►
From YouTube: Governor Newsom's Major COVID-19 Announcement: Statewide Stay-At-Home Order - March 19, 2020
Description
Governor Gavin Newsom issues a stay-at-home order to protect the health and well-being of all Californians and to establish consistency across the state in order to slow the spread of COVID-19.
Recorded March 19, 2020 in Sacramento.
For more information regarding the impact of the COVID-19 outbreak in Cupertino, please visit https://www.cupertino.org/coronavirus
A
Thank
you.
Everybody
I
have
long
believed
that
the
future
is
not
just
something
to
experience
it's
something
to
manifest
that
our
fate
and
future
is
inside
of
us.
It's
decisions
at
the
end
of
the
day,
not
conditions
that
determine
that
fate.
In
future,
we're
not
victims
of
circumstance.
We
can
make
decisions
to
meet
moments,
and
this
is
a
moment
we
need
to
make
tough
decisions.
This
is
a
moment
where
we
need
some
straight
talk
and
we
need
to
tell
people
the
truth.
A
We
need
to
bend
the
curve
in
the
state
of
California,
and
in
order
to
do
that,
we
need
to
recognize
the
reality.
The
fact
is,
experience
we're
having
on
the
ground
throughout
the
state
of
California
the
experience
it's
manifesting
all
across
the
United
States
and
for
that
matter,
around
the
rest
of
the
world,
require
us
to
adjust
our
thinking
and
to
adjust
our
activities
in
the
state
of
California.
Many
people
are
very
familiar
with
these
adjustments.
Number
of
days
ago,
there
were
six
bay
area
counties
that
led
with
stay-at-home
orders.
A
Now,
as
I
speak,
some
20
1.3
million
Californians
reside
in
a
community
in
a
city
and/or
County
that
have
similar
orders
a
state
as
large
as
ours.
Nation
state
is
many
parts,
but
at
the
end
of
the
day,
were
one
body
there's
a
mutuality
and
there's
a
recognition
of
our
interdependence
that
requires
of
this
moment
that
we
direct
a
statewide
order
for
people
to
stay
at
home.
That
directive
goes
into
force
in
effect
this
evening,
and
we
were
confident
we
are
confident
that
the
people
of
the
state
of
California
will
abide
by
it.
A
They'll
do
the
right
thing.
They'll
meet
this
moment,
they'll
step
up.
Have
they
have
over
the
course
of
the
last
number
of
weeks
to
protect
themselves,
to
protect
them,
found
their
families
and
to
protect
the
broader
community
in
this
great
state
in
the
world
that
we
reside
in
I
have
confidence
in
that
I've
confidence
because
I've
seen
it
every
single
day,
we've
seen
it
in
cities,
large
and
small
people
still
doing
essential
work,
people
still
providing
essential
services,
people
still
going
out
to
the
grocery
store
to
get
food,
walking
their
dogs
practicing
social
distancing.
A
Nonetheless,
when
they're
out
in
the
streets,
people
still
getting
their
medicine,
people
still
going
about
doing
the
kind
of
essential
work
that
is
required
to
meet
this
moment.
The
order
provides
for
all
of
that.
Just
as
these
other
orders
that
have
been
put
into
place
and
cities
large
and
small
across
the
state
have
afforded
people
will
ask.
A
Well
how
will
you
enforce
as
I
say,
there's
a
social
contract
here,
people
I
think
recognize
the
need
to
do
more
and
to
meet
this
moment
a
people
will
self
regulate
their
behavior
they'll
begin
to
adjust
and
adapt,
as
they
have
been
quite
significantly.
We
will
have
social
pressure
and
that
will
encourage
people
to
do
the
right
thing.
Just
a
nod
and
look
saying
hey,
maybe
you
should
reconsider
just
being
out
there
on
the
beach
being
22
strong
at
a
park,
it's
time
for
all
of
us
to
recognize
as
individuals
and
as
a
community.
A
We
need
to
do
more
to
meet
this
moment.
Forcement
comes
in
many
shapes,
a
regulatory
framework.
