►
Description
The agenda for the meeting can be found on the city's website at http://bit.iy/clearwaterCityCouncilMeetings
A
A
B
B
Municipal
Code
Enforcement
board
consists
of
seven
members
who
are
appointed
by
the
City
Council
and
we
serve
voluntarily.
It
is
the
board's
intention
to
promote,
protect
and
improve
the
health,
safety
and
welfare
of
the
citizens
of
Clearwater
by
providing
this
equitable,
effective
and
inexpensive
method
of
enforcing
certain
codes
within
the
city.
The
board
consists
considers
new
business
items
in
two
parts:
first,
a
violation
and
then
affirmative
relief,
formal
rules
of
evidence
do
not
apply.
Each
side
is
limited
to
15
minutes
and
the
board
may
grant
additional
time.
B
B
F
I
J
H
B
H
All
right
very
good,
so
this
this
depicts
the
property,
and
this
depicts
an
easement
that
encumbers
the
property
that
the
city
is
in
the
benefit
of
the
city.
My
client
has
been
a
very,
very
good
partner
for
the
city
over
the
years.
My
client
actually
gave
that
easement
to
the
city
for
free
at
absolutely
no
consideration
when
they
were
not
obligated
to
do
so
so
I
just
wanted
to
put
that
out
there.
My
client
is
not
one
of
these
frequent
repeat
offenders
that
hasn't
been
communicating
or
working
proactively
with
the
city.
H
We
have
a
really
good
working
relationship
with
the
city
and
I
think
that
the
planning
department
would
would
agree
with
that.
I.
Don't
think,
there's
any
evidence
to
the
contrary.
So
the
issue
that
we
have
is
that
my
client
has
retained
me
as
an
architect
who
has
a
civil
engineer
to
put
in
a
flexible
development
application
to
the
Planning
Department
to
develop
a
five
unit,
condo,
which
would
be
you
know,
consistent
with
beach
by
design
and
meet
all
the
requirements
of
the
Community
Development
code.
H
The
issue
that
we
have
with
that
is
that
the
city
is
currently
working
in
the
easement,
so
this
is
the
site.
Today,
I
was
just
there
about
an
hour
ago.
The
site
is
over
here
and,
as
you
can
see,
this
is
about
a
12
foot,
high
fence
that
basically
surrounds
almost
all
of
my
clients
property.
So
you
can't
even
access
the
vast
majority
of
my
clients,
property
based
on
the
city,
doing
the
easement
work.
This
is
a
picture,
my
clients
properties
actually
behind
this
fence
here.
H
So
the
issue
comes
down
to
the
dock,
and
the
dock
is
certainly
in
disrepair.
It's
not
being
used
by
anyone.
The
issue
is
that
my
client
is
working
with
the
Planning
Department
to
determine
how
many
docks
or
how
many
boat
slips
can
go
there
as
part
of
the
development
application.
So
when
we
had
this
conversation
with
mr.
Dale
I
believe
it
was
last
month
when
this
issue
first
came
to
my
attention
about
the
dock.
I
said
you
know,
mr.
H
So
again,
the
question
is
probably
going
to
be:
why
can't
they
just
take
down
the
dock
or
repair
it?
And
the
answer
is:
we
are
waiting
for
the
city
to
be
done
with
the
improvements
to
the
easement,
because
we'd
like
to
vacate
a
portion
of
the
easement,
it's
a
very
small
site,
we'd
like
to
see,
if
there's
any
footage
that
can
be
vacated
of
the
easement,
to
allow
us
to
you
to
use
in
our
development
application
and
we're
waiting
on
confirmation
from
the
city
staff
as
to
what
dock
can
go
there.
H
We
don't
have
any
objection
to
removing
the
dock,
repairing
it
replacing
it,
but
we
need
to
know
what
we
can
do.
Can
we
do
five
slips?
Can
we
do
more
than
that
and
we've
again,
we've
met
with
mr.
Dell.
My
clients
met
with
Miss
Clayton
I've
met
with
mr.
Perry,
so
we're
proactively
working
on
that
I
want
to
point
out
that
the
city
I
think
it's
Kalyn
price
who's
in
charge
of
this.
H
The
city
improvements
on
the
easement
she's
told
me
the
projects
ahead
of
schedule,
but
she's
also
said
that
the
schedule
calls
were
to
last
until
August,
which
is
why
we've
asked
for
the
continuance
until
August.
If
we
get
an
agreement
or
some
understanding
from
the
Planning
Department
about
what
we
can
do
with
the
dock,
now
we
don't
have
any
problem,
moving
it
or
fixing
it
before
August,
but
I
think
that
my
client
has
reached
a
reasonable
resolution
here.
H
This
dock
is
not
able
to
be
used,
it's
not
an
attractive
nuisance,
it's
not
an
empty
building
that
is
inviting
homeless
or
other
kind
of
activity.
No
one's
gonna,
you
know,
put
a
boat
on
this
dive.
I've
got
a
client
that
is
redeveloping
353
and
345
coronado,
and
there
are
two
docks
that
are
that
are
not
in
disrepair
that
are
vacant
that
had
actually
holdovers
had
people
that
were
that
were
trespassing.
Their
boats
there
and
I
had
to
eject
them.
H
I've
never
had
to
do
an
ejectment
action
against
a
boat
before,
but
I
actually
had
to
do
it
against
two
of
them.
So
my
point
is:
there
are
plenty
of
unoccupied
docks
that
actually
could
be
utilized
by
someone
if
they
were
looking
to
take
advantage
of
a
dock.
This
dock
is
not
going
to
be
used
by
anyone.
I
can
represent
to
you
that
this
tree
or
this
little
bush
here,
is
on
the
seawall.
So
if
I
were
to
try
to
get
onto
that
dock
I
would
fall
into
the
water.
