►
Description
The County of Santa Clara speaks on the first two cases of South African COVID-19 variant identified in California, detected in Santa Clara and Alameda Counties.
Recorded February 10, 2021.
The City of Cupertino would like to express its thanks to the County of Santa Clara for the use of their video materials during the COVID-19 pandemic.
For more information regarding the impact of the COVID-19 outbreak in Cupertino, please visit https://www.cupertino.org/coronavirus
B
Good
afternoon,
I'm
hilary
armstrong,
a
public
information
officer
with
the
county
of
santa
clara
emergency
operations
center.
Thank
you
for
joining
us
this
afternoon.
We
are
here
and
joined
by
the
health
officers
for
the
counties
of
alameda
in
santa
clara
to
discuss
the
first
two
cases
of
the
south
african
variant
of
covid19
identified
in
california.
B
B
Following
statements
by
dr
moss
and
dr
cody,
we
will
be
taking
question
and
answer
from
the
media
when
that
time
comes,
I
will
ask
media
to
please
raise
your
hands
using
the
hand,
raise
function
in
zoom
and
I
will
put
through
a
request
that
will
ask
you
to
unmute
yourself
to
ask
your
question.
Please
also
identify
the
media
outlet.
You
are
with
following
the
conclusion
of
the
english
and
asl
portion
of
our
press
conference.
We
will
go
on
to
statements
in
chinese,
spanish,
vietnamese
and
tagalog.
C
C
I
want
to
emphasize,
we
have
begun
investigating.
We
have
not
completed
our
investigation,
but
the
encouraging
news
from
our
end
is
that
this
person
upon
returning
immediately
quarantined
and
therefore
we
don't
know
of
any
opportunities
for
further
spread
within
our
community
and
after
dr
moss.
Of
course,
I'm
happy
to
answer
any
questions.
Thank.
D
Our
investigation
is
still
in
progress,
but
we
can
say
this
person
is
no
longer
infectious
to
others.
We
have
no
evidence
of
other
b1351
variant
cases
in
the
county
at
this
time,
but
we
have
a
limited
picture.
Only
a
small
fraction
of
coded
specimens
are
sequenced
in
the
us,
although
this
number
is
increasing,
efforts
are
underway
in
alameda,
county
and
across
california
to
systematically
improve
surveillance
for
variants
of
concern.
D
We
expect
to
receive
more
reports
from
labs,
detecting
such
variants
in
the
coming
weeks
for
all
cdc
variants
of
concern
reported
in
alameda
county.
We
investigate
the
case,
ensure
isolation
and
quarantine
requirements
are
followed
when
we
investigate
for
exposures
that
may
have
led
to
infection
as
well
as
for
potential
for
ongoing
spread.
D
Covert
rates
are
improving
with
the
resolution
of
the
winter
surge,
but
rates
remain
high
and
higher
still
even
than
the
peak
of
the
summer
surge
residents
are
strongly
encouraged
to
take
all
precautions.
We
now
know
prevent
the
spread
of
covid19,
including
face
coverings,
physical
distancing
and
limiting
gatherings
with
others.
Thank
you.
B
E
F
B
I'm
really
sorry
lisa.
We
seem
to
have
a
bad
connection
with
you.
Perhaps
we'll
go
to
the
next
question
and
then
we'll
come
right
back
to
you.
B
C
So
this
is
dr
cody.
Thank
you
for
your
question.
To
best
of
our
knowledge,
our
investigation
so
far,
we've
not
found
any
connections.
However,
as
dr
moss
stated,
they
are
quite
early
in
their
investigation.
We
have
a
bit
more
detail
than
they've
have
so
far,
no
evidence
so
far
that
they
are
related
to
each
other.
D
I
would
just
add
that
this
is
under
investigation
and
that's
exactly
the
kind
of
thing
we'll
be
looking
for,
but
we
don't
have
anything
to
share
at
this
time.
