►
From YouTube: PAC MEETING JAN 4 2017
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
Thank
you
and
I
would
like
to
remind
those
in
the
audience
and
those
watching
on
TV
that
this
is
the
first
reading
of
any
rezoning
request
brought
before
us
today.
We
will
hear
a
reading
of
a
staff
report
and
ask
the
applicant
to
provide
a
brief
overview
of
the
request.
We
will
then
give
the
opportunity
for
anyone
in
the
audience
to
speak,
for
or
against
that
request.
The
commissioners
will
have
any
needed
discussion
and
render
a
decision.
A
The
decision
will
be
sent
to
City
Council,
who
will
hear
the
request
two
more
times
before
rendering
the
final
decision
minute
wise.
We
do
not
have
minutes
to
bring
forth
so
we're
going
to
go
ahead
and
move
on
to
our
first
case,
and
this
is
a
zoning
case.
It's
our
easy
n
12
16
24
7
8.
This
is
request
for
a
text
amendment
to
amend
the
text
of
the
unified
development
ordinance,
also
known
as
the
you
do
in
regards
to
section
10.8
point2
certificate
of
occupancy
and
section
ten
point.
Eight
point:
one
building
permit
mr.
C
So
I
deal
with
this
kind
of
want
to
go
through,
like
I
said.
What's
currently
existing
in
the
code
is
more
than
the
same,
identical
and
I
just
want
to
take.
What's
in
the
you
do,
and
just
have
everybody
refer
to
the
code,
the
Columbus
Code
of
Ordinances.
What
happens
is
well,
as
you
know,
we're
a
very
litigious
society,
so
I
get
called
in
the
court
or
on
issues
during
codes
of
what
what
requires
a
building
permit?
D
C
I
know
that
everything
is
in
the
code
of
ordinances
and
I
know
that's
the
rule
or
if
everything
you
know
whatever
is
in
the
you
do
so,
there's
no
conflicts
so,
ideally
more
or
less
that's
the
purpose
and
what
I
want
to
do
is
literally
go
through
literally
what
the
you
do
says
and
then
what
the
code
says
and
then
we
can
discuss
as
to
what
needs
to
stay
or,
however,
but
ideally
I'd
like
to
have
a
agreement
from
you
all
what
needs
to
go
into
the
code.
C
So,
therefore,
if
I
need
to
make
any
future
changes,
not
only
I
have
to
come
to
you
all
to
to
get
everything
worked
out
here,
but
I
also
still
have
to
go
to
counsel
to
get
anything
passed
through
the
ordinances.
So
the
first
one
is
the
building.
Permit
is
required
and
you
can
read
it
there,
but
I
kind
of
highlighted
the
important
words
its
initiation
of
construction,
moving
alteration
of
any
building
or
structure.
Now,
in
the
you
do
we
have
a
cost
requirement,
which
is
estimated,
which
is
director
of
inspection.
C
That
codes,
which
is
me,
will
be
in
excess
of
three
hundred
dollars
and
I.
Guess
from
talking
I
see
that
that
is
I.
Guess
that's
a
sticking
point
for
some
of
you
all
this
is
that
cost
now,
ideally,
I,
don't
know
much
construction.
These
days,
that
is
less
than
three
hundred
dollars,
so
I,
don't
know
I,
guess
y'all
y'all's
concern
is
maybe
possibly
raising
that
number,
but
my
question
we
kind
of
get
into
taxes
and
things
like
that
and
I
don't
specifically
deal
with
that.
C
My
I'm
more
dealing
with
public
safety
so
say
if
somebody
wants
to
one
of
the
biggest
complaints
we
get
with
the
city
over
in
my
department
is
adorned.
So
if
somebody
has
to
get
their
door
switched
their
George
changed
out,
they
do
have
to
come,
get
a
permit
and
everybody's
like.
Why
would
they
have
to
get
a
building
permit
for
door
and
I'm
like
I,
understand
on
face
value
I'm
like
okay,
if
it's
the
same
size
door,
that's
different,
but
if
you
go
to
Home
Depot,
you
go
to
lowes.
