►
From YouTube: 12/15/2020 Affordable Housing Advisory Committee.
Description
Comments are not monitored on this platform. To make a comment, please visit www.myclearwater.com/government/council-meeting-streaming-videos or one of our social media pages.
Agenda can be found here: http://bit.ly/ClearwaterCityCouncilMeetings
A
A
A
Okay,
I'd
like
to
call
to
order
this
meeting
of
the
affordable
housing
advisory
committee
december
15
2020..
Thank
you
all
for
being
here.
Thank
you
for
your
service
on
this
board.
Our
last
meeting
was
a
bit
of
a
long
one.
Hopefully
we
can.
We
can
wrap
up
our
business
today,
a
little
bit
more
quickly.
The
first
thing
we
need
to
do
is
approval
of
the
minutes.
From
the
november
16th
meeting
of
the
a
hack.
May
I
have
a
motion
to
approve
the
minutes,
I'll.
A
Seeing
no
one
will
close
the
public
comment
period
so
so
today's
meeting
is
primarily
to
approve
the
local
housing
incentive
strategy,
so
the
discussions
you've
had
over
the
last
two
meetings
have
created
that
document.
It's
an
update
to
our
previous
strategy,
a
lot
of
the
recommendations
and
I'll
roll
through
them
in
a
moment.
You've
continued
from
some
prior
a
hack
recommendations.
Some
you've
made
minor
minor
changes
to
language
changes
too,
and
there's
some
new
stuff
that
you
also
brought
forward.
A
I
think
I
want
to
thank
you
because
I
think
we
had
some
really
active
discussions.
I
think
this
board
was
very
engaged.
You
know
a
lot
of
times
advisory
committees.
It
seems
to
be
a
rubber
stamp
on
things
and
that's
frustrating,
but
this
was
not
that
I
thought
we'd
get
some
great
feedback.
You
know
our
affordable
housing
crisis,
as
as
we
all
call
it.
These
days
is
so
well
known,
and
it's
it's
heightened
more
so
than
than
I
think
it's
ever
been
from.
A
You
know
in
terms
of
meeting
with
this
a
hack
we've
met
every
three
years
now
for
the
last
several
years
and
and
we're
in
a
point
now,
where
it's
it's
it's
more
of
a
problem
than
it's
ever
been.
I
think
that
the
recession
we
saw
several
years
ago
drove
a
lot
of
people
to
the
rental
side
of
things
and
that
really
just
it
just
drove
those
rental
prices
sky
high
and
we're
seeing
people
that
just
can't
afford
a
decent
place
to
live.
A
So
it's
very
timely
that
we
put
this
committee
together
and
I
think
it's
very
important
and
and
now
thanks
to
our
florida
legislature,
we'll
be
doing
this
annually.
A
So
if
you
think
you
had
any
unfinished
business,
you
know
during
this
process
we
will
reconvene
again
in
the
fall,
we'll
go
through
the
same
process
and
I
anticipate
most
most
of
you,
if
not
probably
not
all
of
you,
but
most
of
you
will
will
be
on
the
board
next
time
around.
So
again.
Thank
you
very
much.
A
So
I'm
going
to
deliver
a
brief
presentation
on
what
what
you've
all
done
and
what
that
local,
how
local
housing
incentive
strategy
is
and
what
it,
what
how
it
guides
us
and
then
I'll
I'll,
take
questions
and
then
I'll
ask
for
a
motion
and
a
second
and
that
will
open
the
floor
to
public
comment.
It
will
open
the
floor
to
board
comments
and
then,
following
that,
we'll
ask
you
to
approve
the
item.
A
Okay,
so
just
rolling
through
it
real
quick,
the
the
a
hack
is,
it's
a
very
prescribed
process
and
it's
required
by
statute.
The
a
hack
is
required
to
consider
11
criteria
that
affect
affordable
housing
and
it's
all
related
to
our
our
development
guidelines,
our
regulations,
our
ordinances,
our
resolutions,
anything
that
that
might
add
cost
to
development
that
might
deter
someone
from
building
affordable
housing.
That's
what
these
11
criteria
are
are
focused
on.
Okay,
so
they're
they're
listed
alphabetically.
A
So
a
the
processing
of
approvals
of
development
orders
or
permits
for
affordable
housing
projects
is
expedited
to
a
greater
degree
than
other
projects
we
already.
This
is
already
in
place
and
it
has
been
for
several
years.
A
A
Traffic
is
combined
with
the
county
when,
when
we
can
we're
going
to
conduct
an
analysis
of
impact
fees
and
that's
what
you've
recommended
that
we
do
and
when
we
get
done
with
that
analysis,
I
think
we're
going
to
find
three
different,
three
very
different
conclusions
on
the
flexibility
and
the
latitude
we
have
with
each
of
those
impact
fees.
So
it
seems
on
the
surface,
to
be
a
simple
analysis.
It's
not.
A
There
are
a
lot
of
a
lot
of
factors
at
play,
but
I
plan
to
conduct
that
that
analysis
internally
and
have
it
complete
by
the
time
that
ahac
reconvenes
in
the
fall
and
I'll
report
that
back
to
you
and
then
we
can
decide
or
you
can
all
decide
whether
or
not
you
have
a
recommendation
with
that
information
at
hand.
Okay,
c
the
allowance
of
flexibility
and
densities
of
affordable
housing.
This
is
already
in
place.
