►
From YouTube: October 13, 2022, Claims Committee, Public Works Committee, and Ordinance Committee Meetings
Description
October 13, 2022
Claims Committee
Public Works Committee
Ordinance Committee Meetings
A
A
D
D
E
E
B
E
E
H
Can
you
hear
me
we
can
hear
you?
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
My
name
is
Pauly
DeRosa
97
Cypress
tribe,
founder
of
the
Garden
City
Alliance
good
evening
council,
president
and
council
members
as
I
understand,
Elise
has
been
signed
between
the
copy
and
Auto
Group
and
Costco
to
build
a
warehouse
club
in
the
champ,
a
Chapel
View
complex.
H
As
I
stated
at
the
city
council
meeting
on
Monday
August
22
with
Topgolf
scheduled
to
be
completed
sometime
in
2023,
the
construction
of
a
Costco
would
be
over
development
at
its
worst
and
why
is
it
necessary
to
jam
another
major
Land
Development
into
Chapel
View?
Are
there
are
no
other
locations
in
the
city
of
Cranston,
where
Costco
can
do
business
and
what
about
the
potential
for
a
development
at
the
Mulligan's
Island
site?
This
would
create
another
level
of
traffic
congestion.
H
H
The
inclusion
of
a
potential
Costco
in
the
Chapel
View
complex
will
have
a
negative
impact
on
the
flow
of
traffic
on
Sacramento's
Crossroad,
New,
London,
Avenue
and
Pontiac
Avenue.
In
spite
of
the
upgrades
to
route
37.,
the
planned
off
ramp
into
the
Topgolf
site
and
potential
Costco
will
increase
access
into
the
complex,
with
the
only
exits
being
either
sock
and
asset
New,
London
Avenue
or
Power
Road,
with
the
Advent
of
both
top
valve
and
a
potential
Costco.
There
will
be
a
steady
stream
of
traffic
in
and
around
the
Garden
City
neighborhood
in
adjoining
communities.
H
Let's
not
leave
out
the
added
truck
traffic,
which
causes
significant
deterioration
of
our
infrastructure.
Traffic
studies
will
be
done,
but
these
are
just
forecasts
and
can
underestimate
traffic
impacts
by
wide
margins.
No
study
can
predict
anyone's
driving
habits
or
the
endless
increase
in
vehicles
traveling
our
roads.
The
planning
department
has
said
fear.
The
traffic
studies
will
be
performed
after
all,
build
out
is
complete
in
the
second
asset
corridor.
H
Clearly,
this
could
necessitate
necessitate
I'm,
sorry
fear
the
road
construction
on
the
corridor.
We
asked
the
city
of
Cranston
to
encourage
Mr
Kelly
coats
and
his
team,
along
with
the
developer
of
Costco,
to
organize
and
hold
the
community
meeting
prior
to
the
start
of
any
construction
for
this
major
Land
Development.
H
H
E
E
No
comment:
I
will
close
public
hearing
first
matter
for
new
matters
before
the
committee
is
an
update
on
Costco
being
developed
in
Chapel,
View
and
traffic
concerns.
This
was
added
to
the
docket
from
Council.
Vice
president
Ferry
he's
not
here
this
evening.
So
I
would
like
to
entertain
a
motion
to
keep
this
on
the
docket
for
the
next
meeting,
if
possible,
so
moved.
B
E
J
Sure
hi
not
much
of
an
update
from
the
prior
meeting
other
to
say
that,
as
we
spoke,
the
mayor
understands
everyone
in
the
council.
The
mayor
would
like
to
see
the
Budlong
pool
reopened
some
fashion
next
year
and
it
kind
of
director
Bernardo
has
contracted
architect,
Mark
sakosha,
to
come
up
with
conceptual
designs
of
the
you
know
of
the
pool
facility,
with
the
hopes
of
fast
tracking
things
as
best
as
possible,
so
Mrs
scotia's
working
on
those
designs.
J
J
Given
the
short
timeline
given
construction
access
or
Construction,
Supply
I'll
say
it's
going
to
be
tight
and
so
he'll
have
a
temporary.
Let
me
say:
he's
going
to
come
back
with
a
more
longer
term
approach
and
then
something
to
and
something
an
intermediary
approach
to
do
the
best
we
can
to
get
the
pool
up
and
running
by
next
summer.
A
pool
up
and
running
by
next
summer,
we'll
have
much
better
information.
Once
Mr
sakosh
gets
back
back
to
to
all
of
us.
E
E
E
Whereas
Maria
Kennedy
passed
away
on
September
1st
2022
at
the
age
of
59
after
a
lengthy
illness
surrounded
by
a
loving
family,
therefore
be
resolved
that
we
The
Honorable
Cranston
City
Council,
hereby
name
the
oak
Juan
gazebo
in
honor,
Maria
Kennedy
and
be
it
further
resolved.
A
sign
shall
be
placed
near
or
at
the
open
on
gazebo
naming
it
in
her
memory.
So
thank
you
for
the
opportunity
to
read
that
for
the
council
and
before
I
open
up
for
any
discussion.
E
D
D
F
I
Thank
you,
council
president,
as
someone
who
practiced
journalism
back
then
and
admit,
admire
seeing
women
in
this
field
and
she
was
a
reporter.
So
I
would
like
to
be
added
as
a
good
sponsor.
You
know,
I
know
the
work
of
a
journalist,
it's
not
easy,
but
when
you
have
the
love
to
do
it
and
to
make
people
inform
people
and
in
bring
light
on
everything
that
is
happening
in
your
community,
it's
a
beautiful
thing
to
do
and
that's
a
legacy
she
left.
So
I
would
like
to
be
out
as
a
clinical
sponsor.
Thank.
K
E
E
She
spread
positive
news
about
this
community
I
mean
Mary
was
Cranston
and
Steve
I
see
us
sitting
there
in
the
audience,
and
you
know
we're
with
you
and
we
miss
her
and
really
happy
that
we're
able
to
do
this,
nice
gesture
and
her
honor-
and
you
know,
remember
her
for
a
long
time.
So
thank
you,
Steve
and
thank
you
all
this
time,
I'll
entertain
a.
We
already
have
a
motion
to
approve
so
Matt
McCoy.
Please
take
the
role.
B
E
C
E
A
J
E
J
E
B
E
D
E
C
C
I
C
L
Good
evening,
at
the
request
of
the
chair,
I
took
a
look
at
the
took
a
look
at
the
ordinance
for
constitutional
reasons
as
as
written
constitutionally.
It
it
meets
constitutional,
muster,
we're
addressing
public
places
and
I
do
I
would
recommend
a
couple
of
changes
to
the
verbiage
in
paragraph
A1.
The
word
actual
before
residences
I
would
recommend
that
it
be
stricken
and
replaced
with
the
word
private
resonances.
L
And
really
that's
the
only
substitution
I
would
make
it's
not
substantive,
so
it
doesn't
need
to
go
back
and
be
re-advertised
and
just
constitutionally
you
know.
I
know
this
is
a
is
a
new
area
of
regulation
for
governmental
subdivisions,
but
you
should
keep
in
mind
if
you
haven't
already
that
the
regulation
itself
is
not
a
lot
different
than
how
consumption
of
alcohol
is
is
governed
the
when
you
look,
we
have
recreational
marijuana
use
in
our
state.
That's
been
approved,
we
have
medicinal
marijuana.
L
Keep
in
mind
that
your
Public
Safety
officials
have
the
right.
You
know
you
have
a
right
to
consume
alcoholic
beverages
recreationally,
but
you
don't
have
a
right
to
drive
drunk
we
regulate
as
a
society.
