►
From YouTube: 6/24/2020 Municipal Code Enforcement Board.
Description
Meeting will begin at 1:30 p.m. EST.
Comments are not monitored on this platform. To make a comment, please visit www.myclearwater.com/government/council-meeting-streaming-videos or one of our social media pages.
Agenda can be found here: http://bit.ly/ClearwaterCityCouncilMeetings
A
B
C
C
F
G
B
H
H
Agendas
of
today's
meeting
are
on
the
wall.
At
the
interest
to
the
chamber
is,
please
remember,
to
turn
off
your
cell
phones.
The
Municipal
Code
Enforcement
board
consists
of
seven
members
who
are
appointed
by
the
City
Council
and
we
serve
voluntarily.
It
is
this
board's
intention
to
promote,
protect
and
improve
the
health,
safety
and
welfare
of
the
citizens
of
Clearwater
by
providing
this
equitable,
effective
and
inexpensive
method
of
enforcing
certain
codes
within
the
city.
H
The
Board
considers
new
business
items
in
two
parts:
first,
a
violation
and
then
affirmative
relief,
formal
rules
of
evidence
do
not
apply.
Each
side
is
limited
to
15
minutes
in
the
Board
may
grant
against
additional
time.
All
proceedings
will
be
conducted
in
a
calm
civil
manner,
individuals
and
Kentucky
conduct
themselves,
otherwise
will
be
asked
to
leave
them
if
necessary,
they
will
be
escorted
from
the
chambers.
Now
I
ask
all
who
can
to
speak,
be
rise.
Please
rise
and
be
sworn
in
by
the
clerk.
H
I
A
I
Guidelines
that
the
state
has
provided
me
that
I
can't
touch
the
house,
I
can't
do
anything
to
the
house
till
they
approve
it
and
they
start
doing
demolition
themselves,
I've
spoken
to
with
Michael
Fujino,
it's
what
they
do.
What
they
know
the
building
supervisor
about
this
and
the
guidelines
states
that,
if
I
touch
the
house.
A
I
A
I
This
has
given
me
a
an
award
letter,
but
they
have
also
determined
that
they
they
will
provide
to
fix
the
house
with
their
general
contractor's.
What's
going
on,
is
we're
waiting
for
their
patiently
to
take
care
of
this
matter,
but
it's
been
so
long.
It's
going
on
forever,
I
pulled
a
building
permit
and
it's
sitting
at
the
building.
Development
Department
got
a
general
contractor,
but
he
needs
the
funds
to
start
the
project.
The
pro
the
project
will
get
started.
It's
just
the
funds
are
coming
in
from
the
state.
I
You
know
it's
been
going
on
for
a
while.
It's
a
long
period
of
time.
I
know
my
neighbors
are
what
a
bit
upset
with
the
situation
of
the
house.
I
am
upset
too,
because
I
can't
live
there
and
I
ain't
now
in
the
position
where
everything
that's
going
off
right
now,
then
back
in
May
somebody
authorized
people
to
come
up
on
my
premises,
not
realizing.
That's
because
the
house
has
been
broken
in
several
different
occasions.
I
had
called
up
to
our
police
department.
I
There
were
18
police
officers
looking
for
these
two
individuals,
he
wouldn't
present
identity
at
my
house,
an
examination
saying
that
they
had
authorization
to
get
on
my
premises.
Nobody
called
me
I
rushed
over
there
and
called
the
police.
Now
we're
wasting
taxpayers
dollars
to
search
these
people.
To
hell
I
mean
they
wouldn't
present
their
identity.
To
tell
me
that
they
were
Doster
supposed
to
do
some
type
of
analyze
for
demolition.
They
wouldn't
be
presently
the
paperwork
or
identity.
They
just
took
off
and
ran
away.
You.
I
H
I
B
We're
just
gonna
catch
yeah,
I
think
the
board
is
compassionate
for
your
situation
and
we're
familiar
with
you.
You've
been
in
with
this
several
times
a
year
you're
in
a
documented
process.
That's
unfolding
at
the
state
level
mandating
what
is
being
done.
Your
problem
is
coming
with
this
city
correct,
trying
to
move
forward
with
the
process
of
keeping
it
safe,
that's
right
and
keeping
people
out.
So
this
the
board
won't
be
able
to
give
you
an
answer
to
that
today.
I
I
J
More
like
a
foreigner
assistant
city
attorney
I,
have
tried
several
discusses
with
mr.
Micawber's
I.
Don't
think
that
the
building
division
is
going
to
be
very
interested
in
anything
else,
he
has
to
say
because
of
how
long
it's
been,
but
in
terms
of
what
we're
doing
today.
This
is
just
the
citizens
to
be
heard
part
of
the
agenda,
which
is
just
things
that
are
not
on
the
agenda.
So
it's
not
anything
that
or
not
to
take
official
action
up,
but
I'll
always
be
willing
to
talk
reasonably
with
people.
If
there's
reasonable
solutions
that
could
be.
A
J
If
we
keep
continuing
to
extend
the
time,
I
think
that's
really
the
issue
it's
been
extended
for
over
a
year
now,
or
something
like
that,
you
know
works
been
done
that
ultimately
even
my
clients
decision,
which
is
developing
division
itself,
if
they
want
to
extend
more
time,
we're
happy
to
do
so.
If
they
don't
want
to
do
that,
I.
J
Understand
that
the
permit
was
and
I
can
have
the
building
to
fish
to
speak
to
this
more
clearly,
but
the
permit
was
never
there.
It
was
ready
to
be
picked
up
and
it
was
never
picked
up
by
the
contractor
and
if
I
understand
correctly,
the
contractor
or
the
proposed
contractor
was
adding
to
the
building
division
and
one
of
the
building
employees
said.
Do
you
want
to
pick
up
the
permit
and
the
contractor
said
not
really
or
something
like
that?.
J
K
Hi
hi
I'm
Dana
root,
I'm,
the
assistant
building
official
for
the
city
of
Clearwater,
the
contractor
for
the
property
of
15:36
Palmetto
to
rehab
the
house.
He
was
in
our
office
in
February,
picking
up
a
couple
items
and
asked
him
if
he
wanted
the
permit
for
this
job,
and
he
said
no
so
what's
approved,
it's
ready
to
go
just
just
has
to
be
picked
up.
J
J
B
Work
would
have
to
be
done
in
the
funding.
Is
the
question
because
he's
in
the
process
of
waiting
for
funding
so
I?
This
is
a
tough
one.
I
I
feel
for
you,
I
mean
I,
don't
I.
I
would
hope
that
the
city
would
be
willing
to
work
with
you
as
I'm
sure
they
have
to
this
point.
But
you're,
not
you're,
not
a
citizen
in
front
of
us
that's
dragging
their
feet
and
just
neglecting
the
process
or
them
it
seems
like
you're
trying
your
hands
are
tied
at
the
state
level.
B
I
A
I
Sorry,
there's
just
one
stuff
that
needs
to
be
taken
at
one
at
one
time
and
then
you
know
the
house
was
never
in
my
possession
or
was
it
my
sister's
house.
It
was
my
house,
nobody,
but
they
stayed
properly.
The
house
was
just
released
just
last
September
ablaze,
so
it
became
my
property
in
September
the
end
of
September
of
last
year,
so
2019
ATK,
my
property.
H
Next
on
the
agenda
or
new
business
items,
first:
okay,
4.3
continued
from
February
26
case
4520
status
report
for
respondents
chestnut
in
myrtle
LLC
at
7:08,
Chestnut
Street,
in
violation
of
code
for
exterior
surfaces,
dorm
window
openings
in
abandoned
building
and
issue
an
order
with
the
compliance
deadlines
and
kind
of
compliance
is
not
met.
Mister,
yes,
sir
hi.
L
My
name
is
reka
Sano
managing
member
of
chestnut
Myrtle
LLC,
okay,.
H
L
You
a
report
of
what's
happening
tomorrow,
Jes
abatements,
taking
the
asbestos
out
of
the
part
that's
being
demolished
and
as
soon
as
that's
done,
Howard
Jimmy's
is
going
to
demolish
about
two-thirds
of
the
building
and
I
believe
they've
already
went
in
for
permits.
So
you
can
check
with
the
city.
Is.
L
A
L
L
A
A
So
all
I
probably
buy
there
and
it
comes
to
my
mind.
This
is
beep
speaking
for
myself.
Okay
is
that
here
the
citizens
of
Clearwater
give
you
five
hundred
thousand
and
they're
storing
junk
vehicles
there
it
so
here's
the
thing:
it's
your
property
and
I
think
you
could
show
your
appreciation
to
the
city
by
getting
it
out
of
there.
L
M
A
L
A
H
C
N
I'm
not
gonna,
go
through
the
entire
PowerPoint
I'm.
Just
gonna
remind
you.
What
was
going
on
at
this
location
was
known:
708,
Chestnut,
Street,
it's
the
corner
of
Myrtle
and
chestnut.
There
were
three
violations
for
the
door
and
windows
being
boarded
off.
The
exterior
service
was
in
bad
shape
and
it
was
abandoned.
No
utilities
was
originally
brought
back
in
February.
We
got
an
extension
when
they
came
in
with
plans
to
read
you
the
billing.
This
is
just
a
reminder
to
show
the
outside.
This
was
back
in
November.
There.
N
N
O
N
N
N
Votes
those
vehicles
I
tagged
just
last
week
because
they're
both
inoperable-
this
is
the
outside
right
now,
I've
talked
to
the
workers,
who
are
there
and
I
also
called
up
mr.
cassano
and
asked
about
the
exterior
storage,
and
why
are
the
terms
everywhere
and
people?
Yes,
then
I
understand
you're
loading
up
this
semi
trailer,
but
please,
when
you're
done,
please
put
all
the
things
back
in
the
back
in
the
building
and
close
the
doors.
This
isn't.
N
N
The
garage
door,
I
heard
was
busted,
so
they're
just
using
fence
panels
to
keep
it
closed.
Doesn't
that
can
actually
close?
This
is
16
to
our
second
and
went
back.
The
vehicle
has
been
posted
with
a
and
I've
already
sent
a
Notice
of
Violation
for
the
exterior
storage.
So
because
those
are
separate
issues
from
Ilan's
they're,
currently
at
the
property,
they
did
apply
for
a
permit
for
demo.
It
was
applied
for
the
16th.
It's
not
complete,
there's
still
some
application,
there's
still
parts
of
the
demo.
N
N
A
tree
plant
as
far
as
the
other
issues
exterior
storage
in
the
operative
vehicles,
if
they
are
removed
from
the
premises,
they'll
just
be
taking
an
expo
board,
we
can
get
those
removed
and
possibly
start
a
needs
for
exterior
storage
and,
like
I
said
I
could
talk
to
mr.
Kazama
about
the
vehicles
I'm
talking
about
the
exterior
storage,
she
said
he
would
take
care
of.
P
C
L
And
give
you
pre
red,
okay
right,
all
right,
the
electricity
is
on
so
it
does
have
utilities,
because
the
asbestos
removal
is
tomorrow.