H
So
I
don't
think
that
the
dock
is
a
danger
to
anyone
in
the
public.
The
site
is
extremely
secure
from
the
city
side.
That
fence
I
think
is
about
12
feet
high.
This
fence
is
eight
feet
high,
so
I
don't
think
there's
any
compelling
or
pressing
need
I.
Don't
think
the
city
has
any
evidence
that
anyone
has
been
using
it
or
that
kids
have
been
jumping
on
it
or
doing
anything
with
it.
That
would
cause
any
problems
or
concerns.
H
K
C
H
I'll
answer
that
and
it's
not
the
city
staffs
fault,
so
the
planning
department
is
separate
and
distinct
from
code
enforcement
code
enforcement
is
doing
their
job.
The
dot,
we're
not
denying
that
this
dock
needs
to
go
I
mean
so
we
understand
that
and
I
think
I
think
what
the
staff
is
trying
to
do
today
is
make
sure
that
you
guys
are
aware
of
this
when
I,
when
I,
when
we
agreed
to
put
the
fence
up-
and
we
got
the
email
from
mr.
delphy,
it
was
my
impression
that
this
was
going
to
be
considered
compliance.
H
But
when
I
reread
the
email
and
looked
at
the
city
staff
position,
the
city
staff
was
very
clear
that
they
were
just
agreeing
to
continue
it
to
May.
So
the
city
never
said,
we
agree
if
you
put
the
fence
up
that
it's
in
compliance
and
so
I
understand
the
city's
position.
They
don't
want
this
to
drag
on
for
months
and
months
and
months,
and
we
don't
want
it
to
drag
on
for
months
and
months
and
months
either,
but
I
think
it's
reasonable.
G
L
E
There's
been
some
transition
as
well,
and
so
they've
been
looking
into
it
to
see
how
many
exact
number
of
slips
that
were
available,
then
because
there
was
another
project
that
got
approved
before
we
got
ownership
of
it,
and
so
it's
a
work
in
progress.
We
just
haven't
been
able
to
I.
We
haven't
been
able
to
attain
from
them
anything
in
writing
to.
Let
us
know
that
if
we
were
to
demolish
the
dock
we
could
we
reassure
to
get
that
same
number
of
love.
It.
H
C
Man,
I'm
caring,
here's
the
thing
I
see
the
city's
concern
about
them.
It's
obvious.
The
picture
speaks
for
itself.
Yet
in
the
last
few
months
we
have
made
exceptions
for
property
purchases
closures
and
condemned
buildings
in
unsafe
buildings
to
continue
for
months
until
the
new
owner
could
do
it.
So
this
to
me
is
more
of
a
controlled
situation
than
as
some
of
the
stuff
that
we
agreed
to
and
these
other
structures,
I
I
think
this
is
a
reasonable
request.
D
They
are
their
offense
contractor.
Dana
Route
assistant,
building
official,
their
fence
contractor,
was
able
to
access
the
site
to
put
up
the
fence.
Marine
contractors
can
can
take
a
boat
there
and
take
down
that
dock
that
that's
how
they
build
them.
That's
how
they
put
the
piles
in
they
do
it
by
by
the
water.
So
I
don't
see
the
access
as
being
the
issue.
D
M
Well,
I'm
Kevin
Gary,
then,
with
a
building
department
of
the
building
official,
the
the
dock.
That's
there
now
is
well
documented
and
that
didn't
occur
overnight.
That's
been
deteriorating
for
a
long
long
time.
It
just
happens
that
these
leaves
have
all
come
together
at
one
time,
but
that
doesn't
make
that
dock
any
less
safe
and
it
is
accessible
from
the
water
and
it
would
need
to
be
accessible
from
the
water
to
be
repaired
or
removed.
M
The
the
fact
that
they
are
determining
what
they
can
put
in
there
is
a
new
development
should
have
no
relevance
on
fixing
or
removing
or
replacing
that
dock.
What
they've
got
there
is
well
documented
and
somebody
isn't
gonna
say:
oh
well,
no,
your
docks
going.
You
can't
have
a
dock
anymore.
I
mean
that
would
be
ridiculous.
G
C
M
H
C
H
Can
that
we
can
again,
you
know
our
request
is
for
the
continuance
and
we
would
work.
We
would
represent
to
you
that
we
would
work
with
the
city
to
do
additional
efforts
to
secure
it
and
remove
access
issues
between
now
and
August
and
hopefully
remove
the
whole
thing.
Once
we
hear
from
the
Planning
Department
I
personally,
just
think
it's
a
reasonable
request.
So
I.
A
Think
it's
pretty
reasonable
myself
as
well.
I,
don't
I,
think
I'm
showing
that
they're
trying
to
do
everything
they
can
to
this
point:
they've
communicated
to
the
city
on
every
level,
imaginative
and
positive
and
they're
not
getting
the
answers
that
they
need
to
move
forward
and
for
security,
knowing
that
your
property
can
be
as
is
or
more
and
not
less
than
what
you
currently
have
I.
Think
it's
a
reasonable
request
from
I.
Do.
G
H
N
E
L
K
K
Q
Q
Q
J
C
R
R
The
Notice
of
Violation
was
sent
on
February
5th
of
2019,
with
a
compliance
date
of
March
5th
2019
and
the
certified
mail
receipt
was
received
on
February
14th
of
2019
I
actually
took
this
photograph
back
in
December
when
I
spoke
to
them
the
first
time
to
let
them
know
that
this
could
not
happen
there.
This
is
that.
R
R
R
This
was
a.
This
is
a
picture
of
that
posting
for
today's
hearing,
these
were
taken
on
May
8th.
You
can
still
see
the
outdoor
storage
not
near
as
much
as
the
there
was,
but
there's
still
a
lot
of
storage
outside.
