►
Description
Coverage of the June 9, 2022 Cupertino City Council Teleconference Meeting.
(Live Streamed Version)
C
I
I
will
note
that
the
very
last
item
that
we
have
after
the
study
session,
which
we
had
on
grant
proposals,
item
14,
which
is
about
our
work
plan
and
then
item
38,
which
was
a
combined
cip
and
budget
item
we
had
39,
which
is
about
our
storm
drainage
system,
and
so
the
essential
crux
of
39
is
not
to
raise
the
rates.
I
think
that
should
be
relatively
fast.
C
C
F
C
Okay,
wonderful,
so
again,
this
is
to
start
our
meeting
with
item
number
39.
There's
a
motion
in
a
second
on
the
table,
madam
city
clerk.
Oh
let
me
go
to
our
members
of
the
public.
C
Actually,
there
is
one
attendee
with
the
hand
raised,
and
that
is
mahesh
pakala,
and
so,
if
I
may
have
a
quick
dialogue
with
my
my
good
friend
mahesh
mahesh,
if
you
wanted
to
speak
on
the
motion
on
the
table,
please
keep
your
hand
up,
but
if
it
is
not
about
the
motion
on
the
table,
please
lower
your
hand
and
I
don't
see
your
hand
lowering
and
so
I'll
go
ahead
and
and
your
hand
is
lowered.
Thank
you
very
much,
and
so
I'm
going
to
go
ahead
and
bring
this
back
to
council.
C
Did
anyone
want
to
make
a
comment
on
this
again?
This
is
just
to
hear
item
39.
First,
I
don't
see
hands
raised
and
so
madison
city
clerk.
Could
you
please
conduct
a
roll
call
vote.
C
You
very
much
madam
city
clerk,
all
right
so
we're
on
and
just
to
give
everyone
context.
I
think
this
is
a
really
nice
combining
of
our
our
various
major
items
for
the
upcoming
fiscal
year.
We're
doing
it
I
think,
in
an
extremely
timely
manner.
This
is
the
first
full
week
of
june
and
so
in
order,
because
they
all
kind
of
implicate
our
budget
you've
got
our
grant
funding,
which
is
item
one.
C
In
the
study
session
last
time,
we've
got
item
14,
which
was
the
work
program
in
item
38,
which
was
the
capital
improvement
program
again
combined
with
the
budget,
and
so
let's
go
to
item
number
one
and
I'll
remind
everyone
when
we
tabled
it,
we
were
tabling
a
discussion
that
had
already
been
presented.
C
We
had
heard
from
the
public-
and
we
were
in
the
midst
of
discussion,
I'll,
remind
everyone
that
the
recommended
action
is
to
consider
the
recommendation
from
the
parks
and
recreation
commission
to
approve
funds
in
the
amount
of
96,
460
and
46
cents
for
the
fiscal
year
22
to
23
or
the
upcoming
fiscal
year.
C
Community
funding
grant
program
and
part
of
the
purview
of
council
here
is
determined,
is
to
determine
and
approve
the
final
funding
amounts
for
the
community
funding
program
to
be
included
in
the
recommended
budget
for
fiscal
year
22
to
23
and
and
to
provide
direction
staff.
I'm
gonna
go
ahead
and
remind
everyone.
It's
eight
o'clock
right
now
we
had
to
have
a
labor
discussion
in
closed
session
at
6
30
this
evening,
and
so
we
have
we
have
about
four
hours.
This
is,
of
course,
is
the
culmination
of
a
lot
of
work.
C
That's
been
done
up
to
this
point
in
our
calendar
year.
We
have
a
lot
of,
like
you,
know
great
synergies
here,
but
just
to
keep
in
mind
that
we
want
to
be
very
cognizant
of
the
time,
and
so
what
I'd
like
to
do
is
basically
say
for
the
community
grant
funding
program.
Let's,
let's
take
a
collective
effort
to
try
to
get
this
done
within
the
hour
and
then,
hopefully
the
city
work
program.
We
can
have
a
similar
kind
of
effort.
C
I
think
that
the
community
funding
grant
program
should
be
actually
considerably
less
than
that.
Frankly,
and
then
we
get
on
to
the
cips
and
the
budget,
and
there
I
do
want
to
note
that
there
was
a
request
from
staff
earlier
today
from
from
our
city
manager,
jim
troop
to
try
to
when
it
came
to
the
budget,
simply
pass
an
operational
budget
so
to
speak,
and
I
I
think
that
the
goal
here
should
be
to
try
to
conclude
this
and
see
what
we
can.
C
You
know,
go
and
and
front
going
into
our
upcoming
fiscal
year,
but
if
we
find
that
time
is
very
much
of
the
essence
and
I'll
be
doing
a
time
check
in
that
regard
around
10
30.,
then
we
can
start
to
look
at
the
the
proposal
from
staff,
which
is
basically
to
say,
hey
look,
you
know
we
need
this
to
be
operational
as
of
july
1st,
the
start
of
the
fiscal
year-
and
so
you
know
we'll
probably
scale
back
to
that
point.
C
If
we
don't
look
like
we're
we're
making
progress
to
the
point
where
we
can
conclude
this,
this
corpus
of
items
by
midnight
this
evening,
okay,
so
we're
back
on
study
session
item
one.
This
is
the
community
funding
grant
program
when
we're
back
on
discussion
and
madam
city
clerk
remind
me-
and
please
confirm
this.
I
think
this
is
correct.
We
did
not
have
a
motion
on
the
table
when
we
when,
when
we
continued
this
item,
is
that
correct.
C
Okay,
so
we
are
in
deliberation.
This
is
item
one
I
can.
I
can
put
a
default
motion
on
the
table
just
to
get
things
going.
I
think
the
default
motion
would
be
simply
adopting
the
recommended
grant
allocations,
as
you
know,
examined
and
recommended
by
the
parks
and
recreation
commission
and
so
I'll
go
ahead
and
see
councilmember
way.
Would
you
like
to
set
forth
that
motion
for
the
purposes
of
further
discussion.
C
I'm
asking
you
to
move
it
so:
okay,
okay,
thanks
councilmember,
william
councilmember
moore.
Did
you
want
to
second
that.
E
C
Okay,
that
sounds
good
well
for
purposes
of
furthering
the
discussion.
I
will
go
ahead
and
second
it
and
that's
just
a
reminder
that
is,
that
does
not
commit
us
to
the
set
of
recommendations
from
the
parks
and
recreation
commission,
but
I
do
want
to
be
able
to
keep
us
in
line
with
you
know
procedural.
You
know,
formalities
and
so
we'll
go
ahead
and
continue
the
discussion.
There's
a
motion,
a
second
on
the
table
council.
Member
way,
your
hand
is
raised.
C
Yes,
we're
we're
beginning
the
deliberative
process
for
this
motion.
F
Okay,
so
here
it
is,
you
know
I've
been
on
many
many
non-profit
boards,
which
I
am
still.
This
kind
of
discussion
is
always
going
on.
What
project
do
we
support?
Do
we
have
you
know
way
this
way,
that
they
are
all
very
good
projects.
We
have,
if
not
hundreds
of
non-profit
organizations
in
our
community,
and
they
contribute
not
just
economically
but
also
humanitarian
to
our
society,
to
cupertino
and
surrounding
areas
they're
all
great
projects.
F
I
don't
think
there
is
a
right
or
wrong
which
one
we
picked
and
first
I
would
like
to
make
that
we
did
authorize
the
parking
recreation
committee
to
make
the
recommendations,
so
I
would
like
to
have
mostly
trust
their
judgment.
Second,
I
would
have
to
say,
is:
I
understand
the
we
might
have
say
we
want
to
support
newer,
smaller
nonprofits,
which
is
a
great
concept,
but
there
are
many
many
very
established,
but
very
good
nonprofits
that
do
projects
in
our
community
over
and
over,
for
example,
west
valley,
community
services.
F
Why
do
they
come
every
time
because
they
have
hundreds
of
projects?
Councilmen
really
mentioned
about
their
mobile
truck
and
mobile
food
truck,
that's
partly
supported
by
cupertino
roadway
with
a
25,
000,
grand
and
west
valley
come
up
with
other
money.
You
talk
about
the
country,
that's
also
partly
supported
by
kubertino
rotary,
and
so
these
are
really
good
organizations.
That's
reputable!
So
I
don't
see
any
wrong
about
supporting
them
year
after
year
with
different
projects
or
same
projects.
Same
thing
with
I.
F
I
start
you
know
bhuvaneshwara
sister
city,
it's
our
assistant
city,
when
they're
doing
an
event
in
our
park
memorial
park
to
give
them
free
facility,
it's
not
free
for
them.
It's
free
for
our
citizens
to
attend
facilities,
a
great
event
same
thing
with
full
festival.
So
I
don't
see
any
you
know
problem
with
providing
facility
in-kind
donations,
support
for
our
very
reputable
organizations
in
our
community.
They
contribute
to
our
citizens
in
tremendously
and
for
school
districts
that
serve
our
students,
whether
100
lives
in
cupertino
or
not.
F
It
is
students
that
they
serve
summer.
Programs
cannot
be
open
to
10
000
students,
but
they
do
pick
students
that
need
economically
disadvantaged
and,
as
to
I
think,
council
member
moore
asked
if
other
cities
support
this
non-profit.
Yes,
they
do.
Every
year
I
applied
to
west
valley
to
san
jose.
To
chucky,
who
is
charge
of
the
west
valley
area.
Did
one
section
close
to
us
and
he
always
supports
the
high
schools
foundation
with
a
community
grant
fund.
F
I
know
sunnyvale
does
the
same
thing,
so
every
city
has
grant
fund
that
help
the
community
they're
all
really
good
causes.
So
two
things
I
want
to
make
is
everyone
has
a
good
cause
and
I
don't
think
we
have
a
right
or
wrong
in
supporting
who
they
who
we
support.
Second,
these
non-profits
are
valuable
assets
to
our
community.
Third,
I
do
believe
we
empowered
our
parking
recreation
commission
to
make
decisions
and
we
could
trust
their
decision.
Making.
F
Third
school
districts
are
very
close
to
our
hearts
and-
and
fourth
is
even
though
we
consider
some
organization
established,
but
they
do
great
projects
in
our
community.
Rotary
club
actually
contribute
over
150
000
to
our
community
every
year,
with
over
30
60
30
to
60
projects
per
year,
so
I
just
want
to
say:
there's
no
right
or
wrong
and
if
we
have
more
money,
yes,
please
support
more.
F
If
we
don't
have
more
money
support
what
we
can
support-
and
I
just
I
do
believe
that
there
is
nothing
right
or
wrong
about
who
we
support
and
we
do
need
to
support
them
when
they,
you
know
open
up
their
time
and
their
volunteering
to
to
do
a
festival.
You
know
our
staff
knows
that
it's
not
easy
to
give
them
in-kind
facilities.
F
C
C
G
C
E
Okay,
thank
you
mayor
paul,
and
thank
you
rochelle
for
providing
the
information.
I
think
we
should
have
someone
from
staff
put
the
written
communications
up
on
on
the
screen
for
us
and
take
a
look
at
it.
C
D
Mayor
I
can
share
those
if
you'd
like
to
direct
me
to
which
item
you'd
like
me,
to
open.
C
E
It
begins
with
a
an
email
from
omniware
networks
and
a
clarification
about
their
tax-exempt
status,
which
addresses
the
question
that
I
had
and
then
the
next
item
community
grant
funding
program.
So
we
don't
need
to
look
at
the
first
one,
but
the
next
one
that
says
updated,
attachment,
c
evaluation
totals
and
parks
and
rec
commission
recommendation
desk
item.
E
We
can
actually
scroll
past
that
and
what
I
want
us
to
be
focused
on
after
the
policy
is
the
blue
and
white
striped
table
that
shows
the
the
vendor.
The
invoice
item
detail
description,
fiscal
calendar,
2018,
19,
20,
21
and
22
in
a
grand
total.
So
I'm
very
grateful
that
we
have
this
information
now
and
then
also
in
this
packet.
We
have
festival
information
which
I
did
not
see
the
I
asked
about
this.
I
didn't
see
the
festival,
fee,
waiver
requests
and
there's
a
on
tuesday
night.
E
I
as
an
attachment
I
sent
in
the
requirements
for
for
festival
fee
waivers.
Yes,
yes,
just
keep
going
yeah
keep
scrolling
down.
So
that's
the
require.
That
is
the
information
about
the
prof
non-profit
status.
So
that
is,
it
is
current
and,
and
I
did
receive
a
a
call
or
a
phone
message
from
omni
networks,
and
then
we
can
pass
through
this.
This
memorandum
onto
it's,
a
blue
and
white
striped
spreadsheet
right
after
the
policy
there's
one
more
and
then
here
we
are
now.
E
If
there's
any
way
to
that,
this
can
be
made
larger,
that's
wonderful!
That
could
help
okay,
so
the
first
one
we
have
and
I'm
not
even
sure
what
this
is
was
seven
thousand
dollars
given
to
heart
of
the
valley.
Then
women's
sv,
out
of
the
mayor's
fund,
a
thousand
dollars
chinese
american
coalition,
compassionate
care
thousand
dollars
a
silicon
valley,
jewish
film
festival.
Five
thousand.
E
I
won't
read
all
of
these
some
things
of
of
note:
cupertino
union
school
district,
we're
having
it
showing
a
total
of
a
hundred
and
eleven
thousand
ufrap
museum,
159
000.
west
valley,
community
services,
1
million
447,
000,
a
rotary
endowment
foundation,
thirty
six
thousand
rotary
club,
twelve
thousand
seven
hundred
and
eighty
breathe
california
bay
area,
sixty
five
hundred
bhubaneshwar,
only
nine
thousand
eight
twenty
fremont
union
high
school
district,
514
546..
E
The
next
page
is
interesting.
It's
the
proposed
fiscal
2022,
2023
festival,
festival,
fee
costs,
and
this
in
my
opinion,
we
probably
should
have
seen
this
come
to
council
already.
So
this
might
be
a
proposal,
but
because
it
is
to
my
knowledge,
I
need
to
have
this
clarified.
This
is
not
part
of
this.
The
96
000.
and
I
look
at
festival,
fee
cost
waivers,
and
I
think
it
should
say
that
the
waiver
num
word
in
there.
E
That
is
a
grant
so
and-
and
this
might
not
even
cover-
I'm
not
entirely
sure
if
this
covers
the
the
whole
cost,
but
you
can
see,
we've
got
145
000
being
requested,
and
that
is
on
top
of
the
96
000.
E
So
when
we,
when
we
have
the
sheriff
and
public
works
and
and
individuals
needing
to
spend
their
time
on
these,
these
particular
festivals,
it
is
a
cost
to
us.
This
is
not
free
and
also
when
you're
looking
at,
in
particular,
the
chamber
of
commerce.
That's
not
a
501c3,
that's
a
501c6!
E
It's
a
lobbying
organization.
They
endorse
candidates,
they
endorsed
council
member
way,
for
instance,
and
they
have
a
pac.
Their
pac
has
previously
given
a
120
000
per
per
candidate
and
opposed
candidates
opposed
that
pac
opposed
the
vice
mayor,
for
instance.
So
I
I
I
don't
see
why
we
would
be
gifting,
because
it's
going
to
a
political
purpose,
why
we
would
be
gifting
funds
to
a
lobbying
organization
in
that
manner.
E
I'm
going
to
assume
that
the
festival
fee
waivers
are
going
to
come
back
to
council,
but
and
that
this
is
not
actually
part
of
of
the
approval
tonight
that
we're
looking
at
just
the
grants-
and
I
want
to
have
have
that
clarified.
But
I
think
that
this
fee
waiver
is
part
of
the
budget.
But
I
I
need
to
understand
that
as
well
from
an
accounting
standpoint,
and
so
I'd
like
to
hear
hear
that
and
then
I
think
I'd
like
to
perhaps
entertain
a
substitute
motion.
C
Okay,
well,
let's,
let's
go
ahead
and
entertain
that
substitute
motion
after
we
hear
from
staff
in
in.
In
response
to
your
comments,
councilmember
moore
and
I
do
want
to
thank
you
for
getting
into
the
granular
detail
here.
It's
it's,
it's
so
very
critical.
I
I
think
there
were
a
couple
of
a
couple
of
fact
check
items.
I
I
just
wanted
to
go
back
and
and
clean
up
a
couple
of
statements.
There
was
one
council
member
way
you
had
indicated
that
we
empower
the
parks
and
recreation
commission
to
make
decisions.
C
I
just
want
to
just
clarify
we're
actually
asking
them
to
make
recommendations.
So
let's
just
be
really
clear
about
you
know
the
the
the
you
know
the
ask
there
and
then
and
then
for
council
member
moore.
C
I
I
think
you
make
legitimate
points,
certainly,
but
the
one
that
I
want
to
clarify
and
I'm
not
doing
this
from
an
advocacy-oriented
perspective,
but
I
just
want
to
clarify
that
the
chamber
of
commerce
actually
separates
out
their
501c6
organization
from
their
political
action
committee
and
so
to
to
make
the
statement
that
giving
money
to
the
chamber
of
commerce
501c6
is
akin
to
supporting
or
opposing
candidates.
I
I
think
you
make
a
good
point
as
to
as
to
that
aspect
of
the
lobbying
of
the
organization,
but
they
are
actually
separate.
H
H
C
E
C
Okay-
oh
I
just
want
to
just
make
it
clear
that
there
is
that
separate
legal
legal
distinction,
and
so
I
that
I
don't
know
about
that-
I
don't
I
know
in
in
the
interest
of
full
disclosure
from
2010
to
2014.
I
sat
on
the
chamber
of
commerce
board
of
directors
and
I
was
a
sitting
president,
which
you
know
came
with
its
own.
You
know
travails
in
2014
when
I
ran,
but
you
know
at
the
end
of
the
day.
E
I
wanted
it
to
come
before
this
discussion
so
that
it
could
all
be
transparent,
brought
out
into
the
light
and
it
it
discusses
the
65
000
given
to
the
chamber
of
commerce
for
them
to
make
a
website
to
advertise
the
chamber
that
the
chamber
has
approximately
300
businesses.
The
city
of
cupertino
has
over
2
400
business
licenses
registered
with
the
city,
so
it
is
a
subset
of
the
businesses
being
represented
there.
E
So
I
I
I
wish
that
that
item
had
had
not
been
postponed
beyond
this,
but
I
think
we
need
to
have
a
full
amount
of
information
about
that
that
organization
and
the
handshake
agreements
that
have
been
made,
that
the
lack
of
accountability
for
funds
that
have
been
given
to
the
chamber
I've
had
this
made
this
request.
I've
asked
about
you
know:
where's
the
contract
for
the
money
that's
been
given
and
and
it
I
nothing
turned
up.
There
was
no
contract.
C
Yeah,
okay.
Well,
thank
you
very
much.
I
appreciate
that.
I
just
wanted
to
clarify
the
the
legal
distinction
between
those
those
entities
and
so
well.
Let's
go
since
our
our
legal
counsel
does
have
a
hand
or
did
have
a
hand
raised
and
but
doesn't
anymore.
Let's
go
to
our
director
of
admin
services,
christina
alfaro,
christina
you
had
a
hand
raised.
Did
you
want
to
speak
to
any
of
the
comments
that
were
made
by
either
councilman
moore
councilmember
way?
I'm
imagining
it's
probably
councilmember
moore's
comments,
but
did
you
want
to
speak
to
those.
I
I
We
get
those
after
we're
able
to
publish
the
budget,
so
we
always
make
sure
we
bring
those
in
to
council
as
part
of
that
proposed
budget
study
session
for
council's
consideration,
and
so
that
they're,
aware
of
those
and
then
they
get
implemented
as
part
of
the
final
budget.
If
council
approves
those
fee
waivers,
but
there
is,
it
is
not
specifically
called
out
as
an
action,
but
we
did
show
them
as
part
of
the
presentation.
E
I
I
think
we
should
have,
I
think,
would
be
prudent
of
us
to
set
a
cap
on
this
because
we're
looking
at
having
a
budget
approved,
and
I
would
consider
we
have
the
70
to
90
000
grant
cap.
I
think
this
year
do
do
a
90
000
grant
cap
on
the
festival
fee
waivers
and
it
should
be.
I
would
assume
similar
where
you
have
the
20
000
per
entity
maximum
and
the
same
501
c
3
designation,
requirement.
C
Yeah,
no
thanks
for
the
comment
and
the
questions
guys
are
more.
You
know.
One
sticking
point
for
me
personally
is
that
I
wonder
how
these
fee
waivers
get
placed
on
a
list
for
request,
because
you
know
back
in
2018
when
I
was
when
I
was
mayor
for
the
first
time
I
started
up
our
volunteer
fair
again,
which
was
just
a
fantastically
well
attended
and
well
received
festival
in
the
city.