You
have
licensing
frameworks,
I,
don't
believe
that
the
people
of
California
need
to
be
told
through
law
enforcement
that
it's
appropriate.
Just
a
home
isolate,
protect
themselves,
go
about
the
essential,
essential
patterns
of
life,
but
do
so
by
socially
distancing
themselves
from
others
and
do
so
using
your
common
sense
now.
Why
is
it
important
that
I
advance
this
new
order?
A
It's
for
the
following
reasons:
we've
been
doing
pandemic
planning
in
the
state
of
California
for
now
over
a
decade
now
we're
moving
into
application
implementation,
and
that
includes
the
latest
technology
and
data
collection,
the
ability
to
work
with
artificial
intelligence
to
match
that
data
up
to
really
look
at
trend
lines
before
they
become
headlines
and
what
we're
seeing
not
only
on
the
ground
but
we're
seeing
through
the
data
is.
This
spread
continues
at
a
pace
that
we
had
anticipated
in
a
number
of
our
models.
A
Let
me
be
precise:
it's
a
number
that
we
have
been
used
for
the
purposes
of
guiding
our
resource
delivery
and
guiding
our
decision-making.
We
estimate
in
the
United
States
we've
heard
this
number
across
the
rest
of
the
world
that
people
30%
of
the
population
as
high
as
70%
of
the
population
may
contract
the
virus.
In
California,
we've
been
working
with
those
numbers
as
a
nation
state.
40
million
strong
we've
been
organized
around
an
attack
rate
as
we
refer
to
it
of
about
56
percent
that
the
virus
will
impact
about
56%
of
us.
A
A
So
we're
looking
at
a
hospitalization
rate
by
using
those
numbers-
and
forgive
me
I
know,
sometimes
these
numbers
get
confusing,
but
a
56
percent
attack
rate,
if
you
assume
that
are
not,
which
is
the
number
of
individuals
that
you
may
come
in
contact
with,
that
can
contract
the
virus.
If
you
use
that
formula,
we
believe
with
a
20
percent
hospitalization
rate
a
little
bit
on
the
higher
end,
though
some
would
argue
could
be
much
higher
some
believe
it
might
be
much
lower,
but
20%
hospitalization
rate.
A
A
Conversations
and
I
know
their
conversations
you're
having
in
real
time
and
you're
having
with
one
another
as
I
speak
and
I
deeply
appreciate
the
anxiety
of
these
difficult
conversations,
but
we
must
have
them,
but
as
we
work
through
that
planning
process,
19,000
543
beds
in
our
system
I'm
able
to
look
at
our
existing
capacity.
Let
me
be
specific
of
what
our
existing
capacity
looks
like.
We
have
four
hundred
sixteen
hospitals
in
the
state
of
California.
We
have
capacity
to
provide
care
beyond
our
hospital
system,
but
within
the
hospital
system
we
have
a
capacity
to
surge.
A
The
number
of
beds
beyond
the
78,000
currently
staffed
beds
by
an
additional
ten
thousand
207
by
the
way
that
number
changes
on
a
daily
basis,
but
that's
today's
number.
So
looking
at
the
19,000,
500
plus
individuals
in
our
planning.
Looking
at
that
surge
capacity
about
10,000,
we
are
looking
at
a
delta,
a
gap
that
requires
about
10,000,
well,
10,000
beds,
10,000
members,
the
community
to
staff
those
beds
and
that's
currently
what
we're
up
against.
But
here's
the
point:
that's
a
planning
document.
If
we
change
our
behaviors,
that
inventory
will
come
down.
A
If
we
meet
this
moment,
we
can
truly
bend
the
curve
to
reduce
the
need
to
surge
to
neut,
reduce
the
need
to
have
to
go
out
and
begin
to
cobble
all
those
assets
together,
though,
I
want
you
to
know,
we
are
doing
just
that.
We
always
plan
we
always
anticipate.
Let
me
give
you
some
proof
points.
Today.
A
We
just
secured
a
very
large
hospital
in
Northern,
California
Seton,
it's
now
part
of
our
portfolio
and
we're
going
to
populate
that
hospital.
