►
From YouTube: Zoning Board of Appeals of 1-10-23
Description
City of Chelsea
B
C
C
Joan
Cromwell
and
who
go
for.
D
E
E
Name
is
Sheila
Grant
of
92
High,
Street,
Suite,
5,
Medford
Mass.
Obviously,
I
have
here
we're
again
representing
DMS
Trinity
in
their
request
for
special
permit
to
renovate
the
existing
first
floor
space
at
260
272nd
Street
in
order
to
operate
a
marijuana
retail
facility,
to
recap
the
spaces
Zone
industrial
which
allows
for
this
use.
It
is
currently
office
space
and
being
utilized
as
a
flower
wholesaler.
We
would
be
using
a
space
on
the
first
floor,
which
has
a
separate
entrance.
E
Space
provides
for
all
requisite
parking,
we're
here
before
you,
and
there
were
some
questions
pertaining
to
the
dumpster
locations,
security
plan
and
signage.
We
have
submitted
to
through
John
some
additional
documentation
to
cover
those
pieces.
The
petitioners
are
social
Equity
applicants
and
have
received
sdo
approval
as
a
minority
business
Enterprise
DMS
is
comprised
of
family
members.
Dennis
and
Mary
are
in-laws
and
run
as
a
minority
and
women
owned
a
business
they're
committed
to
outreach
and
hiring
within
the
city
as
well.
C
Okay,
this
is
a
public
Hearing
in
the
boat
portion
of
the
hearing
is
still
open,
but
I'll
ask
the
board
to
see
if
they
have
any
any
questions
before
I
open
up
to
the
public.
E
You
had
the
dumpster,
yes,
the
dumpster,
and
we
have
our
consultant
Matt
here.
If
you
could.
G
And
if
you
wanted
to
go
to
slide,
22
or
23
you'll
see
what
he's
going
to
be
discussing.
H
Good
evening
Matt
mazziore
a
magazuri
companies,
13
Wheeling
Ave
Woburn
Mass,
where
the
general
contractor
and
facilitating
the
design
documents
for
the
client
for
construction.
So
after
the
previous
meeting,
we've
updated
the
drawing
both
the
site,
drawing
and
the
architectural
rendering
of
the
fence
scenario
to
depict
a
six-yard
dumpster
within
the
fenced
in
Secure
enclosure.
H
H
F
D
E
E
Not
any
changes,
we've
updated
information
with
respect
to
the
signage
and
got
more
specifics
with
respect
to
that
and
also
submitted
the
security
plan
that
was
approved
by
the
CCC
and.
C
G
Okay,
so
signage
details,
the
sign
will
have
an
internal
aluminum
frame
covered
with
eighth
inch.
Aluminum
outer
cabinet
the
face
will
be
an
aluminum
sheet
with
cutout
letters
and
Logo.
The
letters
will
be
one
inch
acrylic
and
pushed
through
the
face
and
then
covered
with
translucent
vinyl.
This
will
create
an
opaque
face
white
with
lit
letters
only
as
per
the
code.
The
cabinet
will
be
painted
with
a
high
grade
automotive
paint
and
will
have
white
LEDs
inside
and
then
last
time
we
showed
signage
samples
and
there's
the
next
couple
of
slides
reflect
that.
K
L
So,
just
to
refresh
my
memory,
will
it
shared
it's
a
shared
space
with
a
flower
company?
It's.
E
Currently
office
space
in
a
wholesale
florist,
so
the
there
are
other
tenants
in
the
building
but
mostly
office
space
I
believe.
G
C
Yeah
any
other
questions:
okay,
open
up
to
the
public.
Does
anybody
from
the
public
have
any
questions.
C
Okay,
CNN
I'm
opposed
to
public
portion
of
the
meeting
John
I
know
there
was
some
some
some
stuff
written,
but
do
you
want
to
kind
of
reiterate.
A
Yes,
the
planning
board
recommended
approval
with
conditions
standing
conditions
as
applicable
design,
review,
updated
signage
plan,
I,
always
love
to
exceed
9
A.M
to
9
pm
daily.
No
on-site
consumption,
no
smoking
petitioner
periodically,
but
at
least
annually
reviews
and
updates
the
security
plan
with
the
police
department
and
implements
any
recommendations
of
the
police
department
and
implements
all
conditions
of
the
traffic
study
at
the
petition's
expense
and
major
site
plan.
Review
right,
May
disciple
in
will
be
done
by
the
planning
board
at
the
January
24th
meeting
got
it.
F
F
F
F
J
C
Yeah
go
on
to
the
next
one,
okay,
so
the
next
case,
actually
I'm
gonna
do
the
next
two
cases
that
are
going
to
go
to
February
14th.
The
next
case
is
2-22-36
69-71
Spencer
Ave
as
a
pal
development,
and
they
have
asked
to
move
the
meeting
to
February.
14Th.
Do
I
hear
a
vote?
No.
D
C
Seconds
others
in
favor,
aye,
okay,
let's
see
214.
all
right.
The
next
one
is
2022-41
8
Addison,
Street,
St,
Mary,
Orthodox
Church.
A
C
40.
got
it
instant,
sorry,
my
mistake:
20
22-40,
245
257
Marginal
Street
Enterprise
Rent-a-Car
company
in
Boston
LLC.
They
want
to
move
into
the
February
14th
meeting.
Do
I
have
a
motion.
C
Okay:
next
sorry
2022-38
concrete
God
and
307
Broadway,
okay,.
O
P
Evening,
members
of
the
board,
thank
you
very
much.
Valerio
Romano
for
concrete
gardening
joined
by
Vladimir
are
Vladimir
Samuel,
our
founder
I'm,
sorry
yeah,
eight
hours
yo-yo,
and
so
we,
since
our
last
hearing,
we've
been
in
front
of
the
planning
board
and
we
have
obtained
the
referral
to
come
here
and
hopefully
get
special.
Permit.
I
also
submitted
a
supplemental
package
that
I
believe
addressed
all
of
the
comments
from
Mr
Dupree's
office.
P
C
So
this
is
a
public
Hearing
in
the
public
portion
of
the
of
the
the
petition
is
still
open,
but
I
will
invite
the
city
manager
to
start
comments.
Please.
K
K
It
has
nothing
to
do
with
the
use
being
proposed.
I
have
never
opposed
the
marijuana
retail
facility
as
far
as
I'm
concerned.
The
board
can
approve
everyone
that
comes
before
and
what
the
market
determine
who
survives
and
who
doesn't.
This
is
about
the
specific
location
that
is
the
site
of
numerous
violations
by
the
city
that
have
never
been
properly
addressed
by
the
owner.
As
of
this
morning,
I
spent
time
with
the
building
inspector.
K
Still
as
of
this
date,
there's
not
been
a
single
permit
issue
to
address
any
of
the
numerous
violations
that
exist
in
the
building.
Second,
there's
been
zero
progress
in
removing
the
illegal
uses
that
have
existed
in
this
property
for
years,
the
city
has
tried
to
get.
Cooperation
has
tried
to
remedy
these
problems.
We
have
not
gotten
the
support.
We
have
not
made
the
progress
that
was
promised
to
this
board.
In
the
past,
it's
the
reason
why
two
members
of
the
planning
board
voted
against
this
recommendation.
K
It's
the
reason
why
I
continue
to
Advocate
that
this
permit
not
issue
as
soon
as
the
city
issued
this
permit.
