►
From YouTube: PAC 07 19 17
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
Thank
you
and
I
would
like
to
remind
those
in
the
audience
and
those
watching
on
television,
that
this
is
the
first
reading
of
any
rezoning
request
brought
before
us
today.
We
will
hear
a
reading
of
the
staff
report
and
ask
the
applicant
to
provide
a
brief
overview
of
the
request.
We
will
then
give
the
opportunity
for
anyone
in
the
audience
to
speak,
for
or
against
that
request.
A
The
commissioners
will
have
any
needed
discussion
and
they
will
render
a
decision
and
then
then
that
the
findings
will
go
back
to
the
planning
and
Advisory
Commission,
and
then
the
decision
will
be
sent
to
City,
Council
or
recommendation
will
be
sent
to
City
Council.
Who
will
hear
the
request
two
more
times
before
rendering
a
final
decision?
B
A
D
A
So
commissioners,
the
minutes
were
posted
to
SharePoint,
I,
guess
last
night,
I
don't
know
if
you've
had
an
opportunity
to
take
a
look
at
those.
Yet
every
is
every
okay
with
them
were
there
any
Corrections
or
additions,
if
not
we'll
accept,
as
submitted
okay,
we'll
accept
as
submitted
then.
Thank
you
so
much
okay.
So
this
will
bring
us
to
our
first
case,
which
is
our
e
ZN
0
7
1
7
1
3
4
6,
and
this
is
a
request
to
amend
the
zoning
atlas
of
the
columbus
consolidated
government.
Robert
w
flowers
of
columbus.
A
Georgia
has
submitted
an
application
for
37
6
gentian
Boulevard.
This
is
parcel
number
zero.
Six,
nine
dash
zero,
two
four
zero
zero.
Two,
the
current
zoning
is
NC,
which
is
neighborhood
commercial
and
the
proposed
zoning
is
GC
general
commercial.
The
property
is
located
in
Council
District,
five
Baker
mr.
Herot.
If
you
will
give
us
the
staff
report.
Thank.
C
You
applicant
is
Robert
W
flowers,
that
owner
is
Robert,
W
flowers,
location
is
3716.
Gentian
Boulevard
acreage
is
three
point:
three
seven
acres
current
zoning
classifications,
neighborhood
commercial
proposed
and
classifications
general
commercial,
current
use
of
property
is
non-conforming
shopping
center
proposed
uses,
shopping
center,
general
land
use
is
consistent,
is
in
planning,
area
E
and
current
land
use.
Designation
is
general
commercial
future
land
use.
That
designation
is
general
commercial.
It
is
compatible
compatible
with
existing
land
uses.
C
There
are
no
environmental
impacts,
all
city
services
are
provided,
traffic
impacts
should
stay
the
same
and
the
road
was
designed
to
meet
the
traffic
at
the
time
that
the
shopping
center
was
built
there
on
our
school
impacts
required
buffers.
The
site
shall
include
a
category
C
buffer
along
all
property
lines,
bounded
by
the
S.
Far
to
and
RMF
to
zoning
district.
The
three
options
are
under
category
C.
C
A
E
Robert
flowers
and
business
address
is
one
one:
three
Bascom
court
suite
a
Columbus,
and
actually
it
was
my
father
and
Odie
Gilliam
his
father
that
home
the
center.
It
was
a
winn-dixie
initially
and
center
is
roughly
forty
thousand
square
feet
and
it's
my
understanding
then,
when
the
you
do
was
adopted
it
against
some
overlay,
it
became
neighborhood
commercial.
So
it's
a
non-conforming
business
building,
as
is,
and
we're
just
trying
to
change
it
back
to
general
commercial
because
it's
the
building
is
currently
non-conforming
right.
That's
all
we
want
to
do
get.
A
It
conforming
commissioners,
any
questions
for
the
applicant.
This
is
pretty
cut
and
dry
I
think.
Is
there
anyone
in
the
audience
who
would
like
to
speak
against
this
request?
If
so,
please
come
forward
and
I've
seen
no
one.
Anyone
who
would
like
to
speak
in
favor
of
the
request
and
I
see
no
one.
In
that
case.
Thank
you
very
much.
I
appreciate
it.
Thank
You
commissioners,
that
there's
no
further
discussion
do
I,
hear
a
motion.
F
Let's
granted
and
the
cases
are
easy
in-
are
easy
in
zero
7
1,
7,
1,
3,
4,
6
location,
3,
7,
1,
6,
Jensen,
Boulevard,
current
zoning
classification,
neighborhood
commercial,
proposed
zoning
classification.
General
commercial
purpose
of
this
rezoning
is
to
bring
it
into
compliance,
since
it
is
consistent
with
the
current
land
use
and
the
future
land
use.
