►
From YouTube: City of Clearwater Live Stream
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
C
A
Agendas
of
today's
meeting
are
on
the
podium
to
your
right
near
the
entry
door.
I
believe
that's
on
your
left
also
on
this
podium,
our
roster
of
the
Community
Development
Board,
the
list
of
city
staff
experts
and
their
resumes
the
board's
rules
of
procedure
in
the
annual
schedule
of
this
board.
Our
first
order
of
business
is
to
review
and
approve
the
minutes
for
last
month's
meeting,
may
I
have
a
motion
for
approval
of
the
minutes.
A
A
Moving
on
to
the
consent
agenda,
this
board
has
adopted
a
consent,
agenda
format
and
the
consent
items
are
identified
as
such
on
the
agenda
consent.
Agenda
items
are
those
items
for
which
the
Planning
Department
recommends
approval.
The
applicant
in
in
agreement
with
any
proposed
conditions
and
no
written
objections
to
the
case
haven't
received
to
date.
Items
may
be
removed
from
the
consent
agenda
today
by
a
member
of
the
board,
a
member
of
the
staff
or
any
person
in
the
audience
for
questions
or
objections.
A
I
will
read
each
item
on
the
consent
agenda
item
and
if
any
person
wishes
to
remove
this
item
from
the
consent
agenda,
please
so
state
or
raise
your
hand,
and
we
will
remove
it
from
the
consent
agenda.
Items
removed
from
the
consent
agenda
will
be
heard
in
the
regular
order
of
the
meeting
items
that
remain
on
the
consent
agenda
will
be
approved
with
a
single
vote
first
case
on
the
consent
agenda
is
case:
FLV
2,
0,
1,
8,
1,
1,
0
2
8
at
10:00,
Bay
Esplanade,
the
owner
is
sunset:
green,
flash
LLC.
A
The
agent
is
Rod
Coleman
at
SDG
architecture.
The
request
the
Community
Development
Board
is
reviewing
a
proposed
roof
replacement
over
an
existing
restaurant
back
in
the
tourist
district
and
seaward
of
the
coastal
construction
control
line
for
the
property
located
at
they
Esplanade
the
project,
request
allowable
flexibility
from
setback
requirements
and
to
allow
new
construction
seaward
of
the
coastal
construction
control
line.
Does
anyone
wish
to
remove
this
from
the
consent
agenda?
A
Okay
case
number:
two
is
FLD
two
zero
one,
eight
one,
two
zero
to
nine
at
12:09
North,
Garden
Avenue,
the
owner
is
Habitat
for
Humanity
of
Pinellas
County.
The
agent
is
Ken
rush
with
Habitat
for
Humanity
of
Pinellas
County,
the
request
the
Community
Development
Board
is
reviewing
a
proposed
detached
dwelling
in
the
commercial
district
for
the
property
located
at
12:09
North
Garden
Avenue.
The
proposal
includes
one
detached
dwelling,
approximately
twelve
feet
in
height
and
request
allowable
flexibility.
With
regard
to
use.
Does
anyone
wish
to
have
this
removed
from
the
consent
agenda?
D
A
Habitat
for
Humanity
of
Pinellas
County,
the
agent
is
Ken
rush
with
Habitat
for
Humanity
of
Pinellas
County,
the
request
the
Community
Development
Board
is
reviewing
a
proposed
detached
dwelling
in
the
commercial
district
for
the
property
located
at
1211,
North
garden
Avenue.
The
proposal
includes
one
detached
dwelling,
approximately
13
feet
in
height
and
request
allowable
flexibility.
With
regard
to
use,
does
anyone
wish
to
have
this
item
removed
from
the
consent
agenda?
A
E
A
A
Rezoning
or
development
agreement
are
considered
legislative
hearings,
the
Community
Development
Board
reviews,
the
application,
the
staff
report
correspondence
and
all
evidence
presented
today
and
makes
a
recommendation
to
the
City
Council
for
level
three
applications.
The
City
Council
makes
the
final
decision
the
procedure
for
all
level.