This
was
the
front
of
the
house
on
May,
8th,
the
side
of
the
house,
and
then
some
bouncy
house
items
all
of
a
sudden,
a
card
in
the
front
yard.
R
R
I'll
just
skip
to
today's
pictures.
They
did
paint
the
house,
but
the
block
is
still
broken.
They
took
a
piece
of
plywood
and
just
covered
up
on
the
south
side
of
the
house,
and
this
is
the
backyard
the
side
of
the
house
and
the
backyard
today
and
then
all
the
bunch
of
things
out
in
front
of
the
house
today,
at
7:20.
K
S
S
There
is
a
check
that
a
car
is,
it
was
running
from
the
police
and
hit
the
side
of
the
house.
Michael
was
in
the
hospital
in
was
on
his
way
out,
so
he
wasn't
able
to
sign
for
it.
Now
we
are
trying
to
help
Patrick
it
fit
the
money
to
put
the
house
in
his
name,
so
he
can
get
the
check
from
the
insurance
company
to
get
that
part
of
the
house
fixed.
S
Q
S
C
S
J
C
J
S
S
C
J
S
C
A
City,
the
city,
to
find
out
what
needs
to
be
done
to
be
coming,
apply
it
yeah,
we're
saying
exterior
surface,
but
we're
saying
it's
been
paying
and
we're
saying
exterior
storage.
What
we're
saying
the
majority
of
it
has
already
been
cleaned,
so
I
think
we're
just
talking
about
the
broken
pieces
of
block
on
the
corner
of
the
building.
So,
let's
find
out
what
the
city's
statement
is
on,
how
that
can
be
repaired,
you're,
not
building
an
entire
new
house.
Maybe
it's
something:
that's
affordable,
they're,
feasible
to
move.
S
R
Recommendation
for
case
71
19
for
the
two
violations
for
the
exterior
surface.
We
were
just
discussing
that
just
to
give
them
time
to
be
able
to
open
the
probate,
we're
going
to
change
it
from
622
to
822
for
their
compliance
date,
or
that
will
be
a
sign
of
$150
a
day
and
then
for
the
exterior
storage.
We're
gonna,
give
them
and
tells
you
in
20.
Second,
that
is
gonna
stand
for
that,
because
all
they
gotta
do
is
clean.
That
mess
up.
C
S
S
C
C
C
Don't
know
how
good
you're
on
this
continue
that
aspect
of
the
case
till
August
and
then
see
where
we
are
just
like
what
we
did
with
the
dock
just
grant
a
continuance
on
that
portion,
but
the
other
thing
has
to
become
in
compliance
and
I
can
tell
you
if
the
other
stuff
doesn't
come
in
compliance.
You're
not
gonna,
find
it
much
sympathy.
Regarding
the
other
issue.
R
M
On
the
wall
on
the
wall,
what
you
really
need
to
do
is
have
a
professional
like
a
contractor
or
architect
or
an
engineer.
Take
a
look
at
that
and
see
how
far
the
damage
has
gone
inside
and
see
if
there
needs
to
be
some
rebar
or
something
put
back
in
there.
You
can't
just
stuck
all
over
that.
That
would
not.
S
M
S
B
L
Make
a
second
motion
and
I'm
going
by
the
city's
recommendation
what
they
said
this
is
for
case
seven
1-19
I
moved
to
enter
an
order
requiring
the
respondent
to
correct
the
violations.
First,
violation
is
storage
to
be
corrected
by
June
22nd
2019,
a
second
violation
exterior
surfaces
to
be
within
compliance
of
August
22nd.
T
L
22Nd
2019
of
the
respondent
does
not
comply
by
those
dates.
The
board
may
enter
a
fine
of
$150
per
day
per
violation
for
each
day.
Each
violation
continues
to
exist
if
the
buyer,
if
the
fines
and
fees
remain
unpaid.
Three
months
after
such
lien
is
filed,
the
city
is
authorized
to
foreclose
collectors.
Settle
such
lien
is.
B
N
L
C
To
find
respondent
was
in
violation
of
the
code,
as
referred
to
in
the
affidavit.
In
this
case,
the
violation
was
corrected
prior
to
today's
hearing
in
to
enter
in
order
that
no
fine
be
imposed.
If
the
respondent
repeats
the
violation,
the
board
may
order
a
fine
of
up
to
$500,
for
each
data
violation
continues
to
exist.
Second,
my.
B
L
Going
to
find
the
respondent
was
in,
violation
of
the
code
is
referred
to
in
the
affidavit.
In
this
case
the
violation
was
corrected
prior
to
today's
hearing
and
to
enter
an
order
that
no
fine
be
imposed.
If
the
respondent
repeats
the
violation
the
board
may
in
order
to
find
them
up
to
$500
for
each
day,
the
violation
continues
to
exist.
B
Motion
carries
ok-okay
7519
by
respondents
anthony
Dorner
at
5:11,
where
you
have
a
new
in
violation
of
code
for
exterior
surfaces
and
fences
and
walls,
an
issue,
an
order
with
compliance
deadlines
and
fine.
If
compliance
is
not
met,
are
they
here?
Is
this
a
declaration?
Okay,
just
thought.
I'd
ask
I.
A
F
F
For
the
home,
we're
just
looking
for
cleaning
of
the
mold
and
mildew,
as
you
can
see
on
the
photos
here,
there's
some
chipped
and
peeling
paint
as
well
to
paint
the
structure
and
for
the
fence
it's
to
repair
replace,
but
the
best
option
would
be
to
remove
his
data,
chingling
fence,
all
the
way
around
the
house,
/
Danson
and
the
interior
of
that
fence
line.
He
has
this
wooden
fence
that
is
falling
around
the
property.
