►
From YouTube: 6/16/2020 Community Development Board.
Description
Meeting will begin at 9 a.m. EST.
Comments are not monitored on this platform. To make a comment, please visit www.myclearwater.com/government/council-meeting-streaming-videos or one of our social media pages.
Agenda can be found here: http://bit.ly/ClearwaterCityCouncilMeetings
B
A
A
First
up
are
procedures
for
quasi
judicial
hearings,
level,
2
cases
all
level
2
cases
such
as
flexible
development
are
considered
quasi
judicial
hearings
in
quasi
judicial
hearings,
the
Community
Development
Board
reviews,
the
application,
the
staff
report
correspondence
and
all
evidence
presented
today
and
makes
final
decisions
subject
to
appeal.
This
board
has
previously
qualified
all
of
the
city
staff
who
will
testify
as
experts
in
their
area,
professional
training,
education
and
experience,
the
list
of
city
staff
experts
and
their
resumes
are
in
the
handbook
on
the
podium
near
the
entry
door.
A
Any
other
professionals
who
desire
to
be
qualified
as
an
expert
witness,
shall
show
request
at
the
beginning
of
the
case
in
present
resume
to
each
board
member.
The
board
shall
determine
whether
or
not
to
qualify
the
person
as
an
expert
and
in
what
field
of
study
at
the
beginning
of
each
level
to
case
I
would
ask
for
anyone
who
wishes
to
request
party
status
to
come
forward
and
state
your
reasons.
Party
status
may
be
granted
if
the
person
requesting
such
status
demonstrates
that
he
or
she
is
a
substantially
effective
person.
A
The
board
will
then
determine
whether
or
not
to
grant
party
status.
Then
the
case
will
proceed
as
follows:
requests
for
party
status,
presentation
by
Planning
and
Development
staff,
ten
minutes
maximum
presentation
by
the
applicant
ten
minutes
max
presentation
by
persons
with
party
status,
five
minutes
per
party
maximum
cross-examination
of
witnesses
by
Planning
and.
A
Staff
cross-examination
of
witnesses
by
OPM
cross-examination
of
witnesses
by
persons
with
party
status
comments
by
the
public
three
minutes
per
person,
closing
remarks
by
the
Planning
and
Development
staff;
three
minutes
maximum
closing
remarks
by
persons
granted
party
status;
three
minutes
maximum
closing
remarks
by
applicant
three
minutes:
maximum
closing
of
the
public
hearing,
discussion
and
vote
by
the
board
and
our
first
level
two
case
will
be.
The
first
item
pulled
out.
Consent.
A
With
this
case,
FLD
two
zero:
two
zero
zero:
three
zero
zero.
Six
at
17
2000
broke
Avenue
the
owners
city
of
Clearwater.
The
agent
is
brian
oaks
locations,
4.12
acres,
located
on
the
south
side
of
Overbrook
Avenue,
approximately
500
feet
west
of
North
Betty
Lane.
The
CDP
is
reviewing
a
proposed
public
transportation
facility
as
a
comprehensive
infill
redevelopment
project
in
the
commercial
district
for
a
portion
of
the
property.
A
D
A
C
E
A
Second
OSHA
made
in
second
all
favor,
say
aye
aye
motion
carries.
Is
anyone
here
else
here
for
party
status?
Okay,
the
board
has
granted
party
status
to
David
J.
For
this
case,
the
granting
of
party
status
entitles
you
to
these
additional
rights
personally
testify
present
evidence
by
documentary
semental,
present
witnesses
conduct
cross-examination
of
any
witnesses.
Present
argument
appealed
the
decision
of
the
board
to
a
hearing
officer
and/or
to
Circuit
Court.
F
G
A
F
Thank
you
good
afternoon.
The
proposal
before
you
today
is
located
at
17
2000
verb.
Rooke.
The
project
area
is
a
portion
of
this
site.
Generally,
it's
the
western
half
of
the
property.
The
eastern
half
is
currently
developed
with
a
fire
station.
The
property
is
zoned
commercial,
with
an
underlying
future
land
use
of
commercial
general.
The
surrounding
properties
to
the
south,
our
zone,
low,
medium
density,
residential,
the
properties
to
the
north
are
largely
in
unincorporated
Pinellas.
County,
though
they
are
in
the
city
of
Clearwater
service
area.
They
have
an
underlying
future
land
use
of
commercial
general.
F
The
proposal
before
you
today
is
to
construct
a
public
transportation
facility
for
the
Jolly
trolley,
including
admin
offices.
A
workshop
and
parking
for
the
trolleys
public
transportation
facility
is
listed
in
the
commercial
zoning
district
as
a
level
1
flexible
standard
development
use.
However,
today
it
is
being
reviewed,
is
a
comprehensive,
infill
redevelopment
project
due
to
the
requested
maximum
height
of
25
feet.
F
F
F
The
admin
building
which
is
located
towards
the
front
near
Overbrook,
is
shown
here
generally
it
has
a
maximum
height
of
20
feet
to
the
top
of
the
entry
element,
which
is
the
pitched
roof
element
here
and
14
feet
to
the
flat
roof
for
the
remainder
of
the
building
in
the
commercial
district
as
a
comprehensive
infill
redevelopment
project,
the
maximum
height
is
not
listed,
however,
for
most
uses
as
a
level
2.
The
maximum
height
ranges
from
25
to
50
feet.
F
F
The
remainder
of
the
buildings
are
generally
less
than
25
feet
between
13
and
feet
and
height
flat
roofs
as
incomprehensive
infill
redevelopment
project.
The
proposed
buildings
include
distinctive
roof
elements,
a
variety
of
building
facade
materials,
varying
fenestrations
and
use
of
architectural
details
such
as
awnings.
F
Further,
the
applicant
is
an
agreement
of
a
condition
of
approval,
specifically
number
five,
that
the
fence
along
the
rear
property
line
shall
be
an
eight-foot
to
provide
the
maximum
amount
of
screening.
This
is
also
consistent
with
the
fire
station
to
the
east,
which
has
an
8-foot
PVC
fence
and
the
condition
also
details
the
high
quality
fence,
and
that
will
be
consistent
throughout
the
remainder
of
the
project.
E
E
F
A
I
H
Property,
the
trolley
is
standing
in
the
shoes
of
the
city
of
clear
water
as
they
want
thermal
st
of
the
property.
As
mr.
Crandall
noted,
this
property
is
zoned
commercial,
and
this
use
is
a
permitted
level.
One
use
public
transportation
facility
in
the
commercial
district.
Nothing
about
the
use
is
before
you
in
terms
of
whether
the
use
itself
is
compatible
or
consistent,
because
that
use
has
been
legislatively
created
as
a
level
and
approval
by
the
City
Council
and
the
prior
City
Commission.
H
So
really
what's
before
this
board
today
is
a
quasi-judicial,
is
a
decision
about
the
flexibility
requested
as
to
the
height
of
the
maintenance
building,
which
is
25
feet
and
the
staff
recommendation
and
the
condition
were
agreeing
to
which
is
the
height
of
the
decorative
wall,
on
the
rear
of
the
property
which
is
8
feet.
I
do
want
to
say
just
a
word
about.
Why
are
we
here?
How
did
we
get
here?
The
Jolly
trolley
currently
leases
property
from
the
Clearwater
gas
system
and
plural
one
Myrtle.
H
As
you
probably
know,
clear,
gasps
is
expanding
their
footprint
on
that
property.
In
about
two
years
ago,
they
asked
the
Jolly
trolley
to
make
plans
to
vacate,
as
the
city
needs,
that
property,
so
the
for
the
past
two
years
to
the
javac'
trial
has
been
working
with
the
city
to
locate
in
a
sufficient
and
appropriate
alternative
site
to
make
sure
the
drive
trolley
stays
in
Clearwater.
H
Since
1982,
the
giant
Riley
has
been
an
indelible
part
of
the
fabric
of
our
community,
providing
alternative
transportation,
not
just
for
the
citizens
of
Clearwater,
but
also
for
all
of
North
Pinellas
County.
Now,
due
to
the
trust,
that's
been
in
place
that
by
the
PSTA,
the
job
trolley
has
long
been
an
alternative
use
of
transportation
to
reduce
emissions,
reduce
cars
and
traffic's
from
the
road
which
clearly
is
a
benefit
to
the
community,
and
it's
important
that
the
delicate
Riley
stay
in
Clearwater
and
not
be
forced
to
go
somewhere
else.
H
This
is
the
long-term
lease
that
was
unanimously
approved
by
the
Clearwater
City
Council
on
February
6th
for
the
public
transportation
facility.
It's
a
25-year
lease
as
part
of
that
leased.
The
city
hired
eight
environmental
attorney
bill
pence,
the
city
conducted
a
environmental
phase-one
and
the
Jolly
trolley,
Commission
and
paid
for
us
to
do
an
additional
soil
and
groundwater
assessment.
H
All
of
that,
all
of
those
environmental
issues
have
been
taken
into
consideration
in
the
lease
and
by
the
council,
and
it's
the
city's
opinion,
and
it's
our
opinion
that
this
project
is
an
environmental
improvement
over
what's
currently
there.
In
other
words,
what's
currently,
there
will
be
improved
in
terms
of
environmental
remediation
and
an
environmental
care
and
maintenance
of
the
property
based
on
even
just
leaving
it
alone.
As
is
I'm
going
to
ask
mr.
purple
easy
to
speak
more
specifically
to
the
mitigation
in
terms
of
the
excess
landscape,
buffering
and
excess.
H
Things
that
exceed
the
code
I'm
still
trying
to
figure
out
how
to
position
is
something
I
just
wanted.
I
just
wanted
to
point
out
briefly,
as
mr.
Crandall
pointed
out
this,
this
is
the
rear
of
the
property
and
the
single-family
homes
are
back
here.
This
maintenance
building
is
75
feet,
setback
from
the
property
line
and
the
homes
are
about
20
feet,
approximately
setback
from
their
property
lines,
so
we're
talking
about
90
feet
from
building
to
other
building.
This
is
only
going
to
be
operated
during
normal
business
hours
and
it
is
enclosed.
H
The
only
work
that's
done
in
here
is
tire
replacement,
oil
changes
and
light
engine
work.
There's
a
painting
there's
nothing
like
that,
and
any
heavy
engine
work
is
sent
out.
