►
Description
Coverage of the Cupertino City Council Meeting of September 20, 2022. (Part 2 of 2)
A
Right
now
we
are
on
item
number
five
on
our
agenda.
This
falls
under
reports
by
Council
and
staff
and
I
apologize,
I,
misspoke
more
under
brief
reports
on
council
member
activities
and
brief
announcements.
That
is
item
number
four
on
the
agenda
and
that's
just
about
a
minute
each
for
any
council
members
that
have
these
brief
reports.
Since
we
last
met,
which
was
two
weeks
ago
on
September
6th,
and
so
would
anyone
like
to
begin
with
those
brief
reports
and
councilmember
way.
Your
hands
up
first,
followed
by
councilmember
Willie.
B
Okay,
I'll
start
very
briefly,
I
think
a
lot
of
us
went
to
the
Cal
City's
annual
conference.
I
want
to
say
two
things
that
I've
learned
at
the
conference
about
housing
policies
is.
We
can
really
have
creative
but
doable
ways
to
accommodate
housing
EX
in
addition
to
building
new
housing,
for
example,
two
programs
I
learned
from
the
conference
is
the
lease
to
local
locals
programs
that
the
city
provides
incentives
for
residents
to
lease
their
homes
to
people
who
are
already
working
in
their
city.
B
So
I
think
that
you
know
that's
we're
not
building
new
homes,
we're
using
homes
that
with
empty
rooms-
or
you
know
empty
cup
of
places
that
we
can
accommodate.
People
who
are
already
working
here
and
the
city
actually
provides
incentives
means
money
for
a
residents
to
do
that.
I
thought
that
would
be
a
very
good
Innovative
program
and
the
other
one
is
really
a.
It's
called
Adu
incentives.
It
has
the
same
effect.
It
encouraged
people
to
build
Adu
but
rent
it
to
people
who
work
here.
B
For
so
I
went
into
teachers
went
into
staff,
went
to
in
retail
people,
so
that
helps
relieve
housing
crisis,
but
also
it
doesn't
affect
the
neighborhood
Integrity.
So
just
a
couple
things
that
I
think
is
a
learning
opportunity
for
us
to
really
learn
from
other
cities
policies,
and
maybe
we
can,
you
know,
implement
it
here
if
we
think
that
fits
into
our
culture.
Thank
you
great.
C
C
C
I
I
discussed
this
with
the
city
manager
each
week
on
the
101,
realizing
that
it's
a
brand
new
city
manager
that
we've
got
and
so
trying
to
fill
in
some
of
the
history.
It
is
such
a
challenging
task
to
to
figure
out
how
best
to
help
these
people.
Well,
we
did
learn
a
lot
from
the
homeless
camp
that
was
on
Wolf,
Road
and
sharing
that,
and
the
city
manager
has
assured
me
that
they
are
actively
working
with
both
the
sheriff
and
West
Valley,
Community,
Services
and
maybe
she'll
say
more.
C
The
other
one
I'll
just
touch
on
Monday
night,
the
below
market
rate
virtual
Workshop
that
the
city
had
I
I,
found
it
very
interesting.
But
most
importantly,
it
was
very
well
put
on
to
convey
to
the
to
the
people
out
there
residents
and
non-residents
how
the
brm
housing
program
works,
and
it's
really
based
on
points.
If
you
live
in
Cupertino,
you
get
a
point.
C
D
A
D
D
I
think
that
that
could
be
useful
because
we
have
been
having
a
hard
time
reaching
out
to
Citizen
things.
We
don't
have
really
have
a
legitimate
newspaper,
so
they
are,
there
are
no
digital
tools
to
that
can
actually
reach
directly
to
residents
is
through
various
channels
and
on
the
17th
attended
the
povatino,
and
it's
this
year
it's
I
understand
three
or
four
hundred
people
registered
it's
an
outdoor
event.
It's
so
successful.
E
Okay,
thank
you.
So
I
also
went
down
to
Long
Beach
September
7th
through
9th
for
the
Cal
cities
conference.
There
there
were
there's
a
vendor
room
in
a
huge
Hall
and
just
a
huge
array
of
of
different
organizations
were
there.
So
some
of
the
things
I
thought
were
kind
of
interesting.