A
Our
code
allows
for
a
flexible
for
a
density
boost
for
projects
that
qualify
as
affordable
housing
under
the
city's
definition,
so
that
density
boost
is
anywhere
from
a
20
percent
to
a
50
density
boost,
depending
on
the
mixture
of
affordable,
affordable
workforce
units
to
market
rate
units.
So
that's
already
in
place
d,
the
reservation
of
infrastructure
capacity
or
housing
for
low
to
moderate
income
persons.
As
with
other
previous,
a
hacks,
you
decided
not
to
make
a
recommendation
on
this.
Our
city
is
very
built
out.
The
infrastructure
is
in
place.
A
You
know
most
of
the
stuff
that
happens.
Most
of
the
development
is
infill
projects.
The
infrastructure's
there
there's
really
not
a
compelling
need
to
create
policy
to
reserve
and
to
reserve
that
capacity,
so
no
recommendation
there
from
the
a
hack
e
the
the
allowance
of
affordable
accessory
residential
units
and
residential
zoning
districts.
So
we
talked
about
this
quite
a
bit
and
it's
something
that
we're
going
to
give
strong
consideration
to
as
we
update
our
consolidated
our
comprehensive
plan.
A
Okay,
it's
already
allowed
at
some
level,
but
there's
certainly
opportunity
to
expand
that,
and
so
it
becomes
more
readily
accessible
to
people
that
want
to
want
to
make
that
investment
f,
the
reduction
of
parking
and
setback
requirements
for
affordable
housing.
This
is
already
provided
for
in
our
code,
so
that's
already
in
place.
A
The
allowance
of
flexible,
lock
configurations,
including
zero
lot
line,
configurations
for
affordable
housing-
again,
that's
already
allowable
in
our
code
h,
the
modification
of
street
requirements
for
affordable
housing,
no
recommendation
here
either
we
are
a
very
built
out
city.
Our
street
kit
grid
is
very
well
established
for
any
new
roads
that
are
built.
We
have
very,
very
clear
criteria
is
what
those
need
to
be.
So
there
was
no
recommendation
from
the
a
hack-
that's
really
probably
more
applicable,
to
a
greenfield
community
than
us
this.
A
I,
the
establishment
of
a
process
by
which
local
government
considers,
before
adoption
policies,
procedures,
ordinances,
regulations
or
plan
provisions
that
increase
the
cost
of
housing.
So
with
any
plans
that
are
put
forth
by
planning
and
development,
any
modifications
to
plans
the
planning
development
puts
forth.
We
are.
We
are
very
much
engaged
in
that
we
work
very
closely
with
them
on
on
working
through
that
process.
A
A
So
when
those
are
raised,
department,
staff,
denise
anderson-
if
not
her,
I
am
at
attendance
at
those
meetings
and
when
those
you
know
when
those
policies
ordinances
are
presented,
you
know
we,
we
look
at
them
through
this
lens
and
we
can.
We
can
evaluate
them
and
discuss
them
at
that
level.
So
there
is
a
there
is
a
procedure
in
place
for
that
jay,
the
preparation
of
a
printed
inventory
of
locally
owned
public
land
suitable
for
affordable
housing.
This
is
a
statutory
requirement.
A
We
we
meet
this
we're
in
compliance
with
this
every
three
years,
council
approves
a
list
of
city-owned
properties
that
are
available
for
affordable
housing.
Sometimes
we
update
that
between
up
between
updates.
If
we
get
a,
you
know
a
rash
of
a
few
properties
that
come
into
our
ownership,
we'll
add
them
to
the
list.
Sometimes,
but
that
list
is
in
place
it's
on
our
website.
If
we
have
time
later
in
the
meeting,
I
want
to
roll
through
that
list
with
you,
because
we
there
was
some
discussion
about
that
list.
A
A
The
last
of
the
11
required
components
is
support
of
development,
near
transportation
hubs,
the
major
employment,
centers
and
mixed-use
developments.
This
is
already
required
under
our
code
already
provided
for
by
our
code.
So
section
3-920
is
the
section
of
our
code
that
relates
specifically
to
affordable
housing.
It's
addressed
in
there
you
can.
You
can
reduce
your
parking
requirement
if
your
development
is
within
a
thousand
feet
of
a
transit
stop,
so
it
is
in
our
code
and
it's
something
that
we
pay
attention
to.
A
Certainly
again,
you
know
we
talked
about
the
impact
fee
study,
we'll
take
care
of
that
we'll
reconvene
in
the
fall
and
I'll
have
some
information
for
you
on
that
there
were
some
some
other
items
that
that
the
the
committee
raised.
Some
other
recommendations
that
that
were
not
part
of
the
required
components:
the
11
required
criteria.
A
We
talked
a
little
bit
about
about
adaptive,
reuse,
it's
allowable
we're
allowable,
where
allowable
in
our
code
folks
can
take,
for
example,
a
former
school
building
and
convert
it
for
housing
and-
and
I
think
the
recommendation
was
that
we
continue
to
allow
that
in
our
code,
because
those
opportunities
can
can
can
be
very
helpful,
talked
a
little
bit
about
land
development,
our
land
development
codes,
specifically
3-920
as
it
relates
to
affordable
housing.
I
think
I
think
the
committee
was
pretty
satisfied
with
that
code.
A
Didn't
recommended
any
changes
to
that
section
of
the
code
in
terms
of
architectural
requirements
and
the
like
and
there's
a
lot
in
there,
but
I
think
the
the
recommendation
was
to
continue
and
not
make
any
changes
to
that
talked
a
lot
about
our
marketing.