The
trolleys
are
parked
in
the
center
of
the
property
and
we
screened
by
the
maintenance,
building
the
eight-foot
wall
and,
of
course,
the
louver
birth
is
over
here,
and
the
office
is
here
so
I
did
want
to
address
the
other
20-foot
land,
landscaping,
buffer,
75
feet,
setback
from
property
line
about
90
feet,
setback
from
the
single
family,
homes.
J
Good
afternoon
Robert
Kirby
Lizzie
with
Gulf
Coast,
consulting
that
AICP
certified
planner,
as
Brian
mentioned,
we're
here
for
public
transportation
facility,
which
is
a
permitted
use
in
the
flexible
standard
development
section
of
the
code,
the
Jolly
trolley,
it's
their
administrative
offices
and
workshop
warehouse
for
minor
repairs
on
their
on
their
vehicles.
It's
consistent
with
the
cg
land
use
of
a
comprehensive
plan
and
that
offices
are
permitted.
Primary
use
offices
are
also
consistent
with
the
commercial
zoning
of
the
property
we.
This
project
is
consistent
with
several
comp
plan
policies.
J
Building,
if
you
can
see
this
is
the
proposed
maintenance
facility,
that
is
the
25
foot
high
building,
as
Brian
mentioned,
it's
a
one-story
building
and
it
is
74
feet
from
the
property
line
and
that's
part
of
that
buffer
from
the
residential
home,
which
there
are
three
homes
directly
above
our
property
and
that
are
zoned
lmv
art
we've
got
a
20-foot
landscape
buffer
and
as
part
of
our
DRC
review.
The
20-foot
landscape
buffer
includes
shade
trees
and
then,
of
course,
there's
the
eight-foot.
What's
going
to
begin,
a
decorative
fence
that
mr.
J
powner
will
talk
about
more
so
will
will
get
to
the
wall
is
going
to
be
consistent
with
the
height
of
the
wall
on
the
fire
station.
That
was
one
of
the
reasons
that
staff
asked
for
eight-foot
high
or
required
a
foot
high
after
we
can
propose
six
I
want
to
touch
on
traffic
a
little
bit.
Traffic
is
minimal
for
this
project.
I
provided
a
traffic
assessment
that
was
part
of
the
part
of
the
submit
all
and
the
peak
hour.
Traffic
from
this
project
falls
well
below
the
threshold
for
detailed
traffic
analysis,
which
is
51
trips.
J
L
The
design
of
the
eight
foot
high
rear
decorative
wall
helps
to
buffer
buffer
the
adjacent
residential
neighborhood.
The
height
of
the
decorative
wall
is
compatible
with
the
fence
height
of
the
neighboring
fire
station.
The
wall
will
be
constructed
of
masonry
chairs,
as
you
can
see,
on
the
elmo
and
horizontal
would
look
infill
panels.
The
fence
ties
into
the
design
of
the
Jolly
trolley
buildings
and
creates
a
warm
residential
like
fence
for
the
neighbors.
The
single-story
administration
and
workshop
buildings
incorporate
architectural
elements
like
changes
of
height,
awnings,
color
pattern
and
texture
to
create
visual
interest.
L
The
admin
building
uses
a
wood-look
material
at
the
entry
to
add
warmth,
creating
a
more
residential
aesthetic.
The
woodland
material
gives
a
nod
to
the
surrounding
neighborhoods,
while
the
corner
Glasson
creates
an
inviting
entry.
The
building
changes
plans
through
a
recess
on
the
north
side,
ending
an
extension
to
the
main
facade
on
the
east
side,
the
design
of
the
buildings
in
the
fence
or
thoughtfully
planned
to
relate
to
the
fire
station
and
the
adjacent
neighborhood
behind,
while
giving
Charlie
Charlie
its
own
identity.
H
Thank
you
very
much,
miss
pan
Oh
mr.
Kerbel
easy.
So,
as
we
stated,
the
hue
specific
criteria
have
all
been
met
and
would
have
been
approved
as
a
level
1
approval
by
the
staff,
but
for
the
25
feet
in
height
for
the
maintenance
building
and
the
20
feet
in
height
from
the
administration
administrative
building.
H
Again,
the
maintenance
building
is
significantly
set
back
from
the
property
line
and
from
the
abutting
homes,
and
also
the
landscape
buffer
of
20
feet
and
the
8
foot
decorative
wall,
which
will
match
the
height
of
the
current
fire
station,
which
is
next
door,
are
all
mitigating
factors
that
we
think
meet
and
exceed
all
of
the
code.
Requirements
for
approval
and
again
just
to
reiterate,
I,
want
to
thank
the
staff,
the
city
attorney
cities
outside
counsel.
Mr.
pence.
H
For
sitting
down
with
us
over
a
long
period
of
time
of
just
about
two
years
in
October,
to
try
to
find
an
appropriate
site
to
keep
the
Jolly
trolley
in
clear
water,
but
to
make
sure
that
that
cooler,
gas
building
can
be
freed
up
and
I
love
the
city
expand
there
and
use
that
for
their
purposes.
So
at
that
point
we'll
just
answer
any
questions
that
you
have
I
do.
A
Have
a
question
about
the
wall:
I
noticed
that
you
do
have
some
large
columns,
there's
some
very
large
Oaks
along
the
back
of
the
property
where
the
wall
is
going
to
be
so
I
presume
that
the
applicant
would
be
working
with
the
city
arborist
and
locating
where
those
those
columns
lands.
So
we're
not
too
close
to
the
structure.
Absolutely.
D
I
want
to
I
want
to
start
out
first
by
saying,
as
a
lifelong
resident
of
Clearwater,
it's
a
pleasure
to
see
this
being
brought
out
of
the
functional
in
the
economic
obsolescence,
having
been
only
several
boards
myself
in
the
ground
field,
I'm
pleased
with
this
project.
Overall,
my
concern
and
my
future
concern-
and
my
current
concern
is
Pineland
drive
it
right
here,
which
is
between
the
city
and
the
city.
D
That's
the
only
way
I
can
acquire
access
to
my
property,
so
the
right-of-way
is
Pineland
Drive,
it's
30
feet
see
the
best
of
my
knowledge
accordingly
engineer
it
should
be
50
feet,
and
so
I
want
this
to
be
on
record.
That
should
we
go
in
the
future.
We
have
to
take
ten
feet
from
this
side
for
the
city
of
the
city
and
ten
feet
on
this
side,
for
the
city,
as
well
as
ingress
and
egress
on
the
adjacent
city
property,
so
that
I
can
have
access
to
my
own
property,
which
of
course,
is
landlocked.
D
I'm
asking
the
city
now
for
access
in
conjunction
with
this
project
for
future
reference,
as
I
said
in
the
past,
I've
had
to
ask
the
city
to
address
this
and
have
been
told
by
the
manager
and
real
estate
services
coordinator,
that
I
don't
need
to
sue
I,
don't
want
to
sue
the
city
of
Clearwater
I'd,
rather
work
with
the
city
to
see
you
know
to
possibly
buy
this
property
rather
than
making
me
to
to
gain
access
to
my
property.
So
I'd
like
to
thank
you
for
your
time,
I'm
hearing
you
today
the
only
questions.
D
C
M
N
N
N
The
new
facility
will
house
a
centralized
administration.
They
maintenance
facility
has
been
pointed
out
already,
which
is
good
because
they
operate
from
two
different
facilities
today,
and
it's
it's
time
for
me
to
get
back
on
for
Charlie.
His
facility
should
fit
well
in
the
area
as
they
proposed
or
in
the
proposed
lot.
Is
a
vacant
vent
landfill,
surrounded
on
one
side
has
pointed
out
automotive
shops
across
the
street,
a
fire
station
to
the
right,
an
empty
lot
to
the
west,
and
this
the
community
to
the
south.
N
Jt
management
and
staff
care
a
lot
about
their
image
in
the
community
and
are
great
stewards
of
their
trade.
Their
secret
as
success
is
that
they
believe
they
offer
a
friendly
tourist
transportation
service
versus
the
city,
bus
and
care
deeply
about
the
environment
and
their
neighbors.
Charlie
Charlie
will
invest
in
an
attractive,
compatible
facility
like
the
fire
station
next
door
on
the
adjacent
portion
of
the
lot
like
to
lift
a
couple
of
things
from
the
staff
report
to
to
speak
about.
N
The
proposed
development
of
the
public
transportation
facility
is
in
harmony
with
the
scale,
bulk
coverage,
density
and
character
of
the
adjacent
properties.
The
proposed
development
means
all
CDC
requirements,
maximum
development
potential
and
minimum
standard
use
for
development
parameters.
The
proposed
development
will
not
reverse
the
effect.
The
health
or
safety
of
persons
residing
or
working
in
the
neighborhood
that
the
proposed
use
of
the
buildings
will
have
an
increased
setbacks
from
all
property
lines.
N
As
the
architect
pointed
out,
with
substantial
landscape
buffers,
the
proposed
development
is
designed
to
minimize
traffic
congestion
and
demonstrated
by
the
traffic
demand
that
mr.
Berger,
as
Li
referred
to
in
the
study
and
has
the
negligible
impact
on
traffic
generation
and
will
be
will
not
affect
the
level
of
service
on
the
adjacent
roads
which
are
classified
as
collectors.
In
the
comprehensive
plan
enclosing.
C
N
O
My
name
is
Alexandra
Nixon
and
I
excellent
good
afternoon,
and
thank
you
for
the
opportunity
to
talk
before
this
board.
My
name
is
Alexandra
Dixon
as
I
just
stated
and
I'm
here
as
a
concerned
resident
and
president
of
the
Spring
Branch
Neighborhood
Association,
which
borders
are
to
the
south
Sunset
Point,
so
we're
actually
located
just
a
few
blocks
north
with
the
proposed
location.
O
We
already
expressed
our
concerns
in
our
letter.
T
new
dated
in
February,
6th
and
I
will
now
leave
the
floor
to
our
vice
president,
Spring
Gretchen
neighborhoods
Association,
vice
president
Jo,
who
will
make
a
more
thoroughly
present
a
more
thorough
presentation
of
the
various
points
to
be
considered
before
approving
this
location
for
this
particular
development.
Thank
you
very
much
for
your
time
and
I'm,
leaving
the
for.
P
Thank
you
again.
Thank
you.
For
your
time
my
name
is
Jared.
