►
From YouTube: City of Clearwater Government: 3/19
Description
The agenda for the meeting can be found on the city’s website at http://bit.ly/ClearwaterCityCouncilMeetings.
A
A
C
B
D
B
D
A
D
D
E
D
F
D
G
C
G
G
A
A
A
D
G
D
D
H
A
E
H
J
I
I
I
I
We're
enjoying
it
so
same
with
you.
What's
that
Thursday
yeah
under
stay
with
us
yeah
actually
weekend
was
really
nice
cuz.
My
son
came
home
from
he's
in
Gaines
fall.
He
came
home
for
the
weekend
at
my
daughter,
wish
presidency
when
Columbus
came
down
to
visit
as
well.
So
we
had
the
whole
house
full
look.
Was
nice
I've
heard
that
when
he's
arrested
we
got
to
the
empty
nest
agent
weekend
was
a
good
reminder
how
busy
things
used
to
be.
I
I
I
I
Please
remember
turn
off
your
cell
phones
and
beepers
so
that
you've
not
become
a
distraction
during
the
meeting.
Please
also
refrain
from
having
conversations
in
this
room
so
that
we
may
hear
all
the
testimony
given
today
to
ensure
a
complete
record
of
the
sports
actions.
We
ask
the
each
individual
wishing
to
speak,
including
the
applicant
speak
into
the
microphone
at
the
podium
in
front
of
us.
Clearly
state
your
name
and
spell
your
last
name
for
the
clerk.
Now
ask
those
in
attendance
today
who
plan
to
speak
to
please
rise
and
be
swarmed
by
the
clerk.
I
Agendas
of
today's
meeting
are
on
the
podium
to
your
right
near
the
entry
door.
Also
on
this
podium
are
Arras
to
the
Community
Development
Board,
the
listless,
a
staff
experts
in
their
resumes,
the
board's
rules
procedure
and
the
annual
schedule
of
this
board.
Our
first
order
of
business
today
is
approval
of
the
minutes
from
last
month's
meeting
may
have.
A
motion
for
group
motion
may
be
seconded
and
discussion
on
favour.
Saying
aye
opposed
motion
carries
next
item
on
our
agenda
today,
our
citizens
to
be
heard
four
items
not
on
the
agenda.
I
Every
citizen
is
here
today
to
be
heard
of
items
that
are
not
on
today's
agenda.
He
may
approach
the
podium,
seeing
none
we'll
continue
with
our
agenda
items.
Today
we
have
one
item
in
the
agenda:
it's
a
level
2
application,
all
level
2
cases
such
as
flexible
development
or
considered
quasi-judicial
hearings
in
a
quasi-judicial
here
in
the
community
development
board,
reviews
the
application,
the
staff
report,
correspondence
and
all
evidence
presented
today
and
makes
the
final
decision
subject
to
appeal.
I
This
board
has
previously
qualified
all
the
city
staff
who
will
testify
as
experts
in
their
area,
professional
training,
education
and
experience.
The
list,
the
city
staff
experts
and
their
resumes
are
on
the
handbook
on
the
podium
near
the
entry
door.
Any
other
professionals
desire
to
be
qualified
as
an
expert
witness
shall
sell
requests
at
the
beginning
of
the
case
and
present
a
resume
to
each
board
member.
I
The
board
shall
determine
whether
about
the
qualify,
the
person
as
an
expert
and
in
what
field
of
study
at
the
beginning
of
each
level
to
case
L
asked
for
anyone
who
wishes
to
request
party
status
to
come
forward
and
state
your
reasons
party
status
may
be
granted
if
the
person
requesting
such
status
demonstrates
that
he
is
a
substantially
affected
person.
The
board
will
then
determine
whether
or
not
to
grant
party
status.
I
Then
the
case
will
proceed
as
follows:
presentations
by
planning
staff,
10
minutes
maximum
presentations
by
applicant
eminence
maximum
presentations
by
persons
with
party
status,
5
minutes
per
party
cross-examination
and
witnesses
by
planning
staff
cross-examination
and
witnesses
by
applicant
and
cross-examination
and
witnesses
by
persons
with
party
status
comments
by
the
public.