C
These
lot
of
these
older
houses
have
28
inch
doors
and
now
we're
30,
32,
36
and
they're
bigger
doors.
So
therefore,
you're
making
a
structural
alteration
to
the
front
of
your
house.
You've
got
that
header.
You've
got
to
make
sure.
That's
correctly
done
your
studs.
You
got
to
make
sure
that
there's
no
riding
any
things
like
that.
So
yeah,
you
probably
couldn't
get
a
door
for
under
three
hundred
dollars,
but
ideally
the
way
we
look
at
it.
C
Inspections
and
codes
is
that
you
are
currently
living
in
that
house,
but
you
won't
always
be
living
in
that
house.
So
therefore,
if
you're
performing
that
work-
and
you
feel
you
don't
need
a
permit,
there
is
an
affidavit
that
you
signed
with
us
that
you
wouldn't
happen
that
you
perform
the
work
cell
perform.
But
at
one
time
in
the
future
you
will
pass
or
you
will
move
or
you
will
sell
your
house
and
therefore
for
us
for
liability.
C
We
want
to
make
sure
that
we
did
at
one
time
inspect
that
door
to
make
sure
that
it
was
correctly
installed
and
it's
not
not
to
make
sure
it's
plumb
and
make
sure
that
structurally,
it's
doing
what
it's
supposed
to
do.
If
you
switching
out
windows
like
I,
said
that
if
it's
a
one
for
one,
if
it's
the
same
frame
and
opening
no,
you
wouldn't
need
a
permit.
But
if
you
do
get
a
bigger
window,
where
one
is
reduced,
you
would
need
it.
C
So,
like
I
said
I
that's
here
and
in
the
code
which
is
already
existing.
This
is
already
in
the
existing
section.
Chapter
8
for
the
columbus
code
is
all
the
building
information,
and
so
here
this
is
any
owner
authorized
agent
of
contractor
and
once
again
you
have
construct,
alter
removed.
Demolisher
change
to
occupancy
/
building
will
require
a
permit.
C
So,
like
I
said
I
know,
there's
gonna
be
questions
on
that
one
I
kind
of
want
to
go
through
all
of
it
to
kind
of
show
you,
the
redundancy
I
do
have
and
everything
else,
and
we
can
kind
of
come
back
and
directly
talk
to
this
one,
but
that
that
is
one
there.
The
power
and
duties
of
the
building
official.
It
says
the
director
of
inspections
in
co
shall
be
responsible
for
administrating
the
code
but
code.
C
It
already
says
that
the
building
official
is
hereby
authorized
to
directed
enforce
the
provisions
of
this
code,
which
would
be
the
codes
of
the
city
of
columbus
and
any
local
ordinances
keep
going
site
Drummond's.
It
asks
for
single
family
and
two-family
dwellings
or
multifamily
that
a
platter,
the
light
showing
the
outline
of
the
site
plan
needs
to
be
done.
But
if
you
go
to
the
code,
it's
already
there,
the
drawings
shall
show
the
location
of
the
proposed
building
structure
and
every
existing
building
a
structure
on
the
site.
Once
again,
it's
just
redundant
permit
application.
C
The
application
for
a
building
permit
shall
be
made
to
the
director
of
inspectors
and
codes,
and
you
go
here
when
required
by
the
building
official.
This
is
the
this
is
what's
required.
Of
the
permit
from
an
application
form
tells
me
that
the
application
of
the
form
furnished
by
discussions
and
codes
enforcement
department-
that's
my
department,
we've
already,
you
know
here
he
goes.
Each
application
for
permit
shall
be
filed
with
the
building
official
with
a
form
the
lexer
said.
C
It's
all
the
same
plan
preparation
plan
shall
be
prepared
under
the
supervision
or
reviewed
by
an
architect
registered
in
Georgia.
We
already
have
them
call
design
professional
shall
be
an
architect
engineering
Lee
registered
under
the
laws
of
the
state
regulating
the
practice
of
architecture.
Engineering
plans
nomination,
completeness
review.
The
application
shall
be
checked
by
the
director
of
inspections
and
codes
for
completeness
here
we
go.
