►
From YouTube: Municipal Code Enforcement Board 8/23/23
Description
Comments made while streaming will not be responded to in real time or become a part of the official meeting record. Closed captions streaming is available online at myclearwater.com
https://www.myclearwater.com/citymeetings
A
B
B
Please
be
seated.
Agendas
of
today's
meeting
are
on
the
wall
at
the
entrance
of
the
chambers.
Please
remember
to
turn
off
your
cell
phones.
The
Municipal
Code
Enforcement
board
consists
of
seven
members
who
are
appointed
by
the
city
council
we
serve
voluntarily.
It
is
the
board's
intention
to
promote,
protect
and
improve
the
health,
safety
and
Welfare
of
the
citizens
of
Clearwater.
By
providing
this
Equitable
effective
and
inexpensive
method
of
enforcing
certain
codes
within
the
city.
B
The
board
considers
new
business
items
in
two
parts:
first,
the
violation
and
then
the
affirmative
relief,
formal
Rules
of
Evidence,
do
not
apply.
Each
side
is
limited
to
15
minutes
the
board
May
Grant
additional
time
all
proceedings
to
be
conducted
in
a
civil,
calm,
civil
manner.
Individuals
who
conduct
themselves
otherwise
will
be
asked
to
leave
if
necessary,
they'll
be
escorted
from
the
chambers.
B
D
E
New
members
of
the
board
attorney
Adam
Gurley
on
behalf
of
Coachman
Creek,
dealing
with
the
Reconstruction
and
repair
of
the
front
walkways
to
a
condominium
building
within
Coachman
Creek
as
well
to
the
balcony.
We've
reported
back
every
few
months
to
give
an
update
I
touched
space
with
the
construction
company
and
the
engineer
overseeing
the
project
prior
to
today,
so
that
they
could
give
me
that
update
they've.
Let
me
know
that
these
structural
repairs
to
the
front
walkways
are
almost
complete.
E
They
are
pouring
the
final
concrete
on
the
front
walkways
to
finish
that
project,
the
framing
for
that
those
front
walkways
past
City
inspection.
They
expect
to
move
on
to
the
back
balconies
fairly
soon.
Once
that
is
completed,
the
completion
date
for
the
entirety
of
the
Project,
based
on
the
last
change
order,
is
October.
15Th
they've
cited
some
material
delivery
delays,
but
they
still
think
October
15th.
E
They
can
at
least
at
this
moment,
get
it
done
by
then
so
I
would
ask
if
the
board
is
inclined
to
invite
me
back,
perhaps
in
November,
hopefully,
I'll
have
a
promising
update
to
let
you
know
that
that
project
has
been
completed.
I
believe
that
at
the
last
hearing
I
did
not
attend.
My
colleague
did
that
there
was
a
request
for
pictures,
so
I
did
ask
the
engineer
to
send
us
pictures
as
well
and
I
have
copies
of
those.
The
board
would
like
to
see
the.
E
J
H
K
Name
for
the
record,
I'm
Clayman,
with
McFarland,
Ferguson
and
McMullen
here
on
behalf
of
aec
Sunset,
Point
LLC,
you
know
as
to
this
issue.
We
have
no
issue
with
agreeing
that
the
storage
containers
were
in
violation
prior
to
the
meeting,
but
compliance
has
been
met
now
prior
to
the
meeting
as
well.
So
for
this
issue,
okay,
we
have
no
objection.
L
Okay,
now
we're
ready
good
afternoon
George
Shelby
Brown
City
of
Clearwater
code
inspector,
we're
here
for
case
52-23.
It's
for
2750
Sunset,
Point
Road.
This
is
a
property
you
may
be
familiar
with.
We've
been
before
the
board
before
over
the
years,
but
I
think
by
the
time
we
get
to
this
end
of
this
presentation.
We'll
have
a
good
result
all
right.
So
there
was
one
violation
that
I'm
here
for
today,
we've
been
here
for
other
things,
but
today
is
just
the
one
violation
that
I
had
left
and
it
was
a
zoning
violation.
L
There
was
an
unpermitted
use
of
the
property,
it's
an
unpermitted,
temporary
use
of
portable
storage
units
or
containers
they're,
not
supposed
to
be
a
full-time
use
or
a
permanent
use.
