►
Description
Governor Gavin Newsom provides an update on the state's response to the COVID-19 outbreak.
Recorded November 23, 2020 in Sacramento, California.
For more information regarding the impact of the COVID-19 outbreak in Cupertino, please visit https://www.cupertino.org/coronavirus
C
I
wanted
to
update
you,
though,
on
the
last
few
weeks
here
as
it
relates
to
our
covid
response
goes
without
saying,
and
we
updated
you
last
week
by
noting
that
the
week
prior-
and
this
has
extended
to
this
week
as
well-
we've
seen
an
unprecedented
number
and
new
rise
in
cases
here
in
the
state
of
california
related
to
coven.
Obviously,
this
extends
all
across
the
united
states
and
many
parts
of
the
world.
We're
not
immune
here
in
the
state
of
california.
You'll
see
on
this
slide.
C
Today's
coven
case
numbers
8
37
cases
in
our
latest
report.
This
is
on
a
basis
of
220
plus
thousand
tests
that
were
conducted
just
interestingly,
we
had
a
record
number
of
tests
that
we
collected
on
saturday
over
265
000
tests.
I've
said
this
many
many
times,
I'll
repeat
it
again
this
afternoon
we
are
not
ashamed
or
shy
about
testing,
nor
determining
those
that
are
positive.
It's
fundamental,
it's
foundational
in
our
covent
response
and,
as
one
would
expect,
the
more
people
we
test
and
testing
is
increasing.
C
We
expect
to
see
these
case
numbers
go
up,
but,
as
always
in
a
moment,
we'll
focus
on
the
essential
importance
of
positivity
rates.
Again
the
number
of
people
that
are
tested
that
test
positive
nonetheless,
that
8
337
number
appears
relatively
small
compared
to
that
seven
day,
average,
always
look
at
the
seven
and
fourteen
day,
averages
that
seven
day
average
getting
close
to
now.
Twelve
thousand
cases,
we've
simply
not
seen
this
since
the
beginning
of
the
pandemic.
C
That
said,
the
number
of
people
that
are
testing
positive,
the
number
of
new
cases
in
the
state
of
california,
the
age
cohort-
is
something
I
wanted
to
highlight
today.
It's
younger
than
80
than
50
years
old,
18
to
49
age
cohort.
That's
now
representing
60
of
all
of
our
new
cases
back
to
the
mythology
that
somehow
this
disease
separates
itself
exclusively
by
age
or
vulnerabilities
that
are
defined
by
pre-existing
conditions
and
the
like
it
transcends.
C
It
impacts
all
populations,
of
course,
not
equally
in
terms
of
its
ultimate
impact,
but
nonetheless
the
case
numbers
impact
age,
cohorts
across
the
spectrum
and,
as
you
can
see
in
this
chart
disproportionately
now
are
impacting
18
to
49
year
olds,
you'll
hear
from
dr
galley
in
just
a
moment.
He
could
talk
more
specifically
about
about
why
he
thinks
that
is
the
case.
Common
sense
would
dictate
the
why,
but
nonetheless,
dr
galley
will
talk
more
substantively
in
more
detail
terms
about
that
back
to
positivity
rate.
C
As
you
can
see
here,
the
total
average
number
of
cases
that
we're
bringing
in
each
and
every
day
is
getting
close
to
200
000..
I
mentioned
the
220
000
yesterday,
the
265
000
on
saturday
240
000
on
friday.
Those
case
rates
are
going
up
more
testing,
but
also
more
testing
is
occurring
across
the
spectrum
across
the
state,
and
that
is
a
very
good
thing.
Averaging
now,
over
a
seven
day
period,
a
little
over
198
000
tests
you'll
see
a
notation
that
the
seven
day,
positivity
rate
in
the
united
states
of
america
is
approaching.
10.
C
It's
been
around
9.8
to
10
percent.
In
the
last
week,
state
of
california
you'll
see
in
the
lower
right
of
this
slide,
our
14-day,
not
seven-day,
positivity
rate.
This
slide.
We
want
to
be
consistent
with
previous
slides
if
it's
tight,
but
our
14-day
positivity
rate
is
at
five
point.
Five
percent,
our
seven
day,
positivity
rate,
is
at
five
point:
eight
percent,
seven
day,
nine
point:
eight
percent
national
positivity
rate,
seven
day,
california
positivity
rate
substantially
lower
at
5.8
percent
14
day
and
5.5.
Let's
take
a
look,
though,
at
that
14
day,
positivity
rate.
C
Just
last
week,
when
I
updated
you
in
a
slide
presentation,
we
were
at
4.6
positivity
rate,
so
you
see
the
rate
of
increase
growing
and
that's
the
cause
of
obvious
concern
and
the
cause
for
some
of
the
recent
announcements
that
we've
made
in
this
state
and
I'll
remind
you
of
some
of
those
announcements
in
a
moment.
C
But
first
I
just
want
to
extend
as
we
do,
an
understanding
of
where
we
are
at
this
exact
moment,
not
just
as
it
relates
to
positivity
rates
and
case
rates,
but
always
hospitalizations
a
focus
on
hospitalizations
and
icus
foundational.
When
these
numbers
go
back
up.
How
prepared
are
we
in
our
health
care
delivery
system?
You
can
see
here
from
this
slide
over
the
14
day
period,
a
77
percent
increase
in
hospitalizations,
but
take
a
look
at
this
in
this
chart,
hopefully
familiar
with
many
of
you.
C
Last
week
we
were
at
5
of
our
health
care
system
capacity
represented
with
people
that
have
tested
positive
for
copa19.
It's
seven
percent
this
week,
five
percent
last
week,
seven
percent
this
week
of
the
entire
health
care
system
capacity
represented
with
cobit
19
positive
patients,
not
dissimilarly.
As
always,
we
experience
increased
rate
of
growth
of
hospitalizations,
we'll
expect
the
same
with
icu
admissions.
C
We're
seeing
a
55
percent
increase
a
little
more
modest
than
that
77
on
the
hospitalization
side,
but
nonetheless,
55
increase
in
icu
admissions
over
a
two-week
period
related
to
those
that
need
and
seek
critical
care
that
critical
care
capacity
last
week
was
17
of
all
of
our
icu
patients
representing
covet
19
positive
patients
today
that
13
rather
is
now
17,
so
up
to
seven
percent
hospital
capacity,
17
in
our
icu
capacity
I'll
remind
everyone.
C
We
have
11
surge
facilities
that
we
have
pre-positioned
all
throughout
the
state
of
california,
what
we
refer
to
as
warm
status,
porter
ville,
fairview
the
arco
arena
up
here
in
the
sacramento
county
area,
representing
close
to
2
000
beds
that
we
can
turn
on
and
provide
critical
care
capacity
outside
the
health
care
delivery
system
within
24
hours
as
long
as
96
hours,
none
of
these
beds
are
currently
occupied.
It
just
gives
you
a
sense
of
what
we're
prepared
for,
if,
indeed,
we
continue
to
see
these
trends
extend
for
weeks
and
weeks.
C
Perhaps
for
many
many
months
again,
we
have
not
just
been
sitting
on
our
hands.
We've
not
been
sitting
back
idly.
We
have
been
preparing
for
this
winter,
quite
literally,
not
just
figuratively
accordingly
and
you'll,
see
at
the
bottom
of
this
slide
the
represented
sample
of
some
of
the
ppe
that
we
put
in
our
cash
in
our
storage
facilities.
This
is
what
the
state
of
california
currently
has
well
over
half
a
billion
units
of
surgical
masks,
procedure,
masks
and
95
mass
also
face
shields
and
gallons.
C
In
addition,
of
course,
the
healthcare
delivery
system,
the
hospitals
clinics,
they
have
tens
of
millions,
hundreds
of
millions
more
units
of
ppe
themselves.