So
how
was.
F
L
Motion
I
move
to
enter
an
order
requiring
responded
to
correct
a
violations
on
or
before
June
24
2019.
If
the
respondent
does
not
apply
about
a
date
to
board
me
in
order
to
find
out
$150
per
day,
provide
information
for
each
day,
each
violation
continues
to
exist
if
fines
and
fees
remain
unpaid.
Three
months
after
such
lead
is
filed,
the
city
is
authorized
to
foreclose,
collect
or
settle
such.
B
B
U
U
C
L
C
K
C
Declaration
and
the
lap
time
okay,
I
move,
the
finders
respondent
was
in
violation
of
the
code,
as
referred
to
in
the
affidavit
in
this
case.
Regarding
a
lot
cleaning,
the
violation
was
corrected
prior
to
today's
hearing
and
to
enter
an
order
that
no
fine
be
imposed.
Its
respondent
repeats
the
violation
the
board
may
order
final
up
to
five
hundred
dollars
for
each
data
violation
continues
to
exist.
L
B
U
Exterior
surfaces
of
a
new
building
request,
compliance
on
or
before
June
the
19th
2019
or
a
fine
$150
per
day
per
violation
for
each
day.
The
violations
continue
to
exist
after
three
months
from
the
recaudación
date
of
such
lien.
If
the
fines
and
fees
remain
unpaid,
the
city's
Attorney's
Office
is
authorized
to
foreclose
collectors.
Settle
such
lien
using
any
legal
or
equitable
remedies
available
under
the
law.
U
Compliance
can
be
met
for
exterior
surfaces
by
replacing
off
damaged
structural
and
decorative
elements
and
addressing
any
failing
or
peeling
paint
compliance
for
the
band
and
building
by
having
the
property
sold
demolish
or
have
all
code
violations
address.
Have
utilities
turned
on
and
have
occupied
here's
some
photos
from
January.
U
U
C
U
U
A
Moved
under
an
order
requiring
the
respondent
to
correct
the
violations
of
exterior
surfaces
and
abandoned
buildings
on
or
before
June
19
to
2019.
If
the
respondent
does
not
comply
with
that
date,
the
board
may
order
a
fine
of
150
dollars
per
day
per
violation.
For
each
day.
Each
violation
continues
to
exist
if
the
fines
and
fees
remain
unpaid.
Three
months
after
such
lien
is
filed,
the
city
is
authorized
to
foreclose
collector,
settle
such
lien.
B
B
C
Move
the
finder
responder
was
in
violation
of
the
code
referred
to
in
the
affidavit
in
this
case,
violation
was
corrected
prior
to
today's
hearing
and
to
enter
an
order
that
no
fine
be
imposed.
If
the
respondent
repeats
the
violation,
the
board
may
order
a
fine
of
up
to
$500
for
each
date
of
violation
can
used
to
exist.
B
C
I
moved
to
find
respondent
was
in
violation
of
the
quotas
referred
to
in
the
affidavit.
In
this
case,
the
violation
was
corrected
prior
to
today's
hearings
and
to
enter
an
order
that
no
fine
be
imposed.
If
respondent
repeats
the
violation,
the
board
may
will
refine
of
up
to
five
hundred
dollars
for
each
day.
The
violation
continues
to
exist.
B
B
U
X
Dr.
moon
and
a
misuse
of
pure
code
compliance,
the
city
of
Clearwater
case
number,
8,
1,
9,
4,
14,
22,
Jasmine
way
at
this
location.
There
are
three
violations:
core
section:
3
does
24:07
a
2
+
D
+,
3,
9,
0,
3,
D
no
vehicle
shall
be
passed
between
the
principal
structure
and
the
right-of-way
up
a
maximum
of
two
pharmacies:
second:
violation:
Code,
section
3,
1,
5,
0
to
H
2
plants,
keeping
required
and
Code
section
3
1,
4,
0
7,
a
five
and
seven
presidential
grass
park.
X
A
Notice
of
Violation
was
sent
out
on
March
21st
2019
compliance
date
was
for
April,
22nd
2019
and
the
certified
mail
receipt
was
received.
March
27
2013
is
a
picture
taken.
Our
March
20
year,
2019
show
in
the
front
of
the
house
the
second
picture,
showing
the
address
of
the
house
showing
the
area
that
needs
to
have
grass.
X
X
This
is
a
shot
so
in
the
location
of
the
property,
so
in
the
RV
and
parties
of
the
front
yard,
the
needs
sod,
the
sun'll
picture
depicting
the
same
thing,
location
and
the
neighbors
have
been
calling
complaining
about
multiple
vehicles
in
a
backyard,
but
I
couldn't
see
so
I
did
acquire
an
aerial
view
from
engineering
department.
This
shot
was
taken
in
September
40
in
2017,
depicting
the
RV
and
a
red
car,
and
a
letter
picture
was
taken.
March
15
2018
still
showing
the
RV
and
record.
N
L
X
L
X
X
C
C
C
If
the
question
is
that,
if
you
look
at
the
aerial
view
that
you
showed
across
the
street,
that
house
had
no
grass
now,
maybe
it
does,
because
you
could
see
the
picture
here,
but
either
he
doesn't
have
grass
or
he
does.
If
he
got
rid
of
the
grass,
would
he
then
be
in
compliance
with
just
having
dirt?
If.
C
A
A
N
I
V
Except
for
the
issue
about
the
one
I
said:
was
the
residential
parking
meaning
I'm
allowed
to
park
one
car
on
the
driveway
or
more
than
one
car
I
guess
it'll
fit
more
one
and
one
car
can
be
parked
and
the
great
grass
adjacent
to
the
driveway,
drink
and
they're,
saying
that
I'm
in
violation
but
I,
don't
think
there's
three
dollars:
I
don't
have
to
requires
out
there.