B
G
Yes,
first
question
is
for
alameda
county:
why
do
you
have
so
little
information
already
in
terms
of
the
travel
history?
That
would
seem
like
a
phone
call
and
for
dr
cody,
you
talk
about
that.
This
person
went
into
isolation
right
away,
and
that's
the
good
news
talk
about
the
the
different
scenarios
in
terms
of
the
spread
of
this
and
why
this
is
better
than
something
else.
D
I'll
start
and
then
turn
it
over
to
dr
cody.
So
these
investigations
take
time
and
we
were
made
aware
we
we
really
received
this
information
effectively
this
morning
and
and
and
and
they
they
are
not
instantaneous
and
they
never
are.
But
but
we
wanted
to
make
sure
that
the
public
was
aware
and-
and
we
know
that
other
others
were
sharing
this
information,
so
we
wanted
to
share
what
we
could.
G
Muted,
they
just
demuted
me,
so
I
can
restate
thank
you.
What
what
I
wanted
to
know
was
talk
about
the
various
scenarios
in
terms
of
what
would
be
helpful
and
what
would
not
be
helpful.
For
example,
in
this
case,
you
said
it
would
be
helpful
if
this
person
went
right
into
quarantine
versus
being
around
others.
What
is
the
fear
about
the
spread
of
this?
Had
that
not
been
the
scenario
or
if
that
turns
out,
not
to
be
the
scenario
in
alameda
county.
C
Well,
let
me
let
me
just
say
I
want
to
echo
a
few
of
the
opening
comments
that
dr
moss
made.
One
is
that
there
are
a
few
variants
of
concern.
C
C
So
in
our
case,
both
a
specimen
from
santa
clara
county
as
well
as
alameda
county,
were
picked
up
through
sequencing
done
by
dr
ben
pinsky's
lab
at
stanford,
and
so
now
that
we
have
the
information.
The
question
is,
you
know,
what
can
we
learn
and
I
was
wanted
to
just
reiterate
that
in
our
county
we
have
a
mandatory
travel
directive.
That
means
that
anyone
returning
from
travel,
that's
greater
than
150
miles
from
the
county
border
must
quarantine
for
10
days.
C
So
this
this
individual
had
international
travel,
returned
to
our
county
and
was
100
compliant
with
that
stayed
in
their
apartment
and
several
days
after
returning
then
developed
symptoms
got
diagnosed.
So
the
good
news
is
that
at
no
time
during
their
infectious
period,
were
they
in
contact
with
anyone
outside
of
their
household,
so
so
that
that
is
encouraging
to
us
in
that.
For
this
particular
case,
we
have
no
evidence
that
there
was
any
further
risk
or
spread
within
the
community.
B
H
Hi
there.
Thank
you
so
much
for
doing
this.
A
couple
of
questions
can
you
say
more
specifically
what
communities
these
patients
were
from
and
if
not,
why
not
and
regarding
the
alameda
county
patient,
do
you
have
any
indication
that
this
person
was
in
contact
with
others
and
if
so,
how
many
people.
D
So
we
typically
don't
share
that
level
of
detailed
information
down
to
the
individual
community
level
with
these
types
of
investigations
and
we're
we're
just
sticking
with
our
normal
policy
in
this
case,
and
then
we
don't
have
that
information
at
this
time,
because
the
investigation
is
in
process
and
then
I
also
wanted
to
make
another
comment
in
response
to
the
last
question.
Just
about
variants
in
general,
the
information
about
variants
comes.
D
Not
only
do
we
not
have
it
on
every
case
in
very
few
cases,
but
it
also
comes
much
later
because
it
takes
time
for
the
labs
to
screen
and
then
run
all
the
testing
necessary
to
have
this
information.
And
so
we
don't
get
this
information
at
the
same
time
that
we
get
in
the
same
way
that
we
get
regular,
coveted
case
reporting
information.
