►
Description
Coverage of the March 8, 2022 City Council Goals and Work Program Special Teleconference Meeting.
A
C
A
And
I'm
here,
thank
you
very
much,
okay.
So
in
this
special
meeting
we
have
one
item,
one
item
only
and
I
think
our
members
of
staff
for
being
here
this
is
the
fiscal
year.
2022
2023
council
goals
and
proposed
city
work,
plan,
work,
program,
items
kickoff
and
we're
here
initially
selecting
city
work,
program,
items
for
prioritization
as
part
of
this
process,
and
so
mr
city
manager
troop.
I
believe
that
there
is
a
staff
presentation.
Would
you
like
to
introduce
the
presenter.
E
F
So
just
an
outline,
as
the
mayor
mentioned,
we'll
look
at
our
strategic
planning
process
for
fiscal
year.
23
discuss
council
goals,
which
hopefully
council
will
adopt
tonight
or
make
amendments
and
adopt.
We
did
have
a
city
work
program,
gold
survey,
so
we'll
go
over
those
results
and
then
discuss
items
to
include
for
prioritization
as
well
as
next
steps,
so
we're
here
at
the
kickoff
as
the
mayor
mentioned,
and
this
is
where
we'll
be
reviewing
goals
and
suggesting
items
for
prioritization.
F
So
we
did
conduct
a
city
work
program,
goals,
survey.
It
was
live
from
january,
16th
to
february
14th.
We
responses.
We
received
185
responses,
255
visitors.
The
analysis
revealed
these
categories,
which
are
relatively
in
good
alignment
with
the
council's
current
goals.
We
do
have
dogs
off
leash
areas
leading
the
pack
here
and
I
was
we
did
break
down.
Some
of
those
larger
categories
did
have
smaller
subcategories
that
presented
themselves.
We
wanted
to
make
that
transparent
to
everyone
like
dogs
off
leash
areas.
There
were
several
responses
from
monte
vista
park
and
memorial
park
in
transportation.
F
It
included
a
lot
for
bike
ped.
There
were
also
traffic
concerns
in
mass
transit
parks
and
recreation.
There
are
comments
specific
to
memorial
park
as
well
as
generally
adding
and
improving
parks
and
recreation
areas.
Quality
of
life
had
comments
for
public
safety,
light
reduction
and
noise
regulation.
F
F
And
so
we
do
have
carryover
items
that
were
recommended
by
commissions
as
well,
and
we
do
recommend
they
be
included
for
the
prioritization
process
and
items
that
are
not
included
here
are
expected
to
not
include
in
here
that
are
on
the
current
city.
Work
program
are
expected
to
be
completed
by
the
end
of
this
fiscal
year.
A
Great,
that
was
a
very
very
to
the
point.
Thank
you,
katie,
and
so
let's
go
ahead
and
bring
this
to
our
members
of
the
public.
Are
members
of
the
public
you'll
have
up
to
three
minutes
to
speak
on
this
item,
and
so
I
will
remind
you,
if
you
have
your
hand
raised
by
the
time
the
first
person
is
done,
speaking
you'll
be
called
on
for
a
public
comment
again.
A
D
Yes,
I
I
was
confused
about
what
this
meeting
was,
but
I
understand-
and
now
we've
got
two
griffins.
Oh
well,
that's
okay!
The
irish
are
here
tonight
anyway.
Yes,
thank
you
for
the
very
speedy
presentation
and
I
think
that,
in
light
of
what
we
just
went
through,
I'm
beginning
more
and
more
convinced
that
understanding
what
is
going
on
with
the
housing
element,
the
the
requirements
from
hcd,
which
are
changing
constantly
that
is
rising
up
to
be,
I
would
say,
the
next
year's
highest
priority.
D
I
I.
I
really
didn't
think
that
it
would
be
that
much.
I
I
just
thought
it
would
be
like
the
last
house
elements,
but
it
has
escalated
in
just
so.
Many
of
the
cities
in
california
are
having
their
housing
elements
denied.
You
know,
they're
getting
mixed
instructions
from
hcd.
You
know
they're
cagey,
like
nobody
knows
how
you're
supposed
to
get
through
this.
It's
like
going
through
some
sort
of
a
dating
app
or
something
it
it's.
D
I
think
that
cupertino
has
a
lot
of
things
we're
coming
out
of
the
pandemic.
We
need
to
make
sure
that
our
staffing
is
ramping
back
up,
that
we
have
goals
for
the
future,
but
with
the
advent
of
this
housing
element
drama,
I'm
going
to
call
it
it's
like
a
soap
opera
and
a
drama.
We
want
to
do
it
right.
D
We
want
to
do
what
the
state
requires,
but
to
me
it
is
a
song
and
dance
we're
trying
hard,
but
we
can't
cha-cha
backwards
in
high
heels
if
we
are
not
getting
clear,
consistent
information
from
hcd
and
sacramento
is
anyone
having
oversight
on
hcd
or
are
they
just
making
things
up?
So?
Yes,
I
I
think
in
all
the
good
work
that
this
city
has
done,
keeping
everyone
safe
for
the
last
two
years
going
through
all
the
the
trauma
and
drama
of
covid
coming
out.
D
A
Thank
you
very
much
jenny
and
at
this
point
I
only
have
three
further
hands
raised.
They
are
from
peggy
griffin,
janet
van
zoren
and
leanna
crabtree,
and
so
I
will
go
ahead
and
remind
our
members
of
the
public,
because
I
know
that
we
had
a
lot
of
emails
come
in
for
one
particular
issue.
If
you
want
to
speak
on
this
item,
you
will
need
to
raise
your
hand
and
I'm
and
the
reason
I
I
make
this
comment-
is
that
there
was
a
request
from
a
member
of
the
public
to
consolidate
time.
A
G
H
Oh
okay,
I'm
confused
right
now
as
to
the
status
of
the
affordable
housing
project
for
people
who
have
developmental
disabilities,
possibly
at
a
site
on
mary
avenue
and
where
that
is
being
proposed
in
the
new
work
plan
and
also
with
regard
to
the
affordable
housing
project.
That's
been
proposed
by
the
county
at
the
old
outback
site.
H
I
Good
evening,
council
and
staff,
my
name
is
liana
crabtree,
I'm
a
cupertino
resident,
and
I
wanted
to
speak
in
favor
of
the
item
related
to
improving
transportation
and
and
travel
options
to
and
from
the
library
in
the
civic
center
plaza
area
prior
to
the
pandemic.
This
was
a
I
think.
Items
related
to
traveling
to
and
from
the
library
were
really
important
items
that
were
addressed
by
the
library
commission.
I
Of
course,
under
the
pandemic,
everyone's
needs
changed,
but
some
of
the
items
that
were
discussed
included,
you
know
a
cooperative
agreement
with
the
cupertino
union
school
district
to
have
satellite
parking
at
eaton
school.
There
was
discussion,
and
I
don't
know
where
has
gone
to
have
dedicated
drop-off
area,
probably
on
torrey
avenue.
That
was
going
to
involve
a
carve
out,
but
we,
you
know,
had
changes
in
the
public
works
department
and
also
the
park
and
recreation
director
changed.
I
You
know
right
at
the
time
of
the
pandemic
and
is
probably
not
at
all
we're
not
very
familiar
with
the
kinds
of
challenges
that
we
had
also
related
to
curbing
bicycle
theft
and
anything
related
to
short-term
parking
and
then
just
general
fact
that
the
demand
for
parking
it
really
exceeded
the
capacity.
So
we
can
encourage
people
through
marketing
campaigns
and
and
possibly
changing
some
of
the
infrastructure
around
the
library
to
accommodate
other
forms
of
transit.
Way-Finding
signs,
you
know
encouraging
people
to
park
in
the
neighborhoods.
I
A
J
J
I
I'm
concerned
that
there
are
so
many
items
on
this
list
and
and
it's
amazing
how
many
of
these
projects
that
we
have
all
going
on
at
the
same
time.
It's
it's
a
huge
list,
which
is
great,
so
I
just
wanted
to
follow
up
on
something
that
lyanna
was
talking
about
with
regards
to
parking
and
the
library,
and
I
I
think
perhaps
one
one
thing
that
we
could
use
for
in
the
interim
is
the
spillover
to
the
torrey
avenue
site,
10455
torrey
avenue.
J
Since
we
do
own
that
property,
it
would
seem
that
library
patrons
could
park
there,
and
I
was
told
that
some
years
ago
there
had
been
an
agreement
with
that
business
park
to
have
after-hours
parking
there
on
the
evenings
and
and
weekends.
So
I
don't
know
if
that's
something
that
we
could
do
in
the
future
to
bring
bring
that
back,
but
that
perhaps
could
help
moving
forward,
and
so
I'm
I
am
wondering
about
things
like
like
building
disposition.
J
So
we
did
a
tour
all
of
the
council.
Members
had
had
tours
of
the
burn
property,
bletch
property
stockholmer,
and
we
all
had
a
tour
of
it,
but
without
saying
what
it
is
that
we
would
say
each
property
would
would
inevitably
become.
I
was
wondering
how
exactly
do
we
construct
a
work
plan
item
that
would
just
simply
say
we
want
to
talk
about
these
buildings
and
have
a
study
session
for
what
we're
going
to
do
with
them
moving
forward,
or
maybe
it.
J
J
So
again,
I'm
not
really
sure
what
to
do
with
that
one
as
a
as
a
work
plan
item,
because
I
don't
I
I'm
not
directive,
as
is
what
the
best
solution
is.
So
if
the
other,
if
my
other
council
members
have
some
suggestions
about
those
items
how
to
get
them
on
the
work
plan,
please
bring
them
up.
Thank
you.
A
A
I
think
that's
a
much
taller
ask,
but
you
know
when
I
spoke
to
our
you
know
our
staff
about
it
seemed
like
there's
some
receptivity
to
doing
what
you
just
there
so
council
member
willie's
next,
but
let
me
check
in
with
our
city
manager
jimmy
you
have
your
hand
raised.
Did
you
want
to
follow
up
on
any
of
the
items
from
councilman
moore.
E
Yes,
thank
you
mayor
and
for
councilmember
moore.
What
we
were
discussing
might
help
out
too
is
currently
in
the
evenings
and
other
times
we
use
the
current
parking
lot
here
at
city
hall
and
community
home
library.
We
have
city
vehicles,
so
we're
actually
thinking
about
moving
those
over
to
torrey
avenue
to
free
up
parking
for
others
closer
to
it,
so
they
don't
have
to
walk
so
far.
So
that's
in
the
works
right
now
that
we
would
use
that
for
putting
the
other
city
vehicles
over
there
and
opening
it
more
closer
to
the
library.
A
Yeah,
it's
a
good
thinking
prospectively
for
sure
you
know
these
kinds
of
things.
You
know
certainly
they're
they're
hard
to
anticipate.
You
know
with
exact
with
exactness,
but
I
think,
as
things
open
up,
civic
center
will
definitely
start
getting
more
congested.
So
you
know
it's
it's!
It's
good
that
we're
thinking
about
it
ahead
of
time.
I.
H
A
F
A
Where
does
that
fall
in
time
relative
to
where
we
are
right
now,
because
in
previous
years
we
were
basically
asked
to
put
you
know
weighted
rankings,
I
think
a
scale
of
one
to
five
or
something
like
that,
and
you
know
you
went
and
added
them
all
up
so
where,
when
are
we
contemplating?
That
process
will
happen.
A
A
If
you
like
stuff
great,
it's
already
on
a
list,
we're
going
to
be
considering
it,
we
don't
have
to
come
out
at
this
meeting,
we're
not
being
asked
to
come
out
of
this
meeting
with
the
full
prioritization
of
all
of
these
work
plan
items,
because
it's
quite
comprehensive
and
exhaustive
and
exhausting,
but
you
know
quite
redeeming
and
worthy.
I
I
do
have
a
hand
raised
from
city
manager,
troupe
so
I'll
go
ahead
and
call
on
you,
jim
after
this.
A
A
That
would
be
the
kind
of
value
in
your
your
comments
here.
If
it's
really,
you
know,
we've
heard
a
lot
from.
For
example,
you
know
the
dog
off
leash
area
proponents.
If
it's
a
matter
of
saying,
let's
put
this
on
and
prioritize
it
higher
it's
on
there.
It
is
certainly
on
the
list
and
you
know
our
process,
for
you
know
kind
of
voting
it.
You
know.
However,
you
wish
to
to
see
it
go.
As
katie
has
said,
that's
a
little
bit
off
on
the
horizon.
