►
From YouTube: Charter Review Meeting of 1-6-21
Description
City of Chelsea, via WebEx and Chelsea Community TV
A
Okay
good
evening,
everyone
happy
new
year
today
is
wednesday
january
6th
and
we
are
resuming
as
the
charter
commission.
We
are
resuming
our
first
meeting
of
the
year
to
discuss
sections
four
through
six.
I
hope
every
single
member
had
a
wonderful
celebration
of
the
new
year
and
also
wonderful
holidays.
A
So
I'm
excited
to
have
all
of
you
here
today.
I
know
that
it
is
a
turbulent
day
for
our
country
this
evening.
However,
I
admire
everyone's
commitment
and
responsibility
to
be
here
today,
as
we
have
a
very
important
task
in
front
of
us,
which
is
to
review
the
the
charter
the
charter
this
year,
so
we
can
have
something
to
present
to
our
council
at
some
point
later
in
in
the
month,
hopefully
aggressively
by
early
february.
A
So
I
commend
all
of
you
who
have
shown
up
today
to
to
do
your
duty,
what
you
were
appointed
to
do
so,
thank
you
so
much
and-
and
I
hope
that
we
keep
our
our
fellow
citizens
of
washington,
dc
elected
staff
members
and
also
public
officials
in
in
our
prayers.
That
being
said,
let's
begin
with
our
charter
review.
Today
we
will
be
discussing
sections
four
through
six
and
I
will
begin
with
attendance,
judith,
garcia
present
leo
robinson
calvin
brown
here,
melinda
vega
maldonado.
A
A
Miriam
reckentore
president.
Thank
you
very
much
before
we
start
the
meeting,
just
a
reminder
to
everyone
that,
if
you
have
any
comments,
questions
please
do
not
write
in
the
chat.
Please
raise
your
hand
you'll
be
acknowledged,
so
you
can
speak.
I
we
cannot
be
writing
anything
on
the
chat
simply
for
for
public
record.
We
need
to
make
sure
that
we
remain
transparent
for
the
public.
So
that
being
said,
thank
you
for
everyone
who
has
been
present
now.
A
A
On
implemented
on
the
charter,
so
we
are
currently
in
the
phase
two
of
of
this
project
face
number
one
was
to
read:
the
entire
charter
have
active
discussion
of
each
section
and
and
and
bounce
around
ideas
of
things
that
we
wanted
to
change
and
and
recommend,
and
now
we
currently
are
discussing
the
package
that
includes
all
the
recommendations
of
every
single
member
here
of
any
recommendation
that
they
had
not
only
the
members
of
the
specific
commission
but
also
members
of
the
public,
who
also
had
recommendations
of
changes
they
want
to
see
implemented
in
the
charter.
A
So
right
now
we're
in
the
face
of
strictly
discussing
some
of
those
recommendations
and
changes,
so
we
can
introduce
a
final
packet
to
the
city
council.
So
that
being
said,
that's
that's
the
role
of
this
commission.
The
commission
is
composed
of
city
council
members,
residents
and
and
key
stakeholders
here.
So
it's
my
apologies
school
committee
members,
school
committee,
members,
council,
members
and
residents
of
our
community.
So
that's
who
you
will
see
virtually
here
and
also
in
person.
A
D
That
I
had
sent
in
earlier
for
the
board
to
the
commission
rather
to
take
a
look
at
was
to
add
a
new
section
in
section
6
and
I'm
sorry,
the
section
would
be
the
section
would
be
6.4
and
it
would
be
titled
zoning
board
of
appeal.
D
Why?
I
think
this
is
important
is
because,
first
of
all,
as
a
long-time
counselor,
I
know
that
myself
and
my
colleagues
more
than
anyone
else,
really
hear
most
from
the
residents
when
it's
any
feedback
regarding
projects
that
are
either
being
proposed
or
have
been
approved
and
with
that
goes
a
lot
of
sometimes
anger
and
feeling
that
their
voices
are
not
being
heard.
Despite
some
maybe
going
to
the
zoning
board,
and
I
don't
want
to
blame
the
zoning
board
for
what
it
can
or
cannot
do
or
whatever
it
proves.
D
But
the
manner
in
which
the
zoning
board
and
the
planning
board
review
some
of
these
proposals
are
through
a
very
limited
lens.
D
Than
what
the
city
council
or
city
councilor
does
they're
not
going
into
the
financial
impacts
that
sometimes
we
know
about
they're
not
going
into
many
of
the
community
impacts
that
the
project
may
have,
and
even
if
it
was
some
of
the
mitigation
that
can
be
required
or
asked
about,
is
off
the
books,
or
rather
outside
the
scope
of
what
a
zoning
board
can
or
cannot
ask
that
isn't
the
case
if
the
zoning
board,
I'm
sorry,
the
chelsea
city
council
had
the
ending
approval
vote
and
again
this
would
only
be
on
the
special
permits.
D
So
I
believe
that
there
are
times
when
community
mitigation
must
be
part
of
a
proposal
that
may
make
a
significant
impact
and
that's
the
reason
why
I
believe
that
this
is
a
nice
checks
and
balance.
I
want
to
say
that
this
is
not
the
first
community
that
does
this.
There
are
many
communities
that
require
a
final
approval
from
its
board
of
aldermen,
selectmen
or
city
council,
and
that
we
already
have
this
in
place
when
it
comes
to
the
traffic
board.
That's
exactly
where
this
section
is
from
that.
D
When
the
traffic
board
makes
a
decision,
it
has
to
be
approved.
The
final
say
is
an
approval
by
the
city
council,
and
there
are
other
things
that
the
city
council
does
final
approval,
also
whether
it's
members
of
the
commission,
even
though
they're
appointed
by
the
city
manager,
they
have
to
be
approved
by
city
council.
D
So
this
is
nothing
new
we're
not
in
uncharted
territory,
but
I
think
it's
important
for
the
city
council
to
have
this
tool
in
their
bag,
so
that,
if
and
when
a
project
may
need
to
be
reviewed
outside
of
the
lens
and
scope
of
what
the
zoning
board
does
and
the
planning
board
does
it
offers
this
opportunity.
So
I
ask
that
the
charter
review
committee
look
at
this
intensively
and
vote
in.
A
Okay,
there's,
no
one
here
from
the
public
besides,
besides
roy,
so
anything
else,
you
want
to
say,
because
I
will
close
the
public
speaking
portion
all
set
so
that
part
of
the
meeting
is
close
public
speaking
is
closed,
and
now
we
will
begin
with
officially
reviewing
what's
in
front
of
us,
which
I
hope
you
all
have,
which
is
the
packet,
and
we
will
begin
with
section
four
section:
four
discusses
city
manager,
so
the
first
item
of
business
in
front
of
us
is
a
proposal
from
miriam
rackentor
for
section
4.1
in
section
4.1,
under
qualifications,
last
paragraph
replace
residence
requirement
with
bilingual
requirement.
E
The
bilingual
because
of
previous
discussions,
but
I
would
like
to
say
that
I
still
would
like
to
see
if
we
can
eliminate
the
city
requirement,
because
we
have
not
had
a
city
manager
live
in
the
since
2000,
so
we're
talking
over
20
years.
The
city
has
thrived
without
it.
I
think
it
limits
us
with
the
ability
to
attract
other
people
who
may
want
the
job.
A
C
A
We
would
leave
established
residents
within
the
city
for
12
months
following
appointment
and
remove
unless
the
city
council
should
waive
such
requirements.
So
essentially,
what
we
have
in
front
of
us
is
simply
an
amendment
to
remove
bilingual
requirement
and
we're
going
to
be
voting
on
the
city.
Manager
need
not
be
a
resident
of
the
city
or
of
the
commonwealth
at
the
time
of
appointment.
Both
should
meet
but
shall
meet
established
residents
within
the
city
within
12
months,
following
appointment
and
remove
unless
the
city
council
should
waive
the
requirement.
F
A
F
A
C
A
A
E
E
C
G
There
is
another
section
of
the
charter
that
requires
that
if
he
leaves
the
city
or
the
country,
he
has
to
inform
the
city
council
and
a
point
and
acting
so
he
basically
requires
him
to
be
at
work
in
commonwealth
of
massachusetts.
H
You
we
can't
hear
you,
okay,
sorry,
the
it
would
also
be
part
of
the
hiring
process
and
the
interview
process
where
the
expectations
would
be.
