►
From YouTube: Charter Review Committee 7-8-20
Description
City of Chelsea
via WebEx
Chelsea Community Cable TV
A
B
A
D
A
A
Miriam
raconteur
Rosen
great,
thank
you,
everyone
that
was
attendance,
and
now
we
are
moving
on.
Our
next
section
is
a
quick
review
of
purpose
and
process.
A
quick
review
I
want
to
just
let
everyone
know
that
the
purpose
of
this
meeting
is
to
discuss
and
review
the
city
charter
and
for
the
members
of
this
committee
to
present
their
suggestions,
comments
of
changes
that
would
like
to
see
set
for
each
section.
The
process
of
that.
Currently,
what
we're
doing
is
we're
reviewing
section
by
section
having
a
discussion.
A
That
being
said,
that
covers
the
quick
review
of
purpose
and
and
the
process
that
we
will
continue
to
really
review
the
city
charter.
Now
we
move
on
to
any
lingering
questions
comments
from
previous
sections.
I
know:
I
have
received
communications
from
Mary
Burke
and
communications
from
Jason
stocker,
but
before
we
move
on
I
see
someone
has
a
question
charlie.
Do
you
have
a
question?
Yes,.
A
C
C
A
A
Rules,
it's
basically
to
set
the
decorum
of
how
the
council
functions
and
those
who
are
available.
They
should
be
available
on
the
website,
and
we
also
have
copies
of
that.
If
it
would
be
helpful
for
the
review
of
this
committee,
we
can
make
sure
to
have
copies
of
that.
For
all
of
you
to
see
what
those
rules
are.
C
C
C
A
E
C
A
A
D
A
A
G
A
A
A
G
Then
in
section
2.1
one
where
we
just
start
to
talk
about
having
a
city
manager,
I
think
a
cross-reference
to
say
that
more
information
on
on
their
duties
can
be
found
in
section
4
or
something
along
those
lines,
so
that
people
don't
think
something
is
missing
here
when
they
we're
introducing
that
person.
We
can
tell
them
that
there's
more
information
over
here
and
I
think
those
cross
references
are
helpful
when
you're
reading,
through
a
document
trying
to
understand.
A
F
You
so
much
so
I
submitted
commentary
on
basically
some
of
the
conversation
that
we
had
at
the
last
week,
which
was
June.
What
and
you'll
see
in
what
I
wrote
that
in
second
in
2.1
and
our
last
meeting
members
of
the
review
commission
suggested
that
one
of
a
city
child
would
be
changed
moving
forward.
But
the
number
of
elected
city
officials.
F
Was
reduced
to
nine
members
from
eleven,
and
the
second
proposal
was
to
reduce
to
seven
members
from
eleven
I
want
to
go
being
against
that
following
two
reasons,
the
first
are
the
following
reasons
we
have
the
first
is
we
have
a
representative
democracy
structure
even
at
the
local
level,
reducing
the
number
of
City
Council
members.
F
We
would,
as
a
result,
be
centralizing
the
decision-making
power
for
the
city
into
fewer
representatives
of
the
people,
thereby
creating
a
structure
where
more
power
and
authority
is
housed
in
fewer
elected
officials
of
the
City
Council
keeping
the
Charter
in
11
council
seats
means
the
representative
government
structure
is
closer
to
the
people.
I,
also
like
the
fact
that,
especially
on
important
decisions
that
impact
all
of
us,
it
takes
more
city,
councilors
to
say
yes
or
to
say
no
to
get
to
a
majority
vote.
F
I
feel
it
protects
the
constituents
and
ensures
more
frequently
than
not
the
decisions
are
being
made
in
the
best
interest
of
all
who
live
in
Chelsea.
Ultimately,
fewer
council
seats
means
fewer
votes,
are
needed
on
an
issue
to
get
to
a
majority.
I
respectfully
disagree
with
the
rationale
that
we
always
worked
with
nine
members.
F
F
A
H
You
I
sent
a
some
comments
about
section:
2.9
I
would
like
council
/
council
people
a
person
whenever,
instead
of
convicted
I,
would
want
them
to
leave
the
council
leave
of
absence
or
whatever,
but
I
think
if
you're
indicted
on
a
crime
from
either
state
or
federal,
it's
a
distraction
and
the
council,
they
should
not
be
able
to
hold
a
seat
in
the
council.
