►
From YouTube: Eviction and Landlords Committee Meeting 11 09 2021
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
Again,
meetings
at
four
o'clock-
and
we
want
to
be
respective
of
your
time
so
that
you
can
get
to
work
and
do
what
you
need
to
do.
A
I'm
lisa
goodwin,
the
deputy
city
manager
here
and
on
october,
the
26th
we
had
the
initial
meeting
of
the
landlords
and
presented
to
them,
and
what
I
have
provided
to
you,
of
course,
is
just
the
the
meat
of
what
we
discussed
on
october,
the
26th,
which
were
the
three
options
and
the
option
that
was
selected
by
the
landlords
at
that
time
was
option
three
that
they
come
up
with
the
plan
that
would
be
acceptable
to
to
the
city.
A
And
so
that's
why
we're
here
today
we
asked
those
who
were
interested
in
serving
on
that
committee
to
acknowledge
acknowledge
that
on
their
way
out,
they
put
you
put
the
check
mark
by
your
name.
There
were
22
of
the
60
that
were
at
that
meeting
that
opted
to
serve
on
the
committee
and,
of
course,
a
sign
up
there,
but
that
did
not
prevent
anyone
else
from
coming
and
attending
the
meeting.
But
at
any
rate,
those
who
are
here
whether
it's
the
committee
members
or
just
other
landlords,
you
have
the
voice.
A
It's
going
to
be
your
decision
on
what
you
want
to
do
as
long
as
it's
something
that
the
city
can
agree
on.
I
want
to
thank
city,
councilor,
charmaine
crabb
for
being
here,
and
she
has
been
very
instrumental
in
helping
us
through
this
process.
In
the
back.
You
have
the
director
of
public
works,
michael
criddle
and
the
director
of
our
inspections
and
codes,
ryan,
pruitt,
and
thank
them
both
for
being
here
as
well,
and
there
will
be
representation
from
the
sheriff's
office.
A
The
assistant
city
attorney,
lucy
schefthall,
was
supposed
to
be
at
this
meeting.
She
did
not
even
attend
council
today,
because
she's
ill,
but
I
have
her
on
the
phone,
and
so
what
I'm
going
to
ask
is
that
for
those
with
you
have
your
questions
or
whatever
your
comments
are.
If
you
will
please
come
to
the
mic,
because
we
certainly
want
her
to
hear
not
yet,
but
we
want
her
to
hear
what's
being
said
so
that
I
will
put
a
microphone
so
that
you
could
hear
her
response.
A
B
Thank
you,
everybody
for
coming
just
a
quick
background.
As
has
been
stated,
there
were
three
options
given
with
regard
to
removing
bulk
items
from
right
away
after
evictions,
both
one
and
two.
The
first
two
options
entailed
a
500
eviction
fee.
One
was
paid
in
advance,
one
is
paid
after
the
fact,
but
we
do
have
a
third
option
and
that
was
for
property
managers,
landlords
to
get
together
and
come
up
with
a
solution.
That's
better
than
than
option
one
and
two
one
quick
thing
and
I've
had
a
good
conversation
with
councillor
crabb.
B
The
city
attorney
and
the
sheriff
have
looked
at
the
law,
the
eviction
laws
and
they
have
indicated
there
is
no
law
that
states
you.
A
landlord
must
put
the
tenant's
belongings
on
the
right
of
way
for
them
to
retrieve
them.
It's
always
been
a
custom,
but
there
is
no
law,
so
apparently
the
items
can
be
removed
with
no
delay.
B
So
it's
not
a
blight
to
the
city,
but
anyway
I
personally
I
mean
I'm
not
in
favor
of
number
one
or
number
two
I
I
would
be
in
favor
with
a
four
day
period
in
which
landlords
have
to
clear
the
right-of-way
in
front
of
their
property
of
debris
or
maybe
three
business
days
and
there's
also
been
some
talks
about
contractors
hired
to
do
evictions
being
allowed
to
take
the
bulk
items
to
the
landfill
and
have
the
landfill
waste
fees
waived,
provided
they
show
proof
that
the
bulk
items
they
have
were
for
an
eviction.
B
I
think
that's
a
great
start
and
that's
something
that
I
would
be
in
favor
of
so
I
think
really
the
landlords
are
helping
the
city
out
by
getting
rid
of
what
can
potentially
be
a
mess,
and
I
think
the
the
the
city
could
help
the
landlords
by
letting
us
expedite
the
process
waiving
the
fee.
We
can
get
our
property
rent
ready,
much
quicker.
B
So
that's
what
I'm
in
favor
for
of
and
I'd
like
to
hear
from
everybody
else
what
they
might
be
in
favor
of
so
we
can
get
everybody's
ideas
and
you
make
will.
A
B
My
interpretation
from
the
city's
proposal
was
that
the
the
landlord
had
to
give
the
tenant
24
hours
to
retrieve
their
belongings
and
if
the
tenant
did
not,
then
on
the
25th
hour,
the
city
would
do
it
and
charge
five
hundred
dollars.
But.
C
D
C
C
D
F
D
What
happens
is
the
judge
does
give
the
tenant
a
seven
day
notice
and
so
and
then,
and
so
we're
wondering.
Does
that
count
as
that
24-hour
notice.
F
F
C
See
they
already
have
seven
days,
that's
more
than
24
hours
and
the
judge
gives
them
seven
days
and
it
ain't
always
seven
days
that
the
sheriffs
can
set
them
out,
sometimes
it's
usually
after
them,
but
they
are
on
hold
for
seven
days
now.
That's
the
ones
that
do
come
to
court,
the
ones
that
don't
come
to
court,
don't
get
that.
F
A
maximum
time,
not
an
exact
term,
and
I
did
speak
with
the
judge-
and
you
know
he
obviously
doesn't
want
to
get
involved
in
this
process
and
all.
But
he
did
indicate
that
he
can
has
concerns
about
tenants
having
adequate
notice
on
the
with
and
the
ways
the
seven-day
notices
are
served
and
just
that
there'll
be
an
adequate
opportunity
to
retrieve
the
prop
a
reasonable
opportunity
to
retrieve
the
property.
F
And
I
know,
certainly
an
argument
can
be
made
that
you
know
they
know
it
could
happen
anytime
in
this
window.
Therefore,
there
shouldn't
need
to
be
any
further
notices,
but
you
know
richard
what
we
don't
want
to
do
is
put,
in
effect,
an
ordinance
that's
going
to
make
the
landlords
at
risk
for
converting
someone's
property.
C
A
And
so
lucy,
if
you
can
hear
him,
he's
saying
that
the
best
time
is
once
it's
up
set
out,
then
that's
the
opportunity
for
the
landlords
to
go
ahead
and
do
what
they've
got
to
do
to
remove
it.
The
tenants
have
already
had
opportunity,
they've
already
had
notice
and
the
landlords
just
want
to
clear
it
before
others
start
coming
in
and
scattered
scavenging.
F
A
And
she's
saying
she's
looked
at
some
other
ordinance
for
ordinances
from
other
cities
and
they
require
containerization
and
that
once
it's
containerized,
then
you
know
it's.