There
was
a
a
golf
course
booth
and
happened
to
be
the
same:
Golf
Course
maintenance
provider
as
deep
Cliff.
They
had
some
interesting
suggestions
there.
E
There
was
one
that
had
that
makes
it
was
for
with
regards
to
traffic.
They
make
a
solar
powered
way
to
light
up
a
crosswalk
at
night,
which
I
thought
was
kind
of
interesting,
because
we
have
some
dark
areas
and
for
for
pedestrian
safety,
it
was
pretty
interesting,
bobatino
I.
This
is
the
first
time
I've
been
to
bobatino,
not
being
a
teenager
and
I
thought
that
the
mental
health
booths
that
they
had
were
exceptional
and
it
was.
E
It
was
really
really
well
done
so
hats
off
to
council
and
and
mayor
Paul
for
for
working
on
this
I
mean
staff,
not
Council,
for
working
on
this.
They
did
a
great
job.
I
did
attend
the
Historical
Society.
The
Cupertino
Historical
Society
Jazz
Age
theme
Barbecue
on
September
9th.
It
was
a
costume
party
and
in
in
my
opinion
this
was
probably
the
most
fun
event
for,
for
the
at
least
the
month
or
the
fall
and
I
I
hope
that
so
they
do
it
again,
it's
for
a
great
cause.
That's
it.
A
Thanks
very
much
councilmember
Moore,
and
so
let's
go
oh
for
My
Own
Part,
yes,
bobatino
was
very
successful
this
past
weekend
and
I.
Also
that
morning
on
Saturday
went
over
to
the
Sunnyvale
state
of
the
city
address
by
by
by
Larry
Klein
mayor
Larry,
Klein
in
in
Sunnyvale,
and
a
lot
of
good
ideas.
You
know
I've
decided
to
try
to
go
to
various
states
that
the
city
addresses
you
know
this
year,
so
a
lot
of
them
take
place
here
in
the
fall.
A
F
A
Very
very
well
attended.
It
was
nice
to
not
nice
to
see
a
good
turnout
by
people,
and
so
we
we
had
a
few
members
of
the
city
council
there
as
well
and
I.
Think
later
in
the
day,
I
want
to
say
all
five
of
us
showed
up
at
the
Armenian
Church
at
St,
Andrew
Armenian
Church
for
The
Armenian
food
festival,
which
was
brought
back
after
a
couple
of
years,
and
so
thanks
to
vice
mayor
Chow,
for
you
know
kind
of
pointing
out
the
traffic
considerations
going
across
bub
road.
A
G
A
We
have
committee
assignments
from
Council
that
are
essentially
representations
by
our
city
council
on
various
committees
throughout
the
region,
and
so,
if
anyone
would
like
to
report
on
their
formal
committee
assignments,
please
raise
your
hand
on
zoom
and
we'll
call
you
in
order.
So
we
have
council,
member
Willie,
first
councilman
ruley,.
C
There
was
actually
a
left
up
hand.
I
was
just
noticing
that
okay
but
I'm
happy
to
to
go
so
on
the
14th
was
the
monthly
Silicon
Valley
clean
energy
meeting
I'm
always
wanting
to
point
out.
You
know
power
purchase
agreements,
get
more
Renewable,
Power
supplied,
less
fossil
fuel,
and
so
we're
now
moving
on
another
Power
purchase
agreement,
it's
solar
storage,
so
we're
not
doing
solar
cells
with
this
power
purchase
agreement.
C
B
So
I
want
to
report
because
council,
member
Moore
and
I
are
on
the
Historic
Society
subcommittee
and
we
all
went
to
the
Historic
Society
Museum
party
and
council
member
just
mentioned
that
she
I
want
to
compliment
her
because
we
all
landed
at
San
Jose
airport
around
six
something.
But
when
we
were
there,
council
member
was
more
was
in
a
fabulous
costume,
so
compliment
to
you
and
I
would
just
want
to
say.
B
A
E
Hey
thank
you.
So,
let's
see
on,
oh
goodness,
let
me
get
the
date
right.
The
lrc
met
on
September,
12th,
and
one
thing
I
want
to
bring
up
is
that
it's
been
discussed
in
is
that
Gonzalez
and
and
Son
they've
cautioned
over
the
record
300
billion
dollar
Surplus
due
to
the
funding
requirement
in
the
Constitution.