I
am
a
resident
of
the
city
and
I
also
served
as
a
vice
president
Gretchen
Neighborhood
Association,
which
is
neither
proposed
development.
This
might
not
directly
affect
me,
but
for
many
of
the
people
who
it
does,
they
don't
know
what's
happening
and
I
took
a
few
moments
to
examine
the
request
and
I
shared
with
you.
Well
I
have
here
to
share
with
you,
but
the
requests
in
some
of
the
relevant
definitions
from
the
city's
development
code.
P
The
proposed
jolly
Charlie
operation
center
is
not
consistent
with
the
goals.
General
purpose
intent
and
basic
planning
objectives
outlined
in
the
city's
code.
Putting
a
transportation
facility
in
a
neighborhood
is
far
from
innovative.
It's
incompatible
using
the
comprehensive
infill
season
redevelopment
zoning
feels
more
like
a
way
to
skirt
development
rules
rather
than
follow
them.
P
P
There's
several
small
commercial
parcels
that
development
groups
have
in
the
last
year
spreader
and
the
larger
commercial
property
that
development
groups
have
expressed
interest
in
developing
as
residential
of
our
apartment's,
but
what's
the
likelihood
of
future
highest
best
use
they're
at
the
transportation
facilities
across
the
street,
the
property
also
borders
environmentally
sensitive
land,
the
Stevenson
Creek
watershed
which
is
owned
preservation
and
according
to
city
staff,
it
would
not
be
an
environmental
improvement
at
best,
it
would
be
a
break-even
well,
this
parcel
is
listed
as
commercial.
It
is
an
undeniably
residential
neighborhood.
P
Otherwise,
clearly
the
purpose
and
intent
of
commercial
district
designation
is
to
get
residents
access
to
goods
and
services
without
adversely
impacting
the
integrity
of
the
neighborhood
and
that's
according
to
the
media
code
definition
well,
the
jolly
Charlie
might
offer
services
between
its
Beach
and
coastal
routes.
There
are
no
plans
to
offer
stops
in
their
neighborhood.
Rather,
these
Charlie's
will
come
and
go
multiple
times
a
day
throughout
the
neighborhood
tickets
to
the
main
roads.
It
needs
to
access
its
routes,
because
the
jolly
Charlie
hasn't
have
plans
to
pick
up
riders
from
here.
P
It
does
not
meet
the
definition
of
a
transportation
facility.
This
proposed
development
is
where
equipment
will
be
stored
and
its
administrative
offices
will
be
based
on
the
transportation
facility
definition.
The
site
plans
in
proposed
development
location
ordering
residential
17
is
also
not
compatible.
The
structure
will
be
viewable
by
the
handful
of
residentially
zoned
properties
from
itself,
as
well
as
the
ones
to
the
north
like
lightnings,
are
ending.
The
Builder
building
will
undoubtedly
be
cast
upon
these
homes.
In
addition
to
lighting,
there
will
be
no
eggs
and
traffic
from
the
trolleys
and
employees
getting
to
work.
P
A
maintenance
Bay
where
were
repairs,
including
oil
and
tire
changes,
will
be
done,
will
likely
use
impact
wrenches.
Another
equipment
that
makes
noise
the
coming
and
going
at
Charlie's
multiple
times
a
day
is
drivers
switch
shifts
as
well
as
additional
traffic
from
employees
throughout
the
day
would
undoubtedly
be
an
adverse
impact
to
a
residential
neighborhood.
Regardless
of
what
the
traffic
study
says
and
there's
also
a
neighbor
biometrics
school,
the
proposed
development
is
incompatible
with
adjacent
land
uses
and
substantially
alternate
essential
uses
characteristics
of
the
neighborhood.
Thank
you
for
your
time.
Thank
you.
Q
R
My
name
is
Orlando
Dorsey
and
I've
been
advocate
for
the
Jolly
trolley
I've
been
riding
the
trolley
for
ten
years,
eight
years
before,
I
even
moved
to
Florida.
That
trolley
was
a
pertinent
part.
The
minute
I
found
out
there
was
a
way
to
get
over
this
branch
to
Clearwater.
Without
having
to
drive
my
car.
That
trolley
became
my
method
of
use.
I,
don't
I,
know:
they've
been
looking
for
space
for
two
years,
I've
heard
about
the
environmental
studies
versus
the
impact.
R
The
gentleman
just
mentioned,
I,
don't
see
them
as
being
a
true
issue
and
I
would
love
to
see
the
trolley
trolley
get
a
new
home
after
being
here
in
Clearwater
for
30
plus
years
I.
Don't
think
that
there
have
been
any
noise
complaints
of
things
from
where
the
current
shop
is
located,
so
I
don't
see,
it'll
be
even
further
away
from
the
residential
areas
where
it's
going
to
be
located
now
and
that's
all
I
have
to
say
thank
you.
S
S
At
this
point
we
do
want
to
stay
in
the
Clearwater
area.
We
feel
like
that.
We
have
been
an
icon
when
people
talk
about
Clearwater
well,
one
of
those
icons
that
do
come
up,
the
red
and
yellow
trolleys
doesn't
matter.
Where
are
you
are
in
Pinellas
County?
If
there's
a
trolley
out
there,
everybody
names
at
the
Jolly
trolley,
because
we
have
built
that
our
name
even
specifies
him.
You
know
Charlie
Charlie
transportation
Clearwater,
so
we
do
want
to
stay
into
the
area.
S
I
really
want
to
talk
a
little
bit
about
the
community,
because
I
know
that
there
is
concerned
again
about
wanting
to
go
into
a
residential
neighborhood
two
of
our
locations.
As
has
been
mentioned,
we
have
one
that
is
in
the
Greenwood
area.
We've
been
there
for
probably
almost
about
two
decades.
Now
that
we
run
to
property
there,
and
then
our
maintenance
shop
is
in.
We
are
considered
a
good
neighbor.
We've
never
received
complaints
from
the
people
in
the
neighborhood.
We
try
to
help
them
out.
S
If
somebody
needs
air
in
their
tires
that
they
need
something
in
the
area,
we
try
to
be
just
a
good
neighbor
to
them
as
well.
When
we
moved
into
the
location
eight
years
ago
there
410
North
Myrtle.
We
got
feedback
from
the
residents
that
they
thought
that
we
were
a
good
neighbor,
because
we
kind
of
cut
down
on
some
of
the
traffic
and
some
of
the
homelessness
that
have
been
going
on
in
that
area.
So
for
us
we
pride
ourselves
in
being
not
only
the
business
partner
but
a
good
partner.
S
Overall,
we
try
to
work
our
hardest
to
keep
everything
everybody
in
compatibility
to
what
we
have
and
try
to
be
a
good
citizen.
I,
don't
see
us
being
any
different
when
we
take
a
look
at
the
new
location
on
Overbrook,
who
proposed
to
be
exactly
the
same
to
where
we
probably
provide
good
service,
and
we
also
provide
ourselves
as
a
good
neighbor,
so
I.
Thank
you
very
much.
I
look
forward
and
help
get
you
the
supports.
Thank.
A
A
A
H
Thank
You
mr.
chairman
I'll,
just
obvious,
because
I
can't
I
just
want
to
reiterate
that
this
process
has
been
a
significant
amount
of
time
due
diligence
and
resources
for
both
the
city
who
hired
an
outside
environmental
attorney
bill
pence
and
the
Jolly
trolley
significant.
Due
diligence
has
gone
into
the
environmental,
a
pre-existing
conditions
and
the
environmental
impact
and
mitigation
that
this
project
will
actually
provide.
And
again
it's
built
into
the
lease
and
that's
publicly
available
for
everyone,
which
was
unanimously
approved
by
the
City
Council
back
in
February
of
2020.
H
I
also
wanted
to
address
the
fact
that,
to
my
knowledge,
we
haven't
received
any
objections
or
concerns
for
many
of
these
owners
of
these
single-family
homes,
who
are
going
to
be
the
ones
that
theoretically,
would
be
the
ones
that
would
be
most
concerned
about
the
development.
But
there's
concerns
have
been
taken
into
consideration
with
the
significant
landscaping,
the
significant
building
setback
and
the
decorative
wall
that
will
be
matching
the
fire
station
wall
I
also
wanted.
As
mr.
Dorsey
and
miss
Windsor
pointed
out.
H
You
know
we
currently
operate
at
410
Myrtle
across
the
street,
from
some
single-family
homes,
on
Park
Street
and
by
an
avenue
and
we've
never
had
any
complaints
or
issues
losing
operation
of
the
building.
Finally,
I
just
wanted
to
ask
mr.
purple
easy
again
to
come
up
very
briefly
and
address
some
of
the
stormwater
issues
and
how
that's
what
he
addressed
in
Queen,
just
in
case
they
ever
concerns
related
to
the
environmental
impacts,
Thank
You,
mr.
music,
for
the
record,
our
new
site
plan,
which
was
recommended
for
approval
by
staff,
includes
stormwater.
J
H
Thank
you
Robert.
If
you
have
any
other
questions,
if
you
have
an
answer
that
I
believe
that
the
köppen
of
substantial
evidence
is
before
you
from
both
the
staff
record,
the
application,
the
expert
testimony
to
approve
the
very,
very
minor
height
variance
and
obviously
the
very
minor
decorative
wall,
height
variance,
which
is
going
to
be
a
benefit
to
the
neighbors
and
not
a
fisherman.
Thank
you
so
much
I
think.
B
My
man,
there
was
a
question
raised
as
to
whether
this
is
in
fact
a
transportation
facility
which
would
be
compatible
in
the
commercial
district.
Since
it's
a
maintenance
facility
which
I
also
believe
is
compatible
I
just
wanted
to
verify.
There
isn't
a
question
as
to
its
conformity
with
the
code
right.
Q
Well,
I
think
that
the
it
is
a
transportation
facility,
it
has
offices,
it
has.
You
know
the
location
for
the
buses
to
be
stored
there,
and
so
we
thought
that
it
met
the
definition
that
meets
the
underlying
future
land
use
pieces
which
allows
those
typing
uses
to
which
is
another
consideration
for
comprehensive
infill
redevelopment
projects.
A
I
E
C
A
A
Our
next
level
to
case
is
case.
Fld,
zero,
zero,
zero
one,
zero,
zero
located
at
24,
25,
North,
McMullen
booth
and
an
unaddressed
parcel
the
owner
is
in
a
freedom,
trust
and
Randall.