It
won't
go
everywhere,
but
then
that's
still
giving
them
opportunity
to
remove
their
stuff,
but
in
a
more
structured
way,
because
it's
now
containerized.
A
C
F
A
I
know
they're
having
a
difficult
time
really
in
terms
of
clarity,
lucy
understanding
you,
and
so
I
think
what
we
will
do
is:
let's
just
go
ahead
and
get
all
the
comments,
let's
hear
from
them,
and
then
we
will
then
have
time.
You
know
to
look
at
the
recordings.
Get
all
the
notes
then
answer
it
so
that
the
next
meeting
or
what
we
can
do
with
the
most
emails
that
we
have.
We
can
send
you
out
the
responses
and
then
continue.
A
A
C
Thing
used
to
when
we
did
it
with
the
marshals,
we
would
walk
from
getting
our
writ
to
the
marshal's
office
and
they
would
schedule
the
time
right
then
and
write
it
down
and
hand
it
to
you.
Now
you
hand
it
to
the
sheriff's
and
they
call
you
in
the
next
day
or
two
and
schedule
it.
So
we
don't
have
nothing
in
right,
neither
like
otherwise
we
could
go
post
it
on
the
door
and
take.
C
A
G
G
G
D
G
A
A
A
There's
a
difference
in
that
you
it's
a
process
that
you
have
initiated
it's
a
process
that
you
have
initiated.
I
think
we're
beyond
you,
the
city,
picking
it
up.
We
are.
The
city
has
already
already
made
the
determination
that
we
will
not
pick
up
that
property
when
there
is
an
eviction,
because
we
have
so
many
other
issues
going
on
in
terms
of
waste
in
the
city.
We
can't
continue
to
do
that.
We
are,
I
think,
at
the
last
meeting.
A
Of
course,
we
indicated
you
know
the
lack
of
resources
that
the
city
has
we're
already
behind
in
picking
up
ways
from
pro
for-profit
businesses
such
as
the
landlords.
So
we
can't
continue
to
do
what
we've
always
done,
because
we're
going
to
keep
getting
the
same
result
and
the
same
result
is
dirty
a
dirty
community
that
we
have
to
live
in.
So
we're
not
going
to
continue
to
do
that.
So
that's.
A
Why
we're
here
today
to
come
up
with
the
process
that
you
can
help
us
with
to
ensure
that,
when
that
eviction
is
set
out,
that
the
neighbors
are
not
having
to
look
at
that
live
through
that
people
aren't
able
to
come
in
scavenge
and
just
thin,
the
winds
blow
and
stuff
is
everywhere.
That's
the
problem
that
we
have
so
the
question
is
you
know
why
are
we
not
doing
what
we've
always
done,
because
we're
trying
to
get
it
right.
G
A
A
G
A
G
A
With
a
solution,
remember
I
sit
in
the
same
seat
that
you
sit
in.
I
too
am
a
landlord,
and
I
know
that
that
whatever
you
decide
will
affect
me
as
well
and
my
properties,
I
get
it,
but
the
thing
is
I'm
responsible
for
my
properties
and
so
I'm
responsible
for
the
way
they
look
and
those
neighbors
in
the
neighbor
that
street
that
has
to
live
around
my
property.
G
I
know
a
couple
of
landlords.
A
I
Yes,
my
name
is
don.
J
I
I
just
had
a
few
questions
for
the
community
here
and
the
fact
is
that
she
replied
that
it's
not
a
responsibility
anymore
because
of
resources
and
where
the
resources
come
from,
I
mean
not
employee,
but
you
already
said
you
had
contract
people.
You
can
have
for
contract
to
do
this
job
for
the
city
that
call
out
or
who's
sick
or
you
just
can't
find
any
help.
So
what
resources
have
you
been
using
before
to
do
that.
D
Your
the
this
meeting
is
not
to
discuss
that
kind
of
stuff.
What
this
meeting
is
all
about
is
to
give
landlords
the
opportunity
to
come
up
with
a
plan
on
how
they
are
going
to
work
with
the
city
in
order
to
keep
the
bulk
waste
from
evictions
off
of
the
off
of
their
property
and
off
of
the
right-of-way,
and
to
keep
the
city
clear
from
the
eviction
debris.
D
I
I
Well,
the
issue
is,
I
guess,
it's
500
that
we
all
talking
about.
That's
the
big
thing.
So
that
is
the
issue.
It
always
boils
down
to
finances,
so
we
were
just.
I
was
just
wondering
what
happened
to
the
resource
before
because,
as
we
all
know,
taxes
are
still
being
raised,
every
quarter
we're
paying
out
what
are
these
funds
going
to.
C
B
I
want
to
say
I
sympathize
with
with
everybody
here.
You
know
for
as
long
as
I
can
remember,
the
city
is
picked
up
bulk
waste.
I
do
think
we
had
a
perfect
storm.
B
We
had
an
eviction
moratorium
that
had
a
backlog
of
addictions
and
then
in
september
we
had
a
lot
of
them
at
the
same
time
that
we
had
a
labor
shortage
and
we
you
know
there
was
a
problem,
but
I
think
even
before
that
the
city
was
struggling
to
pick
up
bulk
waste
and
from
a
landlord's
perspective,
it
became
an
issue
with
us,
because
we'd
wait
one
week,
then
we
wait
a
second
week
and
then
citizens
would
go
through
the
items
make
a
mess.
B
And
I,
and
I'm
with
you,
the
500
option
is
just
not
tenable
for
for
me
or
any
of
my
landlords.
So
that's
why
I'm
here
to
to
find
a
solution.
That
is
a
lot
better
than
that.
I
think
we
can
clear
the
debris
much
more
efficiently
and
and
get
something
done,
but
I'm
with
you,
you
know
that
that's
that
was
the
old
way
and
but
it
just
looks
like
it.
I
D
I
A
Well,
let
me
say
that
the
city's
preferred
option
is
number
two,
and
so,
when
you
mention
those
bulk
waste
vendors
that
we
have
our
our
solution
is
that
we
will
use
those
bulky,
waste,
vendors,
all
18
of
them,
and
what
we
will
do.
A
That
was
not
the
option
that
those
in
attendance
wanted,
and
so
that's
why
we
said
you
can
come
up
with
another.
That's
the
only
option
that
we
have
is
to
use
those
persons
in
that
way.
That's
why
the
city
contracted
with
them,
because
we
can't
even
go
out
and
pick
up
all
of
the
waste.
That's
out
there
on
the
streets
right
now
because
of
a
lack
of
resources.
A
A
I've
already
indicated
you
pay
18
in
your
for
the
garbage
fee
for
four
pickups,
and
I
don't
want
to
go
back
through
that
presentation
again
and
that
is
for
household
waste,
recycling,
bulky
waste
and
for
yard
waste.
Bulky
waste
is
what
you
put
out.
Not
eviction
waste
totally
different,
but
we
I'll
certainly
be
open
to
have
a
one-on-one
with
you
if
you
want,
but
I
want
to
give
others
an
opportunity
as
well.
I
K
There
is
money
in
the
city
budget,
we
pay
taxes
and
we
pay
them
through
the
no's,
because
we
have
the
highest
at
volume,
taxes
in
the
state
of
georgia
for
commercial
property,
because
partially
because
of
the
tax
freeze
and
all
that
now
all
these
years
the
city
has
been
picking
up
this
stuff
part
of
the
money.