How
can
they
need
the
electricity
on
it
is
on,
and
they
even
told
me
it's
on,
so
the
risk
utilities
there
you're
gonna,
clean
it
up.
I'll
tell
them
to
get
it
off
or
I'll
tow.
It
wait.
I'll
just
talk,
hire
a
dumpster,
well,
they've
been
getting
a
container
and
filling
it.
I
can't
believe
they
put
that
much
stuff
in
that
building.
You
know.
H
In
a
very
short
period,
yeah,
but
well
we're
gonna
ask
you
to
keep
on
it.
Please.
L
L
L
H
Had
a
four
point:
four
continue
from
March
25th,
an
April
22nd
case
57
days
20,
my
respondents,
Joshua
Legree
and
Lisa
D
Garcia
at
1793,
North,
Fort,
Harrison,
Avenue
in
repeat,
violation
for
short
of
code
for
short-term
rentals
in
issue;
an
order
that
a
daily
find
me
opposed
for
each
day.
The
repeat:
violations
existed,
no.
Q
Q
Not
here,
okay,
dr.
Julie,
Phillips
inspection,
specialist
for
the
city
of
Clearwater,
we'll
be
doing
a
powered
presentation
for
1793
North,
Fort
Harrison.
This
will
be
a
repeat
violation
for
case
number:
57
20,
there's
one
violation
at
this
property.
It
violates
Code,
section
1,
104,
B
for
development
code
violation
and
3
9
1
dire
for
prima
facie
evidence,
advertising
and
Inlet
legal,
short-term
rental,
I
posted
the
property
with
an
affidavit
of
posting
and
a
notice
of
repeat
violation
on
February
4th
2020
and
also
sentence
certified
mail
on
February
4th
2020.
Q
The
definition
of
a
residential
use
as
a
residential
use
means
a
permanent
place
of
residence
for
a
family.
A
residential
use
located
on
residentially
zoned
property
shall
not
include
rentals
for
periods
of
less
than
31
days
or
1
calendar
month,
whichever
is
less
or
which
is
advertised
or
held
out
to
the
public
as
a
place
rented
for
periods
of
less
than
31
days
or
one
calendar
month.
Whichever
is
less
our
residential
you
slow,
kated
on
residentially,
zoned
property
shall
include,
shall
not
include
interval,
ownership,
fractional
ownership
or
time
sharing.
Q
Notwithstanding,
the
violations
occur
at
different
locations
on
July
24th
2019
case
1
0
2
19
was
brought
before
the
municipal
code
enforcement
board
and
was
found
in
violation
for
violating
code
section
1,
104,
B,
+,
3,
9,
1
9
by
advertising,
a
short-term
rental
less
than
a
30
one
day
or
one
calendar
month
requirement
in
a
residential
zoning
district.
The
board
ordered
the
respondent
to
rent
the
property
for
a
minimum
of
30
days
from
on
calendar
month.
Q
Remove
all
daily
and/or
weekly
rates,
reviews
counts
and
ensure
all
websites
and
calendars
reflect
the
31
day
or
one
calendar
month
requirement.
The
owner,
Joshua
liquor.
Ii
was
present
and
given
until
August
1st
2019
to
bring
his
websites
into
compliance
with
the
city's
ordinance.
If
compliance
was
not
met,
a
fine
of
$250
would
be
issued
per
day
for
each
day
the
violation
continued
to
exist
and
compliance
was
met
by
the
property
owner.
At
that
time,
I
received
a
complaint
in
February
that
this
location
was
renting
again
in
less
than
the
31-day
requirement.
Q
So
I
searched
the
internet
and
found
them
on
the
VRBO
website.
On
February
3rd
2020,
as
you
can
see,
with
the
yellow
arrow
they
hadn't
listed
for
a
midnight
or
a
minimum
stay
of
one
night
and
they
advertised
it
as
a
stunning
martyr,
modern
single-family,
home
I
tried
to
rent
the
property
from
May,
2nd
to
May.
5Th
was
able
to
do
so
for
3
nights
for
914
dollars
and
76
cents.
Q
If
you
look
under
availability
availability,
the
host
offers
a
26
percent
discount.
If
you
stay
for
one
week
and
41
percent
monthly
discount.
So
again,
not
the
31
days
or
one
calendar
month,
as
the
ordinance
requires
I
did
try
to
book
it
again
from
April
25th
to
the
27th
for
two
nights
and
able
to
do
so
together,
four
thousand
and
five
dollars.
Q
Q
The
house
is
currently
listed
for
sale.
It's
located
on
North
Fort
Harrison,
approximately
across
from
the
pink
flamingo,
if
you're
familiar
with
it
and
there's
the
address
of
1793-
and
this
was
my
posting
with
my
repeat-
violation
which
was
done
on
February
4th.
This
might
seem
a
little
bit
redundant,
but
when
you're
dealing
with
a
repeat
violation
in
order
to
find
them,
I
need
to
show
you
that
they're
doing
it
consistently
until
they
actually
stop.
Q
Q
Q
Q
This
is
VR
video
on
February
10th,
again
minimum
stay
one
night
and
again
looking
at
the
inconsistencies
of
the
calendar
and
when
I
try
to
book
it.
It
does
say
that
you
have
a
one
night:
minimum
stay,
so
I
went
ahead
and
did
that
May
1st
through
May
4th
totally
927
dollars
and
76
cents
for
three
nights
on
the
11th.
I've
still
had
a
one
night.
Q
Minimum
stay
three
nights,
this
time
from
May
21st
to
the
24th
for
$900
and
27th,
my
hundred
twenty-seven
dollars
and
76
cents
on
the
11th
again,
the
inconsistencies
with
both
calendars
for
February
and
March,
with
a
one
night
minimum
stay
now
we're
at
February
14th
the
RBI
website.
So,
instead
of
doing
the
stunning
modern
home,
he
went
ahead
and
changed
the
listing
to
a
beautiful
Dunedin
home
to
try
and
swim
me
off
a
little
bit,
but
he's
very
easy
to
find
again.
The
inconsistencies
that
the
calendars
and
the
one
night
minimum
stay.
Q
He
did
it
went
ahead
and
did
another
booking
in
April,
as
you
can
see
the
first
week
for
three
days
and
then
the
third
week
for
four
I
tried
to
book
it
again
for
May
23rd
to
the
26th
was
able
to
do
so
for
1126
dollars,
and
then
we
got
to
February
20th
he's
still
advertising
on
the
VRBO
website,
beautiful
done
even
home.
One
night
minimum
staying
inconsistencies
with
the
calendars,
we're
almost
finished,
and
then
I
tried
to
book
from
July
4th
to
the
11th
for
seven
nights
and
able
to
do
so.
Q
Another
VRBO
on
February
21st
2020
when
I
been
up
staying,
tried
to
book
June
1st
through
the
4th
for
3
nights,
also
for
2040
dollars
and
76
cents,
and
this
was
on
the
24th.
This
is
trip
on
TripAdvisor,
studying
modern
single-family
home
again
on
one
night
minimum
stay
on
all
of
his
sights
and
the
inconsistencies
with
calendars
tried
to
book
that,
for
two
nights
was
able
to
do
so
for
1000,
17.4,
T,
5
cents,
and
then
it
actually
stopped.
Q
I
received
my
first
email
from
Josh
Legree
I
took
a
screenshot
of
it
back
when
we
were
dealing
with
kovat
19.
He
was
then
able
to
come
because
of
everything
that
was
going
on
with
covet
19.
So
he
told
me
that
because
he
couldn't
come,
he
wanted
the
board
to
see
this,
and
it
says
confirmed
the
activation,
so
I'm
not
quite
sure
what
we're
looking
at,
but
it
looks
like
he
tried
to
delete
a
listing
off.
One
of
the
websites
and
I
feel
look
at
the
top.
It
says:
1793
North,
Fort,
Harrison,
Avenue
err.
Q
There
is
a
problem
in
processing
the
request
and
at
the
bottom,
where
the
yellow
arrow
is
indicated.
It
says
note
at
the
bottom
of
this
picture
the
result
of
this
listing
still
being
able
to
be
seen.
Airbnb
said
there
was
some
sort
of
error
when
deactivating.
My
account
I
called
the
customer
service.
Not
you
told
me
to
call,
and
they
said
it
was
still
active.
I
won't
be
attending
your
hearing
on
March,
25th,
I
have
other
or
prior
obligations.
I
want
to
make
sure
you
present
this
to
the
board.
Q
With
this
information
which
I'm
doing
right
now,
it
says
I
acknowledge
this
can't
be
undone.
If
you
want
the
hook.
If
you
want
to
host
this
space
again,
you'll
have
to
create
a
new
listing
from
scratch,
confirm
deactivation.
It
looks
like
there
a
button,
don't
know
if
he
ever
hit
it
to
me
irrelevant.
Clearly,
you
can
see
by
the
presentation
he
is
renting
less
than
the
31-day
requirement
has
for
a
very
long
time.
Then
I
love
the
board
delivery,
I'd.
A
F
Q
In
March,
but
all
the
listings
I
had
went
up
to
my
believes,
February
24th
and
after
the
whole
Kovac
thing,
I
quit
investigating
that
specific
property,
because,
with
the
governor's
executive
order,
anything
else
that
was
called
into
that
was
going
to
the
DBPR
to
investigate
and
then
to
the
sheriff's
office.
So
I
just
stood
with
what
I
had
a
question.
H
Q
H
F
F
R
P
H
F
Find
respond,
it
was
a
violation
of
the
code
is
referred
to
in
the
affidavit
for
education
to
violations
corrected
prior
to
today's
hearing,
that's
winter,
in
order
that
no
fine
be
imposed.
If
the
respondent
beats,
the
violation
aboard,
maybe
order
a
fine
of
up
to
$500
for
each
date
of
violation
continues.
Please
second,.
B
T
T
Daniel
X
I
inspector
for
the
city
of
Clearwater.
This
is
case
61
24,
the
one
violation
of
prohibited
signage,
which
is
feather
science.
The
city
is
asking
compliance
on
or
before
July
5th
of
2020
or
a
fine
of
$150
per
day
that
the
violation
exists.
We
are
asking
the
board
to
authorize
the
following
after
three
months
from
the
recordation
date
of
such
lien.
If
the
fines
and
fees
remain
unpaid,
the
city's
turning
to
its
City
Attorney's
Office
is
authorized
to
foreclose,
collect
or
settle
such
lien
using
any
legal
or
equitable
remedies
under
the
law.
T
T
This
was
on
5:15.
In
between
that
time,
the
the
feathers
thought
the
feather
signs
did
come
down
so
I
closed
the
case
out
then,
about
a
month
later,
they
reappeared
so
I
opened
the
case
back
up.
I
notified
the
property
owner
that
it
was
reopened
and
the
feather
signs
continued
to
be
erected
at
the
property.
This
was
on
6:15.
F
H
H
A
Move
to
find
respondent
was
in
violation
of
the
code,
as
referred
to
in
the
affidavit.
