►
From YouTube: Claims Committee, Public Works Committee, and Ordinance Committee Meetings, January 13, 2022
Description
Claims Committee, Public Works Committee, and Ordinance Committee Meetings, January 13, 2022
A
D
A
E
E
G
B
B
I
E
B
D
C
B
F
K
Great,
I
just
wanted
to
say
thank
you,
first
of
all,
for
putting
for
the
council
and
to
councilwoman
vargas
for
putting
the
potential
one-way
drop-off
in
the
morning
and
pick-up
times
on
shaw
avenue
as
a
one-way.
I
just
want
to
thank
you
all
for
putting
that
on
the
agenda
under
new
matters
today,
and
I
just
wanted
to
speak
a
little
bit
in
favor
of
it
in
case
anybody
had
any
questions
who
was
unfamiliar
with
the
street.
It
is
a
narrow
street
and
rhodes.
K
Additionally,
cars
tend
in
this
street
to
also
do
three-point
turns
in
the
middle
of
the
street
to
head
back
down
it
in
the
opposite
direction,
which
is
a
a
very
obvious
danger
to
walkers,
which
there
are
many
of
in
our
on
in
that
area
of
the
neighborhood
and
it's
dangerous
for
cars
as
well.
So,
based
on
all
of
those
observations
and
the
safety
of
our
community
and
the
safety
of
the
children
going
to
school.
B
B
J
Thank
you,
chairman
and
happy
new
year
to
all
my
colleagues
and
everyone.
That's
on
the
call
wishing
you
lots
of
good
health
and
definitely
blessings
in
the
year
ahead.
So,
as
you
all
heard
school
committee
member
speak,
sarah
just
spoke
regarding
shaw
avenue.
She
reached
out
to
me
I'd,
say
maybe
sometime
in
december,
in
hopes
that
we
can
actually
work
together
to
consider,
as
she
noted,
making
shore
avenue
a
one-way
potentially
during
school
days
during
drop-off
in
the
morning
and
dismissal
councilman.
J
J
J
I
did
reach
out
already
to
director
mason
on
this,
so
there
has
been
some
email
exchange.
It
could
probably
be
made
based
on
an
ordinance,
I
believe,
once
an
ordinance
introduced
from
what
I
was
told.
It
is
then,
after
when
we
are
able
to
actually
have
a
traffic
report
done
or
traffic
study
done
on
that
road,
so
my
hope
is
that
a
I
wanted
to
make
sure
that
I
shine
a
light
on
this
concern
and
let
you
all
know
that
this
most
likely
will
be
coming.
J
So,
in
the
event,
any
one
of
you
receive
any
type
of
communication
or
the
administration
on
this,
but
also
be
work
with
anyone
on
this
that's
interest,
particularly
the
administration
and
director
mason
director
mason
by.
I
believe
this
has
to
be
done
through
an
ordinance
and
correct
me.
I'm
wrong,
and
so
do
you
see
any
objection
and
do
I
need
to
have
any
public
hearing
whatsoever
on
this
matter.
J
I
would
assume
it
should
if
it's
gonna
go
before
an
ordinance
come,
does
it
go
through
ordinance
and
does
it
or
does
it
go
through
public
works
and
b?
I
sent
an
email
just
today
to
the
principal
of
the
school
as
well
on
this
just
so
that
way
we
can
all
be
on
the
same
page,
and
this
may
be
something
relatively
new
even
to
the
superintendent
which,
much
to
my
fault,
I
have
not
reached
out
to
her
on
this
issue.
J
L
J
Okay,
all
right
perfect,
thank
you
so
to
counsel
school
committee
member
woodman.
I
will
certainly
be
putting
some
language
together
and
be,
let
and
I'll
send
that
over
to
you
as
well.
So
you
well
aware
and
reach
out
to
the
school
and
the
superintendent
as
well,
and
obviously
yes,
I
will
be
getting
putting
something
together
for
the
residents
of
shore
abs,
so
that
was
my
item
on
onshore
ave.
J
J
It
might
be
something
that
I
could
have
brought
in
my
first
term,
but
I'm
really
trying
to
get
a
sense
as
to
is
there
any
way
whatsoever
that
we
as
a
city
other
than
social
media,
of
course,
able
to
provide
information
on
parking
bans
during
the
obviously
during
parking
bans,
whether
it's
snow
issue
and
emergency,
some
cities
and
towns
have
used
cup
logic.
I
know
there's
been
some
hesitation
on
using
that
or
a
robocall
or
a
matter
of
attacks
or
providing
a
software.
J
Perhaps
residents
are
able
to
log
in
their
information
their
phone
number
and
be
able
to
at
least
receive
any
type
of
updates.
