►
From YouTube: PAC 05 17 17
Description
Description
A
Thank
you
and
I
would
like
to
remind
those
in
the
audience
and
those
watching
on
television
that
this
is
the
first
reading
of
any
rezoning
or
special
exception
request
brought
before
us
today.
We
will
first
hear
a
reading
of
the
staff
report
for
the
case
and
ask
the
applicant
to
provide
a
brief
overview
of
the
request.
We
will
then
give
the
opportunity
for
anyone
in
the
audience
to
speak,
for
or
against
the
request,
and
the
commissioners
will
have
any
needed
discussion
and
then
vote
and
render
a
recommendation
to
the
City
Council.
A
However,
it
will
go
back
to
planning
before
it
goes
to
the
city.
That
recommendation
will
then
be
sent
on
to
the
City
Council.
Who
will
hear
the
request
two
more
times
before
rendering
a
final
decision
I?
Don't
we
make
sure
we
do
have
minutes,
so
we
do
have
minutes
that
have
been
brought
before
us
today
from
the
April
19th
meeting
and
I.
Believe
all
the
commissioners
had
an
opportunity
this
week
to
take
a
look
at
those
minutes.
A
B
A
All
right-
and
so
that
brings
us
to
our
new
business,
which
we
have
three
cases
here
today
and
I
assume.
Mr.
Herot,
we
have
everyone
in
attendance.
Okay,
thank
you.
So
our
first
one
is
our
ezn
0
5
1
7
0
8
9
9,
and
this
is
a
request
to
amend
the
zoning
atlas
of
the
Columbus
consolidated
government.
Charles
H
4
jr.
A
of
Columbus
Georgia,
has
submitted
an
application
for
76
34
Oldman
Road
parcels,
0
7
3
0
2
2
0
0
7,
+,
0,
7,
3,
0,
2,
0,
0
7,
a
the
current
zoning
is
sfr,
one
which
is
single-family
residential,
one
and
SFR
three
single-family
residential
3.
The
proposed
zoning
is
G,
C,
general
commercial
and
the
property
is
located
in
Council,
District
Davis.
Mr.
Heron.
If
you'll,
please
read
the
staff
report,
Thank.
C
You
Jimmy
the
applicant
is
Charles
H
Ford
owner
is
Frank
D
Foley,
the
third
location
is
76
34
Old
Main
Road
acreage
is
12
point
zero,
five
acres,
current
zoning
classification
is
single-family
residential,
one
and
single-family
residential
three
proposed
and
classification
is
general
commercial.
Current
use
of
the
property
is
vacant,
proposed
use
of
property
is
medical
office.
Development
general
land
use
is
consistent,
it
is
in
planning
area
a
it
is
current
land
use,
designation
is
vacant,
future
land
use
designation
is
mixed
use,
it
is
compatible
with
existing
land
uses.
C
There
are
no
environmental
impacts,
all
city
services
are
provided.
Traffic
impact
is
that
traffic
on
Oldman,
rent
or
traffic
on
mineral
will
increase
by
2030
for
average
daily
annual
trips
and
level
of
service
will
stay
at
a
level
of
B.
The
traffic
study
that
was
submitted
with
the
application
has
a
higher
traffic
count
due
to
the
added
fast-food
restaurant.
The
report
also
states
that
a
traffic
light
will
be
warranted
on
moon,
Road,
moon,
roads,
ingress
and
egress
point.
C
C
A
D
E
F
D
The
property
is
has
been
in
the
Foley
family
for
quite
a
few
years,
they
were
I
have
been
approached
by
one
of
a
number
of
groups
that
I'm
sure
you
know
is
seeking
to
build
a
Veterans
Administration
clinic
in
Columbus.
This
is
one
of
probably
five
sites
that
are
being
looked
at
in
order
to
be
considered.
Va
requires
that
the
property
be
rezone
before
they
will
consider
the
applications.
D
We
now
understand
that
it
will
probably
be
late
this
year
or
even
January
before
they
make
a
decision
and
select
the
site,
and
so
there's
a
good
deal
of
negotiations
going
on
back
and
forth
between
the
actual
entity
that
will
buy
this
property
if
it's
selected
and
constructibility.
So
the
site
plan
that
we
submitted
is
probably
fairly
close
to
the
final
site
plan,
but
it's
not
certain
that
it
will
be
exactly
that.