3
minutes
per
person,
closing
remarks
by
planning
staff,
3
minutes,
maximum
closing
remarks
by
persons,
grand
party
status,
three
minutes
per
party
and
closing
remarks
by
the
applicant
three
minutes.
Maximum
closing
the
public
hearing
and
a
discussion
then
vote
by
the
board.
I
Our
first
level
to
case
today
is
as
follows:
case
FLD
2,
0,
1,
9,
0,
1,
0,
0,
1
@
1:14,
Turner
Street,
the
owner
is
Stanley
114
Turner
LLC
represented
by
Asian
Cathy
called
Catherine
:
award
Henderson.
The
location
is
on
the
north
side
of
Turner
Street,
approximately
60
feet
west
from
the
bay
Avenue
in
Turner
Street
intersection,
and
the
request
is
to
read
her
proposed
addition
to
an
existing
office
in
the
office
district
for
property
located
at
114.
Turner
Street.
I
J
D
H
I
E
Afternoon
Kevin
no
marine,
Development
Department,
the
subject:
property
is
zoned
office
district.
The
request
is
to
add
596
square
foot,
building
addition
to
the
front
of
the
existing
900
square
foot
office.
Building
this
additional
allow
for
a
reception
area
of
break
room.
The
conference
room
for
future
office
uses
the
building
will
have
a
front
setback
of
37
feet
to
building
side.
West
setbacks
of
4.2
feet,
pavement
and
4.5
feet
to
building
and
the
side.
East
setback
of
10.1
feet
to
building
my
rear
setback.
E
The
front
and
side
setbacks
for
the
new
addition
meet
the
minimum
setback
requirements
for
office
use.
The
request
is
a
comprehensive,
infill
redevelopment
project
because
the
lot
with
number
of
off-street
parking
spaces
and
the
existing
side,
west
setback
are
less
than
those
are
quiet
for
minimum
required
development
standard
or
for
a
level
1.
E
The
lot
width
and
side
was
setback.
As
I
said,
there
are
existing
conditions,
which
is
the
primary
here.
Any
proposed
redevelopment
on
this
property
would
be
required
to
be
a
level
2
based
on
the
existing
lot
width
of
the
property.
The
minimum
number
of
off
street
parking
spaces
for
this
project
would
be
5
spaces.
There
are
2
proposed
off
street
parking
spaces
in
the
rear
of
the
property
that
will
be
accessed
through
a
rear
alley.
E
One
parking
space
will
be
88
and,
as
required,
the
existing
lot
with
and
location
of
the
building
addition
will
not
allow
for
more
on-site
parking.
Few
properties
in
this
area
used
for
office
or
commercial
uses
are
adequate.
Inadequate
parking
on
site,
it
appears
in
most
commercial
uses,
rely
on
the
various
time
parking
schemes
available
within
proximity
to
their
property.
Trying
to
provide
a
direct
access
to
off
street
parking
from
Terrence
Street
would
create
site
designs
that
would
be
inconsistent
with
the
small
offset
properties
along
Turner
Street.
E
That
also
result
in
the
loss
of
on
street
parking
spaces
for
the
new
driveway
connection
to
Terrence
Street.
Therefore,
the
use
of
the
osteo
parking
spaces,
rather
than
creating
a
new
drive
with
direct
access
to
Turner
Street,
will
maintain
the
existing
traffic
pattern,
maintain
neighborhood
character
and
reduced
any
pedestrian
and
vehicle
traffic
conflicts.
Within
the
with
the
introduction.
New
access
point
to
Turner
Street
staff
recommends
approval
the
request,
subject
to
twelve
conditions
of
approval,
because
the
part
of
the
proposal
is
consistent
of
general
purposes
is
consistent
with
the
maximum
development
potential.
E
G
New
technology-
maybe
coal
with
law,
firm
of
Hill,
Ward
Henderson,
representing
the
applicant
600
Cleveland
street,
suite
800
Clearwater
Florida
good
afternoon.