As
soon
as
this
board
does
that
the
city
loses
a
substantial
portion
of
whatever
leverage
it
has
to
try
to
get
cooperation
from
this
building
owned.
I've
advocated
to
this
particular
petitioner
to
find
another
location,
I
feel
bad
for
this
petitioner.
Quite
honestly.
Nonetheless,
it
is
not
in
the
city's
best
interest,
in
my
opinion,
for
this
board
to
issue
this
permit
I'd.
K
P
P
This
is
the
only
use
that's
going
to
do
that,
so
by
sort
of
denying
the
permit
or
continuing
it
for
some
unknown
time,
we're
not
going
to
sink
a
ton
of
money
into
the
building
until
we
know
that
we're
going
to
be
able
to
site
there-
and
this
is
sort
of
the
first
step
in
being
able
to
site
there.
P
So
if
you
look
at
the
Cannabis
uses,
I've
licensed
excuse
me
probably
a
hundred
and
something
of
these
around
the
Commonwealth
over
the
years,
but
all
the
Cannabis
uses
continually
like
engage
with
their
community
and
the
building
and
they're
all
like
you
know:
spotless
scrupulous
sleep
maintained
buildings.
This
is
the
opportunity
to
actually
fix
the
concerns.
I
mean
I,
get
it
there's
an
allegation
that
the
current
property
owner
has
you
know
has
a
use,
that's
improper
there.
P
We
may
potentially
rent
that
as
our
office
space,
but
if
we
want
to
get
the
building
fixed
up
and
figure
out
these
violations,
this
is
the
this.
Is
the
vehicle
to
do
it
I
mean
there's.
No,
you
know
whatever
you
know.
Water
is
under
the
bridge
between
the
city
and
the
property.
Owner
is
really
not
the
fault
of
concrete
garden.
Now
we
can
fix
these
issues,
and
so
we
have
the
full
list
of
them.
P
We've
started
trying
to
pull
building
permits,
but,
frankly
we
need
this
special
permit
in
order
to
move
forward
and
fix
this
there's
just
no
other
way.
It's
going
to
happen,
and
so
I
I
feel
like
denying
this
or
continuing
it.
For
some
unforeseen
amount
time
it
would
actually
backfire.
If
the
city's
real
interest
is
in
fixing
up
this
building.
P
Obviously
I
you
know,
don't
have
the
you
know
the
history
in
the
city,
as
the
city
manager
does,
but
I
do
know
that
this
is
how
cannabis
businesses
work
and
as
far
as
having
no
leverage
after
this,
we
have
to
get
a
certificate
of
occupancy
right.
I
mean
the
building
department
is
going
to
have
to
give
us
the
co,
and
so
how
are
we
going
to
get
a
CO
if
the
building
is
like
sitting
there
with
a
ton
of
violations
that
make
it?
You
know
unoccupable,
so
we're
going
to
fix
that
as
well.
P
So
this
is
not
the
only
leverage
that
the
city
has
over
this
location.
The
building
department
is
the
real
leverage
and
so
I
urge
the
board
to
have
us
move
forward
so
that
we
can
actually
get
into
the
process
of
fixing
the
building.
I,
don't
know
we're
joined
by
a
couple
other
counselors
at
Mr,
Timmins
I,
don't
know.
If
there's
anything
you
wanted
to
add.
J
B
Good
evening,
Mr
chairman
members
of
the
board,
my
name
is
James
Timmons
I'm,
an
attorney
with
an
office
in
Quincy
and
I've,
been
representing
the
property
owner
of
307
Broadway,
for
this
is
my
fourth
year,
and
the
focus
of
my
representation
has
been
a
dispute
with
the
city
about
bringing
this
building
back
online.
B
We
now
have
a
zoning
appeal:
that's
pending,
it's
actually
down
the
street
in
Chelsea
District
Court,
where
the
property
owners,
alleging
that
he
has
some
pre-existing
rights
and
the
city
is
alleging.
While
you
have
problems
with
the
building
and
we're
trying
to
figure
out
how
to
resolve
everything.
B
The
statement
by
the
the
city
administrator
that
he
has
told
this
applicant,
we,
like
your
application,
just
find
another
location-
is
outrageous.
What's
pending
before
this
board,
is
whether
this
applicant
has
a
good
application,
which
he
clearly
does
and
whether
that
application
in
this
location
is
going
to
work.
It's
on
the
first
floor,
where
there
are
other
existing
businesses
that
the
city
of
Chelsea
has
not
complained
about
during
my
representation
over
the
past
four
years.
B
There's
nothing
in
the
record
from
the
city
of
Chelsea,
Beyond,
arm
waving
and
I
watched
a
hearing
this
past
summer,
where
this
board
was
told
there
are
violations
that
occurred
in
2004
that
he
got
permits
for
doing
this
and
didn't
do
it
and
that
there
were
numerous
violations.
Well,
after
that
hearing
occurred,
I
asked
Mr
Treadway
the
assistant
city
solicitor,
to
send
me
a
letter
listing
the
violations
because
we
still
didn't
have
them.
B
I
have
a
number
of
letters
such
as
one
here
dated
July
26
21,
the
2021
inspections
from
this
department
at
Chelsea
fire
were
conducted
at
the
above
property.
Observations
revealed
numerous
Renovations
on
the
upper
floors
without
permits
and
inspections.
No
specifics,
no
violations
listed,
which
is
what
the
state
building
CO
building
code
requires.
We
finally
got
a
letter
dated
September
9th
2022.,
which
was
after
the
hearing
before
this
board
and
prior
to
the
re-application
by
this
applicant
that
listed
the
violations.
B
So
the
property
owners
sat
with
the
applicant
went
over
the
violations,
they've
contracted
with
contractors
who
have
applied
for
permits
and,
as
I
said,
I
come
from
Quincy
in
Quincy,
when
City
officials
are
concerned
about
the
condition
of
a
building
and
permit
applications
come
in,
the
permits
are
issued
immediately.
If
there's
a
concern
here,
we're
still
waiting
for
the
permits
to
wish
you,
so
the
work
can
start
until
the
city
of
Chelsea
issues
permits
that
have
been
applied
for,
but
the
work
is
going
to
be
done.
B
B
He
has
his
list
he's
prepared
to
work
on
it
he's
going
to
work
on
it,
and
this
statement
in
paragraph
number
one
says
that
the
board
should
be
concerned
that
this
work
won't
be
done.
If
you
issue
the
permit,
well
a
permit
for
these
individuals.
This
company
can't
be
held
hostage
over
this
dispute
that
the
city
has
with
the
property
owner.
307
Broadway
is
a
cavernous
building,
it's
an
old
building
and
it
actually
could
be
a
very
lovely
building,
but
it
does
require
a
lot
of
work.
What
Mr
Peach
the
owner
did?
B
Was
he
installed
at
a
cost
of
eighty
thousand
dollars
with
minimal
rental
income?
The
second
and
third
floors
are
now
vacant.
The
tax
office
that's
referenced
in
one
of
the
letters
and
the
music
studio
were
the
only
rental
income
on
those
two
floors.
B
Notwithstanding
that
Mr
Mr
Peach
spent
eighty
thousand
dollars
to
outfit
the
building
with
a
fire
sprinkler
system
that
the
fire
department
has
inspected
and
signed
off
on
the
overseer
of
all
this
work,
a
building,
a
licensed
building
official
could
verify
that,
but
there
are
sprinklers
in
the
building.