I
think
glass
I
was
told
was
that
cop
logic
should
really
be
used
for
emergency.
Only,
not
everyone.
Surprisingly
to
some,
not
everyone
has
access
to
social
media.
Someone
some
folks
just
refuse
to
be
on
it,
and
so
some,
I
think
we
we
we
should
just.
J
So
I'm
not
sure
if
the
director
of
the
administration
would
be
able
to
provide
any
feedback.
On
that.
I
I
again
it's
just
trying
to
get
going,
make
sure
that
we
keep
our
streets
plowed
and
clear
and
that
people
will
know
that
there's
a
parking
ban
coming.
It
may
make
sense
to
some
people.
Might
some
some
folks
may
say
it's
common
sense.
There's
a
parking
ban,
there's
snow
coming,
there
might
be
a
parking
ban,
but
I
also
want
to
make
sure
that
we
get
the
word
out.
M
L
J
Through
the
chair
to
to
direct
him
already,
if
possible,
yes,
director
is
there,
are
we
should
at?
What
point
can
we
really
use
top
logic,
because
I
know
it
should
be
for
like
emergency
onlys?
But
what
what
do
we
really
consider
an
emergency,
because
I
think
there's
been
certain
emergencies
and
I
don't
think
we've
used
cop
logic,
so
is
there
you
know,
can?
Can
we
use
that
system?
If
we
have
that
in
place,
do
we
still
have
a
contract
with
them
or
any
other
potential
tools
that
we
can
use
to
communicate?
M
M
J
M
Correct
but
now
yeah
correct
yeah,
but
we
can't
do
paper
we're
using
facebook.
We,
you
know
the
city's
web,
the
city's
website.
We
asked
the
council.
People
have
been
very
cooperative
and
very
helpful.
I
can
I
can
inquire,
I
would
just
say,
but
I
don't
want
to
speak
on
behalf
of
the
emergency
departments.
To
you
know,
I'd
have
to
consult
with
them.
B
You
next
I
had
an
item
here
that
I
would
like
to
have
the
administration
chime
in
on.
I
personally
got
contacted
three
or
four
times
during
the
storm
of
in
pictures
taken
people
sent
me
emails.
I
saw
it
a
lot
on
facebook.
A
lot
of
people
do
not
obey
the
parking
ban
when
it
when
it's
in
effect
and
paul
mccauley
was
absolutely
fantastic
and
responding,
and
we
had
some
situations
taken
care
of,
but
I
would
just
like
the
administration
to
tell
us.
B
You
know
what
effort
is
being
made,
that
this
of
the
parking
being
violation
stopped
being
enforced,
because
some
people
really
had
a
tough
situation
with
their
streets.
I
saw
pitches.
I
I
spoke
to
several
people.
Are
we
we're
making
an
effort
to
try
and
get
this
enforced
because
it?
It
was
a
problem,
this
past
storm?
You
know,
I'm
I'm
just
being
the
messenger
here.
We
did
get
contacted
a
lot.
So
if
you
could,
please
just
enlighten
us
sure.
M
We
we
we
the
mayor,
she
has
that
frustration.
In
fact,
he
he's
not
happy
about
the
situation.
The
process
is
the
snowdrive.
If
people
are
aware
of
it,
they
call
it
to
the
administration's
attention
or
public
works
attention,
particularly
the
plow
drivers,
when
they're
out
would
contact
john
corso
to
call
police
dispatch
and,
as
director
mason
and
I
discussed
earlier,
police
apparently
have
a
and
storms
like
this.
M
They
have
an
officer
on
the
west
side
in
the
east
side
and
they
respond
to
all
the
calls
know
what
the
first
attempt
is
to
ring
doorbells
or
blast
their
sirens
to
get
their
people's
attention.
That
works
quite
often,
most
most
of
the
time.
This
past
storm.
I
believe
director
mesa
mentioned
that
there
were
two
tickets
and
two
toes.
As
you
know,
myself
and
the
mayor
were
out,
and
there
was
many
calls
every
every
time
we
saw
vehicles
out
there,
we'd
call
in
so
the
mechanism
would
be
calling
it.
M
In
this
case,
the
paul
mccauley
was
available.
Direct
the
public
works,
public
works,
the
police
police
dispatch
it
out
to
the
and
try
to
resolve
it,
but
correct
people.
I
noticed
too,
there
were
several
cars
out
of
state
and
and
people
parked
overnight
so
and
the
mayor
was
asking
to
have
cars
towed,
so
I
guess
most
of
the
times
on
those
calls.
B
I
personally
appreciate
the
fact
that
everybody
was
frustrated
that
an
effort
is
being
made
to
take
care
of
it.