The
applicant,
as
the
staff
has
already
stated,
seeks
to
add,
put
an
addition
on
the
front
of
his
property.
It's
a
small
addition.
It
is
does
not
even
double
the
size
of
the
property
and
it
creates
a
consistent
front
yard
setback
with
the
properties
to
the
west.
We
know
mr.
Govan
who's.
The
property
owner
to
the
east
is
here
to
object.
G
His
is
the
one
other
property
that
is
set
further
back
on
the
street,
as
opposed
to
the
proposal
for
this
property
and
its
two
neighbors
before
we
introduce
any
additional
evidence.
I
would
like
to
ask
mr.
perfectly
Z,
who
is
a
urban
planner
transportation.
Planner
who's
been
qualified
by
this
board
several
times
his
resumes
on
record
with
the
board.
If,
mr.
chairman,
you
would
accept
him
as
an
expert
for
this
testimony
do.
I
G
Carries
thank
you.
I
did
want
to
show
a
couple
of
pictures
before
mr.
Furley.
He
testifies
just
about
the
consistency
in
the
neighborhoods,
the
staff
report
and
mr.
norburg
in
his
presentation,
spoke
about
the
inability
to
put
parking
in
the
front.
Obviously,
if
there
was
if
it
was
consistent
with
the
neighborhood,
as
you
see,
most
commercial
and
office
spaces
parking
is
in
the
front.
This
is.
G
Looking
east
at
the
parcel
two
doors
down-
and
this
is
where
the
front
line
set
back
and
you
can
see
the
secondary.
The
second
part
property
owned
by
the
mills.
Fog
is
also
there.
This
is
the
most
law
property
to
be
immediately
to
the
west
of
the
subject.
Property
in
the
your
packet
is
the
letter
of
no
objection
from
mr.
and
mrs.
millspaugh
who
owned
this
property
in
our
adjacent
to
it.
G
This
is
the
existing
subject:
property
and
mr.
good
man's
property
is
here
to
the
east
event
with
that
with
the
testimony
that
is
in
the
application.
The
evidence
presented
there.
The
staff
report-
and
it's
evidence
I'd
like
to
ask
mr.
pearl
easy
to
speak
a
little
bit
to
mr.
Govan
objection
with
respect
to
ite.
K
Good
afternoon
Robert
pergolas
ii
with
gulf
coast,
consulting,
am
a
certified
planner
transportation
planner
with
gulf
coast,
consulting
one
three
eight
to
five,
I
cotton
velour
at
suite
605
clearwater,
as
Katie
mentioned,
the
staff
mentioned
this.
This
neighborhood
is
has
small
offices
on
small
lots
and,
as
it
was
stated,
trying
to
put
a
parking
lot
in
the
front
yard,
but
completely
destroy
the
the
ambience
of
this
site.
K
The
comprehensive
NFL
criteria
does
recommend
the
use
of
ite
standards,
as
opposed
to
city
code
with
city
code,
you'll
be
required
to
have
five
spaces
per
ite
parking
generation
standards
for
small
offices.
The
rate
is
two
point:
four
spaces
per
thousand
square
feet:
you'd
be
required
to
have
four
spaces.
We
can
only
fit
two
spaces
in
the
rear
yard.
Access
from
the
alley.
However,
there
is
ample
on-street
parking
directly
in
front
of
the
site
and
on
portions
of
the
block,
I've
got
a
couple
of
photographs
that
I
could
I
could
show.
K
Of
course,
this
is
one
that
anybody
could
see,
and
that
is
this
is
Google
Earth
looking
west
from
bay,
the
properties
appear
on
the
north
side.
All
that
area
is
open
for
on
street
parking,
and
this
is
a
photo
that
I
took
about
a
month
ago
prior
to
DRC
meeting.
That's
the
null
spot
property
right
there.
This
is
the
front
yard
of
the
front
of
the
property
where
you
can
park
on
the
street.
For
this,
for
this
office
building
be
happy
to
answer
any
questions
you
have
regarding
the
use
of
ite
standards.
