►
From YouTube: 03/2/2020 Council Work Session.
Description
Comments are not monitored on this platform. To make a comment, please visit www.myclearwater.com/government/council-meeting-streaming-videos or one of our social media pages.
Agenda can be found here: http://bit.ly/ClearwaterCityCouncilMeetings
A
Like
to
call
to
order
the
work
session
for
March,
the
second,
our
first
order
of
business
other
than
to
wish
dr.
Seuss,
a
happy
birthday
is
to
ask
Michelle
Smith
our
two-time
Olympian
gold
medal
and
softball
to
come
forward
and
give
us
a
report
on
some
fantastic
events
that
have
taken
place
in
Clearwater.
Recently.
Thank.
B
You
very
much
always
an
honor
to
be
up
here
in
to
talk
to
you.
Mr.
mayor
rheticus
and
councilmembers
first
off
I
want
to
say
thank
you
so
much
for
the
support
of
young
girls,
of
the
sport
of
softball,
obviously
very
near
and
dear
to
my
heart.
Obviously,
the
city
of
Clearwater,
Parks
and
Recreation
Department,
the
entire
city
in
general,
has
just
been
extremely
supportive,
as
is
the
county
of
Pinellas
County
a
little
bit
of
update
on
the
success
of
the
event.
B
Our
ratings
for
ESPN
were
well
over
50
percent
from
last
year's.
What
we
like
to
call
our
championship
game,
which
was
on
espn2
Sunday
evening
or
the
final
game
of
the
event,
so
the
growth
is
obviously
obviously
there.
The
number
of
attendees
was
up
significantly
as
well,
so
the
number
of
tickets
sold,
which
means
more
people
coming
into
our
amazing
area,
our
great
city,
and
being
able
to
see
some
of
the
best
athletes
in
the
entire
country.
B
B
For
everybody
to
partake
in
and
I
truly
truly
thank
you
for
all
your
support
and
supporting
the
young
girls.
My
hope
is
in
the
future.
We
can
continue
to
keep
the
event
in
Clearwater
in
Pinellas
County,
and
hopes
that
this
is
such
a
great
diamond
sport
area
with
the
success
that
we
have
with
spring
training
for
for
the
men
in
Major,
League
Baseball.
My
hope
is
that
we
can
continue
to
support
the
support
of
softball,
build
a
stadium
and
bring
in
even
three
times
the
number
we
had
over
12,000
tickets
sold.
B
I
think
we
could
easily
get
to
over
30,000
tickets.
So
if
we
have
the
right
facilities
and
the
economic
impact
of
that
would
be
significant,
last
year's
economic
and
was
over
three
and
a
half
million
dollars
to
the
city
of
Clearwater
in
this
area
so
and
that
was
with
tickets
sold
of
about
eight
thousand.
So
if
we
can
triple
that,
you
can
just
see
it
I
think
the
stadium
would
make
sense.
We
could
pay
it
off
in
a
couple
of
years.
B
Talk
with
anyone
or
throw
a
little
EP
to
anyone
who
needs
a
great
exercise,
specifically
mine.
Thank
you.
You've
been
such
a
loyal
supporter
of
women's
sports.
Whether
or
not
was
the
Junior
World
Championships,
some
of
the
women's
gold
championships
from
Team
USA
softball,
the
collegiate
game,
you're,
always
out
taking
pictures
and
being
a
huge
voice
for
women's
sports.
So
thank
you
very
much
for
that.
It's
again
it
warms
my
heart
that
we
support
our
view.
I
also
have
a
gift
for
you
to
sign
flag
from
the
US
Olympic
team.
A
A
B
The
University
of
Washington
UCLA,
so
we
have
the
teams
from
the
pac-12.
We
have
seen
teams
from
the
big
ten,
the
big
12,
all
different
conferences-
mid-majors,
you
name
it
USF
from
across
the
bridge,
was
over.
So
it's
a
great
event
and
there's
so
many
universities
I
want
to
take
place
and
in
this
event
and
be
a
party
because
they
understand
not
just
our
weather,
but
the
ability
to
play
some
great
games
and
then
bring
their
fans
and
enjoy
enjoy
the
beaches.
Great
yeah.
A
We
know
you
have
a
couple
of
gold
medals.
You
know
you
have
been
a
great
supporter
not
only
of
softball,
but
you've
helped
us
out
with
our
clear
water
for
youth
programming.
We
had
that
banquet
well
over
the
weekend
and
michelle's
they're,
offering
scholarships
promoting
not
only
women's
softball
but
willing
the
area
and
so
on
behalf
of
the
city
of
Clearwater,
we're
changing
the
locks
at
the
anymore,
complex,
okay,
but
we
are
going
to
give
you
a.
A
B
Think
if
we
had
permanent
seating
of
somewhere
around
three
to
four
thousand
and
then
expandable
with
an
outside
and
an
outfield
fence,
we
could
bring
in
another
four
to
five
thousand
and
actually
see
eight
to
ten
thousand
people
for
large
events
like
this,
it
would
make
a
lot
of
sense
and
then
we
could
still
host
little
league
events.
We
could
host
state
event
all-star
events.
It
would
be
used
year
round.
We
could
bring
in
international
events,
I
mean
that
it
would.
B
It
would
be
an
asset
not
just
for
the
international
game,
the
collegiate
game,
the
NFSA,
but
for
our
local
citizens.
Waka
slowpitch
is
still
a
very
big
part
of
a
lot
of
events
and
games
that
are
played
at
the
ATC,
more
complexes,
so
I
think
if
we
could
be
in
that,
ballpark
of
you
know
again,
four
to
five
permanent
seating
with
additional
ability
to
bring
it
stands.
We
would
be.
We.
A
Council
Michele
reference,
our
staff
and
I
see
Mike
Lockwood
and
Carla
I'm,
not
sure
who
else
from
Parks
and
Rec
is
hair.
Chris
gut
gross
come
on
come
on
up
staff
because
you
know
y'all
worked
tirelessly
for
like
two
or
three
weekends
in
a
row,
and
we
just
want
to
thank
y'all
for
the
work
that
y'all
done
because
come
up
front
up,
so
everybody
can
see
on
the
camera.
But
you
know
help
our
ratings.
A
F
G
Right
good
morning,
Gina
Clayton,
Planning
and
Development
Department
I'm
here
with
Tara
Cabot
and
Amanda
Thompson,
who
are
also
on
the
City
Hall
site
selection
team,
as
well
as
Micah
and
Michael,
who
also
gave
us
some
input
and
guidance.
What
I'd
like
to
do
is
first
talk
to
you
a
little
bit
about
the
process
that
we
use
to
get
to
our
ranked
sites
and
then
turn
that
over
to
Harvard
jolly,
to
talk
about
the
feasibility
study
that
they
did
on
to
talk
to
ranked
sites.