Our
freedom
trust
the
agent
will
Morgan
with
best
core
communities
Inc.
This
is
located
at
six.
This
is
this
is
six
point:
five,
two
acres
located
on
the
west
side
of
North
McMullen
booth,
Road,
approximately
eight
hundred
seventy-five
feet,
south
of
enterprise
Road
east.
A
The
community
development
is
reviewing
a
proposed
99
bed
assisted
living
facility
with
thirty
two
attacks,
dwelling
independent
living
units
in
the
medium
density,
residential
district
for
the
property
located
at
to
four
to
five
North
McFarland
booth
Road,
which
consists
of
two
parcels
project,
will
be
45
feet
in
height,
includes
118
off-street
parking
spaces
and
request
allowable
flexibility
from
youths
and
landscaping
requirements.
The
association's
of
clearwater
neighborhoods
coalition
oak,
brook
estates,
HOA
and
Board
of
County
Commissioners.
The
presenter
is
Melissa
dr.
Baker,
ASEP,
Senior
Planner.
A
A
A
V
A
Okay,
the
party
to
board
has
granted
party
status
to
climb
this
hand
this
pretty
mo.
For
this
case,
the
granting
of
party
status
entitles
you
to
these
additional
rights.
You
can
personally
testify
present
evidence
by
documentary's
middle
present.
Witnesses
conduct
cross-examination
of
any
witnesses.
Present
arguments
appealed.
The
decision
of
the
board
to
a
hearing
officer
and/or
to
Circuit
Court
will
now
have
our
presentation
by
Planning
and
Development
step.
F
F
F
So
the
pro
the
proposal
before
you
today
is
for
the
property
at
24
25
North,
McMullen
booth
Road,
which
is
comprised
of
two
parcels
both
of
the
partials
are
zoned
medium
density,
residential
zoning
district,
the
property
is
adjacent
to
low
density,
residential
to
the
west
and
low
medium
density
residential
to
the
south,
and
the
north
and
east
are
both
in
the
city
of
safety
Harbor
to
the
north.
There
is
a
stormwater
pond
and
a
commercial
plaza
and
then
to
the
east
across
with
polling
booth.
Road
is
another
single-family
neighborhood.
F
F
Medium
density,
residential
site
and
the
future
land
use
two
residential
low
medium
excuse
me.
So
the
zoning
district
EMDR
establishes
the
permitted
uses
the
development
parameters,
such
as
height
setback
and
Rick
at
parking.
The
future
land-use
establishes
the
maximum
density
or
intensity
such
as
dwelling
units
per
acre.
The
proposal
is
to
construct
an
assisted
living
facility
with
99
beds
and
32
attached
drilling
independent
living
units,
though
these
are
called
out
as
two
different
items
for
the
purposes
of
zoning
review.
This
is
one
integrated
project.
F
The
use
of
assisted
living
facility
may
be
requested
in
the
medium
density,
residential
zoning
district
as
a
level
2
flexible
development
application,
which
this
project
is
further,
the
use
of
attached
drawings,
is
being
requested
through
a
residential
infill
project
as
part
of
the
level
2
application.
Both
of
these
uses
are
able
to
be
requested
in
the
zoning
district
as
the
property
abuts
single-family
homes
to
the
south
and
to
the
west.
The
most
active
elements
of
the
project
have
been
designed
to
be
to
the
east
and
to
the
north,
so
this
is
McMullen
booth.
F
Here
the
single
family
homes
are
to
the
south
and
the
west.
The
most
active
elements,
including
the
main
entrance,
the
parking,
the
generators
and
the
tallest
portions
of
the
building
and
even
internal
to
the
building
the
assists
the
independent
living
units
are
also
located
in
the
central
to
the
northeast
of
the
project
to
buffer
the
adjacent
single-family
homes
as
much
as
possible.
F
The
eastern
portion
of
the
building
is
three
stories
and
it
steps
down
to
two
storeys
towards
the
west.
The
proposal
complies
with
the
required
development
parameters
of
the
zoning
district,
including
the
height
setbacks,
and
required
parking.
The
required
setbacks
for
both
an
assisted
living
facility
and
attached
dwellings
are
25
foot,
front,
5,
foot,
side
and
10
foot
rear
residential
infill
projects
may
request
down
to
ten
foot
front
and
zero
foot
side
and
rear.
F
However,
the
project
proposes
to
exceed
all
required
setbacks
with
a
25
foot
front
setback
to
pavement
a
5
foot
side,
north
setback
to
building
a
30
foot,
rear
setback
to
building
and
a
35
foot
side
setback
to
building
and
10
feet
to
pavement,
that's
a
little
easier
to
see
on
the
landscape
plan.
The
project
has
submitted
a
comprehensive
landscape
program
due
to
a
few
of
the
interior
landscape,
Islands
being
less
than
the
required
17
feet
back
of
card.
The
back
of
curb
with,
however,
the
remainder
of
the
proposed
landscaping
meets
or
exceeds
the
code
requirements.
F
The
proposal
includes
a
15
foot
buffer
along
McMullen
booth,
a
10
foot
side
buffer
along
the
south,
a
5
foot
landscape
buffer
to
the
north
and
a
10
foot
landscape
buffer
to
the
rear.
There
are
also
green
space
areas
and
greater
width
of
that,
and
it's
due
to
these
larger
green
space
areas
that
the
project
is
also
able
to
propose
preserving
several
of
the
trees
that
are
on
the
site.
These
are
shown
here
with
some
of
the
larger
circles.
F
In
the
MDR
zoning
district,
the
use
of
assisted
living
facility
and
residential
infill
may
request
a
height
of
up
to
50
feet.
The
project
proposes
a
maximum
height
of
40
feet,
which
is
measured
to
the
midpoint
of
a
pitched
roof,
and
this
highest
height
is
measured
at
the
tower
element
towards
the
entrance.
The
remainder
of
the
building
is
three
storeys
and
it
steps
down
to
two
storeys
towards
the
west.
F
F
It
should
also
be
noted
that
the
flexibility
criteria
for
an
assisted
living
facility
and
the
medium
density
residential
requires
the
building
to
not
have
a
flat
roof
off.
Street
parking
will
be
screened
with
the
landscaped
and
decorative
four
foot
wall
that
is
shown
here
in
the
top
right.
This
will
be
primarily
along
McMullen
booth.
F
Further,
the
fire
access
of
Barton
lane
will
be
gated
and
locked,
which
is
shown
here
kind
of
on
the
middle
right
of
there's.
A
middle
almost
should
also
be
noted
that
six
foot
and
height
is
the
maximum
fence
height
that
can
be
requested
for
this
area,
unlike
our
previous
case,
where
they
could
request
eight
because
they
were
commercial
adjacent
to
residential.
There
is
no
code
provision
for
a
greater
fence
than
six
feet
in
height.
F
The
ingress
egress
will
be
off
of
McMullen
Boothe
Road.
As
I
noted,
the
access
of
Barton
Lane
will
be
locked
in
gated
for
fire
and
emergency
access.
Only
the
project
in
both
the
site
plan,
architectural
elevations,
has
been
designed
to
be
compatible
with
the
surrounding
neighborhoods
by
providing
substantial
setbacks,
landscape
buffers
in
green
space,
reducing
the
height
as
they
near
the
residential
neighborhoods,
designing
the
areas
of
activity
to
be
to
the
east
and
the
north
away
from
the
neighborhoods.
F
The
project
is
consistent
with
the
city's
comprehensive
plan
and
is
consistent
with
the
applicable
requirements
of
the
Community
Development
code
and,
as
such,
staff
recommends
approval
with
the
conditions
of
approval
detailed
in
the
staff
report.
These
conditions
of
approval
do
detail.
Items
such
as
that
the
drainage
will
be
handled
at
the
erosion
control
shall
be
approved
at
time
of
building
permit.
That
lighting
shall
not
negatively
impact
the
adjacent
neighborhoods
and
will
meet
the
code
requirements.
W
This
is
I
just
want
to
make
sure
it's
clear.
In
the
record,
we
received
a
package
of
the
letters
I
think
you
referred
to
and
interspersed
throughout
that
package
of
letters.
I
noticed
a
number
of
people
expressing
concerns,
but
that
they
just
found
out
about
this
or
they
didn't
know
this
was
happening.
Can
you
just
speak
to
that
and
whether
the
ordinary
knows
procedures
will
follow?
Yes,.
F
So
the
the
procedures
for
this
application
were
followed,
it
was
advertised,
it
was
posted
and
the
notices
went
out
in
accordance
with
the
requirements
of
CDC
or
the
CDP.
This
particular
project
was
originally
slated
to
come
before
the
March
cdb.
It
went
to
the
development
review
committee
in
February
and
at
that
meaning
at
least
two
or
three
of
the
neighborhood's
attended
the
development
review
committee
meeting.
So
they
saw
the
site
plans
and
they
asked
some
questions.
F
Allowable
density
would
be
the
same
as
far
as
so.
If
it's
six
point,
five
two
acres
and
then
based
on
the
underlying
future
land
use
presidential
low-medium,
the
allowable
maximum
density
would
stay
the
same.
It
would
kind
of
end
up.
How
could
you
if
they
were
able
to
carve
it
up
how
many
Lots
would
fit
where
they
meet
the?
Would
they
be
able
to
have
enough
Lots.
E
F
If
it's
zone
MDR
and
they
wanted
to
subdivide
it
and
build
single-family
homes,
they
would
have
to
meet
the
code.
Requirements
of
the
MB
I
mean
I,
want
to
say
it's
a
25
foot
maximum
height,
but
we
want
to
look
up
the
code
to
say,
but
I
mean
generally,
you
can
accommodate
a
two-story
home
on
most
residential
zoning
districts.
X
X
F
Bahrein
is
a
public
right-of-way,
I
mean
if
this
this
is
a
hypothetical.
If
it
was
submitted,
you
know
to
be
a
single-family
development,
that's
probably
something
that
would
be
discussed
both
with
planning
and
engineering.
So
I
don't
want
to
speak
with.
You
know
their
knowledge,
but
I
would
think
we
would
want
connections.
I
mean
if
it's
a
single-family
home
subdivision
the
buildings
would
be
much
closer.
The
trees
would
likely
not
be
accommodated,
I
mean
it
would
have
a
number
of
different
development
front.
You
know
different
design
impacts.