K
G
Just
one
clarification
in
the
staff
report:
it
indicates
that
the
height
is
23
feet
to
the
midpoint
of
the
cupola,
the
city
code
measures
height,
the
midpoint
of
the
roofline
of
the
pitched
roof
and
not
to
the
architectural
feature
per
se.
So
you
can
see
in
the
architectural
plans
that
are
before
you
in
the
elevation
sheet,
a
dash,
201
and
the
front
elevation.
It
does
show
that
the
midpoint
of
the
pitched
roof
is
15.
J
J
My
background
is
I
have
been
a
actual
city
planner
with
the
city
of
Clearwater
I've
been
a
zoning
administrator
with
the
city
of
Pinellas,
Park
I
have
a
master's
degree
in
public
administration
and
I'm
a
lawyer.
So
that's
what
we're
doing
primarily
with
our
time.
What
my
interest
is
in
this
reality
is
to
protect
these
windows.
J
This
portion,
those
are
primary
windows
that
we
see
out
of,
and
we
built
a
porch
to
be
able
to
take
advantage
of
that
front
space.
The
current
relationship
have
having
talked
to
John
Connolly
who's,
the
primary
driver
in
this
project
is
he
identified
that
it's
20
feet
to
the
edge
of
the
window,
but
it's
20
feet
and
a
half
as
far
as
this
project
is
concerned.
So,
if
we're
looking
out
of
the
window,
I'm
going
to
be
seeing
a
roof
in
the
plan,
this
didn't
show
the
legend
here.
J
The
legend
shows
existing
conditional
space,
new
construction
and
then
a
front
porch
space.
The
total
gross
is
2068,
so
I
didn't
quite
understand
when
the
planner
Kevin
Annenberg
identified
that
it
was
only
a
500
foot
expansion,
it's
actually
about
a
thousand
feet,
but
I'm
not
concerned
about
that.
When
I
had
asked
initially
that
we
established
a.
J
J
At
that
point,
there's
a
porch
in
terms
of
the
legend
that
shows
that
the
porch
was
515
feet
so
that
porch
is
10
feet
of
this
building.
There
doesn't
seem
to
me
to
be
a
reason
that
you
have
to
have
a
23
foot
high
or
very
high
roof
over
a
porch
that
would
give
us
the
10
feet
in
regard
to
that
and
I'd
be
able
to
see
out
I've.
Given
some
examples
in
the
neighbor
here
just
took
some
pictures.
J
J
Your
big
deer,
okay,
you're
just
a
little
house,
that's
in
the
neighborhood,
it's
a
very
old
house,
probably
the
same
vintage
about
the
20,
so
you
can
see
that
it
has
a
similar
roofline
to
the
one
that
they're
asking
for,
but
it
has
a
little
porch
that
goes
out.
That's
a
flat
roof.
If
that
porch
had
the
same
roof
line,
you
would
see
it
coming
forward
and
it
would
block
additional
windows
to
the
house
next
door.
But
there's
no
reason
to
have
that.
J
J
J
J
The
community
development
boards
to
meet
each
and
every
one
of
the
following
criteria:
number
two
is
the
proposed
development
will
not
hinder
or
discourage
the
appropriate
development
and
use
of
adjacent
land
and
buildings,
or
significantly
impair
the
value
of.
We
believe
that
this
particular
design
would
impair
the
value
and
the
use
of
our
property.
The
proposed
development
is
consistent
with
the
community
character
of
the
immediate
vicinity
and
the
proposed
parcel
proposed
for
development.
J
Certainly,
the
existing
design
is,
but
a
change
in
that
design
would
also
accommodate
this
same
relationship,
because
we
have
other
examples
here
that
I
brought
in
the
neighborhood
that
don't
have
full
by
full
height
ports,
coverings
and
number
six.
The
design
of
the
proposed
development
minimizes
adverse
effects,
including
visual
acoustic
and
olfactory
and
hours
of
operation,
impacts
on
adjacent
properties.
Clearly,
this
would
adversely
affect
the
visual
relationship
that
we
have
with
our
existing
property,
but
it
can
be
remedied.
