►
From YouTube: 11/18/2020 Municipal Code Enforcement Board.
Description
Comments are not monitored on this platform. To make a comment, please visit www.myclearwater.com/government/council-meeting-streaming-videos or one of our social media pages.
Agenda can be found here: http://bit.ly/ClearwaterCityCouncilMeetings
A
A
Staying
safe
during
these
crazy
times,
it's
a
great
for
us
as
a
board
to
be
back
and
it's
nice
to
see
citizens
and
staff
again,
please
rise
for
the
pledge
of
allegiance.
A
A
It
is
this
board's
intention
to
promote,
protect
and
improve
the
health,
safety
and
welfare,
the
citizens
of
clearwater,
by
providing
this
equitable,
effective
and
inexpensive
method
of
enforcing
certain
codes
within
the
city.
The
board
considers
new
business
items
in
two
parts:
first,
the
violation
and
then
affirmative
relief,
former
rules
of
evidence
do
not
apply.
Each
side
is
limited
to
15
minutes.
The
board
may
grant
additional
time
as
needed.
All
proceedings
will
be
conducted
in
a
calm
civil
manner.
Individuals
who
conduct
themselves
otherwise
will
be
asked
to
leave
if
necessary,
they
will
be
escorted
from
chambers.
A
E
B
B
B
A
Thank
you
moving
on
four
point:
three:
continued
from
three:
twenty:
five:
twenty
four:
twenty:
two:
twenty
six:
twenty
four
twenty
and
seven
twenty
two
220
case:
7920
find
respondents,
onalay
and
chandra
kapasi
at
629
bay
bay,
way,
boulevard,
302
in
violation
of
code
for
residential
rental,
business,
tax
receipts,
receipt
and
short-term
rental
and
issue
an
order
with
compliance
deadline
and
fine.
If
compliance
is
not
met.
Is
anybody
here
to
speak
to
that
case.
G
H
I
moved
to
find
the
respondent
was
in
violation
of
the
code,
as
referred
to
the
affidavit.
In
this
case
the
violation
was
correct
prior
to
today's
hearing
and
to
enter
an
order
that
no
fine
be
imposed.
If
the
respondent
repeats
a
violation,
the
board
may
order
a
fine
of
up
to
500
dollars.
For
each
day,
the
violation
continues
to
exist.
A
Motion
made
seconded
all
in
favor,
I
approve,
nay
motion
passes,
moving
on
4.4
continued
from
325
20,
422,
26,
2420
and
7220
case
number,
81-20,
fine
respondents,
east
gateway
holdings,
llc
at
1390
gulf
debate,
boulevard
in
violation
of
code
for
business,
tax,
receipt
required
and
signage
without
permits
issue
an
order
with
the
compliance
deadline
and
fine
if
compliance
is
not
met.
Is
anybody
here
to
speak?
To
that
case?
I
You
do
that
chairman,
the
the
business
did
come
and
get
their
business
tax
received,
so
the
city
has
withdrawn
that
violation
from
this
case.
So
we
won't
be.
That
won't
be
part
of
this
case.
Just
the
signage
without
permits.
A
A
H
I
Hello
board
danny
knight,
sign
inspector
for
the
city.
This
is
case
81-20
for
1390
galton
bay,
boulevard
for
signage
erected
without
permits.
The
city
is
asking
compliance
on
or
before
january,
18th
of
2021,
or
a
fine
of
a
hundred
dollars
per
day
that
the
violation
exists.
We
are
asking
the
board
to
authorize
the
following
after
three
months
from
the
recordation
date
of
such
lien.
If
the
fines
and
fees
remain
unpaid,
the
city's
attorney's
office
is
authorized
to
foreclose,
collect
or
settle
such
lien
using
any
legal
or
equitable
remedy
allowed.
I
Compliance
can
also
be
met
by
removing
the
unpermitted
sign
and
refraining
from
re-erecting
any
permanent
signage
at
the
property
until
a
signed
permit
is
obtained,
and
here
are
just
some
snippets.
This
is
a
photo
of
from
11
13
of
2020.
To
show
this
is
our
database.
There
have
only
been
two
signed
permits
pulled
at
this
location.
One
was
back
in
2008,
nothing
current.
I
E
I
E
E
F
F
Though
I
moved
that
to
enter
an
order
required
and
responded
to
correct
violation
on
or
before
you
said
january
18th,
yes,
sir
respondent
does
not
comply
by
that
date.
The
board
may
order
a
fine
of
100
per
day
violation
for
each
day.
Each
violation
continues
to
exist
to
fines
and
fees
remain
unpaid.
Three
months
after
such
lien
is
filed,
the
city
is
authorized
to
foreclose,
so
that'll
collect
or
settle
such
lane.
A
Moving
on
to
4.7
continued
from
3
25
20
and
4
22
26,
24,
20
and
7
22
20
case
number
8820
find
respondents
nilly
yahn
at
900
vine
avenue
in
violation
of
code
for
unsafe
building
and
issue,
an
order
with
the
compliance
deadline
and
fine
if
compliance
is
not
met.
Is
there
anybody
here
to
speak
to
this
case.
H
L
L
L
So
the
remainder
of
the
presentation
is
based
on
my
case,
so
my
notice
of
violation
was
sent
5
8
2019
with
the
compliance
date
seven
days
from
the
receipt
of
the
notice
to
secure
permits
and
commence
work
and
completion
within
20
days
of
the
issuance
of
permit
certified
mail
receipt
was
not
received.
However,
the
usps
tracking
website
showed
that
they
was
delivered,
may
9
2019
and
through
various
phone
calls
with
the
owner,
she
did
acknowledge
the
violation.
L
L
L
This
was
in
june
of
2018.
This
is
when
I
took
over.
You
can
see
they've
done
some
work.
They
did
have
an
expired
permit
at
this
point,
but
up
prior
to
it
expiring,
they
were
getting
inspections
again.
That
same
day
shows
that
got
a
new
roof,
some
new
windows-
and
then
this
was
this
month.
11
4
of
2020..
L
L
Sure
for
compliance
to
be
met
for
the
unsafe
structure
would
be
repair
or
replace
any
areas
where
deteriorate.
Deterioration
exists
to
meet
current
florida
building
codes.
All
work
must
be
properly
permitted
and
the
permits
must
be
completed
and
for
that
the
city
is
requesting
compliance
on
or
before
february,
18
2021,
or
a
fine
of
25
dollars
per
day
that
the
violation
continues
to
exist
and
any
reasonable
cost
to
be
applied
as
liens
against
the
property
after
three
months
from
the
recordation
date
of
such
lien.
L
E
A
L
A
M
I
move
to
enter
an
order
requiring
the
respondent
to
correct
the
violations
on
or
before
february
18th
2021.
If
the
respondent
does
not
comply
by
that
date,
the
board
may
order
a
fine
of
25
per
day.
For
each
day
the
violation
continues
to
exist
and
the
city
may
take
all
reasonable
actions,
including
entry
onto
the
property,
to
bring
the
property
into
compliance
and
charge
the
respondent
with
all
costs
which
will
become
a
lien
on
the
property
if
cost
fines
and
fees
remain
unpaid.
C
A
Opposed
nay
motion
passes.
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
Moving
on
to
4.9
continue
from
3
25
20
4,
22,
20,
6,
24,
20
and
7
22
20
case
90-20
find
respondents
at
1447,
druid
road
land,
trust
at
1447,
druid
road
in
violation
of
code
for
permits
and
issue,
an
order
with
the
compliance
deadline
and
fine
if
compliance
is
not
met.
Is
there
anybody
here
to
speak?
To
that
case,
no.
H
A
O
O
O
This
this
house
is
just
west
of
highland
south
of
gulf
to
bay
and
just
east
of
missouri.
O
This
is
what
the
house
looks
like,
as
you
can
see
there.
The
way
the
arrow
is
is
moving
material.
If
this
house
was
in
foreclosure,
the
former
tenants
were
out
the
bank
took
it
over.
I
do
not
know
who
started
the
roofing
could
be,
could
have
been
the
bank.
It
could
have
been
the
owners
now,
don't
know
this
is
a
cop,
a
photo
of
the
stock
work
order
that
I
posted
on
the
window.
O
O
This
is
the
way
it
looks,
and
it
still
looks
that
way
you
can
see
they
put
down
new
roofing
tiles.
O
I
will
tell
you
that
they
came
in
last
year.
I
believe
was
november,
maybe
october
they
had
applied
for
a
permit.
They
could
not
get
a
permit
roof.
They
needed
two
contractors.
Roofing
contractor
cannot
put
down
the
rafters,
that
has
to
be
a
general
contractor.
They
never
contacted
back
or
anything.
A
F
O
O
I
have
per
violation
that
should
be
per
day
and
after
three
months
from
the
recommendation
date
of
such
thing.
If
the
fines
and
fees
remain
unpaid,
the
city
attorney's
office
is
subdivised
to
foreclose,
collect
or
sell
such
need
using
any
legal
or
equitable
remedies
available
under
the
wall,
and
that
can
be
remedied
by
applying
and
obtaining
a
required
permit.
A
Thank
you
comments
from
the
board.
O
H
P
Good
afternoon
board,
my
name
is
dana
root,
I'm
the
assistant
building
official
for
the
city
of
clearwater.
What
they've
done
is
they
re-roofed
the
house
and
in
that
process
of
the
of
the
re-roof?
They
thought
they
probably
found
some
damage
and
they
did
some
framing,
so
that
would
require
one
one
permit
and
that
would
require
a
roofing
contractor
and
a
general
contractor,
or
they
could
have
two
permits
if
they
want
to.
A
M
I
move
to
enter
in
order
requiring
the
respondents
to
correct
the
violations
on
or
before
december
30th
of
this
year.
If
the
respondent
does
not
comply
by
that
date,
the
board
may
order
a
plan
of
150
per
day
for
violation
for
each
day
per
violation.
For
each
day,
each
violation
continues
to
exist
and
finds
a
theme
rate
on
pay.
Three
months
after
such
a
lead
has
filed,
the
city
is
authorized
for
closed
collectors.
F
C
O
A
Moving
on
to
case
number,
four
point:
one:
zero
continued
from
three
twenty:
five:
twenty:
four:
twenty:
two:
twenty
six:
twenty,
four
twenty
and
seven
twenty
two
twenty
case
number:
ninety
one:
twenty
fine
respondents,
trust
1917,
william
asset
conversion,
inc
tray
at
1917,
macomber
avenue
in
violation
of
code
for
permits,
an
issue,
an
order
with
the
compliance
deadline
and
fine.
If
compliance
is
not
met.
Is
there
anybody
here
to
speak
to
case
4.10,
no?
Okay
board?
We
will
need
a
first.
O
Q
A
Thank
you,
sir,
and
then
motion
for
declaration.
F
I'll
make
the
motion
the
declaration
I
moved
to
find
the
respondent
was
in
violation
of
the
code,
as
referred
to
in
the
affidavit.
In
this
case
the
violation
was
corrected
prior
to
today's
hearing
and
to
enter
an
order
that
no
fine
be
imposed.
If
the
respondent
repeats
the
violation,
the
board
may
order
a
fine
of
up
to
five
hundred
dollars.
For
each
day,
the
violation
continues
to
exist.
A
O
A
O
A
Case
number
4.11
continue
from
325
24
22
26,
24,
20
and
7
7220
case
number
93-20
find
respondents
gary
english
at
3131,
downing
street
violation
of
code
for
permits
accessory
structure,
an
issue
in
order
with
the
compliance
deadline
and
fine.
If
compliance
is
not
met.
Is
there
anyone
here
to
speak
to
case
number
4.11.
A
R
R
Okay,
and
that
was,
I
had
a
travel
trailer
in
my
front
driveway
and
that
wasn't
correct
and
I
removed
that
and
the
boat
the
boat
on
the
side
of
my
house.
He
said
he
must
be,
you
know,
covered
up
and
left
me
to
meet
either
fencing
or
hedges
right.
So
I
comply
with
that
and
I
built
I
put
the
fence
up
and
I
called
the
inspector
he
came
back
out
and
inspected.
It
said
you're
in
compliance
good
to
go,
and
then
a
month
after
that,
you
might
get
another
notification.
K
A
It
didn't
go
like
that.
Just
seemed
like
there,
and
that
makes
sense
and
we'll
get
some
clarification
here.
So
if
how
the
procedure
works,
if
you'll
have
a
seat
in
that
front
row
we'll
let
mr
contrell
in
the
city
come
and
hopefully
give
you
some
clarification,
we'll
see
how
we
can
help
you
remedy
this.
Thank
you,
mr.
L
English
good
afternoon
board
jason
cantrell,
building
inspector
city
clearwater.
This
is
case
number
93-20
for
an
accessory
structure
in
the
case
94-20
for
a
fence
at
the
property
at
31,
3131
downing
street.
L
L
L
L
L
Bay
on
january
21st,
2020
inspector
espinosa
took
this
photo
for
me,
and
this
is
the
the
arrows
pointing
to
the
accessory
structure
in
question
that
one
of
the
height,
the
height
limitation,
for
accessory
structures
that
cannot
be
taller
than
15
feet
or
the
height
of
the
structure.
Whichever
is
less,
it
is
clearly
higher
than
the
structure
february
5th.
L
Again
you
can
see
that
structure.
That's
a
better
angle.
You
can
see
it's
much
higher
than
the
house
from
there
and
then
the
two
arrows
are
pointing
to
the
fence
posts
that
were
installed
fence
panels
themselves
may
not
require
a
permit,
but
it
really
depends
on
how
they're
anchored
in
this
case
he's
using
fence
posts
and
those
would
require
permit
there's
another
view
of
another
one
of
the
posts.
L
This
is
inside
the
structure.