The
building
official
shall
examine
our
cost
of
the
examine
each
application
for
permit
code
compliance.
C
The
owner,
the
owner,
shall
be
responsible
for
compliance
with
the
you
do
and
all
building
code
requirements,
but
it's
already
there.
It
shall
be
the
duty
of
every
contractor
that
makes
contracts
from
the
installation
of
buildings
to
comply
with
state
and
local
rules
and
regulations
concerning
likes
the
same,
which
is
applicable
to
the
governing
authority.
Same
thing
issuing
a
building
permit
such
time,
the
owner,
the
director
of
inspections
and
codes
and
a
building
permit
shall
be
issue
for
the
structure.
Once
again,
an
artist
says
are
in
the
cold.
C
Currently,
if
the
building
official
is
satisfied
with
the
work
described
in
the
application
fee
shall
issue
a
permit
certificate
of
occupancy
inspections
and
codes
of
enforcement.
Department
just
stating
that
the
proposed
use
of
the
building
of
land
conforms
to
the
requirements
of
this.
You
do
and
the
section
of
the
code,
it
already
says,
says:
certificate
shall
not
be
issued
until
all
required
systems
have
been
inspected
for
compliance
with
technical
coats
and
other
flickable
laws
and
ordinances
I,
the
building
official
service.
C
You
tell
me
the
same
thing
you
kneel
section
that
says
it
has
to
be
contacted
by
the
director
instructions
and
co.
Sport
utilities
can
be
activated
on
the
site.
We
already
have
that
that
no
person
shall
make
connections
from
a
utility
until
released
by
the
building
official
and
certificate
of
occupancy
has
been
issued
and
one
more
temporary
certificates.
This
is
1,
I'm
not
a
fan
of
that.
I'd
like
to
change
is
that
we
have
a
temporary
certificate
of
occupancy,
may
be
issued
for
a
period
not
to
exceed
six
months.
What
happens?
There
typically
is
home.
E
C
Estate
home,
won't,
you
know
when
you
get
your
certificate
of
completion
for
the
for
the
property.
When
it's
done
it's
done
so
typically,
we
don't
have
issues
there.
We
have
issues
more
on
the
commercial
side
where
a
walmart
or
a
family
dollar
wants
to
open
early,
and
so
they
want
a
temporary
CEO,
so
they
can
order
liquor
or
whatever
they
have
to
get
their
alcohol
licenses,
and
things
like
that.
C
We
typically
frown
on
that,
because
what
happens
is
there's
any
other
issues
once
that
once
they've
got
that
Co,
those
contractors
are
out
the
door
they're
not
coming
back
so
I,
don't
particularly
like.
If
we
have
one
in
here
that
we
give
a
temporary
CEO
and,
like
I,
said
the
way
the
code
has
it
read
right
now
it
says
it
may
be
issued
and
I
like
to
do
that
so
depend
on.
C
C
Instead
of
me
having
to
revise
things
in
both
locations,
like
I,
said
I'm
just
trying
to
clean
up
what
we
have
just
so
it
makes
more
sense,
and
so,
if
I'm
referring
the
citizen
or
someone's
to
it,
then
I
playing
like
I
said
I'm
not
touching,
be
hard
bza,
all
those
things
for
sideboard
all
that
staying
the
same.
It's
literally
that
section
10.8
which
just
refers
to
building
permitting-
and
I
just
refer
all
of
that
to
the
to
the
code.
A
F
C
The
cost
estimate
we
still
if
anybody
comes
in
like
I
said
a
day.
If
people
have
questions,
that's
that's
the
issue.
You
have
some
people
that
want
to
come
because
they
want
to
know
if
they
need
a
permit,
but
then
you
have
other
people
that
are
going
to
perform
work
and
not
talk
to
us
at
all
and
ideally
where
I
want
to
start
with.
This
is
to
be
able
to
create
a
better
framework
to
explain
to
people.
Here's
a
list.
These
things
do
not
require
a
permit.