I
only
have
two
I
have
one
in
the
driveway.
One
of
the
grass
suggestions
is
wrong,
maybe
which
is
yeah,
maybe
most
of
the
time.
It's
this
time.
V
W
A
V
N
N
V
A
P
Make
some
clarification
I?
Did
this
inspection
with
you
sifter
a
when
we
went
out
and
mr.
Mueller
has
come
into
the
office
and
I
spoke
to
him
in
full
detail
for
at
least
40
minutes
of
what
we
needed
to
do
so
just
to
explain.
I
did
want
to
address
your
issue
when
you
do
have
a
double
frontage
lot.
It
is
a
code.
So
technically
it
shouldn't
be
an
opinion.
P
If
you
can't
have
a
car
there,
you
can't
have
a
car
there
and
that's
the
way
the
codes
written
when
it
was
for
the
residential
grass
parking
there
is.
We
have
a
RV,
that's
parked
on
the
grass.
You
cannot
have
vehicles
parked
on
the
grass
one
pair
alone
adjacent
to
the
driveway,
which
means
they
can
bring
the
red
vehicle
from
the
backyard
to
the
front
yard.
But
you
can't
just
park
a
vehicle
in
your
backyard,
there's
a
certain
criteria
of
what
you
park
in
the
backyard.
P
If
the
RV
wants
to
continue
to
be
in
the
backyard
as
it
was
stated
twice,
mr.
Mueller
knows
he
needs
to
come
down
to
zoning.
You
have
to
get
a
permit
for
ribbons.
He
has
to
meet
the
setbacks
from
the
side
and
the
back
if
he
can
do
that,
there
are
two
neighbors
here:
one
who
would
like
to
speak
to
the
RV.
It
backs
right
up
to
her
house
where
it
is
currently
and
it
does
not
meet
those
setback
criteria.
So
I
just
wanted
to
be
very
precise
and
making
you
understand
what's
wrong.
G
J
X
Recommendation
for
case
8
2009
for
residential
parking,
Blanche
Bacon
required
residential
parking
on
intervals,
4
o'clock,
requesting
compliance
Arnold
before
June,
22nd
2019
or
a
final
$150
party
for
violet.
For
each
day
the
violation
continues
to
exist
potential
$450
per
day.
We're
asking
the
board
to
authorize
the
following
after
three
months
from
the
reputation
date
of
site
lien.
X
If
the
fines
and
fees
remain
unpaid,
the
City,
Attorney's
Office
is
authorized
to
foreclose,
collect
or
settle,
certainly
in
using
any
legal
or
equitable
remedies
available
under
the
law,
compliance
can
be
met
for
residential
parking
on
a
double
front
lot
by
removing
the
RV
and
any
other
vehicles.
Third
and
in
north
side
of
the
property,
compliance
can
be
met
for
landscaping
required
by
installing
grass
or
other
appropriate
ground
cover
and
maintaining
it
in
a
neat
and
orderly
one.
X
S
B
J
C
Z
Z
Z
Y
B
Z
K
Z
A
L
Z
I
I
I
N
Z
Z
Z
J
J
V
Now,
I'm
supposed
to
be
over
there,
maintaining
that
recording
the
city
I'm
supposed
to
maintain
that
right
away
that
grass
it's
over
there
so
before
I
can
cut
the
grass
I
have
to
go
over
and
pick
up
all
the
debris
that's
being
left
over
there,
because
the
city
has
authorized
the
people
in
the
three
three
houses,
the
two
behind
and
the
one
across
for
me.
Does
it
allow
them
to
put
the
trash
on
the
right-of-way
that
I'm
charged
with
maintaining.
W
V
W
W
W
V
V
N
V
B
L
L
V
L
Me
just
finish
this,
and
then
you
come
home.
Okay.
If
the
respondent
does
not
comply
by
that
date,
the
board
may
order
a
fine
of
a
hundred
and
fifty
dollars
per
day
per
violation.
For
each
day
the
violation
continues
to
exist.
The
fines
and
fees
remain
unpaid.
Three
months
after
such
lien
is
filed,
the
city
is
authorized
to
foreclose,
collect
or
settle
such.
L
V
V
Behind
the
house
and
we're
trying
to
see
because
an
area
that
we
have
to
try
and
navigate
to
get
around
behind,
we
have
a
pad
in
the
back
of
the
house
and
we're
trying
to
get
around
it
and
there's
only
15
feet
between
the
pad
and
the
fence.
So
the
RV
is
11
and
a
half
feet
wide.
So
I
have
to
navigate
now
turn
and
then
come
back
up
and
get
behind
the
house.
We
take.
What
I've
been
able
to
do
is
it's
a
mess
and
everybody.
AA
W
C
Now
he's
getting
it
around
there,
but
we
didn't
know:
we've
just
made
a
motion.
Okay,
and
there
are
three
violations
that
you
were
brought
up
here
for
you
now
know
what
you
need
to
do
to
correct
it:
okay
and
you
have
to
June
22nd
to
do
it.
So
with
that,
thank
you
for
coming.
You
need
to
get
your
problems
resolved.
We
don't
give
advice,
we
don't
give
directions,
we
just
determine
whether
or
not
you
were
in
violation
and
your
work
like
an
extension.
Q
J
C
V
N
K
C
M
F
AB
AB
AB
The
Notice
of
Violation
was
sent
out
in
February
22nd
of
2019
the
compliance
date
of
March
25th,
2019
and
certified
mail
receipt
was
received
on
March
4th
2019.
This
was
on
the
22nd
of
February
and
78
falen.
There
was
a
large
trailer
parked
in
the
driveway
and
then
a
smaller
trailer
parked
on
the
side,
not
screened
by
a
fence.