The
building
is
safe.
The
city,
if
it
were
concerned
about
safety,
would
have
shut
the
building
down
and
they've
they've,
never
done
that.
B
P
B
B
B
B
That's
what
I
respectfully
suggest
this
board
should
be
reviewing
and
ensuring,
if
you're
satisfied
that
the
particular
physical
facility
that
they
are
representing
to
you
that
going
to
construct
here
right
on
Broadway
they're
right
in
the
center
of
the
town
right
where
there's
functioning
Bakery
has
business
coming
in
and
out
all
the
time.
It's
a
terrific
location,
I,
don't
understand
how
a
city
official
can
tell
someone
go
somewhere
else.
B
There
are
other
issues
here,
but
I'll
address
them
with
the
assistant
solicitor
in
the
zoning
appeal,
but
I
ask
that
this
board
look
at
this
application,
which
is
an
excellent
application.
It's
a
way
to
help
Mr
Peach
bring
this
building
back
online
in
a
reasonable
manner.
He's
not
looking
to
go
to
the
second
or
third
floors,
which
are
the
the
areas
that
are
identified
as
problematic.
The
applicant
and
the
the
building
owner
have
committed
to
resolving
everything.
As
far
as
the
building
inspect
the
building
officials
letter
of
September
9
2022.
B
So
were
you
to
Grant
this
permit
you're
actually
going
to
help
both
parties
solve
the
problem.
This
isn't
a
case
of
an
issue
where
Chelsea
is
going
to
have
have
further
problems
of
this
building.
I'm
in
court,
as
I
said
with
the
assistant
solicitor,
we're
going
to
take
care
of
the
issues
there
as
well,
but
this
is
an
opportunity
to
help
bring
307
Broadway
back
online,
but
to
allow
this
particular
business
which
will
provide
Chelsea
with
an
economic
empowerment
opportunity
to
move
forward.
B
So
I'd
ask
that
the
comments
that
have
been
raised
about
the
building
in
the
summer
this
evening
that,
while
obviously
you
have
to
be
respectful
of
the
concerns
of
Chelsea
and
and
the
building
owner,
is
as
well
in
relation
of
the
building.
Please
understand
that
it's
the
application
of
these
individuals
creating
a
segregated
unit
that
we
ask
you
to
focus
on
and
you
can
put
reasonable
assurances
in
the
permit
as
a
condition
that
representations
made
here
tonight
are
followed
through
one,
so
I
I.
B
Thank
you
for
listening
and
ask
you
to
further
consider
this
application
with
an
open
mind.
Thank
you.
Thank.
C
P
So
I
don't
think
I
have
a
lot
more
to
add
other
than,
of
course,
you
know
we'll
accept
any
reasonable
conditions
of
the
board,
and
should
those
conditions
include
bringing
the
you
know
resolving
the
various
issues.
That's
in
that
September
letter
that
could
be
a
reasonable
condition.
I
just
spoke
again
to
Mr
Samuel
and
he's
committed
to
working
with
the
property
order
and
bringing
this
building
up
so
I
think
it's
a
great
opportunity
to
solve
the
city
managers
problems
and
by
kicking
the
can
down.
P
A
Absolutely
and
any
all
the
previous
meetings
and
at
the
last
planning
board
meeting
I
brought
up
the
issue
of
the
illegal.
The
non-conforming
uses
the
unpermitted
uses,
and
there
was
no
discussion
of
it.
It
was
in
fact
the
previous
speaker
on
the
plane,
but
avoided
saying
anything
about
it
and
I
hit
nothing
tonight
about
addressing
those
uses
all
I
hear
about
is
addressing
the
building
violations
the
building
code
violations.
What
is
the
schedule
for
addressing
the
the
illegal
uses?
It's
not
really.
A
The
building,
what
I
mean
is
you
were
arguing
that
the
billing
owner
needed
this
use
in
order
to
provide
for
addressing
the
building
code
is
just
having
some
funding
to
provide
the
building
code
issues
that
has
really
no
relevance
to
addressing
the
use
issues,
because
all
the
building
owner
has
to
do.
Is
you.
P
P
I
understand
the
concern:
are
those
purportedly
illegal
uses
in
the
unit
that
we
intend
to
occupy?
They.
P
So
we're
occupying
a
discrete
unit
in
the
building,
is
it
I
mean,
frankly,
is
it
really
a
relevant
consideration
for
our
ability
as
a
as
a
discrete
applicant
in
the
building
we've
we've
fulfilled
the
requirements
of
the
special
permit
application.
I
understand,
there's
a
goal
for
the
city
to
get
this
building.
P
You
know
the
building
code
violations
and
the
you
know,
alleged
illegal
uses
resolved
I
get
that,
but
is
it
really
something
that
we
have
to
resolve
tonight,
given
that
we
have
a
discrete
application
for
a
particular
use
for
a
particular
portion
of
the
building,
that's
going
to
be
segregated
from
the
rest,
I
mean.
How
could
that
be
a
grounds
to
deny
the
special
permit
for
that
the
1500
square
feet
that
we
propose
to
site
in.
P
O
Yes,
exactly
so
there's
a
the
two
legal
uses
are
the
tax
office
and
there's
a
bakery
in
the
basement,
so
the
tax
office
I
am
going
to
take
that
for
office
space
for
my
for
my
unit
and
so
we're
going
to
do
a
full
build
out
there
for
the
office
that
this
is
new
news.
We
just
agree.
We
just
spoke
to
the
owner
last
week
and
we
are
going
to
take
that
space
because
it
is
open
right
now.
O
There
is
nobody
there,
so
we
are
going
to
take
that
space
for
office
use
and
the
bakery
that
is
in
the
basement.
I
spoke
to
the
head
of
ISD
Mike
mcateer,
and
he
said
if
the
violations
are
remedied.
There's
no
reason
that
that
Bakery
cannot
get
the
the
the
the
baker
in
the
basement
cannot
get
an
occupancy
permit
straight
from
Mike
mcateer.
When
we
spoke
last
week.
O
So
the
issues
will
be
addressed,
so
we
plan
on
doing
construction
from
now
until
April
and
all
the
the
building
violations
will
be
remedied,
which
will
allow
the
bakery
in
the
basement
to
get
an
occupancy
permit,
because
there
are
violations
there
and
so
and
also
the
other
legal
use
is
the
tax
office.
And
we
are
going
to
take
that
for
Office
Space.
P
We
we
have,
we
have
potential
discussion,
we'll
come
back
before
the
board.
If
we
want
to
expand
what
our
application
is
right
now
we
have
administrative
space
and
employees
based
on
the
second
floor
and
then
our
retail
facility.
On
the
first
floor,
if
the
question
is
when
are
these
things
going
to
be
addressed,
the
answer
is
not
till
after
the
permit
is
awarded,
and
it's.
This
is
a.
P
This
is
a
compliant
application
for
a
discrete
use
for
a
portion
of
the
building,
and
somehow
you
expect
a
social
Equity
applicant
to
come
in
fix
up
the
building,
kick
out
two
tenants
in
the
building
before
they
can
even
come
before
the
board
and
request
a
permit.
It's
just
not
reasonable
I.
Don't
understand
why
yeah.
A
P
They've
confirmed
that
they're
gonna
they're
gonna
fix
the
building
code
violations
in
the
building,
which
would
make
the
the
bakery
on
the
bay
and
the
basement
floor.