It
takes
a
long
time
to
go
through
the
courts.
I
think
just
saying
that
they're
convicted
of
a
crime
is
not
enough.
C
C
A
Great
Thank
You
Charlene
you're
breaking
up
a
bit
just
letting
you
know,
but
we
did
here
and
just
to
repeat
for
the
record
for
folks
who
are
watching.
You
do
not
agree
we're
setting
this
aside
for
Cheryl
and
her
consultation.
You
do
not
believe
that
an
indictment
is
something
that
we
can
really
target
specifically
because
it
might
be
unconstitutional,
but
this
is
a
question
that
is
to
be
set
aside
for
Cheryl,
so
Mimi.
Thank
you
for
that.
I
appreciate
your
comment,
but
again
we're
going
to
move
that
over
as
a
question
to
to
Cheryl.
A
G
A
B
Someone
to
be
removed
from
a
board
whether
it's
appointed
or
elected,
just
because
they've
been
accused
with
something
and
we've
seen
too
many
times
that
folks
are
in
reality
and
in
the
end
of
the
day
that
would
file
I've,
been
vindicated
and
not
have
been
found
guilty.
Think
you
know
we
should
continue
to
let
the
court
run
the
courts
and
new
contests.
You
can't
do
Papa,
which
is
part
of
our
Constitution
right
and
I.
Think
there
is
concur,
Robert
is
the
here.
B
Is
some
language
quickly
say
if
you
are
a
convicted
felon
or
have
been
convicted
felon,
you
cannot
serve
an
elected
position
or
an
appointed
and
to
go
even
further.
Even
before
you
run
for
such
office.
You
have
to
take
the
quarry
check.
Excuse
me:
a
quarry
review
check
just
to
make
sure
that
you're
not
equal,
take
their
phone.
If
you've
had
a
misdemeanor,
that's
something
up,
I
mean
you
can
have
a
misdemeanor
that
can
lead
into
a
smaller
charge
against
you
and
you
can
run.
A
Anyone
else
have
any
pending
comments
regarding
section
two
or
anything
that
was
mentioned:
okay,
so
that
if
that
moves
us
to
the
public
speaking
portion,
do
we
have
any
public
speakers
I?
Believe
not
so
that
section
of
the
meeting
is
closed
and
now
we
officially
move
on
to
the
review
of
section
three.
So
for
the
review
of
section,
3
I
have
received
three
communications
from
three
different
folks
comments.
I
have
me
me.
I
know
you
submitted
comments
as
well,
so
maybe
I
will
let
you
go
first.
Everyone
had
should
have
a
copy
of
Mimi's
comments.
H
A
H
G
Point
of
clarification,
because
my
comment
goes
a
little
off
of
Mimi's.
Can
we
have
some
back
prints?
Anyone
share
background
on
the
school
committee
like:
where
does
their
budget
come
from?
How
did
how
are
they
who
gives
it
to
them
to
spend
and
what
are
they
allowed
to
spend
it
on
I
and
does
their
salary
actually
come
from
the
City
Council,
or
is
it
given
to
them
by
another
entity,
because
that
information
is
in
here-
and
so
some
background
is
helpful,
so
that
these
comments
can
be
more
clear.
F
Okay,
I
have
to
give
you
a
little
bit
of
history
in
order
to
understand,
prior
to
1993
across
Massachusetts
for
a
number
of
years,
school
districts
we're
not
doing
a
very
good
job,
bye-bye
children
and
by
our
students,
and
so
it
took
a
great
deal
on
the
on
the
half
on
behalf
of
the
Commonwealth
to
actually
change
the
lock
and
it
was.
It
was
a
huge
change
it
was.
It
was
nineteen
nine.
It
was
called
the
nineteen
ninety-three
education
reform
law.
F
What
it
did
was
it
separated
for
the
most
part
school
departments
from
the
City
Council.
In
many
ways
you
know
it's
not
as
you're,
not
it's
closely
aligned
anymore,
you're,
separated
so
that
school
departments
can
focus
on
school
and
not
so
much.
In
the
olden
days
it
was
like
there
was
a
lot
of
politics
in
school
departments,
right
school
departments,
school
committees,
etc.
