►
From YouTube: 12/18 Clearwater Municipal Code Enforcement Board.
Description
Comments are not monitored on this platform. To make a comment, please visit www.myclearwater.com/government/council-meeting-streaming-videos or one of our social media pages.
A
B
Genders
for
today's
meeting
are
on
the
wall
at
the
entrance
to
chambers.
Please
remember
to
turn
off
your
cell
phones.
The
Municipal
Code
Enforcement
board
consists
of
seven
members
who
are
appointed
by
the
City
Council
and
we
serve
voluntarily.
It
is
this
for
its
intention
to
promote,
protect
and
improve
the
health,
safety
and
welfare
of
the
citizens
of
Clearwater.
By
providing
this
equitable,
effective
and
inexpensive
method
of
enforcing
certain
codes
within
the
city.
The
Board
considers
new
business
items
in
two
parts.
First,
the
violations,
then
affirmative
relief,
formal
rules
of
evidence,
do
not
apply.
B
Each
side
is
limited
to
15
minutes
in
the
Board
may
grant
additional
time.
All
proceedings
will
be
conducted
in
a
calm
civil
manner.
Individuals
who
conduct
themselves
otherwise
will
be
asked
to
leave.
If
necessary,
they
will
be
escorted
from
the
chambers.
Now
I
ask
all
who
plan
to
speak,
to
rise
and
be
sworn
in
by
the
clerk.
B
B
D
If
you
touch
her
at
the
city
of
Clearwater,
this
is
for
1307
first
street
case
number
two
for
one
19,
there's
one
violation
here
for
exterior
surfaces
and
we're
requesting
compliance
on
or
before
January
18,
2020
or
a
fine
of
$150
per
day.
For
each
day,
the
violation
continues
to
exist.
You're
asking
the
board
to
authorize
the
following
after
three
months
from
their
incarnation
dates
of
such
lien.
D
B
E
E
Second,
motion:
I
move
to
enter
an
order
required
or
spot
it
to
correct
the
violation
hunter
before
January
18
2020
did
the
respondent
does
not
comply
but
a
date
to
form
a
order,
a
fine
of
$150
per
day
per
violation.
For
each
day.
Each
violation
continues
to
exist.
It
fines
and
fees
remain
unpaid.
Three
months
after
such
lien
is
filed,
the
city
is
authorized
to
foreclose,
collect
or
sit
or
settle.
Such
leave.
B
C
I
Going
to
find
the
respondent
was,
a
violation
of
the
code
is
referred
to
in
the
affidavit.
In
this
case,
the
violation
was
corrected
prior
to
today's
hearing
and
then
an
order
that
no
fine
be
imposed.
If
the
respondent
repeats
the
violation,
the
board
may
order
a
fine
of
up
to
$500.
For
each
day,
the
violation
continues
to
exist.
J
J
F
Want
you
yeah
what
happened?
You
know
it's.
It's
tough
to
get
into
the
location.
You
know
it
was
very
tough.
Obsessed
was
very
much
impeded
over
the
over
the
years,
as
you
know
it
with
growth.
Some
things
kind
of
you
know
worked
for
the
greater
good,
but
maybe
not
for
us
for
our
access
good
think
it
hurt
us.
Thank
you.
Thank.
K
L
H
Laborde
daniel
night
sign
inspector
with
the
city.
This
is
case
2
for
619
for
sign
maintenance
at
1280,
South,
Highland
Avenue.
The
city
is
asking
compliance
honor
before
January
18th
of
2020
or
a
fine
of
$150
per
day
that
the
violation
continues
to
exist.
We're
asking
the
board
to
authorize
the
following
after
three
months
from
the
recordation
date
of
such
lien.
If
the
fines
and
fees
remain
unpaid,
the
city's
Attorney's
Office
is
authorized
to
foreclose,
collect
or
settle
such
lien
using
any
legal
or
equitable
remedies
under
the
law.
H
This
is
the
express
Mart
on
Lakeview
and
Highland.
It
would
be
the
northwest
corner
and
the
sign
itself
is
just
cracking
faded
paint.
It's
peeling
like
the
gentleman
said
they
do.
A
sign
contractor
has
called
me
and
said
that
they
are
working
on
it.