Cranston
included
open
containers
of
alcohol
in
public
places
in
particular,
and
we
we
regulate
whether
you
can
have
an
open
alcoholic
beverage
container
in
an
automobile.
L
L
They
cannot
stop
you
from
consuming
it,
but
you
know,
obviously
you
have
a
medical
reason
to
consume
it,
but
if
you
are
a
school
teacher
and
you
you
know,
for
example,
have
medicinal
reasons
why
you
need
to
consume
marijuana
you
you
cannot
smoke
in
the
school
setting,
but
you
more
than
likely
can
ingest
ingested
in
some
other
way.
You
know
whether
it
be
a
you
know,
a
gummy
or
or
something
like
that.
L
So
that's
not
what
this
speaks
to
I
just
wanted
to
give
you
sort
of
a
general
background
as
to
how
one
might
look
at
this
constitutionally.
It's
a
developing
area,
I'm
sure
from
a
public
safety
standpoint
and
I,
see
I,
think
I
see
the
chief
actually
who's
walked
through
the
door
to
speak
on
this
I'm
sure.
L
But
you
know,
unlike
a
breathalyzer
for
the
consumption
of
alcoholic
beverages
for
recreational
purposes,
you
know
where
the
you
know
there
is
very
well-known,
well-publicized
ways
for
your
Police
Department
to
you
know,
see
if
someone's
driving
under
the
influence
and
that's
what
this
falls
under
you
you
could
be
driving
under
the
influence
of
marijuana
to
to
have
smoked,
marijuana
and
get
in
your
car
is
not
in
and
of
itself
illegal
for
recreational
purposes.
You
can
consume
it
for
medicinal
purposes.
L
You
can
consume
it,
but
much
like
other
prescription
medications
and
much
like
the
consumption
of
alcohol.
You
do
not
have
a
right
to
consume,
marijuana
and
drive
impaired
and
I'm
sure
the
police,
the
chief
of
beg,
your
pardon,
the
colonel,
will
go
through
the
protocol
that
his
Department
uses,
which
I'm
sure
is
a
nationally
adopted
best
practices
standard
for
how
you
assess
one's
impairment,
who's
driving
a
motor
vehicle
under
the
influence
of
marijuana.
With
that
said,
I
have
I
have
looked
at
this
as
it
sits
on
all
four
it
does
meet.
L
L
Amendment
Mr
chair
was
at
a
one
in
the
last
sentence.
The
last
word
of
that
sentence
is
residences
and
before
that
is
the
word
present,
actual
I
believe
strike
actual
and
in
its
place,
insert
the
word
private
now.
One
thing
I
I
will
say
is
with
respect
to
public
housing
as
as
I'm
sure
the
lawyers
in
the
room
understand
in
the
in
the
world
of
constitutional
poker
as
I
like
to
call
it
federal
law,
oftentimes,
preempts
and
Trump's.
L
But
there
are
some
exceptions
that
don't
need
to
be
written
into
this
they're
just
obvious,
because
on
their
face,
those
laws
speak
for
themselves
and
you
have
a
very
able
executive
director
of
the
Housing
Authority,
who
just
also
happens
to
be
a
lawyer
and
I'm
sure
he's
well
aware,
I'm
sure,
Mr
coop
is
well
aware
of
what
what
can
and
can't
be
done
and
we'll
inform
the
residents
accordingly.
But
just
to
be
clear.
L
This
is
not
this
ordinance
in
and
of
itself
is
not
a
restriction
of
one's
private
right
to
consume
recreational
or
medicinal
marijuana
in
any
form
that
they
so
choose
within
a
certain
limit
or
to
excess
within
their
private
property
within
their
private
residence.
That's
not
what
this
does.
This
speaks
only
to
the
public
spaces
as
as
the
ordinance
suggests,
or
actually
makes
rather
explicit,
and
you
do
have
the
right
to
regulate
what
goes
on
in
public
spaces.
A
Thank
you,
chairman
question
about
the
last
two
lines
of
1A,
beginning
with
and
Those,
portions
of
apartment,
houses,
apartment
buildings
and
hotels,
not
constituting
rooms
or
apartments
designed
for
actual
residences.
So
if
this,
if
there's
a
three
family
house
and
they
want
to
smoke
in
their
backyard,
can
can
they
smoke
in
their
backyard?
It's
a
private
residence.
A
L
I
Thank
you,
Council
chairman.
My
question
is
still
in
the
definition
consumption.
When
we
talk
about
consumption,
so
the
reference
you
make
it's
mostly
about
smoking
that
we
understand
for
the
smoking
part,
but
how
you
can
enforce
someone
using
I
think
you
mentioned
it
as
well
because,
like
for
example,
for
people
who
smoke
cigarettes,
often
you
go
to
a
building
and
people
take
their
breaks.
Take
out
breaks
right.
So
how
someone
who
do
not
smoke
it,
but
you
don't
see
it
smoke
it
but
went
in
the
break
and
I.
I
Had
the
people
make
food
with
cannabis,
I
don't
know.
If
you
recall
there
were
a
wedding
in
Florida
and
the
food
we
all
have
canalism
and
and
and
they
even
sue
the
category.
So
my
question
is
how
me
so
for
the
smoking
you
can
enforce
that.
It's
clear
you
can
smell
it,
but
how
you
can
enforce
any
audio
consumption.
Well,.
L
You
know
if
you're
going
to
lace
all
your
food
at
your
wedding
with
cannabis,
make
sure
you
don't
rent
out
the
auditorium
at
Cranston
East
to
have
your
wedding,
because
if
the
folks
leaving
there
are
under
the
influence-
and
they
happen
across
cranston's
finest
there's
going
to
be
a
problem
not
just
for
the
motorist
who
gets
pulled
over
but
after
they
I'm
sure,
ask
the
obvious
question.
Just
where
is
it
you're
coming
from?
L
That
would
probably
cause
some
issues
right,
but
if
that
event
should
occur
on
a
on
you
know,
I
could
I
could
sit
in
the
park
and
have
a
handful
of
gummies
to
access
who's
going
to
know,
but
if
I'm
sick
well,
nobody
would
know
okay
and
if
I
leave
there
peacefully.
Nobody
will
know
is
the
activity
in
and
of
itself
illegal
sure
it
is
just
as
you
know,
you
know
to
be
basic
about
it.
So
is
open
sex
and
a
motor
vehicle
in
a
part
in
the
parking
lot
of
this
building.
L
But
if
nobody
sees
you
and
nobody
catches,
you
you
know
is
it?
Is
it
against
the
law?
Yes,
it
is,
is
it
are
you
going
to
get
a
ticket
in
the
mail?
Probably
not
okay,
I
mean
I
mean
the
chief
can
speak
more
to
those
permutations
better
than
I
can
I'm
sure
he's
I'm
sure
he
has
thousands
of
them,
some
of
which
he
would
share
with
you
humorously
no
doubt,
but
not,
and
not
to
be
glib
about
your
question.
L
Who
would
know,
but
if
you're
walking
down
the
street-
and
you
are
smoking-
a
marijuana
cigarette,
it's
pretty
obvious
and
you're
not
supposed
to
do
that.
Cigar
smokers
are
not
able
to
smoke
in
public
parks,
for
example
in
the
city
of
Providence.
So
if
I
have
my
cigar
and
I
decide
to
sit
in
any
park
in
the
city
of
Providence,
I
may
not
get
caught
and
I
may
well
enjoy.
My
cigar.
I
may
well
also
get
a
visit
from
the
the
ladies
and
gentlemen
in
blue
and
be
summoned.
L
I
L
J
Yes,
thank
you
on
this
ordinance.