C
So
what
I've
been
hearing
you
know
more
recently,
is
that
as
we
didn't
have
the
volunteer
fair
last
year,
but
we
had
it
the
prior
year
before
the
pandemic,
and
we
were
looking,
we
were
looking
to
start
it
up
again
in
may
this
year,
but
it
was
pushed
back
to
the
fall,
probably
september.
C
What
I've
been
hearing
is
that
you
know
staff
was
telling
me
well
that's
going
to
come
out
of
your
mayor's
budget,
and
you
know
the
mayor's
budget
is,
is
15
000
a
year
and,
generally
speaking,
it's
allocated
7
500
for
the
first
half
of
the
fiscal
year,
which
is
july
1st
and
december
31st,
and
then
for
the
second
half
of
the
fiscal
year
january
1st
to
june
30th,
and
those
are
usually
two
different
mayors.
C
So
so
what
I'm
being
told
is
that
that
entirety
of
that
that
half
prospectively
is
looking
to
be
allocated
towards
the
volunteer
fair
if
we
have
it
so
so,
my
question
is:
how
do
we
get
all
these
various
other
items
on
on
the
list,
but
for
something
that
is,
you
know
historically
been
there,
because
I
didn't
invent
the
volunteer
fair.
It
was.
It
was
there
in
cupertino
long
before
any
of
us
came
on
council.
I
just
revived
it.
C
I'm
I'm
wondering
how
do
these
items
get
onto
this
list
for
consideration
of
an
automatic
waiver,
but
you
know
the
one
that
is
obviously
very
well.
You
know
grounded
in
cupertino
history,
but
not
actually
you
know
and
perhaps
there's
an
application,
but
I
I
do
wonder
whether
it
makes
sense
to
you
know
basically
and
have
also
been
asked.
Oh,
can
you
put
all
of
your
mayor's
money
into
bobatino,
which
you
know
I
kind
of
think
you
know.
C
Surely
there's
some
kind
of
surely
there's
some
kind
of
mechanism
if
there
are
appetites
from
say
the
teen
commission
to
have
that
kind
of
event
to
to
to
fund
this
other
than
you
know,
a
discretionary
funding,
that's
a
relatively
limited
amount,
and
I
will
point
out
you
know.
At
the
end
of
the
day
you
know
we
we
have
a
very
limited
amount
of
discretion
as
to
you
know
things
that
we
set
forth
in
the
city.
You
know
on
our
own
as
council,
members
and
and
as
the
mayor.
C
So
so
so
I
just
you
know,
I
appreciate
this
list
being
set
forth,
but
at
the
same
time
I
wonder
whether
there
are
some
fine-tuning
points
we
can
make
in
order
to
you
know.
I.
H
C
Better
reflect
the
the
activities
that
we're
we're
putting
forward
as
well.
So
I
do
see
your
hand
is
still
raised.
Councilmember
moore,
let
me
give
vice
mayor
chow
an
opportunity,
but
before
we
do
that
councilmember
moore,
you
had
stated
that
you
wanted
to
place
a
substitute
motion
on
the
table.
So
why
don't
you
do
that
at
this
point?
And
so
we
can
entertain
that
substitute
motion.
E
Essentially,
it's
with
the
the
the
same
primary
list
that
the
the
city
has
provided
and
I
would
remove
cusd
and
fuhsd
foundation
and
west
valley
community
services
at
this
time
and
because
we're
providing
within
our
budget
even
more
funding
to
west
valley
community
services
for
another
another
program,
which
is
far
more
substantial
than
the
ten
thousand
requested
here.
C
Okay,
is
there
a
second
for
council
member
moore's
motion
vice
mayor
chow,
I
see
that
you
have
your
hand
raised.
Would
you
like
to
second
the
motion?
The
substitute
motion
that
council
member
moore
has
set
forth.
C
And
vice
mayor
you'll
need
to
unmute
yourself
to
be
heard.
C
Just
like
the
substitution,
okay,
very
good,
so
we
we've
got
a
motion
on
the
table.
Now
we
have
substitute
motion.
These
are
not
enumerated,
but
if
I
were
to
look
on
page
303
super
enumerated
page
303
of
our
original
agenda
packet
from
june
7th.
C
It
is
the
the
organizations
in
green
which
are
one
two
three
four,
five,
six,
seven,
eight
nine.
So
there
are
nine
of
them
that
were
recommended
by
the
parks
and
recreation
commission.
It
would
be
the
first
fourth
and
ninth
that
would
be
removed.
So
then
it
would
leave
six
more
organizations
to
be
funded.
Okay,
so
vice
mayor,
let's
go
to
you
for
commentary
and
again
this
is
on
the
substitute
motion,
that's
on
the
table
and
then
we'll
go
to
councilmember
away.
J
I
have
a
question:
it
may
not
be
relevant
enough,
but
just
want
to
clarify.
So
if
someone
is
a
member
of
an
organization,
that's
seeking
funding,
I
think
there
is
no
conflict
of
interest,
but
if
someone
is
listed
as
officer
or
a
member
of
the
board,
then
is
there
a?
I
believe
there
is
a
conflict
of
interest
right.
Maybe
we
need
to
vote
separately
just.
C
K
Yeah,
I
I
think
that
that
that
you
know
answering
that
question
sort
of
from
general
principles.
I
think
vice
mayor
chow
stated
it
accurately
that
that
so
some
somebody
that
that's
that's
what
that's
a
member
of
a
board
of
a
non-profit
or
you
know
you
know,
you
know,
certainly
that
if
anybody
that
gets
income
from
that
nonprofit
would
have
a
conflict
of
interest
in
this
kind
of
decision.
K
And
you
know
I
would
advise
them
to
recuse
themselves,
someone
who's,
just
a
member
of
a
nonprofit
that
doesn't
you
know,
have
they
have
any
financial
or
other
interests
that
warrants
recusal.
I
I
would
that
you
know
that
would
be
an
issue.
C
J
J
C
Okay,
so
does
that
apply
to
the
entirety
of
the
item
chris
or
just
to
the
vote
on
that
particular
organization.
In
this
case.
K
So
it
it
it
it
it
would.
I
I
mean
there
are
probably
ways
you
could
set
it
up,
but
the
way
this
this
has
been
set
up,
I
think
particularly
because
you're
you're
talking
about
a
finite
pool
of
funds.
I
think
that
yeah
and
that
you
know
this
item
has
been
grouped
together.
I
think
that
the
appropriate
remedy
would
be
to
to
produce
oneself
from
consideration.
C
Let
me
ask
if
this
is
just
kind
of
an
academic
question:
are
there
currently
we
have
a
substitute
motion
on
the
table
and
the
six
organizations
up
for
consideration,
funding
or
women's
fee
senior
services,
heart
of
valley,
american
cancer
society
relay
for
life?
I'm
aware
of
networks,
the
buddhist
medical
foundation
breathe
california
at
the
bay
area
I
mean.
Does
this
apply?
Does
this
apply
to
any
of
our
council
members?
Does
anyone
sit
on
the
board
of
any
of
these
organizations.
C
But
that
that's
not
one
of
the
that's,
not
one
of
the
ones
that
are
always.
C
Union
school
district,
I
think
that
was
removed
by
councilman
moore
in
her
substitute
motions,
okay
yeah.
But
let
me
let
me
go
to
our
legal
counsel
on
this,
so
chris,
the
fremont
union
school
district
item
is
part
of
the
corpus
of
applicants
and
it
is
part
of
the
original
motion
on
the
table.
So
so
how
would
you
suggest
that
we
deal
with
this
in
in
that
instance,.
K
Yeah,
so
so
you
know
so
you
know
I
apologize
that
this
wasn't
direct
addressed
earlier,
but
I
think
you
know
it
that
the
most
prudent
course
would
be
for
first
council
member
way
to
recuse
herself.
If
she
is
on
the
board
of
of
the
fountain
union
school
district
foundation,.
C
Okay,
well
far
away,
I
I
think
that
that's
ultimately
your
call,
but
it
seems
like
recusal,
is
the
recommended
course
of
action.
F
C
Okay,
well,
thank
you,
councilman.
I'm
sure
that
our
city
clerk
will
notify
you,
so
mr
city
attorney
jensen,
so
hung
can
still
participate
as
an
attendee
at
this
point
right
so
that
we
can.
C
Got
it
okay,
well,
councilmember
way,
I'm
going
to
do
that
now
with
your
consent,
of
course,.
F
Oh
sure,
but
can
I
make
one
last
comment.
F
Know
not
about
anything
just
about
the
festival
which
is
not
on
the,
but
I
guess
we
can
talk
about
festival
later
when
it
comes
with
the
agenda
right.
Oh
you're,
right,
exactly:
okay,
yeah,
that's
good!
Okay!.
C
Thanks
customer
away
all
right,
so
I
guess
we
are
along
twice:
I'm
sorry
we're
on
vice
mayor
chow's
comments
and
then
we'll
go
back
to
council
member,
more
I'll,
remind
everyone
that
we
have
a
substitute
motion
on
the
table.
If
that
is
voted
on,
doesn't
pass
we'll
go
back
to
the
original
motion.
The
substitute
motion
is
what
we're
discussing
at
this
point.
Vice
versa,.
J
To
be
fair,
I
think
we
could
also
partition
the
item
right,
so
we
can
partition,
the
fremont
union
foundation
went
out
and
then
we
can
just
discuss
the
rest
together
and
then
council
rainbow
we
can
participate
and
then
we
can
vote
on
the
foundation
one
later
and
that
one
she
just
needs
to
recuse
herself
from
that
one
yeah.
I
didn't
know
that.
Actually
it's
from
her
comment,
I
kind
of
get
the
sense
it
seems
she
has
certain
personal
interests.
I
get.
C
I
wouldn't
don't
don't
hang
the
the
downstream
effect
on
on
your
on
your
exclusive.
You
know
on
your
head,
I
mean
it's
a
legitimate
comment
and,
at
the
end
of
the
day,
councilman
way
has
agreed
to
recuse
I'll
point
out
that
our
legal
counsel
did
point
out
that
this
is
a
finite
pot
of
money
and
so
you're
making
decisions
about
what's
applicable
for
one
you
know
in
in
a
real
sense
to
the
exclusion
of
other
organizations.
C
So
I
I
will
note
that
we
do
have
a
subcommittee
for
this
particular
topic
of
of
grant
funding,
and
so
that
is
part
of
the
mechanics
that
certainly
the
subcommittee
can
and
should
be,
should
and
can
be
looking
at
in
the
future.
But
let's
let's
proceed
at
this
point.
Vice
mayor
ciao,
you
have
your
hand
no
longer
raised,
and
so
council
member
more,
you
have
your
hand
raised
again.
I
don't
see
the
hand
raised
councilmember.
C
I
don't
have
comments
about
the
substitute
motion
myself
and
so
councilmember
moore
after
you
make
your
commentary.
I
will
call
for
a
vote
on
the
motion
that
is
on
the
table.
Councilman
moore.
E
Okay,
thank
you.
I
just
have
kind
of
a
procedural
question
so
who
was
the
maker
of
the
original
motion.
C
The
original
motion:
that's
a
good
question.
Actually
that
was
council
member
away.
C
Yeah,
let
me
go
back
to
our
legal
counsel
now,
so
so
so
here
we
are
chris.
We
have
a
midstream
recusal
of
the
motion
maker.
C
How
would
you
suggest
that
we
resolve
this
and
I
I
realized
that
perhaps
it
would
be
a
question
best
set
forth
to
a
parliamentary
parliamentarian,
but
you
know
here
we
are
and
we're
leaning
upon
your
good
thoughts
and
expertise
here.
K
Yeah
this
this
this
well,
this
is
an
unusual
situation,
so
I
I
think
I
I
think
we
should
look
at
a
a
you
know
to
resolve
it
as
pragmatically
as
possible.
You
know,
certainly,
since
you
know
it's
not
appropriate
for
councilman
for
way
to
have,
you
know
really
participate
in
the
debate.
I
don't
think
you
know
that
I
don't
think
the
motion
can
really
be
voted
upon
without
creating
conflict
of
interest
issues
she's
not
present
to
withdraw
it.
K
I
think
perhaps
what
might
be
cleanest
is
that
if
somebody
else
makes
and
and
seconds
the
same
motion
and-
and
you
know
that
council
can
vote
on
the
substantive
motion,
substitute
motion
and
and
then
you
know
vote
on,
I
guess
this
was
a
replacement
motion
and.
C
K
C
Why
don't
we
do
this?
Since
we
have
the
substitute
motion
and
there's
that
original
motion
by
a
movement
that
is
no
longer
here,
can
we
can
we
remove
the
substitute
motion
so
as
who
was
the
seconder
of
the
substitute
motion
vice
mayor.
C
Okay,
so
I'll
ask
the
vice
mayor
if
she
would
be
willing
to
remove
her
second
and
then,
as
the
seconder
of
the
original
motion,
I'll
go
ahead
and
remove
that.
Second,
therefore,
if,
if
that,
if
the
willingness
of
the
seconders
are
both
there,
there's
no
longer
a
motion
on
the
table
and
then
we
can
start
over
basically
with
a
new
motion.
Does
that?
Does
that
work?
From
your
perspective,
legal
counsel,
jensen.
K
C
Okay-
let's
do
that,
so
let
me
ask
vice
mayor
chow:
are
you
willing
to
withdraw
your
second
from
the
substitute
motion.
E
E
I
have
a
procedural
question
about
that,
so
I
have
to
say
is
for
having
made
the
substitute
motion
and
having
my
second,
I
think
that
you
could
very
simply
just
remove
your
second
from
the
the
first
original
motion,
if
you
felt,
as
we
seem
to
see
that
it
was
done
in
procedurally
in
error,
so
I
I
do
have
a
problem
with
having
lost
my
second,
it
seems
a
bit
seems
a
bit
unfair,
just
pointing
that
out,
but
if
what
you're
saying
is
that
I
simply
make
it
again
and
get
seconded
again,
then
then
that
can
happen,
and
then
I
might
actually
wish
to
alter
it
and
bring
in
some
of
the
other
items
in
the
list
which
parks
and
rec
commission
suggested,
which
is,
if
you
have
the
money
they
suggested
we
bring
in
yongsan.
C
Yeah,
okay,
great
so
I
I
I'm
certainly
not
trying
to
be
unfair.
I'm
just
trying
to
be
procedurally,
you
know
cohesive,
but
you
know
your.
Your
comment
is
registered
on
the
recorded
record,
councilman
moore,
and
so
we
are
clean
right
now.
There's
no
motion
on
the
table,
so
let's
go
ahead
and
entertain
another
motion,
since
our
original
movement
is
not
here
for
the
original
motion,
but
our
substitute
motion
movement
is
is
here.
E
Okay,
so
I
I
move
that
we
approve
the
recommended
action
and
yet
remove
the
fuhsd
foundation.
Remove
cusd,
remove
west
valley,
community
services
for
the
reason
I
mentioned
previously
and
add
young
zein.
C
Okay,
so
that
that
is
the
next
one
down
on
the
list.
I
note
in
terms
of
the
ranking
order
of
the
parks
and
recreation
commission.
Is
there
a
second
for
council
member
moore's
motion
vice
mayor
chow,
I
see
that
your
hand
is
raised.
C
H
C
C
But
yeah
okay,
so.
J
Yeah
but
I
have
a
comment
to
make.
C
Okay,
so
there's
a
motion
in
a
second
on
the
table
and
we
will
go
to
vice
merchant
for
the
start
of
deliberation
on
this
motion.
J
Okay,
so,
for
I
think
for
cosd
the
I
have
concerned
about
the
type
of
program
that's
offered
is
not
open
to
everyone,
even
though
our
brand
guideline
doesn't
seem
to
be
clear
and
also
they
are
not
501c3.
I
think
we
should
follow
our
policy,
the
for
the
freemont
union,
one,
the
foundation,
one,
it's
an
online
mentor
service.
That's
also
it's
not
a
one-time
event.
J
I
think
the
intent
of
the
grant
is
for
a
one-time
event,
and
that
seems
to
have
go
over
all
over
the
place
and
also,
I
think
there
are
so
many
public
agencies
if
they
all
come
and
compete
for
our
very
tiny
grant
and
they
they
all
have
they
offer
or
offer
amazing
progress.
Then
it
doesn't
seem
too.
Big
people
are
competing
at
the
same
footing
and
then
for
west
valley
community
service.
J
J
When
that
specifically
is
meant
for
the
client,
that's
served
by
wvcs
and
the
specific
type
of
program
they
do
serve
and
then
the
cp
city
has,
during
the
pandemic,
added
the
funding
to
serve
their
client,
and
I
think
those
are
appropriate
use
of
grant
and
if
they
do
need
to
have
a
unique
program
that
do
need
city
support.
They
could
always
come
and
make
a
separate
request
for
for
grant.
But
for
this
one
it's
not
an
effect,
that's
what
this
grant
is
meant
for
and
then
for
yam
zing.
J
I
think
that
program
is
great,
but
I
was
going
to
suggest
that
they
should
they
actually
qualify
for
the
what
valley,
water,
grand
valley,
water.
I
spoke
to
their
grand
officer.
They
their
grant
comes
from
a
voter
approved
bond.
Major
a
certain
percentage
have
to
go
to
community
grants.
They
say
that
they
have
money
sitting
there
that
they
never
use
up
every
year.
It's
sitting
there
waiting
for
people
to
apply,
and
this
kind
of
environmental
program
fit
right
in
their
category.
J
J
People
can
apply
besides
the
city
grant
that
then
they
are
not
relying
only
on
the
city.
So
a
lot
of
high
school
programs
are
great.
Like
the
quick
side,
like
the
the
highway
cleanup
program,
we
had
was
funded
by
the
what
valley
water
grant
I'm
talking
about
and
the
city
could
have
applied,
and
they
also
found
festivals
actually
and
asked
what
festivals
they
found
in
cupertino.
They
found
that
they
gave
funding
for
rotary
and
chamber
for
their
holly
and
diwali
fest
festival,
but
the
city
did
not
apply
for
our
earth
fast
festival.
C
Okay.
Okay,
thank
you.
Let's
go
on
to
council
member
willie.
At
this
point
I
see
a
handle
is
still
raised
from
councilman
moore
councilmember
willie.
Did
you
have
some
commentary
on
this
motion.
L
Yeah,
thank
you.
So
we
have
the
motion.
That's
on
the
table.
You
know
I
I'd
like
to
you
know
back
up.
I
I
do
like
what
councilman
way
said.
L
All
these
organizations
that
have
requested
for
funds
are
good
are
good
organizations
and
yeah.
We
can.
We
can
get
into
some
of
the
details
as
to
particulars
about
why
they
they
wouldn't
be
able
to
to
get
funds
because
of
the
the
the
details
dotting
the
eyes
and
crossing
the
t's
per
our
requirements.
L
But
I
did
like
what
vice
mayor
chow
said.
You
know
for
a
couple
of
those
you
know
that
maybe
could
get
funds
elsewhere
and
so
and
so
forth,
but
being
able
to
fund
them
this
year.
Maybe
we
should
update
our
manual
and
make
it
more
clear.
So
the
west
valley,
community
services
knows
to
identify
specifically
what
what
projects
the
funds
would
be
used
for.
You
know
like
the
the
the
way
they
got,
the
the
mobile
food
truck
or
upgraded
their
pantry.
L
You
know
the
I
think
they
have
so
many
projects
and
the
fact
that
they
didn't
clearly
define
what
the
project
would
be
that
without
that
funding,
it
likely
wouldn't
happen.
L
Yeah
they'd
like
to
do
it,
but
they
they
only
have
what
they
have.
So
in
general,
all
these
organizations
are
great
in
general,
the
particulars
that
might
bounce
a
couple
of
them
out,
I
think,
being
a
little
bit
more
generous
in
terms
of
or
allowances,
allowing
a
little
bit
more
in
the
way
of
allowances.
L
So
that
being
said,
we
have
the
staff
recommendation.
I
I
support
the
staff
recommendation,
but
then
I
also
support
the
young
zine,
the
you
know
to
me
the
name.
I
think
they
could
use
a
little
bit
of
a
name
change.
You
know
the
summer
youth
client
program,
climate
summer,
youth
climate
program.
As
I
said,
on
tuesday
night,
you
know
trying
to
get
our
next
generation
involved
in
important
issues
in
our
community,
both
the
the
our
community
students
and
issues
of
importance
in
our
community.
L
L
You
know
elementary
school
and
middle
school
students
to
not
only
understand
technology
but
to
more
or
less
be
able
to
understand
how
it
might
help
them
and
they
could
get
involved
and
I
think,
on
tuesday
night,
the
answer
from
staff
was
is
that
stem
boost
wasn't
fully
able
to
meet
all
our
requirements
and
so
I'd
sure,
like
staff,
to
try
and
revisit
that
once
again
for
for
something,
that's
gonna
help
kids
in
our
community,
you
know,
understand
and
get
involved
and-
and
you
know,
go
places
that
they
may
not
go
without
some
of
these
items,
so
I
think
there's
some
other
really
nice
ones,
but
I'll
limit
it
to
to
those
ones.