Mr
english
allowed
me
in
there
to
show
me
how
he
affixed
these
panels
to
the
structure
which,
how
he
affixed
them
still
wouldn't
be
allowed,
because
one
the
structure
itself
would
need
a
permit
and
also
the
structure
itself
is
anchored
to
the
ground.
So
even
if
he's
using
that,
it
would
still
require
her.
F
L
L
Not
as
it
sits
and
also
there's
other
community
development
regulations
that
wouldn't
allow
it
to
be
in
front
of
the
principal
structure
which
in
this
case
it
is.
K
L
We
did,
and
I
kept
referring
him
to
inspector
odegaard
and
mr
pizlick
from
code
compliance
to
deal
with
his
concerns
with
what
he
believes.
He
was
told,
that's
between
them,
and
I
just
I
let
him
know
what
he
needed
with
us.
Okay,.
A
So
basically,
it
seems
like
the
remedy
is
a
permit
for
the
fence
that
wasn't
permitted
and
then
the
structure
that's
higher
than
the
roof
would
need
to
be
either
lowered
or
correct.
Okay,
any
additional
questions
from
the
board.
Mr
cantrell,
can
you
give
us
the
city's
recommendation.
A
D
R
R
R
R
A
R
A
A
Unfortunately,
there
are
codes
that
we
all
have
to
play
by,
and
the
city
is
stating
in
front
of
us
that
to
fix
your
violation,
you
need
to
a
apply
for
that
fence,
permit,
whether
it's
carport,
siding
or
fence,
it's
whatever.
We
want
to
call
it,
which
should
be
a
relatively
simple
fix,
and
then
the
second
thing
is
is
fixing
your
carport
structure
that
has
to
be
as
the
height
of
your
roof
or
lower.
If
I'm
understanding
that
correctly,
mr
cantrell,
yes,
that's
impossible.
R
E
A
R
A
A
R
A
Of
my
neighbors
have
a
problem
with
it.
Unfortunately,
when
you
become
on
the
city's
radar
and
it's
in
violation,
they
have
a
job
to
do
and
they
have
to
interpret
the
codes
and
we're
in
violation
as
and
now
as
we
sit,
mr
english,
so
we're
as
a
board
we're
given
no
other
option
other
than
to
support
the
city.
In
that
sense,
if
it's
a
code,
it's
a
code
so.
R
A
R
It
so
the
code
didn't
change.
I
mean
I
have
the
underlying
areas
where
I
was
in
violation
right
here
from
the
very
first
time
yeah,
it
doesn't
say
anything
about
permits
or
heights
of
the
structure
or
the
cardboard.
That's
none
of
those
I
mean
I'll,
be
glad
to
give
it
to
you
yeah.
No,
I'm
I'm
I'm
fine.
I
can
only
go
by.
R
R
F
Yeah,
mr
chairman,
could
the
the
gentleman
go
back
to
the
city
of
clearwater
the
building
department
and
apply
for
a
permit,
knowing
that
the
structure
is
going
to
be
higher
than
his
is
his
residential
use
and
then
be
denied
a
permit
and
then
appeal
for
a
variance
or
a
special
exception,
or
some
other
method
of
of
allowing
this
structure?
Is
that.
N
A
A
P
Yes,
you
could
apply
for
a
flexible
standard
or
if
you
want
to
call
that
a
variance,
he
would
have
to
prove
that
that
the
surrounding
properties-
or
he
would
have
to
prove
that
his
what
he
wanted
to
do
would
be
consistent
with
the
surrounding
properties,
meaning
that
there
was
many
other
properties
in
the
area
that
had
similar
accessory
structures,
the
height
in
front
of
the
primary
structure.
There
may
be
an
issue
with
the
side
setback
of
5
foot,
so
he's
probably
got
three
things.
P
He
has
to
deal
with
the
height,
the
that
carport
being
in
front
of
the
primary
structure
and
also
being
too
close
to
the
property
line,
but
without
him
talking
to
a
planner,
giving
them
a
survey
of
the
property
and
discussing
what
he
wants
to
do.
S
S
Hi
good
afternoon,
lauren
matzke
planning
and
development
for
the
first
level
review,
assuming
that
it
could
be
approved
through
that,
which
is
what
we
call
an
fls
that
takes
about
six
weeks,
so
applications
are
accepted
at
the
first
business
day
of
each
month
by
noon
and
those
are
reviewed
by
our
development
review
committee.
S
S
A
Mr
english,
you
want
to
step
back
up,
so
it
seems
we're
we're
finding
some
avenues
for
you
to
possibly
make
this
work.
You
just
have
to
remain
in
an
open
line
of
communication
with
mr
cantrell,
so
you're
not
wasting
time
or
money
that
isn't
part
of
the
code
and
isn't
legal,
and
then
you
know,
hopefully
you.
A
Be
and
have
them
call
me
nobody's
calling
me
I've
called
down
five
six
times.
Nobody
called
me
back,
except
him.
Okay,
I
apologize
for
that.
But
hopefully
what
we
can
do
is
remedy
this
going
forward
is,
unfortunately,
we're
in
violation
as
of
now
as
a
board.
We're
gonna
have
to
make
a
decision,
but
we
are
supportive
in
the
fact
that
you
do
have
avenues
to
go
down
to
hopefully
fix
this
problem,
so
I
we
would
just
as
a
board
urge
you
to
stay
in
open
communication
with
the
city.
You
know
mr
kendrick.
R
A
Yeah,
mr
cantrell
is
great
at
communication,
mr
pislax
here
as
well.
So
if
you
have
questions
mr
roots
here
grab
business
cards
and
and
hopefully
remedy
that,
but
on
the
from
the
board
standpoint,
we
have
to
issue
in
order
going
forward
because
we
are
in
violation
as.
R
A
Yes,
I
don't
think
it's
fair
at
all.
I
agree.
Let's
just
do
it
one
thing
at
a
time.
I
think
your
fence,
if
you're,
going
to
keep
your
fence
up,
go
through
the
permitting
process
for
it
and
then,
if
you
are
you're
going
to
have
time
we're
going
to
issue
an
order,
it's
going
to
give
you
the
city
is
going
to
recommend
time.
That
gives
you
time
to
start
these
processes.
We've
just
been
told
it's
probably
going
to
take
a
six-week
application
process.
A
R
Understand
it's
it's
it's
beyond
my
property
line,
but
I
mean
it's
in
front
of
my
property
line,
but
I
don't
know
five
feet
or
something
yeah,
but
if
I
covered
that
that
I
would
be
in
compliance
now,
if,
if
I
can't
have
the
fence-
and
I
can't
have
five
feet
from
the
property
line,
then
I've
got
to
remove
the
boat.
Tear
the
fence
down,
tear
the
park
board
down,
understand.
A
Because
they
can't
go
back
any
farther
conditions,
we're
not
sure
of
those
rules
and
codes
and
and
that
process,
that's
not
what
we're
here,
for
we
can
be
understanding
as
compassionate
as
we
can.
We
can
grant
you
a
little
more
time
because
the
processes
take,
but
I
think
your
best
remedy
is
keep
those
open
lines
of
communication.
Follow
the
processes,
and
hopefully
you
can
come
to
a
understanding
and
an
acceptance.
A
B
A
A
A
A
Okay,
first
motion
is
made:
can
we
have
a
second?
Second,
all
in
favor,
aye
aye,
those
opposed,
nay,
okay.
So,
mr
english,
if
you
would
just
either
have
a
seat
there
step
aside,
mr
cantrell
is
going
to
give
us
a
recommendation
on
from
the
city.
L
L
He
would
have
to
rectify
those
just
obtaining
the
permit
and
doing
nothing
with
the
structure
of
offense
wouldn't
suffice.
So
I
just
want
to
clarify
for
compliance
to
be
met
for
the
stock
work.
Orders
apply
for
and
obtain
permitting
for
the
nest
for
the
accessory
structure
and
the
fencing
meet
all
community
development
requirements
associated
with
those
permits.
Alternatively,
the
fence
and
structure
can
be
removed.
L
The
city's
recommendation
is
compliance
on
or
before
december,
18th
2020,
or
a
fine
of
150
per
day
per
violation
that
the
violation
continues
to
exist
and
any
reasonable
cost
to
be
applied,
as
leads
against
the
property
after
three
months
from
the
recordation
date
of
such
leads.
If
the
fines
fees
remain
unpaid,
the
city
attorney's
office
is
authorized
to
foreclose,
collect
or
settle
such
lien,
using
any
legal
or
equitable
remedies
available
under
the
law,
and
we
have
no
objection
if
you
wanted
to
alter
any
of
the
time.
So
we're
fine.
A
So
what
the
city
is
initially
saying
is
they
were
requesting
you
to
comply
by
december
18th
of
2020
or
a
fine
of
150
per
day
would
start
accruing.
A
What
they're
saying
is
to
grant
you
some
leniency,
because
you're
availability
to
go
through
other
channels
and
building
and
permits
and
stuff
they're
gonna
they're
willing
to
grant
you
more
time
and
that's
something
that
this
board
can
do
for
you.
So
if
the
the
board
is
unanimous
in
that
decision,
we
would
like
to
give
you
a
little
bit
more
time
in
that
process.
But
do
you
understand
what
you
need
to
do
going
forward?
Because
we
don't
want
to
see
you
start
accruing
these
fines
either.
R
A
We're
we're
we're
understanding,
compassion
of
that
and
again
what
the
best
we
can
do
as
a
board
to
help
you
out
in
this
situation
is
to
make
sure
your
understanding
of
what
you
can
do
to
remove
the
situation
so
you're
not
collecting
more
fines
and
fees
because
you
haven't
started
yet
and
we're
willing
to
grant
you
more
time
is
what
the
city's
saying.
So
I
mean
I
don't
know
the
board's
position,
but
I
don't
have
a
an
issue
granting
a
minute
with
an
additional
30
days.
H
We're
talking
about
six
weeks
for
permitting
this
is
an
older
gentleman
with
health
problems
have
no
problem
even
more
than
90
days.
A
A
And
what
we
will
need
is
two
separate
motions.
As
the
the
second
motions,
two
separate
for
case
number,
four
point,
one
and
then
4.12.
H
So
then,
I
move
to
enter
an
order
requiring
respondent
to
correct
the
corrections
on
or
before
february
18th
right
and
may
order
a
fight
of
150
per
day
per
violation.
For
each
day.
Each
violation
continues
to
exist
if
fines
and
fees
remain
unpaid.
Three
months
after
such
lien
is
filed,
the
city
is
authorized
for
close,
collect
or
sell
such
so
instead
of
30
days.
You
now
have
three
months.
A
Okay,
first
motion:
do
I
have
a
second
I'll
make
a
second
okay
motion
is
made,
and
second
it
all
in
favor,
aye
aye
opposed,
nay,
okay,
perfect!
So
that's
4.11
february
18th.
You
have
to
get
that
running.
Second
motion
on
4.12.
R
A
Let
us
finish
this
second
motion
and
we'll
make
sure
that
you
have
those
avenues
of
communication.
A
H
H
A
Motion
passes,
mr
english.
Thank
you.
If,
if
I
were
you,
I
would
make
sure
why
you
have
all
these.
Ladies
and
gentlemen,
in
the
same
room,
pick
up
their
cards,
make
sure
you
have
those
lines
of
communication
and
they
will
be
the
professionals
that
will
give
you,
hopefully
that
correct
advice
so
you're
not
wasting
any
more
time
and
money.
A
B
A
Okay,
mr
cirelli,
do
you
admit
to.
N
It
yes,
so
basically
what
happened?
Is
I
get
a
letter
on
my
door
saying
I
was
in
violation
of
advertising
and
I
don't
know
it
was
coincidence
or
whatever,
but
we
have
nosy
neighbors
who
walk
around
looking
at
out
of
state
license
plates
and
saying
they're
rented
well,
my
stepson
and
grandkids,
wherein
that
come
came
and
made
north
carolina.
Please
they
stayed
there
the
day
after
they
left.
I
got
the
letter
saying
I
was
rented.
N
I
haven't
rented,
I
rented
three
people
a
year
january
february
and
march.
That's
it
100
a
week
and
I
approve
for
you.
You
can
look
at
the
sales
tax
and
when
I
call
and
I
got
the
letter,
I
called
the
person
and
they
said
you're
you're
advertising.
I
said,
I'm
not
advertising,
it
says
monthly.
Rentable
only
say
well,
you
I
could
put
in
a
week
and
you
could
book
it.
That's
no!
N
You
can't,
because
I
have
a
program
where
you
have
to
tell
me
that
it's
going
to
be
rented
and
I
have
to
prove
it,
and
I
tell
them
I
can
only
rent
by
the
month
and
then
she
started
saying
to
me.
Well,
I
can
put
it
in
and
I
can
see
all
these
states
that
you
have
well
if
you're,
not
the
owner
of
that
website.
I
block
it
because
I
don't
want
people
directed
so
it
says,
block
block
block,
but
the
one
you
look
at
it.
N
It
looks
like
it's
somebody
there
being
rented
gotcha,
so
that's
that's
my
might
be,
but
I
I
approve
I
mean
basically
I
use
bellais.
I
guess
it
is
they
rent
the
january
february
march.
For
me,
I
do
use
home
away
and
I
do
try
to
rent,
but
sometimes
I
don't
want
to
rent.
So
I
just
block
those
out
and
that's
basically
it
and
I
I
can
understand
somebody
looking
at
it
and
saying
well
wow
this
guy's
renting
a
lot.
N
A
G
This
property
was
posted
with
an
affidavit
of
posting
and
notice
of
repeat
violation
on
may
19
2020,
and
it
was
also
sent
certified
mail
section
802.
The
definition
of
a
residential
use
means
a
permanent
place
of
residence
for
a
family.