I
want
the
project
to
go
forward.
J
J
It's
24
hour
parking
at
this
location,
so
just
a
little
bit
above
the
to
the
west
and
the
block
there's
a
two-hour
space,
but
this
can
be
a
24
hour
space
which
is
absolutely
accommodating
to
people
who
are
working
at
this
office
across
the
street.
The
Episcopal
Church
of
the
Ascension
also
leases
or
lends
their
entire
parking
lot
to
the
county.
So
there's
lots
of
opportunity
to
park
in
this
area
that
doesn't
have
to
be
on
here.
I,
don't
want
to
change
it
I
think
the
two
spaces
in
the
back
are
clearly
more
than
enough.
J
One
of
the
arguments
was
to
remove
a
hickory
tree
to
put
a
handicap
parking
space.
I,
don't
think
we
have
to
do
that
because
there's
parking
in
the
front
and
you
can
make
a
handicapped
space
without
removing
a
tree,
but
you
know
I
want
the
project
to
go
forward
just
want
to
see
out
those
windows.
That's
my
that's!
My
complete
argument
and
my
effective
nature
I.
A
J
I
met
with
John
a
couple
of
times
and
he
did
not
want
to
move
the
building
back
because
it's
cost
a
considerable
amount
of
money
to
be
able
to
do
these
designs
and
things.
But
I
only
came
up.
I
didn't
want
a
minute.
He
didn't
want
to
minimize
the
square
footage
that
he
had,
but
he
was
not
sure
of
just
putting
a
lower
roof
over
the
porch,
because
I
kind
of
came
up
with
that.
J
He
had
been
gone
for
a
couple
of
days
and
I
came
up
with
that
and
actually
went
over
to
his
office,
which
is
at
the
end
of
the
street,
the
first
building
that
you
see,
which
has
that
similar
type
of
affront
and
address
that
with
him,
and
he
said
that
he
would
consider
it.
But
he
didn't
know
if
it
would
be
architecturally
acceptable,
and
there
was
supposed
to
be
an
architect
here
today
that
might
be
able
to
consider
that.
I
J
F
Actually,
chairman,
if
I
may
yeah
a
couple
of
things,
one
is
I
think
to
kind
of
reiterate
staffs
position
in
almost
every
conceivable
way.
This
is
a
condition
our
consistent
use
addition
to
this
office
and
I.
Think
as
the
board
is
well
aware,
view
is
not
a
restrictive
requirement
for
view
protection
on
developments
and
just
as
the
gentleman
who
lives
in
a
two-story
home
next
door,
a
two-story
home
would
theoretically
be
allowed
here.
F
The
one
thing
I
will
say
that
I
am
in
agreement
with,
is
that
the
I
would
like
the
applicant
to
consider
preservation
of
the
large
mature
tree
in
the
rear
of
the
property.
I.
Think,
like
the
general
development
pattern
in
this
neighborhood,
some
of
these
mature
trees
lend
itself
to
kind
of
the
the
atmosphere
in
the
context
of
the
neighborhood
and
I
think
with
the
availability
of
public
parking
in
the
street
as
being
more
than
sufficient
to
serve
this
area.
D
G
To
mr.
delts
point,
the
applicant
was
attempting
to
save
that
tree
and
provide
less
parking,
but
there
was
a
balance
there
if
a
handicapped
spot
can't
because
the
building
codes
requiring
a
handicapped
spot
where
there
is
none.
Now
there
is
an
issue
on
the
side
of
architectural
II
it
whether
the
handicapped
spot
can
be
on
the
other
side,
but
if
the
back
can
accommodate
a
handicapped
spot
on
the
other
side
and
not
remove
the
tree
and
the
board
is
amenable
to
allowing
one
required
parking
space.
The
applicants
certainly
happy
to
do
that.
If.
F
I
J
G
G
It's
one
of
the
requirements
bylaw
and
chapter
163
that
both
your
land
development
regulations
have
to
be
consistent
within
one
another,
as
well
as
with
the
Comprehensive
Plan
and
as
your
staff
report
in
the
plans
show,
the
applicant
is
not
requesting
relief
from
height
or
relief
from
a
front
setback
and
in
fact
the
proposed
front
setback
has
37
feet
where
the
requirement
is
a
minimum
of
25
feet.
