there's
some
money
thrown
in
there
for
some
other
special
transportation
needs
also,
but
what
what
kind
of
money
is
spent
by
those
cities
where
they
were
able
to
get
to
the
levels
they
were
and
we're
not-
and
you
know,
what's
their
tax
base
compared
to
ours?
Did
they
have
to
have
special?
E
You
know
tax
increases
to
do
it.
You
know
how
did
they
get
there
and
what
will
we
have
to
do
to
get
there?
So
I
guess
those
were
questions
that
popped
up
to
me
as
I
reviewed
it
that
were
not
answered
in
the
in
the.
C
K
Quick,
mr
may
that's
a
astute
observation.
This
is
simply
a
snapshot
of
characteristics
of
charlotte
and
then
comparing
those
characteristics
to
to
you
know
what
arguably,
is
five
good
peer
cities.
I
think
we
could
all
come
up
with
five
additional,
not
primarily
a
study,
but
more
just
a
reflection
of
information
foundationally
to
help
us
with
supporting
conversations.
K
And
but
yet
it's
still
an
interesting
piece
of
information,
and
one
of
the
things
that
we
committed
to
do
was
during
the
the
funding
and
finance
portion
of
our
conversations
was
to
maybe
bring
a
little
bit
more
information
about
how
some
other
peer
cities
are
addressing
their
shortfalls.
Essentially
because
to
your
point,
this
is
great,
but
at
the
same
time
we
have
to
have
a
fiscally
responsible
approach
to
how
we
support
whatever
strategy
is
put
forward.
So
I
appreciate
the
observation.
D
Mr
mayor,
this
is
ernie
regal
one
question
I
had
and
I
may
have
missed
it,
but
as
I
went
through
that
there
wasn't
much
mention
of
the
latino
or
hispanic
community
in
charlotte,
and
I
know
we
talked
about
it
a
little
while
ago
in
terms
of
that
earlier
survey,
I'm
just
curious
if
there's
something
in
there
about
it
and
whether
the
the
needs
or
the
desires
of
that
community
are
recognized
or
shown
in
this.
K
D
K
Hispanic
or
even
spanish,
speaking
or
an
ethnicity,
representing
latin
culture,
and
and
so
that
that
information
is
not
omitted,
it
wasn't
showcased
in
in
this
diagram.
I
think
that's
a
great
observation.
It
doesn't
change
the
results
of
the
data
just
to
be
clear,
but
I
appreciate
you.
K
Think
I
feel
like
that's
something
that
should
be
added
to
that
that
chart,
because
it
is
significant
to
the
mayor's
point,
the
the
arc.
The
data
that's
represented
in
there
is
inclusive
of
of
all
diversity
and
and-
and
so
it's
it's
pretty
clear-
that
geography
being
well
defined
by
that.
I,
I
think,
but
more
important
to
your
point-
is
that
it's
an
important
voice,
an
important
lens
not
to
be
lost
on
the
process
and
just
a
reminder
about
what
ty
mentioned
earlier.
K
I
think
the
one
challenge
with
public
engagement
is
that
one
method
does
not
fit
all
simply
stated.
If
you
put
a
survey
out
there,
it
it's
not
de
facto,
going
to
reflect
the
demographic
spectrum
of
those
in
the
community,
and
so
you
have
to
be
very
intentional
either
about
taking
it
to
certain
individuals
or
you
need
to
be
willing
to
identify
that.
K
Maybe
there's
a
better
way
to
engage
certain
members
of
of
the
community,
and
so
one
of
the
things
that
is
happening-
and
I
know
we've
talked
about
a
few
times
thus
far-
is
that
we're
not
going
to
rely
solely
on
a
survey
or
a
poll
we're
going
to
actually
reach
out
and
create
some
focus
groups
that
represent
specific
demographic
cohorts,
different
vulnerable
populations
and
or
different
interests
that
primarily
are
captured
in
in
the
arc
in
particular,
because
that's
where
we
tend
to
see
the
lowest
public
participation
rates
as
well,
and
so
we're
trying
to
do
our
best
to
canvas
within
the
time
frame
and
the
resources
available
to
get
to
those
voices,
even
if
it's
representative,
so
I'm
anxious
to
report
back
results
of
that
when
that
work
is
complete
in
november.
K
I
think
we
should
ask
ourselves
the
question:
how
good
a
job
do
we
do
and
see
what
we
can
build
as
we
move
forward
through
the
smp
process.
N
C
N
Okay,
very
good
good
evening.
Everyone
first
of
all,
I
just
wanted
to
thank
the
team
for
a
really
fantastic
and
and
easy
to
read
report.
It's
it's
rich
with
information
and
the
the
planner
in
me
is
kind
of
geeking
out
with
all
that's
in
here.
I
wanted
to
know
if
the
team
could
comment
a
little
bit
on
the
emerging
trends
section
of
the
report,
which
I
found
really
interesting.
N
But
it
seems
to
me
that
there
are
some
things
in
the
emerging
trends
that
can
be
potential
supports
to
the
direction
that
we're
going
in
that
are
around
policy
change
and
may
not
be
capital
intensive.
So
I
wondered
if
you
can
just
talk
a
little
bit
about
why
you
included
this
section
and
what
we
might
want
to
do
with
some
of
these
interesting
ideas
in
this
section.
K
Thanks
geraldine,
you
nailed
it
right.
Capital
projects
are
one
thing,
but
policy
is
really
what
drives,
how
we
spend
our
our
dollars
and
and
how
we
choose
to
govern
and
make
choices
about
trade-offs
and
so
you'll
be
pleased
to
know
that
this
works
not
being
done
in
a
vacuum.