A
F
F
So
this
is
the
tower
element
here,
so
this
is
McMullen
booth
Road
over
here
see
your
entry,
your
tower
that
first
kind
of
tea
is
two
stories,
the
central
kind
of
main
body,
it's
three
stories,
and
then
here
it
goes
down
to
two
and
then
towards
the
back.
They
kind
of
why
out
so
even
it's
kind
of
an
oblique
angle,
even
as
it
approaches
the
neighborhood.
Y
Where
the
applicant
representing
the
landowner,
okay,
I,
said
like
this
start
just
thinking,
Helen
and
her
staff,
they
did
a
tremendous
job,
getting
us
up
to
speed
on
what
we
should
consider
for
our
site
planning
and
we
had
meetings
early
on
all
the
resources
that
they
brought
to
the
table
to
allow
us
to
understand
and
through
public
record
requests,
understand
previous
applicants
and
site
plans.
What
were
hot
buttons
and
things
that
we
should
consider
in
our
own
cycling.
Y
So
we
took
all
those
into
consideration
and
I
guess.
The
best
thing
I
can
do
is
kind
of
talk
you
through
the
process,
as
opposed
to
set
up
here
and
tell
you
why
we
didn't
would
do
a
good
job.
I
can
tell
you
the
type
of
input
there.
You
know
we
encouraged
and
really
engaged
with
the
neighbors
to
try
to
get
everything
on
the
table
for
consideration
before
we
proposed
our
site
plan
and
we
had.
We
had
an
initial
meeting
in
February.
Y
Which
was
a
pre-application
meeting
with
the
staff
subsequent
today
we
had
a
community
meeting
where
we
noticed
all
the
surrounding
neighborhoods
encourage
them
to
come.
Learn
more
about
our
project.
We
presented
some
inspirational
images.
What
the
project
might
look
like:
the
densities,
the
site
plan,
which
was
consistent
with
what
you
see
today,
because
we
had
already
considered
things
like
traffic
lighting
and
parking.
Y
These
communities
did
have
a
service
element
to
them,
so
we
oriented
that,
as
Helen
pointed
out
to
the
north
side
of
the
property,
so
that
it
wouldn't
everything
associated
with
traffic
and
lighting
would
be
away
from
the
neighbors
I
think
the
biggest
hot
button
is
the
the
Barton
lien
element
to
this.
The
connectivity
which
we've
cut
off
that
connectivity,
but
for
the
fire
department,
other
items
that
were
considerations.
You
know
we
felt
like
we
improved
the
setbacks
tremendously.
We
either
5
or
10
foot
requirement.
We
went
to
25
to
35
feet.
Y
We
kept
it
two
stories
along
the
back,
which
is
the
ldr
section.
How
would
you
go
to
three
stories
on
the
front,
but
you
know
we
can
go
up
to
50
feet
in
wonder
42
at
the
highest
point.
Our
density
is
a
fraction
of
the
allowable
light,
the
great
70
percent
of
the
allowable
density,
which
actually
fits
right
in
the
comfort
level.
For
us
there's
an
operator
we
don't
want
to
get
too
big
yeah,
we
feel
like
we
can
provide
the
right
level
of
service
and
care
to
a
residence.
Y
So
that's
comfortable
for
us
landscaping,
site
lighting.
All
those
things
were
considerations
tree,
save,
there's
some
beautiful
trees
on
this
property
and
we've
been
able
to
save
a
number
of
them.
So
we
feel
like
that
was
an
aspect
that
we
considered
and
again
back
to
the
engagement
with
neighbors.
You
know,
I've
answered
every
phone
call
and
email
inform
them
about
our
project.
They
weren't
able
to
attend
the
library
meeting
that
we
had
in
early
March
and
then
we've
invited
them
to
attend.
Y
Y
We
have
Gary
Corsi
our
architect
he's
out
of
Atlanta
he's
here
today
we
have
David
Smith
Orlan
to
use
expertise
with
Stearns
Weaver
here
locally
and
Ron
Anderson
and
cold
lane,
or
both
with
Anderson
Lane.
There
are
civil
engineers
for
any
questions,
technical
questions
I'm
just
here
to
coordinate
and
make
sure
we
engage
residents
and
get
feedback
and
and
have
a
project
because
smoothly.
A
T
Again,
I'm
Chris,
Klein
and
our
home
is
adjacent
to
both
Barton
Lane
and
the
freedom.
Trust
property
in
question
and
I
would
like
to
first
of
all
speak
to
the
non
notification
to
homeowners.
We
were
notified,
but
what
we
weren't
notified
of
were
all
the
cancellations.
I
think
it
wasn't
well
handled
and
I
hope
that
in
the
future
they
will
hand
do
a
better
job
because
it
was
very
frustrating
we're
having
it
we're
not
having
it
so
on.
It
was
incredibly
frustrating
okay,
no.
T
And
first
I
want
to
thank,
will
Morgan
for
keeping
the
lines
of
communication
open
between
us
over
these
last
month's
through
email
he's
absolutely
right.
He
answered
every
email
and,
with
the
exception
of
the
first
one
very
quickly,
we
further
appreciate
mr.
Morgan
and
the
people
at
best
core
for
the
efforts
and
assurances
they've
made
to
save
the
magnificent
century-old
trees
on
the
site
of
the
proposed
assisted
living
facility.
T
T
T
First,
is
the
proposal
for
Barton
Lane
I
understand
the
plan
is
for
best
car
to
install
a
gate
in
an
ox
box,
after
which
the
only
access
to
open
the
gate
will
be
in
the
hands
of
the
clear
water
police
in
the
Clearwater
Fire
Department,
which
is
all
good.
However,
this
will
mean
losing
the
additional
parking,
a
common
area
we
now
enjoy
for
neighborhood,
picnics,
etc,
and,
unfortunately
the
plan
is
it
stands.
However,
it
has
every
potential
for
being
an
ugly
eyesore
on
the
neighborhood,
as
it's
now
designed.
T
Secondly,
the
height
of
45
feet
will
infringe
on
the
privacy
of
the
people
in
our
neighborhood,
as
well
as
be
visually
overpowering
in
comparison
to
the
height
of
the
rest
of
the
structure
surrounding
us.
Third,
the
cdb
staff
report
calls
for
flexibility
from
use
and
landscaping
requirements
when
I
asked
mr.
Morgan
what
that
meant.
He
volunteered
that
he
didn't
know
and
without
more
specific
information,
we
can't
possibly
comment
or
presents
support
or
opposition
for
our
access
to
and
from
McMullen
booth.
T
For
my
next
door
to
us,
this
new
facility
will
aggravate
the
problem
it
just
will.
I
do
want
to
stress
that
I
believe.
None
of
these
concerns
and
objections
are
without
reasonable
solutions.
As
long
as
we're
all
willing
to
work
together,
I
simply
ask
that
the
city
of
Clearwater
delay
their
decision
on
this
project
long
enough
to
work
with
best
score
on
options
that
would
be
less
intrusive
to
our
neighborhood
and
honestly
I.
Think
most
of
the
suggestions
wouldn't
be
that
big
of
a
deal
but
it'd
make
a
huge
deal
to
me.
Thank
you.
A
U
Yes,
so
I
am
the
owner
of
law
26,
which
is
the
north
west
corner
of
the
project.
I
do
want
to
clarify
for
record.
You
had
asked
me
if
I
received
notice
from
the
city
I
did
receive
notice
for
the
from
the
city
about
this
meeting.
However,
I
did
not
receive
notice
from
the
city
about
the
project
occurring.
You
know,
in
advance
of
this
meeting,
I
did
receive
a
letter
from
the
owners
that
this
project
was
going
on.
U
My
main
concern
is
that
there
are
two
wings
of
the
building
that
are
going
to
be
overlooking
my
property.
One
is
the
three-foot
three-story
tall
area
where
the
kitchen
and
common
area
and
some
other
floors
are
going
to
be,
and
that's
the
north-facing
wing
that
overlooks
the
garbage
area
as
well
as
the
wing
II,
which
contains
the
residents
areas.
U
So
those
two
will
have
direct
line
of
sight
into
our
home,
which
includes
two
master:
bedroom
windows,
a
master
bedroom
glass,
patio
window
door,
the
window
overlooking
our
master
bath
tub
and
shower,
as
well
as
our
entire
balcony.
That
over
looks
our
common
area
in
our
home,
our
living
space,
living
room,
dining
room
as
well
as
the
foyer
and
part
of
our
kitchen.
So
if
these
floors
go
up
that
high
everybody
will
be
able
to
see
directly
into
our
home
day
or
night,
we
also
have
a
backyard
pool
and
jacuzzi
grill
area
sitting
area.
U
So
we
will
not
even
be
able
to
enjoy
our
privacy
of
those
areas.
I'm
definitely
not
going
to
be
wearing
my
bathing
suit,
sunbathing
in
my
pool
when
I
have
a
building
of
people
looking
at
me
or
possibly
being
able
to
look
at
me,
so
that
basically
removes
our
ability
to
use
our
backyard
area
as
well,
as
removes
all
the
privacy
inside
of
our
home,
especially
our
master
bedroom
and
living
room.
So
this
is
a
major
major
concern
for
us.
U
You
know
if
that
does
happen,
and
we
do
move
forward
with
the
project,
as
is
that
we
would
have
to
move.
We
can't
live
in
a
home
where
we
don't
have
any
privacy
and
obviously
any
project
that
goes
up
like
this
behind
a
property
that
has
this
amount
of
privacy
already,
you
know,
reduces
that
property
value
and
we
would
be
having
to
sell
at
a
loss,
and
we
already
invested
in
a
premium
for
to
get
this
corner
a
lot
with
this
privacy.
U
U
Our
property
already
has
a
dry
pond,
a
massive
one
that
spans
two
properties
in
our
subdivided
subdivision.
So
we
also
have
an
in-ground
pool
and
spa
so
that
dry
pond
that
is
going
to
be
adjacent
to
our
property
is
a
huge
concern
to
us.
It's
going
to
attract
a
lot
of
pests.
We
already
have
a
snake
problem,
in
addition
to
many
other
rats
and
other
pests
that
come
in
I'm
very,
very
concerned
with
the
storm
surge
and
hurricanes
overflowing
that
into
our
property.
We
already
have
problems
with
the
pond
next
door.
U
You
know
on
our
property,
so
would
like
to
address
that
and
make
sure
it
doesn't.