It's
an
example
to
meet
the
moment
tomorrow,
we'll
announce
a
hospital
in
Southern
California.
That's
seven
hundred
and
50
beds,
those
two
hospitals
combined.
We
start
to
stack
this
750
here.
The
motels
that
were
currently
in
hotels
were
currently
in
negotiating
with.
We
start
stacking.
Those
master
leases
for
those
hotels.
A
A
Those
numbers
we're
working
with
the
federal
government
I
had
a
conversation
today
with
vice
president
pence
and
president
Donald
Trump
together
on
the
phone
talking
about
our
needs,
in
addition
to
my
conversation
today
with
the
Secretary
of
Defense
about
these
mobile
medical
and
field
units
that
they
have
committed
to
pledging
not
just
to
California
but
to
folks
all
across
this
country.
You
start
stacking
those
things
and
we
have
I
believe
the
capacity
to
meet
this
moment,
but
not
unless
we
change
our
behaviors
and
do
what
is
necessary
to
meet
this
moment.
A
Let's
bend
the
curve
together,
let's
not
regret,
let's
not
dream
of
regretting
go
back,
say.
Well,
you
know
we
coulda
woulda
shoulda.
Now,
when
the
data
all
points
to
where
I
think
most
of
us
know
we're
going,
one
has
to
be
transparent.
One
has
to
be
honest
that
still
go
to
time.
Being
the
bearer
of
these
messages.
I
can
assure
you
home
isolation.
It's
not
my
preferred.
You
know
choice.
I
know
it's
not
yours,
but
it's
a
necessary
one.
A
We
started
with
seniors
65
and
over
the
most
vulnerable
population
and
will
continue
to
overly
focus
on
that
population
and
those
with
compromised
compromised
immune
systems,
but
we
now
need
to
broaden
it
to
all
Californians.
So
that's
the
order
we're
putting
out
today,
it's
consistent
with
the
leadership
we've
seen
at
the
local
level,
including
I,
want
to
acknowledge
mayor
Garcetti
and
others
in
Los,
Angeles
and
LA
County
that
are
recognizing
and
meeting
this
moment
as
well.
In
addition,
I
want
to
thank
Speaker
Nancy
Pelosi.
A
We
had
a
very
long
conversation
today,
talk
about
meeting
the
moment,
we're
so
blessed
to
have
her
leadership
in
California,
she's,
very
familiar
Northern,
California,
and
certainly
familiar
to
me
as
a
former
mayor
of
San
Francisco.
Our
conversation
was
not
only
about
what
she
has
done
and
what
is
being
done
in
the
Senate
as
we
speak,
but
what
will
be
needed
over
the
course
of
the
next
number
of
months
as
we
come
back
as
we
recover
as
we
will.
This
is
not
a
permanent
state.
A
This
is
a
moment
in
time,
and
we
will
meet
this
moment
together
and
we
will
look
back
at
these
kinds
of
decisions
as
pivotal
decisions.
If
we're
to
be
criticized
at
this
moment,
let
us
be
criticized
for
taking
this
moment
seriously.
Let
us
be
criticized
for
going
full
force
and
meeting
this
virus
head-on,
we're
doing
so
today
in
the
state
of
California,
through
this
order
and
we're
doing
so
by
continuing
to
build
collaboration
and
partnership
across
every
level
of
government
and
the
private
sector.
A
Let
me
conclude
by
just
making
a
few
points
to
fill
in
that
we
had
today
a
very
important
conversation.
It
was
punctuated
earlier
today
by
President
Trump
in
his
press
conference
with
the
CEO
of
Gilead.
It's
a
california-based
company
around
treatments.
I
want
to
compliment
the
president
in
his
focus
on
treatments.
It
is
a
focus
of
positivity
as
we
work
to
bridge
towards
a
vaccine.
It
was
a
very
encouraging
conversation.
A
It's
a
conversation
that
we
can
have
with
many
other
CEOs
of
companies,
not
just
in
the
state
of
California,
but
for
that
matter
around
the
rest
of
this
country
and
around
the
rest
of
the
world.