K
An
extension
of
the
comprehensive
plan,
as
we've
talked
about
earlier,
is
this
idea
of
taking
a
charlotte
strategic
mobility
plan
and
kind
of
leading
with
the
priorities
and
values
from
the
comprehensive
plan,
using
that
as
the
north
star,
there
was
a
policy
diagnostic
that
was
done
as
a
part
of
the
comprehensive
plan,
work
that
is
being
shared
with
the
strategic
mobility
planning
effort,
so
we'll
be
receiving
that,
and
I
think
to
your
point,
we
wouldn't
want
to
just
suggest
that
we,
you
know,
collect
more
money
and
spend
more
money.
K
It
should
be
more
about
what
can
we
do
to
align
our
policy
with
our
aspirational
goals
so
that
we
do
achieve
desired
outcomes
sooner
rather
than
later,
and
so
I
would
be
expecting
a
policy
element
to
be
finalized.
It's
already
begun,
but
to
become
finalized
during
the
remainder
of
this
phase.
Two
that
we
oftentimes
talk
about
the
strategic
mobility
plan
that
follows
the
task
force
work.
J
A
Joe,
yes,
the
the
I
forget
who
mentioned
what
was
going
on
in
the
latinx
community
and
whether
or
not
the
other
non-white
ethnic
groups
and
non-african-american
ethnic
groups
are
being
reached
out
to,
and
that's
why
I
asked
the
question:
was
it
being
sent
out
in
other
languages?
A
C
C
I
made
a
comment
to
the
committee,
the
other
day
to
the
staff
the
other
day
that
we
are
going
to
have
to
test
this
plan,
whatever
it
ultimately
becomes
in
every
specific
area
of
the
city
that
we
can
to
see
whether
it
meets
those
transformational
goals
that
we've
talked
about
in
the
beginning-
and
I
know
we've
been-
I
mean
I'm
looking
at
maps
and
eventually
we're
going
to
have
some
maps
that
will
focus
on
specific
areas
and
we
will
test
the
goals.
C
But
something
that
crossed
my
mind
some
years
ago
when
we
instituted
the
blue
line
in
the
initial
blue
line
from
out
to
the
south
southern
section
of
the
city.
C
It
would
have
been
very
interesting
for
all
of
us
to
see
to
have
seen
what
what
percentage
of
people
used
the
automobiles
to
get
to
work
back
then,
and
now
that
the
system
has
been
in
operation
for
x
amount
of
years,
how
mobility
needs
has
changed
whether
we
had
mode
shifts
a
significant
or
appreciable
amount
that
we
could
measure
what
the
impact
of
that
that
blue
line
was.
C
We
certainly
know
that
in
terms
of
land
use
and
what
we've
seen
happen
with
regard
to
development,
a
large
part
of
that
vision
has
come
true.
But
beyond
that
we
don't
know
really
what
occurred
as
a
result
of
a
significant
investment
made.
C
So
that's
something
I'm
not
sure
we
can
study
between
now
and
the
end
of
this
task
force
deliberations,
but
it
does
tell
me
it
would
tell
it
would
send
a
message
as
to
how
well
these
arteries
these
greenways
these
bikeways,
how
well
they're
doing
and
serving
the
specific
community
that
we
worked
on
initially,
and
it
may
give
us
some
projection
as
to
what
they.
This
thing
might
look
like
going
forward.
C
C
O
Samuel
good
evening,
mr
mir,
good
evening,
mr
vols,
one
of
the
questions
that
you
asked
for
the
homework
was
what
kind
of
stood
out.
What
surprised
me
about
charlotte,
I
too
wondered
given
the
amount
of
development
that
has
happened
along
the
blue
line,
why
the
percentage
of
citizens
that
actually
use
public
transit
is
just
over
three
percent.
O
That
was
surprising
to
me,
and
I
too
wonder
about
the
mode
shift
that
may
have
happened
there
as
a
development
has
come
along.
Secondly,
in
getting
closer
to
the
end
of
the
present,
the
slideshow
that
we
were
given
to
review
prior
to
this
meeting
of
note
was
that
nashville,
probably
is
of
of
our
peer
cities
that
were
listed
in
the
report.
O
P
Mayor
gant,
this
is
janet
lavar
good
evening,
hello,
mary
lyles.
My
question
is
more
for
steven.
I
think
you
know
I
made
from
portland
and
I
think
our
housing
and
transportation
costs
from
the
regional
standpoint
was
also
pretty
high,
but
we
knew
that
the
problem
there
was
around
housing
more
than
it
was
around
transportation.
P
So
is
there
an
ideal,
I
think
when
it
comes
to
the
cost
and
the
the
division
of
how
much
income
should
be
split,
that
that
we
should
be
striving
for,
or
is
that
kind
of
a
false
measure
to
to
look
to.
K
K
Obviously
the
higher
your
your
absorption
of
housing,
income
and
transportation
costs
will
be
as
an
absolute
percentage
of
your
household
income
and
so
disproportionately
it's
always
going
to
be
higher.
It's
hard
to
look
at
it
on
aggregate
and-
and
I
know
that
in
many
communities
there
is
this
notion
that
well
housing
clearly
is
our
biggest
struggle,
primarily
because
we
see
the
shortage.
K
K
For
example,
people
are
spending
more
on
schools
because
in
many
cases,
they've
gone
the
private
school
route,
and
so
it's
a
totality
of
your
household
income
that
needs
to
be
contemplated
really
for
the
purposes
of
our
conversation
with
the
task
force,
we
want
to
try
to
isolate
the
influence
of
transportation
and
understand
the
elasticity
that
it
has
on
the
other
measures
that
are
important
to
us,
and
I
think
it's
a
really
interesting
observation.