So,
let's
just
hopefully
we'll
continue
on
that
path
and
people
will
get
the
word
they'll
get
out
that
if
you
park
in
the
street
during
a
snowstorm,
you're
gonna
get
tagged
or
you're
gonna
get
towed,
and
if
I
think
we
enforce
it,
it'll
just
help
the
matter
and
everyone
will
be
better
off.
Thank
you
very
much
all
right.
Next
on
the
agenda,
councilwoman
moreno,
you
have
something
for
discussion.
H
Thank
you
to
the
chair
tonight
on
the
agenda.
I
want
to
discuss
the
potential
for
the
city
of
cranston's
participation
in
the
rhode
island
community
septic
system
loan
program
in
the
rhode
island
sewer,
tie-in
loan
program.
It
was
actually
a
resident
that
had
reached
out
and
asked
a
good
question
of.
You
know
why
doesn't
cranston
take
advantage
of
this
program
when
so
many
other
cities
and
towns
in
rhode,
island
do?
H
And
this
person
is
somebody
who
has
does
not
have
the
availability
of
sewers
ward
4,
which
is
a
considerable
part
actually
of
ward
4,
and
the
septic
system
needs
to
be
replaced,
and
you
know,
and
this
particular
person
he
lives
in
an
area
where
probably
a
lot
of
his
neighbors
are
going
to
be
in
a
similar
situation
because
the
homes
are
coming
up
to.
I
think
it's
like
about
40
years
old
in
particular
where
he
lives.
H
So
I
was
just
wondering
if
that's
something
that
we
might
want
to
avail
ourselves
up
to
to
fill
everybody
in
the
septic
system
loan
program.
What
it
does
is
it
allows
through
the
rhode
island
infrastructure
bank.
It
allows
rhode,
island
cities
and
towns
to
have
their
residents,
who
need
to
replace
their
septic
systems
in
areas
where
sewer
is
not
an
option
to
take
a
very
low
interest
loan.
H
But
there
are,
you
know,
different
requirements
of
it
and
similarly,
with
respect
to
the
sewer
tie-in
program,
that
is
just
what
it
sounds
like
as
well.
It
would
be
if
you
live
in
an
area
where
you
do
have
the
option
of
sewers,
but
you
have
a
septic
and
you'd
like
to
tie
into
the
sewers.
It
would
be
a
low
interest
loan
to
the
residents
of
cranston,
and
I
guess
you
know
this.
The
program
from
what
I
heard
has
been
successful
in
other
cities
and
towns.
L
Yeah
I'll
chime
in
we
looked
at
this
program,
I'm
thinking
about
five
or
six
years
ago,
and
it
may
have
changed
from
where
it
was
five
or
six
years
ago,
because
back
then
it
was
a
requirement
that
the
city
have
a
loan
program
on
the
dem's
project.
Priority
list,
which
we
do
it
is
on
it.
We
could.
We
could
go
through
with
this,
and
also
we
would
have
to
have
the
the
approved
dem
on-site
wastewater
management
plan,
which
currently
we
do
not
have
an
approved
plan.
L
I'm
a
little
surprised
that
that
the
rhode
island,
clean
water,
finance
is
or
the
infrastructure
bank
it's
called
now
has
changed
because
it
used
to
be
where
all
the
administrative
functions
had
to
go
through
sydney
administration
through
the
finance
department.
If
that
has
changed,
then
maybe
that
that
could
very
well
be
a
game
change
changer.
L
Let
me
reach
out
to
the
rhode,
island
infrastructure
bank
and
I
think
we
need
to
get
it
ends
up
being
more
of
a
finance
issue
with
bob
strom
and
company
versus
a
public
works
issue.
You
know
we
would
need
to.
We
would
need
to
do
that
plan,
but
other
than
that
it
would
be
more
through
the
finance
office.
H
Okay,
I
did
put
it
on
the
agenda
for
next
month's
finance
meeting,
so
we
will
wait
until
that
finance
meeting
as
well
and
or
in
the
meantime,
you
can
reach
out
to
director
sram
and
see
what
what
his
input
is,
and
maybe
research
a
little
bit
too.
Okay,
very
good,
because
it'd
be
a
great
benefit
to
to
the
residents.
You
know
to
help
them
out.
That's
a
lot
of
money
for
people
to
dole
out.
You
know
15
000
or
more
often
times,
there's
a
cap.
H
B
B
B
H
I
C
I
I
N
B
B
B
P
D
O
O
I
O
O
Q
Everybody
on
the
call
is
clear,
particularly
the
public.