This
is
just
the
backup
that
we
have
accrued
over
the
course
of
many
many
months
when
we
boldly
went
to
procure
large-scale
ppe
that
we
were
able
to
draw
down
and
address
the
past
acuity
of
crisis
and
now
prepare
to
move
into
the
winter
months.
C
We,
as
I
noted
a
moment
ago,
have
done
a
number
of
things
over
the
last
few
weeks
again
not
to
sit
back
idly,
not
just
in
terms
of
preparing
for
the
medium
term
and
the
longer
term,
but
also
addressing
the
recent
increase
in
case
rates
and
positivity
rates.
We
refer
to
it
as
a
limited
stay-at-home
order,
just
looking
at
the
essential
nature
in
these
purple-tiered
counties
and
I'll
go
to
those
purple
tears
in
a
moment
exclusively
in
the
purple
tier
counties.
C
Dr
galley
announced
a
few
days
ago
on
friday
that
we
want
to
limit
non-essential
activities
past
10
p.m,
and
the
purpose
of
that
is
self-evident
that
people
that
are
staying
out,
congregating
mixing
late
late
at
night
in
those
counties
where
you
have
a
substantial
amount
of
community,
spread
background
rate
of
spread
represented
again
in
that
purple
tier
specifically,
we
want
to
limit
as
much
of
that
activity
as
possible,
there's
a
lot
of
exemptions
and,
by
the
way,
those
that
want
to
inquire
what
those
exemptions
are
and
our
strategies
and
thinking
around
that
go
to
the
covet19.ca.gov
website
covid19.ca.gov
website
and
learn
more
about
what
represents
essential
versus
non-essential
activities.
C
Again,
we
want
to
extend
this
for
a
four
week
period
and
this
is
effective
through
12
21.,
we're
hoping
that's
all
we'll
need,
but
we'll
see
we're
open-minded
to
the
dynamics
of
this
changing
well,
the
conditions
that
are
changing
in
real
time,
but
that's
the
current
hope
and
expectation
is
a
four-week
modification
to
that
stay-at-home
related
to
these
non-essential
activities.
C
Well,
the
specifics
on
the
status
of
these
tiers.
I
want
to
remind
you
that
we
updated
our
tiered
status
a
little
early
last
week.
We
traditionally
do
this
every
tuesday.
We
did
it
last
monday
applying
what
we
refer
to
as
this
emergency
break.
40
counties
moved
backwards,
not
forwards
into
more
restrictive,
not
less
restrictive,
tiers
I'll
remind
you.
C
We
have
four
tiers,
the
most
restrictive
being
the
purple
tier,
the
less
restrictive
red
least
restrictive,
two
tiers,
the
orange
tier
and
the
yellow
tier,
unfortunately,
now
moving
because
of
the
rate
and
spread
of
this
disease
now
to
41
of
our
58
counties
in
that
purple.
Tier
with
that,
we
also
last
week
and
previous
week
prior
to
the
stay-at-home
modifications
announcements,
the
travel
advisory.
C
Dr
galley,
will
talk
a
little
bit
more
about
that
in
a
moment
when
he
updates
you
around
holiday
planning
and
our
thinking
and
our
encouragement
and
guidelines
at
least
recommendations
around
this
thanksgiving
week.
But
travel
advisory
was
one
of
those
that
we
put
out
number
of
weeks
back
to
again
discourage
non-essential
travel
not
mandating,
but
discouraging
it
reminding
folks
when
they
come
back
into
the
state.
C
The
importance
of
doing
exactly
what
I'm
doing
as
it
relates
to
quarantining
and
making
sure
you
get
tested
and
avail
yourself
to
thinking
more
locally
in
terms
of
trying
to
regionalize
and
trying
to
organize
a
construct
to
minimize
the
amount
of
spread
outside
of
jurisdictions
outside
of
regions.
C
Again,
I
hesitate,
but
then
again
I
don't
repetition,
as
my
coach
used
to
say
is
the
mother
of
skill.
So
let
me
repeat
the
original
three-prong
strategy
now
adding
to
the
fourth
prong,
the
vaccination,
but
the
approach
we've
taken
from
the
beginning
of
this
pandemic,
the
three
prong
around
prevention
testing,
there's
notion
of
quarantine
and
isolating
you'll
recall
the
prevention
strategies
included
california,
leading
as
the
first
state
to
do
a
statewide
state
home
order.
C
We
move
forward
a
few
months
later
with
the
state
mass
mandate
that
600
plus
million
masks
units
that
have
been
distributed
already
again.
That's
not
including
what
we
have
in
storage
that
I
referenced
a
moment
ago
and
of
course,
this
week
now
13th
week.
Almost
of
this
tiered
status
that
we
put
into
effect
testing
has
improved
substantially
since
the
beginning
of
this
pandemic,
represented
in
those
198
000
tests
that
we
have
improved
upon
recently,
and,
of
course,
forgive
me,
that's
tea
that
I
just
got
in
my
snack
that
I
drank
a
moment
ago.
C
I
recognize
that
that
was
all
part
and
parcel
of
that
perkin
elmer
partnership
and
our
commitment
to
substantially
again
continue
to
increase
our
testing
capacity
and
our
ability
to
get
testing
results
in
that
window
of
24
to
48
hours
the
isolation
we
wanted
to
make
easier
job,
protected,
paid,
sick
leave
and,
again
all
the
work
that
we've
done.
That
we've
highlighted
pretty
consistently
here
to
help
our
cultural
workers,
farm
workers,
homeless,
individuals
and
others
to
provide
supports
we're
still
about
95
of
people
plus
or
minus.
C
This
number
changes
on
a
weekly
basis,
but
plus
or
minus
95
percent
of
people
that
are
testing
positive.
That
report
in
the
local
health
officers,
local
jurisdictions,
working
with
some
of
the
support
coming
from
the
state
of
california,
are
contacting
and
beginning
to
do
some
of
the
tracing
that
is
required
at
this
moment
within
a
24-hour
period.
But
again,
let's
talk
about
that.
C
Fourth
leg
of
the
stool
and
that's
what's
on
our
minds,
the
vaccines
now
made
more
well
more
focused
today
with
the
advent
of
potential
third
manufacturer
of
a
vaccine
that
will
be
entering
into
the
market.
We
expect
on
a
weekly
basis,
maybe
monthly
basis
and
eventually,
on
a
daily
basis,
more
and
more
manufacturers
to
enter
into
this
vaccine
place.
But
I
wanted
to
remind
you
all
on
where
we've
been
on
the
vaccine.
C
I
wanted
to
disclose
and
provide
more
information,
basically
take
the
veil
off
some
of
the
work
that
we
have
been
doing
as
it
relates
to
our
response
plan.
Our
vaccine
planning
we've
announced
on
multiple
occasions.
C
Some
of
the
work
that
we
did
as
it
relates
to
our
micro
planning
work
is
one
of
five
jurisdictions
with
the
federal
government
working
with
the
cdc
and
the
department
of
defense
on
organizing
our
vaccination
planning,
and
we
did
so
because
of
california's
scale,
our
expertise,
the
incredible
resource
that
we
have
here:
human
resource
and
other
physical
resources
we
have
for
logistics
and
distribution,
but
perhaps
more
important
than
anything
else.
Just
the
question
of
scale
as
it
relates
to
our
response
plan.
You'll
recall
the
cdc
put
out
their
playbook
in
september.
C
One
month
later
we
put
out
our
vaccination
plan
and
we
provided
it
to
the
cdc.
The
max
the
mass
vaccination
efforts
come
with
experience
in
mind
and
that's
the
work
that
we're
doing
at
scale
to
vaccinate
people
through
our
annual
flu
vaccinations.
C
The
experience
that
we
accrued
and
learned
from
with
h1n1
hepatitis,
a
and
others
we're
building
off
an
existing
infrastructure
at
the
state
and
local
level,
and
a
history
of
well-organized
partnerships
that
have
been
developed
at
all
levels,
all
across
the
state
of
california.