You
know
it's
in
the
budget,
so
it's
a
question
of
how
much
budget.
Why
don't
we?
K
Let's,
let's
form
a
committee,
let's
go
out
there
and
see
if
we
can
find
some
private
contractors
that
will
work
for
cheaper
than
the
ones
the
city
has
found,
and
let's
let
the
city
pay
the
bill,
but
by
golly
we
pay
the
taxes,
and-
and
here
it
is,
you
know
we
just
passed
another
splost,
so
we
could
tear
down
a
perfectly
good
building
and
put
up
another
one
for
200
million
dollars.
Why
wasn't
any
money
allocated
for
this
serious
problem
in
that
splost?
K
If
it
was
an
issue,
you
know
what
I'm
saying
is
the
city
wants
to
just
be
be
done
with
wash
with
it
and
just
say:
hey,
you
guys,
pay
for
it
all
of
a
sudden
and
we're
just
gonna
get
out
of
the
out
of
out
of
funding
this
stuff
at
all,
so
he
was
dead
on.
He
was
talking
about
where's
the
month,
the
resources,
the
money,
the
money
is
there
in
the
city
budget.
It
may
not
be
enough
to
do
everything
that
needs
to
be
done,
but
it's
there.
K
If
you
want
us
to
go
out
there
and
see
if
we
can
find
better
vendors,
you
know
and
then
issue
them
your
way
so
that
you
could,
you
know
or
we'll
negotiate
a
price
on
them,
that's
better
than
the
price
you
got
from
the
private
contractors.
Now
fine,
but
not
our
money.
We
have
to
spend
our
money
doing
the
things
we
do
paying
the
taxes
that
are
supposed
to
pay
for
this
service.
K
D
I
think
where
we
get
mixed
up
in
in
this
situation
is
we
we
get.
The
lines
are
blurry
between
residential.
D
You
know
what
you
pay
for
residential
trash
pickup,
which
is
and
and
and
we-
and
this
is
actually
a
for-profit
business-
any
retail
establishment
out
there
they
pay
for
trash
pickup
from
another
service.
You
know
they
have
their
dumpsters,
they
have
all
of
these
things.
D
The
lines
get
a
little
bit
blurry
when
this
is
a
residential
property
and
garbage
gets
set
out,
and-
and
I
agree
with
the
person
who
spoke
earlier
about
you
know
this
isn't
just
an
eviction
issue.
This
happens.
I
mean
when
people
move
from
one
house
to
the
other,
we're
in
real
estate.
We
see
how
it
how
it
happens.
You
know
sometimes
we
take
a
listing
and
the
owner
has
moved
out
and
they
leave
stuff
on
the
on
the
you
know
in
the
yard.
D
L
L
I
guess
the
penalty
for
leaving
your
items
in
said
owner's
property
because
as
it
stands
now,
if
they
are
evicted
and
they
choose
to
up
and
leave
and
not
take
any
of
their
belongings,
they
have
absolutely
no
consequence
other
than
possibly
having
the
owners
take
them
to
court
through
civil
through
a
civil
action
so
other
than
that
they're
clavi
they're
off
with
their
lives.
They
have
no
other
responsibilities
to
the
mess
that
they
left.
So
if
we
start
incorporating
consequences
for
the
tenant,
if
they
so
decide
to
leave
or
whatever
situ
whatever.
L
Now,
of
course,
there
are
some
situations
where
that
can't
be
prevented
if
they're
ill.
There
was
a
passing
whatever
you
know.
Those
extenuating
circumstances
are,
but
for
those
who
have
just
decided
to
not
do
the
right
thing,
I
think
there
should
be
some
involvement
on
their
behalf,
also,
which
would,
I
think,
eliminate
a
lot
of
the.
I
probably
shouldn't
leave
all
of
my
items
in
this
house.
I
should
probably
take
as
many
things
with
me
as
I
can
and
to
also
speak
to
ricky's
point.
I
think
it's
a
great
idea.
L
Maybe
we
can
revise
the
eviction
process
so
that
we're
not
having
to
take
to
do
a
double
process
when
it
comes
to
evicting
the
tenants
where
they've
been
given
ample
time
past
the
court
date.
If
they
show
up,
then
the
judge,
of
course
you
know,
presents
the
option
of
having
the
seven
days
to
remove
their
items
at
that
time.
L
But
from
that
point
you
eliminate
the
majority
of
the
issue
if
we're
allowed
as
landlords
to
go
in
immediately
after
that
time
period
is
up
and
remove
the
items
ourselves
from
the
house
to
the
dumpster,
because
they've
had
that
adequate
time
they've
been
told
you
have
seven
days
to
remove
your
items
and
vacate
the
property
and
they're
making
that
choice
within
that
seven
day
period
to
either
stay
and
wait
to
the
last
minute.
But
again
that's
on
that
would
be
their
responsibility
and
not
the
owners.
L
L
E
B
Agree
with
just
about
everything
you
said,
one
thing
that
is
sort
of
along
the
lines
of
consequences
is
the
there
have
been
credit
reporting
agencies
that
have
solicited
us
to
use
their
credit
reports
and
they
tout
that
they
can.
B
They
can
let
you
know
if
a
tenant
has
been
evicted
in
so
many
states
or
counties
or
whatever,
and
one
of
the
counties
that
did
not
participate
was
muskogee,
and
so
I
wonder
if
someone
with
the
city
could
look
into
that,
and
that
way
we
might
could
have
some
consequences
for
tenants
and
property
managers
could
could
get
that
information
before
they
went.
Do
you.
B
M
D
So
yeah
that
seems
like
that
would
be
something
very
simple:
that
muscogee
county
could
report
that
I
don't
know
who
I
don't
know
if
it
comes
from
the
sheriff's
department
or
I
would
think
that
it
would
come
from
the
sheriff's
department,
because
that's
who
does
all
of
our
defections
now
and.
D
N
Hi
everyone,
I'm
jane
dunn.
I
agree
with
this
lady.
N
I
think
there's
certainly
some
benefit
to
having
the
tenants
responsible
for
a
portion
of
this,
but
let.
N
Bit
my
main
question
is:
do
we
still
have
the
city,
the
assistant
city,
attorney
on
the
on
the
line?
Yes,
I
have
a
question
about
and
I
find
this
unique.
I'm
a
former
property
manager,
former
broker
from
elsewhere.
Muskogee
county
is
new
to
me
in
the
last
10
years,
but
I
find
part
of
the.
I
think
where
we're
at
number
one
boils
down
to
money.
N
N
So
we're
talking
about
another
month
that
not
only
am
I
not
getting
rent
from
the
current
tenant.
I
cannot
rent
the
property
out,
but
my
question
to
to
the
attorney
is
columbus
or
any
municipality
able
to
strict,
strictly
or
strengthen
the
state
laws
that
we
now
that
the
sheriff's
office
operates
under
that
we
operate
under
as
landlord-tenant
law.
Does
the
city
have
a
right
to
strengthen
laws
locally
for
our
community.