You
know,
affect
us,
especially
with
storm
surge
and
that
that's
factored
for
the
we've
had
already
issues
even
before
construction,
starting
with
people,
trespassing
on
our
property
standing
next
to
our
bedroom
windows,
completely
unannounced,
no
knocking
nothing
and
we
were
not
dressed.
U
We
were
not
ready
for
guests
to
be
standing
next
to
our
bedroom
windows,
so
we
would
like
the
property
owners
to
make
sure
that
anybody
coming
on
to
their
property
to
do
work
is
very
cognizant
of
the
property
line
and
is
aware
that
that
pond
is
actually
part
of
our
property,
not
a
common
area,
and
they
should
not
be.
You
know
30-something
feet
deep
into
our
property,
especially
without
knocking
we're
very
reasonable.
U
We
understand
there
needs
to
be
surveys
and
things
done,
but
that
is
a
concern
to
us,
our
privacy,
during
construction
and
after
construction,
as
well
as
debris
being
left
on
our
property
we
had.
Is
that
my
time,
oh
okay,
so
one
last
thing
is
the
trees
going
up.
We
do
have
a
solar
system
going
in,
so
we
do
not
want
any
shade
or
any
additional
maintenance
to
have
to
be
done
for
trees
coming
in
our
property.
So
all
of
our
concerns
are
detailed
in
the
letter.
Okay,.
A
A
V
V
So,
as
you
can
see,
it's
really
not
very
far,
and
when
you
talk
about
45
feet
tall,
that's
three
stories
tall,
and
so
it
looks
like
and
because
I
haven't
seen
the
plans
either,
and
so
it
looks
like
they
kind
of
moved
the
buildings
around
a
little
bit
to
where,
hopefully,
the
residents
are
not
going
to
have
a
direct
view
of
the
people
who
live
there,
because,
as
the
lady
who
spoke
before
me
so
adequately
spoke,
you
lose
privacy.
You
know
you
totally
lose
your
privacy
in
the
backyard.
V
You
don't
want
your
kids
out
there,
you
don't
want
to
I
mean
you
just
can't
use
your
backyard
anymore,
because
you
don't
know
who
is
looking.
You
know,
you've
got
a
second
story.
You've
got
a
third
story
about
99
residents
in
that
in
that
building,
basically,
that's
99,
assisted
living
and
32
independent
living
three
stories
tall
with
only
a
6
foot,
PVC
fence
separating
so
I
brought.
V
V
Very
large
thanks,
Evan,
now
I'm
going
to
show
you
because
last
time
that
we
went
through
this
is
all
in
your
packages.
Taylor
gave
you
Regency
Oaks
yeah,
it's
no
comparison,
because
the
width
between
the
residential
areas
and
the
buildings
is
immense
and
the
buildings
that
are
closer
to
the
residential
areas
are
just
single
storey.
So
there's
really
no
comparison.
When
they
talk
about.
We
talk
about
that.
V
V
To
peaceful
enjoyment
over
their
homes
right,
so
property
law
gives
a
landowner
the
right
to
full
use
and
enjoyment
of
his
property
without
substantial
interference
from
others
under
reasonable
circumstances,
and
that
includes
disturbances
with
sleep
and
noise,
etc.
So
the
four
different
types
of
harm
that
can
be
done
in
this
category
are
physical
harm
to
the
property
physical
harm
to
people.
We
don't
believe
in
the
me
that's
going
to
take
place,
however,
mental
disturbance
and
annoyance
to
people
and
I
mean
if
you're
always
worried,
and
you
can't
be
at
home
in
your
home.
V
Our
real
estate
specialist
I've
done
a
lot
of
work
in
the
area
and
I
know
that
the
properties
are
going
to
be
devalued.
It's
going
to
start
first
with
the
properties
that
are
immediately
next
door,
she's
already
talking
about
moving,
you
know
what
happens,
then
you
put
the
property
on
the
market
and
nobody
wants
a
property,
because
it's
got
this
massive
building
behind
it.
V
All
of
our
landscape
is
going
to
change
there,
and
so
then
the
only
thing
really
it
doesn't
matter
if
it's
beautiful
it
doesn't
matter
if
it's
been
upgraded,
because
if
nobody
wants
it,
what
happens
you
have
to
decrease?
The
price
price
is
the
only
thing
that's
going
to
be
the
equalizing
factor
in
Shadyac
farms.
We
already
have
one
adverse
condition
there,
and
that
is
that
some
of
our
homes
back
up
to
Podocarpus,
I'm,
sorry
back
up
to
McMullen
booth,
Road
and
those
the
home
is
mainly
on
Podocarpus
there
and
you
know,
Pinnock
drive
and
so.
V
A
V
A
A
Z
Z
Z
Z
Z
Z
There's
only
one
really
only
one
way
in
it
and
one
way
out
of
it,
and
that
is
on
McMullen
Booth
Road
and,
as
you
heard,
one
person
say
if
I
have
to
go
right
on
McMullen
left
north
on
McMullen
Booth
Road
I
have
to
go
right.
Well,
I
have
learned
to
do
this.
I
have
to
go
right.
I
go
down
to
the
school
at
McMullen
booth
on
McMullen
booth,
road
I,
make
a
light,
I
go
to
the
red
light
and
then
I
go
left
to
the
to
the
north
shopping
centers.
These
are
my
concerns.
Z
I,
don't
care
how
beautiful
the
building
is
they
can
they
can
take
the
trees?
Yes,
it's
wonderful,
etc,
etc.
However,
I
am
concerned
about
the
safety
of
the
children
in
my
neighborhood,
because
the
only
way
that
a
better
emergency
vehicle
is
going
to
be
able
to
enter
safely
is
through
my
neighborhood
on
Barton
like
thank
you
very
much
good
afternoon.
Everybody.
V
Name
is
Rachel,
freeze,
MA
from
two
three
one:
six
pinup
lane
West
and
Clearwater
Florida,
so
I
know
that
there
are
a
lot
of
baby
boomers
aging
out,
and
this
is
a
big
concern
in
the
package
that
I
gave
you
there's
a
brand
new
state-of-the-art
facility
being
built
just
down
the
street
from
us
by
Arabella,
it's
already
under
construction.
It's
two
stories
with
95
beds
for
memory
care
and
132
beds
for
assisted
living.
We
have
a
huge
number
of
facilities
already
in
the
area
that
are
operating.
V
If
you
go
up
and
down
McMullen,
Ruth,
Road
and
just
out
within
a
few
miles
to
three
miles.
There
are
so
many
facilities
that
are
already
there
and
operating.
We
really
don't
need
another,
a
LF.
You
know
what
we
do
need
is
some
maintenance-free
Villa
communities
for
55
plus
I
mean
if
we
really
want
to
help
the
55
plus
community.
That's
what
they're
looking
for
now.
Thank
you.
A
Y
Y
The
last
one
again
just
stressing
how
we
really
tried
to
preserve
the
corridors
as
best
we
can
and
can't
save
trees
and
the
rock
the
building
the
buffer
is
35
feet
off
the
property
line,
and
so
it's
not
35
feet
through
the
person's
back
that
it
would
be.
We
think
it's
interesting
to
point
out
that
we
had
a
competing
proposal
on
this
property.
The
so
did
from
a
65
unit.
Y
Townhome
developer
would
have
higher
traffic
counts,
probably
five
that
setbacks
connectivity
to
Barton
Lane
a
lot
of
the
things
that
I've
heard
over
the
course
of
this.
Is
it
we're
not
appealing
to
their
neighbors
felt,
like
our
property,
probably
accommodated
better
than
that
tenant,
and
you
would
especially
the
connectivity
I'm.
Almost
certain
neighborhood
connectivities,
importantly
I
saw
I,
probably
didn't
do
a
good
enough.
Job
did
I
think
this
was
in
here
for
just
to
show
validation,
hikes
and
things,
but
yeah,
that's
more
representative
of
the
look
and
feel
of
our
property.
Y
This
is
one
in
Jacksonville.
There's
some
other
inspirational
images
that
we
talk
about
in
our
community
we
developed
also,
we
would
probably
choose
the
Mediterranean
style
for
this
property.
Just
it
fits
the
neighborhood
center,
just
some
shots
of
the
inside.
This
is
a
bistro
bar
area
for
anytime
dining
lunch
dinner,
breakfast
dining
room
I
feel
like
the
economic
loss.
We
did
look
at
that
this
is
a
property
in
Jacksonville.
When
I
said
previously,
we
researched
what
transpired
values
since
we
broke
ground
and
they've
all
gone
up.
Y
These
are
$250,000
price
points.
It
is
not
twenty-three
thousand.
Seventeen
thousand
seventeen,
so
there's
been
their
loss
in
property
value
for
sure,
I
think
the
safety
is
absolutely
one
of
our
most
important
things.
I
think
all
fire
and
rescue
people
are
coming
through
the
front
entrance.
All
the
time
they're.
Taking
the
address
of
the
property
they're
coming
through
the
front
entrance
knock
on
wood
and
my
20
years
the
best
floor.
We've
never
had
a
fire
that
required
access
to
second
floor,
but
in
the
event
we
absolutely
needed
it.
Y
We
have
it,
and
that
would
be
the
only
reason
for
that
Burton
Lane
connectivity.
So
hopefully
we
never
need
it.
It's
there
if
we
do
but
other
than
that,
I
feel
like
the
fire
department,
and
everybody
else
is
going
to
do
the
front
entrance
to
serve
our
neighbors
in
our
residence.
Scuse
me.
Lastly,
market
study,
we
did
perform
a
market
study
and
there's
a
he
unmet
demand
in
this
sub
market.
Y
That's
that's
clear
and
the
research
we've
done
and
work
a
study
that
we
received
as
well
you'll
get
about
that.
I
feel
comfortable
that
we
addressed
all
the
weekend
with
our
neighbors
I
think
miss
Klein
stated
yeah
I
really
tried
to
correspond
time,
leave
with
everyone,
I'm
forming
them
and
also
taking
into
consideration
their
their
feedback
and
really
making
this
a
fluid
process
for
everyone.
So
thank
you
for
your
time
and
thank
the
cleaning
staff
for
their
time.
B
I
I'd,
say
I
think
it's
a
I
appreciate
the
effort
put
forth
by
the
developer.
The
architects
planners
I
think
it's
a
thoughtful
design.
