►
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
A
B
I'd
like
to
call
the
october
14th
public
works
meeting
committee
to
order
rose.
Could
you
please
take
a
roll.
C
B
Okay,
may
I
entertain
a
motion
to
approve
and
dispense
with
the
reading
of
the
prior
months
meetings
minutes.
B
C
B
Okay,
at
this
time,
we
would
like
to
cover
committee
business
matters
carried
over
first,
we
have
ordinance
72108,
ordinance
and
amendment
of
chapter
12
of
the
code
of
the
city
of
cranston,
entitled
streets,
sidewalks
and
public
places
street,
paving
sponsored
by
councilman,
donegan
and
councilwoman
moreno.
This
is
continued
from
9
15
21.
B
E
F
Personally,
I'm
not
a
big
fan
of
this
ordinance,
but
I
I
would
implore
you
to
try
to
do
one
thing
and
in
the
third
third
line
it
says
to
be
paved
during
the
corresponding
budget
fiscal
year.
F
F
Typically,
that
list
contains
a
lot
more
roads
than
we're
actually
physically
going
to
pave
during
the
next
year
and
and
roads
get
knocked
off.
They
get
added
and
I
would
be
very
hesitant
to
publish
a
list
especially
again
for
for
the
for
the
general
public
to
see
a
list
of
roads
that
we
are
looking
to
pave
and
then
people
will
wonder
why
it
didn't
get
paved.
F
One
example
in
point
that
worked
out
quite
well
for
us
this
year
was
councilwoman
vargas,
contacted
me
in
the
spring
and
asked
me
which
roads
were.
We
were
planning
on
paving
in
her
ward.
F
I
sent
her
over
a
list
of
streets
and
she
requested
that
I
change
those
and
do
a
different
section
of
the
city
which
we
did
and
everything
worked
out
very
well.
Everything
was
everybody
was
reasonably
happy
with
it,
but
if
that
list
had
been
published,
the
six
or
seven
streets
that
we
were
initially
planning
on
paving,
you
probably
would
have
gotten
phone
calls
for
it
for
them
they
weren't
paid.
So
those
are
my
comments
on
it.
F
This
was
always
a
policy
decision
that
the
previous
administration
had
had
had
held
that
they
didn't
want
to
publish
a
proposed
list,
and
I
can
see
the
reason
why
they
always
were
amenable
to
sitting
down
with
each
individual
council
person
just
to
get
their
input
on
what
roads
they
would
like
to
see
paved
so
whether
an
ordinance
is
needed
like
this,
I
really
don't.
No,
that's
up
to
you.
Folks.
G
Thank
you.
Thank
you,
our
director
mason,
just
to
provide
you
with
a
little
insight
as
to
what
happened
the
previous
meeting.
When,
when
you
were
away,
we
specifically
continued
it
so
that
you
could
have
some
input
on
this.
Obviously,
and
the
intent
we
had
expressed
at
that
time
and
I'll
repeat
again,
is
to
set
the
the
time
frame
for
the
reporting
at
a
time
that's
convenient
for
you
to
not
be
as
burdensome
so
we
don't.
I
don't
you
know.
G
Councilman
donegan
can
speak
to
this
as
well,
but
so
I
don't
have
any
issue
with
changing
it
for
the
list
to
be
representing
online
27
for
the
corresponding
budget
calendar
year.
But
then
what
I
would
seek
some
input
from
you
on
is
with
respect
to
the
timing
of
producing
the
actual
list.
I
understand
what
you
stated
this
evening,
but
I
do
think
that
this
provides
for
a
lot
of
transparency.
G
Yourself
had
stated
that
you
know
when
councilwoman
vargas
reached
out
to
you.
You
were
able
to
give
her
the
list
work
through
that
by
doing
something
like
this,
you
wouldn't
even
have
to
do
that.
Everyone
would
know,
and
the
als
the
other
portion
of
this
ordinance
allows
for
at
the
end
of
the
time
period,
which
we
can
work
out
as
to
when
that's
most
convenient
to
report
on,
there
will
be
a
report
as
to
which
lists
were
paved.
G
If
you
would
like
at
that
time,
to
provide
a
simple
explanation
as
to
why
the
ones
were
not
paved,
we
can
simply
do
that
too,
but
I
do
still
feel
this
ordinance
is
beneficial
to
the
residents
and
I
think
that
it
would
be
a
good
step
in
transparency.
Thanks.
H
Councilman
donegan
thank
you
chairman,
and
thank
you
director,
mason,
for
what
you
offered
earlier.
I
share
the
sentiments
of
my
colleague,
councilwoman
mourinho,
and
appreciate
your
insights.
As
always
the
personally
open
to
you
know
having
your
comments
and
suggestions
to
make
it.
So
it's
not
an
additional
burden
to
you,
something
that's
can
be
formulated
and
put
together
as
easily
as
possible.
H
I
appreciate,
as
always
as
you've
as
you
extended
to
councilwoman
vargas
this
year
and
as
you've
extended
to
me
personally
in
the
past
your
openness
and
willingness
to
discuss
what
streets
are
being
done,
and
certainly
perhaps
pivot
at
times
on
on
what
what
is
getting
worked
on,
and
I
think
that
that
can
still
happen
it
just
maybe
that
conversation
happens
a
few
weeks
or
months
before
the
list
goes
out
to
kind
of
solidify
or
get
a
better
idea
of
what
streets
in
each
area
are
going
to
get
done.
H
But
I
do
think
that
this
would
add.
Having
this
on
the
books
would
would
add
some
clarity
for
the
public
and,
as
and
and
for
the
council
to
to
know
you
know
what
the
money
is
being
used
for.
That's
coming
before
us
in
the
budget
and
then
on
the
back
end.
B
H
E
I'm
just
wondering
would
it
be
helpful
if
this
was
like
a
live
document
like
some
kind
of
google
doc
or,
if
there's
something
more
secure,
so
as
things
change,
the
administration
can
just
change
it
and
people
aren't
confused
as
to
you
know
they
can
see
it
happening
live
if
they
want
to
check
if
their
street's
going
to
be
getting
done
or
not.
I
know
that
other
municipalities,
I've
seen
them,
do
it
on
a
map.
Almost
so
people
know
you
know
when
they
can
see
it
visually.
E
What's
getting
done
when
and
I
don't
know
if
that
would
alleviate
people
coming
back.
Oh
hey,
why
wasn't
my
street
being
done?
They
saw
a
change
and
you
know
couldn't
figure
it
out.
I
Thank
you
chairman.
I
would
like
to
echo
the
sentiment
of
our
councilman
marino
and
councilman
done
again
for
the
ordinance,
because,
as
a
new
council
person
I
have
received
so
many
calls
and
we
have
a
resident
that
says
the
the
street
haven't
been
paved
for
30
years.
I
I
have
residents,
tell
me
30
years,
and
I
don't
have
the
answer
so
if
we
have
something
in
narrative
that
tell
them
this
is
the
rationale
behind
why
york
street
haven't
been
paved.
So
I
think
the
transparency
we
all
in
the
same
page
that
will
help
all
of
us
to
do
the
work.
So
that's
why
I
will
I'm
not
in
the
committee,
but
I
really
hope
that
you
pass
this
ordinance
tonight.
D
You
chair
through
the
chair
to
director
mason,
once
you
facilitate
the
list
that
you
have
now
and
you're
getting
ready
to
work
on
the
roads
or
you
you
know
it's
getting
closer.
How
often
does
the
list
change
due
to
utility
work
or
that
sort
of
thing
where
you
have
to
pivot,
to
a
different
neighborhood
or
a
different
area
or
hold
off.
F
Well,
we
typically
I've
started
working
on
next
year's
paving
list
already
and
one
of
the
first
things
I
do
I'll
look
through
our
pavement
management
study
and
pick
out
the
roads
that
are
in
need
of
paving
typically
anything
any
road,
that's
rated
less
than
60
right
now
we
have
a.
We
have
all
the
roads,
rated
from
zero
to
100,
and
I
typically
don't
want
to
pave
anything.
That's
that's
over
60.
F
F
We
usually
go
by
the
pavement
condition
index
and
then
also
the
functional
classification
of
the
road.
You
know
if
it's
a
main
road,
that's
rated
55
and
it's
a
side
street.
That's
a
cul-de-sac,
that's
rated
60,
we'll
do
the
main
road.
You
know
all
day
long
and
then
what
we
usually
do
or
what
we
always
do
is.
We
will
submit
this
list
of
proposed
roads
to
our
utilities,
mainly
national
grid
gas
and
providence.
Water
and
they'll
send
their
comments
back.
You
know
I
had
a
section
of
the
city.
F
So
I'm
going
to
stay
out
of
there.
It's
it's
going
to
be
another
two
or
three
years,
but
then
we'll
go
in
and
then
you
know
one
of
my
last
things
is,
you
know,
obviously
constituent
requests.
We
get
requests
all
the
time
from
constituents
through
the
mayor's
office
and
also
council
people's
requests.
D
B
Thank
you
and
councilman
donald
council,
councilwoman
vargas.
J
Sorry,
just
for
the
record,
through
the
chair
that
can
just
be
marked
as
present.
B
Oh
yes
rose.
Could
you
please
mock
president
councilman
riley
and
councilwoman
vargas?
Thank
you.
Councilman
vice
council
president
pop
laskas.
Thank.
D
You
chair,
I
would
like
to
make
the
amendment
that
director
mason
had
requested,
make
that,
in
the
form
of
a
motion
that
it
we
change
it,
which
line?
Is
it.
G
Yeah
I
just
want
to
to
just
for
clarity's
sake,
if
I
may,
to
director
mason.
Are
you
okay,
with
the
first
line
where
it's
going
to
be
submitted
at
the
time
of
the
operating
budget,
or
is
that
a
bad
time
for
you.
D
A
B
J
A
E
B
D
B
Okay,
now
we
have
to
we're
all
set
with
that.
That's
it.
Okay,
very
good!
Second,
here
is
7
21
16
ordinance,
an
amendment
of
chapter
8.12
of
the
code
of
the
city
of
cranston
2005,
entitled
health
and
safety
sponsored
by
councilwoman
vargas,
councilwoman,
vargas.
J
Thank
you.
Sorry.
My
wi-fi
is
not
working
just
from
here.
Yes,
so
this
ordinance,
that's
for
us,
which
is
garbage
collection
and
disposal.
Thank
you.
I
am
going
so
if
we
recall
last
month
I
had
it
continue
for
this
month,
because
I
was
going
to
be
doing
an
amendment,
so
I
will
be
substituted
this
substitute
in
the
amended
language
with
what
was
previously
presented,
and
I
have
a
copy
that
I'm
not
sure
that
you'll
have,
but
I
can
provide
you
a
copy,
those
that
don't
have
one.
J
So
the
these,
the
idea
behind
this-
as
I
had
mentioned
last
month
and
I'll
actually
touch
upon
it
once
again,
is
to
make
sure
that
where
there
is
a
private
residential
establishment
of
at
least
five
units
or
more
that
they
their
dumpster,
are
actually
picked
up
on
time,
they're
not
overflowing,
and
if
we
have
an
ordinance
in
the
books
as
we
currently
do
for
residents,
we
should
definitely
have
one
as
well
for
those
that
have
at
least
a
five
unit
or
more
complex
as
well.
J
I'm
also
asking
that
the
dumpsters,
those
that
are
being
picked
up
by
whether
a
private
company
that
they
be
covered,
that
the
name
and
address
and
telephone
number
of
these
commercial
waste
haulers
be
placed
on
the
dumpster
I've
driven
around
the
city.
It
seems
like
most
of
them
already
do
that
already.
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
we
have
that
covered
on
here
as
well,
and
I'm
pretty
much
kind
of
mirroring.
I
believe
the
dumpster
pickup.
J
You
know
from
seven
two
to
five
p.m,
which
is,
I
believe,
with
within
our
audience
on
the
city,
trash
pickup,
so
happy
to
discuss
further
answer.
Any
questions
that
I
have,
but
I
am
pretty
much
just
amended
the
language
that
I
had
mixed
used
on
the
last
one
and
just
replacing
that,
with
the
actual
residential
commercial
apartment.
H
Just
want
to
say,
first
and
foremost,
this
is,
this
is
really
good
work.
Thank
you,
councilwoman,
for
bringing
this
forward
and
for
for
putting
this
together.
Mr
chairman,.
L
If
I
may
interrupt
for
just
a
brief
minute,
I
apologize
if
you're
going
to
consider
the
the
substituted
bill
need
to
take
a
motion
on
that
before
you
have
discussion.