D
For
example,
the
VA
does
not
want
a
through
Street
on
the
property
because
they
bill
to
have
through
traffic.
It
appears
they
won't
take
all
of
the
site
that
there
may
be
a
lot
left
on
the
old
moon,
Road
side,
but
the
end
that
still
has
not
been
tied
down
so
that
will
be
worked
out
as
we
go
fall.
D
G
D
H
A
Any
other
questions
from
the
commissioners
for
the
applicant
any
other
discussion.
If
not
Doyle,
here,
motion.
Oh,
let
me
ask
I'm
sorry:
is
there
anyone
in
the
audience
who
would
like
to
speak
against
this
I've
seen
none
anyone
who's
speaking
in
favor,
there
is
none.
Thank
you
for
that
reminder.
Do
I
hear
a
motion
amongst
the
commissioners.
Please.
B
Matter
of
our
easy
no.5
1
7
0
8
9
9
I've
got
Charles
H
Ford's
Union,
Frank,
D
Foley,
the
third
I
move
approval
of
rezoning,
76,
34,
Ramon,
Road
12
point:
oh
five:
acres
from
single-family
residential
one
and
single-family
residential
3,
general
commercial,
current
uses
vacant
and
general
land
use,
though
proposed
uses
medical
office,
development
and
general
land
use,
is
consistent
with
the
planning
area.
Do.
A
J
J
I
ask
a
or
make
a
side
statement
to
Kevin
or
to
request
from
the
city.
You
know
these.
This
is
not
in
question
to
y'all
via
mr.
Ford
I'm,
fine,
with
what
we
just
did,
but
I
am
a
little
challenged
by
the
fact
that
we've
got
these
sort
of
projects
where
people
have
to
get
the
zoning
redone
and
then
they
might
or
might
not
get
the
the
project.
So
if
there's
some
way
that
we,
if
we
have
to
do
a
text
amendment
or
something
like
that
to
the
you
do,
that
would
allow
that
I.
J
Don't
and
again
it
goes
to
some
of
the
constitutionality
issues
and
things
like
that,
but
I'm
frustrated
with
you
know.
Somebody
else
outside
force
that
might
not
even
selected
project
is
forcing
us
to
make
a
change.
They
choose
somewhere
else
and
now
this
change
has
been
made
and
we
don't.
It
opens
up
that
property
for
what
we
don't
for
something
we
don't
know
and
again
I'm
completely
happy
with
GC
at
that
location.
This
is
not
a
challenge
to
y'all
I'm,
just
frustrated
with
the
process.
J
A
You
very
much-
and
that
brings
us
to
our
next
case,
which
is
our
easy
n
0
5
1
7
0
9
0
5,
and
this
is
request
to
amend
the
zoning
atlas
of
the
Columbus
consolidated
government.
Sylvester
Jenkins
of
Columbus
Georgia
has
submitted
an
application
for
1751
and
1815
44th
Street.
This
would
be
four
parcels:
0
3
5
0
0
1
0
0
1
&,
0,
3,
5,
0,
0,
3,
0,
0
1.
The
current
zoning
is
LMI,
which
is
light
manufacturing
and
industrial,
and
the
proposed
zoning
is
G,
C
general
commercial.
A
C
You
applicant
is
Sylvester,
Jenkins
owner
is
quonset,
Laurie
Church
location
is
17,
51
1815,
44th,
Street
acreage
is
0.56
acres.
Current
zoning
classification
is
light,
manufacturing,
industrial
proposes
and
classifications
general
commercial,
current
use
of
the
property
is
Church
proposed
use
of
property,
as
Church
general
land
use
is
consistent,
is
in
planning
area.
D
current
land
use
designation
is
light.
Industrial
future
land
use
designation
is
general,
commercial
is
compatible
with
existing
land
uses.
C
G
H
C
G
G
C
G
Okay,
well,
let
me
let
me
say
where
I'm
coming
from
on
this
ro,
there
are
residences
on
a
clerk
right
across
the
street
and
I
think
that
neighborhood
needs
as
much
help
as
it
can
get.
So
if
it
was
a
narrow
designation
for
the
church,
property
I
support
the
church.
If
it
was
our
designation
for
the
church
property,
it
might
just
have
a
little
lighter
touch
on
the
neighborhood
from
the
standpoint
of
future
land
uses
along
that
Street.
If
something
happen
to
the
church
in
the
future.
Okay,
thank.