That's
not
maximizing
use
of
the
of
the
lot
I
appreciate
that
there's
a
good
communication
I
think
that
there's
a
real
effort
at
trying
to
be
a
good
neighbor
and
like
the
one
support
project.
K
K
Now
they
don't
want
a
single
point
of
entry
and
in
in
theory,
I'm
looking
at
this
that
this
could,
if
there
was,
if
there
was
an
access
problem
to
the
property
to
the
south,
that
if
they
needed
to
they
could
fire
has
the
ability
to
take
access
as
they
need
to
and
if
they
need
access
through
Barton
to
get
into
the
subdivision
the
residential.
They
could
also
do
that.
The
opposite
way
is
that
correct.
M
So
the
Barton
access
is
really
set
up
and
designed
just
for
egress
for
the
emergency
vehicles
in
the
case
of
a
fire.
Ambulances
won't
have
to
worry
about
it.
There's
a
nice
Portagee
shade
turn
around
and
let's
just
become
a
go
like
this
miss
poor.
You
said
you
go
to
the
front
the
front
address
side
and
then
they
would
exit
back
out
on
that
same
with
the
fire
trucks
emergency.
The
reason
that
fire
access
is
there
is,
according
to
the
NFPA
code
in
FPA
one.
M
We
have
to
get
within
50
feet
of
a
door
of
the
building
and
we
also
have
to
be
able
to
get
within
450
feet
from
any
point
of
the
building.
So
that's
they
created
that
Lane,
but
it
doesn't
have
to
be
open
all
the
time.
So
what
they've
done
is
they've
gated
it
off
on
the
east
end
and
it
gated
it
off
on
Barton,
so
it's
only
access
or
only
use
will
be.
If
we
had
a
fire
emergency,
we
had
to
get
down
the
south
side
of
that
building.
We
opened
the
gate
with
our
key.
M
K
M
Their
design
meets
the
requirement
of
the
code.
I
wish
I
had
a
picture
on
the
northwest
corner
of
the
property
they
had
to
put
what
we
call
a
tee
term
tell
out
for
the
apparatus
that
went
down
this
they
created
150
put
that
in
well.
They
created
the
teeter,
allow
the
apparatus
to
turn
around
and
get
out
so
there's
no
dead
ends.
X
K
As
mr.
Morgan
brought
up
there
at
the
end
and
I
think
my
question
and
early
on
was
regarding
a
townhouse
or
single-family
residential
development
on
this
property,
the
setbacks
that
you
would
have
multiple
houses
or
residences
along
the
entire
border
of
this
property
and
much
closer
than
what
they're
actually
proposing
on
this,
and
we
start
talking
about
two-story
and
three-story
I'm.
Taking
a
look
at
this
I
mean
the
only
three-story
component
of
this
is
coming
in
the
main
entrance.
K
The
main
hub
of
this
project,
along
with
not
the
front
links
but
the
two
center
wings
going
on
out
on
the
two
stories
in
the
back
I
mean
I
know
we
talked
about
it
and
every
gets
going
on
about
height
but
I'm.
Looking
at
the
elevation
plan
and
Jordan,
you
might
be
able
to
help
me
out
being
better
here
being
an
architect
that
the
floor
level
is
at
12
feet.
Seven
inches
I
mean
so
you're
standing
at
12
feet.
So
anybody
that's
up
there.
It
means
like
a
second
floor
to
a
house.
K
I
mean
you're
not
standing
at
31
feet
or
45
feet
looking
on
down
and
that's
not
any
different
from
a
single
family
or
a
townhouse
residential
project
and
one
of
the
units
or
one
of
the
corners.
If
I'm
looking
at
the
plan
here,
each
corner
has
concurrent
as
a
stairwell
on
one
side
of
it.
So
the
other
corner
is
a
residential
component,
so
to
speak
unit,
but
the
other
one
is
solid
stairwell.
So
there's
no
windows,
no,
nothing
on
that
side
of
it.
K
I'm
just
trying
to
address
some
of
the
things
that
were
brought
up
from
the
residence
and
I'm
hearing
I
mean
I.
Think
you
could
have
you
know
on
a
residential
development.
You'll
have
no
restriction
on
vehicle
access
at
any
point
in
time
of
the
day
they
can
come
and
go.
You're
gonna
have
a
traffic
pattern
that
is
going
to
be
much
more
intrusive
than
what
they're
showing
on
I
mean
I'm
looking
at.
K
Appreciate
the
effort
on
the
landscaping
on
the
trees
and
the
safety
of
that
I
mean
I,
think
that
was
I'm
really
pleased.
I
mean
there's
so
many
times,
and
projects
get
in
front
of
us
here
that
I'm
hearing
from
the
residents
to
that
the
development
side
of
it
kept
that
access
conversation
open
to
you,
because
a
lot
of
times
it
doesn't
happen
so
I
mean
I'm
sure
that
they're
not
addressing
100%
of
everything
you
want,
but
to
have
an
open
ear
to
address.
K
Your
concerns
is
quite
refreshing
on
my
side
of
it,
and
you
know
to
the
point
of
I
mean
how
many
times
do
you
hear
a
developer
that
comes
on
through
that's
reducing
the
density?
That's
allocated
to
the
to
the
property.
I
mean
usually
they're
coming
in
here,
trying
to
get
10
pounds
in
a
five-pound
bag
and
trying
to
increase
the
density
to
the
utmost
limit.
So
you
know
I
know
the
concerns.
I
hear
it
I
mean
the
Barton
Lane.
K
If
that
was
a
through
open
access
and
it
is
a
public
street
from
what
I'm
hearing
dedicated
Street,
but
it's
not
gonna
be
used
that
way.
For
the
most
part,
they
still
will
be
able
to
make
use
of
it,
as
it
is
I
think
they
give
them
a
lot
of
thought
to
this
development,
and
you
know,
unless
I
hear
something
different.
I'm
gonna
tend
to
support
as
well.
A
W
Just
echo
what
thumbs
chalky
said
that
I
hear
and
understand
the
sincere
concerns
of
the
adjoining
homeowners,
but
I'm
convinced
that
the
evidence
shows
the
project
needs
code
and
I
think
that
the
developer
has
done
everything
possible
to
minimize
that
loss
of
privacy
to
address
that
with
landscaping
and
other
pieces
of
the
project.
So
I'm
inclined
to
support
it.
A
W
A
Our
next
level
to
case
today
is
f
l,
b201
5,
0,
9
0
3
6,
a
related
to
FL
d,
2013
0
4
0
1
5,
a
402
411
421
425
and
431
South
Gulf
View
Boulevard
south
called
Gulf
View
Boulevard
right
away.
This
is
a
level
2
application.
The
owner
is
the
city
Clearwater.
The
agent
is
Catherine
Anderson
beautification,
2.41
6
acre
is
bound
by
South
Gulf
View,
Boulevard,
West,
Coronado,
Drive,
east
and
5th
Street.
North
south
call
people
of
our
right-of-way
between
Hampton
Drive
and
Pitt
Street.
A
The
project
will
be
150
feet
in
height,
proposes
of
minimum
of
298
off
street
parking
spaces
of
it
available
for
the
hotel
and
in
additional
230
off
street
parking
spaces
available
to
the
general
public
and
includes
a
proposed
pedestrian
overpass
bridge
extending
between
the
subject
site
and
430
South
Gulf,
View
Boulevard
spanning
beach
walk
and
the
South
Gulf
View
Boulevard
right
away.
The
project,
request,
allowable
flexibility
from
height
setback
requirements
and
the
design
guidelines
of
beach
by
design
and
a
two-year
development
order.
A
Chameleon
development
code
section
is
2.2
803
d,
+
4
407,
the
association's
clearwater
neighborhoods
coalition,
Clearwater
Beach,
Association
and
board
of
commissioners.
The
presenter
is
Mark
T
Perry,
a
ICP
Senior
Planner.
First
we're
going
to
ask
if
there's
anyone
in
the
audience
who
wishes
to
request
party
status
on
this
case.
Okay,.
AA
Good
afternoon,
I
will
be
brief.
This
project
has
been
before
this
board
before
most
recently,
it
was
before
City
Council.
Its
prior
approvals
were
essentially
for
the
for
this
building.
What's
changed
since
the
last
time
this
board
has
seen
it
is
that
the
applicant
has
acquired
the
post
corner
pizza
property.
They
did
have
to
go
to
City
Council
to
amend
their
development
agreement,
which
they
did
at
the
end
of
last
year
to
add
that
property
and,
of
course,
having
property
to
an
approved,
flexible
development
application
required
had
to
come
back
to
this
board.
AA
AA
The
project
obviously
doesn't
encroach
into
the
right-of-way,
so
the
sidewalks
that
are
are
there
that
are
in
the
right-of-way.
The
intention
is
to
maintain
them,
if,
obviously,
if
they're
damaged
during
construction
they'll
be
replaced
in
kind.
One
other
point
I
assume
that
you
all
received
a
memo
from
me.
While
making
one
minor
amendment
to
condition
the
third
team,
there
is
a
scriveners
error
where
it
said
that
accessory
uses
would
be
limited
to
10%.
That
should
be
15%,
which
is
consistent
with
code.
AA
AB
Lure
this,
you
can
hear
me
good
afternoon:
Katie
Cole,
with
law,
firm
of
Hill,
Ward
Henderson
representing
the
applicant
mr.
Perry,
went
through
the
background
of
this
project
and
all
of
the
compliance
with
beached
by
design
and
his
staff
report,
and
so
we
do
have
the
architect
here,
as
well
as
the
engineer
and
the
owners
rep.
If,
if
there
are
specific
things
that
we
can
answer,
but
we
don't
want
to
belabor
this
because
I
know
unless
you
had
questions
about
the
sidewalks
that
could
have
been
done
a
couple
hours
ago.
AB
So
I
did
want
to
reiterate
what
mr.
Perry
said.
The
sidewalks
are
part
of
beach
by
design
in
this
area,
and
so
they're
incorporated
it
with,
in
conjunction
with
the
city's
engineering
department,
to
reflect
the
beach
by
design
plans
there.
The
property
does
have
a
zero
foot
setback
on
the
front,
and
so
the
sidewalks
are
all
in
the
city
right-of-way
there.
There
is
an
existing
road
spur
that
was
included
when
the
city
previously
did
Beach
by
design
and
closed
relocated.