You
are
going
to
be
living
in
massachusetts,
you
know,
and
you
can
put
it
in
the
job
posting
even.
A
Okay,
give
me
just
one:
second:
everyone
we're
having
a
bit
of
technical
difficulties
if
we
can
raise
the
volume
for
the
it
team.
That's
here
if
we
can
raise
the
volume
of
the
screen,
so
I
can
hear
the
members
who
have
joined
us
virtually.
That
would
be
helpful,
sorry
team.
It's
a
bit
difficult
for
me
to
hear
you.
A
Mary,
I
might
ask
you
to
repeat
yourself
one
more
time.
Meanwhile,
I
get
the
volume
to
go
up
in
just
two
seconds
here.
Okay,
does
that
work?
Can
you
okay,
can
you
can
you
say
it
again.
H
So
it
would
also
be
part
of
the
hiring
process-
I
think
not
only
the
put
it
in
the
job
posting.
The
expectation
is
that
you
are
a
resident
of
massachusetts,
but
also
the
expectations
when
you're
interviewing.
I
I
So
what
I
understand
is
mimi
is
stating
that
she
wishes
to
spread
the
out
that
the
city
manager
does
not
have
to
live
in
the
city.
He
could
live
in
gloucester.
He
could
live
in
worcester,
but
long
as
he
show
up
to
work
here
when
he's
employed
and
he
can
go
out
of
the
country
on
vacation
to
do
what
he
wants,
but
he
still
has
to
inform
the
city
council
correct.
I
Correct
so
I
will
be
voting
no
against
this
because
again,
I
think
what
we
have
now
in
the
charter.
We
have
some
consideration.
If
we,
you
know
a
lot
of
the
positions
that
we've
been
I'm
trying
to
get
and
really
fill
with
residents
for
chelsea.
Is
that
it
be
that
you
consider
living
in
a
city
we've
been
trying
to
go
with
the
police
exam
we've
been
trying
to
do
it
with
the
new
positions
that
we
just
created.
I
So
I
don't
think
it's
fair
to
now
get
collapsed
on
the
opportunity.
The
city
council
still
has
the
waiver
ability
if
they
wish
that
this
person
is
a
superior
candidate.
You
just
cannot
manage
to
move
in
the
city
because
he
or
she
may
already
have
a
family
rooted.
Then
we
can
have
that
discussion,
but
I
still
think
it's
important
to
have
it
in
the
quality
of
the
high-end
process.
A
So
so
counselor
brown,
so
in
yours
in
your
case,
are
you
in
favor
of
of
how
it
is
right
now?
A
F
I
I
just
wanted
to
be
clear.
I
wasn't
trying
to
to
to
become
a
proponent
of
it
with
miriam.
I
was
just
trying
to
reiterate
what
she
was
saying,
because
I
think
it
was
being
misinterpreted.
F
A
Thank
you,
jason
yeah.
You
were
incredibly
helpful
for
me
as
well
to
understand
her
point.
So
so
I
appreciate
that
okay,
so
essentially
what
we
and
just
before
we
continue
discussion.
I
want
to
make
sure.
Can
you
guys
give
me
a
thumbs
up?
If
you
hear
us
clearly
with
no
feedback,
you
guys
are
good
okay,
great
great.
So
so,
essentially,
is
there
anyone
else
who
would
like
to
discuss
the
matter
in
front
of
us.
C
A
So,
as
is
right
now
would
I
have
and
feel
free
to
interrupt
me
if
I
misunderstood
anything.
So
what
we
have
in
front
of
us
is
the
proposal,
the
recommendation
by
mimi
reckentor,
which
is
to
make
a
change
to
section
4.1,
to
read
as
follows:
the
city
manager
need
not
be
a
resident
of
the
city
or
of
the
commonwealth
at
the
time
of
appointment,
and
then
the
other
option
that
you
have
is
to
leave
it,
as
is
to
leave
the
requirement,
as
is
on
the
city
charter.
A
A
C
A
Begin
we,
let
me
just
record
here
we
begin
with
myself,
judith
garcia.
B
A
No
okay,
henry
wilson,
henry
wilson.
Yes,
it's
a
yes,
yes,
okay,
alex
berkelson,
no
mary.
C
Burke,
you're
on
mute.
A
A
Meaning
the
recommendation
passes
to
be
added
and
included
into
the
the
packet
that
we
we
introduced
to
city
council
so
for
anyone
who's
watching
that's
what
it
means.
Okay.
So
now
we
move
on
to
the
next
section,
which
is
section
yes
all
right.
I
A
Yes,
absolutely
so
so
the
recommendation
was
accepted
by
a
majority
of
those
present
and
now
the
section
would
read
as
follows:
the
city
manager
need
not
be
a
resident
of
the
city
or
of
the
commonwealth
at
the
time
of
appointment
period.
A
A
Great
so
section
4.3,
which
is
a
motion
presented
to
us
by
jason
stalker
and
the
the
recommendation
reads
as
follows:
we're
at
section
4.3
f,
the
sentence
should
have
or
requested
added
to
the
end
of
it.
So
we
should
read
as
follows:
to
ensure
that
complete
and
full
records
of
the
financial
and
administrative
activity
of
the
city
are
maintained
and
to
render
reports
to
the
city
council
as
may
be
required
or
requested.
A
F
No,
I
don't
think
it
needs
I
I
was
just.
It
was
more
to
outline
so
that
the
city
manager
knows
that
they
can
be
called
upon
to
provide
these
reports
at
the
wish
of
city
council
versus
limiting
it
to
just
required,
based
on
some
other
statute.
A
Yeah,
thank
you,
jason.
It's
pretty
self-explanatory.
I
think
it's
not.
You
know,
I
I
think
it's
it's
great,
so
I'll
open
it
up
for
any
more
discussion.
Does
anybody
feel
strongly
or
strongly
in
favor,
strongly
against
mary
go
ahead,
you're
on
mute
again
we're
gonna
have
to
unmute
you,
okay,.
H
So
a
question
I
mean
they,
they
provide
the
information
now,
as
requested,
am
I
right?
F
A
Okay,
councillor
brown.
I
I
mean
yeah,
I
I
know
what
jason
is
trying
to
say,
but
if
this
is
a
job,
this
is
something
that's
already
taken
place,
as
conqueror
robinson
stated.
Not
only
do
we
do
it
from
the
finance
committee.
We
also
have
an
evaluation
where
we
do
part
of
an
annual
evaluation
and
expectation,
and
we
also
have
folks
that
come
in
to
give
us
an
annual
analytics
so
and
that's
a
document
and
that's
a
period
that's
open
to
the
public.
Also,
it's
just
maybe
the
public
a
win
weapon.
I
A
Okay,
great,
so
anyone
else
have
any
comments,
suggestions,
feelings,
okay,
great,
so
we
can
take
it
to
a
vote
honestly,
I'm
not
strongly
against
it.
I
think
it's
just
stating
something
that
that
is
already
happening
so
again.
What
what's
in
front
of
you?
You
have
two
options
right
now,
we'll
take
it
for
a
vote
since
we've
closed
discussion
and
if
you
a
vote,
a
yes
vote
would
be
supporting
the
proposal.
A
I
Counselor
brown,
yes,
go
ahead,
yeah,
let
me
know
if
I
can
actually
just
ask
jason
if
he
would
like
to
clear
this.
I
mean
this
is
something
that
you
can
do.
This
is
something
that
anyone
as
sean
cheryl
just
stated
has
access
to
I'm
just
trying
to
figure
out.
Why
are
we
trying
to
change
it
or
add
something?
What
are
we
looking
to
get
out?
Maybe
if
it's
something
that
I'm
not
sure
about,
then
I'll
have
a
different
perspective
of
voting,
but
as
of
right
now
it's
something.
I
That's
it's
a
part
of
the
job
title.
F
Yeah-
and
I
guess
that
if
it's
in
the
job
title
I
haven't
looked
at
the
whatever
job,
description
would
go
out
for
the
expectations
of
the
city
manager.
But
if
this
was
to
highlight
what
some
of
those
are,
then
it's
not
matching
up
with
what
the
expectation
is.
That's
outlined
in
the
job
description
right,
and
so,
while
I
understand
cheryl's
point
that
anybody
can
ask
for
the
financials
at
any
time,
they're
public,
that
that's
fine,
and
I
agree
that
makes
sense.
F
F
I
can't
think
of
the
word
I'm
looking
for.