Along
with
the
next
one,
the
mayor
has
had
invited
the
colonel
and
the
fire
chief
to
the
office
to
talk
about
Public
Safety
so
took
this
very
seriously.
I
could
say
the
mayor.
May
goes
along
with
the
recommendations
and
always
of
our
Public
Safety
off
key
Public
Safety
officers.
These
two
gentlemen,
so
I
could
say
for
the
administration.
The
mayor
will
support
everything.
The
colonel
is
going
to
say
and
I.
J
Please
ask
you
to
indulge
the
colonel
to
share
his
thoughts,
because,
frankly,
it
was
the
colonel
that
first,
you
know
came
to
the
administration,
the
councilman
about
sponsoring
an
ordinance
I
think
he
cares
very
deeply
about
and
I
think
he
can
provide
many
many
answers
to
some
of
the
questions.
If
I
took
that
feedback
from
the
last
council
meeting
to
that
meeting
to
express
some
of
the
concerns
some
of
the
council
members
had
by
my
my
recollection
and
the
kernel
was
answering
those
questions
right
off
the
top
of
his
head.
J
C
M
Well,
I
think
director
Moretti
Chief
of
Staff
already
hit
it
on
the
head,
as
as
a
police
chief
and
part
of
the
Rhode
Island
police,
Chiefs
Association
I'll
be
the
first
to
admit
that
we
oppose
the
legalization
of
recreational
marijuana.
I
was
one
of
the
persons
that
opposed
it
and
that
was
based
on
Public
Safety,
specifically
driving
well
under
the
influence
of
of
marijuana
and
I.
M
Do
believe
that
you
know
that
will
increase,
but
the
bottom
line
is
the
law
has
passed
and
the
law
specifically
states
that
gives
the
authority
to
on
the
cities
and
towns
to
decide
to
pass
their
own
ordinances
to
restrict
the
public
use
of
marijuana.
So
they
they
kind
of
really
didn't.
Do
you
a
favor
by
passing
this
on
that
it
should
have
been,
in
my
opinion
in
the
state
law
should
have
been
addressed,
but
it
wasn't
so
what
we
do.
M
What
we
have
now
is
a
bunch
of
cities
and
towns
trying
to
figure
it
out
on
their
own,
but
I
can
tell
you
that
Bristol
Warren,
a
lot
of
my
colleagues
in
the
other
cities
and
towns,
are
passing
identical,
audiences,
more
or
less
to
what
you
have
in
front
of
you.
So
I
did
do
research
in
Colorado,
for
instance,
it
is
illegal
to
they
carry
marijuana
unless
it's
in
a
sealed
container,
similar
to
alcohol,
where
you
can't
open
a
bottle
of
beer
and
drive
down
the
roadway.
M
So
it's
constitutional
there
and
Colorado
has
been
dealing
with
this
issue
of
impaired
driving
a
lot
longer
than
we're
going
to
deal
with
it
here.
So
right
now,
I
gotta
say
we.
We
haven't
come
across
a
lot
of
people
in
violation
of
any
types
of
laws
of
marijuana
since
it
passed
at
the
state
house,
but
on
December
1st
of
this
year,
when
these
commercial
shops
open
I,
think
that's
when
you're
going
to
see
a
lot
more
use
publicly
and
that's
why
we
wanted
to
get
ahead
of
this
and
I
I.
M
Thank
you
for
taking
the
time
to
consider
this
ordinance.
I
really
thought
the
driving
part
of
it
was
important
and,
as
a
councilwoman
Jermaine
pointed
out,
Edibles
are
really
difficult
to
determine.
I
could
put
a
gum,
a
regular
gummy
bear
in
front
of
you
in
an
edible
and
I'm,
not
going
to
know
the
difference
nobody's
going
to
know
the
difference.
M
There's
also
discretion
offices
have
discretion.
So
we
that's
okay,
we
do
receive
complaints
now,
one
neighbor
smoking
marijuana
and
it's
coming
into
somebody
else's
apartment.
Can
only
imagine
we're
going
to
be.
You
know
in
December
when
this
becomes
mainstream.
If
you
will
so,
we
believe
that
smoking
a
place
marijuana
should
be
treated
the
same
as
alcohol.
There's.
A
reason
why
we
don't
want
people
walking
down
the
street
drinking
alcohol,
open
containers
and
vehicles,
there's
secondhand
smoke
that
goes
with
obviously
smoking
in
a
vehicle
there
could
be
children
in
the
vehicle.
M
They
could
be
a
passenger
that
could
be
impacted
by
secondhand
smoke,
and
we
do
believe
that
we're
going
to
see
a
lot
of
that
and
the
challenges
that
we
have
is
trying
to
prove
a
impaired
by
drug
case
is
difficult.
We
have
eight
drug
recognition,
experts
in
the
Cranston
Police
Department
they
go
through
Advanced
Training
and
even
with
that
Advanced
Training.
M
Sometimes
the
courts
don't
recognize
their
expertise,
we're
hoping
that
changes,
but
we
we
do
think
that
we're
going
to
see
a
lot
more
impaired
operation,
but
I
think
this
is
a
common
sense,
ordinance,
I
think,
as
the
attorney
mentioned,
there's
no
constitutional
right
to
consume
marijuana
Republic.
Obviously
it's
illegal
to
possess,
but
to
consume.
There's
no
legal
Genesis.
If
you
will
for
someone
to
smoke
in
a
public
area
right
now,
the
way
the
law
is
written
in
the
state
law
anywhere,
smoking
is
currently
prohibited,
which
is
Parks.
M
Recreational
facilities
inside
school
grounds
automatically
it's
prohibited
under
the
state
law.
When
you
get
into
sidewalks
and
side
streets
and
other
scenarios
that
we
talked
about.
This
is
where
that
audience
will
take,
will
kick
in
I
know
my
my
offices
will
use
the
best
judgment.
I'm
sure
there'll
be
a
lot
of
warnings
made
if
they
do
come
across
people.
Why
not
out
to
criminalize
the
possession
of
marijuana,
but
we
are
concerned
about
the
public
consumption,
especially
with
children
in
the
city.
M
You
know
it's
just
to
me:
it
makes
common
sense
and
it's
a
quality
of
life
issue.
A
lot
of
people,
don't
like
the
smell
of
marijuana
smoke,
I
mean
included
so
I
think
I
think
that
this
will
help
alleviate
some
of
the
complaints
that
you're
going
to
get
in
and
the
police
department
will
get
and
I
think
it's
fair
to
the
people.
They
want
to
use
marijuana,
medicinally
or
for
recreational
purposes.
It
should
be
done
in
the
Privacy
they
own
homes
for
their
Apartments
I'm,
really
glad
to
answer
any
questions
that
you
have.
A
Thank
you
chairman,
thank
you,
Colonel
for
being
here,
I
appreciate
your
time
and
work
on
this,
my
own
ignorance
on
it.
Why
handle
as
similar
to
alcohol
rather
than
something
like
tobacco
for
sorry,
obviously,
driving
is
a
separate
issue.
You
know
I
completely
understand,
but
like
for
public
consumption,
you
know
sidewalks
walking
down
the
street.
Something
like
that.
Why
well.
M
Obviously,
marijuana
has
a
hallucinogenic
effect
on
a
person
and
I
know.
The
fire
department
will
probably
echo
my
comments
that
somebody
that's
high
out
in
public
is
prone
to
a
lot
of
other
issues,
whether
it
be
crossing
a
roadway,
whether
it
be
out
in
public
and
also
having
children.
You
know
have
to
walk
through
a
you
know,
a
cloud
of
marijuana
smoke.