G
If
you'll
recall
at
the
November
City
Council
meeting,
we
presented
to
you
our
proposed
selection
criteria
and
got
your
buy-in.
We
also
showed
you
the
ninth,
that
we
were
considering
to
evaluate,
and,
after
you
all
had
some
discussion,
you
asked
us
to
add
an
additional
site.
So
in
the
end
we
evaluated
in
rank
10
sites.
We
also
in
that
sense
that
November
meeting
higher
job
harbour
Jolly
to
prepare
a
feasibility
study
that
includes
some
conceptual
studies
and
sketches
for
the
top
ranked
sites
I'd
like
to
just
refresh
you
about
what
we
looked
at.
G
Obviously,
the
most
important
one
from
our
standpoint
was
how
a
site
could
help
us
read,
implement
our
downtown
redevelopment
plan
and
that's
why
it
has
a
total
of
four
points
we
considered
if
this
site
had
a
prominent
location
and
if
it
was
visible
and
would
it
reflect
City
Hall
civic
importance
as
a
community
gathering
space,
we
also
evaluated
if
that
site
could
anchor
and
attract
new
development
to
strengthen
our
downtown
as
an
activity
and
economic
center.
We
also
looked
at
a
few
other
things,
such
as
transportation
access
and
its
proximity
to
other
city
facilities.
G
The
second
most
important
criteria
revolved
around
real
estate
considerations.
We
look
at
things
like
property
ownership
potential
for
public-private
partnerships,
whether
the
site
was
located
in
the
opportunity
zone
and
how
ready
it
was
for
construction.
The
third
ranked
site
centered
on
site
characteristics,
and
that
was
awarded
two
points.
We
looked
at
parcel
size
and
configuration
site
conditions
and
access
impacts
on
the
surrounding
roadway
things
of
that
nature.
G
So,
as
I
mentioned
earlier,
we
evaluated
a
total
of
ten
properties
and,
as
you
can
see
up
on
the
map,
we
looked
at
sites
all
through
the
downtown
plan
area
and
we
tried
to
look
at
a
variety
of
sites
in
terms
of
property
types,
the
size
of
property
as
well
as
ownership.
We
applied
the
site,
selection
criteria
to
each
site
and
assign
points
across
the
four
criteria,
and
then,
after
that
scoring
we
reviewed
it
again,
not
only
against
the
criteria
but
also
within
the
category.
G
G
So
the
detail
of
the
points
and
rankings
were
provided
to
you
in
a
table
that
was
attached
to
your
agenda
item
so
that
you
can
see
how
all
the
sites
compared
to
one
another
and
how
each
site
compared
to
other
in
each
category
and
based
on
the
scores
at
the
low
end.
We
had
a
site
that
got
only
two
points
and
then
up
to
the
top
ranked
site
which
had
9.25
there
at
the
high
end.
So
because
there
was
a
four
point
difference
between
our
first
and
third
ranked
site.
G
We
felt
that
that
was
a
large
enough
difference
that
we
only
move
forward
with
evaluating
further
the
top
two
ranked
properties.
So
the
top
ranked
site
is
the
city-owned
property.
That's
located
on
the
northwest
corner
of
Myrtle
Avenue
and
Court
Street
south
of
the
municipal
services,
building,
it's
labeled
as
site
B
on
the
map,
and
this
site
received
a
total
of
nine
point.
Two
five
out
of
ten
points.
This
site
scored
the
highest
and
implementing
the
downtown
plan
due
to
its
great
location.
It's
on
two
state
roadways
they're
at
an
intersection.
G
It
provides
excellent
visibility
and
prominence,
and
we
felt
that
this
intersection
also
has
prominence,
as
it's
often
seen
as
the
entry
into
the
downtown
core
because
of
the
numerous
vacant
and
underutilized
property
in
this
area
of
downtown
and
the
fact
that
this
site
could
potentially
free
up
other
institutional
land
for
redevelopment.
This
score,
the
site
scored
high
in
that
category
as
well.
G
The
site
also
received
the
highest
score
in
the
real
estate
category,
because
there's
a
high
potential
for
public-private
partnerships
and
due
to
the
size
and
allowed
the
development
potential,
and
also
because
it's
an
opportunity
zone,
the
site
is
also
mostly
construction,
ready.
With
the
exception
of
the
warehouse
that
requires
demolition.
The
site
also
received
the
maximum
one
point
in
the
cost
category,
because
it's
currently
owned
by
the
city
and
the
CRA,
and
it
can
provide
flexibility
and
that
it
can
accommodate
both
the
city
hall
or
government
center.
G
So
the
second
highest
ranked
site
is
located
on
the
east
side
of
Myrtle
Avenue
across
from
MSB
and
that's
labeled
site
a
on
your
map.
This
received
seven
point
to
five
points
out
of
total
of
ten
two
points
below
the
highest
ranked
site.
This
site
also
scored
well
and
the
implementation
of
the
downtown
plan
due
to
its
location
on
a
state
roadway,
its
adjacency
to
undeveloped
and
underutilized
property.
It's
also
located
on
Prospect
Lake
and
it's
close
to
other
city
facilities.
G
The
site
didn't
score
so
high
when
it
comes
to
the
real
estate
category,
even
though
it
is
located
in
an
opportunity,
zone
and
CRA
was
a
small
piece
of
the
block.
The
big
unknown
with
this
site
is
that
it's
held
in
private
ownership
and
we're
not
sure
how
willing
this
owner
might
be
willing
to
sell,
and
then
it
also
requires
demolition.
The
site
also
didn't
score
very
well
in
the
cost
category
due
to
those
unknown
acquisition
cost.
G
Even
though
it
provides
some
operational
facilities
located
in
close
proximity
to
other
city
buildings,
so
with
that,
if
you'd
like
I,
can
either
answer
questions
or
we
can
move
forward
and
have
ten
Feaster
and
more
is
Alaska.
Harbor
jolly
point:
do
the
presentation
of
the
feasibility
study
and
show
you
some
concept,
studies
give.
G
H
I'm,
just
a
little
confused,
well
I
know
we
talked
about
him,
but
I
was
like
I
kind
of
you
know.
We
got
two
things
going
on.
We
got
a
library
remodel
and
that's
supposedly
starting
like
soon
right
and
then
I
looked
at
the
Harvard
jolly
report.
They
talked
about
substantial
space
for
City,
Hall
I,
don't
know
how
that
would
it
be
incorporated
into
this
structure
unless
it,
you
know
just
one
well.
G
I
Yeah
Thank
You
Gina
good
morning,
honorable
mayor
and
council
members,
I'm
Ward
frist
last
year,
was
our
jolly
architecture
and
with
me,
is
Tim
feast
der
Farber,
jolly
and
Amy
Weber
of
Harvard
jolly,
so
Gina
did
a
good
job
of
describing
the
two
different
sites
that
we
were
asked
to.
