►
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
Good
morning,
I
would
like
to
bring
the
january
20
2021
planning
advisory
commission
meeting
to
order
official
start
time.
This
meeting
is
9.
00
am,
if
you
would
please
rise
for
the
pledge
allegiance,
flag,
united
states
of
america
if
you'll
turn
around
there's
a
flag
actually
behind
the
glass
there.
A
A
If
you
would
please
silence
or
turn
off
your
cell
phones
today
we're
operating
under
much
different
circumstances,
as
most
meetings
are
now
being
held.
We
have
some
commissioners
that
are
watching
by
television
or
youtube,
and
they
will
be
forwarding
questions
to
me
via
text.
So
I
will
have
my
phone
here.
It
is
silenced,
but
I
will
be
using
that
to
communicate
with
the
two
commissioners.
A
A
I
remind
those
in
the
audience
and
those
watching
on
tv
that
this
is
the
first
hearing
of
any
rezoning
text,
change
or
special
exception
requests
brought
before
us
today.
We'll
first
hear
a
reading
of
the
staff
report
for
the
case
by
the
planning
staff
and
ask
the
applicant
to
provide
a
brief
overview
of
their
quest.
A
We
will
then
give
the
opportunity
for
anyone
in
the
audience
to
speak,
for
or
against
that
request
or
to
inquire
about
the
said
request.
The
commissioners
will
have
any
needed
discussion
on
the
case.
Once
a
motion
is
made
and
seconded
by
the
commission,
a
vote
will
take
place
and
a
recommendation
will
be
rendered.
A
A
The
city
council
of
columbus
will
hold
a
public
meeting
called
the
first
reading
said.
Council
shall
consider
the
case,
review,
pac
and
planning
department
recommendations
and
hear
discussions
on
the
matter.
Council
make
a
final
decision
at
the
second
public
meeting
called
the
second
reading
all
right.
That
brings
us
up
to
our
first
case
today,
which
is.
B
Yes,
sir
explanation
of
revision
amen,
table
2.2.1
by
deleting
townhouse
and
multifamily
and
condo
in
the
historic
zoning
district
and
explanation
of
revision.
Number
two
of
men
table
2.2.2
by
deleting
townhouse
and
multi-family
and
condo
in
the
historic
district
in
historic
zoning
districts.
B
C
D
Rezn-12-20-3086
a
request
to
amend
the
text
of
the
udo
specifically
mending
table
2.2.1
deleting
townhouse
and
multi-family,
and
condo
and
historic,
and
also
amend,
table
2.2.2
by
the
leading
townhouse
and
multi-family
and
condo
in
the
historic
district,
make
a
motion
that
we
recommend
approval.
Do
I
have
a
second.
A
Recn-12-20-308-7
a
request
to
rezone
9.77
acres
of
land
located
at
2730
manchester
expressway
current
zoning
is
nc
neighborhood
commercial
and
sfr-3
single-family
residential
3.
proposed
zoning
is
gc.
General
commercial
proposed
uses,
mixed-use
hotel,
retail
grocery
restaurant
cotton
companies
is
the
applicant
property
is
located
in
council
district
8
garrett.
B
Excuse
me,
general
land
use
is
inconsistent
for
planning
area
d.
Current
land
use
designation
is
general
commercial
future
land
use
is
office
and
professional.
It
is
compatible
with
existing
land
uses.
The
property
does
not
lie
within
the
floodway
and
flood
plain
area.
The
developer
will
need
an
approved
drainage
plan
prior
to
issuance
of
a
site
development
permit.
If
a
permit
is
required,
the
property
is
served
by
all
city
services.
B
Annual
average
annual
daily
trip
will
increase
by
2391
trips.
If
used
for
commercial
use,
the
level
of
service
will
remain
at
a
level
c.
The
site
shall
meet
the
codes
and
regulations
of
the
columbus
consolidated
government
for
commercial
usage.