B
I
Hey
doctors
thanks
so
much
for
taking
our
questions
really
appreciate
it.
The
south
african
variant
has
caused
substantial
concern
because,
as
dr
fatchi
has
said,
our
current
vaccines
are
less
efficacious
against
it.
Should
members
of
the
public
be
doing
doing
anything
differently
now
that
we
know
the
south
african
variant
is
here
like
double
masking
or
making
our
masks
fit
better
and
should
counties
or
the
state
be
altering
public
policies
such
as
the
statewide
mandatory
travel
quarantine
policy,
as
is
the
case
in
the
santa
clara
and
l.a
counties?
Thank
you.
D
I
can
start,
and
so
so
the.
D
So
the
vaccines
available
in
the
u.s
should
still
are
expected
to
still
protect
against
infections
caused
by
this
variant.
There
may
be
some
variability
we're
gonna
we'll
be
interested
to
see
if
there's
more
data
that
comes
from
the
manufacturers,
but
the
early
evidence
suggests
that
they
will
continue
to
fight
provide
protection.
But
there
are
also
many
other
covid.
You
know
there.
D
They
are
still
likely
a
small
proportion
of
what's
circulating
here
locally
and
it's
important
to
realize
that
the
benefits
of
the
vaccine
will
extend
across
all
of
the
covered
variants
that
are
circulating,
including
ones
that
we've
had
locally
for
some
time.
C
C
California,
we
know
that
this
virus
will
continue
to
adapt
and
change,
that's
its
job,
and
so
I
think
that
what
this
information
does
is
it
really
underscores
how
important
it
is,
even
though
we're
tired,
even
though
we've
been
doing
this
for
a
year,
that
we
have
to
continue
to
take
all
of
these
precautions
and
and
wear
a
mask
and
not
gather
indoors
and
wear
a
mask
consistently.
C
That's
really
really
really
important,
like
don't
take
it
off
to
have
a
snack
unless
you're
by
yourself
or
outside
with
a
family
member,
wear
your
mask.
So
if
anything,
I
think
that
the
the
fact
that
we've
now
documented
them-
you
know,
maybe
that-
will
help
change
change
behavior
in
the
public.
I
I
certainly
hope
so,
and
I
would
say
that
you
know
so
in
santa
clara
county,
it's
mandatory.
This
is
a
travel
directive.
It's
a
health
office
or
order
that
after
travel,
you
quarantine
for
10
days
but
statewide.
C
B
J
Thanks
very
much
a
few
quick
things:
where
did
the
santa
clara
county
person
travel
to
number
one
number
two
in
alameda
county,
you
mentioned
that
the
person
is
no
longer
infectious
to
others.
How
do
you
know
that?
Have
you
spoken
to
the
person
and
then
finally,
how
big
of
a
spike
in
cases
due
to
these
variants?
Do
we
expect
in
the
coming
weeks
or
months?
Thank
you.
C
So
I
could
start
the
the
travel
history
for
the
santa
clara
county
case
is
a
bit
complex
and
we're
still
filling
it
in.
So
I
don't
have
particular
details
to
share,
but
what
I
can
tell
you
was
that
the
individual
did
travel
internationally
and
that
they
were
not
infectious
while
they
were
traveling,
their
infectious
periods
started
after
they
were
back
home
and
and
that's
why
we
we,
fortunately,
are
not
concerned
that
they
exposed
anyone.
C
But
the
question
is,
of
course
you
know:
where
did
the
infection
come
from
and
that
that
is
still
under
investigation
and
you're
going
to
have
to
restate
the
rest
of
your
question
or
I'll
hand
it
off
to
nick?
Who,
who
may
remember
dr
moss.
C
D
The
question
for
alameda
county
was
how
we
know
that
the
person
is
no
longer
infectious
and
that's
because
we
have
the
date
that
the
lab
test
was
performed,
and
that
provides
enough
information
at
this
time
to
make
that
to
make
that
judgment
and
then,
in
terms
of
the
risk
of
future
surges.