It's
a
very
limited
window
that
you
can
have
them,
and
we
found
that
that
property
was
in
violation
of
that
and
it's
covered
by
code
sections
1-104b,
which
is
a
zoning
violation
or
development
code
violation
and
code,
section
3-2103
H2,
which
are
for
temporary
uses
and
that's
in
a
non-residential
Zone.
L
All
right
so
you'll
see
here.
Lewis
evaluation
was
sent
back
in
May
of
2021.
That's
why
we
want
to
present
this.
It's
been
going
on
a
long
time.
We
sent
that
notice
of
violation
out
the
compliance
state
was
set
for
June
21st
of
2021,
which
was
extended
to
July
21st
of
2021
at
the
owner
and
his
attorney's
request,
and
we
did
get
the
certified
mail
green
card
back
on
May
25th
of
2021.
27
months
ago,
all
right.
Here's
just
an
overhead
Ariel
of
this
property
from
property,
appraiser,
there's
two
properties
kind
of
contained
here.
L
The
issue
today
is
on
the
green
section.
That's
what
2750,
Sunset
Point
Road
is
all
right.
So
going
back
to
April,
23
2021,
what
you're?
Looking
at
you
see
four
different
vehicles
or
containers
there
on
the
far
left
and
Far
Right
are
what
we're
here
for
today.
Those
are
the
portable
storage
units
or
containers
they're
non-vehicular,
and
they
were
there
for
a
long
time,
so
that
was
May
23rd
of
2021
a
picture
of
the
yellow
one
that
has
been
there
for
a
long
time
or
had
been
there
and
there's
the
white
one.
L
There's
a
couple
of
semi
trainers
there
in
the
middle.
Those
were
inoperable
and
we'd
also
cited
for
that
at
some
point
on
August
26th,
same
condition:
we've
got
everything
there,
still
the
portable
storage
units
flanking
the
trailers,
all
right,
Splash
forward
to
November
2nd
of
2021.
You
can
see
the
warehouse
building
for
aec
here,
so
they've
got
a
big
building
and
there
you
see
the
two
storage
units.
The
semi-trailers
are
gone.
That
was
a
win.
L
Those
trailers
or
containers
are
still
there,
though,
and
at
that
time
things
were
kind
of
Tidy
around
the
containers,
we're
going
to
move
way
forward
to
April
12th
of
this
year
and
at
that
time,
when
I
came
out
that
day,
there's
a
lot
of
things
stored
on
the
outside
of
these
storage
containers
that
have
been
there
for
a
couple
years
longer
than
they're
allowed
to
be.
There
was
an
RV
out
there
that
day,
I
don't
know
barbecue
some
different
things
happening.
L
L
A
lot
of
outdoor
storage
debris
Etc,
there's
a
picture
of
the
back
of
one
of
the
containers,
lots
of
materials
just
sitting
there
and
if
you
need
a
stop
sign
it's
gone
now,
but
there
was
that
out
there
lots
of
different
items:
okay,
on
August
11th,
just
two
weeks
ago,
I
went
out
and
we
still
had
the
containers
there
still
lots
of
materials
out
there,
so
the
violation
still
existed
on
August
11th.
We
got
a
word
from
the
owner's
attorney
that
the
containers
had
been
removed.
L
I
think
we
got
that
notice
on
April
August,
16th
I
went
out
on
the
17th
complied
corrected,
everything's
cleared
off
those
containers
are
gone,
the
materials
that
were
around
them
were
gone
and
with
that
compliance
was
met
so
four
case
52
23
750
Sunset,
Point
Road.
There
was
one
violation
there
for
an
unpermitted
use
of
a
portable
storage
unit
and
compliance
was
met,
so
I
am
requesting
a
declaration
of
violation
at
this
time.
Thank.
B
L
D
I
moved
to
founder,
's
mom,
that
was
in
violation
of
the
code.
I
was
referred
to
in
the
affidavit.
In
this
case
the
violation
was
corrected
prior
to
today's
hearing
and
to
enter
an
order
that
no
fine
be
imposed.
If
the
respondent
repeats
the
violation,
the
board
May
order
a
fine
of
up
to
five
hundred
dollars
for
each
day.