F
Nineteen
ninety
three
part
of
it
was
the
promise
of
they're
gonna.
Give
us
increased
funding
at
that
point
which
winded
over
the
years
due
to
inflation,
but
that's
another
story
that
came
to
SOA
last
year,
but
increased
funding,
but
in
return
it
would
be
increased
accountability
on
the
schools
and
the
increases.
The
accountability
came
through
the
commissioner's
office,
and
so
the
Commissioner
of
Education
deemed
that
there
would
be
a
standard
curriculum.
No
longer
could
individual
districts
choose
their
own
just
to
choose
their
own
curriculum.
F
It
came
from
the
state
known
as
the
Massachusetts
frameworks
and
it
was
going
to
be
annual
testing
the
annual
testing,
as
we
all
know,
as
the
MCATs,
and
then
we
would
be
held
accountable
for
increasing
those
test
scores
year
over
year
in
order
to
it
to
continue
to
get
the
increased
funding
in
from
the
state
which
was
called
chapter
70.
So
Jason
an
answer
to
your
to
your
question.
You
know
a
significant
if
proportion
of
our
funding
comes
from
the
state
roughly
anywhere
depending
upon
the
year.
F
F
Ask
you
to
ask
me
clarifying
questions
if
I
haven't
been
clear
but
before
I
do
that
if
two
places
that
answer
in
answer
to
the
the
amount
of
money
that
committee
members
would
receive,
I'm
gonna
probably
defer
to
Leo
and
Calvin,
but
I
am
I'm
pretty
sure.
The
last
time
it
was
raised
was
during
my
tenure
and
I
believe
it
had
to
be
approved
by
the
City
Council.
Look,
it
comes
in
to
a
vote.
F
The
school
department
budget
is
prepared
by
the
superintendent
annually
and
the
superintendent
going
out
and
eliciting
support
and
and
and
needs
from,
the
constituents
from
the
stakeholders,
the
parents,
the
the
students,
the
School
Committee,
the
superintendent
will
present
at
a
public
hearing
in
March
and
at
the
by
the
end
of
March.
The
vote
goes
to
the
School
Committee,
whether
or
not
to
vote
for
the
budget.
As
the
plan
is
presented
and
then
about
60
days
later,
I
think
it
goes
to
the
City
Council.
F
For
the
City
for
the
School
Committee,
the
school
superintendent,
to
present
to
the
City
Council
and
then
the
school,
the
City
Council
at
that
point
has
to
vote
to
endorse
the
budget.
So
the
budget
goes
through
multiple
iterations,
multiple
approval
processes,
but
ultimately
the
City
Council
approves
the
budget
you
know
in
in
it
is
a
plan
in
they
get
a
very
detailed
booklet
in
terms
of
where
the
line
items
go.
How
much
for
salaries,
how
much
for
facilities?
How
much
for
repairs
and
capital
improvements
acceptor!
It's
a
full
cost
when
getting
your
administration
degree.
F
So
I've
just
done
15
weeks
in
about
10
minutes
and
so
I
know,
I've
done
it
a
great
job
and
then
why
we
can't
have
a
teacher
on
a
non-voting
member,
a
teacher
on
the
School
Committee.
We
have
a
non-voting
member
already
we
have
to.
We
have
a
student.
Then
we
have
a
city
council,
member
I
believe
this
year
in
Leo
Robinson.
F
However,
you
it
would
be
difficult,
it
would
be
difficult
to
have
a
teacher
because
they
are
a
member
of
the
teachers
union.
If
we
did
that,
then
we
would
have
to
go
for
equity
and
equity.
It
would
mean
that
we
would
have
to
have
the
following
unions:
our
administrative
union,
our
administrators,
are
in
a
union
Paris
our
clerk,
our
nurses,
our
custodians
nurses,
so
we
would
have
to
have
four
equity,
a
non-voting
member
across
the
board,
and
so
it
doesn't
really
serve
an
efficient
purpose
in
a
governance
structure.
F
But
that's
what
the
public
comment
section
is,
and
there
is
also
to
a
piece
where
you
hold
your
superintendent
responsible
and
accountable
for
holding
meetings
throughout
the
year.