K
K
If
we
decide
that
or
just
mentally,
we
think
that
a
city
work
plan
can
have
40
items
and
trying
to
get
our
arms
around
this
huge
list.
But
if
we
know
that
this
is
our
current
work
plan,
this
is
you
know:
8
12
14
that
have
now
been
finished,
and
now
we
have
those
slots
to
fill
in
to
me.
That
would
have
been
really
helpful,
and
so
it
gets
a
little
more
confusing
when
the
existing
work
plan
items
are
interdispersed
in
this
list
because
now
gosh.
K
Well,
you
know
these
these
ones
that
are
already
on
our
work
plan
and
have
been
in
work.
That
said,
you
know
I.
I
would
hope
that
in
the
future
we
can,
we
can
try
to
simplify
the
process
for
us.
The
next
one
is
so
when
I
look
at
the
the
list
you
know
I
see,
number
29
license
plate
readers
and
then
I
see
number
41
pilot
license
plate
recognition
and
so
there's
one
instance
where
our
list
is
bigger
than
I
think
it
really
should
be.
K
K
K
Each
councilman
will
get
13
5,
13
threes,
13
ones,
and
then
we
decide
how
we
want
to
place
those
in
terms
of
the
priority,
but
I
just
want
to
be
sure
that,
or
I
want
to
understand
our
ranking
process
for
this
current
year's
work
plan.
So
I'll
leave
it
with
that
for
tonight,
but
I'll
definitely
take
this
list
and
go
through
it
and
try
to
place
them
in
in
order
of
what
I
think
the
community's
preferences
are
top
to
bottom.
Thank
you
all.
A
F
G
F
F
This
is
a
list
of
everything
that
we're
recommending
to
include
for
prioritization
because
they
will
be
multi-year
projects.
Anything
that's
not
listed
here
from
the
current
fiscal
year.
Work
program
is
expected
to
be
completed,
so
we
have
done
kind
of
what
you
mentioned
in
the
carryover
section
of
attachment
c.
Those
are
the
items
that
need
to
be
considered
for
next
year
and
then
I
also
wanted
to
say
in
this
presentation.
F
In
attachment
seats,
some
of
them
are
listed
twice
because
they
were
recommended
explicitly
by
a
commission,
and
we
didn't
want
to
take
away
the
clarity
that
these
are
the
items
the
commission
recommended.
So
we
wanted
to
keep
those
there,
but
we
also
have
carryover
items
in
the
carryover
section
that
are
duplicative,
and
so,
but
in
this
powerpoint
we
don't
duplicate
them.
So
in
total,
right
now
of
items
recommended
to
be
included
for
prioritization,
there
are
34
items,
so
I
just.
K
If
I
could
just
make
comments,
okay,
so
so
great
that
I
maybe
I
missed
a
little
bit
in
the
presentation
to
me
it
it
putting
the
cart
before
the
horse
is
what's
kind
of
confusing
me.
You
know
when
I
see
that
that
new
list
of
and
then
the
higher
higher
numbered
items
are
the
carryover
items
wow.
I
mean
it
very
confusing
for
me.
If
I
saw
that
you
know
1
2
30
were
the
current
ones.
F
F
A
F
It
would
be
so
the
way
that
I,
the
way
that
we're
presenting
it
tonight
is
here
are
the
items
that
we're
recommending
to
include,
and
in
attachment
c
we
have
a
listing
of
whether
we
recommend
to
include
or
not
include,
and
so
what
I've
presented
this
evening
in
the
powerpoint
are
all
the
items
that
are
recommended
for
inclusion
currently.
However,
so
that
would
be
prioritized
unless
council
would
like
to
take
some
out
and,
in
addition,
any
other
items
that
council
would
like
to
elevate
to
the
prioritization
process.
We'll
definitely
add
those
right.
A
Let
me
ask
you
just
very
briefly
for
the
lawrence
mini
park,
you're
you're,
putting
that
on
something
to
prioritize,
but
that's
actually
a
fully
funded
capital
improvement
project.
So
if
we
don't
prioritize
it
or
we
don't
prioritize
it
hi
what
what
impact
does
that
have
on
the
project
itself?
Because
it
has
a
timeline,
you
know,
so,
what's
the
purpose
of
placing
it
here
at
this
point,
I.
F
Think
it's
it's
a
very
complex
process
with
a
lot
of
nuances,
and
so
we
didn't
want
to
not
list
all
of
the
carryover
items.
Kind
of
to
the
point
that
councilmember
willie
made.
We
are
trying
to
just
really
show
which
items
are
carryovers.
It
may
be
that
by
the
time
we
get
to
the
prioritization
process,
perhaps
we
point
out
which
items
may
well.
A
Well,
you
know
I'll
just
make
an
observation
here
before
we
go
to
councilman
moore.
You
know
this
is
a
relatively
high
priority
item.
It
has
been
fully
funded,
it's
a
capital
improvement
project,
so
I
just
you
know.
I
would
just
reiterate
the
question
as
to:
why
put
it
on
a
list,
because
you
know
from
my
own
perspective,
it's
very
challenging
getting
a
significant
park
delivered
on
the
eastern
side
of
town
and
so.
F
Definitely
multi-year-
and
I
think
also
this
also
is
a
little
bit
in
alignment
with
in
the
past.
We've
tried
to
keep
the
cip
projects
and
work
program
projects
separate
because
they
do
have
their
own
trajectory
and
our
own
approval
process
and
all
of
that
and
it
gets
a
little
complicated,
but
you
know
nonetheless,
we
we're
happy
to
include
it
at
council's
direction
or.
A
I
mean,
I
guess
my
point
is
you
know
I've
seen
it
slow
down,
regardless
of
how
it's
prioritized,
whether
it's
high-
and
you
know
my
fear,
is
you
know
if
it
doesn't
happen
to
get
prioritized
so
high?
It
could
be
used.
As
you
know,
some
kind
of
justification
for
natural
tendencies
which
I'd
like
to
you
know
make
sure
that
if
we
have
a
fully
funded
capital
improvement
project,
it's
not
you
know
treated
in
that
manner,
and
I
understand
you
know
we
have
annexation
issues.
A
I
was
actually
you
know
on
the
on
the
phone
with
the
lafco
staff
member
yesterday
and
you
know
the
day
before
so
hopefully
that
gets
in
april,
but
at
the
same
time
I
would
love
to
not
see
it
become
a
staging
area
for
our
public
works
process.
You
know,
projects
without
notice
to
the
public
right
is
sometime
in
the
next.
You
know
a
year
or
calendar
year.
I
should
say
okay.
Well,
let
me
go
to
council,
member
moore
and
then
vice
mayor
ciao,
then
councilman
away.
J
Okay,
thank
you
mayor
paul,
so
a
little
disappointed,
I'm
not
I'm
not
seeing
when
I
look
at
attachment
c
something
from
the
fine
arts
commission
included.
I
I
see
four
items
and
they
all
say
not
include,
and
I
and
I'm
wondering
if
perhaps
the
liaison
could
ask
for
some
other
suggestions
that
we
could
review.
J
I
just
want
to
mention
one
thing,
and
perhaps
the
city
attorney
can
correct
me,
but
I
think
for
the
westport
project,
that
by
the
new
calculations
for
public
art,
that
about
three
hundred
thousand
dollars
was
generated
from
that
development.
I
I
believe
that
was
the
the
one
that
had
such
a
high
number
would.
Would
you
happen
to
recall
that
or
any
anyone
on
staff
have
some
recollection
about
that.
M
J
N
I
I
just
wanted
to
reiterate:
probably
not
the
westport
project.
I
know
that
a
couple
of
items
are
going
to
the
fine
arts
commission
they
haven't
as
yet.
However,
the
current
fine
arts
ordinance.
It
does
not
have
the
hundred
thousand
dollar
cap
that
it
used
to
in
the
past,
so
projects
will
be
required
to
provide.
I
believe
it's
a
one
percent
cap
of
the
construction
value
and
so
certainly
we'll
see
more
projects
with
a
lot
more
art
work
involved.
J
J
J
So
my
concern
is
that
for
some
of
these
projects,
which
are
getting
bigger,
especially
given
our
housing
element
that
there's
going
to
be
a
significant
amount
of
of
of
money,
that
needs
to
have
some
suggestions
on
where
it
will
go
with
regards
to
art
and
and
do
we
do
we
want
to
have
some
of
those
recommendations
then
come
to
council
to
hear
hear
what
the
fine
arts
commission
suggests
be
done
with
it
or
or
not.
So
two
things.
You
know
one
I'd
like
to
see
another.
J
If
there
are
some
other
suggestions
from
the
fine
arts
commission
which
could
possibly
make
it
onto
the
city
work
program,
I'd
appreciate
it.
We
did
have
an
item
under
housing,
commission,
the
programs
for
dan's,
a
college
students
explore
solutions
for
homeless
and
housing,
insecure
students-
and
I
was
wondering
if
we
could
perhaps
have
some
update
from
their.
I
believe
our
their
president
is
now
patrick
ahrens
for
foothill
dans
aboard
board
of
trustees
and
they
have
the
bond
which
is
around,
I
believe,
890
million
dollars.
J
So
I
I'm
curious
if
someone
can
reach
out
from
staff
to
find
out
if
they
are
intending
to
provide
something
for
the
students,
because
we
can't
build
on
their
campus
they're
pretty
much
an
autonomous
site
with
with
regards
to
what
they
build
there.
I'm
a
little
disappointed
that
second
story:
balconies
was
not
included.
I
know
that
that
keeps
coming
up
every
time
we
see
one
of
these
balconies
we
get
frustrated.
We
say
we
need
to
change
it
and
if
there's
anyone
on
council
that
would
like
to
see
this.
This
item
moved
forward.
J
I
I
would
welcome
that
so
that
we'd
stop
revisiting
the
same
thing.
Every
time
it
comes
up
and
could
somebody
from
staff
explain
the
work
plan
items
that
fall
on
under
cip
versus?
I
think
things
like
the
balcony.
The
second
story-
balcony
ordinance
would
not
be
cip.
So
how
do
we
make
those
distinctions-
and
I
think,
that'll
help
the
public
as
well?
Thank
you.
A
Thank
you,
councilman
moore.
I
I
wonder
when
you're
referring
to
the
the
art
related
fee,
whether
you
might
not
be
thinking
about
if
it's
the
westport
project
the
park,
dedication
fee,
which
was
actually
quite
a
sizable
payment,
but
no
you're
shaking
your
head.
Okay,
vice
mayor
ciao,
you
are
next
followed
by
councilman
away.
Oh
actually,
I
see
katie
with
her
hand
raised
katie.
Did
you
want
to
speak
to
any
of
the
comments
before
we
go
to
by
the
way.
F
Yes,
then
I'll
be
brief,
so
for
the
fine
arts
we
did,
one
of
the
items
that
they
suggested
is
the
kind
of
art
piece
of
the
cupertino
store
the
art
designed
by
community
members
to
provide
giveaways,
or
you
know,
at
a
store.
We
just.
We
can
definitely
include
a
component
like
that.
We
do
have
a
chamber
store
or
the
cupertino
store
item
being
recommended
to
include.
F
So
we
can
include
that
component
there,
while
we
just
weren't
comfortable,
including
it
as
a
completely
different
item,
but
if
it's
part
of
that
ongoing
effort,
if
that's
the
wish
of
the
council,
then
we
can
include.
We
also
were
hesitant
to
say
what
the
store
would
look
like
or
what
it
might
include
before.
We
brought
it
to
council
for
that
direction,
so
that
that
was
the
reason
why
it's
not
included
now,
but
if
you
would
like
to
have
it
included
as
part
of
that
store
discussion,
we
can
definitely
incorporate
that
piece
and
then
also.
F
Danza
college
support.
I
think
if
the
council
wishes
for
us
to
add
that
item
for
prioritization,
we
can
and
then
follow
up
as
we've
suggested.
The
second
story,
but
so
cip
projects
are
capital,
improvement
product
projects
they
involve
construction.
Public
works
can
probably
give
a
better
answer
than
I
can,
but
if
it
involves
construction
of
infrastructure
of
buildings,
of
that
nature,
balconies
and
or
balcony
ordinances
are
really
policy
documents
and
they
would
become
part
of
our
municipal
code.
So
that's
just
the
difference
in
nature.
It's
not
actual.
O
O
I
have
proposed
to
include
that
as
part
of
the
library
commission,
so
it's
library
and
community
engagement,
they
could
identify
ambassadors
in
different
social
media
to
help
us
outreach.