That's
you
know,
folks
are
picking
up
that.
K
We've
spent
a
lot
of
money
on
on
other
travel
modes
transit
in
particular,
and
yet
we
don't
have
that
huge
increment
of
modeshare
occurring
in
transit.
I
would
argue
that
we're
actually
seeing
increases
if
you
look
over
time
when
we
added
that
we
saw
increases
but
in
isolation,
isolation
once
again,
we're
missing
the
other
influences
things
like
the
cost
of
parking,
the
amount
of
congestion.
K
You
experience
whether
or
not
your
region's
still
continuing
to
invest
in
making
it
easier
for
cars
where
people
live,
our
land
use
all
those
things
you
all
have
been
exposed
to,
and
many
of
you
have
participated
in
those
efforts
in
this
community,
but
to
look
at
any
of
this
information
in
isolation.
I
just
caution
us
all,
because
it
is
complicated
and
yet
it's
understandable.
K
There
is
no
quid
pro
quo
where,
if
we
just
guarantee
that,
if
we
invest
here
that
will
have
this
outcome,
we
have
to
create
conditions
where
there
is
an
opportunity
and
therefore
the
propensity
for
it
occurring
is
much
higher,
and
that
gets
back
to
what
geraldine
even
said,
because
having
this
strategy
is
one
thing
we
have
to
couple
it
with
policy
as
well.
I
think
a
big
victory
for
many
regions
is
simply
to
change
the
way
we're
doing
business
in
some
respects,
sometimes
just
repeating
those
processes
of
the
past
and
hoping
for
a
different
outcome.
K
You
remember
anik
boude
from
austin.
She
cautioned
us
about
that
and
said
that
it
wasn't
until
they
woke
up
and
decided
they
wanted
a
different
outcome
that
required
them
to
do
different
things,
and
so
I'm
sorry,
I
didn't
give
you
a
shorter
answer,
a
more
direct
answer,
but
I
think
you
comprehend
all
those
facets.
It's.
C
Q
I
Q
Just
very
quickly,
I
I
echo
what
folks
have
said
about
the
richness
of
the
data
we
were
afforded
the
opportunity
to
to
look
at,
and
I
kind
of
go
back
to
some
some
conversations
we've
had
in
the
small
group
meetings
about
equity
and
as
we
look
at
the
arc
and
the
fact
that
the
percentage
of
people's
income
that
is
spent
on
transportation
in
our
most
vulnerable
areas
of
the
city
is
a
huge
concern
and
I'm
pretty
sure
that
at
some
point,
taxes
and
the
tax
base
is
going
to
have
some
influence
over
what
the
outcome
of
this
transportation
transformation
might
be.
Q
I
don't
know
if
this
is
a
question
or
just
more
observation:
how?
How
do
we
build
into
our
discussion?
Our
conversation,
the
fact
that
the
folks
who
are
going
to
need
us
to
be
looking
after
them
the
most
are
least
able
to
contribute
to
the
overall
process
of
of
this
transformational
transportation
network.
I
mean
it
to
me,
it's
it's.
I
can't
I
can't
move
forward
because
I'm
concerned
so
much
about
that
huge
population
of
people
that
to
pedro's
point
you
know,
could
be
latinx.
Q
Certainly
they're
brown
people
they're
african-american
people
and
we've
just
got
to
be
thinking
about
that
because
it's
such
a
real
element
of
this
work.
C
That's
an
excellent
point
tammy.
I
I
think
that
last
slide
shown
by
stephen
that
talks
about
equity
and
access
to
opportunity
is
very,
very
sobering
from
the
standpoint
that
and
when
you
tie
that
into
economic
mobility.
C
If
people
can
move
to
jobs,
to
education,
to
bettering
themselves
in
a
city
and
they
can
move
through
it
seamlessly
and
at
that
minimal
cost,
then
we
can
achieve
economic
mobility,
which
is
something
charlotte's
been
focused
on
and
we
can
have
a
far
higher
quality
of
life.
If
we
in
fact
enact
all
those
moods
so
that
when
you
ask
the
question,
what
jumped
out
of
the
mobility
the
the
state
of
mobility,
it's
this
business
of
equity
and
access
to
opportunity,
which
I
think
you
focused
on
that
that
really
makes
some
sense.
C
Let's
move
on
it's
a
good
discussion,
very
good
discussion.
C
Yes,
our
technical
team
has
been
hard
at
work.
Sifting
through
all
the
mobility
needs
identified
through
the
various
plans
we
discussed.
I
think
you
discussed
a
lot
of
that
in
the
meeting
that
I
missed,
but
they've
been
working
on
it
with
the
goal
of
presenting
a
subset
of
potential
project
ideas,
the
rise
to
the
level
of
transformational.
C
F
So
before
scott
does
that
I
want
you
to
see
that
the
work
has
been
done.
This
is
not
a
joke.
This
is
serious
business
here,
so
these
are
scott's
twin
daughters
and
susanna
and
clara
they
already
developed
this
network
and
they
even
have
the
money
to
pay
for
it.
I
I
really
think
our
job
here
is
done.
Frankly
speaking,
I
I
wanted
to
share.
C
A
F
Ready
to
pay
for
it,
so
scott
has
done
a
good
job
raising
them.
So
what's
your
score.
I
Thank
you,
ty
transportation
planners
in
training.
I
guess
so
we're
excited
tonight
to
start
talking
with
you
all
in
a
little
bit
more
specifics
about
this
idea
of
the
transformational
mobility
network.