In
this
case,
the
violation
was
corrected
prior
to
today's
hearing
and
to
enter
an
order
that
no
fine
be
imposed.
If
the
respondent
repeats
the
violation,
the
board
may
order
a
fine
of
up
to
$500
for
each
native
violation
continues
to
exist.
T
T
A
Make
a
motion
I
move
to
find
the
respondent
was
in
violation
of
the
code,
as
referred
to
me
affidavit
in
this
case.
The
violation
was
corrected
prior
to
today's
hearing
and
to
enter
an
order
that
no
fine
be
imposed.
If
respondent
repeats
the
violation,
the
board
may
order
a
fine
of
up
to
$500,
for
each
data
violation
continues
to
exist.
A
A
D
A
U
A
T
C
F
Give
you
okay,
I'll,
give
you
your
first
I
bought
to
find
a
respondent,
wasn't
a
violation
of
the
code,
as
referred
to
in
the
affidavit.
In
this
case
the
violation
was
corrected
prior
to
today's
hearing
and
to
enter
an
order
that
no
fine
be
imposed.
If
the
respondent
repeats
the
violation,
the
board
may
order
a
fine
of
up
to
500
dollars
for
each
day,
violation
continues
to
exist.
H
B
T
Daniel
might
again
sigh
inspector
for
the
city,
this
is
case,
64
21,
violation
for
signage
erected
without
permits,
and
the
city
is
asking
compliance
on
or
before
July
24th
of
2020
or
a
fine
of
$100
per
day
that
the
violation
exists.
We
are
asking
the
board
to
authorize
the
following
after
three
months
from
the
recordation
date
of
such
link.
If
the
fines
and
fees
remain
unpaid,
the
city's
Attorney's
Office
is
authorized
to
foreclose,
collect
or
settle
such
lien
using
any
legal
or
equitable
remedies
under
the
law.
T
T
A
google
shot-
if
you
can
say
this,
this
is
from
google
images
from
April
2017.
The
only
sign
that
was
up
at
this
time
was
the
barbershop
sign,
and
then
this
was
part
of
our
downtown
gateway
sweep
in
November.
The
optimum
health
sign
was
erected
before
that
point,
but
I'd
spoken
to
the
business
owner
and
to
the
property
owner.
They
know
that
a
sign
needs
to
either
come
down
or
a
permit
needs
to
be
obtained.
Other
businesses
did
comply
with
with
that,
but
this
business
did
not,
and
then
this
was
again
on
615.
F
H
B
Moved
in
an
order
requiring
the
respondent
to
correct
the
violations
on
or
before
July
24th,
if
the
respondent
does
not
comply
by
that
date,
the
board
may
order
a
fine
of
$100
per
day
per
violation.
For
each
day,
each
violation
continues
to
exist.
It
finds
in
fees
remain
unpaid.
Three
months
after
such
lien
is
filed,
the
city
has
authorized
to
foreclose,
collect
or
settle
such
lien.
T
A
Moved
to
find
a
respondent
was
in
violation
of
the
code,
as
referred
to
in
the
affidavit.
In
this
case,
the
violation
was
corrected
prior
to
today's
hearing
and
to
enter
an
order
that
no
fine
be
imposed.
If
the
respondent
repeats
the
violation,
the
board
may
order
a
fine
of
up
to
$500,
for
each
data
violation
continues
to
exist.
Favor.
H
F
H
C
V
D
T
E
F
Want
to
find
a
respondent
was
in
violation
of
the
code,
as
referred
to
in
the
affidavit.
In
this
case,
the
violation
was
corrected
prior
to
today's
hearing
until
enter
an
order
that
no
fine
be
imposed.
If
the
respondent
repeats
the
violation,
the
board
may
order
a
fine
of
up
to
$500.
For
each
day,
the
violation
continues
to
exist,
and
this
is
on
the
signage.
F
H
A
T
V
T
T
You
know
if
I
hit
the
right
button,
danyoung
lights,
an
inspector
with
the
city.
This
is
1285
Cleveland,
Street,
4k,
66
420.
The
one
violation
of
zoning
violation
for
BT
are
being
required.
City
is
asking
compliance
on
or
before
July
24th
of
2020
or
fine
of
$150
per
day
that
the
violation
exists.
We're
asking
the
board
to
authorize
the
following
after
three
months
from
the
recordation
date
of
such
lien.
T
T
A
A
W
C
F
Move
to
enter
an
order
requiring
responded
to
correct
the
violation
on
it
before
August
24
2020.
If
the
respondent
does
not
apply,
but
a
date
to
board
me
order
a
fine,
fifty
dollars
per
day
per
violation
for
each
day,
each
violation
continues
to
exist.
It
fines
and
fees.
We
made
unpaid
three
months
after
such
lien
is
filed.
The
city
is
authorized
to
foreclose,
collect
or
settle
such
late.
F
H
B
H
Item
4.15
continued
from
March,
25th
and
April
22nd
case
6820;
fine
respondents,
Gilbert
G
Ginelli
at
14,
11
Gulf
to
Bay,
Boulevard
and
repeat:
violation
of
code
4,
abandoned
buildings,
fences,
roof,
maintenance
and
exterior
surface
an
issue
in
order
that
a
daily
fine
be
imposed
for
each
day.
The
repeat:
violations
exist.
M
Good
afternoon
madam
chair
board
members
brian
o
6543,
on
behalf
of
the
respondent
dr.
Gilbert
dinelli,
it's
my
understanding
that
inspector
Katzman
will
confirm
that
the
property
is
currently
in
compliance.
We
are
not
denying
that
there
were
violations
on
the
property,
but
we
would
like
to
present
mitigating
evidence
before
you
consider
in
closing
any
fine,
so
probably
best
for
mr.
Katzman,
to
provide
his
confirm
it's
in
compliance
and
then
provide
his
recommendation
and
then
allow
me
to
respond
to
that.
Okay,.
C
M
N
N
The
definition
of
a
repeat
violation
means
a
violation
of
a
provision
of
a
code
by
a
person
has
or
been
previously
found
through
a
code
enforcement
board
or
any
other
quasi
judicial
or
judicial
process
to
have
violated
or
who
has
admitted
violating
the
same
provision
within
five
years
prior
to
the
violation.
Notwithstanding,
the
violations
occurred
at
different
locations.
N
Notice
of
repeat,
violation
was
posted,
this
property
on
January
29
to
2020.
Some
of
these
issues
were
originally
brought.
The
code
board
and
previous
properties
owned
by
dr.
Chen
le
one,
was
at
1343
cleveland
april
28th
2016
for
exterior
services
and
roof
maintenance
and
fence
maintenance
and
another
property
at
1871
Douglas,
July,
26,
2016
4
abandoned
building
in
November,
17th
2016
for
exterior
surfaces
and
roof
maintenance.
N
N
These
violations
inspector
Fletcher
submitted
affidavits
of
compliance
for
the
property
on
October
24
2017.
The
current
lien
amount
to
attach
this
property
is
three
hundred
twenty
four
thousand
five
hundred
dollars
and
November
seventeenth
to
twenty.
Sixteen
1871
Douglas
was
brought
before
the
MCB
by
inspector
Knight
for
abandoned
building,
exterior
surfaces
and
roof
maintenance.
The
property
was
in
compliance
before
the
Board
date.
The
board
found
the
property
being
violation
for
repeat
violation.
The
board
ordered
a
fine
of
$250
per
day
per
violation
for
the
seventy
seven
days.
It
was
not
in
compliance.
N
There
were
two
other
violations
that
are
not
being
referenced
for
this
case.
The
total
lien
attached
to
this
property
is
ninety.
Six
thousand
two
hundred
fifty
dollars
On
January
7th
twenty
twenty
I
drove
the
location.
He
had
gotten
a
complaint
from
someone
that
the
exterior
the
building
had
some
chipped
and
peeling
paint
and
mildew
and
algae.
N
N
This
was
in
January
if
just
from
the
first
photo,
the
roof
looks
a
little
bit
faded.
There's
some
paint,
there's
some
peeling
and
missing
shingles
a
little
bit
of
damage
to
some
of
the
corners
there.
Soffits
missing
damage
again
to
the
corners,
the
metals
all
peeling
up,
missing,
soffits,
missing,
soffits
exteriors
got
some
chipped
and
peeling
paint
the
shingles
are
faded.
N
N
This
is
the
fence
that
the
neighbor
was
also
gonna
play
about
it's
kind
of
a
patchwork
fence
just
created
from
a
bunch
of
boards
and
some
random
material.
Neighbor
said
it
was
not
his
from
the
way
it's
facing.
It
would
look
like
be
on
his
property
else,
from
an
aerial
seemed
to
confirm
that
the
fence
was
on
dr.
Jennings
property.
N
N
Still
some
damaged
algae
growing
on
the
side
of
the
building
fence
was
still
there
on.
The
third
third
doctor
generally
got
in
contact
with
me
fairly
quickly.
He
got
my
notices
in
the
mail
met
me
at
the
property
we
went
over.
The
issues
spoke
about
how
they
might
be
remedied
and
over
the
next
month
he
he
had
workers
work
on
the
building,
but
these
are
just
photos
of
the
evidence
of
the
condition
it
was
in
during
that
time,
more
algae
on
the
side
she
started
to
do
some
painting
knocked
off.
N
N
N
N
Probably
the
utilities
were
still
off
started
to
be
starting.
The
21st
started:
painting
the
building,
this
beige
color
on
the
shingles
or
the
beige
from
distance
building,
starting
to
look
a
little
bit
better
got
a
gentleman
named
Frank
to
open
up
a
BTR
with
business
called
a
something
furniture
and
junk
he
got
a
BTR
and
they
had.
The
utilities
turned
back
on
the
28th.
There
was
just
a
little
bit
of
left
work
to
do
in
the
corners
of
the
roof.
N
You
couldn't
see
from
the
road
I
fit
put
down
some
flashing
there,
the
fourth
it
was
all
painted.
The
utilities
were
on
in
April
22nd
of
2020
I
mean
the
utilities
were
turned
back
on
on
February
28th
of
2020,
but
this
was
gonna
originally
come
to
the
board
on
March
25th
I
believe
the
leftover
was
gonna,
be
before
the
pandemic
hit,
and
we
all
were
out
of
the
office
for
about
three
months.
N
I
didn't
know
it
at
the
time,
but
the
utilities
were
turned
off
again
on
April
22nd
of
2020
two
months
into
them
being
on,
though,
here's
a
proof
of
the
BTR
being
issued
for
the
retails
for
the
retail
sales
of
the
property
and
went
back
on
the
16th
property
was
still
in
okay
condition.
Some
of
the
repairs
have
become
undone.
N
And
went
back
on
the
22nd.
Still
a
little
bit
of
damage
utilities
are
still
off,
went
back
again,
have
done
a
little
bit
of
talk
with
Brian
over
email
showed
him
the
photos
of
the
damage
that
had
happened
over
the
time
period.
Talking
about
the
utilities
being
turned
off
and
I
guess
today
they
were
yesterday.