Also,
there
should
be
an
integrated
plan
so
that
we
don't
start
from
scratch
every
time.
So
I
hope
library
commission
could
help
us
come.
They
don't
actually
do
the
outreach,
but
they
help
create
integrated
resource.
So
next
time
we
have
a
go-to
place
to
review
the
engagement
plan.
Second
proposal
is
hybrid
meeting
for
commission
meetings.
O
I
think
we
will
go
back
to
in-person
in
april,
but
I
think
hybrid
meeting
will
enable
a
lot
of
seniors
who
can
dial
in
from
home
and
parents
with
young
kids
who
can
die
failing
from
home.
So
we
should
continue
to
support
that
and
hope
we
can
figure
out
a
way
and
the
third
is
a
pre-approved
adu
program.
We
approved
the
process
last
year,
but
there
is
only
one
pre-approved
adu
unit,
that's
less
than
500
square
feet
now.
O
O
This
is
a
project
we
didn't
finish.
We
approved
the
process,
but
we
didn't
recruit
the
vendors.
The
fourth
one
is
the
visitor
center.
The
chamber
of
commerce
proposed
to
create
a
cupertino
visitor
center.
Cupertino
is
well
known
as
the
center
of
silicon
valley,
but
people
who
visit
cupertino
have
no
idea
where
to
go,
and
so
now
we
have,
we
are
going
to
have
a
new
economic
development
committee.
I
think
this
could
be
a
project
for
that
committee
and
third
and
fifth
is
team.
Commission.
O
I
see
that
both
items
proposed
by
team
commission
are
not
included,
but
I
have
two
other
ideas.
I
hope
they
can
consider.
I
hope
the
staff
bring
it
to
team
commission.
One
is
mental
health
survey
and
resources.
I
think
that's
top
of
everything's
list
and
the
second
is
intergenerational
engagement,
possibly
with
age-friendly
task
force,
so
that
seniors
teenagers
and
there
are
activities
that
can
involve
people
from
a
diverse
age
group
and
another
fifth
one,
one,
two,
three
four
five
six
one
is
campaign
to
use
public
transit
bike
pad
or
alternative
parking
to
access
library.
O
A
No,
let's
go
ahead
and
and
cut
off
their.
I
mean
unless
and
when
you,
when
you
go
back
we'll
we'll
get
back
to
you
vice
mayor
when
you,
when
you
go
back
on
the
existing
items,
focus
on
changes
that
you
have
you
know
as
opposed
to
you
know
plaudits
or
you
know.
I
guess
if
you
want
to
take
it
off,
it's
it's
a
different
story
as
well,
but
just
focus
on
the
changes.
A
C
Thank
you,
mayor
paul,
so
I've
noticed
that
we
have
added
a
lot
of
items
to
it
and
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
we
know
that.
Can
the
staff
provide
whether
it's
large,
medium
small,
how
much
time
it's
going
to
take,
because
it
really
doesn't
make
sense,
put
a
lot
of
items
on
it
where
the
staff
doesn't
have
time
to
take
it.
C
I
know
we're
going
to
prioritize
it,
but
if
we
put
a
lot
of
them
and
prioritize
them
and
then
a
lot
of
them
don't
get
done,
it
doesn't
make
sense
to
me
too.
So
I
I
would
really
like
to
know
how
much
time
on
each
project
that's
already
on
the
list
that
all
our
council
members
have
suggested
to
add
on
the
list,
so
that
eventually
we'll
be
able
to
scout
it
down
to
make
sure
it's
realistic,
stretching
it
but
be
realistic.
A
Yeah
absolutely
thank
you
councilman
way,
and
I
think
that
the
voting
procedure
can
certainly
you
know,
kind
of
wash
out
prioritization
and
you
know
okay,
some
stuff
goes
to
the
top.
Some
stuff
goes
to
the
bottom
right.
Okay,
so
let
me
make
my
own
comments
here.
You
know,
as
you
can
tell
from
my
prior
questions
with
regard
to
lauren
smitty.
A
I
I
think
you
know
again.
This
is
a
fully
funded
capital
improvement
project.
I
know
that
it's
challenging
it's,
it's
all
the
way.
On
the
far
eastern
side,
we
don't
actually
have
it
in
cupertino,
yet
I
I
hope
that
that
gets
remedied.
You
know
soon,
I'm
very
optimistic
that
lafco
will
be
taking
it
up
in
april,
but
I
think
we
need
a
project
manager
for
it
again.
It's
fully
funded,
there's
a
lot
of
money
for
it.
A
So
what
I
would
suggest
is
that
we
put
into
if
we're
going
to
prioritize,
we
explicitly
put
into
the
language
securing
a
project
manager
for
this
project.
We
want
to
make
sure
that
you
know
we
don't
get
unhoused
encampments,
entrenched
people
kind
of
scratch,
their
heads
and
go
well.
You
know
it's
a
couple.
Few
acres
here
it's
very
convenient
for
this
purpose
and
that
purpose
yeah.
A
I
I
think
we
need
to
keep
our
eye
on
the
ball
and
keep
focused
and
go
forward,
especially
you
know
again
we're
not
scrounging
about
for
funding.
For
this
I
mean
the
funding.
Is
there
the
land?
Is
there
we're
about
to
annex
it?
So
that's
my
first
comment.
My
second
comment.
You
know,
I
thought
you
know
the
thing
about
the
cupertino
store.
I
think
we
lack
the
ability
to
go
ahead
and
allow
people
you
know
locally
and
from
out
of
town
to
have
some
cupertino
branded
items.
A
You
know
this
isn't
about
giving
them
away.
It's
really
just
about
going
to
a
place
where
you
can.
You
can
buy
some
really
and
I
think
that
dovetails
actually
pretty
nicely
with
something
like
a
visitor
center
and
if
we're
talking
about
economic
development,
really
that
kind
of
gets
to
the
core
of
awareness
and
branding
for
city.
So
you
know,
I
think
it's
it's
something
that
you
know
we
could
look
at
in
terms
of
having
different
synergies.
A
I
think
the
vice
mayor
mentioned
one
of
them
with
regard
to
a
visitor
center
and
having
the
new
economic
development
committee
intersecting
with
it.
I
think
a
visitor
center
could
intersect
nicely
with
you
know,
cupertino's
store,
so
so
I
definitely
agree
with
that
and
another
another
frequent
request
that
I
get
from
the
public,
and
this
is
over
years.
It's
not
just
recently.
A
Our
our
students
really
want
internship
opportunities,
and
I
think
that
maybe
we
can
start
small,
but
you
know
when
I
go
around
city
hall
and
I
ask
people
hey
what
do
you
have
as
a
project?
That's
kind
of
lingering
right
that
perhaps
a
student
could
do
you
know
there
might
be
cataloging
of
various
things.
You
know
non-confidential
just
just
work.
That
needs
to
be
done.
That's
nice
and
packetized.
I
mean
I
think
we
could
take
it
from
a
relatively
low
cost.
A
You
know
low,
you
know,
staff
overhead
kind
of
perspective
and
basically
say
an
outreach
to
our
various
staff
points.
Hey
can
you
think
of
maybe
two
or
three?
You
know
tasks
two
or
three
projects
that
you
could
give
to
a
student
over
the
course
of
the
summer.
I
mean
I,
I
think
I
think
our
city
could
come
up
with
an
internship
program
and,
if
consolidated
with
our
council
members,
maybe
each
of
us
could
you
know
sort
of
in
this.
You
know
program
get
one
or
two
interns
helping
us
out.
A
I
can
certainly
do
that,
but
I
would
have
to
sit
down
and
think
about.
You
know
what
are
the
various
tasks
that
would
need
to
be
done.
I
think
we
could
you
know
kind
of
roll
it
into
something
very
interesting
as
well.
You
know,
maybe
you
know
tours
of
the
the
city.
You
know
we
we
have
the
you
know
we
have
the
vehicles,
I
think
we
can
contain
it.
You
know
nicely
and
also
provide
a
nice
service,
the
other
part
of
it.
A
I
think
you
know
we
have
an
economic
development
director
and
we
do
have
a
reformed
economic
development
committee,
I'm
not
necessarily
saying
that
should
get
into
the
committee's
purview,
but
if
we're
interfacing
with
the
business
community,
I
think
there's
also
you
know
some
potential
opportunity,
but
I
think
once
you
talk
about
private
sector,
it
becomes
a
much
more
far-ranging
and
complicated.
You
know
endeavor.
I
I
would
say
you
know
if
we
wanted
to
packetize
it
as
as
minimally
as
possible,
I
mean
just
for
my
own
part.
A
A
Take
some
pictures,
but
I
mean
I
think
if
we
had
a
bit
more
of
a
formal
program,
we
can
a
not
only
provide
that
opportunity
from
the
community
and
also
to
get
the
students
engaged
more
in
understanding
what
our
public
processes
are
about,
but
also
get
some
things
done.
You
know,
frankly,
we
have
really
capable
students,
you
know
some
sometimes
shockingly
so
you
know
over
the
years
you
you
know,
might
hear
like
a
science
project
done
by
a
fifth
grader
and
you're
kind
of
scratching
your
head
and
going
wow.
A
I
can't
believe
that
that
this
is
going
forward.
You
know
by
someone
who's,
you
know
11
or
12
years
old.
So
I
I
think
kind
of
thought
through.
If
we
were
just
to
ask
this
simple
question
to
staff
and
basically
say
you
know,
can
you
think
of
a
project
or
two
all
right
I
mean,
and
it's
just
a
matter
of
bandwidth
you
just
you
know,
need
someone
who
has
sufficient
amounts
of
intelligence
to
learn
an
app
on
a
computer
or
you
know,
do
you
know
a
task?
A
That's
just
been
kind
of
set
aside
that,
if
coordinated
could
help
get
some
stuff
done,
I
mean
I.
I
think
that
could
be
a
really
an
intriguing
type
of
you
know
service
that
we
can
provide
with
with
a
win-win,
hopefully
so
so
that
would
be
my
addition.
I
I
would
propose
a
possible
city-driven
internship
program.
You
know
for
our
students
and
so
yeah
that
that's
you
know
the
way.
I
see
this
list
right
now.
It's
asking
for
suggestions,
I
you
know.
A
I
think
that
the
you
know,
other
suggestions
are,
are
really
interesting
and
compelling,
but
I
would
just
kind
of
focus
in
on
on
that
particular
one,
the
other,
the
other
thought
that
I
had
had
to
do.
Kind
of
the
other
side
of
the
age
spectrum-
and
I
really
appreciated
the
comment
with
regard
to
the
age
friendly
task
force
and
trying
to
find
ways
to
coordinate.
You
know
one
way
I
think
we
could
do.
A
It
could
also
be
tied
with
public
communications
and
outreach,
because
you
know,
I
think
we
do
have
a
a
very
appreciably
aging
community
and
if
we
were
to
tie
that
in
with
interaction
with
our
with
our
students
and
the
and
the
and
the
younger
set
kind
of
in
a
manner
that
keeps
it
more
neutral.
It
kind
of
keeps
a
more
issue,
and
you
know
particularly
monetarily.
You
know,
driven
influence
is
neutral.
A
I
think
we
get
some
really
good
communicative
mechanisms
going
within
the
within
the
city.
So
it's
just
a
thought,
and-
and
maybe
you
know,
we
don't
really
have
a
department,
or
particular
people
in
our
city.
That
kind
of
focuses
on
the
topic
of
aging
or
you
know,
outreach
to.
You
know
that
particular
demographic
of
of
the
elderly.
We
do
have
a
senior
center.
A
We
have,
of
course,
the
parks,
direct
department
and
you
know
community
development,
but
I
think
some
of
those
dots
have
been
quite
connected
in
in,
in
a
way
that
you
know
we
can
be
interacting.
I
mean
we
did
have
a
senior
commission
previously
and
I
guess
the
natural
synergy
would
probably
have
been.
A
You
know
melding
one
of
our
team
mechanisms,
either
team,
commission
or
one
of
the
councils
or
one
of
the
team
groups
with
the
the
senior
commission,
but
I
I
know
we
have
a
committee
right
now,
but
we
no
longer
have
that
commission.
So
so
just
some
thoughts
in
in
terms
of
you
know
where
the
needs
are.
I
I
think
those
community,
it's
really
good
to
communicate,
but
I'd
really
like
to
be
able
to
as
a
city
set
forth
real
value.
A
That's
really
not
kind
of
like
you
know
ulterior
agenda
or
I
don't
like
this
particular
you
know
thing
or
person.
I
I
think
just
kind
of
going
forward
and
trying
to
figure
out.