There'll
be
no
school
impact,
no
buffer
requirements,
no
fort
bending
recommendation,
no
dri
recommendation.
B
The
surrounding
zoning
north
is
general
commercial
south,
as
general
commercial
east
is.
I
185
west
is
neighborhood
commercial
attitude
of
the
property
owners.
65
property
owners
within
300
feet
of
the
subject.
Properties
were
notified
over
the
rezoning
request.
The
planner
department
received
no
calls
in
or
emails
regarding
the
rezoning.
B
As
far
as
additional
information,
we
have
proposed
with
the
developer,
to
condition
this
property
to
be
completed.
In
phases
and
those
those
conditions
are
as
follows:
the
property
shall
be
developed
in
three
phases.
The
phase
one
shall
include
a
hotel
only
and
number
three.
A
traffic
story
should
be
required
before
phase
two
is
started.
B
A
E
With
your
permission,
I
can
remove
the
mask.
Yes,
absolutely!
Thank
you,
chris
woodruff.
With
the
cotton
companies
we
are
based
out
of
12
30
broadway
in
columbus,
georgia,
I'm
representing
fnb
company,
which
is
I'm
part
owner
and
as
well.
Fmb
company
is
a
columbus-based
development
company.
That's
been
around
since
about
1972.
E
E
F
Question
so
on
phase
one
nothing's
gonna
be
done
until
or
nobody's
gonna
be
living
on
the
hotel,
utilizing
the
hotel
premises
until
two
and
three
are
done.
I'm
concerned
about
the
safety
of
the
personnel
coming
into
the
hotel,
while
the
construction,
if
in
in
case
two
or
three,
is
not
done
yet.
That's
an
excellent.
E
Question
so
the
idea
here
is
the
hotel
is:
is
one
of
the
anchor
tenets
of
this
development?
In
order
for
a
hotel
to
exist
on
this
property,
they
must
be
zoned
gc,
so
the
thought
is
to
lock
in
the
hotel
developer,
allowing
them
to
construct
under
a
gc
zoning.
At
that
same
time,
simultaneous
grading
will
be
occurring
and
a
infrastructure
will
be
implemented
so
that
we
do
have
access
roads
and
secure
areas
where
there
is
delineable
hotel
site
versus
pad
ready
sites
for
sale.
A
A
C
G
A
F
I
recommend
this
motion
to
be
approved
when
it
comes
to
r
e
z,
n
1
2
2
0
2
3
0
8
7
and
requested
rezone
9.77
acres
of
land
located
at
2730
manchester's
expressway
current
zoning
from
neighborhood
commercial
and
sfr
3
proposed
zoning,
gc
general
commercial
proposes
used
for
makes
used
by
the
hotel
retail
grocery
restaurant.
I've
recommended
this
motion
to
be
approved.
F
A
A
A
request
to
rezone
0.95
acres
land
located
at
2744
warm
springs.
Road
current
zone
is
ro
residential
office
proposed
zoning
is
gc
general
commercial.
The
proposed
use
is
convenience
store
with
gas
sales
blacksmith
karthik
is
the
applicant.
The
property
is
located
in
council
district
8
garrett,
mr
renfrow.
B
Yes,
sir
general
land
use
is
inconsistent
for
planet
area
d,
general
commercial,
future
land
uses
mixed
use,
it
is
compatible
existing
lane
uses.
The
property
does
not
lie
within
the
flood
way
and
floodplain
area.
The
developer
will
need
an
approved
drainage
plan
prior
to
issuance
of
a
site
development
permit.
If
a
permit
is
required,
property
is
served
by
all
city
services.
Average.
Annual
annual
daily
trips
will
increase
by
111
trips.
If
used
for
commercial,
the
level
of
service
will
remain
at
b.