A
You
made
some
recommendations
that
we
make
some
changes
to
our
website.
We
do
plan
to
do
that
I'll
work
directly
with
our
public
communications
department
and
we
will
certainly
try
to
achieve.
You
know
everything
that
you
told
us
in
reconfiguring
our
website,
making
it
more
user-friendly
for
developers
and
and
even
for
those
you
know
with
the
programs
we
have
for
for
the
direct
residents
that
can
be
helped.
So
there's
really
two
two
different
sides
of
that.
A
There's
there's
informing
the
developer
on
what,
on
you
know
the
incentives,
the
opportunities
and
then
informing
the
residents
on
on
opportunities
for
them.
They're
two
completely
different
things
and
we
will
capture
both
in
our.
We
do
capture
both
in
our
in
our
current
website.
I
think
we
could
do
a
better
job
and
see
points
well.
Taken
talked
a
little
bit
about
finances,
the
funding,
the
the
funding
that
we
have
to
distribute
to
developers.
A
I
think
the
the
biggest
takeaway
from
the
from
the
committee
was
our
dpa
program.
He
made
a
recommendation
that
we
increased
the
subsidy
in
our
dpa
program.
So,
at
the
end
of
the
day,
what
you
have
is,
you
know
the
gap
between
what
people
are
being
approved
for
on
the
first
mortgage
and
what
that
price
is
is
widening
and
our
current
dpa
maximum
of
twenty
thousand
dollars
for
an
existing
home
doesn't
cover
that
gap.
So
we
do
have
a
a
a
subsidy
of
forty
five
thousand
dollars
for
new
construction.
A
I
think
we're
probably
going
to
raise
the
the
the
subsidy
for
an
existing
home
to
45
as
well.
I
think
we're
going
to
do
that
and
we,
I
think,
we're
going
to
do
that.
We're
certainly
going
to
evaluate
that
and
if
and
we'll
make
that
change
with
our
local
housing
assistance
plan
that
we
put
together
in
the
spring.
Okay,
the
naha
will
have
a
lot
to
say
about
that.
A
We'll
go
to
council,
I
think
in
march
or
april,
so
we'll
bring
that
forward
now
that
also
that
also
brings
into
the
question
okay,
when
it
comes
time
to
paying
that
loan
back.
How
does
that
look
now?
We
need
to
look
at
that
very
carefully,
because
right
now
that
twenty
thousand
dollar
loan
is
deferred
for
five
years.
So
after
five
years
they
begin
paying
that
back
zero
percent
interest
over
20
years.
So
now
they
have
an
increased
payment.
Okay,
we're
going
to
double
that
now,
you
know.
A
Are
we
going
to
double
that
payment
because
we're
going
from
20
to
40
or
45.?
So
we
may
have
to
look
at
at
a
reduced
payment
through
through
the
life
of
the
affordability
period,
and
then
maybe
when
that
affordability
period
is
up,
the
remainder
of
that
loan
is
forgiven.
Those
are
along
the
lines
of
what
we're
thinking.
So
what
we
don't
want
to
do
is
put
someone
in
a
position
where
they're
going
to
fail
five
years
down
the
road.
So
we
have
to
be
very
careful
about
that.
A
A
We
want
our
residents
to
be
comfortable
and
understand
the
opportunities
that
are
out
there
for
them.
You
know
we
work
hard
at
partnerships
and-
and
that's
something
we
will
continue
to
do.
I
think
building
relationships
is,
is
24
7.
I
think
that's
what
that's
the
biggest
part
of
the
job.
So
that's
that's
my
presentation.
I
wanted
to
just
kind
of
roll
through
each
of
the
things
and
highlight
each
of
the
things
that
you
recommended
at
this
point.
I'd
be
happy
to
take
any
questions
from
any
of
the
members.
A
Okay
is
running
from
the
public
wishing
to
speak
on
this
item,
seeing
no
one
I'll
close
the
public
I'll
close
the
florida
public
comments
and
do
we
have
any
comments
from
the
board?
A
E
E
A
couple
of
comments
I
had
was
hoping
that
next
year,
when
we
review
it,
we
can
look
at
putting
in
some
measurables
where
it
might
be
appropriate,
and
I
know
that
chuck
and
I
had
I
had
an
email
question
about
measurable
goals
and
that
if
we
put
some
measurable
goals
in
in
the
document,
they
become
a
requirement
and
they
may
not
align
with
the
funding
levels
that
we
get,
that
we
have
no
control
over
from
federal
or
state
sources,
and
I
I
understand
that,
but
I'm
thinking
we're
going
to
get
some
funding,
but
if,
if
we
have
some
goals
that
are
truly
important
to
us,
you
know
related
to
things
that
that
have
an
expense.
E
Then
I
would
think
that
the
council
would
find
some
money
somewhere
to
help
us
realize
those
goals.
I
mean
it's
just
something
to
think
about
I
for
me
to
learn
about
through
this
next
spring
and
summer
before
we
meet
in
the
fall.
So
I'm
not.
You
know.
I
I'd
want
to
look
at
that
and
then
maybe
we
could
have
measurable
goals
about
where
the
wording
says
you
know,
affordable
housing
is
moved
to
the
front
of
the
line
for
permitting
or
inspections
or
things
like
that.