I
just
felt
that
it
was
more
clear
if
we
say
that
anytime,
the
city
council
asks
for
it.
They
have
to
provide
it
versus
just
saying
that
it
was
required
from
on
some
other
piece.
Maybe
you
can
get
comfortable.
That
required
would
mean
the
statute,
so
it's
public.
So
if
anyone
comes
for
it
public
or
not,
then
that's
the
requirement.
I
I
So
it's
something
that's
there
I
mean
I
just
don't
want
to
put
a
you
know
just
unnecessary
language
in
in
the
charter,
as
the
statement
changed
something
because
I
understand
what
you're
saying
and
as
you
get
involved
in
this
and
you've
done
a
great
job.
Getting
involved
in
this
commission
here,
you'll
find
out
more
than
you
knew
before
and
find
out.
All
this
stuff
is
pretty
much
right
at
our
fingertips.
We
just
have
to
engage
ourselves
in
requesting
it,
because
the
public
records
requires
you,
whether
you
want
to
do
it
or
not.
I
I
A
Okay,
great
so
again,
I
appreciate
the
feedback.
I
don't
know
jason
if
you're
going
to
respond
honestly,
if
you
feel
one
way
or
the
other,
you
can
go
ahead
and
vote
in
favor
or
against.
I
I
don't
want
to
complicate
it
too
much
for
jason.
I.
A
J
These
things
are
actually
already
taken
place,
yeah
and
actually
all
things
go
through
the
finance
committee,
and
if
there
are
any
irregularities
that
the
finance
committee
would
pick
it
up
besides
what
the
auditors
would
present
and
show
where
things
are
not
being
properly
done.
You
know
because
there's
a
state
audit,
a
federal
audit
and
we
get
to
see
all
those
documents
and
anytime
that
a
city
council
wants
to
make
a
request
in
regards
to
a
financial
matter
of
city
manager,
responses
by
the
next
meeting
to
give
an
update
on
what
that
situation
is.
A
I
believe
that
what
jason's
presenting
is
something
I
understand,
and
I
think
it's
been
very
clear
that
we
already
do
this
and
it's
a
procedure.
That's
already
been
practiced.
My
understanding
when
I
read
this
and
it
was
presented
by
jason.
I
I
figured
this
is
something
that
essentially,
what
he's
doing
is
we
are.
He
understands
we
do
this.
He
just
wants
to
have
it
in
writing.
A
So
is
it
earth
shattering
cheryl
or
if
we
vote
in
favor.
G
Requests
for
loan
documents,
so
I
believe
those
required
ones
needed
to
be
set
out
and
and
these
are
list
of
tasks,
so
this
is
part
of
the
job
duties.
Everyone
keeps
saying
the
job
duties
of
the
city
manager.
These
are
those
required
under
the
charter
are
those
are
those
job
duties
required
under
the
city?
Chart
requested
really
doesn't
mean
much
because
it's
under
the
law
that
they
can
get
whatever
they
request.
G
G
A
Jason's
request
was
to
add
or
request
it
not
to
eliminate
required.
So,
oh.
A
A
So
that's
that's
where
it
is
so
if
everyone's
okay
we'll
take
it
to
a
vote,
judith
garcia,
yes
leo
robinson,
yes,
calvin
brown,.
A
K
J
A
Shirley
maclean
is
absent:
miriam
wrecking
tour;
yes,
okay,
so
we're
counting
one
two,
three,
four
sorry,
three,
six,
seven,
eight
nine
in
favor
three
opposed
one
absent.
The
recommendation
passes.
A
Okay,
we
move
on
to
the
next
item,
which
is
also
a
recommendation
presented
by
jason.
Stalker
is
on
section
4.30
and
the
suggestion
is
suggest
changing
any
to
all.
To
read
as
follows:
to
inquire
into
the
affairs
of
all
city
department,
agency
or
office,
that
is
the
recommendation
in
front
of
us
jason.
I
give
you
the
floor.
I
think
it's
pretty
self-explanatory
in
case
you
want
to
add
anything
else.
A
Okay
sounds
fair.
Anyone
else,
any
opening
to
discussion.
Anyone
feel
strongly
against.
Okay
seems
like
no,
so
I
will
go
ahead,
we'll
take
it
to
a
vote.
A
yes
vote
is
you
are
in
support
of
the
recommendation
in
front
of
you.
A
no
vote
is
you
want
to
leave
it
as
is
presented
on
the
original
charter,
the
charter
in
front
of
us,
so
we
will
begin.
J
G
No
because
it
doesn't
really
change
the
what
he's
requesting
leo
any
or
all
is
interchangeable.
Here
you
have
the
right
when
it
says
any.
It
means
all
departments.
So
I
don't
think
this
should
be
a
major
debate.
It's
just
a
it's
just
language
preference
versus
anything.
Whether
you
know
any
doesn't
refer
all
it
doesn't
limit
you
to
just
one
or
the
other.
G
Your
inquiry
into
it
has
you've
been
allowed
to
do
it
for
years.
It's
been
in
the
charter
since
day,
one
it's
just
to
inquire
into
the
affairs,
but
they
usually
do
it
through
the
city
manager.
When
they
respond
to
you.
J
A
A
We'll
begin
with
me,
my
vote
is
yes
leo
robinson,
yes,
calvin
brown.
I
B
F
A
Okay,
shirley
mclean
is
absent:
miriam
raconter,
yes,
okay,
so
this
motion
passes
by
unanimous
support.
So
all
of
you
voted
in
favor,
one
absent.
A
And
now
we
move
on
to
the
next
proposal
in
front
of
us
also
by
jason,
and
his
proposal
is
on
section
4.8
and
it
read
as
follows:
add
to
second
paragraph
that
date
of
city
manager
review
must
be
made
on
the
internet
and
not
just
the
newspaper.
It
must
be
made
public
on
the
internet
and
not
just
a
newspaper.
So
I
think
this
is
pretty
self-explanatory
as
well
to
keep
up
with
the
times,
but
I
will
give
the
floor
to
jason
to
see
if
he
wants
to
add
anything
else.
A
Okay,
so
anyone
feel
strongly
against
anyone
have
any
questions.
Okay,
I
see
no
emotion
strongly
against
so
we'll
move
it
to
a
vote.
I
For
calvin
brown,
doesn't
it
state
that
the
it
shall
be
posted
on
the
internet
in
at
least
one
newspaper?
Two
items
he's
actually
doing:
okay,.
I
A
A
Yeah,
thank
you,
calvin
yeah.
Anyone,
you
know,
feel
free
to
ask
any
questions
before
you
vote.
So
thanks
for
asking
for
that
clarification.
So
again,
if
there's
no
strong
feelings
for
or
against,
then
we
will
go
ahead
and
take
it
to
a
vote.
And
again,
if
you
vote
in
favor,
yes,
vote
means
you're
supporting
the
proposal
in
front
of
us,
introduced
by
jason.
A
no
vote
is
you
want
to
leave
it,
as
is
discussion
is
internet?
Do
we
include
this
on
the
internet,
so
judith
garcia?
Yes,
leo
robinson,
yes,
calvin
brown,
yes,.
A
B
C
F
A
A
Besides
the
newspaper
add
other
outlets,
it
should
state
online
to
include
social
media,
calendar
and
general
email,
so
this
one
would
include
social
media
calendar
and
general
email.
So
that's
what
we
have
in
front
of
us.
Do
you
want
to
proceed
mimi
with
this
one
or
do
you
want
to
withdraw?
I
think.
A
E
A
A
The
first
item
of
business
in
front
of
me
is
a
recommendation
introduced
by
jason
stucker
comment
on
section
5.3
a
and
the
request
is
add
reference
to
publish
information
via
internet.
So
this
is
similar
to
to
what
we
have
which
again
keeping
up
with
the
times,
but
I'll
give
jason
the
floor
to
see
if
he
wants
to
add
anything
else.
A
Okay,
so
anyone
feel
strongly
against
calvin
brown
go
ahead.
Thank.
I
I
A
Jason
I'll
give
you
the
floor.
I
understand
what
you
mean,
but
I'll
keep
chasing
the
floor.
F
Yeah,
I
think
that
this
this
section
replies
to
previously
you
would
have
to
put
in
the
newspaper
the
date
and
time
of
the
public
hearing
around
the
budget,
and
so
now
we're
just
saying
that
people
also
need
to
be
made
aware
of
it
via
the
internet,
which
I
think,
like
other
things,
is
already
happening.