I
told
him
that
we
would
be
requesting
a
compliance
date
of
January
18th,
and
he
told
me
that
that
should
be
more
than
enough
time
to
complete
the
task
that
was
on,
and
this
is
on
Friday,
just
to
show
that
compliance
still
was
not
met.
F
E
Motion
move
second
motion:
I
won't
enter
an
order
required
and
responded
to
correct
a
violation
odd
or
before
January
18
2020
get.
The
respondent
does
not
comply
by
that
date.
The
board
may
order
a
fine
of
$150
per
day
per
violation
for
each
day.
Each
violation
continues
to
exist
if
fines
and
fees
remain
unpaid.
Three
months
after
such
lien
is
filed,
the
city
is
authorized
to
foreclose,
collect
or
settle
such.
B
N
Well,
as
of
today,
they
I
believe
they're
in
compliance
or
in
the
process
of
being
complied
with.
There's
four
tenants
at
this
property.
One
of
them
is
a
national
insurance
company
and
they
use
a
big
sign
outfit
out
of
Texas
I've,
communicated
that
with
mr.
Knight
today
and
before
today,
by
email.
The
the
second
item
is
a
business
license
of
one
of
the
tenants
that
our
restaurant
he
has
paid
for
his
business
license.
However,
in
communicating
with
mr.
McKnight
today,
I
was
informed
that
they
also
have
to
suppose
have
their
grease
trap
inspected.
N
N
They
email
to
me
from
the
song
company
is
November
6
2019,
but
in
conversations
with
them
they
said
that
there's
apparently
some
tremendous
backlog
with
signs
or
what
have
you
now?
The
signs
are
not
completely
fallen
to
pieces.
You
have
to
understand,
and
there
might
be
some
fading,
but
myself
to
the
naked
eye,
driving
by
I,
don't
see
any
peeling
per
se
and
at
the
same
time,
freeway
insurance
is
going
above
and
beyond
by
changing
all
their
sides.
N
M
N
N
N
M
N
E
J
H
Laborde
Daniel,
like
science
Spectre
with
the
city-
this
is
for
case
284,
19,
4,
1993,
true
Street.
There
two
violations
at
the
property,
one
is
for
Code,
section,
3,
1502,
I
and
3
1805
q2
for
sign
maintenance
and
the
second
for
Code,
section,
20,
9.31,
29.41,
29
35
and
one
104
B,
which
is
a
zoning
violation
for
BTR
being
required
at
the
property
notice.
The
violation
was
sent
out
in
on
August
13th
of
2019,
with
a
compliance
date
of
September
23rd
2019
I
did
receive
the
certified
mail
receipt
back
on
822.
H
This
is
on
the
corner
of
Hercules
and
drew
this
would
be
the
southwest
corner.
As
you
can
see,
freeway
insurance,
their
sign
is
faded
compared
to
all
the
other
signs,
and
then
also
on
the
day
of
the
initial
inspection.
We
had
this
attached
sign
that
was
falling
over.
So
when
I
go
out
and
I
assess
a
property.
If
sign
maintenance
is
at
one,
business,
I
have
to
look
at
the
entire
property
as
a
whole
until
compliance
can
be
met.
So
this
was
on
a
12
on
926.
H
H
This
is
just
a
far
shot
to
show
you
that
the
restaurant
did
remove,
that
falling
off
portion
of
the
sign,
so
their
business
did
come
into
compliance
with
sign
maintenance,
but
the
property
as
a
whole
did
not
because
of
the
sign
maintenance
for
the
side
sign
and
the
freestanding
sign.
This
restaurant
is
also
the
business
that
did
not
have
a
business
tax
receipt.
The
business
owner
that
changed
hands
the
old
business
owner
didn't
pay.
There
didn't
renew
their
BTR
and
had
a
BAC
balance.
The
new
business
owner
came
in
tried
to
obtain
one.
H
We
told
him
that
the
back
balance
would
need
to
be
paid.
He
couldn't
do
it
at
the
time.
He
did,
however,
come
in
yesterday
and
he
did
pay
for
that
back
balance.
But
the
city
requires
a
grease
trap,
inspection
to
be
done
by
the
city
before
we
can
issue
that
business
tax
receipt
like
I,
told
the
business
owner
yesterday.
If
that
grease
trap
inspection
came
in
before
I
had
to
come
here
today.