I
know
that
the
council
probably
is
aware,
but
this
was
originally
referred
to
the
ordinance
committee
back
in
october
and
at
that
time
the
ordinance
that
was
sent
over
strictly
said
that
the
keeping
of
any
roosters
is
strictly
prohibited
and
that
the
provisions
of
the
section
will
be
strictly
in
four
a
floor.
Amendment
was
introduced
at
that
time.
Q
I
believe
by
councilwoman
moreno,
and
it
was
a
substantive
amendment
because
of
the
substance
of
of
the
amendment
in
terms
of
the
amount
of
language
that
it
added.
I
believe
it
was
late
in
the
hour.
If
I
recall
right,
it
was
sent
back
to
committee
and
then
I
think
it
was
held
in
committee
and
the
councilwoman
mourinho
can
jump
in
and
councilwoman
renzuli's
been
working
on.
This
they've
been
working
together.
Q
My
understanding
is
that
it
had
been
held
a
month
or
so
and
there's
a
consensus
on
some
on
a
written
amendment,
and
that
was
what
had
been
talked
about
at
the
council
at
the
full
council
meeting
that
you
know.
Given
that
the
amendment
was,
you
know
so
long,
the
council
thought
it
best
that
be
reduced
to
writing
and
sent
back
to
the
committee.
Q
As
far
as
notice
is
concerned,
the
public
does
have
notice
of
the
ordinance
it
does
have
notice
of
what
the
the
ordinance
seeks
to
prohibit,
which
is
strictly
prohibit
the
keeping
of
roosters.
The
amendment
would
seem
to
allow
roosters
under
certain
circumstances
that
had
been
talked
about
at
the
at
the
council
meeting
as
well.
I
would
take
the
position
that
you
know
the
public
does
have
notice
as
to
the
substantive
framework
of
what
this
ordinance
is
about.
P
Q
Words
and
amendment
doesn't
necessarily
mean
that
there's
a
substantive
change,
a
substantive
change
would
be
that
if
we're
going
to
allow,
you
know
roosters
to
be
permitted
in
district
one,
but
not
district
five
or
you
know
whatever
the
case
may
be,
that's
not
what's
being
proposed
here,
so
I
leave
it.
I
leave
it
at
the
pleasure
of
the
chair
and
the
committee
to
decide
the
issue.
O
Thank
you,
counselor
yeah.
My
only
concern
was
whether
or
not
it
was
a
substantive
change
from
150,
where
someone
would
would
say.
No,
that's,
okay.
I
wouldn't
go
down
to
city
hall
and
talk
about
this
down
to
50,
where
maybe
that
would
draw
them
into
to
have
public
comment
on.
It
was
just
my
concern.
R
Through
the
chair,
if
I
may
chairman,
if
I,
if
I
may
just
offer
my
two
cents
here,
I
did
receive
a
call
from
solicitor
malay
on
this
at
this
very
issue
and
the
concern
here
and
attorney
angel
touched
upon
it
to
his
credit.
The
issue
here
is
in
the
general
sense.
Yes,
the
public
is
on
notice
that
we
intend
to
enact
a
rooster
ordinance.
There's
there's
no
question
about
that,
and
the
record
though
a
little
spotty
does
seem
to.
D
R
The
idea
that
some
of
these
issues
were
in
fact
touched
upon,
but
the
concern
is
that
that
we
have
is
that
not
all
of
them
were,
and,
as
attorney
angel
said,
sometimes
I
mean
amendments
clearly
are
allowed
and
always
have
been
allowed.
It
becomes.
It
gets
thorny
when
the
amendment
can
be
said
to
essentially
swallow
the
original
so
as
to
constitute
really
a
whole
new
ordinance.
It
could
be
characterized
that
way.
R
So
if
you
look
at
the
original
ordinance
and
highlight
the
you
know
the
salient
parts
of
it,
the
salient
parts
are,
it
mentions
the
right
to
farm
act.
It
carves
out
an
exception
for
that.
It
talks
about
the
single
rooster.
It
talks
about
a
fenced
area,
house
coupe
and
I
think,
crucially,
it
mentions
150
feet
and
250
feet.
R
Now
the
amendment
is
is
pretty
comprehensive
in
the
sense
that
it
does
incorporate
the
right
to
farm
act,
but
then
it
kind
of
goes
off
a
little
bit
into
much
more
detail
where
it
says
that
you
know
there's
a
condition
to
having
the
single
rooster
and
number
one.
As
I
see
it,
these
are
the
substantive
changes.
It's
going
to
be
contained
from
sunset
to
sunrise.
R
That's
a
substantial
change!
That's
a
change
on
the
merits,
enclosed
sunlight
block
in
an
enclosed,
sunlight
blocking
coop.
That's
two
sound
proof:
insulation.