I
We
have
taken
all
that
you
have
communicated
to
us
to
heart
and
have
used
that
as
a
lens
to
guide
some
of
this
work
that
you
will
see
over
this
next
series
of
slides.
I
I
This
is
roughly
what
you
would
get
if
you
just
stapled
all
those
existing
plans
together,
and
we
understand
that
is
not
the
intent
of
the
transformational
mobility
network.
If
it
was,
we
wouldn't
really
need
a
task
force
to
guide
that
work.
So
what
you
all
are
helping
us
to
do
is
identify
the
subset
of
these
projects.
As
as
mayor
gant
mentioned,
the
subset
of
these
projects
that
rise
to
a
level
of
transformational.
I
And
so
what
we
have
done
is
we've
already
talked
with
you
about
major
categories
of
potential
investment.
We
we
called
those
transformational
mobility
opportunities
and-
and
we
have
done
some
work
to
filter
that
universal
potential
projects
according
to
the
priorities
and
aspirations
that
you
all
have
been
describing
in
our
time
together,
as
well
as
the
ongoing
community
input
that
we've
heard
about
and
the
goals
of
the
2040
comprehensive
plan.
I
And,
ultimately,
we
need
to
deliver
some
recommendations
to
mayor
lyles
for
a
transformational
mobility
network
that
is
aligned
with
recommended
funding
and
financing
options.
So
before
we
want
to
launch
into
this,
we
want
to
emphasize
that
we
are.
We
are
here
in
this
process.
I
I
I
also
want
to
reassure
and
clarify
that
this
is
not
a
final
draft
you
are
about
to
see.
This
is
simply
a
first
draft
for
comment
and
reaction.
It
is
also
not
intended
to
indicate
specific
project
details.
A
lot
of
this
is
based
on
planning
work
in
progress,
and
so
the
specifics
of
individual
project
alignments
the
scope,
the
limits,
those
things
will
change.
I
I'm
going
to
come
back
to
this
slide
at
the
end
of
this
sequence,
because
this
is
where
we
really
want
to
get
some
feedback
and
reaction
from
you
all.
We
had
to
apply
some
selection
criteria
and
an
approach
to
picking
the
different
types
of
projects
and
programs
within
each
of
the
six
major
categories.
I
I
We've
heard
pretty
clearly
from
you
all
that
prioritizing
light
rail
is
important,
that
creating
more
high
capacity,
rapid
transit
corridors
is
important
and
that
using
rapid
transit
to
connect
employers
to
areas
of
population
and
spur
economic
development
is
something
that
is
a
focus.
So
again,
this
one
is
probably
the
most
easy,
the
easiest
to
describe
of
the
the
six
major
categories.
I
also
want
to
point
out
on
the
left.
The
bottom
left
of
these
slides
you'll
see
the
existing
plans
that
inform
each
of
the
the
projects
and
programs
that
we've
suggested.
I
This
is
very
much
based
on
work
in
progress
right
now,
in
coordination
with
cats,
they
have
a
bus,
priority,
study
underway,
and
so
the
selection
criteria
really
relies
on
information
from
cats
in
terms
of
the
key
corridors
that
they
are
studying.
I
The
overall
vision
here
is
to
provide
fast
and
frequent
bus
service
throughout
the
city
and
change,
perceptions
and
experiences
about
what
riding
a
bus
is
and
can
be.
In
charlotte,
we've
called
out
just
a
few
key
projects
and
potential
corridors
that
are
a
part
of
this
in
different
parts
of
the
city.
Central
avenue,
south
tryon
street
freedom
drive
statesville
road
overall
there's
about
140
miles
of
new
bus
priority
corridors
that
are
represented
on
this
map.
These
could
look
a
lot
different
in
different
contexts.
In
some
cases,
it
could
be
bus
only
lanes.
I
I
The
this
greenway
network,
across
the
county
and
beyond,
we've
been
coordinating
with
staff
from
mecklenburg
county
greenways
on
the
types
of
projects
that
are
highest
priority
to
them.
They
are
also
informed
by
their
greenway
and
trails
advisory
council
on
those
types
of
things,
and
so
we've
taken
that
under
advisement.
I
We
have
tried
here
to
identify
key
projects
and
programs
that
leverage
existing
greenways
and
also
account
for
a
lack
of
east-west
connectivity
within
our
greenway
network.
Our
creeks
and
streams
run
north
to
south,
which
mean
most
of
our
greenways
do
the
same
and
so
you'll
see
here.
We've
got
some
big
ideas
around
east-west
greenways,
like
the
cross
charlotte
trail,
2
idea,
and
this
north
charlotte
arc,
which
is
a
long
creek
to
reedy
creek
corridor
running
along
this
northern
arc
of
the
city.
I
The
big
idea
here
is
really
pretty
simple.
We
over
the
years
have
installed
opportunistically
bike
facilities
throughout
the
city,
and
the
aspiration
here
is
to
try
to
stitch
that
together
in
a
more
meaningful
way,
to
create
really
safe
and
comfortable
commuting
corridors
connecting
residents
to
employment,
centers
and
providing
a
more
affordable
transportation
option.
I
So
you'll
see
in
this
map,
the
the
dotted
lines
are
proposed,
bikeways
that
stitch
together,
what
are
otherwise
complete
networks
that
are
on
the
ground
today.
Some
key
project
and
program
ideas
within
this
category.
The
silver
line
rail
trail
is
a
big
part
of
this
running
east
to
west.