I
think
it's
going
on
to
chelseamass.gov,
I
think
they're
doing
social
media
posts,
so
these
things
are
happening.
This
is
just
to
memorialize
an
action.
That's
already
happening.
I
F
With
without
getting
into
a
marketing
campaign,
I
would
think
that
if
you
you,
if
it's
just
says
general
the
internet,
you
posting
it
on
the
the
city's
website
would
satisfy
that
requirement.
Okay
versus,
if
we
went
in
more
detail
and
said
it
needed
to
be
on
social
media,
or
it
needed
to
be
specifically
on
twitter
or
something
then
you'd
be
really
pigeonholing.
A
J
A
Yeah
great
and
just
to
piggyback
off
that
I'm
actually
in
favor
of
this.
I
think
it
just
states
what
we're
already
doing,
but
it's
it's
very
important
to
have
it
in
writing
again.
You
know
we
for
the
members
who
are
watching
on
tv
youtube
comcast.
The
charter
gets
reviewed
every
10
years,
so
we
don't
necessarily
have
the
opportunity
to
include
some
of
these
things
that
we've
incorporated
and
and
as
of
today,
2021.
A
This
commission
is
live
on
facebook
right
now.
It's
live
on
on
youtube
and
adding
on
adding
via
internet
on
the
internet
is
just
stating
what
we
already
do
so
so
I'm
personally
in
favor
of
this,
I
think
it's
just
as
jason
the
the
proposed
the
person
who
proposed
this
already
stated
it's
basically
to
immortalize
what
what
we've
already
been
doing.
So
I'm
not
against
this,
but
again
is
there
anyone
here
who
would
like
to
speak
strongly
in
favor
against
okay,
we'll
take
it
to
a
vote.
A
A
yes
vote
is
you
are
in
favor
to
adding
on
the
internet,
to
this
specific
section,
which
is
section
5.3
a
so
something
that
we're
already
doing
just
stating
the
obvious?
A
no
vote
is
you:
are
you
want
it
to
remain
the
way
it's
always
read
in
the
original
draft?
A
B
A
Rosemary
carlisle,
yes
de
san
alfaro,
yes,
okay,
henry
wilson,
yes
great
and
by
alex
marcus,
yes,
okay,
mary
burke,.
E
A
A
A
E
A
A
Okay,
thank
you.
So
the
author
of
this
recommendation
has
asked
to
withdraw
this
specific
section.
Okay.
So
now
we
move
on
to
the
next
recommendation
in
front
of
us,
which
is
by
jason
section
5.4,
and
the
section
reads
as
follows:
will
the
recommendation
section
5.4c
add
reference
to
publish
information
via
internet
jason
I'll
give
you
the
floor.
A
I
Now
I
just
want
to
thank
you
jason
for
this,
because
you
know
our
chairperson
keeps
saying
it
we're
just
actually
catching
up
with
the
time
and
this
year
this
past
year
has
taught
us
a
lesson
how
we
need
to
invest
more
into
the
internet
and
also
it's
another
mechanism
that
we
have
available
for
us.
But
you
know
I
noticed
some
conversation,
but
a
lot
of
these
things
are
done,
but
it
does
make
sense
just
to
ask
to
have
it
put
up
on
the
website.
I
We
have
been
doing
it,
but
now
it's
known
that
it's
a
requirement
that
we
have
it
up.
So
I
appreciate
your
consideration
and
your
thought
and
reading
through
a
small
print
here
and
figuring
out
that
we
don't
have
something
that
we
all
have
in
the
computer,
but
we
need
to
access
it
with
city
hall.
Thank
you.
A
Yeah,
thank
you.
Councillor
brown
and
I
wholeheartedly
agree.
I
I
think
he
raises
a
good
point
and
and
also
thanks
to
the
staff
who's
actually
working
here,
some
late
hours,
I.t
team
and
and
ricky
as
well
who's
who's
in
the
back.
You
know
ensuring
that
we're
streaming.
This
live
on
internet
on
digital
platforms,
so
a
big
shout
out
to
the
guys
who
you
can't
see
who
are
in
the
back
rooms.
A
Getting
this
streamed
live
to
youtube
to
facebook,
irt
team
who
have
made
it
possible
for
many
of
you
guys
to
join
virtually
during
this
covet
time.
So
thank
you,
jason
as
well.
So
that
being
said,
let's
bring
it
to
a
vote.
Yes,
is
your
in
favor
of
jason's
recommendation,
which
is
to
add
things
on
the
internet.
This
specific
reference
so
I'll
make
it
clear.
It's
to
add
capital
improvement
program,
public
hearings
to
the
internet,
not
only
the
newspaper,
so
a
yes
vote,
you're
in
favor
a
no
vote,
you
leave
it.
I
B
F
F
A
A
So
the
the
change
seems
mostly
just
grammatical
but
again
I'll,
give
the
floor
to
to
jason
to
see
if
there's
anything
else,
he
wants
to
add
or
explain.
I.
F
I
always
think
it's
easier
if
we
just
pick
physical
date,
numbers
days
numbers
it's
easier
for
people
to
count
backwards.
The
way
it
states
now
is
you
have
to
go
the
first
day
before
the
last
month
of
the
fiscal
year,
you're
doing
a
little
bit
more
game
of
like
where
are
we
and
counting
backwards,
whereas
if
you
just
say
30
days
before
fiscal
year
end
that
gives
you
the
same
exact
date,
but
it's
clearer.
I
think.
A
A
Okay,
so
so
again,
there's
no
actual
structural
change.
It's
just
a
matter
of
making
it
easier
to
read
for
average
person
who's
reading.
But
I
see
mary,
you
have
a
question
so
I'll
give
you
the
floor.
H
Yeah-
and
maybe
this
is
more
of
a
cheryl
question,
but
you
know
you
have
at
times
years
where
the
the
budget
from
the
state
which
informs
the
the
city
budget,
which
you
know
all
of
those
complications,
doesn't
come
in
actually
in
time
and
so
naming
the
june
30th
may
not
be
the
best
way
or
30
days
within
the
fiscal
year,
so,
for
example,
fiscal
21
budget,
which
should
have
been
enacted
by
july
1st
this
past
july,
1st
just
was
approved
last
night.
H
Finally,
by
the
legislature
due
to
the
pandemic,
it
was
in
it
and
so
they've
done
like
three-month
budgets
to
get
us
through
until
they
can
have
the
pool.
So
I
don't
know
if,
if
this
applies,
cheryl
in
this
case
is
that
if
the
definition
of
fiscal
year
is
static
versus
it
moves
with
whatever
the
budget
is
going
to
be
enacted.
G
G
G
So
if
you
required
a
certain
time,
our
city
council
knows
that
sometimes
the
city
manager
comes
back.
Sometimes
they
don't,
he
doesn't,
but
you
can
always
amend
and
reappropriate
or
appropriate
money.
So
I
I
I
it's
either
way.
I
don't
think
you
change
change
much
of
what
this
paragraph
is
and
how
it's
reflected
upon,
how
the
how
the
city
manager
does
his
job
and
how
the
city
council
acts.
F
K
J
Well,
normally,
in
good
years,
the
truth
we
brought
up
in
april
and
kind
of
finalized
by
the
end
of
april,
because
it's
more
of
a
wish
list
of
all
the
projects
that
the
city
manager
would
like
to
see
done
and
sometime
in
the
capital
improvement
plan.
Sometimes
some
of
those
monies
get
moved
around
because
some
of
the
projects
are
just
not
able
to
be
done
at
that
period
of
time.
So
there's
a
rollover
of
the
money
from
the
capital
improvement
plan.
A
Great
thanks
for
that
leo
and
cheryl
as
well.
So
so
again,
if
there's
no
more
discussion
or
or
feeling
stronger
against
I'll
repeat,
what's
in
front
of
us
and
we'll
take
it
for
a
vote,
so
a
yes
vote
is
in
favor
of
the
recommendation
in
front
of
us,
which
is
essentially
leave
everything
the
same,
but
just
put
it
in
a
language,
that's
easier
for
for
others
to
to
understand,
and
a
no
vote
is
leave
it
as
is
so.
K
E
H
I
I
I
A
A
F
A
Okay,
so,
according
to
the
author
of
this
recommendation,
is
withdrawal,
so
we
will
withdraw
this
motion,
everyone,
okay,
so
we
move
on
to
section
5.6,
which
was
also
introduced
by
jason
and
section
5.6.