A
Three
cases
is
as
follows:
presentation
by
planning
staff,
ten
minutes
max
presentation
by
the
applicant
ten
minutes
max
comments
by
the
public
three
minutes
per
person,
closing
remarks
by
the
planning
staff;
three
minutes
maximum
closing
remarks
by
applicant
three
minutes
max
closing
of
the
public
hearing
and
then
the
discussion
and
vote
by
the
board.
Our
first
level
three
case
today
is
ACLU
P
2
0,
1
8
1
1
0
0
8
at
1885,
County
Road
193,
the
owner
is
st.
Mary
and
Saint
in
a
Coptic
Orthodox
Church
the
agent
is
attempt
a
Hana.
A
F
You
Brotherton
Planning
and
Development.
So
this
case
involves
a
two
point:
six
one
acre
property
which
is
located
on
the
east
side
of
County
Road
193,
approximately
520
feet
south
of
Sunset
Point
Road,
yes,
connor
for
other
ten
playing
a
development
on
a
single-family
home
which
was
constructed
in
1973,
occupies
the
site.
The
current
owner
st.
Mary
and
st.
Mina
Coptic
Orthodox
Church,
which
is
located
on
the
parcel
to
the
south
29:30
County
Road
193
purchased
this
property
in
June
of
2015.
F
The
church's
campus
is
comprised
of
four
buildings
with
just
over
3,000
square
feet
of
development,
on
4.4,
seven
acres,
the
city
and
exit
churches,
main
property
into
the
city
in
2014,
as
it
was
located
in
the
area
where
the
public
utilities
was
expanding
sanitary
sewer
service.
At
the
time
the
city's
Community
Development
Code
does
not
permit
places
of
worship
in
its
residential
zoning
districts.
F
So
the
church
applied
for
a
change
in
the
properties,
future
land
use
and
zoning
atlas
designations
to
institutional
in
the
city
of
Clearwater
to
remain
a
conforming
use
after
annexation,
which
City
Council
approved.
At
that
time.
The
church
and
not
any
gate
that
they
had
any
plans
for
expansion
in
early
2018,
the
applicant
contacted
staff,
because
the
church
would
like
to
create
a
master
plan
to
include
the
addition
of
the
subject
property,
which
is
the
parcel
to
the
north
of
the
main
campus
addressing
the
traffic
circulation
for
the
church
campus.
F
It
is
unknown
if
any
new
buildings
are
intended
to
be
constructed
as
no
site
plan
has
been
submitted
at
this
time.
The
request
is
to
change
the
future
land
use
map
designation
of
the
subject:
property
from
residential
low
to
institutional,
a
request
to
rezone
the
property
from
the
low
medium
density,
residential
district
to
the
institutional
district
was
processed
being
processed
concurrently
with
this
case,
in
that
is
case
are
easy
to
0
1
8
1
2
0
0
5.
There
is
a
mix
of
residential
and
institutional
uses
in
the
area
to
the
south.
F
Is
the
existing
church,
campus
and
abutting
to
the
north
of
the
single-family
house,
and
to
the
north
and
east
are
single-family
subdivisions.
The
properties
to
the
west
are
owned
by
Sylvan
Abbey
Memorial
Park
and
are
developed
with
a
single
family
home,
a
place
of
worship
and
a
funeral
home
further
south
across
County
Road
193
is
the
Paul
V
Stephens
exceptional
student
educational
center
CR
1
93
is
a
two
lane,
undivided
Road,
which
lacks
sidewalks.
F
It
terminates
at
a
private
driveway
for
a
two
point:
six
acre
single-family
lot,
which
is
still
in
Pinellas
County,
the
neighborhood
abutting,
the
subject
property
to
the
east
that
contains
two
calls
to
sax
with
no
through
access
to
Sunset
Point
Road,
as
detailed
in
the
staff
report.
Staff
is
concerned
that
the
expansion
of
the
institutional
future
land-use
destination
could
allow
for
additional
development
that
is
out
of
character
or
could
have
negative
impacts
in
this
area.
