►
From YouTube: Charter Review Meeting of 10-28-20
Description
City of Chelsea
via WebEx
A
Hi
everyone
happy
wednesday
today
is
wednesday
october
28th
and
we
are
starting
our
city
charter
review
meeting
with
the
special
committee.
So
before
we
get
started
into
more
details,
I
will
start
with
attendance
start
with
myself:
judith
garcia,
present
counselor
leo
robinson
counselor,
cabin
brown.
A
A
This
is
the
special
committee
meeting
for
the
review
of
the
city
charter
charter,
which
is
the
most
important
legal
document
of
our
city.
What
we
do
is
every
bi-weekly
we
meet
to
discuss
different
sections
of
our
charter.
Today
we
finally
reached
the
last
section
of
our
charter,
which
is
section
10.,
so
today
we
meet.
A
We
will
discuss
any
suggestions,
recommendations
of
things
we
wish
to
see
changed
or
implemented
or
added
into
this
charter,
and
that
will
conclude
in
a
discussion
after
that
we
will
continue
discussing
and
how
we
present,
we
plan
to
present
a
formal
packet
to
the
council.
That's
something
that
we'll
discuss
later
on,
but
this
is
a
quick
review
of
purpose
and
process
of
this
committee.
We
sit
here
and
we
review
the
sitting
charter
in
different
sections.
A
So
today's
section
10.,
considering
that
we've
discussed
that
we
move
on
to
our
next
section
of
our
meeting,
which
is
any
lingering
questions
comments
from
previous
sections.
So
today
we're
discussing
discussing
section
10,
but
are
there
any
previous
lingering
questions?
Regarding
other
sections,
we
received
the
communication
from
alex
welcome.
A
B
A
E
I
don't
I
don't
see
why
that
if
we
decide
to
do
hispanic
version
that
the
whole
charter
you
could
have
a
charter
in
spanish,
I
don't
see
why
you
would
just
do
a
whole
sister
introduction
piece,
but
if
you're
going
to
make
it
available,
why
don't
you
just
make
it
available?
That's
something
we
should
consider
just
have
a
whole
charter
in
spanish
also
available.
E
A
Great-
and
you
raised
a
good
point,
because
I
know
that
we
do
have
a
charter
in
spanish
that
we
did
dig
up.
I
think
I
believe
it's
from
2005
or
10
2010
and
we
are
actively
working
on
on
submitting
a
finalized,
revamped
spanish
translation
of
it
completely.
We
have
gotten
circling
around
for
any
residents
who
are
watching.
You
can
also
find
it
online.
A
A
A
So
I'm
sure
all
of
you
had
ample
time
to
read
section
10,
which
is
half
a
page,
did
anyone
I
did
not
receive
any
communications
from
anyone.
Does
anyone
here
have
any
comments,
concerns
regarding
section
10
and
allow
me
to
remind
you
section:
10
is
just
a
continuation
of
existing
laws,
consideration
of
obligations
and
it
includes
a
comparative
table.
A
A
So
the
reason
why
I'm
going
to
meet
with
all
of
you
is
because
I
want
to
be
able
to
establish
a
clear
timeline
of
how
we
plan
to
coordinate
our
schedules
going
forward
in
terms
of
submitting
a
packet
to
a
council.
As
you
know,
the
role
of
the
special
committee
is
for
us
to
submit
one
single
packet,
one
single
package
to
the
council,
with
our
collective
recommendations
of
any
suggestions
edits
that
we
would
like
to
see
on
our
charter.
A
We
need
to
do
that
as
a
collective,
so
I
have
compiled
everything
that
every
single
note
that
everyone
has
submitted
I've
compiled
it
with
fatima
we
will
be
sending
out
those
packets
to
all
of
you
to
review
and
we
will
sit
and
take
the
next
meetings,
which
I
hope
should
be
anywhere
between
three
to
five
six
meetings
to
finally
submit
something
to
the
council.
So
that
being
said,
I
thought
of
some
dates
for
for
those
discussions
to
begin
and
those
discussions
will
be
more
hands-on.
A
What
we
plan
to
present
so
for
the
month
of
november
november,
has
I,
I
initially
had
thought
of
wednesday
november
keeping
the
wednesday
timeline
wednesday
at
6
p.m
and
having
two
dates
for
november.
My
initial
thought
was
november
4th,
which
is
the
first
wednesday
of
november
and
then
wednesday
november
18th.