There
are
treatments
in
trial,
our
UC
system,
while
five
hospitals
are
already
actively
engaged
in
those
treatments
in
the
courses
that
are
part
of
some
of
these
antivirals
and
some
of
these
medicines
that
you
have
all
learned
about
today,
because
the
president's
announcement
that's
very
encouraged.
We
want
to
continue
to
build
capacity
and
build
partnerships
along
those
lines.
A
A
Here's
the
good
news
in
the
state
of
California
I
was
talking
to
vice
president,
the
president
today
thanking
them
for
the
first
national
stockpile
transfer
of
assets
that
we
just
received
where
we
received,
quite
literally
hundreds
of
thousands
of
gloves
and
face
masks,
not
just
n95,
but
also
surgical,
masks,
we're
going
to
be
starting
get
that
cache
of
assets
out
into
our
diverse
communities
throughout
the
state
of
California.
Many
of
you
know
we
had
our
own
cache
in
our
own
storage
of
n95
masks.
A
We
still
have
ten
million
of
those
masks
and
we
are
getting
them
out
in
real
time.
We
started
with
21
million.
We
have
about
10
million
still
as
we
distribute
those
we've
distributed,
those
first
11
to
55
counties
in
the
state
and
we'll
continue
to
get
those
n95
masks
out
there,
and
we
recognize
that
distribution
can't
happen
fast
enough.
We
also
talked
to
a
well-known
entrepreneur
today
around
ventilators,
as
many
of
you
know
that,
if
followed
our
press
conferences
here
in
the
state,
we
have
seven
thousand
five
hundred
eighty-seven
ventilators
in
our
hospital
system.
A
We
have
five
hundred
and
fourteen
through
a
cache
at
the
Department
of
Public
Health
that
are
being
repurposed.
We
have
an
additional
200
in
our
EMSA
cache
that
we
are
repurposing
and
then
we
ordered
an
additional
200,
but
we're
going
to
need
to
increase
the
manufacturing
of
those
ventilators
and
we
are
working
with
the
private
sector
and
well-known
entrepreneurs
to
consider
to
help
us
in
that
respect
as
well,
starting
to
repurpose
some
of
the
manufacturing
in
this
state
to
meet
the
moment,
particularly
to
pair
for
our
seniors
and
others.
That
may
need
that
support.
A
So
again,
this
is
this
is
a
difficult
moment,
and
this
is
one
that
I
know
is
filled
with
deep
anxiety
as
a
father
as
a
husband
as
a
parent
for
young
kids
to
families
in
particular
to
folks
that
have
had
to
drop
their
kids
no
longer
drop
off
at
school,
but
now
are
living
with
their
kids
24/7.
Putting
together,
you
know,
learning
plans
trying
to
figure
out.
A
You
know
the
nomenclature
of
what
their
7th
grade
science
teacher
understands
and
think
all
of
us
are
coming
to
appreciate
our
teachers,
we're
all
coming
to
appreciate
each
other
I
think
a
little
bit
more.
We
don't
see
this
the
lens
of
rural
urban.
We
certainly
don't
see
it
through
the
lens
of
a
Republican
and
Democrat
I.
A
A
We've
put
up
to
provide
information,
we'll
be
putting
more
detailed
information
out
in
the
next
hours
and
days
about
the
exemptions
to
the
stay
at
home
order,
but
again
for
those
living
in
many
in
the
northern
Californians,
already
impacted,
you're
very
familiar
with
those
exemptions,
and
for
those
of
you
are
not
again
we're
gonna
keep
the
grocery
stores
open.
We're
gonna
make
sure
that
you're
getting
critical
medical
supplies.
You
can
still
take
your
kids
outside
practicing
common
sense
and
social
distancing.
You
can
still
walk
your
dog.
A
You
can
still
pick
up
that
food
at
one
of
our
distribution
centers
and
a
restaurant
and
a
drive-through
all
those
things
we
will
still
be
able
to
do
and
to
secure
that
in
closing.