I
think
that
there
is
a
risk
we
we
certainly
should
expect
that
more
surges
will
come.
They
may
look
different
we're.
We
will
be
moving
out.
D
Will
have
received
vaccine
or
will
have
had
past
infection
that
could
affect
things.
Many
more
older
adults
will
have
been
vaccinated,
which
could
impact.
D
Could
it
should
affect
positively
the
the
impact
on
our
health
care
systems,
but
nevertheless,
many
people
have
not
had
coveted
infection,
and
I
do
think
that
that
means
that
there
is
a
risk
of
of
of
continued
surges
and
and
all
the
more
reason
to
keep
doing
the
things
that
we
know
keep
each
other
safe
and
I
think
that's
true,
regardless
of
the
situation
with
the
variants.
D
Certainly
there's
concern
with
the
uk
variant
and
reports
of
increased
transmissibility
contributing
to
future
surges
in
the
u.s,
but
regardless,
I
think
that
the
risk
is
there,
no
matter
what
variance
that
we're
talking
about
and
and
people
need
to
again
and
stick
with
the
things
that
we
know
work
to
protect
each
other.
D
K
Yes,
can
you
hear
me
yes
hi
there?
Thank
you
for
answering
our
questions.
I
was
curious
about
the
condition
of
both
the
santa
clara
and
alameda
patient
if
they're
doing
okay,
given
that
we've
heard
that
these
variants
are
perhaps
more
contagious,
but
not
necessarily
more
severe
or
result
in
more
severe
infections.
My
other
question,
I'm
hoping
you
both
can
clarify
this
governor
newsom
said
on
january
29th,
or
this
is
when
we
reported
it
that
the
brazil
variant
had
been
detected
in
california.
K
I
know
we're
talking
about
south
african,
but
this
also
came
out
of
the
same
stanford
lab
that
detected
the
south
african
variants,
but
then
today
earlier
he
said
that
the
brazil
variant
is
not
in
california,
so
I'm
curious.
If
either
of
you
can
clarify
that
question
as
to
whether
the
uk,
south
african
and
brazil
variant
have
been
detected
in
the
bay
area
and
or
california,
and
then
I'm
wondering
if
you
either
of
you
at
this
point,
can
answer
how
this
might
impact
vaccine
distribution
and
immunity.
K
C
So
to
your
first
question,
as
as
to
the
how
ill
was
our
case,
our
case
never
required
hospitalization
recovered
at
home
and
is
fully
recovered
now
so
this
was.
This
was
not
a
a
severe
illness.
I
really
can't
speak
to
detections
of
the
brazilian
variant
in
california.
I
can
just
say
that
not
as
yet
detected
in
santa
clara
county.
D
D
For
alameda
county
again
investigation
underway
so
can't
make
any
comments
about
the
severity
of
of
the
particular
infection.
But
with
regard
to
other
variants,
a
couple
things
I
can't
speak
for
the
state.
I
think
questions
for
state
remarks
should
go
to
the
state,
but
generally
speaking
more
generally,
there
are.
There
is
a
variant
of
concern
that
is
sometimes
referred
to
as
the
brazil
variant
p.
D
One
is,
it's
also
referred
to
sometimes
and
then
there's
a
another
variant
of
interest
that
has
been
associated
with
the
country
of
brazil
and
and
that
may
have
been
a
source
of
confusion,
but
but
there
are
actually
two
different
variants
and
then
we
do
have.
I
believe
it's
now
seven
total
reported
cases
of
the
uk
variant
in
alameda
county.
D
All
of
those
either
directly
or
indirectly
appear
to
be
related
to
travel
outside
of
the
county
and
in
fact
outside
of
the
country
or
at
least
outside
of
the
state.
But
but
again
we
have
a
very
limited
picture
of
the
extent
to
which
these
are
impacting
our
communities.