I
say
this
because
I
want
folks
to
know
we're
not
starting
from
scratch.
There's
a
sense-
and
I
I
watch
some
of
the
punditry
on
the
national
media-
that
this
is
something
unprecedented.
It's
on
unparalleled.
C
Those
doses
are
administered
within
90
to
120
days
every
single
calendar
year
this
on
top
of
the
tens
of
millions
of
routine
vaccinations
that
are
administered
on
a
yearly
basis,
all
throughout
the
state
of
california.
C
Those
are
being
administered
in
settings
that
are
also
very
familiar
to
individuals.
These
clinical
settings
and
have
been
proven
in
terms
of
building
trust
with
partnerships
with
local
health
officers
and
again
with
h1n1
experience.
We
have
more
contemporary
experience
on
something
that
was
a
little
abnormal.
C
That
allows
us
to
learn
some
lessons
in
terms
of
that
distribution
plan.
By
the
way,
I'm
not
naive,
the
h1n1
didn't
require
as
much
masking
didn't
require
as
much
physical
distancing
didn't
require
as
much
ppe,
as
our
current
planning
protocols
require,
but
nonetheless
provide
an
enormous
amount
of
clues
and
examples
that
have
allowed
us
to
build
a
framework
for
our
efforts
and
for
our
prioritizations
I'll,
remind
everybody
that
the
first
tranche
of
vaccinations
with
pfizer
and
moderna
and
astrazeneca,
which
we'll
talk
about
just
in
a
moment,
will
be
extraordinarily
limited.
C
So
we
begin
a
framework
of
scarcity
and,
as
a
consequence,
we've
been
thinking
through
for
many
many
months,
not
just
many
weeks,
but
many
many
months
of
making
sure
we
are
aligned
with
that
with
the
nation's
leading
ethnicians
of
sorts
forgiven,
making
up
a
word
but
ethicists
as
it
relates
to
prioritization,
as
it
relates
to
the
federal
guidance.
That's
already
been
put
out
in
broad
strokes
and
the
work
that
the
national
economy
of
sciences
have
put
out.
C
We've
been
informed
by
worlds
experts,
not
just
national
experts,
on
what
the
prioritization
planning
should
be
like,
and
so
we
have
put
out-
and
we
put
this
out
a
few
weeks
ago-
what
we
refer
to
as
our
phase
one
prioritizations,
and
it
shouldn't
surprise
anybody
that
the
phase
one
vaccination
distribution
plan
in
terms
of
prioritization
is
focusing
first
and
foremost
on
our
health
care
workers.
These
truly
essential
workers
that
are
now
experiencing
even
more
stress
after
months
and
months
of
intense
stress
stress.
C
Not
only
have
they
been
on
this
marathon
now
we're
all
on
this
sprint
to
a
vaccine
and
we're
being
called
out
to
do
now
more
than
ever
after
this
exhausting
nine
to
ten
months.
So
we
are
prioritizing
those
health
care
workers,
we're
also
prioritizing
individuals
in
congregate,
care
settings,
those
that
are
medically
vulnerable,
skilled
nursing
facilities,
residential
care
facilities,
assisted
living
facilities
and
like
and,
of
course,
our
first
responders
and
other
critical
infrastructure
where
we're
making
sure
we're
protecting
those
that
are
protecting
the
most
vulnerable
and
the
majority
of
californians.
C
So
that's
phase
one
of
our
planning.
Let's
get
underneath
that
a
little
bit
more
and
talk
about
the
announcement
today
of
astrazeneca
and
about
their
third
possible
vaccine
may
not
be
have
the
same
level
of
efficacy
that
the
pfizer
moderna
have,
but
nonetheless
encouraging
news.
We
are
waiting
for
this
likely
fda
approval
of
at
least
one
or
more
of
these
vaccines
to
occur
in
a
number
of
weeks.
C
But
I
want
to
remind
everybody
that
mass
vaccination
and
the
distribution
available
to
mass
vaccinations
is
unlikely
to
occur
anytime
soon
for
the
back
of
the
envelope
purposes
march
april
may
june
july,
where
we
start
to
scale,
and
we
start
getting
into
these
subsequent
phases.
Phase
two
in
phase
three
and
prioritizations
I'll
talk
more
about
that
in
a
moment
as
well.
I
want
to
remind
you
of
some
of
the
things
that
we
have
socialized
in
previous
announcements.
C
I'll
remind
you
again
of
where
we
are
on
those
critical
efforts,
one
of
the
most
important
scientific
safety
review
committee
that
we
put
together
put
together
not
only
as
a
state
but
in
partnership
with
governor
inslee
and
governor
brown
in
oregon
and
washington
state.
They
are
joining
our
efforts
and
that's
that
safety
review
working
group
has
been
working
hard
and
I'll.
Let
you
know
what
they've
been
up
to
in
a
moment.
C
We
also
created
this
drafting
guidelines,
work
group,
which
is
around
not
just
safety
and
efficacy
of
the
vaccine,
but
those
priorities
and
developing
those
phases
and
making
sure
that
we
are
meeting
the
moment
by
providing
for
those
that
are
most
in
need
most
acute
most
precious
in
terms
of
their
importance
in
those
congregate
facilities,
those
health
care
workers
making
sure
we're
getting
those
vaccines
in
an
equitable
and
timely
manner
out
first,
but
in
order
to
do
that,
we
also
have
this
advisory
committee.
C
So
it's
three
committees,
safety
review
committee,
this
prioritization
drafting
work
group
committee
and
that
committee
will
report
to
an
advisory
committee
made
up
of
non-profits
others
that
I'll
talk
about
in
a
moment
that
will
help
make
sure
that
that
work
group
on
the
drafting
guidelines
work
group.
The
privatizations
are
truly
being
done
with
that
equity
lens.
We
are
just
being
stubborn
on
that,
because
we're
committed
to
getting
that
right.
We
don't
want
that
to
be
a
platitude.
C
We
want
to
drive
real
deliverable
in
that
space
and,
again,
that's
why
this
advisory
vaccine
committee
is
so
important.
But
let
me
break
down
a
little
bit
of
where
we
are
in
these
three
committees
briefly
and
then
I'll
turn
it
over
to
dr
galley
and,
of
course,
we're
here
to
answer
any
questions
that
anyone
may
have
on
this
on
the
scientific
safety
review
committee.
They
have
reviewed
phase
1
and
phase
2
data
they've
already
reviewed
that,
and
they
have
no
concerns
so
far.
C
They
are
looking
forward
to
getting
and
being
able
to
access
the
phase
three
data
when
the
fda
and
the
cdc
receives
that
information,
and
we
will
expedite
that
review
within
24
hours
to
avoid
any
delay.
I
just
want
to
mitigate
any
concern
that
the
creation
of
the
seismic
safety
review
in
any
way
shape
or
form
will
delay
the
access
and
distribution
of
the
vaccine.
It's
about
building
trust,
building
capacity
and
partnership,
and
it's
about
moving
as
quickly
and
efficiently
as
possible
to
just
have
another
set
of
eyes
on
these
phase.
Three
data.
C
After
reviewing
phase
one
and
two
on
phase
three
data,
as
it
becomes
available
I'll
remind
you
on
the
guidelines
working
group
that
they've
been
meeting
consistently
over
the
last
three
weeks
every
friday.
I
think
the
last
meeting
was
over
three
hours,
if
average
over
three
plus
hours-
it's
neither
here
nor
there,
except
to
say
it's
a
very
dynamic
engaged
group,
and
we
have
a
really
remarkable,
diverse
group
of
individuals
that
are
contributing
their
time
and
energy
to
make
sure
we
get
things
right.
C
They
are
the
ones
responsible
for
that
phase,
one
plan,
but
we
break
out
phase
one
in
phase
one
a
and
phase
one
a
again
is
targeting
those
2.4
million
health
care
workers.