E
Could
we
have,
you
know
they'll
get
their
permitting
within
10
days
or
five
days
or
whatever
you
know,
pull
the
number
I
don't
know,
but
have
something
that's
more
concrete
there.
So
you
know
I'd
like
us
to.
I
mean
I'm
going
to
learn
more
about
that.
I
reached
out
to
a
friend
who's
on
this
committee
for
saint
pete
and
asked
you
know.
E
How
did
you
all
approach
the
11
requirements
and
what
are
you
all
doing
and
and
so
I
think,
if
you
know
we
can
learn
what
other
municipalities
are
doing
in
the
county
as
well.
I
think
that's
a
good
thing.
E
Let's
see,
okay,
can
we
ask
now,
let's
see
the
okay
you're
gonna
talk
about
the
list
of
land
inventory
and
and
how
accurate
that
is.
So
that's
good
and
oh,
this
is
about
those
adus,
because
that's
pretty
popular
for
people
to
look
at
you
know
these
accessory
dwelling
units
and
people
email
me
articles
every
now
and
then
about.
Why
can't
we
do
this
in
clearwater
and
stuff?
E
Is
there
ever-
and
I
know
it's
part
of
our
comprehensive
plan
update
which
is
supposed
to
be
completed
within
the
next
year
and
a
half
or
two
years,
but
is
there
any
possibility
that
that
we
can
approve
this
particular
adu
on
this
particular
neighborhood?
Or
is
that
that
those
exceptions
don't
ever
happen?
E
F
Good
morning,
gina,
clayton,
planning
and
development
director,
the
issue
is:
is
that
with
an
accessory
dwelling
unit,
you're
exceeding
the
allowable
density?
So
that's
why
we
have
to
amend
the
comprehensive
plan
to
give
us
that
authority.
We
also,
then
have
to
put
it
in
the
code
of
and
the
community
development
code
to
authorize
it.
So
we
don't
have
any
sort
of
mechanism
to
grant
density
variances
if
you
will.
So
that's
why
it
has
to
be.
B
F
Is
that,
first
of
all,
we
have
we
have
two
long-range
planners
they're
going
to
be
working
on
north
greenwood,
cra
they're,
going
to
be
working
on
a
comp
plan,
update
they're
working
on
a
downtown
plan,
update
so
for
us
to
take
this
issue
and
put
it
on
a
parallel
track,
is
just
not
feasible
and
we'll
have
the
benefit
of
all
the
research
that
is
being
done
to
build
the
basis
for
the
amendment
for
the
comprehensive
plan.
It's
something
we're
definitely
going
to
put
forward.
F
F
E
F
D
F
Okay,
well,
the
only
way
we
could
do
that
under
today's
regulatory
framework
is
if
the
lot
was
large
enough
to
support
two
units,
because
we
don't
have
a
mechanism
to
exceed
the
allowable
density
of
a
lot.
F
So
the
way
that
council
approached
this
issue
when
we
updated
the
plan
before
was
if
the
lot
was
big
enough,
so
it
didn't
really
allow
a
true
accessory
dwelling.
So
I
just
we
don't
have
a
mechanism.
Now
we
do
have
some
property
in
downtown
where
the
density
is
high
enough,
and
I
think
pierre
has
recently
done
something-
that's
similar
to
this,
where
you
know
he
built
two
a
duplex
and
then
a
garage
apartment
above,
and
we
did
that
through
the
downtown
plan.
But
again
the
density
was
there
to
support
it.
F
So
it's
not
truly
a
adu
in
the
sense
that
you're
talking
about.
We
have
had
some
conversation
with
some
people
who
are
maybe
interested
in
doing
a
tiny
home
village
or
just
a
tiny
home
development,
and
that
could
be
done,
but
we
haven't
had
anyone
bring
forward
an
actual.
You
know
proposal
to
do
that.
So
I'm
sorry.
I
can't
no.
F
Proper
zoning,
it's
yeah
it's
possible.
If
multiple
units
are
allowed,
you
know,
like
I
would
say,
in
a
multi-family
zoning
district,
you
could
have
multi
units
or
even
and
say
like
a
property,
that's
zoned
mdr.
That
would
allow
a
number
of
homes.
I
think
there's
a
way
that
we
could
certainly
get
someone
through
the
regulatory
process.
E
E
Indicators-
and
there
are
a
number
of
them
that
we're
already
doing-
which
is
great,
but
are
we
going
to?
Is
there
a
mechanism
to
have
updates
provided
to
us
between
now
and
next
early
fall
when
we
meet
again
to
see
how
we're
doing,
and
then
you
and
I
kind
of
talked
before
the
meeting
about
us
being
released
from
sunshine?
So
we
can
all
talk
to
each
other
yeah.
A
We're
gonna
we'll
sunset
the
committee
in
in
january
and
at
that
point
the
committee
no
longer
exists,
you're
free
to
you're
free
to
talk
amongst
each
other
and
when
that,
when
that
happens
I'll.
Unless
that
anyone
has
an
objection-
and
you
can
email
me,
if
you
do,
I
will
send
contact
information
emails,
probably
more
than
anything
to
each
of
you
so
you're
able
to
communicate
freely
instead
of
blind
copying,
you'll
actually
copy
you
on
that
email
or
send
it
to
each
of
you
so
updates
between
now
and
then.
A
I
think,
if
there's
anything
anything
significant,
I
I
think
I
can
certainly
pass
it
along.