D
So
you
know
there
are
many
many
many
strain
specimens
out
there
that
have
simply
not
been
sequenced
and
then,
in
terms
of
the
boosters,
I
think
the
early
information
from
from
scientific
researchers
is
that
the
the
currently
approved
vaccines
in
the
u.s,
the
pfizer
moderna
vaccines
should
have
good
or
excellent
efficacy
against
this.
These
the
strains
circulating
here,
including
these
variants,
even
if
they're,
somewhat
reduced
efficacy
in
some
cases.
Overall,
it
is
still
very
good,
but
I
think
prudently.
D
The
manufacturers
and
others
are
looking
at
booster
strategies
should
they
be
necessary
either
for
these
or
for
other
variants
that
could
emerge
before
we
were
able
to
collectively
get
this
pandemic
under
better
control.
L
Okay,
can
you
I
don't
know
if
you
guys
can
hear
me,
but
we
can
hear
you,
so
it
is
also
known
that
these
variants
are
more
contagious
than
the
original
covid.
How
so
and
what
is
expected
with
the
vaccine
as
such,
and
also
can
you
give
us
specifics
as
to
where
these
people
came
from
you
mentioned
internationally,
but
is
there
a
possibility
to
know
exactly
where
and
I
did
send
a
list
over.
D
So
in
terms
of
contagiousness,
there
are
varying
estimates
of
the
contagiousness
of
different
variants,
the
one
that
has
been
of
where
we've
got
the
most
information
and
that
has
been
of
greatest
concern,
has
been
the
uk
variant,
and
these
are
just
estimates,
but
it
does
appear
more
infectious
than
the
strengths
that
were
circulating
in
the
uk
before
it
emerged,
and
there
is
recent
data
to
suggest
similarly
true
in
the
united
states
that
it
that
it
could
replace
other
circulating
strains.
D
How
much
more
infectious,
I
think
is
you
know.
Matters
is
still
really
an
open
research
question,
but
but
but
it
is
reasonable
to
expect
that
it's
more
infectious
than
other
circulating
strains
and
and
again
I
would
just
highlight
that
the
same
prevention
measures
still
work,
but
it's
all
the
more
reason
to
be
diligent
about
using
them.
C
The
truth
is,
as
we've
said
before
this,
we
should
expect
that
the
virus
will
continue
to
adapt
and
change,
and
so
it
is
important
that
we
continue
to
do
everything
that
we
can
to
prevent
every
opportunity
for
spread,
and
that
means
consistently,
masking
and
and
keeping
our
distance
from
others
and
certainly
and
very
importantly,
quarantining
after
travel
to
another
area.
That
is
what
has
presented
preventive
spread
from
this
case
further
into
the
community
here
in
santa
clara
county,
as
I
mentioned
before,
our
case
in
santa
clara
county
did
have
a
history
of
international
travel.
C
B
M
Time
with
me,
I
know
you're
really
busy,
so
we
really
appreciate
it
just
a
question.
I
know
that
you've
said
that
it's,
it's
obviously
really
important
for
everybody
to
do
the
the
social
distancing
the
practices
we
know
of,
but
can
you
speak
to
the
importance
of
really
kind
of
increasing
our
surveillance,
increasing
our
screening
and
sequencing?
So
we
can
identify
these
particularly
troublesome
cases.
M
Very
early
and
kind
of
you
know
form
that
contact
tracing
investigation
around
them
and
get
those
kind
of
isolated
and
and
taken
care
of
really
quickly
is
that
is
that
on
the
table?
Is
that
something
that
is
possible
to
do
and
that
we
should
be
doing?
M
C
You
so
much
for
the
question
I
I
have
to
say
that
this
does
remind
me
a
little
bit
of
our
early
days
of
testing,
where
we
had
very
little
testing
and
it
was
so
focused
if
you
I'm
sure
you
remember
that
we
were
only
testing
people
who
are
hospitalized
with
a
travel
history,
because
we
simply
didn't
have
the
capacity
and
a
year
ago.