F
The
proposed
expansion
is
therefore
inconsistent
with
the
goals,
objectives
and
policies
of
the
Clearwater
Comprehensive
Plan
and
conflicts
with
said
plan,
as
indicated,
and
the
detailed
goals,
objective
and
policy
and
the
staff
report,
as
detailed
in
the
staff
report
as
well.
The
future
land
use
map
amendment
would
require
an
amendment
to
the
countywide
plan
map
category
from
residential
low
medium
to
the
public
semi
public
category.
F
Although
the
proposed
amendments
is
consistent
with
the
purpose
of
the
proposed
category
in
the
county
arrivals,
the
expansion
of
this
designation
onto
the
subject
property
is
inconsistent
with
the
character
and
scale
relative
to
the
surrounding
uses,
transportation
facilities
and
natural
resources.
Natural
resources
features
the
proposed
expansion
of
the
institutional
future.
Land-Use
category
will
further
erode
the
low
density
residential
character
of
the
area.
The
addition
of
institutional
property
is
incompatible
with
surrounding
uses
and
inconsistent
with
the
character
of
the
surrounding
properties
and
neighborhood.
F
Based
upon
the
findings
effect
as
detailed
in
the
staff
report,
the
proposed
expansion
would
increase
the
demand
on
several
of
the
public
facilities
when
compared
to
the
existing
residential
development.
However,
it
is
determined
that
the
proposed
change
would
not
result
in
the
degradation
of
existing
levels
of
service
for
potable
water,
sanitary
sewer,
solid
waste,
parkland
and
stormwater
management,
degradation
to
the
level
of
service
of
CR
193
being
a
two-lane,
undivided
Road
and
a
dead-end
roadway
could
occur
with
this
proposed
amendment.
There
are
no
wetlands
or
no
wetlands
appear
to
be
on
the
subject
property.
F
G
What's
gonna
happen,
if,
if
we
are
to
add
a
building
that
will
be
a
service
building,
it's
not
going
to
be
it's
for
the
same
number
of
people
that
has
been
attending
the
church.
As
you
can
see,
we
have
a
conceptual
site
plan
that
I
wanted
to
show
you,
as
you
can
see.
It's
not
shown
on
this
plan,
but
sunset
is
to
the
top
of
the
page
east
west
and
that
entrance
to
the
complex.
If
we
are
including
the
parcel
here,
is
going
to
be
the
north
entrance,
which
we
are
proposing.
G
G
The
intention
is
to
improve
the
situation
as
we
are
now
we
have.
We
have
parking
problems
within
the
site
and
we
need
to
contain
the
parking
within
the
site.
We
have
an
agreement
with
the
school
across
across
the
road
to
the
south.
We
have
a
parking
agreement
on
Sundays
to
use
the
school
and
during
the
days
the
school
actually
uses
this
the
church
parking.
So
we
want
to
contain
the
traffic
within
our
the
circulation
and
the
traffic.
We
in
sight
no
additional
impact.
G
G
So
again
also
the
church,
because
we
cannot
expand
beyond
the
chapel.
You
can
see
the
chapel
at
the
south
west
corner
it's
limited
and
we
cannot
increase
the
number.
So
the
church
recently
actually
created
two
two
new
churches,
one
in
Largo
and
one
in
Palm
Harbor
on
a
temporary
temporary
basis
and
we
are
using
the
services
on
Saturdays
for
the
congregation
so
becomes
because
we
cannot
accommodate
the
number.
So
we
try
to
do
it
that
way
and
further
mean
I
can
actually
talk
about
that.
H
Generally,
it's
not
you,
don't
like
big
large
family
churches,
because
it's
easier
to
better
serve
them.
You
have
a
smaller
amount
of
people
so
because
of
the
growth
in
the
last
five
years,
because
a
lot
of
immigration
coming
from
Egypt
in
the
Christian
community
to
hear
what
we're
doing,
fortunately,
in
Florida,
we're
seeing
that
a
lot
cheaper
than
you
have
up
north.