A
resident
excuse
me,
residential
use
located
on
residentially
zoned
property
shall
not
include
rentals
for
periods
of
less
than
31
days
or
one
calendar
month,
whichever
is
less
or
which
is
advertised
or
held
out
to
the
public,
is
a
place
rented
for
periods
of
less
than
31
days
or
one
calendar
month.
G
On
march
22
2017
case
46-17
was
brought
before
the
municipal
code
enforcement
board
and
was
found
in
violation
for
code,
section,
1-104b
and
3-919
advertising
an
illegal,
short-term
rental.
The
property
was
brought
into
compliance
prior
to
the
board
hearing
the
board
ordered
that
no
fine
be
imposed.
If
the
respondent
repeats
the
violation
within
a
five-year
period,
the
board
may
order
the
respondent
to
pay
up
to
500.
For
each
day.
The
repeat:
violation
continues:
the
respondent
was
not
present.
G
I
did
receive
a
call
from
anonymous
neighbor
he
advertises
on
the
homeaway.com
website.
This
was
taken
on
may
19
2020
and
if
you
look
at
the
minimum
stay
where
the
yellow
arrow
is
it's
a
minimum
night
stay
of
one
night
for
a
residentially,
zoned
neighborhood,
it
has
to
be
31
days
and
one
calendar
month,
not
one,
so
it
doesn't
matter
whether
he
has
contracts
of
people
staying
there
tonight.
It's
the
advertising.
G
G
And
I
went
back
to
the
website.
Vrbo
brbo
and
homeaway
are
the
same
company
again.
Minimum
stay.
One
night
tried
to
book
it
november
7th
through
the
14th,
was
able
to
do
so
again
for
seven
nights
for
one
thousand
two
hundred
fifty
seven
dollars
and
then
when
the
owner
actually
got
the
notice
back,
may
21st
2020.
F
G
I'm
going
after
is
the
advertising.
So
again,
if
you
have
a
short-term
rental,
it
has
to
be
31
days
or
one
calendar
month.
Whichever
is
less
so.
The
owner
was
brought
before
the
board
previously
and
brought
it
into
compliance.
How
he
left
it
in
compliance
there
wouldn't
be
a
problem.
Short-Term
rentals
is
such
an
issue
on
clearwater
beach,
neighbors
do
look
at
neighbors
and
when
they
find
somebody
doing
something
they
report
it
and
I
enforce
on
it.
So
the
contracts
don't
make
a
difference.
I'm
not
looking
at
license
plates.
G
E
A
G
A
N
Mr
sorelli,
would
you
step
back
up?
Please?
Yes,
so
the
first
violation
was
basically
a
review.
I
didn't
do
nothing,
somebody
put
in
a
review
and
that's
they
were
calling
that
advertising.
I
didn't
put
it
up.
The
person
put
it
up.
I
had
it.
When
I
got
a
call
about
it,
I
had
to
go.
Call
the
person
who
put
the
review
up,
tell
them
to
call
home
away,
take
it
off,
because
I
you
can't
do
it,
you
can't
put
every
year.
That's
the
reason.
N
It
was
violation,
because
somebody
put
a
review
on
this,
that
they
stayed
there
and
I
couldn't
do
anything
about
it.
I
had
to
actually
embarrassing
call
someone
who
stayed
there
and
tell
them.
Please
take
the
review
off
and
she
didn't
know
how
to
do
it.
She
had
to
call
them
away
and
that's
the
reason
I
got
that
if
you
look
at
that
calendar
it
says
old,
gray,
that's
not
bookings.
I
I
block
and
I
can
show
proof
that
it
says
block
on
my
website.
I
got
it.
N
I
mean
I
took
a
photo
of
this
because
when
you
take
a
picture,
it
doesn't
come
out
on
a
printer
and
then,
like
I
said,
yeah
she
she
is
right,
she's
not
looking
at
life's
place,
but
the
people
who
who
basically
paddle
tell
me
all
looking
at
the
life's
place
because
it
happened
that
day
after
the
people,
my
family
came
from
north
carolina
yeah
I
mean,
and
then
I
also
said
how
many
days
I
put
in,
and
she
did
say
31
days.
So
what
happens
the
third
day?
Well,
you
could
put
30.
N
N
So
I
just
want
to
be
the
right.
I
want
to
be
fair.
I
just
wanted
to
show
I'm
doing
the
right
thing,
but
if
other
people
are
doing
it,
I'm
not
saying
I'm
going
to
do
it
too.
I
put
it
in
and
that's
how
it
is,
but
it
seemed
honestly,
it
seems
like
people
are
doing
it
until
somebody
gets
caught
to
some,
and
I
I
I
realized
that
told
me
the
same
thing
you.
Basically
if
it's
on
the
website,
it's
fine,
but
somebody
says:
oh,
I
caught
you
and
then
this
all
starts.
E
N
N
K
K
N
K
N
A
A
Secondly,
I
think
that
we've
already
went
through
this
and
you've
been
through
this
process,
so
you
understand
the
game
and
how
to
play
it
and
you
you
switch
your
amount
of
days
from
one
to
thirty
so
that
you
can
appease
the
city
and
staff,
but
then
it
in
your
understanding
of
what
was
wrong,
but
then
we
flipped
it
back
to
one
again
once
a
time
period
went
by
and
then
the
excuse
of
everybody's
doing
it.
Well,
I
mean
we're
all.
N
N
E
A
N
A
E
N
A
It
I'm
not
doing
it
exactly
so
what
she
brought
it
before
us
was
you're
in
violation
because
you're
advertising,
it
she's,
not
saying
you're,
collecting
money
you're
in
violation
because
you're
advertising
it
in
you
did
previously
right
and
we've
you
remedied
it.
Thank
you
for
doing
that.
You
saved
yourself
time
and
money
and
city
staff,
time
and
money,
but
then
here
we
are
right
back
in
the
same
exact
situation.
Yes,
when
we
already
know
what
we
can
and
can't
do,
and.
C
A
Book
a
week
you
can't
I
get
it.
You
have
to
understand
that
this
comes
these
short-term
rentals,
especially
on
clearwater
beach,
come
before
the
city
often
yeah,
because
they're
not
just
because
they're
nosy,
because
they
they
protect
and
care
about
their
neighborhood.
That's
you
know
disappearing,
because
the
building
and
the
little
bit
they
have
left
and
now
rentals.
N
N
A
A
K
T
Didn't
put
on
and
I
took
care
of
it
right
away,
yeah
and
I'll
review
somebody
right
now,
mr
chair,
may
I
ask
her
a
few
questions?
Yes,
sir,
thank
you.
Is
it
sorely?
I'm
sorry,
my
name
is
michael,
I'm
assistant
city
attorney.
Now
this
property?
It's
not
your
house
right,
it's
not
your
homestead.
You
live
in
newport
richard,
yes,
okay
and
you've
lived
in
newport
richard
since
about
2003
yeah.
T
Always
been
your
home
today
right
and
that's
always
been
you
and
your
wife's
homestead,
so
why
in
2017
and
2018,
did
you
apply
for
and
obtain
the
homestead
extension
from
the
pinellas
county
property
for
this
property.
A
T
N
T
This
property
was
never
your
home
state,
no
okay,
and
so
you
really
should
not
have
applied
for
home
selling
right,
which
I
didn't
know.
So,
if,
if
you,
if
you
incorrectly
told
the
property
appraiser
something,
why
should
this
board
believe
you
when
you
say
you
have
not
short-term
rented
this
property.
N
N
There's
a
little
confusion
going
on.
I
understand
your
side
and
under
my
side
I'm
not
trying
to
I'm
I'm
not
a
person
who's
renting
20
times
a
year,
I'm
renting
it
three
to
four
times
a
year,
and
that's
it
it's
only
four
or
five
people.
When
somebody
tells
me
they're,
sick
or
tired
of
somebody
renting
in.
N
Times
or
seven
four
times,
you're
in
violation,
I
understand
what
I
did.
I
was
wrong.
I
do
what
I
could
do
by
saying
you
can't
rent
by
the
month,
even
though
I
put
in
monthly
rentals-
and
I
do
it
if
you
if
it
was
in
there-
and
I
tell
them
because
you
can't
book
it
unless
I
say
you
could
book
it.
I
I
do
what
I
was
good.
D
Okay,
so
if
you
determine
that
there
is
a
violation
that
there
should
be
a
fine
for
those
days
that
there
was
up
to
500
today,
that's
the
difference
between
one,
where
you
give
somebody
an
opportunity,
and
the
first
scenario
to
correct
it
repeat-
is
done
differently.
So
I
just
want
you
to
be
aware
of
that
before
you
make
your
decision
as
to
whether
or
not
the
vibration.
U
N
When
I
got
that
letter,
I
called
that
date
to
say
right.
Mine
says
not
the
rentals
and
two
she
said
well,
it
says
weekly
and
then
the
next
day,
when
I
got
in
touch,
I
changed
it.
So
it
wasn't
two
days.
The
first
day
I
tried
to
call
didn't
you
get
an
answer
back
and
the
next
day
I
got
an
answer
from
her
and
then
I
changed
it
that
day
and
basically
I
don't
really
be.
N
E
A
Would
just
have
a
seat
and
let
us
kind
of
discuss
as
a
board.
I
don't
know
how
the
board
feels
about
it,
but
I
think
it's
important
to
hear
that
if
we
do
make
this
motion,
it's
for
two
days
of
a
fine
is
what
you're
saying
is
the
time
period
right
because
in
essence,.
D
By
making
this
motion,
if
you
find
a
violation
that
you
found
that
he
has
committed
the
violation
for
two
days
on
your
repeat,
then
your
second
part
of
your
motion
will
be
to
determine
if
you
want
to
find
how
much,
knowing
that
it's
up
to
five
hundred
dollars
a
day.
But
so
so
it's
important
for
you
to
just
understand
how
these.
A
My
personal
feeling
towards
the
board
is,
it
is
a
repeat
right
and
the
gentleman
was
in
violation,
went
through
the
process
through
city
to
correct
the
violation,
and
then
we
did
it
again
right.
So
I
as
much
as
I
want
to
be
compassionate
and
understanding,
and
it's
a
mistake
and
you
can
block
it.
I
think
there
probably
should
be
some
component
put
into
this.
I
don't
think
500
is
the
amount,
I
think
that's
probably
a
little
excessive,
but
I
think
there
probably
needs
to
be
something.
A
That's
a
statement
of
this
is
wrong
and,
let's
not
do
it
going
forward
if
that
makes
sense.
So
whether
that's
you
know
a
hundred
dollars
a
day,
we're
making
230
239
dollars
a
day
in
a
rental
fee
for,
however
long
it
was
rented,
I
think
two
days
is,
is
reasonable,
so
I
think
for
the
board:
it's
coming
up
with
what
is
that
amount?
If
there
is
one.
M
M
A
Motion
is
made
and
seconded
all
in
favor
aye.
All
right,
oppose,
nay,
hey
motion
passes
city
recommendation.
D
A
A
Okay,
so
what
we
would
need
is
make
sure
we're
on
repeat
violation
in
the
second
motion.
H
F
F
E
A
Off
the
the
board
order,
two
city
recommended
two:
they
I
don't
know
what
they
were
referencing
five
hundred
dollars
a
day.
I
think
the
board
granted
some
leniency
and
got
you
better
than
50
percent
of
what
they
wanted
to
take
out
of
your
checkbook.
So
what
we
can
help
you
with
at
this
point
is
if
30
days
isn't
enough
time
for
you
to
make
that
payment.
We
can
help
you
with
that.
Otherwise,.
N
It's
not
the
money
really.
I
mean
I
appreciate
reducing
it.
It's
just
that
this
is
what's
going
on
now,.
N
It's
it's,
I
understand
what's
going
on
in
the
city
of
clearwater
short-term
rentals,
but
I
just
don't
understand
and
it's
nothing
to
do
with
anybody
is
where
you
go
into
a
beautiful
neighborhood
and
you
get
an
absolute
tea
owner
who
doesn't
care
about
us
house
and
rented
the
undesirables,
and
that
house
looks
terrible.
There's
no
laws
against
that.
K
N
A
A
A
Thanks,
thank
you.
Moving
on
case
number,
4.16
continued
from
720
220
case
number
10220
find
respondent.
I
add
elian
at
1391
gulf
debate,
boulevard
in
violation
for
code
for
door
and
windows
and
issue
an
order
with
the
compliance
deadline
and
fine
if
compliance
is
not
met.
Is
anyone
here
for
case
number
4.16,
no
okay
board?
If
we
could
have
a
first,
please.
F
A
Committed
just
a
regular
first,
not
a
star.
F
F
That's
not
it
either.
You're,
okay,
you're
getting
it.
A
V
V
V
Us
so
there
was
one
violation
here
for
code,
section,
3-102.c.1,
c3
and
c4
for
door
window
openings
window,
maintenance
and
windows
now
facing
the
right-of-way
notice.
Violation
was
sent
on
march
4th
of
2020
compliance
date
of
april
4th
of
2020,
and
the
certified
mail
receivers
received
back
on
march
17th
to
2020..
V
V
V
V
A
A
V
There
were
some
issues
before
with
work
being
done
on
the
interior,
but
that
was
a
separate
case
being
handled
by
the
building
department.
There
were
stop
work,
orders
and
work
being
done
in
the
interior,
but
I
don't
know
what
the
conclusion
came
of
that.
My
specific
concerns
were
just
the
exterior
of
the
building.
S
V
F
V
F
So
he
has
corrected
violations
in
the
past.
V
V
I
had
to
have
our
contractor
cut
the
property
because
they
allowed
the
grass
on
the
south
side
to
grow
into
the
street
in
excess
of
four
inches
and
over
a
foot.