A
F
E
E
Well,
we've
done
the
first
thing,
that's
required
of
us
to
review
the
charter,
and
we
have
definitely
reviewed
it
and
definitely
made
some
recommended
recommendations
and
I
think
we're
going
in
the
right
direction
with
the
timeline
of
seven
days
for
previous
investigation
or
you
know
when
an
offering
so,
but
I
just
think
next
tuesday.
Our
next
wednesday
is
too
quickly
it's
less
than
a
week
away.
It's
a
week
away.
F
A
So,
actually,
no
so
so
these
are.
These
are
my
thoughts.
My
thoughts
are
25th
is
off
the
books,
because
I
know
that
thanksgiving
is
the
next
day
and
I
wouldn't
be
mindful
of
that.
So
the
only
options
that
I
have
now
is
the
fourth
and
the
18th,
but
the
fourth
I'm
hearing
you
all
loud
and
clear.
So
what
we'll
do
is-
and
this
is
game
plan
it
would
be
we'll
have
one
meeting
november
18th
wednesday,
we'll
have
one
meeting
for
the
month
of
november
and
then
we
will
have
december
all
of
december.
A
A
So
tuesdays
are
very
difficult
because
council,
some
of
the
council
members,
that's
when
we
have
tuesdays
mondays
tuesdays,
tend
to
be
a
big
day
for
subcommittees.
Okay.
So
it's
difficult
to
conflict
and
considering
that
everyone's
scheduled
for
wednesday
for
the
past
months
have
worked.
Then
I'm
thinking
it
should
be
fine
to
keep
it.
One
say
if
that's
okay
for
everyone
once
they
had
sex.
G
A
A
G
A
E
A
To
see
what
we
can
do
to
open
it,
obviously
all
our
meetings
and
I
need
to
be
fully
transparent.
I
know
cheryl's
on
the
line
as
well.
All
our
meetings
are
open
to
the
public,
so
the
public
can
come
here
and
we're
giving
covet
19
times
we're
trying
to
make
it
as
accessible
as
possible
by
live
streaming
through
facebook
and
live
streaming
through
these
other
outlets,
but
in
terms
of
a
lot
making
it
a
little
bit
more
of
a
public
forum.
I
think
that's
what
I'm
hearing
from
you.
G
A
A
Because
of
that
that
can
get
as
you
can
imagine
that
that
could
be
too
many
conversations
going
on
and
stopping
us
from
from
really
making
the
the
critical
decisions
that
we
need
to
make
to
have
a
final
packet
submitted,
but
obviously
we're
not
discouraging
the
public
from
coming,
and
I
want
to
make
that
clear.
This
is
open
meetings.
People
can
come
here,
people
have
come
here
to
to
give
their
feedback
it's
in
a
public
setting,
people
can
actually
come
and
and
witness
this
and
watch
us
talk
and
and
support
our
discussions.
Yeah.
H
May
I
respond
yes,
there
is
no
requirement
city,
councilor
brown.
You
are
only
making
a
recommendation
to
the
full
city
council
right
if
the
city
council
has
to
hold
public
hearings
to
make
changes
to
the
charter,
because
the
legislature
won't
accept
anything
that
goes
home
will
petition
to
change
the
charter
without
public
hearings.
One
two:
some
of
the
changes
may
require
public
vote.
H
A
H
A
E
Madam
chair,
I
understand
that,
but
also
we're
making
recommendations.
We've
made
recommendations,
I
think,
in
a
full
form.
We
should
still
extend
to
the
public
that
these
are
the
obligations
that
we'll
be
forwarding
to
the
city
council
and
maybe
at
that
form
they
may
have
some
kind
of
you
know
discretion
well,
whether
they
like
it
or
not,
or
it's
just
in
a
public
opinion.
That's
all
it
is.
E
I
So
I
can,
I
just
repeat
what
I
heard
just
so.
I
make
sure
that
I
have
the
process
down
correctly,
so
so
certainly
the
dates,
the
18th
second,
the
9th
and
the
16th
we're
going
to
be
meeting.
You
are
going
to
provide
us
before
no
november
18
a
full
set
of
all
recommendations
and
that
have
come
forward
on
the
18th.
We
will
start
to
discuss
those
recommendations
and
with
the
intent
that
a
full
packet
would
be
developed
for
the
city
council.
I
What
happens
when
we
have
two
conflicting
points
of
view
on
a
portion
of
that
that
goes
into
the
full
packet?
Are
we
looking
for
a
majority
vote
of
this
committee,
or
are
we
looking
for
a
consensus
vote
or
a
two-thirds
vote?