I
remember
that
very
uncomfortable
feeling,
thinking
that
you
know,
there's
got
to
be
cases
out
there
when
we
just
can't
see
them.
I
think
it
is
a
similar
story
with
genomic
sequencing.
C
C
The
county
of
santa
clara
is
for
a
variety
of
reasons,
able
to
access
more
labs
from
for
genomic
sequencing
as
compared
to
many
counties,
but
it
is
still
just
a
small
fraction
of
the
cases
that
we
identify
every
day.
So
we
are
indebted
to
academic
labs
who
support
this
work.
And
again,
I
want
to
emphasize
and
thank
the
lab
at
stanford
that
did
the
sequencing
and
reported
it
to
us
so
quickly
after
they
got
the
result.
N
L
N
Okay,
so
I
am
wondering
if,
with
so
much
unknown
about
the
variants,
are
we
moving
too
quickly
on
reopening
you
know,
there's
a
lot
of
pressure
to
get
schools
reopened
a
lot
of
pressure
to
reopen
the
economy
and
businesses.
N
C
We
have
more
tools
and
more
nuanced
tools
than
than
we
had
a
year
ago,
and
so
we
know
more
about
what
kind
of
masks
work
and
why
they
work.
We
know
how
important
ventilation
is.
We
know
how
important
filtration
is.
C
We
know
that
a
primary
mode
of
transmission
is
through
aerosols,
those
you
know,
fine
little
little
particles
that
can
kind
of
linger
and
float
in
the
air.
None
of
that
was,
you
know
really
clear
to
us
a
year
ago,
so
we
know
what
steps
we
need
to
take.
I
think
the
biggest
challenge
is
to
ensure
that
that
everyone
is
willing
and
able
to
to
change
those
behaviors
all
the
time.
C
That's
the
that
that
really
is
the
key
challenge
and
that's
a
challenge
now
and
I
think
that
it's
going
to
be
more
of
a
challenge
going
forward
with
these
new
variants.
You
know
that
may
be
coming
on
online
to
a
greater
or
lesser
extent,
we're
not
quite
certain
certain
yet
so,
as
with
everything
I
think
it's
you
know,
we
we
still
do
need
to
be
cautious.
As
dr
moss
mentioned
case
rates
are
declining,
however,
they
are
still
really
high.
C
They
are
still
far
higher
than
they
ever
were
even
during
the
summer
peak.
So
we
are,
you
know
we're
still
in
a
pretty
big
pickle,
that's
the
truth,
and
so
I
don't
think
we
have
that
much
room
to
to
move.
C
That
being
said
as
far
as
schools,
I
know
our
local
data
for
the
schools
that
we
have
had
open,
which
are
primarily
k
through
five
or
k
through
six
we've
seen
very
little
transmission
in
the
school,
so
the
schools
have
been
able
to
apply
the
the
safety
measures
and
the
safety
protocols
and
prevent
the
vast
majority
of
spread
within
school.
So
that's
that's
a
that's
a
bit
of
good
news.
D
You
know
I'll
just
add
that
in
terms
of
monitoring
case
rates
and
and
the
state's
blueprint
for
safer
economy
that
that
we
use
to
regulate
reopening
that
the
those
case
rates
are,
are
you
know,
we
should
still
be
able
to
detect
these
variants
with
current
testing,
based
on
what
the
fda
is
saying
about
the
available
tests
and
the
variants
themselves,
and
so
case
rates
falling.
That's
that's
true.
D
Regardless
of
what
is
circulating
here
in
the
counties,
again
rates
remain
very
high,
but
also,
I
think
you
know,
although
some
reopening
has
happened,
we
we
remain
in
in
at
a
time
where
there
are
a
lot
of
restrictions
in
place,
and
I
think
this
is
all
the
more
reason
for
people
to
to
abide
by
those.