Now
we're
not
naive
ability
to
do
what
we
hope
we
can
do
in
phase
1a
will
be
limited
based
upon
the
availability,
the
doses
of
the
first
tranche
of
vaccines.
C
The
planning
for
phase
2
and
three
that
framework
requires
more
time
more
deliberation
and
based
upon
where
the
targeted
vaccination
availability
is.
We
believe
it's
best
to
roll
out
the
beginning
to
mid
january,
this
community
advisory
committee,
as
I
mentioned,
and
you
see
a
sense
of
who
they
are
community
groups-
school
leaders,
school
leaders.
C
Any
vaccination
plan
has
to
also
provide
prioritization
and
will
in
those
subsequent
phases
to
our
critical
staff,
our
teachers
paraprofessionals
and
make
available
as
parents
want
to
our
kids
in
order
to
prioritize
getting
our
schools
reopened
in
a
safe
manner.
But
that's
why
we
include
school
leaders
in
this
advisory
committee
and
we
have
others
on
that
committee.
That
will
also
provide
guidance
and
feedbacks
to
that
work.
Group
and
again,
we
expect
they'll
have
that
first
tranche
recommendation
as
early
as
the
end
of
the
month
december
1st.
C
We
also
then
will
make
it
available
on
the
covet
19.ca.gov
website.
The
goal
is
to
have
this
website
available
for
the
portal
for
everybody
to
be
able
to
access
information
of
when
their
accessing
opportunities
present
themselves.
So,
as
we
review
as
we
sign
off
on
these
drafts,
we
make
them
final,
we'll
get
them
up
as
soon
as
we
possibly
can
again
on
the
covit19.ca.gov
website.
I
want
to
go
back
just
briefly
now
to
pfizer
and
mckesson,
and
you
say
pfizer
mckesson,
why
not
pfizer
and
moderna?
C
Well,
here's
an
interesting
fact
that
not
everybody
has
been
privy
to
some
have
reported
it.
Others
have
not
pfizer
has
one
distribution
strategy.
Moderna
has
a
separate
and
distinct
distribution
strategy,
so
we're
working
to
tailor
two
approaches
in
terms
of
of
subs.
Well,
basically,
parallel
and
supportive
strategies
for
both
pfizer
and
moderna
pfizer
is
doing
direct
provider
distribution
based
upon
a
pre-existing
network
of
well-established
groups,
clinics,
hospital
settings
plans
and
the
like
moderna
is
working
with
an
intermediary.
C
Mckesson
mckesson
is
well
known
to
californians
used
to
be
a
california-based
headquartered
companies
to
be
a
san
francisco,
based
headquartered
company
they're
at
scale
and
they're.
The
intermediary
we're
working
directly
with
that's
working
with
moderna
on
their
distribution
plan,
but
remember
they're,
not
sending
the
vaccines
to
the
state
for
the
state
to
redistribute
these
vaccines
they're,
sending
these
vaccines
directly
to
providers.
So
let's
take
a
look
at
what
that
means.
C
Well,
we
know
with
pfizer
that
means
that
the
vaccine
that
they
have
requires
these
ultra
low
temperatures,
these
these
temperatures
that
make
well
distribution
transportation
of
the
vaccine,
particularly
challenging
these
require
these
ult
freezers.
They
require
some
dry
ice
accessibility
that
can
be
made
more
challenging
in
rural
parts
of
the
state.
More
remote
parts
of
the
state
and
that's
why
we
currently
are
working
to
substitute,
not
substitute
data.
C
You
think
mono
county,
you
think,
cisco.
You
think
parts
of
the
state
where
it's
more
challenging
more
difficult.
Where
pfizer
may
not
have
the
traditional
provider
network,
we
have
got
to
supplement
and
support
to
get
these
vaccines
out
or
even
within
dense
urban
environments.
To
make
sure
again,
an
equity
lens
is
our
focus
and
that's
why
these
smaller
freezers
and
these
other
transport
containers
are
also
part
of
our
planning,
and
our
current
procurement
strategy.
Moderna
again
doesn't
require
these
ultra
low
freezers
and
they're
more
easily
stored,
more
easily
transported.
C
So
again,
two
different
strategies,
two
different
plans-
people
have
asked.
Well,
how
do
you
pay
for
all
this?
I've
seen
some
governors
say?
Well,
we
just
don't
have
the
money
and
and
oftentimes
that
leaves
people
wondering
well
what
the
heck
does
that
mean?
Are
they
just
giving
up?
Are
they
just
waiting
for
the
binding
administration
to
come
in
office?
We're
not
waiting
for
anything
we'll
be
creative,
we'll
find
the
resources
we'll
always
we
maintain
a
resourceful
mindset.
C
We
obviously
need
more
support
from
the
federal
government,
particularly
as
we
get
into
phase
two
and
three,
but
for
the
purposes
of
phase
one
planning.
I
want
folks
to
know
what
is
represented
here
in
this
slide.
To
date,
the
cdc
has
provided
the
state
of
california
28
million
dollars
for
our
vaccine
distribution.
C
C
C
No
greater
partnership
than
speaker
nancy
pelosi,
working
very
collaboratively
with
her
working
with
minority
leader,
another
california,
representative,
mccarthy,
working
with
our
california
delegation
and
working
with
the
transition
team,
including
vice
president,
elect
kamala
harris
to
make
sure
that
we
are
getting
our
asks
in
and
we'll
be
more
specific
on
what
those
asks
may
look
like
as
it
relates
to
getting
new,
cares,
act,
funding
or
more
specific
targeted
funding
for
vaccine
distributions,
but
again
we're
not
just
sitting
in
our
hands.
That's
what
we
need.
C
C
Well,
we
will
be
submitting
to
the
legislature
a
new
budget,
I'm
working
on
the
state
budget
for
the
next
fiscal
year,
we'll
be
submitting
that
budget
in
january,
with
more
detailed,
specific
prescriptive
asks
for
support
for
concurrence
with
the
legislature,
we'll
try
to
draw
as
many
dollars
we
can
from
the
federal
government
down,
and
then
we
look
forward
to
the
next
stimulus,
but
we're
not
going
to
wait
for
that
next
stimulus
to
keep
the
momentum
and
do
what
we
need
to
do
to
get
these
these
vaccines
out,
and
that
includes
by
the
way,
a
public
awareness
and
media
campaign.
C
That's
tens
of
millions
of
dollars,
we're
developing
the
psas.
That's
a
multi-faceted
effort,
not
just
traditional
tv
broadcast,
broadcast
radio,
but
more
culturally
competent
messaging
and
messengers
that
are
trusted
messengers
and
diverse
communities
to
develop
again.
Trust
vaccine
will
be
distributed
at
the
speed
of
trust
and
develop
some
momentum
as
these
vaccines
become
available.
So
people
know
when
where
and
how
to
access
these
vaccines
supplies
remain.
Perhaps
the
most
costly
of
all
of
the
requests
that
we
have
made
of
the
federal
government,
ppe
and
the
like.
C
That's
tens
of
millions
plus
plus
I'll,
remind
you,
h1n1
didn't
require
the
masking
didn't
require
each
one
in
in
the
ppe
that
this
distribution
plan
will
require
the
physical
distancing.
All
of
that
will
require
sanitation
and
protocols.
C
That
will
indeed
be
costly,
and
we
need
to
supplement
what
our
providers
are
getting
in
terms
of
their
support
and
make
sure
that
we
are
hitting
that
issue
head
on
course,
data
and
we
can
could
talk
for
hours
and
hours
about
large-scale
procurement
of
I.t
in
this
state,
and
we
are
turning
the
page
on
some
of
those
efforts
and
we
have
a
lot
more
to
say
on
that
topic
in
the
next
months,
and
certainly
next
year's
budget.