The
recommendation
reads
as
follows:
add
reference
to
publish
information
via
internet
again
catching
up
with
the
times
jason.
Anything
else
you
want
to
add.
A
No
okay,
anyone
have
any
opinions
strong
against
okay.
We
move
on
to
a
vote.
So
essentially,
what
he's
asking
is
for
the
annual
audit
to
be
included
and
published
on
the
internet?
It's
already
a
motion
we
practice,
but
this
is
simply
just
to
add
what
we
already
do.
So
a
yes
vote.
Is
you
accept
the
recommendation
in
front
of
us?
A
no
vote
is
you
leave
it,
as
is
judith
garcia?
Yes,
leo
robinson
calvin
brown.
A
A
B
A
F
A
Charlene
is
absent
and
mimi
reckons
or
yes,
okay,
please
do
it.
Yourself,
emotion
passes
with
majority
of
those
present,
which
is
12
one
absent,
and
we
move
on
to
the
next
section,
which
is
section
six.
So
now
we
are
at
an
entirely
different
section.
It's
the
last
section
of
discussion
today,
which
is
section
six
administrative
organization.
A
A
Yeah
thanks
for
doing
that,
jason
great
any
questions
feeling
strongly
for
or
against.
A
F
A
G
Housing
and
community
development,
mr
train
is
now
assigned
to
traffic
yeah,
okay,.
C
A
F
A
Okay,
so
so
essentially
so
thank
you
so
much
cheryl
for
clarifying
that
and
thank
you
so
much
jason
for
introducing
that
that
is
correct.
So
essentially,
let
me
amend
this.
So
we
can
read
the
actual
titles,
so
essentially,
what
jason's
proposing
is
to
change
the
director
of
planning
and
development
to
read
housing
and
community
development
director?
A
C
F
E
A
Okay,
charlene
is
absent,
so
this
passes
by
a
majority
of
those
present,
which
means
12.
One
absent
recommendation
is
accepted.
We
move
on
to
another
recommendation,
presented
by
jason
comment
on
section
6.3
b.
A
F
A
E
F
E
A
Okay,
so
this
motion
passes
with
the
majority
of
those
present.
That's
12,
one
absent
the
recommendation
is
accepted,
and
now
we
move
on
to
this
is
another
recommendation
presented
by
jason
comment
on
section
six.
I
would
propose
that
this
charter
add
in
some
existing
commissions
boards
that
were
created
via
administrative
order
that
have
impact
on
decisions
made
within
the
city
in
reviewing
the
list
of
about
16
on
the
city's
website.
A
I
propose
we
add
the
following
to
the
charter:
zoning
board
of
appeals,
planning,
board,
community
preservation
committee
and
economic
development
board
and
again,
as
he
stated,
this
is
something
that
he's
already
sent
on
our
website,
but
I'll
give
jason
the
floor
in
case.
He
wants
to
add
any
more
I'm
guessing.
F
I
know
there
when
you
read
through
it,
there's
multiple
ways
for
these
commissions
and
boards
to
be
created,
and
I
was
considering
whether
or
not
it
was
important
for
some
of
these
ones
that
impact
a
lot
of
what
happens
in
the
city
if
we
memorialize
them
in
the
charter,
so
that
an
order
couldn't
be
done
where
they
then
get
removed,
and
so
that
was
kind
of
where
my
mindset
was
so.
I
guess
I
see
how
other
people
feel
if
that
makes
sense,
or
they
don't
think
it's
necessary.
A
Thanks
jason,
so
again
you
know
he's
opened
it
for
discussion,
so
I
don't
know
if
any
of
the
members
here
feel
feel
strongly
in
favor
against,
but
I'll
open
it.
With
this.
I
I
really
appreciate
that
you
acknowledge
these
boards.
They
are
very
important,
they're
very
critical.
I
think
we've
heard
from
the
public
speaking
portion
today
that
that
some
of
these
boards
are
just
vital
and
and
they
have
a
huge
impact
in
our
quality
of
life.
A
So
I
honestly,
I
honestly
support
this-
that
it
be
included
on
the
charter
simply
because
of
the
level
of
not
only
the
importance
of
the
decisions
that
are
being
made
in
these
commissions,
but
also
to
really
acknowledge
the
the
city
residents
who
recent
city
residents
and
stakeholders
who
who
volunteer
their
time
to
participate
in
these
boards.
So
I
am
honestly
in
favor
of
it.
But
again
I
open
it
up
for
discussion,
and
I
see
cheryl
has
an
opinion
so
cheryl.
G
G
F
So
like,
if
you
look
at
the
licensing
port,
so
we
list
licensing
and
traffic
right.
That's
all
that's
listed
in
here.
F
G
Is
a
committee
created
under
the
law
when
we
adopted
the
cpa,
the
the
economic
development
board
is
basically
our
redevelopment
board
that
is
created
under
the
law,
right,
the
planning
board
and
zoning
board.
I
believe
you
have
something
to
together.
They
are
this.
One
is
the
special
permitting.
G
The
planning
board
has
authority
under
chapter
48,
and
the
zoning
board
of
appeals
is
your
special
perma
granting
board
and
what
you
have
to
recognize
is,
in
the
past,
the
city
determined
that
the
volunteers
on
the
board
of
residents
and
not
elected
officials,
to
take
away
the
political
in
the
past
corruption.
G
Right
now
to
just
say
these
are
our
boards.
We
already
have
them.
I
don't
understand
by
just
placing
them
in
the
charter
when
the
administrative
code
is
also
online.
What
is
it
that
you
want
on
the
charter?
What
changes
do
you
want?
The
city
manager
appoints
the
members,
except
for
the
cpc
it
kind
of
states
how
their
members
are
appointed.
The
requirements.
F
So
could
you
do
it?
Can
you
clarify,
then,
what
the?
What
might
be
the
rationale
for
why
the
traffic
and
the
licensing
are
listed
in
the
charter,
but
the
the
other
ones?
I
know
you
said
you've
already
explained
how
the
other
ones
I
listed
are
were
created.
So
what
would
be
the
rationale
for
traffic
and
licensing
actually
being
listed
in
the
charter?
That's.
G
Okay,
because
the
way
that
the
appointment
on
the
city
and
those
two
boards
cannot
be
changed
by
the
city
manager.
So
the
fact
that
the
traffic
and
parking
commission
is
made
up
of
mainly
staff
and
maybe
a
couple
of
residents
that
cannot
be
changed
unless
it's
through
charter
review.
The
fact
that
the
licensing
commission
is
on
the
board-
and
it's
made
up
of
mainly
residents
and
one
staff
person
that
cannot
be
changed
unless
there's
a
charter
change.
G
A
A
Excellent
question
and
just
to
clarify,
because
because
I'm
interested
as
well
so
these
boards
and-
and
I
agree
wholeheartedly
with
with
jason-
these
boards-
are
very
important.
Zoning
board
of
appeals
planning
board
community
preservation
in
terms
of
power,
so
you've
stated
cheryl
that
the
reason
the
boards
that
are
actually
listed
on
the
charter
is
because
we
want
to
make
sure
that
no
one
really
touches
the
composition
and
it's
written
on
the
charter.
So.
H
A
These
boards
are
equally
as
important.
Then
I
mean
zoning
board
economic
development
board.
I
cannot
think
of
anything
more
important
than
those
two.
Why
can't
we
do
the
same
and
also
limit
anyone?
You
know
messing
around
with
the
composition
if,
if
they're
so
strong
and
powerful.
G
Because
those
particular
full
boards
are
very
strongly
written
in
state
law,
got
it.
Okay,
not
a
lot
of
cities
and
towns,
have
a
traffic
commission.
They
have
a
director
of
traffic
and
parking
right
and,
and
they
have
professional
staff
engineers
who
make
up
decisions
who
bring
it
to
the
city
manager
or
to
the
mayor.
But
in
chelsea
we
have
a
traffic
and
parking
commission
and
we
have
which
has
some
power,
because
we
give
them
authority
on
the
way
our
streets
and
roads
go.
G
Not
the
parking
clerk
right
and
the
licensing
commission
is
has
a
lot
of
authority.
That
has
a
lot
to
do
with
the
businesses
in
chelsea
and
there
was
a
push
to
make
sure
that
elected
officials
are
not
on
the
licensing
commission
in
the
past.