This
is
just
a
separate
issue
with
property
maintenance
of
boarding
up
the
windows
and
doors.
V
I've
I've
attempted
they
got
the
I
received
the
green
card
back,
but
no
efforts
have
been
made
to
make
any
improvements
in
the
building
or
change
the
situation
and,
like
I
said,
the
other
issue
with
the
interior,
where
work
was
being
done.
That
was
with
the
building
department.
I
don't
know
many
more
details
on
that.
A
I
believe
I
remember
this
building
being
here
before
we
had
some
issues
with
addresses
or
communication
getting
that
he
was
here
in
person,
if
I
remember
correctly,
and
he
was
complaining
something
about
the-
how
we
were
communicating
with
him
wasn't
getting
to
him
because
of
mixed
up
addresses.
I
don't
know
if
that
was
remedied.
Or
do
you
recall
that.
J
D
A
V
For
this
case
for
102-20
1391
gulf
debate
for
doors
and
windows,
requesting
compliance
honor
before
december
5th
of
2020
or
a
fine
of
150
dollars
per
day
per
violation
for
each
day,
the
violations
continue
to
exist.
We're
asking
the
board
authorized
the
following
after
three
months
from
the
recommendation
date
of
such
lien.
If
the
fines
and
fees
remain
unpaid,
the
city
attorney's
office
is
authorized
to
foreclose,
collect
or
settle
such
a
lean
use
using
any
legal
or
equitable
remedies
available
under
law.
M
V
A
Comments
or
a
motion
it'll
be
this
second
motion.
C
I
moved
to
enter
an
order
requiring
the
respondent
to
correct
the
violations
on
or
before
december
5th.
The
respondent
does
not
comply
with
that
date.
The
board
may
order
a
fine
of
250
per
day
per
violation
for
each
day
if
the
violation
exists,
if
fines
and
fees
remain
unpaid.
For
three
months
after
such
lien
is
filed,
the
city
authorized
foreclosure,
collect
or
settle
like
such
lean.
A
A
Moving
on
agenda
item
4.17
continued
from
722-20
case
103-20,
find
respondents
salty
llc
at
1401
gulf
debate,
boulevard
in
violation
for
code
for
roof
maintenance
and
business
tax,
receipt
and
issue
an
order
with
compliance
deadline
and
fine.
If
compliance
is
not
met,
is
there
anyone
here
to
speak
to
item
4.17.
C
A
V
K
V
K
A
V
I
won't
go
through
all
the
violation:
it's
for
business
taxes
required
for
the
consciezar,
which
is
a
restaurant
there
and
roof
maintenance,
there's
a
massive
hole
in
the
roof
and
the
tarp
has
been
placed
on
it,
but
no
repairs
have
ever
been
done.
A
tarp
cannot
be
a
fix
for
roof
damage,
so
this
is
the
conscious
hour.
This
is
in
january,
8th
of
2020
you'd
see
the
tarp
on
top
of
the
roof.
V
V
So
this
is
the
side
of
a
property.
This
is
february
10
to
2020
again
tarps
on
the
roof.
Even
the
the
man
who
is
the
tenant
in
there
leroy,
who
runs
the
conscious
hour,
told
us
there's
damage
on
the
roof.
I
think
there
might
have
been
also
a
building
case
on
this
one
as
well
just
a
better
picture
of
the
tarp.
This
is
the
posting
of
the
affidavits
for
the
violations.
I
did
not
get
the
green
card
from
cld
llc.
They
didn't
sign
for
anything,
so
the
property
was
posted
on
the
23rd
of
march.
V
V
Oh,
this
was
just
a
review.
I
got
online
for
the
conscious
hour,
pretty
good
reviews,
but
it
was
operating
a
few
months
back
just
another
picture
on
july
24th
of
the
property.
I
again
another
property
I
had
to
cut
as
well,
because
they're
not
maintaining
the
grounds
anymore
again
november
4th
I
went
back
tarp
still
on
the
roof.
This
is
a
notice
of
hearing
posted
in
the
door.
They
didn't
sign
for
their
certified
mail,
for
the
hearing
is
starting
to
really
rip
up
and
then
back
on
the
17th
of
this
month.
A
F
A
We
already
did
a
first
of
his
recommendation
is
december
5th.
Oh.
M
A
M
I
move
to
enter
an
order
requiring
the
respondent
to
correct
the
violations
on
or
before
december
5th
of
this
year.
If
the
respondent
does
not
comply
by
that
date,
the
board
may
offer
they
order
a
fine
of
250
per
day
per
violation.
For
each
day.
Each
violation
continues
to
exist
if
fines
and
fees
remain
unpaid.
Three
months
after
such
lien
is
filed,
the
city
is
authorized
to
foreclose,
collect
or
settle
such
a
lien.
V
A
Moving
on
agenda
item
4.21
continued
from
722.20
case
107.20,
fine
respondents
douglas
e
fisher
at
10,
north
aurora
avenue,
in
violation
of
code
for
residential
grass,
parking
roof
maintenance,
exterior
storage
and
vehicle
repair
and
issue
an
order
with
the
compliance
deadline
and
fine
if
compliance
is
not
met.
Is
there
anyone
here
to
speak
to
item
4.21?
V
D
C
V
You
know
kasman
inspector
for
the
city
of
clearwater
toy
compliance.
This
is
for
10
north
aurora
avenue
case
number
107-20
today.
There's
three
violations
of
this
property
seeking,
through
the
board
code,
section
3-916-c
for
vehicle
repair
and
residential
zone
code,
section
3-1,
502,
d1,
d3
and
d5
for
roof
maintenance,
clean
roof,
false
roof
elements
and
code,
section
dash,
1502.,
g2
and
g3
for
exterior
storage,
exterior
storage,
not
for
use
outdoors
and
construction
material
storage
notices.
V
V
This
is
a
photo
taken
from
the
rear
yard.
Neighbor,
who
gave
me
permission
to
come
out
of
the
property.
Take
a
look.
This
is
again
on
february
19th.
This
is
some
fence
panels
and
a
bunch
of
cars.
He
keeps
in
the
backyard
and
a
tarp
on
the
back
porch,
which
he's
admitted
to
me
there's
a
hole
in
the
roof.
That's
why
I
had
the
tarp
on
it,
but
part
of
the
complaint
was
from
the
tarp.
V
There's
also
various
items
stored
about
the
yard
strewn
about
the
yard,
just
random
fence
panels
and
just
a
better
picture
of
what's
going
on
back
here.
It
went
back
on
march.
1St
still
has
multiple
vehicles
parked
in
the
yard,
some
items
up
front
by
the
house,
some
tools,
there's
a
cherry
picker
engine
hoist
he
uses
to
do
work
on
the
vehicles.
I
came
back
in
the
12th
he's
doing
work
on
the
work
van
with
the
hood
open.
V
Yeah
he's
the
owner
of
the
property
douglas
fisher's
name.
I
went
back
on
april
6th.
There
was
now
a
boat
trailer
parked
in
the
yard
as
well.
You
can
see,
for
this
is
a
picture
taken
from
the
street.
You
can
see
the
vehicles
parked
behind
the
house
went
back
on
may
26.
He
had
one
vehicle
off
on
its
wheels.
He
was
repairing
the
wheels
on
jack
and
I
created
a
post
for
the
boat.
Trailer
came
back
on
june
1st
and
all
that
vehicle
was
gone.
V
But
now
he's
left
his
tools
in
the
driveway
went
back
to
chuck
the
status.
The
backyard
in
june.
Still
vehicles
parked
in
the
backyard
more
stuff
has
been
added.
I
guess
he
couldn't
finish
with
the
work
truck,
so
it
was
pushed
out
in
the
street.
It
doesn't
have
a
license
plate
on
it.
I
took
some
photos
of
it
and
a
few
days
later
had
to
tow
it
because
there
was
no
license
plate
on
the
vehicle.
The
owner
called
me
of
the
vehicle
and
said
what
what
was
going
on.
V
I
said
I
had
the
tow,
it
was
in
the
street
and
he
told
me
well.
I
paid
mr
fischer
to
work
on
my
vehicle.
Why
did
he
push
in
the
street?
And
I
said
I
you
have
to
talk
to
him
about.
It
went
back
again.
Second,
there's
another
vehicle
parked
half
in
and
half
out
of
the
garage
with
the
hood
open
that
he's
working
on
I
went
back.
The
vehicles
are
still
in
the
backyard
with
some
of
the
exterior
storage.
V
Now
he's
got
some
tires
and
the
cherry
pickers
in
the
back,
but
back
on
the
16th
of
june,
it
looks
like
things
have
been
starting
to
clean
up
over
there.
I
had
had
some
conversations
with
him
still
were
vehicles
in
the
backyard,
but
he
said
he
was
working
on
it
he's
added
a
few
water
coolers
some
more
tires,
but
back
on
the
27th,
but
things
were
business
as
usual.
V
Another
vehicle
happened,
half
out
of
the
he
claims,
they're
all
friends,
cars
and
he's
not
receiving
any
payment
for
doing
this
work
went
back
and
was
the
september
24th
now
there's
even
more
vehicles.
I
was
doing
some
minor
repairs
on
them.
Just
doing
some
fluid,
it
looks
like
a
bunch
of
tools
were
left
out.
Again,
came
back
in
the
13th
he's
now,
repairing
a
lawnmower
that
he
claims
is
his
and
he
said
the
vehicle
in
the
street
had
illegal
tag.
V
He
was
just
working
on
it
in
the
street,
but
he
had
hit
all
of
his
tools
out
again.
I
at
this
time
I
had
gotten
a
call
from
two
neighbors
saying
that
at
night
he
had
10
vehicles
parked
in
the
yard,
with
a
spotlight
working
on
them
during
the
various
hours
they
called
the
cops
out
and
for
the
noise
complaint.
V
I'm
assuming
that
this
lawnmower
belongs
to
this
gentleman,
who
came
by
to
have
it
repaired
and
possibly
pick
it
up
that
day.
This
was
on
the
22nd
of
october
and
again
still
items
being
left
outside
went
back
in
the
fourth
of
november.
V
Still
vehicles
parked
in
the
grass
and
properly
went
back
on
the
10th,
and
he
had
another
vehicle
parked
up.
Those
were
his
clients
waiting
on
the
repairs
being
done
to
their
car
while
they
were
there
and
the
situation.
The
backyard
has
not
really
changed
much
with
the
exterior
storage
and
the
grass
parking
and
the
fence
paneling.
E
V
For
this
property
10
north
rory
avenue
case
number
107-20
for
roof
maintenance,
residential
vehicle
repair
and
outdoor
storage,
I'm
requesting
compliance
center
before
december
5th,
2020
or
a
fine
of
per
day
per
violation
for
each
day.
The
violations
continue
to
exist,
asking
the
board
to
authorize
the
following
after
three
months
from
the
recordation
date
of
such
lane.
If
the
fines
and
fees
remain
unpaid,
the
city
attorney's
office
is
authorized
for
close
collectors.
V
Settle
such
lien
using
any
legal
or
equitable
remedies
available
under
the
law
and
for
compliance
for
the
roof
maintenance
by
removing
the
tarp
from
the
roof
and
repairing
any
damages
occurred.
Compliance
may
have
for
the
vehicle
repair
by
ceasing
all
commercial
repair
activities
at
the
residence
appliance
met
for
the
exterior
storage
by
properly,
storing
or
removing
all
materials
tools,
fence,
paneling
and
any
other
miscellaneous
items
from
the
president
premises.
V
M
Motion,
I
moved
to
enter
an
order
requiring
the
respondent
to
correct
the
violations
on
or
before
december
12th
of
this
year.
If
they
responded,
I'm
sorry
december
5th.
If
the
respondent
does
not
comply
by
that
date,
the
board
may
order
a
fine
of
150
per
day
per
violation
for
each
day.
Each
violation
continues
to
exist
if
fines
and
fees
remain
unpaid.
Three
months
after
such
lien
is
filed,
the
city
is
authorized
to
foreclose,
collect
or
settle
such
a
lien.
K
A
V
A
W
Afternoon
shelby
brown
code
inspector
city
of
clearwater
welcome
new
members.
It's
good
to
see
you
all
thanks
in
advance
for
your
service
chairman,
welcome
back,
because
it's
good
to
see
pictures
I'm
going
to
start
with
the
pictures.
First,
just
a
few
pictures
and
then
go
to
my
recommendation
all
right,
since
that
will
probably
be
more
helpful.
W
W
Okay,
this
is
a
single
family,
residential
property.
We
have
property
maintenance,
ordinances
in
the
city
of
clearwater,
and
this
is
for
exterior
surfaces.
This
picture
was
taken
a
few
weeks
ago.
You
can
see
that
the
paint
is
in
pretty
rough
shape
here
the
property
is
supposed
to
be
that
tan
color,
and
you
can
see
that
there's
a
lot
of
peeling
paint
paint
that's
torn
away
from
the
building.
W
Let's
see
there,
we
go
there's
a
little
bit
more
of
a
close-up,
and
these
pictures
are
just
representative
of
how
the
whole
property
looks.
They
have
some
kind
of
coating
on
there
and
it's
just
a
really
poor
shape.
There's
also
some
damage
to
the
fascia
and
soffits
there.
This
is
a
picture
of
the
west
side
of
the
property
just
so
that
you
can
see.
So
what
we
want
to
see
here
is
one
color
of
paint
or
things
in
good
shape.
W
W
So
when
we're
thinking
about
recommendations
which
I'm
going
to
make
now
for
compliance
by
january
31st
of
2021,
I
believe
that's
more
than
fair
amount
of
time
to
get
the
property
sorted
out
so
for
case
111-20
for
exterior
services.
I'm
requesting
compliance
honor
before
january,
31st,
2021
or
a
fine
of
150
per
day.