A
Just
to
get
an
understanding
of
where
they
don't
come
from.
Thank
you.
I
think
that
would
be
appropriate.
Any
other
questions
regarding
the
staff
report
all
right.
Well,
if
the
applicant
please
come
forward,
and
if
you
will
state
your
name
and
address
and
give
us
a
brief
overview,
that
would
be
great.
K
A
A
F
A
K
K
Gotten
that
property
to
it
can't
begin
a
church
there
and
I'm
not
used
to
this
as
my
first
time,
but
I
just
want
to
share
that.
Since
being
there,
we've
had
several
people
out
of
the
neighborhood
who
have
come
out
of
prostitution
out
of
all
types
of
addictions
and
if
you're
familiar
with
Columbus
in
that
area,
you
can
only
imagine
the
things
that
have
gone
on
there.
Several
people
they
have
continued
with
us.
K
As
a
matter
of
testimony
this
past
Saturday,
one
of
the
individuals
who
was
heavily
addicted
to
drugs,
went
out
with
us
as
an
evangelist
with
the
evangelism
King
to
witness
in
neighborhood
they're
great
things
going
on
they're
just
like
to
share
that,
and
we
want
to
be
inline
with
everything
that
the
city
says.
We
need
to
do
in
order
to
be
in
line
with
what
we
believe
is
God's
structure
for
that
area.
K
A
G
I,
say,
sir
good
morning
to
both
of
you
and
I
support
the
concept
of
a
church
there.
Okay,
my
question
has
to
do
with
whether
it
should
be
zoned,
general
commercial.
In
case
you
decided
to
move
the
church
at
some
point
in
the
future,
or
something
else
happened,
and
then
that
property
would
be
opened
up
to
a
variety
of
uses
which
may
not
support
the
residential
properties
immediately
across
the
street.
Okay,
so
the
the
aro
designation
would
still
provide
for
a
church,
but
it
would
provide
downstream.
G
K
K
C
C
There
are
a
lot
of
old
areas
within
the
city
that
have
that
same
type
of
uses.
So
we
we
looked
at
it.
Looked
at
the
rest,
everything
else
you
couldn't
go
with:
neighborhood
commercial,
because
neighborhood
commercial
is
a
5,000
square
foot
limit
it's
over
5,000
square
feet,
so
we
suggested
general
commercial
for
them.
I.
A
L
So
this
is
for
Stefan
over
here.
So
just
to
be
sure,
there
are
other
general
commercial
areas
in
close
enough
proximity
that
you
all
were
comfortable
with
giving
or
allowing
in
the
move
for
or
approving
the
general
commercial
space
right.
That's
correct!
That's
correct!
Okay,
and
you
said
to
your
knowledge:
there's:
there
are
no
current
problems
or
issues
with
places
where
we
have
general
commercial
and
residential.
L
C
They
were
brought
in
on
the
same
application
and
I
broke
them
up,
because
I
thought
it
would
be
easier
for
you
guys
to
handle
one
general
commercial
and
one
that
is
going
to.
It
is
a
current
single-family
residential
house
and
it
will
be
the
parsonage
for
the
church,
and
so
we
saw
it
fit
since
it
is
a
single-family
residential
house
to
go
back
to
single-family
residential.
But.
L
M
A
They
don't
have
to
I,
don't
have
to
come
back
before
us,
no
sir,
thank
you.
It
would
go
forward
with
our
recommendation,
as
in
our
own
house,
our.
A
J
Brannon
I
guess
my
concern
is
that
we
would
be
introducing
yet
another
zoning
class
in
that
area
and
I,
don't
know
Kevin.
If
you
have
the
ability
to
pull
up
the
zoning
map
in
there,
you've
got
GC
the
light
manufacturing
and
neighborhood
commercial
in
there.
So
then
we'd
be
and
obviously
the
residential
block,
but
then
we'd
be
dumping
in
another
random
zoning
in
that
area,
so
I
mean
quite
honestly,
although
I
don't
like
the
idea
of
opening
it
up
for
GC
facing
those
those
residences
just
from
a
practical
purpose.
J
C
G
G
J
But
if
we
change
it-
and
they
don't
say
it's
currently-
a
single-family
residence
would
continue
to
be
single
family
residents,
regardless
of
what
they
do
as
long
as
they
don't
change
that
they
mean
they
would
be
grandfathered
to
a
certain
degree
right.