B
J
You
you
know,
that's
an
interesting
point
recently,
this
past
summer
I
had
visited
a
commercial
complex,
and
I
asked
that
question
whether
or
not
they
do
recycle
and
I
don't
think
they
do
and
it's
something
worth
actually
looking
into,
because
some
of
the
residents
who've
I
reached
out
to-
and
I
I
think
maybe
customer
vanzu
was
was
with
me
when
we
asked-
and
I
believe
their
answer
was
no
and
that
they
would
actually
love
to
so.
J
My
hope
is
that
if
either
this
passes-
or
if
we
add
it
as
on
here,
I
don't
know-
I'm
gonna
be
honest
with
you
what
pushback
or
what
we
can
do
as
far
as
control
over
like
a
private,
you
know
waste
hauler,
taking
away
the
dumpsters,
but
definitely
all
ears.
If
there's
any
suggestions
or
anything
along
those
lines
or
perhaps
the
director
may
know,
that's
something
that
we
are
able
to
actually
enforce
on
the
recycling
side
of
it.
F
I
don't
believe
we
have
anything
in
our
codes.
Dem
does
have
a
state
law,
I
believe,
there's
a
state
law
that
requires
commercial
facilities
to
recycle.
I
don't
believe
anybody
has
any
enforcement
capabilities.
I've
asked
dem
before
and
they
don't
have
any
enforcement
police
going
around
checking
businesses
and
I
don't
believe
we
have
it
in
our
ordinances
either.
J
Thank
you.
I
guess
you
know
kind
of
to
add
a
little
bit
on
that
not
to
delay
the
conversation.
But
if
that
was
you
may
know
this,
but
if
there
was
a
residential
private
com,
commercial
building
that
did
want
to
recycle,
I
would
assume
they
would
know
the
land,
the
lane,
the
lay
of
the
land
and
how
to
go
about
saturn,
where
they
have
to
go
through
the
city.
To
actually
ask
how
that
would
work.
A
J
I
think
it
definitely
opened
suggestions
on
that.
I
know
recycling's,
obviously
something
that
we
should
all
be
doing
and
definitely
be
doing
more
of,
and
I
do
want
to
just
point
out
one
last
thing
on
this
actual
ordinance.
The
idea
behind
this
as
well
is
not
just
to
enforce
the
picking
up
of
the
you
know
the
waste
and
all
those
overflowing
trash,
but
a
lot
of
that,
if
this
happens,
will
hopefully
reduce
the
rodents
and
have
some
more
voting
control
around
the
city
as
as
well.
J
F
Yeah
I
just
had
one
last
comment.
I
think
you'll
have
a
conflict
at
the
very
end
of
this
ordinance
line.
64
says
all
dumpsters
shall
be
serviced
between
the
hours
of
7am
and
5pm.
J
Sure,
director,
if,
if
I
may,
you
know
the
timing
on
the
trash
pickup,
if
it's
does
that
apply,
then
for
the
city
to
go
and
pick
up
trash
at
residential
properties
up
until
10
p.m,
as
well.
F
F
D
J
The
only
reason
I
did
add
actually
from
seven
to
ten
is
under
section
eight
point:
twelve
point,
one:
twenty
placing
rubbish
trash
up
on
highway
prior
to
collection.
It
has
the
time
from
6
30,
it
does
have
6
30
am,
but
it
has
it
till
5
pm.
So
I
mirrored
what
we
had
in
our
ordinance
and
make
it
the
same
time
on
this
new
proposed
ordinance
as
well.
F
J
Okay,
if
I
can
propose
an
emotion,
then
we're
on
line
64
and
have
it
say
all
dumpsters
shall
be
serviced
only
between
the
hours
of
6
30
a.m
until
5
p.m.
Sorry
7
o'clock,
actually
because
I
think
the
7
o'clock
does
start,
though,
because
landscaping
everything's
our
start
at
seven.
Sorry,
I
know
I'm
putting
a
motion
out,
but
it
is
seven
right.
The.
J
J
All
right,
well,
I'm
open
to
suggestions
and
any
comments
from
my
fellow
council
colleagues
if
they
have
any
objections
to
going
a
little
later.
D
B
G
Councilwoman
mourinho
yep
our
ordinance
8.12.020
states,
actually
that
no
person
shall
pick
up
or
remove,
nor
shall
any
person
cause
or
allow
to
be
picked
or
up
or
removed
any
refuse
rubbish
or
trash
from
any
commercial
or
industrial
establishment
between
the
hours
of
10
p.m
and
7
a.m.
So
implicit
in
that
means
that
you
can
pick
it
up
between
7
a.m
and
10.
J
Right,
okay,
so
then
I
will
then
I
know
I
initially
had
started
a
motion
I'll
withdraw
that
if
that
actually
ended
up
putting
through
and
instead
my
motion
will
be
all
dumps
shall
be
serviced
only
between
the
hours
of
7am
and
10
pm.
D
K
K
J
I
have
a
second
motion
in
line
65
and
that
is
to
increase
in
the
fine
from
100
to
200,
so
we
can
mirror
what
director
mason
had
just
mentioned.
D
B
E
C
D
K
Nope,
yes,
thank
you.
I
just
had
a
two
points.
Two
questions
on
line
52,
where
it
says
all
dumpsters
shall
be
screened,
a
fenced
or
shrubbery.
So
that's
not
visible
from
the
street
is
to
the
sponsor.
Is
that
so?
Is
that
something
you
took
from
any
other
ordinance
or
is
that
specific
to
this
one.
J
I
I
believe
I
did,
and
you
know
I
should
have
taken
my
notes
on
here
as
I'm
quickly
searching
the
code
of
ordinance,
but
I
believe
that
is
you
know
if
they
have
a
setback
on
there.
There
shouldn't
be
a
reason
why
there's
not
a
chevrolet
or
someone
visible
at
all
from
that
from
the
lot
itself.
A
K
No,
I
I
agree,
we
want
to
keep
it
as
aesthetic
as
possible.
I
just
also
want
to
be
cognizant
of
costs
to
the
the
private
landlords,
so
that
kind
of
leads
me
to
my
second
question,
which
is
the
frequency
of
once
a
week
for
as
a
standard.
Is
that
something
that
came
because
I
just
think
that
there'll
be
different
size
buildings.
Some
places
may
need
it
every
two
weeks.
K
Some
may
need
it
twice
a
week,
but
that's
there's
a
cost
for
that,
every
time
so
and
that's
going
to
fall
on
the
landlord,
so
I
just
wanted
to
try
to
minimize
any
expense
while
keeping
this
initiative
in
place.
B
J
Thank
you.
So,
yes,
through
the
charity,
answer
these
ones,
so
they
if
they
need
it
twice
a
week
at
least
not
once
a
week,
we'll
actually
cover
it.
Given
the
current
situation,
the
huge
amount
of
rodent
issues
that
we've
been
having
in
the
city.
J
But
for
the
time
being,
I
really
do
prefer
at
least
once
a
week
if
they
want
to
do
it
twice.
At
least
it's
already
covered,
but
just
my
my
thought
on
that.
K
Okay,
I
appreciate
that-
and
my
last
point
was
just
about
the
recycling
and
if
director
mason,
if
you
you
could
in
in
residential
properties
throughout
the
city,
even
above
four
units,
the
actual
tenants
there
they
can
come
before
the
city
and
obtain
their
own
recycle
bin.
Can
they
not.
F
K
F
Well,
with
the
exception
of
condominiums,
get
serviced
by
the
city,
it
was
that
changed,
probably
twenty
or
thirty
years
ago.
I
believe
it
was
a
lawsuit
that
was
involved
in
that
whole
thing
and
condominiums
do
get
picked
up
and
at
condominiums
we
do
provide
waste
management.
Does
that
also?
And
we
do
provide
recycling
containers
for
condominiums,
but
for
commercial
establishments
and
if
there's
a
five
unit,
apartment
building
or
six
or
eight
unit
apartment
building?
No,
that's
all
on
the
commercial
side
and
they
would
have
to
provide
their
own.
J
C
B
C
B
At
this
time,
I'd
like
to
ask
if
there's
anyone
either
online
or
in
council
chambers,
I'm
sorry
councilman
donegan,
you
have
a
question:
okay,
is
there
anyone
in
council
chambers
or
on
line
that
has
yeah?
Please
raise
your
hand
if
you
have
any
public
comments
on
any
of
the
docketed
for
public
works
for
public
works,
not
for
ordinance
for
public
works,
because
we
are
still
in
the
public
works
meeting.
Those
of
you
that
are
here
for
of
the
ordinance
meeting.
We
are
running
a
little
late.
B
G
Thank
you
director,
mason,
I
understand
from
the
previous
meeting
director
mcauley
and
represented
that
the
work
was
completed
is,
is
that
in
fact,
your
understanding
as
well.
F
Yes,
there
was
a
grade,
3
gas
leak
on
that
section
of
pipe,
and
they
ended
up
fixing
that
repairing
it
in
august
the
end
of
august.
It
ended
up
being
a
little
bit
more
complicated
that
than
they
wanted
to
have
it
and
they
ended
up
replacing,
I
believe,
a
six
foot
length
of
pipe,
but
that's
why
it
took
so
long.
G
I
know,
and
and
as
you
mentioned
it
took
longer
than
expected
and
every
time
I
guess
people
weren't
the
impression
it
was
done.
Then
it
was
resurrected
again
and
it
being
a
high
pressure
line
on
a
narrow
road.
You
know
it
was
it
was
concerning,
and
the
inconsistent
information
was
not
any
fault
of
yours.
I
understand
you
know
it's,
it's
a
bit
unpredictable.
G
You
make
a
repair,
you
expect
it
to
work,
and
you
know
that
may
not
happen,
but
we
just
want
to
be
certain
to
convey
to
the
residents
that
that
the
project
as
planned
is
at
least
complete
and
they
don't
have
any
foreseeable.
G
G
And
the
only
other
question
I
have
is:
should
this
occur
again,
where
it's
something
like?
As
you
know,
this
was
on
weekend
nights.
It
was
after
11
o'clock
at
night.
There
was,
you
know
the
road
was
blocked
off.
There
were
heavy
lights,
it
was,
you
know,
I
had
driven
to
the
area
and
saw
it
myself
in
the
future.
If
that
were
to
occur,
should
this?
G
Should
the
procedure
be
where
reach
out
to
you
to
get
an
answer
as
to
what
the
status
is,
because
you'll
then
have
contact
with
the
appropriate
person
at
national
grid.
F
J
J
I
decided
to
leave
this
again
on
the
agenda
for
this
month.
I
reached
out
to
dot.
Last
month
they
told
me
that
the
expected
project-
sorry,
the
project-
was
expected
to
conclude
mid-september.
J
Clearly
it
hasn't,
they
don't
even
think
it's
going
to
be
done
by
december
because
of
the
amtrak's
situation
as
far
as
timing
and
coming
into
an
agreement
as
far
as
what
time
they
can
actually
go
in
and
start
repairing
on
the
bridge,
any
any
new
updates
at
all
is
there
anything
that
we
can
do
as
a
city
to
send
letters,
whether
it's
a
dot
director
amtrak
just
anything
to
expedite
this.
F
Well,
actually,
I
just
spoke
to
the
project
manager
for
aetna
bridge.
On
this
I
met
him
out
at
the
bridge.
Today,
they've
made
some
progress,
but
from
september
1st
to
today's
date,
they've
only
been
able
to
work
on
the
bridge
on
12
days
and
they
average
2.1
hours
per
day.
That's
all
the
time
that
they've
been
allotted
by
amtrak
to
get
onto
the
bridge
and
actually
do
the
work.
F
J
B
Okay,
next
on
the
agenda
is
an
update
on
mechanic
at
lake
park
and
pond
evasive,
lotus
councilman
council
president
paplascus.
D
Thank
you
chair.
Nothing
really
to
add
today,
other
than
a
couple
days
ago,
the
lotus
was
sprayed
again
with
a
chemical
treatment.
Does
look
like
the
lotus
is
wilting,
so
hopefully
that
works
time
will
tell
next
year
to
see
how
strong
the
lotus
comes
back.
That's
all
we
have
for
updates.
There
was
a
great
article
on
the
cranston
herald,
which
also
had
a
lot
of
updates
in
it
this
week,
director
mason.
Do
you
have
anything
to
add
other
than
that?
D
We
can
take
this
off
the
docket
for
now
until
we
get
more
updates.
Thank
you.
B
Okay,
director
mason
the
next
two
items
put
on
by
me
and
what
I'm
really
looking
for
is.
Are
we
coming
up
with
a
long
term
plan
to
stop
the
flooding
on
wilbur
avenue
and
also
on
cranston
street?