I
want
folks
to
know
that
we've
lost
a
lot
of
volunteers,
that
you
know
simply
our
concern
and
understandably
are
staying
at
home.
Our
food
banks
and
other
others
that
have
relied
on
volunteers
in
the
community
spirit
need
a
little
support
and
so
we're
gonna
provide
that
support.
This
shouldn't
be
alarming.
A
It's
humanitarian
only
but
we'll
send
out
about
500
of
our
extraordinary
leaders
in
the
National
Guard
to
help
with
the
distribution
and
the
food
again,
just
purely
humanitarian
and
we'll
be
announcing
some
very,
very
exciting.
Partnerships
with
social
media
companies
like
next-door
to
provide
kits
information
QAS
to
you
know,
start
to
check
in
on
loved
ones
check
in
on
your
neighbors
things
that
you
need
one-pagers.
A
So
you
know
what
kind
of
things
you
need
at
home
to
protect
yourself,
those
that
are
socially
isolated,
our
seniors,
struggling
with
loneliness
as
much
of
more
than
anything
else
to
make
sure
we
reach
out,
maybe
call
five
people
a
day
just
check
in
on
them.
So
we've
got
a
whole
kit
we
put
out
with
that
social
media
company
and
we're
going
to
be
doing
more
with
AmeriCorps
Conservation
Corp
in
the
state
of
California.
A
All
of
this,
in
the
spirit
of
meeting
the
moment,
including
the
spirit
of
reaching
out
those
that
are
healthy,
young,
those
that
can
make
an
appointment
be
socially
appropriate
in
terms
of
their
distancing
to
get
a
blood
drawn
to
help
those
and
needs
our
blood
banks
need
support.
Interesting
ly.
We
are
not
able
to
provide
because
we're
not
doing
the
large
blood
draws
and
fairs
the
kind
of
capacity
we've
seen
the
past.
The
good
news
about
the
social
isolation
in
some
respects.
A
The
need
in
the
short
term
has
gone
down,
so
it
shouldn't
be
alarming,
but
we
want
to
meet
the
moment
if,
indeed,
our
blood
banks
need
additional
resources
as
well.
So
again,
it's
the
spirit
of
the
moment
stepping
up
stepping
in
recognizing
our
own
individual
capacity
to
meet
this
moment,
not
just
relying
on
others
doing
it
safe
and
thoughtfully
and
again.
A
I,
just
cannot
express
more
appreciation
for
the
collaborative
spirit
that
is
defined
this
moment
across
agencies
across
jurisdictions
across
this
country,
into
the
White
House,
the
Pentagon
health
and
human
service
agencies
across
this
country
and
sharing
best
practices
across
state
and
a
course,
the
CDC
and
their
leadership.
So
with
that
we're
here
to
answer
any
questions,
I've
got
a
team
assembled
behind
me
and
I.
Thank
all
of
you
in
the
state
of
California
for
recognizing
this
moment
and
meeting
it.
C
A
So
we've
been
working
very
collaboratively.
Just
yesterday
we
had
representatives
representing
the
panoply
of
health
care
delivery
system,
broadly
defined
from
the
hospitals
on
down
represented
the
doctors
and
others
nurses.
Clearly,
we
are
currently
looking
not
only
at
the
assets
within
the
system,
but
we
are
looking
more
broadly
at
scope
of
practice
and
reforms
that
are
necessary
under
these
circumstances.
I'll
give
you
a
more
specific
example.
D
We
know
that
some
professionals
who
are
not
as
busy
in
their
outpatient
practices,
nurses,
doctors
and
nurse
practitioners-
other
healthcare
professionals-
can
step
up
and
are
willing
to
join
us
as
we
build
up
this
capacity
and
new
facilities
and
increase
our
capacity
in
our
existing
facilities.
So
it
has
felt-
and
it
can
10
used
to
feel
like
a
hole
all
hands
on
deck
mission,
we're
having
great
conversations
with
all
of
our
partners
across
the
state.
The
willingness
is
enormous.
