►
From YouTube: City of Clearwater Community Development Board 9/20/22
Description
Comments are not monitored on this platform. To make a comment, please visit www.myclearwater.com/government/council-meeting-streaming-videos or one of our social media pages.
Agenda can be found here: http://bit.ly/ClearwaterCityCouncilMeetings
A
B
B
B
B
Please
remember
to
turn
off
your
cell
phone,
so
they
do
not
become
a
distraction
during
the
meeting.
Please
also
refrain
from
having
conversations
in
this
room
so
that
we
might
hear
all
of
the
testimony
given
today
to
ensure
a
complete
record
of
this
board's
actions.
We
ask
that
each
individual
wishing
to
speak,
including
the
applicant,
speak
into
the
microphone
on
the
podium
in
front
of
us,
clearly
state
your
name
and
spell
your
last
name
for
the
clerk
now
I'll.
Ask
all
those
in
attendance
today
who
plan
to
speak.
Please
rise
and
be
sworn
by.
B
Agendas
of
today's
meeting
are
on
the
podium
to
your
left
near
the
entry
door.
Also
on
this
podium
are
a
roster
of
the
community
development
board,
the
list
of
city
staff
experts
and
their
resumes,
the
board's
rules
and
procedures
and
the
annual
schedule
of
this
board
our
first
order
of
businesses
to
review
and
approve
the
minutes.
From
last
month's
meeting.
May
I
have
a
motion
for
approval
of
the
minutes.
B
The
next
item
on
the
agenda
is
an
opportunity
for
anyone
who
wishes
to
address
something
that
is
not
on
today's
agenda.
If
there
is
anyone
who
wishes
to
speak
on
something,
that's
not
on
the
agenda,
please
come
forward
all
right,
seeing
none
we'll
move
on
to
our
consent
agenda,
which
is
the
entire
extent
of
our
agenda.
Today
the
board
has
adopted
a
consent,
agenda
format
and
the
consent
items
are
identified
as
such
on
the
agenda
consent.
Agenda
items
are
those
items
for
which
the
planning
and
development
department
recommends
approval.
B
B
I'll
read
each
item
on
the
consent
agenda
and
if
any
person
wishes
to
remove
this
item
from
the
consent
agenda,
please
so
state
or
raise
your
hand,
and
we
will
remove
it.
Items
removed
from
the
consent
agenda
will
be
heard
in
the
regular
order
of
the
meeting
items
that
remain
on
the
consent
agenda
will
be
approved
with
a
single
vote
items
number
one
through
three
remain
on
the
consent
agenda
item.
One
is
case,
fld2022-06018.
B
At
1569,
south
fort
harrison
avenue
owner
is
fair
woods,
property
representative,
brian
angst
of
mcfarland
ferguson
location
is
1.759
acres,
consisting
of
one
parcel
on
the
east
side
of
south
fort
harrison
avenue
approximately
700
feet
north
of
bel
air
road.
The
board
is
reviewing
the
addition
of
detoxification
services
and
capabilities
to
an
existing
36
bed
residential
treatment
facility
as
a
comprehensive
infill
redevelopment
project
in
the
commercial
district
for
the
property
located
at
1569
south
ford,
harrison
avenue,
no
changes
to
the
site,
building
or
intensity
of
use
are
proposed.
B
B
The
location
is
.118
acres
located
on
the
west
side
of
south
washington
avenue
approximately
95
feet
south
of
the
intersection
with
lake
view
road
the
board
is
reviewing
a
covered
porch
addition
to
an
existing
detached
dwelling
use
in
the
medium
density,
residential
district
for
that
property.
The
project
includes
a
height
of
15.
Feet,
provides
a
minimum
of
two
off-street
parking
spaces
and
requests
allowable
flexibility
from
setback
requirements.
B
B
Our
remaining
item
on
the
consent
agenda
case
fld2014
dash
a
at
521,
south
gulfi
boulevard
owner
is
decade
gulf
coast,
hotel
partners
and
jk
golfview
representative
is
terry
skepic
woods.
Consulting
inc
location
is
4.87
acres,
three
3.908
acres
in
the
tourist
district,
0.962
acres,
the
open
space,
recreation
district,
located
on
the
south
side
of
gulf,
south
gulf
view,
boulevard
between
hampden
drive
and
bayway
boulevard.
The
board
is
reviewing
an
amendment
to
an
approved,
flexible
development
agreement.
B
Application
excuse
me
flexible
development,
application
for
a
proposed,
approximately
six
thousand
four
hundred
and
fifty
square
foot,
expansion
of
commercial
dock
area
accessory
to
an
existing
overnight
accommodation
use
in
the
tourist
district
and
open
space,
recreation
district
and
the
clearwater
pass
district
of
beach
by
design
for
this
property.