Take
a
look
at
and
so
I'll
move
on
to
the
next
slide.
We
were
asked
to
look
at
three
different
options
on
each
one
of
these
two
sites.
I
I
If
you
wish
to
do
so
with
all
of
these,
we
looked
at
different
criteria,
and
that
was
part
of
your
packet,
so
I'm
going
into
detail
here,
but
the
cost
of
the
land
partnership
opportunities,
redevelopment,
operational
efficiencies,
the
cost
range
and
cost
offset
for
each
one
of
these
options.
So
with
that
I'm
going
to
ask
Tim
to
just
walk
us
through
each
one
of
the
different
options
and
there
were
not
burning
questioners.
J
And
as
we
look
at
these
six
criteria,
they
were
majorly
set
up
to
be
yes
or
no
answers
for
these
questions
and
you'll
notice,
I'm
sure,
as
you
have
already
that
there's
a
small
blue
chart
associated
with
each
option
that
gives
this
simple
yes-or-no
answer
to
these
questions.
So
as
we
move
along
we're
going
to
start
with
site
a
which
was
described
as
being
to
the
east
of
the
existing
municipal
services
building
across
Myrtle
Avenue,
this
is
partially
owned.
J
Approximately
two-thirds
of
the
property
is
owned
by
a
private
entity,
so
it
would
acquire
the
land
acquisition
issue.
Also,
there
would
be
a
demolition
cost
for
existing
buildings
about
five
different
buildings
that
are
there.
The
first
option
on
site
a
option,
a
one
again
as
Ward
described.
This
is
a
standalone
City
Hall,
two
storeys,
approximately
44,000
square
feet
and
we're
implementing
a
surface
parking
lot
which
accommodates
about
445
spaces
in
the
city
of
the
city
parking
lot.
This
would
accommodate
the
functions
of
City
Hall
for
those
either
visiting
for
events
as
well
as
the
employees.
J
The
employees
of
the
MSP
would
still
be
utilizing
their
building
and
the
existing
mxb
garage.
But
this
would
provide
visitor
overflow
for
the
booths.
The
municipal
services
building,
since
their
current
parking
lot
gets
filled
up.
Quite
often,
the
building
and
parking
lot
would
be
on
one
block,
as
we
see
here
in
the
plan
view,
so
that
proximity
is,
it
doesn't
create
a
long
walk
for
any
visitors,
but
for
the
visitors
of
municipal
services
building
they
would
have
to
walk
across
Myrtle
Avenue.
J
This,
of
course,
is
the
least
expensive
option
for
this
site:
option
1,
as
we
look
at
option
2
for
site
a
option:
a2
we're
looking
at
a
combined
city
hall
and
municipal
services
operations
and
City
Government
Center,
it's
approximately
100
thousand
square
feet
and
in
configuration
it's
four
stories
high
again
we're
using
a
surface
parking
lot
on
site.
In
this
instance,
we
increased
its
parking
capabilities
at
260
spaces
because
of
the
larger
capacity
of
the
building
and
all
of
the
visitor
parking
having
to
be
in
one
parking
lot.
J
Along
with
that,
however,
the
NSB
employees
would
still
be
utilizing
the
parking
garage
that
is
in
existence.
Now
you
can
see
that
the
Municipal
Services
Building
itself
has
been
grayed
out,
indicating
that
it
is
vacated
and
available
for
sale
or
for
repurposing,
as
the
city
sees
that.
So
that
being
the
case,
the
police
department
would
still
also
utilize
the
existing
parking
lot.
But
this
doesn't
maximize
the
new
development
opportunities
for
this
site.
J
Moving
to
the
third
option:
option
a3!
This
is
essentially
the
same
as
option
2,
with
the
exception
of
the
fact
that
we're
implementing
a
four
level
630
space
parking
garage
rather
than
surface
parking,
because
this
would
then
take
care
of
the
needs
of
not
only
city
fall,
but
also
the
municipal
services
building
functions
as
well
as
utilize
spaces
for
the
police
department.
J
Of
course,
that
could
be
something
that
could
be
viewed
as
inconvenient
by
the
police
default
Department
because
of
it
being
two
blocks
away
rather
than
across
the
street
and
for
obvious
reasons
we're
using
not
only
a
larger
building
but
a
new
parking
garage.
This
becomes
the
most
expensive
option
for
this
site.
J
So
now
moving
along
to
site
B,
which
is
completely
city-owned,
there's
no
need
for
land
acquisition.
Nor
is
there
a
need
for
demolition
of
multiple
buildings
again
the
first
option:
option
b1
is
a
two-story
stand-alone,
City
Hall
44,000
square
feet,
but
because
this
site
spans
two
smaller
blocks,
we
would
have
to
utilize
parking
not
only
on
the
site
of
the
building,
but
we're
looking
at
using
reverse
angle
parking
around
the
north
block
of
the
site
as
well.
J
This
again
believes
opportunity
for
the
sale
of
the
existing
municipal
services
building
in
option
two
of
for
site,
B
and
I
believe
I
skipped
over
the
fact
that
pop
ssin
one
for
the
new
city
hall,
that
leaves
the
majority
of
the
north
block
available
for
either
sale
or
a
public-private
partnership.
That
could
be
the
lies
there
in
option
two
again
we're
using
surface
parking
on
the
majority
of
both
blocks.
However,
this
also
allows
for
a
public-private
partnership
for
either
the
sale
of
the
parcel
or
the
use
of
a
mixed-use
building.
J
J
We
were
asked
to
provide
a
fourth
option
that
would
make
this
a
possibility
in
this
fourth
option.
This
consolidates
the
new
city
government
center
and
the
parking
garage
onto
the
South
block
of
this
site.
It
does
decrease
the
number
of
parking
spaces,
but
it
is
still
above
the
code
requirement
for
the
city
development
for
parking
spaces
for
this
space.
J
It
also
continues
to
allow
for
a
public
partnership,
a
public-private
partnership
on
a
liner
of
that
parking
garage
and
allows
for
three
city
blocks
to
possibly
be
sold
or
repurposed
and,
as
we
see
in
option
4.1,
this
is
the
this
indicates
or
depicts
the
possibility
of
utilizing.
The
north
block
of
site
B
for
a
new
PSTA
transfer
station,
it's
a
little
bit
smaller
than
what
they
were
envisioning,
but
it
accommodates
the
needs
that
they
expressed
they
had
for
that.
J
So
the
main
differences
between
sites,
a
and
B
site,
a
provides
closer
proximity
to
the
existing
MSB
for
option.