You
know
what
are
the
needs.
I
hear
all
sorts
of
you
know
comments
from
some
of
the
elderly
community.
I
have
no
idea
how
to
use
a
zoom.
You
know
function
on
a
meeting.
How
do
I
how
to
get
even
access
to
the
meeting
materials?
I
mean?
A
I
I
think
if
we
were
to
create
a
mechanism
for
that
kind
of
outreach
and
communication
on
a
broader
basis,
it
would
be
really
helpful
for
the
various
parts
and-
and
I
I
tend
to
think
you
know
that
energy
of
you
know
not
just
the
volunteering
spirit,
but
you
know
within
our
more
more
student
oriented.
You
know,
demographic
that
that
could
be
put
a
really
good
effect
there.
So
those
are
my
comments
just
some
thoughts.
A
I
you
know
I'm
not
providing
a
tangible
suggestion
with
regard
to
this,
this
latter
one.
But
but
if
I,
if
I
were
to
put
something
forward,
it
would
really
be
more
long
lines
of
kind
of
dovetailing
off
the
idea
of
an
internship
program,
with
the
hope
that
perhaps
somebody
in
the
city
could
identify
ways
we
can
synergize
our
student
population
with
the
elderly
population,
so
vice
mayor
chow,
your
hand
is
raised,
and
so
is
council
member
morse.
O
So
I
am
using
attachment
c,
so
my
numbers
is
from
attachment
c
for
item
number
two
region,
zero.
I
think
I
would
like
that
to
be
merged
with
number
items.
Four,
that's
potentially
into
include
potentially
near
misses
studies.
Item
four
was
recommended
for
not
including
not
to
be
included
and
then
on
under
fine
arts
commission.
O
How
come?
I
have
another
item
on
anyway:
the
festival
in
israel.
Okay,
that's
that's
number
six
yeah
under
fine
arts,
commission
festival
that
is
run
by
fine
arts
commission.
I
clarified
that
with
the
chair.
She
is
is
indicating
that
she
means
visual
and
performing
art
festival
which
cupertino
doesn't
have.
O
I
think
cupertino
doesn't
have
a
lot
of
public
art
and
with
the
potential
visitor
center,
I'm
hoping
there
could
be
a
photo
worthy
public
art
in
cupertino.
People
can
come,
take
a
photo
post
on
social
media,
and
here
is
where
I've
been
cupertino
and
possibly
a
grant
to
support
this
kind
of
public
art.
And
then
maybe
young
artists
could
get
also
getting
involved
in
producing.
O
There
are
some
simple
public
art
like
paving
on
the
ground
or
on
a
wall
that
could
make
interesting
public
art
with
low
cost
too,
and
then,
as
for
art
store,
I
think
that
cupertino
store
is
a
great
idea,
but
we
need
the
art
on
all
these
store
items.
So
I
would
like
to
assign
cupertino
store
to
art,
commission,
an
art.
Fine
art
commission
can
help
come
up
with
art,
designs
or
even
solicit
artwork,
representing
cupertino,
to
be
put
on
the
cupertino
store
items.
We
don't
want
those
just
to
have
the
cupola
logo.
O
We
want
them
to
have
some
colorful
art
representing
cupertino,
so
I
think
we
can
assign
the
store
to
by
r
to
help
us
come
up
with
what
to
include
in
cupertino
store
and
then
number
10
programs
for
the
anzac
college
students.
I
remember
we
had
a
home
share
program
so
that
the
college
students
can
share
a
home
with
the
seniors,
with
an
agreement
to
maybe
provide
some
housework
or
assistance
for
reduction
reduction
in
rent.
But
that
program
has
been
stopped.
O
What
makes
them
choose
to
come
to
dianza,
even
when
they
have
no
housing
option?
Why
they
couldn't
choose
a
community
college
in
their
own
home
area?
I'm
curious
about
that
and
I
think
we
need
to
understand
the
cause
of
this
kind
of
housing,
insecure
students
and
number
11
city
plan
to
end
homeless.
This
is
in
response
to
the
county
plan
to
end
homeless.
I
checked
the
county
website.
They
actually
have
quite
a
bit
of
program
for
homeless.
O
I
hope
that
our
plan
leverage
the
county
plan
and
get,
and
I
would
like
to
get
data
from
the
county
on
how
many
cupertino
residents
workers
are
being
served
by
the
county
programs,
because
I
keep
getting
the
feedback
that
the
county
doesn't
really
provide
service
to
us.
Maybe
that's
true.
Maybe
that's
that's
not.
I
hope
the
friend
to
end
homeless
provide
that
information
and
homeless
jobs
program
on.
I
think
the.
O
If
the
pilot
is
successful,
I
don't
know
why
we
are
not,
including
that.
However,
I
also
find
out
the
county
has
its
own
program
very
similar.
It's
also
for
homeless.
It's
called
the
creating
employment
pathways
by
the
county
and
they
have
a
goal
of
per
of
in
providing
jobs
for
170
people,
so
that
many
of
them
could
work
30
plus
hours
per
week,
and
then
they
also
have
programs
to
help.
O
Many
of
them
homeless
do
work,
but
they
don't
earn
enough
to
to
to
rent.
So
they
have
pathways
to
help
them
get
a
higher
paying
jobs,
so
they
can
earn
their
living
county
already
has
a
program.
I
wonder
how
we
can
maybe
work
with
the
county
to
leverage
their
resources
with
our
homeless
jobs
program
so
that
we
are
now
working
in
a
cycle.
O
Maybe
we
can
enhance
each
other's
work
and
number
13
create
plans
for
the
city
to
purchase
or
lease
very
low,
low
income,
rental
housing
to
include
seniors
and
developmentally
disabled.
This
is
not
included
by
the
staff
because
it
says
the
city
is
progressing
with
existing
site.
I
see
that
this
was
on
the
city
work
program,
but
the
item
was
never
on
the
housing
commission
agenda.
O
Maybe
this
is
something
the
city
is
already
doing.
Maybe
it's
making
progress?
Let's
put
that
on
the
housing
pro
housing
commission
agenda
so
that
they
are
involved,
and
I
hope
that
as
a
policy,
every
city,
a
council
approved
work
program,
item
related
to
any
commission
should
be
placed
on
their
work
program
and
any
operational
item.
O
A
A
You
have
11
more
items.
Okay,
if
you
could
try
to
you
know
summarize,
without
expounding
too
much,
maybe
half
a
minute
for
each
of
your
remaining
items.
That
would
be
really,
I
think
you
know.
I
appreciate
it
and
the
other
part
about
it
is
that
you
know
feel
free
to
your
comments
to
an
email
to
to
our
staff.
Member
that,
I
think,
can
get
reflected
in
you
know
the
next
iteration
that's
described
here.
So,
for
example,
you
know
I'll
just
go
over
number
13.
A
You
know
one
of
the
things
that
you
indicate
in
terms
of
creating
plans
for
the
city
to
purchase,
or
at
least
very
low
or
low
income
rental
housing
units
I
mean
I
I
think
those
are
those
are
very
well
intentioned,
but
if
the
staff
comment
is
that
you
know
quote,
the
city
is
progressing
with
existing
sites
for
development
of
affordable
housing.
The
city
has
funding
and
staffing
challenges.
O
Number
15
is
the
artwork
at
the
library
and
the
arts
day
and
that
one
on
the
library
commission
is
proposing
something
that's
expanding.
The
current
art
display,
because
our
library
is
really
really
doesn't
have
a
lot
of
art.
I
love
saratoga
library
where,
as
you
walk
in
you'll,
see
an
art
gallery,
and
I
think
this,
even
though
staff
says
it's
operational,
I
don't
think
operational
does
what
the
com
commission
is
in.
O
O
The
dark
of
this
area
is
is
close
to
other
athletic
athletic
field,
but
there
are
other
parks,
for
example,
here
in
linda
vista
park,
this
area
doesn't
have
any
other
athletic
field,
so
I
think
a
trial
in
this
area
could
start
right
away.
You
don't
need
to
wait
until
you
collect
data
from
julieman
park
and
then
for
memorial
park.
I
think
this
part
that
in
right
behind
queenland
is
also
far
away
from
the
softball
field.
Maybe
that
could
be
the
first
trial
for
that.
O
I
would
like
the
commission
to
explore
that
the
staff
made
some
comments,
but
it
really
does
not
include
the
privately
owned
ev
charger
and
exploration
and
number
38,
and
I
think
this
exploration
probably
shouldn't
need
any
staff
time
it's
for
the
commission
to
spend
time
to
explore.
So
I
hope
it
doesn't
take
up
staff
time
number,
38,
climate
victory,
garden,
pilot
expansion,
the
same
thing
we
have
a
pilot,
but
how
to
do
future
expansion.
If
it's
under
operational
there
will
be
no
expansion.
O
So
I
think
this
needs
to
be
on
the
commission
agenda
so
that
they
can
help
identify
more
sites
for
pilot,
and
I
hope
that
we
rely
on
our
volunteers
to
do
more
of
the
work
number
46
lawson
middle
school
bikeway.
This
is
a
one
item
out
of
the
many
walk
out
out
in
item.
I
asked
the
black
pet
commission.
O
I
think
sheriff
is
sure
this
item
was
never
was
not
recommended
by
them.
They
didn't
even
know
about
this
item.
I
think
if
I
I
would
like
the
backpack
commission
to
review
all
the
walk
audit
items
and
if
some
of
them
need
additional
work
that
cannot
be
covered
by
the
existing
allocation
for
incrementing
workload
audit
item.
They
should
recommend
the
prioritize
them
and
recommend
that
to
the
console,
let's
not
take
it
one
by
one:
that's
not
fair
to
the
other
project
and
number
forty
night
to
pertino
store
yeah.
O
As
I
said,
this
should
be
assigned
to
fine
arts
commission
for
implementation
and
number
fifty
safe
gun
storage
ordinance.
I
wonder
how
many
gun
owners
are
there
incorporating
do
we
really
have
time
for
this?
That's
probably
name
that
many
people
need
number
52
senior
strategy
is
already
on
this
year's
agenda,
but
I
understand
the
staffing
challenge.
There
hasn't
been
much
progress
made,
but
this
is
a
very
important
item.
A
J
Okay,
thank
you
mayor
paul,
and
I
do
think
for
procedurally
that,
if
we're
going
line
by
line
that
all
of
councils
should
be
allowed
to
provide
input
for
each
one-
and
it
wasn't
my
understanding
that
we
would
be
doing
that
this
evening,
I
I
just
want
to
bring
going
back
to
the
the
public
art
issue.
The
we,
the
municipal
code,
has
changed
so
that
we
are
getting
more
funding
for
art
from
these
various
projects
that
we
have
so,
for
instance,
the
the
project
I
was
thinking
about
it.
J
It
was
actually
public
storage,
it
was
a
27
million
dollar
project
and
the
in
lieu
of
fees
ended
up
being
338
thousand
dollars.
If
they
provided
artwork,
it
would
have
been
270
000.
So
it
went
to
the
fine
arts
commission
on
november
22nd
2021
and
they
decided
to
accept
the
in
lieu
of
payment
and
what
I'm
not
personally
clear
on
is
what
happened
to
that
money
and
what
decisions
were
made
with
regards
to
to
that,
for
what
public
art
would
happen.
J
Would
it
be
public
art
somewhere
else
in
the
in
the
city,
and
so
I'm
I'm
thinking
that
we
might
possibly,
if
you
consider
the
art
and
unexpected
places,
project
which
was
a
ten
thousand
dollar
mural
out
at?
I
believe
it
was
blackberry
farm
we
could
have.
You
know
like
34
such
murals,
with
this
amount
of
funding.
So
I
because
we
have
projects
like
westport,
which
could
potentially
be
a
50
million
dollar
project.
J
So
I
think
that,
because
these
fees
are
so
high
that
we
need
to
actually
start
inquiring
as
to
inquiring
as
to
where
the
money
is
going
and
consider
some
policy
about
where
the
cut
off
is,
is
it?
Is
it
fifteen
thousand
dollars
where
we
want
to?
Have
it
come
to
council
and
have
it
have
a
discussion
or
some
other
number?
But
I
don't
think
we,
because
we
have
these
big
projects
moving
forward.
I
don't
think
we
wanna
just
ignore
this,
and
and
and
not
not
have
a
discussion
about
it.
A
Okay,
thank
you,
councilmember
moore.