D
E
Hi
governor
thanks
for
doing
this,
do
you
have
a
sense
of
how
long
the
statewide
shelter-in-place
order
is
going
to
last,
and
then
you
know
you
talked
about
the
state
has
been
modeling
and
has
been
kind
of
seeing
where
this
is
been
going
for
days
now.
You
know
why.
Now,
if
you
decide
to
issue
this
today,
was
there
a
specific
number
or
thing
that
changed
it
made?
You
take
this
extra
step,
I.
A
So,
based
upon
the
meetings
we
had
yesterday
with
their
health
care
professionals,
based
upon
the
conversations
we
had
this
morning
with
fellow
governors
with
the
president,
CDC
and
others
based
upon
our
model
based
upon
our
trend
lines
based
upon
some
new
information
that
came
in
as
relates
to
those
models
from
John
Hopkins
and
among
others,
we
felt
it
was
appropriate
to
raise
the
ante
and
do
what
we
can
to
bend
that
curve.
Let
me
remind
you,
the
numbers
we
put
out
today
assume
that
we're
just
along
for
the
ride
or
not.
A
We
want
to
manipulate
those
numbers
down.
That's
what
this
order
is
all
about.
The
projection
said
we
will
have,
but
we
don't
live
by
projection
again.
I
began
this
by
saying:
we
are
not
victims
of
fate
or
circumstance.
The
future
is
something
inside
of
us.
It's
our
decisions
that
will
determine
those
projections
and
that's
why
we
decided
today
to
make
this
decision.
F
F
I
think
governor
I
appreciate
you
taking
the
time
to
talk
with
us
tonight,
we're
hearing
a
lot
from
state
workers
that
they're
still
being
told
to
come
into
work,
and
you
touched
on
this
a
bit
last
night.
But
does
the
state
have
the
capability
to
have
workers
Pelican
you
and
the
numbers
needed
for
social
distancing,
yeah.
A
That's
being
worked
on
in
real-time,
we
had
a
remarkable
conversation
last
night
with
our
largest
public
employees
union
at
ella
town
hall,
and
we
talked
about
so
many
of
the
essential
services
that
are
provided
in
the
state.
Let
me
put
that
in
perspective
when
you
consider
police
and
fire
and
those
in
our
corrections,
industry
broadly
defined
you're
over
50%
of
the
workforce
operating
on
some
form
of
24-hour
support.
So
it's
deeply
defined
as
essential.
A
Those
in
non-essential
positions
that
have
skills
are
being
surveyed
to
see
if
they
could
provide
essential
capacity
and
fill
in
voids
that
may
exist
or
persist
throughout
our
system.
But
when
we
look
across
the
panoply
of
services,
overwhelming
majority
of
those
services,
we
believe
we
can
meet
based
upon
that
criteria
and
that
criteria
is
being
processed
in
real
time.
A
In
terms
of
making
the
actual
determination
to
your
question
around
how
many
individuals
can
tell
work,
how
many
people
don't
have
that
kind
of
broadband
access
or
otherwise
are
not
positioned
because
of
their
particular
job,
to
get
any
big
benefit
from
telework.
So
all
that
is
being
processed
and
we're
working
very
collaborative
with
our
teams
and
HR
to
make
all
that
real.
But
it's
a
constant
and
never-ending
adjustment.
A
Well,
we're
expecting
the
delivery
of
that
national
stockpile
and
those
numbers
that
I
gave
you
just
a
moment
ago
that
the
Trump
administration
agreed
to
and
they
delivered,
was
on
the
call
with
the
president
and
the
vice
president,
specifically
about
the
first
tranche
of
those
requests.
They
gave
25
percent
of
those
requests
as
they're
processing.
These
requests
all
across
the
country
will
arrive.
We
believe
in
our
West
Sacramento
warehouse
and
then
be
distributed
throughout
our
system.
Again,
that's
just
the
first
order.
A
H
H
Bobby
I'm
there
anybody
hear
me
perfectly
how
about
her?
Can
you
hear
me
perfectly
fantastic
one
more
time,
I
want
to
go
back
to
the
projection
in
the
letter
that
you
sent
to
the
president
of
the
twenty-five
and
a
half
million,
which
I
understand
as
you've
said
a
moment
ago,
is
a
projection.