A
F
A
N
Home
in
the
landlord's
property,
then
they
are,
they
do
in
fact
become
the
landlord's
property
number
one.
Then
we
can
bring
in
our
regular
cruise,
take
it
off
all
at
once,
and
it
never
stays
on
the
curb.
I
feel
like
the
length
of
time
that
it
takes
from
the
time
my
property
manager
files,
the
eviction
request
until
it
gets
to
court,
especially
when
a
tenant
contests,
and
I
understand
that
I've
never
seen
a
tenant,
actually
pay
money
into
the
court
for
the
privilege
of
contesting.
N
But
I
think
that,
if
that
were
done,
we
probably
wouldn't
have
as
many
contested
evictions
but
that's
another
subject.
I
just
feel
like
at
some
point
as
a
city,
we
should
be
able
to
strengthen
this
to
say:
okay,
it
shouldn't
be
the
city's
problem.
It
shouldn't
be
an
extra
500
to
the
landlord
and
it
shouldn't
blight
the
curb,
by
sitting
there
and
being
picked
through
by
the
vultures
after
the
24
hours.
We
have
a
hard
time
finding
resources
too
for
both
ways.
F
With
this,
we
can
certainly
make
an
ordinance
that
says
in
columbus,
georgia.
Eviction
property
is
not
to
be
set
on
city
right
away.
I
mean
that
can
be
done.
That's
actually
what's
anticipated
by
this
state
law,
and
it's
only
because
our
executing
officers
have
traditionally
permitted
it
to
be
on
the
right-of-way
that
it's
ever
been
on
the
right
away.
To
begin
with,.
N
What
I'm
proposing
would
eliminate
the
need
to
set
it
on
the
curb
period
now.
Could
this
be
enacted
by
the
end
of
the
year
so
that
it
goes
into
effect
in
january?
No,
I'm
just
saying
that
I
see
there's
a
lot
deeper
issues
that
should
be
addressed,
and
I'm
not
sure
where
to
take
that,
but
I
think
it
would
be
a
good
solution
for
this
group.
That's.
A
N
A
N
O
First
of
all,
thanks
for
inviting
us
here,
everybody
should
know
that
the
sheriff's
office
has
nothing
to
do
with
the
eviction
process
other
than
serving
the
eviction
notices,
the
risks
and
possessions.
Then
we
show
when
the
eviction
is
scheduled.
We
show
up
at
the
eviction
site
to
secure
that
scene
to
make
sure
it's
safe
for
the
landlord
to
take
possession
of
nowhere
in
the
law.
O
Does
it
provide
for
the
sheriff's
office
to
put
their
hands
on
any
property
other
than
something
that
is
illegal
in
their
I.e,
drugs
or
something
that
cannot
be
put
out
onto
the
property
itself,
we'll
take
any
drugs
firearms
that
are
left
there
or
weapons
pornography
things
like
that
and
we'll
secure
them
for
the
owner
to
come
and
pick
them
up
after
90
days.
We
can
then
do
something
through
cold
order
to
take
care
of
them,
but
the
sheriff's
office
will
not
put
their
hands
on
anything.
O
O
That
is
a
command
for
us
to
go
out
and
give
you
the
landlord
possession
of
that
property
period.
It
is
not
to
say
for
us
to
divvy
up
who
can
get
it
where
it
goes,
how
it
goes.
That's
why
all
we
do
is
require
you
to
have
the
people
there
to
get
it
out
of
the
house
to
give
you
possession
of
that
property
period.
That
is
all
the
sheriff's
office
is
going
to
be
able
to
do.
If
we
do
anything
else
now,
the
sheriff's
office
has
now
incurred
liability
for
that
property.
O
That's
why,
whenever
we
get
property,
we
have
to
do
a
report
on
it,
put
it
in
our
property
evidence
section
and
give
it
90
days
and
then
dispose
of
it
through
the
legal
process.
That
is
the
extent
of
which
the
sheriff's
office
can
do
it
any
law
enforce
throughout
the
state.
That
is
how
it's
done.
They
cannot
decide
what
the
landlord
does
with
the
property.
None
of
that
is
within
our
program.
C
O
K
O
That
the
process
of
setting
it
on
the
right-of-way
was
enacted,
but
just
in
my
general
knowledge
of
why
it
was
probably
done
was
because
just
that
the
law
says
that
when
we
leave
it
has
become,
it
becomes
abandoned.
It's
just
like
setting
your
trash
can
out.
They
want
you
to
set
it
up
on
city
property,
because
that
way
they
can
come.
They
can't
come
on
my
property
and
get
trash.
It
has
to
be
on
city
curtis.
So
that's
why
we
I'm
I'm
surmising
now
this
is
long
before
I
got
into
this
business.
O
A
Okay-
and
we
are
saying
now
that
the
city's
position
is
that
the
set
out
should
be
from
this
point
forward
on
private
property,
not
on
public
property,.
F
C
O
J
Very
short
person,
I'm
deborah
wright-
and
I
did
hear
a
couple
of
good
points
today
to
resolve
the
city's
issue.
Number
one,
this
young
lady
right
here
that
addressed
that
it
could
be
the
tenant's
responsibility.
That
seemed
like
a
great
idea,
saves
the
landlords
saves
the
city
and
maybe
it
could
be
addressed
to
their
water
bill.
Since
that's
where
trash
pickup
is
picked
up.
That
sounds
like
a
great
idea.
J
Okay
and
then
I
know,
y'all
have
a
problem
getting
stuff
off
the
right
away
because
I've
seen
it
sit
there
and
if
maybe
it
sits
there
or
something
like
that,
and
they
don't
come
pick
it
up,
because
I
believe
in
letting
them
have
a
chance
to
come
pick
up
their
stuff.
Maybe
they
couldn't
get
it
out
by
their
date.
Maybe
they
did
need
a
day
or
two
more.
J
J
O
P
All
courts
are
going
through
that
all
every
legal
attorney
all
attorneys
are
now
e-filing.
So
it's
all
online
you're
able
now,
if
you'll
go
to
the
city
website,
go
to
the
sheriff's
office
page
and
look
up
where
it
says:
inmate
search,
it'll,
bring
you
to
a
page
and
at
the
bottom
you
can
look
at
the
bottom.
It'll
have
an
odyssey
look
up.
You
can
actually
look
up
and
see
when
your
paperwork
is
being
served
when
it's
been
served
without
having
to
call
without
having
it
it's
automatically.
P
When
soon
as
we
get
it
back
to
our
office,
scan
it
through.
We
return
it
back
to
that
core.
It
updates
through
that
odyssey
system,
so
that
you
won't
can
look
up
your
rigs
and
your
summons
and
dispose
online.
But
the
reason
why
we
can't
set
up
any
big
state
right.
P
Then
there
is
because
the
clerks
have
to
process
it
and
send
it
through
odyssey
to
our
our
tracking
system
is
civil
serve
and
that's
when
we
enter
in
pass
it
through
and
we
that's
how
we
keep
up
with
what
papers
are
being
served,
setting
up
evictions
and
going
through
that
process.
So
that's
the
typical
that's
the
one
or
two
day
delay,
but
I
mean
currently
we're
we're.