You
know
up
to
code
and
then
they're
in
discussions
with
the
property
owner
potentially
using
this
other
ancillary
area
as
office
space.
That's
not
part
of
the
instant
application.
If
we
need
to
come
back
before
the
board,
if
we're
going
to
expand
to
that
for
office
space
just
so,
we
can
get
this
permit
through
right.
That's
that's
the
reason
we're
jumping
through
these
hoops.
P
P
You
know
this
is
the
opportunity
to
approve
this
then
give
these
people
the
financial
security
that
they
need
in
order
to
go
through
and
fix
the
building,
so
that
we
won't
have
the
issues
that
the
city
manager
brought
up,
but
by
continuing
this-
and
this
is
just
sort
of
we're-
like
butting,
our
heads
here
and
nothing's
ever
going
to
get
resolved.
But
now
you
have
the
opportunity
with
a
cannabis
company
a
retailer.
P
That's
so
much
oversight
between
the
city
and
the
Cannabis
Control
Commission
you're
about
to
have
a
beautiful
building
with
the
with
the
code
fixed
you're,
not
going
to
have
a
cannabis
retailer
in
a
building
with
illegal
uses.
It's
never
going
to
open
up
the
Cannabis
Control
Commission
was
going
to
come
to
you
and
make
sure
at
final
licensing
that
we've
complied
with.
Everything
I
mean
they're,
going
to
reach
out
to
potentially
the
city
manager,
but
there's
no
way.
P
This
is
the
perfect
opportunity
to
fix
these
issues
as
opposed
to
just
sort
of
kicking
the
can
down
the
road
and
expecting
something
to
happen
when
it
hasn't
so
I
I,
don't
know
what
further
information
that
we
can
provide.
I
so
with
that
I
mean
I
turn
it
back
over
Mr
priest,
I
appreciate
where
you're
coming
from.
We
want
to
fix
this
bill
and
we
want
to
get
it
up.
You
know
code
violations
and
the
use
violations
up
there.
The
alleged
use
violations.
This
is
the
way
to
do
it.
P
I
don't
really
know
how
further
to
to
explain
that
and
I
think
it's
probably
pretty
well
understood
and
what
I'm
saying
isn't
controversial.
There
is
no
disputed
fact
where,
where
we're
disagreeing
on
some
factual
matter
right
that
we're
trying
to
issue
a
permit,
so
they
can
go
fix
the
building,
they
pull
the
building
permits.
P
A
B
Looking
at
the
review
sheet,
Police
Department
comments:
they're
fine,
with
everything
they
approved
of
the
security
fire
department
comments,
fire
department
request,
a
stat
of
sprinkler
and
fire
system
plans
for
the
property,
while
they've
already
approved
the
sprinkler
system,
they'll,
obviously
get
when
all
the
work
is
done.
The
fire
system
plans
for
this
unit
and
to
the
extent
further
work,
goes
on
they're,
going
to
be
involved
in
that
department
of
public
work
comments.
Final
sentence
at
present
DPW
takes
no
exception
for
the
project
as
proposed.
B
The
negative
comments
are
what's
going
to
go
on
with
the
second
floor.
Well,
if
you
look
at
the
application
now
I
heard
tonight
from
the
applicant,
he
might
use
an
office
up
there,
but
the
application
is
on
the
street
level.
It's
a
part
of
the
building,
so
I
would
ask
the
board
to
focus
on
this
segregated
unit
again
and
this
opportunity
for
this
application.
P
Yeah
so
I
mean
there
is
a
portion
of
the
application.
That's
on
the
second
floor,
it's
clearly
described
in
the
application
itself
square
footage.
We
responded.
It
responded
in
detail
to
all
of
Mr
depriest
and
the
board's
concerns
from
the
last
hearing.
I,
don't
know
if
there's
anything
else
we
can
provide
and
we
need
to
continue
again.
That
would
certainly
be
disappointing
to
us,
as
we'd
like
to
be
able
to
move
this
project
forward.
P
You
have
a
social
equity
and
an
economic
empowerment
applicant,
where
a
certain
number
of
the
licenses
in
Chelsea
were
actually
supposed
to
be
earmarked
for
exactly
these
folks
and
that's
been
delayed.
Unfortunately,
and
I
hope
that
somehow
we
can
keep
this
moving
forward
like
I,
said
I
think
we
have
a
compliant
application.
P
There's
no
issue
of
fact
that
is
in
controversy,
and
we
can
set
reasonable
conditions
on
the
application,
particularly
if
we
want
to
reference
that
September
letter
that
describes
the
various
building
violations
and
make
sure
that
before
we
are
allowed
a
certificate
of
occupancy,
or
at
least
a
in
our
business,
that
those
are
remedied.
So
that
would
be
my
suggestion
and
with
that
any
other
questions
from
the
board
we'd
be
happy
to
answer.
You
have
the
full
team
here:
okay,.
C
I'm
going
to
close
the
public
portion
of
the
of
the
the
hearing,
but
the
petition
obviously
can
make
comments.
Our
I
think
we're
good
all
right,
there's
the
chair.
Thank
you.
Does
the
board
have
any
questions
or
comments
if.
J
It
doesn't
get
approved,
was
a
plan
of
the
owner
to
try
to
fix
the
problems
in
the
building.
P
So
Jim
the
question
was:
if
the,
if,
if
this
is
not
approved
tonight,
what's
up
the
plans
for
the
owner
to
try
to
fix
the
building.
I
B
We
have
permanent
applications
in
now
that
were
submitted
by
the
applicant,
so
we'll
have
to
Pivot.
We
have
the
court
case
going
on
and
I'm,
not
quite
certain
I,
don't
know,
and
I
I
respectfully
well.
I,
certainly
understand
the
question
and
I
understand
why
a
representative
of
the
city
would
ask
it.
B
I
would
respectfully
suggest
that
really
doesn't
have
anything
to
do
with
this.
If
the
permit's
denied
it
would
not
be
denied
on
the
basis
of
the
applicant
and
the
application,
so
I
would
expect
they
would
appeal
that
I'm
not
quite
sure
as
far
as
the
the
building,
because
what
the
property
owner
has
done
is
vacated
the
second
and
third
floors
where
the
issues
are
and
we'll
keep
them
vacant
because
of
the
court
case.
So
in
that
instance,
you'd
have
first
floor,
property
and
I'm
not
sure
what
we'd
end
up
doing
with
those
folks.
B
But
we
keep
the
second
and
third
floors
vacant,
which
would
mean
that
the
city
would
not
be
able
to
take
any
further
affirmative
action,
but
the
applicant,
or
rather
the
owner,
could
not
try
to
get
permits
to
use
the
second
and
third
floor
unless
he
fixed
he
remedied.
The
conditions,
so
part
of
what
was
going
on
here
is
bring
part
of
the
building
online
and
use
that
money
to
upgrade
the
building
and
get
the
building
back
on
its
feet.
B
And
we
would
continue
that
process,
hopefully
with
this
applicant
and
with
this,
this
business
in
the
building
paying
rental
income
because
I
see,
as
I
said,
he's
already
down
80
000
to
get
the
sprinkler
in,
because
that
was
considered
a
public
safety
issue
by
the
city
of
Chelsea.
So
Mr
Peach
addressed
it.
He
put
the
sprinkler
system
in
and
we'll
continue
to
work
in
that
manner.