They
turned
that
utilities
back
on
again
and
had
someone
come
out
and
fix
a
little
bit
of
damage
and
what's
happening
to
the
roof.
There.
D
O
J
N
J
J
J
J
Okay,
but
after
considering
all
those
factors,
you
feel
a
$250
per
day.
Yes,
you're
aware
that
dr.,
jean
le
is
either
asking
for
words
going
to
ask
that
define
the
administrative,
just
the
administrative
cost.
Yes,
in
your
measured
expert
opinion
as
a
code
enforcement
expert
inspector
for
the
city
of
Clearwater,
do
you
feel
that
that
fine
is
too
low?
The
fine
I'm
asking
for
administrative.
M
P
M
E
E
F
F
Some
dinosaurs
have
yeah,
but
you
know
so
I
know
he
has
numerous
repeat
violations
because
I
said
on
those
have
made
a
lot
of
those
decisions
so
one
or
another
one
comes
current
like
this
one.
What's
the
language
we
used
here
that
wraps
all
that
back
together,
I
know,
there's
a
war
or
something
that
the
city's
using.
That
makes
that
all
fair
game
am
I
correct,
or
is
that
a
question
baby
for
him?
You
know
because
I
see
where
the
city
is
going
with.
This
I
agree
with
a
lot
of
it.
F
A
Tough
questions
for
you:
they
always
they
have
attached
violations
to
property,
a
which
are
new
violations
to
previous
action
and
property
B
and
C.
Yes,
so
that
automatically
makes
it
a
repeat
if
it's
that
thing.
So,
if
it's
offensive
property
a-
and
you
already
had
offensive
property
B
that
you
hooked.
B
Is
it
common
from
the
city
standpoint
that,
as
we're
going
through
the
process
of
notification
and
a
citizen's
starts
to
rectify
the
situation,
I
mean
in
this
one
I'm
looking
at
January
29th
and
within
six
days,
issues
were
already
beginning
to
be
resolved
correct.
So
at
what
point?
Do
we
not
there's
a
gray
area
there
of
understanding
of
they're
working
with
us
in
the
process
is
moving
forward
in
understanding
that
we're
working
towards
compliance
versus
still?
This
is
the
law.
This
is
the
rule,
a
finds,
a
fine.
Does
that
mean?
Does
that
make
sense?
N
Yes,
it's
a
repeat
violation:
there
were
several
properties
that
they
also
had
the
same
exact
violations
within
a
five-year
period.
This
is
the
standard
by
which
we
go
by
to
offer
repeat
violations
until
they're
fixed
gave
a
notification
of
the
day
that
they
thought
I
posted
the
property
is
that's
when
the
day
it
started
and
sent
the
Notice
of
Violation
and
from
that
point
forward.
A
We
find
people,
so
they
am
my
understanding,
hope
that
they
don't
repeat
yes,
okay,
so
when
you
find
something,
that's
wrong
and
you
contact
the
owner
and
they
respond
immediately
and
proceed
to
correct
things
and
they
hire
people
to
do
it
to
me,
there's
an
implication
that
they
have
the
financial
wherewithal.
And
if
you
are,
someone
have
a
corporation
that
you
own
person,
let's
say
an
LLC
and
you
own
many
properties
that
to
me
says
that
you're,
a
professional
property
owner-
and
you
know
what
property
mental
terms,
property
management
means.
A
Preventive
maintenance
means,
if
you
had
properties
down
the
street
previously
that
were
cited
because
of
all
types
of
reasons.
You
should
be
attuned
to
what,
by
this
time,
the
city,
statues
and
regulations
are,
and
you
would
hope
that,
since
they
paid
Pines
they're
going
to
cooperate
and
stay
in
compliance,
is
that
right?
Yes,
I,
understand
it
correct.
Thank
you.
The.
W
A
N
M
Yeah,
okay,
so
we'll
try
it
this
way.
Mr.
Katzman,
thank
you
again
appreciate
you
answering
these
questions.
I'll!
Try
to
keep
this
as
brief
as
possible
for
the
board.
Can
you
remind
me
and
feel
free
to
go
back
through
your
PowerPoint?
It's
my
understanding.
This
is
the
only
open
case
involving
any
properties
with
dr.
Tinelli.
In
other
words,
all
of
the
other
properties
are
in
compliance
and
there
haven't
been
any
other
citations
or
notices
of
violation
that
are
pending.
M
As
of
today,
your
PowerPoint
did
indicate
that
the
two
properties
at
Douglas,
with
the
ninety
six
thousand
dollar
fine
and
at
Cleveland
with
the
$325
dollar,
fine,
those
were
brought
into
compliance
in
2017.
Is
that
correct?
Yes,
and
you
also
testify
that
it
took
you
a
long
time
to
come
up
with
the
repeat
violations
because
they
happened
so
long
ago.
Is
that
correct
the.
N
N
M
Did
a
five-year
period,
which
is
four
years
ago
correct
yes
and
they
were
all
brought
into
compliance,
or
at
least
those
two
that
you
showed
us
by
2017.
Is
that
correct?
Okay?
So,
in
terms
of
the
gravity,
do
you
haven't
found
any
other
repeat
violations
regarding
these
four
ordinances
since
2016?
Is
that
correct
for
what
property?
For
any
of
this
properties
other
than
this
property?
There
have
been
no
other
violations
of
fence
exterior
roof.
The
things
that
you
are
charging
is
repeat
violations
since
2016.
Is
that
correct?
Well,.
D
M
M
N
We're
there's
a
lot
clearing
violation,
the
boxes
they
were
being
used
by
a
gentleman
to
sleep.
There
I
have
the
gentleman
who
looked
on
Hillcrest
in
the
home
right
there,
who
is
telling
me
that
there's
guys
sleep
in
there
and
right
now,
there's
a
few
shopping
carts
in
the
property.
I
might
post
it
for
a
lot
of
players.
Yeah,
okay,.
M
D
N
M
Are
you
aware
that
mr.
Gianelli,
about
a
few
weeks
ago,
paid
the
city
fair
one
hundred
thousand
dollars
to
settle
a
lien
on
the
u.s.
19
property
I
heard
of
it?
Okay,
so
you're
aware
that
mr.
dr.
Tinelli
has
paid
$100,000
to
sell
one
of
his
outstanding
liens?
Is
that
correct
yes,
and
are
you
aware
whether
that
is
the
second
or
third
highest
fine
ever
paid
in
the
city
of
Clearwater
for
code
enforcement,
at
least
in
the
last
five
years?
Do
you
know
anything
about
know
about
that?
Okay,
that's,
fair
enough!
I!
M
M
Months
ago,
okay
and
I
got
the
emails
here.
If
you
want
to
see
them
June
15th,
can
you
confirm
to
the
board
that
you
emailed
me
and
said
the
property
stone
compliance
as
of
June
15th,
the
16th,
and
you
didn't
inform
me
of
the
non-compliance
that
you
found
on
the
16th
until
I
emailed
you
yesterday
at
10:20,
and
you
responded
at
11:20
a.m.
on
June
23rd.
Providing
me
those
pictures.
Is
that
correct?
M
Yes,
so
the
first
time
doctors
Nellie
became
aware
of
the
issues
you
found
on
the
16th
was
in
response
to
my
email
from
yesterday.
Is
that
right?
Is
he
not
policing
his
own
property
I'm?
Just
asking
you
that's
correct
or
not
I,
don't
know.
If
you
didn't
know
about
his
own
property,
okay!
Well,
he
didn't
know
that
you
didn't
consider
it
in
compliance.
Until
you
responded
to
my
email.
Is
that
right,
I.
N
A
B
Questions
as
well
we're
obviously
pretty
what
is
the
board
I
in
the
beginning?
We
use
the
word
egregious
to
describe
that
property
and
usually
that's
used
as
in
shocking
and
very
bad
and
I.
Think
we've
seen
some
egregious
cases
with
where
we're
worried
about
the
welfare
of
children
or
you
know
a
house
falling
in
on
somebody's
head
and
people
living
in
it.
I
was
just
surprised
to
see
the
level
that
you
know
that
this
has
come
to
and
kind
of
describing
this,
because
it
usually
isn't
like
that.
I,
don't
know
if
there's.
X
A
Well,
you
know
here's
the
thing
I
remember
the
19
I
think
it
was
a
McDonald's
and
it's
not
easy,
maintaining
something
like
that
with
transient
and
all
that
stuff.
But
if
you
choose
to
go
into
that
business,
that's
what
the
baggage
comes
with
then
manage
it
or
continue
doing
the
way
you've
been
doing.
But
let
me
ask
this
question:
how's
it
working
for
you.
N
Right
now
for
the
four
violations
that
are
currently
in
compliance,
I'm
asking
for
fine
of
$250
a
day
per
violation
for
the
filing
dates
for
the
fentons
maintenance.
For
two
days
it
was
out
of
compliance
$500
for
that
date
for
the
exterior
surfaces,
seven
days
at
250,
which
is
1700
$750
for
roof
maintenance
at
7
days
times,
250
$1,750
the
abandoned
building
seven
days
at
250
$1,750
for
a
total
amount
of
$5,750
in
lanes.
A
F
F
F
So
there's
a
lot
of
stuff
up
in
the
air,
I
kind
of
feel
I,
don't
feel
sympathy,
but
there's
a
lot
of
confusion
with
that
whole
area
of
the
East
Gate
that
the
city
is
kind
of
dragging
their
feet
on,
but
getting
back
to
what
he
said
over
there.
The
language
I
think
there's
a
little
harsh
I,
don't
think
mr.
Gianelli
is
an
egregious
person.
A
B
Y
B
That
I
don't
think
we're
holding
every
business
and
property
owner
in
this
community
and
then
to
throw
words
like
egregious
on
it
like
like
we're,
you
know
putting
people's
lives
in
jeopardy,
I'm,
gonna,
support,
administrative
costs,
I
think
that's
the
way
this
should
go.
The
gentleman
is
moving
forward.
Trying
to
to
make
changes.
A
A
I
may
address
what
you
say:
I
respect
your
opinion,
but
it
got
to
the
point
there's
when
we
were
reading,
it's
City
Hall
building
there
that
they
were
contemplating
gaming.
Dr.
Jenelle,
his
own
personal
parking
space
busy
show
that
there
almost
every
meeting,
because
there
was
one
problem
after
another
problem,
so
all
I
feel
is
to
increase.
It
would
be
punitive,
doesn't
make
sense,
go
with
the
recommendation
and
it
will
get
handled
like
all
the
other
outstanding
issues
that
he
has
with
the
city.
No
I'm
sure
we
can't
change
his
behavior.
X
M
M
I'm
entitled
to
present
evidence
mitigating
the
fine
prior
to
your
motion,
and
so
what,
at
the
beginning,
when
I
said
when
I
my
mask
on
and
I
apologize
again,
I
didn't
realize
it
was
hard
to
understand
me
when
I
had
my
mask
on
what
I
said.
Was
we're
not
here
to
fight
the
city
about
the
violations?