You
know
making
sure
that
having
conversations
with
faculty
meetings
or
focus
groups
and
things
on
that
nature,
so
there
are
other
ways
to
get
that
non-voting.
A
G
Then,
when
it
comes
to
the
salaries
for
the
school
committee,
members
is
that
salary
in
the
March
packet,
or
is
that
salary
separate
in
a
separate
approval
item
so
once
for
the
kids,
we'll
call
it
for
the
kids
in
the
schools?
That's
one
budget
right
and
it's
going
to
be
a
hundred
thousand
dollars.
Eighty
thousand
s
coming
from
this
state,
the
City
Council,
agrees
to
pay
the
other
twenty
thousand
and
then
there's
another
budget.
If
the
School
Committee
decided
to
increase
their
budget
from
$10,000
to
$15,000,
is
that
correct.
E
By
the
City
Council
any
time
that
the
City
Council
would
go
for
a
pay
increase,
they
would
also
include
the
School
Committee
in
that
in
that
vein,
and
actually
just
for
the
recognize
the
City
Council
over
the
past
few
years
have
gone
above
and
beyond
what
our
contribution
to
the
School
Department
has
been
and
I
don't
know.
If
people
realize
the
School
Committee
budget
is
larger
than
the
City
Council
budget.
A
A
F
I
will
say
rightfully
so
the
School
Department
budget
should
be
larger
than
the
school
than
the
the
city
budget.
Keep
in
mind.
We
are
the
elephant
in
the
room.
We
are
the
largest
employer
in
the
district
when
you
include
part-time
employees
as
well
as
full-time
employees,
we
employ
twelve
hundred
people
and,
and
the
majority
are
residents
we
make
sure
we
prioritize
residents.
So
so
that's
a
big
piece
of
it.
And,
yes,
you
know
our
City
Council.
F
The
last
four
years
has
gone
above
net
school
spending
by
anywhere
from
four
to
five
percent
every
single
year,
and
that
has
been
huge
because
when
I
first
started,
City
Hall,
both
it's
an
a
deputy
superintendent
and
then
the
first
couple
of
years
is
a
superintendent.
We
were
always
at
95%
Mexico
spending.
In
the
last
four
years,
our
City
Council
has
believed
in
the
work
of
the
school
department,
to
the
point
where
they
have
funded
us
at
104
to
105
percent.
C
Just
to
Leo's
point
about
the
School
Committee
compensation,
it
does
say
section
3.4
that
the
school
it
begins.
The
school
committee
shall,
by
vote,
establish
an
annual
salary
for
its
members,
so
that
baldly
says
the
school
committee
is
establishing
its
own
compensation
and
I
get
you
know
just
the
question
is.
A
F
So
there's
a
difference
between
establishing
and
then
getting
it
voted
to
approval
I
can
establish
that
you
know
every
school
car.
You
know
if
I
was
a
school
committee,
member
I
be
a
100
thousand
you're
gonna
give
me
a
hundred
thousand,
but
it's
not
by
City
Council
right.
So
it
has
to
be
approved
by.
C
A
A
Meeting:
okay,
yeah!
Thank
you.
That's
a
great
point,
I'm!
So
glad
you
asked
that
if
you
can
submit
that
by
Friday,
I
think
that
will
be
very
helpful
for
several
of
the
members
here
who
had
questions
council
around
I
saw
you,
but
I
saw
Jason
first,
if
Jason
you
can
hear
us
I'll,
let
you
go
first
and
I
like
around
Jason.
B
I
just
wanted
to
and
project
with
the
budget.
Regarding
this
committee,
the
City
Council,
obviously
we'd
sit
back,
we
listen
to
them.
We
give
them
lead
ways.
We
expect
what
they
doing
so
I
mean
a
lot
of
times
when
we
sitting
here
and
we
determine
what
salary
should
be.
We
have
no
imagination
what
we
think
that
city
count.
What
the
School
Committee
said.
B
We
feel
that,
though,
the
figures
that
weekend
I'm
support
and
we
vote
in
favor
of
it,
but
they
do
I
believe
they
do
have
some
early
stating
barrage
suggesting
that
you
know
if
it
city
councillors,
having
a
raise
we
should
be
considered
also,
and
whenever
language
come
up.