I
move
that
we
approve
this
rezoning
request
and.
A
Mr.
Kiner
has
a
second
all
those
in
favor.
Please
raise
your
right
hands
and
it
is
unanimous,
so
we
will
submit
that
as
a
recommendation
for
approval.
Thank
you
for
that.
That
brings
us
to
our
next
case,
which
is
our
easy
n.
Zero.
Seven
one,
seven
one
three
five.
This
is
a
request
to
amend
the
zoning
atlas
of
the
Columbus
consolidated
government.
Jimmy
Lewis
and
Nellie
Smith
of
Columbus
Georgia
have
submitted
an
application
for
50
30
50
36
Farley
drive
and
205
Northstar
Drive.
A
These
are
parcels:
0,
9,
4,
0,
6,
0,
1,
1
and
parcel
number
0,
9,
4,
0,
6,
0,
1,
0
and
lastly,
parcel
number
0
9
4
0
6
0,
1
2.
The
current
zoning
is
NC,
which
is
neighborhood
commercial
and
the
proposed
zoning
is
sfr,
which
is
single-family
residential.
The
property
is
located
in
Council
District,
4
pew
mr.
haire,
the
staff
report.
Please
thank
you.
C
Applicant
is
columbus
planning
department,
owner
is
Jimmy,
Lewis
and
Neil.
Smith
location
is
30,
50,
30
and
50
36
Farley
drive
and
2
5
Northstar
Drive
acreage
is
2.2.
4
acres,
current
zoning
classifications,
neighborhood
commercial
proposed
zoning
classification
and
single-family
residential
current
use
of
the
property
is
single-family
residential
proposed
use
of
single-family
residential
general
land
use.
It
is
consistent.
It's
in
playing
area
e
current
land
use
designation
is
single-family,
land
use,
future
land
uses
single-family
is
compatible
existing
land
uses,
there
are
no
environmental
impacts.
All
city
services
are
provided,
traffic
impacts
should
stay
the
same.
G
C
Had
another
applicant
that
was
part
of
it,
but
they
wanted
to
pull
out
okay,
and
so
that's
why,
when
we,
then
we
readjusted
the
maps
to
show
the
actual
parcels
that
we're
going
to
be
part
of
the
part
of
it
and
the
GC
I
believe
that
was
NC,
says
my
little.
So
anything
that's
for
buffers
anything!
That's
around
the
neighborhood
commercial
instead
of
the
GC
it'll.
H
Will
Johnson
Planning
Department
just
a
little
background
of
why
the
Planning
Department
is
the
applicant
here?
As
mr.
Heric
stated,
there
were
originally
three
property
owners
who
owned
these
five
Lots,
one
of
them
being
tranche
aster.
Mr.
Chester
Owens
y'all
are
very
familiar
with
Chester's
barbecue,
which
is
the
only
NC
not
in
the
red
boundary.
H
Well,
upon
further
review,
he
decided
that
which
is
understandable
if
Chester's
ever
expands.
He
doesn't
want
to
be
blocked
in
by
single-family
that
you
probably
would
have
a
hard
time
getting
back.
So
the
originally
that
started
off
as
five
parcels
now
we're
down
to
three.
That
was
last
Friday.
So
that's
probably
why
Kevin
did
four
o'clock
last
Friday,
so
it's
probably
why
we
haven't
had
the
maps
updated.
H
We
do
not
know.
That's
an
excellent
question.
Mr.
Lewis's
daughter
came
to
us
and
bought
it
to
our
attention.
We
had
no
idea.
They
had
no
idea.
The
Lewis's
had
lived
there
for
30
years
really
since
Oh
8,
we,
since
the
Great
Recession
in
the
housing
market
collapse,
we
have
found
that
underwriters
are
for
mortgage
companies
are
scrutinizing
every
little
thing
and
we
have
had
more
problems
with
zoning
that
we
did
not
know
was
out
there
where
somebody's
own
the
house
bought.
It
got
a
mortgage
3040
years
ago.
Nobody
cared
about
zoning.
B
C
H
A
I
Looking
at
this
map
and
I'm
just
going
to
ask
a
question,
partial
12
looks
to
be
landlocked.
It
is
but
it's
an
existing
lot
of
record
okay.
So
if
they
build
a
house,
how
would
they
get
in
and
out
of
the
house
the
driveways
already
there
and
I
mean
it
hit
on
me.
Is
there
an
easement
through
the
other
piece
of
property?
There.
G
H
B
F
H
H
H
G
B
C
A
D
G
A
A
All
right
any
other
questions
for
mr.
Johnson
at
this
time.
I!
Don't
so
you
are
the
applicants?
I,
don't
do
this
yeah,
those
we
okay!
