►
From YouTube: Columbus GA Planning Advisiory Comm Meeting 04 05 2023
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
Yes,
good
morning,
I'd
like
to
bring
the
April
5th
2023
planning
advisory
commission
meeting
to
order
official
start
of
this
meeting
is
9
A.M.
If
you
please
rise
for
the
pledge
allegiance
to
the
flag
of
the
United
States
of
America
I
pledge
allegiance
to
the
flag
of
the
United
States
of
America
and
to
the
Republic
for
which
it
stands.
One
nation
under
God,
indivisible
with
liberty
and
the
justice
for
all.
A
A
A
If
a
favorable
recommendation
is
given,
then
the
case
is
forwarded
to
the
city
council
with
two
independent
recommendations.
The
planning
department
makes
a
recommendation
for
denial.
The
applicant
will
have
10
days
from
the
receipt
of
the
letter
stating
the
denial
to
notify
the
clerk
of
council
that
they
are
requesting
to
be
placed
on
the
city
council's
agenda.
A
The
city
council
of
Columbus
will
hold
a
public
meeting
called
the
first
reading
said.
Council
shall
consider
the
case,
review,
planning,
advisory,
commission
and
planning
department
recommendations
and
hear
discussion
on
the
matter.
Council
will
make
a
final
decision
at
a
second
public
meeting
called
the
second
reading.
A
Our
first
agenda
today
is
to
prove
the
minutes
of
our
previous
meeting.
Does
anyone
have
any
comments
or
corrections
to
the
minutes?
All
right.
Would
someone
like
to
make
a
motion
to
prove
the
minutes?
Of
course,
all
right,
I'll
favor
razor
right
hand,
alrighty.
That
brings
us
to
our
first
case
of
the
day
case.
A
R-E-Z-N03-23-0473
a
request
to
rezone
61.10
acres
of
land
located
at
9423
94
43
94,
63,
Macon
Road.
The
current
zoning
is
re-1
residential
Estate
One,
slash
HMI
heavy
manufacturing
Industrial
for
pro
zoning
is
GC,
General,
commercial
or
single
single
family.
Residential
three,
the
proposed
use
is
a
commercial
and
residential
subdivision.
Ram
Wright
Incorporated
is
the
applicant.
The
property
is
located
in
Council
District
Six
Allen.
Could
we
please
hear
from
planning
staff?
Yes,.
B
Sir,
the
general
land
use
is
inconsistent
from
for
for
planning
area
B.
The
current
land
use
designation
is
vacant
undeveloped.
The
future
is
heavy
manufacturing
industrial.
It
is
compatible
with
existing
land
uses.
The
property
does
not
lie
within
the
floodway
and
floodplain
area.
The
developer
would
need
an
improved
drainage
plan
priority
issuance
of
a
site
development
permit.
If
a
permit
is
required,
property
is
served
by
all
city
services
averaging
will
daily
trips
will
increase
to
2
424
up
from
112
trips.
B
If
used
for
commercial,
commercial
and
residential
use,
the
level
of
service
will
remain
at
a
level
B
the
site
show
me
the
show
me.
The
codes
and
regulations
of
ccg
for
com
for
commercial
usage
there'll
be
no
school
impact.
The
buffer
requirements.
The
site
shall
include
a
category
C
buffer
along
all
property
lines,
bordered
by
the
sfr3
re1
and
HMI
zoning
districts.
B
The
three
options
on
a
category
C
are
20
feet
with
a
certain
amount
of
canopy
trees,
understory
trees,
shrubs
ornamental
grasses
per
100
linear
feet,
10
feet
with
a
certain
amount
of
shrubs
ornamental
grasses
per
100
linear
feet
in
a
wood
fence
or
masonry
wall
30
feet
undisturbed,
natural
buffer,
there's
no
Fort,
Benning
recommendation
no
dri
recommendation.
The
surrounding
zoning
to
the
north
is
already
one
to
the
South
is
already
one
to
the
east.
Islami
to
the
West
is
HMI
20
Property
Owners
within
300
feet
of
the
subject's
property,
were
notified
of
the
reasoning
request.
B
The
planet
apartment
received
four
calls
and
or
emails
regarding
the
rezoning.
There
was
nobody
in
approval
or
opposition
and
as
far
as
additional
information
applicant,
originally
salt
P
mud
plan
mix
use
development,
but
due
to
tax
considerations,
decided
to
submit
the
GC
and
sfr
Zoning
classifications.
The
applicant
can
speak
to
that
when
he
comes
to
the
podium.
A
public
meeting
was
held
on
March
21st
2023
by
the
applicant
and
counselor
Allen.
Seven
local
residents
attended
the
meeting
and
there
was
no
major
opposition
at
that
time
and
the
last
thing
U.S
Highway
80
overlay
District.
A
C
A
D
D
So
as
as
John
mentioned
in
his
planning
report,
we're
looking
at
Zone
61
acres
and
currently
it's
split
into
three
different
tax
Parcels
going
left
to
right.