One
there's
definitely
a
higher
visibility
aspect,
though,
to
location
on
site
B
it's
at
the
intersection
of
court
Street
and
Myrtle
Avenue,
which
are
two
highly
traveled
state
and
US
roads
site
a
is
partially
owned
about
two-thirds
of
that
by
a
private
entity.
J
So
there
is
land
acquisition
costs
associated
with
that,
while
site
B
is
completely
city
owned
site,
a
does
not
provide
for
public/private
partnership
opportunities
and
any
of
the
options,
whereas
site
B
provides
for
such
in
every
option.
Yeah
those
possibilities
exist
in
every
option
site
a
allows
for
some
new
development
opportunities
with
the
sale
of
the
existing
municipal
services,
building
and
or
the
King
garage,
but
site
B
allows
for
the
most
opportunities
for
new
development
because
of
the
fact
that
it
can
allow
for
more
land
to
be
sold
or
repurposed,
as
the
city
deems
necessary.
A
K
Why,
in
all
of
these,
in
all
of
this
work,
why
was
the
north
parcel
of
B
never
considered
as
the
location
for
the
city
hall,
because
that
corner
to
me
seems
to
really
create
a
very
functional
campus
type
thing
and
there's
not
nobody
else
across
Myrtle
Avenue,
nobody
has
to
there's.
No,
you
know
you've
got
the
Pinellas
Trail
you
got
across
to
get
to
the
police
station.
You
got
across
Pierce
Street
to
get
to
the
MSB.
So
why
was
that?
K
That
site
never
is
not
considered
in
the
presentation
that
we're
getting
I
just
don't
understand
that
the
the
corner
of
court
Myrtle
has
great
potential
either
I.
Don't
see
why
PSTA
would
probably
love
that
site,
because
it's
got
great
ingress
and
egress
into
their
into
their
routes
and
if
PSD
I
can't
we
can't
come
to
an
agreement
PSC
a
that
parcel.
Has
the
greatest
commercial
development
potential.
Yes,
so
I'm
not
I'm
having
a
hard
time
understanding
why
the
north
parcel
of
B
wasn't
considered
as
a
site
for
this,
but.
I
I
A
look
at
the
southern
block
is
a
little
bit
larger
than
the
northern
block,
but
if
you
didn't
want
the
high
visibility
for
City
Hall
on
that
corner
of
court
and
Myrtle
and
you'd,
rather
us
take
a
look
at
it
on
that
northern
block,
we
could
take
a
look
at
doing
that
and
then
selling
off
the
southern
block.
If
that
was
what
you
guys
are
considering.
K
K
So
that's
my
that's
my
biggest
question
so
far
because
and
I'm,
sorry,
my
hair,
but
this
is
gonna,
be
more
common.
The
you
know
parcel
a
I,
just
think
the
fact
that
it's
just
mentioned
that
we're
even
thinking
about
it.
The
price
just
went
up
because
you're
dealing
with
the
city,
the
city
would
be
buying
at
the
price.
Just
went
up,
there's
remediation
on
that
whole
block
because
of
the
auto
parts
and
auto
repair
and
used
to
be
a
service
station
and
everything
else,
there's
going
to
be
major
remediation,
necessary
on
that
whole
block.
K
G
Just
wanted
to
say
you
know
we
had
internal
discussion
about
the
point
that
you're,
raising
and
I
think.
The
reason
why
we
focused
on
the
corner
is
because
the
downtown
plan
talks
about
the
visibility
and
prominence
of
a
City
Hall,
and
we
felt
that
that
location
at
this
major
roadway,
an
entry
point
into
the
downtown,
gave
us
an
iconic
location.
So
that's
the
reason
why
we
selected
that
piece
over
the
other.
We
don't
think
it's
a
good
location
to
put
a
transfer
bus
facility.
G
A
Any
other
questions
cover
mr.
Hamilton,
you
took
my
question
out
of
my
mouth
and
ever
since
I
got
on
council
Northey
to
me
makes
the
most
sense
for
a
City
Hall
I
wish
that
a
year
ago,
when
we
decided
to
move
from
City
Hall
to
a
private
office
tower,
we
would
have
just
stated
City,
Hall
and
concentrated
on
north
being.
We
could
have
had
that
building
built
by
now
we're
at
least
under
construction.
A
D
Sir
just
wanted
to
make
sure
everyone
knew
that
as
first
PSTA
is
concerned,
the
initial
design
that
they've
shown
us
includes
multiple
parcels.
So
not
just
not
just
the
one
in
the
corner,
but
also
I.
Think
one
of
the
other
reasons
to
potentially.
C
C
D
D
D
H
Well,
I
have
comments
too,
but
try
to
ask
a
question
here.
H
H
You
know
if
I
just
wish
that
we
would
have
had
a
little
more
information
on
that
site
and
I
know.
Psta
wanting
to
to
sites
isn't
really
going
to
be
enamored
with
the
smaller
of
the
two
sites
here.
So
I
haven't
had
a
chance
to
talk
to
Abby
stack
their
engineer.
Yet
after
seeing
this
plan,
that
definitely
won't
talk
to
him
tomorrow.
On
that.
G
Which
might
may
her
if
I
could
address
why
the
PSTA
County
parking
lot
was
lower
in
the
rankings
and
why
it
wasn't
selected
is
that
while
it
is
on
Fort
Harrison
and
it
has
some
limited
prominence,
we
are
very
concerned
about
adding
another
institutional
use
corner.
That
already
has
three
institutional
uses,
so
in
effect
by
adding
city
hall,
we're
really
creating
a
dead
zone
in
downtown
and
we
were
looking
and
how
to
better,
implement
the
downtown
plan,
locating
City
Hall
and
a
visible
prominent
location.
G
H
I
could
understand
that
I
would
really
prefer
retail
rap
or
something
with
a
parking
garage
on
that
site,
but
still
PSTA
to
me
is
always
and
I
used
to
own
part
of
that
property
on
court.
That
you're,
talking
about
and
I
was
sold.
I
was
asked
by
a
previous
administration
to
sell
it
to
the
city
for
before
green
light
for
an
intermodal
center
and
I
reluctantly
sold
it
because
I
thought
it'd
be
a
good
idea
for
an
intermodal
center
there.
H
So
I'm,
really
not
enamored,
with
putting
a
city
hall
sign
on
the
site
that
I
really
didn't
want
to
sell
to
begin
with
something
of
another
use
than
an
intermodal
center.
So
anyway,
it's
good
we're
having
the
discussion
I
I
can
sit.
I
can
put
my
parking
garage
discussion
with
a
retail
wrap
for
the
old
PSTA
site,
that's
kind
of
where
I
was
we're.
Talking
about
City
Hall,
now,
I
really
like
I,
really
like
the
number
one
sight
better.