For
that
one
violation,
and
I'm
asking
the
board
to
authorize
the
following
after
three
months
from
the
recordation
date
of
such
lien.
W
If
the
fines
and
fees
remain
unpaid,
the
city
attorney's
office
is
authorized
to
foreclose,
collect
or
settle
such
lean,
using
any
legal
or
equitable
remedies
available
under
the
law
and
the
way
that
they
can
meet
compliance
is
to
have
any
damaged
or
deteriorated,
structural
and
decorative
elements
repaired
and
or
placed
in
a
workmanlike
manner.
This
includes
everything:
the
stucco,
the
trims,
the
soffits,
the
fascia,
etc.
W
I
did
speak
with
the
owner
yesterday.
She
said
she
made
a
little
bit
of
progress.
I
went
by
and
it
was
the
first
progress
I've
seen
in
12
months
at
the
property
in
anticipation
of
today's
hearing
and
I'd
express
that
it
wasn't
necessary
for
her
to
come
that
we
were
going
to
give
proper
time
for
them
to
get
it
sorted
out.
W
They'd
accomplished
some
more
peeling
back
of
that
beige
paint
and
gotten
a
little
bit
more
white
on
the
front
of
the
property.
It's
I'd
say
15
of
where
we
need
to
be
so.
They've
got
time,
they're
moving
in
a
direction,
and
she
was
just
relieved
to
know
they
were
going
to
have
more
time
to
get
it
done
with
all
the
things
that
have
been
happening.
W
I
think
that
we're
being
very
fair,
we
know
things
happen,
but
we
want
the
property
to
be
brought
up
to
the
level
of
the
neighborhood
and
into
compliance
yeah.
M
If
the
respondent
does
not
comply
by
that
date,
the
board
may
order
a
fine
of
150
dollars
per
day
per
violation
for
each
day.
Each
violation
continues
to
exist
if
fines
and
fees
remain
unpaid.
Three
months
after
such
a
lean
is
filed,
the
city
is
authorized
to
foreclose,
collect
or
settle
such
a
leak.
A
A
H
A
A
At
109,
devon,
drive
and
repeat
violation
of
code
for
short-term
rental
and
issue,
an
order
that
daily
fine
be
imposed
for
each
day
that
the
repeat,
violation
or
violations
have
existed.
Is
there
anyone
here
for
case
number,
4.27,
okay
board,
keep
in
mind
that
this
is
a
repeat
violation,
so
we'll
need
a
first
motion
under
repeat.
G
There's
one
violation
at
this
property
code,
section
1-104b
for
development
code,
violation
and
code,
section
3-919
for
primation
evidence
of
certain
uses
of
residential
zoning
district
property
was
posted
with
an
affidavit
posting,
a
notice
of
repeat
violation.
A
copy
was
also
sent
certified
to
the
owner
and
I
did
receive
the
certified
mail
back
on
august
20th
2020.,
section
802
for
the
definition
of
a
residential
use
means
a
permanent
place
of
residence
for
a
family.
G
A
residential
use
located
on
residentially
zoned
property
shall
not
include
rentals
for
periods
of
less
than
31
days
or
one
calendar
month,
whichever
is
less
or
which
is
advertised
or
held
out
to
the
public
as
a
place
rented
for
periods
of
less
than
31
days
or
one
calendar
month.
Whichever
is
less
a
residential
use
located
on
residential's
own
property
shall
not
include
interval
ownership,
a
fractional
ownership
or
time
sharing
unit
again.
G
Notwithstanding,
the
violations
occur
at
different
locations
on
january
24th,
2018
case
1318
was
brought
before
the
municipal
code
enforcement
board
and
was
found
in
violation
for
section
1-104b,
for
a
development
code,
violation
and
section
3-919
for
advertising
and
illegal
short-term
rental.
The
board
ordered
the
respondent,
who
was
present
to
rent
the
property
for
at
least
31
days
or
one
calendar
month.
Whichever
is
less
remove
all
daily
and
weekly
rates,
reviews
discounts
and
update
the
calendar
to
reflect
the
31
day
or
one
calendar
month
requirement.
G
The
respondent
was
given
until
february
3rd
2018
to
comply
or
a
fine
of
250
dollars
would
be
issued
for
each
day
the
violation
continued
to
exist.
Compliance
was
met
by
the
property
owner,
so
I
received
another
complaint
on
august
11th
from
anonymous
neighbor
2020
that
this
location
was
renting
short
term.
This
is
the
front
of
the
house
located
at
109
divine
drive
and
it's
on
the
vrbo
website,
which
was
taken
august
11th.
G
When
I
tried
to
book
the
property
for
the
12
to
the
26
you'll
see
it
says
a
minimum
14
night
stay
and
when
I
tried
to
book
it,
it
went
ahead
and
allowed
me
to
you.
Listen
to
the
previous
case.
That
was
here
when
you're
able
to
set
your
time
for
30
days
on
any
website,
and
you
do
it
properly.
It
will
not
allow
me
to
go
ahead
and
book
it
for
five
days,
14
days
or
30
days.
G
G
That's
pretty
much
just
a
different
picture,
14
to
30
nights
and
then
the
minimum
stay
very
so
that
leaves
options
to
when
people
are
looking
for
a
short
term
rental.
You
might
be
able
to
stay
a
week
two
weeks
a
month,
but
here
we
had
a
14
night
minimum
stay
again
on
november
9th
2020
january
9th
through
the
23rd
14
nights.
It
still
allowed
me
to
book
the
property
again
on
november
13th,
vrbo
14
to
30
nights
again
on
the
16th
same
website,
vrbo
14,
to
30
nights.
G
It
did
allow
me
to
book
it
at
that
time
and
I'll.
Let
the
board
deliberate.
Normally,
when
you
deal
with
a
repeat
violation,
just
so
the
boards
where,
during
covet
19,
when
you
do
a
repeat
violation,
we
would
normally
have
pictures
of
every
single
day
and
it
seems
kind
of
redundant.
But
that
puts
the
burden
on
me
to
take
pictures
every
single
day
because
of
covid
you
just
kind
of
give
people
time
and
time
again.
So
there
could
have
been
a
much
stricter
fine,
but
there
won't
be
at
this.
C
C
A
A
A
Moving
on
to
case
number
4.28
case,
114-20
find
respondents,
trust,
number,
152,
ocs,
land,
trust
services,
corp
trey
at
1520
clark
street,
in
violation
for
code
for
exterior
storage
and
issue,
an
order
with
the
compliance
deadline
and
fine
if
compliance
is
not
met.
Is
anyone
here
for
case
number
4.28?
A
X
My
name
is
donald
gracia.
Yes,
I
own
the
property,
but
the
the
accusations
are
really
against
my
tenant,
so
ing.
A
Understandable
so
the
way
the
process
worked,
you
would
have
to
admit
or
deny
that
there's
a
violation
to
begin
with
and
then
we'll
proceed
forward
with
getting.
X
A
V
There's
one
violation:
this
property
was
for
exterior
storage
code,
section
3-1502,
g1,
g2
and
g3.
Did
you
hear
him
admit
or
deny
or.
V
So
notice
the
violation
was
sent
at
february
20th
of
2020,
with
a
compliance
date
of
march
20th
2020.
certified
mail
receipt
was
received
on
mark
on
february
26
of
2020..
This
is
the
property
in
question.
It's
15
20
clark
street.
It
was
during
a
sweep
in
the
flagler
street
area,
it's
right
off
of
flagler,
where,
where
highland
and
palmetto
meet,
if
you
continue
to
head
north,
you
take
the
first
right
into
that
neighborhood.
What
we're
seeing
here
is
a
carport,
it's
full
of
a
lot
of
furniture,
buckets
construction
materials.
V
I
went
back
on
the
20th
after
having
spoke
with
the
tenant
on
the
12th
about
the
items
in
the
carport,
and
there
was
still
the
same
situation.
There
were
even
a
few
more
items
added
there,
some
furniture.
What's
underneath
that
cover,
is
actually
an
arcade
machine,
old
arcade
machine
and
just
there's
buckets,
there's
a
door
there's
just
random
pieces.
I
do
not.
The
city
doesn't
mind
the
toys.
Toys
are
not
an
issue,
it's
just
everything
else.
That's
not
really
meant
to
be
out
in
the
elements
and
being
hit
by
rain
or
anything.
V
Over
there,
at
that
time,
we've
been
hit
with
the
coved
pandemic.
I'd
been
in
contact
with
mr
and
gracia
about
the
situation,
but
he
had
explained
to
me
several
times
without
the
ability
to
evict.
I
have
no
power
to
in
any
way
to
make
my
client
make
my
tenant
stop
with
the
exterior
storage
situation.
He
explained
he
was
toothless
to
do
anything
about
it
so,
for
I
did
little
checkups
here
and
there
to
see
how
the
situation
was.
This
was
the
first
code
board
available
to
bring
forward
with
this
case.
V
That's
why
it's
being
heard
now
this
was
on
the
1st
of
june.
This
was
on
the
17th
of
june
same
situation,
just
tables
chairs,
a
bunch
of
stuff
that
doesn't
belong
outside
being
stored
in
the
carport.
This
was
again
on
the
29th
of
june
and
went
back
on
october.
30Th
seems,
like
some
items
were
moved,
but
some
other
items
were
added
more
construction
materials.
V
This
is
what
it
looks
from
from
the
side.
Again,
not
mining,
the
toys
really,
but
the
other
items
don't
really
have
any
business
being
outside.
I
went
back
in
the
17th
to
take
a
closer
look.
They,
if
you
look
here
some
of
the
the
items
have
been
left
out
in
the
street
for
garbage
pickup,
but
there
was
still
an
amount
inside
that
just
didn't
make
sense,
the
buckets
and
all
the
arcade
machines
still
and
just
random
construction
materials.
Here's
a
look
from
the
side.
A
And
we've
had
these
cases
before
and
I
think
that
you're
it's
an
unfortunate
situation
that
you're
in
when
a
tenant
is,
is
not
complying
and
he's
the
one
or
she's
the
one
living
in
that
house
or
structure.
There's
only
so
much.
You
can
do
as
the
owner
right
to
force
them
to
comply,
but
what
the
board
does
is
we
can't
find
the
tenant?
It
would
only.
I
know.
X
Something
falls
on
you
to
me
when
I
gotta
pay
a
license
to
I'm
legally
allowed
to
rent
the
place
right,
but
then
I
either
cost
me
500
to
get
rid
of
the
tenant
or
me
and
him
fight
all
day.
You
know
what
I
mean,
so
it's
been
cleaned
up.
Finally,
but
I
just
want
some
kind
of
you
know
what
are
the:
why
is
it
fall
on
to
the
property
owner
when
I
have
to
get
a
license
for
a
tenant?
You
should
be.
You
should
take
deals
out
with
the
tenant.
X
X
D
The
clarification
owners,
that's
the
only
one
clients
on
and
that's
the
only
one
you
can
actually
lean
on
the
property.
So
I
mean,
I
obviously
can't
give
you
legal
advice.
This
is
my
client,
but
the
point
is:
is
that
you
have
you
need
to
have
a
contract
that
allows
you
to
enforce
those
particular
violations
and
the
individual
is
responsible
and
or
is
evicted
because
of
that?
D
But
it's
clear
under
the
law
that
if
you
went
after
the,
if
this
board
went
after
the
tenant,
we
would
have
a
because
we
did
this
years
ago
where
we
went
after
both
the
owner
and
the
tenant.
It
was
almost
impossible
to
get
proper
notification
to
the
tenant.
Tenants
leave
to
get
them
to
comply
because
they
don't
have
to
because
they
don't
want
to
look
properly.
What
are
you
gonna
do
to
them
right,
so
you
have
no
power
against
intent.
That's
why
we
go
out
to
the
property.
A
X
A
F
V
Again,
dana
kasman
1520
clark
street
for
outdoor
storage,
exterior
storage
or
requesting
compliant
compliance
on
or
before
january,
15
of
2021,
not
2020,
where
it
says
quite
impossible
or
a
fine
of
150
dollars
per
day
per
violation
for
each
day.
The
violations
continue
to
exist.
We're
asking
the
board
to
authorize
the
following
after
three
months
from
the
recommendation
date
of
such
liens.
If
the
fines
and
fees
remain
unpaid,
the
city
attorney's
office
is
authorized
to
foreclose
collectors.
Settle
such
lien
using
any
legal
or
equitable
remedies
under.
U
A
You
can
step
back
up
mr
gracie,
and
this
is
this
is
again,
is
a
very
different
case
because
the
times
are
in.
But
let's
say
that
you
know
he
is
in
compliance.
You
do
declare
that.
But
then,
in
three
weeks
we
fall
back
to
the
same
behavior
that
he
has
no
control
over.
D
Wow,
okay,
I
mean
you
had
they
can
say
he's
in
compliance.
The
affidavit
of
compliance
would
come
to
you
for
the
next
meeting.
So
once
you
make
a
determination
that
he's
saying
compliance
accept
the
affidavit
of
compliance,
that's
the
end
of
the
case.
If
there's
something
new,
that
would
be
a
new
case.
Unfortunately,
that
becomes
a
repeat
violation
in
those
scenarios.
D
X
X
A
I
think
so
that
we
can
move
on
and
you
can
move
on
and
thank
you
for
coming.
Unfortunately,
he
couldn't
come
with
you.
A
A
Were
you
sworn
in
when
you
first
came?
Yes,
okay,
thank
you.
Do
you
understand
the
particulate
that
you're
putting
your
the
homeowner
in
that
he's,
gonna
start
being
fined
for
you
not
keeping
that
clean,
and
is
that
something
that
you
can
help
him
with,
so
that
we
don't
have
to
as
a
board?