This
is
our
state
budget
surplus,
which
will
result
in
a
large
growth
in
the
K-12
education
budget
due
to
prop
98..
E
The
education
budget
will
be
guaranteed,
but
there
may
be
a
possibility
of
the
Surplus
being
non-existent
next
year,
resulting
in
a
deficit
by
2025..
So
keep
an
eye
on
that.
The
lrc
of
note
or
our
local
businesses
is
that
we
switched
from
a
watch
position
on
ab2164
to
a
support
position
and
that
provides
some
funding
for
ADA
compliance.
E
Support
then
on,
while
at
the
once
again,
I
have
to
say
once
again
the
VTA
pack
met
during
one
of
these
conferences,
so
I
needed
to
break
away
to
chair
the
pack
on
on
September
8th
there.
We
recommended
that
Santa
Clara
Valley,
the
VTA
board
of
directors
adopt
the
county-wide
local
Road
Safety
plan.
E
We
also
recommended
that
they
adopt
the
2023
Transit
service
plan,
approve
one
Bay,
Area
Grant
cycle
three
list
of
projects
we,
unfortunately
one
of
ours
did
not
make
it
on
the
list.
It
didn't
meet
their
criteria,
so
their
criteria
actually
had
some
issues,
and
then
we
looked
at
the
vta's.
It
was
informational
item
to
look
at
vta's
effort
to
update
its
county-wide
long-range
Transportation
plan
and
I
will
have
I'll
be
on
the
audit
committee
with
mayor
this
coming
Monday
September
26th.
E
If
anyone
would
like
to
come
join
there,
we
have
some
terrific
reports
on
there
and
so
it'd
be
great
to
have
some
more
members
of
the
public
showing
up
and
we're
trying
to
make
the
audit
committee
information
more
accessible
to
the
public,
with
more
definitions
provided
when
the
reports
come
in
and
so
that
people
aren't
intimidated
about
all
of
those
numbers.
That's
it.
Thank
you.
A
A
You
know
issues
with
the
the
BART
extension,
so
a
major
project
I
think
it'll
probably
have
a
fairly
profound
impact
on
our
area
in
the
long
term.
So,
let's
go
on
to
item
number
six
after
we
call
on
the
vice
mayor
whose
hand
is
now
up
Vice
marriage.
How
do
you
have
committee
reports
between
September,
6th
and
and
today.
D
Is
so
on
the
12th
lrc
meeting?
We
also
discussed
the
bills
that
have
passed
the
both
houses.
Ap
2097
is
a
non-profit,
Bill
so-called
is
passed,
and
then
there
is
a
b2011
that
would
allow
by
right
converging
of
commercial
sites
to
housing
and
the
enactment
date
is
July
1st
2023.
So
that
gives
the
city
some
time
to
look
whether
our
existing
ordinances
might
need
to
be
updated.
So
we
are
recommending
to
bring
a
study
session
to
the
Council
on
bills.
That's
passed
this
year
and
on
the
16th
of
we
have
the
cep.
D
Meeting
for
the
third
community
meeting
for
housing
element
will
be
on
Monday
September
26th
at
6
30.
It
will
be
virtual.
The
focus
will
be
on
senior
homeowners
with
limited
income
and
the
employees
who
work
at
Cupertino,
and
the
committee
recommended
a
possibility
of
having
a
hybrid
or
in-person
option
for
seniors
who
not
only
have
Tech
challenges
technology
who
have
no
access
to
technology.
So
I'm
not
sure
if
that
might
be
worked
out.
A
Yeah,
thank
you.
Thank
you.
Vice
mayor
child,
let's
go
on
to
item
number
six.
This
is
our
report
on
subcommittee
assignments
for
the
various
subcommittees
that
Council
has
formed,
and
would
anyone
like
to
go?
First
on
the
subcommittee
assignments
reports
and
I
see
the
order
of
hands,
or
vice
mayor,
child
councilmember,
Moore
and
councilmember
Willie
vice
mayor
child?
Was
that
raised
from
before
or
would.
E
A
H
Yeah
I
think
I
think
that
the
comment
at
the
time
was
that
there's
certainly
nothing
preventing
those
two
council
members
for
for
a
meeting
to
discuss
the
the
you
know.