L
L
You
know
how,
often
in
in
in
this
silicon
valley,
where
we
have
paved
and
and
concreted
over
so
much,
you
know
making
whatever
we
can
more
accessible
and
and
these
people
are
using
volunteers
and
and
stuff,
but
they
didn't
ask
for
money
this
this
time,
so
I
won't
go
there.
I
just
want
to
do
a
shout
out
for
them,
so
my
preference
is
to
not
shrink
the
the
bucket
this
year
to
go
with
the
staff
recommendation.
L
L
I
think
the
message
also
needs
to
go
out
to
them
all
that
we
welcome
them.
We
want
to
encourage
them.
If,
if
we
say
no
money,
no,
you
guys
go
and
do
it
on
your
own.
We're
not
really
encouraging
these
people,
we're
not
really
welcoming
them
and
saying
hey.
We
want
to
work
with
you,
and
so
since
bhubaneshwar
did
ask
for
funds
this
year,
fifteen
thousand,
but
if
we
were
to
take
the
approach
that
for
sister
cities
to
be
equitable,
that
we
would
want
a
a
a
number
that
could
be
applied.
L
I
think
we
have
four
sister
cities,
something
on
the
order
of
you
know
four
thousand
dollars
per
sister
city,
but
the
other
ones
haven't
asked
great,
but
bubanar
shawar
did
so.
If
we
were
to
lower
the
15
down
to
four,
let
the
other
ones
know
you
know
so.
Toyakawa
and
the
cherry
blossom
festival
yeah
they're
able
to
manage
it
on
their
own.
But
let's
be
a
welcoming
community.
Let
let's
reach
out,
you
know:
coppertino
get
them
to
be
able
to
have
a
a.
C
Okay,
well,
thank
you
for
recording
your
comments
and
sentiments
on
the
record.
So
let
me
let
me
just
go
to
councilmember
moore
and
vice
mayor
chow,
very
briefly
time
check
where
854
I
want
us
to
wrap
by
nine
o'clock.
I
was
hoping
we
could
get
a
little
bit
faster
than
that,
but
to
the
extent
that
we're
being
repetitive,
please
just
table
that
and
then
I'll
remind
you
that
councilmember
moore's
motion
is
on
the
table
and
so
we'll
go
ahead
and
go
to
council
for
more
and
then
vice
versa.
E
So
I
was
wondering
well
well,
first,
with
regards
to
the
the
festivals,
there
was
a
question.
There
is
a
some
policy
that
I
I
sent
in
it's
written
communications
for
for
tuesday
night.
It
was
in
attachments
showing
that,
with
regards
to
the
the
history
of
the
sister
cities,
having
fee
waivers
festival,
fee
waivers,
the
fee
waivers
for
the
toyokawa
sister
city
has
been
a
little
over
thirty
thousand
dollars
per
year,
around
nine
thousand
dollars
for
bhumaneshwar
and
zero
for
the
other
two
sister
cities.
E
So
that's
so
we
have
a
a
pretty
pretty
big
disparity
there.
I
was
wondering
if
there's
some,
because
we're
we've
dropped
the
total
funding.
E
If
there's
some
appetite
for
adding
the
the
chinese-american
coalition
for
compassionate
care,
which
covers
issues
with
mindfully
facing
grief
and
loss
and
starting
the
conversation
is
the
the
program
name
and
event,
and-
and
I
appreciate
this
because
it
it
is,
it
is
a
it
is
a
difficult
topic
and
I
I
think
it
it's
covering
an
area
that
I
don't
think
that
that
we
have
touched
on
in
the
past,
with
our
with
our
programming
that
the
city
is
providing
and
yeah.
E
I
think
I
think
it
would
be
really
beneficial
to
the
community
if
this
this
could
be
considered,
and
I
would
like
to
hear
something
about
the
palisados
calico
challenge,
because
we
could
bring
those
two
items
into
the
list
and
then
I
believe
that
puts
us
into
the
the
grant
range
that
we're
looking
for
and
and
could
provide
some
good
a
variety
of
programming.
So.
E
Possibly
I
want
to
hear
about
the
the
calico
challenge,
but
I
might
want
to
I.
I
would
definitely
like
to
to
see
if
there's
support
for
adding
the
chinese
american
coalition
for
compassionate
care
because
of
the
end
of
life
issues
and
the
grief,
grief
and
lost
topic.
I
think
that
that
would
covering
that
would
be
a
really
wonderful
thing.
C
Okay,
this
one
I
do,
I
have
a
hand
raised
from
vice
mayor
ciao
and
hand
raised
from
councilmember
willie,
so
our
assistant
director
of
the
recreation
community
services
department,
rochelle,
remind
me-
is
it
called
parks
and
rec
now
or
is
it
still
recreation
and
community
services
department?
I.
G
C
C
Okay,
so
we
went
back
to
the
code.
Okay,
great,
so
you
know
rachelle
you've
been
patiently
waiting
we're
into
the
deliberative
process,
though,
and
so
I
would
need
to
grant
your
leave
to
speak.
Did
you
want
to
speak
on
some
informational
material
here
or
was.
G
C
Okay,
well,
thank
you
for
the
clarification.
Let's
go
back
to
the
the
deliberation
here,
so
the
question
from
councilmember
moore
was
essentially
whether
there
would
be
a
willingness
to
add
the
chinese-american
coalition
for
compassionate
care
in
the
palace.
Pali
palisados
foundation
grant
applications
to
promotion
mayor
paul.
No,
no,
please
can
you
please.
Let
me
ask
my
question,
madam
city
clerk,
can
you
tell
me
who
the
seconder
of
council
member
moore's
motion
was.
C
Okay,
so
what
I
will
do
now
is
you
know,
because
we're
already
right
at
nine
o'clock
at
this
point,
let
me
let
me
ask
the
seconder
vice
mayor
ciao,
whether
you
would
be
willing
to
make
that
amendment
to
the
motion
on
the
table
since
the
movement
it's
herself
is
asking
for
that,
and
I
realized
it
was.
You
know,
as
a
request.
C
You'll
need
some
questions
answered
first,
okay,
so
so
let
me
let
me
just
suggest
this
okay,
you
know
when,
when
I
allocate
time
for
an
hour,
you
know
when
we
have
a
motion
on
the
table
by
the
original
movement.
There
is
no
reason
to
add
two
more.
You
know
two
more
organizations
as
this
is
going
along
as
we're
not
adding
more
information.
You
know
I
I'm
simply
trying
to
do
this
in
an
efficient
manner
and
so
to
the
extent
that
we
don't
need
to
make
gratuitous
comments.
C
You
know
focus
upon
the
motion
that
is
on
the
table
all
right,
so
councilmember
moore.
You
wanted
to
make
some
modifications
to
your
emotion
and
you're
seeking
commentary.
C
So
is
this
something
that
we
really
necessarily
need
to
do
at
this
point
from
the
perspective
of
your
motion,
or
can
we
essentially
say
let's
go
ahead
and
put
this
on
for
a
vote,
because
I
don't
know
precisely
how
long
that
this
is
going
to
take
in
terms
of
a
deliberative
process
that
seems
to
you
know
not
really
have
a
finite
end.
If
the
movement
is
making
some
modifications
that
could
have
been
made
from
the
original
motion
itself,.
E
Okay,
so
at
issue
is
that
when
I
tallied
up
the
the
the
grant
amount,
there's
no
rule
that
says
it.
E
Well
that
the
I'm
trying
to
stick
towards
the
policy
that
we
have,
which
is
the
range
of
70
to
90
000.
So
when
I
added
it
up,
it
ended
up
below
that
and
I
thought
well.
Perhaps
there
are
other
other
potential
grantees
on
the
list
that
we
could
add
and
put
it
into
the
range
and
and
feel
as
though
I'm
following
the
policy
that
we're
following
the
policy
amount.
And
so
that's
that's.
E
What
I'm
thinking
there,
okay
and
and
also
after
hearing
the
west
valley
community
services
for
the
the
gift
of
hope
that
that
putting
the
ten
thousand
in
there
puts
the
numbers
squarely
in
so
you're.
Looking
at
the
palisados
calico
challenge
chinese
american
coalition
for
compassionate
care
and
the
west
valley,
community
services,
gift
of
hope.
Added
on
to
the
the
original
grouping.
E
C
J
So
if
we
fund
them
and
we
don't
found
things
boost,
we
are
not
founding
someone
because
they
are
more
honest.
I
don't
feel
comfortable
with
that
and
I
think
we
are
trying
to
stick
to
the
intent
of
the
grant.
The
reason
is
many:
other
organizations
could
have
applied,
but
they
did
not
because
they
think
they
don't
qualify
and
whenever
we
open
it
up
and
relax
our
rule.
We
are
again.
H
J
C
Let
me
refer
this
question
another
question.
I
want
to
cut
you
off
there
because
I,
I
don't
think
it's
appropriate
having
gone
through
a
parks
and
rec
commission
vetting
process
to
be
insinuating
that
a
particular
grant
applicant
is
not
following
the
rules
or
or
making
misrepresentations.
C
G
G
However,
within
the
perks
and
recreation
meeting,
the
young
zine
stated
that
they
will
no
longer
be
using
their
funding
for
that
they
will
be
using
it
as
scholarships
for
the
kids,
so
they
will
be
using
it
toward
the
children
not
paying
toward
their
program.
G
She's
actually
pointing
out
their
application,
and
that
is
their
original
application,
so
when,
if
they
are
funded,
their
agreement
will
show
that
it
is
not
for.
It
is
for
the
scholarship
purpose.
H
J
J
So
last
year,
when
I
expressed
that
we
said
okay,
we
will
form
a
subcommittee
to
look
at
funding
additional
things
like
this,
providing
assistance
for
so
kids
who
couldn't
normally
afford
the
summer
camp,
but
can
afford
them.
But
that
particular
thing
then,
does
not
fall
under
the
current
guideline,
because
the
event
should
be
open
to
all
and
this
event
is
not
free
and
open
to
everyone.
J
That
sounds
like
a
really
interesting
problem,
and
but
the
parks
and
rec
did
not
recommend
to
fund
them,
and
I
find
out
that
here
is
compassionate
care,
and
this
is
a
thank
you
for
this
wonderful
table.
That's
all
the
funding
that
we
have
provided
for
different
organizations
over
the
years.
In
this
particular
organization.
J
C
All
right:
okay,
let's
go
ahead
and
go
back
to
staff
at
this
point.
You
know
we're
okay,
rochelle!
Do
you
have
any
comments
on
that.
G
Yes,
so
I
don't
have
any
parks
and
rec
commissioners
here
tonight,
but
during
the
meeting
there
was
a
thought
that
they
wanted
to
try
to
fund
more
organizations
that
hadn't
been
funded
year
after
year
after
year,
so
that
kind
of
was
more
of
the
direction
they
took
this
year.
C
For
that
yeah,
the
question
on
the
table
vice
mayor
ciao,
is
whether
you
were
willing
to
entertain
a
modification
as
the
second
order
of
emotion
which
would
have
added
that
organization
for
compassionate
care,
as
well
as
the
say,
those
families.
J
And
leaning
towards
not
funding
young
zing
but
adding
comes
west
valley,
community
services,
back
which
I
agree
with
council
member
more
on
the
compassionate
care.
I
think
they
are
providing
essential
services
we
need
during
the
pandemic,
even
though
we
are
funding
them
continuously.
I'm
lying
with
that.
C
I
will
I
will
say
this:
I
would
support
adding
young
zine
to
their
in
my
preparation
for
the
mayor's
cup.
I
did
take
a
couple
of
meetings
with
that
organization
and
to
me
it
seemed
quite
worthy
what
they
were
doing
so
so
so
I
mean
for
whatever
that's
worth
in
terms
of
the
palisados
foundation.
C
I
I
don't
really
have
as
strong
a
familiarity
with
it.
It
gives
me
a
little
bit
of
pause
that
it's
fairly
low
in
the
parks
and
rec
ranking,
and
so
that's
that's
my
concern
there.
So
I
see
a
nod
from
councilmember
moore.
So
so
can
we
maybe
can
we
maybe
do
that
then
at
west
valley,
community
services
back
at
young
zine
and
then
add
chinese
american
coalition
for
compassionate
care
to
the
as
the
motion
is
that
workable?
C
J
Would
not,
I
would
not
found
the
young
thing
because
they
don't
qualify
on
either
the
original
purpose
or
the
modified
purpose
under
the
current
guideline,
if
we
fund
them
like,
I
said
it's
unfair
to
the
people
who
did
not
apply
for
an
assistance
to
underprivileged
privileged
children
and
many
summer,
programs
would
have
applied
for
that,
and
they
did
not,
and
it's
not
really
fair
for
them.
C
J
Mean
it's
a
wealth,
it's
a
great
program
and,
like
I
said
they
can
apply
for
valley
water
grant,
and
I
this
has
nothing
to
do
with
the
fact.
C
That,
let's
not
repeat
our
reasons
I
will
I
will
proceed
to
that.
That's
fine,
councilmember
moore!
Are
you
okay
with
and
michelle,
if
you
could,
let's
just
deliberate
now,
so
I
appreciate
your
your
enthusiasm
about
this,
but
let's,
let's
just
leave
the
council
this
time.
Councilman
moore.
Are
you
okay
with
just
adding
west
valley
community
services,
as
well
as
the
chinese
american
coalition
for
fashion
care
at
this
time
to
your
motion.
C
Yes,
that's
correct
and
vice
mayor:
can
you
confirm
that
as
the.
C
Okay,
so
at
this
point
I'm
going
to
go
ahead
and
call
in
council
member
willie
and
then
let's
take
a
vote,
councilmember
willie,
your
comments.
L
I
think
that
might
have
just
so
is
young
zing?
Not
there
then.
C
No
based
upon
the
advice
from
council,
because
it's
a
limited
plot
and
fuhsd
is
part
of
the
consideration.
The
recusal
recommendation
was
to
recuse
entirely
for
a
council
member
way
for
the
system.
L
So,
okay,
what
I
was
going
to
do
is
I
thought
I
was
prepared
to
make
a
substitute
motion,
which
is
the
staff
recommendation
plus
yong
zine.
But
since
councilman
moore's
motion
now
picked
back
up
well,
I'm
still
going
to
do
that
because
let's
go
so
yeah,
I'm
going
to
move
the
council,
the
staff's
recommendation
and
I'll
leave
it
at
that
and
now,
if
somebody
wanted
to
bring
something
else
into
it,
I'm
good
with
it.
But
I
would
move
the
staff
recommendation
or
the
parks
and
recreation.
L
C
Yeah,
okay!
Well
then,
let's
do
this
I'll
see
if
there's
a
second
for
your
substitute
motion.
Is
there
a
second
for
council
member
we'll
leave
such
too
much
customer?
Really,
I
don't
see
a
hand
raised,
and
so
the
original
motion
stands.
Do
you
have
any
further
commentary
on
that
motion.
C
Thank
you
for
for
for
for
bringing
that
and
making
the
attempt.
We
will
go
ahead
and
conduct
a
roll
call
vote
on
the
motion
that
is
on
the
table
and
so
madame
city
clerk.
If
you
could
conduct
that
role
call
vote,
let's.
D
Remember
more
hi
councilmember
way
all
right.
I
apologize
council
member
willie
hi.
H
C
C
Okay,
thank
you
very
much,
madam
city
clerk
and
so
we're
on
to
the
next
item
on
our
agenda
and
so
for
that
I'll
go
ahead
and
bring
back
council
councilmember
way,
we'll
go
to
the
storm
water
fees,
and
so
we
did
not.
C
We
did
not
actually
have
a
presentation
on
that.
That's
item
39
and
so
for
this
item.
We
will
be
taking
public
input
after
the
staff
presentation,
and
so
let
me
take
a
brief
look
as
to
where
our
contemplated-
I
don't
see.
I
don't
see
a
a
presenter
here
and
so
I'll
refer
to
our
city
manager.
Jim
troop,
I
mean
I
imagine
it's
probably
either
director
morley
or
or
perhaps
chad,
mosley
but
city
manager.
Did
you
want
to
yeah.
C
Great
hey,
ursula,
how
you
doing
welcome
and
item
39
again
is
to
consider
the
approval
to
renew
with
no
increase
the
1992
storm
drain
fee
and
the
2019
clean
water
and
storm
protection
fee.
So
welcome
ursula.
Take
it
away.
B
B
Alrighty
good
evening,
honorable
mayor
and
council,
I
am
ursula
sirova
environmental
programs
manager.
The
city
has
two
property-based
fees
in
place
to
support
compliance
with
the
municipal
regional
permit
as
regulated
by
the
california
regional
water
control
board
and
to
support
storm
protection
infrastructure
work
on
our
storm
drain
system.
These
fees
require
an
annual
renewal
process
in
advance
of
the
county,
assessing
the
fee
on
individual
properties
via
property,
tax
bills
or
direct
billed
by
the
city.
My
presentation
should
take
just
about
six
minutes.
B
Here
are
the
current
rates
for
the
2019,
clean
water
and
storm
protection
fee,
which
is
sensitive
to
land
area
and
land
use
commensurate
to
the
cost
to
provide
the
service.
This
fee
is
applicable
to
all
properties,
including
school
district
lands
and
city-owned
parcels
that
are
exempt
from
the
1992
fee.
Council
has
the
option
to
increase
the
clean
water
and
storm
protection
fee
at
cpi
with
a
three
percent
cap.
If
actual
program,
expenditures,
increase
or
fund
balance
is
insufficient
to
cover
shortfall.
B
1992
fees
remain
the
same
each
year
and
while
the
clean
water
fee
does
allow
for
an
annual
increase
up
to
three
percent
staff
is
not
recommending
any
increase
to
the
clean
water
fee
for
2223,
while
expenses
for
fiscal
use,
2223
are
expected
to
be
above
the
revenues.
There
is
an
eligible
balance
in
the
environmental
management,
clean
creek
special
revenue
fund
fund
230
to
cover
the
difference.
B
The
current
balance
of
this
fund
accumulated
as
the
city
transitioned
from
storm
drain,
maintenance
costs
being
funded
by
the
general
fund
to
being
funded
by
the
clean
water
fee,
as
well
as
lower
expenditures
during
covid
and
then
coming
in
under
budget
on
expenses,
as
it
is
not
intended
for
this
fund
to
carry
a
significant
balance.
The
use
of
this
balance
to
pay
for
expenses
that
have
exceeded
revenues
is
appropriate.
B
Expenses
are
forecasted
to
continue
to
exceed
revenues,
and
if
this
does
occur
in
a
future
year,
we
may
recommend
an
increase
to
the
clean
water
fee.
Up
to
the
3
cpi
limit,
as
is
allowed
one
potential
area
for
increased
expense,
is
what
will
be
required
to
continue
meeting
the
requirements
of
our
municipal
regional
permit.
A
new
five-year
permit
was
adopted
in
may
and
will
be
effective
july
1st
of
this
year
with
certain
requirements
phased
in
for
2023.
B
And
then
we
want
to
touch
on
the
annual
budget
for
stormwater
pollution
prevention.
Storm
drainage
infrastructure
program
includes
money
for
several
rainwater
capture
rebates
and
a
cost
share
program
for
low-income
residents.
The
rebate
programs
each
have
a
first
come
first
serve
maximum
budget
of
12
500..
B
Participation
in
the
rebate
programs
has
not
been
as
high
as
we
would
like,
despite
outreach
through
valley,
water
and
the
climate
victory
gardens
program,
palo
alto,
which
has
similar
programs
to
ours,
also
reports
low
participation
for
these
types
of
projects.
We
will
continue
to
promote
these
programs
regarding
permeable
pavement.
Installation
council
did
increase
the
maximum
rebate
amount
last
year
from
900
to
1800,
to
accommodate
larger
pavement
projects,
and
in
the
past
year
one
project
applied
for
the
rebate
and
received
over
fourteen
hundred
dollars.
B
The
cost
share
program
is
available
to
low-income
property
owners.
231
people
have
already
qualified
for
this
and
now
see
a
reduced
fee
on
their
property
tax
bills,
but
more
residents
are
likely
eligible
to
receive
the
fee
reduction.
So
we
will
continue
to
reach
out
to
those
who
may
qualify
the
nonpoint
source
program
and
storm
drain
maintenance.
Revenues
and
expenses
are
annually
audited
during
the
regular
external
audit.
B
And
that
concludes
my
presentation.
I
leave
you
with
this
detail
from
a
poster
created
by
cupertino
ninth
grade
student
jessica,
quandu,
a
winner
of
the
recent
santa
clara
valley,
urban
runoff
pollution
prevention
program,
earth
day
poster
contest.