H
G
Another
thing
for
us
to
consider
as
we
move
forward
with
the
transit
study
is
you
know
how
they
can
make
that
design,
that
the
transit
facility
meet
the
downtown
design,
guidelines
and
I
think
we
have
some
concerns
about
how
that
might
be
accomplished
and,
in
particular
what
that
may
look
like
on
this
high,
visible
corner
there
on
the
thinner
section
of
court
and
chestnuts.
So
from
our
perspective,
you
know
potentially
opening
up
MSB
as
well
as
the
site,
that's
labeled
as
future
that
might
be
a
better
location
and
fit
for
the
PST.
A.
A
F
Pam
and
I
talked
about
the
necessity
to
really
provide
you
with
much
more
detailed
information,
whether
you
agree
with
it
or
not.
It
was
important
for
you
to
have
a
framework
about
which
you
then
could
make
some
decisions
about
how
to
go
forward,
as
opposed
to
just
expressing
personal
opinions
and
preferences,
because
this
is
very,
very
important
to
all
of
you
and
to
the
future.
So,
rather
than
just
make
it
a
general
discussion,
we
really
wanted
to
provide
you
a
little
bit
more
substance
to
spur
your
conversation.
F
That's
number
one
number
two
is
pretty
obvious
to
me
that
the
downtown
plan
may
resonate
more
with
the
staff
than
it
does
with
you
guys,
because
what's
driving
kind
of
what
we
did
was
based
on
the
downtown
plan.
So
if
the
downtown
plan
isn't
resonating
with
you,
then
that's
what's
generating
some
of
the
questions
about
well.
Why
did
you
do
this,
or
why
did
you
do
that?
F
So
what
I'm
looking
for
today
is
that
first
reaction,
now
to
a
more
substantive
presentation
of
information
for
you
all
to
all
five
of
you
to
say
you
know
what
I
I
heard.
What
you
said
here
is
kind
of
where
I'm
coming
from
and
I
think
you
started
out
that
way.
Councilmen
realtor
I'd
like
to
hear
everybody
and
I
think
you
had
shared
some
thoughts,
so
I
think
we
need
to
hear
from
the
other
three
about
what
direction
you
you
would
like
that
just
to
go,
because
some
of
this
you
may
not
agree.
M
M
It
shows
site
B
yeah
that
one
thank
you
and
proximity
to
the
MSB,
so
I'm
I
would
agree
with
mr.
Horne
I
mean
right
now
the
downtown
plan,
as
far
as
it
relates
to
City
Hall.
It's
not
absolutely.
The
most
important
thing
downtown
plans
are
gonna
require
a
lot
of
pieces
of
that
puzzle
to
come
together
and
I.
Don't
know
that
the
first
piece
needs
to
be
City
Hall.
If
we
get
that
private
investment
and
other
development
coming
I
think
what
makes
the
most
sense
is
and
I'm
gonna
go.
M
Take
this
two
parts
I
would
agree
with
mr.
accounts
about
all
Britain
that
an
intermodal
transportation
major
facility
is
is
a
is
a
landmark
development
that
will
be
very
beneficial
to
our
downtown
core,
our
Beach,
it's
extremely
important,
and
for
the
past
13
years
that
I've
been
involved
with
downtown.
That
has
been
the
preferred
site
and
the
conversation
with
PSTA
has
been
to
have
that
there.
M
So,
in
relation
to
City
Hall,
the
next
part
of
the
conversation
that'll
dress
is
I
think
it
is
important
to
keep
our
government
Center
convenient
and
close
to
not
only
the
police
station
but
the
existing
MSB
to
have
a
true
government
center,
where
all
all
activity
of
the
government
is
in
one
convenient
place.
So
I
don't
know
that
site
a
necessarily
has
to
be
there.
There's
a
lot
of
negatives
with
site
a
that
makes
it
difficult,
but,
for
instance,
one
thing
we
had
in
sense.
M
This
is
a
throw
out
there
anything
conversation,
one
of
the
things
we
hadn't
considered
or
I
heard.
Even
talking
talked
about.
Was
we
own
the
msb
building
we
own
that
existing
garage?
Those
are
two
sites
that
I'm
looking
at
right.
There
police
stations
right
there
across
the
street
from
Pierce,
so
you
have
this
little
90-degree
angle.
There
I
think
everything
we're
talking
about
MS,
be
combined
with
City
Hall,
fit
on
the
two
existing
sites,
Worth
and
I.
M
We
own
them
that's
a
plus
demo
would
be
expensive
or
maybe
there's
a
retro
but
then
everything's
all
together.
We
have
the
intermodal
center.
What
I
think
it?
It
makes
perfect
sense
to
have
that,
so
that's
just
something
that
I
noticed
in
the
conversation
and
the
points
that
were
made.
That
might
even
make
sense.
L
To
me,
it
makes
no
sense
unless
you
build
a
bridge
across
from
a
municipal
services.
You've
got
to
have
continuous
crossing
of
Myrtle
on
foot
to
the
other.
The
other
buildings,
unless
you
built
on
a
municipal
services
and
City,
Hall
and
I,
think
it's
too
far
away
from
the
police
department
and
the
other
garages,
so
I'm
leaning
toward
both
sites
and
be
the
North
End
makes
a
lot
of
sense.
K
K
D
This
is
just
for
financial
modeling.
The
cost
efficiencies
were
there
to
potentially
have
a
government
there.
So
we
would
expect
that
when
we
go
into
the
design
phase,
the
first
part
of
the
design
phase
that
they
would
looked
and
use
that
and
use
the
building
condition
in
helping
us
decide
whether
it's
just
City
Hall
or
it's
both
City,
Hall
and
MSB,
and
what
building?
So
you
know
it's
really
it's
just
a
number
at
this
point.
It's
not
to
say
that
it's
gonna
fall
down
in
15
years
or
anything
like
that.
It's
just.
K
The
other
thing
I
think
what
we
need
and
I
don't
know
how
we
go
about
doing
it,
but
we
need
I
need
a
presentation,
I,
I
need
and
I
think
we
need.
A
presentation
from
PSTA
show
me
why
you
need
both
of
those
parcels
to
build
the
intermodal
systems.
We
need
because
either
one
of
these
parcels
either
one
of
the
beep
parcels
is
larger
than
the
parcel
they
have
presently
so
I
think
what
proper
design
and
everything
I
think
one
of
those
two
parcels
could
fit
what
they
need
now
might
not
fit
what
they
want.
K
K
Because
there's
a
difference-
and
it's
you
know:
I'm,
just
I'm,
sorry,
my
personal
to
me
that
the
two
best
sites
for
City
Hall,
all
along,
had
been
the
North
section
of
be
the
north
parcel
of
B
or
when
we
do
the
switch
with
when
or
if
we're
able
to
do
a
swap
with
BST
a
because
I
still
believe
wholeheartedly
that
the
parking
where
the
bus
terminal
is
today
on
Fort,
Harrison,
Park
and
Pierce
and
garden.