AB
South
Gulf
View
that's
being
closed
in
green
spaces
being
added
in
that
area,
and
so
that's
an
opportunity
there.
For
the
city
and
the
applicant
in
that
right-of-way
area
to
look
at
what
else
might
be
done
in
conjunction
with
the
existing
landscape
architecture
features
of
beach
by
design.
As
mr.
Perry
said,
the
proposed
plans
before
you
are
consistent
with
those
that
were
approved
as
an
exhibit
to
the
development
agreement
in
November,
and
there
is
a
companion
piece
across
the
street
for
okhla
sins,
just
because
we
do
have
this
opportunity.
AB
I
wanted
to
highlight
that
these
are
the
owners
of
the
opal
sands
and
this
new
design,
that's
coming
back
and
the
opportunity
to
add
the
real
estate
allowed
them
to
really
create
a
product
and
an
architecture
scheme
that
is
reflective
of
the
opal
sands.
And
so,
when
you
see
these
two
projects
together
across
the
street,
it's
a
very
beautiful
serpentine.
Look
that
kind
of
goes
across
the
street
there
and
I
think
that
it
will
be
personally
a
great
addition
to
you,
South
Beach
and
does
meet
all
of
Beach
by
design.
AB
This
is
probably
the
third
or
fourth
time
a
project
at
the
site
has
been
before
this
board
with
various
amendments.
So
again
we
we
don't
want
to
belabor.
If
it's
happy
to
answer
any
questions
and
provide
any
additional
details
and
exhibits
and
like
I
said
we
have
the
team
here,
we
have
all
of
the
exhibits
available
and
are
happy
to
walk
through
those.
So.
A
A
A
W
Make
a
motion:
mr.
chairman
I,
move
to
approve
case
number
FLD
2
0
1,
3,
0,
4,
0,
1,
5,
a
based
on
the
evidence
and
testimony
presented
in
the
application,
the
Stafford
port
canet.
Today's
hearing
hereby
adopt
the
findings
of
fact
and
conclusions
of
law
stated
in
the
staff
report
with
conditions
of
approval,
as
listed
including
the
modified
condition
of
approval
that
was
discussed
by
mr.
Perry.
So.
A
Bolivars
South
Gulf
people
start
right
away.
Owner
of
City.
Clearwater
agent
is
Katherine,
he
cold
with
Hill
warden,
Henderson
location,
two
point:
four:
five:
acres
on
the
west
side
of
South
Gulf
View
Boulevard,
approximately
500
feet,
northwest
of
Hampton
Drive
south
the
Community
Development
Board,
is
reviewing
an
amendment
to
an
approved
level.
Two
flexible
development
application
for
a
proposed
pedestrian
overpass
bridge,
extend
extending
between
the
subject
site
and
the
property
located
at
401
411
421
425
and
431
South
Gulf
View
Boulevard,
spanning
beach
walk
and
the
South
Gulf
View
Boulevard
right-of-way.
A
C
AA
AA
The
only
reason
that
it
needs
to
come
back
to
this
board
is
for
the
addition
of
that
pedestrian
overpass
bridge
and
the
only
reason
that
we
removed
it
from
the
consent
agenda
again
was
because
of
the
emails
that
had
expressed
concerns
about
the
sidewalk
widths
and
things
like
that.
To
again,
there
is
no
change
to
any
of
the
adjacent
sidewalks
to
this
property.
All
the
construction,
of
course,
is
you
know
on
this.
Particular
project
is
above
grade
and
the
only
impacts
are
gonna
be
on
where
this
pedestrian
bridge
will
connect
to
the
second
floor
lobby.
AA
AB
Good
afternoon
Katie
Cole
with
Hill
Mort
Henderson
representing
the
applicant,
as
mr.
Perry
said.
The
only
change
here
is
to
modify
the
approved
setback
for
the
front
setback
which
will
accommodate
the
receipt
as
a
pedestrian
bridge,
which
was
part
of
the
last
application
that
was
approved
and
as
part
of
the
city,
the
development
agreement,
which
was
approved
by
the
City
Council.
So
as
a
condition
of
approval
of
that
development
agreement,
the
council
asked
for
this
application
site
plan
to
be
modified
just
to
reflect
what
the
exterior
will
look
like
post
construction
of
the
pedestrian
bridge.
AB
So
just
again,
just
to
offer
the
pedestrian
bridge
allows
these
two
to
be
connected
in
a
way
that
will
really
from
a
tourism
standpoint.
Ocean
properties
and
opal
feels
like
gives
a
great
opportunity
for
additional
group
sales
and
hosting
of
meetings.
In
with
this
connection,
and
so
it's
it's
hopeful
that
this
will
be
a
great
benefit
to
the
tourism
community.
On
the
beach.
A
Cross-Examination
of
witnesses
by
planning
and
development
staff
cross-examination
of
witnesses
by
up
Kent
cross-examination
of
witnesses
by
persons
with
fire
status
comments
by
the
public,
not
closing
remarks
by
the
Planning
and
Development
staff.
Closing
remarks
by
persons
granted
party
status
closing
remarks
by
applicant.
We
are
now
closing.
This
is
closing
the
public
hearing,
discussion
and
vote
by
the
board.
B
Q
W
K
W
Q
Geno
in
planning
and
development,
if
you
recall,
when
you
had
the
Edgewater
case,
we
talked
about
the
need
to
better
educate
our
residents
about
what
their
rights
are
with
regard
to
quasi
judicial
hearings,
and
fortunately
we
finally
have
it
done
thanks
to
a
lot
of
help
from
our
our
legal
department
and
I'm.
Sorry,
it
was
sent
out
to
so
late,
but
I
hope
you've
got
a
chance
to
maybe
look
through
it.
Q
If
you
would
like,
you
know
a
little
longer
opportunity
to
review
it
and
give
us
comments
back,
we
I'm
happy
to
take
them,
but
essentially
what
this
document
does
is
explain
to
the
public
what
the
CVB
meaning
is
all
about
and
that
you
hear
quasi
judicial
and
legislative
cases
and
what
those
differences
are.
And
then
it
really
walks
through
preparing
a
citizen
if
they
want
to
participate
in
the
hearing,
and
it
tells
them
how
to
ask
her
party
status.
Q
That
tells
them,
then
what
their
rights
are,
what
it
means,
because,
unfortunately,
a
lot
of
people
don't
understand
what
their
rights
and
role
is
if
they
have
party
status.
So
this
will
do
that.
It
explains
how
to
prepare,
for
it
explains
to
them
what
competent
substantial
evidence
it
is
so
that
they
hopefully
can
present
to
a
solid
argument.
Q
A
new
opportunity
to
provide
evidence.
The
document
goes
on
to
explain
that
also
people
have
a
right
just
to
participate
in
a
public
hearing
which
does
not
give
them
rights
to
kill,
there's
a
little
discussion
on
legislative
matters,
and
then
it
specifies
the
process
for
appealing
a
case.
If
someone
wants
to
do
that
and
then
so,
that's
essentially
what's
here,
I
hope
that
you
know
this
will
be
helpful
to
people
and
help
your
meetings
run
smoother
and
then
help
our
residents
participate
more
fully.
I
make.
B
One
one
suggestion
and
I
think
this
is
great
and
I
think
it'll
help
a
lot.
I
think
it's
still
a
little
bit
daunting
for
some
people,
perhaps,
and
and
maybe
there's
a
simple
decision
tree
that
could
be
added
to
it.
You
know:
do
I
live
within
500
feet,
you
know
or
did
I
receive
notice.
You
know
just
something
that
says.
If
you
answer
yes,
then
carry
on
to
here.
B
X
They
know
what
they
would
do.
I'd
like
to
know
can
I
say
this:
it's
towel
or
it's
too
ugly
or
too
much
traffic
or
something
they
could
get
Third
Point
Inn
before
it's
all
pretty
well
worked
out
between
the
city
staff
and
the
developer.
Is
it
there's
probably
this
process
in
there?
I
just
don't
know
where
it
is
that.
Q
Would
probably
be
with
the
surrounding
property
owners
being
able
to
participate
through
the
DRC
house,
us
they
can't
testify
and
give
input,
but
they
can
work
with
the
planner
I
think.
The
challenge
is,
though,
for
that
part
of
the
process
is
that
people
don't
necessarily
get
notice
for
a
CDB
hearing
until
after
the
process,
so
I
think
that's
where
some
of
the
disconnect
can
can
be
in
this
process.
Q
But
we
definitely
are
gonna,
be
posting
this
on
our
website,
there's
also
a
citizen's
Bill
of
Rights
that
was
passed
years
ago.
So
we're
hoping
to
build
a
little
section
of
the
Planning
and
Development
Department's
website
to
you
know,
provide
citizens
more
accessable
information
about
how
to
participate
and
at
what
points
can
they
participate
in?
Q
Obviously,
when
we
do
the
DRC
agendas
they
do
get
sent
to
the
neighborhood
associations
that
are
affected
so
a
lot
of
times.
People
find
out
information
that
way.
We
also
send
notice
it's
to
the
Clearwater
neighborhoods
coalition,
who
can
then
also
be
a
clearinghouse
for
information
for
the
neighborhoods
that
participates.
So
my
plan
is,
is
once
we
finalize
this,
then
we
would
take
it
to
the
C&C
present
that
to
them
and
educate
there
and
then
hopefully
that
will
you
know
how
people
be
better
informed
and
then
they
can
disseminate
that
out
to
their
neighbors.
K
Obviously,
the
final
products
will
be
posted
online.
The
is
there
a
way
to
instead
of
printing
and
like
taking
down
trees
all
the
time,
but
when
we
give
out
that
notice
for
this
meeting
to
those,
they
have
a
reference
of
whatever
this
appendix
is
where
they
can
find
it
or
whatever
in
that
notice,
so
that.
Q
I
will
say
that
you
know
the
planners
are
really
good
about
working
with
the
neighbors
and
LU.
Maybe
I
don't
know
if
you
ended
up
sending
this
out
to
people
now,
because
it
was
a
draft.
We
didn't
really
want
to
disseminate
it
until
you
all
have
had
a
chance
to
look
at
it
and
give
us
your
feedback
on
it.
But
it
could
be
something
that
we
just
do
when
people
contact
us
and
have
an
interest
or
have
concerns
that
we
would
provide
them
this
via
email
or
you
know,
direct
them
to
our
website.