What
are
the
what's
the
process
to
getting
through
that
packet?
That
ultimately
goes
to
the
city
council.
A
H
H
H
H
D
F
Sorry
about
that,
I
just
wanted
to
speak.
I
mean
count
to
speak
to
what
calvin
just
mentioned
about,
as
we
are
deliberating
the
recommendations
to
make
to
the
city
council
calvin.
If
I
understood
you
correctly,
you
were
saying
that
during
that
process,
where
we
should
be
allowing
the
public
to
provide
comments,
they've
already
had
the
public
has
already
had
their
input.
F
A
So
all
of
this
mary,
I
appreciate
it
and
thank
you
for
asking
that
question.
I
think
now
we
should
proceed
to
really
cover
as
we
wrap
up
this
meeting,
I
think
we've
just
we've
covered
key
things
which
are
timeline
updates.
I
will
send
you
those
timeline
updates
that
that
we
have
in
mind
in
order
to
continue
reviewing
and
again
remember.
G
A
Ideally,
if
we
had
the
november
meeting
established,
I
was
planning
to
be
a
bit
aggressive
and
have
something
to
cancel
by
december
21st,
but
considering
the
delay
of
the
holidays
and
the
delay
of
the
election
this
year,
I
realistically
speaking,
we
won't
have
something
for
council
until
january
of
next
year,
so
that
gives
us
ample
room,
and
I
don't
want
anyone
to
feel
pressured
that
you
have
to
submit
something
immediately.
So
I
think,
between
six
six
to
eight
meetings
that
we
may
have
or
not,
we
should
be
able
to
submit
something
in
january.
A
If
it
takes
longer,
then
that's
fine.
So
that
being
said,
I
see
okay,
so
I
see
two
hands
I
do
want
to
before.
We
we
go
on
topics
that
we've
already
discussed.
I
do
want
to
put
it
in
your
mind
that
I,
before
we
end
this
meeting
today,
I
want
to
establish
a
consensus
of
how
we
plan
to
decide
our
process
for
the
november
18th
meeting,
so
just
putting
that
in
your
mind,
right
now,
because
cheryl
and
mary
have
brought
up
this
great
point.
So
I'll
go
with
jason
and
then
counselor
brown,
jason.
G
E
This
kind
of
question
for
cheryl
cheryl,
you
said
I
thought
I
heard
you
say
something
and
likeness
of
this.
If
there's
something
right
now
that
we
have
made
recommendations
to
that's
inconsistent
with
the
charter
yeah,
I
think
he
said
the
city
council
may
have
to
vote
on
it.
That's
something
that
we
should
be
aware
of
before
we
start
putting
this
piece
that
we're
going
to
discuss.
H
So
once
you
make
a
decision
on
what
your
recommendation
is
going
to
be
for
the
city
council,
my
office
and
I
need
to
review
the
legal
path
of
how
to
change
the
charter,
which
is
different
than
what
you
decide.
So
most
things
may
be
inconsistent.
That's
the
whole
point
about
changing
the
charter
right,
but
you
made
that
recommendation.
So,
if
you're
recommending
a
change
in
the
form
of
government,
the
path
to
that
would
be
to
the
voters
if
you're,
adding
grammatical
changes.
H
I
So
two
things,
so
what
I'm
hearing
is?
If
it's,
if
it's
issues
of
substance,
then
that's
going
to
have
to
go
before
us
in
terms
of
a
vote
and
then
to
the
to
the
city
council.
If
it's
issues
of
housekeeping
grammatical
changes,
you
know
being
consistent
throughout
the
document,
then
that
may
not
be
the
big
issues.
I
H
So
I
think
there
might
have
been
just
one
issue
that
may
be
a
little
illegal
or
in
direct
conflict
with
the
state,
corey
laws
and
the
changes
in
the
quarry
laws
that
we
have.
But
otherwise
I
have
not
heard
anything
that
would
be
illegal
presented,
but
I
will
I
will.
We
will
review
the
actual
packet,
which
is
nice,
that
we're
not.
A
Okay,
so
I
think
I
think
that's
a
great
idea
in
terms
of
process.
I
will
compile
it.
I
will
compile
everything
that
we've
discussed
in
the
past
months
with
our
administrative
assistants.
I
will
have
cheryl's
office,
the
city
solicitor's
office.
Give
it
a
view
before
every
member
of
this
committee
receives
it
for
discussion
and
for
final
recommendations.
D
H
So
that's
one
of
them
that
we
would
definitely
recommend
a
change
to
I
mean
it
might
be.