You
know,
I
I
think
at
this
point,
given
the
volume
of
comments,
what
I
would
recommend
is
that
staff
take
this
back,
and
I
I
think
that
katie,
your
your
next
step
in
this
process,
would
be
to
generate
a
new
list.
Is
that
correct,
based
upon
our
feedback
this
evening.
F
F
That
one
in
particular
in
the
staff
comments,
we
said
that
this
near
miss
could
be
included
in
vision,
zero.
So
that
seems
in
alignment
with
what
we
were
suggesting
anyway,
but
I
I
think
it
would
help
in
terms
of
I
know
that
there
were
a
lot
of
different
ideas.
I
don't
know
if
that's
the
will
of
the
pool
council
or
majority
of
council
any
clarity
or
if
the
desire
is
as
long
as
one
person
suggested
it
we'd
at
least
like
to
look
at
it.
That's
fine!
A
Right
right
now
that
that's
fair,
that's
fair
to
to
to
send
it
back
to
us.
On
that
point,
you
know
I
did
hear
things
that
I
would
agree
with
conceptually.
There
are
some
things
that
I
could
live
without,
but
in
terms
of
what
the
what
the
pleasure
of
the
group
would
be,
I
I
I'm
a
little
bit
I'm
a
little
bit
concerned
that
it
may
create
a
a
a
bit
of
a
logistical
difficulty
to
to
get
through
every
single
one
of
these
suggestions
to
see
what
the
guidance
would
be.
A
A
You
see
this
item
coming
back
to
us.
I
think
you
are
looking
at
not
next
week,
but
the
first
meeting
in
april
correct
okay,
so
that
gives
us
enough
time
a
few
weeks
to
absorb
some
of
this.
I
would
suggest
that,
for
the
sake
of
clarity
that
the
individual
council
members,
you
know,
do
use
you
as
an
interface
point
and
of
course
you
know,
you're
not
kind
of
consolidating
comments
and
comparing
them
outside
of
the
contours
or
the
context
of
a
public
meeting.
A
A
I
mean
because
I
think,
with
regard
to
you
know
other
comments
that
that
actually
does
give
other
council
members,
as
councilmember
moore,
was
pointing
out
the
opportunity
to
you
know,
provide
that
input,
but
again,
without
you
know,
creating
any
kind
of
serial
communication
outside
of
the
context
of
a
public
meeting,
because
when
it
comes
back
it
would
be
the
next
publicly
noticed
meeting
where,
where
these
thoughts
are
consolidated,
and
then
I
think
the
task
would
be
upon
our
city
council
to
make
sure
that
we
do
our
homework.
Just
you
know
go
over.
A
You
know
these
various
items
and
suggestions
and
see
how
you
feel
right,
because
this
is
suggested.
This
is
a
very
significant
amount
of
commentary
and
I'm
not
going
to
ask
anybody.
You
know
certainly
even
to
take
two
or
three
items
and
not
you
know
properly
digest
them.
You
know
let
alone
the
majority
of
you
know
some
70
odd,
60,
odd
items.
So
so
that's
that's
what
I
would
suggest.
I
would
suggest
you
take
the
comments.
Give
us
cutoff
date.
That's
reasonable!
A
You
know
we're
kind
of
in
a
busy
stretch
of
march
next
week
is
our
third
sequential
tuesday,
with
a
meeting
maybe
give
people
till
the
end
of
you
know
next
week
you
know
to
provide
their
commentary
and
and
then
see
you
know
what
we
can
do
about
a
consolidated
document.
I
I
do
ask
that
my
fellow
council
members,
don't
add
items,
okay,
don't
don't
take
items
out
of
whole
cloth
and
you
know
kind
of
put
them
on
here.
A
I
think
it's
fair
to
have
had
that
opportunity
and
if
you
just
have
a
burning
desire
to
have
something,
that's
just
so
brilliant
that
will
you
know
kind
of
like
solve
things
for
all
time.
You
know
douglas
adams,
you
know
just
maybe
bring
it
to
the
next
council
meeting,
but
I
mean
that
would
be
my
suggestion,
for
you
know
how
to
how
to
proceed
in
this
process,
and
I
do
see
both
council
member
willie
and
our
city
manager.
Jim
troupe,
have
their
hands
right.
E
Thank
you
mayor.
I
was
just
gonna
state
and
it's
sort
of
the
obvious.
I
guess,
but
I'd
be
working
with
katie
on
this,
and
if
we
have
any
need
for
clarification,
we
can
reach
out
to
that
council
member
that
made
that
discussion
point
to
get
clarity
on
any
of
these
items,
to
make
sure
that
we
have
it
correct.
L
A
K
K
K
A
You
know
all
of
the
various
suggestions
and-
and
you
know
if,
as
a
group,
you
know,
one
person
is
really
wedded
to
an
idea,
but
the
other
four
thinks
well.
Okay.
This
is
not,
for
example,
even
a
priority.
You
know
for
for
the
other
four
as
a
topic,
then
I
think
you
know
that
that
gives
us.
You
know
a
good.
You
know
direction
for
that
particular
item.
I
I
just.
A
I
think
that
we
need
another
session
in
order
to
consolidate
these
comments
and
from
what
I'm
hearing
of
your
suggestion
right
now,
maybe
start
applying
those
you
know
rankings
of
one
three
or
five
or
or
the
point
system.
You
know
I'm
I'm
I
I'm
willing
to
go.
Do
that,
but
I
just
don't
know
if
we
have.
A
You
know
kind
of
an
agreed-upon
baseline
palette
of
of
topics,
and
you
know
I
don't
want
this
to
balloon
to
100,
certainly,
but
at
the
same
time
I
think
we
would
be
benefited
by
you
know,
given
the
time
that
we
do
have.
You
know
another
iteration
based
upon
our
comments.
So
if
you're
suggesting
council
member
willie
that
would
go
back
and
take
this
list
and
start
voting
on
it
I'd
be
happy
to
entertain.
A
You
know
emotion
that
in
fact,
but
I
do
think
that
we
do
have
you
know
comments
you
know.
For
my
own
part,
I
I'd
like
to
see
you
know.
Possibly
you
know
my
my
you
know
single
suggestion
in
there,
but
you
know
I'm
happy
to
go
with
the
will
of
the
group
here.
This,
like,
as
you
say,
is
it's
a
fairly
fairly
comprehensive
list.
Councilmember
roy.
C
Okay,
I'm
gonna
make
sure
that
I
do
agree
with
councilman
woodley
and
I
agree
with
mayor
paul
and
I
agree
with
council
more
because
we
really
didn't.
I
didn't
realize
that
we
supposed
to
make
comments
on
a
lot
of
the
things
in
detail
like
vice
mayor
ciao
did,
and
so
I
happen
to
think.
The
gown
ordinance
is
important,
important
issue
because
we
just
have
a
gunshot
incident
by
mcdonald
homestead.
So
I
would
like
to
take
mayor
paul's
suggestion
that
we
get
into
some
some
input
to
each
item.
C
C
O
O
O
Are
thinking
what
I'm
doing
is
outlier?
I
thought
this
I
totally
didn't
understand,
but
then
I
think
it's
true
that
I
have
some
comment
on
each
because
of
the
staff
comment
on
including
or
not
including
or
something
is
operational
or
not,
so
this
is
yeah.
So
a
lot
of
it
is
in
response
to
that,
and
so
I
will
send
my
list
to
the
staff
and
I
would
also
like,
I
think,
councilman
for
more.
O
A
A
Q
A
Right
I
mean
I,
I
think
it
certainly
complies
with
the
spirit
of
trying
to
keep
it
open
and
communicative,
and
you
know
not
having
you
know.
You
know,
decisions
that
aren't
aired
out
that
this
is
a
matter
of
trying
to
get
all
of
these
comments
out
there.
So
yeah,
informative
public
discussion
about
it,
so
so
appreciate
that
city
attorney
jensen
and
so
let's
go
and
and
to
your
comment
vice
mayor
yeah.
Well,
you
know
thank
you
for
for
for
doing
the
homework.
That's
that's
great.
A
I
mean
you
and
I,
of
course
you
know,
you
know
contemplated
this
process
a
number
of
years
ago,
and
you
know
it
all
started
with
kind
of
reforming
the
idea
behind
putting
every
of
the
work
plans
for
the
various
commissions
and
committees
in
lockstep
with
council.
So
maybe
maybe
we
can
say
you
know
you
have
a
bit
of
a
jump
on.
A
You
know
kind
of
an
understanding
of
the
process
and
leave
it
at
that,
but
also
I
do
want
to
provide
the
opportunity
for
everybody
kind
of
you
know
just
on
your
comments
alone.
It
would
be
good
to
you
know,
just
state
them
a
bit
to
get
a
sense
of
what
the
you
know.
The
group
the
group
will
is
so
katie
your
your
hand
is
raising.
Did
you
want
to
speak
to
any
of
the
points
raised
here.
F
Yeah
I
just
want
to
kind
of
well
based
on
your
recommendation,
mayor
paul.
I
wanted
to
just
clarify
what
I
would
plan
to
do
to
make
sure
that
we're
all
on
the
same
page
and
then
how
we
could
potentially
move
forward
at
our
next
session
and
the
first
meeting
in
april
so
by
the
end
of
next
week.
Well,
first,
what
I
would
do
is
I'd
take
our
attachment
c
list.
A
This
is
how
I
envision
this.
I
I
don't
think
that
you
have
a
deliverable
to
us
before
you
we
get.
We
send
something
back
to
you.
I
I
think
the
the
purpose
for
this
meeting
was
to
provide
input
on
this
initial
list,
and
I
think
that
there's
a
follow-up
required
here
in
order
for
us
to
consider,
because
it
just
you
know,
spans
the
entire
breadth
of
city
activity.
You
know
the
various
input
points
from
the
public
and
our
and
our
colleagues,
so
I
think
it's
just
one
way
I
mean
for
my
own
part.
A
I
doubt
that
I'll
even
communicate
any
additional
points,
because
I
feel
that
when
I
look
at
you
know
the
the
the
spectrum
of
things
I
I've.
I've
relayed
what
I
found
important,
and
my
hope
is
that
you
know
that's
also
echoed
by
you
know
the
majority,
if
not
all,
of
council,
but
I
would
also
say
that
we
should
be
very
modest
about
how
we
treat
this.
You
know
communication
to
you
in
the
sense
that
we
have
had
a
public
meeting,
but
if
there
is,
you
know
some
kind
of
addenda
information
to
provide.
A
This
is
not
an
opportunity
to
go
through
all
you
know
all
the
enumerated
items
and
you
know
provided
kind
of
a
semi-encyclopedia.
You
know
detailed
feedback,
you
know,
irrespective
of
you
know
everything
else
in
a
vacuum
of
you
know
what
our
own
kind
of
stream
of
consciousness
or
thoughts.
Are
it's
really
just
a
matter
of
being
able
to
clarify
to
you
by
the
end
of
next
week,
based
upon
you
know
what
what
our,
what
what
our
feedback
would
be
if
we
were
basically
saying
to
ourselves.
A
So
so
you
know,
my
request
basically
to
the
rest
of
council
is
yes
feel
free
to
communicate
with
katie
by
the
end
of
next
week,
but
don't
feel
obligated,
and
certainly
please
do
not.
You
know,
go
through
every
single
one
of
the
items
and
you
know
kind
of
weave
things
out
of
whole
cloth
in
terms
of
reasons.
It's
just
that
this
is
just
a
a
time
for
us
to
wait
for
that
new
documentation
to
come
in
and
and
have
it
consolidated.
A
If
you
happen
to
think
of
things,
you
know
in
the
meantime,
that
would
really
add
value
to
the
you
know,
discussion
or
to
clarify
a
point
that
that
you
made
here
then
I
think
that's
a
good
opportunity,
but
you
know
please
give
our
staff
the
consideration
of
the
fact
that
they've
done
a
lot
of
work
on
this.
You
know
this
has
been.
A
J
2022-2023,
council
goals
and
select
city
work
program
items
for
prioritization,
and
I
think
one
way
that
we
could
actually
have
a
motion
and
a
second
and
get
a
vote
on
this
would
be
if
we,
you
know,
agree
to
adopt
the
council
goals
which
we
saw
and
that
we
essentially
say
that
our
items
for
prioritization,
which
we're
going
to
do
at
some
other
time
and
drop
items
off
and
whatnot,
is
just
that.
The
the
the
items
are
the
entirety
of
what
we
added
to
the
list,
which
was
was
recommended.
A
J
J
No
not
at
all,
not
at
all,
I'm
just
saying
that
that
we've
we
or
say
you
know
I
it's.