We
don't
like
issuing
fines
and
fees
like
this
when
he's
in
a
position
where
he
can't
handle
it.
Q
Yeah,
what
happened
is
a
personal
situation.
I
got
separated
and
most
of
that
stuff
was
my
ex
belonging.
So
I
tried
to
put
him
away
and
then
she
called
the
cops
and
then
the
cops
told
me
put
him
back
in
the
house
because
she
legally
still
in
my
house
but
she's,
not
with
me.
So
it
was
a
yeah,
a
very
tough
situation.
Gotcha.
A
Okay,
I
think
going
forward,
thank
you
for
if
it
is
all
cleaned
up
and
the
city
will
make
that
determination
and
judgment
at
some
point,
you
know
thank
you
for
doing
that.
Hopefully,
in
respect
to
your
homeowner,
you
can
continue
to
keep
it
in
in
that
kind
of
shape
and
cleaned
up
to
code.
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
A
Mr
kasman,
did
you
have
something
else?
You
want
a
dad.
Are
you
good
okay?
So
we
we
had
a
first
already,
so
if,
if
we
want
to
make
a
second,
I
think
the
recommendation
was
january
15th
of
2021
at
150
a
day.
So
that's
up
to
the
board's
discretion
on
that
end.
Well,.
M
I
moved
to
enter
an
order
requiring
the
respondent
to
correct
the
violations
on
or
before
january
15
2021.
If
the
respondent
does
not
comply
by
that
date,
the
board
may
order
a
fine
of
150
per
day
per
violation
for
each
day.
Each
violation
continues
to
exist
if
fines
and
fees
remain
unpaid.
Three
months
after
such
a
lien
is
filed,
the
city
is
authorized
to
foreclose,
collect
or
settle
such
lead.
A
Motion
is
made
in
second
and
all
in
favor,
aye
aye.
Those
opposed,
nay
motion
passes.
Mr
and
gracia.
Do
you
understand
the
motion
that
was
made
in
past?
So,
although
we'd
set
a
deadline
of
january
15th
in
a
fine
of
150
a
day,
those
fines
and
fees
do
not
start
accruing
until
said
day
and
apparently
you
know,
the
city
will
come
out
and
determine
that
it's
been
resolved
and
that
time
that
case
will
disappear
and
go
away
for
the
time
being.
B
X
K
X
T
So,
sir,
and
you
you
were
sworn
under
oath
and
you
understand
what
that
means.
It
basically
means
that
if
you
lie
you
committed
perjury
and
then
you
could
be
prosecuted.
So
would
you
allow
the
gentleman
to
come
onto
the
property
and
just
clean
it
up.
K
T
Okay,
so,
and-
and
is
it
your
testimony
right
now
that
by
january
15
2021
that
property
will
be
cleaned
up?
I'm
sorry!
Yes,
sir!
Okay!
Thank
you.
X
I
do
have
to
add
one
thing,
though:
the
guy
does
do
construction.
I
mean
this.
Sometimes
at
night
you
want,
to,
you,
know,
drop
some
things
in
the
in
the
carport.
I
see
these
guys
go
back
every
day.
I
mean
he's
not
allowed
anything
in
his
carport,
but
a
car
I
mean
it
kind
of
seems
a
little
ridiculous
too,
that
he
can't
put
anything
in
a
car
for.
V
K
V
Elements:
it's
not
going
to
be
out
there
tools
and
it
has
to
be
properly
inside.
You
wouldn't
leave
your
tools
out
in
the
rain.
Well,
there's
not
anywhere
in
the
carport.
Even
things
left
outside
is
not
meant
for
that.
Like
I
said
we
didn't,
I
don't
mind
the
toys
being
outside,
but
just
random
construction
material.
That's
all
supposed
to
be
stored
properly
indoors.
A
Thank
you,
and
hopefully
that
clears
it
up.
If
you
have
any
additional
questions
regarding
code
and
what
can
be
there
and
what
can't
please,
please
reach
out
to
city
staff.
A
My
answer:
thank
you.
Moving
on
agenda
five
unfinished
business,
it
looks
like
5.1
through
5.9.
Is
there
anybody?
That's
here
to
speak
to
5.1
through
5.9.
E
D
A
E
R
E
A
A
A
Yeah
we're
gonna,
do
5.6,
5.7
and
then
5.9
so
you're.
Third,
sir.
F
D
Okay,
so
what
we
have
here
in
essence,
is
an
affidavit
of
non-compliance,
which
the
inspector
has
made
a
determination
that
the
property
is
not
in
compliance
as
the
day
he
inspected
it.
So
you
may
want
to
hear
from
mr
english
as
to
why
he
believes
property
is
in
compliance,
as
our
inspector
has
already
decided
that
it
is
not.
A
R
Because,
originally,
when
I
was
contacted
by
ryan
odegaard
and
I
was
out
of
compliance,
he
left
me
items
that
were
out
of
compliance.
I
moved
traveled
trailer.
I
moved
the
utility
trailer
relocated,
another
boat
that
I
had
and
fenced
around
the
boat.
That's
on
the
side
of
my
house
fenced
to
put
cardboard
siding.
However
we'd
like
to
we
went
over
that
before
and
then
I
called
him
and
he
came
out
to
look
at
it
and
said
you
did
good
good.
A
Good
to
go
okay,
fair
enough!
Do
you
mind
having
a
seat,
mr
english
and
we'll
let
mr
odergaard
come
up
and
explain
to
us
a
little
bit
about
the
case.
It
still
works.
Y
Afternoon
board
good
afternoon
ryan
odegaard.
This
is
3131
dining
street.
This
was
actually
from
january
of
earlier
this
year
and
it
was
brought
before
the
board,
for
one
was
a
declaration
of
violation.
The
other
one
was
excuse
me,
a
boat
in
the
cider
rear
setback
that
was
not
screened
by
a
fence
wall
or
hedge
notice.
A
violation
was
sent
out
on
10-3,
with
a
compliance
date
of
11-2
certified
mail
receipt.
He
refused
to
sign
on
10
15..
I
got
that
back.
Y
Just
for
your
guys,
understanding
downing
street
is
located
just
north
of
gulf
to
bay
and
east
of
mcmullen
booth.
This
was
the
property.
When
I
went
out
on
10-2,
you
can
see.
He's
got
multiple
vehicles
on
the
grass
boats
rvs
a
closer
image
of
the
rv
here,
then
you
can
see
the
boat.
That's
in
question.
Y
Y
This
was
on
11
19,
still,
no
change
to
the
property.
What
he
had
done
is
the
property
to
his
west
is
county
property,
so
he
took
all
his
vehicles
and
just
put
them
on
the
vacant
parcel
that
was
in
the
county.
Besides
the
one
boat
that
he
still
had
on
his
property
january
21st.
This
was
the
day
before
code
board,
still
no
change
the
boat's
still
not
screened
by
a
fence.
Y
At
that
time.
That's
when
I
brought
him
to
code
board
on
january
22nd.
He
was
found
in
violation.
I
requested
30
days
to
come
into
compliance.
Mr
menino
actually
gave
him
90
days
and
it
was
explained
to
him.
The
reason
he
got
90
days
is
because
he
had
to
pull
a
permit,
and
so
when
I
went
out
to
the
property,
he
had
erected
a
fence,
but
he
did
not
build
a
pur
or
did
not
pull
a
permit
for
it,
and
I
explained
to
him
when
he
asked
me
to
come
out.
Y
I
said
yes,
you
are,
you
did
what
we
asked
as
far
as
screening,
your
prop
the
boat.
Well,
you
didn't
pull
a
permit,
and
the
city
code
doesn't
allow
any
fences
above
four
feet
in
height
to
be
forward
of
the
structure,
so
he's
not
in
compliance,
because
the
city
would
never
allow
that
fence
to
be
erected.
Y
D
D
So
what
you
have
now
before
you
is
the
affidavit
of
non-compliance,
because
compliance
was
not
met
as
of
march
22
2020.,
the
fine,
which
is
150
a
day
does
not
start
until
you
accept
the
affidavit
of
number
of
violence,
so
there's
no!
So
since
march
to
now
there
has
been
no
fine
and
nothing
happens
from
a
fine
perspective.
K
A
Y
A
So
as
we
gave
him
information
earlier
on
the
resolution
side,
the
piece
we
left
out
was
not
knowing
that
this
case
was
coming
before
us
again
that
it's
not
just
a
problem
with
the
fence,
not
having
a
permit.
You
also
have
a
problem
with
the
fence
being
six
foot
in
the
front
and
not
four
foot.
In
addition
to
not
having
the
permit
and
the
structure
covering
the
boat.
Y
E
H
Y
H
D
Do
that
because
we
don't
you're,
not
you're
supposed
to
take
each
factual
basis
separately
and
so
the
so
you
base
your
decision.
Not
we
don't
want
to
prejudice
your
decision
by
necessarily
knowing
some
other
violation
has
occurred
for
you
to
determine
whether
or
not
a
violation
exists
in
this
particular
situation.
But
I
understand
based
on
this
and
this
and
some
of
it's
also
the
fact
that
we
have
a
new
board.
D
So
we
don't
have
a
history
on
the
property
that's
going
on,
but
technically
they
are
different
violations,
so
the
one
that
was
back
in
january
could
have
been
corrected
by
doing
a
couple
different
things.
He
chose
to
correct
it,
a
different
way
which
apparently,
as
we
sit
here
today,
doesn't
meet
the
criteria
of
the
of
the
city.
So
that's
what
happens
when
somebody
doesn't
continue
to
talk
to
the
city?
They
don't
know.
You
know
he
decided
what
to
do.
It's
not
allowed
the
way.
He
did
it
the
first
one
that
I
read.
D
That's
why
I
read
you.
The
order
is
because
they
specifically
told
him
what
he
could
and
couldn't
do,
which
still
required
him
to
get
permits,
which
he
never
did.
So
he
was
under
the
information
after
the
first
one,
what
he
was
supposed
to
do.
D
A
D
B
F
That,
let
me
ask
you
this:
is
that
trailer
on
county
property,
that's
on
county
property
and
that's
his
trailer.
Y
D
I'm
sorry,
I
just
want
to
correct
something
that
I
said
so
we're
clear
what
you're
establishing
today,
if
you
accept
the
affidavit
of
non-compliance,
that
there
was
not
in
compliance
as
of
march
20th,
the
fine
would
move
forward
after
that
date.
I'm
sorry
what
I
was
trying
to
say
is
you
have
to
it's
whatever
date,
you
accept
the
affidavit
of
non-compliance.
T
I,
if
I
may
I'm
sorry
so
here's
I
think
that
that
would
be
entirely
correct.
We
can
do
that
because
this
is
really
a
two-phase
process
and
I
look
at
it
as
a
criminal
thing.
You
look
at
the
guilt
phase
and
you
look
at
the
sentencing
phase.
The
guilt
phase
is:
are
you
in
violation?
Yes,
you
are
we'll
give
you
until
march,
okay,
if
you're
not
in
by
march,
then
the
sentencing
phase
is
defined,
but
to
make
this
clearer
and
perhaps
easier
on
the
gentleman.
T
T
If
the
gentleman
comes
into
full
compliance
with
both
this
order,
that
we're
going
to
review
and
the
order
that
you
issued
previously,
what
the
city
will
do
is
withdraw
the
affidavit
of
non-compliance
in
this
case
not
ask
for
fines
on
anything
and
then
he
will
issue
enough.
Neighborhood
compliance
on
everything
he'll
be
in
compliance.
He
has
a
six-foot
fence,
it's
permitted
whatever.
T
D
A
She
february
18th
was
february
well
the.
D
Probably
the
february
meeting,
if
not
the
march
meeting,
and
so
you
would
hear
it
at
that
time
at
that
time.
If
he's
not
in
compliance,
the
city
is
going
to
say
we
want
you
to
determine
that
there
was
no
compliance
as
of
march
of
2020,
so
you're
talking
about
a
year
worth
of
fines
that
they're
going
to
have
you
don't
have
to
do
anything
today
right.
We
will
just
we're
just
going
to
go
ahead
and
put
it
on
that
meeting,
and
we
will
hopefully
remind
you
of
what
happened
today.
R
Yes,
but
it
is
totally
wrong
and
I
don't
care
how
you
look
at
this
it's
wrong
because
he
was
at
my
property
after
march
and
told
me
first
of
all,
he
told
me
if
you
build
a
fence
around
it.
You
know
it
doesn't
matter.
I
move
the
back
five
feet.
It's
still
out
there
build
a
non-vision
fence
around
it
and
you'll
be
in
compliance.
Then
I
called
him
and
asked
me
to
come
inspect
it.
He
came
out
and
told
me
you're
you're,
in
compliance
you're
good
to
go
now.
How?
D
K
K
D
D
Or
you
could,
or
I
mean
the
order
of
this
board
at
that
date-
was
telling
you
what
you
needed
to
do.
This
board
doesn't
give
people
permits.
You
have
to
go
back
to
the
city,
to
get
that
this
board
doesn't
determine
what
exactly
is
necessary
to
obtain
compliance
they're,
just
telling
you
the
time
period
to
do
it.
So
as
of
this
order,
it's
certainly
up
to
the
board
to
decide
this
order
has
not
been
complied
with.
That
was
back
in
january
almost
a
year
ago,.
Y
I
went
out
to
the
property
in
march
before
his
compliance
date
that
you
guys
gave
him.
He
asked
me
to
come
out
and
look
at
the
property.
I
went
out
and
looked
at
and
I
said
yes,
you
have
screened
in
your
boat.
That
is
what
we
asked
and
I
told
him
you
did
what
we
asked,
but
you
did
not
pull
a
permit.
That
was
part
of
it
yeah
and
his
whole
thing
of
well.