Wall
or
henshin
approved
service
went
back
on
the
26th,
which
was
one
day
after
the
compliance
date.
The
larger
trailer
had
been
moved.
AB
He
had
parked
it
in
the
garage,
but
the
smaller
Channel
were
still
on
the
side
of
the
house
and
back
to
28th.
The
smaller
trailer
was
still
in
the
side
of
the
house,
went
back.
The
10th
of
April
and
the
smaller
trailer
was
still
on.
The
side
of
the
house
went
back
a
few
days
before
board
and
the
trailer
has
been
removed
as
parked
elsewhere.
No,
that
was
the
28th
of
May.
L
C
Move
the
find
respondent,
wasn't
violation
of
the
quarters
refer
to
an
affidavit.
In
this
case
the
violation
was
corrected
prior
to
today's
hearing
and
to
an
enter
an
order
that
no
fine
be
imposed.
If
the
respondent
repeats,
the
violations
aboard
may
were
to
refine
$500
for
each
data,
violation
continues
to
exist.
Second,.
Y
B
AC
AC
AC
AC
We
had
a
few
outside
of
Pinellas
contractors
who
were
able
to
do
the
work,
but
we
prefer
to
have
someone
here,
who's
based
in
Pinellas,
so
we
are
continuing
to
look
actively
as
we
speak
for
a
contractor
to
apply
for
the
necessary
permits
after-the-fact,
as
well
as
pull
the
additional
permits
needed
for
the
job.
We
would
ask
just
for
a
brief
extension
if
we
could
reset
this
to
occur
and
maybe
60
days
or
so,
and
we
can
come
back
in
and
by
then
I
would
imagine
that
the
problem
should
be
resolved.
We.
B
L
L
K
O
O
O
We
also
are
asking
for
84
19
work
without
permit
request
compliance
to
be
on
or
before
June
26
or
a
fine
of
$150
per
day
per
violation
for
each
day
on
through
a
violation
katinhat.
Is
this
they're
also
asking
the
board
to
authorize
the
following
after
three
months
from
the
reputation
of
this
such
lien?
O
O
Q
O
C
O
C
M
T
Second
motion:
yes:
I
moved
to
enter
an
order
requiring
respondent
to
correct
the
violations
on
ER
before
June
26
2019.
Its
respondent
does
not
comply
by
that
date.
The
board
may
order
a
fine
of
$150
per
day
for
violation
for
each
day.
Each
violation
continues
to
exist.
It
fines
and
fees
remain
unpaid.
Three
months
after
such
lien
is
filed,
the
city
is
authorized
to
foreclose,
collect
or
settle
such
leading.
AC
K
F
B
AD
249
Bayside
Drive
here
there
are
two
violations
so
for
compliance
to
be
met
for
the
unsafe
structure.
They
would
need
to
complete
all
required
inspections
within
six
months
for
this
building
permit
number,
which
is
their
current
active
permit,
and
for
that
we're
requesting
compliance
honor
before
November
22nd,
2019
war,
fines
of
one
hundred
and
fifty
dollars
per
day
for
the
violation
the
violation
continues
to
exist.
AD
Additionally,
we
were
asking
the
board
authorized
the
city
of
Clearwater
to
enter
onto
the
property,
to
correct
the
violations
by
any
means
necessary
and
any
reason
and
any
reasonable
cost
to
be
applied
as
liens
against
the
property
after
three
months
from
the
recordation
date
of
such
lien.
If
the
fines
and
fees
remain
unpaid,
the
City
Attorney's
Office
is
authorized
to
foreclose
foreclose,
collect
or
settle
such
lien
using
any
legal
or
equitable
remedies
on
the
available
under
the
law
today
comes
from
Florida
because
they
do
have
an
active
permit.
AD
AD
AD
AD
C
AD
L
AD
C
J
L
L
L
L
L
Okay,
so
we'll
do
them
one
time
correct
a
violation
to
correct
a
violation
of
the
pool
on
or
before
June
22nd
2019.
If
the
respondent
does
not
comply
by
that
date,
the
city
may
take
up
reasonable
actions,
including
entering
the
property,
to
bring
the
property
into
compliance
to
charge
the
respondent
with
all
costs
which
will
become
a
lien
on
the
property.
The
board
may
order
a
fine
of
would
say
ante
to
fifty
fifty
per
day
for
each
date
of
violation
continues
to
exist
if
cost
fines
and
fees
remain
unpaid.
K
L
A
second
motion
on
the
second
violation:
that's
the
unsafe
building
itself,
I
moved
to
enter
an
order
requiring
respondent
to
correct
the
violations
on
or
before
November
22nd
2019.
If
the
respondent
does
not
comply
without
date,
the
city
may
take
all
reasonable
actions,
including
entering
the
property,
to
bring
the
property
into
compliance
and
charge
and
respondent
with
all
cost,
which
will
become
a
lien
on
the
property.
The
board
may
order
a
fine
of
150
per
day
for
each
date
of
violation
continues
to
exist
if
cost
fines
and
fees
remain
unpaid.
B
K
A
AD
AD
AD
That's
the
same
window.
You
could
see
a
skylight
has
fallen
or
sunlight
coming
through,
so
it's
in
bad
shape.
They
are
working
on
it.
They
I.
Let
her
tell
me
that
see
what
do
you?
You
need
the
recommendation.
Yeah,
okay,
city's
recommendation
for
this
case
is
compliance
owner
before
June,
22nd,
2019
or
a
fine
of
$150
per
day
that
the
violation
continues
to
exist.
AD
Additionally,
we
are
asking
the
board
to
authorize
a
city
of
clear
water
to
enter
onto
the
property,
to
correct
the
violations
by
any
means
necessary
and
any
reasonable
cost
to
be
applied
as
latest
against
the
property
after
three
months
from
the
recordation
date
of
such
lien.