I
think
when
I
look,
but
I
understand
the
word
consider
doesn't
doesn't
sound
like
we
need
to
really
do
anything.
Oh
we
considered
them,
but
it
does
say
recommended
actions
that
we
adopt
them.
So
I
guess
if,
if
you
just
want
to
read
it
as
we
were
merely
supposed
to
consider
it
rather
than
take
an
action,
then
I
question
why
it's
under
ordinances
and
action
items.
I
suppose.
A
A
A
Good,
this
is
fair.
No,
I
I'm
not
going
to
belabor
this
by.
You
know
repeating
this.
Every
time
like
you
know,
public
comments,
three
minutes
and
raise
your
hand,
but
but
I
think
this
is
a
very
important
point.
The
subject
is
what
we
consider
the
recommended
action
is
something
that
our
hard
working
staff
puts
together
right
after
they,
you
know,
go
through
it,
but
that
doesn't
that
doesn't
constrain
your
decision
right.
That's
just
the
recommended
action
by
your
staff.
You
know
you
can
make
an
action
that
is
based
upon
the
subject
right.
A
The
subject
you
have
to
stay
within
the
boundaries
of
the
subject.
Not
the
boundaries
of
the
recommended
action
is
what
I'm
saying.
So
you
don't
don't
feel
that
the
recommended
action,
if
you,
if
you're
deviating
it
from
it,
somehow
that
that
that
isn't
a
violation
of
anything.
I
mean
that.
That's
that's
really.
You
know
it's
the
start
of
a
conversation
just
like
you
know
when
I
call
for
a
motion,
and
the
default
motion
is
the
recommended
action.
Well,
the
the
nature
of
rosenberg's
rules
or
robert's
rules,
or
whatever
rules
order.
A
A
You
know
we
can
provide
more
and
I
think
it's
a
good
idea,
given
our
input
to
go
ahead
and
you
know
bring
this
back
for
another
session
and
you
know
hopefully
you
know
that's
that's
something
that
you
can
agree
with
as
well,
because
you
know
I'd
be
happy
to
entertain
a
motion
if
you
wanted
to
bring
one
forward,
councilmember
moore
as
the
as
a
default
motion
under
the
recommended
action.
Now,
I'm
happy
to
do
that
and
see
if
we
can
get
a
second
and
you
know,
move
forward
in
that
manner.
A
O
For
senior
strategy,
for
example,
it's
priority
number
four
this
year,
but
the
staff
due
to
staffing
constraint
didn't
make
much
progress,
but
I
see
that
other
cities
use
task
force
with
a
lot
of
volunteers
and
they
are
able
to
make
a
lot
of
progress.
So
I'm
proposing
to
form
a
task
force
with
age-friendly
folks,
for
example,
that
so
I'm
trying
to
clarify
how
a
better
implementation
next
year
could
get
us
more
done
with
less
staff
support.
So
how
should
I
integrate
that
into
where
or
when
should
we
include
this?
A
Yeah,
I
would
you
know
very
respectfully
I
I
would
say
that
in
my
experience,
it's
a
matter
of
putting
in
the
elbow
grease
yourself
and
getting
done
what
needs
to
get
done,
because
at
the
end
of
the
day
you
know
a
lot
of
these
items
require
work.
They
require
strategizing
and
if
you're
willing
to
you
know,
do
that
work
and
you
know
effectuate
those
strategies,
then
that's
really
what
so
you,
okay.
So
for
example,
let
me
let
me
finish.
A
Let
me
finish
this
point.
So,
for
example,
you
could
you
could
you
you
could
ask
for
task
force
to
be
formed,
but
if
there's,
no
one
coordinating
that
task
force
or
or
creating
the
deliverable
for
that
task
force.
That
task
force
will
not
necessarily
do
what
you
think
it
can
do.
Okay
and
so
typically,
what
ends
up
happening
is
that
you
know
the
the
work
of
a
thing.
A
But
if
you
basically
commit
to
the
task
force-
and
you
say
to
yourself:
okay,
I'm
going
to
be
consolidating
all
this
and
I'll
put
forward
a
professional.
You
know
public
consumption
ready
report
at
the
end
of
this.
If
you
commit
to
that,
then
yes,
you
can,
you
know,
probably
you
know
short
circuit
and
get
that
work
done.
But
but
if
you're
not
you
know,
if
you
don't
have
a
plan
in
mind
for
that,
then
I
think
you
just
create
more
more
structure
right
and
you
don't
necessarily.
O
A
O
Feel
like
this
is
number
four
priority
this
year.
All
we
had
is
a
survey
so
far,
which
the
parks
and
rec
community
was
not
involved
in
making.
I
don't
know
who
was
involved
in
making
and
the
age-friendly
task
force
was
not
involved
in
making
either
so
I'm
hoping
to
have
a
more
efficient
process
to
get
people
who
are
knowledgeable
about
this
involved.
A
A
Really
I
mean
you
know
at
the
end
of
the
day,
if
you
know
recently,
I
had
an
issue
with
you
know:
trash
along
the
waterways
and
and
highways
right
I
mean
if
you
need
to
be
the
person
that
pushes
and
asks
for
you
know
a
you
know,
grant
proposal
being
made
and
if
it
doesn't
happen
you
know,
do
you
pick
up
the
phone
and
call
to
call
caltrans
or
talk
to
people
to
you
know,
get
the
water
district
involved.
Then
then
you
would
go
and
be
that
person
right.
A
I
mean
that's,
that's
essentially
what
I'm
saying
right
and
if
you
don't
see
the
staff
person
that
is
going
to
coordinate
for
you.
The
task
force
work
that
you're
identifying.
Then
that's
going
to
be
an
issue
right,
and
so
you
know,
I
think
the
question
you
have
to
ask
yourself
at
that
point
is:
am
I
willing
to
go
and
do
that?
A
I'm
not
trying
to
talk
down,
I'm
not
trying
to
condescend,
but
the
reality
of
the
situation
is,
you
know,
there's
a
set
amount
of
work
that
needs
to
be
done
to
get
a
lot
of
these
projects
done,
and
so
you
know
if,
if
you
don't
identify
the
person
that
will
do
you
know
those
particular
bottleneck
points,
and
you
don't
take
it
upon
yourself
to
do
it.
Then
it's
not
gonna
get
done.
That's
that's!
That's
the
best
thing
I
can
say
with
regard
to
that
city
manager,
troop
you
have
your.
E
Hand
raised:
oh
thank
you
mayor
and
council.
I
just
I
am
concerned.
You
know
anytime.
We
look
at
being
a
a
different
subset
of
a
group
or
something
it's
like
you
had
said
mayor.
It
does
require
additional
staff
time,
and
this
is
a
very,
very
large
list
right
now
and
even
if
we
do
a
subset
to
essentially
try
to
help
staff,
it
actually
does
add
more
work
to
the
staff
and
this
list
that
you
know
we're
trying
very
hard
to
get
through
it.
E
I
think,
if
we're
just
adding
more
even
like
the
vice
mayor
was
saying,
it
really
does
take
additional
staff
time.
If
something
gets
a
hiccup,
then
staff's
involved,
there's
just
there's
just
a
lot
of
different
ways
that
it's
really
going
to
impact
staff.
It
may
not
sound
like
it
does,
but
it
will-
and
I
just
wanted
to
point
that
out.
A
Thank
you,
city
manager,
troop
and,
I
will
say,
having
gone
through
two
or
three
iterations
of
this.
There
are
built-in
mechanisms
to
kind
of
curtail.
You
know
that
that
list
in
terms
of
you,
know,
staff
bandwidth,
and
you
know
those
are
those
are
proposed
here
right.
I
mean
along
the
way
it's
a
matter
of
you
know,
trying
to
figure
out
how
long
a
particular
project
would
take,
and
you
know
there
are
prioritizations
there.
There
are,
you
know,
kind
of
bandwidth
assignments
there
within
the
process
flow
council
member
willie.
A
K
K
I
I
make
a
motion
that
each
of
us
on
the
council
rank.
We
get
13
fives,
13,
threes,
13
ones,
and
by
next
tuesday
we
each
send
our
list
to
katie
and
the
ones
that
don't
rank.
Let's
not
deal
with
them
anymore.
Let's
not
tie
up
city
staff
if
they,
if
they
don't,
if,
if
they
don't
come
out
with
sufficient
support,
there's
no
reason
city
should
be
spending
time
rewarding
them.
So
that
would
be
my
motion.
A
Okay,
fair
enough,
you
know
I
actually
see
that
as
and
katie,
jim
or
other
staff.
You
know,
let
me
know
if
you
disagree
with
this
assessment.
I
see
that
as
the
staff
recommendation,
essentially
that
we
proceed
with
the
the
current
list
and
asking
for
rank
prioritizations,
so
so
councilman
willie
does
your?
K
A
K
Yeah,
I
would
just
say
that
you
know
life's
not
perfect,
and
you
know
it'll
come
next
time
and
if
somebody
next
next
time
should
say
they
want
to
that'll,
be
our
first
ranking
and
then
next
time
the
list
comes
back
a
couple
write-ins
and
now
we
go
back
and
rank
those
that
we've
got.
We
know
the
ones
that
fell
off.
So,
let's,
let's
move
up
the
ones
that
we're
most
passionate
about.
O
A
A
I'm
sorry,
oh
yeah
right
other
people
won't
be
able
to
vote
for
it,
but
as
councilmember
william
was
pointing
out,
this
will
come
back
to
us.
We
would
see
it
and
then
we
could
have
a
discussion
about
whether
prioritizations
might
change
the
next
time
it's
in
front
of
us
publicly
after
it's
been
consolidated.
Based
upon.
You
know
the
the
work
that
staff
would
do
to
make
that
that
new.
You
know
that
that
that
new
document
indicating
the
rankings
so
council
councilmember,
willie
you're,
saying
13
ones,
13
threes,
13
fives.
A
The
last
time,
that's
what
we
did
last
time
right
and,
and
so
the
the
items
with
the
most
the
most
points
so
to
speak,
are
the
ones
that
ended
up
getting
the
highest
rate.
Yep.
Okay,
I
will
second
your
motion,
council,
member,
willie
and-
and
you
had
indicated
a
time
by
next
tuesday
I
would
can.
I
can
I
get
a
friendly
amendment
to
that
to
make
it
by
the
by
next
friday,
because
next
meeting
and
so
yep
okay,
so
so
this.
A
A
O
A
Right,
I
mean
we're
not
we're
not
forcing
a
distribution
under
this
motion.
That's
true
everything
could
theoretically
fall
under.
You
know
all
your
fives,
I
I
don't
know.
If
any
of
these,
I
don't
know
if
any
of
these
follow
under,
like
the,
if
there
are
13
items
under
one
particular
commission
or
department,
is.
O
A
A
F
Thank
you,
mr
mayor.
I
just
wanted
to
confirm
that
reiterate
what
the
mayor
has
mentioned,
that
I
get
the
point
of
perhaps
the
new
items
that
council
members
would
be.
Writing
in
may
not
be
visible
until
the
next
meeting,
but
since
we're
going
to
almost
essentially
have
an
opportunity
to
re-rank
at
that
next
meeting,
I
think
that
they'll
have
an
opportunity
to
then
also
be
included.
F
I
think
council
member
willie's
goal
here
is
to
try
to
know
where
to
focus
energy,
so
maybe
we
can
just
lop
off
some
of
the
ones
at
the
bottom,
so
we
don't
even
spend
a
lot
of
time
fine-tuning
them,
and
so
I
definitely
understand
that
point.
So
I
just
wanted
to
reassure
you
that
even
new
items
that
get
added
in
this
process
can
definitely
be
re-ranked
by
the
full
council
at
the
prioritization
meeting.
F
J
J
K
K
Let's
say
that
she
writes
in
one.
All
she
has
to
do
is
use
one
of
her
fives
for
a
write-in
that
doesn't
mean
when
we
rank
them
at
the
next
time.
She
may
she
doesn't
have
to
give
that
right
in
a
number
five,
but
by
her
giving
it
a
five.
It
now
has
substance
on
our
list
that
we're
gonna
that
city
staff
is
going
to
bring
us
and
say
based
on
your
initial
ranking.
This
is
what
we
got.
K
Let's
say.
Councilman
said
the
senior
strategy
is
going
to
get
a
number
five
from
her
and
a
number
three
from
me.
It's
gonna,
you
know,
move
to
the
top.
The
five
from
vice
mayor,
chow's,
right
in,
is
still
going
to
be
on
the
list.
So
now
we
still
really
do
have
this.