H
So
a
lot
more
people
are
moving
down
here,
but
with
that
we're
trying
to
expand
also
in
other
areas,
we
would
like
to
limit
our
congregation
numbers
to
more,
no
more
than
200
250
families.
We
have
grown
in
the
last
few
years
faster
than
what
any
one
of
us
would
have
expected.
So
we've
opened
the
two
churches
and
they
are
registered
in
the
state
for
same
fidelity,
McCurry's
Coptic,
Orthodox
Church.
This
will
be
in
Palm
Harbor
and
seeing
the
uptick
Orthodox
Church.
H
This
is
in
Largo,
so
we're
trying
to
address
all
the
families
try
to,
and
then
this,
among
the
other
three
churches
in
Tampa
Bay
area
that
we
have,
while
on
your
part
routine
in
Tampa.
So
our
goal
is
not
to
just
add
another
chapel
or
just
because
of
the
numbers
are
growing,
but
just
add
more
service
to
the
current
community
that
we
have.
A
G
A
G
A
C
G
I
Actually
met
with
them
maybe
months
ago,
and
we
visited
him
during
the
holidays
and
we
approached
them
deck
and
the
actually
appreciate
that
we
contained
the
kids
in
the
church.
Some
of
them
said
you
guys
very
good
to
keep
the
kids
in
the
city
of
the
street,
give
them
in
the
church.
We
invited
them
to
come
us
to
us,
none
of
not
all
of
them
came,
but
actually
they.
We
have
a
built,
a
good
relationship
for
the
best
two
years
since
I
became
a
board
member,
we
visit
them
regularly.
I
J
G
H
H
You
know
when
we
discussed
with
the
board
what
we'd
like
to
do
want
to
be
more
youth
oriented,
and
we
do
yes
have
the
outside
basketball
court,
but
being
a
part
of
just
and
at
the
same
time
that
we,
you
know
we're
trying
to
stay
good
with
the
neighbors
not
to
have
the
youth
out
very
late
with
them.
They're
gonna
complain
about
noise
know
if
we
can
keep
them
indoors
that
this
not
only
help
us
even
the
neighbors
themselves.
G
L
G
D
A
Planning
staff
will
be
speaking
again
but
seeing
the
site
plan
I
sort
of
wonder
if
they
would
change
their
recommendation
right
now.
Their
recommendation
is
denial
in
this
sounded,
like
a
lot
of
that
was
based
on
the
fact
that
there
was
no
site
plans,
they
didn't
understand
what
was
being
planned,
I'm,
not
sure
they
would.
They
would
turn
that
today
they
probably
need
time
to
digest
what
you
have
here,
but
again
they
will
be
speaking
shortly.
I.
M
General
same
general
questions
society
essentially
over.
What
we're
asked
to
do
is
change.
The
zoning
in
this
could
be
any
other
plan.
When
we're
done,
you
could
do
anything,
you
want
yeah,
it
sounds
like
it
could
be
a
storage
building
and
you
could
be
you
know,
put
rice
in
there.
You
could
put
200
students
in
there,
I
mean
there's
just
bite.
What
we're
doing
today
and
the
building
may
not
be
there.
M
M
Before
it
happens,
I
mean
how
you
already
you
have
may
have
two
schools
coming
in
and
out
what
you
say
here
today:
I'm
sorry,
I've
been
around
and
development
a
long
time
and
I've
been
through
a
lot
of
plans,
a
lot
of
people
that
change
as
soon
as
the
zoning
has
changed.
It
becomes
something
entirely
different,
so
I,
if,
if
those
that
can
be
resolved,
I'm
nice
buff
for
a
lot
of
what
you're
doing
and
would
like
to
see.
M
I
wouldn't
mind
that
but
I'd
like
to
have
the
planning
department
have
a
chance
to
look
at
it
and
digest
what
you're
and
and
put
limitations
on
it
so
that
the
people
can
get
in
and
out
of
the
high
on
the
highway.
The
road
is
is
is
worked
up
correctly.
They
and
many
other
factors
that
have
to
go
into
it.
I'm
just
saying
I
think
it's
to
me.
It's
a
little
bit
early.
That's
all.