Is
there
anyone
in
the
audience
who
would
like
to
speak
against
this
proposal
against
it,
come
if
you'll
please
come
forward
and
if
you
will
be
sure
to
state
your
name
and
address
in
the
microphone
and
then
you
can
give
us
your
overview
good.
J
Morning,
Council
I'm,
Sharon,
Norfleet
I'm,
the
owner
of
lot
18
and
my
my
concerns
are
for
one
thing:
I
did
get
a
tax
bill.
What
about
my
taxes
with
almost
doubled,
therefore
receiving
this
letter
and
that's
one
thing
I'm
concerned
about
and
number
two
like
I
said:
I'm
familiar
with
one
of
the
owners:
the
young
owner
now
of
Chester's
father
who's
tad
too
arrogant,
and
what
the
problem
that
I've
had
with
my
property
I've
owned
the
property
for
over
30
years
33
years,
and
my
concern
is
that
he
has.
J
Driven
or
created
some
type
of
driveway
access
wave
road.
If
you
look
at,
let's
see
a
lot
a
where
he
built
on
a
roadway,
barely
cleared
the
lot.
You
build
a
roadway
and
what
has
really
impacted
me,
because
when
he
cleared
that
area
it
gave
access
to
my
property,
I've
owned
it
for
33
years,
the
13th
of
June,
someone
drove
through
that
property
climb.
My
8
foot
sense
broke
into
my
house
and
stole
four
thousand
dollars
worth
of
property
from
my
house.
I'm
really
concerned
about
that.
J
Because
of
the
theft
I
was
like
I
said:
I've
only
had
two
break-ins
in
the
33
years,
and
it
was
all
after
he
created
that
access
for
individuals
to
come
in,
and
we
also
have
another
neighbor
that
they
say
that
people
will
come
in
to
that
area
and
they're
using
drugs,
and
things
of
that
nature
I'm
very
upset
about
him
asking
for
that
to
be
commercial,
because
my
concern
is
with
him
now
clearing
it
out.
He's
created
a
road
where
people
can
under
tected
come
in
our
backyards
and
break
into
our
homes.
J
What
is
his
plan
about
basic
building
up
a
complex
parking
lot,
which
puts
my
property
vulnerable
to
that
I'm?
Having
a
problem
now
get
insurance
because
of
these
two
recent
break-ins
and
I'm
very
concerned
about
that
and
I
am
concerned
about
the
fact
that
when
he
did
drive
that
that,
on
created
that
roadway,
it
seems
like
he
has
taken
some
of
our
property
and
I
was
told
by
neighbor
said
that
his
concern
the
one
that's
in
life
right
beside
me,
50:35.
He
is
also
concerned.
J
A
Whether
or
not
that
is
part
of
your
property
is
by
having
a
survey
done
so
that
would
be
my
first
bit
of
advice
to
you.
Is
you
not
to
take
anybody's
word
for
it,
but
to
actually
have
a
survey
done
so
you
know
legally
what
your
boundary
of
your
property
is.
You
may
be
surprised
that
may
actually
belong
to
him.
I,
don't
know
so
that's.
That
would
be
your
first
step
in
that
regard,
your
property
taxes.
We
have
nothing
to
do
with
that
here,
so
that'll
be
an
issue.
B
G
Day
to
bear
to
not
even
be
comfortable
in
your
own
home
and
have
to
worry
about
you
know,
individuals
coming
in
that
are
unwelcome,
so
I
am
definitely
sorry
to
hear
that,
and
chairwoman
just
gave
you
some
solid
advice,
and
it's
not
that
we
don't
want
to
help.
You
is
that
we
are
incapable
of
providing
certain
assistance,
because
we're
here
to
review
zoning
application
now
in
regards
to
their
driveway.
Is
it
running
between
Lot,
seven
and
nineteen
on
the
map?
Yes,.
J
G
J
G
A
G
G
G
Know
now
now
now,
in
addition
to
the
survey,
I
would
hopefully
you're
considering
a
good
security
system
so
that
you're
protected
because
we
do
want
you
to
be
protected.
But
what
we're
here
today
considering
is
like
10,
11
and
12
and
making
those
residential
areas
which
is
actually
favorable
to
you,
because
if
those
remain
homes,
then
you
have
people
living
there
like
you.
That
is
going
to
be
able
to
watch
out
for
the
neighborhood
and
keep
things
on
the
outlook.
D
G
G
Or
anything
no
9
&
8
are
already
labeled
neighborhood
commercial,
we're
not
changing
notes,
so
whatever
neighborhood
commercial
allows
and
you
can
speak
with
the
Zoning
Department.
That
capability
still
exists
for
that
location,
but
10,
11
and
12,
in
which
12
is
right.