We
are
running.
P
P
We
don't
do
them
and
we
can't
do
them
in
the
rain
or
inclement
weather.
If
it's
sprinkling,
then
there's
there's
a
thing,
but
they
the
officers
that
go
out
and
determine
what
the
inclement
weather.
C
P
So
what
we
do
is
we
set
up
a
nine
o'clock
at
ten
o'clock.
We
set
up
a
nine
o'clock
at
ten
o'clock
at
eleven
o'clock
and
then
two
one
o'clock
and
then
at
two
o'clock
on
on
monday,
through
thursday,
with
the
exception
of
fridays.
P
Now
for
the
nine
and
ten
o'clock
we
typically
hold
those
for
mass
properties
like
apartment
complexes
or
stuff,
like
that
when
they
have
like
10
or
10
or
15
units
to
do
it
one
time.
So,
instead
of
us
going
back
and
forth,
we
can
knock
out
that
group.
But
yes,
I
mean
we
do
as
long
as
there's
a
72
hour
change
in
the
time,
because
we
are
not
sending
any
notification
to
the
tenant
we
go
through.
We
can
set
it
up
and
we
can
make
that
change
within
our
calendar.
D
Tacking,
like
we
used
to
so
that
that's
24
hours,
that's
so
that's
a
notice
so
that
items
can
actually
be
put
into
a
truck
taken
out
of
the
house
and
put
right
into
a
truck
what
needs
to
happen
in
order
for
the
landlords
to
do
that,
because
I
truly
believe
that
that
idea
solves
everybody's
problems.
Q
O
Remember
now,
a
a
tenant,
just
like
a
landlord
can
send
an
agent
to
take
care
of
their
property.
So
if
I'm
going
to
get
a
vision,
I
know
I
have
to
work,
and
I
send
my
brother
to
take
care
of
my
property.
Then,
if
somebody's
there,
whether
that
be
me
or
an
agent
guess
what
that
property
is
not
abandoned
if
somebody's
there
with
it
that
is
representing
the
owner.
Now,
I'm
not
a
I'm,
not
an
attorney.
I'm
not
trying
to
give
you
any
legal
advice.
I'm
just
saying
the
sheriff's
office
perspective
is.
O
I
get
that
and
but
there's
nothing.
We
can't
make
a
decision
on
that,
because
that
is
not
our
problem
to
decide
one
way
or
the
other,
so
we
don't
have
a.
We
can't
have
a
as
they
say
the
dog
in
that
fight,
because
then
now
we're
becoming
an
agent
to
decide
who's
going
to
get
the
property.
We
cannot
give
anyone
permission
to
take
something
out
of
a
house
or
to
leave
it
in
there.
What
the
only
thing
we
can
do
if
we
get
there
and
a
landlord
says.
O
O
Against
the
landlord
you
have
to
make
sure
you're
within
the
law
of
any
eviction.
All
we're
there
to
do
is
make
sure
those
things
that
are
required
by
the
sheriff's
office
are
carried
out.
We
get
there,
we
secure
that
doorman
or
office
space
or
whatever
it
may
be.
If
it's
a
business,
we
give
you
possession
of
it
your
job
as
a
landlord
is
to
give
now
take
that
property
out
of
your
property,
so
that
the
tenant,
if
they
want
it,
can
get
have
access
to
it.
O
O
O
We
just
don't
have
we
ran
out
of
manpower
and
marshall's
office,
but
but
we
were
doing
a
whole
lot
more
than,
but
now
we're
doing
all
of
them.
If
you
look
at
a
whole
year,
you're
talking
about
close
to
9
000
pieces
of
paper
that
come
through
to
do
evictions,
we
don't
do
all
of
them,
but
we
do
about
4
300
to
5
000
of
them.
Think
about.
O
O
E
Q
So
back
back
to
my
my
question:
if
we're
saying
that
the
sheriff's
office
comes
and
gives
us
possession
of
our
dwelling
and
the
property
is
placed
on
our
property
and
quote
unquote,
it's
abandoned
when
you
all
leave
is
considered
abandoned
then,
what's
what
do
we
have
any
protection
from
us?
If
we
take
it
and
and
dump
it
or
are
we
opening
ourselves
up
to
civil
liability?
Q
Is
that
a
matter
of
everything
being
passed
on
to
the
landlord
because
you
know
could
couldn't
we
couldn't
there
be
a
an
ordinance
that
something
adopted
to
where
once
it's
set
out
on
that
property
and
you
all
leave
it's
abandoned,
and
then
that
gives
us
if
we've
got
legal
cover
to
take
it
to
the
land,
the
landfill,
then
the
problem
solved?
I
just
don't
understand
so.
Q
D
Q
Q
D
A
Lucy,
can
you
hear
mr
powell,
I
think
we've
indicated
there
there
isn't?
Is
there
anything
in
writing
codified
on
the
24
hour
notice
to
the
tenants.
A
A
A
F
If
there's
no,
I
was
on
you,
there
is.
There
are
legal
cases
that
refer
and
they
are
just
as
binding
as
the
statutes
of
the
general
assembly
that
refer
to
having
a
reasonable
opportunity
to
retrieve
the
tenant's
property
and,
in
one
case
in
2015,
the
court
of
appeals
specifically
said
that
the
24
hours
was
sufficient.
A
D
D
Be
the
official
the
attack,
the
attack
24
hours
prior
to
the
sheriff
coming.
Q
So
so,
then
is
the
is
the
requirement
for
a
reasonable
opportunity
to
get
the
stuff?
Is
that
24
hours
a
matter
of
interpretation
or
where
does
that?
Where
does
that
come
from
because
the
process
itself
allowed
they
they
leave
and
I'm
not
there?
They
know
they're
being
evicted
and
they
know
what
they're
leaving.
So,
I'm
trying
to
understand
where's
this
reasonable
opportunity
to
get
their
stuff
they.
What
they
typically
do
is
leave
what
they
don't
want.
D
F
The
concern
in
the
state
statute
is,
it
says
the
property
is
abandoned
and
that
the
landlord
won't
be
considered
a
bailey
of
the
property.
In
other
words,
they
don't
have
to
be
responsible
for
its
security
or
someone
comes
and
takes
it
off
the
pile,
but
in
cases
where
the
landlord
has
appropriated
the
property
to
their
own
use.
That's
when
you
the
fact
that
the
writ
of
execution
has
happened,
the
courts
have
held
has
not,
you
know,
been
sufficient
to
give
landlord
title
to
dispose
of
the
property
for
their
benefit.
D
Okay,
so
tom
calhoun
and
I
had
talked
previously
about
possibly
when
we,
when
the
sheriff
leaves
do,
are
we
given
any
kind
of
a
piece
of
paper
when
you
leave
or
have
we've
already
received
the
writ
right?
I
don't
do
very
many
evictions
thing,
but
so
I'm
kind
of
and
then
so
are
you
given
a
paper
with
a
with
a
set
out
date.
D
Okay,
well,
what
I'm?