The
first
is
currently
is
on
HMI,
the
middle
one
is
re1
and
then
the
one
on
the
right
is
also
heavy
manufacturing,
Industrial
and
one
you
can
see.
You
can
see
it
there
as
well
and
and
as
as
they
mentioned,
there's
generally
industrial
uses
and
residential
uses.
D
The
the
light
blue
across
Calumet
Drive
is
currently
in
a
piedmont,
and
so
what
they've
developed
so
far
on
the
on
the
left
hand,
side
is
residential,
but
the
right
hand
side
will
eventually
be
developed
into
commercial
into
a
commercial
use.
As
my
understanding,
and
so
this
is
our
site
plan,
it's
it's
not
that
large,
but
generally
you've
got
six
commercial
excuse
me:
commercial
Parcels,
on
the
left
hand,
side
off,
Calumet
drive
and
then
you
go
into
115
potential
residential
Parcels
and
those
are
sfr3.
D
D
So,
as
I
mentioned
earlier,
the
developer
Ram
right
Inc
has
been
involved
in
several
major
developments
in
Columbus,
currently
they're
working
on
Midland
Commons
out
in
the
Midland
area,
and
then
they've
also
done
all
or
portions
of
certain
subdivisions
in
town,
including
portions
of
Garrett
Creek
and
Garrett
Pines,
which
are
located
near
that
area
in
in
that
area
and
I
also
included
some
visuals,
showing
you
know
examples
of
some
of
their
some
of
their
prior
developments.
That
would
be
generally
generally
similar
to
what
we
would
see
in
this
instance.
D
The
properties
design,
with
the
full
intention
of
providing
significant
buffering
across
all
areas
currently
on
the
on
the
West
Side
you've
got
a
100
foot
buffer,
that's
already
in
place
on
the
on
the
heavy
manufacturing
track.
Next
to
this,
and
there's
also
100
foot
buffer
in
place
here,
so
you'd
have
over
200
feet
of
buffer
in
that
area
and
then
we'd
also
comply
with
all
other
buffer
requirements
throughout
the
remainder
of
the
of
the
development
properties
already
serviced
by
all
utilities.
D
We've
met
with
with
any
residents
that
we've
met
with
any
residents
that
wanted
to
come
out
and
talk
with
us
at
Salman
Road
a
few
weeks
ago,
I
believe
there
were
six
or
seven
folks
who
came
out
who
lived
in
that
general
area
and
the
notice
my
understanding
that
the
notice
that
councilor
Allen
sent
out
on
that
was
further
than
300
feet
at
the
planning
department,
since
I
think
he
extended,
maybe
maybe
two
miles
I
think
so.
D
Residents
within
a
pretty
wide
area
were
given
notice
of
the
meeting,
and
we
had
seven
people
show
up
and
generally
they
weren't
opposed
or
against.
They
just
wanted.
Some
additional
information
property
is
currently
well.
The
property
will
be
within
the
Highway,
80
overlay
district
and
so
I
pulled
some
just
a
couple
of
things
out
of
that
for
your
consideration.
The
first
is
that
in
the
Highway
80
overlay,
District
encouraged
use,
especially
in
Focus
areas,
which
are
defined
as
intersections
between
roads.
D
As
far
as
economic
impact,
this
this
project
would
have
a
significant
job
economic
impact
and
that
it
would
create
a
lot
of
construction
jobs
in
the
build
out
of
the
commercial
spaces
and
the
residential
spaces,
and
then
there
would
also
be
you
know,
obviously,
some
full-time
positions
after
Construction
in
some
of
those
commercial
commercial
buildings,
it
also
increased
out
to
warm
taxes.
D
In
that
you
know,
the
property
would
obviously
be
developed
and
the
commercial
would
be
taxed
at
a
commercial
rate
and
the
residential
at
a
residential
rate,
and
the
last
thing
is,
as
John
mentioned,
the
the
P
Mud
versus
what
the
format
that
we
eventually
went
for.
D
We
originally
thought
we
would
try
for
p
mud
and
that's
what
the
planning
department
recommended
to
us,
because
you
already
have
the
Midland
Downs
Piedmont
across
Calumet
drive
from
us
and
so
I'm
sure
you're
familiar,
but
with
Piedmont
you,
you
Zone
it
and
you
have
a
certain
percentage
of
commercial
and
a
certain
percentage
of
residential
that
you
can
do
within
your
development.
Currently
the
way
that
the
tax
assessor's
office
taxes,
those
Parcels,
though
until
the
properties
develop,
the
entire
acreage
is
taxed
at
a
commercial
rate.
D
So
that's
that's
why
we
eventually
ended
up
going
with
the
GC
and
the
sfr
same
development,
but
with
the
with
the
tax
implications
and
the
way
it's
going
to
be
taxed
by
the
tax
assessor,
the
P
mud.
Just
wasn't
wasn't
a
feasible
option.
D
What
questions
do
you
guys
have
for
me?
You.
