►
From YouTube: Legislative Delagation Agenda 2016C
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
B
Those
twenty
legislative
agenda
items
came
from
various
council
members,
some
council
members
had
three
or
four
others
had
two
or
three.
Some
had
two.
Some
have
one.
A
few
of
them
came
from
city
staff,
two
of
those
legislative
agenda
items
you
asked
that
they
be
delayed
and
I
bring
them
back
this
week
and
so
I
didn't
just
bring
back.
B
B
The
legislative
delegation
introduced
and/or
support
legislation
to
authorize
a
ref
to
allow
Georgia
citizens
to
vote
as
to
whether
they
want
to
allow
casino
gaming
in
Georgia
for
the
purpose
of
hope,
scholarship
funding
and
so,
madam
mayor,
we're
asking
for
your
approval
to
allow
this
legislative
agenda
item
to
move
forward.
I've.
C
Let's
say
that
last
Tuesday
I'm
getting
several
emails
of
individual
ask
me
not
support
casino
gambling
come
into
Columbus
but
and
I
wrote
back
in
Italian,
where
I'm
asking.
What
we
were
asking
for
is
that
the
legislators
allow
the
citizens
of
the
state
of
Georgia
to
vote
whether
they
want
it
or
not.
In
this
state,
that's
all
we're
asking
at
this
family.
Okay,
we
hate
it
with
tant.
C
We
did
it
whoo
several
tax
issues,
you
did
it
on
the
breeze
and
when
it
passes
or
not
that's
up
to
the
citizens
and
that's
what
we're
asking
so
for
somebody
to
go
out
and
tell
somebody
that
I'm
asking
us
to
vote
on
bringing
the
casino
here.
That's
not
true
I'm
asking
that
we
have
the
right
as
individuals
in
the
United
States
to
vote
on
whether
we
wanted
in
Georgia,
not
all.
D
You
mayor
in
the
last
week,
I've
had
an
opportunity
to
call
up
to
Atlanta
and
talk
some
folks
that
I
know
that
trying
to
get
a
better
understanding
of
this
and
granite
everybody
needs
to
understand
this
is
we
haven't
even
discussed
this
matter
up
until
about
two
or
three
weeks
ago,
when
it
popped
up
on
this
legislative
agenda.
I
want
everybody
to
understand
that
I.
D
D
Right
now,
I
still
think
it's
a
little
early
I
think
it's
a
little
premature
and
I
keep
asking
the
question.
Why
do
you
need
me
today
why
you
asking
me
today
to
endorse
this
Wow
vote
on
what
there's
no
referendum
you're
asking
me
to
endorse
the
referendum.
I
only
know
what
it's
about,
I
don't
need,
it
I
haven't
even
seen
it
I
haven't
even
I,
already
know
what
they're
talking
about
up
in
Atlanta
I
hear
they're
talking
about
all
different
kinds
of
things.
Our
last
year
there
might
have
been
nine
eleven
bills
that
were
introduced.
D
I,
don't
even
know
what
those
bills
stated,
I'm,
not
sure
other
than
the
topic
casino.
Gambling
now
didn't
know,
and
you
know,
and
reading
the
article
and
I
appreciate
all
the
comments
tonight
and
read
the
article.
It
does
say
that
there's
many
many
many
lobbyists
that
had
been
hired
and
there's
right
now,
67
lobbyists
that
have
been
hired
last
year,
there's
only
12
that
were
hired,
so
I'm,
not
sure
I'm,
not
sure
the
message
that
we're
trying
to
communicate
here.
But
look.
D
We
have
state
representatives
that
our
elected
officials
and
that's
their
job
is
to
do
the
business
up
in
Atlanta,
and
you
don't
need
my
endorsement.
You
just
need
to
go
those
guys
and
ask
them
to
work
in
Atlanta.
That's
what
it's
all
going
to
happen.
It's
not
going
to
happen
here
and
then
let
them
bring
it
back
to
us.
So
we
can
see
what
it
is
and
then
we
can
have
that
conversation
I
want
to
participate.
D
People
called
and
I
said:
I
can't
tell
you
what
it
is,
and
so
there's
a
lot
of
suspicion,
a
lot
of
just
trying
to
understand
and
grasp
and
try
to
figure
out
what
we're
talking
about
so
I
think
there's
still
a
lot
of
work
in
Atlanta
I'm,
not
sure
what
my
places
in
this,
because
there's
not
I
mean
I,
don't
want
people
to
think
that
there's
gonna
be
a
vote
coming
up
here
soon,
there's
not
unless
somebody
knows
something
I,
don't
know.
How
do
you
know?
D
Columbus
is
gonna,
get
them
a
casino
I,
don't
even
know
if
what
kind
of
casino
I
don't
even
know
I
have
no
understanding
of
this
at
all.
I.
Don't
think
anybody
does
so
at
the
end
of
the
day,
I
mean
as
you
go
through
the
process.
What
in
finality?
What
is
it
going
to
look
like?
What
is
it
gonna
be
so
I
think
the
city
in
my
position
from
from
this
standpoint,
I
think
it's
a
little
premature
for
me
to
endorse
this
matter,
because
it
is
a
major
issue.
D
We
haven't
even
discussed
this
matter,
so
you
know
not
I
I
will
never
stand
in
the
way
of
somebody's
right
to
vote.
But
I
think
at
this
point
that
it's
a
little
premature
and
understanding
and
I
would
like
to
receive
more
input.
I
would
like
more
input
to
come
from
Atlanta
I
would
like
our
state
legislatures
to
to
come
here
and
tell
us
what's
going
on
and
what
this
is
about
and
what's
gonna
happen
this
coming
year
and
what's
gonna
happen
in
the
next
year?
D
I
want
to
understand
that
I
think
we
all
need
to
understand
that
so
I
think
you
know
with
my
remarks
again,
I'll
say
I'm
not
taking
a
position
on
this
at
this
point,
but
I
think
it's
a
little
premature
and
I.
You
know
I
do
question
if
it's,
why
I'm
telling
the
state
legislature
to
legislature
to
to
craft
something
that
I
have
no
clue?
What's
what
it's
all
about.
E
Amount
whole
understanding
of
this
is
that
we
are
talking
about
concept
here.
Whether
or
not
our
citizens
in
this
state
want
to
allow
gambling
at
all,
then
we're
gonna
have
to
tailor
a
basically
this
legislation
or
the
ordinances
to
allow
gambling
within
the
city
and
Ross
again
through
that
state
level.