C
But
the
issue
of
I.t
and
data
management
is
critical
and
I'll
just
end
on
this
and
pass
it
over
to
dr
galley,
because
I
think
it's
important
because
it's
always
been
a
stubborn
point
of
concern
as
it
relates
to
anything
we
do
at
scale
and
our
ability
for
existing
systems
to
manage
at
the
scale
of
a
pandemic.
I'll
remind
you
that
there
are
two
it
strategies.
C
You
have
the
interface
with
the
public,
which
is
our
current
california,
immunization
registry.
It's
an
existing
platform
called
the
care
system.
That's
already
in
place,
it's
a
relatively
relatively
good
system,
but
it's
not
good
enough.
We
believe
to
address
all
of
the
needs
in
the
state
and
that's
why
we
have
been
going
through
an
advanced
procurement
process,
we're
looking
as
early
as
the
next
10
days
to
get
the
finalists
signed
off
to
do
an
end-to-end
it
strategy.
C
That's
why
you
see
in
this
slide
two
phases
of
I.t
development
both
december
as
early
as
december,
1st
and
january,
but
also
it's
critical,
that
we
lock
in
with
our
providers
and
that's
the
clinics
and
the
hospitals
etc.
The
distribution
that
eventually
will
be
out
into
many
of
the
pharmacies
in
the
state
that
we
have
provider
registration,
reporting,
tracking
ordering
all
of
that
needs
to
feed
into
our
state
system
and
not
just
that
direct
interface
with
users
through
the
care
system.
So
all
of
that
we've
been
working
on.
C
D
C
An
update
on
where
we
are
on
vaccinations,
we
are
making
real
progress,
I'm
very
proud
of
the
teams
that
we
have
pre-assembled
we're
not
reacting
to
this
moment,
we've
leaned
into
it.
We've
been
proactive
and
closing.
Before
I
turn
over
dr
galli,
we
also
are
blessed
to
be
supported
by
the
new
covet
advisory
committee
that
vice
president
elect
now
president
rather
elect
joe
biden
has
organized
that
included
includes
by
the
way
one
of
our
scientific
safety
review
committee
members
that
the
president-elect
took
to
be
part
of
the
national
advisory
committee.
C
This,
in
addition
to
those
other
californians
that
are
also
on
that
national
advisory
committee,
so
we're
very
blessed
to
have
strong
relationships
with
the
current
administration
vis-a-vis,
this
vaccination
strategy
and
even
stronger
still
with
the
incoming
administration.
C
But
with
that,
I
want
to
now
turn
it
over
to
dr
galley
and
talk
about
incoming,
and
that
is
the
number
of
inquiries
that
he
has
received
around
gatherings
for
thanksgiving
and
the
likelihood
that
we
will
see
an
increase
in
spread
of
transmissions
as
we
see
more
and
more
mixing
and
what
we
are
doing
to
prepare
for
that.
C
E
Radar,
thank
you
governor
and
thank
you
all
all
for
tuning
in
governor
you,
as
always,
did
a
tremendous
job
explaining
where
we
are
on.
What
is
a
really
hopeful
topic
which
is
vaccinations
california
is
preparing,
has
been
preparing
and
is
ready
to
work
with
our
local
partners,
our
federal
partners,
to
make
sure
that
vaccines
which
are
really
weeks
away
for
some
populations,
are,
are
ready
and
that
we
use
it
as
the
important
tool
that
they
are.
E
But
now
more
than
ever
with
that
hopeful
news,
it's
important
that
we
keep
our
guard
up
and
we
keep
doing
the
things
that
we've
been
talking
about
over
the
last
many
months.
It's
not
that
there's
a
promise
that
everyone
will
get
the
vaccine
in
the
first
few
months
of
the
year,
but
some
of
our
most
vulnerable
individuals,
those
who
are
working
on
the
front
lines
of
our
hospitals
that
are
exposed
almost
every
day
to
covet
19
will
be
protected.
E
That's
great
news
for
our
communities,
and
it
tells
me
and
tells
us
that
the
dependence
on
continuing
to
keep
our
guard
up
like
we
can
make
it.
We
can
do
this
as
a
state
and
we've
done
it
before,
and
we
need
to
continue
doing
that
and
with
this
thanksgiving
holiday
coming
up
it's
an
important
week
to
emphasize
all
of
those
protective
factors,
and
the
governor
mentioned
on
an
earlier
slide
that
just
sixty
percent
of
our
cases
are
or
a
full.
Sixty
percent
of
our
cases
are
among
those
19
to
49
years
old.
E
So
a
vast
majority
of
the
cases
or
those
who
we
test
who
are
infected
are
in
that
age
category.
Yet
they
make
up
only
seven
percent
of
those
who
have
the
worst
outcome
in
death
in
this
state.
E
E
So
what
does
it
mean
for
our
traditional
thanksgiving
celebrations
or
celebrations
in
the
many
weeks
to
come,
when
we
bring
together
many
generations
for
traditions
and
celebration,
and
a
great
time
together
that
those
younger
individuals
who
many
are
not
sick
or
not
very
sick,
not
sick
at
all,
they're,
the
asymptomatic
or
pre-symptomatic
individuals?
Folks
who
will
never
need
to
go
into
an
urgent
care
center,
an
emergency
room
or
be
admitted
that
they
are
exactly
the
individuals.
E
E
Even
at
the
height
of
our
june
and
july
peak
of
cases,
we
now
have
hospitals
across
the
state
that
are
telling
us
that
their
census,
the
number
of
people
with
covenant
19
in
their
hospitals,
is
higher
than
it's
ever
been,
and
we
know
that
cases
are
still
rising
and
the
overall
average
number
of
cases
over
a
seven
day
period
is
a
lot
higher
than
what
it
used
to
be.
So
what
that
means
is
we
need
to
do
our
part?
We
need
to
help,
stop
the
spread
and
recognize
that
the
days
to
come
are
really
important.
E
What
our
decisions
are.
I've
had
countless
conversations
with
friends
and
family,
but
a
lot
of
californians
who've
reached
out
and
said
you
know:
we've
decided
to
change
what
our
thanksgiving
meal
looks
like,
instead
of
doing
it
later
in
the
day,
we're
going
to
move
it
up,
we're
going
to
try
to
move
it
outside
to
catch
a
little
bit
of
the
warmer
weather.
Thankfully,
it
looks
like
we'll
have
some
sun
on
that
day
that
there
are
some
options,
even
at
this
day,
just
a
few
days
ahead
to
change
that
plan
and
maybe
do
something
slightly
differently.
E
So
we
know
that
this
is
all
part
of
stopping
the
spread
doing
our
part
and
hopefully
helping
get
california
through
the
next
many
weeks,
as
we
anticipate
parts
of
our
communities
getting
the
vaccine
next
slide.
So
the
clearest
guidance
is
celebrate
with
your
own
household.
There's
lots
of
ways
to
connect
with
those
that
you
love.
I
know
that
we're
going
to
be
zooming
with
loved
ones.
E
My
mom
in
particular
a
lot
of
the
day
on
thursday,
traditionally
she'd
come
and
visit
us
and
be
with
our
family,
but
we're
going
to
keep
it
safe
and
zoom
and
interact
with
her
that
way.
Of
course,
we
know
that
some
people
are
not
able
to
prepare
a
meal,
and
maybe
that's
the
urge
to
gather
with
them,
but
there's
other
ways
to
support
those
individuals
to
make
that
connection,
dropping
off
a
meal
and
then
sharing
it
when
you
zoom
together.
E
E
So,
as
we
end
every
time
and
before
I
kick
it
back
over
to
the
governor
and
open
it
up
for
questions,
just
remind
you
of
these
four
basic
things,
and
you
know,
even
as
I
put
it
up,
I
I
you
know
really
want
to
push
forward
this
idea
that
yeah
you've
heard
wear
the
mask,
and
many
of
you
are
tired
of
wearing
it.