C
People
say
to
you:
if
you're
reaching
on
your
roof,
you
don't
need
a
permit
until
you
get
into
the
decade,
because
then
now
you're
making
a
structural
alterations,
a
lot
of
people,
don't
know
that
you
see
them
saying,
but
there's
it's
not
written
specifically
anywhere,
spelling
that
all
out,
and
so
the
threshold
I
got
I
had
an
issue
with
a
deck
when
the
guy
came
in
and
he
said
that
he
went
and
purchased
his
own.
He
went
to
the
scrapyard.
C
He
built
the
deck,
he
got
all
the
material
and
it
was
under
300
off
and
he
was
like
I
should
be
able
to
build
my
deck
and
I
pull
a
permit.
I
said,
sir,
and,
like
I
said
on
the
public
safety
side
I'm
like
you're,
installing
the
deck
we
go
out
and
and
review
it,
and
it
doesn't
mean
any
of
the
deck
guidelines.
Then
you
know,
like
I,
said
that
we
know
that
it's
in
violation,
but
the
guy,
if
he
would've
pulled
the
permits,
showed
us
drawings
to
let
us
know
what
was
being
installed.
C
Then
we
would
have
been
able
to
keep
him
before
he
poured
those
concrete
footers
that
weren't
deep
enough
we
could
have.
We
could
have
prevented
that
so
I'm,
not
I,
know
people
are
afraid
of
government.
Afraid
of
asking
us
as
I
always
feel
like
we're
going
to
charge
them
but
I'd.
Rather
it
he
tried
to
use
that
loophole
and
it
didn't
work,
and
then
he
got
mad
at
me
and
then
we
hadn't
really
had
to
go
to
court
and
then
had
to
get
him
to
take
it
down.
I
have.
A
A
C
So,
unfortunately,
we
have
to
review
those
as
well,
because
it's
sent
through
311
as
a
complaint
and
we
had
to
review
and
then
once
we
get
to
it
and
then
we
kind
of
start
the
process
from
there,
but
no
we're
not
looking
over
people's
fences
to
see
if
they
added
a
lean-to
or
they
close
in
there
I
mean
we
we
just.
We
don't
have
that
time
right,
we're
sure.
C
G
C
You
go
back
to
the
code,
it's
it's!
It's
I
understand
the
reasoning,
because
if
you
go
back
and
look
at
the
code,
we
actually
still
have
a
contractor's
Registration
Board
and
that
has
been
gone
for
years
and
years,
but
it's
technically
still
in
the
code.
So
I
think
they
made
revisions
to
the
you
do
so
they
wouldn't
have
to
attack
this
whole
thing
in
the
code
and.
G
What
I'm
getting
at
is
more
of
a
question
of
process
which
would
be
a
pain
for
you.
If
council
established
the
you
do
after
this,
after
the
code
sections
were
in
there
to
me,
it
seems
like
their
intent
would
be,
rather
than
two
for
the
you
do
direct
back
into
the
code,
the
code
to
direct
into
the
you
do
so
that
there
is
a
review
process
like
this,
which
this
body
has
a
review
over
me.
G
We
don't
make
any
decisions,
really
just
recommendation,
so
my
question
would
be
is
before
we
start
pointing
out
of
the
you
do
back
into
ordinance.
What
does
the
city
turn
attorney
and
councils
intent?
What
was
their
intent
when
they
enacted
the
you
do?
Should
they
have
not
struck
the
right
language
in
the
code,
and
that
would
be
my
concern?
Is
it
we're
going
back
and
pointed
back
to
old
stuff,
rather
than
the
old
stuff,
pointing
to
the
new
singer?
I
I.
G
Question
is
it's
almost
like
this
should
be,
it
means
we
need
to
look
at
council's
intent
on
what
were
they
intending
for
building
permits
and
cos
back
at
the
time,
and
if
it's,
they
even
added
the
new
you
do
than
the
council's
intent.
At
that
time,
I
would
assume,
is
to
supplant
the
old
code
and
so
we're
pointing
at
in
a
sense
pointing
the
code
in
the
wrong
direction.
It
needs
to
be
modified.
This
council
needs
to
change
the
ordinance
to
point
to
the
you
do
rather
than
mm-hmm.