This
is
simply
to
see
what
the
citizens
want.
E
E
This
gets
us
a
seat
at
the
table.
They're
very
legitimate
concerns
related
gamely.
Their
concerns
about
the
arts
I
want
us
to
have
a
seat
at
the
table
when
we
discuss
that
I,
don't
want
a
gust
having
a
casino
Savannah,
have
a
casino
Atlanta,
having
a
casino
and
then
non-competes,
preventing
our
arts
facilities
from
gain
the
best
entertainers
and
getting
the
best
arts.
E
E
If
this
is
something
that
becomes
a
local
issue,
and
then
we
can
talk
about
these
issues
related
the
arts,
and
we
can
help
control
that
rather
than
be
controlled
by
and
I,
think
we
seriously
need
to
consider
at
least
allowing
our
citizens
the
opportunity
to
express
to
us
what
their
desire
is
and
what
their
wishes,
because
otherwise,
if
Augusta
supports
it,
Savannah
supports
it.
We
may
be
left
behind.
This
may
be
one
of
those
issues
where
you're
left
behind.
E
F
I'm
reminded
of
the
chicken
and
the
egg
I'm
not
sure
which
one
should
come
first
in
this
conversation
as
I
have
done
some
research
over
this
last
week,
particularly
I
found
a
number
of
things.
One
of
the
things
that
I
have
found
is
that
the
whether
or
not
casinos
are
allowed
in
the
state
of
Georgia
will
take
a
constitutional
amendment
by
the
legislature
and
in
order
for
a
constitutional
amendment
to
be
enacted,
it
must
be
voted
on
by
the
people
of
the
state
of
Georgia.
F
F
What's
there,
the
others
that
were
there
was
one
that
was
70
pages
long
and
I
will
tell
you
that
I
read
a
good
bit
of
those
70
pages
and
it
was
very
detailed
in
what
would
be
allowed
and
what
would
not
be
allowed,
and
one
of
the
things
that
it
said,
for
example,
is
that
there
would
be
two
regions
in
the
state
of
Georgia.
In
order
to
have
casinos,
one
of
those
regions
would
be
the
ten
counties
around
Atlanta
and
those
10
counties
around
Atlanta.
You
could
have
two
casinos.
F
F
It
was
to
that
specificity
in
that
detail
in
this
in
this
piece
of
legislation,
and
it
went
on
to
talk
about
the
Gaming
Commission
and
how
it
would
be
formed
and
so
forth,
and
all
of
that
that
particular
piece
of
legislation,
the
cities,
the
municipalities,
had
little
or
no
say-so
in
what
went
on
with
the
casinos.
It
did
not
provide
for
a
vote
of
the
folks
in
that
municipality.
F
F
If
you
will
I'm,
not
sure
of
the
exact
terminology,
but
pre-filed
I
guess
is
the
word,
and
so
one
of
the
things
that
that
I
have
heard
and
I
heard
very
clearly
and
I
agree
with
a
hundred
percent-
is
that
if
there
are
going
to
be
ramifications
for
a
local
municipality
in
these
casinos,
we
need
to
be
at
the
table
to
have
that
conversation
about
how
will
that
affect
the
city
of
Columbus?
How
will
that
affect
our
consolidated
government
and
I?
Don't
know
mr.
city
manager
if
it
would
be
appropriate
to
change.
F
That
goes
up
there,
and
one
of
those
items
may
very
well
be
that
the
local
municipality
has
to
vote.
When
in
listening
to
the
speaker's
here
tonight
on
the
public
agenda,
it
seemed
to
me
that
there
were
some
of
them
who
were
talking
about
the
vote
on
the
constitutional
issue,
for
everybody
in
the
state
of
Georgia
will
vote
on
this.
And
then
there
were
some
who
were
talking
about
the
local
municipality
voting
and
those
are
two
two
different
items.
Do
we
want
those
in
the
bill?
We
need
to
talk
about
that.
F
We
need
to
talk
about
that.
Our
legislature,
the
legislative
delegation-
and
we
have
not
done
that
this-
this
item-
that
is
here,
talks
about
to
allow
Georgia
citizens
to
vote
as
to
whether
they
want
to
allow
casino
gaming
in
Georgia.
That's
the
constitutional
amendment
piece
for
the
purpose
of
hope.
Scholarship
funding
is
that
is
that
all
that
we
would,
we
would
support
suppose
the
the
legislation
comes
out
and
does
more
than
support,
hope,
scholarship
or
don't
support,
hope
scholarship
to
any
great
degree
or
whatever
it
is.
F
We
have
not
had
the
opportunity
to
sit
down
with
our
delegation
and
talk
to
them
about
what
is
important
to
us
and
to
our
community
and
I.
Think
we
need
to
do
that
before
we
can
say
we
support
this.
We
support
it
with
reservations.
We
don't
support
it.
We
do
whatever,
because
I
think
dr.
Wright
is
absolutely
correct,
that
we
need
to
have
a
voice
in
how
this
piece
of
legislation
will
affect
us.
I
think
we
need
to
bring
to
that
conversation,
some
of
the
folks
from
our
arts
community.
How
will
this
affect
you?
F
What
can
we
do
in
the
legislation
to
make
sure
that
you're
not
wiped
out?
You
know
all
of
those
kinds
of
things
we
we're
not
there
yet
so
I
I'm
having
a
hard
time
going
to
support
this
tonight,
based
on
just
what
is
here
if,
if
it
were
to
say
we'll,
get
together
with
our
delegation
and
talk
about
it,
I
wouldn't
have
a
problem
at
all
in
in
supporting
it,
I'm,
not
sure
where
our
delegation
stands.
F
Signed
on
to
legislation
to
any
other
legislation
that
piece
of
legislation
that
70
piece
legislation
that
I
told
you
about,
there
were
five
sponsors
for
that
three
of
them
from
those
ten
counties
in
Atlanta,
one
of
them
from
Savannah
and
one
of
them
from
Augusta.
So
that
sort
of
tells
you
where,
where
those
folks
are
going
at
any
rate,
this
is
an
issue
that
I
think
is
going
to
be,
is
going
to
continue
to
be
talked
about
throughout
the
city
and
one
I
want
us.
F
I
want
to
step
back
to,
and
one
other
thing
I
want
to
tell
you
I've.