M
It's
just
I,
don't
think
that's
what
we
want
for
our
next
Generation
to
have
to
deal
with
and
again
it
is
a
schedule,
one
narcotic
as
of
today,
so
it
is
illegal
under
federal
law.
So
it's
a
little
different.
Tobacco,
obviously
is
legal.
It's
you
know
commonly
used.
You
don't
see
it
in
public
as
much
as
used
with
cigarettes,
but
I
think
it
just
makes
Common
Sense
from
a
public
safety
perspective
that
you
know.
If
you
want
to
take,
take
upon
this
activity
and
get
high
or
whatever
you
want
to
do
smoke.
M
D
M
D
It
says
it
reads:
it
shall
be
unlawful
for
any
person
to
consume
marijuana,
whether
by
smoking,
vaping
or
any
other
method
will
operating
or
occupying
a
motor
vehicle
as
a
passenger
on
a
public
roadway.
But
do
you
think
that
there
should
be
anything
additional
concerning
an
open
container
in
a
vehicle
you're
not
consuming
it?
But
if.
M
I
think
that
would
be
helpful
again.
I
have
a
copy
of
Colorado's
law,
and
you
know
just
like
alcohol.
It
should
be
in
a
sealed
container.
It
shouldn't
be
open
and
so
similar
to
an
open
container
law.
That
would
that
would
be
helpful
Amendment.
If
that
the
counselor
wishes
to
add
that
that
would
be
helpful.
M
Because
when
you,
when
you're
going
to
buy
this
marijuana
from
one
of
these
stores,
my
understanding
is
going
to
be
labeled.
It's
going
to
be
in
a
sealed
container
like
whether
it's
a
bag
or
whatever
it
may
be,
and
you
can
at
least
say
that
it
was
purchased
legally
and
I.
Think
that
having
it
in
a
container
like
that
versus
Black
Market
marijuana,
you
will
be
able
to
tell
the
difference
if
it
wasn't
in
this
profit
container,
more
or
less.
D
N
Hi,
just
that
alone,
no
I
I,
don't
think
that's
substantive
enough.
If
we
can
stop
going
beyond
that,
I
don't
know
where
this
is
going
to
end,
how
many
more
substantive
changes.
The
colonel
would
like
to
see
that
standing
alone
I
would
agree
with
Mr
Angel,
but
we
start
going
beyond
that.
We
may
have
to
start
the
process
again.
C
L
Is
not
just
the
chairman
if
I
may
you're
right
to
remind
the
council
if,
if
there's
an
ordinance
before
the
council
and
it
fails
during
the
term
you're
not
going
to
bring
that
back,
and
you
can't
bring
that
back
during
the
term
if
you
pass
an
ordinance
during
the
term,
you
cannot
then,
during
the
term,
repeal
that
ordinance.
However,
if
you
pass
this
ordinance
in
what
you
do
is
merely
add
to
it
and
augment
it,
you
are
permitted
to
do
that
during
the
term.
Just
so
you're
aware,
thank.
K
I,
just
wanted
to
say
that
I
was
dismayed
that
the
state
in
enacting
the
legislation
didn't,
in
my
opinion,
really
follow
through
on
concerns
for
Public,
Safety
and
Implement
certain
safeguards
into
the
law
and
give
you
know
a
local
municipalities,
the
enforcement
tools.
I
know
that
I
had
reached
out
at
the
time
and
had
conversations
with
different
state
senators
and
different
state
reps.
But
my
concerns
are
primarily
because
of
you
know
what
I
do
during
my
day.
K
Job
for
over
20
years,
dealing
with
accident
cases
and
I
have
serious
concern
of
the
impairment.
That's
going
to
increase
with
the
accessibility,
because
alcohol
is
a
big
enough
concern,
and
now
this
and
I
can
say,
and
what
I
do
every
day,
I've
already
seen
an
increase
in
in
this
before
the
shops
have
opened
up
once
the
medical
use
had
had
presented
itself,
so
I
will
say:
well
I'm,
not
a
member
of
the
ordinance
committee.
K
If
this
committee
does
pass
this
ordinance,
I
would
be
happy
to
vote
Yes
before
the
full,
Council
and
I
would
urge
my
colleagues
to
pass
this
ordinance
because
it
does
give
our
local
law
enforcement
and
even
the
fire
department
in
terms
of
the
the
police
department,
the
tools
they
need
for
enforcement
to
address
the
issues
and
and
the
fire
department
will
be
faced
with
ways
to
address
the
concerns
when
they
present
themselves.
So
I
would
support
this
ordinance.
Thanks.
Thank.
L
Mr
chairman,
yes,
if
I
may
through
the
chair,
it
may
be
beneficial
while
you
have
the
benefit
of
the
colonel
here
tonight,
as
I
alluded
to
in
in
my
comments
earlier,
we're
all
generally
familiar
with
how
Public
Safety
officials
assess
someone
who's
impaired
as
a
result
of
alcohol.
It
might
be
of
benefit
to
the
council
and
the
committee
as
a
whole
to
get
a
sense
of
what
it
is
that
the
police
department
does
to
assess
someone's
level
of
inebriation
as
a
result
of
consumption
of
marijuana.
M
I
mean
there's
a
lot
of
challenges
in
councilman
Mourinho
mentioned
you
know.
Although
the
Chiefs
Association,
we
oppose
the
legalization,
we
had
submitted
a
number
of
items
that
we
wish
made
it
into
the
into
the
bill
itself,
which
would
give
some
teeth
to
the
drug
recognition
experts,
even
as
of
now,
there's
there's
no
recognized
limit
of
nanograms
of
marijuana
that
is
considered
impairment
in
one's
bloodstream.
So
you
know
we
the
only
time
we're
able
to
draw
blood
is
there's
a
serious
accident
with
a
bodily
injury
or
death.
M
So
it
has
a
lengthy
process,
but
the
problem
is:
there's
no
breath
test
right
now
for
marijuana,
obviously
alcohol.
We
can
do
that,
but
we're
hoping
they're
going
to
be
a
saliva
test
or
breath
test
being
developed
sooner
than
later,
because
this
is
a
problem,
that's
not
going
away
and
I
can
see
it
becoming
a
major
issue.
M
So
without
getting
a
blood
draw,
you
know
it's
hard
for
us
to
really
prove
one
of
these
cases,
based
on
the
observations
of
a
Dre
and
we've
lost
a
few
cases
in
court,
and
we
try
to
educate
the
judges
on
the
level
of
training
that
these
officers
go
through,
but
it
hasn't
reached
the
point
now
with
a
lot
of
the
judges.
Still
don't
recognize
it
so
you
want
to.
M
We
want
to
bring
the
judges
in
educate
them
to
to
how
extensive
this
training
is
now
they're,
not
doctors,
but
they're,
well
trained
to
look
for
these
physiological
impact
of
drug
use
and
impairment.
But
even
these
serious
bodily
injury
accidents
has
been
some
where
there's
clearly
THC
in
the
system
of
the
of
the
driver
that
either
seriously
injured
somebody
or
killed
somebody
and
the
defenses.
Well,
there's
no
level
of
impairment
because
you
could
have
smoked
marijuana
two
or
three
days
previously,
but
you
still
have
those
THC
in
your
system.
M
So
we
really
wanted,
like
some
states,
to
set
a
limit
in
the
blood
that
you
could
use
for
impairment.
But
that
didn't
happen
in
this
particular
Bill
I'm,
hoping
that
the
state
will
revisit
some
of
those
recommendations
by
the
Chiefs
Association.