The
property
consists
of
two
new
separate
docks
and
an
addition
to
an
existing
dock
and
request
allowable
flexibility
for
a
commercial
dock.
Is
there
anyone
who
wish
to
remove
this
item
from
today's
consent
agenda?
B
E
B
B
The
this
is
a
level
two
case
all
level
two
cases,
such
as
flexible
development,
are
considered
quasi-judicial
hearings
in
a
quasi-judicial
hearing.
The
community
development
board
reviews,
the
application,
the
staff
report,
correspondence
and
all
evidence
presented
today
and
makes
the
final
decision
subject
to
appeal.
B
This
board
has
previously
qualified
all
the
city
staff
who
will
testify
as
experts
in
their
area
of
professional
training,
education
and
experience,
the
list
of
city
staff
experts
and
their
resumes
are
in
the
handbook
on
the
podium
near
the
entry
door.
Any
other
professionals
who
desire
to
be
qualified
as
an
expert
shall
sell
request
at
the
beginning
of
the
case
and
present
a
resume
to
each
board
member.
B
The
board
shall
determine
whether
or
not
to
qualify
the
person
as
an
expert
and
in
what
field
of
study
at
the
beginning
of
hearing
this
item,
I'll
ask
for
anyone
who
wishes
to
request
party
status
to
come
forward
and
state.
Your
reasons.
Party
status
can
may
be
granted
if
the
person
requesting
such
status
demonstrates
that
he's
a
substantially
affected
person.
The
board
will
then
determine
whether
or
not
to
grant
party
status.
B
At
1310
south
washington
avenue
the
owner
is
victoria
kashuk.
B
1.11
acres,
located
on
the
west
side
of
south
washington
avenue
approximately
95
feet
south
of
the
intersection
with
lakeview
road.
The
board
is
reviewing
a
covered
porch
addition
to
an
existing
detached
dwelling
in
use
in
the
medium
density
residential
district
for
that
property.
The
project
includes
a
height
of
15.
Feet,
provides
a
minimum
of
two
off
street
parking
spaces
and
requests
allowable
flexibility
from
setback
requirements.
B
B
G
G
The
existing
home
is
a
single
family,
detached
dwelling
and
it
was
constructed
in
1925.
G
The
entire
area
was
planted
in
august
of
1925
and
there
features
an
existing
range
of
single-family
as
well
as
multi-family
homes,
within
both
the
medium
density,
residential
zoning
district
and
the
low
medium
density
residential
zoning
district.
The
existing
800
square
foot
detached
dwelling
when
it
was
built,
featured
a
16
foot
front
setback.
G
Our
zoning
code
for
the
medium
density,
residential
zoning
district
requires
a
25
foot
front
setback
for
a
single
family
home
and
the
only
mechanism
that
our
code
provides
for
any
flexibility
is
that
a
homeowner
must
apply
for
a
level
two
application
and
come
before
you
to
ask
for
any
reduction
to
the
setback,
whereas
other
residential
zoning
districts,
the
low
medium
density
residential,
which
is
exactly
to
the
south
property
line
of
this
subject,
property
that
zoning
district
provides
flexibility
where
you
could.
G
The
applicant
could
pursue
a
level
one
planning
application
and
seek
a
reduction
to
the
front.
Setback
just
wanted
to
give
a
little
bit
of
background,
so
the
existing
property,
the
existing
porch
or
the
pre-existing
porch.
That
was
there
measured
approximately
eight
feet
by
five
feet,
so
it
was
eight
feet
along
the
front
of
the
house
and
came
five
feet
forward
of
the
house.
G
So
the
pre-existing
front
setback
with
that
porch
was
11
feet.
The
homeowner
took
that
porch
down
and
built
a
new
front
porch,
which
extends
into
the
front
setback
an
additional
approximately
three
feet.
So
the
previous
setback
to
the
front
setback
or
the
front
porch
was
11
feet
and
now,
with
the
porch
that's
been
constructed.
G
The
surrounding
neighborhood
does
feature
a
wide
variety
of
properties
that
were
constructed
from
the
20s
up
through
even
post
the
1999
community
development
code
that
we're
working
from,
but
the
majority
of
them
were
built
prior
to
this
code,
the
1999
code
that
we're
working
with
and
there's
a
wide
variety
of
dates
of
construction,
and
due
to
the
fact
that
most
of
them
were
built,
20s,
30s,
40s,
the
record
keeping
system
that
we
have.
I
don't
have
the
ability
to
go
back
and
find
building
permits,
for
you
know,
improvements
and
things
like
that.
G
So
what
we
do
is
we
just
take
a
general
overview
using
our
gis
system,
google
maps,
google
street
view
and
cross-reference
with
our
permitting
system,
as
well
as
the
county
property
appraiser
website,
and
that
is
how
we
evaluate
and
look
at
neighborhoods
that
have
older
construction
dates
that
we
just
don't
have
a
whole
series
of
physical
building
permits
and
surveys
to
pull
out.