D
G
G
And
that's
why
I
would
say
that
the
question
really
ought
to
be
asked
of
the
city
attorney
and
the
council
as
to
what
was
their
intent,
because
they
specifically
pulled
these
two
things
into
the
you
do
and
not
the
other
way
around,
because
the
you
do
postdates
the
community
is
assuming.
This
is
correct,
the
you
do
postdates
the
code
sections
and
and
so
that
now,
if
they
show
me
that
the
these
sections
we
need
to
change
were
modified
by
council
after
you
do
that?
Absolutely
let's
point
it
outward.
D
C
C
Different
interpretations
of
the
same
thing
so
she's
fine,
we
just
need
to
know
where
we
need
to
do
it
if
I,
if
I
make
the
changes-
and
it
just
is
in
the
you
neyo.
That's
fine
strike
because,
like
I
said
I'm
making
all
kinds
of
revisions
to
the
code
because
there's
a
whole
section
in
there
referring
to
the
state
licensing
board
that
we
don't
do
anymore.
The
state
handles
so
she's
already
ready
to
take
that
out
and
like
I
said.
C
G
Of
the
definition
of
the
sea
and
my
my
only
thought
on
why
they
pulled
these
two
is
when
they
create
the
you.
Do
they
created
this
review
process,
which
was
the
Planning
Commission
Roger
Commission,
to
give
citizens
an
extra
step
and
give
counsel
buffer
on
on
issues,
and
so
there's
a
reason
that
they
pull
these
two
out
into
the
you
do
and
thereby
adding
a
review
process
for
cos
and
building
permits.
The
text
itself
and
it'd.
H
Mr.
Davis
John
not
concerned,
is
it
this?
You
know
you
mentioned
strength,
screen,
doors
and
doors
itself.
You
send
a
person
want
to
get
a
screen
door
put
on
at
the
wound.
Property
screen
has
come
out.
You
send
it
that
you're
asking
for
a
three-hundred-dollar
building
permit
on.
That
is
just
the
way.
I'm
understanding.
Now,
sir,
no.
C
C
C
So
it's
just
it's
really
hard
to
kind
of
say
you
know
this
is
exactly
what
it
is,
but,
like
I
said,
we
get
a
lot
of
calls
from
roofers,
specifically
from
out
of
town,
they'll,
call
in
and
say,
hey
we're
coming
to
reshingle
the
roof
and
we're
like
that's
just
that.
We
would
consider
that
property
maintenance
and
they
wouldn't
require
a
permit,
but
once
they
start
we
go
out
there.
You
know
we
now
they've
already
called
us
and
we
go
out
there
and
we
see
decking
is
missing
and
we
see
insulation
is
being
moved
around.
F
C
The
line
so
I
typically
like
this
to
hold
the
line
of
structural
alterations,
because
if
you
come
in
and
remodel
your
bathroom
we're
not
asking
for
a
permit,
you
know
you're
doing
tile
on
the
floor.
You're
changing
your
toilets
out,
we're
not
asking
for
a
building
for
that.
If
you're.
If
you
know,
if
your
remodeling,
your
kitchen,
you
know
we're
not
looking
for
permanent
we're,
not
going
after
that,
we're
looking
for
straight
now,
if
you
knock
your
wall
out
between
your
your
your
great
room
in
your
kitchen.
C
D
As
you're
aware,
there's
there's
some
concern
in
this
group
relative
to
the
three
hundred
dollars.
Yes,
I
guess
my
question:
maybe
maybe
two
questions
one:
should
there
be
a
dollar
value
and
they're
all
if
it's,
if
it's
a
structural
alteration
and
if
there
is
a
dollar
value,
should
mean
I
how
long
as
the
three
hundred
dollars
number
been
there,
has
it
been
there
since
the
1970s
or
since
2005?
Or
how
long
has
it
been
there?
We'd.
C
B
C
Ideally
I
would
say
no
like
I,
said
I,
I
I,
know
the
other
elephant
in
the
room,
with
taxes
and
assessing
and
that
part
I
don't
personally
deal
with,
but
with
public
welfare.
It,
like
I
said
we
have.