Had
a
number
of
people
say
to
me:
this
was
sprung
on
us
at
the
last
minute.
No
one.
This
has
been
on
the
city
manager's
agenda
for
at
least
a
month
at
least
a
month.
It
was
there
we
knew
about
it.
We
didn't
have
a
discussion
about
it,
but
it
was
on
the
agenda.
It
was
provided
on
the
website.
F
It
was
provided
to
the
media.
The
news
media
didn't
choose
to
bring
attention
to
it,
but
this
was
not
sprung
on
us.
The
city
manager
did
not
do
that
to
us.
He
told
us
about
this
early,
October,
I
think
at
least,
and
so
for
those
people
who
are
saying
this
is
some
kind
of
nefarious
scheme
to
get
it
under
the
wire
and
not
so.
People
won't
know
what
we're
doing.
That's
not
true.
F
We
knew
about
it
and
perhaps
it's
you
know
our
fault
for
not
finding
some
other
way
to
let
you
know
about
it,
but
it
was
there.
I,
don't
know
mr.
city
manager,
when
it
when
it
first
appeared
on
your
agenda,
but
it's
been
at
least
a
month.
I
know
that
so
my
my
I
guess,
my
in
in
comment
is:
let's
make
haste
slowly
on
this
on
this
piece
of
business
and.
B
Madam
mayor
may
I
just
respond
to
the
city
manager.
I
mean
it's
obviously
always
the
city
manager
and
but
you
know,
as
I
presented
this
item.
I
explained
how
the
legislative
agenda
comes
together.
If
anyone
has
a
problem
with
casino
gaming
being
on
the
referendum,
don't
blame
the
city
manager,
this
time,
blame
the
sponsors
and
that
would
be
Mayor
Pro
Tem,
Evelyn
turnip
you
and
Councilwoman
Mimi
Woodson,
and
so
what
we've
said
throughout
the
process
and
I
don't
mean
that
literally.
B
But,
as
we've
said
throughout
this
process,
we've
had
referrals
from
councilmembers
dating
back
a
year.
We,
the
Chamber
of
Commerce,
called
me
last
night
with
the
third
one
on
the
list.
This
is
an
evolving
agenda
and
if
a
councilmember
calls
tomorrow
and
says
you
know,
I
forgot
something
and
I
want
to
put
it
on
the
agenda.
Guess
what
it's
going
on
the
agenda?
It's
not
that
the
city
manager
was
hiding
it
and
sprung
it
on
you
and
so
I
didn't
make
the
agenda.
B
B
If
council
members
want
something
on
to
be
taken
up
by
the
let
by
our
delegation
will
bring
a
resolution
we'll
vote
on
and
we'll
drive
it
to
Atlanta
if
we
have
to,
and
so
that's
how
they
legislative
agenda
comes
together,
not
that
I
put
I
I
decided
that
we
were
going
to
have
20
21,
22
items,
and
so
I
just
wanted
to
make
that
clear.
It's
not
the
city
manager
and.
F
G
You
mayor
I'll,
try
not
to
rehash
some
of
the
stuff
that
my
colleagues
have
already
mentioned.
It's
unlikely
that
I
would
ever
vote
against
allowing
and
I
never
have
voting
would
be
allowing
the
folks
in
this
community
to
vote
on
things
that
impact
this
community
I.
Did
it
with
the
Tad's
I.
Did
it
with
the
Thal,
the
tax
freeze
and
some
of
those
are
very
unpopular,
but
it,
but
frankly
it
sticks
with
my
philosophy
of
how
can
I
not
afford
that
opportunity
to
people
without
telling
I.
Don't
trust
them.
They
elected
me.
G
G
I,
didn't
I
didn't
take
the
right
initiatives
this
past
week
to
try
to
get
some
of
the
answers
to
a
few
of
the
questions
that
still
linger,
one
that
I
haven't
heard
mentioned
here,
but
they
kind
of
I
just
want
somebody
to
answer
me
whether
it's
from
our
delegation
or
whoever.
Whoever
has
the
knowledge
to
be
able
to
answer.
If
if
it
goes
to
a
referendum
statewide
and
if
it
passes
and
Muscogee
County,
it
does
not
pass
in
Muskogee
County
conceivably.
G
Could
there
still
be
gaming
in
Muskogee
County,
because
the
point
of
giving
them
a
voice
is
to
be
able
to
have
some
direction
here
in
the
community
that
they
live.
So
that's
one
of
the
questions
there's
some
other
questions.
If
the
if
the
concerns
from
the
arts,
community
and
I
haven't
had
a
chance
to
sit
down
with
mr.
Pierce
or
some
of
the
other
folks
involved
in
the
arts
community,
if
some
of
those
concerns
are
I,
guess
they're,
there
I
won't
say
exaggerated,
because
that
makes
it
sound
like
you're
making
stuff
up.
G
But
if
they
turned
out
to
be
inflated,
then
I
want
some
assurance
that
there's
some
data
to
back
up
some
of
the
some
of
the
concerns
that
they
share
or
to
refute
those
concerns.
So
I
get
back
to
one
common
theme,
I
think
and
that
is
I
feel
like
this
is,
is
going
quicker.
Then
maybe
it
needs
to.
We
have
time
in
my
mind,
to
get
the
answers
to
these
questions
and
still
send
this
back
up
to
our
legislative
delegation.
A
A
H
I'm
not
sure
this
is
going
to
be
the
first
time
we
have
endorsed
something
because
you
know
how
legislation
is.
Legislation
has
to
be
worked.
Okay
and
all
we
ask
and
fall
is
together
citizens
of
right
to
vote
on
the
Constitution
amendment.
Now,
there's
a
lot
of
you
know.
Fortunately,
we
have
Calvin
Smyre
up
there,
who's
on
the
committee
and
I'm
sure,
as
the
legislature
began
to
do
that
work
there
will
be
input
as
to
how
this
legislation
should
take
place.
H
Secondly,
is
my
understanding
I'm
sure
that
many
bills
have
been
introduced,
but
the
bill
that
that
that
I
know
about
and
I've
been
told
about
is
that
there
will
be
Columbus,
Savannah,
Augusta
and
Atlanta
for
sites?
Okay,
now,
if
it
passes
the
state
and-
and
we
passed
that
Constitution
amendment,
it
would
still
have
to
come
back
for
local
referendum,
it
was
let
me
repeat
that
it
would
still
have
to
come
back
to
a
local
referendum.