B
P
B
J
B
Court
we
filed
an
appeal:
I
filed
an
appeal
on
behalf
of
Mr
Peach
I
could
give
you
the
exact
date.
J
B
The
city
against
the
city
yeah,
the
city
is
the
is
the
defendant,
the
zoning
board
of
appeals,
and
there
are
claims
that
I
I
frankly
I've
always
worked
very
cordially
with
the
assistant
solicitor
and
we're
we're
working
to
resolve
things,
not
not
to
continue
to
have
one
party
win
or
another.
B
You
know
we're
trying
to
resolve
this,
and
that
was
part
of
the
process
that
brought
forward
the
discussions
when
Mr
Peach
solicited
applications
for
the
first
floor,
we
thought
we
were
moving
in
that
type
of
Direction.
Where
We
would
incrementally
bring
the
building
back
online,
but
so
I
would
call
the
court
case
a
zoning
appeal.
That's
pending
with
the
parties
working
to
mutually
come
up
with
a
resolution
to
get
this
building
back
online.
P
B
On
our
end
on
on
our
end,
it
would
but
I'll
just
make
I
can't
be
certain
what
the
city
will
say,
because
we
have
to
just
further
bring
the
second
and
third
floors
online.
That's
all
there's
going
to
be
additional
work
in
the
building,
but
now,
as
as
I
mentioned
before,
as
of
September
21
2022,
we
know
what
the
issues
are
prior
to
that
date.
All
we
heard
were
comments
such
as
the
one
from
the
administrator,
where
there
are
all
kinds
of
violations
in
the
building.
Fine
tell
us
what
they
are,
we'll
fix
them.
J
I'll
ask
a
question
for
him:
can
you
remind
us
the
first
time
you
came?
Do
you
were
talking
about
the
second
floor
put
in
this
project?
It
was
the
second
floor
you're
trying
to
the
first
time
the
second
floor,
yeah,
that's
what
you're
trying
to
use
the
first
time
the
second
floor,
no
we're
using
the.
O
Oh,
we've
always
been
in
the
same
unit
and
we're
addressing
all
the
issues
in
the
building,
so
we
are
going
to
go
through
and
we
already
put
Plumbing
permits
in
building
permits
in
and
electrical
permitting
we're
waiting
for
those
to
come
back
so
that
we
can
start
the
work
on
the
building.
That's
not
even
for
my
unit,
that's
for
everything
in
the
building
that
and
that
addresses
the
September
9th
letter
of
violations
that
was
2022
that
was
sent
out
so
we're
addressing
all
the
violations
and
all
the
use
violations.
K
I,
really
don't
want
to
get
into
a
back
and
forth
here.
You
folks
have
heard
my
position.
I
do
take
exception
to
one
thing:
leave
aside
the
city's
objection
to
the
idea
that
until
September
of
2022,
the
Sona
had
no
idea
what
the
violations
were
in
this
building,
but
at
least
I've
got
them
to
concede
that
in
September
of
2022
they
knew
exactly
what
every
violation
was
yet
we're
here
in
January
of
2023
and
still
not
a
single
permit
has
been
pulled
to
fix
them.
The
attorney
suggests
that's
the
fault
of
the
city.
K
They
don't
act,
quick
enough
when
the
reality
is
from
the
building
inspector.
Today,
every
application
they've
submitted
has
been
deficient,
hasn't
shown
sufficient
plans
for
how
they're
going
to
fix
them.
That's
the
reason
why
no
permit
has
issued
so
they
have
not
done
a
single
thing
to
address
the
problems
that
were
previously
presented
to
this
board.
The
last
time
this
petitioner
was
here.
That's
the
last
thing,
I'm
going
to
say
the
board
should
do
what
it
thinks
is
best.
P
I
I
I'm,
really
at
a
loss
We've.
You
know
this.
Applicator
is
not
the
building
owner
who's.
Just
going
to
be
a
tenant
in
the
building,
has
pulled
Electrical
Plumbing
building
permits
or
applied
for
them
has
gotten
comments.
Back
has
responded
to
those
comments
we
haven't
had
any
rejected
permits.
You
have
a
great
applicant
here
is
sitting
waiting
to
fix
this
building.
I,
don't
really
understand
what
the
it.
B
Chair
I
apologize,
I,
get
it
and
one
other
thing
for
your
consideration.
The
reason
that
the
applicant
is
before
you
tonight
is
because
he
can't
pull
permits
to
construct
the
facility
that
he
wishes
to
construct
until
you
vote
on
it.
Once
you
grant
the
necessary
relief,
then
further
permitting
will
follow
so
I
I.
You
know
I've.
B
O
Building
inspector
did
give
me
comments
and
I
was
able
to
fulfill
everything
he
asked
for.
He
gave
me
the
comments
and
I
responded
and
I
submitted
all
the
attachments,
all
the
images
that
he
needed,
my
Contractor
License
what
she
needed.
He
needed
a
contract
for
me
and
my
contractor.
He
needed
the
liability
insurance
for
my
contract
or
the
workers.
Compensation,
insurance
and
I
submitted
all
that
in
so
I'm
waiting
for
him
to
get
back
to
me,
okay,.
A
The
planning
board
recommended
not
unanimously
approval
of
the
special
permit,
with
falling
conditions,
standing
conditions
as
applicable
design,
review,
sign
plan
address,
unpermitted
uses
in
the
building.
No
on-site,
consumption
of
smoking
review
security
plan
with
police
department,
at
least
annually
and
Implement
any
recommendations
made
by
the
police
department.
All
zoning
and
building
code
violations
be
addressed
prior
to
the
issuance
of
an
occupancy
and
then
I
just
added
hours,
not
to
exceed
9
A.M
to
9
pm.
F
O
Why?
Because
this
is
a
great
opportunity
for
us,
as
as
a
social
equity
and
economic
empowerment,
to
get
in
there
and
show
kids
that
look
just
like
us,
we're
from
Chelsea
so
to
get
in
there
to
show
kids
just
like
us
that,
yes,
you
can
do
it.
If
you
work
hard
enough,
you
can
you
can
make
something
of
yourself
very
much,
and
so
that's
what
we're
fighting
for
to
make
something
of
ourselves.
P
In
my
opinion,
I've
done
many
significant
expertise,
expertise,
probably
not
particularly
relevant
for
this
exact
application,
but
I've
spoken
with
Mr
Samuel
separately
and
I've,
told
him
hey,
you're,
really
committing
to
fixing
up
the
rest
of
this
building.
Why
don't
we
try
to
just
make
this
just
your
location,
just
your
portion
of
the
building.
P
Yet
when
you
know
these
outstanding
issues
are
there
and
he
feels
like
the
way
to
get
it
awarded
is
by
resolving
these
issues
and,
frankly,
it's
a
great
location
for
a
cannabis
retailer
in
Massachusetts,
and
every
month
that
goes
by
is
a
month
lost
Revenue
where
that
month
of
Revenue
would
pay
for
the
building
to
be
fixed.
So
you
know
if
we
continue
this,
it
just
makes
it
harder
and
harder
to
get
it
done.
What's.
G
O
What's,
the
total
cost
yeah
we're
going
to
handle
the
total
cost.
We
we
know
the
total
cost
is
about
50
to
70
000.
So.
F
O
Very
much
committed
we're
committed
to
this
business,
we're
committed
to
the
landlord
we're
committed
to
to
opening
up
and
and
being
a
pillar
in
the
city
of
Chelsea.