That's
on
the
charter,
so
it
was
to
clear
up,
residents
have
a
say,
not
elected
officials
who
have.
A
G
G
Right,
I'm
not
too
sure,
that's
actually
legal.
The
way
we
have
our
set
up,
but
that's
something
that
the
city,
the
residents
have
to
say
because
someone
goes
before
residential
hearing
and
then
they
have
to
go
to
yet
another
hearing
and
they
have
all
these
rights
and
monies
put
in
to
say
that
they
then
now
have
to
negotiate
with
11
councillors.
Who's
going
to
develop
here.
But
I'm
just
saying
to
you
is
that
under
the
law,
the
authority
is
clear:
right
got
it
in
chelsea
licensing,
commission.
G
Our
licensing
commission
reviews
entertainment,
it
reviews
tobacco,
it
reviews
deliveries
and
taxi
cabs.
So
it's
a
little
different
than
the
way
some
other
city
or
town
does
it
we
tend
to
do.
Our
zoning
board
of
appeals
tends
to
be
standard
and
plan
e.
A
Form
of
governments-
okay,
so
that
the
commissions-
and
that
was
the
point
that
I
wanted
to
get
to
so
the
commissions
that
are
actually
on
the
charter.
It's
because
it's
up
to
each
municipality
to
decide
on
the
composition,
it's
it
could
be
molded
as
municipality
changes.
So
we
wanted
to
put
it
here
to
ensure
that
the
standards
and
expectations
are
clear.
A
J
No
just
just
for
some
clarification,
all
business
in
the
past
used
to
have
to
come
through
the
city
council
and
then,
when
he
did,
the
charter
change
a
lot
of
those
things
changed.
So
they
didn't
have
to
come
before
the
city
council.
J
A
Thank
you
leo.
That's
a
good
clarification
for
for
the
public
who
might
be
watching
it
may
not
be
as
as
aware.
So
we
appreciate
that
great
so,
annie
calvin.
I
see
you
go
ahead.
I
Work
again,
okay,
I
just
wanted
to
say
all
these
boards
are
important
to
the
city
and
in
this
case
we're
here.
I
I
appreciate
you
all
the
time
and
the
service
has
been
volunteer,
but
I
think
when
we
start
going
to
trying
to
label
and
defining
a
powerful
job
or
a
powerful
board
over
one
or
the
other,
I
think
sometimes
that's
what
the
notion
was
to
try
to
get
away
with
that
people
in
the
past,
through
the
corruption
wouldn't
approach
these
board
members
now
that
they
don't
have
to
deal
with
the
city
council
and
try
to
do
this.
I
think
the
way
it's
set
up
now.
I
think
they
worked
pretty
good.
I
You
know
we
haven't
had
any
fbi
or
any
quotes
arrested
on
either
one
of
these
boards.
Since
I've
been
on
the
city,
council
and
I've
been
on
the
city
council
for
quite
some
time,
and
I
think
it
worked
very
good.
I
think
people
volunteer
their
time.
Did
the
ham
feel
these
by
speech
stature
to
get
a
stipend,
but
for
the
most
of
the
part,
they're
volunteer?
There's
no
money
involved
with
people.
I
People
like
drawing
the
work
they're
great
help
to
the
city,
but
I
think
we
should
just
leave
this
one
alone.
Unless
we
look
to
start
you
know,
if
you
want
to
get
voice
of
power,
you
may
want
to
think
about
changing
them
into
being
appointed
instead
of
elected.
Then
you
really
get
your
you
get
your
money
for
your
your
work,
but
right
now
I
think
this
year
keeps
us
straight
and
keep
us
narrow,
and
we
also
have
that
citizen
poor,
that's
not
elected.
I
They
may
not
want
to
go
out
and
be
elected,
but
they
also
may
want
to
be
very
helpful
and
instrumental
in
helping
the
city
develop
and
move
forward.
I
So
I
know
jesus
has
a
lot
of
great
good
thoughts
and
a
good
wording
of
what
he's
trying
to
do,
but
this
one
here
I
think
we
should
really
be
careful
again
how
we
try
to
put
one
quarter
of
another
boy
with
a
power
status
quote.
F
I'm
I'm
comfortable
with
drawing
this
now
I
I
needed
to
get
the
understanding
on
what
why
we're
differentiating
between
the
different
commissions
within
the
charter
and
not
within
the
charter,
and
I
think
that
cheryl
outlined
that
clearly
for
me,
so
I
don't
think
they
need
to
be
captured
within
this.
A
Okay,
so
the
author
of
the
recommendation
has
requested
to
withdraw,
so,
thank
you,
jason.
Thank
you,
everyone
for
all
the
questions
and
input
okay.
So
we
move
on
to
the
next
section,
which
is
a
recommendation
introduced
by
a
resident
susan
backstrom
for
section
six
requests
to
add
the
chelsea
disability
commission
to
the
charter.
So
it's
similar
to
the
topic
that
that
was
just
discussed
so
nonetheless
for
full
transparency.
A
On
please
mute
yourself:
we
hear
the
echo
again
what's
in
front
of
us,
is
to
request
at
the
chelsea
disability
commission
to
the
charter,
we're
still
on
section
six.
So
this
is
to
be
added
to
section
six.
A
Any
discussion
leo.
I
see
your
hand.
A
Law.
Okay,
so,
as
you
may
heard
this,
this
is
already
a
topic
that
was
discussed
and,
as
leo
pointed
out,
this
is
something
that's
already
been
established
by
law.
Nonetheless,
we're
going
to
take
it
as
a
vote,
because
the
resident's
not
here
to
withdraw.
So
if
you
are
in
favor
of
the
motion,
calvin.
I
I
I
mean
by
voting
on
it.
You
actually
I
mean
you
voted
down
and
you
know
it
may
be
a
new
point,
but
I
think
we
can
give
the
maker
of
the
motion
an
opportunity
to
address
us
and
say:
okay,
I
didn't
know
it
was
part
of
mass
discrimination
or
so
on
or
one
of
the
state
agencies
and
instead
of
just
shooting
it
down
tonight,
one
with
another.
A
Okay,
so
so
I'm
sorry
counselor
brown,
it's
it's
a
bit.
We
have
a
lot
of
feedback
here
for
some
particular
reason,
but
what
I
got
from
you
is
that
you
want
to.
You
want
to
make.
I
A
Yeah,
so
so
just
for
clarification,
this
board
we
we
did
not
set
that
in
our
laws
and
in
our
rules
we
didn't
set
to
table
as
a
motion,
so
essentially
what
we
could
do-
and
I
wholeheartedly-
and
I
obviously
agree
with
you-
we
should
notify
the
the
resident,
but
we
we
actually
decided
as
a
board
to
just
vote
yes
or
no
on
the
recommendation.
This
is
not
something
again.
This
is
just
a
recommendation
that
we're
presenting
to
council,
so
we
are
going
to
vote
on
it.
A
We
can't
table
it
because
we
we
didn't
agree
on
that
for
for
our
rules
when
we
established
this
committee.
So
if
you
are
not,
obviously
it
seems
that
it's
pretty
redundant
we're
gonna
have
to
vote
no
on
it,
but
again
we
can.
We
can.
We
will
notify
the
resident.
We
actually
send
residents
letters
to.
Let
them
know
what
the
decision
was
and
why
and
I'm
sure
that
she
will
understand
that
it
was
honestly
just
because
states
state
rules.
So
that
being
said,
we
we
will
vote
on
it
before.
G
Ahead
so
the
reason
the
interesting
thing
is
that
chelsea
created
has
always
had
a
human
rights
commission
and
we
reinstituted
it
and
when
we
started
complying
with
the
american.
G
K
G
It's
not
updated
on
the
administrative
code
either.
So
I
think
that's
what
her
issue
is
is
that
we
should
at
least
recognize
that
we
do
have
a
disability
commission.
We
are
trying
to
get
them
and
the
human
rights
commission
to
be
involved
and
for
the
record
we
also
want
a
diversity,
equity
and
inclusion
person
to
be
involved
with
this
particular
commission,
because
it
is
part
of
one
of
our
most
vulnerable
populations
in
chelsea
and
we're
trying
to
make
city
hall
more
compliant
with
ada
through
the
dpw
commission.
G
So
I
I
wish
she
was
here
tonight
so
that
she
could
see
the
updates
of
what
her
commission
and
what
the
city
is
also
doing
together.