I
What
you'll
see
on
this
map
is
a
a
graphic
representation
of
an
idea
that
we
would
go
all
in
on
this
idea
of
first
last
file
connectivity,
the
orange
buffer
is
a
buffer
around
our
transit
greenway
corridors
and
also
around
our
activity
centers,
and
so
we
have
heard
from
you
all
through
our
conversations
together
that
stitching
together
our
pedestrian
network,
especially
to
be
able
to
support
folks
who
are
walking
to
transit
to
greenways
into
activity.
Centers
should
be
a
focus
of
our
work
together.
I
The
suggestion
here
is
that
we
prioritize
all
of
our
sidewalk
and
pedestrian
safety
investment
to
focus
on
that
issue.
You'll
also
see
proposed
mobility
hubs,
which
would
occur
at
the
intersection
of
other
parts
of
our
mobility
network,
for
instance,
where
a
rapid
transit
and
a
greenway
corridor
across
each
other.
We
know
that
these
are
critical
exchange
points
within
our
network
and
and
supporting
those
with
greater
investment
is
also
suggested
as
an
area
of
focus
on
this
slide.
I
Which
brings
us
to
our
final
category
with
our
investment
in
the
roadway
network.
We
want
to
manage
congestion
and
extend
the
capacity
and
connectivity
of
our
roads
and
rights-of-way
on
this
page.
You'll
you'll
see
new
multimodal
transportation
options,
you'll
see
areas
of
congestion
where
we
know
we
may
need
some
focused
investment
to
try
to
help
manage
that
issue.
I
We've
also
identified
some
priority
roadways
and
vision.
Zero
projects,
as
I
mentioned,
and
priority
intersections,
that
you
can
see
on
the
map
those
are
identified
as
priorities
both
because
of
safety
issues
and
also
congestion
issues
and
then
there's
more
of
a
programmatic
thing
which
isn't
necessarily
represented
on
the
map.
And
that
is
that,
in
addition
to
the
larger
new
streets,
we
we
know
that
we
need
more
connectivity
in
other
parts
of
town
and
then
a
lot
of
that
relies
on
partnerships
with
ongoing
development.
I
I
So
I
want
to
summarize
and
conclude
in
this
way
it's
it's
going
to
be
really
difficult
and
I
imagine
a
little
bit
frustrating
for
you
all,
given
our
virtual
format
to
try
to
make
heads
and
tails
of
the
maps
that
we
just
went
through.
I
I
think
what
we
want
to
try
to
do
is
reinforce
these
big
ideas
and
get
some
feedback
from
you
all
around
each
of
these
categories.
I
The
big
ideas
and
the
selection
criteria
that
we've
cleaned
from
our
conversation
so
just
very
quickly
for
the
rapid
transit
corridors,
the
big
idea
there
is
again
to
complete
the
2030
system
plan
for
the
bus
priority
system,
it's
to
reimagine.
What
fast
frequent,
reliable
bus
service
and
experience
could
look
like
throughout
our
city
for
the
greenway
network.
It's
to
install
these
regional
pet
bike,
super
highways
that
connect
throughout
the
county
and
to
the
carolina
for
a
trail
beyond
for
the
pedestrian
network.
It's
it's!
The
big
idea
is
going
all
in
on
that.
I
First
last
mile
connectivity
for
the
bicycle
network,
it's
to
stitch
together,
really
meaningful,
safe
and
comfortable
commuting
corridors
throughout
our
city
and
then
for
the
roadway
network.
It's
to
focus
on
stitching
together,
more
connectivity
as
a
way
to
help
provide
more
transportation
choices
and
mitigate
congestion.
I
So
mayor
and
tywell
with
that
I'd
like
to
open
it
back
up
for
conversation
in
reaction,
I'm
going
to
leave
this
slide
on
the
screen
for
a
little
while,
so
the
task
force
members
can
have
this
at
their
fingertips.
C
G
Thank
you
mayor.
I
I
took
screenshots
of
all
of
that,
so
I
was
able
to
go
back
and
look
at
it.
So
that's
what
I
was
cheated
a
little
bit,
but
I'm
I'm
impressed
with,
I
would
say
five
out
of
the
six
categories
in
terms
of
seeing
you
know
new
plans
bringing
focus
to
new
areas.
G
I
know
there's
no
way
that
further,
you
know
beyond
the
2030
plan
could
be
developed
in
the
time
that
we
have,
but
maybe
the
idea
of
looking
at
that
some
of
this
investment
will
go
towards
looking
beyond
that
2030
plan
since
we're
or
we're
only
10
years
away
from
that
to
begin
with-
and
you
know
that
was
developed
such
a
long
time
ago-
and
the
only
thing
I
worry
about
is
you
know
is
that
is
that
the
right
plan
does
it
need
to
be
corrected?
Looked
at?
G
For
you
know
mode
share
it's
going
to
move
along
with
the
bus
priority
system
move
the
most
people
the
most
efficiently,
and
that's
the
only
thing
that
I
see
on
here
that
you
know
I
just
would
like
I
I
if
I
had
the
magic
wand,
we
could
just
kind
of
come
up
with
the
2050
plan
and
have
it
here
in
the
slides,
but
I
think
looking
at
something
to
focus
moving
forward
to
be
put
kind
of
in
writing.
G
Here
is
a
suggestion
that
you
know
we
complete
that
obviously
maybe
reevaluate
it
and
then
add
on
to
it,
build
something
in
there
that
focuses
in
the
future
a
little
bit
more
to
make
sure
we
accomplish
what
this
task
force
mission
yeah
is
is
luke
trying
to
you
know
hoping
to
to.