If
the
fines
and
fees
remain
unpaid,
the
City
Attorney's
Office
is
authorized
to
foreclose,
collect
or
subtle
such
lien,
using
any
legal
or
equitable
remedies
available
under
the
law.
AD
No,
this
building
is
actually
in
front,
there's
one
next
to
it
and
then
a
couple
more
behind
it
and
I
apologize,
but
I
believe
I
skipped
over
this
slide.
I'm
out
of
sorts
today,
compliance
to
be
met
for
the
unsafe
structure
would
be
to
repair
or
replace
any
areas
or
deterioration
where
damage
exists.
To
meet
the
current
florida
building
codes.
Complete
demolition
of
the
structure
is
also
an
option
for
compliance.
AD
AA
AA
M
AA
AA
AA
This
was
like
I
was
in
way
over
my
head,
I
thought,
I
didn't
know
about
any
of
this
and
then
I
paid
$11,000
to
have
an
asbestos
study
done
not
even
the
removal,
so
they
just
completed
taking
the
samples
and
I
talked
to
him
this
morning,
because
I
wanted
to
be
able
to
tell
you
more
of
a
timeline,
and
he
said
that
within
there's
a
holiday
coming
up
and
that
he
hopes
to
have
the
report
back
to
me
within
10
business
days,
at
which
time
I'll
have
to
get
bids
for
the
asbestos
removal,
which
I
believe
there's
a
lot
of
asbestos,
because
I
was
told
by
the
inspector
that
when
he
just
looked
at
it,
that,
of
course
it
would
have
to
be
verified.
AA
But
he
felt
like
all
the
siding
was
asbestos
and
so
I
think
there's
a
tremendous
amount
of
asbestos.
I
have
also
gotten
bids
for
the
demolition
of
not
just
this
but
I
kind
of
looked
at
it
and
wanted
to
be
proactive.
It's
been
vacant
for
a
long
time
and
I
looked
at
the
other
buildings
and
I
went
inside
and
they're
really
not
in
good
shape
either
so
I
got
bids
to
have
all
the
buildings
demolished
on
that
property
and
I'm
under
contract
for
the
demolition
as
well.
AA
But
what
has
to
happen
in
the
middle
is
the
asbestos
removal,
so
in
10
business
days,
I
should
have
the
report
back
and
he
said
he
may
have
to
go
back
out
after
that.
He's
not
sure
the
city
Clearwater
is
much
more
strict
than
anyone
else
on
asbestos.
In
fact
many
of
the
companies
when
they
knew
where
I
may
be
its
Pinellas
I.
AA
AA
And
then
he
told
me
that
once
he
gets
me
this
back,
which
will
hopefully
be
in
ten
business
days
from
today,
then
there's
then
I
have
to
get
the
bids
from
the
asbestos
removal.
Then
he
said
once
we
have
an
asbestos
person,
there's
a
10-day
notification
for
asbestos.
It's
required
by
law
that
those
people
have
to
give.
Then
they
do
all
the
asbestos
removal
and
then
there's
a
10-day
notification
for
the
demolition.
AA
So
just
those
waiting
times
are
at
least
six
weeks
of
just
the
waiting
times,
not
counting
the
time
to
get
the
bids
for
the
asbestos
removal
and
for
both
asbestos
removal
and
the
demolition
to
be
done.
It
is
six
bubbles.
I
have
the
contract
for
the
demolition
and
I
have
the
contract
for
this
best
dose
survey.
So
I'm
asking
for
four
months
to
complete
it.
AA
Yeah
I,
don't
know
exactly
where
they
get
permits.
I
know
that
the
bid
I
have
right
now
for
the
actual
demolition
that
doesn't
include
asbestos
is
around
thirty
thousand
dollars.
So
so
fine
I
got
the
11,000
for
just
a
survey.
The
30,000
for
the
demolition
and
the
removal
could
be
another
30,000.
You
know
so
I
I've
been
really
working
on
it
and
trying
to
figure
it
all
out,
but
I
sure
these
guys
get
permits.
N
C
C
T
G
AA
A
A
L
L
I
L
So
that's
part
of
this
stipulation
if
the
respondent
does
not
comply
by
that
date,
the
board
may
order
a
fine
of
$150
per
day
per
violation
for
each
status
violation
continues
to
exist.
It
fines
and
fees
remain
unpaid.
Three
months
after
such
lien
is
filed,
the
city
is
authorized
to
foreclose,
collect
or
settle
easily,
especially
all.
N
B
A
AD
AD
This
is
a
Google
Street
map
use.
Just
so
you
can
see
what
we're
looking
at
this
is
the
pink
flamingo
hotel.
The
building
in
question
is
the
two-story
on
the
right
this.
This
area
shows
my
areas
of
concern.
The
violations
I
found
first
one
being
right
at
the
base
of
the
railing
banister,
and
you
can
see
it's
broken
that
needs
to
be
repaired.
AD
The
second
violation
this
photo
is
gonna,
be
as
good
as
it
gets
the
floor.
You
can
see
the
door
to
unit
10
right
there.
The
walkway
is
fine
and
solid
up
until
that
point.
But
as
soon
as
you
step
past
that
doorway
the
floor
gets
really
spongy,
you
could
feel
it
sinking.
It
feels
like
it's
gonna
collapse
right
through
affordance.
AD
AD
L
L
AD
B
K
L
AD
Our
recommendation
for
this
case
is
compliance
on
or
before
June
22nd,
2019,
or
a
fine
of
150
dollars
per
day
that
the
violation
continues
to
exist.