That
I
would
present
the
case
for
that
business
tax
receipt
as
in
compliance,
but
it
hasn't
been
done
yet.
H
So
it's
still
technically
in
violation.
There
is
no
business
tax
receipt
issued
for
this
business,
even
though
it's
been
paid
for
the
issuance
of
the
BTR
has
not
been
done.
This
is
this,
isn't
current.
This
is
from
twelve
thirteen,
so
I
haven't
updated
it
since
yesterday,
so
it
would
not
show
a
fee
any
more
because
it
has
been
paid,
but
it
still
has
not
been
issued,
and
this
was
on
twelve
thirteen
again.
The
cracking
fading
pain
on
the
side
and
just
again
to
show
that
that
sign
did
come
into
compliance.
M
E
You
know
this
is
the
typical
case,
though
we
have
a
building.
We
have
four
separate
businesses
in
that
one
building
an
LLC
is
the
owner
of
the
building
right
and
because
one
side
is
on
a
violation,
you
still
hold.
Yes,
sir,
you
represent
the
owner.
Yes,
okay
and
I
heard
what
you
said.
The
beginning
one
sign
is
out
with
Judy's.
The
owner
is
going
above
and
beyond.
N
I
H
The
grease
trap
inspectors
get
out
as
soon
as
we
tell
them
hey.
We
need
something
that
the
next
day
they'll
go
out
there.
It's
just
that
they
haven't
been
able
to
reply
back
to
our
DRT
before
I
was
able
to
come
here
today.
So
I
would
I
can't
say
whether
or
not
they've
been
out
there
today
or
not,
but
it
should
be.
It
should
have
been
done,
at
least
by
end
of
business.
Today,
okay,.
B
N
Just
to
just
the
point,
based
on
what
was
heard
here,
I
think
I'm,
beginning
to
understand
a
little
bit
more
about
the
grease
trap.
My
understanding
was
that
it's
a
that
they
already
had
a
letter
that
only
required
that
they
report
a
pump
out
every
60
days,
and
this
is
that
letter,
so
I
mean
I,
don't
know
about
an
inspection
or
not,
but
in
any
case
that's
where
we
are
I,
don't
think
it's
insurmountable.
M
M
C
E
E
We
good
second
motion
I
move
to
enter
an
order
required
to
responded
to
corrective
violations
on
it
before
February
18
2020
that
the
respondent
does
not
comply
but
empty.
The
board
may
order
a
fine
of
$150
per
day
per
violation.
For
each
day.
Each
violation
continues
to
exist.
The
fines
and
fees
remain
unpaid.
Three
months
after
such
a
lien
is
filed,
the
city
is
authorized
to
foreclose,
collect
or
settle
such
lien
on
favor.
A
A
G
I
don't
currently
reside
at
the
house.
I've
been
staying
with
my
mother
for
the
last
year
and
a
half
because
her
health
is
ill
she's.
An
ill
health
I
got
notification
of
a
red
sign
being
in
the
yard,
but
a
friend
of
mine
drove
by
me,
I,
didn't
know
it
was
there
I
sent
out
a
gentleman
to
do
the
limbs
and
the
gutters
and
I
called
the
number
I
showed
him.
I
had
a
picture
and
I
called
the
number
on
the
red
sign
and
asked:
did
I
do
what
was
required?
G
If
not,
please,
let
me
know
I'd
like
to
you
know,
come
in
compliance.
Nobody
called
me
back
and
I
had
also
asked:
do
I
take
down
the
side,
you
come
out
and
recheck
it.
You
take
down
the
side
if
it's
in
compliance
and
then
they
sent
out
a
notification
of
this
hearing
and
again
somebody
notified
me
because
I
don't
go
over
there
and
then
I
would
just
came
here.
Cuz
I'm
gonna
be
in
compliance.
I
spoke
with
him.
He
said
the
limbs
are
fine.
The
gutters
are
fine,
but
I
still
need
to
I.
G
M
O
A
O
Thing
for
the
exterior
surfaces
is
still
an
issue
and
we're
posting
$150
per
day,
while
requesting
the
flat
side
before
January
18
to
20,
20
or
final
hundred
fifty
dollars
per
day.
For
that
violation,
the
Icicle
board
authorized
five
four
three
months
from
the
recommendation
date,
especially
at
the
fines
and
fees
remain
unpaid.