If
nothing
else
happens.
H
At
least
one
of
my
colleagues
has
talked
to
an
epidemiologist
at
Harvard
who
thinks
in
eight
weeks
that
would
be,
in
his
words
a
catastrophic
number
and
then
they
normally
talk
in
terms
of
18
months
when
you're
looking
at
numbers
like
that,
and
that
would
be
really
bad.
Are
you
sure
I
want
to
understand
the
the
methodology,
the
science
behind
a
potential
of
eight
weeks
and
twenty
five
and
a
half
million
people
yeah.
A
D
In
about
three
or
four
weeks
ago,
we
began
knowing
that
in
California
we
had
to
create
a
model
that
took
the
best
thinking
from
around
the
globe
and
started
to
look
in
how
we
would
apply
it
in
California
and
using
the
available
literature
advice
from
the
CDC
and
our
understanding
and
experience
in
California,
we
applied
of
a
variety
of
different
measures
that
looked
at
an
attack
rate
that
looked
at.
They
are
not,
as
the
governor
has
described,
which
is
that
infectivity
ratio
or
that
one
persons
affected
and
how
many
others
will
be
infected.
D
We
would
have
a
majority
of
our
state
affected
by
the
disease.
We
knew
that
that
did
not
equate
to
the
same
number
of
people
who
would
be
sick
enough
to
seek
care
sick
enough
to
be
hospitalized
and
then
beyond
that
sick
enough
to
need
the
of
ICU
level
care
that
we
worry
about
most
and
some
of
the
worst
outcomes.
I
I
Lasting
is
there
a
date
on
this
order
for
how
long
it
would
last
and
then
also
will
there
be
any
actual
enforcement,
and
if
not,
how
practical
and
impactful
do
you
think
it
will
have
given
how
many
people
are
still
going
out
going
the
stores
going
to
essential
jobs
I
think
that's
all
you'll.
Let
me
ask
for
now:
let's
try
that
yeah.
A
A
We
have
enforcement,
that's
not
traditional
law
enforcement,
but
we
have
regulatory
enforcement,
licensing
enforcement
from
a
business
perspective,
and
then
we
have
social
pressure
that
you
other's
comments
will
place
on
people
and
of
course
we
have
the
capacity
to
move
beyond
that.
To
the
extent
this
is
a
directive,
it
is
open-ended
one
and
it
is
for
a
reason
that
we
could
not
give
you
a
deadline
that
we
really
could
believe
in.
This
is
a
dynamic
situation.
We
could
put
a
two-week
deadline,
it
gives
people
a
false
sense
of
what
to
expect
I
don't
expect.
G
J
Hi
governor
I
wanted
to
follow
up
on
John
Meyers
question
I,
don't
think
I,
don't
think
it
was
quite
fully
addressed
but
are
even
with
the
orders
to
the
23
million
Californians
and
all
the
other
social
distancing
measures.
So
far,
are
you
still
operating
under
an
assumption
that
we're
on
track
for
this
25
million
Californians
infected
by
within
a
week
unless
we
all
go
under
the
order?
The.
A
Point
of
the
state
home
order
is
to
make
those
numbers
moot
to
bend
that
curve
when
we
say
bend
the
curve.
That
means
the
projection
no
longer
becomes
a
reality,
because
we
changed
our
behavior
and,
as
a
consequence,
that
curve
that
projection
that
trendline
becomes
something
very,
very
different
in
reality,
and
so
that's
what
we're
operating
under
is
that
expectation
but
I'm
also
operating
under
the
worst-case
scenarios,
as
it
relates
to
planning
and
as
it
relates
to
procurement
and
those
two
things
go
hand
in
hand
procuring
the
physical
assets.
The
human
resources
that
are
necessary.
A
Physical
assets
include
the
hospitals,
include
the
medical
support
teams
and
the
personal
protective
gear,
and
all
of
those
things
are
being
looked
at
through
this
lens
bottom-up.