That's
where
we
need
a
public
parking
garage,
because
it's
a
very
short
walk
anywhere
in
the
core
of
downtown
period.
K
That's
where
the
parking
lot
they
parking
garages
be
and
city
hall
could
conceivably
sit
on
top
of
that.
But
those
are
my
two
sites,
like
I,
said:
parcel
a.
We
just
drove
the
price.
Just
by
mentioning
that
we
might
be
thinking
about
that
site.
We
just
took
the
the
cost
of
acquiring
that
land.
We
just
bumped.
A
A
A
But
what's
our
responsibility
is
our
responsibility
to
the
citizens
of
the
Clearwater
or
to
PSTA?
So
what
we're
talking
about
now
is
what's
in
the
best
interest
of
the
city
of
Clearwater
and
the
points
being
raised.
Where
are
we
going
to
serve
our
city
with
the
City
Hall?
Mr.
Pogue
lays
raise
an
industry
conversation
because
I
have
always
said
that
we
need
to
have
all
of
our
employees
in
the
same
building.
It's
ridiculous
to
me
to
have
a
City
Hall
over
here
and
three
blocks
away
to
have
them
msb.
A
So
if
there's
some
way
that
we
can
do
a
combined
City,
Hall
msb,
and
then
that
would
free
up
north,
a
and
B
for
PSA
and
13
more
years
to
come
up
with
a
plan
for
us
or
we
can
do
something
else
with
it,
but
I
really
do
think.
We
need
to
start
concentrating
on
doing
what
what
the
citizens
of
clear
want.
You
know
wait
when
did
we
put
aside
money
in
penny
for
a
new
City
Hall
building
in
penny
two
or
penny
three
penny
three.
A
A
So
let's
start
talking
about
what
we
need
to
do
and
get
it
done
for
the
citizens
of
Clearwater
and
if
it's
the
possibility
of
merging
you
know
a
City
Hall
building
with
them
MSB
building,
whether
it's
something
B,
whether
it's
at
MSB
or
whether
tear
down
the
garage
and
build
it.
You
know,
let's
just
let's
just
start
talking
about
doing
something
like
that
and
get
some
specific
numbers
so
that
we
know
what
we're
talking
about
and
what
we're.
H
F
K
K
A
K
K
Our
office
building
right
now
that
we're
in
we
can
build
a
City
Hall
to
take
all
of
that
and
have
some
additional
space
for
necessary
growth
or
whatever
put
it
on
the
North
section
of
B
and
have
a
campus
I
mean
walking.
You
know,
100
feet
across
the
street
is
about
the
same
as
going
up
an
elevator.
They
had
another
floor,
whatever
I.
H
I
H
G
F
N
Amanda
Thompson
Community
Redevelopment
Agency
director
as
part
of
this,
and
we
worked
with
Colliers
International
the
commercial
real
estate
brokerage
to
give
us
their
insight
on.
If
these
different
properties
were
sold,
what
would
they
potentially
be
redeveloped
as
because
part
of
there's
so
many
moving
parts
to
this?
N
You
know
we
built
one
thing
here:
we
might
be
able
to
sell
off
this
property
and
how
they
influence
each
other,
and
so
they
pulled
together
all
their
market
research
and
and
looked
at
the
sites
on
your
screen
and
what
would
be
most
likely
for
redevelopment
in
our
market
right
now
today
and
they
looked
at
all
of
the
region.
What
could
happen
our
highest
potential
for
redevelopment
would
be
something
like
the
Walgreens
or
CVS.
N
So
in
these
locations,
they'd
be
looking
at
really
single-story,
most
likely
standalone
retail
right
because
that's
going
to
be
driven
by
the
vehicular
traffic
counts,
so
that's
the
most
likely
redevelopment
use.
The
second
most
likely
would
be
apartments
right
would
be
a
multi-story
residential
type
building,
not
necessarily
condos,
but
apartments.
The
third
most
likely
use
would
be
another
kind
of
short-term
hotel
stay
right.
So,
just
like
the
Marriott
Residence
Inn
that
we
have
now,
that
would
be
a
third
most
likely
use.
N
So
those
are
the
kind
of
partnerships
that
we
were
looking
at,
that
we
would
see
for
public/private
I
also
have
them
specifically
look
at
transit
and
transit,
oriented
development
and
in
Colliers
opinion.
Psta
is
not
considered
a
premium
transit
service
right
you're,
not
looking
at
like
a
bright
line
train
or
you
know
one
day
if
it's
built
a
pod
right
that
uses
magnetic
levitation
right.
It's
it's
still
a
bus
system
I'm
and
still
a
fairly
limited
bus
system,
so
they're
they
call.
N
Yours
did
not
see,
in
their
opinion,
a
lot
of
opportunity
for
someone
wanting
to
partner
with
PSTA
to
build
some
type
of
mixed-use
or
transit,
oriented
development
and
and
I.
Don't
take
that
as
a
death
sentence
that
nothing
can
happen,
but
I
think
that
means
the
onus
will
really
be
on
us
and
PSTA
to
find
the
right
partner
to
really
sell
it
and
to
create
a
kind
of
design.
That
would
be
exciting
and
interesting,
and
probably
not
investors
from
this
area.
N
Investors
from
outside
of
the
area
who
are
used
to
more
types
of
transit,
oriented
development,
because
the
fact
is,
is
we
just
don't
have
that
level
of
density
of
people
in
downtown
yet
for
that
to
make
sense
to
a
lot
of
developers?
So
I
say
that
to
say
that
you
know
there
are
a
lot
of
moving
parts,
but
that's
what
we
would
most
likely
be
looking
at.
N
Transit
transit
is
extremely
important
and
looking
at
the
plan
that
PSTA
presented
and
will
say
that
they
are
a
little
bit
behind
the
times
and
what
other
cities
are
presenting
for
federal
grant,
funding
in
terms
of
their
design
and
layout
and
and
the
mixture
of
uses
that
they're
showing
on
the
site
we
went
through
this
when
I
was
in
metro,
Atlanta
Decatur
had
three
transit
stations,
bus
and
rail.
Within
our
city
limits.
We
went
through
redeveloping
all
of
those
sites,
it's
it's
very
tricky
and
it's
extremely
competitive.
N
F
D
D
We
want
to
make
sure
that
those
are
meted
out
and
then,
after
that
15%
completes,
we
would
then
make
the
decision
on
whether
or
not
would
be
a
government
Center
or
a
city
hall
only
so
what
we
would
like
to
do
is
draft
that
that
RFP
and
then
prior
to
putting
the
RFP
out
I
have
some
final
decision
on
which
physical
site
you
would
like
to
go
to.