We,
you
know
we,
like,
I
said,
we're
meeting
annually
now,
so
it's
it
really.
It's
really
going
to
take
maybe
the
form
of
a
continuous
committee
rather
than
sunset
and
start,
which
is
actually
what
we're
going
to
do
every
year,
but
the
fact
that
we're
meeting
annually.
I
think
I
think
it
allows
us
to
keep
things
on
the
table
and
keep
things
moving
forward
so
but
yeah
if
anything's
significant.
A
H
G
H
I
was
just
going
to
suggest
that,
because
the
nehab
comprises
the
majority
of
this
board,
as
seven
members
as
you
know
of
this
committee,
will
have
to
be
cautious
that
any
items
that
may
actually
come
before
nahab
is
not
discussed
amongst
the
group,
because
nahab
is
still
convened,
standing
advisory
board.
So
that
makes
sense
to
everybody.
A
And
certainly
the
nahab
is
a
good
forum
to
disseminate
any
updates
and
there's
only
there
are
what
I
think
four
other
members
beyond
and
they
have
on
this
committee.
So
we
will
certainly
keep
the
naha
posted
and
you
know
when
appropriate
I'll.
Certainly
let
the
other
four
members
know
exactly
what's
going
on
when
we
had
some
significant
changes.
I
And
I
apologize
to
the
group
for
missing
the
last
couple
meetings,
which
seemed
to
be
very
progressive
and
great
conversation.
So
it
is
my
understanding,
we're
going
to
approve
the
incentives
right
now
and
then
the
next
meeting
for
the
a
hack
will
be
in
the
fall
between
now
and
then
is
there
any
way
for
us
to
make
recommendations
like
kathleen
was
mentioning
timing
or
more
tangible
recommendations
for
the
for
this
eight
hack
or
once
we
approve
there's
nothing
until
the
fall,
and
we
start
conversation
again
well.
A
You're
certainly
welcome
to
communicate
with
me
on
any
thoughts.
You
have
any
recommendations
you
have,
but
this
this
is,
you
know
statutory,
a
statutory
requirement
and
what
happens
now
is.
Is
you
improve
that
document?
Okay,
the
board
approves
that
document
council
I'll
be
asked
to
accept
that
document
on
thursday.
That
document
then
becomes
incorporated
into
our
local
housing
assistance
plan
and
our
local
housing
assistance
plan
is
our
regulatory
document.
It
governs
how
we
administer
ship
fundings
ship
funding
in
that
program,
so
these
incentives
become
part
of
what
is
required
of
us
as
staff.
A
Okay.
So
you
know
making
changes
to
that.
You
know
we
have
to
be
very
careful
about
how
we
step
through
that.
So
mid-year,
you
know
it's.
We
we
can
make
changes
to
the
l-hat
mid-year.
Some
changes
require
council
approval,
some
don't,
but
if
you
have
any
thoughts
or
recommendations
any
of
you
throughout
the
year.
You're
welcome
to
to
contact
me
directly
on
any
ideas,
thoughts
you
have
and
if
you
know,
if,
if
I
think
appropriate,
certainly
we
can
take.
I
can
take
a
next
step
with
them.
A
Any
other
questions,
so
we
have
a
motion
and
a
second
all
in
favor,
aye
opposed
motion
carries
unanimously.
Thank
you.
So
the
the
next
steps
that
I,
as
I
just
touched
on,
we'll
ask
the
we
will
ask
the
the
council
to
sunset
this
committee
and
that'll
happen
in
january,
but
your
recommendations
will
continue
to
guide
staff.
Obviously,
like
I
said
this
document
will
be
incorporated
into
our
lhap
and
that
becomes
part
of
our
guiding
document
that
we
have
to
use.
A
So
a
lot
of
the
notes.
I
have
that
I'm
going
to
present,
I
have
just
said
so
again:
we've
had
some
great
feedback
in
this
throughout
this
process,
and
I
just
want
to
thank
everybody
for
your
engagement.
I
think
it's
been
a
really
great
discussion
and
you
know
my
time
here
in
this
position.
I
think
this
has
been
about
the
most
active
and
engaged
board
that
that
you
know
that
we've
had,
and
I
think-
and
I
thank
you
all
for
that
all
right.
A
Okay,
this
is
our
list
of
of
city
city-owned
properties
that
are
available
for
affordable
housing.
We
have
to
update
this
list
every
three
years.
It's
due
to
be
updated
again
in
next
year.
I
believe.
Okay,
we
did
do
kind
of
a
midterm
update.
This
was
last
updated
in
2019,
okay,
so
you
can
see
from
the
from
the
map
here
most
of
the
properties,
all
of
those
to
the
north
are
within
the
north.
Greenwood
community
there's
one
property
in
the
east
gateway
and
there
are
two
properties
in
lake
bellevue.
Okay.
A
So
I'm
going
to
take
you
through
each
of
these
properties
and
give
you
a
brief
update
on
what
they
are
okay,
so
this
one's
in
lake
bellevue,
it's
about
1.3
acres,
it's
just
south
of
ross,
norton
recreation
center,
the
density
on
this
about
when
you
include
the
the
the
density
boost
for
affordable
housing
somewhere
around
22-23,
we're
working
with
a
group,
that's
very
interested
in
doing
a
multi-family
project
on
the
site.
A
I
think
we're
going
to
put
it
out
to
rfp,
okay
and
the
reason
for
that
is:
we're
allowed
to
donate
property
less
than
five
acres
for
affordable
housing.