But
we
ask
you
as
much
as
you
can
to
keep
it
on.
E
We
put
out
the
guidance
we
let
you
know
how
and
where
to
use
your
mask,
but
it's
really
a
choice
that
each
of
us
has
to
make
and
not
just
make
in
the
morning,
and
you
know,
but
something
we
have
to
make
throughout
the
day
physically
distance.
E
That's
a
important
thing
hard
to
do
when
we're
keeping
our
distance
from
loved
ones,
but
all
the
more
important
now
washing
our
hands
and
minimizing
the
mixing,
and
this
really
comes
back
to
in
the
days
to
come,
keeping
it
with
our
households
and
reaching
out
to
loved
ones
in
a
different
way
than
we
normally
do.
So,
with
that
look
forward
to
the
questions
and
governor
back
to
you,.
C
Dr
galley,
just
because
the
awkward
silence,
maybe
I'll,
just
ask
you,
as
we
figure
out
the
calls
question
about
the
issue
of
travel
advisory,
what
that
means
vis-a-vis
thanksgiving,
obviously
so
much
the
national
attention
has
been
focused
on
airports
and
people
traveling
all
across
this
country,
coming
back
into
the
state
of
california
after
traveling
in
other
parts
of
the
country.
Perhaps
you
give
us
a
sense
of
what
your?
What
your
reason
we
put
out
that
advisory
and
your
concerns
in
that
space.
E
Yeah
thanks
governor
and
and
like
many
other
parts
of
the
nation,
we're
concerned
about
people
traveling
during
the
holiday
season
that
they
go
and
they're
in
an
environment.
Maybe
where
transmission
rates
are
much
much
higher
much
of
the
country's
experiencing
higher
rates
of
transmission
than
california
and
visiting
even
just
a
few
friends
keeping
it
short
and
coming
back.
E
Just
those
travels.
Expose
you
to
a
level
of
profit
19
that,
as
you
come
back
into
the
state,
we're
really
encouraging
you
to
do
do
what
you're
doing
governor,
which
is
quarantine,
make
sure
that
you
weren't
infected
that
you
don't
end
up
inadvertently,
passing
it
on
to
other
members
of
your
community
and
we
can
keep
the
spread
low.
E
C
Last
week
and
sort
of
anticipating
your
questions,
we
figured
this
out.
You
you
announced
on
friday
this
non-essential
recommendation,
people
past
10
p.m,
to
5
a.m,
for
non-essential
activities
and
on
monday,
basically
implied
that
we
were
not
only
looking
at
it,
but
that
we
were
looking
at
the
studies,
the
efficacy
of
of
of
these
efforts
around
the
world.
C
I
think
referred
to
three
specific
studies
last
monday
that
we
had
reviewed
that
you
had
provided
your
team
and
reviewed
et
cetera
the
work
that
was
done
in
virginia
relating
to
alcohol
consumption
massachusetts,
other
parts
of
the
country
that
have
limited
versions,
including
many
cities,
not
just
states.
Maybe
you
can
give
folks
that
may
not
have
tuned
in
friday
an
overview
of
what
the
thinking
was
in
terms
of
that
recommendation
and
why
you
think
it's
important
at
this
stage.
E
One
is
really
we
we
want
to
continue
to
communicate
and
provide
provide
information
to
all
of
californians
that,
where
we
are
right
now
is
different
than
where
we
were
before
we're
in
a
point
of
surge
that
we
have
to
take
out
all
of
the
tools
in
our
toolbox
and
and
apply
them
here,
and
it
is
in
part,
a
symbol
and
a
message
to
all
of
our
public
that
what
we're
facing
every
little
bit
matters-
and
I
was
asked
you
know-
why
is
it
the
ten
to
five?
E
That's
special
one
reporter
said?
Can
the
can
covet
tell
time-
and
I
said
you
know-
handily-
no,
of
course,
there's
there's
no
reason
why
between
10
and
5
a.m,
doing
the
exact
same
things
done
at
10
in
the
morning
that
covid
will
behave
any
differently,
but
what
we
do
know
and
what
you
alluded
to
is
that
oftentimes
during
that
time
period,
non-essential
gatherings
non-essential
coming
together
really
does
happen
without
the
best
protective
tools
people
take
off
their
mask,
they
come
a
little
closer
than
they
should
they.
E
You
know
celebrate
and,
and
do
certain
things
that
allow
transmission
to
go
pretty
quickly.
I
say
that
covet
goes
from
zero
to
sixty
in
no
time,
and
that
happens
when
all
those
protective
factors
are
down.
E
So
you
know
this
is
a
tool
for
us
across
california,
in
our
purple
counties
that
are
facing
the
worst
of
our
surge
to
be
additive,
with
all
the
other
tools
that
we
have,
and
we
hope
and
we're
looking
closely
at
our
data
to
see
if
that
begins,
to
turn
the
tide
on
these
impressive
case
numbers
and
hopefully
in
time
to
keep
our
hospitals
in
good
shape.
So
we
can
continue
to
provide
care
to
those
who
need
it
and
who
are
sick.
C
And
and
before
we,
we
open
up
the
questions
and
it
looks
like
we
finally
figured
that
out.
I
just
want
to
just
ask
you
one
additional
question
in
anticipation
question
it's
been
brought
up
a
number
of
times
and
we
made
the
point
last
week
that
we
were
putting
this
emergency
break
on
as
it
relates
to
our
tiered
status,
rather
than
waiting
until
traditional
tuesday
announcement
your
tuesday
at
noon.
Announcement
on
new
tears,
we
moved
on
monday.
C
We
made
the
point
that
we
will
in
real
time,
continue
to
assess
if
we
were
going
to
move
tears
in
based
upon
the
epidemiology
based
upon
the
spread
on
friday,
there
was
a
review.
You
made
the
determination
that
we
were
not
moving
forward
just
preview
a
little
bit
tomorrow.
You
will
be
making
announcements
updating
based
upon
the
data
getting
this
weekend.
Maybe
you
can
just
preview
a
little
bit
about
what
you
expect
to
be
saying
tomorrow.
E
Yeah,
so
thanks
governor,
yes,
just
to
reiterate,
we
did,
as
you
promised,
looked
at
the
data
at
the
end
of
last
week
and
ran
it
like
we
do
every
week
and
indeed
no
additional
counties
made
to
your
movement.
So
we
didn't
and
we
agreed
that
if
a
county
needed
to
move,
we
would
move
them
quickly
so
that
we
could
begin
to
stem
the
tide
on
the
surge
in
those
areas.
E
Tomorrow.
We
anticipate
that
there
will
be
some
tier
movement,
handful
of
counties
likely
moving
to
a
more
restrictive
tier
and
maybe
even
a
county
or
two
that
that
are
showing
that
they
are
getting
containment
on
the
virus
and
potentially
meeting
that
one
week
mark
to
move
forward
so
again
a
mixed
picture
across
california.
We
are
always
looking
at
the
data
trying
to
be
as
current
as
we
can
and
we
report
it
as
such
and
we
treat
counties
as
such.
You
have
said
that
california
shouldn't
be
treated
in
the
aggregate
that
we
have
regions.
E
C
Excellent
with
that,
we
happy
now
answer
any.
F
We
could
hear
him
on
the
line,
but
it
sounds
like
you
couldn't
he
wanted
to
know
if
you
have
lost
credibility
after
photos
have
circulated
of
you
at
the
birthday
party
earlier
this
month
you
weren't
wearing
a
mask
in
those
photos,
and
yet
you
were
talking
very
closely
with
other
people.
Can
you
can
you
speak
to
that
and
tell
us
what
precautions
you
were
taking
at
that
party?
You
said
you'd
taken
precautions,
but
it
was
not
clear
that
that
was
happening
from
those
photos.
C
Yeah,
no,
I
made
a
mistake.