The
violation
continues
to
exist.
B
K
Good
afternoon
board
members
I'm
clay
gilm
with
McFarland
Ferguson
McMullen
here
again
on
behalf
of
aec
Sunset
Point.
This
is
in
regards
to
landscape
buffering.
We,
we
don't
have
an
issue
with
submitting
a
plan,
we've
hired
a
landscape
architect
to
design
such
a
plan.
We
would
just
ask
that
we
have
90
days
for
permit
and
compliance
rather
than
the
typical
60
30,
because
sometimes
the
permitting
takes
a
little
longer.
K
K
B
M
N
O
N
Thank
you
and
when
we
obtain
permit
back
in
2019,
we
did
a
all
that
was
instructed
and
written
in
the
permit
requirements.
We
comply
with
everything
we
had
the
city
inspector
come
and
look
at
all
the
work
that
was
done
in
terms
of
grading,
removal
of
certain
pepper
trees
and
one,
and
what
not,
which
is
what
they
wanted:
yeah
Swift
not
involved
and
the
fdep
involved.
Everyone
looked
at
all
the
work
that
was
done.
They
gave
us
thumbs
up
all
three
City
fdap
and
swiss
man,
so
that
goes
now.
N
Four
years
later,
Swiss
not
is
very
happy.
We
create
a
lot
of
different
survey
requirements
that
came
to
us
as
a
result
of
City
requesting
from
us.
We
comply
with
all
of
those.
We
did
spend
a
lot
of
money
doing
surveys
as
they
wished.
We
submitted
those
things.
City
accepted
those
things.
The
city
maps
are
now
updated.
N
Some
four
and
a
half
years
later,
City
requests
that
they
do
landscaping
over
an
area
that
naturally
is
grown
and
controlled
by
Swift.
So,
as
a
result
of
that
request
from
the
city
we
have
been
in
touch
with
swift,
not
to
allow
us
to
work
cooperatively,
all
three,
for
you
know
the
fde,
Eastmont,
City
and
us
work
together,
make
sure
that
we
do
things
that
are
in
compliance
and
meet
with
everybody's
code
requirements.
N
B
J
Good
afternoon
board
Jason
Cantrell.
This
is
again
the
property
of
2750
Sunset
Point
Road.
Here
we
have
one
violation:
citing
sections
4-1301
land,
clearing
and
grubbing
permit
required
section,
51.301
development
in
a
flood,
Hazard
area,
section
51.901
development
in
a
preservation
area
and
article
447.0832
for
work
commencing
before
permit
issuance
notice.
The
violation
was
sent
on
5
20
21,
with
a
compliance
date
of
60
days.
After
the
receipt
of
that
notice,
certified
mail
receipt
was
received
on
5
25
21.
J
I
J
So
again,
you
saw
this
on
inspector
Brown's
slide.
This
is
just
showing
the
layout
of
the
of
the
parcel
with
this
one.
I
want
you
to
notice.
This
is
our
our
zoning
GIS
map
and
it
this
is
showing
the
preservation
area,
which
is
noted
in
green.
It's
marked
with
a
P
that
is
the
area
of
concern
and
just
to
mention
section
3-907
buffers
provided
for
purposes
other
than
Landscaping
states
that
a
vegetative
buffer
shall
be
provided
on
all
lands
within
25
feet
of
any
property
designated
on
the
zoning
Alice
as
preservation.
A
I
have
a
question
from
my
understanding
based
on
the
data,
so
far
permits
were
pulled
and
work
was
done
in
2019.,
and
here
we
are
later
in
the
game
and
I
mean
permits
were
pulled.
Documents
were
submitted,
reviewed
plans,
Etc
et
cetera.
How
did
this
thing
come
to
lighter
become
an
issue
if
there?
If
this
is,
was
this
something
outside
of
what
was
on
the
drawings
or
I
mean
I'm
a
little
confused
about
how
this
when
this
occurred,
did
it
occur
outside
of
the
original
permits?
Had
this
thing
become
an.
I
J
G
I
can
speak
to
that
and
our
position
is
that
this
is
our.
This
is
our
code
and
that's.
This
is
what's
applicable
to
this
board,
to
the
extent
that
there
are
other
governmental
entities
that
have
regulations
that
they
enforce
through
their
processes.