I
know
that
it's
a
problem.
I
know
it's
it's
the
state's
issue.
I
know
it's
oakland
avenue,
but
it
seems
to
be
that
this
has
been
going
on
forever
and
every
time
we
get
a
lot
of
rain.
B
Somebody
loses
their
car
and
I
just
wonder,
are
we
are
we
in
conversation
with
the
state
to
solve
this
problem
like
once
and
for
all?
If
we
start
now,
maybe
in
two
years,
it'll
be
solved.
So
that's
just
basically
why
I
have
this
on
the
agenda
and
I
do
get
complaints
from
two
constituents
on
cranston
street.
Every
time
we
get
a
flash
flood,
one
seller
gets
flooded
and
the
other
lady's
yard
gets
flooded
so
and
she's
been
here
to
testify
too.
F
Well,
the
the
flooding
on
cranston
street.
That's
an
issue
that
the
city
partially
rectified
that
the
pipe
that
leads
underneath
cranston
street
was
partially
clogged
with
the
with
the
trees
and
and
some
branches
we
cleared
that
out.
F
There
is
another
issue
further
down
the
line
that
we
need
to
get
back
into,
and
we
do
have
plans
to
to
to
look
into
that.
That's
something
that
the
city
could
undertake
with
its
own,
not
with
its
own
forces
but
with
its
own
bond
fund
money
for
storm
drain.
F
As
far
as
the
flooding
on
wilbur
avenue
we're
in
the
process
of
searching
for
money
to
be
able
to
at
least
attempt
to
address
that
problem,
I
mean
there's
several
different
thoughts
on
the
whole
thing
and
one
of
the
things
that
you
cannot
do
is
you
can't
just
increase
the
size
of
the
pipe
that
discharges
to
the
machinic
brook
you're,
just
not
allowed
to
do
that
type
of
thing
anymore.
It
would
have
to
be
some
offline,
stormwater
storage.
F
My
whole
proposal
would
be
to
take
the
take
the
railroad
bridge
down
and
put
a
nice
arched
bridge
over
it
and
then
raise
raise
wilbur
avenue
where
it
bellies
underneath
it
and
you
could
get
rid
of
the
the
floating
that
way
again,
that's
a
that's
a
big
ticket
item.
We
are
looking
to
possibly
get
some
grant
money
to
to
look
into
that
further.
F
B
You
as
far
as
cranston
street
goes,
can
I
give
the
residents
any
kind
of
a
timeline
as
to
when
we're
going
to
maybe
start
to
solve
the
problem
six
months.
Thank
you
very
much
appreciate
it.
Okay,
we
have
new
matters
before
the
committee.
Okay,
we
have
two
pull
requests
from
national
grid,
one
on
lincoln
avenue
and
one
at
meadow
block
drive.
I
personally
drove
out
to
both
of
those
locations
today
and
they
just
look
like
they're,
necessary
and
they're,
not
obstructing
anybody's
highway
or
house
or
anything.
B
As
far
as
I
know-
and
I
know
that
public
works
does
check
these
spots
out
ahead
of
time.
So
I'd
like
to
have
a
motion
to
approve
the
first
request
for
lincoln
avenue.
A
E
B
C
C
B
Yes,
yes,
okay,
next
on
the
agenda
is
from
the
rhode
island
department
of
transportation.
A
surplus
state
land
offer
is
someone
from
the
administration
here
to
represent
that
cause.
F
That's
a
property
on
norfolk
street
right
in
back
of
the
burger
king
and
apparently
it
used
to
be
a
group
home
run
by
the
state
and
it's
surplus
property,
and
I
guess
they've
got
a
proposal
or
some
purchase
and
sales
agreement
to
sell
that
building.
It's
really
a
house
for
hundred
thousand
dollars
and
I
guess
by
state
law.
We
have
the
option
to
take
it
for
three
hundred
thousand
dollars.
F
If
we
so
choose
to,
I
don't
see,
I
don't
see
any
need
or
use
for
that
house
and
I
would
not
recommend
exercising
that
option.
B
I
checked
out
where
the
property
was
it's
not
next
to
a
school.
It's
not
next
to
a
playground,
it's
not
next
to
any
city
property,
whereas
that
may
have
made
it
something
attractive
to
us,
but
I
I
personally
would
not
be
in
favor
of
purchasing
that
property
at
this
time.
D
B
B
Yes,
before
we
adrian
like
to
thank
director
mason
for
being
here
to
answer
all
these
questions
tonight
and
do
I
have
a
motion
to
adjourn
some
moves.
K
We'll
take
a
a
10
minute
break
and
come
back
to
start
the
ordinance
meeting.
A
A
M
M
A
A
A
A
E
C
K
J
I
I
So
let
me
start
why
I
propose
this
amendment
so
it
since
I
was
appointed
july
2020
have
been
received,
emails
from
resident
iran
park,
ave
and
greece
park
avenue
and
queen
street
and
I
have
those
emails,
but
they
say
they
cannot
come
to
the
meetings
and
but
they
send
me
emails,
but
I
because
they
don't
come
to
the
meetings.
Probably
that's
an
issue
for
not
having
this
heard
properly,
but
I
do
think
as
they
are
represented.
I
I
That
was
the
first
acting
and
dr
mason
email
me
says
because
of
the
law
direct
mention
because
of
the
law
of
highways
law.
We
cannot
have
a
stop
sign.
I
say:
okay,
what
we
can
do
next
next,
I
propose
to
have,
because
you
know
this
part
of
the
city
is
very
this:
there's
a
big
traffic
there.
There
is
this
restaurant.
There
is
dollar
trees,
we
have
elderlies
and
we
have
a
bus
stop
white
in
the
corner,
so
we
have
children
and
we
said
we
need
to
do
something.
I
So
when
I
propose
after
I
withdraw
the
ordinance
for
stop
sign,
I
propose
to
have
this
what
we
call
days
in
a
name
for
it
if,
in
the
analysis,
says,
chapter
1008
or
30,
specifically
nxt
within
this
pedestrian
control,
signal
pedestrian
control,
signal
that
display
the
word:
work,
wait
or
don't
work.
I
So
that's
what
I
proposed
before
after
I
proposed
that
there
was
discussion
that
will
cost
so
much
money
for
the
city,
and
I
had
a
conversation
with
tilted
mission
and
also
there
was
mentioned
that
for
distance
purposes
and
for
the
course
purposes.
I
I
So
when
I
spoke
to
director
mason,
he
says
there
is
something
else
we
can
do,
and
you
know
this
is
not
my
area
expectations.
I
don't
know
the
name
really
well,
but
when
he
was
talking,
I
said
why
we
don't
do
that,
because
this
will
cost
less
money
and
for
me
at
the
the
hearings
we
have
for
the
budget,
we
raise
the
issue
again
and
he
proposed.
I
Actually
I
have
the
name
right
now:
pedestrian
actuated
conspicuous
enhancements
of
fancy
words.
He
said
we
can
have
that.
I
said
it's
not
in
the
book.
We
do
not
have
the
name
on
the
book.
I
say
why
we,
if
we,
if
we
have
it,
we
can
just
ask
it
and
there's
gonna
be
budget
for
that.
So
my
understanding
at
that
moment
we
do
not
have
the
language
for
this
in
the
book
and
that's
why
I
propose
to
have
the
language
anytime.
I
Someone
needs
a
device
to
be
put
up.
There
is
no
issue
where
we're
going
to
have
the
money
what's
going
to
happen,
so
the
solution
I'm
looking
for.
So
that's
why
I
want
to
give
you
the
background.
That's
why
I
propose
the
amendment
to
have
probably
I
did
not
put
the
right
language
pedestrian.
I
I
put
electronic
crossing
signal
or
rapid
flashing
crosswalk
signal
so
as
language
to
put
on,
but
in
the
analysis-
and
I
have
to
mention-
I
see
the
irony
in
the
analysis,
but
at
least
they
understand
what
I
mean
in
the
analysis.
I
This
is
exactly
what
dr
mason
told
me
so,
but
it
is
denied
to
the
amendment
is
denied
and
also
in
the
conclusion
he
said.
The
analysis
continued
to
said
that
we
denied
it
for
because
we
have
the
language
already.
It
is
with
us.
If
you
really
is
this
referred,
what
I
propose,
I
think
this
scientific
name
is
rectangular
rapid,
flashing
bacon
that
stand
for
rrfb.
I
I
I
I
I
We
have
right
the
traffic
light
right
at
the
corner
of
domino's.
We
have
a
bee
and
then
right
after
we
have
intersection
queenstone
and
park.
Have
we
have
another
act?
So
tell
me
first
what
was
told
first,
the
distance
to
have
a
b
in
constant
impact
of
and
waste.
It's
too
close
of
intersection,
wolf
square
and
pack
up.
This
is
not
okay.
This
is
is
bsi
because
distance
is
not
an
issue.
I
I
That's
the
question
I
ask:
do
you
have
a
number,
because
if
we
are
waiting
for
the
number
of
death,
we
need
to
take
action,
so
I
would
like
to
know
how
much
you
put
on
the
life
on
somebody
who
is
dead?
Do
you
have
a
price?
So
that's
why?
I
urge
you
to
vote
for
this
ordinance,
because
this
is
doesn't
mean
anything
for
me
because
it
doesn't
hold
on.
He
doesn't.
F
Ken
mason
director
of
public
works,
the
city
has
no
issues
putting
rapid
flashing
crosswalk
signals
throughout
the
signal
throughout
the
city.
The
last
time
I
was
up
here
talking
about
it,
you
wanted
to
get
a
fiscal
impact
on
it,
which
we've
given
you
by
this
analysis
about
seventeen
thousand
one
hundred
dollars
per
per
crosswalk
signal
that
includes
redoing
the
ada
handicap
ramps
and
making
it
fully
legal.
The
problem
that
I
have
with
this
ordinance
is
you're
trying
to
put
it
in
a
regulatory
section
of
the
code.
F
K
Council
vice
president.
B
B
K
H
Director
mason,
thank
you
again
for
being
here
this
evening.
Is
there
sufficient
funding
available
to
to
fund
the
17
100
that
it
would
cause
to
put
one
of
these
at
grayson
park?
Ave.
F
Yes,
we,
you
folks,
approved
a
hundred
thousand
dollars
for
traffic
calming
devices
for
this
fiscal
year
and
to
date
I
believe,
we've
only
done
the
peverell
road
bump
outs,
which
some
people,
like
some
people
hate
and
that
only
costs
25
000.
So
there's
money
in
the
budget.
H
H
K
If
I
mean
council
president.
D
I
just
had
a
suggestion
in
the
past
when
the
council
might
have
requested
devices
like
this,
if
we
couldn't
get
it
done,
for
whatever
reason
we
could
pass
a
resolution,
which
is
the
will
of
the
council,
asking
the
administration
to
put
it
in
with
with
this
being
a
warning
device
or
not
regulated
by
code.
Maybe
that
might
be
the
way
to
go,
but
I'm
happy
to
hear
that
it
will
go
up.
D
So
whether
or
not
we
pass
this
tonight,
I
don't
really
know
if
we
need
to
certainly
support
it,
but
I
do
have
to
agree
with
warning
signs
go
up
across
the
city
all
the
time
and
none
of
them
are
codified
by
code.
So
I
do
have
to
agree
with
that
point.
Thank
you.
J
Thank
you
through
the
chair
to
councilwoman
germain.
This
is
for
the
grace
street
in
park
street
correct,
okay,
I'm
just
making
sure
so
I
am
not
sure
if
we
vote
on
this
ordinance
before
us
this
evening,
do
we
have
to
put
the
location
as
to
where
it's
going
or
do
we
keep
it
generalized?
The
way
it
is
with
states,
streets
and
locations
where
we're.
I
This
is
what
we
need.
It's
because
I
am
like
really
tired,
like
to
beg
for
something
that
needs
to
be
done.
So
if
we
have
it
in
the
books,
we
know
we
we
are
required
to
do
it.
That's
why
so,
why
we
don't
have
it.
I
would
like
to
know
to
the
solicitor
is:
is
a
a
violation
of
the
charter
to
not
have
it
in
the
court
or
we
cannot
make
an
amendment?
L
Thank
you.
I
agree
with
what
director
mason
had
to
say
with
respect
to
codifying
this.
If
you
know
it
is
not
a
traffic
control
device,
I'm
not
going
to
reiterate
what
he
said,
but
by
the
same
token,
I've.
I've
heard
the
debate
on
the
floor,
and
I
agree
with
the
council
president
that
if
this
is
not
done,
then
the
council
can
certainly
resolve
as
a
body
to
do
it
and
accomplish
it.