So
we
do
have
one,
and
it
was
unfortunate
that
we
just
recognized
that
we
now
have
that
we
just
instituted
the
commission.
A
So
cheryl,
can
you
clarify
for
for
members
who
who
have
been
appointed
to
this
specific
commission
for
the
charter
review,
so
is
it?
Is
it
appropriate?
Should
we
have
this
on
the
charter.
G
So
are
you
trying
to
ensure
who
should
be
on
the
commission
right
now?
The
commission
is
made
up
of
members
of
a
residents
who
have
a
form
of
disability
and
all
forms
of
disability-
the
dpw
commissioner,
actually
his
staff.
He
may
actually
sit
on
the
board,
so
I'm
not
sure
what
putting
it
in
the
charter
would
do
unless
you
want
to
ensure
that
we
always
have
a
disability
commission
and
it's
not
swallowed
up
by
some
other
commission.
A
F
A
So
is
it
okay
to
do
that.
A
H
Yeah,
I
mean
we're
not
listing
all
of
the
commissions
in
the
chat
or
we
haven't
in
the
past
right.
So
if
we
list
one
aren't
we
supposed
to
list
all
them.
H
I
mean
certain
ones
are
going
to
be
forever
right,
your
disability
can
it
would
be,
but
but
also
too
you
if
you're
we're
living
in
a
community,
that's
a
dynamic
environment.
So
within
10
years
there's
going
to
be
no
need
for
another
commission.
Look
at
we,
we
ended
up
realizing,
we
needed
a
disability
commission,
it
wasn't
written
into
the
chat
and
we
had
the
flexibility
to
create
it
mid-term.
H
You
know,
I'm
not
sure
we
need
to
write
everything
into
the
charter
and
it
because
I
do
think
sometimes
that
holds
a
community
back
from
being
innovative
and
entrepreneurial
unto
itself.
C
A
Okay,
so
if
anybody
feels
strongly
in
favor
against
before
I
close
that
speaking
portion,
okay,
so
now
we'll
take
it
for
a
vote,
a
yes
vote
is
that
you
want
to
add
the
chelsea
disability
commission
to
the
charter.
A
no
vote
is
you
do
not
you
want
to
leave
it,
as
is
so.
Anyone
want
to
speak
on
their
vote.
A
Okay.
So
that
being
said,
I'll
open
the
vote-
and
I
will
say
I
will
say
yes
leo
robinson,
no
calvin
brown,
president.
A
A
Off,
oh,
yes,
thank
you.
Thank
you.
Thank
you,
jason.
So,
just
for
the
record
again,
please
don't
put
things
on
chat
because
they
have
to
be
public
for
the
record,
but
the
chat
reads.
Thank
you,
jason.
The
chat
reads:
I
have
to
step
off,
so
the
the
commissioner
had
to
step
off
to
put
the
kids
to
bed.
A
Okay,
so
absent.
Tell
taylor.
A
D
E
A
A
F
Garcia,
do
we
still
have
quorum
if
all
of
these
people
have
left
the
meeting.
A
Thank
you
jason.
Thank
you
for
pointing
that
out.
Let
me
count.
We
have
one
two,
three,
four,
five,
six,
seven.
Yes,
we
do
have
quorum,
seven,
eight,
nine
ten.
So
yes,
we
we
do
have
forum.
Thank
you
thank
you
for
pointing
that
out,
and
these
things
happen
guys.
I
am
going
to
ask
for
a
five
minute
recess
before
we
continue
with
the
last
item
of
discussion.
The
last
item
is
a
bit
long.
I
want
to
make
sure
that
we
have
productive
conversation
on
it.
A
C
A
A
C
A
A
We
have
discussed
everything
and
now,
after
a
five
minute
break,
we
are
resuming
with
the
last
item
that
was
presented
to
us
by
our
city
resident.
Along
with,
I
should
also
say
our
recently
elected
council
president
roya
vellanera
has
introduced
and
presented
a
motion
in
front
of
us,
a
recommendation
for
section
6.4.
A
So
it
seems
that
everyone
is
trickling
back
from
from
the
the
five
minute
break,
so
we
have
a
quorum,
so
I
will
begin
reading
what
we
have
in
front
of
us.
So
it's
a
long
one.
So
here
we
go,
6.4
makes
section
6.4
personnel
administration,
the
zoning
board
of
appeals
section
and
create
section
6.5
as
personnel
administration.
A
The
new
section
6.4
zoning
board
of
appeal
should
read
as
follows.
So
there
was
an
entire
section
presented
to
us
and
I
would
read,
as
it
was
presented
to
us
by
royal
section.
6-4
zoning
board
of
appeal:
there
shall
be
a
zoning
board
of
appeals
consisting
of
five
members,
all
of
whom
shall
be
residents
of
the
city
of
chelsea.
The
board
should
shall
annually
choose
a
chair
from
among
its
members.
The
city
manager
may
appoint
an
associate
member
to
serve
when
a
regular
member
is
absent.
A
The
director
of
planning
and
development
or
his
her
designee
shall
serve
as
administrative
assistant
to
the
board
to
provide
advice
and
guidance
to
the
board
on
all
matters
are
required:
a
board
boat,
section
b,
the
zoning
board
of
appeals
hears
and
decides
individual
cases
brought
by
persons
seeking
relief
from
the
requirements
of
the
zoning
ordinance,
all
as
provided
for
the
state
legislation
and
by
the
city,
zoning
ordinance,
specifically
the
board
hears
and
decides
cases
which
involve
variances
from
zoning
ordinance.
It
also
hears
and
decides
applications
for
special
permits
and
special
permits
for
planned
developments.
A
A
Section
c
other
boards,
the
zoning
board
of
appeals,
interacts
with
the
planning
board
the
conservation
commission.
The
board
of
health,
the
economic
development
board,
the
traffic
and
parking
commission
and
the
licensing
commission
in
order
to
accomplish
the
board's
responsibilities
and
of
recommendation
presented
so,
as
you
may
all
have
in
front
of
you,
I
hope
you
were
following
along.
I
know
it
was
a
lot
to
read,
but
that
is
the
recommendation
that
has
been
presented
to
us.
A
Essentially,
what
you
would
be
voting
on
is
to
add
this
to
section
six
as
presented,
so
I
will
not
be
opening
the
floor
for
the
author
of
the
petition
to
to
provide
more
information.
He
he
clearly
provided
that
information
during
the
public
speaking
portion
now.
I
will
only
allow
the
members
of
this
commission
to
discuss
or
to
ask
any
questions
to
our
city
solicitor.
If
there's
any
clarifying
details
that
you
want
so
any
takers,
any
comments,
any
strong
opinions,
emotions,
jason.
F
Well,
I
guess
one
piece
is
cheryl
alluded
to
when
we
were
in
the
previous
section
about
that
we
might
not
have
authority
to
make
these
changes
that
are
outlined
here.
So
I
guess
I
guess
I
have
trouble
voting
on
it
unless
we
know
for
sure
or
not
if
we
even
have
the
authority
to
give
these
rights
to
the
city
council
to
vote
on
these
matters
coming
out
of
the
zoning.
C
C
C
G
Well,
I'm
just
well,
first
of
all,
what's
before
you
is
the
first
time
I'm
reading
it
and
the
scheme
is
that
an
individual
person
seeking
a
special
permit
would
go
through
the
normal
special
permit
process,
which
the
city
council.
J
K
J
G
They
then
get
to
negotiate
more
or
seek
more
mitigation,
who
gets
the
final
approving
on
the
special
permit
and
how
do
the
public
and
those
members
and
the
brothers
get
to
appeal
it?
So
those
are
things
I
need
to
look
at
to
see
if
this
process
is
legal
and
does
it
make
sense,
so
I
I
can't
recommend
this
legally
right
now.
I
also
don't
understand
why
city
councilors
need
to
seek
mitigation
when
that's
not
their
job.
That
is,
that
the
city
manager
and
of
the
zoning
board
of
appeals.
K
G
I
think
that
this
city
has
a
history
of
hoping
that
the
public
it
takes
more
involvement
because
the
city
councilors
don't
like
what
the
cpa
does.
They
have
the
authority
not
to
approve
the
appointments
that
the
city
manager
gave
them,
which
again,
I
I
think,
is
against
the
charter,
but
he
did
give
them
authority
to
approve
the
appointment.
So
at
this
point,
you're
putting
developers
and
property
owners
through
quite
a
bit
of
a
process
that
are
going
to
determine.