I
am
happy
to
answer
any
questions
that
council
or
the
public
may
have.
C
Hey
thanks
very
much
ursula.
Let's
go
on
to
our
members
of
the
public
now
to
see.
If
there
are
any
comments
on
this,
this
is
again
item
number
39.
Item
number
39
has
to
do
with
a
storm
drainage
fee
and
there's
a
recommendation
of
no
increase.
I
don't
see
any
hands
raised
from
the
public
here,
but
as
we're
waiting
for
that
possibility,
let
me
just
let
people
know
that
you'll
be
provided
three
minutes
to
speak
and
within
the
time
allocated
for
the
first
person
to
speak.
C
You'll
need
to
have
your
hand
raised
in
order
to
be
recognized
to
speak
on
this
item,
and
then
you
can
also
consolidate
your
time
if
you
like
up
two
minutes
per
person
up
to
a
total
amount
of
10
minutes.
If
you
consolidate
your
time,
you
don't
have
the
the
time
for
yourself
individually,
but
you
can
have
more
time
for
one
single
person.
C
I
don't
see
any
hands
raised
at
this
point,
but
the
the
final
way
to
make
commentary
would
be
to
email
in
this
context,
city
clerk
at
cupertino.org,
but
apparently
we
don't
have
the
the
hands
raised
at
this
point.
So,
let's,
let's
take
this
back
to
our
city
council
for
deliberation.
Are
there
any
questions?
First
of
all
of
counsel
of
the
present
presenter
of
the
presentation,
councilman
moore,
your
your
hand
is
raised.
Did
you
want
to
ask
a
question
or
perhaps
put
forward
a
motion
on
this.
E
Well,
question:
first
before
I
go
with
the
recommended
action,
so
I'm
looking
at
the
budget
and
there's
three
special
revenue
funds
that
relate
to
to
storm
drains.
We
have
a
storm
drain
improvement,
that's
the
210
fund
and
it's
a
beginning
fund
balance
looks
like
2.4
million
projected
beginning
fund
balance
for
this
year,
368
000.
Then
we
have
fund
215
the
storm
drain
ab1600
fund.
E
That's
the
one
I'm
really
curious
about,
and
then
we
have
this
fund
230,
the
environmental,
environmental
management,
clean,
creek,
storm
drain
special
revenue
fund.
I'm
wondering,
if
is,
is
any
amount
of
this
funding
within
this
fund
able
to
be
used
towards
storm
drain
improvements
at
all
and
then
are
should
these?
Should
these
funds
all
remain
separate
and
and
and
as
I
said,
what
is
the?
What
is
the
purpose
of
the
ab
1600
storm
drain
fund?
If
so,
it's
kind
of
maybe
someone
from
finance
could
answer
that
question
too.
C
M
M
So
when
we
have
to
expand
the
storm
drain
system
for
any
new,
you
know
if
there's
a
housing
system
going
in
or
buildings
going
in
something
that
expands
the
need.
That's
what
that
one
would
be
used
for.
I
don't
know
if
christina
has
the
other
one
or
not.
E
Okay
and
that
and
then
through
the
mayor,
that's
where
it's
a
little
confusing,
because
210
is
called
the
storm
storm
drain
improvement.
So
that-
and
I
I
realize
we've
had-
we
have
new
people
coming
on
board
and-
and
I'm
asking
kind
of
detailed
questions
about
this.
So
it
may
be
that
we
can
get
the
answer
offline,
but
I
I'm
just
wondering
if
what
exactly
if
we
could
just
have
a
kind
of
a
refresher
on
this
fund
230?
What
it's
particular
purpose
is
I'm
wondering
if
we
might
have
some
overlap.
M
Yeah,
if
we
can't,
we
don't
have
it
now.
We
can
definitely
get
it
for
you.
I
have
not
memorized
all
the
funds
yet
christina
said
she's.
Looking
it
up
right
now,
okay,.
C
Okay,
so
I'll
remind
everyone
that
the
recommended
action
again
is
to
set
the
fees
static,
and
that
would
be
the
consideration
of
the
adoption
approval
of
resolution
22-068,
which
is
attachment
a
to
the
item
approving
the
renewal
and
collection
of
the
1992
storm
green
drain
fee,
with
no
increases
and
rates
for
fiscal
year,
22
to
23
upcoming,
starting
on
july
1st,
and
then
resolution
number
22-069,
which
is
attachment
b
to
the
item
in
our
agenda,
approving
the
renewal
and
collection
of
the
2019
clean
water
and
storm
protection
fee
with
no
increases
in
rates
for
the
fiscal
year
upcoming
22
to
23,
starting
on
july
1st,
so
councilman
moore,
you
had
indicated
that
you
would
move
the
recommended
action.
E
E
The
point
that
were
that
we're
holding
the
fees
static
for
so,
if
could
we
see
the
slide?
That
explains
what
the
fee
purpose
is
for.
I
think
that
that
would
help
just
so
I
just
so.
I
can
keep
it
clear
when
I'm
asking
my
questions
about
the
other
two
funds
moving
forward.
C
Okay,
this
is
this
is
not.
This
is
not
exclusively
for
education.
If
it's,
if
it's
that
it
is,
it
is
to
fund
the
infrastructure,
that's
needed
to
be
maintained
or
built
out,
but
ursula.
C
And
I'm
not
really
clear,
counseling
more
on
what
your
question
specifically
pertains
to,
but
the
two
resolutions
that
are
under
the
recommended
action
have
to
do
with
the
1992
storm
drain
fee
and
the
2019
clean
water
and
storm
protection
fee
and
so
correct.
E
And
I'm
looking
at
the
mayor
paul.
Thank
you.
I'm
looking
at
the
the
municipal
code,
which
was
which
was
approved,
and
I
just
wanted
someone
point
me
to
the
section
in
this
code,
which
tells
me
what
the
where
the
fee,
what
what
the
fee
is
going
to
be
used
for
in
particular,
because
I'm
not
for
some
reason,
I'm
not
able
to
to
grab
it
really
quickly.
And
when
I
went
through
the
agenda
packet,
it
was
not
very
clear
and
I
so
when
I
asked
the
questions
about
the
other
two
fees.
B
H
F
B
Education
is
part
of
it,
but
also
we
do
proactive
inspections
of
over
130
businesses
every
year
to
make
sure
that
the
back
of
house
has
no
potential
discharges
to
the
storm
water.
We
respond
whenever
an
illicit
discharge
happens,
we
go
out
and
make
sure
that's
all
cleaned
up
properly,
including
clean
out
of
the
laterals,
and
you
know
other
parts
of
the
system.
B
B
C
Yes,
go
ahead
castle
more
and
I'm
sorry
did
I
hear
somebody
else
looking
to
spread.
K
Christmas
yeah,
I'm
sorry,
I
should
have
raised
my
hand.
I
could
just
add
to
that
answer,
though,
so
the
I
mean
the
purposes
of
the
fees
are
listed
in
chapter
336
with
338
subs
in
this
chapter,
338
of
the
musical
code
there
is
there
is,
I
think
you
know
if
you
look
at
those
purposes
it
will.
You
know
I
think
you'll
conclude
that
there's
some
overlap.
That's
you
know
likely
due
to
historical
reasons,
with
the
change
in
law
as
to
how
these
fees
are
assessed.
K
E
Through
the
mayor
is
there,
is
there
some
way,
or
is
it
already
being
accounted
for
to
ensure
that
or
does
it
matter?
Is
it
relevant
how
the
the
golf
course
is
is
fertilized
if
it's
using
fertilizers,
which
could
drain
into
the
creek
and
cause
environmental
damage
or
or
not
in
this
could
could
this
fee
be
also
used
to
help
essentially
help
with
any
additional
costs
that
could
be
incurred?
B
We
do
track
all
pesticide
use
in
the
city.
We
get
reports
from
all
the
applicators.
We
encourage
ipm,
integrated
pest
management
techniques
and
we're
actually
working
on
a
you
know,
a
plan
for
the
corridor,
specifically
along
stevens
creek,
to
really
drill
down
more
into
that
issue
of
what's
appropriate
to
use.
But
we
are,
you
know
using
good
management
practices
and
the
the
golf
course
in
particular
takes
takes
good
care
in
that
realm.
C
Yeah,
no,
I
mean
it's
it's
a
reasonable
comment.
I
mean
you
know
we
could
go
pretty
far
afield
on
all
of
this,
but
at
the
end
of
the
day,
this
is
about
whether
we
hold
the
fee
steady
or
we
increase
it.
You
know,
and
so
it's
not
within
our
purview,
to
cancel
the
fee,
so
I
mean
or
to
diminish
it.
So
I
I
would
like
to
ask
for
you
know
I
will
say
I
can
go
far
afield
too.
C
You
know
ursula,
and
I
were
you
know,
talking
offline
over
email
about
you
know
tires
and
the
fact
that
you
know
basically
plastics
are
coming
out
off
of
tires
and
really
they're
really
quite
an
appreciable
issue,
and
that,
of
course,
would
implicate
storm
drainage
as
well.
But
you
know
with
all
respect
and
the
interest
of
time,
let's
just
try
to
figure
out
whether
we
want
to
raise
these.
You
know
fees
or
hold
them
steady.
C
E
Yes,
second,
it,
but
one
of
the
things
that.
C
L
I
was
just
going
to
second
your
default
motion.
No.
C
Other
comment
all
right:
I
appreciate
that
council
or
more
you
have
before
yet.
E
Simply
that
I
think
we
need
to
have
staff
review,
the
storm
drain,
improvement,
special
revenue
fund,
210,
215
and
and
then
2
30
and
perhaps
see
if
there
is
some
overlap.
That
needs
to
be.
E
Changed
and
then
let
us
know
what
the
the
definitions
of
each
of
these
funds,
how
they,
how
they
were
created,
what
they're
for
because
there's
a
considerable
amount
of
money
sitting
in
the
storm
drain
ab1600
fund,
and
we
might
have
some
projects
that
that
should
be
using
it
up.
Thank
you.
C
Okay,
thank
you,
councilman
moore
yeah,
and
I
will
say
that
you
know
these
these
just
ramify
to
a
lot
of
facets.
I
mean
you
know
in
the
last
drought
we
actually
didn't
have
much
use
for
the
well.
I
would
say
in
in
the
prior
drought
to
what
we're
experiencing
right
now,
a
lot
of
the
detritus
kind
of
accumulated
and
what
we
were
finding
was
that
there
was
a
lot
of
backups
from
our
storm
drainage
system
and
people
around
the
city.
C
Once
the
water
came
back,
you
know
one
season
we're
experiencing
significant
amounts
of.
C
You
know
water
flooding
in
in
some
parts
of
the
city,
and
so
what
ended
up
happening
was
that
that
year
we
actually
spent
quite
a
bit
of
money
to
kind
of
clean
out
the
drains
and
and
that
kind
of
gave
us
a
little
bit
of
more
awareness
of
the
need
for
funding
to
maintain
that,
even
in
times
of
when
there's
no
water
and
we're
not
noticing
you
know
the
flow
issues,
and
so
I
I
think
that
basically
kicked
off
some
consideration
about
trying
to
find
additional
funding.
C
But
you
know
to
your
point:
councilmember
moore.
I
think
it
is
a
good
idea
to
constantly
be
looking
at.
You
know
the
various
sources
of
funding
and
whether
we're
using
them
optimally,
but
you
know
again
at
the
end
of
the
day,
this
is
about
whether
we
hold
this.
You
know
a
rate
steady
and
I'm
very
appreciative
of
the
motion.
That's
on
the
table,
because
when
we
passed
this
in
2019
or
at
least
place
it
on
the
ballot
or
the
mail
ballot,
I
should
say
you
know.
C
I
said
as
long
as
I'm
on
council.
I
will
not
be
voting
for
any
increases,
and
so
I'm
glad
to
be
able
to
make
good
on
that
commitment.
So
if,
if
this
passes,
of
course,
or
at
least
you
know
even
if
it
doesn't
pass-
and
we
have
another
motion-
I'm
going
to
be
voting
against
it.
If
it,
if
it's
an
increase
in
the
event,
I
don't
see
any
further
hands
raised,
and
so,
madam
city
clerk,
could
you
please
conduct
a
roll
call
vote
on
the
motion
on
the
table.
C
All
right
great
so
we're
at
9
30
right
now
we
started
around
6
30
with
closed
session.
So
let's
let's
go
ahead
and
take
a
a
brief
break.
We'll
come
back
at
9
38
and
get
into
the
work
plan
item
which
was
originally
consent.
Calendar
item
number
14
that
was
pulled
and
brought
forward
to
this
evening,
and
so
we'll
see
you
in
a
few
minutes.
Thanks.
C
C
C
14
and
the
subject
was
a
final
priority,
ranking
of
our
adopted
fiscal
year
22-23
again,
starting
on
july
1st
city
work
program.
The
recommended
action
was
to
receive
the
final
priority,
ranking
of
the
adopted
fiscal
year,
2022-23
city
work
program
and
so
jim.
Who
is
providing
this
presentation
for
item
14.?
Thank
you.
M
Mayor,
actually,
we
have
asked
robles
she's,
stepping
in
and
stepping
up
to
help
us
out
and
she.
O
Great
good
evening,
honorable
mayor
and
council
members,
in
summary,
I'm
here
to
discuss
the
consent
item
today
on
the
city
work
program.
So
this
item
was
brought
to
council
on
may
17th,
and
this
item
was
actually
adopted
with
modifications
and
then
requested
to
be
reprioritized
one
last
time
with
all
the
38
items
that
were
adopted
that
day
and
so
attached
in
the
packet
was
attachment.
A
council
member's
ratings
were
compiled
into
that
attachment,
and
I
have
it
here
which
I
can
share
earlier
today.
O
I
got
a
request
to
modify
the
attachment
to
include
council
member
names,
so
I
can
go
ahead
and
share
that
with
your
permission,
mayor
right
now
to
show
the
attachment
here.
C
Oh,
thank
you.
Thank
you
very
much
astrid.
Thank
you,
jim.
So
a
little
bit
of
context
on
this
one.
When
we
had
come
out
with
a
work
program,
former
rankings
and
the
ratings
staff
had
taken
it
upon
themselves
to
anonymize
the
council
member
rankings
and
I
wasn't
sure
whether
they
were
further.
You
know
kind
of
randomly
scattered
in
terms
of
like
you
know.
C
If
council
member
one
was
a
consistent
council
member,
for
instance,
but
we
did
have
a
member
of
the
public
ask
for
the
identities
of
the
council
members,
one
through
five,
and
so
you
know
I
was
unaware
of
anybody
who
had
asked
you
know
for
anonymization
from
from
from
council,
and
so
I
did
respond
back
to
the
member
of
the
public,
and
you
know
I
ccr
city
manager-
and
it
really
did
seem
like
this-
was
not
driven
by
anybody
on
council
in
terms
of
the
identities
so
yeah
so
so
astrid.
C
It
looks
like
you
have
a
new
document
there
and
so.
O
And
yes,
I
do
have
this
attachment
here
and
I
can.
Oh,
I'm
also
planning
on
emailing
this
to
the
city
clerks,
so
it
could
be
posted
as
a
written
communication,
so
it
can
be
viewable
by
the
public.
O
C
All
right,
yeah
now
take
your
presentation
away.
So
is
your
presentation
basically.
H
O
C
I
see
I
see
okay.
Well,
that's
what
was
on
our
consent
calendar
and
this
has
been
released
public
since
last
thursday.
So
it's
it's
been
out
there.
For
a
week
we
had
it
on
consent,
14,
as
you
indicated,
it
was
pulled
from
consent,
calendar
and
so
esther
did
you
want
to
go
over
the
the
items
I
mean
you
know
scrolling
through.
I
think
it
will
probably
take
a
few
minutes.
C
You
know
just
to
read,
you
know
all
the
items
through
so
so
so
I
mean
if
you're,
okay
with
it
I'll,
basically
refer
this
to
everyone's.
You
know
material
that
that
is
accessible
through
the
agenda
and
then
we'll
take
public
comment
and
then
bring
it
back
to
council
for
any
follow-up
questions
or
comments,
but.
O
O
So
so
here
I
wanted
to
keep
it
simple
and
make
it
easy
to
read,
and
so
we
have
the
project,
tasks
and
objectives
here.
I
also
included
the
old
priority
numbers
just
to
see
the
change
throughout,
so
you
that
could
be
viewed
right
here.
On
the
left
side
column
most
of
the
items
tended
to
stay
the
same.
O
C
I
think
that
would
be
fine
yeah.
If
you
don't
want
to
kind
of
explicate
each
each
one
by
title.
That's
fine!
Just
just
scroll,
you
know,
maybe
a
couple
few
seconds
per
page.
O
I
would
also
just
note,
I
think
we
mentioned
at
the
last
meeting,
but
any
items
with
the
same
rating
were
just
tied,
so
the
number
just
continues
because
they
have
the
same
priority.
O
Yeah
and
again
this
will
be
posted
as
a
written
communication.
C
Yeah
I
mean
it's,
it's
posted
right.
I
mean
this
is
just
to
kind
of
reiterate
it.
It's
on
the
on
the
full
agenda
packet
from
tuesday,
the
7th
that's
1517
page
packet,
and
it
starts
on
page
452
and,
I
believe,
goes
to
page
463,
so
yeah,
so
it
looks
like
you're
almost
there.
Okay,
let's
do
this,
let's
go
to
our
members
of
the
public
with
any
comments
and
then
we'll
take
it
back
to
council.
So
I'm
not.
C
Actually
there
is
one
josh
silo
has
a
hand
raised,
and
so
I
remind
our
members
of
the
public
you'll
have
three
minutes
to
provide
public
comment.
You
also
have
the
ability
to
pull
your
time.
Each
person
within
the
pool
can
allocate
two
minutes
that
gives
up
your
individual
time
up
to
a
total
of
10
minutes
and
while
the
first
person
is
speaking,
please
have
your
hand
raised
in
order
to
be
called
on
for
this
item.
C
And
then,
if
you
want
to
email
your
comments
in
to
be
read
up
to
three
minutes
into
the
record
by
the
city
clerk,
you
can
do
so
during
the
time
the
first
person
is
speaking,
and
that
would
be
to
city
clerk.
All
one
word
at
cupertino.org,
so
it
is
still
just
josh
with
the
hand,
race
and
so
josh
welcome.
You'll
have
three
minutes
to
speak.
C
Yes,
yes,
we
can.
Thank
you.
N
Thank
you
so
much
mayor
paul,
it's
good
to
be
with
you
vice
mayor,
ciao
and
council
members
more
way
and
willie,
I'm
here
to
speak
on
behalf
of
the
homeless
jobs
program
and
to
thank
you
for
your
continued
support
and
prioritization
of
this
program,
hopefully
into
a
second
year.
I
wanted
to
share
a
testimonial
from
one
of
the
clients
who
participated
in
the
program
this
year,
so
you
can
hear
about
the
impact
that
the
program
has
had
on
her
and
her
family's
life.
So
she
said
that
she
she
and
she
wrote
this.
N
So
I'm
reading
her
words.
She
got
into
the
program
she
returned
to
full
employment.
She's
now
received
rapid
rehousing.
So
she
has
a
house
and
she's
been
reunited
with
her
children,
which
are
now
living
with
her
in
her
home.
They
were
not
living
with
her
before
she
participated
in
the
program
and
she
says
the
program
has
helped
me:
learn
new
life
skills
and
how
to
be
more
responsible.
N
I
have
a
lot
to
learn
when
it
comes
to
my
finances.
However,
I
signed
up
to
take
a
financial
workshop
in
july.
I'm
truly
grateful
to
be
housed
and
not
having
to
worry
where
I'm
going
to
sleep.
I'm
also
grateful
that
I'm
going
to
be
working
with
jobtrain
and
continue
to
work
on
developing
my
employment
skills
building
on
my
previous
employment
skills.
So
I
can
maintain
my
housing
if
it
wasn't
for
this
program,
I
don't
know
where
I
would
be.
N
Thank
you
very
much,
and
I
just
want
you
all
to
know
this
is
the
kind
of
support
that
you
make
possible
with
this
type
of
program.
So
I
want
to
thank
the
investment
that
the
city
of
cupertino
has
made
in
the
homeless
jobs
program
and
I'm
hoping
to
see
it
continue
into
another
year.
Thank
you
all.
So
much.
C
C
Okay
and
let's
go
ahead
and
bring
it
back
to
council,
I
see
hands
raised
from
council
members,
moore
and
willie.
So
let's
start
with
any
clarifying
questions
and
before
we
go
into
commentary,
I
will
ask
for
actually
there's
there's
no
motion
requested,
but
we
can
go
ahead
and
move
to
accept
the
the
report
as
well.
If
we
want
to
put
that
on
the
table.