We
have
had
people
that
have,
you
know,
went
to
lowes
and
try
to
install
the
door
and
then
they'll
call
us
because
they
didn't
get
the
header
being
the
right
size
and
it's
starting
to
sag.
They
pulled
it
out
and
that
would
was
right
so
in.
But
you
can
go
pick
up
a
door.
C
You
know
go
to
a
you
know,
antique.
You
know
you
can
go
get
a
door
for
Less,
that
threshold
and
be
okay,
and
so,
like
I,
said,
I
understands
the
other
side
of
that.
But
on
my
side,
I'm
looking
at
public
welfare,
so
in
public
safety.
So
I
don't
think
there
should
be
a
number,
but
like
I
just
know,
people
or
a
they're
going
to
say
over
now
they
gonna
make
hang
a
permit
and
that's
not
the
case,
but
people
are
too
afraid
to
call
to
find
they'd.
E
F
A
Mr.
deadly
I'm.
F
Still
confused
in
that
it
looks
to
me,
like
you,
are
proposing
eliminating
the
dollar
limit,
because
the
current
language
in
the
you
do
says
you
would
need
the
three
hundred
dollars,
but
your
proposed
language
just
refer
to
the
code
and
the
code
doesn't
have
a
dollar
limit.
It
just
says
any
construction,
enlarging
alteration
moving,
etc.
That's,
oh!
So
what
you
are
proposing
is
to,
in
effect,
eliminate
the
dollar
limit
right.
Okay,
thank.
A
I
I
A
C
I
I
I
appreciate
that
and
I'm,
not
in
disagreement
with
that
and
I'm
glad
you're
removing
the
dollar
amount,
like
my
only
concern
and
I
hear
the
spirit
of
what
you're
doing
and
I
agree
with
this
beard
of
what
you're
doing
my
concern
is:
there's
the
spirit
of
the
law
and
then
there's
the
law.
So
when
we
say
alter
that
word
is
very
subjective.
I
hear
that
your
same
structure
and
I
agree
with
that
when
it's
a
safety
concern.
I
C
I
said
mon,
my
next
step
is,
you
know,
like
I
said
I
want
to
make
sure
I
had
jobs
blessing
and
then
to
meet
with
the
city
of
turn.
I'm
actually
meeting
with
her
tomorrow
afternoon,
to
try
to
you
know,
work
some
of
the
words
out
like
I
said
I
literally
just
pulled
I
copied
and
pasted.
What's
currently
in
the
existent.
I
When
I
appreciate
you
going
to
those
steps
and
working
with
I
I,
just
don't
want
us
to
exasperate
exacerbate
this
and
carry
it
on
in
and
vote
and
say
yes
and
now
we've
taken
something
that
all
of
us
I
think
collectively
if
agreed,
needs
to
be
changed
and
yet
we're
going
to
vote
and
say
well,
let's
just
make
it
even
more
complex
and
I
hear
the
spirit
of
what
you're
doing.
I
don't
disagree
with
with
where
you're
going
with
that.
D
C
Takeaways,
like
I,
said
one
is
to
remove
the
dollar
amount
from
the
building.
Permit
too,
that's
12
to
clarify
to
declare
a
flower,
like
you
said,
to
structural
alterations
to
property.
So
therefore,
that
definition
of
a
building
permit
is
better
to
find
32,
I,
guess,
I'm,
not
sure
I.
Guess
we
have
to
find
out
a
little
bit
more
research
on
which
way
we
want
the
you
do
to
reference
the
code
or
the
code.
The
reference
to
you
do
either
way
like
I,
said
we're
fine
and
Lucy's
fine.
C
E
E
A
I
If
you
go
by
an
exterior
door-
and
you
say
well,
I've
got
a
wooden
front
door
and
I
want
to
go
to
a
metal
front
doors
and
offers
like
it's.
It's
three
hinges:
I'm,
not
changing
the
header,
the
framing
or
anything,
but
that's
an
alteration
that
bang
I
gotta
go,
get
a
building
permit
or
I've
at
least
got
to
write
up
something
and
get.
I
To
look
at
it
and
I
mean
I
think
we're
burdening
the
citizens
way
too
much
for
what
I
consider
non
structural
type
changes
and
I.