B
B
Those
three
options
on
a
category
c
are
120
feet
with
a
certain
amount
of
canopy
trees,
understory
trees
and
shrubs,
or
mental
grasses
per
100
linear
feet
to
10
feet
with
a
certain
amount
of
shrubs
or
metal
grasses
per
100
linear
feet
in
a
wood
fence
or
masonry
wall,
and
three
thirty
feet
undisturbed:
natural
buffer,
no
recommendation
from
fort
benning,
no
dri
recommendation
the
surrounding
zone
into
the
north
is
neighborhood.
Commercial.
South
is
sfr2.
B
East
is
sfr2
and
west
is
residential
office.
100
property
owners
within
300
feet
of
the
subject's
property
were
notified
of
the
rezoning
request.
The
planning
department
department
received
two
calls
and
or
emails
regarding
the
res,
the
rezoning,
those
were
two
in
opposition.
We
actually
got
one
additional
phone
call
late
last
night
that
was
concerned
just
with
the
buffering
requirement,
since
his
property
was
right
up
next
to
the
parcel,
that's
being
rezoned.
B
Well,
they
were
just
concerned
about
traffic
and
how
the
the
driveways
that
would
be
entering
exit
the
site.
Okay,.
H
I
My
name
is
robert
wood.
I
live
at
4101,
armor,
avenue
directly
adjacent
to
the
property
27.44,
although
I
did
have
a
couple
of
questions
specifically
related
to
the
buffer,
since
my
property
is
directly
next
to
the
construction.
I
Currently,
I
have
a
privacy
fence
that
does
not
extend
all
the
way
to
the
road.
I
was
actually
planning
on
replacing
that
and
actually
adding
a
piece
of
fence.
So
I
didn't
know
what
the
buffer
would
be
as
far
as
height
material
to
delineate,
because
my
driveway
is
actually
on
that
side
of
the
property
of
where
the
gas
station
will
be
placed.
That
was
my
first
question.
C
B
As
far
as
buffer,
they
have
the
three
options
that
I
stated
in
the
review.
They
obviously
can't
meet
the
30
feet,
I'm
just
undisturbed
natural
buffer
they'll
have
to.
I
would
assume
that
they're
going
to
go
with
a
category
2,
which
is
10
feet
with
a
certain
amount
of
shrubs
ornamental
grasses
per
100,
linear
feet
and
a
wood
fence
or
masonry
wall,
so
that
that
will
be
required
for
them
too.
Okay,
dude.
I
B
B
Normally,
since
this
doesn't
fall
into
overlay,
we
don't
require
it
to
be
covered
or
sheltered
in
in
this
location,
but
normally
they're
they're
placed
in
the
back
in
engineering
handles
the
location
of
that
during
the
pro
during
the
actual
design
and
build
process
of
that.
Okay.
A
J
J
The
lighting
convenience
stores
by
necessity
have
got
very
bright
lighting,
which
would
not
be
compatible
with
the
use
of
residential
property
across
the
street
or
next
door.
Like
mr
woods,
if
you
look
at
the
zoning
map,
there
is
no
gc
south
of
warm
springs
road
until
you
get
on
the
other
side
of
the
bypass
or
way
back
down
towards
town.
J
We
think
this
is
inconsistent
with
the
land
use.
We
think
it's
spot
zoning.
We
don't
think
it
complies
with
the
comprehensive
plan.
We
don't
think
it's
suitable
for
the
neighborhood
hardaway
high
school
is
right
down
the
street,
I'm
not
so
sure
how
the
traffic
people
get
their
levels
of
service
some
parts
of
the
day.
There's
nobody
on
that
street,
but
when's
well
school's,
not
in
session.
J
It
would
be
very
difficult
to
take
a
left
turn
onto
warm
springs
out
of
this
convenience
store,
it's
so
close
to
the
traffic
light
and
traffic
would
back
up.
So
that's
going
to
put
more
traffic
on
armor
avenue,
which
again
is
more
of
a
disturbance
for
the
neighbors,
particularly
the
property
across
the
street.