You
know
any
farmers
market,
so
you
know
there's
no
Brown
act
issue
with
that,
so
if
they
wanted
to
proceed
with
having
that
meeting,
they
could,
if,
if
Council
wanted
to
provide
formal
Direction,
you
know
especially
to
the
extent
that
staff
report
staff
support
is
needed.
You
know
I
would
recommend
an
official
reporter.
A
Appointment
from
Council
right
exactly
so
in
this
context,
perhaps
in
a
future
meeting
well
certain
definitively
in
a
future
meeting,
they
would
say
something
like
we'd
like
to
request
a
report
out
in
the
next
meeting
or
something
along
those
lines
right
so
yeah,
okay
and
then
you
know,
also
extend
the
invitation.
If
you
have
something
before
within
that
Gap
period,
when
you
can
put
something
on
an
agenda,
just
just
let
us
know,
and
then
we
can
we
can.
You
know
presumptively
put
that
specifically
on
an
agenda
outside
of
the
subcommittee
report
out
so
yeah.
A
G
You
Mr
Mayor,
for
it
I
will
try
to
do
my
best
to
wrap
up
so
a
big
shout
out
to
everyone.
Who's
attended,
a
bobatino
sounds
like
the
council.
Members
had
a
great
time.
I
also
had
a
great
time
had
I
known
that
I
can
register
and
get
a
free,
Boba
I
probably
would
done
it,
but
great
shout
out
to
staff
who's
done
a
fantastic
job,
as
acting
director
sander
provided
an
update
last
time.
This
is
really
the
onset
for
ongoing
events
leading
us
to
the
holiday
season.
G
So
I
want
to
remind
all
of
you
that
there's
a
bike
fest
this
Saturday
and
also
on
October
1st-
it
will
be.
The
volunteer
affair,
also
want
to
provide
an
update
on
recruitment.
So
staff
is
currently
working
on
closing
up
some
key
recruitment
within
the
finance
department
and
also
working
on
opening
up
the
recruitment
for
the
economic
development
committee.
So
there
will
be
a
lot
more
recruitment
coming
up
along
the
line
of
the
individual.
G
That's
portal
and
Stevens
Creek
I
do
want
to
make
sure
Council
and
also
the
community
understand
that
we've
been
working
closely
with
the
County's
Supportive
Housing
West
Valley,
Community,
Services
and
Sheriff's
Office.
There's
certain
confidential
information
that
we
cannot
release,
but
please
rest
assured
that
we're
working
on
it.
It
does
take
time
and
we're
really
trying
to
work
on
an
alternative.
G
That's
the
in
the
best
interest
of
the
individual,
so
I
do
want
to
shout
out
to
those
of
you,
the
residents
who
have
shown
extraordinary
support
and
concern
for
this
individual
by
writing
to
staff
have
to
council
members
and
also
by
providing
materialism
good
to
the
individual.
It
is
difficult.
It
is
unfortunate,
we're
really
looking
to
see
if
there's
a
best
alternative
for
and
look
for,
a
pathway
to
a
permanent
housing
for
this
individual.
G
With
that
said,
I
also
have
some
happy.
News
Public
Works
staff
has
been
Staffing
booth
at
the
bobatino
shop
for
the
revitalized
Memorial
Park
project.
So
for
those
of
you
who
are
interested,
May
participate
in
an
online
survey
and
engage
cupertino.org
through
October
9th,
and
there
will
also
be
another
pop-up
booth
at
the
Silicon
Valley
day
and
night
Fun
Fest
this
coming
Saturday
more
information
on
this
event
is
available
on
the
calendar
section
of
City
Cupertino
website.
What
that
said,
I
don't
want
to
spill
all
the
beans.
G
A
C
A
I
I
I
We
act
as
a
partner
to
our
other
departments,
supporting
the
delivery
of
their
services
and
a
lot
that
we
do
as
an
example
of
this.
Our
development
services
team
who
work
behind
the
scenes
to
support
the
work
of
Community,
Development
utility
companies
and
others
in
building
infrastructure
around
the
city
and
I'll,
go
through
the
other
groups
briefly
through
in
the
course
of
the
the
presentation
as
I
Was
preparing
this
presentation.
I
I
I
So
reviewing
the
slides
on
the
screen
on
the
top
left
is
the
ponds
project
that
we're
doing
now.