We're
only
here
to
ask
you
to
consider
evidence,
mitigating
the
fine,
which
is
why
I
thought
it
was
proper
for
mr.
M
M
I
will
I
will
I
do
want
to
apologize
to
mr.
Katzman.
He
has
been
very
easy
to
deal
with
during
this
process,
and
I
was
not
trying
to
impugn
him
by
any
stretch
of
the
imagination.
I
do
want
to
highlight
what
mr.
Menino
said
and
I
think
when
mr.
Katzman
said
that
dr.
Tinelli
responded
to
this
immediately
and
that's
because
his
behavior
has
changed
I'm,
not
here
to
fight
the
city
I'm
here
to
resolve
all
of
this.
This
is
the
last
case,
the
last
case
that
we
have
of
Notice
of
Violation
on
as
of
right.
M
Now,
the
case
before
you
on
4.14
was
the
drawn
by
mr.
Knight,
because
we
got
that
resolved
I've
been
working
with
dr.
Genelia
since
May
of
2019
to
settle
the
MacDonalds
property
to
get
that
resolved
to
and
then
to
resolve
any
other
issues
and
then
to
come
back
to
you
in
a
month
or
two
with
a
petition
to
reduce
the
two
outstanding
liens
Douglas
and
Cleveland
Street
to
administrative
cost,
which
is
the
process
and
I
think
to
answer
mr.
Carruthers
question
from
earlier.
M
The
effect
of
a
lien
on
one
parcel
is
that
it
clouds
the
title
of
doctor
to
Nelly's
properties,
all
through
Pinellas
County,
so
any
property
that
dr.
Tinelli
owns
is
encumbered
by
any
lien,
that's
imposed
upon
any
of
his
parcels
and
what
does
that
do?
That
makes
it
impossible
for
him
to
vet
to
divest
himself
of
his
property.
So
we're
not
here
saying
that
dr.
Tinelli
hasn't
had
a
problem
in
the
past.
M
What
we're
here
to
say
is
we've
got
to
work
together
to
fix
it
and
putting
more
and
more
and
more
and
more
liens
is
not
going
to
help
him
get
rid
of
his
properties
right.
So
what
I
am
and
and
you're
the
lien
reduction
for
the
other
means
is
not
before
you
today.
We're
only
talking
about
this
parcel.
But
what
I'm
trying
to
convey
to
you
is
that
dr.
Ginelli
has
had
a
change
in
attitude.
He
was
immediately
responsive
to
mr.
Katzman.
Mr.
Katzman
was
very
good
to
deal
with.
He
was
immediately
responsive
to
mr.
M
Knight
on
the
prior
case
that
was
withdrawn
and
I'm
staying
on
top
of
him
to
make
sure
he
does
that
and
I'm
trying
to
communicate
with
the
city
as
much
as
I
can
to
make
sure.
Are
we
on
the
same
page
with
this,
and
they
know
they
can
come
to
me
on
that,
the
fine
that
he
paid
for
Cleveland,
I'm,
sorry
for
us,
19,
the
$100,000,
fine,
that
the
City
Council
unanimously
accepted
for
the
usit
property
in
my
to
my
knowledge,
is
the
second
highest
fine
ever
paid
in
the
last
five
years.
M
The
only
other
fine
that
is
higher
that
I'm,
aware
of
was
the
AutoNation
Kenyon
dodge
fine
for
property
on
South
19,
although
nation
is
a
national
company
and
I
totally
understand.
Commissioner,
pressed
your
comment
that
doctors
Nelly
owns
a
lot
of
property,
so
he
better.
He
should
be
able
to
keep
maintain
him
and
keep
him
up.
What
I'm
here
to
say
is
that
dr.
Jenelle,
he
doesn't
have
the
resources
of
an
auto
nation
he's
not
made
of
a
hundred
thousand
dollar
checks.
He's
not
made
of
that
he's.
M
A
local
optometrist
who
loves
this
city
and
who
you
all
known
for
a
long
time
and
what
I'm
trying
to
do
is
help
him
get
rid
of
these
parcels
and
the
only
way
he
can
get
rid
of
these
parcels
is
if
the
liens
are
reduced.
So
what
I'm
asking
today
is
a
good-faith
acknowledgement
that,
yes,
he
has
had
a
significant
problem
in
the
past.
We
have
made
a
lot
of
ground
up
over
the
last
year.
We're
continuing
to
work
hard
he's
paid
me
a
lot
of
money
to
fight
the
litigation
regarding
the
us.
M
19
property
he's
put
a
lot
of
money
into
these
parcels,
he's
put
over
$100,000
into
fixing
the
properties
which
he
needed
to
do
right.
We're
not
saying
that!
That's
if
he
needed
to
do
that.
But
my
point
is
that
it
starts
it's
got
to
end,
and
that
starts
today,
he's
not
here
in
front
of
you
with
him
himself,
with
his
hat
in
his
hand,
making
excuses
he's
hired
me
to
try
to
help
fix
the
problem
for
the
city
and
for
himself,
and
for
that
reason
the
board
can
increase
the
fine
to
$500
a
day.
M
M
I,
don't
think
there
was
one
complaint
back
in
January
I,
don't
think,
there's
been
a
whole
bunch
of
complaints
since
then,
and
he
immediately
responded
to
it
so
respectfully,
based
on
all
of
that,
we're
asking
for
a
reduced
fine
of
administrative
cost
today,
which
would
close
this
case
out.
He
would
pay
that
immediately.
M
H
A
Here's
the
thing
there
isn't
any
case
where
there's
fines
involved
that
is
not
settled
out
of
the
dollar
for
administrative
costs.
It's
a
given
when
there's
never
been
a
reduction
of
administrative
cost
that
I
know
of
so
it's
gonna
pay
that
regardless
and
what
worse
you're
saying
is:
geez
he's
a
changed
person
and
just
make
him
pay
what
he'd
have
to
pay?
Anyways,
no
I,
don't
think
that's
right!
I
can
go
with
this.
A
I'll
tell
you
what
I
could
even
go
for
25
dollars
a
day,
but
a
fine
has
to
be
paid,
because
it's
a
repeat-
and
it's
constant
repeating
it's
worse
than
dripping
water.
You
hear
it
all
the
time.
No,
it
hasn't
changed.
You
may
even
want
us
to
believe
it.
Oh
you
may
want
me
to,
but
I
can't
speak
for
everybody
else.
Unfortunately,
I
don't
believe
it
yeah
I
mean
you
said
yourself
when
you
started.
This
is
the
only
outstanding
case
now.
M
The
lien
in
that
case
was
around
330
and
again
one
of
the
problems
with
these
liens
is
they're
like
double
or
triple
the
value
of
the
actual
property,
so
it
makes
it
impossible
when
you
get
into
the
whole.
The
dr.
Jenelle
he's
gotten
himself
into
it,
makes
it
very
difficult
to
get
out
and
I'm
here
to
try
to
work
with
you
to
get
him
out
of
the
hole.
M
A
A
B
A
Me,
why
did
somebody
have
to
call
code
enforcement
and
tell
them
there
was
a
problem
to
the
point
that
and
bothered
them
that
much
that
they
made
the
phone
call
when
this,
when
that,
when
the
neighbors
start
complaining,
then
it's
it's
gone
beyond
and
I,
don't
know
if
the
neighbor,
whoever
called,
and
we
don't
know
who
it
is
that
kitten,
don't
need
to
know
contact
the
doctor
jelly
in
the
first
place
say:
hey:
can
you
straighten
this
mess
out?
Okay,
there
was
something
that
was
at
mold.
B
You're
doing
a
great
job,
obviously
you're
doing
your
job
good
and
I
think
there
becomes
times
in
our
city
when
it
needs
to
go
beyond
just
a
rulebook
and
enforcement
and
there's
a
gray
area
of
compassion
and
cooperation
and
I.
Think
this
is
a
perfect
example
of
a
process
where
we're
trying
to
cooperate,
we're
trying
to
make
changes
and
then
we're
still
fighting.
B
There's
I
and
in
lowering
fees
bothers
me
and
I've
said
that
before
because
what
happens
on
a
lot
of
properties,
they
leave
it,
they
neglect
it.
We
get
up
to
fifty
seven
hundred
six
to
some
sixty
hundred
thousand
dollars.
They
leave
it
and
the
new
owner
comes
in
purchases,
the
property
and
they
stand
before
us
without
hand
and
say
I
just
bought
this
property
I'm
trying
to
make
clear
water
better
and
then
we
drop
it
and
that's
but
I,
don't
think
that's
happening
here.
B
I
support,
we
don't
know
the
figures,
we're
not
we're
not
being
given
administrative
cost,
but
I
I
believe
in
the
process.
We're
trying
to
seems
to
be
trying
to
work
forward
and
whether
you
know
$5,000
is
dropped
down
to
1500
whatever
the
math
is
I
support
the
administrative
cost,
but
without
seeing
a
figure
given.
F
B
A
B
I
can
make
a
motion
and
I
can
give
you
a
fictitious
number.
I
can
say
a
thousand
dollars
and-
and
we
not
call
it
administrative
cost,
we
call
it
a
fee
of
$1,000
and
we
put
this
to
bed
and
we
all
move
forward
to
the
next
one.
Without
putting
the
city
through
more
work,
I
mean
it
depends
on
how
you
want
to
look
at
it,
how
you
want
to
handle
it
if.
A
A
F
A
I
moved
in
an
order
that
a
fine
of
25
dollars
per
day
be
imposed
for
the
days
ago,
up
there,
seven
and
two
days
cumulative
days,
the
repeat:
violation
existed
for
a
total
fine
of
five
hundred
and
seventy
five
dollars
payable
within
30
days.
It
fines
and
fees
remain
unpaid.
Three
months
after
such
lien
is
filed,
the
city
is
authorized
to
foreclose,
collect
or
settle
such
lien.
If
the
respondent
repeats
the
violation,
the
board
may
order
a
fine
of
up
to
$500.
For
each
day,
the
violation
continues
to
exist.
Second,.
H
H
N
F
Into
an
order
requiring
the
respondent
to
correct
the
violation
ottar
before
July,
8th
2020,
that
the
respondent
does
not
comply
by
that
date,
the
board
may
order
a
fine
of
$150
per
day
per
violation
for
each
day.
Each
violation
continues
to
exist
if
fines
and
fees
remain
unpaid.
Three
months
after
such
a
rain
is
file,
the
city
is
authorized
to
foreclose,
collect
or
settle.
Such
plea.
H
P
A
B
W
B
N
Daniel
kinsmen
code
enforcement
inspector
for
the
city
of
Clearwater
number
71,
24,
705,
South
Avenue.
There
was
one
violation
here
from
section
3,
2103,
h1,
h3
and
h4
goes
for
portable
storage
unit,
residential
zones
and
portable
storage
unit.
Currencies
permit
is
not
needed
to
have
a
storage
unit
at
your
home,
but
it
can't
be
there
for
longer
than
four
days.
It
can't
be
there
for
more
than
four
ounces
per
year
and
not
consecutively.