We're
not
gonna,
go
in
there
and
kick
out
the
family.
That's
staying
there
as.
J
C
A
Any
other
questions,
commissioners,
thank
you.
There
is
no
one
in
the
audience,
but
I'll
for
official
purposes
calls
if
there's
anyone
out
there
that
I
don't
know
about
that
is
against
or
in
favor
of
this,
but
we
don't,
like
I,
said
how
many
one
in
the
audience.
So
any
other
discussion.
Commissioners,
and
if
not,
do
I,
hear
a
motion.
B
J
Okay,
all
right
in
the
case
of
rzn
zero,
five
one,
seven,
zero
905
applicant
Sylvester,
Jenkins
owner
glimpse
of
glory,
Church
location,
17
51
in
1815,
44th
Street,
current
zoning
classification,
LMI
proposed
classification
general
commercial,
because
it
is
consistent
with
the
general
land
use
incompatible
with
existing
land
uses.
I
move
that
we
have
proved
the
general
commercial
or
recommend
the
general
commercial
zone.
All.
A
Right
all
right
and
all
those
in
favor
of
this
recommendation
recommendation.
Please
raise
your
right
hand
it's
unanimous,
so
this
will
go
go
forward
as
as
an
approval
recommendation
and
you
can
just
say
right
there,
since
you're
up
next
for
the
first
one
all
right.
So
that
brings
us
to
our
next.
In
our
final
case,
which
is
our
easy
n
0
5
1
7
0
9
1,
and
this
is
request
to
amend
the
zoning
atlas
of
the
Columbus
consolidated
government.
Sylvester
Jenkins
of
Columbus
Georgia
has
submitted
an
application
for
1819
44th
Street.
A
This
is
parcel
number
zero.
Three:
five:
zero:
zero:
three
zero
zero.
Two,
the
current
zoning
is
LMI
light
manufacturing,
industrial
and
the
proposed
zoning
is
sfr
for
single-family,
residential
for
and
the
property
is
located
in
council
district
8
Garrett
mr.
Heric.
If
you
will
give
us
our
staff
report.
Thank
you.
Applicant.
C
Sylvester
Jenkins
owner
is
glimpse
of
glory.
Church
location
is
1819,
44th
Street
acreage
is
zero
point
one
seven
acres
current
zoning
classification
is
lot
manufacturing.
Industrial
proposed
in
classification,
a
single-family
residential
for
current
use
of
property
of
single-family
residence
proposed
use
of
property
of
single-family
residence.
General
land
use
is
consistent
planning
area.
D
current
land
use
designation
is
light.
Industrial
future
land
use
designation
is
GC
compatible.
It
is
compatible
with
existing
land
uses.
There
are
no
environmental
impacts,
property
is
has
all
city
services.
C
C
C
It
is
knit
that
gets
back
to
the
well.
We
raised
the
last
time.
It
is
neighborhood
commercial
because
it
was
c2
whenever
it
was
brought.
Whenever
we
changed,
the
zoning
in
2005
c2
was
moved
over
to
neighborhood
commercial.
However,
the
structures
that
are
there
were
currently
there
before
that
time.
Those
structures
are
over
2,000
or
5,000
square
feet,
so
they
are
legal
non-conforming
uses,
but.
A
K
A
L
L
In
zero
five
one,
seven
zero
nine
one:
two
applicants,
Avesta
Jenkins
owner
glimpse
of
glory,
Church
location,
1819,
44th,
Street,
sitting
on
point
17
acres,
currently
known
as
light
manufacturing
industrial
and
proposed
zoning
single-family
residential
for
we're
consistent
with
planning
area
D
for
the
general
land
usage
compatible
with
existing
land
uses.
Yes,
it
is,
and
with
the
recommendation,
no
for
recommendation
of
the
city,
I
move
that
this
body
approved
the
residential
application.
As
for
all.
A
Right,
so
we
have
an
approval
in
the
second
all
those
in
favor.
Please
raise
your
right
hand
and
it's
unanimous
and
yes,
I
did
skip
asking
the
audience,
because
there's
no
one
out
there
all
right
so
again,
this
will
go
forward
with
a
recommendation
for
approval.
Thank
you
so
much
for
your
time,
and
that
brings
us
to
the
end
of
our
cases
this
morning.
I
don't
see
that
we
have
any
other
business
other
than
a
reminder
of
our
next
meeting.
We.