The
city's
Attorney's
Office
is
authorized
to
foreclose,
plucked
or
sell
such
leading
using
any
legal
or
equitable
remedies
and
under
the
law
amiss.
G
B
O
The
plants
gonna
die
for
the
exterior
surface
by
removing
any
tripped
or
peeling
paint
clean
the
walls
of
the
home
and
retain
both
the
eaves
and
the
walls.
This
was
the
initial
time
I
went
out,
it
was
821
2019
someone
I
complained
about
the
grass
being
overgrown,
so
I
posted
for
a
lot
clearing
violation
while
I
was
there.
I
had
noticed
that
tree
limbs
were
growing
on
top
of
the
house
and
the
exterior
was
dirty.
O
September
24th
2019,
again
went
back
after
worried
after
ten
days.
Still
there
same
issues,
and
then
this
was
at
the
5th
December.
The
tree
issues
been
taken.
Care
of
looks
really
good,
but
it
was
just
the
still
the
issue
of
the
exterior
surfaces,
and
this
was
the
notice
of
hearing
that
was
taped
to
the
door.
I'm.
The
fifth
for
this
year
and
I
went
back
on
the
16th
and
there
was
still
the
same
issues.
E
M
Case
250
19
regarding
exterior
surfaces
and
roof
I
mean
regarding
the
roof
and
limbs
move.
The
phyto
respondent
was
in
violation
of
the
code
has
referred
to
in
the
affidavit.
In
this
case
the
violation
was
corrected
prior
to
today's
hearing
and
to
enter
an
order
that
they'll
find
be
imposed.
The
respondent
repeats
the
violation
before
they
order
a
fine
of
up
to
$500.
For
each
day
a
violation
contain
you
stream,
60-second
volunteer.
Q
D
Q
R
J
E
Motion
I
vote
to
enter
an
order
requiring
responded
to
correct
the
violation.
That's
the
exterior
surfaces
hotter
before
January
18
2020.
If
the
respondent
does
not
comply
by
that
date,
the
Fed
may
order
a
fine
of
$150
per
day
per
violation.
For
each
day.
Each
violation
continues
to
exist
if
fines
and
fees
remain
unpaid.
Three
months
after
such
lien
is
filed,
the
city
is
authorized
to
foreclose,
collect
or
settle
such
lien.
O
I
Respondent
was
in
violation
of
the
code
was
referred
to
in
the
affidavit.
In
this
case,
the
violation
was
corrected
prior
to
today's
hearing
and
enter
an
order
that
no
fine
be
imposed.
If
the
respondent
repeats
the
violation,
the
board
may
order
a
fine
of
up
to
$500
each
day.
For
the
each
day,
the
violation
continues
to
exist.
O
B
I
Moved
to
find
the
respondent
was
in
violation
of
the
code
who's
referred
to
in
the
affidavit.
In
this
case,
the
violation
was
corrected
prior
to
today's
hearing
and
to
enter
an
order
that
no
fine
be
imposed,
that
the
respondent
repeats
the
violation
the
board
may
order
a
fine
of
up
to
$500.
For
each
day
the
violation
continues
to
exist.
B
C
I
S
A
M
S
C
S
M
T
Sir,
my
son
Ryan,
he
was
the
one
that
was
with
me
here
this
week
was
it
was
postponed
until
today
and
Ryan
couldn't
be
here
due
to
work
Thunder.
It
shaking
sorry
take
your
time.
Oh
just
relax,
okay,
we're
with
weeks
which
do
villagers
to
a
callow
reality
and
the
the
Realtors
name
is
Brendan
drives
and
there's
a
contract
pending
with
their
reaching
for
the
closing
date
to
be
February.
The
7th.
J
T
E
M
M
A
E
T
And
Ryan
at
least
two
to
three
times
a
week,
even
at
dark,
which
my
husband
tells
me
not
to
do
that
because
of
the
danger
of
a
woman
me
but
I
take
my
13
year
old
with
me,
my
adopted
son
I
know
it
sounds
crazy,
magic
words
or
or
just
is
the
property
fenced
just
on
the
sides
you
know,
but
the
black
building
behind
the
front.
It's
not
that
big.
What
is
it
about
1,500
square
feet
right?