But
we
have
to
deal
with
what
we
have
now
and
it's
a
challenge:
it's
a
real
Challenge
and
dgdres
there's
not
many
of
them
across
the
state.
M
Our
department
probably
has
the
second
highest
number
of
Dres,
with
the
state
police
being
the
first,
some
departments
don't
have
any
because
they
officers
don't
want
to
go
through
the
training
they
have
to
travel
out
of
state
it's
expensive
for
them
to
get
trained.
Luckily,
we
receive
grant
money
to
get
our
offices
trained,
but
it's
a
really
uphill
battle,
and
if
you
look
up
Washington,
State
and
Colorado,
they
clearly
have
seen
more
roadways
fatalities
involving
marijuana
with
THC
in
the
system.
So
we've
got
our
fingers
crossed.
M
We
already
have
a
lot
of
fatalities
with
alcohol
and
other
drugs
and
I
think
we're
going
to
do
our
best
to
suppress
and
eliminate
some
of
this.
But
it's
an
uphill
battle
for
law
enforcement.
It's
going
to
be
that
way
and
about
in
December
1st,
when
these
stores
open,
presumably
there'll,
probably
be
one
in
the
Cranston
area,
Providence
and
other
locations.
I
do
think
you're
going
to
see
the
use
increase,
even
though
the
black
Market's
still
going
to
exist,
having
the
ability
to
legally
buy
marijuana
people
driving
over
the
line.
M
Now
they're
going
to
Swansea
sea
concwell,
River
other
places,
so
they
are
doing
it
now,
but
I
think
the
fact
that
it's
down
the
street
from
you,
when
you
can
buy
it
very
easily
like
going
to
a
liquor,
store
I,
think
you
I
think
you're
going
to
see
it
more
frequent
and
we're
bracing
ourselves
in
the
law
enforcement
Community
to
deal
with
it.
But
I
appreciate
you
giving
me
an
opportunity
to
speak
about
it.
C
C
C
B
O
F
L
C
D
H
I
Because
we
we
see
the
the
purpose
of
keeping
our
community
safe,
our
children
and,
as
I
mentioned
previously,
I
I
had
a
problem
with
the
public
street
because
we
didn't
want
to
make
people
feel
like
we
are
criminalizing
the
use
of
it.
But
with
the
help
with
of
the
attorney
Angel
and
the
explanation
of
the
colonel
I
am
really
sure
that
I
am
really
in
a
good
place
with
it.
Right
now
and
I
am
fully
supported
and
I
would
love
to
be
added.
As
a
co-sponsor.
E
You
know,
one
of
the
main
charges
of
the
police
department
is
traffic
safety,
and
this
goes
right
along
with
that,
ensuring
that
our
roadways
are
safe
for
our
families
and
friends
and
for
everyone
to
use.
You
know
I
want
to
thank
the
chief
and
the
police
Chiefs
Association
for
for
fighting
the
fight
on
that
I'm.
Sorry,
you
didn't
win
the
win
your
battle,
but
I
was
rooting
for
you.
The
whole
way
and
I
think
this
ordinance
just
Falls
in
line
with
the
open
container
war
and
and
consumption
of
alcohol.
C
C
E
C
P
Maybe
a
solution
to
it
and
I
guess:
I'm
going
to
go
back
to
when
I
first
got
it
and
started
getting
active
with
the
council.
It
seemed
that
when
issues
involve
poorly
resourced
people,
that
the
council
did
not
pay
a
lot
of
attention
to
so,
for
instance,
the
panhandling
issue
a
number
of
years
ago
there
was
great
energy
to
ban
panhandling
the
people
who
are
really
disadvantaged
and
we
were
trying
to
ban
them
from
the
streets
and
the
corners
public
safety
issue.
I
understand.
P
But
it
was
also
well
I
felt
very
discriminatory,
and
then
we
just
recently
have
had
the
the
bud
long
pool
where
a
lot
of
poorly
resourced
people
were
not
able
to
really
take
advantage
of
recreation,
and
particularly
at
times
when
climate
change
and
heat
were
really
stressing.
People-
and
you
know
when
people
don't
have
a
an
out-
a
way
of
cooling
off,
so
to
speak,
a
place
to
recreate.
P
I,
don't
know
what
I
would
do
if
I
was
not
able
to
be
someone
who
owned
a
home
that
had
a
driveway
and
that
I
could
park
my
car
in
the
driveway
and
not
have
to
worry
and
interfere
with
Public
Safety,
because
I
do
understand
the
public
safety
issue
of
this
I
really
do
the
street
that
I
live
off.
Bluff
Avenue
is
a
primary
use
of
particularly
of
our
fire
department,
and
there
are
signs
there
that
you
know
it's.
It's
a
parking
ban
and
I.
P
Think
I
don't
know
how
long
ago
it
was
about
I
guess
it
could
be
as
many
as
six
months
ago,
many
people
on
Bluff
Avenue
woke
up
with
a
very
sizable
ticket
on
their
windshield
and
I.
Think
it
was
the
largest
community
meeting
we
ever
had.
It
was
like
everybody
was
out
there
going
like
why
the
hell
did
we
get
these
tickets
and
and
I
and
I
think
everybody
came
to
the
conclusion
that
they
they
began
to
understand
it.
I,
don't
know
how
many
of
them
complained
or
anything
like
that.
P
So
I
really
hope
that
you
know.
Maybe
it's
it's
an
experiment
to
see
how
certain
things
work,
I,
don't
know
permitting
works
or
looking
at
those
kinds
of
things
or
whatever
it
is,
but
I.
But
I
am
concerned
that
we,
you
know
we
could
make
our
community
not
very
welcoming
for
people
who
are
very
under-resourced
and
you
know
can't
find
a
place
to
park
an
automobile
which,
in
this
day
and
age,
unfortunately,
is
a
necessity
for
them
to
to
Really
survive.
P
That
kind
of
thing,
so
I,
I,
guess
I
would
just
speaking
for
an
ordinance.
That
may
not
be
the
most
perfect
way
of
dealing
with
this.
This
issue
and
I,
don't
know
if
there's
a
perfect
way.
I,
don't
think
Banning
is
a
is
a
is
an
easy
way
out
and
I
just
hope
that
we
will
consider
and
give
some
strong
consideration
to
a
large
part
of
the
population
that
live
in
Cranston
that
are
under
resource
but
contribute.
P
Q
James
Warren
136,
Longview,
Drive,
so
I'm
here,
just
on
a
strictly
on
a
safety
for
us
nighttime
parking
is
a
problem
city
of
Cranston.
We
realized
that,
but
it
does
affect
our
response
numbers.
We
realized
this
back
in
2017.
We,
our
last
three
engines
that
we
purchased
are
actually
shorter
because
we
realized
how
difficult
it
is
to
get
around
the
city.
Our
newest
ladder
truck
our
our
oldest
one,
is
44
feet
long.
Q
Our
newest
is
38
just
to
narrow
it
down
to
get
shorter
to
get
around
the
city
and
it
does
affect
the
older
part
of
the
neighborhoods.
You
know
in
Edgewood
Arlington's,
a
tough
part
to
get
around
Auburn's
a
tough
time
to
get
around
so
for
us,
it
really
does
affect
our
response
times
operating
on
the
street.
If
there
are
cars,
especially
on
both
sides,
a
lot
of
trucks
cannot
put
out
their
Outriggers
to
stabilize
the
ladder,
and
that
does
affect
us.
Q
So
we
really
I
understand
it's
a
problem.
I
do
and
I
know
it's
more
like
I
said
in
the
older
neighborhoods
it's
more
of
a
problem,
but
for
us
it
does
affect
our
response
times
and
just
getting
around
and
I'm
sure
we'll
hit
a
couple
more
cards
than
we
normally
do
a
year,
but
more
claims.