But
let's
let's
go
for
clarifying
questions
of
the
presentation
at
this
point.
Tell
us
a
little
bit
more.
E
Okay,
well
I'll
do
this
as
a
clarifying
question,
so
I
notice
we
have
cip
items
on
on
this
ranking
and
then
we
also
in
in
tonight's
agenda.
We
have
another
ranking
the
cip
programs,
which
overlap
the
the
ranking
that
that
we
have
in
in
this
city
work
program
item.
E
So
I'm
I'm
wondering
what
I
noticed
about
the
rankings
that
we
have
here
is
that
number
seven
was
the
seismic
retrofit
and
upgrade
so
I
just
wanna
and
I'm
not
sure
how
to
point
this
out,
but
but
in
our
this,
when
we
ranked
cips
that
that
one
really
fell
fell
to
the
very
low
on
the
list,
so
I
want
just
one
point
that
out
but
do
other
cities.
This
is
kind
of
a
question
for
staff.
E
Do
are
do
other
cities
combine
their
cip
items
into
their
city
work
program
because
normally
what
I'm
seeing?
If
I
go,
look
at
what
sunnyvale
has
for
their
budget?
I'm
seeing
this
like
an
operational
budget
and
then
I'm
seeing
the
cip
budget
and
they're
separate,
and
then
I'm
also
wondering
what
are
the
rules
around
when
each
has
to
be
approved.
C
Great
it
looks
like
jim
is
waiting
and
we
also
have
our
director
of
pub
works,
matt
marley,
so
so
jim.
Why
don't
we
start
with
you.
M
Okay,
I
didn't
see
that
pop
up
there,
but
I'm
just
gonna
say
so.
This
is
my
first
city
where
we
have
what
we're
calling
the
city
work
plan.
I've
always
been.
It's
either
been
the
operational
budget
plus
a
cip
budget
and
they're
off
they're
adopted
at
the
same
time,
but
not
the
same
product.
If
you,
if
that
makes
sense,
you
know
you
have
the
budget,
then
you
have
the
cip.
The
cip,
then
becomes
part
whatever
is
approved,
becomes
part
of
the
budget.
M
Q
Thank
you
very
much
yeah,
so
the
my
experience
in
my
previous
organization
was
that
there
were
tended
to
be
a
number
of
items
that
were
cip
that
ended
up
on
the
work
program
and
it
really
it
sort
of
adds
emphasis
to
those
items
being
important
to
the
council.
Q
It
it
just
means
a
little
bit
of
tracking
in
two
locations.
I
think
moving
them
forward
is
is
still
functional
and
something
that
we
that
we
can
do
so.
If
it
helps
the
council
to
be
able
to
provide
that
emphasis,
then
it's
something
that
I
think
that
staff
can
accommodate.
Really
a
council
decision.
C
Yeah
and
that's
that's-
that's
a
good
way
of
ending
it
frankly,
director,
morally,
so
so
council
decision,
you
know,
even
if
we
have
a
work
program
out
there
and
it's
adopted
and
correct
me
if
I'm
wrong.
C
If
there
are
any
particular
items
like
we
all
agree
that
item
number,
I'm
just
going
to
pick
a
random
number
from
1
through
38
that
item
number
33.
I
don't
know
what
it
is
it
just
shouldn't
be
budgeted.
Then
we
don't
budget
it
I
mean.
That's
that's
within
our
purview.
This
is
not
some
kind
of
you
know
etched
in
stone
requirement.
C
You
know
this
receipt
of
the
work
plan
because
it's
actually
a
fairly.
You
know,
at
least
from
our
currency
manager's
experience.
I
have
no
reason
to
think
that
it's
not
typically
a
a
novel
thing
that
you
know
we
go
through
in
order
to
kind
of
reach
out
to
our
public
and
all
the
commissions
and
committees
and
try
to
figure
out.
You
know
what
are
priorities
for
our
our
city
in
terms
of
working
on.
You
know,
potential
items
that
come
from
you
know
essentially
the
public
over
the
course
of
the
year.
C
So
we're
not,
I
don't
see
in
any
way
shape
or
form
bound
to
these
38
items.
Nor
do
I
think,
even
if
we
were
trying
to
you,
know
represent
that
that
we
were
that
staff
would
get
all
38
items
done
or
even
addressed
over
the
course
of
the
fiscal
year.
So
I
I
think
that
this
you
know,
take
it
with
a
grain
of
salt.
It
is
a
good
document.
C
It
is
a
well-formed
document,
but
it
is
not
something
that
absolutely
absolutely
binds
us
to
how
we
proceed
going
forward
and
without
putting
too
fine
a
point
on
it.
We
have
a
budget
that
we're
considering
you
know.
Hopefully
you
know
dealing
with
an
approval
of
some
kind
later
this
evening.
C
It
is
something
if
something
doesn't
get
funded.
Then.
Obviously,
it's
not
going
to
going
to
proceed,
so
I
would
say,
take
the
work
plan
process
for
what
it
has
been.
You
can
examine
the
rankings
as
they
are,
but
but
not
to
get
too
lost
in
the
weeds
of
how
these
rankings
are
are
represented.
Without
you
know,
kind
of
putting
any
kind
of
qualitative.
You
know
kind
of
kind
of
idea
on
it.
As
as
staff
pointed
out,
you
know
we
agreed
to
process.
This
is
the
ranking,
we're
not
re-ranking
at
this
point.
C
This
is
just
the
receipt
of
a
document.
So
so
again
you
know
let
this
inform
and
notify
how
you're
proceeding,
but
it's
not
something
that
even
if
it's
like
you
know,
within
the
top
ten
or
top
five
that
we
absolutely
have
to
you
know,
set
forth
as
part
of
the
budget,
which
is
really
where
you
know,
if
you'll
pardon
the
expression
where
the
rubber
meets
the
road
in
terms
of
how
things
go
forward
in
this
next
fiscal
year.
So,
okay,
so
councilman
moore's
hand
is
not
raised
anymore.
L
Great
thank
you
mayor
first
number
one
shout
out
to
josh
giving
us
some
feedback
good,
better
and
different.
That's
what
we
want
to
find
out
hearing
your
awesome
feedback
it
to
me.
It's
just
wonderful
to
hear.
L
I
would
say
that
at
the
library
expansion
opening
bonaifer,
who
is
part
of
the
west
valley,
community
services,
assistance
on
this
jobs
program
said
that
actually
sunnyvale
had
reached
out
to
her
to
find
out
how
this
program
is
being
done.
So
here
we
are
possibly
helping
to
to
put
the
word
out
and
get
other
programs
going,
because
we
do
see
a
huge
need
out
there.
Okay,.
L
I'll
start
with
a
question
for
the
city
manager,
so
there's
35
items,
I
I
really
tried
hard
to
keep
it
to
35,
so
I
actually
didn't
put
any
numbers
on
ones
that
I
felt
you
know
went
beyond
the
city
staff's
ability.
Are
you
comfortable
with
the
35
items
or
do
you
feel
staff
is
taxed
over
taxed?
You
know,
how
do
you
feel
no.
M
Question,
thank
you.
You
know
the
mayor
through
there
to
council
member
really,
you
know
we.
What
we
do
in
between
is
we
I
get
with
the
staff,
all
the
department,
heads
and
everybody.
That's
this.
It
is
going
to
be
a
lot
of
work,
but
I
do
ask
them
to
be
realistic
on
what
their
accomplishments
they
think
we
can
do
throughout
the
year.
So
this
is
what
we
think
we
can
get
done.
You
know
there
might
be
some
hiccups
along
the
way,
but
we
think
we
can
get
through
this.
L
Great
so
now
a
a
positive
comment
for
our
public
works
director
matt
that
he's
coming
from
a
place
where
items
were
put
on
the
work
plan
for
city
council
to
be
able
to
track
the
history
that
I
experienced
here
is
that
if
it
wasn't
on
the
work
plan
item
then
city,
the
previous
city
manager,
said
no
staff
has
no
time
to
give
you
updates,
and
yet
these
are
important
items.
This
work
plan
that
we
feel
are
answering
the
calls
to
our
community.
L
So
that
being
said,
that's
how
some
of
these
got
on
there.
You
know
like
the
seismic
upgrade.
So
if
staff
could
jump
to
the
seismic
upper
grade,
I
think
councilman
moore
said
it
was
number
seven
if
they
could
throw
that
up
there,
so
that
we
can
read
the
description.
L
So
I'm
glad
that
the
description
I
think
now
reflects
our
intent.
We're
number
seven
you're,
not
quite
there,
yet
the
seismic
upgrade
for.
L
There
you
go,
and
so
it
says
seismic
retrofit
and
upgrade
to
existing
city
hall
formally
investigate
alternatives
to
city
hall.
So
by
putting
it
on
the
work
plan,
I
I
the
intent
was.
I
truly
hope
that
we
could
help
get
from
point
a
to
point
b,
with
b
being
the
city
council's
desire
and
quarterly
updates.
L
I
think
you
will
be
asking
for
an
update
on
this
and
so
to
me,
although
it's
primarily
a
cip
project,
that's
where
the
the
bulk
of
the
money
perhaps
would
come
from,
although
I
believe
it's
requested
the
500k
here
as
long
as
it's
not
doubly
funded,
and
so
I'm
happy
with
what
we're
seeing
here
when
we
get
to
the
cip
I'll
make
some
more
comments
about
additional
cip
items
that
I
think
belong
connected
with
this
and
that's
the
parking
analysis
at
the
city
hall
city,
community
center
and
the
there's
one
other
one
so
I'll
bring
those
up.
L
C
Okay,
folks,
thanks
very
much
thank
you.
Councilmember
wooly,
and
you
know
what
I
would
suggest
at
this
time,
since
we
have
a
couple
hours
left
before
midnight
that
we
move
on
to
the
cip
and
the
budget,
because,
ultimately,
at
the
end
of
the
day,
what
we
fund
is
what
will
be
financially
supported,
going
forward
for
the
upcoming
fiscal
year.
So
thank
you
for
your
comments.
C
Councilmember
willie,
thank
you
for
your
presentation
astrid
and,
to
you
know
all
of
the
the
staff
that
work
together
to
you
know
bring
this
forward.
We
we
don't
have
within
our
purview
the
ability
to
change
this,
and
so
we
have
a
document
and
let's
go
on
to
item
number.
I
believe
it
was
someone
helped
me
out
here
it
wasn't
39.
That
was
the
last
one.
I
think
it
was
37.
Is
that
right
or
was
it
38
38.
D
C
I'm
38
okay,
so
that
that
report
having
been
received,
I
don't
see
further
hands
raised.
Let's
go
on
to
item
38
and
item
38
I'll,
go
ahead
and
read
the
the
title
of
it,
although
I
won't
read
all
the
various
items
because
of
course
this
comprises
the
entirety
of
our
budget
with
the
recommended
action.
C
So
the
subject
is
a
public
hearing
to
consider
the
capital,
improvement
program
or
cip,
consider
supplemental
information
for
the
capital
improvements
program
and
to
consider
the
recommended
budget
for
fiscal
year
22
to
23,
starting
on
july
1st,
a
little
less
than
a
month.
From
now
adoption
of
the
fiscal
year
22
to
23
establishment,
I
should
say
adoption
of
the
budget
for
fiscal
year
22-23
rather
establishment
of
the
appropriation
limit
and
related
actions,
and
so
let
me
refer
this
to
our
city
manager.
C
Jim
welcome
to
your
very
first
combined
cip
and
budget
item
been
great
to
have
you
from
this
last
almost
half
year
here,
and
so
why?
Don't
you
kick
us
off
on
item
38
here:
hey.
Q
P
So
this
slide
shows
all
the
components
that
are
incorporated
into
the
proposed
budget.
So
over
the
past
few
months,
the
city
council
has
held
meetings
and
study
sessions
to
review
and
provide
direction
to
staff
on
the
city
award
program,
the
capital,
improvement
program
or
cip
community
funding,
as
well
as
a
proposed
budget
and
so
city
council's
direction.
From
these
meetings
and
study
sessions
are
then
incorporated
into
the
budget
that
you're
seeing
today.
P
So
on
this
slide,
we
have
a
summary
of
the
proposed
budget
of
changes
to
the
proposed
budget,
since
it
was
printed
on
may
1st,
so
the
printed
proposed
budget
on
may
1st
recommended
expenses
of
125.5
million.
Since
then,
it's
been
increased
by
0.8
million
due
to
operating
changes.
Operating
changes
refer
to
items
that
were
unknown
when
the
proposed
budget
was
printed
and
then
also
due
to
the
timing
of
the
city,
work,
program
and
capital
improvement
program.
P
They
were
also
incorporated
after
the
proposed
budget
was
printed
so
the
city
work
program,
projects
and
transfers
are
increasing
the
budget
by
800
000
and
the
city,
capital
improvement
program
and
transfers
are
increasing
the
budget
by
3.5
million
leading
to
a
proposed
budget.
As
of
june
9
of
130.6
million,
and
on
this
slide
we
can
see
these
changes
by
fun
type
and
I'll.
Just
mention
that
the
city
work
program
total
includes
107
500
in
transfers
and
the
capital
improvement
program
total
as
well
includes
transfers
of
23
600.
P
P
P
P
P
On
this
slide,
we
also
have
a
increase
of
300
000
to
a
sp1
or
senate
bill,
one
gas
tax
revenue
estimate,
and
so
this
is
increasing
to
a
line
of
projections
from
the
state.
As
city
council
heard
at
the
june
7
meeting
from
public
works,
the
city
expects
to
receive
1.3
million
in
sd1
revenues,
and
the
amount
received
by
the
city
is
tied
to
overall
state
gas
consumption
and
then
the
last
change
on
this
slide
is
a
removal
of
fixed
asset
requests
for
vehicle
and
equipment
replacement.
P
P
And
on
this
second
part
of
the
city,
work
program,
slides
I'll,
just
note
that
the
study
session
on
city-owned
properties
and
the
blackberry
farm
blackberry
fund
golf
course
needs
assessments
are
budgeted
in
the
cip
budget
and
so
for
the
city
work
program.
Total
expenses
are
844,
000
and
total
revenues
are
107
500.,
and
these
revenues
are
transfers
from
the
general
fund
to
the
other
funds,
and
so.
Q
This
is
the
the
list
of
projects
that
came
forward
in
the
proposed
originally
and
if
we
go
to
the
next
slide,
you'll
see
that,
since
that
time,
we've
made
some
adjustments
at
council
direction.
Q
This
is
what
we
think
the
council
direction
has
been
in
terms
of
adjustments
that
we'd
like
to
make
in
the
proposed-
and
this
is
in
the
actual
cip,
and
so
this
is
what
we're
thinking
we're
moving
forward
at
this
point
pending
for
the
discussion
tonight
or
at
a
future
night,
and
so
you
can
see
that
with
this
one,
we've
redlined
through
some
of
the
projects
that
we
think
the
council
is
not
supporting,
based
on
motions
that
we've
heard
in
previous
meetings.
H
P
That
so,
let's
talk
about
what's
coming
up
next
in
the
budget
cycle,
so
we
plan
to
publish
the
adopted
budget
in
july
or
august
and
then
we'll
plan
to
present
the
first
quarter
report
to
city
council
in
november.
The
first
quarter
report
will
update
the
city
council
on
year.
End
results
for
the
current
fiscal
year
as
well
as
update
council
on
first
quarter
results
for
the
next
fiscal
year
and
we
look
forward
to
your
questions
and
comments.
Thank
you.
C
Great
well,
thank
you
very
much.
That
was
a
smart
thank
you
for
listening
to
our
our
past
discussions
as
well
and
adopting
them
in
the
current
staff
recommendations
in
this
presentation.
Before
we
go
to
council,
I'm
going
to
go
and
check
in
with
our
members
of
the
public
that
are
here
so
you'll
have
three
minutes
to
speak
on
this
item
number
38,
and
so
I
don't
see
any
hands
raised
at
this
point,
but
I
do
see
one
now,
that
is
from
gene,
badord
and
I'll.
C
In
this
context,
you
can
also
once
the
hands
are
all
called
upon
in
zoom
email,
our
city
clerk.
During
time.
The
first
person
is
speaking
for
your
comments
to
be
read
into
the
record
for
up
to
three
minutes.
So
at
this
point
it
is
still
one
hand
raised
and
so
gene
welcome.
S
S
S
Those
new
positions
are,
first
of
all,
an
assisted
city
manager
for
three
hundred
and
eighty
seven
thousand
dollars
to
oversee
legislative
issues
and
advocacy,
do
outreach
to
communities
and
to
engage
with
affordable
housing
developers
and
two
a
legislative
aid
for
183
thousand
dollars
combined.
These
two
positions
will
cost
the
city
over
570
thousand
dollars.
S
S
S
S
C
Thank
you
very
much
gene
and
I
will
bring
it
back
to
council
at
this
point
so
I'll
go
by
questions
clarifying
for
the
staff,
presentation
and
others
pertinent
to
the
item
of
course,
and
so
I
don't
see
hands
raised,
but
I'm
certain
that
there
will
be
questions
and
follow-ups
council
member
willie,
your
hand
is
raised.
Why
don't
you
start
us
off.
L
Yeah,
so
very
good
presentation,
good
assistance
from
director
of
public
works
matt.
L
The
question
that
I've
got
kind
of
stems
in
the
form
of
director
of
public
works
has
struck
out
the
four
million
dollars
for
the
city
hall,
correct
it
previous
description,
new
city
hall,
new,
well,
new
three-story
parking
structure,
80
million
dollars,
yeah
yeah.
We
we
talked
about
that,
but
in
terms
of
the
seismic
upgrade
for
which
we
just
talked
about
the
work
plan
and
the
item
is
there
with
the
funding
amount
of
say
five
hundred
thousand
dollars
and
when
we
previously
talked
about
the
cip.
L
L
When
I
looked
at
the
cip
item,
there
was
both
new
projects
and
existing
funded
projects,
and
there
were
three
of
them:
community
hall
improvement,
relocation,
slash
relocation
of
eoc,
which
was
item
number
23
city
hall,
improvements
and
programming
feasibility
item
number
33,
civic
center
parking
analysis.
Item
number
37..
L
I
think
all
three
of
those
need
to
be
brought
under
the
umbrella
of
the
seismic
upgrade
for
city
hall,
and
hopefully
my
my
hope
is
that
over
the
next
six
months
we
will
be
able
to
define
what
the
most
likely
options
are,
that
this
city
council
would
consider
and
it
it
should
have
that
programming
feasibility,
the
parking
you
know
wrapped
up
in
it.
So
that's
where
my
question
is
for
director
of
public
works.
Thank
you.
Q
Thank
you
mayor,
so
yeah.
I
think
we
heard
the
council
loud
and
clear
that
the
council
would
like
a
more
deliberate
process
before
we
start
out
appropriating
funds
that
would
lead
to
100
design
for
a
project,
so
our
plan
is
is
to
actually
use
those
other
funds
that
that
you
cited
council
member
willie
to
to
advance
this
in
in
close
coordination
and
under
direction
of
the
council.
Ultimately,
so
we
think
that
there's
some
work
and
some
discussion
to
happen,
and
we
would
like
to
move
forward
with
that.
Q
The
council
council
can
help
us
along
the
way,
with
direction
on
how
we're
doing
and
what
does
it.
What
the
designs
are
are
fleshing
out
to
look
like
with
the
idea
that
it'll
be
conceptual
and
start
with
a
good
deal
of
planning
from
a
capacity
standpoint
for
parking,
staffing
and
available
space.
C
All
right,
great
thanks,
councilmember
thanks
director
morley
and
before
I
call
on
vice
mayor
ciao.
Let
me
check
in
with
our
city
attorney,
so
so
chris
on
this
item.
You
know
this
is
far
and
away.
You
know,
in
the
longer
term,
just
two
or
three
years
down
the
line,
the
most
expensive
project
being
contemplated.
C
C
Could
we,
at
this
stage,
in
our
conversation,
implement
a
council
subcommittee
to
be
working
with
our
staff,
our
city
manager,
the
director
of
public
works,
and
you
know
having
the
meetings
and
talking
about
the
the
plans
for
city
hall,
seismic
retrofits.
Possibly
doing
some
diligence
on
you
know,
past
action
is
that
something
that
would
be
legitimate
in
terms
of
the
consideration
of
the
budget,
and
you
know
moving
forward
from
this.
H
K
Know
giving
specific
direction
on
how
that
project's
going
to
be
implemented
is
probably
a
little
bit
outside
of
the
the
scope
of
what's
been
agendized
here
I
think
you
know
a
subcommittee
may
be
useful,
and
you
know
that
may,
but
perhaps
the
next
time
that
this
comes
this
meeting,
the
the
this
city
hall
investigation
comes
back
to
council
for
an
update.
I
think
that
would
be
an
opportunity
to
to
act
on
that
thought
near
paul.