T
M
T
R
E
T
All
so
Ryan
got
a
proposal
for
a
demolition
demolition
company
for
20,000,
and
that
was
within
the
last
two
weeks
or
that's
your
son
Ryan,
the
young
man
that
came
with
you.
T
In
meantime,
this
happened
because
we've
only
been
working
with
that
this
realtor
for
a
couple
of
months.
It
says
moving
much
faster
than
it
did
with
the
other
realtor
that
Ruthie
used
before
she
passed
even,
but
they
really
want
the
property
they
want
to
build
from
what
I
understand
they're
from
Poland
or
their
polish
family,
and
they
want
to
build
for
condos
on
there
for
their
family
ultimate
together.
That's
that's
what
I
was
told.
R
U
About
if
we
do
two
orders,
one
order
is
effective
today
that
would
give
the
city
the
right
to
enter
the
property
to
correct
the
issue.
That
would
mean
demolition
of
the
structures
and
the
second
order
would
be
a
fine
that
would
be
imposed
a
date
that
was
picked
by
the
board.
That
could
be
after
that
closing
date.
T
R
T
I
S
We
also
give
a
compliance
date
with
with
fines
that
way,
if
she
that
would
hopefully
give
her
time
to
sell
the
property,
but
then
we
would
still
have
the
ability
to
come
in
and
correct
the
issue
after
that,
if
we
need
that
was
that,
would
that
be
that
would
be
picked
by
you.
We
generally
recommend
30
days,
but
that
can
be
picked
that
day
could
be
whatever.
P
C
P
Little
bit
of
logistics,
I'll
talk
to
mr.
rout.
The
city
will
be
okay
with
setting
the
compliance
date
for
April
7
that
will
give
on
the
top
February
7
to
close
and
then
two
months
to
demo.
However,
if
we
don't,
if
they
don't
reach
demolition
by
April
7th,
whether
it's
by
the
gentlelady
or
the
older,
then
the
city
will
have
the
right
to
come
onto
the
property
due
to
violation
and
that
if
they
wanted
you
to
find
me.
C
M
Has
been
going
on,
like
you
say
for
four
months
and
everything
that
you
have
said
you
have
done
and
to
me
that
shows
how
this
whole
system
is
supposed
to
work,
we're
making
progress
and
I
think
the
city's
saying
give
us
a
tool
that
doesn't
get
corrected.
We
can
move,
make
sense,
that's
the
way
to
go
and
we're
just
continually
making
progress
versus
some
cases
that
come
before
us,
nothing
happens
and
that
restaurant
was
operating
and
those
buildings
behind
it
were
in
the
same
condition.
They
were
then
than
they
are
today.
E
K
I
L
C
K
I
E
If
that
is
not
the
case
by
April
7th
2020,
the
city
has
the
right
to
come
in
and
demo
it
and
fines.
If
the
reason
that's
the
language
of
that,
if
the
respondent
does
not
comply
by
that
date,
the
board
may
enter
a
fine
of
$150
per
day
per
violation.
For
each
day.
Each
violation
continues
to
exist.
The
fines
and
fees
remain
unpaid.
Three
months
after
such
lien
world
or.
E
T
Credit
card
is
it's
like
almost
eighty
something
thousand,
but
that
she
owes
right
and
then
there's,
of
course,
the
closing
cost
and
then
IP.
We
pay
the
property
taxes,
but
then
they
were
again.
What
I'm
trying
to
say
is
I,
don't
know
what
the
attorneys
fees
are,
the
closing
costs
up
and
all
that,
but
there
isn't
gonna,
be,
of
course,
that
much
I
don't
know.
I
have
no
idea
what's
left
all
in
it
was,
it
needs
to
be
taken
care
of.
T
E
T
E
E
Okay,
if
the
respondent
does
not
comply
by
that
date,
the
board
may
enter
a
fine
of
$150
per
day
for
each
day
to
violation
continues
to
the
city,
may
take
all
reasonable
actions,
including
entry
onto
the
property,
to
bring
the
property
into
compliance
and
charge
the
respondent
with
all
costs
which
will
become
a
lien
on
the
property
if
the
cost
fines
and
fees
remain
unpaid.
Three
months
after
such
lien
is
filed,
the
city
is
authorized
for
I.
Think.