H
Now,
if
you
believe
in
a
right
of
people
to
vote,
you
can
say
we
believe
in
a
right
of
people
to
vote
on
this,
but
let's
make
sure
within
the
legislation,
local
delegation
that
is
going
to
come
back
here
for
us
to
vote,
which
I
think
is
a
good
thing
and
that's
my
understanding
and
perhaps
answer
the
question
that
you
let
us
yeah.
We
all
know
when
we
all
know
how
sausage
is
made
and
we
can't
sit
up
here
and
figure
out
how
all
the
sides
are
gonna
be
made
before
they
start
doing
that
deliberations.
H
But
we
can't
say
well:
I
love
the
delegation.
This
is
what
we
will
warn
in
you
and
I.
Think
y'all
can
do
that
now.
I
think,
and
do
that
now
we
want
a
local
referendum,
make
sure
we
get
a
local
referendum.
So
it
comes
back
to
the
people
of
Columbus
to
decide
whether
they
want
it,
but
let
it
change
if
we
don't
get
Columbus
at
the
table.
H
Let's,
let's
not,
let's
not
deny
the
people
to
write
on
the
Constitution
amendment
and
let's
tell
our
local
delegation
those
things
we
would
like
to
see
in
it
if
it
passes
that
would
protect
constantly
Henderson
what
you're
talking
about
and
council
the
time
what
you're
talking
about
I
don't
think
we
can
sit
up
here
and
and
figure
out
all
the
legislation.
We
don't
do
that
at
the
council.
H
D
Know,
doctor
Radha
I
have
a
greatest
amount
of
respect
for
you
and
I
appreciate
everybody
getting
up
and
taking
the
time
to
come
up
here
and
share
or
not.
You
know,
I,
listen
to
everything.
That's
said,
and
you
know
a
lot
of
what
is
said
is
what
I
want
as
well.
But
you
know
you've
you've
got
I've
heard
a
seat
at
the
table.
We've
got
a
seat
at
the
table.
We've
got
the
people
there.
We've
got
state
elected
representatives
that
are
that's
what
they're
doing.
D
This
is
a
state
matter,
but
I
just
heard
I
just
heard
that
if
we
don't
endorse
it,
then
it
may
not
happen
but
I.
Think
I
gotta
have
some
confidence
in
my
state
legislature.
We
got
somebody
to
own
the
committee
and
we
got
people
who
are
up
there.
Who
you
know
can
make
things
happen
and
I
mean
I.
Don't.
D
The
bottom
line
is
I'm,
a
local
elected
official
and
I
have
constituents
that
I
represent
and,
as
councillor
Thomas
said,
we've
only
known
about
this
for
about
a
month
up
until
the
day,
I
just
started
hearing
from
people
yesterday
and
today,
I
heard
from
people
today
and
I'm
not
going
to
tell
you
what
the
comments
were,
because
there
was
an
article
in
the
paper
people
started
reading
it
I
think
what
I'm
saying
is
that
it's
when
I
say
premature
and
endorse
in
a
matter.
I
got
to
have
this
conversation
with
my
constituents.
D
I've
heard
a
lot
of
comments
tonight
that
tell
me
that
this
is
not
next
year
or
the
following
year.
It
could
be
three
four
five
years
from
now.
So
what's
the
rush?
Well,
madam
mayor
I
mean
I.
If
there's
anybody
else
that
would
like
well,
we've
got
members
from
the
arts
community.
Hear
me
if
they
would
like
to
express
their
concerns,
I
think
it's
appropriate
to
allow
them
to
to
come
on
it
comment
on
it.
If
anybody
would
like
to
comment
on
it,
okay,.
A
The
vote
would
be
to
have
council
request
of
our
local
legislative
delegation
to
introduce
or
to
support
legislation,
to
authorize
a
referendum
to
Georgia
citizens
to
vote
as
to
whether
they
want
to
allow
casino
gambling
in
Georgia
for
the
purpose
of
the
HOPE
scholarship.
That's
what's
on
the
table.
Mayor
temple
also.
C
A
I
I
Since
last
legislative
session,
we've
met
with
members
of
our
delegation
and
expressed
to
them
concerns
not
an
objection
to
gambling,
but
concerns
that
we
have
on
what
would
happen
to
our
existing
markets
and
our
existing
economies.
Shouldn't
a
casino,
be
introduced.
I
think
it's
really
important
that
we
have
the
exchange
of
information.
We
are
certainly
not
saying
the
citizens
do
not
have
a
right
to
vote.
Some
of
that
conversation
started
just
outside
the
doorway.
Today,
Catania
and
I
will
be
speaking,
November
30th
at
the
loft
and
have
a
conversation
about
this,
and
that's.
I
What's
really
important
is
the
conversation
yesterday
we
did
were
able
to
commission
with
the
butler
Institute
for
them
to
do
an
economic
study
of
comparing
communities
and
other
scenarios
that
have
around
the
country
that
have
introduced
casino
gaming
into
the
local
market
so
that
we
have
some
real
data
to
work
on,
because
I
certainly
don't
want
to
sound
like
Chicken
Little.
You
know
it's
it's
getting
a
little
bit
old
to
present
anecdotal
information
all
the
time.
We
need
some
empirical
data
to
present
as
well.
K
G
G
That
was
was
mentioned
to
be
gathered
and
discussed
before
there's
a
local
referendum
on
placing
a
a
gaming
facility
in
Muskogee
County,
and
it
would,
by
necessity,
slow
down
the
process,
because
if
the
statewide
referendum
were
held
and
it
passed,
then
we
would
not
have
a
special
election.
It
would
be
some
period
of
time
before
we
could
have
the
local
referendum
on
place
in
one
of
Muscogee
County.
Would
you
have
any
objections.
J
G
J
K
L
To
encapsulate
everything
that
you
said,
the
first
sentence
needs
to
be
changed.
If
you've
got
to
make
these
amendments
to
sorry,
we
have
our
respectfully
request
the
local
legislative
delegation
of
the
Georgia
General
Assembly,
introduce
or
support
legislation
to
authorize
a
statewide
referendum
for
a
constitutional
amendment
to
allow
Georgia
sidess
citizens
to
vote
as
to
whether
casino
gaming
should
be
allowed
in
Georgia
for
the
purpose
of
hope,
scholarship
funding.
Further.