We
also
consider
you
know
what
some
of
the
numbers
that
we
can
give
you
when
we
look
at
our
budget.
B
E
Absolutely
council
Brown
in
the
past
anytime,
that
the
City
Council
for
the
protei
rage.
They
would
do
a
survey,
what
all
the
other
communities
were
making
and
whether
or
not
Chelsea
should
be
brought
up
to
that
level
and
and
so
far
we've
never
happened
and
anytime
that
they
look
at
an
increase.
They
always
include
the
School
Committee.
It's
being
part
of
that,
so
the
school
committee
is
not
on
an
island
by
itself.
So
when
a
council
good
moves
for
an
increase,
they
also
help
the
school
look
at
an
increase.
Great.
F
Can
I
just
do
one
final
comment
and
I
also
want
people
to
understand
that
our
school
committee
and
City
Council
are
underpaid
compared
to
other
communities
and
districts,
and
they
I
believe
they've
only
once
in
the
past,
15
years
actually
gone
for
an
increase.
So
I
think
that
you
know
I'm
really
I'm.
Really.
You
know
in
our
of
the
hours
that
you
guys
put
in
that
the
School
Committee
puts
in
to
help
us.
You
know
as
a
successful
district,
so.
A
Thank
you,
Mary
I
know
Jason's
on
the
line.
Jason
here
is
Jason
gone.
Okay,
so
we'll
go
back
to
Jason.
I
know
he
submitted
comments.
So
let
me
now
move
on
to
Mary.
I
know.
You
also
submitted
comments.
It
once
Jason
gets
by
God
will
review
his
comments,
but
Mary
I'll
give
you
the
floor.
I
know
you
had
comments
on
section
3.1.
F
And
it's
very
it's
very
quick,
like
comments
on
on
3.1
are
very
similar
to
my
comments
on
two
point.
One
I
believe
that
the
chatter
should
stay
as
written
I,
don't
believe
that
we
should
be
reducing
any
numbers
of
the
seats
of
the
School
Committee
I
believe
that
we
need
to
keep
the
governance
structure
as
it
is.
A
A
His
comment
is:
if
we
reduce
the
council
members,
so
we
need
to
consider
reducing
school
committee
to
match
City
Council
next
comment:
3.1
cross
reference
to
section
2-2,
where
we
say
that
the
city
councilor
sits
on
the
School
Committee
as
a
non-voting
member.
So
I
guess
here
he
wants
to
highlight
that
we
have
a
non-voting
City,
Council
I,
remember
on
the
School
Committee.
E
A
A
So
we
will
see
you
know
I'm
just
doing
this
for
the
record.
If
he
join
says
he
could
go
ahead
and
explain
more
so
now
section
3,
4
and
section
2-1.
His
comments
are
compensation
to
city
councillors,
school
committee.
We
should
consider
adding
language
that
limits
compensation
to
available
appropriations
like
we
do
for
compensation,
city
manager
in
section
4,
4
Jason
have
you
joined
us.
G
G
A
I'll
give
you
the
floor
now,
so
you
can
pick
up
on
your
comments.
I'm.
Actually
on
section
3-4,
where
you
asked
regarding
where
does
the
school
committee
get
its
budget
from
so
I'll?
Let
you
I'll,
let
you
read
your
comments
and
explain
them
and
and
just
give
us
an
overview
of
why
you
submitted
up.
Oh.
G
G
G
Also
in
3.1
it'd,
be
helpful
to
have
a
cross
reference
to
section
2.2,
where
we
state
that
the
make
left
of
school
committee
also
has
a
city
councilor,
that's
non-voting
that
sits
on
it
as
it
reads
it
that
doesn't.
If
you
didn't
read
the
previous
section,
you
would
know
that
section.
So
the
first
reference
I
think
is
helpful
and
then
3
4
+
2
1.
When
we
talk
about
compensation
to
the
School
Committee
and
to
City
Council,
it
was
interesting.
G
E
A
I
think
I
think
Jason,
so
I
think
what
Jason's
saying
is
that
we
should
take
this
technicality
on
our
charter.
So
we
should
be
very
clear
that
if
we're
setting
parameters
for
tongue
for
our
city
manager,
then
we
should
set
parameters
for
a
city
councilor,
an
elected
official
member
for
the
future
I.