I
believe
there
was
one
council
robinson
that
you
mentioned
about
redistricting
or
changing
the
lines.
There's
a
process
for
that,
and-
and
I
want
to
make
sure
that
we
have
it-
that
everyone's
aware
of
it,
when
we
do
do
it,
that
there's
a
process
when
you
want
to
who
change.
C
A
A
H
It's
always
good
to
have
a
redlined
copy
of
the
charter
so
that
they
can
see
the
changes
that
you're
requesting,
but
the
vote
is
actually
per
section
per
line
like
we
adopt
anything
else
on
the
city
council,
so
we
yeah
there
would
be
an
actual
when,
if
the
council
wishes
to
take
it
up
for
vote,
we
would
change.
We
would
write
what
their
votes
would
entail,
but
really
you're
recommending
a
change
to
this
section.
C
H
A
A
There's
ways
that
we
can
figure
it
out,
but
let's,
let's,
let's
cross
that
bridge
when
we
get
there.
Let's
start
with
with
establishing
you
know
the
the
packet
itself,
but,
most
importantly
before
this
meeting
ends,
let's
establish
very
clear
rules
on
how
we
plan
to
agree
on
on
our
process.
So
in
terms
of
majority
vote,
is
it
two-thirds
vote?
Are
there
any
any
thoughts
and
cheryl?
Can
you
are
there
three
options
that
are
the
most
popular
I'm
assuming
there's
a
two-thirds
vote.
H
For
two
options:
a
majority
or
two-thirds,
so
it
would
be
a
majority
of
the
quorum
that
is
present
the
night
you're
voting
on
these
recommendations
right
or
you
could
do
a
two-thirds
vote
of
the
entire
committee
makeup.
I
don't
know
how
many
people
are
actually
on
this
committee,
but
yes,
so
there's.
I
B
B
You
were
talking
about
changing
the
representation
and
that
there's
a
long
process
to
that
that
that's
that's
only
in
certain
cases
and
what
that
change
would
be.
So,
for
instance,
we
were
talking
about
going
back
and
and
doing
ward
counselors
instead
of
district
counselors.
That
would
not,
in
fact,
be
a
long
process,
since
the
war
lines
already
exist,
correct.
H
H
D
C
E
With
the
award
representation,
you
only
have
four
awards.
So
if
you
have
eight
district
councils,
what
we
have
now,
you
would
still
have
to
indicate
more
than
what
you
would
like
to
see
at
the
ward
conflict
you
can
see.
For
us,
an
award
counselor
would
be
for
ward
one
and
two,
and
what
to
be
counseled
would
be
from
two
and
three
so
because
you
only
have
four
more
you'd
have
to
create
eight
movement.
A
Great
great
so
great
conversations.
This
is
a
perfect
time
to
just
remind
members
of
the
committee
that
if,
if
there
is
something
that
you
feel
strongly
about
in
terms
of
ward
or
changing
the
number
of
representatives
in
terms
of
council,
you
can
submit
this
as
well
via
writing
and
I'll,
be
happy
to
add
it
to
the
recommendations.
So
we
can
talk
about
it
and
dissect
it
more
as
we
continue
on
these
next
meetings
before
we
present
the
final
package.
I
Yep,
actually
that's
where
I'm
going
back
to
so.
Yes
majority,
you
know
what
does
this?
What
does
what's
the
role?
What's
the
responsibility
of
this
committee?
We've
put
a
great
deal
of
time
into
this
process?
I
think
we
begin
in
june.
I
can't
remember,
but
we
you
know
and-
and
we've
got
a
couple
of
months
in
front
of
us.
I
think
it
needs
to
be
a
two-thirds
vote
and
it's
not
just
that.
A
I
must
say
maria.
I
also
agree
with
you
in
terms
of
the
two
thirds
vote.
My
my
only
hesitation
of
doing
it
of
members
present
is
that
we
have
not
had
a
consistent
attendance
rate
with
some
members.
Some
of
you
have
been
outstanding
and
I
really
appreciate
your
participation
and
and
and
your
attendance,
it's
reflected
each
time
I
take
it,
but
others
not
so
much
so
so
that
is
my
only
hesitation
in
terms
of
as
you've
said.
A
A
G
I
think
I
I'm
with
counselor
taylor.
I
I
think
a
majority
is
easy
enough.
I
think
if
we
start
getting,
I
mean,
there's
still
a
whole
another
level
of
approvals
that
need
to
go
through
this.