We
obviously
can't
control
that
we
don't
have
much
try
to
coordinate
with
them
if
if
there
becomes
an
issue,
certainly
if
a
property
owner
says
kind
of
caught
in
the
middle,
we
try
to
resolve
that
as
best
we
can.
I
G
It
may
be
that
he
pulled
other
permits
for
other
work
that
did
not
involve
encroaching
into
the
Wetland
buffer
I
personally,
have
no
personal
knowledge,
so
I
can't
speak
to
that.
I,
don't
know
if
anybody
else
from
the
city
would
know
that
it's
our
understanding
that
there's
been
no
permit
for
the
land,
clearing
and
grubbing
that
occurred
will
show.
G
You'll
hear
some
evidence
related
to
that
here
shortly,
but
the
the
I
guess
the
our
case,
in
summary-
and
very
you
know
simple
terms-
is
that
there
was
not
a
proper
land
clearing
and
grubbing
permit
cooled
for
the
dirt
that
was
brought
into
the
property
and
for
the
clearing
of
the
vegetation
that
occurred
within
the
buffer
zone.
So
you'll
hear
the
evidence
that
shows
that,
but
whether
there
were
other
permits
on
the
property
for
other
work,
I
can't
I
can't
speak
to
that.
G
A
name
I'm
not
sure
exactly
what
he
was
referring
to,
and
certainly
the
board
can
direct.
We
ask
him
all
sorts
of
questions
now
that
he's
said
those
things,
but
our
position
is
that
he
did
not
have
a
permit
to
perform
the
clearing
and
the
and
the
grubbing
of
the
Wetland
buffer
area,
which
is
the
25
feet
adjacent
to
the
preservation
District.
So
if
you
look
at
this
code,
it
says
it
refers
to
two
different
lines.
The
one
is
our
zoning
preservation
District.
The
second
one
is
the
institutional
line
of
Florida.
G
So
when
you
refer
to
dep
Swift
Mud
Swift
much
the
Water
Management
District
dep,
is
the
state
agency
that
regular
regulates
the
environment,
Clean
Water
Act
those
sorts
of
things
we
we
draw
the
line
at
our
preservation
district
line,
which
is
our
zoning.
If
they
get
a
wetland
survey
done.
That
shows
us
where
the
state
of
Florida's
jurisdiction
begins,
that
Wetland
area,
then
we
will
move
our
line
to
that.
Will
respect
that
line.
G
We
move
our
line
to
that
and
then
what
we're
talking
about
is
the
25
feet
off
of
that,
where
we
require
a
vegetative
natural
vegetative
buffer,
so
you
can't
go
in
there.
You
can't
clear
that
area.
You
can't
bring
dirt
in
and
fill
up
that
area
to
raise
it
up.
That's
those
things
are
against
the
code.
That's
what
the
city
is
alleging
has
occurred
here
perfect.
Thank
you.
F
Oh
Rebecca,
with
code
compliance
I,
would
just
want
to
reiterate
and
build
upon
what
Jared
is
discussing
here
at
the
end
to
your
question,
there
has
been
permits
pulled
at
the
property
over
the
years
that
the
property
owner
has
hired
contractors
to
deal
with,
but
none
of
those
specifically
address
what
we're
dealing
with
here
today.
Okay,
thank.
J
We'll
probably
get
more
information.
Okay!
Thank
you.
So
again
this
this
is
just
to
show
that
buffer,
the
Hat
green
hatch
line
shows
the
approximate
location
of
that
25
foot
buffer.
Everything
to
the
left
of
that
would
be
preservation,
and
they
would
need
to
provide
a
survey
when
they
submit
their
permit
to
show
exactly
where
those
lines
are
and
the
flags
from
that
survey
will
have
to
be
out.
J
Landscape
pedal
has
to
be
very
so.
This
is
just
a
Google
Earth
overview
of
the
property
back
in
21,
and
it's
just
to
show
the
amount
of
land
clearing
that
was
done,
the
that
large
section
in
that
in
the
center
there.
Some
of
that
is
on
the
other
side
of
the
buffer.
Some
of
it
is
on
the
preservation
side.
J
J
This
is
a
photo
from
December
of
2018
Google
Earth.