What
we
were
discussing
was
the
possibility
that
you
have
the
set
out
and
the
landlords
can
could
take
the
property
right
then
and
there
to
the
landfill,
or
they
would
have
say
three
business
days
to
take
it
to
the
landfill
and
if
they
have
that,
if
they
have
that
paper
showing
the
date
of
the
set
out,
then
when
they
take
it
to
the
landfill,
then
the
landfill
charges
are
waived.
D
So
then
gosh,
I
forget
what
I
was
where
I
was
going
with
this.
Q
The
only
problem
right
now
is
is
that
that
window
of
opportunity
for
them
to
get
it
and
and
if
we
can
close
that
door
and
we've
got
the
waiver
from
the
landfill,
then
we'd
be
glad
to
get
the
property
out
of
our
place
and
and
take
it
to
the
landfill
and
be
done
with
it.
So
then
we
can
go
in
and
try
to
fix
our
place
that
they
just
tore
up
right.
D
I
mean
it's
it's.
What
all
of
us
really
do
want
to
do.
We
just
we've
all
been
told
different
things
and
even
today,
we're
being
told
different
things
on
when
we
can
actually
take.
Oh
that's
what
I
was
that's
what
I
was
getting
to
so
we
get
a
receipt
at
the
landfill
showing
that
we
took
it
to
the
landfill.
D
A
Well,
I
guess
my
comment
on
that
was
I
don't
know
that
it
all
it
would
say
is
that
you
took
material
to
the
landfill,
it
will
not
say
this
is
what
you
took
in
from
where,
and
so
we
would
have
no
way
of
verifying
that.
A
D
We
could
that
would
be.
That
would
show
that
it
was
their
items.
That's
a
good,
that's
a
good
point
too.
So
so
it'd
be
no
different
than
us
preparing
for
court.
The
way,
the
same
way
we
prepare
for
court
on
an
eviction
we
take
our
own
prop.
We
take
our
own
pictures,
we
have
the
receipt
from
the
landfill
and
then
we
just
keep
those
in
that
file.
Q
And
and
again
you
know
we
go
through
this
eviction
process
and
those
and
and
and
those
they
have
access
to
our
property
up
until
the
time
you
guys
come,
they
have
access
to
our
property
up
until
the
time
you
guys
come.
I
don't
understand
why
that's
not
a
reasonable
amount
of
time
they're
in
there
for
days
and
weeks
until
you
guys
come
so.
Why
do
we
need
to
afford
these
people
that
are
in
default,
another
opportunity
to
come
and
get
their
prop
their
property
from
in
front
of
our
place?
O
But
since
I
started
the
martial's
office
in
2005,
coming
from
the
police
side,
when
we
were
serving
24-hour
notice,
we
would
never
we're
never
going
to
tell
them
when
their
conviction
is
that's
up
to
the
landlord,
but
for
officer
safety.
We'll
never
tell
them
we'll
be
there
nine
in
the
morning,
because
we
don't
want
someone
to
sit
up
because
we've
had
meth
labs
people
selling
dope
out
of
their
houses
or
they're
in
there
with
their
guns
and
everything
else.
So
they
know
we're
coming.
It
becomes
a
public
safety
issue
for
us
and
the
neighborhood
itself.
A
O
Advocating
telling
people
hey
be
ready
for
the
sheriff's
office
when
they
come
at
nine
o'clock
in
the
morning,
you
can
give
them
20.
I
mean
we
always
if
the
landlord
wants
to.
We
can't
tell
you
what
to
do.
The
sheriff's
office
is
not
going
to
tell
a
tenant.
You
know
we'll
be
there
nine
o'clock
on
tuesday
we're
not
going
to
do
that,
because
that
puts
our
deputies
at
risk
for
somebody
to
set
up.
O
What
would
be
the
problem
if
the
landlord,
once
we
leave
knight's,
abandon
it's
on
right
now,
it's
on
the
city
right
away,
but
now
the
landlords-
you
still
have
to
get
that
property.
If
you
don't
want
to
you
know,
if
that's
the
legal
question,
I
don't
I
don't
get
that
part
when
you
say
put
it
keep
it
on
private
property,
but
it
becomes
abandoned.
O
Q
Let
me
ask
you
a
question
because
we
get
we
get
notified
when
the
sit-up
date
is
what,
if
we
send
them
a
registered
letter,
seven
to
ten
days
prior
to
the
eviction
and
say
that
you're
you're
in
process
of
being
evicted
and
you're
in
danger
of
losing
leaving
your
property
after
we
don't
give
them
the
date
but
say
once
the
eviction
is
executed,
your
property
becomes
abandoned
property
and
you
lose
all
right
to
reclaim
the
property.
Q
Why
we
just
send
them
a
a
certified
letter
that
they
have
to
sign
for
and
if
they
don't
sign
for
don't
come
back,
I
mean
we
will
have
proof
that
we
sent
it
out
that
we
gave
them
warning
that
they
were
under.
They
were
on
the
eviction
and
subject
to
lose
their
property.
Why
can't
we
just
do
that
and
that
would
get
that
would
afford
that
reasonable
opportunity
for
them
to
get
their
stuff
if
they.
D
Well,
I'm
pretty
sure
that
that
is
that
that
that
is
legally.
M
B
But
you
know
just
to
reiterate
what
I
said
earlier.
I
think
landlords
ought
to
be
given
three
to
four
days
to
clear
the
whole
property
and
if
the
tenant
has
one
day,
we
know
that
the
tenant's
probably
not
gonna,
to
get
their
belongings.
We
know
there's
a
risk
of
a
mess
being
made,
but
after
that
24-hour
period
expires.
We
have
the
right.
We
should
have
the
right
to
clear
it
within
three
business
days,
48
hours
whatever's
been
suggested.
I
think
that's
reasonable.
B
Legislature,
you
know
I'm
kind
of
fearful
for
us
to
be
toying
around
with
this,
because
we
we
know
that
it's
already
tenant
friendly
and
if
we
get
into
a
big,
if
we
make
a
big
issue
of
it
and
they
start
revising
these
laws,
my
fear
is,
they
might
even
make
it
more
tenant-friendly.
So
I'm
okay
with
the
laws
the
way
they
are.
B
But
one
last
thing
is
the
columbus
board
of
realtors
they're
meeting
tomorrow
at
two
o'clock,
they're
going
to
have
suggestions
coming
out
of
the
board,
I'm
going
to
get
give
that
to
lisa
and
charmaine
and
and
then
the
comments
that
y'all
made
tonight
are
going
to
be
given
to
to
the
officials.
So
I
think
we
can
come
up
with
some
good
solutions,
but.
E
B
A
B
Never
been
it,
the
judges
have
never
enforced
it
because
judges
are
elected
officials
and
and
and
they
they
want
to
be
fair
and
but.
B
And
and
because
they
don't
pay
into
the
registry
of
the
court
at
the
time
of
that
filing,
we
have
to
rule
nysite,
which
is
a
motion
to
compel
them
to
pay
monies
into
the
court
and
that's
a
separate
hearing.
So
the
reason
the
nice
site
hearing
exists
is
because
they
don't
pay
their
money
into
the
registry
of
the
court
at
the
time
that
they
file
an
answer,
and
I.
G
B
N
I'll
try
to
be
brief.