C
Q
C
C
G
G
I
think
they
were
all
kind
of
a
are
they
being
updated
or
they
just
a
couple
years
old,
so
they
all
were
pretty
recent
and
a
lot
of
things
have
changed
since
that
original
2030
plan
was,
you
know,
developed
and
came
up
with,
and
I
think
that's
you
know
we're
reflected
in
some
of
the
stephen's
draft
and
why
that
transit
ridership
was
low
too.
It's
not
robust
enough.
It's
not
getting
folks
where
they
need
to
be.
G
It's
not
convenient
enough
to
get
to
where,
where
you
know
where
they
need
it
to
be,
so
I
think
you
know
just
making
sure
that
we're
fully
like
you
know
maximizing
that
investment
to
achieve
you
know
the
goals
of
the
task
force.
E
Thank
you
mayor.
I
was
actually
going
to
direct
this
at
mayor
lyles
and
I
think
she
has
dropped
off
the
call.
But
as
I
look
at
it-
and
I
agree
with
everything
eric
just
said-
I
mean
we
have
to
take
a
long-term
look.
That's
the
whole
purpose
of
this,
but
then
I
also
look
at
you
know
what
are
the
quick
low-hanging
fruit,
short-term
solutions
that
we
that
we
can
make,
and
then
I
look
at
number
six.
You
know
the
roadway
and
77.
E
I
think
it
was
of
our
you
know.
Commuters
are
single
occupancy
vehicles
and
we
have
these
bottleneck.
You
know,
thoroughfares,
you
know
park
road,
providence,
road,
now,
community
house,
in
the
south,
I'm
not
as
familiar
with
the
ones
in
the
north,
and
one
of
the
major
problems
I
see
is
that
the
zoning
as
I
watch
city
council
meetings
every
week,
the
number
of
multi-family
zonings
going
up
along
those
corridors
continues
to
increase
at
exponential
levels,
and
you
know
there's
always
a
big
argument.
At
the
end
of
the
day,
they
almost
all
get
approved.
E
Valentine,
of
course,
has
just
been
approved
for
for
tons
new
and
well.
I
think
we're
we're
continuing
to
exacerbate
the
problem
among
our
most
crowded
roadway
areas,
right
now
through
zoning,
which
is
nothing
that
this
committee
can
solve.
It's
really
a
you
know,
a
city
council
issue
because
that's
who
approves
the
zoning,
but
I
see
us
continue
to
to
grow
in
areas
where
I
don't
see
it
a
possibility
to
expand
the
streets.
So,
yes,
we
need
a
long-range
plan
to
you
know
cut
down
the
traffic
there.
E
C
E
E
O
Thank
you
mayor.
I
just
wanted
to
respond
to.
I
think
eric
made
a
comment
about
the
2030
cats
plan
and
how
frequently
it
might
be
updated.
If
I'm
not
mistaken,
I
think
the
most
recent
update
was
in
early
2019.
O
I
remember
seeing
a
presentation
about
it
that
came
to
the
planning
commission
and
then
clarifying
a
point
of
clarification
on
the
roadway
network
slide.
There
was
some
information
on
there
about
the
priority
intersections
and
I
just
wondered
if
that
particular
slide,
were
there
any
specific
exclusions
like?
Was
there
a
particular
focus
to
city,
maintain
roads
versus
state,
maintained,
roads,
etc?
Scott,
that
might
be
a
question
for
you.
I
Yeah,
that's
that's
a
really
good
question
and
I
can
try
to
go
back
a
couple
slides.
I
One
of
the
things
that
we
were
mindful
of
in
preparing
this
slide
is
that
we
have
a
state
funded
transportation
program
with
projects
on
the
list
that
are
in
various
stages
of
planning
and
design,
and
so
what
you're
seeing
on
the
map
is
in
sort
of
the
the
gray
lines.
Those
are
those
planned
state
projects.
I
The
dashed
lines
are
the
the
new
potential
projects
that
we
are
suggesting
in
this
first
draft
and
those
projects
occur
both
on
state
maintained
and
locally
maintained
roads.
F
I
C
F
F
So
I
do
get
that,
but
I
also
understand
that
in
any
community
like
ours,
real
forms
the
backbone,
and
then
you
just
have
to
build
on
it
with
your
boss
network,
your
trails
network,
your
bicycle
network,
because
not
every
roadway
is
suited
for
for
a
real
investment.
So,
but
I
do
understand
that,
in
terms
of
wanting
to
go
beyond
where
we
are
today,
I'm
sure
that
we'll
have
that
conversation
again
when
the
numbers,
when
we
start
talking
numbers
with
you
on
october
22nd
as
well.
C
My
impression
is
that
if
we
did
all
the
things
that
that
are
projected
here
and
we
thoroughly
understood
how
they
how
they
mesh
together-
and
I
know
that
when
you-
you
saw
that
first
map
that
showed
all
of
them
sort
of
overlaid
on
each
other,
it
is
absolutely
confusing,
and
perhaps
we
may
find
a
graphic
way
of
picking
out
sections.
C
C
The
only
plus
that
I
can
say
from
in
terms
of
reading
the
map
is
that
first,
one
just
was
very
colored
and
seemed
to
cover
the
entire
county
and
that's
a
plus,
because
that
means
some
kind
of
network
is
in
your
area,
no
matter
where
you
are
and
what
the
standing
might
be.
Yes,
your
economic
standing
or
anything
else
is
at
that
point.
In
time,
so
from
that
standpoint
I
think
we
we
are
on
the
road
to
something
transformational.
C
I
think
ken's
comment
or
eric's
comment
that
that
the
rapid
transit
is
is
already
caught
up
to
itself.
I
mean
2030
is
nine
years
from
now.
C
C
We
may
have
to
feed
in
other
ways.