Just
to
show
this
is
pointing
down
towards
Sunset
Point
Road
I'm
standing
up
on
their
property
near
the
buildings
where
I
would
be
in
this
photo.
I
didn't
Sunset.
Point
is
down
there
in
the
background
there
that
this
is
just
to
show
the
vegetation
and
where
it
was
at
at
that
point,
and
this
is
a
photo
from
July
of
22
to
show
how
far
back
that
vegetation
has
been
pushed.
J
This
photo
is
a
few
steps
back
from
the
previous
photo
where
it
was
actually
taken,
but
it's
still
showing
the
same
area
on
another.
Before
and
after
from
the
same
position
just
pointing
toward
the
North
again,
you
can
see
all
the
vegetation
there
on
the
left.
You
can
see
how
close
it
is
in
relation
to
that
power
pole
behind
the
trailer
there
in
2018,
and
then
you
go
forward
to
July
of
22.
You
can
see
that
same
pole
is
right
above
that
container.
J
J
I
J
Where
they've
cleared
out
here's
another
photo
of
2021,
basically
the
same
area,
the
only
reason
I
included
this
photo
is
there's
a
couple
of
planner
boxes
that
it
would
be
within
that
buffer.
This
is
one
of
the
boxes.
That's
a
simple
fix.
Those
would
need
to
be
moved
out
of
the
buffer.
Excuse
me
once
that
actual
line
is
determined
by
a
survey
and
then
for
compliance
to
be
met.
J
And
our
recommendation
for
that
is
apply
for
and
obtain
a
permit
by
October
24th
2023
in
complete
the
permit
by
November
24
2023
or
a
fine
of
150
per
day
that
the
violation
continues
to
exist
and
any
reasonable
cost
to
be
applied
as
liens
against
the
property
after
three
months
from
the
recreation
date
of
such
lean.
If
the
fines
and
fees
remain
unpaid,
the
city
attorney's
office
is
authored
to
foreclose,
collect
or
settle
such
lien
using
an
illegal
or
Equitable
remedies
available.
A
A
Let's
then
go
into
compliance
if
the,
if
the
the
clearing
and
of
growth
and
or
trees
or
bushes,
or
what
have
you
and
the
the
dirt's
easy
enough
to
pull
back
and
I
mean
but
you're
talking
about
potentially
having
to
put
it
back
in
its
original
condition.
If,
at
the
end
of
the
day,
what
was
done
is
this
is
not
allowed
per
code.
C
Sarah
Kessler
lead
environmental
specialist
in
the
public
works
department,
so
I'm
I'm
very
familiar
with
the
filling
of
the
floodplain
and
everything.
So
we
came
to
an
agreement
with
the
property
owner
several
years
ago
that
we
are
going
to
start
at
day
one
from
that
point
forward.
So
what
we
asked
them
to
complete
was
a
jurisdictional
wetland
survey
at
that
point
and
from
that
point
forward,
we
that
jurisdictional
Wetland
survey
was
approved
by
the
Water
Management
District,
so
that
is
legally
binding
line.
C
We
set
that
line
as
our
preservation
area,
and
so
from
that
moment
on,
we
are
saying:
okay,
here's
our
line.
We
didn't
have
a
good
survey
before
to
know
exactly
how
much
Phil
went
in
it
or
anything
else,
and
so
from
from
right
now
we're
saying
from
this
line.
We
need
25
foot
buffer
from
that
Wetland
line,
so
we're
not
at
A
lot
happened
and
we're
not
trying
to
fix
all
the
previous
wrongs.
J
G
When
we
were
talking
about
the
hearing,
upcoming
I
had
spoken
with
their
attorney.
They
had
they
had
for
60
days
to
be
able
to
get
the
permit.
We
continue
to
have
these
discussions
about
coordinating
with
these
other
agencies
and
so
based
on
that
they
they
adjusted
their
ask
to
just
ask
for
90
to
just
one
deadline
without
the
interim
Milestone
of
getting.
G
We
didn't.
I
didn't
really
have
time
to
coordinate
with
Mr
Cantrell
and
and
modify
the
PowerPoint
and
everything,
but
we
just
kind
of
put
that
to
the
board.