If,
if
we're
looking
for
two-thirds
and
people
aren't
attending
and
and
we
can't
get
it,
that
means
that
nothing
can
move
forward
at
all
for
even
further
discussions.
G
I
think
all
we're
proving
is.
We
think
these
are
solid
enough
recommendations
to
go
to
the
city
council.
The
city
council
can
have
conversations
in
amongst
themselves
and
what
they
think
is
important
and
valuable,
and
then
it's
going
it
it.
Then
it's
being
opened
up
to
the
residents
to
have
open
dialogue
with
the
city
councilors
on
it
and
so
there's.
I
think,
there's
other
levels
of
of
continued
conversations
to
happen.
This
we're
just
the
first,
the
first
hurdle
in
getting
to
getting
somewhere
and
so
for
us
to
have
a
two-thirds
vote.
F
I
don't
have
any
real,
strong
feelings,
one
way
or
another
as
to
whether
it's
a
simple
majority
or
two-thirds
majority,
but
I
do
think
it
needs
to
be
whatever
majority
we
go
with
of
the
quorum
present
that
evening.
I
think
you
know
if
you
make
it
of
the
whole
group.
While
that
would
that's
ideal,
you
know
the
reality
has
been.
You
know.
I
know
I've
had
to
miss
meetings
because
of
work
as
other
people,
and
I
think
that
could
slow
things
down
even
more
if
it's
of
the
entire
group
present.
F
B
Sorry,
try
having
problems
with
this
mute
button,
it's
okay,
so
every
board
that
exists
in
this
city
operates
the
same
way.
I
see
no
reason
for
us
to
create
some
new.
You
know
procedure,
you
know
or
standard
for
this
for
this
board
as
well.
You
know,
I
think
a
majority
of
the
quorum
is
what
decides
the
issue
and
I
believe
counselor
robinson.
You
might
correct
me
if
I'm
wrong
or
cheryl.
If
past
charter
review
boards
had
a
two-thirds
vote,
I
I
I'm
not
aware
of
it.
D
I
A
A
H
Because
I
don't
know,
I
recall
I
wasn't
there
for
the
vote,
so
I've
been
I've
been
involved
with
one
charter
review
commission
in
the
years
that
I've
been
here
and
most
of
what
was
sent
to
the
city
council
was
gender
changes
or
making
the
chart
agenda
neutral.
So
maybe
things
didn't
pass?
I
don't
know
what
what
happened
in
that
meeting.
I
believe
they
set
their
own
rules.
I
really
don't
know
if.
A
H
A
C
C
A
C
C
D
A
E
E
So
we
just
have
to
get
this
to
the
city
council,
the
public,
maybe,
and
just
let
them
have
some
say
so
on,
and
I
think
again
by
setting
this
standard
when
any
given
night,
if
you
teach
one
of
the
two
of
the
folks,
that's
not
speaking
on
on
the
forum
tonight,
you're
probably
going
to
need
eight
folks
and
you're
only
going
to
have
seven
as
live.
So
you
know.
A
A
B
A
B
A
A
That
was
a
good
one.
Thank
you,
barry,
okay,
so
in
in
terms
of
a
real
agreeing
and
process
november
18th,
I
will
send
we
will
send
everyone
a
schedule
for
future
meetings,
we'll
start
november
18th.
You
will
have
a
packet
in
front
of
you
of
all
the
recommendations
that
you've
made
and
we
will
do
our
process
by
a
majority
vote
jason.
I
saw
you
have
your
hand
up.
G
A
Yeah,
so
what
we'll
do
is
because
it
is
10
sections
that
we've
already
discussed,
you've
already
read
you're
already
familiar
with
once
I
present
that
packet,
it
will
be
the
entire
packet
of
all
the
recommendations
and
what
we'll
do
is
on
day
one
we'll
go
section,
one,
two
three
and
we'll
have
each
we.
We
will
do
section
one
two
three,
so
we
we
don't
need
like
a
specific
meeting
for
a
specific
section,
we'll
cover
several
sections
in
one
night
and
continue
that
discussion
until
we'll
book
two
hours.
A
A
A
No
we're
not
going
through
the
charter,
that's
what
we're
doing
so.
The
packet
that
you'll
have
in
front
of
you
is
just
the
package
of
any
recommendations
that
you
send.
It's,
not
the
charter.
What
you
will
have
in
front
of
you
is
everything.
You've
said
my
way
and
to
this
body
saying
these
are
the
changes
I
want
to
see
implemented.