That's
three
50
feet
from
the
nearest
property
line
and
100
feet
from
the
nearest
neighboring
residential
house.
Those
are
fairly
substantial
reductions
in
the
original
setback
requirements.
R
So
our
concern
is
that
this
may
be
a
case
and
I'm
not
saying
definitively.
It
is
it's
our
concern,
though,
that
someone
could
arguably
conceivably
say.
Look
you
advertised
ordinance
a,
but
in
fact
you
discussed
and
you
passed
ordinance
b
and
had
we
been
aware
that
you
know
these
significant
substantial
changes
were
going
to
be
made.
We
would
have
been
present
at
the
meeting.
R
So
that's
that's
the
concern
that
we
had
so
it's
I
mean
I
compliment
councilwoman,
renzuli
and
councilwoman
moreno.
I
think
they
came
up
with
a
pretty
ingenious
solution
actually
to
this
whole
rooster
issue,
so
they
they
did
a
tremendous
job.
So
the
the
the
concern
certainly
is
not
with
the
substance.
R
The
concern
is
is
strictly
with
the
notice
issue
of
the
open
meetings
act.
So,
as
attorney
angel
said
just
to
sort
of
you
know
hop
on
his
bandwagon.
I
mean
it's
it's
going
to
be
up
to
the
committee
how
they
want
to
approach
this.
I
guess
there
you
could
do
it
one
of
two
ways.
If
you
really
want
to
get
it
done
without
continuing
this,
you
could
pass.
My
suggestion
would
be
pass.
R
The
original,
as
it
was
proposed
out
of
committee,
then
councilwoman,
moreno
and
councilwoman
renzuli
can
then
attach
their
written
amendment
to
the
ordinance
and
it
can
be
advertised
and
we've
done
this
before
and
I'm
sure
rose
can
can
corroborate
this.
Then
we
advertise
it.
This
way
someone
looks
at
the
council
meeting
and
sees
ordinance
6.08.300.
R
D
Q
Be
my
feeling,
if
I,
if
I
might
to
piggyback
on
what
mr
vradecki
had
to
say,
you
can
treat
this
committee
meeting
as
a
workshop,
come
to
a
consensus
on
what
essentially
is
a
substitute
ordinance
and
proceed
precisely
as
attorney
videkia
discussed
with
one,
and
I
would
just
recommend
one
modification
that
you
you
essentially
you're
gonna
advertise.
The
old.
Q
The
old
piece
of
legislation
will
be
linked
to
the
meeting
agenda
and
link
an
entirely
new
substitute
ordinance
and
label
it
as
such,
so
that
the
public's
clear
you
know
that
you
know
the
committee
is
recommending
an
amended
ordinance
advertise
it
and
you
can
do
the
whole
show
at
the
council
meeting,
as
as
john
had
suggested.
I
think
that's
probably
the
most
efficient
way
that
puts
everybody
on
notice
gives
them
a
point
of
reference.
Q
R
Yeah,
that's
that's
steve.
I
yeah
you
you,
you
know
it's
a
matter
of
semantics,
but
essentially
we
were
saying
the
same
thing.
You
said
it
a
little
bit
clearer
than
I
said
it,
but
I
like
that
idea.
The
important
thing
here
is
it
gives
it
just
puts
someone
on
notice
that
look.
You
know
this
was
the
original,
but
this
is
you
know
this
is
going
to
be
the
final
that
we
would
like
to
pass
this
way.
R
Q
E
I
just
have
one
point
of
information:
our
question
chair.
Yes,
we
have
two
ordinances
tonight:
920
104
and
11
1201,
both
of
them.
I
think
kind
of
trying
to
deal
with
the
same
thing.
Is
this
amendment
or
reconciliation
of
those
two
ordinances,
or
are
we
still
treating
these
as
separate
ordinances?
I
believe.
H
F
H
E
Q
You
know
it
certainly
can
be
discussed
and
it
can
be
read
if
somebody
wants
to
share
a
screen
from
where
they
sit,
then
that
certainly
can
be
done.
But
I
I
wouldn't
take
a
vote
on
that.
I
would
take
a
vote
at
the
full
council
on
it
after
it's
been
rehabbed,
you
know,
re-advertised
that
you
know
it's
going
to
be
dealt
with
just
as
john
and
I
had
talked
about
and
then
on.
The
full
council
agenda
provide
them
as
a
point
of
reference
with
the
original
and
whatever
language.
This
committee
comes
to
consensus
on.
O
Thank
you
so
tonight
we
will
we'll
discuss
the
the
one
that's
on
the
docket
and
then
it
in
discussion.