So
I
guess
I'm
slightly
disagreeing
eric
that
that
2050
gets
beyond
the
purview
of
the
county.
Although
I
think
in
talking
to
the
people
in
the
central
llana
region
and
the
business
alliance,
we
need
to
look
beyond
mecklenburg
county,
but
on
that
particular
plan
I
actually
think
we're
covering
every
end
of
the
county
that
we
will
probably
want
to
kind
of
cover,
but
I'm
wide
open
to
how
we
might
make
that
even
more
aggressive
and
more
transformational,
I'm
only
speaking
now
to
rapid
transit.
C
All
right,
then,
can
I
get
a
show
of
hands
for
people
who
believe
that
the
transformational
mobility
network
is
on
the
right
track?
C
C
Yes,
sir,
if
I
may.
L
L
So
as
I
look
at
those
first
mile
last
mile
connections
for
pedestrian
and
bicyclists,
how
I
make
those
connections
to
support
land
uses
that
are
within
the
range
of
most
people
who
we
could
entice
to
use
their
feet
or
their
bikes
to
get
somewhere.
C
J
Mr
mayor,
this
is
david,
I
think,
to
maybe
build
on
bill's
point
using
your
feet
or
a
non-modal
form
of
transportation
to
get
to
a
light
rail
or
to
get
to
a
bus
allowing
that
connectivity
from
from
a
neighborhood
that
has
a
dead
end
with
you
know,
a
half
acre
of
of
land
behind
it,
but
there's
a
you
know:
there's
a
light
rail
stop.
J
What
would
be
you
know,
300
yards
away,
creating
some
sort
of
pathway
for
them
to
get
there
creating
connections
within
the
city
to
to
accommodate
multiple
modes
of
transportation
that
we're
not
seeing
now,
I
think,
would
be
really
really
helpful.
G
Yeah
mayor,
thank
you.
I
just
want
to
make
sure
other
folks
got
to
speak
and
then
just
wanted
to
clarify
my
comments,
since
it
kind
of
arose
a
lot
of
response
just
to
clarify
it's
more
and
I'm
fully
aware
that
the
2030
plan
has
been
added
to
and
adapted
and
tweaked,
but
I
think
it's
more
that
it
hasn't
left
the
original
corridors
that
were
defined
back
in
26
in
2006
and
and
my
point
you
know
we
can't
identify
those
those
new
corridors
in
the
time
that
we
have
so
it's
it's.
G
It's
we're
stuck
in
a
rock
and
a
hard
place
there.
So
the
point
it
was
more
kind
of
making.
If
we
could
add,
it
is
an
aspirational
goal
that
you
know
that
the
next
2.0
corridor
you
know,
plan
is
put
into
place
to
be
worked
on
as
a
result,
as
a
recommendation
to
the
mayor
that
we
start
looking
at
identifying
some
more
rapid
transit
transit
corridors.
G
That
may
be
just
bus
brt,
as
we
you
know,
include
true
brt,
and
only
one
of
those
have
been
identified
in
in
in
the
current
2030
plan,
and
I
think
that
would
be.
You
know
mistake
to
not
work
on
identifying
those
and
broadening.
G
G
Is
everyone
satisfied
with
those
corridors
connecting
to
the
the
the
most
jobs,
the
larger
the
largest
job
suppliers?
And
I
know
healthcare
is
the
most
the
biggest
employer
in
the
area
and
how
much
of
their
workplaces
are
left
out
from
rapid
transit
and
how
you
can
get
there
in
that
first
and
last
mile
is
obviously
important
as
well
in
those
corridors,
but
that
was
just
my
point
is
to
make
sure
that
we're
not
missing
that
opportunity
to
look
beyond
the
corridors
that
have
been
initially
adopted
and
then
expanded.
G
We
just
want
to
make
sure
we're
not
missing
that.
That's
all
my
concern
thanks
eric.
M
Eric
I'd
like
to
add
to
what
you
just
said,
I
am
big
on
the
the
large
transit
projects
and
I'm
really
big
on
the
fact
that
we
we
need
to
put
some
stuff
in
place
now,
because
looking
at
the
growth
that
we
have
already
experienced
and
we're
expecting
to
experience,
we're
gonna
have
to
do
it
and
we're
gonna
have
to
do
it
now,
but
one
of
the
things
I
was
thinking
about
you
talking
about
that
first
and
last
mile
and
then
also
with
the
larger
ordering
arteries
we
could
possibly
maybe
expand
even
the
the
trolley
systems
that
we
have
think
about
folks
coming
into
different.
M
C
N
Hey
hi
just
wanted
to
to
say
that
I
thought
the
the
team
did
a
great
job
in
putting
together
this
this
road
map,
it
seems
like
it
covers
a
lot
of
the
conversation
that
we
had
and
responds
to
comments
and
and
the
existing
plans.
I
wonder
I
mean
the
devil's
always
in
the
details
when
it
comes
to
implementation
right
and
that's
part
of
our
charge
and
how
we
start
to
bring
the
equity
lens
to
the
implementation
of
some
of
this.
N
How
do
you
start
to
match
needs
and
conditions
on
the
ground
with
this
toolkit
of
potential
investments
that
you've
just
laid
out?
So
what
is?
How
can
we,
I
don't
know
if
there's
a
series
of
indicators
that
can
be
created
that
would
help
us
or
help
the
city
start
to
pinpoint
how
to
apply
these
ideas,
in
particular,
communities
based
on
the
needs
that
they
have
here
and
now
for
transportation,
access
and
connectivity,
and
things
like
that.
I
So
I
can
respond
briefly
to
that
geraldine,
you've
sort
of
just
previewed
some
of
our
our
next
couple
of
meetings
together.