But
that's
just
part
of
doing
business
for
us,
but
it
does
affect
us.
Those
narrow
streets
can
even
narrower,
especially
in
the
winter
time
the
snow,
the
trash
cans.
It
does
create
problems
for
us.
M
I
actually
share
a
lot
of
Chief
Warren's
concerns,
especially
being
a
department
has
to
respond
to
emergencies
back
in
2017,
I
think
this
there
was
a
ordinance
considered
for
permitting
of
overnight
parking,
and
there
was
testimony
back
then,
which
is
stays
true
to
to
today,
as
well
as
a
police
department
having
the
advantage
of
having
no
cars
on
the
street
during
a
certain
time
late
in
the
evening.
It
allows
us
to
detect
stolen
vehicles,
abandoned
vehicles,
a
lot
easier,
obviously
those
cars
there
we're
going
to
check
it
out.
M
If
there's
parking
along
the
street,
then
those
cars
can
obviously
be
not
not
identified
as
easy
and
also
we're
dealing
with
a
lot
of
car
breaks
in
the
city,
we've
made
some
arrests
over
time,
vandalism
to
Vehicles
those
are
cars
that
are
actually
in
driveways.
I
can
only
imagine
at
night
when
these
people
usually
strike
like
2
A.M,
3
A.M.
These
cars
were
on
the
street,
just
made
it
a
lot
easier
for
the
average
criminal
to
walk
up
and
down
the
street,
trying
each
car
door
to
get
in
as
they
they
normally
do.
M
As
we
know
from
the
videos
that
we've
that
we've
seen
and
it
also,
if
there's
a
Narcotics
transaction
or
somebody
that's
going
to
burglize
a
house,
it
makes
it
a
lot
harder
for
them
to
blend
in.
If
there's
no
cars
on
the
street
between
you
know,
1am
and
6
a.m,
we're
going
to
be
able
to
identify
those
Vehicles
a
lot
easier
and
have
the
officers
check
them
out
a
lot
quicker,
and
it
was
mentioned
about
the
response
times.
M
If
we're
going
to
a
a
major
call,
we
have
two
or
three
cruises
that
are
trying
to
get
there
and
just
cause
along
the
street.
We
usually
we
pull
up
and
we
right
in
front
of
the
house
or
in
the
general
proximity
now
we're
gonna
have
to
look
where
we're
going
to
put
our
cruises
are
going
to
be
in
the
middle
of
the
street.
M
If
you
will
so
we'll
see
more
of
that
and
then
when
people
are
backing
out
of
their
driveways
when
there's
cars,
either
on
one
side
of
both
sides
of
the
street
close
to
somebody's
driveway,
obviously
the
view
the
Viewpoint
of
that
driver
is
is
inhibited,
so
that
would
be
a
concern,
some
of
the
disadvantages
of
allowing
entree
parking
right.
Now
we
do
our
best
to
enforce
the
parking
ban.
M
That's
in
place
takes
a
lot
of
resources
and
Manpower,
and
it's
probably
one
of
the
biggest
complaints
that
we
get
is
the
on
street
parking
overnight
and
I'm
sure
I
know
you
all
get
the
same:
complaints
that
we
get.
We
add
in
people
that
don't
have
permits
and
then
people
that
have
permits
that's
going
to
have
taken
officer
to
have
to
decipher
through
who
has
a
sticker,
who
doesn't
have
the
sticker
coming
back
clocking
the
vehicle
coming
back,
hopefully
that
car
is
still
there
and
then
identifying
and
antagon
it.
M
If
you
work
late
at
night,
you
park
your
car
on
the
street
the
next
day
you
might
sleep
in
until
11
12
o'clock,
we
have
more
cars
parked
along
these
side
streets,
even
during
the
daytime,
which
impacts
again
the
fire
and
the
police
response
times.
So
we
believe
that
that
would
be
a
problem
and
the
biggest
thing
talking
to
Public
Works
is
parking
bans
when
the
snow,
removal
and
things
of
that
nature.
It's
hard
enough
now
to
get
the
cars
off
the
street.
M
Sometimes
you
might
have
a
flash
freeze
situation
where
we
don't
have
time
to
put
a
parking
ban
out
now
we're
dealing
with
multiple
cars
parked
in
the
street,
trying
to
get
them
off
the
street.
So
I
think
that
will
complicate
the
Public
Works
aspect
to
it
and
then
I
don't
know
who
would
handle
this
talking
permitting
aspect
who
would
actually
issue
the
permits?
I
know
we
don't
have
the
staff,
the
civilian
staff
to
do
it
and
I
know
a
lot
of
the
other
City
departments,
they're
strapped
for
Personnel.
M
So
for
all
those
reasons
and
strictly
for
Public
Safety
I
do
I,
do
you
know,
listen
to
the
gentleman
that
came
up
here
and
I
do
feel
for
them.
We
do
give
temporary
parking
overnight
parking
when
needed
if
somebody's
doing
work
on
their
residence
they're
in
a
dire
situation.
We
do
give
temporary
permissions.
We
keep
track
of
that
at
the
police
department,
but
it
is
a
difficult
situation.
M
R
R
How
will
you
confirm
that
the
apartments
have
four
drivers
number
two?
Who
will
be
the
owner
of
a
permit
for
each
of
the
apartments
and
will
the
permit
be
a
sticker?
That's
transferable
in
case
a
tenant
moves
out
prior
to
the
permit,
expiring
and
number
three.
If
this
does
happen,
could
it
be
stated
in
the
application
for
the
permit
that
the
car
owner,
not
the
landlord,
is
responsible
for
moving
the
car
during
a
parking
ban,
even
if
the
landlord
doesn't
provide
on-site
parking?
R
J
On
behalf
of
Public
Works
Department,
we
asked
to
solicit
some
input
very
honestly,
very
unbiased
and
asked
some
dishonest
objective
data
or
to
pass
along.
Certainly
Mr
Bojack
had
presented
a
very,
very
plausible
and
heartfelt
case
for
the
social
issue
in
in
this.
You
know
the
physical
issues
concerns
I.
J
Think
we
all
feel
so
just
want
to
make
that
you
know
first
and
foremost,
but
but
many
of
the
things
stated
for
Logistics
are
very,
very
challenging
I
think,
as
we
know,
as
Chief
Warren
and
Colonel
winquist
mentioned
from
the
public
safety
end,
but
from
the
public
works
perspective.
Just
considerations
in
addition
to
what
was
discussed
was
well
as
discussed,
allows
need
to
allow
for
easier
emergency
vehicle
response.
J
J
People
could
conduct
themselves
repairing
vehicles
that
type
of
thing
I
think
there
could
be
very
much
a
problem
with
the
street
sweeping
and
refuse
collection.
There
might
be
some
issue.
I
I
guarantee
you're
going
to
be
getting
a
lot
of
phone
calls
when,
when
the
not
able
to
Street
The
Sweep,
so
we
can
dispute
the
sweeps,
you
think
you
know
what
I
mean
the
other
thing.
The
other
consideration
with
traffic
end
is
easy.
J
J
This
I
guess
they're
going
to
say
basically
the
the
Public
Works
field,
there's
going
to
be
some
feuding
amongst
neighbors
and
it
can
get
pretty
emotional
I.
Think
I
think
the
current
will
be
having
a
few
calls
on
that
and
then
I'm
not
sure
I
have
to
defer
to
legal,
but
there
could
be
legal
challenges
just
to
allow
the
pre
right-of-way
parking
to
our
residents
and
not
necessarily
outside
the
city.