Additionally,
we're
asking
the
board
to
authorize
the
city
of
Clearwater
to
enter
on
to
the
property,
to
correct
the
violations
by
any
means
necessary
and
any
reasonable
cost
to
be
applied
as
liens
against
the
property
after
three
months
from
the
recordation
date
of
such
lien.
AD
L
J
AD
AD
A
U
A
Moved
in
that,
in
order
requiring
the
respondent
to
correct
the
violations
on
or
before
June
22nd
2019,
if
the
respondent
does
not
comply
by
that
date,
the
city
may
take
all
reasonable
actions,
including
entering
the
property,
to
bring
the
property
into
compliance
and
charge
that
respondent
with
all
the
costs,
which
will
become
a
lien
on
the
property.
The
board
may
order
a
fine
of
150
dollars
per
day.
For
each
day,
the
violation
continues
to
exist
if
cost
fines
and
fees
remain
unpaid.
AD
L
B
B
B
AE
AE
The
question
to
reduce
the
lien
there
was
a
confusion.
I
went
got
the
licensing
that
there
I
was
left
a
meeting
that
day,
but
they
were
closed.
I
went
the
next
business
day
and
got
the
licenses
taken
care
of,
and
we
just
hope
that
you
guys
could
see
way
to
reduce
to
the
lien
on
the
property,
to
something
that's
administrative
and
I
could
sell
it
them.
AE
AE
AE
AE
P
It
was
an
illegal,
short-term
rental
that
was
being
rented
out
without
a
business
tax
receipt
and,
according
to
my
records
that
case
was
open.
April
3rd
of
2018,
the
business
tax
receipt
was
not
issued
until
October
25th,
so
it
was
a
significant
time
after
Victor
and
I
had
spoke
previously,
and
he
had
told
me
at
that
time.
According
to
my
notes
that
when
he
went
to
the
county
records,
he
thought
his
property
was
in
the
county.
I
went
ahead
and
pulled
the
annex
ordinance.
P
P
J
P
Code
board,
when
the
we
were
first
supposed
to
hear
it
and
Victor
did
show
up.
He
asked
me
if
it
could
be
continued
because
he
stated
that
his
property
was
in
the
county.
We
went
ahead
and
pushed
it
to
the
following
hearing
and
he
had
hired
an
attorney
because
he
wanted
to
be
debate.
The
fact
that
his
property
was
in
the
county,
which
it
was
not
I.
Let
him
know
I
had
the
information
that
it
was
not
so
at
the
board
that
we
continued
it
to
for
he
and
his
attorney.
They
did
not
show
I.
G
C
AE
AE
AE
It
has
a
grinder
pit
that
is
not
tied
to
the
city
itself,
so
I'm
really
not
so
sure
it
was
annexed
properly
to
begin
with,
but
I
just
didn't
feel
like
going
through
it
anymore
and
just
figured
I'd
Airbnb
really
wasn't
for
me
and
I
was
gonna,
sell
the
property
and
I
had
a
sale
on
it
and
was
that
their
last
meeting
that
I
was
here,
but
it
fell
through
because
I
really
didn't
know
what
the
fines
were.
Gonna
be
and
I
kind
of
told
them.
G
G
G
G
G
Because,
before
this
board
even
adjudicated
this
gentleman
guilty,
we
gave
him
the
opportunity
to
come
back
twice
and
if,
during
that
time
period,
he
had
stopped
his
short-term
rental
and
gotten
his
PTR,
he
never
would
have
got
a
find
in
the
first
place.
In
fact,
he
wouldn't
have
even
gotten
dude
occasion
of
guilty.
He
would
simply
have
gotten
a
declaration
of
violation.
So
with
those
facts
in
mind,
it
doesn't
seem
to
make
any
sense
to
allow
a
lien
reduction
when
he's
literally
making
money
off
of
things.
G
Otherwise,
what's
the
incentive
to
never
violate
the
law
again,
and
so
that's
pretty
much
it
in
a
nutshell:
it's
not
to
penalize
it's
not
to
hurt.
If
the
gentleman
truly
believe
that
he
was
outside
the
city
limits,
as
Inspector
Phillips
testified,
she
was
going
to
provide
that
information
to
him.
In
fact,
that's
why
I
the
first
hearing
continues:
I
wanted
to
make
sure
that
he
wasn't
inside
the
city
limits
and
what
he
was.
G
AE
Mean
I
said
a
I
didn't
I,
didn't
advertise
and
rent
it
anymore
after
I
was
told
it
was
going
on.
That
was
where
the
confusion
I
think
came
to
effect.
I
was
I,
wasn't
indicated
that
I
could
rent
the
property.
If
I
had
the
licensing
things
so
I
thought
well,
let
me
try
to
go
ahead
and
advertise
it
for
a
longer
than
a
short-term
rental,
and
that's
where
I
think
the
snafu
got
into
effect,
because
the
ads
I
put
out
there
was
for
longer
than
a
short-term
rental.
N
AE
N
B
L
C
A
A
Knowing
that
there's
a
ridiculous
lien
on
it,
and
now
they
stand
in
front
of
us
or
they
want
those
liens
completely
dropped,
and
we
feel
sorry
or
bad
that
so
we
do,
and
at
some
point
there
has
to
be
a
message
set
throughout
the
city,
that
fines
are
there
for
a
reason:
comply
the
rest
of
the
citizens
have
to
they
work
with
you.
We
try,
we
reschedule
so
this
is.
A
F
L
N
AE
B
J
N
C
N
G
They
are
now
selling
it
to
third
party
I've
reached
an
agreement
with
both
of
those
parties
to
buyer
and
seller.
The
property
we'll
get
the
terms
of
the
stipulation
offer
the
property
to
be
sold
on
May
31st.
What's
the
end
of
this
month,
compliance
which
requires
a
roof
and
a
fence
by
July,
31st
and
payment
of
$25,000
to
the
say.