L
That
also
said,
I
think
you
have
a
firm
commitment
from
the
reclamation
tonight
to
get
it
done,
and
you
can
certainly
keep
it
on
your
agenda
in
public
works,
as
you
have
with
other
things,
to
monitor
the
progress
of
its
installation
from
ordering
the
parts
to
putting
the
shovel
in
the
ground.
Is
that.
L
That
would
be
my
proposed
solution,
which
I
suppose
is
a
non-legal
solution,
mr
chairman,
but
you
know
to
answer
your
initial
question.
I
you
know
it's
not
a
traffic
control
device,
it's
a
warning
device
and
the
director
is
correct
on
that.
J
Thank
you,
councilwoman
jermaine,.
J
One
sorry
one
side
is
ward,
one,
the
other
two.
If,
if
I
can
it's
obviously
your
ordinance,
but
if
we
can
given
the
fact
and
not
to
reiterate
what
our
city
solicitor
said,
would
you
be
open
to
given
the
fact
that
director
mason
gave
his
word
that
he'll
be
working
on
this
and
he
will
be
able
to
do
it?
J
J
I
mean
I
support
putting
one
up,
but
if
the
director
is
giving
his
adv
his
word
for
it,
I
think
you
know
perhaps
we
might
be
able
to
take
them
up
on
it,
but
I
defer
to
you.
Thank
you.
I
I
What,
because
one
thing
we
have
here,
a
resolution,
we
know
a
resolution
is
a
will:
it's
not
it's
not
body.
So
what
whatever
administration
it
is.
If
they
don't
want
to
do
it,
you
don't
have
anything
to
to
really
oh
no
of
a
sign,
nothing
to
really
concern
them
to
do
it.
We
cannot
do
it
to
a
resolution.
So
that's
something!
I
want
everybody
to
understand
that
you
cannot
make
a
resolution
to
tell
the
administration
to
do
something.
It's
a
will
you
just
we.
We
talked
about
it
last
week
last
month.
I
A
resolution
is
a
will.
It's
a
it's
a
suggestion,
so
this
is
like.
I
would
like
you
to
do,
but
you
don't
have
any
power
to
tell
to
a
resolution.
So
we
agree
on
that
one.
So
if
the
only
power
you
have
as
a
council
is
the
ordinance
so
now,
if
there
is
a
conflict
to
the
charter,
you
can
have
the
ordinance
because
of
the
charter.
There
is
a
conflict.
I
will
understand
that.
Okay,
but
I
agree
I
can
take
the
director
messen
on
his
words.
I
I
A
E
J
I
can
open
sorry
provide
suggestions
and
add
it
to
the
public
works
sure
the
media
agenda
for
the
two
months.
Of
course,
in
two
months
I
guess
just
so
you
can
follow
up.
That
would
be
very
right.
A
K
E
F
K
Director
one
question
this:
at
the
corner
of
grace
and
park
councilwoman
jermaine
had
listed.
There
was
one
at
diren
park.
There's
one
at
cranston
and
park.
Is
this
location,
a
location
that
this
device
would
be
useful
at
in
your
expertise?.
K
And
I'll
entertain
a
motion
to
have
this
transferred
to
the
public
works
docket
in
what
do
you
say
three
months.
I
I
B
C
K
Which
was
sponsored
by
councilwoman
renzuli
relative
to
the
keeping
of
chickens
that
is
going
to
be
withdrawn
by
the
sponsor
at
this
time,
and
it
will
not
be
heard
tonight.
However,
the
following
ordinance
will
remain
on
the
docket
relative
to
roosters.
K
Moving
on,
we
have
still
carried
over
from
last
time,
ordinance
5-2-1-0-8.
K
Sponsored
by
councilwoman
jermaine
relative
to
through
trucking
prohibited
on
certain
streets.
I
will
insane
a
motion.
I
I
I
So
that's
why
I
propose
dishonest
it's
being
asked
by
residents
in
the
neighborhood,
architect,
interval,
colonial
and
all
of
them
all
they
were
really
affected.
I
met
with
many
many
residents
in
this
area.
They
were
so
because
you
know
all
people
who
had
dog,
you
know
you,
everybody
knows
everybody.
You
work
with
dog.
Together
they
are
friends,
family.
They
work
together.
I
So
it
was
really
a
heartbreaking
moment
for
those
residents
and
I
met
with
them.
I
went
to
the
place
you
know
even
from
flower,
so
if
we
can
do
something
to
no
to
not
having
a
death
by
chalk,
death
can
happen
anyways,
but
that's
something
we
can
be
proactive
thing
we
can
prevent.
So
that's
why
I
propose
it
or
also
it
is
denied.
So
I
don't
know
what
the
issue
is
is
to
just
ask
for
a
sign,
say
no
charge
to
reservoir
and
akido.
I
So
no
big
truck
coming
in,
because
you
have
right
in
the
corner.
There
is
a
the
cointen.
This
is
a
multiple
house,
you
know
having
multiple
family
and
they
see
their
children
cannot
play
so
the
traffic
shock
coming
the
speed
they
can
cannot
even
play
and
right.
Next,
though,
a
few
miles
not
not
a
lot,
you
have
bad
lung
pull
when
it's
open
and
you
have
the
school
it
didn't
park
right,
so
no
shot
in
this.
When
you
come
from
reservoir
to
go
to
academ,
that's
what
it
is.
I
I
H
Thank
you
count,
chairman
councilwoman.
I
agree
with
with
everything
he
said.
Having
you
know
grown
up
just
on
the
other
side
of
aquadoc
road
across
reservoir
ave
living
there.
You
know
in
the
area.
Now
it's
it's
not
a
place.
That
truck
should
be
going.
My
understanding
after
reviewing
the
the
code,
the
traffic
engineers
report
is
that
it
is.
It
is
included.
This
aqueduct
road
is
already
a
prohibited
street
for
trucks
to
travel
on
and
from
what
I'm
collecting
from
what
I'm
hearing
you
saying
is
that
we
need
signage.
H
Signage
needs
to
go
up,
and
I
think
that
in
my
experience
just
a
couple
a
couple
months
ago,
nolwood
avenue
similarly
to
aqueduct
is
also
a
no
a
no
through
truck,
and
I
had
reached
I
reached
out
to
depaul
director
paul
smith
and
the
mayor's
office,
and
they
were
able
to
get
some
no
truck
signs
put
up.
H
So
I
think,
because
it's
already
in
the
city
code,
the
ordinance
just
my
opinion,
likely
isn't
necessary
what's
necessary-
is
to
follow
up
on
the
enforcement
of
that
by
putting
up
signs,
which
you
know,
I'm
sure
you
know
that
I
would
hope
the
the
mayor's
office
would
be
able
to
to
assist
with.
F
Director
yeah,
I
just
wanted
to
agree
with
mr
donegan.
There
already
is
no
through
trucking
codified
in
section
10.12.210,
and
there
are
signs
up
at
that
intersection
of
aqueduct
and
reservoir,
and
you
know
it's
already
signed
and
we
should
be
all
set.
I
N
F
N
F
I
I
K
You
director,
thank
you
in
in
light
of
that
new
information.
Councilwoman
did
you
want
to
go
forward
with
your
ordinance?
I
have
that
withdrawn
at
this
time.
I
A
I
Will
visit
so
and
come
back
probably.
D
K
All
right
moving
on
now
to
7-2-1-11
this
is
sponsored
by
council
president
pavlaskas
for
a
multi-way
stop.
I
will
entertain
a
move.
B
D
Just
real
brief:
this
is
a
two-way
stop.
Now
it's
a
request
from
a
number
of
constituents
that
live
at
that
intersection
to
change
it
to
a
four-way.
Stop,
so
that's
the
story
behind
it.
K
Seeing
none
clerk
please
take
the
roll.
F
D
D
Same
thing:
requests
from
constituents
changing
from
a
two-way
stop
to
a
four-way
stop
and
just
for
the
record
for
director
mason.
I
think
I
do
about
one
of
these
a
term
so
we're
you
know
we're
two
we're
two
tonight,
but
I
won't
put
any
more
in
this
term.
D
K
D
E
K
All
right
now
we're
moving
on
to
the
new
matters
before
this
night
and
if,
at
this
time,
we're
going
to
take
public
comment,
if
there's
anyone
from
the
pub
from
the
public
that
wants
to
be
heard
on
any
matters
on
this
docket
tonight,
other
than
those
that
have
been
withdrawn,
feel
free
to
come
to
the
podium.
Give
your
name
and
address
for
the
record
and
you'll
each
be
given
four
minutes,
we'll
start
with
those
in
council
chambers
and
then
we'll
move
on
to
who
is
joining
us
over
the
incident.
D
Chair
chair,
I
have
a
one
point
of
information.
I
think
the
first
two
8-2101
in
8-2102
need
to
be
continued
because
I
don't
think
planning
has
taken
any
action
and
set
any
recommendations
to
us.
Yet.
K
Yes,
thank
you.
I
will
entertain
a
motion
to
continue
those
two
matters.
C
L
Any
discussion,
mr
chairman,
if
I
may
yes,
these
are
two
ordinances.
If
you
and
I'm
sure
you
have
look
at
charter
section
3.11,
only
a
council
member
of
the
administration,
namely
the
mayor,
can
sponsor
an
ordinance.
So
you
just
need
sponsors
for
these
when
they
come
back
before
you.
K
Okay
and
madame
clerk,
please
take
the
role.
K
K
M
My
name
is
joshua
miller,
I'm
a
state
senator,
but
I
also
live
at
41
talbot
manor,
which
is
about
500
feet
from
one
of
the
cemeteries
that
will
be
impacted
by
the
ordinance
92107,
and
I
will
tell
you
that
I've
been
a
state
senator
since
2007.,
so
that's
probably
three
mayors
and
several
governors
administrations
who
have
all
tried
to
approach
this
issue
around
how
to
have
better
oversight
and
conditions
in
private
cemeteries,
and
this
is
probably
the
most
well-defined
and
spelt
out
legislation
or
ordinance
that
could
address
the
issues
to
the
conditions
of
private
cemeteries.
M
The
fact
that
it's
taken
so
long
is
amazing
to
have
an
ordinance
of
this
type
come
before
us.
M
I
hope
it
passes
before
the
the
cemetery
gets
any
more
dangerous
than
it
currently
is,
and
I
highly
encourage
you
to
consider
it
and,
at
the
proper
moment
take
action
on
it
especially
concerned
about
the
structure
that
is
there
also
not
only
the
mausoleum
but
the
building
that
is
about
600
feet
from
my
house,
which
has
been
vacant
as
long
as
I've
lived
there
before
it
becomes
either
a
site
of
a
fire
or
overdose
or
something
else.
O
O
I
live
at
450
pippin
orchard
road
in
cranston
for
the
past
28
years,
and
I
thank
everyone
for
giving
me
this
opportunity
because
I've
been
waiting
a
long
time
to
to
address
this
problem
since
early
2020,
my
family,
which
includes
my
daughters
and
my
grandchildren,
have
been
suffering
relentlessly
with
my
next
door,
neighbors
rooster,
who
is
starts
every
day,
sometimes
as
early
as
4
30
or
quarter
past
four
each
morning
and
crows
on
and
off
all
day.
O
O
I'm
doing
this
research
over
the
over
the
past
year
and
a
half
to
try
to
get
some
people
in
the
city
to
to
help
us
out
with
this.
The
city
ordinance
for
noise
ordinances
is
50
decibels,
but
I'm
here
to
speak
in
favor
of
6.08
point
300
the
ordinance
to
prohibit
roosters.
O
This
is
a
daily
event
for
my
family
and
I'm
sure
there
are
others
that
are
affected
by
it.
Also.
I
know
the
neighbors
on
the
other
side
of
my
my
next
door,
neighbor
their
elderly
people.
They
wouldn't
come
out
tonight,
but
they
are
in
favor
of
this
ordinance.
Also,
it's
become
a
health
issue
with
my
family
for
sleep
deprivation,
more
imperative
for
me,
because
I'm
in
a
stressful
profession,
I'm
a
public
accountant.
O
It's
an
impossibility
for
us
to
enjoy
warmer
weather
sounds
crazy,
but
the
windows
are
shut
tight
at
all
times
we
can
never
enjoy.
In
order
to
mitigate
the
noise,
we
can
never
enjoy
a
warm
or
a
cool
summer.
Breeze
always
have
the
ac
on
it's.
It's
life
affecting
it
sounds
crazy.