J
I,
don't
know
that
again,
I'm
kind
of
passing
this
along
from
Public
Public
Works
listing
their
input,
I,
know
for
sure
I'd
say:
police
fire
in
public
works.
It's
gonna
there'll
be
a
lot
more
claims.
Certainly
this
is
going
to
be
our
vehicle
emergency
vehicles
and
City
vehicles.
You
know
hitting
having
accidents
with
cars
park
down
the
street,
so
we
can
experience
a
higher
costs.
I
think
that's
inevitable
and
then
also
difficulty
along
with
the
snow
removal
removing
those
vehicles.
J
The
other
thing
is
that
fire
hydrants
just
more,
you
know
just
more
of
a
concern
in
terms
of
blocking
there's
a
whole
bunch
of
reasons.
Unfortunately,
why
there
this
traffic
ban
part
of
me
parking
ban
has
has
existed.
Certainly,
you
know
there
is
a
I'll
say
the
Socialist
issue
and
the
livability
issue
for
those
people
that
you
know
needing
greater
parking
there
is
that
sensitivity,
but
should
something
be
enacted.
I
think
these
various
concerns
would
should
be
addressed
if
there's
going
to
be
an
ordinance
ordinance
to
best
balance.
L
L
The
issue
first
came
to
me
about
a
year
ago
from
one
council
person
and
then
over
the
course
of
of
the
year
and
evaluating
the
issue,
because
in
evaluating
the
issue,
as
the
council
knows,
you
know
you
just
don't
sit
down
and
write
a
law
in
a
vacuum.
You
try
to.
You
know,
consider
the
Nexus
between
the
policy
aspects
of
it,
the
law
and
the
logistics
of
its
implementation.
L
It
seems
to
me,
obviously
that
there
are
a
majority
members
here
that
are
interested
in
in,
in
some
form
of
on
overnight
parking
provision
to
alleviate
parking
in
certain
areas,
but
just
one
logistical
concern
right
and
I've
not
had
a
conversation
with
the
chief
about
this
or
the
director
of
administration,
because
it's
not
ripe
yet,
but
you
need
you
need
a
sticker
program
and
someone
has
to
administer
that
who's
going
to
do
that.
What's
involved
in
that,
what's
the
cost
of
it?
What's
the
renewal
who's
going
to
handle
the
paper?
L
How
is
it
going
to
be
accounted
for?
I
mean
there's,
that's
just
one
sliver,
okay
and
while
Finance
may
not
necessarily
be
involved,
because
there's
a
fiscal
note
to
this
necessarily
and
I,
don't
know
the
answer
to
that:
I'm
not
going
to
speak
for
the
administration
or
Mr
iGo,
but
there
is,
there
is
a
cost
in
terms
of
productivity
within
the
Chiefs
Department.
L
There
are
significant
public
safety
issues.
You
know
I've
evaluated
the
program
that
they
have
in
the
city
of
Boston.
Now,
certainly
we're
not
as
big
as
Boston.
Nobody
is
in
Rhode
Island,
but
the
fact
of
the
matter
is
they
have
a
framework
that
works
pretty
well
other
cities
and
towns.
Do
it
here
in
Rhode,
Island,
but
other
cities
and
towns
are
not
complected,
necessarily
the
way
that
we
are
in
Cranston.
It's
very
unique
here,
we're
not
small.
L
We
are
the
second
largest
municipality
in
this
state
and
we
have
areas
of
this
city
that
are
truly
City
traditional
City
areas.
We
have
Suburban
areas
and
we
have
rural
areas
and
there
are
different
rules
for
those
different
parts
of
of
the
city.
My
wreck
and,
given
you
know,
you've
heard
from
Public
Safety
tonight.
You've
you've
essentially
heard
from
public
works
tonight,
knowing
that
there
are
a
majority
of
council
people,
I
mean
I,
know,
there's
a
majority
I
met
with
a
minority
of
the
council.
I
met
with
four
people.
L
I've
talked
to
a
fifth
independently,
just
to
be
clear:
there's
not
been
a
violation
of
the
open
meetings
Act.
The
fact
of
the
matter
is,
and
I'm
not
talking
about
necessarily
a
public
works
meeting
per
se,
but
a
workshop
of
the
Public
Works
meeting.
We
we
don't
do
that
in
this
Council
and
I.
Think
it's
a
workshop
where
we
have
Public
Safety
come
in
and
we
have
Public
Works
come
in
and
we
we
lit.
L
I
know
that
you
know
my
my
research
into
this
in
the
city
indicates
that
the
last
time
this
issue
was
approached
was
in
2017
that
there
was
in
fact
a
study
done
and
I
know.
Councilwoman
I
believe
you
had
sent
me
the
study.
It
was
2017..
The
the
ordinance
was
proposed,
essentially
as
a
as
a
test
case
or
a
pilot
study.
That's
not
going
to
work!
Okay,
you!
You
know
you
you
get
in
with
both
feet.
L
You
don't
get
in
at
all,
but
also
just
as
we
do
with
you
know,
streets
that
have
no
parking
on
one
side
or
parking
on
both
sides,
and
that
kind
of
thing
you,
you
Council
people
individually,
need
to
consider
that
you
know
your
Awards.
You
know
your
city,
you
need
to
think
about
the
list
of
enumerated
streets
to
which
this
is
going
to
apply,
and
that
would
be
a
great
help.
I
would
think
the
public
safety
you
need.
You
also
need
to
give
some
thought
to.
L
Where
are
these
cars
going
to
go
in
some
type
of
a
weather
emergency,
whether
it
be
you
know,
a
hurricane
or
a
snowstorm,
or
things
like
that
when
there's
a
general
parking
ban,
there's
a
reason
for
that
I
mean
Public.
Safety
has
to
plow
streets,
think
about
the
nightmare
that
it
would
become
if
people
didn't
remove
if
they
were
allowed
to
park
overnight
in
a
snowstorm
and
those
cars
got
plowed
in
and
there
was
some
sort
of
a
medical
emergency
or
the
kind
of
Emergency
on
the
street.
So
certainly
there
has
to
be
some
protocol.
L
Put
a
framework
in
front
of
you
after
it's
been
circulated
to
the
various
constituencies
and
then
bring
everybody
in
I
know
it
sounds
like
a
lot
of
work,
but
it's
not
I'm
offering
if
I
can
to
take
some
of
that
work
off
the
floor
of
the
council
and
bring
it
back
to
you
in
a
more
meaningful
way,
so
that,
if
you
want
to
add
to
it
chop
it
up
and
and
do
other
things
to
it,
you'll
you'll
really
have
quite
a
bit
more
to
work
with.
Let's
thank.
C
P
Peace
again,
I
was
just
down
in
Newport
recently,
and
it
took
me
quite
a
quite
a
bottle,
a
few
minutes
to
find
a
place
to
park,
because
every
time
I
pulled
over
on
all
of
the
side
streets,
it
was
like
resident
parking
unless
they
had
a
sticker
and
there
were
signs
as
to
when
I
could
park
there,
even
without
a
resident
sticker,
and
there
are
times
when
you
couldn't
park
there.
Unless
you
had
a
resident
sticker.
These
are
very
narrow
streets.
P
So
I
was
just
wondering
if
you
know
I
I
kind
of
like
the
idea
that
I
just
was
presented,
but
I
think
we
should
take
a
look
at
how
other
communities
are
handling
this
and
they
seem
to
be
working
out
just
fine,
giving
residents
community
and
Public
Safety
the
best
chance
of
doing
their
jobs
that
everybody
gets
taken
into
consideration.