You
can
have
the
privacy
fence
which
may
protect
you
from
the
people
next
door,
but
nothing
to
protect
the
people
across
the
street
from
the
lighting.
J
And
so
we
just
at
the
applicant
says
that
this
is
there's
no
other,
there's
substantial
reasons
why
the
property
cannot
or
should
not
be
used
as
currently
zoned.
I'm
not
so
sure
what
those
reasons
are.
There's
doctor's
offices
up
and
down
that
street
plenty
of
other
uses
they
could
put
to
that.
This
property
could
be
put
to
besides
the
convenience
store,
which
will
not
be
compatible
to
the
neighborhood
okay.
J
F
There
was
a
church
in
there
there
was
a
church
and
it's
been
demolished,
half
of
it
is
already
gone,
and
so
people
it's
not
like
a
vacant
lot.
There's
nothing
been
there
before
so
people
used
to
left
turning
there
before
so.
J
Doing
it
again,
but
but
the
church
was
operated
on
sundays
and
their
driveway
was
further
down
warm
spring
road
from
the
proposed
driveway.
Here.
This
driveway
is
much
closer
to
the
intersection
than
the
church's
driveway
was
the
church
was
operating
on
sundays
when
there
weren't
that
much
traffic,
and
it
was
so
in
in
for
limited
hours.
So
I
think
this
is
a
whole
different
operation.
As
far
as
the
traffic
goes
and
the
congestion
that's
going
to
be
caused.
J
A
H
I
think
if
the
ingress
and
egress
is
one
of
the
concerns,
as
far
as
being
closer
to
the
traffic
light,
we
can
try
to
make
some
modifications.
So
it
is
not
as
close
to
the
traffic
signal,
so
it'll
be
a
little
more
convenient
for
people
getting
in
and
out.
If
that
would
help.
Okay,
we
can
do
some
modifications
in
the
plan
and.
C
B
H
B
Their
their
original
application
had
a
different
site
plan.
It
was
sent
to
engineering,
they
sent
it
back
and
said
that
their
driveways
needed
to
be
adjusted,
so
we
sent
it
back
to
to
the
applicant.
She
worked
with
their
architect
and
engineer
and
they
sent
out
this
plan
engineering
reviewed
this
and
said
this
was
sufficient.
So
it's
re,
it's
really.
F
1-12-20-3088
request
to
resold
0.95
acres
of
land
located
at
27441
springs
road.
Current
zoning
is
ro
residential
office
proposed
zoning
general
commercial
proposal.
Use
is
convenience
store
with
gas
sales
and
I
will
add,
the
probation
that
is
not
going
to
be
open.
Past
11
and
I
recommend
for
this
motion
to
be
approved.
B
F
According
to
the
owners,
okay,
previous
notes,.
A
A
Recn-12-20-3178
a
request
to
rezone
0.5
acres
of
land
located
at
1421
6th
avenue.
Current
zoning
is
lmi
light
manufacturing
industrial
proposed
uses,
upt
uptown
the
proposed
use
is
mixed
use.
Retail
restaurant
cotton
companies
is
the
applicant
property
is
located
in
council
district
7
woodson,
mr
renfrow.
Yes,.
B
Sir
general
land
use
is
consistent
in
planning
area
d.
Currently,
news
designation
is
mixed-used.
Future
is
high
density,
mixed
use,
it
is
compatible
with
the
existing
land
uses.
The
property
does
not
lie
within
the
floodway
and
floodplain
area.
The
developer
will
need
an
approved
drainage
plan
prior
to
issuance
of
a
site
development
permit.
If
for
a
permit,
is
required,
property
is
served
by
all
city
services.
Average
annual
daily
trips
will
increase
by
450
58
trips.
If
used
for
commercial
usage,
the
level
of
service
will
remain
a
level
8..