Okay,
so
what
that
does
is
that
allows
us
now
to
do
an
rfp
where,
when
we
sell
property
regularly
under
our
under
our
charter,
we
can't
do
an
rfp.
We
have
to
sell
to
the
highest
bidder.
Now
we
can.
A
We
can
stipulate
the
future
use
of
that
property,
what
it
needs
to
be
and
that
can
qualify
bidders
in
itself,
but
among
the
qualifying
bidders
we
have
to
take
the
highest
price
above
the
appraised
value.
We
don't
have
to
do
that
with
affordable
housing
less
than
five
acres.
So
what
we
can
do
is
we
can
put
out
an
rfp
and
we
can
select
the
project
based
on
the
merits
of
the
project,
so
we
can
take
the
best
project.
A
So
I
think
it's
incumbent
on
us
as
staff,
to
put
this
out
there
and
see
who
out
there
is
going
to
give
us
the
best
product.
So
that's
what,
even
though
we
have
a
very
competent
and
engaged
group,
I
think
we
need
to
take
that
step.
So
that's
what
we're
going
to
do
just
west
of
that
you
can
see
that
housing
development
is,
is
norton
apartments,
it's
owned
by
the
pinellas
county
housing
authority.
A
We
actually
approached
them
about
building
out
this
site.
They
were
interested,
but
they
had
other
priorities,
so
they
kind
of
passed
on
it.
They
they
may
be
involved
in
in
managing
a
product
that
that
ends
up
on
this
site.
So.
A
This
one
has
been
donated
and
sold
to
a
homeowner
habitat
for
humanity
built
this
project
project
out.
It
is
a
single
family
home
to
a
home
buyer,
eighty
percent
era,
median
income
and
under
this
this
piece
of
property
is
in
our
gateway.
A
The
the
map
is
configured,
so
you
can
see
the
proximity
to
cleveland
street.
Unfortunately,
what
you
can't
really
see
is
the
entire
property
here
on
that
southwest
corner,
that
is
about
three
and
a
half
acres
and
we
have
a
developer
that
is
going
to
build
171
units
on
that
project.
He's
finalizing
his
funding
with
the
county
that
funding
has
not
been
approved
yet
has
not
got
to
the
finish
line
yet
so
it's
still
still
tentative.
But
everything
looks
pro
positive
for
this
project
to
move
forward.
A
All
of
the
units
will
be
120
of
ami
or
below.
So
this
is
truly
a
workforce
housing
project.
There
are
going
to
be
a
number
of
units
at
80,
ami
and
below
a
number
100
of
ami
and
below
so
there's
a
good
mix
there
very
attractive
project.
So
we're
excited
about
that
and
this
site
will
be
used
for
staging
as
that
project's
going
on
that
developer
is
actually
interested
in
building
it
out
once
completed.
A
A
It's
a
it's
a
tough
one,
because
it's
owned
commercial,
its
own
commercial.
So
it
takes
a
bit
of
a
process
through
our
comp
infill
process
to
to
get
the
to
get
the
the
entitlements
to
build
a
single
family
home
there,
but
that's,
hopefully
that
gets
started
in
the
next
year.
A
This
street
in
itself
here
is
interesting
because
a
couple
of
fairly
new
homes
here
habitat
for
humanity,
owns
this.
We
own
this.
We
just
did
a
rehab
project
here.
If
you
drive
down
the
street
you're
going
to
see
a
street,
that's
very
blighted,
there's
a
just!
A
lot
of
you
know
it's
vagrancy
and
it's
just
not
one
of
the
attractive
streets
in
the
neighborhood,
and
I
think,
with
the
opportunities
we
have
we
can.
We
can
make
a
difference
on
the
street
and
that's
the
partnership
with
habitat
for
humanity,
which
is,
is
very
strong.
A
That's
the
piece
that
I
told
you
that
that
we
own
on
that
street
as
well
and
that's
has
been
donated
to
habitat
for
humanity.
This
parcel
here
on
monroe
ave,
clearwater,
neighborhood
housing
services
owns
this
land
over
here.
They
they
believe
they
have
an
inside
track,
maybe
to
acquire
this
so
we're
holding
on
to
this,
because
you
know
if
and
when
they're
ready
to
to
build
and
they're
they're
more
so
in
single
family
homes.
You
know
we
would.
A
It
makes
a
lot
of
sense
for
the
for,
for
us
to
to
donate,
donate
this
property
to
them.
Maybe
economies
of
scale,
maybe
a
single
mobilization
and
three
homes,
something
in
that
neighborhood,
so
we're
kind
of
holding
the
fort
on
that
one.
So
no,
no
movement
there!
A
This
one
here
we
have
some
active
discussions
with
with
a
group
to
build
a
single
family
home
on
that
property
that
will
go
to
council,
I
believe
in
in
january,
okay,
it's
gonna
be
a
smaller
home.
There's
a
you
can
see.
If
you
see
closely
in
the
aerial
the
home
to
the
right
is
very
close
to
encroaching,
so
it
makes
it
that
in
itself
makes
it
even
a
smaller
parcel,
so
we're
gonna
try
to
work
with
that
and
put
a
smaller
home
on
that
site.
A
This
is
under
construction
with
a
merged
community
development
corporation.
The
building,
I
believe,
a
three
family
home.