Now
we
all
go
off
and
do
our
final
ranking
and
we
all
say
what
are
our
13
fives
and
then
those
are
going
to
be
at
the
top
of
the
list.
K
L
J
Okay,
thank
you,
councilmember,
william
and
through
the
mayor.
I
think
I
think
probably
my
preference
would
be
that
we
continue
this
item
and
allow
the
additional
items.
If
there
are
even
items
from
the
public
that
they
they
would
get
added
onto
the
list
and
then
we
go
back
and
prioritize
it
having
all
of
the
extra
items.
That
would
be
my
preference,
but
I
I
see
that
we've
already
got
a
motion
and
I
guess
I
can
go
along
with
that.
C
Just
real
short,
I
do
agree
with
council
member
willie.
We
need
to
get
rid
of
the
bottom
third
of
it
right
away,
and
also,
I
remember,
if
I
remember
correctly
mayor
paul
last
time
we
did
get
to
add
our
new
items
at
the
meeting
and
you
actually
encouraged
us
to
do
that
and
a
lot
of
quite
a
few
of
them
made
the
list.
So
I'm
comfortable
with
the
process.
A
I
think
this
is
good.
You
know
I
I
I
concede
that
councilmember
williams,
I
think,
made
a
superior
course
of
action
in
motion
here.
Instead
of
a
potentially
expanding
significantly
of
the
list,
it
has
a
a
very
strong
chance
of
you
know
contracting
it
vice
mayor
ciao,
so
please
feel
free
if
you
wish
to
bring
your
substitution
at
the
start.
A
F
I
actually
don't
think
it
was
13
before
I
think
we
only
had
five
fives
per
council
member,
because
that
would
indicate
five
number
one
prior
sorry,
15
number
one.
No,
I
can't
do
math
25
number
one
priorities
already,
and
so
we
or
potentially,
if
you
didn't
all
align
with
the
same
one,
so
we
actually
had
five
number
fives.
I
believe,
and
then
I
think
we
had
some
number.
It
might
have
been
18
threes
and
x,
number
of
one
it
wasn't.
It
wasn't
13th.
F
A
K
K
A
K
K
A
A
O
So
I
would
like
to
modify
the
list
to
include
the
council
proposed
items
to
the
list
in
attachment
c,
so
we
will
have
a
list
starting
with
list
of
console
items
and
then
commission
items
and
then
staff
proposed
items
and
I
think
13
13
13
is
okay,
because
this
is
the
first
round
of
ranking.
I
think
we
can
go
a
little
broader,
the
next
round.
We
could
narrow
it
down.
O
Maybe
we
should
even
do
15
15
so
that
we
have
some
rough
priority,
but
then
it's
not
as
limiting
and-
and
I
I
think
the
purpose
of
this
study
session
is
for
everyone
to
propose
items
which
is
what
I
did
and
if
my
items
is
not
included.
I
feel
why
are
we
here
and
then
it
used
to
be.
The
council
proposed
item
first,
which
was
end
of
january.
We
didn't
do
that
and
now
we
are
combining
that
with
this
today.
So
I
would
like
to
be
on
that
be
honored.
O
A
I'm
sorry
I
I
have
to
cut
you
off.
You
brought
your
forward
your
motion.
I
think
it's
very
clear
you're
asking
for
consolidated
lists,
including
council
items,
and
you
want
13,
fives,
13,
threes
and
13
ones
for
for
ranking.
So
let
me
go
before
you
start
deliberating
and
arguing
for
the
substitute
motion.
Let
me
ask
our
council:
is
there
a
second
to
vice
mayor
child's
substitute
motion
council
member,
more
I'll?
Second,
that
okay,
so
council
member
more
seconds,
let's
go
ahead
and
bring
it
back
to
vice
mayor
ciao.
At
this
point.
O
So
I
understand
some
council
members
may
have
items
they
want
to
propose,
but
they
they
didn't
come
prepare
this
today.
So
and
potential
amendment
is
to
allow
council
to
propose.
It
may
be
saved
by
friday
to
katie
and
katie
can
create
a
consolidated
list
and
then
we
can
rent
rank
them
and
submit
that
rank
in
the
next
meeting.
A
I
personally,
I
actually
like
seeing
the
process
go
through
and
visited
upon
our
commissions
and
seeing
this
comprehensive
list
before
thinking
about
what
else
might
supplement
it,
or
you
know
in
for
lack
of
a
more
delicate
way
to
put
it
compete
with
the
items
that
are
here
coming
from
council.
So
I
I'm
actually
okay
with
the
way
that
this
is.
This
is
panning
out.
Councilmember
moore,
you
have
a
hand
raising
them,
we'll
go
back
to
vice
marriage,
hell.
J
Okay,
thank
you
mayor
paul,
so
I'm
kind
of
wondering
this
list
doesn't
include
the
suggestions
that
I
had
made
last
year.
So
how,
in
order
to
give
like,
like
just
even
the
discussion
about
how
we're
going
to
dispose
of
or
take
care
of,
the
properties
we
own,
which
is
a
requirement
that
we
have
how
to
to
get
have
that.
J
You
know
a
fair,
a
fair
look
over
rather
than
this
way,
so
I
I
feel
like
this
this.
If
I
were
to
vote
for
yours,
that
then
the
items
that
that
I'm
interested
in
seeing
are
aren't
really
going
to
have
a
chance,
and
so
that's
that's
the
problem.
I
see
there,
so
I
wish
there
was
a
way
to
make
that
a
little
bit
more
fair
and
it
was
disappointing
not
getting
anything
on
the
list
last
year
and
I
feel
like
it's
going
to
get
repeated
again
here.
Thank
you.
A
I
don't
want
to
be
snide
about
it
and
it's
not
meant
in
that.
In
that
spirit
at
all,
I
think
that
when
I,
when
I
reflect
upon
your
added
items
last
year,
I
I
I
know
that
people
had
an
opportunity
to
consider
them
and
if
they
didn't
get
the
support,
then
I
think
I
think
perhaps
that's
more
of
a
reflection
of
of
individual
priorities,
kind
of
writ
large
into
the
group
of
five.
A
But
I
I
completely
understand
the
perspective
and
in
terms
of
the
the
items
that
you
you
were
interested
in
and
adding
that's
that's
one
of
the
reasons
I
was
trying
to
make
sure
that
council
did
visit
the
various
sites
that
the
that
the
city
owns.
You
know,
individually
with
our
staff
members
to
to
get
that
awareness.
A
F
A
O
Just
I
think
I
want
to
clarify
something:
is
katie
said
it
it's,
so
what
you
are
proposing
is
today
we
rank
only
the
non-council
items
so
that
we
cut
them
down
and
then
next
time
council
members
are
encouraged
to
propose
their
prioritized
new
items.
In
addition,
then,
we
will
do
another
ranking
in
that
meeting
or
after
that
meeting.
So
that's
where
we
will
consider
the
council
proposed
items
and
the
higher
rank
the
other
items
right.
So
so
next
time
it's
where.
O
A
A
After
the
and
the
next
meeting
at
or
after
the
next
meeting,
so
if
you
have
so
like,
I
was
saying,
if
you
have,
if
you
have
31
unique
items
that
you're
adding
to
this
list,
then
those
will
all
get
onto
the
document
that
were
provided
for
the
next
meeting
and
then
it's
not
it's
not
as
you're
describing
we're
ranking
just
the
stuff.
That's
in
front
of
us
right
now,
and
then
we
talk
about
stuff.
We
want
to
add
in
the
next
meeting.
A
You
are
in
the
process
of
adding
that
stuff
right
now
under
the
original
motion
and
then
that
could
get
fully
considered
by
the
entirety
of
the
council
at
the
next
meeting,
because
that
new
document
will
then
have
all
of
these
items.
Because
if
you
added
an
item,
you
wouldn't
add
an
item
without
putting
a
point
score
to
it,
so
it
will
at
least
have
one
point
so
that
it
will
be
included
within
that
new
document.
So
so
then
it
gets
you
know.
A
So,
theoretically,
okay,
you
could
you
have
five
people
under
this
process?
You,
you
could
have.
You
know
a
bunch
of
new
stuff,
but
I
I
really
don't
think
that's
going
to
happen.
I
think
most
of
us
are
just
going
to
rank
based
upon
what's
there
out
of
the
69
items
and
maybe
add
at
the
most
a
handful
for
for
my
own
part,
I
would
add
one
maybe
two
items
so
so
so
so
that's
just
because.
O
Q
Yeah,
that's
correct.
I
think
that's
consistent
with
the
the
response
to
the
mayor's
question
earlier
that
I
think
it
would
be
best
if
that
there,
if
new
items
are
added,
I
think
it'd
be
best.
If
they're
circular
circulated
without
identifying
information
and
then,
of
course
you
could
discuss
them
at
the
meeting,
but
by
just
just
just
adding
the
items
to
the
agenda
or
the
agenda,
the
list
would
that
be
a
violation
right.
O
A
A
I
I'm
not
saying
another
round
of
consideration
in
a
public
meeting,
but
in
order
to
generate
this
document
that
you're
referring
to
council
needs
to
send
a
staff
what
their
additional
items
are.
Staff
needs
to
send
back
to
us
a
consolidated,
a
new
consolidated
list
to
vote
on.
So
so
that's
the
round.
I'm
referring
to
to
get
us
to
the
point
where
we
have
a
new
consolidated
list.
You
know
that
we're
voting
on.
I
you
know
I'm
okay
with
that.
I
I
think
it
adds
time.
A
You
know-
and
I
don't
know
if
it's
really
necessary
time
to
to
have,
especially
given
our
staff
commitment,
that
we
would
have
that
full
list
in
front
of
us,
irrespective
the
next
time
we
meet.
But
if
you're,
if
your
sticking
point
is
that
you
want
to
be
able
to
have
everyone
consider
you
know,
you
know
all
the
all
the
particular
items
that
would
be
set
forth,
then
I
understand
what
your
your
concern
is.
So
I
I
I
think
that
that's
that's
solid
clarification.
A
O
O
A
E
Well,
I
just
with
the
you
know
when
council,
if
we
went
that
direction
when
council
turned
something
in
that
could
be
a
hard
fast
date,
but
it
would
be
very
hard
for
my
side
for
staff
to
say.
Oh,
we
can
turn
it
around
in
two
days
because
we
don't
know
what's
coming
in
what
kind
of
I
don't
know
if
you
want
to
say
research
or
modifications
or
go
back
and
forth
with
council
to
make
sure
we
have
it.
E
A
O
P
O
O
O
A
O
L
O
O
Q
O
A
Okay,
at
this
point,
high
school
chow,
I'm
going
to
go
ahead
and
check
in
with
councilman
moore.
Tell
us
more.
Did
you
have
a
comment
at
this
point?
I
will
note
that
you
are
the
seconder
of
this
motion,
the
substitute
motion,
and
so
I'm
inclined
to
call
a
question
on
the
substitute
motion.
Frankly,.
J
Thank
you,
mayor
paul,
so
I'm
wondering
if
the
vice
mayor
would
accept
a
limitation
on
the
council
additions
to
the
the
existing
list
of
either
five
or
ten
new
items
maximum
and
that
each
council,
member,
maybe
five
items,
would
be
my
preference.
Each
council
member,
could
add
five
items
or
none
if
they
already
saw
things
that
were
great
and
that
way
we
don't
end
up
with
so
many
items
that
we
end
up
confused
when
we
go
to
rank
them.
So
I'm.
J
Q
C
F
So
what
I
think
we
would
do
to
expedite
turning
it
around
for
ranking
from
my
understanding
is
we'll
receive
the
items
we'll
put
a
title
and
objective
in
alignment
with
what's
been
provided
to
us.
We
send
it
back
out
for
a
ranking
and
then
once
that
ranking
is
received,
we
can
then
flesh
out
items
that
seem
to
have
gotten
a
vote.
A
But
it
seems
katie
that
the
substitute
motion
basically
says
until
a
particular
time.
Individual
council
members
can
contact
you
with
a
list
of
up
to
five
items.
Okay
and
those
five
items
have
to
be
something
that's
not
already
on
there,
and
so
you
give
people
until
a
deadline,
and
then
you
add
up
to
30
items
right.
I
mean
because
if
there's
five
council
members
and
five
I
or
you
add
up
25
items
to
this
list
of
69.
A
So
so
that's
my
understanding
of
what
substitute
motion
is.
So
there
are
still
three
time
points.
There's
council
gets
back
to
you
with
their
up
to
five
items.