L
If
any
such
constitutional
amendment
has
adopted
this
council
requests,
a
local
referendum
be
established
for
approval
of
any
such
casino
gaming
in
Muskogee
County,
because
I
start
to
write,
know
that
you're
going
to
have
a
statewide
vote
on
a
constitutional
amendment.
If
you
have
anything
first,
that's
a
statewide
vote
to
change
the
constitution
to
allow
casino
gaming,
then
you
may
have
local
legislation
or
statewide
legislation
to
allow
a
referendum
and
Muskogee
or
other
counties
so
well.
K
K
The
concern
that
some
of
us
have
around
the
table
is
it
some
of
the
legislation
that
was
introduced
either
limited
the
casino
to
Atlanta,
Leonard
it
to
Atlanta
and
Savannah,
and
then
another
piece
included
other
communities,
and
so
we're
in
this
body
we're
being
asked
to
vote
for
whatever
comes
out
and
we
don't
know
what
that
whatever
is
gonna,
be
so
I.
Think
if
we
craft
something
like
the
City
Attorney,
read
I
think
it
would.
It
would
laser
in
on
what
our
intent
is.
What
our
desire
is
here,
yeah.
L
L
H
F
I'm
wondering
if,
instead
of
saying
in
the
the
furthermore
piece
you
limited
to
Muscogee
County
if
we
said
that
for
any
municipality,
it
has
to
come
back
that
way,
it
would
come
back
if
it
were.
If
it
were
in
Columbus,
art
would
come
back
it
would.
The
people
in
Savannah
would
vote
in
if
it
were
going
to
Savannah
or
whatever
and
I,
get
I'm
saying
that,
because
I
did
read
all
of
those
other
pieces
of
legislation
and
some
of
them
said
local
referendums,
some
of
them
did
not
say
local
referendums
and
I.
F
F
A
M
Mr.
Wright
has
stated
so
eloquently
tonight
that
he
and
the
director
of
the
River
Center
have
had
a
conversation
and
he's
in
no
way
trying
to
affect
his
operation,
so
that,
if
entertainment
is
the
issue
of
whatever
issue,
is
it
was
stated
by
the
director
to
River
Center
that
there's
a
particular
state
that
has
gaming?
That's
incented
around
the
arts
community
and
everything
and
it's
working
well,
that's
become
a
tourism
site.
M
So
if
it
becomes
a
destination,
maybe
that's
what
we
need
to
be
looking
at
and
we
can
kind
of
have
it
as
a
destination
of
tourism.
Point
for
us
and
incorporate
a
community
and
get
the
community
behind
it.
I
think
I
think
tonight
has
been
a
good
open
dialogue
by
everyone
to
kind
of
open
it
up
and
see
what's
affecting
it.
M
What's
bothering
you
you
know,
what's
what's
deep
down,
what's
your
worries
and
I
see
some
heads
nodding,
and
so
hopefully,
hopefully,
if
there's
anything
else
here
tonight,
I'm
sure
we'll
hear
about
it,
but
I'm
feeling
more
comfortable
now
that
it
seems
like
everyone's
being
included.
Thank
you
all.
G
You,
mayor,
I
and
I
understand
completely
what
councillor
thomas
is
attempting
to
do
and
I
respect
that
I
just
hide
I,
don't
think!
That's
a
good
idea
and
here's.
Why
I
think
that
if
we
are
gonna
try
to
place
into
a
statewide
referendum
and
the
way
this
is
written
and
we're
going
to
we're
going
to
create
requirements
for
other
communities
if
those
communities
decided
to
push
back,
they
didn't
want
those.
My
fear
is
they'd
strike
down
the
whole
thing
and
that
wipes
our
local
referendum
out
as
well
and
I'm.
A
K
A
K
A
K
J
K
K
K
The
concern
that
I
have
is,
as
we
move
forward
there
going
to
be
other
things,
that
we
need
to
talk
about,
I'm
glad
we're
going
to
be
at
the
table
and
talking
amongst
ourselves
and
Columbus
the
Columbus
group
and
talk
about
the
impact
of
the
community.
Not
just
the
revenue
is
going
to
generate,
but
there
are
public
safety
issues
that
will
have
to
be
funded
once
this
comes
becomes
about
if
it
comes
about,
but
let
it
be
known
that
my
understanding
is
there's
going
to
be
a
vote
statewide
at
some
point.
K
This
issue
is
going
to
come
on
the
ballot
and
we
will
be
voting
for
it,
whether
it's
a
statewide
ballot
or
just
a
local
ballot,
I
mean
just
a
little
wide
ballot
and
a
local
ballot.
One
of
the
other
we've
got
to
let
that
work
place.
Work
is
set
myself
out
at
the
state
level.
This
vote
tonight
does
not
say
we
are
going
to
support
the
casino.
J
D
A
B
H
H
Bottom
line
and
job
creation
now
I
think
what
the
council
I
think
what
this,
what
this
body
has
come
to
I
think
makes
a
lot
of
sense
and
I
think
the
text
which
wouldn't
what
Council
Tom's
missing
it
protects
the
right
of
people,
even
in
Columbus
to
vote
or
whether
they
want
to
know
the
same
things
you
were
saying
councillor,
Henderson
and
I
think
that
makes
for
a
good
resolution.
I
think
that
makes
sense
for
everybody
you're
not
voting
on
game.
You've!
Oh,
no!
H
A
All
right,
I
think
that
concludes
discussion.
We
have
a
motion
to
amend
the
proposed
language
on
the
Inman
on
the
legislative
agenda,
and
so
this
time
we'll
take
a
vote
on
that
all
those
in
favor
of
the
amended
language
police
state
I
there
any
opposed
okay,
now
I
believe
that,
because
it
was
amended
in
full,
we
do
not
have
to
take
another
vote.
Mr.
City
Attorney
is
that
correct?
It
wasn't
a
substitute.
J
A
A
J
A
You
had
wait
just
so
we
don't
get
too
many
balls
going
on
now.
People
have
invested
in
this.
We
need
to
go
ahead
and
cut
them
loose,
so
I'm
hoping
it
won't
take
more
than
a
split
second
here,
everybody's
patience,
all
right,
all
right,
sorry
about
that
we're
gonna
get
a
break
in
just
a
minute.
Okay,
we
have
a
motion
in
a
second
to
actually
approve
the
amended
language.
We
had
to
take
one
more
step.
So
that's
where
we
are
all
those
in
favor,
please
state
aye.
Are
there
any
opposed?