N
Notices
of
violation
were
sent
in
this
case.
December
13
2019
and
January
16th
of
2020,
with
compliance
dates
of
January,
13th,
2020
and
January
26
2020
certified
mail
receipt
was
received
on
January
24th
2020,
and
there
was
an
affidavit
of
posting
on
January
16
to
2020.
This
is
the
property
705.
Something
I
would
have
until
I
went
back
here.
Wild
back
about
six
months
ago,
had
an
issue
with
a
commercial
vehicle
being
stored
at
the
property
was
a
proper
parking.
N
When
I
look
closer,
look
at
the
backyard
there
was
a
storage
bag
being
stored
in
the
backyard
of
the
property,
went
back
on
the
15th
after
standing
Nov
for
the
storage
unit
and
I
spoke
with
someone
on
the
phone
said
they
were
from
the
property
and
I
was
explaining
to
them.
That
storage
unit
can't
be
back.
There
only
be
there
a
few
days
a
year,
and
the
person
told
me
that
they
said
it's.
N
Accessory
structure
that
they
need
to
talk
to
the
Planning
and
Development
Department
and
get
a
permit,
so
there
might
be
placed
properly
on
there
if
it
would
even
be
thought
of
as
that
structure
there's
just
a
closer
shot
of
it.
Here's
the
affidavit
of
posting
on
the
16th
I
went
back
on
the
30th
you'll
notice,
it's
a
little
harder
to
see
because
the
unit's
been
painted
beige
color
still
in
the
backyard.
N
Gentlemen.
I
believe
you
spoke
with
the
city
about
the
unit
and
wanting
to
designate
it
as
a
shed
and
was
pulled
again
that
they
had
to
speak
with
planning
Development
Department,
to
pull
a
permit
to
say
that
it's
a
ship
was
the
case,
was
delayed,
had
they
covered
pandemic,
Laidback,
seventeenth,
still
back
they're.
Still
in
the
same
exact
spot,
there
was
a
permit
poll
recently
bills
for
repairs.
Your
garage
door,
there's
never
been
a
permanent
hole
to
say
that
that's
a
show
back
on
the
22nd
I'm
still
back
there.
N
N
F
F
B
Do
know
you
know
people
in
the
community
that
preferred
about
that
route.
A
lot
of
sheds.
Do
you
put
on
a
foundation,
or
you
know,
ten
by
ten
or
ten
by
twelve,
and
we
can
barely
put
lawn
mowers
and
weed
eaters
and
shovels
in
them.
So
they
do
go
that
route.
I'm
interested
to
know
why
legal,
through
the
legal
process
of
getting
the
permit
and
obtaining
it,
don't
you
they're
gonna,
make
you
pull
it
away
from
the
fence
and
send
the
right,
easements
and
stuff,
but
I
mean.
E
E
E
E
E
D
E
Granddaughter
the
daughter
of
that
pastor,
a
that's
what's
being
stored
there,
so
I
know
that
we
are
not
allowed
to
store
I'm
tagging
registered
in
our
you
know
in
our
driveways
in
the
road
that
is
I,
know
that
is
illegal
to
have
II
would
have
been
done
for
that
to
you,
but
I
will
go
the
proper
outs.
If
somebody
helps
me,
do
I
need
to
speak
with
cuz.
E
The
only
one
that
I
named
I
was
given
was
a
Miss
Baker
and
zoning,
which
I
had
spoken
with
her
by
email
once
she
did
a
tough
time
to
call
me
back
in
March,
but
I
was
on
a
cruise.
I
did
not
get
that
phone
call
until
after
we
got
back,
and
then
we
got
back
from
that
cruise,
the
city.
She
is
what
and
everything
happened,
and
we
all
everybody
shut
down.
So
that's
as
far
as
I've
been
able
to
go
with
it.
W
W
W
A
U
B
E
Mr.
Horner
mr.
pen
also
told
us
that's
exactly
what
they
told
us
that
if
we
were
to
contact
the
right
people
and
get
it
to
where
we
are
allowed
to
keep
it
on
the
property
or
whatever
we
need
to
do
for
the
permits
or
whatever
else
that
so
in
case,
somebody
else
was
to
try
to
do
it
or
wanted
to
do
it.
It
would
be
there.
You
learn
the
curve
and
then
set
in
stone
tomorrow.
H
U
N
Recommendation
for
705
South
Glenwood
Avenue
I
was
four
by
OSHA
portable
storage
unit,
requesting
appliance
honor
before
July
24th
of
2020
or
$550
per
day
per
violation
for
each
day,
violations
for
three
months
from
the
recommendation
date
of
such
little.
If
fines
and
fees
remain
unpaid,
the
City
Attorney's
Office
authorized
to
foreclose
collector
settling
using
legal
record
local
remedies
under
available
under
the
law.
A
F
L
N
C
C
A
Moved
to
enter
an
order
requiring
to
respond
to
correct
a
violation
honor
before
September
24th
2020,
the
respondent
does
not
comply
by
that
date.
The
board
may
order
a
fine
of
150
dollars
per
day
per
violation
for
each
day.
Each
violation
continues
to
exist.
It
fines
and
fees
remain
unpaid.
Three
months
after
such
lien
is
filed,
the
city
is
authorized
to
foreclose,
collect
or
settle
such
lien.
H
A
September
24th
is
what
we've
give
to
you,
so
you
need
to
go
to
Planning
development
and
get
all
that
stuff.
The
most
important
thing
is:
keep
keep
this
gentleman
informed
as
you're
making
your
progress,
but
they
will
tell
you
what
you
need
to
do
to
come
in
compliance
to
make
it
the
structure
you
want
it
to
be.
We
can't
do
we
don't.
H
H
Q
F
H
All
in
favor
motion
carries
four
point:
two
one
declaration
of
violation
complied
prior
continued
from
March
25th
and
April
22nd
case
78;
twenty
pondan's
human
Holdings
LLC
at
692,
Bayway,
boulevard,
number
202
in
violation
of
code
for
short-term
rental
and
issue;
an
order
with
compliance
deadlines
and
fine.
If
compliance
is
not
met,
Gerry.
A
To
find
a
respondent
wasn't
violation
of
the
code
as
referred
to
in
the
affidavit.
In
this
case
the
violation
was
corrected
prior
to
today's
hearing
and
to
enter
an
order
that
no
fine
be
imposed.
If
the
respondent
repeats
the
violation,
the
board
may
were
fine
of
up
to
$500.
For
each
day,
the
violation
continues
to
exist.
Q
A
H
Four
point:
two
three
declaration
of
violation
continue
complied
continued
from
March
25th
and
April
22nd
case
80-20
by
respondents.
Austin
America
LLC
is
692
Bayway
Boulevard
number
402
in
violation
of
code
for
residential
rental
business,
tax,
receipt,
short-term
rental
issue,
an
order
with
compliance
deadlines
and
fine.
If
compliance
is
not
met,
while
requesting
a
declaration.
H
F
H
H
H
H
T
B
T
Well,
good
day,
no
light
sigh
inspector
with
the
city-
this
is
case,
82
20,
there's
one
violation
at
the
property,
and
it's
for
science
director
without
permits
city
is
asking
compliance
on
her
before
July
24th
of
2020,
which
I
stated
they
seem
to
already
be
in
compliance
according
to
the
owner
or
fined
$100
per
day
that
the
violation
exists.
We're
asking
the
board
to
authorize
the
following
after
three
months
from
the
recordation
date
of
such
lien.
T
If
the
fines
and
fees
remain
unpaid,
the
city's
Attorney's
Office
is
authorized
to
foreclose,
collect
or
civil
such
lien,
using
any
legal
or
equitable
remedies
under
the
wall.
Come
on,
Scalia
met
for
signage
director
without
permits
by
either
removing
all
unpermitted
all
permanent,
on
permitted
signage
from
the
property
or
by
obtaining
a
signed
permit
to
allow
the
sign
to
remain
erected.
T
D
T
Come
and
get
a
permit
for
big-box
supermarket,
but
they
did
not
get
one
for
the
for
the
middle
sign.
This
was
on
3/14,
showing
some
improvements
on
the
fastener
signs
and
the
other
two
signs
still
up.
This
is
just
to
show
that
the
big-box
store
did
obtain
a
permit
to
install
one
attached
sign
not
to-
and
this
was
on
615
just
to
show
they've
taken
down
the
images
of
what
products
that
they're
selling,
or
at
least
the
majority
of
them
there's
still
one
up,
but
they
seem
to
have
no
problem
with
taking
it
down.
A
F
F
Into
an
order
required
respondent
to
correct
a
violation
hotter
before
July
24
20
20,
the
respondent
does
not
comply
by
that
date.
The
board
may
order
a
fine
of
$100.
You
say
yes,
sir
per
day
per
violation.
For
each
day,
each
violation
continues
to
exist
if
fines
and
fees
remain
unpaid.
Three
months
after
such
lien
is
filed,
the
city
is
authorized
to
foreclose,
collect
or
settle
socially
favor.
H
Motion
carries
okay,
four
point:
two
six:
six
declaration
of
violation
complied
with
Pryor
continued
from
March
25th
and
April
22nd
case
83,
25
respondents
and
I'm.
Sorry,
I'm,
just
gonna,
say
the
address
at
333,
Coronado
Avenue,
in
violation
of
code
for
business
tax,
receipt
required
issue,
ordered
with
compliance
deadlines
and
fine
and
compliances
that
meant
compliance.
A
To
find
the
respondent
was
in,
violation
of
the
code
has
referred
to
the
affidavit.
In
this
case,
the
violation
was
corrected
prior
to
today's
hearing
into
an
Internet
order
that
no
fine
be
imposed.
If
respondent
repeats
the
violation,
the
board
may
order
refine
it
up
to
500
dollars
for
each
state.
A
violation
continues
to
exist.
H
H
T
A
U
F
H
D
R
R
H
F
A
A
B
Z
A
B
B
A
J
P
Z
D
R
Z
Z
T
O
A
T
Z
B
H
H
B
U
S
S
The
windows
has
been
that
glass
was
broken,
so
we
thought
that
the
painting
recommended
by
Eric
we're
doing
it
that
as
well
and
electric
done,
but
couple
outlet
minor
things
to
need
to
have
done
so
he
gonna
that
one
is
actually
for
a
5.10
people.
Jason
will
be
go
back
to
to
look
that
outlets.
All
those
minor
things
to
get
it
done
so.
S
A
J
P
P
J
F
J
P
S
A
So
here's
the
thing,
sir
there's
ways
to
get
things
done,
maybe
a
little
more
difficult
than
normal
yeah,
that's
where
we
are
and
you've
been
head.
This
started
in
October
and
now
it's
eight
months
later,
you
know
or
more
than
that,
nine
months
later
and
you're
still
not
in
compliance,
you
need
to
get
into
compliance.
But
let
me
ask
you
one
question:
during
those
three
four
months
with
a
pandemic,
were
you
still
collecting
rent.
S
A
S
A
X
X
A
F
B
I
think
it's
important
to
understand
that
that
fines
and
the
meter
is
running.