Don't
think
you're
really
discussing
how
we
things
now.
I
think
when
you're
trying
to
establish
is
a
clear
written
statement
for
the
future,
a
roadmap
for
the
future
yeah.
G
B
So
what
we
did
what
happened
with
this
year,
with
out
of
what
happened
prior
to
1993
and
the
receivership
year,
where
this
Charter
actually
came
into,
which
around
1994
until
having
to
bring
in
a
city
man,
didn't
have
to
be
able
to
give
them
a
contract
or
her
contract
with
305
and
then
have
to
be
able
to
vote
for
your
own
salary,
which
is
something
that
we
have
done.
I
believe
twice
or
once
and
twice
it's
something
that
it
preview
to
the
City
Council.
The
China
gives
us
that
language.
H
F
F
Think
that's
where
we
can
feel
secure
that
you
know
you
the
the
fact
that
our
City
Council
over
the
last
40
to
50
years
ahead
Anna
look
may
have
not
given
themselves.
It's
huge
raises
constantly
and
everything
else
is
an
indication
that
there
is
already
an
internal
checks
and
balance
system
to
all
of
this.
E
G
No,
that
wasn't
my
no,
that
that's
not
my
intent.
My
intent
was
not
to
say
that
that
explicit
time
frames,
but
to
put
to
either
put
the
same
phrasing
that
it
says
for
the
city
manager
within
the
Appropriations
or
if
we
need
to
get
more
opening
up
the
general
conversation,
do
we
need
to
be
more
granular
and
say
that
any
increase
cannot
be
greater
than
10%
of
the
existing
salary.
Something
like
that
to
allow
for
those
section
balances
and
I'm
it.
G
This
isn't
coming
from
a
place
of
I'm,
not
coming
down
on
this
city
councilor
or
a
previous
city
council
I'm,
forward-thinking
on
what,
if
the
wrong,
but
what,
if
the
wrong
people
get
there,
what
if
something
happens
that
people
to
give
them
give
increases
to
this
council
and
you've
now
created
something
greater
right
that
wasn't
intended.
So,
if
the,
if
the,
if
the
Charter
can
help
control
that
at
a
rate,
then
I
think
that's
smart,
but
it's
not
it's
not.
My
comment
is
no
reflection
on
the
existing
council
and
I.
D
G
It
doesn't
the
number
can
be
if,
if
we
put
a
number
in
there,
we
can
determine
what
that
is
it
doesn't.
If
you
go
to
inflation
right,
then
you're
really
trying
it
to
like
at
some
regimented
rate,
there
will
be
a
raise:
that's
not
what
I'm
trying
to
get
at
I'm,
not
trying
to
I'm
not
trying
to
build
in
raises
just
to
build
it
in
the
safe
I'm,
just
saying,
if
the
board,
if
the
City
Council
proposes
a
raise
for
them
and
the
school
committee.
G
This
is
these
are
the
parameters
at
which
they
can
do
it
right.
They,
they
can't
be
more
than
what
the
budget
allows.
It
can't
be
more
than
X
percentage
of
the
existing
rate,
or
you
could
say
to
that
to
that
year's
inflationary.
If
you
wanted
to
you,
you
can
say
that,
but
I'm,
just
it
it's
not
to
create
regimented
increases
it's
to
create
when
it's
decided.
These
are
what
you
have
to
work
into
to
determine
what
that
number
is.
That's
it.
A
C
Yeah,
what
Jason
is
being
it's
basically
adopting
section
four
point:
four
states
the
city
manager
shall
receive
such
compensation
for
services
as
the
City
Council
shall
determine,
but
such
compensation
shall
be
within
the
limits
of
available
appropriations.
So
I
do
think
you
know
it
is
just
it's
just
setting
a
parameter.
C
A
A
From
Jason's
point
is
you're
trying
to
set
a
parameter
to
anticipate
or
avoid
any
potential
loopholes
that
the
wrong
person
in
30
50
years
from
now
might
say.
Well,
there's
nothing
written
here.
Therefore,
I'm
gonna
make
my
salary.
You
know
whatever
50,000
60,000,
so
whatever
that
is
you're,
not
you're,
not
setting
any
price
points.
You're,
not
saying
that's
increase,
you're,
saying:
let's
set
some
sort
of
parameters.