Just
don't
think
we
should
burden
the
citizens
that
way
and
I
think
this
$300
had
to
have
come
from
the
60s
or
something
that
was
a
lot
of
money,
but
I
like
taking
the
dollar
out,
but
in.
I
Of
the
law
and
the
law
are
two
different
things
own.
You
put
subjective
words
in
there
than
anybody.
If
you
move
on
to
become
mayor
than
your
replacement
is
going
to
come
in
and
say
well,
alter
means
if
you
touch
anything,
I'm
full
of
nails,
I
want
a
building
permit
which
triggers
that
process
and
then
triggers
the
Tax
commissioner's
process
and
all
of
a
sudden
we've
got
this
whole
ball
of
wax
rolling
zone.
So
I'm.
C
Get
over
12,000
of
permits
a
year,
so
my
inspector
having
to
stop
they
look
at
a
front
door.
It's
not
not
a
top
list
of
things
to
do,
but
we
can
I
have
known.
I
have
no
problem
with
with
changing
that.
To
just
say
that,
like
I
said,
I
just
have
to
get
with
Lucy
and
Clifton
and
figure
out
where
it
needs
to
be
whether
it
be
in
the
you
do
as
the
definition
of
a
building
permit
and
CEO
or
in
the
Code
of
Ordinances
I'm.
A
B
D
A
I
think
you
know,
for
your
purposes,
I
think
that
the
suggestions
that
you're
bringing
forward
are
not
the
heartburn
right
here.
I
think
we
support
you
in
your
cleaning
up
effort
and
getting
the
redundancy
out,
but
it
does
sound
like
we
need
to
table
this
until
we
get
some
information.
You
know
beep
from
mr.
Fay
or
what
have
you
in
terms
of
the
the
you
do
and
the.
D
A
Here
a
second
mr.
Greenblatt,
okay,
so
we
will
table
this
and
look
forward
to
getting
the
answer
to
that
and
then
letting
you
move
on
anymore.
Thank
you
again
for
the
work
you're
putting
into
this,
and
that
actually
is
the
only
case
that
we
have
today.
We
do
need
to
you
had
been
emailed
by
mr.
Herod
the
calendar
for
2017
I.
A
Don't
need
a
motion
and
all
that,
since
you
were
given
this
ahead
of
time,
but
if
you've
had
an
opportunity
to
look
at
the
dates,
is
there
any
objection
or
questions
regarding
the
dates?
Okay?
Well,
then,
we
will
submit
them
as
approved.
Then,
okay,
okay
and
we
have
our
next
meeting
January
the
18.
We.
B
Have
sorry
chairman,
we
have
one
more
thing:
we'd
like
to
show
you
guys.
We
have
Shane
from
IT
he's
going
to
give
you
a
presentation
on
sharepoint,
and
that
is
what
we're
going
to
start
moving
to
to
get
you
your
packets,
so
that
you
can
go
in
and
I
have
your
own
login
to
go
into
sharepoint
and
then
I'll
have
everything
uploaded
and
you'll
get
a
reminder.
The
minute
that
I
uploaded
to
sharepoint.
J
J
All
I
need
is
an
email
address,
such
yourself
up
with
a
password
like
he
said
anytime,
you
get
a
anytime,
he
uploads
a
document,
it
will
send
you
an
email
and
you
just
have
to
click
a
link,
and
it
will
bring
you
to
this
right.
There
you
see
at
the
very
top.
It
says
any
announcements,
a
you're
not
gonna,
have
a
meeting.
He
wants
everybody
to
know
something
he
can
put
it
there
below
that
all
of
the
documents
that
he's
uploaded
this
month.
If
he
Scrolls
down
you'll,
see
a
calendar.
J
B
B
We're
going
to
do
is
he
he
will
have
all
your
email
addresses
and
then
we're
going
to
send
you
a
link
for
you
to
be
able
to
log
into
it
and
create
your
password
for
each
one.
And
then
you
all
will
have
separate
passwords
that
you
created
and
links
to
your
we're
not
going
to
have
to
recreate
new
emails
for
you.
You'll
use
your
current
email
that.