That's
what
you
will
have
in
front
of
you,
a
package
of
those
recommendations
that
every
single
one
of
you
has
made.
It
won't
be
the
charter.
A
You
can
use
the
charter
to
reference
those
points,
but
you'll
have
in
front
of
you
those
recommendations,
so
you'll
have
that
packet
on
november
18
and
you'll
have
a
very
clear
outline
of
the
dates
that
we'll
be
meeting
and
what
sections
we'll
be
covering
that
day.
I
see
todd
is
that
tom
taylor
todd
taylor.
A
A
A
B
That
will
not
include
any
of
the
suggestions
that
were
brought
up
during
the
meetings
that
were
not
submitted
in
writing.
That's
that's
what
I'm
that's
what
I'm
concerned
about,
because
I
think
I
think
we
did
spend
a
lot
of
time
going
through
different
ideas
and
and
objections
to
those
ideas
or
whatever
it
is.
That
may
not
have
been
submitted
in
writing.
A
Yeah,
so
so
that's
why
I
made
it
very
clear
when
we
met
during
these
meetings
that
any
changes
that
want
that
you
want
to
implement
were
asked
to
be
submitted
in
writing.
So
everyone
can
see
it
and
and
know
about
it.
However,
however,
if
that's
why
I'm
saying
now,
if
you
have
anything
else
that
you're
passionate
about
that,
you
want
to
see
change,
it's
not
late
to
submit
it,
you
can
submit
it
in
writing.
The
point
is:
it
has
to
be
submitted
in
writing,
so
our
colleagues
can
see
it
and
we
can
have
it
transparently.
A
G
Well
to
piggyback
off
of
consular
taylor,
I
think,
though
we
had
some
great
conversations
during
our
meetings.
Sometimes
we
started
off
in
one
place
and
we
had
some
consensus
that
it
should
be
adjusted
to
the
following
and
so
are
have
those
have
those
notes
not
been
taken,
and
I'm
just
saying
so.
We
started
with
someone
writing
something
and
saying
whatever
right
and
then
we
had
some
some
dialogue
on
it,
and
this
group,
I
think,
decided.
Oh
yeah.
A
Of
those
conversations
jason,
we
have
records
of
those
conversations
and
that
will
be
included
during
the
moment
of
the
discussion
of
that
section.
So
so
so
so
again,
these
recommendations
will
be
edited
and
we
will
include
within
that
specific
section,
any
other
feedback
that
you
want
to
see
implemented.
A
G
A
I
Mary
dude,
if
I
could
recommend,
maybe
the
november
18th
you
know
all
of
us-
spend
maybe
the
first
10
to
15
minutes
going
through
the
document
I
mean.
If
we
get
them
before
the
18th,
we
should
do
it
as
a
homework
assignment
before,
but
maybe
we
spend
time
each
individually
going
through
it
and
just
making
sure
from
our
memory
that
everything
is
included,
because
I
know
that
you
know
certainly
from
the
verbal
conversations.
You'll
include
that
from
the
written
submittals
you'll
include
that
but
human
nature
being
what
it
is.
I
I'm
sure
there
might
be
a
couple
of
things
that
we
forget
in
addition
to
to
be
included,
in
addition
to
any
new
things
that
come
up.
So
maybe
it's
a
on
the
agenda.
The
first
15
minutes
is
devoted
to
just
going
through
the
documents
to
make
sure
it's
complete,
and
then
we
work
off
of
the
complete.
We,
we
do
a
vote,
a
consensus
vote
at
that
point
that
it
is
complete.
So
we
can
move
forward
from
that
point.
A
Yeah
no
and
thank
you
mary,
the
idea
is
to
have
you
will
have
these
packets
before
the
18th
so
and
and
that's
the
idea,
it's
you
read
it
before
by
the
18th.
If
there's
any
lingering
questions
any
comments,
but
I
want
you
to
be
familiarized
with
packing
in
front
of
you
with
your
own
recommendations
prior
to
the
18th
meeting.
A
A
A
No,
no
questions,
no
concerns
or
comments.
Okay,
so
everyone
you
before
the
18th
the
week
before
the
18th,
you
will
all
have
the
packets
in
front
of
you.
I
look
forward
to
seeing
everyone
on
the
18th
and
we
will
start
the
process
by
the
majority
of
those
present
in
agreeing
with
any
recommendations
that
we
discussed
that
day
so
I'll
send
all
those
items
to
you
before
then,
including
the
schedule
of
what
we
will
plan
to
meet.
That
will
be
also
public
record.