C
A
Right,
if
you
got
one
missing,
okay,
all
right,
I
appreciate
it.
Would
a
commissioner
like
to
make
a
motion
yeah?
Oh,
yes,
anybody
only!
It's
four!
That
said
a
request.
Is
anybody
against
this
request?
All
right.
Would
a
commissioner
like
to
make
a
motion.
A
All
right
that
brings
us
to
our
second
case
of
the
day.
A
B
Sir
Nike
said
this
is
to
amend
the
amend
table
3.1.1
by
permitting
the
following
use
in
the
following
district,
and
that
would
be
to
allow
private
dog
parts
in
General
commercial.
We
originally.
This
is
an
update
to
the
original
ordinance
that
we
submitted
and
I
guess.
That's
probably
been
about
like
two
years
ago
for
the
fetch
dog
park.
B
C
B
Essentially,
it's
a
it's
a
private,
privately
owned
commercial-based
dog
park
that
you
would
bring
your
dog
to
a
lot
of
times.
There
is
a
membership
fee,
that's
involved.
They
provide
toys
and
activities
for
your
for
your
dogs
to
do
a
lot
of
times,
there's
also
a
store
or
a
shop,
that's
associated
with
fetch
in
in
their
case,
they
have
a
place
that
you
can
eat
and
and
or
get
drinks
there
as
well.
So
that's
that's
typically
what
we
view
a.
B
Other
words
and
technically
now
is
not
it's
just
permitted
in
uptown
in
crd,
just
out
of
out
of
use,
but
we're
adding
it
to
GC
so
that
they
so
that
people
can
develop
it
in
a
General
commercial
area,
though,
as
though
you
couldn't
even
get
a
special
exception
prior
to
this,
for
General,
commercial
or
neighborhood
commercial.
B
The
only
thing
that
I
could
think
of
related
to
Jericho
Marshall
is
is
possibly
lot.
Size
may
need
to
have
a
minimum
lot
size
requirement
on
it
because
General
commercial.
We
have
some
lots
that
are
4
000
square
feet
and
they
could
possibly
back
up
right
to
to
a
neighborhood,
so
that
could
that
could
potentially
cause
a
problem.
I
think
well.
E
B
Okay,
but
but
I
do
think
that
this
use
is
going
to
be,
of
course,
less
of
a
use.
If
you
have
a
private
dog
park
versus
a
convenience
store
with
gas
sales,
so
I
I
think
that
there
probably
should
be
a
minimum
acreage
requirement
on
that,
but
the
buffering
should
the
buff.
The
current
buffering
that
we
we
have
in
the
Udo
should
handle
the
distance
requirements
as
far
as
noise.
How.
C
B
Right
right
now
we
just
have
the
one
we
do
have
there's
the
the
city
on
one
in
Oxbow,
Meadows,
that's
in
South
Columbus
and
then
this
applicant
has
has
a
general
idea
of
where
they
make,
where
they're
looking
to
put
one
but
they're,
not
a
100
percent
on
sold
on
that.
B
We
see
maybe
three
to
five
of
these,
possibly
but
I.
Don't
I,
don't
think
we're
going
to
see
an
influx
of
a
hundred,
and
you
know
150
of
these
coming
into
town.
Okay,.
C
F
A
A
G
Hey
good
morning,
everyone
I'm
British
Mali,
and
this
is
my
business
partner.
Krishna
Shah,
hey.
H
Good
morning
so
yeah
we,
you
know,
we
we've
come
into
this
community
and
we
absolutely
love
the
community.
We
live
in
North
Columbus
and
you
know
that's
an
area
that
we'd
like
for
this
girl
to
to
be
seen
in.
G
I
think
the
benefit
for
everyone
to
see
to
see
it
encourages
a
safe
space
for
dogs
and
communities
alike
to
come
and
socialize.
So
it
builds
Fosters
the
sense
of
community
and
that's
what
we
want
to
you
know:
bring
to
North
Columbus,
make
all
of
that
more
accessible
and
not
have
households,
Drive
20
30
minutes
every
time,
and
that's
really
what
drives
our
vision.
G
It
would
be
in
line
with
what
fetch
does
I
would
like.
Think
we
don't
have
an
exact
handle
on
that
yet,
but
as
as
this
organically
grows,
I
think
we
can
set
that
in
stone.
G
E
King
I'd
like
to
make
a
motion
I'd
like
to
make
a
motion.
We
deny
this
until
we
have
more
information
as
far
as
square
footage
on
Lots
I
feel
like
this
is
my
opinion
that
it
needs
to
be
a
special
exception,
use
in
any
General
commercial.
So
I'd
like
to
make
a
motion.
We
deny
it
at
this
time,
based
on
the
information
we've
been
given
and.
C
E
B
So
General
commercial,
the
minimum
lot
size,
is
4
000
square
feet.
Right
I
mean
you
could
set
a
minimum
acreage
size
that
you
feel
comfortable
with
now.
That's
within
a
special
exception.