All
the
numbers
we
used
talked
about
our
numbers
in
the
aggregate.
We
don't
live
in
the
aggregate.
We
live
in
communities
large
and
small,
diverse
throughout
the
state
of
California,
so
do
our
resources,
and
so
we
are
working.
A
For
example,
conversation
I
have
a
department
offense
today
about
looking
at
their
resources,
providing
those
resources
in
the
deeper
part
of
Northern
California
in
central
California
in
different
parts
of
the
state.
So
we
can
make
sure
that
we
are
meeting
the
adequacy
of
resources
that
are
required.
Clearly,
there
is
a
dominant
focus
right
now
in
the
bay
area,
particularly
in
Santa
Clara,
where
we
have
to
be
overly
resourced,
but
we
have
to
anticipate
those
needs
more
broadly
defined.
B
Hi
governor,
thank
you.
There
are
more
than
two
million
undocumented
immigrants
in
California
and
many
don't
have
access
to
health
care,
and
certainly
people
who
don't
have
access
to
well.
Insurance
or
medical
might
be
a
lot
more
concerned
about
going
to
the
doctor
to
get
treatment
or
testing
or
necessary
medical
advice
about
what
they
should
be
doing
right
now
and
wondering
what
you
plan
to
make
sure
that
they
stay
safe
and
also
that
the
community
at
large
stays
safe
for
those
people
who
do
not
have
access
to
medical.
Well.
A
We're
a
universal
state,
we
practice
pluralism
and
we're
a
state
that
has
universal
health
care.
It's
sadly,
it's
in
our
emergency
rooms
for
those
that
are
fiscally
conservative.
That's
our
concern
them
because
that
universal
health
care
cost
the
taxpayers
a
fortune
and
state
of
California.
As
you
know,
well,
we
believe
in
universal
health
care.
A
A
We
have
universal
care,
regardless
of
immigration
status
that
we
expend
last
year
up
to
the
age
of
26
and
clearly,
as
you
know,
from
my
budget,
we
had
a
desire
to
do
even
more.
To
the
extent
we
can.
We
are
reviewing
that
we're
looking
at
the
entire
budget,
looking
at
the
existing
proposals
that
we
introduced
in
January,
looking
at
where
the
legislature
is
currently
in
terms
of
without
they'd
support
it.
A
Let
me
just
conclusion,
since
that
was
the
last
question,
make
this
point
as
well:
I'm
very
proud
to
be
a
Bay
Area
kid
born
and
raised,
but
one
of
the
things
that
doesn't
make
me
proudest
but
of
our
past
I,
come
from
a
community
that
initiated
the
Chinese
Exclusion
Act
I,
remember
a
guy
by
the
name
of
dentist.
In
the
time
he
began
and
ended
in
every
speech.
A
By
saying
whatever
else
we
do,
Chinese
must
go
that
yellow
fever
led
to
the
Chinese,
Exclusion
Act
sure
a
black
eye
in
the
history
of
the
United
States
of
America,
our
state,
my
city,
but
one
thing
I
also
want
to
express,
is
deep,
deep
recognition
of
the
xenophobia,
the
racism
that
is
being
perpetuated
against
Asians
in
our
state.
We
have
seen
a
huge
increase
in
people
that
are
assaulting
people
on
the
basis
of
how
they
were
born.
The
way
they
look
and
I
just
want
folks
to
know.
We
are
better
than
that.
A
We
are
watching
that
we're
gonna
begin
to
enforce
that
more
aggressively
and
I
just
hope.
People
put
down
their
bigotry
their
bias
and
recognize
that
a
state
where
27
percent
of
us
are
foreign-born
a
state
that,
as
I
said,
is
truly
universal,
the
most
diverse
state
and
the
world's
most
diverse
democracy.
That,
in
order
to
meet
this
moment,
we
have
to
recognize
our
common
humanity,
and
so
it's
in
that
spirit,
I,
conclude
and
I.
Thank
all
my
fellow
Californians
for
recognizing
the
urgency
of
tonight's
call
and
over
the
course,
the
next
few
days.