So
it's
super
important
that
when
that
work
gets
done
and
the
windows
are
done
and
exterior
surfaces
done
and
your
electric
cover
is
done,
I
think
the
second
it's
done.
You
need
to
make
sure
the
city
knows
understanding
that
that's
the
cutoff
date,
because
you're
I'm,
afraid
of
your
fees
and
fines
are
gonna,
be
three
times.
F
A
That's
Jason's,
nothing!
So
here's
the
thing,
sir,
we're
not
here
to
calculate
the
number
or
anything
like
that.
All
we're
prepared
to
is
to
see
if
you
are
you
in
compliance
or
not,
and
I'm
gonna
make
a
motion
that
you're
not
based
on
the
evidence
that
we've
had
and
then
whatever
comes
out
the
numbers.
The
dollar
you
work
that
out
later
on,
but
right
now,
you're,
not
in
compliance
and
that's
the
problem.
And
what
he's
trying
to
bring
to
your
attention
is.
This
is
costing
you
a
lot
of
money,
and
so
is
he?
What.
S
A
Not
income
he's
just
said
you're,
not
in
compliance.
You
hit
doors
and
windows
that
you
haven't
addressed
and
you
haven't
addressed
the
exterior
of
the
building.
So
with
that
I'm
gonna
make
a
motion.
Okay,
I
move
to
accept
the
affidavit
of
non-compliance
for
case.
Oh
three,
twenty
an
issue,
an
order
that
imposes
fines
and
states
if
fines
and
fees
remain
unpaid.
Three
months
after
such
lien
is
filed,
the
city's
authorized
to
foreclose
collector
settle
such
lien.
F
A
F
A
S
G
P
Okay,
that's
what
I
was
explaining
to
him
that
there
was
a
dispute
on
who
owns
that
property
according
to
property
appraiser.
This
is
their
outline
for
the
property
line
for
that
property
and
as
far
as
the
other
doors
and
windows
and
scope,
this
is
one
that
he
had
repaired.
It
was
a
broken
window,
but,
as
you
can
see,
it's
talked
in
on
the
side
and
it's
actually
screwed
in
so
we
can't
operate.
P
A
You
see
what
that
makes
you're,
not
in
compliance.
So
here's
my
advice
to
you,
sir
get
it
fixed,
get
it
right
and
then
you
can
talk
to
them
about
the
fines
and
all
that.
Maybe
you
can
work
something
out.
Okay,
but
in
your
case
the
sooner
the
better
is
it's
costing
you
some
money.
Thank
you
now,
you're
gonna
be
up
for
something
else.
Now
right,
mister,
mr.
J
B
F
J
J
Y
Y
A
Y
Y
A
S
S
Y
B
Was
my
question
is
how
you
feel
communication
is,
and
do
you
feel
that
he's
understanding
the
gravity
of
what
we
as
a
city
of
presenting
to
them,
because
it
sounds
like
there's
a
lot
of
confusion
and
misunderstanding,
and
it
says
in
just
days
and
weeks
I
mean
you're,
my
god
you're
three
months
into
ticking
it.
We
just
were
given
a
figure
over
sixty
thousand
dollars
on
a
previous
fine,
seven
hundred
dollars
a
day
is
a
lot
of
money.
S
S
A
Here's
the
thing,
sir,
you
have
their
property
and
you
have
tenants
in
their
property
and
as
a
landlord
you're
responsible
to
maintain
that
property
in
such
a
safe
way
that
they're
not
injured,
and
if
they
say
no,
you
can't
come
in.
You
can
do
something
about
that.
Okay,
because
you're
gonna
be
liable
for
their
safety.
So
here's
the
thing
I
also
agree
with
my
colleague
here
I
think
you
have
a
there's
a
problem
and
understanding
where
you
are
on
all
this.
You
may
need
to
get
some
assistance
from
somebody.
I
know.
S
In
the
bottom
we
keep
it
like.
I
spoke
with
adjacent
about
that
I
said:
I
have
to
keep
this
empty
until
fall,
I'm
getting
new
good
tenant
who
can
pay
and
who
can
employ
in
the
city's
they
pulled
up
permit.
They
show
that
they
can
get
that
licensee.
They
don't
have
a
no
licensee
before
and
the
previous
owner
doesn't
care.
So
it's
not
like
I
I,
just
go
there
and
I
do
something
I.
Take
it
big
losses.
U
S
Not
even
I'm
right
now,
I'm
just
going
to
be
hard
like
almost
way.
His
situation
is
saying
you
serious
protein
750
part
day.
Yeah
I
spoke
with
so
many
times
on
the
phone
email,
nothing,
he
you
know
even
he's
a
help
me
go
true,
so
I'm
going
as
he
direction
like
if
we
say
go
this
way,
I'm
going
that
way,
I
don't
say:
I,
don't
nothing
like
you
know,
taking
my
way,
I'm
just
born
what
one
he
said
and
I
go
in
that
way.
B
Nothing
you
have
a
responsibility,
and
this
is
a
big
responsibility
as
a
property
owner
in
the
city.
The
city
has
a
responsibility
of
following
rules
and
codes.
I
think
that
we
learn
from
it
almost
as
City.
We
almost
need
to
ensure
that
we're
effectively
communicating
when
we
hit
this
roadblock
or
hurdle
and
that
they
are
fully
understanding
the
gravity
of
the
situation.
Where
sometimes
you
know
you
can
throw
this
out
into
many
conversation.
We
get
it
we
move
on.
We
know
what
we
do
I
think
here.
B
B
A
B
S
B
X
B
You
finished
it
in
February
when
you're
compliant
to
date,
he
give
you
that
date
was
set.
There
would
have
been
no
fines
since
then,
every
single
day,
you're
you're,
collecting
fines
and
fees
that
you
are
responsible
for.
Yes,
you
will
at
the
end,
when
you
finally
finish
it,
you
will
owe
that
money.
Does
that
make
sense.
S
A
One
thing
you
got
a
letter
in
the
mail
that
told
you
what
the
board
said
and
that
you
were
going
to
be
buying
$250
a
day.
You
got
that
remember,
yeah
sign
for
it,
probably
even
okay.
That
was
your
notification.
If
you
didn't
understand
that
you
should
maybe
gotten
help
from
your
friends
do
go
already.
You
know
me,
but
that's
when
you
were
told
what
it
was
and
he
kept
telling
you
one
thing
when
you're
in
compliance.
It
stops
that's
true,
too.
Okay,
but
you're,
not
in
compliance.
F
A
A
C
A
Y
A
J
Lord
Michael
Foley,
no
assistant
city
attorney
this
one.
This
agenda
items
gonna
be
even
more
different
than
normal
I'll.
Just
give
you
the
procedural
background
and
then
I'll
turn
it
over.
The
case
came
before
the
board
without
employment
issue,
the
board
entered
order
finding
mr.
Roy
in
violation
requiring
and
compliance
state,
but
not
instituting
the
fine,
the
so
called
first
order.
J
J
Even
lawyers
who
do
this
stuff
don't
serve.
You
don't
always
understand
how
a
palatable
artwork
does
wolf
goes,
might
get
a
lot
of
work
so
just
because
someone
files,
an
appeal
of
a
cold
board
order
or
judgment
or
whatever
it
may
be,
does
not
stop
as
long
as
execution
of
the
order.
It
doesn't
means
that
and
I
used
to
have
us
a
lot
in
for
to
defend
foreclosures
a
lot
when
you
get
a
foreclosure
judgment,
there's
an
amount
that
you
have
to
pay
and
then
a
foreclosure
sale
date.
J
Okay,
now
my
clients
would
often
appeal
the
foreclosure
judgment
and
they
think
all
that
would
cancel
the
foreclosure
sale
date.
That's
not
some
in
order
to
cancel
the
sale
date,
you
have
to
file,
what's
known
as
a
motion
to
sustain
and
that's
what
mr.
Roy
is
done
now.
The
motion
to
stay
essentially
asks
what
the
loan
tribunal,
which
would
be
this
board,
to
maintain
the
status
quo,
and
we
can
get
into
the
merits
of
that.
It's
all
been
attached.
J
But
if
the
board
that
the
board
grants
the
motion
to
stay-
and
that
would
be
all
the
board
will
do
today,
what
the
city
is
going
to
ask
is
twofold.
Its
first
I
will
argue
why
the
court
why
the
board
should
deny
the
motion
instead,
I
would
ask
for
a
first
motion
on
that.
Someone
would
say
a
motion
to
deny
I
moved
to
deny
mr.
Lloyd's
motion
staying
all
in
favor
aye,
and
then
we
go
to
the
second
part,
which
would
be
I
will
call
the
inspector
up
to
ask
the
board
the
issue.
B
J
J
His
son's
here
this
is
a
legal
argument
and
he's
not
a
lawyer
I'm,
not
sure
if
you
would
even
allow
him
to
speak
because
we're
the
only
lawyers
are
supposed
to
argue
that
at
the
last
hearing
it's
a
little
different
when
it's
giving
testimony
well
whether
or
not
something's
in
compliance.
This
is
a
legal
issue.
J
I'll
leave
that
to
the
board,
but
if
you
did
not
the
motion,
the
state,
which
is
what
I'm
asking
you
to
do,
then
you
would
and
I
would
then
ask
you
to
accept
the
affidavit
of
non-compliance
and
the
fines
would
begin
to
occur
so
before
we
get
there.
How
about
I
give
mr.
Roy
or
mr.
Roy
son
his
opportunity
to
speak
about
why
I
stayed.
J
J
B
A
What
we
know
certain
work
was
done
on
the
exterior
of
the
building
and
with
belief
that
that
property
was
gonna,
be
turned
into
something,
and
the
city
said
we
could
work
with
you
if
we
have
access
to
the
building
to
see
what's
going
on
there
now,
because
we
are
that.
So
what
did
we
ask
them?
What
did
we
say?
No,
this
is
what
we
want
you
to
do.
We.
J
J
A
J
R
O
Want
to
give
you
some
brief
instruction
about
how
to
weigh
the
evidence
that
you're
gonna
be
presented,
emotion,
estates
a
little
bit
different
than
other
code
enforcement
decisions
that
you've
made
today
and
other
meetings.
So
the
pellet
Rules
of
Civil
Procedure
says
that
the
lower
tribunal
has
the
discretion
to
grants,
modify
or
deny
a
motion
to
stay.
So
it's
it's
a
discretionary
standard
for
you
all.
There
are
two
elements
to
consider
for
a
motion
to
stay.
One
is
the
the
likeliness
for
the
case
to
succeed
on
the
merits.
So
that's
that's
the
appellate
court.
O
So
how
likely
the
petitioner
is
to
succeed
up
at
the
appellate
level
and
the
other
is
the
lepton
is
for
irreconcilable
harm.
So
one
of
the
questions
was
asked.
You
know
about
about
cost,
be
encouraged
regarding
compliance
or
not
compliance
so
does
do
you
think
they
just
wanted
to
give
you
that
that
instruction,
because
it's
a
little
bit
different
than
what
it's
been
going
on
in
the
past.