A
Okay,
so
when
you
say
and
just
for
clarifications
mary,
you
will
be
next,
but
just
for
clarifications
before
it
slips
my
mind
when
you
say
you
don't
know,
if
it's
legal,
would
it
mean
you
would
need
more
time
to
look
into
it
or
or
do
you
mean
what
does
that
mean.
A
And
then
mary,
I
I
see
your
hand
so
I'll.
Let
you
speak
and
leo
did
you
have
your
hand
up
so
I'll
go
with
mary
first
and
then
I'll
go
with
leo
mary
yeah.
H
I
think
I'm
going
back
to
the
same
questions
I
had
in
the
summer,
and
so
I
was
when
I
first
read
it
in
the
summer
I
was
confused
and
I
had
some
questions
and
at
the
time
I
got
I
got
what
I
thought
was
clarification,
but
I'm
back
to
being
confused.
H
So
you
know,
I
think,
the
question
I
I
clarification
in
basically,
in
a
summary
form,
it's
almost
like
what
is
the
big
ask
what
and
then,
how
does
that
this
ask
different
for
what's
taking
place
now,
and
so
it
may
be
a
wording
of
this
that
needs
to
the
clarity
and
and
it
yeah,
I
think
that's
where
I'm.
A
Struggling
mary,
are
you
directing
the
question
to
cheryl,
or
would
you
like
to
hear
it
from
the
author
of
the
motion.
H
Well,
I
thought
you,
I
thought
you
said
that
roy
couldn't
talk,
so
I
guess
I
was
doing
I'll
tag.
Your
head.
H
G
G
A
Okay,
so
so
here
so
so
first,
let
me
give
the
floor
to
leo,
because
I
know
he
has
questions
and
then
before
I
give
it
to
leo,
then
if
you
guys
feel
strongly-
and
you
have
questions
to
the
author
who
is
present,
we
can
take
a
vote
to
see
if
you
guys
want
him
to
speak.
A
The
reason
why
and
I
want
to
clarify
the
reason
why
I
was
not
going
to
allow
to
for
him
to
speak
was
because
he
had
an
opportunity
to
speak
during
the
public
speaking
portion,
and
that
was
the
time
where
he
could
state
his
case.
But
if
you
guys
feel
that,
in
order
to
make
a
decision
and
take
a
vote
you'd
like
to
ask
some
questions
to
the
author,
then
we
will
take
a
vote
to
see
if
he
can
speak.
A
J
J
A
Thank
you
so
so
I
think
for
for
this
specific
case,
let's
take
a
vote
to
move
it
to
the
next
meeting
and
the
reason
I
say
that
is
because-
and
I
want
to
clarify
for
the
public.
The
reason
why
we
didn't
take
a
vote
for
the
last
motion
presented
to
us
was
because
it
was
very
clear
in
terms
why
we
we
couldn't
vote
on
it
and
and
that's
why
we
didn't
allow
to
table
it
because
this
body
had
not.
A
A
She
does
not
have
the
answer
to
some
of
the
questions
that
our
commissioners
here
have
and
that's
totally
fair,
she's
being
due
diligent
and
she's,
saying
she'll
do
the
research
so
given
that
she
needs
more
time
for
that,
let's
take
a
vote
for
the
matter
that
leo
just
proposed.
Go
ahead
leo,
but
also.
A
A
C
F
You
know,
as
we
think
about
it,
or
do
we
think
asking
questions
now
and
then
having
to
ask
questions
again
in
two
weeks.
Is
too
many
questions
and
we've
belabored
it?
I
don't.
I
don't
know.
I
just.
A
Okay,
would
you
guys
prefer
to
ask
questions
now?
Okay,
perfect?
So
so,
let's
take
it
for
a
vote
so
I'll.
Let
you
guys
ask
questions
now
and
we
before
yeah.
Let's
take
the
questions
now
and
then
we
wrote
actually,
let's,
let's
move
it.
Let's
vote
on
moving
this
to
a
second
meeting
and
ask
questions.
Is
that
okay
does
that?
Does
that
order
work
for
you
guys?
You
guys
will
ask
questions
today.
So
I'll?
Let
you
guys
ask
questions
today.
So,
let's
vote
on
that.
First,
do
you
guys
want
to
ask
questions
today?
A
A
yes
vote
means
yes
and
no.
It
means
you
don't
want
to
ask
any
questions
today.
So
I'll
start
with
judith
garcia,
yes
leo
robinson,
no
calvin
brown,
calvin,
yes
or
no
for
questions
today,
counselor
brown,
yes
or
no,
okay,
I'll
mark
you
as
absent
melinda
vega,
maldonado
questions
today,
yes
or
no
absent
todd
taylor
questions
today,
yes
or
no.
A
A
A
A
Okay,
please,
when
I
ask
for
your
vote
on
mute
yourself
when
you're
not
voting,
mute
yourself,
todd
taylor,
we
agreed
that
top
tier
is
not
so
he's
absent,
rosemary
carlisle
nope.
Is
that
a
no?
No
okay,
just
senia
alfaro,
please
unmute
yourself,
yes
or
no.
A
K
F
A
A
A
A
yes
is
a
yes
vote
is
moving
it
to
the
next
meeting.
A
no
vote
is
not
moving
into
the
next
meeting,
so
judith
garcia,
yes
leo
robinson,
yes,
calvin
brown,
calvin
brown
is
absent.
Vega,
maldonado,
melinda,
vega,
maldonado
taylor.
I
believe
he
had
technical
difficulties
rosemary
carlisle
second
meeting.
A
A
A
K
F
A
Charlene
mclean
and
she's
absent,
sorry,
guys
and
mimi
rack
and
tour.
Yes,
okay,
so
everyone
with
the
few
absence.
Everyone
voted
in
favor
of
moving
this
to
a
second
meeting
and
again
for
clarification.
Everyone
at
home
we're
moving
it
to
a
second
meeting,
because
city
solicitor
needs
to
do
research
on
it
and
the
commissioners
here
do
not
feel
strongly
on
voting
on
something
they.
They
don't
have
the
answers
to.
A
F
If
we
have
additional
questions
for
cheryl
that
we
want
researched,
can
we
ask
her
that
offline
or
is
that
something
we
should
address
here?
I
just
don't
know
what
the
protocol.
A
Yes,
and
just
for
the
record
guys
yeah,
that's
that's
definitely
great
so
feel
free
to
to
ask
her
questions.
Just
see,
see
me
on
it,
so
I
can
have
a
copy
and
I
can
make
sure
that
we
read
it
during
the
we.
You
know
we
read
it
during
the
meeting
itself,
so.
G
A
Got
it
got
it?
Okay,
good
that
clarifies
things
for
me,
because
I
was
under
the
impression
that
that
the
confidential
client
confidential
aspect
was
just
between
council
city
and
you.
But
I
guess
it's
open.
A
Employees
board
members
excellent
okay,
so
that's
a
great
question
all
right,
so
if
you
want
for
any
purpose,
if
any
of
you
guys
want
to
share
it
with
the
public
that
what
you
learned,
you
can
feel
free
to
share
it,
but
you
don't
have
to
according
to
city
solicitor.
So
thank
you,
everyone
for
being
so
diligent
and
prudent
and
asking
incredible
questions.
Today.
We've
covered
the
big
chunk
of
discussion.
A
We've
we've
covered
sections
four
through
six
today,
the
next
two
meetings
will
should
be
smooth
sailing.
The
topics
are
are
not
as
as
as
heavily
you
know,
as
a
lot
of
content
as
tonight
did
have.
So.
Thank
you,
everyone
for,
for
being
so
prudent,
asking
questions
and,
and
moving
this
to
to
a
second
meeting
and
again
thank
you
city
solicitor
for
being
fully
transparent
on
having
to
do
research.
A
A
Today
was
a
very
turbulent
day
in
our
history
for
our
country,
as
I
said
at
the
beginning
of
this
meeting,
so
I
I
hope
that
all
of
you
go
out
there
and
catch
up
and
and
hopefully
we
can
keep
the
residents
of
washington
dc,
the
staff
members,
the
elected
officials,
in
our
prayers
and
in
our
thoughts
as
as
everything
continues
to
to
unravel.
I
wish
everyone
a
good
night
and
thank
you
again
for
serving
the
city
of
chelsea.
This
is
a
very
important
task
that
we
all
have.