People
laugh
when
I,
when
I
talk
about
it,
one
of
the
reasons
for
living
in
western
cranston
is
to
have
that
bit
of
country
life,
that's
close
to
the
city,
quiet,
cool
cooler,
but
for
us
that's
not
the
case.
O
The
city
has
tried
their
best.
The
administration,
the
police
have
asked
my
neighbor.
The
aco
has
been
out
there
more
than
once
that
to
ask
him
to
be
a
good
neighbor
and
because
his
rooster
pen,
the
way
our
houses,
are
even
though
the
lots
there
are
larger.
My
house
is
almost
on
the
property
line,
so
he
keeps
it
probably
60
to
70
feet
from
our
bedroom
windows,
which
are
situated
in
the
back
of
the
house.
O
I
want
people
to
understand
that.
I
had
to
learn
this
and,
and
I
I've
done
my
research-
you
don't
need
a
rooster
to
for
an
order
for
a
hen
to
lay
eggs.
If
you
weren't
aware
of
it,
that
is
a
fact,
baby
chicks
for
people
who
want
to
keep
chickens
and
get
fresh
eggs.
That's
fine
with
me,
but
the
baby
chicks
you
can
buy
for
five
bucks
or
less
a
tractor
supply,
so
the
only
purpose
of
a
rooster
is
to
make
little
roosters
or
little
chickens.
Okay
and
that's
the
only
purpose
they
serve.
O
It's
got
nothing
to
do
with
a
hen
being
able
to
lay
an
egg
just
so
people
know.
So.
Therefore,
I
find
them
to
be
useless
other
than
for
a
commercial
farm,
poultry
farm
which
may
have
a
need
for
them.
My
next
door,
neighbor
is
not
a
poultry
farmer
he's
a
real
estate
agent.
He
has
a
handful
of
chickens,
a
duck
and
sometimes
as
high
as
two
roosters,
but
I
think
it's
now
down
to
one
one
may
have
gone
on
to
his
great
reward.
I
wish
this
one
would
move
along
with
him.
O
O
We
live
there,
a
better
part
of
28
years,
never
an
infraction
of
any
kind.
If,
if
and
I
always
bring
this
this
up
to
the
aco
and
to
other
people
involved,
if
you
had
a
barking
dog
that
barked
incessantly
starting
at
four
o'clock
in
the
morning,
I
actually
think
there's
an
ordinance
against
that.
Okay,
the
rooster
crow
believe
it
or
not.
Is
it's
just
it's
ear
piercing
and
you
can't
believe
how
loud
it
is,
and
it's
infinitely
louder
than
the
biggest
dog
you
would
ever
encounter.
O
So
I
I
really
don't
understand
the
distinction
why
the
audience
for
a
barking
dog
wouldn't
apply
in
this
case,
but
I'm
very
very
grateful
for
the
mayor
for
having
introduced
this
ordinance
or
whoever
else
in
in
conjunction
with
the
mayor.
K
Hi
beth,
just
please
provide
your
name
and
address
for
the
record
and
feel
free
to
go
ahead.
N
First
of
all,
I'd
like
to
thank
mr
palino
for
being
so
for
being
so
eloquent
in
the
way
he
expressed
how
a
neighbor
feels
in
this
situation
with
roosters
in
their
proximity.
I
live
on
the
eastern
side
of
cranston,
which
you
are
well
aware
of,
is
very
small
properties.
We
are
very
close
to
our
neighbors.
N
I
could
you
know,
reach
out
and
touch
them
if
they
were
walking
by
my
window.
So
the
fact
that
neighbors
are
allowed
to
have
these
roosters
and
when
he
says
four
o'clock
in
the
morning
it
is.
It
is
not
no
exaggeration
four
o'clock.
In
the
morning
I
have
a
dog
who
hears
him,
whether
I
do
or
not,
which
is
a
whole
other
issue.
N
So
the
the
piercing
noise
has
affected
us
for
the
few
months
that
our
neighbor
has
decided
to
to
adopt
these
pets,
and
I
just
asked
where's
the
common
sense
and
decency.
N
If
my
son
woke
up
at
four
o'clock
in
the
morning
and
turned
on
his
stereo
to
the
decibel
that
these
roosters
crumb,
the
police
would
be
on
my
door
every
time
he
did
that,
I
don't
understand
anyone
who
who
who
can't,
who
can't
understand
that
this
needs
to
be
an
ordinance
as
soon
as
possible.
N
My
husband
would
like
to
speak
as
well.
K
P
P
Sorry,
richard
naraki,
59
bryant
wrote-
and
I
want
to
just
reiterate,
like
especially
in
my
side
of
the
city
here,
and
you
know
I
can't,
if
he's
having
problems
up
in
tip
and
archer
road,
you
can
just
imagine
how
many
people
in
this
neighborhood
are
affected
by
this.
This
is
you're
talking.
You
know
you
got
20
neighbors,
20
houses
that
can
hear
this
rooster
at
all
times
a
day
and
again
I
I
also
did
my
homework.
You
do
not
need
that
rooster.
P
If
you
want
to
raise
your
farm
fresh
eggs,
you
know
we're
lucky
enough
to
have
several
stores
close
by
I'm,
not
even
sure.
You
know
why
that
other
ordinance
got
banned
like
taking
off
the
docket
about
the
hens,
but
anyway
this
this
is,
you
know
as
a
taxpayer.
P
Q
P
For
right
here
I
don't
live
out
on
the
farm,
and
yet
this
is
what
I'm
putting
up
with
I
I
chose
to
live
here
because
I'm
I'm
a
you
know,
I'm
a
city
dweller.
I
don't
want
to
live
out
in
the
country
all
right,
but
I'm
I'm
experiencing
those
things
that
I
would
have
to
if
I
were
out
there.
So
I
I
also
I
plead
with
you.
I
plead
with
you
on
behalf
of
my
neighbors,
who
have
complained
about
this
other
other
neighbors
on
on
in
our
neighborhood
who
have
them.
P
R
Hello,
drake
patton,
64
nate
avenue
in
cranston.
I'm
a
farmer
and.
Q
R
So
I'm
a
farmer-
and
I
have
a
couple
of
things
to
say
about
this
particular
ordinance,
although
I
want
to
also
say
fantastic,
that
you
withdrew
the
other
one,
because
I'm
not
really
sure
what
the
point
of
it
was
or
what
it
was
doing
exactly
this
particular
ordinance
seems
related
to
that
one,
and
if
it
is
then
perhaps
it
should
not
be
heard
without
some
context.
R
R
That
being
said,
a
good
and
powerful
chicken
ordinance,
which
was
passed
by
this
council
when
it
was
at
the
council
that
sat
10
years
ago,
would
not
allow
roosters
in
a
backyard
situation.
That
makes
sense.
No
one
needs
that
no
one
wants
that,
but
it's
very
important
for
the
distinction
to
be
made
that
farms
have
the
right
to
have
roosters,
and
you
know
that's
very
different
than
a
backyard
situation
and
because
the
city
at
present
has
absolutely
no
ordinance
regarding
chicken
keeping.
K
One
last
call
if
anyone
would
like
to
be
heard.
Yes,
ma'am.
A
A
E
So,
like
was
already
brought
up,
we
get
several
complaints
about
roasters,
I
believe
it
constitutes
as
a
nuisance
and
unreasonably
interferes
with
the
comfortable
enjoyment
of
life
and
property
for
some
of
the
people
that
spoke
tonight.
I
would
like
to
know
from
legal,
however,
if
they
have
any
guidance.
As
far
as
what
ms
patton
said
from
the
state
and
dem's
laws.
L
Mr
chairman,
yes
yeah
the
the
right
to
farm
act
which
is
located
at
rhode,
island
general
laws.
Sections
2-23
at
sec
needs
to
be
observed
here.
L
L
If
that
change
is
made,
it
would
certainly
protect
those
engaged
in
a
farming
activity
as
authorized
by
federal
and
state
law
and
would
seem
to
accomplish
the
the
aim
of
the
author
of
the
the
authors
of
the
ordinance,
which
seems
to
be
the
prohibition
against
quote-unquote
backyard
roosters.
Those
would
be
my
two
cents
great.
K
Minimum
clerk
do
we
have
to
can
the
motion
to
amend
be
for
what
council
attorney
stated
on
the
record?
Okay,
I'll,
entertain.
K
Council,
could
you
put
that
on
the
record
for
us?
Yes,.
L
Mr
chairman,
the
amendment
would
be
that,
except
for
activities
protected
by
the
right
to
farm
act,
codified
of
rhode,
island
general
laws,
section
2-23-1,
etsec,
comma,
the
keeping
of
any
roosters
is
strictly
prohibited
period.
The
rest
of
the
ordinance
stands.
H
I
guess
it's
more
of
a
procedural
question
as
there's
an
amendment
on
the
floor
is,
is
the
public
allowed
to
comment
on
the
amendment
and-
and
the
reason
I
ask,
is
I'm
not
a
farmer
grown
up
in
eastern
grants
in
my
whole
life?
I
don't
pretend
to
be
a
farmer,
but
I
know
there
are
some
people
well
versed
and
experienced
in
in
this
on
the
call
and
I'm
wondering
if
any
of
them
might
have
the
opportunity
to
have
any
input
on
the
ordinance
as
amended.
Q
Hi,
my
comment
is
merely
that
the
land
size
should
also
be
considered.
Q
Q
I
understand
that
the
the
intent
of
this
ordinance
is
to
eliminate
roosters
from
backyard
settings,
and
I
think
that
can
be
done
in
other
ways
other
than
just
blanket
elimination
of
having
roosters
in
the
in
the
city
of
granston,
so
possibly
looking
at
lot
sizes
or
land
sizes
acreage
would
be
great
in
addition
to
actual
registered
farms.
K
O
Yes,
I
think
it
should
be
restricted
to
those
people
who
actually
have
a
commercial
use
for
the
rooster
other
than
for
lack
of
a
better
word
of
pet
or
a
casual
need
to
to
or
desire
to
have
fresh
eggs
know
lot.
Size
is
important
if
someone
has
100
acres,
I'm
sure
they
could
do
that,
but
to
to
call
it
a
backyard.
And
then
someone
says
hey
or
or
in
the
case
of
where
I
live,
the
zoning
is
80
and
there's
just
a
blurb
in
that
zone.
O
That
says
agriculture
and
I
haven't
been-
and
that's,
I
think,
is
what
stopped
the
city
all
this
time,
because
that
area
used
to
be
a
farming
area.
There
were
orchards,
piping,
watches,
is
there
and
so
on.
If
you're
not
running
a
farm
and
you
have
a
half
a
dozen
chickens
and
you
want
to
get
fresh
eggs
and
you
happen
to
have
a
rooster
and
you
say:
hey,
I'm
a
farmer,
I'm
a
chicken
farmer,
a
poultry
farmer.
I
don't
think
that
should
fly
in
this
case.
O
You
know
if
you,
if
you
were
running
a
poultry
farm
at
the
end
of
pippen
orchard
road.
There
is
a
a
poultry
farm
and
I
think
former
councilman
stykos
was
a
farmer
and
in
discussions
with
him
last
year
he
was
actually
going
to
introduce
this
ordinance
on
my
behalf,
but
then
you
know
he
didn't
win.
So
that
was
the
end
of
that.
O
So
the
fact
that
somebody
might
have
some
acreage,
I'm
not
saying
if
you
have
100
acres,
you
shouldn't
have
a
rooster,
but
if
you
have
three
or
four
or
five
acres,
which
a
lot
of
properties
do
up
my
area
that
doesn't
constitute
a
farm
and
trust
me,
anybody
who
knows
anything
about
roosters,
you
could
have
it
200
feet
away
from
you
and
it'll
go
right
through
you.
So
I
I
want
to
make
that
point
clear.
O
R
Thank
you,
drake
patton,
684
natick
avenue.
I
spoke
before.
I
appreciate
the
opportunity
to
speak
again.
I
will
be
sort
of
restating
a
little
bit
what
I
said
before,
but
I
first
want
to
support
jess
salter's
comment
about
the
size
of
property,
and
I
want
to
say
that,
because
again,
10
years
ago,
a
very
comprehensive
ordinance
was
passed
that
addressed
lot
size
that
really
drilled
down
on
the
issues
around
chicken
keeping
in
urban
settings
which,
by
the
way
happens
across
this
country
in
cities
like
providence,
chicago,
etc,
etc.
R
This
is
happening
across
the
country,
so
we
can
do
this.
This
ordinance
again
is
standing
alone
without
context,
and
it
seems
like
we
have
enough
of
a
question.
Mr
palino
has
his
concerns.
Other
people
have
concerns
about
land
size.