So,
in
fact,
the
applicant
has
the
right
to
come.
G
12
feet
further,
closer
to
Turner
Street
if
he
so
desired,
but
yet
in
acknowledgment
of
the
surrounding
properties
and
in
attempting
and
that's
what
the
criteria
says
to
minimize
the
impacts,
he
is
minimizing
the
impacts
because
he's
not
going
to
be
25
feet
from
the
roadway
he's
going
to
be
37
feet
from
the
river
roadway.
The
plans
that
mr.
Govan
was
referencing
with
respect
to
square
footage
are
not
the
actual
submitted
plans.
G
They
were
an
original
application
that
was
submitted
in
under
recent
middle
both
for
DRC,
and
the
plans
that
you
have
today
are
not
reflected
reflective
of
what
he
was
referencing
from
a
square
footage
standpoint.
The
staff
report
and
the
plans
of
the
square
footage
are
correct,
as
well
as
the
height
and
once
again,
I
wanted
to
show
their
architectural
plans
with
the
front
porch
that
mr.
Govan,
that's
speaking
of,
is
covered
by
15
feet
to
the
midpoint
of
the
roof
here,
and
then
it
raises
back
to
the
existing.
G
So
the
relief
requested
by
this
board
today
is
for
the
lot
width,
which
is
an
existing
condition,
the
parking
which
is
an
existing
condition
and
the
side
setback,
which
is
an
existing
condition,
the
proposed
development
and
the
modification
of
this
site.
The
only
reason
that
we're
here
before
you
today
is
because
of
the
existing
conditions
under
your
code
as
you're,
well
aware.
If
this
was
to
be
a
change
of
use
of
any
site,
the
same
conditions
would
be
back
for
you
back
before
you
asking
for
relief
in
this
level
to
standard.
So
while
mr.
G
Connolly
met
with
mr.
Govan
this
morning,
and
he
expressed
his
disappointment
that
his
view
may
be
impacted
from
a
second-story
window,
that's
not
really
something
that's
before
this
board
for
consideration.
Specifically,
this
proposed
development
is
within
the
confines,
without
a
request
for
relief,
and
is
it
from
a
front
setback
and
a
height
standpoint,
which
are
his
main
concerns
and
the
existing
conditions
we're
just
simply
asking
you
to
confirm,
as
presented
in
the
photos
that
staff
provided
and
in
the
application
the
consistency
with
the
neighbors,
the
neighbor
to
the
west.
G
I
This
poses
the
public
hearing.
Alkie
gets
to
go
last,
so
let's
close
the
public
hearing-
and
we
have
discussion
in
both
by
the
board
or
motion
and
I-
do
find
the
suggestion
that
if
there
is
a
method
to
add
a
condition
relative
to
saving
the
hickory
tree,
that's
something
that
we
might
want
to
consider
as
a
board,
but
any
preference
among
support
members.
C
I
Think
the
condition
would
be
long
lines
that
if
it
could
be
reduced
to
one
space,
if
the
handicapped
space
will
fit
and
the
tree
can
be
saved,
if
the
tree
can't
be
saved,
then
it's
going
to
be
the
two
spaces
in
there.
I
think
would
be
the
additional
conditions.
Something
along
those
lines
sounds
right:
I
moved.
I
Yes,
the
accessible
parking
space
will
appear.
Okay.
Does
everybody
understand
that
the
weather?
Second?
On
that
motion
second
motion?
Maybe
second
between
a
discussion
on
the
motion
there,
being
none
all
in
favor,
say
aye
all
opposed
motion
carries.
Thank
you
very
much.
It
concludes
that
first
item
next
item
on
our
agenda.
Are
the
directors
items
anything
from
the
director
nothing
today
pretty
good
and
then
the
last
time
when
agenda
is
a
German.
Thank
you
very
much
everybody
for
being
here.