Thank
you.
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
C
F
E
I'll
explain
why
I
need
the
motion
table.
First
of
all,
councilmember
Jermaine,
I
love
the
passion,
I
love
you
trying
to
fix
the
issue.
It's
important.
You
know,
I
agree
with
you.
The
days
of
the
family
station
wagon
are
over
right.
Everybody's
got
multiple
cars,
two
three
four
cars
and
we
certainly
need
to
figure
it
out.
E
I
do
think
we
need
to
have
a
more
comprehensive
plan
and
have
everyone
come
together
after
the
input
that
was
given
tonight
from
police
fire
Administration
speaking
on
behalf
of
Public
Works
and
even
legal
counsel,
and
even
even
myself,
I
was
writing
down
some
notes.
As
as
people
were
talking,
you
know
fiscal
note,
we're
gonna
need
a
fiscal
note.
We
don't
have
that
tonight.
We're
gonna
have
to
put
signage
I
assume
on
all
the
streets.
E
If
we're
going
to
do
parking
on
one
side
and
with
the
ordinance
and
explain
you
know
the
overnight
situation,
we
don't
know
how
much
the
stickers
are
going
to
cost
per
sticker.
Those
are
some
questions.
I
wrote
down,
Chief
Warren
brought
up
the
concern
about
responding
to
a
fire,
and
you
know
if
there's
a
fire
and
they
need
to
get
that
ladder
up.
I
she's
thinking
about
the
guy
driving
the
ladder
truck.
E
Who
now
has
to
figure
out
where
he's
going
to
park,
to
put
out
the
Outriggers
and
still
has
to
avoid
power
lines
to
you
know
God
forbid
if
they
have
to
save
somebody
in
a
building,
that's
on
fire.
So
that's
what
came
to
mind
Chief
when
when
you
spoke
and
then
also
can
we
do
overnight
parking
on
state
roads?
Some
houses
are
on
state
roads.
E
Can
we
regulate
state
roads
because
that's
one
of
the
questions
I
have
too
so
I
think
it's
more
than
what
we
can
just
do
tonight
certainly
happy
to
help
and
work
with
anybody
on
it.
But
if
we
voted
down,
we
can't
bring
it
back
this
term.
If
we
table
it,
we
can
bring
it
back.
So
that's
why
I
made
the
motion
to
table
and
for
those
reasons
and
I
just
cited.
A
A
A
So
again,
thank
you
for
bringing
this
forward
I
think
that
there
is
room
to
work
and
come
to
the
table
on
this
specific
ordinance
or
or
general
idea
with
to
incorporate
some
of
the
comments
and
concerns
from
legal
from
Public
Safety,
both
the
colonel
and
the
chief
as
well
as
input
from
you
know,
the
collective,
the
collective
body
so
I
I
don't
want
to
see
this
get
shot
down.
I
don't
have
a
vote
tonight.
A
L
Councilman
Majority
Leader,
you
can
bring
it
off
the
table
at
any
time
within
the
three
months.
What
I?
What
I'm
recommending
is
that
this
issue
be
workshopped
in
the
constituencies
be
put
in
the
room
with
their
concerns
in
a
meaningful
way,
where
we
can
write
a
piece
of
legislation
that
addresses
what
needs
to
be
addressed.
L
I'll
just
give
you
an
example.
You
passed
this
ordinance
at
some
point.
The
way
that
it's
written,
you
can
have
people
on
Beechwood,
Drive
they're,
going
to
have
overnight
parking
on
their
street.
What
do
you
do
with
that?
I?
Don't
know
if
they
want
that.
You
know
that's!
That's
a
council,
member
and
I'm
just
using
that
as
an
example,
there
are
areas
that,
from
a
policies,
perspective
certainly
do
need
overnight
parking,
but
there's
not
enough.
L
L
The
work
was
paused
when
this
was
introduced.
I
I
frankly
had
no
idea
that
this
ordinance
was
being
drafted.
I've
never
laid
eyes
on
this
ordinance
until
I
saw
an
agenda,
and
it
raised
more
questions
for
me
than
some
of
the
other
discussions
that
I've
had
with
other
Council
people.
Quite
frankly,
so
you
know,
I
I
think
an
amendment
to
this.
L
I
I
want
to
get
this
done.
It's
been
on
my
plate
now.
You
know
I
I've
sat
in
this
seat,
not
quite
two
years,
but
it's
been
on
my
plate
longer
than
anything
that
I've
worked
on.
I'd
love
to
get
it
off
my
plate
and
and
see
it
move
ahead
in
a
meaningful
fashion,
whatever
that
fashion
may
be
I
I'm,
not
about
policy
I'm
about
what's
effective
candidly-
and
you
know
this
is
this-
is
a
big
issue.
It's
a
it's
one
that
will
affect
every
single
Department
in
the
executive.
L
If
it's
not
handled
appropriately,
and
it
certainly
will.
It
certainly
will
not
help
the
folks
who
need
the
relief
that
they
need
and
it
will
anger
the
folks
who,
frankly,
don't
need
the
relief
and
have
the
have
what
they
might
consider
to
be
a
burden
of
overnight
parking
and
I
and
I.
Put
that
out
there
to
you
again.
I
I
think
it's
best
handled
in
a
workshop.
Whether
this
is
you
know,
table
you
can
bring
it
off
the
table
and
that
might
be
a
tool.
L
C
D
So
I
I
agree
with
the
motion
to
table
purely
because,
having
also
been
working
on
this
separately
and
reading
the
traffic
study
report
from
the
Bureau
of
traffic
safety
floor
at
the
last
pilot
program
that
came
up
in
2017.
There
are
several
different
concerns
within
the
analysis
that
we
need
to
address
and
I
commend
councilwoman
Jermain
for
putting
this
forward,
because
it
is
a
problem
that
you
know
we
need
some
immediate
action
on,
but
if
we
don't
do
it
properly,
I
think
it's
going
to
cause.
D
You
know
more
problems
than
we
have
now,
so
we
need
to
address
these
issues
so
that
we
can
implement
this
properly
and
have
we
do
need
a
fiscal
note
on
it.
I
think
it's
much
more
in-depth
than
just
putting
stickers
on
on
cars
because
the
tickets
are
still
going
to
have
to
be
done
for
the
people
who
you
know
don't,
have
proper
permitting
or
are
not
parked
in
the
right
area
or
parked
past
7
A.M
and
then
that's
going
to
have
to
go
through
municipal
court
and
they'll,
be
you
know,
we'll
be
inundating
them.
C
E
S
S
S
S
S
S
C
I
C
J
L
E
Yeah
I
mean
we
can
either
continue
this
to
the
next
ordinance
committee
meeting
our
passive
pending
traffic
study.
If
there's
no
traffic
study
at
the
full
counselor
meeting,
we
might
have
to
send
it
back
to
committee
anyways,
but
I
mean
it's
up
to
the
sponsor
what
Avenue
but
we're
supposed
to?
Let
the
traffic
engineer
have
a
60
days
to
do
a
report.
C
E
B
E
I
have
a
I
have
a
Shameless
plug,
as
they
say
on
the
radio.
Here
is
a
a
scout
from
Troop
six
having
their
Eagle
project.
This
Saturday
in
front
of
Lowe's
Garfield,
Avenue
they're,
doing
a
food
drive
for
project
hand
up,
you
can
drop
off
canned
goods
or
food
and
they're
also
having
a
bake
sale
on
anything
sold
at
the
bake,
sale,
benefits
project
hand
up.
That's
nine
o'clock
in
the
morning
to
1
pm
at
Lowe's
on
Garfield
Avenue.
Thank
you.