L
O
L
But
it's
disheartening
to
Noah's
tenants,
there's
a
missing
piece
there
and
that's
the
landlord
that
for
you
to
go
above
and
beyond,
and
fixing
and
and
being
totally
invested
is,
is
a
plausible,
but
sometimes
it's
like
bringing
a
friend
to
lunch
and
he
didn't
bring
his
lunch.
L
So
how
does
that
work
in
terms
of
I
only
wish
that
the
prop
the
the
owner
would
stand
up
and
say
I'm
committed
to
this,
or
why
has
it
been
so
long
that
the
permits
weren't
pulled
not
on
your
part
but
on
the
building
owner,
because
I
feel
like,
even
though
you
guys
are
committed,
it's
kind
of
setting
this
plan
up
to
fail?
If
these
things
haven't
been
fixed,
haven't
been
it's
been
years,
the
property
owner
has
come
before
us
for
several
years
now
with
these
complaints.
L
So
that's
worrisome
and
that's
that's
really
unfortunate,
but
also
the
other
businesses
there,
like
the
bakery,
is
operating
and
there's
another
business
there
as
well.
There's.
O
A
baker
on
the
first
floor,
but
there
is
another
Baker
in
the
basement,
so
the
bakery
that
is
opening
is
sanctioned.
It
is,
it
has
its
occupancy
permit.
It
is
running
legally,
but
there's
a
baker
in
the
basement
which
does
not
have
an
occupancy
permit
and
they
are
not
there,
but
with
our
construction
they
will
be
able
to
pull
an
occupancy
permit.
L
It's
just
unfortunate
that
it's
been
so
flagrant
on
the
property
owners
part
because
your
plant
is
beautiful.
It's
right,
you
guys,
are
born
and
raised
here
in
Chelsea,
it's
beautiful!
This
is
exactly
what
social
Equity
is
all
about,
but
the
flagrancy
on
the
building
owners
part
really
puts
a
damper
on
that
and
I
just
I'm
baffled.
All
the
other
businesses
on
the
ground
level
are
up
and
operating
if
there's
so
many
violations
in
the
building
and
codes,
and
things
like
that.
L
So
if
they're
on
that
level,
you
know
they're
just
another
business
doing
business
on
that
level.
So
if
the
bakery
can
operate
in
the
the
Jeweler
and
all
the
other
business
I,
don't
think
that
you
know
excludes
them
from
operating
on
that
level
as
long
as
their
plan
is
in
place
and
I
think
that's
what
I'm
kind
of
struggling
with
that.
L
If
there's
three
businesses
already
operating
there
on
that
level,
then
what
makes
them
that
exception,
the
other
part
of
the
building
is
worrisome
and
what
type
of
commitment
or
agreement
or
what
can
be
worked
out
that
you
know
you
know,
there's
some
reassurance
that
you
know
these
guys.
Could
get
that
social
Equity
piece,
which
is
amazing,
but
the
other
part
of
that
is
worrisome.
L
P
I
didn't
I
think
the
one
suggestion
and
I
understand
the
you
know
the
I
had
the
same
feeling
I'm
like
look
fly,
we're
not
fixing
this
guy's
whole
building.
Just
so
you
could
move
this
retailer
in
I
like
I'm,
like
that's,
that's
not
fair,
but
why
would
that
be
our
responsibility
right
and
we've
had
that
conversation
multiple
times
you
know
and
because
I'm
looking
out
for
him
too
he's
my
client
we've
actually
become
friends
over
the
last.
You
know
a
couple
months
like
I
I'm
with
it.
P
But
the
fact
is,
you
know
a
bunch
of
Market
forces
were
cannabis
retailer
in
Massachusetts
the
I,
the
available
properties
he's
a
Chelsea
local
right,
like
you
know
the
available
properties
in
Chelsea.
To
do
this.
This
is
an
ideal
property.
You
know
the
fact
that
if
we
get
this
permit
awarded,
you
know
that
brings
us
if
we
need
to
do
additional
fundraising.
That
brings
us
like
much
closer
to
that,
because
there's
more
certainty
for
anybody,
we
want
to
borrow
money
from
I
mean
getting.
P
This
permit
awarded
is
really
the
net
sort
of
The
Next
Step
I
mean
if
the
board
would
not
make
a
condition
that
we
fix
all
of
the
other
building
issues.
We
would
certainly
support
that
not
being
a
condition.
We
offered
that
as
a
reasonable
condition
so
that
we
can
get
the
permit
awarded.
So
these
guys
can
keep
moving
forward,
but
I
I
get
I
get
the
issue.
I
totally
do
I
felt
it
the
same
way
after
we
first
started
talking
about
this
and
I
read
that
list
of
violations.
P
The
vlad's
like
I'm
fixing
all
these
and
I
said
no
you're,
not,
and
you
know,
and
he's,
but
frankly,
the
market
forces
for
cannabis
in
Massachusetts
spending
an
extra
50
Grand
to
open
up
front
for
a
marijuana
cannabis
retailer
on
a
great
location
like
that
Broadway
location
are
not
such
that
you
know
it's
prohibitive,
despite
the
fact
that
we
feel,
like
you
know,
we're
going
to
continue
to
work.
Mr
city
manager.
B
All
I
can
tell
you
is
that
my
experience
has
been
unusually
difficult,
all
right
and
I'm
not
sure
why
it
has
something
to
do
with
this
building
and
this
applicant,
but
I
have
sat
in
meetings
with
Mr
mcateer,
and
then
things
don't
happen
that
we
talked
about
and
I.
Don't
know
why
Mr
mcateer
has
been
terrific
to
deal
with
during
the
course
of
the
litigation,
but
my
point
is
I
can't
guarantee
when
the
city
will
issue
permits.
B
We
heard
for
the
first
time
today
at
the
hearing,
not
prior
to
the
hearing
at
the
hearing,
that
there
are
problems
with
plans
and
everything
well
I
looked
at
that
September
21
list
and
the
plans
to
do
the
work
that
has
to
get
done
are
nothing
exceptional.
We're
not
constructing
a
new
building
here.
All
right,
so
I
will
call
Mr
mcateer.
Tomorrow,
on
behalf
of
the
property
owner,
I
will
email
him
as
well,
and
I
will
email,
Mr,
Treadway,
the
assistant
city,
solicitor
and
I'll
tell
them
what
went
on
tonight.
B
B
So
we
can
get
the
work
done,
it's
nothing
exceptional
and
we
will
get
the
work
done
and
I
do
understand
the
question
about
the
property
owner.
What
is
his
investment
and
are
we
dumping
it
all
on
a
on
a
tenant
who,
in
his
exuberance
to
get
into
this
project,
might
be
taking
on
too
much
while
there
was
some
back
and
forth
between
the
parties
about
the
tenant
fit
up
and
the
capital
investment
and
how
that
would
impact
rents?
So
the
parties
are
being
treated
fairly.
B
P
So,
just
through
the
chair,
it
sounds
like
running
for
the
property
owner
committed
to
the
permits
are
issued
by
the
building
department,
and
so
that
you
know
with
or
without
Mr
Samuel.
It
sounds
like
we
just
got
that
commitment
from
the
property
owner,
so
I
hope
that
helps
to
resolve
some
of
the
the
issues
that
we
might
have
and
additionally.
P
Finally,
what
the
city
manager's
last
comment:
well,
obviously
I
respect
the
city
manager's
position
and
where
they
want
to
get
this
building,
but
he
has
to
continue
it
for
a
month
so
that
we
could
there
was
nothing
tangible
in
the
reason
to
continue
it.