I
don't
need
permits,
he
keeps
going
back
and
saying
I
don't
need
him,
I
don't
need
him.
Y
D
D
For
you
to
come
in
compliance
understand,
I
can
only
tell
you
what
I'm
the
attorney
for
the
board,
not
the
city,
so
the
board
has
looked
at
this
and
they're,
giving
their
they've
acted
under
the
earlier
case.
In
fact,
they're
not
acting
at
all
under
this
case
they're,
going
to
put
it
back
on
their
calendar
in
february
or
march
to
hear
it
so
that
you,
you
have
to
work
with
the
city.
I.
R
E
A
A
We
want
you
to
keep
all
your
beautiful
toys
at
your
house,
but
you
have
to
do
it
legally
and
up
to
code
and
if
it's
fixed
the
structure
and
the
height
of
it,
if
it's
get
your
permit
for
your
fence,
if
it's
change
the
front,
you
just
have
to
figure
out
what
the
code
is
communicate
with
them
and
let's
get
it
fixed.
But
I
don't
want
to
waste
staff
or
any
more
citizens
time
to
keep
going
back
and
forth
on
what
you
were
told
or
what
you
want
weren't
told,
but
we
are.
A
A
A
In
february
okay,
so
no
action
is
being
taken,
communicate
with
the
city
just
like
we
spoke
of
earlier,
and
we
we
as
a
board,
wish
you
the
best
of
luck
on
rectifying.
I.
R
A
You're
good,
we
wish
you
the
best
and
you'll
get
it
figured
out,
and
hopefully
hopefully
but
here's
the
big
thing.
Mr
english
understand
this
part
is
what
the
city
said.
Was
you
kind
of
got
yourself
in
this
position
when
you
made
changes
in
what
you
thought
was
rectifying
the
situation,
which
puts
you
in
a
bigger
hole
right?
A
So
don't
do
that
this
time
going
forward,
because
if
this
case
comes
back
before
us
from
the
city,
they're
gonna
look
for
fines
and
fees
to
start
when
you
originally
violated
in
march,
and
that's
where
it's
going
to
get
expensive
and
there's
not
much.
We
can
do
at
that
point
because
they're
giving
you
march
april
may
june
july
august
september
october
november
december
january,
I
mean
we're
now.
R
A
Get
it,
but
my
point
is:
don't
just
try
to
rectify
it
on
what
you
think
and
believe
or
read
in
an
older
book,
make
sure
that
you
are
a
hundred
percent
accurate
on
spending
your
time
and
money
and
rectifying
it
and
that
it's
permitted
in
what
the
city
is
telling
you.
Yes,
you
can
absolutely
do
this
because
we
don't
want
to
see
you
back
in
here.
You
wasted
more
time
and
more
money
and
then
you're
still
not
compliant.
R
A
A
At
1938
north
betty
lane
for
permits
is
the
gentleman
for
this
case
step
up.
Please
thank
you.
Were
you
sworn
in,
sir?
Oh,
no,
okay,
if
you'd
be
sworn
in.
B
U
U
Yes,
sir,
we
actually
did
submit
a
permit
application
and
then-
and
because
this
is
right
after
covet
starter
since
the
last
time
we
we
were
here
and
the
so
we
submitted,
and
we
submitted
the
plans
and
the
scope
of
work
and
the
specs
for
the
windows,
because
that's
what
they
wanted
on
the
application
and
it
was
rejected
by
this
by
the
online
system,
because
then
we
had
to
separate
into
three
files
resubmitted
again
and
then
it
rejected
because
it
was
not
in
compliance
for
something
else.
U
I
called
somebody
in
the
city,
not
her,
not
near
the
somebody
else,
and
I
I
just
called
a
general
number
and
I
never
got
an
answer
and
then
things
got
really
bad
and
because
of
cover
19
we're
a
lot
of
money.
So
we
couldn't
go
and
continue
the
process,
but
we're
now
almost
back
in
shape.
But
we
like
to
extend
that.
We
actually
want
to
we're
hoping
to
pull
from
all
of
the
plumber,
the
ic
person
to
come
over
here
and
pull
their
permits.
U
So
we
can
get
started
and
finish
everything
even
in
the
in
the
windows
by
january.
Okay,.
A
A
What
we
wanted,
and-
and
thank
you
for
that-
and
I
can't
I
feel,
a
bit
of
frustration,
because
I've
tried
to
do
some
things
through
the
pandemic
and
not
being
able
to
get
somebody
or
the
online
system.
It
is
tricky
and
there
are
hang-ups
with
it
and
so.
U
Our
goal
is
to
complete
by
january,
and
if
and
if
we
can
get
until
the
february,
one
to
complete,
actually
the
whole
project
can
have
it
completely
inspected
by
that
time,
that's
okay,
perfect!
Thank
you.
O
Okay,
so
I
did
an
epic
affidavit
non-compliance.
Permit
came
in
in
february,
city
requested
some
more
information
as
of
today.
There
is
no
active
permit.
My
affidavit
of
compliance,
I
believe,
was
done
the
end
of
may
the
office
I
was
lit,
sent
out
the
end
of
march.
They
had
all
of
march
to
submit
permitting
people
was
still
in
the
office.
K
A
I
think
this
is
we're
probably
going
to
have
these
for
a
couple
months.
The
the
fallout
of
issues
during
a
pandemic
of
how
business
is
normal
has
changed
for
a
city,
but
not
just
for
how
a
city
operates,
but
how
citizens
operate
and
citizens
understanding
how
to
use
the
system
and
have
sex
success
with
the
system
doesn't
always
equate
to
it.
The
city's
expectations
right
on
how
it
should
be
handled.
O
By
may,
please
permit
encounter
was
in
the
office
from
the
end
of
march
all
the
way
when
I
came
back
in
may
so
people
were
working
in
there
just
pop
the
public
was
not
allowed.
D
A
I
I
don't
know
how
the
board
feel,
I
think
for
me
hearing.
Can
you
step
back
up
hearing
the
gentleman
state
that
he's
in
a
in
a
better
position
financially
and
with
the
pandemic,
changing
and
with
the
plans
and
hopes
to
move?
We.
A
I
get
it
and
you're
incentivized
there
to
do
that,
but
when
are
you
going
to
legally
rightfully
and.
U
Pull
the
permit
well,
like
I
said
we
have
a
permit.
I
mean
that's
what
I
was
looking
for
right
now,
because
I
could
prove
that
we
submitted
the
the
permit
request
and
also
submitted
stuff
to
the
city,
and
so
but
right
now
we're
not
gonna
take
the
time,
but
we
can-
and
I
know
when
I
talked
with
spoke
with
her
last
time.
We
said
with
that.
I
needed
the
individual
subcontractors
for
the
ac
and
for
the
plumber
and
for
the
windows.
They
also
needed
to
pull
their
own
permission
so
which.
A
U
U
A
Well,
it's
under
understandable.
This
might
be
another
one
in
a
situation
where
we're
identifying
as
a
board
you're,
not
in
compliance
right
now,
and
I
think
you're
admitting
that
you're
not
in
compliance.
But
I
think,
where
we're
seem
to
be
leaning
is
to
another
one
that
we
table.
K
A
February,
right,
just
like
we
did
on
the
last
one
that
that
you
just
have
to
understand
again,
like
we
told
the
last
one
is
when
we
grant
this
leniency.
If
the
city
comes
back
in
our
february
meeting
and
we're
still
sitting
in
the
same
space
that
we
are
now,
your
fines
and
fees
are
going
to
be
retroactive
to
that
original
date
and
that's
where
we
then
can't
help
you
on
that
side.
U
F
A
U
H
E
A
Nicole,
are
you
good
if
we
move
on
while
you
do
that
moving
on
to
case
5.9
case
1920,
except
the
affidavits
of
non-compliance
for
respondents,
jeffrey
rothschild,
at
600,
eatonville
avenue
for
parking
lot
surfaces?
J
A
Okay
and
jeffrey,
do
you
understand
what
we're
doing
today?
As
far
as
why
you're
in
non-compliance.
J
Yes,
because
it
wasn't
done
in
time,
they
told
me
that
I
should
try
to
get
it
done
by
the
beginning
of
the
year
march,
whatever
it
was,
and
I
didn't
do
it
and
I
I
just
I
need
more
time
so
gotcha,
okay
july.
D
J
Reason
for
that
was
was
basically
coveted,
19.,
I'm
an
argentine
cousin
jew,
which
puts
me
at
very
high
risk.
They've
found
two
malignant
tumors
in
my
bladder.
I
can't
lift
more
than
five
pounds
and
I
have
uncontrolled
diabetes.
I
just
got
out
of
the
hospital
I
actually
mentioned
to
lady.
J
A
Okay,
well,
relax
and
breathe
for
a
minute.
We
don't
want
to
lose.
You
catch
your
breath
and
if
you
don't,
if
you
don't
mind,
sit
in
that
chair
right
there,
so
we
can
catch
your
breath
and
relax
for
a
minute.
Let's
let
the
the
city
come
up
and
talk
to
us
a
little
bit
about
the
case
and
see
if
we
can
get
you
to
but
you're,
okay,
just
breathe
and
relax
for
us.
Y
Afternoon
again,
board
ryan
odegaard.
This
is
for
case
six
or
I'm
sorry
case
1920
600
to
edenville
avenue.
This
was
actually
brought
before
the
board
on
january
22nd
of
this
year,
and
it
was
for
one
violation:
code,
section,
3-1502
k-4,
for
parking
lot
and
driveway
surfaces
notice.
A
violation
was
sent
out
on
10
9
of
2019
compliance
date,
11
9
of
2019,
I
did
get
the
certified
mail
returned
unclaimed
on
11
19..
Y
Y
Y
The
day
before
the
code
board
I
went
out
and
the
property
was
all
or
I'm
sorry.
The
driveway
was
just
busted
up
and,
as
you
can
see,
it's
just
sitting
there,
so
he
started
work
without
it
and
I
again
issued
a
stop
work
order.
When
he
went
to
the
code
board
on
the
22nd.
You
guys
found
him
in
violation.
He
was
given
six
months
which
takes
us
to
the
july
22nd
date.
F
So
so
what
what
is
compliance
is
it?
Compliance
is.
Y
Concrete
asphalt
it
just,
he
needs
to
repair
the
driveway
to
ensure
that
it's
free
from
potholes
cracks
heaves
and
maintain
it
on
a
regular
basis.
The
city
doesn't
allow
you
can't
just
have
a
gravel
driveway,
you
can't
just
throw
mulch
down,
it
has
to
be
concrete,
pavers
asphalt
and
again,
it
needs
to
be
permitted.
Y
The
code
board
issued
a
compliance
date
of
july
22nd
of
this
year.
2020.
J
E
A
J
I
was
going
to
get
some
help
from
some
neighbors,
but
dr
andor,
from
my
next-door
neighbor
has
sold
this
home
and
moved
away
and
I've
gotten
carrie
miller
who's,
a
social
worker
for
blue
cross.
My
insurance
and
the
veterans
administration
are
right
now
trying
to
find
a
good
solution
for
this.
I
I
I'm
a
veteran
with
post-traumatic
stress,
disorder,
stress
and
anxiety,
disorder,
panic
disorder
with
agoraphobia.
J
I
felt
real
dizzy.
I
was
trying
to
work
on
this
right
and
I
went
to
the
clinic
on
on
druid
and
belcher
and
they
thought
I
was
about
to
have
a
stroke,
and
I
was
at
one
plant
for
five
days
and
they
said
that
I
have
what's
called
the
stress
cardiomyopathy,
which
means
that
I'm
so
stressed
out
that
my
arteries
converse
and
I
can
die
just
like
if
I
have
a
massive
stroke,
so
I'm
shaking
now,
okay,
we
don't
want
that.
J
I
live
on
892
dollars
for
my
social
security
right
and
my
mortgage
is
almost
600
and
I
have
electric
100
water
100,
my
phone
30.
You
know
it
doesn't
leave
me
a
lot
of
money
to
do
a
lot
of
stuff
with
and
that's
why
the
social
workers
are
trying
to
help
me
trying
to
find
something.
Dr
andorfer
has
suggested
my
next
door
neighbor.
J
What
he
did
was
he
cleared
out
the
driveway
like
that
and
he
he
had
a
truckload
of
shells
put
in,
and
I
don't
know
if
that's
allowed
now
or
not
or
what.
But
that's.
J
I'm
trying
to
get
help,
I
just
I
don't-
have
money
to
call
a
concrete
company
and
do
that
right.
You
know
I'm
almost
70.,
I
and
I
just
you
know
I
don't
know
what
to
do.
You
know
I.
I
don't
even
know
that
I'll
live
that
long,
really,
because
I'm
not
doing
well
physically,
but
I'm
trying
you
know,
that's
all
I
can
do
and
and
I
don't
want
to
die
living
under
a
bridge
somewhere.
I've
saved
all
I've
done
a
lot
of
work
on
that
house
on
the
interior.
J
J
Done
and
complied
with
working
with
the
social
workers
to
see
carrie
miller
said,
there's
an
organization
in
saint
pete,
where
they
help
veterans,
especially
wartime
veterans
like
myself,
and
they
do
major
construction
projects
to
help
them,
and
actually
this
isn't
as
big
a
project
as
what
they
usually
take
on
so
she's
trying
to
help
find
something
about
that
and
seeing,
if
there's
another
organization
that
can
help
me
to
fix
that.
So
I
can
because
she's
helping
she's
for
my
medical
insurance
but
she's
helping
because
my
stress
levels
are
so
high
yeah.
A
No
understandable
and
we
we
want
to
help-
and
I
know
the
city
wants
to
help
you
as
well
they're,
not
in
the
business,
to
just
try
to
find
you
in
fees
and
make
money
on
you
right.