No
one
should
be
disturbed
by
anything,
but
again,
farms
come
in
lots
of
sizes.
Western
cranston
is
filled
with
them.
How
do
we
create
a
of
one
size
fits
all
ordinance?
It
seems
quite
difficult
in
this
moment
tonight
to
do
that.
R
The
ordinance
that
was
not
heard
tonight
was
not
a
successful
ordinance.
It
needs
to
be
completely
turned
over,
and
this
should
be
connected
to
that,
so
that
there's
a
larger
conversation
that
is
more
intelligent
around
what
it
means
to
keep
chickens
in
various
settings,
whether
that
be
a
farm,
commercial
or
small,
or
whether
that's
a
backyard
again.
R
This
discussion
happened
ten
years
ago
and
it
was
passed,
but
it
was
vetoed
by
mayor
fung.
I
believe
we
could
go
back
to
that
start
to
think
about
that
in
a
more
comprehensive
way,
open
it
up
to
the
public,
the
diverse
public
that
we
have
and
come
up
with
something
much
better.
This
seems
premature
and
out
of
context.
Thank
you.
P
Yeah
I
visited
richard
iraqi
59
brian
road
and
to
to
speak
out
against
what
the
last
woman
was
saying
is
that
I
think
we
are
covered
when
we
talk
about
the
farm,
and
you
know
if
you're
you're
out
there
and
you're
you're
in
an
agricultural
setting,
I
think
legally,
where
we
are
covered
in,
although
she
apparently
isn't
affected
by
these
roosters
I
can.
I
can
tell
you
if
it
was
in
your
backyard.
You'd
want
this
done
as
soon
as
possible
and
you'd
want.
You
know
this
address,
I'm
not
I'm
not.
O
P
You
know
slot
size.
I
think
I
think
it's
well
stated
in
the
state
law
about
the
need
for
the
rooster,
and
you
know
who,
in
the
provision
for
that
on
the
chicken
farm
and
she
wants
to
debate
what
what
what
constitutes
a
farm.
You
know-
and
you
know
if
it-
and
I
I
think
I
think
that's
aptly
applied.
K
S
S
I
think
if
we
follow
these
guidelines,
we're
fine,
that's
that's
the
state's
description
of
farmland.
So
thank
you.
I
think
if
you
follow
the
council's
suggestion
with
the
amendment
we're
good
to
go.
Thank
you.
K
K
K
Public
comment
as
to
that
amendment
and
open
up
for
discussion,
councilman
donegan.
H
Thank
you
chairman.
I
would.
H
I'm
conflicted
because
I
agree
that
there
are
places
that
roosters
likely
are
needed
and
should
be
allowed
and
there
are
other
places
where
they
shouldn't
be.
I'm
not
an
expert
in
agricultural
legislation.
I'm
not
gonna
sit
here
tonight
pretend
to
be,
but.
H
Having
been
on
the
council,
for
you
know
now
in
my
second
term,
I
think
we
I'm
not
usually
one
to
say
this,
but
I
think
this
is
a
time
where
we
should
pause
for
a
moment,
and
rather
than
do
this
piece
meal,
whereas
we
have
a
rooster
ordinance,
a
chicken
ordinance
at
some
date.
We
do
this
together
in
a
comprehensive
manner.
There
are
clearly
people
from
every
side
of
the
issue,
with
varying
degrees
and
diverse
opinions,
on
the
issue
with
diverse
experiences
on
the
issue
that
can
provide
input,
opinions.
H
And
some
expertise
to
get
this
right
rather
than
trying
to
do
this
tonight,
the
intention
of
the
ordinance
is
well.
I
know
that,
and
I'm
not
saying
this,
because
I'm
opposed
to
the
ordinance
I'm
saying
I
think
we
should
look
at
a
comprehensive
proposal
on
chickens
and
roosters
and
where
they
should
be
and
where
they
shouldn't
be,
rather
than
doing
part
of
it
tonight
and
part
of
it
another
night
where
it
doesn't
really
make
sense
without
the
other
part.
I
really
think
we
should
just
take
a
step
back,
get
everyone
at
the
table.
H
G
Thank
you,
while
very
much
to
councilman
donegan's
point.
I
think
it
suits
us
all
well
to
take
the
time
to
get
this
done
properly,
and
I
can
specifically
address
two
concerns
that
I
haven't
heard
mentioned
tonight,
which
are
concerning
to
me
and
before
I
say
that
I
sympathize
with
the
plight
of
people
that
have
roosters
crowing
just
as
much
as
I
would.
G
If
someone
had
a
dog
barking
at
close
proximity
to
your
house-
and
you
know
this
is
our
job
to
be
creative
and
coming
up
with
the
solutions
as
best
we
can
and
if
the
goal
is
to
eliminate
that
that
nuisance
or
or
whatever
you'd
like
to
call
it,
then
it
needs
to
be
done
in
a
responsible
way,
and
I
don't
see
that
that
we'll
be
able
to
do
that
tonight.
But
maybe
I'm
I'm
wrong.
A
couple
of
concerns
I
have
is
with
respect
to
the
legal
implications
of
grandfathering.
G
You
know
what
are
we
to
do
with
someone
who
is,
unfortunately,
already
in
possession
of
a
rooster?
Do
we
have
you
know
the
legal
ability
to
do
anything
about
that?
Unfortunately,
I
don't
want
to
give
these
poor
people
a
false
sense
of
hope,
because
you
know
we
may
not
be
able
to
apply
this
retroactively,
which
in
effect,
would
would
be
what
that
is
and
I'll
leave
that
for
legal
counsel.
G
But
the
other
question
I
have
is
with
respect
to
enforcement,
it's
wonderful
to
tell
the
public
that
we're
going
to
cure
your
problem,
but
we
can't
just
go
in
rogue
and
say:
hey,
I'm
going
to
take
your
rooster.
We
need
to
know
the
proper
mechanism.
G
Are
there,
you
know
particular
licenses.
Are
there
union
issues?
Do
we
need
special
personnel?
Do
they
have
to
be
put
in
a
certain
location?
Where
do
they
go
so
these
are
all
pieces
to
the
puzzle
that
we
need
to
hash
out
if
we're
going
to
move
on
this
effectively
as
a
body
in
a
responsible
way.
Thank
you.
L
To
counsel
donegan's
point
about
expertise
in
the
in
the
farm
act.
If
you
had
asked
me
these
questions
five
months
ago,
I
would
not
have
been
well
suited
to
answer
this
question
for
you,
but
I
happen
to
be
involved
in
a
case
in
another
municipality
representing
the
municipality,
where
the
very
issue
focuses
around
the
application
of
the
farm
act.
L
So
I
feel
somewhat
uniquely
qualified
to
provide
you
with
a
legal
opinion
on
it
and
that's
why
I
I
had
suggested
the
amendment
that
I
did.
The
right
to
farm
act.
Isn't
a
rhode
island
invention.
L
L
You
have
to
file
with
rydem
agriculture
division
to
obtain
an
approved
farm
plan,
to
tell
them
precisely
what
it
is
you're
going
to
do
on
this
farm
in
layman's
terms,
are
you
going
to
raise
chickens?
Are
you
going
to
have
dairy
cows
pigs,
whatever
the
case
may
be,
and
that
farm
plant
is
renewable
every
10
years
in?
In
addition,
by
the
way,
those
that
do
have
farms
are
entitled
to
a
different
tax
status
when
it
comes
to
taxing
their
property
and
taxing
their
tangibles
and
so
forth.
L
So
within
the
structure
of
of
zoning,
if
you
will
councilwoman
mourinho
had
alluded
to
enforcement,
your
zoning
enforcement
officer
is
charged
with
enforcing
the
code
of
zoning
ordinances
in
your
city.
As
I
read
this
ordinance
and
I'm
not
going
to
speak
for
the
sponsors
as
to
what
their
intent
was.
L
I
don't
have
an
opinion
on
that
as
I
stand
here,
because
that's
not
something
I
I
contemplated
truthfully,
but
you
know
I'll
go
back
20
some
odd
years
ago,
when
the
first
adult
entertainment
statute
was
passed
in
rhode
island
and
the
constitutional
argument
made
by
existing
adult
establishment
owners
was
that
we
already
exist
where
we
are.
You
can't
tell
us
how
to
behave
where
we
are,
and
you
can't
tell
us
to
go
to
a
particular
area
within
your
municipality.
L
Well,
they
were
wrong.
The
state
supreme
court
ruled
differently
in
that
particular
constitutional
ruling
has
been
upheld
at
the
united
states
supreme
court
level.
So
I
I
wish
mr
vedecki
were
here
because,
quite
frankly,
he
and
I
were
on
the
same
side
of
the
coin
on
that
one
successfully.
L
This
seems
to
do
that
and
respect
the
rights
of
those
who
are
protected
under
the
right
to
farm
act.
Now
that
said,
you
know
you
may
want
to
consider
this
in
a
larger
context.
You
may
not.
That
is
entirely.
You
know
a
political
decision
if
the
will
of
the
council.
Certainly
there
was
another
question
I
think
councilwoman
that
you
had
raised.
I
wanted
to
make
sure
that
I
had
addressed
your
questions.
G
Thank
you.
Yes,
the
other
aspect
was
with
respect
to
enforcement.
In
terms
of
I
don't
pretend
to
be
an
expert,
but
they
I
I
don't
know
if
there
are
state
regulations
and
laws
with
respect
to
the
housing
of
those
you
know
roosters
once
they
are
caught,
and
I
imagine
that
that
there
are.
L
There
was
a
a
point
raised
about
acreage
in
this
discussion,
be
clear
that
the
farm
act,
the
the
federal
and
state
pharmax
control,
if
you're
a
farm
and
the
federal
and
state
act
says
that
you
can
be
a
farm
on
a
postage
stamp,
then
that's
the
way
it
goes
or
if
a
certain
amount
of
acreage
is
required.
L
That's
the
way
that
it
goes,
and
the
purpose
really
behind
the
farm
act
is
that
for
folks
who
are
in
the
proper
zone
engaged
in
a
legitimate
farming
activity,
those
who
come
to
the
nuisance,
if
you
will,
by
living
next
door
to
the
the
smell
of
manure
and
the
noise
of
animals.
Well,
if
they're
a
legitimate
farm.
Tough
luck!
L
You
came
to
the
nuisance,
but
in
this
instance,
as
the
facts
are
described
then-
and
this
obviously
an
ordinance
like
this
is
designed,
as
I
see
it
and
as
explained
by
the
councilwoman
rinzuli,
to
really
to
speak
for
those
people
who
are
being
spoken
to
it
four
in
the
morning
by
a
residential
rooster.
L
So
that's
that's
how
I
view
this.
If
the
council
chooses
to
view
it
in
a
in
a
larger
scope
and
a
larger
context,
that
certainly
is
well
within
the
rights
of
the
council
to
do
so.
Thank
you.
K
I
Thank
you
chairman.
Certainly,
I
understand
the
sentiment
of
councilman
zully
with
this
ordinance,
because
there
is
an
issue
in
the
city
that
we
all
as
council.
I
We
know
what
it
is
that
we
want
to
get
to
the
bottom
of
that,
but
the
problem,
the
issue
is
it's
not
about
the
chickens
or
it's
not
about
the
wooster.
It's
about
the
enforcement
of
the
law.
That's
the
problem.
We
have
that's
why
we
need
to
stop
the
enforcement,
because,
as
council
really
and
I
encountered
once,
we
are
working
on
an
ordinance
about
drug
honors
issue,
police
officers
did
not
have
the
provision
willing
to
enforce
the
law
somewhere.
They
have
probably
because
of
resources.
I
The
work
has
not
done
so.
We
have
a
problem
of
enforcement,
so
I
don't
think
we
need
to
restrict
people.
They'll
already
said
you
cannot
have
in
your
backyard,
but
if
you
have
the
lens,
I
I
I
concur
with
this
woman
woman,
mrs
draken,
if
you
have
the
ability,
I
don't
think
we
should
restrict
somebody
if
you
have
the
ability
so
where
we
need
to
work
is
the
nuisance.
I
I
It's
how
we
go
in
to
enforce
the
law,
how
we're
going
to
make
sure
when
someone
is
a
nuisance
for
your
neighbor
and
you
pay
for
that.
That's
I
think,
that's
where
we
need
to
go
because
I'm
on
that
process,
so
we
need
to
figure
out
how
to
enforce
how
to
make
sure
when
you're
not
complying
and
you
pay
that's
where
we
need
to
start.
So,
that's
why
the
way
because
I
am
against
mutants
because
we
have
back
you-
know
dog
barking.