It
was
to
continue
it
for
a
month
so
that
we
could
see
what
progress
is
made.
I
mean
that's
not
a
basis
to
continue
something
that
has
been
applied
for
once
then
withdrawn
something
we
applied
for
again.
We
got
all
the
comments
from
the
from
the
city.
P
Responded
to
all
the
comments
had
another
now
we're
at
our
second
public
hearing
for
a
social
Equity
applicant,
an
existing
retail
spot
on
Broadway.
So
I
don't
see
why
you
know
a
further
continuance
so
that
we
could
see
what
progress
is
made
would
be
appropriate
or
relevant,
particularly
that
we
just
got
commitment
from
the
property
owner
that
we
will
have
these
issues
fixed
within
90
days
after
the
permits
to
fix
them
are
issued.
B
I
want
to
acknowledge
that
your
question
was
similar
and
that
I'd
kind
of
tap
danced
a
little
bit.
I
went
back
and
talked
with
the
contractor
to
find
out
more
information
about
what
was
going
on
and
how
long
it
would
take
to
do
the
work
and
then
I
think
your
colleagues
questioned
help
focus
a
little
bit
the
answer
that
I
brought
forth.
So
there
will
be
a
commitment
for
a
condition
of
that
nature.
P
Yeah
we
weren't
trying
to
Discount
any
individual
comments.
We
just
had
an
opportunity
to
pow-wow
for
a
minute
and
we're
able
to
come
to
a
better
consensus
as
to
what
the
path
forward
will
be.
D
B
With
the
consent
of
the
applicant,
the
property
owner
agrees
that
a
condition
of
this
permit
could
be,
or
the
permit
could
be
made
conditional
upon
the
property
owner
exercising
due
diligence
to
obtain
permits
and
then
within
90
days
from
the
date
that
the
permits
are
obtained
from
the
city.
Completing
the
work
on
the
September,
21,
2022
violation
list
and
we'll
get
sign-offs
and
I
mean
technically.
The
building
inspector
would
be
signing
off
would
be
the
the
custodian
of
the
confirmation
of
that
sign
off.
But
we're
happy
to
provide
that
to
whomever.
P
Elation
should
the
building
be
brought
up
to
code,
so
both
of
the
use
violations
will
also
evaporate.
Should
we
be
allowed
to
move
forward
with
this.
C
P
B
Has
been
part
of
the
dispute
in
the
court
case
is
pre-existing
rights
and
whether
a
use
in
the
building
was
in
existence
and
therefore
grandfathered
and
that's
something
I've
been
working
on
with
the
the
city
solicitor.
Now,
if
it's
considered
a
violation,
I'll
find
out
from
the
property
on
what's
going
on
with
that.
But
if
it's,
if,
if
there's
some
issue,
it
would
only
be
with
the
consent
of
the
city
solicitor's
office
that
somehow,
if
this
basement
Bakery
operation
is,
is
pre-existing,
maybe
they
can
override
that
as
a
violation
in
the
November.
B
The
September
21
letter,
but
anything
that
happens
here
would
be
either
full
compliance
or,
if
there's
a
use
issue
that
is
part
of
the
dispute
with
the
city
solicitor
I'll
ask
him
to
notify
everybody,
because
I
I
frankly,
don't
know
whether
that
basement
Bakery
is
an
issue
or
not.
P
It's
just
sort
of
go
back
to
the
the
larger
perspective.
Here
there
was
an
early
cannabis
medical
dispensary
at
21,
Milk
Street
in
Boston.
It's
a
an
office
building
was
that
tenant
required
to
make
sure
that
all
the
other
tenants
in
the
office
building
were
fully
up
to
code
and
the
whole
bit.
There's
a
you
know,
there's
various
one
of
these.
You
know
in
Arlington,
one
of
the
very
first
ones
I
opened
was
in
a
building
with
many
tenants.
P
Next
to
a
pediatrician's
office,
we
were
never
expected
to
make
sure
that
all
the
other
tenants
in
the
building
and
the
property
owners
full
issues
with
the
building
with
Arlington
we're
up
to
code.
That
was
never
an
issue
that
was
in
front
of
the
special
permit,
granting
Authority
or
relevant
for
that
special
permit,
and
there
are
numerous
others
in
Massachusetts
that
are
in
multiple
tenant
buildings,
where
this
is
not
necessarily
an
issue
now
I
get
it.
This
is
the
Forum
we've
heard
from
the
city
manager.
P
This
is
the
only
leverage
that
the
city
has
to
fix
this
building
and,
if
you
permit
this,
somehow
these
guys
are
going
to
open
up
a
marijuana
retailer
without
fixing
any
of
the
building
issues
which,
as
we've
discussed,
we
make
this
reasonable
condition.
That
can't
be
an
issue,
and
so,
but
it's
just
you
know,
on
the
10
000
foot
level,
this
issue
of
what
is
going
on
in
the
rest
of
the
building,
discrete
from
their
occupancy,
isn't
really
relevant.
You
know
to
what's
in
front
of
this
board:
I
yeah.
P
P
P
A
I
have
none
okay,
so
you
got
the
other
than
adding
the
condition
that
was
proposed
to
the
list
of
conditions.
Yeah.
C
Okay,
I'm
I'm
gonna,
say
I
support
this
petition
with
the
conditions
that
the
building
is
fully
you
know
renovated.
So
this
petition
can
get
in
there
all
right
because
for
lots
of
reasons
for
safety
and
for
all
those
issues,
but
the
petition
the
occupancy
permit
will
not
and
cannot
be
issued
until
the
violations
are
are
limited.
Is
that
is
that
your
understanding?
Yes,.
C
P
D
C
L
C
Right,
so
so
what
it
is
the
pleasure
of
the
board.
F
A
If
the
all
the
information
that
is
supplied
is
adequate
for
the
building
inspector
to
make
the
determination
that
it
meets
building
code
and
Zoning,
it's
usually
done
in
a
very
short
time.
D
F
Yes,
I
would
think
that
the
landlord
would
do
the
right
thing.
You
know
it's
a
it's
a
large
space
and
if
he
wants
to
be
able
to
like
rent
to
tenants,
especially
like
this
one,
you
know
that
has
applied
for
a
space
there.
That's
willing
to
make
such
a
long
commitment,
not
only
you
know
like
a
five-year
lease,
but
like
the
financial
commitment
that
they
agreed
to
that
he
would.
F
You
know,
step
up
to
the
plate
and
do
the
right
thing
to
to
correct
all
the
violations
in
that
property
as
a
good
landlord
and
as
a
sign
of
good
faith
with
us,
because
he
has
come
before
the
board
several
times
with
different
petitions
and
I.
Think
that
we've
been
fair
with
him
and
I.
Think
it's
time
that
you
know
he
does
the
right
thing.
P
And
I've
heard
that
I've
heard
that
commitment
from
him
we
powwowed
and
I,
will
you
know
not
at
a
significant
expense
to
these
guys?
I?
Will
you
know
I'm
very
fair.
I
will
stay
on
top
of
this
and
make
sure
it
keeps
moving
forward
because
once
I
have
a
client,
I,
always
care
about
them,
and
so
we'll
absolutely
you
know,
keep
this
moving
forward
and
stay
on
top
of
the
landlord
to
remedy
the
various
issues.