I
apologized
we
had
dinner
four
o'clock
dinner
in
an
orange-tiered
county,
we're
not
telling
people
they
can't
eat,
but
indeed
I
made
a
mistake
being
with
few
extra
people
beyond
the
guidelines
that
I've
been
promoting,
which
is
outside
the
households.
C
That
was
a
mistake,
and
I
let
my
guard
down
and
I
apologize
for
it
and
and
we're
moving
to
correct
that
in
terms
of
working
hard
working
harder
every
single
day,
never
made
that
mistake
before
I
haven't
made
it
since,
and
I
won't
make
it
again
period
full
stop.
F
Emily
hoven
cal
matters,
hey
governor.
As
you
know,
the
state
controller
benny
yee
has
been
saying
for
months.
The
secretary
of
state's
office
doesn't
have
budgetary
authority
to
pay
for
a
35
million
dollar
contract
awarded
to
sjd
ickerbocker.
F
C
Campaign
I'll
leave
I'll
leave
the
controllers
perfectly,
situated
first
of
all,
deep
admiration
for
our
controller
and
her
character,
her
competency
and
her
judgment.
The
controller
is
reviewing
that
she
will
make
an
independent
assessment,
and
I
look
forward
to
that
review
and
to
her
counsel.
I
will
happily
answer
that
question
after
I
have
the
benefit
of
her
review
and
independent.
D
Thank
you,
governor
first
off
nice
bookcase.
Secondly,
I'm
wondering
how
does
this
experience
for
you
of
quarantining
at
home?
Maybe
change
the
way
you
think
about
this
experience
that
so
many
californians
have
gone
through
and
a
follow-up
to
the
question
about
the
curfew
which
I
appreciate
you
asking
dr
galley
a
few
moments
ago,
but
I
talked
on
friday
with
dr
burks
at
the
white
house
about
the
science
behind
curfew.
C
No-
and
I
really
appreciate
that
question
dr
galley
answer
that
more
specificity,
but
you
may
recall.
Last
monday
I
implied
my
own
hesitancy
as
relates
to
being
open
to
argument
interested
in
evidence
based
upon
the
studies
that
have
been
conducted,
and
we
have
the
benefit
of
three
studies
and
and
some
show
some
very
positive.
Behavioral
changes,
others
a
little
more
inconclusive.
C
So
I'm
very
aware
of
of
that
in
the
context
of
this
ongoing
debate,
but
we
based
upon
not
only
the
analysis
and
review
of
those
studies
but
based
upon
our
engagement
with
our
colleagues
across
this
country,
health
officers
across
the
country,
other
governors
and
their
review.
Based
upon
all
of
that,
we
made
the
assessment
that
we
wanted
to
give
this
a
go.
Dr
galley
could
talk
more
specifically
about
his
independent
analysis
and
not
just
the
analysis
that
was
conducted
in
those
three
studies
that
we
were
referring
to.
E
Yeah,
thank
you
for
the
question
and
and
I'll
tell
you
one
of
the
things
that
we
did.
I
believe
differently
than
some
other
states
with
the
curfew
and
remember
we
called
ours.
A
limited
stay
at
home
because
part
of
the
entire
approach
and
concept
was
not
just
to
ask
business
sectors
to
stop
operating
between
those
times
of
10
and
5
am
but
also
that
household
gathering
shouldn't
occur.
E
So
you
know
the
guidance
isn't
just
a
let's
not
do
it
in
the
businesses
in
the
restaurants
and
the
bars
and
the
other
areas,
or
even
outside
in
the
open,
and
although
really
difficult
to
enforce
or
regulate
the
signal
and
the
messages
and
don't
take
these
same
activities
indoors,
because
that's
exactly
where
spread
could
occur.
So
it
was
meant
to
complement
the
other
effects
of
curfews
from
other
areas
and
enhance
it
with
an
additional
restriction
for
the
time
limited
period
of
about
4
weeks
30
days
in
the
purple
counties.
C
And
so
that's
I
mean
the
bottom
line
is
none
of
us
are
ideological
about
this.
In
the
spirit
of
your
question,
we
are
open
argument
interested
in
evidence
we've
committed
to
a
four-week
process
based
upon
the
significant
increase
in
and
transmission
rates.
C
We
believe
in
a
more
targeted
and
effective
strategy
than
just
going
back
to
a
full
lockdown
in
the
state
of
california,
based
upon
where
we
are
today,
and
so
that
was
the
determination,
we're
leaning
into
that,
and
we
will
be
very
cognizant
of
its
its
cause
and
effect,
and
we
are
very,
very
open
about
it,
not
stubborn
about
that
analysis
and
review.
That
said,
let
me
answer
the
first
part
of
your
question.
Clearly
anyone
that's
prone
to
be
with
their
kids,
isolated
or
quarantined
for
many
many
days.
C
It
is
a
very
challenging
and
trying
time,
and
it's
certainly
something
that
is
now
been
brought
home,
quite
literally
in
terms
of
my
own
experience
just
over
the
course.
The
last
couple
days.
That
said,
I
have
deep
empathy
and
respect
for
people.
C
They
don't
have
the
supports
of
people
that
are
in
my
position
that
don't
have
the
resources
of
people
in
my
position
and
those
that
are
struggling
and
can't
even
imagine
being
a
day
away
from
work
or
a
day
or
two
away
from
loved
ones
that
need
to
be
in
their
care.
C
We
are
at
peril
at
the
end
of
this
calendar
year
of
putting
people's
lives
quite
literally,
at
risk
of
the
economy,
much
much
more
harm
in
families
in
much
in
positions
of
being
much
more
vulnerable.
So
all
of
that
is
brought
in
clear,
unambiguous
focus
as
it
relates
to
one's
personal
experience,
but
also
recognizing
the
experience
that
millions
of
americans
have
hundreds
of
thousands
that
are
struggling
in
even
more
dire
and
difficult.
C
C
D
Okay,
thank
you
very
much.
I
just
wanted
to
check
because
we
don't
have
the
ability
to
do
follow-up
questions
in
this.
I
wanted
to
know
because
the
beginning
of
your
presentation
was
muted.
We
could
not
hear
it
if
you
talk
about
what's
going
on
with
your
family,
can
you
talk
about
that
and
here's
what
I'd
like
to
have
you
focus
on?
D
If
you
could,
you
could
tell
us
what
your
family
knew
and
when
they
knew
it,
give
us
a
little
bit
more
information
about
when
you
knew
of
information
about
the
chp
officer
who
had
tested
positive?
D
Are
there
additional
officers
in
that
team
who
tested
positive
and
and
then
also
trying
to
understand
the
universe
that
your
family
operates
in
you
mentioned
that
other
families
are
not
as
fortunate,
but
could
we
understand
kind
of
a
sense
of
for
lack
of
a
better
term,
the
pod
that
your
family
lives
in?
Do
you
have
other
support
people,
house,
cleaners
or
child
care
assistants
that
help
with
your
children,
and
are
you
considering
sending
the
children
back
to
school
when
they're
done,
or
does
this
give?
C
Yeah
the
school
made
that
decision
independently
and
they
have
paused
so
that
was
determined
by
the
school
itself
as
it
relates
to
my
three
children
that
were
exposed.
It
was
a
chp
officer
and
they
were
exposed.
A
four-year-old
was
exposed
first,
so
forgive
me,
I
don't
have
the
ability
to
acquire
when
he
knew
and
how
he
knew
it
because
of
his
age,
all
of
them
below
the
age
of
11
years
old.
C
But
when
we
discovered-
or
rather
we
were
told
of
the
positive
case
and
the
fact
that
the
chp
officer
was
in
close
contact
with
those
three
kids,
we
immediately
went
through
the
process
of
protocols
and
reviews
that
are
well
established
by
the
state
and
also
went
to
greater
lengths
to
get
more
specificity
about
local
guidelines
as
well
to
make
sure
that
we
were
abiding
by
those
as
well.