B
The
site
shall
meet
the
codes
and
regulations
of
ccg
for
all
for
commercial
usage,
there'll
be
no
school
impact,
no
buffer
requirements,
no
fort
benning
recommendation,
no
dri
recommendation.
The
surrounding
zone
in
the
north
side
is
lmi,
light
manufacturing,
industrial
and
then
south,
east
and
west
is
upt,
which
is
uptown.
B
A
E
Long
time
no
see
hello
again
guys.
Ladies
and
gentlemen,
chris
woodruff
with
the
cotton
companies
12
30,
broadway
columbus.
E
E
E
E
South
is
gallery
143,
which
is
a
retail
establishment
and
to
the
north
lot.
7
and
block
16
is
the
new
stumpy's
hatchet.
Throwing
the
area
itself
in
this
part
of
town
is
being
redeveloped
and
rebuilt,
re-established,
hope
and
desire
for
cotton
companies
is
to
rezone
this
property
as
upt,
so
that
we
may
proceed
forward
with
a
mixed-use
development
which
would
allow
for
a
retail
restaurant
and.
E
A
D
Sure,
in
the
case
of
rezn
12-21
a
request
to
rezone
14216
avenue
from
lmi
to
uptown
because
it
is
compatible
with
existing
land
uses.
I
recommend-
or
I
move,
that
we
recommend
approval.
Okay,.
A
A
A
Recn-12-20-3180
a
request
to
rezone
2.31
acres
of
land
located
at
3518
jensen
boulevard
current
zoning
is
nc
neighborhood
commercial
proposed
zoning
is
ro
residential
office
proposed
use
is
apartments.
David
realty
company
is
the
applicant.
The
property
is
located
in
council
district
5
crap.
If
the
applicant
would
please
come
forward
and
state
your
name
and
address
staff
report.
First,
I'm
sorry.
B
Report,
yes,
our
general
land
use
is
consistent.
Planet
area
e
currently
in
use
is
general
commercial
future
land
use
designation
is
mixed
use.
It
is
compatible
with
existing
land
uses.
The
property
does
not
lie
within
the
floodway
and
flood
plain
area.
The
developer
will
need
an
approved
drainage
plan
prior
to
issuance
of
a
site
development
permit.
If
a
perimeter
is
required,
property
is
served
by
all
city
services
and
every
annual
daily
trips
will
increase
by
638
trips.
B
B
L
Good
morning
applicant,
thank
you.
How
are
y'all
good
morning,
I'm
rob
mckenna,
I'm
with
paige
crown
with
price
tucker
and
ford,
and
I
represent
uv
phase,
two
llc
who's,
the
actual
applicant
on
the
petition.
I
know
it's
listed
as
davis
realty
company.
They
are
currently
the
owner
of
the
property.
We
have
that
property
under
contract
to
purchase
and
we're
doing
this
rezoning
in
connection
with
that.
L
So
the
the
applicant
intends
to
extend
the
existing
university
crossing
apartments,
which
are
right
behind
this
property
to
the
south
into
this
property
and
put
a
access
point
on
to
junction
boulevard,
so
so
it'll
be
you've
got
property
to
the
east
that
is
currently
apartment
use.
Although
it's
it's
zoned
rmf
two
you've
got
property.
This
is
the
proposed
site
plan.
I
guess
I'll
pull
that
down
a
little
bit.
L
Two
of
the
buildings
will
be
on
existing
property
and
two
of
the
buildings
will
be
on
the
property.
That's
subject
to
the
rezoning
today,
the
five
acres,
so
there
will
be
buffer
all
the
way
around
the
property
down
to
the
west
side
is
unused.
L
A
All
right,
we
have
one
person
in
the
audience.
That's
my
client.
A
Assume
officially,
all
right,
so
I'm
assuming
we
don't
have
anyone
to
speak
in
favor
orient
opposition
commissioners.
If
there's
no
other
questions,
do
we
have
a
recommendation.