If
we
want
to
discuss
some
of
those
other
points,
like
attorney
angel
had
said,
we
can
certainly
do
that
to
try
to
build
consensus
for
the
future,
so
I'll
entertain.
A
motion
on
the
on
the
docketed
item.
N
E
O
Q
R
I
agree
steve
I
mean
you
know.
Unfortunately,
this
is
the
difficulty
that
we're
dealing
with
with
this
omicron
in
this
covert
situation.
It's
really
putting
people
at
a
disadvantage,
so
I
don't
know
how
effective
it
will
be
if
we
can
somehow
disseminate
this
so
that
the
public
can
see
it.
I
I
me
I
am
not
a
technological
geek.
I
have
no
idea
how
you
would
do
that
and
I
don't
know
how
effective
it
would
be.
So
I
don't
know
what
we're
really
going
to
accomplish.
R
Obviously,
it's
up
to
the
committee
what
they
want
to
do,
but
it
seems
to
me
that
it
would
be
a
lot
cleaner
once
we
follow
the
procedure
that
you
and
I
outlined
so
that
there's
no
doubt
and
everyone
has
it
in
front
of
them
and
everybody
can
refer
to
it.
This
is
kind
of
doing
it.
This
is
almost
kind
of
like
you
know,
shutting
the
light
off
and
grasping
in
the
dark
hoping
to
catch
something
I
I
don't
know
I
mean
it's
up
to
the
committee.
O
E
Q
If
you
withdraw
it,
then
you
have
to
go
through
the
process
of
introducing
a
new
bill,
sending
it
to
committee
by
charter
and
then
sending
it
back
to
council
for
full
vote.
John's
right.
Pass
this
audit
committee
to
the
floor
of
the
council.
It
now
sits.
The
the
original
bill
now
sits
before
the
full
council.
At
the
end
of
the
month.
Q
A
substitute
ordinance
can
be
introduced
as
an
amendment
to
the
original
and
schedule
your
public
hearing
on
the
original
and
the
comparison
point
of
the
amendment.
For
that
night,
the
public
will
have
an
opportunity
to
not
only
be
heard,
but
they'll
have
that
bill
in
front
of
them,
because
they
can
see
the
link
on
the
website.
N
D
Q
My
recommendation
is
that
you
have
a
workshop
tonight
to
discuss
the
amendment
you
all
on
the
on
this
committee
have
seen
the
amendment
have
a
discussion
about
the
amendment.
If
everybody's
in
agreement
on
the
amendment,
then
that
can
be
put
into
a
an
amended
ordinance
at
the
council
level.
Okay
and
it
will
be
adopted
as
an
amendment
to
the
ordinance
that
you
just
sent
back
to
the
council
and
you'll.
Have
your
full
public
hearing
that
night
with
an
opportunity
for
the
clerk
to
re-advertise.
It.
H
It
the
prior
amendment,
as
I
advertised
discussed
the
coup
as
well,
but
this
is
a
little
a
variation
of
it
in
terms
of
having
the
single
rooster
be
housed
within
that
coupe,
from
sunset
to
sunrise
and
with
the
coupe
having
the
soundproof
insulation
and
the
light
blocking
fabric.
If
there
are
any
transparencies
or
windows
will
help
to
alleviate
the
problem
of
the
sound
of
the
rooster
crowing.
H
In
those
you
know,
agricultural
rural
areas,
the
amendment
as
previously
suggested
remains
the
same
in
terms
of
it
being
one
single
rooster
and
having
the
coup
and
the
other
modification.
With
respect
to
the
distance.
The
prior
amendment,
as
as
advertised
had
different
distances.
They
were
150
feet
and
250
feet.
The
problem
with
that
in
practicality
is
that,
although
these
properties
are
two
acres,
some
of
these
properties
are
not
200
feet
wide,
never
mind.
You
know
250
from
a
near
a
neighboring
house.
H
H
So
this
is
our
proposed
solution
to
the
problem,
so
that
people
in
the
rural
area
of
cranston
can
still
keep
a
rooster.
Keep
that
agricultural
element
that
a
lot
of
you
know
these
people
want
to
have,
and
at
the
same
time
again
we're
all
in
agreement
that
the
roosters
do
not
belong
in
the
non-agricultural
settings
in
our
city
in
the
urban
areas.
That
has
not
changed,
and
that
will
solve
that
problem
as
well
and
council
and
councilman
manzulli.
I
don't
know
if
you
want
to
add
anything
to
that.
N
So
I
don't
know
if
I
can.
This
is
thank
you
councilman
moreno,
for
working
with
me
on
this.