So
if
anyone
ever
wants
to
abusive
loophole
because
there's
no
language
that
stops
them
from
it,
let.
C
E
The
city
manager
was
hired
by
the
City
Council.
There
are
parameters
of
when
the
salary
should
stop
arranged
on
where
it,
where
Trinette.
So,
if
the
rain
starts
at
175
and
we
can
afford
to
go
to
say
190,
we
could
do
that
and
then,
as
increases
would
be
built
in,
if
was
one
percent
a
year,
two
percent
here
or
three
percent
here-
that
all
would
be
set
by
this.
B
You
Jason
I
understand
what
you're
trying
to
say:
I'm
just
gonna
make
a
little
clearer.
One
of
the
things
we
do
which
haven't
been
mentioned
is
that
every
year
we
have
an
evaluation,
an
expectation
for
the
city
manager,
and
we
have
group
called
evaluation
list
and
that
evaluation.
We
also
have
a
perk
in
there
that
if
you
meet
or
exceed
you
get
certain
amount,
it's
similar
to
we
as
City
Council's
and
school
committee
members.
B
If
we
go
out,
we
do
a
job
that
you
like,
or
you
know,
for
the
majority
of
the
constituents,
whether
it's
difficult
it
Eli.
Then
you
really
like
that
we're
trying
to
take.
We
just
want
to
take
a
lot
of
the
politics
day-to-day
politics
out
of
the
city
of
Chelsea
because
of
its
facets
of
the
city
to
have
city
in
mayor.
B
If
you
raises
they
put
the
mayor's
raised
in
here
and
the
City
Council
raise
in
there
and
they
get
these
photos
through
we're
City
Council,
we
realize
with
a
smaller
city
in
the
Commonwealth
and
that
you
know
what
we
do
is
really
a
job
of
service
and
we're
not
gonna
get
rich
on
it.
And
if
you
try
to
get
rich
on
it,
you're
probably
gonna
end
up
with
some
of
those
elected
officials
in
the
past,
so
I
don't
think
anyone
wants
that
I
think
because
we
have
a
good
group
of
folks
around
the
city.
B
B
Also
and
I'm
sure
you
do
yeah
the
City
Council
works
so
vigorously
and
hard
to
try
to
keep
that
image
out
of
what
we
came
in
to
in
1994
when
it
went
from
receivership
to
elected
body
members
and
that's
what
we
don't
give
up
top
raises
every
year.
That's
why
we
don't
talk
about
raises
every
year
I'm
for
the
most
of
us.
We
all
work
a
full-time
job.
Some
of
us
are
retired
and
we
love
them
serving
up
a
city
and
a
community.
B
A
C
B
I,
it's
my
hope
that
we
can
get
a
little
oh
yeah
I.
Actually,
you
know
again
some
of
us
work
and
I
think
the
majority
of
us
work,
but
when
I
get
home,
I
look
at
it
and
look
at
it
the
day
before
and
if
I
had
a
much
more
another
24
hours
or
another
12
hours.
We
can
really
get
it
in
depth
about
this
and
have
a
more
thorough
conversation.
So
if
it's
any
way
possible,
we
get
to
Monday.
C
A
A
day
before
or
two
days
before,
stop
everyone
two
days
before
two
days
before,
okay.
So
then
what
we're
going
to
do
is
if
we
change
it
to
two
days
before
it
means
you're.
Gonna
get
the
agenda
and
you're
gonna
get
everyone's
comments.
Final
Monday,
which
means
you
have
to
submit
everything
by
Friday,
the
previous
very
name,
yep.
Okay.
A
So
if
everyone
can
submit
and
I'll
send
this
in
writing,
so
everyone
could
know,
set
their
comments
by
Friday
at
noon
and
then
I
will
make
sure
to
have
an
agenda
and
everyone's
comments
by
Monday
and
I'll.
Send
them
email
they'll
send
an
email
about
this,
so
everyone
can
have
it
on
the
record
in
their
email.
So
you
can
never
change
the
rules
so
going
forward.
Comments
should
be
submitted
by
Friday
and
you
will
have
everything
in
front
of
you
by
Monday
great.
So
with
that
being
said,
everyone
have
a
great
evening.