B
Are
requesting
the
delegation
to
introduce
general
legislation
at
the
next
session
on
one
or
more
of
the
recommendations
require
all
law
enforcement
agencies
within
the
state
of
Georgia
to
meet
best
practices
of
the
Commission
on
Accreditation
for
law
enforcement
agencies
require
any
future
fatal.
Officer-Involved
shooting
within
the
state
of
Georgia
to
be
investigated
by
the
GBI
require
any
further
fatal.
B
Officer-Involved
shootings
shooting
within
the
state
of
Georgia,
to
be
reviewed
and
or
prosecuted
by
a
district
attorney
outside
the
jurisdiction
of
the
shooting,
require
the
compilation
of
and
maintenance
of
data
on,
officer-involved
shootings
in
all
Georgia
jurisdictions
require
all
incident.
Video
footage
of
any
officer-involved
shooting
to
be
subject
to
the
Georgia
open
records
act,
regardless
of
pending
review
or
investigation,
absent
court
order
protection,
and
so
again
it's
asking
the
delegation
to
introduce
general
legislation
on
one
or
more
of
these
recommendations.
Sure.
A
A
Think
everyone
recognizes
we're
never
going
to
have
certainty.
There
is
volatility
on
the
streets
and
communities
across
this
nation.
In
the
best
of
circumstances
you
don't
know
how
any
particular
engagement
is
going
to
come
out,
but
what
you
can
do
is
create
a
culture
of
professionalism
and,
and
many
agencies
across
this
nation
have
done
just
that
and
by
by
adopting
a
culture
of
professionalism.
A
You
you
narrow,
perhaps
some
some
of
those
extreme
opportunities
you
you,
you
bring
the
path
of
outcomes,
perhaps
in
a
more
a
more
narrow
range
of
acceptability
and
safety
for
the
law
enforcement
officers
in
the
citizen,
and
so
some
of
the
things
that
that,
frankly,
we're
already
doing
in
Columbus.
Some
of
some
of
the
agencies
in
the
state
of
Georgia
are
already
doing.
A
Are
things
that
other
a
law
enforcement
agency
should
consider
doing
as
I
said,
they're
well
recognized
in
the
law
enforcement
community
itself
as
being
best
practices,
and
so
let
me
just
run
through
these,
as
the
city
manager
said.
The
first
is
that
our
our
legislative
body
in
Atlanta
consider
requiring
all
law
enforcement
agencies
within
the
state
to
meet
best
practices
as
set
out
by
Kalia.
Now
that
doesn't
mean
they
have
to
be
Kalia
certified,
because
that
has
a
fee.
A
They
can
be
self
audited,
but
they
set
those
as
principals
and
they
they
attempt
to
achieve
them,
and
that
has
to
do
with
hiring
and
training
and
self
governance
and
there's
all
sorts
of
standards.
So
there's
certainly
a
credo
of
best
practices
out
there.
That's
been
signed
off
by
the
law
enforcement
profession
and
why
shouldn't
all
agencies
strive
to
achieve
them
require
any
future
fatal
officer-involved
shooting
within
the
state
of
Georgia,
be
investigated
by
the
Georgia
Bureau
of
Investigation.
We
do
this,
we've
heard
in
meaning
the
Columbus
Police
Department.
A
Does
this
already
we've
heard
in
these
communities
across
the
nation
that
oftentimes
the
things
that
lead
to
people
taking
to
the
streets
are
that
the
citizens,
in
an
unfortunate
circumstance,
didn't
have
faith
that
an
independent
body
was
reviewing
the
matter?
It
subjects
the
law
enforcement
agency
to
criticism
and,
and
certainly
the
state
agency,
the
Georgia
Bureau
of
Investigation
is
in
many
instances
already
doing
this.
They
do
it
as
I
said
for
Columbus
Georgia.
They
do
it
for
other
jurisdictions
require
any
fatal
future
fatal.
A
Officer-Involved
shooting
within
the
state
of
Georgia,
be
reviewed
and
are
prosecuted
by
a
district
attorney
outside
the
jurisdiction
of
the
shooting.
This
something
that's
largely
in
the
discretion
of
either
the
district
attorney
or
the
state
attorney
general,
but
most
do
defer
to
an
independent
review
and,
and
it's
something
that
certainly
the
Legislature
should
consider
it's
a
practice.
It's
not
a
requirement,
but
it's
something
that
again
I
think
would
imbue
more
trust
into
the
system,
as
these
events
unfortunately
do
and
may
occur
in
the
future
to
require
a
compilation
and
maintenance
of
data
on
officer-involved
shootings.
A
This
is
something
that's
already
being
discussed
at
the
state
level.
That's
not
something
we
invented
here,
the
Atlanta
journal-constitution,
the
Georgia,
State
Bar,
many
other
agencies,
the
post
certification,
as
well
as
some
other
entities,
are
already
look
Georgia
Bureau
of
Investigation
already
looking
at
how
they
can
have
a
systematic
way
of
compiling
and
maintaining
data
so
that
we
can
answer
questions
when
citizens
ask
us
how
many
of
this?
How
many
of
that
we
know
and
it
takes
away
a
question
mark
and
the
possibility
of
suspicion-
require
all
incident.
A
We
saw
riots
in
the
streets
of
Charlotte
because
of
this
very
thing,
and
certainly
if
there
is
an
ongoing
investigation,
orders
are
entered
all
the
time,
sometimes
in
the
middle
of
the
night,
on
an
ex
parte
basis
and
an
appropriate
ex
parte
basis
by
requirements
set
out
by
state
law
when
certain
things
need
to
be
protected.
So
there's
already
systems
in
place
for
reviewing
these
kinds
of
things
it's.
These
are
certainly
state
issues
I've
set
in
hours
and
hours
of
forums
and
hearings
where
citizens
appeal
to
us
for
these
various
types
of
things.
A
This
isn't
in
our
jurisdiction.
We
can
certainly
adopt
policies
for
our
own
law
enforcement
agency
that
the
police
department,
certainly,
but
not
as
to
other
things
that
happen
around
the
state,
that's
outside
our
jurisdiction,
but
it
certainly
is
within
the
jurisdiction
and
worthy
of
a
conversation
state
legislative
arena-
and
let
me
the
other
thing
is-
is
I,
think
something.
That's
really
fascinating.
Probably
the
single
most
question
we
get
at
these
forums.