I
I
guess:
I
throw
out
there.
P
P
F
Not
fair
to
them
they're
trying
to
do
the
right
thing.
You
know
they've
come
before
us
several
times,
and
they
just
want
to
open
up
a
business.
You
know
provide
services
to
the
city
and
we
want
to
you
know,
be
fair
as
board
members
and
give
them
an
opportunity,
but
we
also
want
them
to
be
safe.
We
want
them
to
be
able
to
move
into
a
property
where
they're
not
going
to
have
any
issues
as.
P
F
P
Absolutely
will
commit
to
the
condition
and-
and
you
know
and
won't
be-
the
co
won't
issue
until
the
list
is,
is
resolved.
C
And
I'm,
assuming
that
the
Cannabis
commission
won't
have
any
of
it
if,
unless
it's
properly
safe
and
like
everything,
has
to
be
proper
with
the
Cannabis
commission,
like
you
can't,
you
know,
I'm
sure
they
can
expect
this.
Well,
all
right,
I'm
going
to
ask
you:
do
they
inspect
the
space
before
they
open?
Yes,.
P
So,
in
order
for
us
to
apply
for
the
Post
provisional
license
inspection
right,
the
ppli
we
actually
have
to
submit
the
certificate
of
occupancy
to
the
Cannabis
Control
Commission.
They
will
not
come
in
and
inspect
until
we've
shown
them
that
we
have
a
CO.
So
so.
P
Absolutely
and
so
we're
making
a
condition
of
the
permit
that
a
CO
won't
issue
until
we
resolve
the
September
21st
2022
list.
I
can't
apply
to
the
commission
for
a
final
license
until
a
CO
issues,
that's
directly
in
the
rules,
I'm
happy
to
show
it
to
you
and
so
there's
no
way
that
we're
going
to
get
licensed
by
the
Cannabis
Control
Commission
until
we've
resolved
the
problems
that
exist
in
Chelsea.
C
P
C
L
P
So
there's
the
first
floor
and
then
our
proposal
has
200
feet
on
the
second
floor
for
ancillary
and
Associated
office
space,
but
there'll
be
no
retail
activity.
There.
C
Okay,
any
other
comments
from
the
board,
and
this
is
a
big
case
all
right.
What
is
the
pleasure
of
the
board
tonight.
L
I'll
make
a
motion
I
make
a
motion
for
2022-38
concrete
Garden
at
3
7
Broadway
to
approve,
with
all
of
the
conditions
that
were
discussed.
D
I
Hey
guys,
Stephen
McDonough
here
with
311
Eastern,
Ave
and
Chelsea,
pretty
simple
case
we're
just
moving
from
one
side
of
the
building
to
another
side
that
has
become
vacant
and
that's
really
it
no
construction
is
needed.
The
tennis
that
moved
out
in
from
the
space
that
we're
moving
into
had
a
private
parking
lot
in
the
front.
So
that's
where
we're
moving
into
now
and
that's
really.
It.
C
Parking
issues
any
part,
any
parking
issues,
so
it's
a
gym.
Yeah.
C
Let's
see,
that's
a
gym
right,
how
many
people
come
to
the
I
mean?
Is
it
it's
a
personal?
You
know
the
personal
trainer,
how
many
personal
trainers.
I
C
I
You're:
okay,
with
that
right
yeah,
that
was
the
just
to
make
sure
I
heard
it
correctly.
The
signage
plan
and.
A
A
C
I
To
have
how
many
do
we
have
yeah
I'd,
say
around
17.
15
to
17.
J
I
Where
do
you
have
your
trash?
He
has
a
dumpster
yeah.
I
Typically,
between
5
a.m
and
nine
pm
just
seven
days
a
week,
yeah
it's
based
on
appointment.
So
whenever
a
client
books
an
appointment,
that's
when
we
go.
G
B
C
J
I
make
a
motion
to
approve
case
2022-35
311
Eastern
Ave,
for
a
special
permit,
so
you
can
approval
to
relocate
personal
training
gym
and
the
current
location
with
the
conditions.
The
standard
conditions
that
have
been
mentioned
before.
C
A
good
night
okay
text
case
20,
22-39,
793,
Broadway,
yeah,
sorry,
Patel,
sorry,.
C
M
D
C
A
M
F
F
M
Going
to
be
a
tobacco
store,
it's
e-cigarette
tobacco
premium,
cigars
and
cigarettes.
F
L
Yeah
did
the
Board
of
Health
or
the
health
department
have
some
criteria
in
terms
of
guidelines
that
they
would
need
to
follow.
A
I,
don't
know
what
their
guidelines
are.
They
did
submit
a
letter
to
you,
which
is
in
The.
Pact
I
gave
you
it's
basically
stating
that
they
have
changed
their
laws
such
that
any
licenses
that
were
not
renewed
were
expired
and
not
being
replaced
in
an
effort
to
reduce
the
number
of
licenses
available
in
the
city,
the
owner,
the
petitioner
will
have
to
seek
a
existing
license
and
make
arrangements
with
the
person
with
having
either
purchase
it
or
or
whatever.
In
order
to
operate
this.
A
A
A
Correct
it's
not
dissimilar
from
the
marijuana.
We
have
the
only
six,
the
only
the
city's
regulations
that
only
six
can
locate
in
the
city,
but
you
you've
basically
approved
seven
so
far
or
about
to
it's
up
to
the
licensing
commission
and
the
state
to
determine
who
gets
that
it'd
be
similar
here.
M
So
he
went
to
the
first
thing
he
went
when
he
came
to
this
city.
He
went
to
the
Tobacco
Control
and
asked
for
a
license
to
open
the
tobacco
shop
there
and
the
licensing
board
telling
he
told
him
that
you
need
to
get
a
occupancy
permit
in
order
to
operate
the
tobacco
store
there
and
license
is
available.
That
particular
time.
That's
what
the
answer
he
got
at
that
particular
time.
A
J
C
Okay
final
case:
well:
eight
Addison,
Street,
St,
Mary,
Orthodox.
D
N
N
Good
evening
my
name
is
Father
Tudor
from
Watertown
26
sunnybank
I'm,
the
parish
priest
at
St,
Mary's,
Orthodox
Church.
We're
actually
pretty
close
to
to
you
guys
here
and
I'm
coming
before
this.
This
board
to
ask
for
the
approval
of
a
curb
cut
and
also
a
driveway.
N
Unfortunately,
Saint
Mary's
does
not
have
a
parking
lot
and
every
single
parking
spot
actually
counts,
and
one
sort
of
problem
is
the
fact
that
obviously
services
are
on
Sunday
morning
when,
when
everyone
is
at
home,
so
there's
no,
you
know
street
parking
available
or
if
there
is,
it's
usually
limited.
So
basically
you
know.
That's
that's.
Why
we're
that's
the
reason
why
we're
applying
for
the
curb
cut
and
also
an
additional
parking
spot.
J
N
So
I
would
say
probably
three
to
four
and
my
plan
is
actually
to
park
on
this.
Hopefully,
on
this
other
side,
where
I
mean
the
one
that
we're
applying
for
this
permit
and
and
on
this
other
side,
it'll
be
maybe
one
to
I
should
say
two
to
three
actually.
C
John,
do
you
have
any
comments
besides
to
no.
A
N
N
A
C
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
Good
night,
let's
see
Marilyn
makes
a
motion
to
adjourn
all
those
in
favor
aye.