M
G
G
M
M
M
What
if
I,
had
the
beautiful
spot?
Okay,
nice
spot
I'd
be
tempted
to
put
a
school
in
there.
Okay,
you
already
have
a
basketball
court
anyway,
I'm
just
saying
I'm,
trying
to
figure
out
what's
happening
and
what
could
happen
and
and
I
just
feel
more
comfortable
if
I
knew
those
parameters
that
were
worked
out
so
the
things
in
that
they
could
be
worked
out.
D
G
Way
in
one
way
out
of
some
set
points
and
don't
want
to
create
any
additional
impact,
we're
trying
to
work
with
planning
on
that,
so
even
a
school,
that's
I'm,
not
sure
we
can
do
that
with
the
situation
that
we
have
now,
unless
this
I
mean
still
was
one
way,
one
way
to
some
support.
You
understand
that
any.
C
N
N
Cker
answer
thank
we're
the
neighborhood
that
is
immediately
on
193
and
Sunset
Point,
a
couple
false
statements.
We
protested
and
resisted
the
city
two
years
ago
on
this
expansion
and,
as
we
see
now,
they're
already
growing.
My
home
sets
at
the
backside,
which
is
my
backyard
faces,
they're
back
where
they
have
the
basketball.
But
noise
is
horrendous.
The
kids
in
the
summer
play
of
10
to
10:30
they've,
put
lights
up
now
that
blinds
into
our
neighborhood,
and
it's
like
it
is
a
massive
traffic
problem.
N
They
keep
the
church
property
very
nice,
but
the
expansion
that
we
fear
is
going
to
Deborah
date.
Our
property
value
and
the
next
thing
you're
going
to
do
is
they're
going
to
want
to
buy
our
town
and
then
we're
going
to
have
them
out
in
our
backyard.
This
congregation
continually
grows
and
it's
B
come
more
of
an
issue
to
us.
I
would
be
presenting
to
the
city
a
100%
signature
notarized,
because
all
they
did
was
notify
the
six
houses
on
one
side
of
the
neighborhood.
N
We
are
a
walled
community
of
12,
that's
12
that
I
will
have
I
will
have
the
castle
Oaks
neighborhoods
signed
notarized
signatures
that
we
do
not
want
this
growth.
We
bought
back
in
there
as
a
nice
little
private,
residential
Enclave,
and
now
it's
turning
into
more.
What
will
go
institutional,
which
will
then
turn
into
commercial
I
deal
with
the
city
in
the
permitting
and
Planning
Department,
all
the
time,
I'm.
N
Actually,
the
guy
that
designed
your
obelisk
and
built
it
out
on
Courtney
Campbell,
so
I
fear
what
can
happen
by
opening
up
the
ability
to
change
this.
If
they
didn't
want
to
move
into
a
residential
neighborhood,
they
should
not
have
built
their
church
there.
We
have
rights
as
residential
to
maintain
residential
neighborhood.
We
have
rights
to
our
protection
of
our
property.
The
city
has
to
protect
those
rights.
The
road
can't
handle
at
193
cannot
handle
any
more
traffic
and
that's
where
we're
at
and.
D
N
Are
welcome
to
come
out
sit
in
my
backyard
and
you'll
hear
the
difference.
They
may
want
to
say
that
they're
very
quiet-
you
only
have
some
in
school,
but
I
can
tell
you
they
get
very
aggressive
in
their
play.
You
know
I
like
that
they
have
at
their
church
congregation,
but
it's
more
than
the
congregation
that
shows
up
to
some
of
these
basketballs.
Please
take
that
into
consideration.
There's
other
neighbors
there
likes
to
be
goofy.
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
D
C
O
Russell
crane,
CRA
and
eight
other
than
1869
council
woods
drive.
I
represent
the
subdivision,
that's
to
the
east
of
the
church.
They,
the
previous
speaker,
talked
about
how
loud
the
basketball
is.
It
is
very
loud.
It's
happy
sound,
so
I'm
not
completely
against
that,
but
I
don't
live
right
next
to
it
like
he
does
so.