That
was
our.
That
was
our
initial
plan.
F
F
H
Mr.
Burton
I
agree
with
the
man
there's
a
lot
of
moving
parts
on
this,
so
I
would
like
to
have
more
conversation
on
this
I'd
like
to
have
meetings,
because
just
looking
at
this
report
from
Harbor
jolly
I'm
starting
to
get
other
ideas
that
maybe
we
can
move
things
around
and
make
things
you
know
the
things
that
I
would
like
to
see
happen
happen.
H
M
I
was
just
gonna
say.
Probably
the
correct
course
of
action
would
be
what
councilman,
rubber
and
suggest,
because
three
weeks,
there's
gonna
be
a
new
council
in
here
like
correct
me.
If
I'm
wrong,
some
of
the
options
that
you
showed
us
did
incorporate
Venus,
MSB
and
City
Hall.
It
was
like
either
a
two
or
three
or
B,
so
I
mean
I.
Think
that
is
a
consideration
that
I
think
you
and
I
agree,
probably
mostly
on
that
close
proximity
to
the
police
station.
M
If
we
don't
incorporate
the
police,
I
mean
to
me,
it
makes
sense
to
put
in
a
government
the
government
services
that
suggests
did
anything
you
need
within
your
government,
msb
City,
Hall
activity
you
can
get,
and
the
police
department
across
the
street,
or
at
least
in
close
proximity
with
a
parking
garage
make
makes
the
most
sense
to
me
and
then,
and
we
own
all
of
those
properties,
with
the
exception
of
a
so.
There
is
a
lot
of
property
freed
up
for
private
development.
M
K
But
again
I
don't
see
a
big
difference
between
having
everything
under
one
roof,
where
you
go
up
an
elevator
to
different
floors
to
see
the
the
department
or
have
to
cross
the
street
to
see
one
department
from
you
know.
If
you're
in
1
million
have
to
go
across
the
street
to
me,
that's
not
a
big
deal
and
it's
the
least
expensive
way
to
achieve
what
we
need
and
again
it's
what
we
need,
not
what
we
want,
but
it
achieves
what
we
need.
So.
F
Can
I
make
one
comment,
sir
I
really
think
we're
at
a
point
in
time
where
you
all
can
be
most
helpful
to
councilmember
all
Britain
as
the
PSTA
rep
you've
got
to
think
about
the
history
of
kind
of
where
we've
all
been.
What
PSTA
has
been
where
we
have
been
the
stas
had
difficulty
in
lining
of
funding.
You
know
to
move
forward
with
some
of
their.
F
You
know,
ideas,
which
is
one
of
the
reasons
why
you
haven't
seen
anything,
but
now
with
councilmember
all
Britain
firmly
in
places
our
rep
and
and
he's
a
part
of
their
board.
He
needs
to
have
expectations
express
to
him
from
the
council
about
what
he's
empowered
to
ask
for
from
PSTA.
So
we
as
staff,
can
work
with
the
pstn
staff
and
see
if
we
can't
provide
that
information
that
you
all
want
to
see
from
them.
A
Funding
is
a
key,
is
a
key
part
of
that
I.
Think
that's
a
good
point.
Mr.
Horne
PS
Day
is
scrapped
and
I
think
we
all
realize
that.
But
if
they're
just
gonna
build
another
bus
station,
then
site
a
site,
B
may
not
be
in
the
best
interest
of
the
city
of
Clearwater
Oh
site.
B
was
a
key
point
when
we
were
talking
about
green
light
and
an
intermodal,
but
that's
gone
by
the
wayside
down.
A
H
Of
all
his
data
doesn't
need
another
bus
station
they
need,
they
were
gonna,
put
money
into
the
small
station.
They
have
to
accommodate
their
bigger
buses.
They've
always
talked
about
an
intermodal
center
where
the
green
light
past,
or
not
whether
we
get
rail
or
not
an
intermodal
center,
especially
with
micro,
all
the
stuff
that
they're
getting
into
now
we
need.
You
know.
One
of
the
plan
is
to
get
buses
from
Tampa.
H
Psta
has
conceptually
drawn
plans
and
they
brought
them
to
the
city
that
they
were
several
different
plans.
A
year
ago,
went
to
planning
planning
says
in
our
downtown.
You
have
conform
to
this,
or
that
so
that's
been
on
hold
it's
not
that
they
haven't
given
us
plans.
The
other
thing
is,
then,
that
they
got
funding
for
the
plans
which
they
did
now
they're.
H
Looking
for
funding
for
construction,
that's
one
of
the
reasons
then
I'm
going
up
to
Tallahassee
tomorrow
to
represent
to
see
if
I
can
talk
up
to
some
of
our
legislators,
about
funding
for
this
and
then
also
with
Blanton
with
for
Pinellas
our
NPO
getting
funding
there,
there's
certain
things
that
we
need
to
do
that.
You
know
we
haven't
been
doing
so
I'm,
really
trying
to
push
that
along
I
know
it's
a
it's.
A
frustrating
thing:
PSTA
does
have
plenty
of
money
right
now,
it's
in
two
years
in
2022.
H
Unless
something
happens,
that's
when
we
kind
of
run
out
of
money,
but
something
will
happen
in
the
interim,
and
this
is
a
big
thing
for
us
in
Clearwater,
with
connecting
to
camp
and
connecting
to
the
beach.
So
this
does
have
something
to
do
with
our
people
in
Clearwater.
It's
not
just
a
PSD,
a
issue.
It
is
a
Clearwater
growth
issue
and,
as
Jay
said,
I
mean
Jay
and
I
we've
been
talking
about
this
for
15
years,
I
mean
it's
not
something
that
we
have
just
come
up
with
overnight.
H
It
just
takes
a
long
time
for
things
like
this
to
develop
and
then
Clearwater
has
to
make.
We
have
to
make
our
minds
up
as
to
where
we're
putting
off.
You
know:
City
Hall
and
our
parking
garages
and
everything.
So
a
lot
of
pieces
of
the
puzzle
have
to
come
together
and
I.
Think
that's
why
we're
talking.
F
And
we'll
be
bringing
back
some
more
discussion
items
because
I
think
there's
needs
to
be
more
conversation
fleshing
out.
We
may
know
a
little
bit
more
from
PSTA,
we'll
see
if
we
can
pull
some
more
their
information
into
the
conversation
if
they're,
comfortable
and
sharing
it
with
me
with
us,
but
but
I
I've
heard
enough
to
give
me
some
insight
as
to
kind
of
how
we
should
have
that
next
conversation.
A
Well,
you
did
because
you
said
that
you
know
staff
has
received
information
and
we're
on
hold.
Well,
that's
the
first
that
I've
ever
heard
of
this,
whether
it's
accurate
or
not,
you
know,
maybe
we
need
to
have
reports.