So
staff
is
recommending
approval
and
I
think
there
was
another
slide,
but
no
okay
and
I
don't
have
anything
further.
So
if
there
are
any
questions,
I'm
happy
to
answer
those.
G
Is
a
right-of-way
there?
There
is
a
right-of-way
yeah.
It's!
I
think
it's
a
40-foot
right
away
there
and.
D
So
if
I'm
understanding
you
correctly,
this
is
lot
15
adjacent
lot.
16
is
low,
medium
density,
residential,
where
this
is
medium
density,
residential,
which
is
changing
in
mid
block.
The
zoning
is
actually
changing
in
a
mid
block
not
going
to
a
complete
end
of
street
or
anything
like
that,
and
if
it
was
lot
16
coming
in
front
of
you.
This
is
something
that
could.
B
All
right-
and
I
believe,
mr
johnson,
it
would
be
time
we
don't
have
any
people
with
party
status,
so
I
think
we're
ready
for
members
of
the
public.
H
H
H
Since
the
staff
report
wasn't
accessible
to
the
public,
the
required
five
days
in
advance,
I
was
asking
her:
will
the
consideration
by
the
cdb
board
be
moved
to
next
month's
meeting?
This
would
allow
consultation
with
the
late
bellevue
community
association
and
the
rest
of
this
document.
It
starts
out
with
a
communication
to
ms
hawk
baker
on
saturday
saying
that
I
looked
for
the
staff
report
on
the
excela
system,
where
they
normally
are
placed,
and
it
was
not
there.
So
I
was
asking
her
initially
it
where
it
is
and
she
responded.
H
this
morning
I
would
have
a
chance
to
actually
go
in
and
look
at
the
staff
report,
and
so
this
morning
I
asked
two
several
questions
on
page
two
of
the
staff
report.
There
is
a
statement.
Many
of
the
surrounding
properties
also
feature
similar
front
setbacks
to
detach
dwelling
or
porches.
Could
you
provide
the
property
addresses
for
those
similar
surrounding
properties
and
their
front
set
back
dimensions.
H
H
Could
you
provide
a
tax
photograph
shows
three
detached
dwellings,
south
of
the
property,
which
should
have
substantially
larger
setbacks
than
the
subject
property,
and
that
is
also
included
on
the
city's
map,
which
indicates
that
the
front
setbacks
along
washington.
A
H
B
Okay,
then
we
can
proceed
with
closing
remarks
by
the
planning
and
development
staff.
A
G
That
is
correct.
I
have
not.
I
was
not
contacted
by
anyone
in
the
neighborhood,
except
for
a
neighbor
across
the
street.
Her
name
is
ethel
johnson
and
she
just
had
questions
what
is
going
on.
What's
the
project
about-
and
I
explained
everything
to
her
and
she
was
very
pleased
with
the
way
that
the
house
has
been
improved
and
that
it
helps
to
make
the
neighborhood
look
better.
I
Hi,
I'm
ellen
crandall
with
planning
development
department.
I
can
speak
to
the
notification
for
the
lake
bellevue
neighborhood
association,
that
particular
neighborhood
association
had
not
actually
provided
a
mailing
address
for
notices.
Staff
noticed
this.
We
talked
to
the
neighborhood's
manager
have
been
noticed
emailed
to
them
directly
and
also
had
their
mailing
address,
updated
and
asked
the
clerk's
office
to
resend
notices
and
re-update
the
official
list
of
notices
so
that
it's
you
know
we.
B
B
B
B
I
would
like
to
defer
to
council
as
to
what
our
options
are
for
this
type
of
objection.
C
You
have
all
the
options
available
to
you
that
you
ordinarily,
do
my
opinion.
Is
that,
though,
the
the
city's
code
requires
that
the
materials
be
accessible
to
the
public,
it
does
not
require
it
to
be
made
available
via
upload
to
a
website
or
any
other
particular
medium.
There's
no
statute
that
requires
it.
C
The
city's
code
doesn't
require
it.
My
understanding,
from
speaking
to
city
staff
is
that
the
materials
were
in
fact
accessible
to
the
public,
though
they
did
get
uploaded
to
the
website
later
than
they
ordinarily
do.
That
does
not
by
itself
mean
at
all
that
they
weren't
accessible
to
the
public.
They
were
in
a
different
form.
D
B
Is
there
a
second
second?
Thank
you
all
in
favor,
okay,
opposed
all
right.
This
item
two
is
approved.
Do
we
have?
I
do
not
have
all
right?
In
that
case,
we
will
be
adjourning.
The
meeting
at.