C
You
know
what
I
had
in
mind
here
when
we
did
our
groundbreaking
in
conjunction
with
the
historical
society
on
the
canyon
crossing,
you
know,
project
one
of
the
former
owners
of
the
property
was
the
was
the
manager
of
the
1986
upgrades
to
city
hall,
and
he
was
willing
to
come
in
and
talk
to
talk
to
our
city
manager,
as
well
as
myself
about
some
of
his
perspectives
on
this
project,
and
you
know
subsequent
to
that,
we
had.
You
know
some
of
our
public
discussions.
C
It
seemed
to
me
that
there
were
at
least
a
couple
of
people
on
our
council
that,
had
you
know
very
strong
interest
in
you
know
keeping
with
this,
given
the
fact
that
I
term
out
in
in
six
months
a
little
bit
less
at
this
point,
I
I
thought
it
would
be
good
to
kind
of
you
know,
perhaps
create
a
subcommittee.
You
know
with
the
beginning
of
this
conversation,
which
I
think
will
happen
in
a
couple
of
weeks.
C
I
I
need
to
check
my
calendar,
but
at
this
point
I
I
think
I'll
probably
take
that
meeting
with
you
know
with
jim
and
hopefully
matt
you'll
be
available.
I
know
you
don't
have
notice
as
to
when
that
was
and
and
so
we'll
coordinate.
And
then
you
know
subsequent
to
this
when
we
have
this
appropriately
agendized,
let's
go
ahead
and
form
that
subcommittee
and
you
know.
Hopefully
we
can
keep
a
good
longer
term
conversation
going
here.
So
matt
director
morley,
you
have
your
hand
raised.
Q
Just
filling
in
a
bit
of
information,
thank
you,
mayor
on
the
17th.
During
our
city
work
program,
discussion
vice
mayor
chow
did
motion
to
form
a
subcommittee
and
that
motion
passed.
So
we
fully
expect
that
that
will
be
the
continued
direction
from
the
council.
So
we're
good
with
that.
I
think
that
we
don't
have
the
details
on
what
that
looks
like
in
terms
of
who's
on
the
subcommittee,
but
we
can
certainly
bring
an
item
to
council
for
that.
C
Thank
you
so
much
for
well
in
the
first
instance.
Listening
that
that's
refreshing.
Thank
you.
That's
much
appreciated
and
I
I
actually
remember
at
the
end
of
that
meeting
and
honestly,
you
know
as
much
of
a
pleasure
as
it
is
to
do
all
this
and
you
know
everything
else
that
comes
with
it,
usually
at
midnight's
on
the
first
and
third
tuesdays.
My
my
brain
is
completely
fried,
but
what
I
remember
is
thinking
we
didn't
populate
that
subcommittee,
but
I'm
gonna
go
with
what
you
know.
C
Our
city
attorney
was
pointing
out
that
you
know
let's,
let's
properly
agendize
this
and
I
I
think
we
can
go
forward
with
you
know
that
plan
as
as
described
and
then
yeah
and
get
that
that
subcommittee,
you
know
populated
so
to
speak.
So
thanks
for
pointing
that
out
and
vice
mayor,
you
have
the
floor
next.
J
So,
first
I
want
to
clarify
something.
So
I'm
sharing
the
screen,
which
was
the
motion
I
made
on
the
17th
of
may,
I
think,
and
there
there
was
the
first
small
motion
which
included
removing
some
items,
and
then
we
decided
that
we
are
going
to
rank
them.
So
I
crossed
some
items
out
and
then
we
added
the
ranking,
but
these
items
still
remain,
which
include
revising
some
language,
but
I
don't
see
that
reflected.
J
I
remember
so
for
black
berry
splash
pad,
rather
than
limiting
to
blackberry,
we
were
revising
it
to
me:
identify
locations
for
splash
pad,
that's
geographically
dispersed
as
specified
in
the
proxy
rank
master
plan,
and
then
the
dianza
buffered
bike
lens
is
changed
to
just
bike
lanes.
The
reason
is
that
we
would
like
to
see
options
not
just
buffer,
because
that's
a
busy
street
so
in
so
rather
than
the
original
language
of
including
a
painted
buffer
zone.
J
This
is
changed
to
provide
buffers
between
existing
bike
lane
and
the
vehicle
list
which
could
be
painted
buffers
or
other
more
visible
options.
So
I
think
we
would
like
to
have
options
that
the
community
and
the
council
can
consider.
Are
these
reflected
in
the
cip,
narratives
right
now.
Q
Through
the
mayor
with
respect
to
black
blackberry
farms,
I
think
what
we
were
hearing
from
the
council
was
that
that
wasn't
a
desirable
location.
So
that's
why
we
struck
it,
but
we
did.
We
did
see
that
there
was
a
potential
for
wanting
to
to
continue
that
discussion.
So
that's
why
we're
presenting
it
as
a
red
sort
of
a
red
line
strike
through
on
our
dot
on
our
document
in
the
presentation,
so
that
you,
you
know
clearly
what
the
what
what
we're
thinking
or
what
we
thought
we
heard.
Q
Q
I
item
to
look
for
for
splash
pad
locations,
but
probably
given
the
the
park
work
that
work
that
we're
programmed
to
do
at
memorial
park
and
at
lawrence
committee
a
good
opportunity
to
to
incorporate
that
concept,
at
least
in
the
discussions
at
the
front
end
of
those
projects
with
respect
to
to
de
anza
boulevard
buffered
bike
lanes
yeah,
we
realize
that
you'd
like
to
have
a
discussion
about
the
scope
of
that
project.
Q
Once
we
get
the
the
scope
underway
in
beginning
we'll
bring
that
to
the
council
for
your
consideration
and
we'll
talk
through
options
on
that.
One.
J
I
think
perhaps
you
misunderstand
the
intention:
what
this
motion
means
like
for
work
program
when
we
discuss
the
work
program,
council
propose,
revise
the
language
and
then
the
the
the
program
that
comes
back
for
the
next
meeting
should
have
that
revised
language.
Rather
than
saying
that,
oh,
we
will
do
it
from
in
the
future
discussion.
I
think
that's
not
about
the
intent
of
this
motion,
so
it
should
have
been
revised
into
this
agenda
packet,
and
then
this
should
have
been
quite
ranked
on.
Is
the
ranking
should
be
based
on
the
revised
language?
C
Okay,
vice
mayor
ciao,
I'm
going
to
go
ahead
and
bring
this
to
our
city
manager,
who
has
his
hand
raised
jim.
What's
your
input
on
this?
Oh
this.
M
Real
quick
thank
you
mayor.
I
was
just
going
to
state
on
the
on
the
blackberry
farm,
splash
pad
yeah.
What
what
matt
was
saying
is
change
if
we
change
the
words.
This
no
longer
is
a
cip
item,
because
a
cip,
by
definition,
has
to
be
a
project
that
is
going
to
be
built
or
constructed,
and
this
would
go
more
onto
a
work
plan
or
another
item,
but
it
would
not
be
by
definition,
a
cip
item
anymore,
because
it's
not
defined.
J
Point
we
also
have
a
new
brand
like
for
park,
200
000
for
park
amenities
and
not
not
identified,
not
location
and
not
specific
amenity
right.
M
In
that
case,
you
have
a
you:
do,
have
a
dollar
amount
assigned
to
a
project
that
would
be
coming
in.
I
think
this
one
falls
definitely
more
in
line
with.
This
is
a
discussion
type
of
item
that
the
staff
can
go
out
and
review
just
in
certain
directors
and
looking.
J
At
the
different
cards,
that's
fine,
okay,
that's
fine,
and
then
another
thing
I
want
to
share
is,
though,
let
me
find
this
okay.
J
So
I
want
to
put
this
on
the
record,
which
I
sent
to
the
city
manager
already
regarding
the
roles
and
responsibility
and
why
we
need
this
assistance
manager,
and
this
is
the
email
I
sent
to
the
city
manager-
and
this
is
in
general
terms,
but
in
terms
of
impact.
If
we
had
such
a
person
it's
to
fill
in
a
lot
of
gaps
that
we
are
not
doing
and
I'm
finding
out
it's
not
that
they
are,
this
person
will
be
doing.
City
council
work.
J
J
If
we
have
an
executive
staff,
that's
in
charge
of
this
plan,
and
then
I
find
out
that
it's,
even
even
in
the
contract
of
emc,
to
provide
the
draft
community
engagement
plan
which
still
doesn't
exist
and
there's
and
then
I
find
out,
I
have
to
be
the
one
reaching
out
to
san
jose
planner
to
find
out
how
they
are
reaching
out
to
the
different
focus
groups
and
they
realize
they
contract
with
the
county.
I
shouldn't
be
the
person,
that's
doing
this
work.
A
city
staff
at
the
higher
level
should
be
reaching
out
to
other
city.
J
I
reach
out
to
san
jose
collaborator,
to
try
and
find
out
if
how
a
kid
in
a
box
works
and
find
out
all
day
get
in
your
box
is
a
valid
way
to
do.
Outreach
by
volunteers
I
find
out
pop-up
books
is
another
way.
This
I
shouldn't
be
the
person
making
a
call
and
finding
this
out
now,
I'm
passing
all
the
information
to
the
city
planning
income
department,
but
I
don't
know
if
they
have
the
staffing
to
follow
up
on
that.
J
J
We
have
not
gotten
any
update
on
the
partnership
with
habit
for
habitat
for
humanity
which
mayor
scharf,
former
mayor
shelf,
back
in
2019
wants
to
do
and
bay
area
housing
authority
for
special
needs
housing,
and
I
have
to
be
the
person
who
called
them
to
find
out
the
status
update
and
then
I
find
out
they
already
visited
the
site,
and
then
I
learned
about
all
these
things
that
I
shouldn't
be
spending
time
figuring
out
and
we
still
have
no
real
positive
relationship
relationship
with
news
media,
which
I
think,
if
we
have
someone
on
staff
on
who
is
aware
of
that.
J
That
will
be
better
on
just
just.
There
are
a
lot
of
gaps,
for
example
this
this
just
this
week.
I
realized
that
we
have
now
reached
out
a
very
essentially
important
component
of
housing
element,
employee
associations
of
the
alzheimer
cupertino
union
freeman
union,
and
then
I
am
the
person
that
fight
I,
I
called
their
board
members
so
that
they
can
connect
me
and
then
I'm
hoping
that
I
will
then
help
I'm
doing
this
so
today,
with
the
city
staff
time.
I
know
they
don't
have
time
to
make
these
contacts
and
then
I'm
finding
out.
C
Oh,
thank
you
vice
mayor
and
legal
counsel.
Chris
has
asked
before
so.
Let's
yield
the
floor
to
gas.
K
Yeah,
so
so
the
housing
element
is
not
on
the
agenda.
Certainly,
a
general
reference
to
the
housing
element
is
something
something
to
justify.
J
Okay
yeah,
so
this
person
could
be,
for
example,
making
phone
calls
to
property
owners
who
did
not
respond
to
housing.
Government,
and
I
understand
the
staff
does
not
have
time
to
do
that.
They
send
an
email
and
then
they
couldn't
follow
up
and
then
I
find
out.
I
will
try
to
see
if
I
can
find
who
is
a
property
owner?
Can
I
follow
up
and
we
need
us
that
person
to
do
that
so
yeah
and
this.
C
Okay,
let
me
ask
a
question
of
staff,
so
we
are
working
with
the
recommended
action
of
the
agenda
from
tuesday.
Is
that
correct
and
that
hasn't
been
modified
in
accordance
to
what
I
think
it
was
director
morley's
presentation
with
regard
to
strikeouts
thomas,
your
hand
is
raised.
Do
you
want
to
speak
to
that
question
with
regard
to
what
you
know
the
so-called
default
action
that
I've
described
it
as
would
end
up
being.
P
The
recommended
action
was
modified
in
the
written
communications
that
was
provided
to
council
today
and
so
in
the
staff
report
there.
That
is
the
most
recent
recommended
action,
which
includes
the
addition
of
the
community
funding,
as
well
as
some
of
the
other
changes
that
we
discussed
operating
budget
changes
that
we
discussed
today,
as
well
as
as
well
as
the
cip.
C
Yeah,
I
have
the
document
open
here,
so
I'm
not
seeing
where
that
that
modification
was
made.
So
I'm
looking
at
the
the
notice
for
this
meeting.
It
also
has
the
same
language
as
the
notice
for
tuesday
evening.
H
C
Is
is
there
anything
okay,
so
that's
recommended
action
on
page
33
and
then
where
would
the
appropriations
for
the
cips
have
been
initially
so
it
looks
like
at
the
bottom
of
page
34,
the
capital
improvement
program
it
so
it
starts
with
the
led
lighting
now.
C
C
Capital
improvement
program
originally
started
out
with
the
the
splash
pads
and
then
it
went
to
the
library
okay.
So
so
now
it's
been
eliminated
from
written
communications.
Those
two
items,
the
splash
pad.
Okay,
so
I
see
so
so
just
to
refer
everyone
I'll
go
ahead,
and
maybe
I
need
to
log
into
my
other
computer
here.
So
I
can
share
the
screen,
but
so
so
thomas
do
you
have
that
that
document
available
to
share
with
people?
C
Okay,
so
yeah
go
ahead
and
share
that
so
that
we
know
we
have
a
common
base
so
go
up
to
the
the
prior
page
please.
So
this
is
under
written
communications.
C
The
recommended
action
here
you've
got
the
subject,
for
you
know
this
item
number
38
and
then
thomas
next
page.
Please-
and
so
that's
the
second
page
of
the
recommended
action.
And
so,
as
we
said,
it's
a
it's
a
fairly
long
version
and.
R
H
C
Third
page
of
the
staff
report
before
this
discussion,
that
is
the
remainder
of
the
recommended
action
as
as
it
now
stands,
so
just
as
by
way
of
noticing
the
public
really
the
default
motion
is
not
going
to
be
what
you
see
in
your
notice
of
this
meeting
or
in
the
notice
for
on
the
agenda
for
tuesday
night
it'll.
Be
this
part
of
the
staff
report.
C
K
Briefly,
because
I
know
we
have
a
lot
to
do
still,
just
that.
Certainly
there
was
you
know
a
lot
of
space
for
the
vice
mayor
to
respond
to
the
resident's
comments
within
the
scope
of
what
was
noticed,
and
certainly
I
I'm
generally
quite
liberal,
with
allowing
people
to
use
that
space.
But,
but
you
know,
part
of
my
job
is
to
enforce
the
brown
act.
Try
attempt
to
enforce
the
brown
act.
Another
legal
requirement.
C
Yeah,
you
know,
frankly,
I
thought
you
you
both
did
a
good
job
and
vice
mayor
made
her
points,
and
you
know
you
just
urged
caution,
and
you
know
she
stayed
within
those
contours
a
little
bit
longer
and
so
yeah.
I
mean
thank
you
for
the
comment
as
well:
councilman
willie,
it's
important
to
be
able
to
respond
to
you,
know
public
concerns,
and
so
I
I
do
see
council
member
way
now
has
the
hand
raised
vice
mayor
chow,
your
hand
is
raised
again.
C
So
let's
go
to
council
member
way
and
then
after
we
get
council
member
way's
comments,
I
will
ask
that
somebody
move
the
recommended
action,
as
articulated
in
the
staff
report
for
this
item
tonight,
and
see
if
we
can
get
a
motion
in
a
second
for
that
council.
Member
way.
F
Thank
you,
mayor
paul.
I
will
be
brief
because
I
did
voted
no
originally
on
tuesday
because
on
the
proposed
two
positions,
because
that
not
I
stated
it's
not
because
I
don't
think
we
could
use
two
positions.
I
do
think
the
job
description
needs
a
little
bit
further
refined
before
we
start
to
add
a
position,
and
I
did
see
vice
mayor
chow's,
more
elaborate
description
on
it.
So
this
is
my
question,
for
maybe
the
council
or
the
staff
is
we
can.
I
can.
F
I
can
approve
the
positions
and
I
do
believe
the
job
description
needs
to
be
more
refined,
and
you
know
my
one
one
of
my
areas,
I
think
it's
important
to
the
council
into
the
city-
is:
maybe
one
of
these
people,
new
jobs,
could
explore,
grant
positions
a
grant
that
could
a
federal
grand
state
grant.
So
you
could
supplement
our
cip
projects.
Our
different
projects
so
grant
approvals,
and
writing
is
very
important.
C
I
don't
see
why
we
wouldn't
be
able
to
do
that,
but
let
me
refer
this
question
to
our
city
manager
and
I
will
also
point
out
that
we
did
have
a
contract.
That's
been
increased
for
grant
writer
when
I
was
at
the
u.s
mayor's
conference.
I
did
speak
to
a
number
of
people
located
in
dc.
C
Talking
about
the
various
you
know,
funding
sources
that
are
out
there
right
now
on
a
grant
basis,
and
I
think
that
we
would
more
than
you
know,
get
our
return
for
a
dollar
right
now,
if
we
had,
you
know
a
good,
cohesive
and
systematic
way
of
identifying
grants
and
going
after
them,
so
I
mean
I
think
that
makes
a
lot
of
sense
to
carve
out
the
grand
space
so
jimmy
your
hands
not
raised
by
c
director
faro's
hand
is
christina.
C
Did
you
want
to
speak
to
the
comments
made
by
councilman
hawaii.
I
M
Thank
you
or
no
excuse
me,
that's
exactly
what
I
was
going
to
say
is
once
if
it
is
approved,
then
we
would
come
back
with
the
full-blown
description
of
it
to
make
sure
it
fits.
What
council
is
thinking.
Yeah.
C
And
then
you
know
before
I
go
back
to
you
know
the
the
request
for
the
motion.
You
know.
One
thing
I
will
say
is
that
you
know
I
I'm
completely
open
about
my
service
on
council
and
I
you
know
I've
actually
welcomed
the
the
pras
that
have
come
out
more
recently
about
you
know
all
this.
It
was
something
extremely
extensive,
like
all
emails
that
I
send
out
for
the
first
three
months
of
the
year.
C
C
What
was
it
was
was
in
the
purview
of
what
I
wrote,
because
a
lot
of
that
is
actually
privileged
a
lot
of
that's
confidential,
but
I
think
it
could
be
fair
to
say
that
within
the
scope
of
that
material,
it
is
just
so
obvious
that
that
people
and
counselor
are
doing
so
much,
and
so
you
know
I
appreciate
the
comment
that
consoles
should
do
its
job.
C
I'm
gonna
hearken
back
to
a
comment
that
I've
made
previously
that
I
often
feel
like
I'm
doing
five
jobs
in
city
hall,
and
so
I
think
that
it
is
reasonable
to
look
at
some
positions
that
could
help
support
the
the
council
efforts.
But
when
we're
talking
about
things
like,
let's
get,
the
housing
element
figured
out.
Let's
go
ahead
and
you
know
get
various
of
these.
You
know
implementation
measures
reach
out
to
the
community,
help
with
the
development
side
of
things
you
know
such
as
you
know,
having
a
groundbreaking
I
did
coordinate.
C
You
know
a
large
part
of
the
first
groundbreaking
that
we
had
earlier
this
year,
just
for
instance-
and
you
know
just
not
feeling
so
well
these
last
couple
of
days,
I've
had
to
offload
a
little
bit
of
the
logistics
and
I
think
our
city
manager
for
helping
to
organize
the
angel
island
trip.
You
know
logistics
beforehand,
which
also
the
you
know
speaker
from
the
public
is,
is
attending
as
well.
C
C
I
do
take
it
all
with
a
grain
of
salt,
but
at
the
same
time
you
know
I
say
very
sincerely
that
we're
doing
a
lot-
and
you
know
some
some
assistance
is
needed
on
top
of
what
we
have
from
our
you
know,
candidly
very,
very
excellent
staff,
but
I
know
that
we're
a
group
of
people
that
do
you
know,
as
our
community
does
expect
more
and
hold
ourselves
to
a
higher
standard
and
are
always
trying
to
improve,
which
is
you
know
precisely
why
we
are
the
community
that
we
are
so
at
this
point,
I'm
going
to
go
ahead
and
ask
for
that
default
motion
and
again
that
will
tie
to
our
staff
report
for
this
item
and
so.
C
So
councilmember
moore,
why
don't
you
make
your
comments
and
and
questions
at
this
point?
I
thought
you
hadn't
spoken,
but
I
guess
we've
had
four
items,
so
I
forgive
me
I
I
wasn't
tracking
mentally
and-
and
I
guess
100
cohesively
the
fact
that
you
haven't
spoken
yet
so
please
plea,
please
feel
free
and
then
I'll
ask
for
that
motion
after
after
your
comments
and
questions,
okay,.