You
get
back
to
council
once
everything
is
consolidated
into
one
document
and
then
council
gets
back
to
you
again
with
regard
to
their
ranked
you
know,
order
or
like
five
five
fives
and
thirteen
threes
and
thirteen
ones.
So
that's
that's
the
substitute
motion,
jim
your
hand
was
raised.
Did
you
wanna
make
a
comment?
Yeah.
E
L
E
This
direction,
if
this
is
you
know
the
votes
taken
and
everything
happens,
that
you
know,
whoever
turns
anything
in,
because
30
is
quite
a
few
more
just
make
sure
when
we
turn
it
in
that
it's
very
well
delineated
on
what
we
need.
This
is
what
it
is.
You
know
everything's
laid
out
just
right,
so
we
we
limit
to
go
back
and
forth
and
trying
to
get
the
clarity
on
those
items.
A
Right,
thank
you
jim,
for
that,
so
you've
got
your
first
two
substantive
columns
in
this
attachment
c.
Basically
counsel,
my
colleagues.
If
this
passes
you're
going
to
have
to
produce
the
project,
slash
task
description
and
the
more
importantly,
I
think
the
project
objective
right,
of
course,
you're
not
going
to
be
producing
the
staff
recommendation,
column
or
the
justification
considerations,
because
that's
that's
staff,
stuff,
you're
gonna
have
to
produce
a
project,
task
description
and
a
project
objective
and
then
vote
on
it.
I
mean
if
you
want
to
stand
any
chance
of
actually
having
this.
A
You
know
in
advance
in
a
thoughtful
manner
or
in
efficacious
manner.
I
should
say
so:
that's
that's!
You
know
I
think,
taking
under
advisement,
and
I
think
what
jim
was
saying
you
know
katie
you're
you're,
taking
on
this
work
willingly,
and
you
know
we
we
thank
you
for
that.
If
this
substitute
motion
passes
yeah-
and
you
know-
I-
I
think
kind
of
mapping
out
the
time
right
now
we're
on
march
8th
someone
tell
me
the
date
of
the
first
tuesday
in
in
april.
Well,
I
know
it's
not!
No!
A
Okay,
so
april
5th
there
are
five
tuesdays
in
march,
so
that
actually
gives
us.
You
know
an
extra
week,
so
you
know
you
could
turn
around.
I
mean
basically
giving
people.
You
know
deadlines
of,
I
think,
maybe
till
the
end
of
this
week
on
the
on
time,
point
one
and
then
seeing
where
you're
at
kde
in
terms
of
what
council
gives
you
and
then
turning
that
around
into
a
new
document.
They
send
back
to
council
and
tell
telling
council
that
it
has
a
certain
number
of
days.
A
I
would
suggest
maybe
three
working
days
or
you
know,
trying
to
you,
know
peck
it
to
the
end
of
next
week,
for
instance,
but
but
you
know,
even
if
it
weren't
in
at
the
end
of
next
week
and
we
went
into
the
the
following
week.
It
still
wouldn't
be
right
at
the
you
know
or
or
in
the
deadline
for
producing
materials,
for
the
following
council
meeting
because
of
the
relatively
long
month
that
we
have,
you
know
vis-a-vis
the
number
of
tuesdays
in
march,
so
councilmember
willie.
A
K
A
Thank
you
councilman
willie,
and
then
you
know
I
I
will
also
you
know,
I'm
I'm
consistent.
I
I
think
your
original
motion
is
a
better
process
frankly,
and
I
think
it
gives
the
opportunity
to
consider
you
know
any
of
the
you
know
additional
council.
You
know
projects
that
that
that
people
would
like
to
add.
A
I
I
think
it's
just
it's
cleaner.
It's
it's!
It's!
It's
it's
more
efficient!
I
think
it'll
you'll
stand
a
better
chance
of
you
know,
keeping
us
on
track.
But,
however,
it
is
sounding
to
me
like
the
vice
mayor
and
councilmember
moore
will
be
supporting
the
slopes
of
motion
and,
if
that's
the
case,
you
know
if
it
comes
down
to
council
member
way,
I
I
can.
I
can
work
either
way.
You
know,
honestly,
with
regard
to
you
know,
whatever's
put
forth.
A
O
So
I
think
you
are
making
it
more
complicated
than
it
is
here
is
what
we
have
right
now
in
the
staff
report.
All
we
need
everyone
to
submit
is
project
title
and
the
very
short
description
like
here,
and
the
staff
just
need
to
collect
the
title
and
objective.
They
don't
need
to
create
this.
The
last
column
there.
O
So
I
don't
know.
Why
is
that
so
hard
to
create
all
the
council
who
submit
will
give
you
the
text
for
the
title
and
the
description
you
just
need
to
copy
paste
to
a
doc?
That's
it!
How
much
time
do
you
need
two
days
three
days
you
can
do
that
in
an
hour,
so
I
totally
don't
understand
what
is
the
hold
up
here?
J
Thank
you,
mayor
paul.
I
I
do
agree
with
you
vice
mayor
as
well.
I
think
what,
as
I
said
earlier,
we
really
should
have
a
table
here
in
this
packet
that
says
city
council,
what
we
have
proposed
for
work
items,
and
so
I
think
that
you
know
part
of
it
is
we're
a
little
left
out
of
this
list,
but
we've
got
it
from
all
the
commissions
and
nothing
from
us,
so
yeah.
J
A
F
Just
really
briefly
and
ed,
just
to
just
clarify
for
councilmember
moore,
that
this
was
the
meeting
that
we
were
intending
to
have
new
items
by
council
brought
up
and
then
the
next
meeting
we
were
going
to
rank
them
all
together.
So
just
that
was
the
intended
process,
we're
just
inserting
some
efficiency
and
pre-ranking.
So
that's
great
just
wanted
to
clarify
that.
Thank
you.
O
A
A
Okay,
well,
you
know
I
just
I.
I
just
respectfully
disagree
with
your
assessment
of
I
I
think
you
know
you're,
making
it
unnecessarily
complicated
frankly
and
there's
an
opportunity
to
to
to
have
your
input
and,
in
fact,
a
more
abundant
one
under
the
original
motion.
So
I'm
going
to
call
the
question.
O
A
K
A
Yeah.
Thank
you.
Thank
you
for
sucking
in
the
motion
the
call
question,
so
there
there
has
to
be
an
immediate
vote
under
these
conditions
and
we
do
need
four
votes
to
call
the
question
and
require
a
vote
on
the
substitute
motion.
So,
madam
city
clerk,
would
you
conduct
a
roll
call
vote
on
the
motion
to
call
a
question.
L
A
A
J
Thank
you,
mayor
paul,
so
I
have
a
question
vice
mayor.
So
as
it
stands
right
now,
I
just
want
to
clarify
the
substitute
motion,
in
fact,
if
you're,
if
you're
able
to
put
it
up
on
the
screen,
I
would
appreciate
that
and
I
believe
we
had
the
additions
trimmed
down
to
five
each
per
council
member,
and
we
had
some
dates
for.
I
believe
it
was
friday
to
turn
in
our
our
five
items
and
then
we've
got
some
back
and
forth.
J
O
P
P
P
J
Vice
mayor
vice
mayor,
may
we
back
it
up
to
the
25th
and
that
way
staff
has
all
of
their
their
documents
for
the
agenda
packet
earlier
that
I
think
I
think
that
we
because
we're
turning
it
in
within
two
days,
our
five
items
that
staff
should
be
able
to
get
us.
Our
new
list
give
them
a
week.
I
think
that
would
be
acceptable
and
if
katie
can
do
that,
and
so
we
turn
it
in
on
the
10th,
we
get
the
full
list
on
the
17th
we
have.
It
turned
back
in
by
the
25th.
J
P
J
J
L
O
O
F
I
think
your
your
instincts
are
correct.
Vice
mayor
that
I
think,
once
I
get
your
five
items,
presuming
that
the
title
and
objector
very
clear,
don't
need
any
clarification.
I
can
compile
that
rather
quickly
and
get
that
back
out
to
you.
My
one
thing.
I
think
this
timeline
is
okay,
assuming
that
what
you're,
expecting
at
that
april
5th
meeting
is
a
list
with
your
input
and
ranking
the
same
way
that
it
is
today
in
the
sense
that
it
has
a
title
and
objective.
F
O
F
P
F
F
P
L
L
O
E
Yes,
just
that
as
sort
of
reiterating
what
katie
said
is
when
it
comes
to
april
5th,
since
we
don't
really
know
what's
going
to
come
in
if
on
that
date,
a
council
member
says
hey
well,
what
will
this
cost,
how
many
staff
hours
or
how
much
staff
time?
We
really
won't
be
able
to
answer
that,
because
we
won't
have
that
time
available
to
really
dig
into
the
questions.
I
just
want
to
make
sure
council's
aware
of
that
problem
for
issue.
A
E
E
F
Time,
I
think
so
because
it
eliminates
the
back
and
forth
and
so
in
that
process,
and
it
depends
on
what
timelines
council
picks
today.
But
I
would
if
it's
possible
to
turn
around
the
rankings
by
friday.
Then
we
have
a
significant
amount
of
time
to
organize
those
rankings
and
then
also
provide
additional
detail
for
high
ranking
items.
A
F
A
The
original
motion
had
the
18th,
but
katie
just
indicated
that
the
16th
would
be
better
in
terms
of
trying
to
turn
over
evaluation
in
time
for
april
5th.
I
I
if,
if
the
substitute
motion
doesn't
pass-
and
it
brings
back
to
the
original
motion,
I
would
be
happy
to
ask
the
movement
to
change
that
deadline
to
the
16th
from
the
18th,
but
but
yeah.
A
A
A
I
understand
and
if
you
want
to
deliberate
under
the
notion
that
you'll
you'll
convince
a
third
person,
you
know
you're
free
to
under
these
rules.
I
mean,
I
will
say,
we're
at
10
49
right
now
and
you
know
if
you
want
to
delay
another
71
minutes.
That's
fine,
but
I
will
be
adjourning
the
meeting
at
midnight
if
it
comes
to
that.
A
So
you
know
just
just
fair
warning,
so
I
I
look
you
you're
free
to
make
your
commentary,
but
I
would
like
to
you
know,
have
the
opportunity
to
to
fairly
run
the
meeting
I
mean
I
think
your
points
have
been
put
forward.
I
appreciate
the
more
the
greater
detail,
but
you
know
we
have
a
hand
raised
from
council
member
moore
at
this
point.
O
Don't
have
I
wish
to
modify
the
timeline
a
little
bit,
so
I
think
we
can
propose
submission
list
to
the
third
to
step
by
thursday,
which
is
the
list.
I
think
everyone
should
have
been
ready
today
and
we
are
just
writing
it
down.
You
know
better
format
with
project
title
and
description
and
then
I
hope
copying
paste
would
take
one
day
to
create
that
list
of
council
proposed
items,
and
then
we
have
one
week
to
rank.
O
A
L
A
A
B
F
A
Okay,
does
anyone
else
want
to
weigh
in
on
this?
I
say
council,
member,
willie
and
councilman
away.
You
know,
okay,
are
you
waving?
Are
you
raising
your
hand
elsewhere?
No,
okay,
all
right.
Let's
go
ahead
and
and
take
a
vote
on
the
motion.
That's
on
the
table,
then
you
know
I
I
will
preface
this.
As
I
say
I
I
do
appreciate
you
know
all
my
colleagues,
for
you
know
their
their
fine
efforts
and
and
staff
as
well.
I
think
we're
all
working
in
good
faith
to
try
to
find.
O
A
B
A
A
P
J
So
for
in
the
future,
I
I
would
prefer
that
all
of
the
the
council
editions
are
are
brought
to
the
table
and
we
do
our
ranking
knowing
the
full
menu
of
suggestions
by
the
council.
So
I
I'm
very
disappointed
with
this.
This
particular
process
and
I
feel
like
I'm
having
a
repeat
of
last
year,
unfortunately,
but
just
wanted
to
state
that.
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
Councilman
moore.
A
A
A
A
A
Okay,
so
we
are
now
at
the
end
of
our
agenda.
I
I
thank
you
for
a
good
meeting.
I
truly
believe
it
was
a
good
meeting.
I
know
we've
been
very
busy
these
last.
You
know
a
couple
weeks
and
we
do
have
another
full
meeting
next
week
and
so
I'll
go
ahead
and
adjourn
this
special
meeting
of
march
8th
2022,
and
we
will
see
you
for
our
second
regular
meeting
of
march
on
the
15th
next
tuesday.
Thanks
very
much
good
night
and
meeting
adjourned.