I
We
have
all
kinds
of
new
reasons
in
the
city,
so
we
do
not
find
a
way
yet
to
really
enforce
inspection.
For
example,
we
have
a
lot
of
problem
enforcement.
The
problem
is
enforcement,
nothing
else
so
now
I
think
we
can
convene
to
make
sure
we
find
ways
for
the
enforcement
part,
but
it's
the
law
already
said
you
cannot
have
how
you
can
have
chicken
or
poster.
I
E
So
I
would
ask
attorney
angel
as
far
as
I
understand
it
and
I
could
be
incorrect
when
dem
you
know
says:
there's
a
farm
they
go
out
there.
They
test
the
animals
they're
in
charge
of
the
enforcement.
E
So
to
my
understanding
you
could
have
a
hundred
acres
of
land,
but
if
you're,
not
a
farm,
gem
is
not
going
out
there
and
testing
your
flock
or
paying
attention
to
what
you're
doing
so.
Why
you
need
a
rooster
in
the
first
place,
I'm
not
sure,
but
you
can't
just
have
whatever
you
want
spreading
bird
flu
or
whatever
else
everywhere.
Just
because
you
decided
that
you
have
a
ton
of
land
and
you
purchased
it.
E
So
that's
where
I
am
at
with
that,
and
I
see
how
this
could
go
with
the
chicken
ordinance,
but
I
don't
think
it
necessarily
has
to,
and
I
would
like
to
try
and
pass
this
tonight
to
give
you
know.
I
want
relief
for
the
people
who
have
been
living
with
this
nuisance
for
years
and
not
getting
anything
solved.
So
we
could
drake
patton
might
come
back
on
five
more
times
and
talk
to
us
about
chickens.
E
I
don't
want
this
to
go
six
more
months,
because
we
can't
pass
the
chicken
ordinance
necessarily
and
I'm
totally
open
to
that,
and
there
were
just
oversights
made
on
that
ordinance
and
that's
why
it
didn't
make
sense.
So
I
propose
that
we
go
with
this
tonight
for
the
roosters
with
the
amendment
by
council.
Thank
you.
B
Okay,
I
fully
understand
that
we
need
to
do
something
to
resolve
this
problem
for
the
people
that
are
having
a
problem,
but
getting
back
to
what
councilman
donegan
said.
Getting
back
to
what
drake
pattern
said,
there
exists
an
ordinance
that
was
passed
by
the
city
council
10
years
ago.
That
covers
everything
lot
size
farm
size,
how
many
who's
where
it
covers
the
whole
thing.
Many
people
spent
many
hours.
Writing
that
ordinance.
B
I
would
be
in
favor
of
passing
the
amended
ordinance
tonight
that
attorney
angel
recommended,
but
we
really
need
to
take
a
look
at
what
exists
already
we're
not
experts
on
this.
There
are
people
that
are
experts
on
it,
so
they
need
to
tell
us
who
should
have
chickens,
how
many
they
should
have
what
slot
size,
that's
something
that
they
spent
many
many
hundreds
of
hours
writing
10
years
ago
and
nothing's
changed
in
that.
B
So
I
would
be
in
favor
of
passing
the
amended
ordinance
tonight
to
resolve
the
immediate
issue,
but
we
really
need
to
take
a
look
at
what
is
already
on
paper.
We're
not
experts
on
this
we're
going
to
spend
weeks
months
hours
wasting
our
time
wasting
everybody's
time.
We
need
to
do
this
right,
so
I
agree
with
councilman
donaghy.
We
need
to
do
it
right.
D
Thank
you
chair.
I
have
to
agree
with
vice
president
ferry.
I
think
we
should
pass
this
tonight.
I
think
we
can
separate
the
roosters
and
chickens.
I
think
that's
a
more
comprehensive
ordinance
that
might
need
some
more
work,
but
I
think
that
well,
I'm
not
think
I
know
I've
visited
mr
palino's
property
and
I
know
what
he's
going
through
and
I
know
a
lot
of
other
residents
in
the
city
that
have
called
me
that
are
dealing
with
roosters
in
their
neighborhood
on
a
daily
basis,
all
day,
sometimes
all
night.
D
So
I
certainly
agree
with
that.
I
think
the
amendment
that
council
provided
tonight
is
is
good,
so
I
will
be
voting
for
this
tonight.
I
think
it's
it's
a
good
step.
I
mean
there's
another
hearing
too
to
this
process.
It's
not
a
done
deal
tonight.
It
will
go
to
the
full
council.
Public
comment
again
will
be
allowed
on
this,
so
we
can
certainly
take
some
more
input
on
it
and
but
I
will
be
voting
to
pass
this
on
tonight.
Thank
you.
K
J
You
know,
I
have
to
say,
while
rooster
the
red
pen
right
interesting
enough
for
having
this
conversation,
you
know
I'm
I
am
actually
I
don't
know
too
much
about
roosters,
just
like
very
much
some
of
our
my
council
colleagues,
you
know
when
I'm,
not
a
farmer,
I'm
not
too
much
aware
of
the
entire
issue.
J
I
don't
even
know
if
any
other
cities
or
towns
have
any
type
of
ordinance
that
excludes
roosters
from
the
city
as
at
all,
you
know,
but
at
the
same
time
I
am
going
to
defer
to
the
solicitor
I'm
going
to
vote
in
support
of
this
ordinance
this
evening,
so
it
can
go
before
the
full
council
as
amended,
so
everyone
can
still
have
the
opportunity,
as
council
president
actually
suggested,
to
speak
on
this
actual
issue.
J
I'm
not
going
to
say
that
I'm
going
to
be
able
to
provide
my
support
for
this
ordinance
that
evening
or
vote
whether
again
in
favor
against
it,
but
I
really
feel
the
way
it
stands
with
that
amendment.
At
least
we're
advertising
we're
letting
everyone
know
and
it'll
give
us
an
opportunity
as
well
that
there's
any
additional
amendments.
Perhaps
between
now
and
then
that
could
be
provided
at
the
floor
the
day
of
the
council
meeting.
J
One
thing
that
I
I
think
one
I
just
had
a
question
to
the
solicitor
to
to
our
city
council.
Legal
counsel
is
if
it
goes
to
the
full
council
at
that
point,
are
we
able
we're
not
able
to
then
recommend
it
back
to
committee,
or
can
we
do
that
if
it
goes
before
the
council
and
there's
additional
suggested
language
or
information
that
comes
before
us
whatsoever
that
we
want
to
refer
back
to
committee.
L
Yeah,
it's
it's
a
good
question,
so
it
certainly
can
be
referred
back
to
committee,
but
anything
other
than
a
ministerial
floor.
Amendment
should
be
sent
back
to
committee
and
probably
re-advertised.
So
you
know,
given
the
nature
of
the
topic
units
into
relationship
to
other
things.
My
advice
would
be.
L
You
know
that
if
you
do
vote
it
out
of
committee
and
there
is
any
sort,
if
you,
if
you
do,
vote
this
out
of
committee-
and
you
do-
you
have
to
pay
attention
to
the
stenographer,
they
tell
you
when
to
speak
and
went
to
speak
up,
and
so
you
can.
If
you
vote
this
out
of
committee-
and
it
goes
to
the
floor
of
the
council,
it
can
certainly
be
amended,
but
any
substantive
amendment
would
need
to
be
sent
back.
L
The
count
the
committee,
this
particular
committee
for
consideration
and
it
would,
I
believe,
necessitate
a
re-advertisement
depending
upon
how
comprehensive
that
amendment
is
so.
J
Great,
thank
you
so
much
again,
I'm
going
to
support
this
this
evening
as
amended
clearly
on
roosters.
This
is
not
about
chicken
or
or
hens
at
this
moment,
but
it's
strictly
about
the
rooster
that
amended
and
looking
forward
to
hearing
from
the
sponsor
the
public
as
well
and
continue
to
get
educated
on
this
actual
issue
coming
before
us.
Thank
you.
I
I
L
Counsel,
thank
you,
mr
chairman.
So
certainly
the
ordinance
doesn't
require
anybody
to
kill
anything.
That's
number
one,
and
you
know
it's
it's
as
if
you
know
someone
said
you
can't
have
a
dog
anymore.
You
have
the
right
to
find
a
home
for
the
dog
if
they're
engaged
in
a
farming
activity
and
that's
the
reason
why
they
have
roosters
and
chickens
together,
then
this
doesn't
apply
to
them.
L
It's
that
simple,
but
if
they
have
roosters
and
chickens
living
next
door
to
mr
palino,
this
ordinance,
if
passed,
would
mean
that
you
know
the
rooster
can't
live
there
anymore.
We
haven't
addressed
the
chicken
issue.
Thank
you.
K
Counselor
mr
johnny.
H
Thank
you,
chairman
to
piggy
to
piggyback
off
of
my
colleague's
question
right.
There
I
think,
raises
a
you
know,
a
question.
I
mean
it's
one
thing
to
say:
roosters
prohibited
it's
another
thing
to
enforce
it,
and
what
does
enforcement
look
like
and
is
there
a
step
you
know?
Is
there
a
process
for
enforcement?
Are
there
fines
involved?
Is
there
the
opportunity
to.
H
Challenge,
you
know
a
said
violation.
We,
you
know
we
usually
include
some
some
opportunity
for
that
in
most
of
the
you
know,
at
least
most
of
the
legislation
that
I've
seen
pass
from
this
committee,
we're
like
we're
going
to
pass
an
ordinance
that
just
says
something's
prohibited
without
actually
enumerating
how
it's
going
to
be
enforced
and
what
that
looks
like
I
just
I'm
sorry.
I
just
don't
think
it's
a
good
precedent
to
set
by
a
committee
to
send
something
out
that
just
isn't
complete.
L
Mr
chairman,
by
state
law,
in
by
ordinance,
you
have
a
zoning
enforcement
officer
in
this
city
that
is
charged
with
enforcement
of
all
zoning
ordinances.
Okay
and
ordinances
of
this
kind
and
the
right
of
appeal.
There
is
a
right
of
appeal
in
the
municipal
right
of
appeal
of
an
action
by
the
zoning
enforcement
officer
is
to
the
zoning
board
of
review
sitting
in
its
appellate
capacity.
L
That's
a
state
law
so
and
if
they
don't
agree
with
the
decision
of
the
zoning
board
of
review
sitting
in
its
appellate
capacity,
then
they
have
an
appeal
by
right
to
the
state
superior
court.
G
Thank
you.
If
I'm,
if
I
can
to
counselor
angel,
I
understand
that
zoning
has
the
role
of
enforcement
for
practically
speaking.
Someone
has
a
rooster.
Zoning
goes
there.
They
take
it.
Where
does
it
go
as
we
sit
here
tonight?
I
don't
you
know,
I
don't
know
the
answer
to
that
question,
but
I
and
I
could
be
wrong
in
this.
I
believe
there
may
be
state
laws
with
respect
to
where
that
bird
can
go
like,
for
example,
we
have
the
animal
shelter.
G
L
First
things:
first,
if
I
may,
your
zoning
enforcement
officer
does
not
have
the
authority
to
do
anything
other
than
issue
to
conduct
an
investigation
to
make
findings
and
then
to
issue
a
notice
of
violation
of
of
the
zoning
code.
They
don't
have
the
authority
to
take
possession
of
someone's
animal.
Just
just
to
be
clear
on
that.
To
answer
the
second
half
of
your
question,
I,
as
I
stated
when
I
stood
at
the
podium,
I
don't
know
the
answer
to
that.
L
As
I
as
I
stand
here,
I
I
don't
know
where,
where
they
would
go,
I
don't
know.
Certainly
if
a
notice
of
violation
were
issued,
you
know
and
a
cease
and
desist
issued.
Obviously
the
owner
of
the
animal
proceeds
at
their
peril
to
continue
to
house
the
animal.
It
continues
to
be
an
ongoing
violation,
but
that
animal
stays
where
it
is.
L
As
far
as
I
would
be
concerned
until
the
appellate
process
has
run
its
course
unless
there's
something
else
in
state
law
somewhere
that
you
know
I
haven't
reached
for
in
the
recess
of
my
mind
tonight
and
I
and
I'm
not
going
to
tell
you-
I
know
the
answer
to
that
it's
this
is
not
a
dog.
This
is
not
a
domestic
animal
any
more
than,
and
I
I
don't
know
what
the
rules
are.
L
K
Thank
you,
councilman
just
my
thoughts
on
this.
I
am
going
to
support
this
tonight.
I
don't
feel
that
this
is
connected
as
much
to
the
chicken
ordinance.
I
think,
there's
very
different
reasons
for
these
ordinances
and
they're
different
animals.