Lisa
mentioned
earlier
that
we
were
here
to
fix
the
problem
that
the
city
has
with
the
bulk
waste
issues.
N
I
think
the
24-hour
notice,
I'm
still
not
clear
on
the
sheriff's
major
said
they
can't
do
it.
They
don't
have
the
personnel
to
do
it.
It's
not
official
if
the
landlord
does
it
so
somehow
we
need
if
we
could
agree
on
something
there
that
would
be
considered
official,
even
if
we're
doing
it
to
help
them
out
because
they
are
short
staffed.
I
think
most
of
us
would
probably
be
willing
to
do
that.
N
Can
it
be
determined
that
that
notice
be
given
24
hours
before
the
set
out
date
way
when
the
sheriff's
deputies
arrive,
our
crews
arrive,
the
tenant
has
had
24
hours
notice
that
the
appellate
court
said
was
reasonable
and
their
stuff,
if
it's
still
there,
most
of
which
is
usually
trash
at
that
point,
they've
gotten
the
good
stuff.
It's
not
like.
We
were
going
to
make
anything
off
of
it,
but
it
could
go
directly
from
the
house
into
the
truck
to.
A
A
D
What
we'd
like
we,
what
we
would
like
clarification
on
is
how
we
could
how
what
is
the
legal
ways,
and
there
may
be
more
than
one
of
delivering
that
24
hours
notice
could
could
the
writ
be
considered
because
they're
given
seven
days,
you
know
so
that's
well
over
24
hours
notice.
D
F
D
I'm
going
to
say
something
right
now.
As
an
official,
you
know
an
elected
official.
We
have
to
do
better
right
now.
We've
got
to
figure
out
a
way
in
the
city
of
columbus
that
these
landlords
can
pick
up
the
property
that
is
left
behind
at
the
time
of
set
out,
and
I
don't-
and
I
don't
know
who
we
want
to
talk
to
or
what?
If
do,
we
have
to
send
something
up
on
a
legislative
agenda
just
to
change
it
at
the
state
level,
but
we
need
to
fix
this
because
it
is
the
pivotal.
D
It's
the
pivotal
issue
of
a
lot
of
different
problems
with
the
with
the
real
estate
industry
and
the
landlord
industry,
with
the
bulk
waste
in
you
know,
for
the
city
for
the
neighbors
that
are
living
next
to
it.
This
is
pivotal
and
it's
creating
a
problem
in
our
city
and
we
need
to
fix
it.
So
can
the
can
the
city
attorney's
office
look
into
ways
of
helping
us
get
around
these
laws
and
make
it
easier
for
the
landlords
to
do
what
we're
asking
them
to
do.
E
D
To
do
then
I'll
do
that,
but
I'd
like
for
us
to
be
creative
on
a
local
level,
because
that's
going
to
happen
a
heck
of
a
lot
faster
and
we
have
a
little
bit
more
and
no
not
just
a
little
bit.
We
have
a
lot
a
bit
more
control
over
that
because
you
know
everybody
here
is
living
with
this,
and
the
10
of
us
are
living
with
this
and
we
can
vote
on
it
and
we
have
control
over
it.
F
And
you
know
just
to
give
a
little
background.
Some
of
the
distinctions
here
come
from
the
fact
that
the
dispossessories
that
are
simply
to
get
the
tenant
out
and
don't
involve
proper
personal
service
and
don't
involve
a
money
judgment
for
rent
are
considered
differently
from
the
distress.
The
actions
that
you
bring
as
a
personally
served
lawsuit
to
get
the
tenant
out
and
recover
back
rent
and
in
those
you
know,
property
rights
and
abilities
to
collect
might
be
entirely
different.
F
But
we're
talking
about
you're,
just
standard
just
possessively
and.
D
F
Well,
yes,
the
one
I
was
mentioning
in
thomaston.
What
they
do
is
they
require
it
to
be
put
in
a
container
for
24
hours
and
then
remove
removed
from
the
property
thereafter,
and
I
think
one
option
here
might
be
that
we
simply
address
the
fact
that
executing
officers
will
no
longer
direct
the
property
to
put
on
the
right-of-way
that
it
be
set.
F
Aside
on
the
tenants
I
mean
on
the
landless
property
is
provided
by
georgia
law,
and
then
we
say
it
will
be
removed
and
no
longer
on
the
property
so
48
hours
after
execution,
or
else
the
city
will
have
the
right
to
come,
remove
it
like
it
would
any
other
complaint
about
junk
on
a
property
and
recharge
and
put
a
lien
on
the
property
for
the
cost.
If
it's
not
paid.
F
So
I
mean
that's,
and
that
way
we're
not
we're.
Just
saying
it's
going
to
be
legally
set
out
by
the
sheriff
and
we're
saying
it's
not
going
to
stay
on
the
property
more
than
a
certain
number
of
hours
to
create
junk,
but
in
between
that
it's
on
the
landlord
how
they
decide
to
dispose
of
it.
And
that
might
be
an
option.
E
Q
B
That's
a
good
question
and
that's
a
legal
question
and
I
don't
I
don't
think,
there's
complete
clarity
on
what
is
the
law
right
now
you
know
case
law
is,
is
important
and
there
was
case
law
where
a
court
determined
that
the
tenant
should
have
had
a
reasonable
time
to
retrieve
their
belongings
and
that
time
was
24
hours.
So
you
know
I.
Q
But
what's
this,
but
what
says
that
reasonable
time
has
to
be
after
it's
put
out:
they
have
the
key
until
they
they
come
anyway.
I
agree
we
don't
get
possession
until
it's
out.
They
have
possession
before
we
get
it
yeah.
So
once
once
we're
given
possession
of
our
our
property-
and
this
and
their
stuff's
put
on
our
property
and
they're
not
supposed
to
come
back,
what
are
we
affording.
B
M
B
Correct,
that's
correct,
they're
not
come
back
on
the
property
and
that's
why
they
put
it
on
the
they've,
always
directed
us
to
put
it
on
the
right.
The
only
exceptions
have
been
when
the
right-of-way
wasn't
big
enough
for
all
the
belongings,
then
they
would
have
put
it
on
private
property.
But
that's
a
discretionary
thing
that
that
officer
has
and
sheriffs
can
speak
more
in
detail
about
that.
But
I
I'm
I'm
somewhat
apprehensive
about
too
much.
B
Issue
20
years
ago,
there
was
an
issue
where
some
advocates
wanted
landlords
to
store
the
tenants
belongings
for
indefinite
periods
of
time.
So
again
the
you
know,
I
think
the
landlords
here
can
come
up
with
something
reasonable
without
getting
too
many
people
involved.
They
don't
don't
understand
the
nuances
of
landlord-tenant
relationships.
B
I
think
we
ought
to
come
up
with
something
simple
and
and
be
done
with
it,
because
if
too
many
people
will
get
their
hands
in
this,
some
things
could
could
get
rough.
So
I'm
in
favor
of
of
the
landfill
waiving
the
tipping
fees
for
contractors
that
have
eviction
papers
and
I'm
in
favor
of
giving
the
landlord
three
to
four
days
to
completely
remove
all
the
belongings
to
me
that
simple,
we
don't
need
any
legislative
process
for
that.