E
Thank
you,
mayor
paul,
so,
within
the
the
written
communications
we
did
also
receive
the
special
projects
update
from
fiscal
year
2021
to
2022,
and
in
this
update
there
are
special
projects
which
were
not
completed,
and
this
is
a
pretty
small
font,
but
it
goes
on
for
a
good
two
and
a
half
pages,
and
this
is
within
within
that
particular
budget.
And
then
within
our
current
budget
we
have
another
page
and
a
half
about
seven
million
dollars
worth
of
special
projects
also
and
then
going
back
in
in
time.
E
We
have
a
multitude
of
special
projects,
and
so
we
really
don't
have
a
an
up-to-date
accounting
for
this
number
of
projects.
For
instance,
fiscal
year
2019
to
2020
special
projects
included
the
bmr,
affordable
housing
fund
for
habitat
for
humanity,
and
that
was
a
hundred
and
fifty
thousand
dollars.
I
we
don't
know
what
what
happened
to.
That
was
what
happened
with
habitat
for
humanity,
because
there
was
a
mention
from
the
vice
mayor
about
habitat
for
humanity.
We
also
had
funding
for
housing
strategies
and
homelessness
allocated.
E
I
perhaps
the
quinlan
community
center
reception
remodel
for
forty
thousand
dollars
happened.
I
don't
know
we
had
going
back
in
time
to
fiscal
year,
2018
175
thousand
dollars
for
an
economic,
strategic
plan,
im
implementation
and
a
city's
facilities,
building
assessment
for
two
hundred
thousand
dollars,
and
that
seems
to
be
something
that
that
we're
kind
of
looking
at
right
now
for
it
was
about
ninety
thousand
to
look
at
burn,
bletch
and
stockholmer.
E
If
I
recall
correctly
so
so
personally,
I
would
want
to
have
an
an
update
from
the
departments
about
these
lingering
special
projects
that
have
had
appropriated
funds
allocated
to
them.
Now,
with
regards
to
the.
C
E
I
would
go
back
to.
I
was
trying
to
figure
out
where,
when
having
special
projects
started,
I
it
was
sometime
after
2005
and
and
I
think
around
2014
15-
I'm
not
really,
I'm
not
really
sure.
I
only
have
so
many
hours
in
the
day
to
go
digging
into
this
stuff
and
hunt
down
that.
It's
and-
and
that's
not
really
my
job
so
but
I
could.
I
could
identify
projects
we're
still
hanging
out
there,
so
somebody
needs
to
go
track
them
down
and
find
out
find
out
what
happened.
C
Okay,
so
so
before
you
you
proceed
and
of
course
you
still
have
the
floor,
but
let
me
just
kind
of
clarify
this.
I
think
this
is
probably
informational
and
perhaps
study
session
oriented
between
finance
as
well
as
public
works,
but
I
think
great
point
I
mean
you
know
if
there
is
actually
a
mechanism
out
there
to
kind
of
track
this.
C
Let's
let
the
public
know
and
if
there's
not,
then
obviously
that's
an
administrative
function
that
we
need
to
clean
up,
but
but
thank
you
for,
for
you
know
pointing
that
out.
Oh,
I
see
jim's
hand
is
raised
at
this
point.
Jim
did
you
want
to
speak
to
this?
Perhaps
you.
M
Yes,
councilmember
moore
and
I
briefly
talked
about
it.
I
think
it's
today
last
track,
but
I
also
mentioned
it
to
our
public
works
director.
I
don't
know
if
I
mentioned
it
to
our
administrative
services,
but
it
is
something
we
could
work
on
as
a
study
session.
M
Some
of
those
go
well
back
before
any
of
us
were
even
here
so
it'll
take
a
little
bit
of
time
and
digging
through
records
and
files
to
try
and
find
that.
But
it
is
something
that
we
can
look
into
matt.
I
don't
know
if
you
have
a
comment
on
it
or
not,.
Q
Yeah,
thank
you.
I
was
right
on
board
with
that.
I
think
that
there's
some
reporting
that
we
can
do
and
probably
fold
into
existing
reporting
processes
that
are
undertaken,
maybe
with
quarterly
report
or
something
along
that
line,
but
we
can
talk
about
it
at
the
staff
level
and
figure
that
out.
There
are
a
lot
of
these
projects
that
are
in
progress
so
to
the
extent
that
the
council
can
move
along
the
funding
for
them.
That
would
be
important
in
order
to
keep
them
going
I'll.
Give
you
a
great
example
is
our
pavement.
Q
Maintenance
program
is
in
a
special
project
funds,
and
I
know
that
the
city
takes
great
pride
in
the
pavement
condition
and
we
have
projects
that
are
underway
in
design
and
ready
to
bid
so,
and
that
goes
for
many
of
the
projects.
So
there
is
active
work
that
is
occurring
on
these.
I
understand
the
new
request
to
to
get
an
update
on
them,
but
important
for
the
for
the
sake
of
the
work
that
we're
able
to
continue
the
progress
on
them.
Q
Q
C
Oh,
am
I
muted,
I'm
sorry
did
I
you're.
E
I'm
not
finished
on
this
item
so
with
regards
to
that
so.
C
Let
me
let
me
just
you
know
kind
of
yield
the
floor
back
to
you
in
just
in
a
moment.
I
I
do
note
that
now
we
have
vice
mayor
chow,
council,
member
willie
and
council
member
way
with
hands
raised
and
so
councilmember
moore
after
you
conclude
your
questions
and
and
comments,
I
I
will
ask
for
that
motion,
but
I
I
think
this
is
an
important
point
that
you're
making
initially
to
just
just
reiterate
that,
if
we're
not
able
to
track
these
funding
allocations
over
time,
you're
absolutely
correct.
C
It
is
not
your
job
to
go
back
17
years
in
time
and
if
anyone
insinuates
that
this
somehow
falls
within
the
purview
of
council's
jobs-
and
you
know
therefore
says
that
we're
not
entitled
to
ask
for
support,
I
think
they're
just
absolutely
wrong.
C
So
so
thank
you
very
much
for
pointing
that
out
and
we
do
need
to
be
able
to
have
a
you
know.
Very
systematic
and
accurate
way
of
tracking
how
these
allocations
are
are
are
are
proceeding
over
time.
So
thanks
very
much
council
member
I'll
yield
the
floor
back
to
you
at
this
point.
E
Thank
you,
mayor
paul,
so
I
a
along
that
line
about
having
the
the
pavement
and
sidewalk
curb
and
gutter
in
as
special
projects.
It
also
sits
inside
of
the
public
works
funding
as
well.
You've
got
4.6
million
for
street
pavement
maintenance
and
about
2
million
for
sidewalk
curb
and
gutter.
I've
tried
to
understand
why
it
was
split
into
both
places.
I
can't
so
hopefully
that'll.
That
answer
will
come
back
and
to
throw
more
more
confusion
into
the
works.
We
have
the
development
impact
fee
reports
going
back
to
2005
within.
E
If
you
go
to
the
cupertino
budget,
page
and
scroll
down
within
these
fee
reports
for
various
projects,
they
had
what
looks
like
kind
of
conditions,
but
they
allocated
funds
to
to
certain
projects,
and
I
went
started
reading
through
several
of
these
and
it,
and
some
of
them
have
not
come
to
pass,
and
so
somebody
someone
needs
to
start
digging
into
these
and
find
out
what
funding
was
already
allocated,
for
instance,
which
I
thought
was
kind
of
a
little
bit
unusual
for
main
street
cupertino.
E
There
was
funding
allocated
out
of
that
project
to
do
some
like
traffic
calming
near
city
hall,
which
I
thought
was
kind
of
odd,
so
like
rodriguez
and
pacifica,
when
the
the
requirement
was
that
they
would
do
some
traffic
mitigations
around
the
the
neighborhoods
of
of
the
project,
and
then
I
I
don't
really
consider
that
near
it,
but
that's
an
interesting
project
that
needs
to
be
tracked
to
see
if
the
money
from
that
that
development
actually
did
it
actually
go
to
that
project.
So
there's
I'm.
E
You
know
I
hate
to
bring
it
up,
but
there's
a
world
more
of
of
of
accounting
issues
to
to
be
followed,
to
see
just
to
be
sure.
If
what
what
was
promised
when
these
developments
were
approved
has
actually
come
to
pass
now
for
the
the
two
positions,
the
assistant
manager
and
legislative
aide.
E
Well,
let
me
go
to
the
two
that
I'm
really
happy
to
see
about.
In
particular,
one
is
the
budget
manager,
because
that's
somebody
who
could
really
help
with
all
of
these
questions
that
I'm
asking
and
they
they
would
get
to
dig
into
all
of
that,
and
I
so
I'm
really
glad
to
see
that
and
the
the
purchasing
manager.
I
am
very
very
pleased
to
see
that
position
added
as
well.
Having
spoken
to
the
the
consultant
for
moss
adams,
I
personally
am
uncomfortable
suggesting
hires.
E
I
would
want
somebody
who
had
all
of
that
experience
looking
at
cities
to
make
that
suggestion
before
we
are
trying
to
hire
in
it
seems
like
we're
up
to
about
500
000
worth
of
new
employees
and
trying
to
suggest
that.
So
I
can.
I
don't
personally
like
the
idea
of
micromanaging
our
city
manager,
for
who
to
hire
where
and
then
to
come
up
with
a
job
description.
I'm
just
I'm
just
not
going
to
do
it.
There's
experts
in
that
field,
I'm
not
it
now
it.
E
With
regards
to
the
city
work
program,
I
personally
would
have
taken
that
city
work
program.
I
think
it's
too
too
long.
I
like
that
the
manager
bravely
said
that
you
feel
you
could
go
through
it,
but
with
all
of
these
numbers
of
of
still
hanging
around
special
projects
and
these
other
developer
impact
fee
projects
that
need
to
be
tracked
and
see
where
I
think
you've
got
a
lot
more
work,
that's
already
already
still
out
there,
so
I
personally
would
have
cut
off
the
list
at
around.
E
I
marked
it
at
26.
I
would
have
taken
26
and
stopped
on
the
on
the
city
work
plan,
so
I'm
uncomfortable
with
the
two
hires,
because
it's
a
long
time
commitment-
and
I
think
the
city
work
program
is-
is
too
too
long,
and
and
so
I
and
I
would
like
to
hear
about
the
special
projects,
because
it
could
be
that
you
really
have
gotten
through
most
of
them
and
it's
not
as
bad
as
I
think,
but
I'm
very
concerned
that
there
is
a
lot
more
work
that
still
needs
to
be
done.
Thank
you.
C
Okay,
thank
you
very
much,
councilman
moore
and
I
I
will
ask
you
right
now,
so
we
have
an
appropriations
list,
and
so
you
know
thomas.
Perhaps
you
can
bring
up
that
list
again
from
the
city
council
staff
report
for
this
meeting.
So
it's
it's
on
page
two
page
34
of
the
written
communications
packet
and
so
to
the
point
about
appropriations
for
the
city
work
program
being
limited
to
a
certain
number
and
if
you
could
do
a
one-pager,
that
would
be
appreciated.
C
Just
put
it
to
the
width
of
thank
you
so
item
h,
so
just
scroll
down
until
you
get
to
the
second
page
item
h:
oh
that's
interesting!
Maybe
we're
not
looking
at
the
same
document
for
some
reason.
C
C
Okay
got
it
guys
so
that
that
explains
the
page
flow,
okay,
so
great
so
up
at
and
maybe
if
you
could
do
the
view
as
like
webview
or
something
like
that.
So
it's
all
one
document.
C
It
used
web
layout
view
the
third
button
from
the
left
on
okay,
yeah,
great
and
then
yeah.
That
should
be
enough.
Based
take
a
look
at
everything
up
there
yeah
you
can
kind
of
zoom
in
on
that
one.
So
so
so
to
councilman.
Remember
more.
I
would
ask
so
the
allocations
to
the
work
plan
as
contemplated
right
now
are
in
roman
nets.
1
through
16
here
under
h.
So
are
there
particular
ones
that
you're
looking
to
remove?
C
Because
this
is
the
the
budgetary
discussion
right
so
or
you
know,
is
it
you
know
just.
E
Mayor
paul,
this
is
a
little
confusing
because
we
had
the
final
priority
ranking
for
adopted
fiscal
year,
2022
to
23
city
work
program,
and
maybe
I
don't
have
the
right
form.
But
it
goes
on
to
38.
E
H
E
I
E
Yeah,
I'm
wondering
how
this
happened
because,
like
our
item,
one
says,
consider
options
for
developing
eli
and
bmr
housing.
E
C
Yeah,
let
me
let
me
bring
this
to
staff.
I
mean
I
believe,
what's
happening
here
is
that
this
is
not
tracking
with
the
enumeration
of
of
the
work
plan.
This
is
just
a
matter
of
identifying
areas
where
we're
where
budgeting
would
be
requested
here
based
upon
that
work
plan.
But
let's
start
with
our
city
manager.
Jim,
you
have
your
hand
raised.
Did
you
want
to
speak
to
this
part
of
the
yes
yeah.
M
M
C
C
That's
okay!
No!
It's
it's!
Just
like
a
little
bit
of
like
background
echo
or
something
like
that,
but
yeah
I'll.
Let
you
know
if
it
gets,
I'm
going
to
go
offline,
real,
quick
and
try
and
change.
Okay,
cool
and
thomas.
You
have
your
hand
raised.
Did
you
want
to
elaborate
any
further
or
was
there
just
my
hand
raised
from
before?
I
was.
C
About
that,
okay,
no
worries
all
right
so
yeah.
That
was
my
follow-up
question
to
you,
counselor
more,
I
mean
from
from
the
perspective
of
a
budget.
That's
what
they're
looking
at
from
the
allocation,
and
so
your
hand
is
raised
again
or
did
you
want
to.
E
Well,
yeah
I'd
like
to
comment
on
that,
so
for
me
I
would
have
cut
it
when
I
say
I
would
have
cut
it
off
at
26
for
the
number
of
items
it's
kind
of
interesting,
because
most
all
of
the
items
with
a
with
that
with
a
cash
value,
fell
below
26.
With
a
with
a
sum
total
vote
of
of.
E
Like
the
next
item
had
one
person
give
a
five
one
person
give
a
one
and
three
zeros
so
that
to
me
isn't
even
a
pass,
but
that
that's
the
first
item
analyze
potential
revenue
measures
for
fifty
thousand
dollars.
It
only
had
two
one
one
person
strongly
for
it
one
week
very
weakly
for
it
and
three
against
my
to
me
as
zero
is
against.
E
So
to
that,
when
I
look
at
something
like
that
it
doesn't,
it
doesn't
seem
to
rise
to
the
the
level
of
wanting
to
to
fund
that
and
and
that's
and
then
it
continues
on
this
way,
because
we
have
sixes
sixes,
fives
and
and
and
lower.
So
personally,
I
I
realize
that
it's,
it's
late
and
people
don't
want
to
perhaps
dig
into
these
items,
but
I
I
won't
vote
for
it.
I'd
rather
go
through
and
knock
things
off.
E
If,
if
people
are
willing
to
do
that,
yeah
anyway,
leave
it
at
that.
C
Well,
I
mean
I'd,
be
open
to
you
know
entertaining
that
if
people
are
prepared
to
do
so,
I
mean
I
will
point
out
that
the
homeless
jobs
program,
number
eight
is
is
very
highly
ranked
and
the
cupertino
store
is
actually
you
know.
I
know
it's
in
the
top
15
and
I
think
that's
the
second
highest
allocation
here.
So
I
mean
numerically,
it's
probably
probably
not
the
majority.
That's
you
know
not
not
ranked
highly,
but
yeah
I
mean
I,
I
see
a
number
of
things.
C
I
one
thing
we
could
potentially
say
is
that
if
it's
not
in
the
top
20
just
you
know
don't
allocate
the
funding
for
the.
For
this
point
I
mean
I'd,
be
happy
to
you
know,
entertain
emotion
without
effect,
but
okay.
Well,
I'm
gonna
go
ahead
and
ask
for
that
a
default
motion.
Maybe
we
can
you
know
kind
of
carve
out
space
from
there.
C
Would
anyone
be
willing
to
put
forward
that
and
again
this
is
the
the
staff
report
item
in
the
in
the
in
the
description
of
the
the
funding
allocation?
This
isn't.
C
Okay,
thank
you
very
much
vice
machou
and
council
member
willie.
Are
you
willing
to
second
that
motion?
Absolutely
okay?
Well,
thanks
very
much
councilman
rolling,
all
right,
so
we're
back
to
the
council
at
this
time
we
have
a
motion
in
a
second.
I've
got
vice
mayor,
ciao,
member
willie,
councilmember,
moore
councilmember
way
and
then
I'll
make
some
comments
as
well.
Oh
before
we
start
off,
I
I
do
want
to
put
in
my
own
kind
of
plug
there.
C
I
I
was
just
notified
recently
that
the
volunteer,
fair
estimated
at
about
8
500
would
kind
of
is,
is
in
search
of
funding,
so
I
I
would
request
that
we,
you
know
kind
of
you
know,
add
that
somewhere
within
the
budget.
So
so
that's
that's
my
ask
here:
council,
member
child.
J
J
When
there
is
capacity,
I
think
this
person,
the
city
manager,
could
likely
decide
how
best
that
what
that
person
could
do-
and
it
doesn't
have
to
be
spelled
out
entirely
in
the
job
description
and
I
think
the
manager
jim
jim,
definitely
knows
how
to
write
this
job
description.
And
we
don't
have
to
really
tell
him.
But
and
the
main
thing
is
we
need
someone
who
is
planning
in
experience
immediately,
because
there
is
a
lot
of
gap
that
should
have
been
done
since
even
back
in
january.
J
And
so
I
would
like
some
commitment
from
doing
that
so
that
we
can
have
a
more
clear
timeline,
a
commitment
to
move
on
this
quickly,
because
housing
admin
elements
really
need
help.
And
the
current
staffing
is
not
able
to
take
on
this,
and
I
have
waited.
I
have
waited
and
I
reached
out
to
all
these
people
because
mayor
darcy,
paul
told
me
if
you
want
something
done,
do
it
yourself,
so
that's
when
I
started
to
do
this
and
then
yeah
I
find
out
I'm
doing
the
city
planner
job.
M
J
Thank
you
for
that,
and
then
the
one
question
is,
I
did
not
see
historical
society
lying
item
mentioned,
so
is
that
line
I'm
still
there?
My
understanding
from
last
year
is,
I
think
we
want
to
support
them,
but
then
this
is
now
turning
out
into
like
the
chamber
of
commerce
situation.
J
R
Sorry
about
that
yeah
I
wanted
to
let
everybody
know
that
the
update
for
the
subcommittee
on
the
historical
society
is
scheduled
to
come
at
the
june
21st
meeting
for
your
consideration.
C
Okay,
great
so
yeah,
so
we've
got
the
the
motion
on
the
table,
but
I.
R
So
we
have
done
the
information
gathering
that
will
be
presented
to
you
on
june
21st
for
council
discussion
about
that.
J
C
Right
thanks
vice
mayor
chow
and
so
madison
clerk.
Can
you
remind
me
who
made
the
motion
who
seconded
this.
D
The
motion
was
vice
mayor,
chow,
moved
and
council
members
seconded.
That's.
C
The
member
willie
well,
let
me
ask
since
we're
in
the
transition
between
vice
mayor
challenge
councilman,
would
you
be
willing
to
add
the
8
500
in
the
budget
for
the
volunteer,
fair.
J
I
have
a
question
so
that
does
that
include
fee
waiver
and
the
city
staff
time,
because
that
or
sometimes
gets
counted
as
a
charged
service.
That's.
J
C
I
think
that's
yeah,
I
think
staff's
estimate
basically
folded
in
the
rental,
the
the
rental
cost
of
the
civic
center
space.
In
addition,
in
addition
to
things
like
tents
and
you
know,
other
other
materials,
and
so
I
jim
forgive
me-
I
don't
remember
if
it
was
you
who
gave
me
that
estimate
or-
or
maybe
you
know
rochelle-
who
has
her
camera
on
right
now,
but
does
anyone
have
information
as
to
that
particular
question?
What
that
estimate
includes.
I
C
I
I'm
sorry,
is
it
a
key
to
answer
that
question
mayor.
C
Okay,
welcome
christina
directoral
forum.
I
Thank
you.
So
that
estimate
includes
rentals
and
insurance
related
to
the
event,
and
that
is
consistent
with
the
cost
that
we
have
actually
expensed
in
the
previous
year.
So
that
should
be
that's
kind
of
all
the
the
hard
costs,
not
necessarily
the
soft
cost
related
to
staff
that
are
already
those
costs
are
already
in
the
budget.
I
So
this
would
just
be
potentially
some
other
things
may
not
get
done,
and
I
think
that's
probably
more
of
a
rochelle
or
joanne
question
if
there
may
be
some
things
that,
if
that's
not
planned
currently
that
it
may
result
in
some
additional
cost.