That
will
ultimately,
in
very
short
order,
result
in
usable
park
space.
So
that's
a
great
project
in
progress
for
us,
but
we're
not
stopping
there
concurrently
as
part
of
our
CIP
we're
looking
at
the
future
of
Memorial
Park.
I
We
have
other
significant
projects.
As
you
know,
we
have
inclusive
playground
at
jalman
Park
that
is
moving
along
well
in
the
design
phase.
We
also
have
Lawrence
midi
Park
progressing
in
its
early
design
phases,
and
we
expect
to
have
three
preliminary
design
options
ready
for
review
in
the
next
month
or
so
on
that
on
that
project,
I
know
the
council's
the
anxious
to
see
each
of
those
and
they're.
They
are
progressing,
we're
anxious
to
bring
them
to
you.
I
I
didn't
I
did
not
include
images
of
some
of
our
other
Capital
work,
including
our
pavement
maintenance
program.
But,
as
you
know,
we
continue
to
maintain
one
of
the
highest
pavement
condition
indexes
or
pcis
in
the
in
the
Bay
Area,
and
we
have
a
project
awarding
soon
on
that
as
well.
That
will
round
out
our
projects
our
payment
projects
for
the
year,
so
continued
strong
efforts
there
and
then
leading
into
the
the
next
slide.
I
We
have
upgrades
to
the
new
section
of
the
Anza
and
Homestead
that
will
upgrade
the
traffic
signals
and
that
project
is
in
progress
and
just
waiting
for
some
equipment.
So
we
can
finish
the
install
there,
so
our
CIP
program
reaches
reaches
everywhere
reaches
the
parks
it
reaches
the
streets,
it
reaches
the
intersections
on
the
transportation
side,
our
next
division.
I
You
know
the
BS
shuttle
program
provides
a
great
first
Last
Mile
Transit
solution
continues
to
grow
and
you'll
talk
about
that
a
little
bit
more
on
the
agenda
tonight
and
we
also
have
a
super
busy
safe
route
to
school
program,
especially
this
time
of
year,
where
school
is
just
getting
off
and
we
want
to
start
off
with
a
bang
and
over
the
summer
we
did
a
lot
of
infrastructure
work
to
help
facilitate
that.
One
neat
thing
that
we'll
be
doing
is
a
pedestrian
pedestrian
scramble
at
one
of
the
intersections
coming
up
soon.
I
So
we'll
try
that
and
see
how
that
works
and
Report
out
on
that
one
and,
of
course,
on
the
right
side,
you
see
the
separated
bikeways
and
you
know
those
have
become
an
icon
in
the
city
and
we're
continuing
to
build
on
those
as
the
projects
come
up
also
happening
last
weekend
was
national
cleanup
day
give
a
shout
out
to
these
images
that
include
our
our
future
environmental
student
stewards.
We
had
a
great
group
of
scouts
out
this
last
weekend,
so
it
was
neat
to
see
them
out
there.
I
Although
the
Council
made
great
strides
in
cleaning
up
the
Saratoga
previously
at
Lawrence,
the
new
future
Lawrence
midi
Park
site,
there
were
still
plenty
of
of
debris
to
bring
out
by
this
group.
Some
400
pounds
came
out
on
Saturday,
so
another
good
effort
to
keep
that
space
clean.
This
group
is
environmental
programs.
Group
is
also
responsible
for
our
single-use
plastic
ordinance
and
our
storm
water
pollution
prevention
program,
as
well
as
managing
waste,
hauler
contracts
and
monitoring
that
progress
of
those
and
they
do.
And,
of
course,
if
there
were
serious
Community
engagement.
I
A
Well,
thank
you
very
much
director
Morley.
You
know.
We
hope
that
it's
an
ongoing
value,
add
from
the
Departments,
and
we
will
very
much
look
forward
to
the
next
iteration
I
think
we're
basically
talking
essentially
once
a
quarter
or
so
for
the
department
heads
as
well
as
possibly
Public
Safety,
Sheriff's
Office,
so
that
might
round
out
the
sixth,
since
there
are
five
departments
so.
G
A
A
See
interesting,
okay
sounds
good
all
right
thanks,
Madam
city
manager
and
thank
you
director,
Marley,
all
right.