Additionally,
I
wanted
to
add
some
enforcement
mechanisms
and
violations
for
the
offenses
is
that
where
I
would
say
that
now
or
would
do
we
just
write
that
in
the
proposed
amendment,
it's
not
written
in
the
proposed
amendment?
So
just
ask
legal
if
I
can
talk
about
that
now,
correct.
N
Okay,
so
just
my
suggestion
is
to
add,
you
know
violation,
so
people
know
what
you
know:
they're
going
to
be
fined
if
someone
has
to
come
in
and
they're
in
violation,
they're,
not
keeping
my
rooster
in
their
coup
from
sunset
to
sunrise:
they're,
not
the
you
know,
there's
not
sound
proofing
in
there.
I
would
suggest
you
know
similar
to
what's
proposed
in
a
the
separate
chicken
ordinance,
the
first
offense
at
a
hundred
dollars,
the
second
at
150
and
the
third
offense
at
200.
N
That
would
be
my
suggestion
and
then
I
would
you
know,
be
open
to.
I
personally
liked
the
footage
from
councilman
moreno's
original
amendment
to
my
original
ordinance.
I
don't
know
if,
if
an
attorney
can
tell
us
if
there's
a
further
compromise
instead
of
going
from
150
to
50,
if
we
can
go
from
150
to
100,
that
seems
more
of
a
compromise
to
me
than
from
150
down
to
50..
I
don't
know
if
we
need
to
pull
in
a
planning
person
to
talk
about
these.
These
lots.
N
I
know
that
they're
all
shaped
differently
and
that's
why
you
need
to
have
200
feet
in
frontage.
So
I
don't
know
if
saying
100
feet
from
the
property
line
is
fair.
I'm
open
to
discussion-
and
I
do
want
to
thank
councilwoman
moreno
for
for
working
with
me
on
this,
and
you
know
trying
to
compromise
so
that
we
can.
You
know,
get
this
taken
care
of.
Q
S
R
D
Q
Yeah
I
mean
if
the
committee
chooses
to
pull
the
original
from
sending
it
back
to
the
floor.
You
can
vote
to
do
that,
but
to
move
forward
on
the
basis
that
john
and
I
understood
at
the
very
beginning
of
of
this
item
on
the
agenda.
I
don't
think
I'm
no
longer
comfortable.
I
don't
think
it
would
be
appropriate
we're
talking
about
a
completely
different
piece
of
legislation,
changing
boundaries
with
enforcement,
it's
totally
different
than
what
was
proposed
in
the
beginning.
Q
Mr
chairman,
if
I
could
you
make
a
motion
to
reconsider
the
the
referral
out
to
the
council
and
on
an
affirmative
vote
of
that,
then
you
just
you
just
vote
to.
Let
it
stay
in
committee
right
where
it
is,
let
it
die
in
committee
and
bring
a
whole
new
bill
before
before
the
council
john.
What
do
you
think.
R
O
O
Q
E
J
Q
B
J
G
O
E
D
O
Q
B
B
E
E
Yes,
I
just
want
to
get
some
clarification
for
everybody
on,
though,
on
the
zoom
tonight
that
this
will
be
reintroduced
with
everything
that
was
discussed
tonight,
but
corrected
so
that
way,
everybody
at
home
can
read
it
and
see
it
and
it'll
be
advertised
that
way,
everybody's
on
the
same
page
of
what
we're
talking
about
and
then
we'll
be
carrying
on.
It
start.
O
E
N
N
O
C
H
H
He
had
indicated
to
me
that
the
administration
has
found
that
domestic
chicken
keeping
has
not
been
something
that
they
have
received
many
complaints
on,
unlike
what
was
previously
the
understanding.
So
what
I
was
seeking
to
do
is
hear
from
the
administration,
because
the
intent
of
this
is
to
facilitate
you
know
a
solution
to
a
problem.
If
the
administration
is
saying
that
there
is
no
problem
because
they
are
the
you
know
the
recipient
of
more
of
these
types
of
complaints,
then
I
don't
have
any
problem
with
drawing
the
domestic
chicken
ordinance.
M
Yes,
on
that,
I
have
to
defer
to
deputy
mccauley
him
and
director
smith
are
the
recipients
of
that.
Frankly,
he
handles
it
and
if
that's
what
he
conveyed
to
you,
that's
what
was
mentioned
to
me
in
the
office,
but
he
knows
firsthand.
So
he
would
be
more
of
the
expert
if
he
will
receive
the
calls
along
with
the
ladies
in
the
office,
so
he
would
have
firsthand
knowledge.
Mind
the
second
hand,
that's
yours,
so
I
believe
director,
mccall
or
deputy,
mccauley,
okay.
H
Okay,
because
we
had
a
specific
disc,
I
had
a
specific
discussion
with
director
mccauley.