Maybe
our
main
concern
is
that
before
this
hearing
we
didn't
have
any
idea.
What
was
gonna
go
on
and
right
now,
I,
don't
believe
that
plans
are
formalized,
I
died,
I
was
trying
to
hear
what
was
going
on
and.
L
O
Think
he
wants
to
use
it
for
Park.
Does
that
mean
it's
gonna
tear
down
the
house?
That's
there
where's.
He
gonna
put
up
something
new
I
heard
some
three-story
building
bellow
at
this
point,
I
would
really
like
the
concrete
idea
of
what's
going
in
there
churches
good
folks,
I
I
don't
really
have
anything
against
them.
They're
loud
there's
a
lot
of
parking.
They
need
more
parking.
Obviously,
so
if
that's
what
they're
going
to
use
it
for
that
I'm
all
for
that,
but
if
they're
gonna
build
anything
or.
O
C
P
My
name
is
Stacy
Bolin
I
live
at
two
nine
three
three
sunrise
drive
and
it's
bees
and
boy
Oh,
LEM
and
I
just
want
to
say
this
is
my
first
meeting
of
this
kind
and
I
live
next
door
to
Kevin,
Hunsicker,
Kevin
and
Rachel
I'm,
fairly
new
to
Florida
from
Colorado
and
while
I
appreciate
the
church's
need
and
desire
to
grow
and
expand
and
I
think
that
that's
a
good
thing.
My
overall
concern
is
from
what
I
understand
is
once
it's
resumed
into
a
different
category.
P
We
don't
necessarily
have
control
or
an
idea
today
of
what
that
could
turn
into
in
the
future
and
so
as
a
homeowner
of
course,
I'm
concerned
as
to
well.
The
idea
of
perhaps
just
parking
sounds
reasonable
in
that
area
that
it
would
turn
into
and
morph
into
something
else
and
I
echo.
What
mr.
Hunsicker
previously
stated
that
the
noise
isn't
just
on
Sundays
and
I
love
the
sound
of
kids.
It
is
a
happy
noise,
but
it
isn't
just
contained
two
Sundays.
P
It
is
throughout
the
week
I'm
home
most
days
and
and
I
don't
mind
the
noise,
but
the
lighting
has
changed
over
the
two
years
that
I've
lived
there
and
it's
more
of
a
spotlight,
and
so
my
concern
again
I
would
say,
is
just
from
what
I
understand
once
we
take
that
next
step
and
turn
this
into
a
different
zoning
is
that
it
can
morph
into
something
that
we
didn't
intend
those
unintended
so
cleanses
and
so
I'm
just
concerned
as
a
homeowner
and
a
new
resident
of
Clearwater.
Thank
you
thank.
A
F
F
Staff
is
really
concerned
generally
with
the
traffic
being
there's
no
through
a
connection
to
Sunset
Point
Road,
which
is
a
larger
you,
don't
matter
arterial,
roadway
and
with
the
other
rights
away
constraints
being
a
narrow
two
lane
undivided
roadway,
and
just
so
you
know
we
cannot
condition
uses
at
this
stage.
We
cannot
do
that
for
amendments
or
zoning
Atlus
amendments.
F
D
F
Actually,
an
increase
from
0.40
so
that
develop
with
intentional
greatly
increases
across
the
site
and
staff
is
concerned.
You
know
with
that
increase
in
development
potential
along
the
uses
it
could
come
with
the
institutional
zoning
and
the
biggest
one
again
is
the
fact
that
there
is
no
through
connection
to
sunset.
F
K
M
Plan
in
the
back
of
the
this
slot
there's
another
lot
that
is
long
in
the
same
size
as
this
lot.
It
has
one
house
on
it
and
to
figure
out
it's
probably
beyond
where
we
are
now,
but
that's
okay.
For
me.
How
is
that
next
lot
developed?
It
sounds
like
if
this
lots
changed
in
zoning.
The
one
behind
it
is
sort
of
automatically
going
to
have
to
be
changed
in
zoning
to
be
useful
or
beat
any
of
you
designer
you
put
a
long,
skinny
road
down
that
one.