They
just
wanted
to
be
compliant
and
that's
their
job,
so
I
think
working
together
with
the
city
with
the
board.
We
want
to
try
to
find
a
resolution
for
this
to
you,
but
your
health
is
obviously
most
important
to
us.
So,
let's
not
you
know,
pass
out
or
have
any
issues
over
the
driveway.
I
I
would
ask.
D
I
mean
you
did
we
were
just
discussing
your
options,
you
could
do
what
you
did
with
the
previous
cases
you
can
put
into
some
kind
of
you
know
review.
We
can
look
at
the
status
of
what's
going
on,
I
mean
at
some
point.
Obviously
the
city
is
going
to
want
some
action
taken,
but
if
you
want
to
look
at
this
again
in
february,
we
can
do
that.
J
T
Barely
have
20
bucks
a
week
to
live
on
no
problem.
What
I
was
just
discussing
with
my
client
is
that
we
could
push
this
out
instead
of
february.
We
would
push
it
out
to
july
and
what
that
means
is
that
the
gentleman
would
have
had
it
would
have
been
a
year
from
when
he
would
have
the
compliance
to
be
met.
Originally,
that's
a
lot
of
time
now,
and
so
in
that
time
he
has
to
figure
out
what
he
wants
to
do,
how
he
wants
to
do
it.
T
I
know
I
can't
tell
him
what
to
do,
and
I
can't
find
the
money
for
him,
but
you
know
that,
should
that
will
give
him
eight
months
from
today
and
a
total
of
12
months
to
figure
out
what
to
do,
and
I
think
that
should
be
enough
time
so,
instead
of
going
to
february
well,
actually
we
would
just
continue
this
thing
all
the
way
to
july,
as
long
as,
and
especially
because
it
looks
like
it's
maintained,
yeah
and
that's
what.
T
A
And
that's
what
I
was
going
to
say
it
possibly
looked
unsafe
before
even
a
mailman
walking
up
your
driveway
breaks
an
ankle,
but
I
think
at
this
point
I
don't
think
we're
questioning
the
safety
of
it.
We're
just
right.
Are
we
we're
not
questioning
the
safety
of
it?
We're
just
questioning
that
it's
not
in
compliance
which
it's
not
so
I
I
you
know.
A
I
appreciate
the
city
and
I'm
sure
you
do
as
well
giving
you
the
leniency
of
you
know
eight
to
12
months,
giving
you
eight
eight
calendar
months
to
hopefully
find
the
channel
and
the
resources
to
get
this
done.
I
wish
I
could
you
know
personally
come
help.
You
mix
concrete
and
stuff.
I
don't
know
if
I'm
allowed,
but
I'm.
J
D
A
Put
it
on
the
july
agenda,
hopefully
you
stay
healthy
and
safe
and
let's
figure
a
way
through
resources
and
channels
to
get
it
done,
but
just
know
that
there
is
a
deadline
and
when
we
do
hit
that
you
know
the
city
has
to
do
their
job
and
I
would
hate
for
you
to
all
of
a
sudden
see
those
additional
fees,
because
it's
not
obviously
a
cheap
repair.
To
begin
with
is.
E
A
A
Now,
moving
on
agenda
item
six
other
board
actions,
6.1
cases,
68
16,
59,
19,
234,
19.,
consider
requests
by
petitioners,
mohamed
839,
lantana
avenue
and
763
mandalay
have
to
reduce
the
fine
regarding
short-term
rentals
and,
if
approve
issue,
an
order
that
specifies
a
fine
that
includes
administrative
costs
and
establishes
a
date
payable
or
the
lien
will
revert
to
its
original
amount.
Is
anybody
here
regarding
agenda
6.1,
please
that
for
thank
you
so
much
for
your
patience
and
sorry,
you
had
to
wait
the
long
haul
were
you
here
to
be
sworn
in?
Z
Z
Really
quick,
I
do
also
have
two
sales
contracts,
one
on
each
of
these
addresses
for
two
current.
A
Z
Them:
okay,
let's
see
the
839
is,
has
sold
for
5.95
and
the
763
has
sold
for
450.
Z
Z
Z
I
was
told
that
a
piece
of
mail
did
come
to
my
husband's
clinic,
which
is
also
in
tennessee
our
business
manager
that
ran
the
clinic
then
left
m.I.a.
I'm
not
saying
that
is
the
reason
why
it
wasn't
found,
but
we
would
have
never
never
allowed
a
year.
We
had
a
lease
with
a
guy
for
a
year.
We
would
have
never
allowed
him
to
sublease.
You
know
no
problem.
A
How
is
he
here,
I
remember,
I
think
your
husband
was
in
here
with
us
and
he
was
a
doctor
from
tennessee.
I
recall
him
coming
in.
We.
D
G
So
this
is
probably
one
of
my
favorite
short-term,
rentals,
julie,
phillips,
I'm
sorry,
short-term
rental
inspector
for
the
city
of
clearwater
muhammad
has
been
renting
his
properties
since
2014..
I
still
have
this
from
airbnb.
I
did
not
think
I
was
going
to
need
to
present
for
fines.
I
have
91
inspections.
I've
done
on
their
properties
in
about
a
five-year
time
span.
I
have
brought
five
cases
to
the
board
for
muhammad.
G
That
was
the
very
first
one
that
came
to
code
board
and
each
time
muhammad
did
not
show
he
corresponded
with
nicole.
He
you
know
said
he
was
going
to
come.
He
didn't
come,
he
wanted
to
push
it
to
the
next
state.
He
still
didn't
come.
The
very
last
time
somebody
showed
was
at
763
mandalay
and
he
had
an
attorney
present,
but
he
was
still
found
in
violation.
So
we'll
start
with
the
first
one
839
lantana
the
first
case
that
came
was
case
number
6816.
G
G
The
second
one
that
came
was
6916,
which
is
843
lantana
and
that's
the
house
next
door
so
because
he
was
found
in
violation
originally
from
937.
He
also
owned
these
properties,
making
it
a
repeat
violation
for
every
property
you
own,
that
you're
violating
in
clearwater.
If
you
read
the
definition
of
the
repeat,
that's
why
continually
read
it
at
the
hearing?
G
G
So
and
I
don't
mean
any
disrespect,
they
know
the
code
each
time
I
bring
somebody
before
the
board,
you
have
to
send
another
notice
of
violation
residential
area
31
days,
one
calendar
month,
you're
in
charge
of
your
websites,
every
single
structure
that
you
have
so
I'm
just
not
really
feeling
that
lenient.
The
people
that
live
there
full
time
that
pay
taxes
have
to
tolerate
different
people
in
that
house.
All
the
time
I
have
a
list.
G
I
was
trying
to
look
through
it
and
find
it,
but
there
is
records
from
the
police
department
every
time
people
have
to
come
out
for
either
beer
cans,
noises
yelling,
it's
just
not
fair
to
the
community.
So
I
understand
that
he's
selling
them
and
they
want
a
reduction.
I
just
don't
think
it's
fair
for
violating
from
2014
to
2020
what
it
does
to
the
neighbors
just
because
you
feel
like
selling
them
and
that's
my
position
on
it.
Z
G
Z
K
G
Which
they
came
and
ken's
either
spouse
girlfriend
wife,
I'm
not
quite
sure
how
she
was
related
to
ken,
came
here
to
speak
on
ken's
behalf
and
muhammad's
behalf,
and
when
I
started
to
present
she
got
up
in
the
meeting
and
exited
the
board
wants
to
look
or
if
I'm
allowed,
to
give
this
to
muhammad's
wife,
I'm
happy
to
do
so.
It's
every
inspection,
I've
done
at
839
lantana
since
july,
2014.
Z
R
Z
D
D
Let
me
let
me
just
explain
something
to
you:
the
board
doesn't
hear
from
somebody
unless
they
have
a
written
representation
that
we
can
verify
and
mike
always
asks
to
make
sure
that
they
have
the
ability
to
speak
on
behalf
of
the
person.
So
if
they
spoke,
which
doesn't
sound
like
they
did,
but
if
they
did
speak
or
if
anybody
speaks,
we
have
written
authorization.
Otherwise
the
board
wouldn't
hear
it.
So
that
I
mean
it
sounds
like
from
inspector
philip
said:
no
one
spoke,
so
it's
kind
of
irrelevant,
but
whoever
you
all.
D
If
you
give
somebody
written
authority,
then
they
can
speak.
If
you
don't
they
don't
okay,
but
but
but
it's
kind
of
irrelevant
to
the
point
which
is
currently.
There
are
fifty
four
thousand
five
hundred
dollars
worth
of
fines.
The
administrative
costs
are
five
thousand
four
hundred
fifty
dollars
and
eighty
cents
you'll
always
hear
80
cents.
So
don't
be
surprised
and
this
board
has
a
discretion
to
do
anything
or
nothing
between
those
two
numbers.
A
Z
Y
A
Them
yeah
it's
great
to
hear
that
you
only
owe
40
000
on
them
and
you're
making
you
know
selling
for
you
know
close
to
over
a
million
dollars,
so
I
think
there
needs
to
be.
This
has
been
a
lot
of
time
and
energy
on
staff's
resources,
as
well
as
the
impact
it's
done
on
the
neighborhood.
So
I
I
definitely
think
there
is
some
fee
that
should
be
paid
in
the
closure
of
this.
Do
I
I
don't.
I
don't
think
that
administrative
cost
is
enough.
A
You
know,
I
don't
know
how
the
board
feels
if
you
know
that
the
entire
amount
of
54
500
is
you
know
what
direction
you
want
to
go,
but
is
there
any
discussion
on?
You
know
where
we
think
that
happy
medium
is.
D
A
T
T
Well,
it
sounds
from
what
I'm
hearing
from
the
gentle
ladies,
why
I
asked
her
that
she
has
substantial
equity
in
the
property,
so
they
made
money
by
breaking
the
law
and
now
they're
going
to
make
a
lot
more
money.
If
you
go
down
to
administrative
costs
or
anything,
there's
nothing
that
I'm
hearing.
That's
saying
these
fines
are
stopping
the
closing
from
taking
place.
There
is
more
than
enough
money
to
allow
the
closing
to
take
place
to
pay
off
everybody
and
they'll
still
walk
away
with
money.
T
Z
D
H
I
just
keep
getting
I
just
one
of
the
things
that
always
sticks
out
to
me
is
you
know
this
has
been
going
on
for
what
seven
years
you
know
I'm
a
landlord
as
well
and
a
tenant.
I
see
both
sides
but
you've
definitely
prospered
at
the
cost
of
of
the
neighborhoods.
You
know
feelings
and
feelings
of
safety,
and
all
that
I.
H
I
was
also
very
happy
that
you
asked
about
the
sale,
because
I
didn't
want
to
impede
that
I
didn't
want
to
be
responsible
for
that,
but
with
making
700
clear,
you
know
close
to
700
000.
H
H
I
don't
see
the
connection.
Okay,
I'm
just
saying
I'm
just
thinking
about
all
the
all
the
all
the
neighbors
that
have
felt
and
I've
complained
for
years.
All
the
and,
like
I
said,
I'm
a
property
owner
and
I
and
I
and
I
rent
as
well,
but
that's
seven
years
of
ignoring
the
law
or
the
fines
and
the
conversations-
and
I
don't
know.
Z
G
Can't
I
can
answer
that,
for
you,
I've
had
multiple
conversations
with
muhammad
and
it's
actually
the
owner's
responsibility
to
get
with
property
appraiser.
Each
time
I've
sent
him
mail,
it
came
back
when
the
clerk
would
send
him
mail,
it
would
come
back
there
and
I
think
it's
shelbyville
or
shelbyville
tennessee,
but
you
have
to
register
your
properties
properly
with
property
appraiser.
They
can't
go
search
you
out
everywhere
and
I've
had
that
conversation
with
him.
Every
time
we've
gone
to
the
board
and
he
asked
me
how
it
went.
D
A
I
I
mean
even
your
concern
of
the
14.
I
mean
okay,
so
to
answer
what
he
said,
I
if,
if
you
owed
what
you're
making
on
what
you're
closing
on
and
it
impeded
the
sale
of
the
properties,
we
would
be
a
little
more
hesitant
it's
not
about
oh
you're
making
money.
We
want
to
slap
your
wrist,
it's
like
we're.
Not
our
decision
isn't
impeding
the
closing
for
the
next
family,
no
within
it
or
your
family.
A
Even
if
you
were
to
subtract
your
fourteen
thousand
dollars
for
the
one
property
we
didn't
know,
you're
still
sitting
at
a
fine
of
over
40
40
500.
So
I
it's
it's
we're
still
at
a
pretty
good
sized
chunk
of
change.
I
don't
it's
probably
best
for
us
as
a
board
to
make
a
decision
on.
What
is
that
fine
that
do
we?
Do
you
stay
at
that
545
or
is
there
additional
leniency
that.
X
D
D
A
D
F
Right,
which,
which
page
are
we
gonna
use.
K
A
The
reduced
lean,
the
administrative
cost
or
the
exceed
side,
but
it
what
is
the?
Where
is
the
language
if
there
is
no
change
to
the.
A
Motion
is
made
and
seconded
all
in
favor
aye.
All
right,
oppose,
nay
mo
motion
passes.
A
Agenda
item
seven
nuisance
abatement,
lien
filings,
nothing
there,
no
wow!
We
this
board,
made
it
through
the
first
one
back
and
thank
you
city
for
you
know
putting
it
back
on
and
putting
on
your
show.
As
always,
you
always
do
a
wonderful
job
and
look
forward
to
hopefully
next
month
and
getting
through
hope
everyone
stays
safe
and
but
it's
nice
to
see
everybody
again.
Thank
you
thanks
adjourned.