C
G
G
H
G
G
No
not
currently
we
were
budgeting
it
through
the
mayor's
fund,
but
it
is
something
that
we
can
and
change
for
the
future
and
have
as
our
ongoing
budget.
Okay.
C
Because
at
least
I
can
speak
to
2018
and
the
current
fiscal
year
in
the
last
coastal
year,
of
course,
last
fiscal
year
we
didn't
have
it,
but
but
in
2018
that
wasn't
taken
from
the
mayor's
fund,
I
mean
I
think
that
was
just
kind
of
kicking
it
back
up,
and
so
so,
if
it's,
if
it's
basically
a
cost
center
that
needs
somewhere
to
land,
I'm
just
asking
that
we
put
it
into
the
budget
because
it
wasn't,
you
know,
kind
of
taken
from
the
mayor's
fund
previously.
C
So,
let's
head
back
to
vice
mayor
ciao,
because
I
actually
did
see
a
head
nod
from
council
member
willie
about
being
the
seconder
and
being
one
I'm.
J
I
do
have
a
question:
how
about
the
earth
stage
is:
that's
also
a
staff
event?
How
much
is
the
budget
in
terms
of
the
hard
cost.
C
Okay,
so
quick
follow
up
before
we
go
to
councilman
willie
on
this,
so
so
from
steph's
perspective.
Does
anyone
know
the
the
hard
cost
budget
of
the
earth
day
festival,
earth.
J
M
C
Okay,
well
thanks
very
much,
and
you
know
I
I
think
you
and
councilman
willie
for
being
able
to
willing
to
amend
your
motion
to
include
the
the
cost
of
volunteer
fair
into
there
council
member
willie
and
then
we'll
go
to
councilmember
moore.
L
Yeah,
hey.
Thank
you
a
couple
of
comments.
You
know
I
I
share
councilman
moore's
concern
with
how
much
is
too
much
for
city
staff.
I
was
drawing
the
line
at
about
30
and
you
know
the
the
comment
that
I'll
make
is.
You
know
the
direction
we
had
was
five
fives
13
threes,
13
ones,
and
to
try
and
keep
it
small
yeah,
the
the
zeros
that
she
brought
up
tonight.
L
I
think
some
of
those
are
mine
simply
trying
to
not
overload
staff,
so
I
think,
maybe
in
the
future,
as
a
preface
to
the
work
plan
we
kind
of
decide.
You
know
how
big
we
think
city
staff
can
tackle
with
the
city
manager's
input,
but
he's
good
tonight.
So
that's
great.
I
also
really
like
councilman
moore's
suggestion
about
having
us
get
the
status
of
these
special
projects.
L
It's
up
to
us
to
start
digging,
and
it
was
through
that
digging
the
various
things
state
density,
bonus
law,
things
like
that
that
vice
mayor
chow
and
I
started
collecting
a
lot
of
material.
You
and
I
were
on
the
subcommittee
for
the
attorney
fees
from
shoot
me
haley
and
that
giant
binder,
and
it
was
during
this
time
then
that
we
actually
got
the
the
bookshelf
in
the
council
chambers
for
me
and
vice
mayor
chow,
to
put
our
binders
on
with
all
this
information.
L
Hopefully
other
councilmen
like
way
and
and
more
can
can
draw
from
that
are
all
my
binders
on
that
shelf.
No,
it
I
need
to
kind
of
load
it
up,
but
with
that
being
said,
the
more
history
that
we
have,
the
more
able
we're
able
to
to
do
more
for
the
community
with
less
and
not
have
staff
repeating
things.
L
L
None
of
that
information
comes
to
us,
but
I'd
really
like
to
see
that
on
that
shelf,
so
that
we
could
pull
out
surveys
yes,
they're
dated,
but
starting
from
some
place.
I
do
a
lot
of
screen
captures
of
those
surveys,
but
the
results
I
only
find
out
when
city
staff
brings
it
to
the
city
council
meeting
and
says
we
did
a
survey.
L
We
had
250
respondents
and
these
were
the
ones
but
they've
done
so
many
more
surveys,
so
just
want
to
put
that
out
there
that
let's
get
smarter,
let's,
let's
learn
and
and
try
and
be
more
effective
and
we'll
be
helping
staff
at
the
same
time.
But
mayor
you're
doing
a
great
job
on
this.
Thank
you
so
much.
C
E
Thank
you,
mayor
paul.
So,
let's
see
probably
three
items.
I
want
to
touch
on
one
under
special
projects:
the
the
erp
system,
106
thousand
928
dollars
with
regards
to
to
erp
systems.
They
can
be
very
expensive
running
into
the
millions
of
dollars.
So
while
it
looks
like
it's
just
a
hundred
and
six
thousand
or
107
thousand
dollars,
it's
actually
something.
That's
there's,
there's
a
large
cost
associated
with
it.
E
I
I
do
agree
with
getting
the
erp
system,
but
I
think
that
we
need
to
understand
what
what
it
is
that
this
is
what
we're
walking
into.
So
if
this
might
look
like
us,
a
small
cost
here,
but
ultimately
it's
it's
going
to
be
something
more,
and
I
see
that
our
chief
technology
officer
is
has
joined
us.
So
I
do
have
two
other
items,
so
I
want
to
keep
the
keep
the
floor.
So
if,
if
bill
would
like
to
say
something,
please
do
it,
but
I
want
to
get
my
other
two
items
in.
E
That
works,
so
I
I
am
also
very
concerned
about
the
the
400
000
or
so
hud
audit
and
and
what
that
impact
could
be,
and
the
the
potential
cdtfa
audit
a
kind
of
multi-million
dollar
reduction
in
in
revenues,
and
I'm
I'm
very
concerned
about
both
of
those
items
when
we're
growing
the
budget
it
it
makes
me
want
to
be
much
more
conservative
and
and
wait
and
find
out
what
some
of
the
results
are
going
to
be
before
before
running
off
on
a
shopping
spree
is
how
it
feels.
E
And,
lastly,
you
know
I
appreciate
the
intentions
of
the
the
cupertino
store.
However,
I
don't
feel
that
the
I
believe
it's
150
000
was
allocated
for
that.
My
concern
is
that
when
we
really
look
at
marketing
the
the
feasibility,
the
storage
of
items
having
personnel
doing
the
the
taxation
for
selling
these
items,
what
kind
of
accounting
is
going
to
be
in
our
in
our
budget
in
the
future?
E
So
I'm
going
to
assume
that
this
isn't
going
to
be
some
kind
of
enterprise
fund
somebody's
going
to
have
to
create
that
designation
for
the
budget.
To
I
mean
I
expecting
in
the
future
we're
going
to
have
cupertino
store
with
some
all
sorts
of
stuff
needing
to
be
items.
What
kind
of
interesting
I
get
to
hear
myself
twice,
so
I'm
worried
about
that.
E
I
don't
think
150
000
is
really
coming
anywhere
near
what
it's
going
to
cost
just
to
to
set
up
a
shop,
and
so
we're
basically
becoming
a
small
business
owner
within
our
own
city,
and
so
were
there
actual
was,
did
a
consultant
come
in
and
come
up
with
this
150
000?
How
did
this
this
get
arrived
at,
because
I
this
this
barely
funds,
one
person's
time
working
on
it
and
then
on?
E
If,
if
this
does,
if
in
its
ultimate
fruition,
we
end
up
with
an
actual
location
with
a
store,
we
will
have
then
created,
I
don't
know
two
or
three
low-wage
jobs
and
and
all
that
responsibility
associated
with
it.
So
I'd
like
to
hear
on
these
three
items,
thank
you.
C
Okay,
let's
start
with
director
mitchell
bill.
T
T
T
So
that's
what
that
is,
for
we
aren't
actually
going
out
and
procuring
that'll
come
to
you
next
fiscal
year
after
rfp
has
been
developed
and
the
vendor
has
been
selected
and
then
we'll
be
able
to
move
forward,
but
that'll
take
about
a
year
year
years
worth
of
work
to
go
through
the
needs,
analysis,
rfp
development
and
vendor
selection.
E
Through
the
mayor,
I
was
looking
at
the
the
erp
page
for
the
city
of
sunnyvale,
and
actually
it
was
looking
like
they
are
grand
total.
I
don't
know
what
they're
buying
16
million
dollars
so
any
thoughts
on
that
number.
It
was.
T
E
M
Jim,
so
the
hud
one
we
are
still
waiting.
You
know
we
sent
in
a
letter
and
gave
the
full
explanation
for
the
hud
for
their
their
audits,
what
they
considered
about
it
and
we're
still
in
a
holding
pattern
to
hear
back
from
them.
We
gave
them
examples
of
why
we
think
what
they
were
doing
was
far
truly
far
too
much
for
a
you
know,
I'll
call
it
simple
mistake
and
then
the
cdtfa
is
one.
C
Okay,
well,
let's
any
other
follow-up
on
councilmember
moore's
questions
or
comments
in
this
round.
E
The
last
question
I
had
through
the
mayor
was
regarding
the
the
cupertino
store,
how
how
the
calculation
was
done,
because
I
I'm
just
thinking
about
in
terms
of
marketing
feasibility,
storage
taxes
and
then
the
cost
to
employ
somebody
to
be
taking
care
of
this.
I
don't
think
that
150
is
going
to
cut
it.
I
think
we're
going
to
need
a
lot
more,
a
lot
more
funding
and
then
down
the
road
if
it
does
open
it
up
into
a
actual
brick
and
mortar
location.
C
Okay,
thank
you
for
the
reiteration
of
your
question
and
I
see
that
tina
kapoor
our
economic
development
manager.
As
for
cameron
tina
did
you
want
to
speak
to
that.
U
Thank
you,
mayor,
paul,
yes,
just
very
briefly,
and
councilmember
moore
you're,
absolutely
right.
There
may
be
additional
costs
associated
with
this
item.
The
approximate
budget
that's
been
allocated
or
requested
for
this
item
is
is,
is
really
just
a
it's
an
estimate
at
this
point.
U
U
If
that's
you
know
something
that
we
can
do
in-house
before
we
go
to
a
third
party
vendor
and
at
the
end
of
that
six
month
time
we
would
have
a
much
better
and
clearer
idea
of
what
the
ongoing
costs
may
look
like,
including
the
staffing
resources
that
you
mentioned.
So
that's
the
plan.
That's
what
we're
thinking
of
doing
before
before
having
like
a
a
full
blown
plan,
we
want
to
try
it
out
in-house
and
see
how
that
might
work.
E
T
Mr
paul
councilmember
moore,
I
could
answer
that
question,
so
I
have
done
a
little
bit
of
research
on
that.
The
cities
that
I
have
found
that
have
online
stores
actually
are
very
large
cities,
so
new
york
city
obviously
has
some
chicago
has
one
and
there
there
are
cities
that
have
an
associated
sports
team
with
them
have
online
stores
as
well,
but
stores
are
our
size.
I
have
not
seen
that
as
of
yet
we
are
still
doing
our
research
on
this.
You
know
it's
definitely
not
a
closed
issue.
T
We're
looking
at
that,
but,
as
tina
mentioned,
we're
looking
at
this
as
a
pilot
to
get
something
up
and
going
understand
what
the
need
is.
You
know
and
and
see
how
the
success
of
this
rolls
out
and
then,
if,
if
it's
successful
and
we
come
back,
we'll
be
coming
back,
you
know
second
quarter
of
the
fiscal
year
and
looking
for
more
funds.
If
it
is
successful
at
that
time,.
C
Great
thank
you
very
much
bill
thanks
tina
and
let's
move
on
to
councilmember
way
at
this
time,.
F
Thank
you,
mayor
paul.
Actually,
I'm
glad
I
actually
a
couple
questions
being
answered
and
I'm
looking
at
this.
This
is
a
proposed
budget,
so
a
lot
of
things
are
going
to
come
back
to
us
and
with
more
details
and
a
lot
of
pilot
programs
in
there.
So
I'm
happy
with
our
staff
committing
their
time
to
do
a
lot
of
things
that
our
council
has
put
on
the
work
plan
in
the
cip.
F
So
I
am
okay
with
the
the
proposal
and
I
do
like
to
add
that
the
volunteer
fair,
because
that
is
a
really
good
fair,
but
it
also
shows
doing
any
fair,
even
in-house.
That's
our
staff
time
for
other
community
organizations
to
do
that,
they're
all
on
their
volunteer
time.
So
I
I
like
that
volunteer
fair.
I
think
it's
a
really
good
one
to
have
every
year
that
serve
our
residents
very
well.
So
I
I
do
think-
and
I
only
repeat
on
the
jobs,
the
two
jobs.
F
I
get
the
answer
that
we
can
refine
the
job
descriptions
and
work
on
that,
and
we
I
admit
that
there
are
a
lot
of
things
we
could
do
so,
adding
two
jobs
to
half
a
million
dollars.
If
we
make
it
really
good,
valuable
job
descriptions
that
could
bring
revenues
back
to
our
city,
not
just
not
just
service
our
residents.
So
I'm,
okay
with
the
budget
that's
proposed,
and
then
I
should
understand
that
every
quarter
we
have
adjustment
and
come
back
and
we
can
always
have
more
input
and
evaluate
projects
going
forward.
F
And,
oh,
I
do
want
to
say
something
about
special
projects.
I
I
understand,
because
a
lot
of
questions
was
being
asked
and
answered
on
the
paperwork
already
that
it's
a
lot
of
operational
and
then
incorporate
with
a
lot
of
special
projects.
Also
include
you
know
pavement
and
this
and
that
so
I
think
the
city
budget
is
more
complicated
than
just
our
straight
checkbook
in
our
in
our
home,
so
understanding
a
study
session
to
understand
how
it
works.
It
would
be
very
good.
Thank
you.
A
J
I
think
this
is
we're
talking
about
budget,
and
there
is
a
question
I
forgot
to
ask
earlier
in
how
it
probably
is
still
appropriate.
The
sister
city
grant
uber
nation.
We
did
not
fund
them
and
then
I
I'm
trying
to,
but
then
we
will
be
talking
about.
We
need
to
be
equitable
between
the
different
sister
city
organization,
and
so
I
think
other
city
like
the
the
toyotawa.
J
They
do
have
an
event.
They
got
to
get
safety
labor,
but
they
did
not
get
grant
in
terms
of
funding
directly
and
their
event
is
meant
to
raise
funding
for
the
student
exchange
program
that
they
do
fund
and
then
for
the
uber
nation.
They
are
relatively
new,
be
new,
so
they
may
need
a
start,
some
stuff
to
get
started.
J
So
what
what
do
we
plan
to
do
about
the
equitability
between
the
sister
cities?
I
wonder
and
if
anyone
has
some
insight
or
is
that
something
we
should
look
into
at
some
time.
C
Yeah,
no,
that's
a
that's
a
that's
a
repetitive
but
but
fair
question
that
that
really
hasn't
been
squarely.
You
know
kind
of
answered,
so
rochelle,
our
assistant,
director
of
parks.
Did
you
have
any
commentary
on
vice
mayor
child's
question.
G
I
can't
speak
to
the
agreements
with
the
sister
cities
because
those
aren't
in
our
department,
but
I
can
speak
to
the
festivals,
both
the
toyakawa
sister
city,
cherry
blossom
festival
and
the
babaneshwar
festival
are
on
the
list
of
festivals
for
fee
wafers,
so
both
of
those
sister
cities
have
festivals.
The
other
ones
do
not
at
this
time.
So
we
are
basically
fair
in
that
section
of
the
festivals.
J
G
Off
the
top
of
my
head,
I
know
that
babaneshwar
has
received
it
in
the
past.
I
do
not
believe
toyota
has
applied
for
it
in
the
past,
but
I
would
have
to
look
into
that.
J
All
right
they'd
received
that
last
year.
Okay,
thank
you.
C
Well,
at
this
point
we
have
the
motion,
that's
on
the
table,
and
you
know
I'm
very
appreciative
of
all
my
colleagues
and
all
of
staff
for
all
the
incredible
amounts
of
work.
That's
been
done
here.
I
think
a
lot
of
the
points
you
know
I
will
will
take
to
heart
and
proceed,
but
at
this
time
you
know
seeing
no
further
comment.
I
will
ask
that
our
city
clerk
conduct
a
role,
call
vote
for
the
motion
that
is
on
the
table.
Madam
soon.
C
D
Mission,
as
amended,
carries
with
more
voting
no.
C
Okay
well,
thank
you
very
much
everyone
and,
as
promised,
I
think
that
we
have
the
very
last
item
on
our
original
agenda,
which
I
believe
was
not
oral
communications
continued,
but
council
and
staff
comments
and
future
agenda
items,
and
so,
let's
start
with
jim,
are
there
any
staff
comments
at
this
time?
Jim.
M
Thank
you
mayor.
My
staff
comments
would
be
to
say
thank
you
to
the
mayor
and
the
council.
This
was
a
a
very
thorough
budget.
You
all
asked
incredible
questions.
You
brought
new
thoughts
and
ideas
to
the
table
and
you
know
it's
something
I
want
to
thank
you
for
and
I'm
very
happy
that
we
are
able
to
get
that
approved.
So
thank
you
very
much.
C
Thanks
very
much
jim
and
let's
go
ahead
and
allocate
a
few
minutes
each
for
any
council
comments
or
future
agenda
items.
Would
anyone
like
to
start
us
off
on
getting
back
on
track?
Frankly,
with
the
end
of
our
meetings
with
the
future
agenda
items
and
our
comments
I
see
vice
mayor
chow
has
a
hand
raised
vice
mayor
chap.
J
Yeah,
I
realize
we
just
approved
the
work
program,
but
then
something
came
up
in
the
public
comment
on
tuesday
that
I
would
like
to
request.
It
has
to
do
with
project
that
doesn't
quite
fit
the
state
restriction
on
sb9,
for
example,
a
30-70
split.
If
someone
doesn't
want
to
cut
their
current
house
in
health,
but
they
want
to
a
lot
split
a
smaller
lot,
but
that
lot
might
be
good
enough
for
a
single
family
home.
J
Is
there
a
process
for
them
to
do
that
and
then
on
what
if
they
would
like?
They
meet
the
state
requirement,
but
they
do
not
meet
the
law.
The
city
ordinance
restriction.
Is
there
still
a
pass
for
discretionary
approval
because,
personally,
I
do
think
lot,
split
and
duplex
if
done
well
and
follow
the
city
standard,
meet
the
neighborhood
characteristic
and
address
parking
issues
should
have
a
viable
pass.
J
J
I
don't
know
if
there
is
time
to
accommodate,
but
I
think
when
we
adopt
an
interim
ordinance,
this
will
be
nice
to
at
least
have
some
information
that
we
can
follow.
It
could
be
through
subdivision
map
act.
It
could
be
through
a
minor
resounding
or
some
kind
of
general
planning
amendment
yeah.
Thank
you.
C
L
So
I
would
like
a
study
session
or
an
agenda
item
on
the
memorial
memorial
park
so
that
we
can
once
and
for
all,
take
care
of
sandra
gentry's,
pile
of
stuff
and
hopefully
get
that
memorial
repaired
asap
so
I'll
leave
it
at
that
for
tonight.
Hopefully,
another
councilman
will
support
that
so
that
we
can
make
turn
it
into
either
a
study
session
or
an
agenda
item.
Thank
you.
C
Okay,
thank
you
very
much
council
member
willie.
You
know
without
you
know,
kind
of
getting
into
discussion
on
it.
I
know
that
this
has
been
an
ongoing
work
that
that
jim's
been
working
on,
so
I
think
it
would
be
pretty
timely
to
bring
forward
a
study
session
in
the
relatively
near
near
future.
I
see
that
jim's
hand
was
raised
and
and
and
lowers
up.
You
know
I
take
it
that
I
probably
covered
your
point.
Okay,
so
I
don't
see
a
new
hand
raised
vice
where
your
hand.
C
So
so,
as
I
as
I,
as
I
told
you
I'll
check
in
with
our
city
manager,
as
well
as
our
city
attorney
on
the
timing
of
how
the
sb9
you
know,
ordinances
is
coming
back
to
us.
I
know
that
it
is
scheduled
to
do
so,
because
we
passed
an
urgency
ordinance
as
opposed
to
a
permanent
one,
and
so
I
will
commit
to
you
that
I'll
go
and
take
a
look.
What
the
timing
looks
like
and
so.
C
Okay,
customer
willie,
would
you
like
to
go
on
the
record
as
seconding
the
request
of
vice
mayor
channel,
absolutely
okay,
great.
J
J
C
Yeah
I
mean
based
upon
you
know
what
what
are
you
know,
what
our
agendas,
so
I
think
no
further
hands
raised
again.
I
want
to
reiterate
our
thanks
to
our
our
our
community
staff,
as
well
as
our
colleagues
on
council,
and
you
know
we'll
we'll
we'll
reconvene
on
jail
on
june
21st
for
our
next
regular
council
meeting.