M
F
You
be
talking
about
the
parcel
to
the
north
of
the
door
Thanks.
Currently
it
does
have
a
single-family
home
on
it.
So
just
just
one
dwelling
unit
on
there
I
mean
again
it
is
another
large
site,
it's
probably
about
the
same
size
as
this
one.
So
I
can't
speculate
into
the
future,
but
yeah
that's
what
what
it
is
currently
is.
A
single-family
home.
J
J
D
Q
Q
J
I
know
we
don't
like
to
talk
about
hypotheticals,
but
you
mentioned
direct
access
and
they
mentioned
parking
issues,
let's
suit
just
safer.
If
they
came
in
to
get
a
permit
not
proposing
a
new
building,
but
they
wanted
to
improve
access
circulation
and
parking
on
their
site.
Is
that
something
that
would
be
allowed
under
their
current
zoning
designation.
Q
R
J
You
because
I
think
you
know
what
what
mr.
Hanna
indicated
was.
Obviously
I
don't
want
to
spend
a
bunch
of
money
in
engineering
fees
and
design
fees,
and
then
it
doesn't
happen,
but
it
sounds
like
if
the
staff
wouldn't
support
it
and
the
board
wouldn't
support
it,
even
though
they
went
through
that
motion.
It
sounds
like
that
could
be
another
avenue
for
them
to
at
least
improve
their
site.
J
K
Institutional
is
already
there
in
the
area
there
and
the
school
to
the
south
of
it
as
well,
and
the
expansion
side
of
it
I
hear
it
and
like
touching
on,
it's
come
up
before,
and
maybe
we
need
to
review
back
into
a
planned
development
zoning
for
another
term,
where
it's
tied
to
a
site
plan
versus
Euclidean.
You
look
Euclidean
rezoning
where
it's
opened
up
to
everything.
K
That's
there
so
I,
don't
know
if
that's
something
as
you
were
talking
about,
we
had
before,
but
I
mean
I
could
see
more
uses
of
that
coming
about
where,
if
this
was
limited
to
the
amount
of
square
footage
that
they
could
put
on
it
and
all
those
types
of
things
which
other
communities
Hillsboro
has
and
things
of
that
nature
that
we
might
look
at.
But
this
is
where
we
are
now.
G
It's
just
and
again
it's
having
that
additional
parcel
to
the
north
creates
the
circulation
within
the
church
to
be
more
efficient
right.
Now,
it's
it's!
It's
a
it's
very
limited.
We
don't
want
to
create
the
impact
that
they
are
talking
about.
That's
why
we
again
I'm
going
to
say
a
game.
We
are
not
proposing
a
use
that
will
be
detrimental
to
what's
happening
today.
We
understand.
G
I
I
Hey
the
traffic,
no
come
back
all
this
closet.
How
did
we
talk
about
the
17
houses?
He
actually
go
through
that
one
lightly,
all
of
them
actually
with
an
agreement,
was
Austin.
We
have
a
very
good
repetition
with
us
and
if
one
or
two
they
have
all
the
noises
in
the
work
instead
of
making
them
and
they
sound
like
they
tend
to.
I
They
try
to
help
that
community
in
it
from
the
neighborhood
wanna
bring
their
kids.
We
won't
come
so
it's
very
actively
to
make
it
endure
threat
to
contain
the
noise
to
try
to
contain
the
eliminate,
even
the
lie
twice.
We
didn't
increase
any
light
for
the
past
five
years
and
we
can
move
three
years,
I
would
say
actually
in
the
Christmas
and
Easter,
we
normally
bring
a
portable
lights
for
people
to
park
on
the
street.
But
during
that
time,
if
we
have
light
pink
this,
we
try
to
work
with
the
unlocked.
A
Q
One
of
the
things
just
looking
at
their
site
plan
here
is
that
and
I
don't
know
whether
the
church
would
want
to
consider
this,
or
would
they
want
to
broach
it
with
their
neighbors.