A
It
comes
from
citizens
having
a
mistrust
of
the
judicial
system
in
the
instance
of
a
review
of
an
officer-involved
shooting
and
usually
because
there's
not
an
indictment
or
not.
A
jury
verdict
returned
and
they
feel
you
all
have
heard.
The
system
is
rigged
well
many
times
that
outcome
is
because
there
are
very
particular
eyes
immunities
on
the
books
and
those
immunities
are
there
for
a
policy
reason
and
those
policy
reasons
were
discussed
long
ago,
almost
a
hundred
years
ago,
frankly,
a
decades
and
decades
ago,
and
perhaps
we've
forgotten.
A
Maybe
we
need
to
have
that
conversation
again.
Why
were
those
immunities
put
on
the
books?
Do
they
still
apply
today
and
what
is
the
ramification
of
not
having
those
immunities
on
the
books
and
I?
Think
it's
something
we
take
for
granted
and
we
ask
the
citizens
to
accept
on
faith,
but
it's
a
very
real
conversation
that
people
are
concerned
about
and
I
think
it's
one
worth
worth
having
as
a
state.
F
A
Have
a
conversation
about
why
we
have
these
immunities,
what
the
ramification
of
not
having
the
immunities
are
I
think
it's
a
really
important
conversation
that
again
we've
either
forgotten
or
people
want
to
speak
to
again
in
light
of
this
new
era
and
and
and
that,
certainly
something
has
to
be
done
at
the
state
level.
It's
a
state,
immunity,
I,.
F
Okay,
since
we
received
this
proposed
legislative
agenda
item,
I
have
had
the
opportunity
to
speak
with
a
number
of
statewide
law
enforcement
organizations.
I
talked
with
the
executive
director
of
the
Association
of
Chiefs
of
Police
I
talked
with
the
Association
of
Georgia
sheriffs
I've
talked
with
the
FOP.
I've
talked
with
the
GBI
about
each
one
of
these
particular
items
and.
F
Every
one
of
those
entities
have
said
to
me
that
they
oppose
every
one
of
these
items
and
here's
here's
one
we'll
try
to
do
this
fairly
quickly
item
and
most
of
the
reason
that
they
oppose
them
is
because
of
the
requirement
that
this
go
into
place.
For
example,
the
first
one
to
require
all
law
enforcement
agencies
to
be
to
meet
the
best
practices
of
Kalia.
F
This
is
much
more
than
they
could
afford
to
do
to
meet
the
requirements
of
Kalia
in
Columbus.
Our
Police
Department
is
certified
by
Kalia.
We
pay
sixteen
thousand
one
hundred
and
twenty
five
dollars
as
an
initial
fee
to
have
our
to
participate
in
this,
and
then
we
pay
an
additional
five
thousand
dollars
each
year.
We
also
have
a
an
employee
who
pretty
much.
This
is
about
all
they
do.
The
smaller
jurisdictions
in
the
state
cannot
afford
to
do
this
and
cannot
afford
it
and
do
not
have
the
time
in
the
employees
to
do
it.
F
Perhaps
if
this
said
encourage
that
might
be
a
different
matter,
but
to
require
that
these
agencies
that
I
have
enumerated
have
a
problem
with
that,
the
second
one
to
require
any
future
fatal,
officer-involved
shooting
to
be
investigated
by
the
GBI.
The
representative
from
the
GBI
said
to
me.
We
would
prefer
that
that
not
be
required.
The
GBI
will
go
into
a
jurisdiction
where
they
are
invited
to
come
in,
but
they
do
not
want
to
be
required
to
investigate
all
fatal
officer-involved
shootings.
F
This
also
includes
investigating
their
own.
If
there
were
a
GBI
officer
involved
in
a
fatal
shooting,
they
would
have
to
investigate
themselves,
and
they
do
not
want
to
do
that.
The
third
one
to
require
that
future
fatal
officer
involved
shootings,
be
reviewed
and
are
prosecuted
by
the
district
attorney
from
outside
the
jurisdiction
of
the
shooting.
F
This
item
was
brought
to
my
attention
about
the
the
time
and
how?
How
would
this
work?
For
example,
the
district
attorney
for
Muscogee
County
also
serves
as
the
district
attorney
for
five
other
counties
in
this
circuit,
and
if
there
were
an
officer
of
fatal
officer-involved
shooting
in
our
circuit,
that
would
mean
that
we
would
need
to
pull
someone
from
outside
of
those
six
counties
to
investigate.
And,
conversely,
if
there
was
a
fatal
officer
shooting
in
some
other
jurisdiction,
they
could
call
on
our
district
attorney
to
do
that.
F
District
attorney,
we
trust
you
to
in
to
investigate
our
robberies,
but
we
don't
trust
you
to
investigate
our
fatal,
officer-involved
shootings,
the
fourth
one
about
the
require
the
compilation
and
maintenance
of
data
that
is
as
I
understand.
It
is
something
that
the
GBI
currently
does,
and
so
this
is
fairly
redundant
and
then
the.
F
F
F
For
the
local
law
enforcement
agency
does
not
have
the
authority
to
to
move
ahead
and
one
of
the
things
that
I
think
we
we
in
Muskogee,
County
and
Columbus,
sometimes
forget.
We
are
so
fortunate
to
be
a
consolidated
government
and
to
have
our
law
enforcement
cover,
the
entire
county
and
one
one
city.
F
But
if
you
look
at
some
of
the
other
counties
in
the
state
of
Georgia
there
158
others,
some
of
them
very
small,
they
have
numerous
cities
in
their
County
and
they
cannot
do
the
kinds
of
things
that
would
be
required
for
them
to
do
under
some
of
these
items.
So
I
think
you
probably
figured
out
by
now
that
I'm
speaking
in
opposition
to
having
this
as
one
of
our
legislative
agenda
items.
Thank
you.
A
Okay,
let's
see
and
just
to
comment
yes
on
the
first
one.
Certainly
there
is
absolutely
a
cost
to
be
kolya
certified
and
and
and
so
it
doesn't
say,
to
be
CLIA
certified,
but
to
just
simply
meet
those
best
practices,
as
I
said
when
I
was
going
through
them,
that
certainly
could
be
even
through
self
audit
and
I
would
say
to
the
cost.
A
You
know,
if
you
can,
if
you
can
give
these
fine
men
and
women
guns
and
badges,
you
can
invest
in
their
training
and
invest
in
a
system
that
protects
them
as
well
as
the
citizens
so
and
I.