We
want
to
figure
out
a
way
to
evaluate
and
describe
the
impact
of
what
we
just
showed
you
so
that
it's
a
little
bit
more
clear
what
we
think
it
might
accomplish
for
us,
so
all
that
to
say
stay
tuned.
I
think
we're
tracking
right,
along
with
you
and
hope,
to
bring
you
more
incoming
meetings.
F
F
F
C
F
So
I'll
kind
of
go
back
to
what
eric
was
also
saying
that
they
connect
beyond
that.
Geraldine's
group
is
working
on
and
actually
it's
not
just
your
audience
group
apologies
for
that.
F
It's
city
cuts
crtpo,
central
and
regional
council
we're
all
working
on
the
connect
beyond
which
really
will
identify
other
rapid
transit
corridors
as
well,
extending
into
other
counties
beyond
mecklenburg,
and
so
working
closely
with
that
team
is
very
important
to
us,
and
you
spoke
geraldine
interviewed
mayor
gant
a
couple
weeks
ago,
and
I
think
that
we
have
areas
of
leveraging
between
the
two
of
synergy
radar
v22,
but
a
few
comments
actually
from
the
public.
F
F
Another
one
from
kidron
french
said
this
is
great
to
begin
with,
then,
regarding
the
polling
and
survey:
don't
throw
away
the
service
and
the
polls
but
make
sure,
there's
more
inclusivity
and
then
next
three
comments
from
maureen
that
we
need
to
have
trails,
shared
parts,
protected
bike
lanes
and
sidewalks,
because
not
everybody
can
use
the
other
modes
of
transportation,
and
I
think
this
is
more
in
responding
to
what
bill
had
said
earlier
with
regards
to
connectivity
and
while
connectivity
is
very
important,
so
it's
multimodal
investment
and
then
marine
also
said
that
the
desire
for
clean
hair
is
very
basic
to
transportation
and
good
health.
C
Todd
you
want
to
tell
us
about
the
remaining
schedule
and
perhaps
an
opportunity
that
might
be
before.
F
Yes,
so
thank
you
mayor
again,
so
we're
looking
at
the
possibility
of
having
a
face
face-to-face
meeting
on
october
22nd.
I
know
that
a
number
of
you
would
definitely
love
that
now.
We
know
that
we're
in
governor's
phase
three
and
we're
limited
to
25
people
indoor,
but
we
will
try
and
see
how
we
can
make
it
work
with
those
25
people
and
others
virtually.
F
But
I
will
get
that
information
to
us
this
week,
hopefully
before
the
end
of
this
week
as
to
the
location,
it
will
be
the
same
time
on
october
22nd
and
it's
going
to
be
uptown
at
least
at
the
edge
of
uptown,
but
I
will
firm
up
that
location
and
share
that
with
everyone
this
week,
we'll
be
focusing
on
what
will
it
cost
now
that
you've
seen
this
network?
F
What
it
looks
like
from
those
six
buckets,
we're
gonna
focus
a
lot
on
what
it
will
cost
and
how
do
we
pay
for
it?
This
is
when
it
starts
to
get
real
and
what
we've
shown
you
is
a
lot
of
cadillac
so
to
speak.
F
If
you
want
to
build
rail,
want
to
expand
our
bus
service
system
and
want
to
build
a
greenway
system
out
successfully
and
really
stitch
together,
a
lot
of
gaps
that
we
have
in
our
mobility
system,
so
the
22nd
will
be
the
time
when
we
start
talking
about
the
numbers
and
how
we
pay
for
it,
and
I
also
want
us
to
take
a
very
good
look
at
what
we
shared
with
you
tonight.
F
We
will
send
that
email
out
tomorrow
to
all
of
you,
the
presentation
and
then,
if
there
are
questions
that
you
have
with
regards
to
specific
mode
or
all
of
them,
please
feel
free
to
share
those
with
us
before
the
next
meeting,
but
we
definitely
look
forward
to
the
22nd
I
will
be
sharing.
I
will
be
talking
to
you
at
that
point
in
time,
but
also
hearing
from
you
about
the
the
cost
and
how
we
we
walk
through
the
different
mechanisms
to
pay
for
for
this
system.
C
I'm
gonna
assume
nobody's
gonna,
miss
october
22nd.
That
is
that's
a
it's
gonna
be
an
interesting
meeting
because
we
will
tie
all
the
favorable
comments.
We
got
back
in
the
survey
in
the
polls
to
beginning
to
look
at
numbers
and
what
it
might
cost
and
what
made
me
ultimately
recommend.
C
Okay,
so
we
may
be
trying
to
schedule
with
you
another
meeting
and
that
will
be
sometime
after
the
election
and
before
the
november
17th
scheduled
meeting.
C
So
we
need
more
time
to
make
sure
we're
deliberating
that,
and
I
want
to
thank
you
tai,
for
trying
to
set
up
our
first
in-person
meeting
honestly.
I
just
would
love
to
see
you
folks,
not
that
we're
going
to
be
able
to
hug
and
kiss
each
other,
but
we
will
at
least
be
in
one
room.
So
please
work
her
out
on
that.
When
is
the?
When
is
the
governor's
next
phase
going
to
come
in?
Isn't
that
october
19th.
C
C
Yeah,
we
don't
know
what
it'll
say:
wear
your
masks
so
that
it'll
be
a
progressive
announcement
on
october
23rd,
not
one
that
takes
us
back,
but
thank
you
again
for
the
time
you've
given,
and
we
will
see
you
in
the
upcoming
meeting
in
two
weeks
october
22nd.