It's
great
lot,
it's
right
behind
our
ml,
north
mlk
aquatic
and
recreation
center
on
nicholson
street.
A
I'm
sorry,
three,
three
bedroom!
Sorry!
Thank
you!
Three
bedroom
home!
This
is
also
under
construction.
Habitat
for
humanity
is
building
this
home
right
now,
good
sized
lot,
10
000
square
feet.
We
were
hoping
to
get
two
lots
out
of
it,
but
there's
some
there's
some
very
mature
live
oaks
on
the
property
that
that
really
made
it
difficult.
A
So
we
just
we
reduced
it
to
one
lot,
we're
having
some
active
discussions
about
this
with
the
group
that
we
have
not
done
business
with
yet,
but
I'm
kind
of
encouraged
by
them,
because
what
their
product
is.
Is
it's
a
prefab
home?
It's
not
a
tiny
home,
it's
not
a
mobile
home,
but
it's
a
home
that
they
can
build
at
a
at
a
price
point
where
they
can
work
with
80,
ami
folks
without
subsidy
and
that's
very
rare
in
our
world.
So
if
we
can
find
a
developer
that
can
do
that.
A
A
This
property-
you
haven't
done
anything
with
because
it's
it's
commercially
zoned,
it's
on
it's
on
north
mlk
and
the
reason
we
haven't
done
anything
with
it
is
is,
I
think,
gina
mentioned
briefly
earlier:
we're
working
to
create
a
cra
in
the
north,
greenwood
neighborhood
and
any
commercial
opportunities
we
have
along
that
main
drag
on
north
north
mlk.
I
think
we
need
to
preserve
for
future
opportunities.
So
that's
why
we're
holding
on
to
that
one,
and
for
that
reason
we
may
need
to
knock
it
off
the
list.
The
next
time
around
this.
A
This
piece
here
is
associated
with
the
next
page.
So
you
can
see
what
we
have
here:
we're
working
with
the
group
clearwater
neighborhood
housing
services
that
owns
this
okay,
and
it
makes
sense
that
we
work
with
them
because
our
land
can
leverage
a
larger
project.
Okay,
what
the
kind
of
the
odd
kind
of
thing
here
is,
what
you
have
is
you
have
two:
you
have
a
different
land
use
here
than
you
do
on
the
south
side
of
grant.
Here
we're
allowed
seven
and
a
half
units
an
acre
here.
A
They're
allowed
15
units
an
acre,
so
our
property
alone
can
only
house
about
three
units
right
now,
when
you
combine
all
the
land
into
one
one
project,
you
can
get
nine
ten.
So
it's
it's!
It's
really
kind
of
leveraging
our
property
for
a
better
project,
so
we
hope
to
work
with
them,
waiting
on
a
concept
design
from
them
and
I'll
keep
you
posted
on
that
one,
because
that
could
be
an
exciting
project.
A
Yeah,
it
could
be
it's
it's,
it
is
zoned,
residential,
okay,
so
next
year's
residential.
So
it's
no!
The
answer
is
no
down.
Here
was
zone
commercial.
There
was
a
zoning
change
by
a
previous
owner,
so
that
would
have
been
an
option
back
in
the
day,
but
no
residential.
So
we're
looking
at
a
multi-family
they're
talking
about
a
product
that
a
project
that
incorporates
some
home
ownership
in
some
rental,
but
don't
have
a
concept.
Yet
it's
just
been
discussions.
E
Okay,
I
had
a
question
on
the.
I
think
it's
the
one
in
lake
bellevue,
that
is
less
than
five
acres,
and
you
thought
it
could
be.
E
A
You
know
I
mean
with
with
the
allowance
of
of
20
22
23
units
yeah,
I
don't
think
you're
going
to
get
that
with
a
tiny
home
with
tiny
home
village.
I
think-
and
I
think
personally
you
know
in
in
studying
up
on
on
this
stuff
to
me.
You
know
tiny
homes.
I
I
think,
there's
there's.
A
I
think
if
you
take
a
tiny
home
and
you
put
it
on
a
full
single
family
lot,
I
think
you're
in
a
challenged
neighborhood.
I
think
you're
reinforcing
that.
It's
a
challenge,
neighborhood,
I
think,
if
you
take
a
cluster
of
tiny
homes
in
in
a
lot
like
this,
I
think
that's
a
much
more
effective
use
of
tiny
homes
and
I'd
love
to
find
a
project
like
that.
A
This
one
there
might
be
some
opportunity
costs
because
of
the
densities
we'd
be
losing,
but
it's
something
we
can
consider.
You
know
I
I'd
hate
to
give
up
the
opportunity
to
you
know
to
to
put
22-23
units
in
when
you
know
maybe
a
tiny
home
cluster
would
be.
You
know,
seven
or
eight.
E
A
A
So
you
know
what
we
you
know
what
we
end
up.
Having
is
we
have
there's
really
13
sites
well,
really
12,
because
the
two
are
combined
with
one
and
we
have
active.
You
know
active
discussions,
we're
actually
talking
with
developers
on
four
of
those
sites
we've
donated
and
built
and
sold
to
homeowner
one
of
those
sites.
We've
done
nothing
with
three
of
the
sites.
For
the
various
reasons
I
mentioned,
we've
donated
an
awaiting
construction
two
sites
donated
an
under
construction
two
sites.