K
The
in
terms
of
the
amendments
and
people
10
years
ago
worked
very
hard
to
come
up
with
the
requirements
back
then,
which
that
ordinance
didn't
pass
well.
It
was
passed
but
then
vetoed
we're,
overlooking
the
fact
that
very
smart
people
at
the
federal
level,
very
smart
people
at
the
state
level
have
already
done
all
this.
We
don't
have
to
do
it.
It's
it's
already
been
done.
It's
the
federal
right
to
farm
act.
K
So
for
us
to
say
we
need
to
sit
here
and
we
need
to
get
these
experts
and
we're
one
we're
one
city
in
one
state
of
a
country.
This
stuff
has
already
been
figured
out
by
I'm
presuming
experts
at
the
the
senate
and
congress
level.
So
I'm
more
than
happy
to
move
forward,
like
council
said
with
the
language
he
suggested
in
that
amendment,.
K
K
There's
an
animal
creates
a
lot
of
noise,
disturbs
people
greatly
and
one
of
the
greatest
rights
a
person
has
as
a
property
right
is
to
the
quiet
enjoyment
of
their
property
and
as
a
city
council,
we
owe
that
to
to
our
citizens
so-
and
I
haven't
heard
any
I've
heard
people
that
are
against
this
ordinance,
but
I
haven't
heard
any
testimony
as
to
why
a
non-farmer
needs
to
have
a
rooster.
K
You
know
there
are
things
that
are
not
illegal,
but
that
are
not
within
the
zoning
of
the
city.
This
clearly
is
is
not
something
we're
supposed
to
have
in
residential
areas.
They
can
be
on
farms,
though,
and
wonderfully
farms
have
already
been
defined.
We
have
that
it's
there
and
it's
already
done
so.
I
think
this
is
ready
to
go.
I
don't
see
any
reason
to
belabor
it
and
I'll
be
supporting
it
tonight.
Thank
you.
K
Seeing
none
madam
clerk,
please
take
the
role.
B
E
B
D
Thank
you.
This
just
adds
another
alternate
to
the
make
up
of
the
body.
Sometimes
there's
quorum
issues
with
some
of
the
boards,
and
that's
all
this
does.
B
E
K
All
right
moving
on
to
9-2-1-0-7
ordinance,
sponsored
by
councilwoman,
vargas
and
council
president
pat
velasquez
regarding
cemeteries,
I
will
entertain
a
motion.
B
I
J
J
This
evening
is
pretty
much
obviously
a
seven
page
paper
ordinance,
not
sure
if
there
are
any
questions,
but
but
the
point
of
this
is
to
make
sure
that
private
cemeteries,
in
particular,
although
are
are
able
to
be
held
accountable
for
the
sole
purpose
of
avoiding
a
cemetery
from
becoming
abandoned
or
neglected,
and
so
we
have
roughly
over
160
or
so
cemeteries,
not
all
private,
but
within
that
160,
65
or
so.
Some
are
public.
J
Some
are
state
and
obviously
some
are
pretty
much
unknown
or
or
abandoned
as
well,
and
so
here
in
the
city
we
have
about
three
or
so
lots
or
cementaries.
If
you
will
that
are
owned
by
the
city,
the
exemptions
of
those
cemeteries
that
are
will
not
be
affected.
J
Is
on
line
277,
which
would
be
religious,
cranston,
historical
cemetery,
public
cemeteries
and
abandoned
cemeteries
as
well,
in
addition
to
active
buildings
that
are
used
regularly
in
active
religious
celebration,
what
I'm
trying
to
do,
or
my
goal
is
to
a
have,
the
private
cemeteries
be
able
to
file
within
the
city
clerk's
office,
their
revenues
where
pretty
much
their
financial
status
on
it,
but
also
be
able
to
provide
their
plotting
of
their
mapping
right.
How
many
people
are?
What's
the
mapping?
J
I,
my
hope
is
that
in
my
ward
in
particular,
I
know
there's
a
private
cemetery,
and
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
I'm
clear
that
in
this
ordinance
in
particular,
it's
not
pointing
fingers
at
one
or
singling
out
one
specific
cemetery
or
another,
but
it's
overall
private
cemeteries
to
avoid
them
from
being
neglected.
As
I
mentioned
earlier,
and
even
mausoleums
as
well.
J
We
don't
own
the
mausoleum
over
in
ward
1.,
but
there
are
a
couple
of
other
muslims
in
the
city
and
so
by
doing
so
of
registering
you
know,
we're
the
loved
ones
of
so
many
are
buried
and
the
budget
and
expense
budgetary.
I
should
say
financial
conditions
of
the
cemeteries
were
able
to
hold
private
cemeteries
accountable
on
this.
A
lot
of
I
should
say,
there's
some
language
in
here,
which
is
taken
by
the
rhode
island
general
law
on
cemeteries,
which
is
title
23
chapter
23-18,
there's
also
language
on
here.
That'll.
J
Allow
us
to
do
a
lot
of
enforcement
within
our
private
cemeteries
on
here
as
as
well,
I
have
to
say
that
this
has
been
an
ongoing.
J
In
progress,
if
you
will,
on
the
actual
ordinance
itself,
I
got
on
the
council
in
2019,
and
I
started
looking
into
this
matter.
As
a
matter
of
fact,
senator
josh
miller
from
district
28
who's
actually
represents
he's.
My
my
senator
over
in
ward,
one
who
thank
you
for
speaking
on
behalf
and
support
of
this
ordinance,
has
been
working
with
me
as
well
as
other
state
reps,
whose
family
are
also
laid
to
rest
there
and
I've
been
getting
a
lot
of
phone
calls
on
just
private
cemeteries
in
general.
J
Let's
just
make
sure
that
we
hold
private
cemeteries
accountable
if
those
private
cemeteries
that
are
well
kept,
those
cemeteries
that
don't
have
to
worry
about
their
operational
expenses
or
providing
us
with
their
filing
shouldn't
be
worried
whatsoever.
So
again,
there,
the
perpetual
care
of
the
cemeteries
in
mausoleum
is
noted
on
here.
The
exceptions
of
who's
going
to
be
exempt
from
this
is
on
here.
J
The
spread
of
ashes
as
well
on
private
cemeteries
also
noted
on
this
actual
document
on
this
ordinance
before
us,
and
one
of
the
things
I
do
want
to
know
on
the
filing
of
this
ordinance
is
that
the
city
clerk
would
then
review
such
filing.
That
would
be
provided
to
the
office
or
the
mayor's
office,
where
the
private
cemetery,
the
owner
of
the
private
secretary,
would
have
to
disclose
whether
or
not
they
have
insufficient
revenues
to
meet
budgeted
expenses.
J
I'm
not
there's
no
reason
why
they
shouldn't
be
able
to
do
that
with
us
here
in
the
city
and
their
osha
should
be
reporting,
whether
or
not
they
have
less
than
25
plots
or
niches
that
are
applicable
and
remaining
available
for
sale
again
once
we
have
that
filing
it'll
allow
us
to
continue
to
also
enforce
and
keep
private
owners
of
the
cemeteries
in
burial
places
accountable
before
we
start
seeing
them
going
downhill
and
then
we'll
have
to
figure
out
what
we're
going
to
be
doing
from
there.
J
How
we're
going
to
act
as
an
actual
council
on
cemeteries
that
are
being
neglected,
so
this
would
enforce
current
cemeteries
and
anyone
who
say
was
to
actually
get
into
the
cemetery
business.
J
For
you
know
if
you
will
to
make
sure
that
we
are
able
to
not
only
label
the
enable
the
rhode
island
general
laws,
but
as
the
city
also
do
it,
and
I
do
hope
that
if
this
passes
out
of
committee
and
if
it
happens
to
even
pass
the
out
of
the
city
council
that
at
the
state
level,
it
would
also
be
introduced
in
past
there
as
well,
because
I
have
heard
from
other
cities
and
towns
where
they
too
are
actually
coming
across
situations
of
private-owned
cemeteries
that
are
starting
to
be
neglected
or
have
been
neglected
and
have
become
abandoned.
J
And
then,
at
that
point
it'd
be
so
late
in
the
game
to
actually
trying
to
really
enforce
and
be
much
harder
to
go
after
their
perpetual
care,
which
has
been
ongoing
with
at
least
one
of
the
cases
that
has
come
before
us
here
in
the
city.
Thank
you.
D
Thank
you
chair.
I
just
want
to
thank
council
member
vargas
for
all
the
hard
work
she
put
into
this.
I
know
over
the
years
it's
certainly
been
an
ongoing
issue.
That's
not
just
award
one
issue,
but
certainly
something
you've
been
working
on
and
I'm
happy
to
co-sponsor
and
support
this
ordinance.
Thank
you.
I
Thank
you
chairman.
I
just
want
to
say
thank
you
to
councilwoman
vadas,
most
of
the
time
when
I
go
drive
down
to
board
street,
and
I
was
like
looking
at
this
side
of
cemetery,
I
was
like
I
feel
like
so
sad
already
and
to
know
you
have
someone.
I
have
a
family
member
down
there
and
it's
always
suddenly
to
see
the
in
the
condition
this
side
of
the
cemetery.
So
this
is
need.
It
was
so
much
to
do
it's
time
and
I
will
anything
I
can
do.
I
We
will
need
to
make
sure
this
is
not
happening.
Pay
respect
to
our
loved
ones.
So
when
you
lay
someone
down
should
be
respected
and
well
kept,
it's
not
because
the
person
is
not
alive
anymore
and
just
treat
it
like.
You
know
it's
really
suddenly
to
see
that.
So
yes,
thank
you
so
much
for
bringing
that.
K
In
the
comments
I'll
just
say,
I
fully
support
this.
I
think
I
mean
it's
a
travesty.
Whenever
you
see
a
dilapidated
and
cemetery,
private
or
public,
you
know
when
you
pass
by.
It
definitely
is
a
blight
on
the
community,
just
as
councilman
jermaine
said
it's
sad
to
drive
by
the
only
piece
that
I
do
want
to
look
into
a
little
more
before
the
full
council
is
the
having
to
provide
the
inc,
the
financial
data-
that's
just
I
wanted
to
put
that
out
there.
K
L
You,
mr
mr
chairman,
if
I
can,
that
was
a
piece
just
so
the
council
knows
every
piece
of
this
has
been
tied
back
to
state
law,
so
I'm
more
than
comfortable
that
we
have
the
authority
to
do
just
that,
and
that
was
also
a
concern
of
mine.
I
know
we
you,
you
wear
a
hat
as
a
lawyer
during
the
day
and
you
can't
help
you
know
but
leave
it
on
at
night
too.
I
understand
that
so
yeah,
your
concern
is
well
founded,
but
we
we
have
the
authority
to
do
it.
K
No
discussion
clark,
please
take
the
role.
D
C
B
C
I
Council
of
me,
usually,
I
was
told
that
you
need
a
review
and
it's
sturdy
for
usually
that's
what
I
heard.
So
we
did
not
study
for
that.
One
traffic.
K
That
there's
not
one
on
the
on
the
docket.
K
J
If
I
can,
I
think,
in
the
past,
what
we've
done
sometimes
is
that
we're
able
to
pass
it
to
the
full
council
contention
on
the
traffic
study
being
presented
in
before
us.
If
that's
done
that
before
I
don't
see
why
we
wouldn't
be
able
to
do
that
tonight,.
D
B
Yes,
I
would
like
to
amend
the
amend
the
ordinance
now
pass
it
on
to
full
council
and
then
we'll
vote
on
it
with
with
the
traffic
study.
A
K
Any
discussion
hearing
none,
madam
clerk.
Please
take
the
role.
D
K
And
I
would
just
ask
the
administration
if
they
could
provide
notice
for
this
traffic
study.
Hopefully
it
would
be
great
if
we
could
get
it
for
the
full
council.
If
not,
you
know,
we
understand.
E
K
B
Just
for
the
record,
there
has
been
a
traffic
study.
I
have
been
back
and
forth
with
steve
mckay
on
this,
and
the
residents
just
will
not
let
up
on
wanting
something
done.
So
you
know
I'm
not
going
to
try
and
hide
the
fact
that
I'm
trying
to
stick
a
stop
sign
in
the
middle
of
the
street
to
stop
people
from
going
36
miles.
That
was
the
average
speed
of
this
traffic
study
was
36
miles
an
hour
in
a
25
mile,
an
hour
zone.
D
D
I
said
I
do
remember
that
so
if
we
just
get
that
email
to
us.
D
K
Thank
you
and
thank
you,
deputy
at
this
time,
I'll,
entertain
a
motion
to
adjourn.