Behind
your
property,
we're
proposing
today
to
change
that
to
residential,
in
which
you'll
be
absolutely
sure
that
there
will
be
nothing
there
but
homes,
okay,.
G
A
F
J
D
A
H
H
H
I
F
H
A
I
G
I
G
Absolutely,
and
so
now,
if
you
come
back
up
here,
we
do
need
to
explain
that,
in
light
of
new
information
has
been
presented
in
in
the
complication
of
the
last-minute
changes
that
were
presented
to
the
engineering
department.
The
lots
that
are
up
for
consideration
today
is
like
10
and
lot
11.
You
see
that
on
the
map,
okay,
neither
one
of
those
borders,
your
property
and
directly,
which
is
a
lot
18.
G
J
G
G
I
would
certainly
recommend
again
a
security
system
to
make
sure
that
your
state's,
because
your
your
safety
matters-
and
we
want
you
to
be
safe
in
your
home,
so
I
know
you
you
prior
to
it.
You
came
here
today
because
you
were
opposed
to
the
changes
because
it
sounded
like
we
needed
to
clarify
what
was
going
on.
So
what
we
are
officially
considering
today
for
changing
and
zoning
is
lot
10
and
a
lot
11,
and
neither
one
of
those
bordered
your
property.
So
what
you
have
concern
with
we're,
not
addressing
it.
G
Right
now
is
labeled
neighborhood
commercial
again.
I
would
recommend
that
you
speak
with
the
engineering
staff
to
see
what
all
right
now
legally.
He
has
the
right
to
do
in
that
space,
because
there
are
some
things
he
can
do,
and
so
you
need
to
know
what
he
can
do
by
law,
and
so
that's
what
that's
considering
in
fact
we're
not
addressing
that
today.
I
will
feel
more
comfortable.
If
you
had
that
conversation
with
them,
you
know
I'll
directly
and
in
their
office.
Okay
right,
the
engineering.
Yes
not,
you
can
speak
with
them
they're
here
today.
G
G
I
A
A
G
H
A
C
When
I
talked
to
mr.
mr.
Chester
about
it,
the
only
two
that
were
talked
about
were
those
two
properties.
I
had
looked
at
them,
but
I
hadn't
realized
that
the
205
was
one
of
his
properties,
and
he
didn't
mention
that
it
was
his
properties,
and
so
that
was
just
a
small
oversight
that
we
did.
We
apologize
for
any
inconvenience
play.
K
K
That
has
been
very
confusing
so
as
soon
as
this
is
cleaned
up
and
cleared
up,
I
think
it
will
probably
be
unanimous,
but
I
mean
we
want
to
make
sure
we
get
you
corrected,
so
that
the
questions
that
are
being
brought
up
and
discussed,
or
not
about
the
two
lots
that
were
originally
brought.
It's
the
rest
of
this
stuff
that
was
was
brought
in
with
it
right.
A
D
D
D
The
state
is
waiting
for
me
to
open
up
those
particular
beds
for
foster
youth,
and
that's
why
I
belong
I
didn't
I,
didn't
realize
this
was
going
to
even
more
to
be
an
issue.
I
just
thought:
I
was
going
to
go,
get
this
owner
in
particular
occupancy
and
be
done
with
it
and
so
I'm
already
three
months
behind,
and
it's
costing
me
$1,200
each
month
that
this
doesn't
get
done
and.
A
A
A
Okay,
we
do
not
have
no,
you
are
no
I'm.
Sorry
I'm,
not.
A
No
I
know
you
were
in
favor,
so
we
do
not
have
any
other
cases
to
bring
before
us.
I
do
want
to
make
one
request
when
city
manager
hugely
came
before
us
and
he
had
said
that
we
would
be
getting
updates
on
our
cases
as
to
how
they
the
decisions
that
were
rendered
for
City
Council.
We
haven't
gotten
any
of
those
I,
don't
know.
If
there's
no.
C
C
A
That
in
an
email
and
everything
okay,
if
you
won't
ask
that
because
I
know
sometimes
the
timing
seems
longer
than
it
actually
is
and
whatnot
so
I
just
want
to
ask
about
that
anything
else.
Amongst
the
commissioners.
I
do
want
to
remind
you
that
we
have
our
next
meeting
August
2nd
and
that
there
is
the
g8,
the
Georgia
Association
of
planners
Georgia.
A
C
Are
at
the
point
of
engine
APA
is
moving
a
little
slow,
G
APA,
so
whenever
they
get
us
a
save
the
date
thing
or
mail
us
something
out
we'll
let
you
know,
but
these
are
the
dates
that
they're
going
to
be
okay
and
we're
more
than
happy
to
send
anybody
who
wants
to
go
and
it'll
be
here
for
two
three
days.
Okay,
thank.