You
know
on
a
regular
basis
as
council
members
to
each
other
on
these
board
meetings
that
we
go
to
once
a
month
or
once
a
quarter
is
you
know
for
the
future,
because
you
know
it's
important.
You.
F
Know
let
me
make
this
one
coming
about
staff
interaction,
it's
not
uncommon
for
one
agency
to
present
a
plan.
The
other
agency
reacts
to
it.
They
then
go
back
and
and
determine
how
they're
going
to
react
to
the
feedback
that
they've
got
from
the
other
agency.
So
I
think
that's
the
scenario
that
we're
talking
about
PSD
and
some
plans.
They
brought
it
to
us.
We
react
to
it
and
reasonable
acts
on
hold
is
that
PSTA
obviously
has
to
make
decisions
about
how
they're
going
to
react
to
whatever
it
is.
They've
been
told
them.
F
So
that's
just
a
normal
nor
the
business
I
mean
that's
not
unusual
if
they
never
make
up
their
mind
so
yeah,
that's
what
they're
gonna
do
then
it's
different.
It's
gonna
be
difficult
for
for
the
board
to
know
the
PSD
a
board
or
even
a
rep,
to
know
you
know
what
the
next
step
is
and
part
of
the
thing
was
with.
H
Abhishek,
their
engineer
actually
told
me
last
week
at
the
meeting.
It
was
a
week
before
that
he
said
we're
on
hold
because
he
knew
we
were
having
this
discussion
as
far
as
one
of
the
sites
being
for
city
hall,
their
site
that
they
were
planning
on
having
their
intermodal
center.
So
things
don't
move
real
fast
when
you
know,
like
you
say,
different
agencies
talk
to
each
other
and
you
know
we're
part
of
them
we're
part
of
it.
We
have
to
make
decisions,
you
know
to
get
the
wheels
movements
so
I'm
glad
we're
talking
about
it.
F
More
fun
ready
to
go
ready.
We're
point.
One
sure
approved
a
request
from
the
owner
of
property,
addressed
a
2001
tough
debate
Boulevard
and
find
me
love
in
south
Hercules
Avenue
to
vacate
a
portion
of
a
dedicated
right
away,
described
as
that
part
of
Lots
1
and
12
Midway
subdivision,
according
to
the
plat
thereof,
is
recorded
in
plaid
book
13
page
4
of
the
public
records
of
Pinellas
County
and
past
the
appropriate
ordinance
on
four
freedoms.
The
perfect
good.
O
Morning
Robert
wears
a
crown
Estate
Services
Coordinator.
The
city
has
no
municipal
use
for
the
planted
right
away,
proposed
to
be
vacated
and
will
retain
a
ten-foot-wide
drainage
and
utility
easement
to
support
existing
and
future
facilities.
City
stakeholders
have
reviewed
the
vacation
application
and.
L
O
F
Their
request
from
SP
trail
LLC
and
the
Housing
Finance
Authority
of
Pinellas
County
is
trustee
of
the
Pinellas
County
Land
Assembly
trust
Woodlawn
trail
applicant
to
vacate
a
70-foot
drainage
and
utility
easement
as
recording
an
official
records
book.
58
80
page
343
of
the
public
records
of
Pinellas
County
Florida
on
real
property
located
at
8:03
Woodlawn
loop
and
passing
appropriate
ordinance
on
first
reading.
Mr.
Bruce.
O
F
A
drainage
and
utility
easement
from
SB
trail
LLC
and
then
the
Housing
Finance
Authority
of
Pinellas
County
is
trustee
of
the
Pinellas
County
land
assembly,
Trust,
woodland
trail
for
the
construction,
installation
and
maintenance
of
city,
drainage
and
utility
facilities
on
real
property
located
at
8:03
woodlot
loop
and
adopt
the
appropriate
resolution.
Mr.
perfect,
again
thank.
O
P
P
My
main
task
with
them
is
the
supervision
of
signals
and
sides.
That's
why
I'm
here
we
are
requesting
authorization
for
a
purchase,
order
to
multiple
vendors
for
various
traffic
signal
parts.
The
amount
will
not
exceed
$900,000
and
it
will.
It
will
be
covered
for
the
period
of
March,
6,
2023
November
3rd
2022.
P
P
P
M
Nice
but
I
do
have
to
pass
some
background
questions
so
because
it
is
900,000.
Is
this
a
a
schedule
of
repair
and
maintenance
that
will
cover
three
years
or
do
we
have
that
much
failing
equipment
that
we're
spending
that
much,
or
is
this
a
traditional,
normal
schedule
of
repair
and
replacement?
This
is
also
for
new
equipment
too.
Not
just
parts
correct.
Yes,.
P
M
M
K
L
A
L
P
O
A
Q
A
A
Q
The
things
you
might
notice
is
Fort.
Harrison
has
been
recently
coordinated.
It
wasn't
coordinated
for
many
years
because
we
were
trying
to
reduce
the
delay
to
the
pedestrians
and
cars
in
the
downtown
area
that
section
between
court
and
drew.
But
now
we
have
coordinated
that
and
it's
working
pretty
good.
We
had
a
request
from
another
government
agency
recently
to
look
into
that.
But,
yes,
all
these
parts
are
for
repair
and
new
work,
but.
Q
There
are
two
synchronization
systems:
we
had
the
a
TMS
system
where
we
have
been
interlocal
agreement
with
the
colony
county
and
they
buy
all
the
parts
for
that.
Okay,
this
is
for
our
legacy
system.
We
call
it,
which
is
everything
outside
of
the
county
partnership
we
have,
which
is
about
85
intersections
okay,.
C
A
F
C
Morning,
my
name
is
Jeremy
Brown,
the
engineering
manager
for
utilities.
The
purpose
of
this
project
is
to
comply
with
America's
water
infrastructure,
Act,
there's
the
requirement
to
conduct
a
risk
and
resilience
assessment
of
the
city's
potable
water
infrastructure.
The
work
includes
performing
threat,
consequence
and
vulnerability
analyses
in
addition
to
various
workshops
with
public
utilities,
engineering,
police,
fire
information
technology
and
finance
departments.
The
goal
is
to
better
understand
the
city's
ability
to
respond
to
various
threats
to
its
potable
water
system
and
identify
necessary
improvements.
Happy
to
respond
any
questions
any.
E
Appoint
Michael
D
Brewster
to
the
sister
cities,
Advisory
Board,
as
a
local
business
community
representative,
with
a
term
to
expire,
March,
31st,
2024,
councilmembers,
Terrence
cordeen,
was
serving
in
that
capacity
as
the
business
community,
local
business
community
representative
and
completed
his
second
term.
Mr.
Brewster
is
the
only
applicant
that
we
have
on
file
that
fits
that
category.