C
We
chose
to
wait
based
upon
the
the
review,
or
rather
based
upon
the
recommendation
of
a
local
health
officer,
in
my
case
folks,
that
work
on
our
team.
They
were
required
that
well,
they
were
courage,
rather
not
required
that
we
wait
48
hours
to
be
tested
because
they
didn't
want
a
false
sense
of
of
negative
tests
to
come
in,
and
so
we
tested
officially
yesterday
after
we
discovered
this
on
friday.
C
So
friday
waited
until
sunday
to
be
tested,
test
results
came
back
late
on
sunday
came
back
negative
and
we
officially
started
the
quarantine
clock
on
sunday,
but
it
was
informal
through
the
weekend
as
it
relates
to
the
house
I'm
blessed,
because
we
have
many
rooms,
I'm
able
to
do
this
without
kids
jumping
on
top
of
me,
I'm
in
an
office.
I
can
assure
you
the
first
time
I've
ever
had
an
office.
I
used
a
smaller
room
in
an
office
was
used
for
many
other
things
in
the
past.
C
That's
a
blessing,
and
I
recognize
that
many
people
don't
even
have
the
ability
to
do
what
I'm
doing
right
here,
and
so
that's
number
one
number
two.
No
one
else
is
in
the
household
we
have
someone
that
has
been
with
us
that
comes
from
overseas
she's
been
living
with
us
for
many
many
months,
she's
part
of
the
pod.
That's
it
she
was
tested,
tested,
negative
as
well.
G
Thank
you
so
much
for
taking
my
question.
I
would
like
to
first
quickly
follow
up
on
john's
question
and
get
any
more
detail
on
when
your
children
came
into
contact
with
the
infected
officer.
Was
he
driving
them
somewhere
et
cetera,
and
I
hate
to
be
the
reporter
to
do
questions?
But
it's
been
a
couple
weeks
now,
since
a
judge
issued
an
injunction
telling
you
to
no
longer
alter
state
law
with
executive
orders,
I'm
hoping
you
can
tell
us
about
what
that
injunction.
C
Yeah
we
are
appealing
that
decision
and
will
be
adjudicated
by
the
appellate
court,
more
confident
in
our
legal
standing
and
legal
position.
It's
foundational
in
terms
of
governing
a
state
in
a
time
of
crisis,
it's
a
profoundly
important
decision
that
will
ultimately
be
made
through
the
deliberative
process
and
independent
adjudication
by
the
california
court
of
appeals,
or
at
least
the
appellate
level
and
based
upon
their
jurisdiction.
That
said,
it
relates
to
the
impact.
C
Yes,
the
officer
was
in
close
contact
with
three
of
our
kids,
not
one
of
our
kids,
three
of
our
kids
and
based
upon
the
fact
that
they
were
in
close
contact
and
they
tested
positive.
C
When
we
learned
that
we
went
through
a
series
of
protocols
that
I
just
laid
out
and
gave
to
john
and
those
protocols
led
to
test
all
family
members,
including
my
youngest
four-year-old,
which
was
an
episode
itself
just
trying
to
encourage
four-year-old
to
sit
and
get
tested
with
nasal
swab
and
fortunately,
all
all
of
us
in
the
household.
C
F
Final
question:
ashley
zavala:
next,
our
media
group,
hi
governor.
I
did
want
to
ask
a
couple
simple
questions
about
your
quarantine,
one.
How
are
you
feeling
and
to
have
you
been
tested
today?
I
know
your
communications
office
said
that
you
could
test
it
every
day
and
I
just
wanted
to
see
if
that
came
back
negative.
C
Yeah,
I
know
well,
I've
been
tested
a
lot
last
few
weeks
on
multiple
occasions.
The
last
few
weeks
I
feel
perfectly
healthy.
I
tested
negative
yesterday
and
I
have
no
expectation
that
I'll
test
any
differently
in
subsequent
days
as
we
apply
by
these
quarantine
protocols
and
so
we'll,
let
you
know
as
we
get
these
subsequent
tests
the
extent
you're
interested,
but
currently
those
last
well,
we've
never
had
a
positive
test.
I've
been
tested
many
many
times.
I
was
stubborn.
C
You
may
recall
in
the
beginning
of
this
pandemic,
I
did
not
get
tested
for
many
many
months.
I
made
it
clear
as
to
why
I
made
that
determination,
because
so
many
others
were
not
afforded
that
privilege.
I
wasn't
going
to
extend
it
and
now
now
with
the
availability
of
much
more
testing,
more
wood,
spread
testing
and
the
fact,
as
you
may
recall,
that
I
visited
prisons,
I
felt
it
incumbent
upon
me
at
that
point
to
begin
the
testing
protocols
and
we've
had
fairly
consistent
tests,
not
just
the
pcr
tests.
C
Those
are
the
ones
that
are
the
tests
we
make
public,
but
also
these
antigen
tests,
which
I've
taken
on
many
occasions.
As
well,
I
don't
have
as
much
confidence
candidly
in
those
results
why
we
always
have
the
backup
pcr
test
with
our
foundational
pcr
tests,
the
ones
the
entire
family
took
yesterday
and
pcr
tests
was
what
I
took
the
previous
week
as
well
in
multiple
previous
occasions.
So
we'll
continue
to
do
all
of
that,
and
and
more
will
continue
also
to
keep
you
and
others
informed
on
where
what
we're
doing
and
where
we're
going.
C
I
want
to
acknowledge
those
that
may
have
inquired
about
where
we
are
on
senate
choice
picks
that
that
termination
has
yet
not
yet
been
made,
but
progress
has
been
made
in
terms
of
getting
closer
to
that
determination.
There's
no
timeline
that
we
have
advanced
or
considered.
Obviously,
we'll
need
to
get
it
done
before.
C
C
I
am
very
aware-
and
we've
been
working
overtime,
including
over
the
course
of
this
last
week,
in
particular,
to
work
to
get
this
budget
done,
which
has
to
be
at
least
to
the
printers
in
the
middle
of
december
cognizant
and
mindful
of
the
myriad
of
needs
throughout
the
state
of
california,
but
none
more
important
than
public
health
and
economic
recovery,
the
needs
of
our
small
business
men
and
women
all
up
and
down
the
state
of
california.
C
I
said
that
last
week
and
I'd
be
remiss
of
not
repeating
that
today
and
you'll
hear
me
repeat
that
over
and
over
and
over
again,
I
am
deeply
mindful
with
41
counties
in
these
purple
restrictive
tiers.
The
impact
that's
had
on
small
businesses
in
particular,
and
all
of
the
uncertainty
around
a
new
ppp,
distinguished
from
ppe,
as
relates
to
small
business,
supports,
which
must
be
a
top
priority
of
a
new
cares
act.
A
new
stimulus
in
this
country,
we're
going
to
do
what
we
can
to
do
more
for
our
small
businesses
in
this
state.
C
That
is
a
top
priority
with
the
budget
team,
will
be
a
top
priority.
I
know
with
the
california
legislature,
based
upon
the
conversations
we've
had
and
I'm
grateful
that
they
recognize
that
imperative
as
well,
so
public
health,
public
safety
continue
to
monitor
these
counties
and
the
transmission
rates
in
real
time.
C
We
will
maintain
our
engagement
and
not
only
with
you
on
a
consistent
basis,
but
tomorrow,
just
furtherance
of
that
dr
gallery
will
be
updating
on
the
tiered
status
and
we
will
likely
be
making
additional
announcement
or
additional
announcements
through
the
week
and
into
next
week.
This
virus
does
not
take
holidays
off,
quite
the
contrary,
take
care
everybody.
Thank
you
for
tuning
in
at
least
to
this
rather
unusual,
but
increasingly
familiar
setting
here
at
home.
Take
care.