Think
that's
what
those
standards
standards
do
and
again
you
don't
have
to
be
certified
to
aspire
to
and
meet
those
standards.
Let's
see,
we
have
like
Mayor
Pro
Tem
until
that.
Second,
it's
not
coming
out
there.
We
go.
A
We
went
through
just
locally
through
our
police
department.
Had
them
look
at
it
had
Calvin
and
a
few
other
folks
look
at
them
and
then
also
went
through
the
n-double-a-cp
to
see
if
they
were
amenable
to
it
at
the
state
level
and
again,
this
is
just
literally
a
list
of
things
that
have
come
up
at
forums
that
are
very
doable
or
otherwise
being
done,
I
mean,
for
instance,
the
District
Attorney
thing.
You
know,
there's
actually
a
process
in
place
for
that,
so
it
wouldn't
be
invented,
but
certainly
could
be
referred
to
GME.
So
I'm.
J
C
F
A
Think
that's
a
wonderful
suggestion
to
refer
it
to
GMA
I
mean
if
everybody's
amenable
to
that
it's
just
it's.
These
are
very
real
and
very
doable
issues.
A
lot
of
a
lot
of
agencies
are
doing
this,
regardless
of
their
size,
and
a
lot
of
these
processes
are
in
place,
they're,
just
not
being
implemented
and
they're,
certainly
not
being
required,
which
is
an
issue
for
the
legislative
folks
to
weigh
not
for
us
to
decide.
But
this
is
just
a
proposal
for
a
statewide
legislative
discussion
and
and
I
certainly
have
no
problem
recommending
it.
C
C
A
D
G
You,
mayor
yeah,
I
agree
with
referring
it
to
GMA,
but
I'll
be
honest
with
you.
I,
don't
know
that
it's
something
I
would
get
behind
anyway.
Simply
because
I
have
my
hesitancy,
they
already
expressed
about
voting
in
favor
of
something
that
is
is
going
beyond
our
borders
and
it's
it's
kind
of
placing
guidelines
and
parameters
on
other
other
cities
and
I
got
to
tell
you
frankly.
I
was
I
was
extremely
proud
of
the
way
you
represented
our
public
safety
in
our
community.
G
In
the
discussion
with
the
head
of
the
n-double
a-c-p
that
was
held
at
the
river
River
Center
I
thought
you
were
very
eloquent
eloquent
you
you,
you
really
focused
on
the
things
that
are
important
to
me,
and
that
is
that
we
got
a
problem
in
they.
We
got
a
problem
around
the
country.
You
know
how
much
of
its
perception,
how
much
of
its
real
it
still
has
to
shake
out.
Something's
got
to
be
done,
and
these
are
wonderful
ideas,
but
you're.
Also
very
I
thought
very.
G
You
laid
out
very
well
the
fact
that
the
training
and
the
resources
and
the
attitude
and
the
initiatives
and
the
efforts
of
the
Muscogee
County
policing
units,
whether
they
be
police,
department
or
Sheriff,
or
even
marshal
we
do
most.
If
not
all,
of
this
and
under
your
leadership,
is
Public
Safety,
Director
I
think
we
focused
even
harder
on
these
things,
so
I
I,
just
just
very
honestly
and
I'm,
not
saying
I,
don't
care
about
folks
out
in
the
state
or
the
country.
I.
G
Just
think
that
that
is
a
big
discussion
for
a
bigger
group
and
and
and
it
just
it.
My
role
here
around
this
table
is
to
try
to
make
sure
we
continue
to
have
the
best
Public,
Safety
Department
and
the
most
open
and
transparent
Public
Safety
Department.
We
can
I
think
I
think
we
do
that
under
your
leadership,
I
think
it's
been
handled
very
well
over
the
last
several
years.
All.
N
May
I'm
in
complete
support
of
each
one
of
these
items
here
the
only
one
that
I
had
a
question
about
being
in
a
River
Valley,
Regional
Commission
under
there's
a
lot
of
counties
that
could
not
afford.
So
if
we
could
interchange
that
required
to
encourage
rather
than
require,
because
a
lot
of
the
counties
I
mean
it's
going
to
be
like
an
unfunded
mandate
to
them,
and
so
we
don't
want
to
really
put
them
in
that
type
of
a
position.
N
But
if
we
put
in
courage
and
it
does
it,
it
does
place
them
in
a
position
to
aspire
or
to
work
towards
so
I'm.
All
for
that
also
for
the
mayor,
I
mean
that
mayor
Pro,
tems
opposition
to
this
place
in
front
of
GMA
a
CCG.
But
as
far
as
the
other
items
here
you
see
it
all
over.
We've
been
blessed
here
in
Columbus,
because
some
we've
been
proactive
and
a
lot
of
these
measures,
but
I
think
that
just
every
is
one
of
these
items
definitely
need
to
be
put
forward.
N
A
A
A
motion:
is
there
a
second
okay
there
being
no
second
than
it?
It
fails
for
a
second
and
what
we'll
do
I,
don't
think
we
need
any
official
action.
Let's
say
from
Council
disagrees.
I
can
certainly
send
it
just
as
Public
Safety
Director
and
asked
GMA
and
ACC
G
to
review
it.
There
are
there
various
policy
committees
at
councilor
Thomas.
If.
F
K
A
O
H
O
I
know
you
were
but
Georgia
as
it
stands
out
of.
The
tax
code
has
a
very,
very
good
standard
retirement
exemption
and
applies
to
both
military
and
civilians
as
well.
It's
it's
uniform,
it's
understandable,
and
this
is
simply
trying
to
and
I
understand,
to
sort
of,
take
one
group
and
give
them
some
preferential
treatment
which,
in
my
mind,
just
sort
of
complicates
the
tax
code.
And
that's
my
that's
my
position.
It's
not
against
veterans,
yeah,.
O
And
I
know
it's
it's
tailored
to
border
towns,
especially
Columbus
been
next
Alabama,
but
keep
in
mind.
Alabama
just
doesn't
exempt
military.
They
exempt
some
civil
service
pay.
They
exempt
some
schoolteacher
pay.
They
exempt
some
Peace
Officers
pay.
So
you
know
Peace
Officers
won't
get
the
exemption,
they
do
in
Alabama,
but
they
won't
here.
It's
just
military.
So
anytime
you
go
in
and
pull
one
group
out
for
some
special
treatment
when
we
have
a
good
uniform
system.