It
was
just
this
week
as
a
matter
of
fact,
and
he
knew
that
this
would
be
on
this
evening,
and
my
understanding
was
that
he
would
be
getting
back
to
me.
So
I
assume
that
he
would
be
on
the
call
this
evening
with
respect
to
the
answer.
We
had
the
ex
this
exact
conversation
as
I
conveyed
if
the
city
doesn't
deem
it
as
being
a
problem,
but
there's
no
point
in
in
legislating
more
on
our
residents.
H
T
T
J
B
O
E
U
V
V
We
were
there
in
december
to
reschedule
for
today
and
I
had
provided
a
petition
and
I
emailed
miss
jermaine
and
mr,
I
believe,
paiva
with
some
information.
Some
videos,
some
still
photo
shoots
and
letters
of
people
over
the
years
of
living
here
of
this
matter,
and
it's
not
getting
better.
It's
getting
worse.
V
V
I'm
just
asking
if
chestnut
avenue
in
oakland
avenue
is
a
one
direction
with
signs
that
state
during
school
hours
only
can
eden
park
drive.
Have
that
as
well.
I'm
not
saying
all
day
just
school
hours,
because
they're
parking
in
our
driveway
they're
blocking
our
driveway
and
as
parking
on
the
street,
the
school
buses,
the
school
vans
and
parents
and
regular
residents
on
the
street
cannot
get
up
and
down
this
road.
It's
extremely
congested.
S
I
would
also
like
to
say
something:
I'm
jasmine
mason
danielle's
daughter,
and
I
would
just
like
to
say
not
only
that
not
not
only
are
we
not
able
to
get
up
and
down
the
road,
but
we're
not
allowed
to
get
into
our
driveways.
So
I
don't
know
if
you
guys
were
able
to
see
the
footage
I
had
sent
a
dropbox
link
of
you
know
the
cars
pop
parking
in
our
driveways,
as
well
as
blocking
them.
O
T
T
They
are
organizing
and
it's
been
an
issue
for
over
years
and
decades,
so
they
are
asking
to
have
it
one
way
during
school
hours.
So
I
put
it
off
as
I
hope
that
you
will
vote
on
that
and
make
you
know
life
better
for
the
resident
as
well,
in
safety
for
children
living
in
this
neighborhood
as
well.
So
I
I
appreciate
that
you
vote
yes
to
make
it
impact
one
way
of
doing
school
hours.
E
Thank
you
not
to.
I
just
have
a
question
for
the
city
clerk
the
both
of
these
ordinances
tonight,
12
2101
en02.
Do
they
have
reports
yet
from
the
traffic
engineer,
not
that
I
want
to
slow
this
process
down
at
all.
I
think
the
work
we're
doing
on
this
is
great,
but
I
know
statutorily
was
supposed
to
let
the
traffic
engineer
do
the
ordinance
for
60
days
and
he
might
actually
have
a
solution
to
the
parking
issues.
So
I'm
just
curious
to
see
if
we
have
a
traffic
report.
E
J
E
T
I
don't
have
any
problem
to
have
traffic,
but
but
the
fact
is,
the
issue
has
been
there
for
over
a
decade
and
and
it's
I
don't
think
we
need
any
more
food
to
show
that
during
school
hours,
people
in
eden
park
cannot
get
to
work
and
get
it
out
with
their
driveway
people
parking
on
the
driveway
it's
congested.
So
this
is
something
people
in
hidden
parties
been
living
for
over
10
years.
I
don't
think
a
traffic
will
change
anything.
O
E
Yeah
I
mean
they
were
supposed
to
give
the
traffic
engineer
60
days.
I
think
it's
in
the
charter.
It's
either
done
by
charter
or
by
ordinance
to
give
a
report
to
us
now.
We
can
certainly
agree
with
his
remarks.
Go
against
his
remark.
It's
really
the
will
of
the
council,
but
it
is
good
to
get
that
traffic
report
done
because
he
might
have
some
more
suggestions
too,
with
no
parking
signs
regarding
people's
driveways
et
cetera,
but
I
mean
I
support
the
ordinance.
E
O
I
I
T
E
D
G
E
President
I'd
just
like
to
say,
I
hope
this
ordinance
fixes
the
issue
on
the
street.
It's
a
very
small
street,
there's
a
mix
of
residential
and
commercial
same
thing
like
the
passive
sign
on
the
full
council
pending
a
traffic
report.
I
just
want
to
thank
mr
liquor
for
being
a
great
advocate
for
the
taber
street
condo
association,
and
if
I
had
a
vote,
I
would
re-elect
you
as
head
of
the
condo
association
you're
doing
a
good
job.