But,
for
example,
if
you
were
to
take
the
proposed
building
use
their
existing
entitlements
through
the
existing
zoning
and
move
the
building
over
to
where
the
the
basketball
court
is
now,
you
know
they
could
they
could
use
their
current.
Q
You
know
it
might
take
some
of
that
outdoor
noise
and
the
impact
of
that
and
move
it
indoors
where
it
would
be
less
impactful
on
the
on
the
neighborhood
and
I.
Would
you
know
I
would
point
out
for
the
two-story
building.
You
can
actually
build
single
family
homes
3035
feet
tall,
so
you
know,
there's
not
a
lot
of
potential
height
differential
there
in
a
in
a
two-story
building.
Q
We
particularly
if
they
design
it
attractively,
so
there
may
be
some
options
for
them
depending
upon
what
their,
how
that
would
meet
their
needs,
and
it
might
be
something
that
they
can
at
least
engage
the
community
in
a
conversation
about
whether
it
might
you
know
mitigate
some
of
the
existing
noise
issues,
if
they're,
if
they're
having
that.
So
that's
just
a
suggestion
of
you
know
something
that
you
know
the
applicants
Mike
they
could
consider
if
they
wanted
to.
Okay
might
present
us
a
different
different
scenario.
D
M
Like
to
just
so
I
understand
the
process
at
some
point:
when
did
the
church
and
I'm
going
to
take
it
to
Paul
B
Stevens,
both
of
those
get
the
zoning
to
be
institutional,
the
history
of
the
city
and
the
land
I
mean
it
seems
wish,
was
it
again
grandfathered
in
is
that
when
we
started
everything
was
this
parcel
that
the
church
is
on
always
commercial
institutional?
When
did
that
change,
whether
the
school
sure
I'm
not
leaving
them
out
of
the
other
side,
I.
Q
The
comforter
see
that
the
gentleman
mentioned
from
the
neighbor
never
good
had
to
do
with
the
city's
annexation
of
the
property.
The
church
was
pre-existing
in
Pinellas
County
and
in
Pinellas.
County
churches
are
allowed
in
residential
zoning
districts,
so
in
Clearwater
they're
not
in
there
water,
we
have
houses
of
worship
located
in
institutional
districts.
So
when
we
annex
the
property
we
have
to
transition
from,
we
did
not
want
to
leave
the
the
chirps
non-conforming
because
they
weren't
non-conforming
in
Pinellas
County.
Q
So
when
we
annex
them,
we
move
them
from
Pinellas
County
residential,
where
they
were
conforming
to
the
city
of
Clearwater
institutional,
where
they
were
conforming,
and
so
that
was
what
generated
the
conflict
with
the
community.
At
that
time,
the
pastor
or
his
representative
may
be
able
to
tell
you
in
fact
how
long
the
church
has
been
there
in
the
neighborhood
that
I
do
not
know
the
answer
to.
G
E
N
N
O
Q
B
R
B
K
A
A
J
Think
mr.
duck
made
a
great
suggestion:
I
think
if
the
site
plan
was
submitted
as
part
of
the
application
now
probably
would
happen
already.
The
dialogue
between
staff
and
the
applicant
I
think
if
the
applicant
wants
to
request
a
continuance,
I
think
my
opinion.
That's
a
good
way
to
go
and
allow
them
to
at
least
have
the
dialogue
before
we
vote
on
anything
deny
their
request.
That's
my
personal
opinion.
I
haven't
heard
anything
from
them.
What.
G
E
L
Can
I,
unless
city
staff,
has
some
objections
to
that
now,
I
continued
hearing
would
need
to
be
advertised
in
the
same
manner
as
this
original
hearing.
So
there
wouldn't
be
any
prejudice
we
attending
a
continuance
and
I
think
you'd
have
a
hard
time
even
selecting
a
date
certain
at
this
juncture,
because
you
don't
know
when
the
submission
would
be
made,
you
don't
know
what
timeframe
the
staff
would
review
and
analyze
that
submission.
So
no,
you
do
not
need
to
pick
a
date
certain
you
could
continue
it
until
it
comes
back.