We
we
normally
ask
for
that
inner
Milestone
so
that
we
can
have.
You
know
something
to
encourage
them
to
get
that
permit
issued,
so
that
we're
not
in
crunch
time
when
that
90
days,
if
it
is
approaching
or
whatever.
So
this
is
our
standard
recommendation,
but
we
obviously
defer
to
the
board,
because
60
30
versus
just
90
is
essentially
the
same
thing
in
the
end.
A
A
K
K
We
understand
that,
in
order
to
move
to
move
forward,
we
need
to
admit
violation.
We
are
okay,
with
emitting
violation
in
order
to
move
forward
with
this
landscape
plan
and
to
work
with
the
city.
We
appreciate
inspector
Cantrell
and
attorney
Simpson
working
with
us
and
we'd
really
like
to
just
move
forward.
So
you
know
we
will
admit
violation
for
purposes
of
this
hearing
and
we
would
ask
like
I,
said
the
90
days,
we'd
be
more
than
happy
to
give
a
60-day
update
where
we're
at
in
the
permitting
process.
B
A
B
G
I
just
want
to
clarify
when
the
city
was
asking
for
a
finding
of
a
violation
with
a
hard
deadline
of
to
where
the
fine
to
be
imposed,
so
I
just
want
to
get
some
clarification
is.
Are
we
is
the
board
not
taking
any
action
on
this
today
and
we're
just
coming
back
in
60
days?
Is
that
the
is
that
what
just
happened.
D
B
B
B
O
So
this
property
actually
was
just
sold
several
months
ago.
It
took
a
little
while
for
property
appraiser
to
catch
up,
so
I
had
contact.
You
know
proper
mailing
address
for
the
current
owner,
which
is
the
the
Flat
Rock.
As
mentioned
I
haven't
been
I
have
been
in
contact
with
the
owner.
Just
so
you
know,
as
we
move
forward,
they
are
trying
to
put
together.
He
did
send
me
the
agreement
with
a
company
to
do
the
work
on
the
property
to
get
the
Mowing
and
the
removal
of
the
junk
taken
care
of.
O
However,
since
we
are
past
the
compliance
date,
I
do
want
to
get
a
decision
from
the
board
in
case
something
falls
through
with
that
or
anything
else.
We
can
make
sure
the
property
does
get
taken
care
of.
So
this
is
back
on
620.
You
can
see
the
posting
there
the
size
of
the
growth
here
as
well
as
this
is
a
very
shallow
Ravine.
However,
it
does
retain
water,
so
the
vegetation
there
grows
very
quickly.
O
O
This
is
a
pile
junk
that
the
previous
owner
in
this
area
had
removed
a
bunch
of
garbage
that
people
dump
here.
Unfortunately,
it
is
one
of
those
areas
in
town
there
used
to
be
McDonald's
on
this
property,
the
building
and
everything
was
torn
down
years
ago.
So
it's
just
an
empty
lot
now
and
you
guys
the
board
knows
how
that
works.
Everything
just
gets
kind
of
dumped
there.
O
O
P
O
Again,
compliance
has
not
been
met,
the
property
is
still
in
the
same
condition.
We
are
asking
for
a
board
order
to
make
sure
the
property
can
get
taken.
Care
of
the
compliance
can
be
met
by
mowing
removal
to
grass
and
foliage
from
the
property
maintain
the
property
free
from
overgrowth
removal
of
the
drunken
debris.
The
waste
from
the
property
asking
for
a
compliance
five
days
after
the
board
renders
its
order
for
the
excessive
growth
and
accumulation
in
placement.
Ending
sentences.
Ask.
O
O
He
understood
the
vegetation
overgrowth
and
the
junk
placement
and
stuff
and
that
he
would
get
it
taken
care
of.
In
speaking
with
him
recently
he's
he's
stated
he's
been
trying
to
get
somebody
to
take
care
of
the
property
they're
just
he's
having
a
problem,
finding
a
company
that
will
come
in
and
do
the
Mowing
and
then
continue
to
do
it
because
they
don't
feel
it's
enough
for
them
to
continue
on
what
his
statement
is,
and
so
he
has
found
a
company
that
says
they
will
do
it.
O
He
actually
emailed
me
copies
of
their
contract
proposals
and
everything.