D
I
know
it's
been
a
a
difficult
year
and
a
year
of
a
lot
of
sacrifice
for
residents
across
the
bay
area,
but
but
they
they
are
extremely
important
and
even
though
some
things
have
opened
up,
a
lot
of
things
remain
closed
and
let's
try
to
stick
with
that.
We'll
watch
the
what
happens
with
the
pandemic
in
terms
of
case
rates
impact
on
our
health
care
system,
and
I
think
we
should
be
prepared
that
that,
if
things
start
moving
the
opposite
direction,
we
might
also
have
to
increase
restrictions
again.
B
F
Yes,
we
can
okay,
great,
so
could
you
let
me
know
with
both
the
cases
were
they
selected
randomly
to
be
genomically
sequenced,
both
in
alameda
and
santa
clara
county
and
dr
moss?
Where
was
the
alameda
county
case
sequenced
and,
finally,
just
any
any
idea
that
you
may
be
doing
dosing
differently
if
we're
seeing
more
of
these
variants
proliferate
around
the
bay
area.
D
So
our
the
alameda
county
variant
was
sequenced
at
stanford,
dr
pinsky's
lab
same
as
dr
cody's,
and
I
I
think
they
can
address
this
more
directly.
My
understanding
is
there.
They
have
a
strategy
for
screening,
everything
that
is
tested
at
their
lab
and
then
they
can
do
additional
testing.
If
those
screening
tests
suggest
there
may
be
a
variant.
So
it
wasn't
anything
specific
to
our
case
that
that
resulted
in
this,
but
rather
their
their
overall
approach.
F
D
I
think
the
most
important
thing
with
dosing
is
that
it
should
be,
you
know,
really
evidence-based
and
driven
by
what
what
has
been
shown
in
ideally
in
the
clinical
trials.
That's
why
the
that's
why
they're
done
and-
and
I
think
you
know
if
a
good
clinical
data
suggests
that
there's
a
more
optimal
dosing
strategy
either
for
these
variants
that
we're
talking
about
today
or
or
any
covid.
D
You
know,
I
think,
we'll
all
be
interested
to
see
that,
but
for
the
time
being
you
know,
I
think
letting
the
the
high
quality
clinical
trial
data
guide
us
is
is
where
we
are
and
and
right
now.
That
is
not
yet
suggesting
any
any
change
in
dosing
strategy.
I
think
at
least
here
in
california,.
B
O
Can
you
hear
me
yes,
that
was
hard.
Thank
you
all
for
your
time,
dr
cody.
O
If
I'm
hearing
this
right,
it
sounds
as
if
two
members
of
the
same
household
traveled,
but
only
one,
was
diagnosed
with
a
new
variant,
and
did
you
say
that
that
person
did
not
contract
the
virus
while
traveling
and
secondly,
your
county
executive
said
yesterday
that
he'd
like
to
opt
out
of
my
turn,
the
state's
new
appointment
system?
Can
you
elaborate
on
why
thank
you.
C
C
The
case
has
a
household
contact,
one
household
contact
that
household
contact
also
became
ill
but
wasn't
tested
that
household
contact
also
had
a
travel
history.
So
that's
why
the?
But
it
is
a
presumed
case,
but
that's
why
this
is
complicated
in
our
county.
As
far
as
the
exposure
and
the
travel
history,
so
you're
correct,
one
confirmed
one
presumed
that
they
are
household
contacts
and
both
have
a
travel
history
and
both
very
importantly-
and
I
really
need
to
underline
this-
they
were
exquisitely
compliant
and
immediately
from
turning
from
travel.
C
C
C
I
can't
I
don't
really
have
information
to
to
to
help
with
that.
So
I
can't
really
answer
that
question
right
now,
but
sorry
about
that.
Perhaps
a
follow-up
with
a
pio
team.