D
D
R
J
D
K
K
Well,
so,
what's
what
about
the
money?
That's
in
the
budget
for
that
right
now,
even
if
it's
not
adequate
to
do
everything
you
know
again,
we
pay
all
these
tax.
All
these
taxes,
you
know,
and
now,
on
top
of
that
we're
going
to
be
responsible
for
removing
the
stuff
from
the
right-of-way
to
the
landfill.
I
don't
think
that's
right.
K
No,
no,
no
ma'am,
no,
no
correction
correction:
we
are
paying
serious
property
taxes
to
the
city
of
columbus.
That
has
a
budget
and
a
budget
item
in
there
is
operating
the
the
grab
all
trucks
to
do
this
very
thing
that
they've
done
for
years
and
years
and
years
now
the
city
has
a
problem
because
we
we
can't
stay
up
with
it.
You
know
we
need
more
money
or
we
need
more
private
contractors
or
whatever.
K
D
E
D
Vacant-
and
I
can't
show
that
property
with
with
that
in
the
front
yard
and
call
me
a
control
freak.
I
want
to
be
in
control
of
of
the
property
that
I
manage
for
my
owners
so
that
I
so
that
I
know
that
it's
going
to
be
rent
ready
with.
K
D
K
D
D
What's
happening
and,
unfortunately,
what
I
think
will
might
happen
is
we
are
going
to
have
less
affordable
housing
because
it's
going
to
it's
going
to
turn
around,
you
know
we're
business
people.
So
what
are
we
going
to
do
we're
going
to
turn
around
and
we're
going
to
recoup
our
expense
through
raising
the
rent,
raising
security
deposits
to
cover
this
expense?
K
K
You
know:
there's
it's
a
market
situation,
there's
only
so
much
the
market
can
bear.
We
all
know
this,
because
we
have
to
set
deposits
where
the
market
will
allow
the
tenant
to
pay
a
deposit
to
pay,
rent
and
so
forth.
So
you
know
this
is
the
thing
I'm
objecting
to
is
the
city
is
abdicating
its
responsibility
totally
they're,
just
saying
you
know
we
got
a
problem,
you
landlords
fix
it,
you
at
your
expense
and
we're
just
we're
just
out
of
this
business.
K
That's
all
I
I
disagree.
I
think
the
city
should
continue
to
bear
responsibility.
Why
not
have
the
grand
ball
truck
show
up
at
the
very
moment
that
the
that
the
sheriff
is
there
to
evict?
We
can
take
the
stuff
right
out.
Grandma
can
put
it
in
it's
not
on
the
curb
it's
not
a
blight
on
the
community.
Sound
like
a
plan
to
me,
but
the
city
needs
to
pay
for
that
grab
all
coming
around
following
the
sheriff
for
the
for
the
evictions.
B
Thanks
jim,
I
I
don't
totally
disagree
with
a
lot
of
what
you
said,
but
it
just
looks
like
if,
if
we
don't
come
up
with
something
something's
gonna
be
passed,
that
that
would
be
much
worse.
Q
I'm
just
thinking
again
we
we
said
that
we'd
be
willing
to
compromise
to
do
that
part
of
it,
but
this
20
this
12,
this
24
hour
thing
is
what's
causing
us
to
have
to
bring
another
crew
back
the
next
day.
That's
what
I'm
saying
if
we
can,
if
we
can
fix
that,
then
we're
not
spending
our
time
two
days
in
a
row
to
handle
an
eviction
for
somebody,
that's
in
default
to
give
them
24
hours
to
come
back
and
get
what
they
want
and
then
leave
the
rest
of
it
for
us
to
take
it
off.
N
D
We're
we're
asking
you
guys
to
to
work
with
us
so
that
at
least
you
have
some
buy-in
into
this.
I
mean
I
do
not
want
to
sit
up
here
and
and
vote
a
burden
onto
people
without
having
some
buy-in
on
on
your
part,
and
I
think
you
guys
have
come
up
with
some
really
great
ideas
here
tonight
and
I
just
and-
and
I
think
it
was-
I
think
it
was
you
ricky
that
came
up
with
this
idea.
You
know
about
putting
it
straight
into
a
truck.
Last
time
too,
I
mean
it's
brilliant.
B
Yeah
yeah
one
thing
I
wanted
to
add
counselor
crab
did
I
mean
if
I
hope
I
didn't
hear
that
the
city
is
looking
to
to
on
regular
bulk
items
for
people
that
moved
out
or
whatever
it
sounds
like
that
y'all
are
talking
about
eventually
having
additional
fees.
I.
D
B
So
you're
saying
not
just
landlords,
you're
saying
home
owner
occupied
homes.
D
Yes,
we're
required
by
law,
we're
required
by
law
to
do
household
waste
recycling
and
are
we
required
to
do
yard
by
law,
or
is
that
just
something
that
we
do.
D
B
I'm
just
you
know
mainly
talking
about
landlords
and
property
owners.
I
just
think
we
need
to
have
laws
that
are
not
too
restrictive
so
that
we
encourage
investment
for
people
to
want
to
buy
property.
I.
B
Investors
buy
properties
nine
out
of
ten
times
they
they
fix
them
up,
they
bring
them
up,
they
provide
a
place
for
someone
to
live
and
collect
rent.
It's
good
for
the
city,
and
my
only
fear
is
that
if
we
have
too
many
ordinances
that
are
punitive
to
landlords,
that
that
could
discourage
investment,
so
I
you
know
the
state.
B
H
H
I
don't
think
where
they
come
into
play.
The
tenant
moves
this
material
into
your
property.
The
landlord
had
nothing
to
do
with
move
them
in
sure
they.
I
think
the
tenants
should
be
also
a
factor
in
this
equation,
because
when
they
are
being
evicted
from
us,
we
are
already
in
the
hole
with
the
tenants.
B
H
D
B
G
B
Would
be
in
favor
of
of
the
garbage
fee
that
is
paid
with
the
columbus
water
works
bill?
If
that
were
raised
enough
and
I'm
sure
the
city
is
going
to
say,
that's
just
for
a
regular
garbage
pickup,
I
don't
know
what
their
position
on
that
is,
but
I
will
be
in
favor
of
a
marginal
increase
to
compensate
for
the
the
bulk
waste
removal.
That's
a
great
idea.
S
S
I
think
we
should
get
a
vote
on
some
of
the
other
things
that's
been
discussed
today,
so
that
when
you
go
to
the
meeting
at
least
you'll
have
more
of
a
feel
of
what
everyone
here
is
thinking,
because
you
know
it's
been
discussed
on
both
sides,
so
maybe
there
should
be
a
show
of
hands
on
the
different
options.
That's
been
discussed.
B
S
D
B
Well,
I
don't
think
we
have
too
many
and.
D
Let
me
tell,
let
me
tell
you
the
reason
why
we're
doing
this
is
because
you
know
with
evictions
is
because
they're
trackable
we
can,
we
can
track
them.
We
can't
track
when
someone
moves
out
of
one
of
our
properties.
We
can't
track
when
you
know
when
it's
an
owner
putting
their
stuff
out.
You
can
track
evictions
because
it's
going
through
the
court
system.