A
B
If
I
could
make
a
quick
recommendation,
I
think
I
think,
because
especially
of
the
rfp
and
that
you
discussed
and
some
of
those
opportunities
that
arise,
it
would
be
great
if
that
list
was
shared
through
partnership
with
the
chamber
of
commerce.
Some
of
the
things
we
talked
about
previously
because
you
never
know
who
might
see
their
communications
and
might
not
see.
You
know
what
the
city
is
putting
out
there,
just
as
an
extra
kind
of
layer
of
communication,
yeah.
A
We
keep
it
on
our
website,
but
yeah.
I
think
we
could
do
a
better
job
at
putting
it
out
there
and
that's
chamber
of
commerce.
That's
great
great
way
to
do
that.
Probably
do
that,
through
through
mr
sutton
you'd,
be
happy
to
disseminate
that
list.
Yeah
yeah.
E
A
E
A
They
put
together,
they
actually
put
together
a
program
and
a
process
for
disposing
of
those
lots
that
I
really
really
liked.
So
something
I
think
I'm
going
to
raise
with
the
naha.
A
And
potentially
council,
if
necessary,
but
more
to
come
on
that,
but
I
think
saint
pete
with
their
foreclosure
program,
they
probably
have
the
most
out
of
any
municipality.
We
have.
We
have
a
code
for
foreclosure
program,
that's
more
or
less
modeled
after
theirs
much
lower
scale
or
small
city,
but
I
don't
think
we've
we've
had
any
foreclosures
through
the
pandemic,
but
I
think
I'm
sure
at
some
point
we'll
we'll
get
another
batch.
B
Is
isn't
the
the
large
lot
that's
on
cleveland
in
missouri,
not
missouri,
it's
not
directly
on
missouri,
but
that
large
lot
that
had
the
the
nice,
the
artist
that
made
that
nice
fencing
thing.
Isn't
that
also
a
lot
that
the
city
owns
on
cleveland.
A
Yes,
I
think
that's
yeah
right
next
to
the
verizon
building.
Yes,
yeah,
that
that's
a
sierra
on
site,
okay,
we're
we're
working
there's!
Actually
I
don't
know
how
much
I
want
to
say,
but
there's
there's
interest
and
the
cra
is
working
very
closely
on
a
project
that
what
which
what
she
wants
to
do
is
incorporate
housing,
mixed
mixed
income
housing
in
the
back
of
that
lot-
and
you
probably
know
this-
there's
a
community
garden,
correct,
so
she's
interested
in
incorporating
and
a
design
that
that
takes
both
of
those
things.
B
A
So
more
to
come
on
that,
but
there
have
been
some
discussions
on
it.
B
And
it's
such
a
large
lot
that
I
know
we
keep
talking
about
tiny
homes,
but
it
would
be
it
would.
It
would
look
very
good,
especially
if
there's
going
to
be
different
types
of
housing
structures
to
have
some
sort
of
like
a
mixed
income
and
mixed
type,
because
some,
if
somebody
were
you
know,
we
could
have
some
rental
some
owner.
A
A
Okay,
all
right.
The
only
other
thing
I
wanted
to
discuss
before
we
close
seven
of
the
eleven
members
of
this
committee
also
serve
on
on
the
nahab,
the
neighborhood,
affordable
housing
advisory
board.
A
So
I
want
to
take
this
opportunity
to
thank
a
neha
board
member
who
has
provided
22
years
of
service
on
our
board.
1998
peggy
was
appointed
to
our
board.
She's
been
a
clearwater
resident
for
41
years,
so
she's
retired.
She
she
sits
on.
She
fills
a
seat
that
represents
the
real
estate
industry,
she's
retired,
from
that
her
licenses
laps.
So
it's
time
for
her
to
move
on
and
we're
going
to
miss
her.
A
She,
you
know
and
from
local
government
and
what
we
do
in
local
government.
I
can
say
that
peggy's
truly
been
alphabetized
and
what
I
mean
by
that
is
she's.
She
knows
all
about.
Cdbg
ship
home
she
sat
through
presentations
at
some
level,
approved
22,
capers,
22
aaps
five,
a
hacks
she's
approved
seven
l
happs.
A
So
I
think
you
can
see
where
I'm
going
with
this
alphabet
thing.
She's
she's
helped
to
provide
guidance
on
all
of
our
regulatory
plans
for
housing.
Community
development
work
along
along
the
way
we've
sprinkled
in
they
have
discussions
with
some
emergency
funding
like
we're
dealing
with
now
not
long
ago,
there
was
nsp
money
that
was
intended
to
pull
people
out
of
the
recession.
A
Peggy's
been
part
of
helping,
you
know
really
tens
of
thousands
of
clearwater
residents
and
with
community
development
and
housing
needs.
So
I
want
to
thank,
I
want
to
thank
peggy
for
her
dedication
and,
more
importantly,
for
your
professionalism
and
your
in
your
kindness.
So
thank
you.
So
if
any
board
members
want.
G
C
It's
been,
it's
been
a
real
trip.
I
mean
I've
learned
a
lot
being
on
this
board.
I've
met
some
amazing
people
along
the
years.
I
got
on
this
board
from
a
commissioner
by
the
name
of
mamie
hodges.
She
knew
I
was
in
real
estate,
we
bowled
together
and
she
says
you
need
to
get
on
this
board.
Well,
I
got
on
the
board
and
then
she
left
so
I've
been
here
all
the
time
and
she's.
You
know
still
out
there
somewhere,
but
it
was
good.
It
was
a
good
experience.