O
D
B
Think
for
me
personally,
just
sitting
here
not
regardless
of
what
the
gentleman
comes
up
and
says
kind
of
uncomfortable
at
issue,
in
an
order
on
a
legal
stance
and
a
legal
argument
when
we're
not
legal
we're,
not
judges,
we're
not
attorneys,
so
we're
being
half
the
stuff.
You
just
told
us
I
think
the
majority
are
probably
sitting
like
what
does
that
mean
what
so
we're
being
asked
to
interpret
and
make
a
legal
decision
as
a
board
that
I
and
just
someone.
J
Comfortable
and
just
so
you
understand,
sir
mr.
Roy
initially
filed
his
motion
to
study
in
the
appellate
court.
The
appellate
court
denied
the
motion
without
prejudice
to
bring
it
before
the
board
here,
which
meant
that
the
court
didn't
reach
on
the
merits
of
the
motion.
It
just
said
he
filed
it
in
the
wrong
form,
which
is
true.
The
motion
needs
to
be
filed
in
the
in
the
lower
tribunal,
which
is
you
all
thanks
for
waiting.
So.
O
B
B
A
K
A
B
K
Right
I
spoke
about
that
after
the
first
hearing,
yes
handling
over
existing
walls,
the
intention
of
that
is
interior,
so
we're
talking
about
wood,
paneling
over
possible
plaster
or
drywall
a
wall
like
this.
You
come
in,
you
put
the
paneling
on.
You,
don't
need
a
permanent
they're
interpreting
that
as
the
exterior
wall.
What
they're
doing
is
they
are
signing.
They
are.
B
B
F
B
K
B
J
B
AA
I'm
sorry
Benjamin
Roy
I'm,
the
representative.
Today
my
address
is
1412
North,
Fort,
Harrison
Avenue.
The
mere
fact
I
mean
there's
play
of
legal
argument
to
be
made
here
and,
as
mr.
Medina's
said,
you
guys
aren't
attorneys.
You
guys
aren't
just
and
you're
you're,
putting
put
in
a
tough
position
and
there's
play
of
legal
arguments.
AA
We've
made
that
the
mere
fact
that
has
to
be
interpreted
further
proves
that
what
the
respondent
did
was
within
his
rights
as
a
property
owner
to
maintain
his
property
and
that's
an
argument
for
the
appellate
court
for
the
appellate
to
decide.
All
we're
asking
today
is
for
a
motion
of
stare.
I,
don't
see
how
this
is
going
to
harm
the
city
of
Clearwater.
B
AA
Sofrito
said
we
can't
just
put
a
motion
of
stay
in
the
foreclosure
proceeding
because
that
won't
stop
anything.
So
there's
there's
more
harm
being
done
to
the
property
owner
about
a
legal
decision
that
the
porter
reviewing
and
it
would
cost.
It
doesn't
cost
anything
to
accept
the
motion
of
stay
until
the
higher
court
has
decided.
F
F
F
A
Have
several
questions?
Yes,
sir,
are
you
said,
are
you
an
attorney
I'm?
Not,
oh,
you
are
I'm,
not
okay,
so
the
you're
in
the
same
group,
we
are
okay,
I'll
clarify
that
and
your
address
is
1412
North
Fort
Harrison.
If
I'm
not
mistaken,
I
recognize
that
property
it's
for
sale
as
a
for
sale
sign.
It
has
that's
their
case.
AA
U
A
A
AA
James
mr.
James
said
to
you:
there
are
two
points
for
improving
emotion,
one,
the
likeliness
of
success
and
what
I've
entered
here
is
the
current
case
and
two
irreconcilable
harm,
so
that
could
be
foreclosed
another
property
or,
as
mr.
fuentemayor
Menino
said,
doing
all
the
work
to
come
into
compliance.
And
then
the
court
saying
yeah
you
probably
you
didn't-
have
to
do
that,
but
you
did
and
so
long.
AA
My
skin
is
the
this
court
they're
in
a
position
now
to
weigh
the
scales
with
fairness
and
I
understand
you
guys,
aren't
attorneys
or
judges,
but
we're
just
asking
for
the
actual
attorneys
and
judges
to
what
wait
until
the
judge
has
ruled
on
it,
and
then
the
fines
and
fees
can
continue.
It's
been
scheduled.
AA
X
X
X
F
AA
A
AA
F
AA
Y
A
You
know
so
here's
the
thing,
but
that
you
did
that
last
time
too,
in
this
diatribe
of
meaningless
stuff,
this
constitution
I
fought
for
it,
I
served
for
it.
I
don't
need
to
be
told
by
you
what
I
didn't
need
to
do.
What
I
want
you
to
understand,
though,
is
there
your
father,
I
asked
him
I
said
so
you
are
a
property
manager
and
that
this
is
your
business.
He
said,
yeah
I
said
great,
but
what
can
be
lost?
If
we
keep
grant
to
stay,
people
will
say
hey.
We
can
get
away
with
it.
A
He
got
away
with
it.
Now
we
can
get
away
with
it
and
here's
the
thing
your
father
does
know
the
building
codes
versus
those
people
that
were
here
that
needed
to
get
a
pad
for
their
storage
unit
in
the
back
they're,
not
aware
of
it,
but
your
father
does.
But
your
father
is
a
strong
man
he's
a
smart
man,
but
he
does
it
his
way
and
you
can
ask
him
for
me:
how's
it
working
out.
A
B
I'm
not
this
is
in
a
situation
because
one
of
the
beautiful
things
about
being
in
a
courtroom
is
that
a
judge
and
a
legal
team
takes
out
emotions,
frustrations,
anger
and
I.
Think
there's
probably
a
little
too
much
decision.
There's
frustrations.
They
hang
over
here.
Well,
there's
definitely
frustrations
and
not
that's
important.
There's
frustrations
over
the
city
I'm
frustrated
because
the
heats
been
in
front
of
us
multiple
times
for
things.
People
have
called
them
slum,
Lords
and
things
like
that.
B
That's
Trading
to
me,
but
we're
to
a
point
where
we
have
to
make
a
decision
on
this,
not
his
past,
not
our
frustrations
or
anger
and
we're
not
it
we're
not
a
judge
in
a
capacity
of
a
legal
to
make
a
legal
decision
based
on
civil
liberties
that
were
arguing,
I'm
not
and
you
can
roll
over
our
eyes.
We
can
say
you
don't
agree
with
me.
That's
fine
and
I
can
be.
B
You
know
separate
from
this
group,
but
I'm
not
comfortable
making
a
decision
on
this
when
it's
in
the
hands
of
a
court,
and
we've
said
that
in
here
before
that,
we're
not
gonna
make
a
decision,
we'll
wait
until
the
higher
court
does
and
if
either
higher
court
is
looking
at
it.
That's
probably
their
decision
now.
Is
there
mitigating
things
that
need
to
be
happen?
B
Our
children
being
harmed
our
homeless,
creating
bombs
in
a
home
are
as
a
roof
falling
down
on
tenants
that
are
is
a
nun
say
that
those
are
things
that
we
probably
mitigate
and
need
to
immediately
attached.
But
if
it
comes
to
things
like
civil
liberties
and
arguments
over
a
permit
for
God's
sakes,
then.
B
J
I
think
this
is
where
mr.
Roy
misses
the
point
he's
talking
about
the
reputable
horn
about
fine
and
lean.
No
fine
has
been
imposed.
Yet
you
know
you
don't
like
the
cities'
recommendation.
Do
what
you
did
earlier
go
lower.
You
don't
like
to
see.
Maybe
a
dollar
again
make
it
$150
a
day
pending
disposition.
He
did
appeal,
but
he's
not
a
record
of
really
hard
right.
Yeah
bees
nothing's
happened
to
him
right.
You
ever
done
anything,
that's
why
expulsion
is
premature.
J
That's
why
do
you
need
to
deny
and
then
you
could
go
on
to
the
next
point?
And
you
say
you
know
what
no
I
don't
want
down
to
$50
again,
I'm
gonna
do
$10
again,
whatever
you
want
to
do.
You
do
$150
a
day
Lee
both
of
their
banks,
but
there's
no
need
why
we
need
to
keep
this
runing
to
halt
this
train
because
he
hasn't
suffered
any
reputable
harm.
Yet
she's
never
been
done
to
him.
Yes,
you
can
find
yet.
B
J
B
D
AA
AA
J
AA
A
D
J
F
B
It's
what's
interpreted
in
our
city
code.
If
it's,
maybe
it's
the
city
code
that
needs
to
be
changed.
Maybe
that's
the
problem
find
and
reinterpreted
to
mean
when
he
stands
in
front
of
us
and
tells
us
what
the
city
believes
that
means.
Well,
maybe
it
needs
to
be
in
writing.
So
us,
as
a
community,
understand
what
it
is
and
then
we
don't
get
to
that
point.
There's.
F
O
B
C
O
Good
okay
for
consumed
now
so
now
up
for
the
board.
This
is
the
city's
recommendation.
S
if
you
want
to
find
the
petitioner
and
non-compliance
and
any
issues
related
to
any
fine
that
you
want
to
impose
you
all
wanna
handle
that
just
so
that
I
can
clarify
the
issues
that
are
before
the
board
presently.
So
the
motion
this
day
has
been
denied
correct.
Okay.
So
now,
once
again,
the
board
is
trying
to
determine
if
they're
gonna
work
with
the
petitioner
and
non-compliance
and
any
related
issues
to
any
fines.
So
just
okay.
A
AA
A
AA
AA
A
AA
A
A
So
it's
it's!
Your
principal
I
move
to
accept
the
affidavit
of
non-compliance
in
case
55
20
an
issue
or
an
order
imposes
fines
of
a
hundred
and
fifty
dollars
per
day
and
those
fines
are
stayed
stayed
until
the
appellate
court
reaches
its
decision
once
if
the
plaintiff
plaintiff
loses
or
losses
decision,
the
fines
are
retroactive
to
March
22nd
2020.
A
H
R
A
H
Six
point:
one
case:
one
36
19
approved
requests
by
petitioners,
star
cleaners
of
Tampa
Bay
ain't
that
one
908
owe
us
highway.
19
north
to
reduce
the
fine
regarding
exterior
services
and
improve
is
an
order.
Excuse
me:
oh
we've
been
here
a
while
this
specifies
some
fine
and
includes
administrative
costs
and
establishes
a
date
payable
or
the
lien
will
revert
to
its
original
amount.
D
D
F
B
M
F
C
H
W
A
B
A
E
F
Prior
to
today's
hearing,
Clara
enter
an
order
that
you'll
find
being
opposed.
This
is
for
7.2
if
the
respondent
repeats
the
violation,
the
board,
they
impose
a
daily
fine,
an
order,
the
city
to
take
all
reasonable
actions
to
abate
and
maintain
the
nuisance,
including
entry
onto
the
property
and
charge
to
respondent,
with
those
costs,
fines
and
fees
which
will
become
a
lien
on
the
property.
Second,.