So
this
also
take
place.
That'd
be
great,
but
again
since
we're
so
far
past
compliance
with
the
property
and
again
I
did
speak
to
the
the
owner.
Let
him
know
it's
got
to
get
taken
care
of
a
couple
months
ago.
You
know
we're
two
months
into
it
and
still
not
taken
care
of.
A
D
A
Yeah,
if
the
respondent
does
not
comply
within
the
time
specified,
the
city
may
take
all
reasonable
actions,
including
entry
onto
the
property,
to
Abate
and
maintain
the
nuisance
and
charge
the
responded
with
a
reasonable
cost
which
will
become
a
lien
on
the
property.
It
costs.
Fines
and
fees
remain
unpaid.
Three
months
after
such
lenus
file,
the
city
is
authorized.
Foreclosed
collectors
settle
such
amen.
O
A
B
D
M
This
is
a
property
on
the
initial
day
of
inspection,
August,
1st
I
believe
this
is
a
vacant
home
I
haven't
seen
anybody.
There
nobody's
contacted
me,
here's
a
couple
days
after
the
compliance
date,
no
change
and
here's
the
property
today,
no
change
in
the
compliance
coming
back
for
clearing
all
overgrowth
from
the
property
and
for
my
recommendation,
request
compliance
five
days
after
the
board
renders
its
order.
Appliance
is
not
met,
requests
in
order
to
be
issued
allowing
the
city
to
enter
the
property
and
debate
the
new
sense.
Thank.
H
A
All
right,
I'll
move
to
enter
an
order,
finding
the
respondent
in
violation
of
code
and
requiring
the
respondent
regular
violations
within
five
days
of
the
board's
written
ordered
if
the
respondent
does
not
comply
within
the
time
specified.
The
city
may
take
all
reasonable
actions,
including
entry
onto
the
property,
to
maintain
the
nuisance
and
charge
the
respondent
with
the
reasonable
cost,
which
will
become
a
lien
on
the
property.
If
costs,
fines
and
fees
remain
unpaid.
Three
months
after
such
lien
is
filed,
the
city
is
authorized
to
foreclosed,
collect
or
settle
such
lien.
P
B
Q
Oh
there
we
go
good
afternoon
input
enforcement
inspector
for
the
city
of
Clearwater.
This
is
for
1406
North,
Garden
Avenue,
it's
a
nuisance
abatement
case
number
90-23,
just
one
violation
here
for
code,
section,
3-1503,
b5a,
B7,
B10
for
accumulation
placement
and
nuisances
lack
clearing
violation
of
budded
right
away.
Q
Q
I
did
get
the
certified
mailbag
for
this
program,
I've
been
in
contact
with
the
owner.
Now
this
is
a
large
lot.
I,
don't
know
if
you
guys
have
ever
seen
it
about
the
1400
block
at
North,
Garden,
there's
an
extremely
large
yeah,
some
sort
of
bus
or
RV
or
large
vehicle
in
the
property.
But
the
continuous
issue
is
that
there's
just
a
trash
garbage
and
piles
which
either
come
from
the
Landscaping
off
the
grounds
of
the
property
or
come
from
possible
dumping
of
the
property.
Q
I've
had
my
eye
on
this
one
for
a
little
bit
said
the
other
issues
that
let
the
Palmettos
grow
out.
Some
people
can't
use
the
sidewalk
on
the
sides
there,
I
posted
on
the
31st
of
July
I,
had
been
in
contact
with
the
owner
of
the
property
or
they
did
come
by
eventually
after
the
compliance
date
and
cut
certain
things.
But
the
issue
has
been
that
they
still
have
left
all
the
piles
of
debris
on
the
property.
There
seems
to
be
some
sort
of
presence
there.
Q
Q
A
If
the
respondent
does
not
comply
within
time
specified,
the
city
may
take
all
reasonable
actions,
including
entry
under
the
property
to
obey,
maintain
the
nuisance
and
charge
to
respondent
with
the
reasonable
costs
which
will
become
a
lien
on
the
property.
It
costs.
Fines
and
fees
remain
unpaid.
Three
months
after
such
lenus
file,
the
city
is
authorized
to
foreclosed
collectors.
Settle
such
lean.