Let's
go
on
to
the
consent
calendar.
The
consent
calendar
is
items
9
through
17
tonight
and
let
us
go
to
asking
whether
anyone
from
the
city
council
is
requesting
that
any
of
the
items
on
consent
be
pulled
and
I
see.
Councilmember
Moore
has
a
hand
raised
council
member
Moore.
Would
you
like
to
pull
any
of
the
items
on
consent.
A
Okay
item
14
has
to
do
with
a
state
grant
for
an
on-demand
shuttle
pilot
program
that
we
run
and
16
has
to
do
with
the
street
light
transition
assessment
report,
and
so
those
two
items
are
pulled.
Are
there
any
other
council
members
that
would
like
to
pull
an
item?
Let
me
go
to
members
of
the
public
as
well.
Jennifer,
you
have
a
hand
up
just
checking
in
briefly.
Are
you
requesting
that
an
item
be
pulled.
A
B
A
A
A
Thank
you
very
much
Madam
Mr
Clerk,
and
so
we
are
on
to
item
number
14..
Once
again,
that's
a
consideration
of
accepting
grant
funding
for
the
Via,
on-demand
shuttle
pilot
program
and
extending
the
contract
with
Nomad
Transit
LLP
to
operate
via
shuttle
pilot
program,
and
so
let
me
hand
this
off
to
our
city
manager.
Pamela.
Would
you
like
to
introduce
the
item,
or
perhaps
somebody
on
staff
who's
on
or
perhaps
even
somebody
else
from
I
guess
via
possibly
might
be
on
for
item
number
14.
A
A
Oh
yes,
thank
you
very
much,
I
appreciate
that.
Thank
you
very
much.
Councilmember
Willie,
that's
a
excellent
point
and
thank
you
for
reminding
me
of
a
good
and
best
practice,
I
think
so.
Councilman
Moore,
you
pulled
the
item.
Would
you
like
to
give
a
brief
summary
of
the
reason
why
you
pulled
it
so
that
they
that
so
that
that
may
direct
some
of
the
staff
comments
on
this.
E
A
G
Mr
Mayor,
thank
you.
We
do
have
a
presentation
ready
for
this
item,
in
particular
I
think
council,
member
Moore's,
looking
for
an
overview
of
why
we're
expanding
the
contract
and
what
will
be
involved.
So,
if
that's
correct
I
know,
director
Morley
also
has
and
also
Chris,
has
a
presentation
ready.
It
may
take
some
slides
to
get
through
an
overview,
so
please
bear
with
with
us.
I
Thank
you
mayor,
so
Chris
is
the
lead,
obviously
with
via
and
you've
talked
with
Chris
Trio
Korea
previously
I
also
wanted
to
introduce
Michael
Liu
with
the
city
of
Santa
Clara,
who
hopefully
will
be
a
partner
with
us.
So
that's
the
unfamiliar
name
for
you,
and
we
have
Michael
here
to
help
support
the
item
as
well
and
with
that
we'll
go
through
the
presentation
and
I'll
turn
it
straight
to
Chris.
L
L
L
One
thing
that
I
want
to
point
out
is
that
there
was
really
sort
of
a
golden
period
in
this
pilot
where
the
system
was
performing
at
its
most
efficient
at
its
best,
and
that
was
from
January
2020
to
through
March
2020..
For
those
three
months,
the
system
performed
really
well.
Ten
thousand
trips
were
made
out
of
the
overall
ridership
shown
on
this
slide
during
those
three
months
alone,
and
then,
obviously
on
March
13th
2020,
the
when
the
county
issued
issued
shelter
in
place
orders
the
ridership
plummeted.
L
The
utilization
rate
is
essentially
the
rate
of
sharing
that
occurs.
It's
actually
the
rate.
The
number
total
number
of
passengers
per
driver
hour.
So
it's
the
closest
metric.
We
have
to
to
understand
how
much
sharing
is
occurring
on
the
system,
and
you
can
also
see
that
around
the
same
time
period
that
this
sort
of
golden
area
era
that
I
referred
to
so
March,
January,
March
and
April-
are
the
three
highest
bars
on
the
left:
I'm,
sorry,
January,
February
and
March,
where
the
utilization
rate
was
at
its
highest.
L
We
hit
almost
2.6,
meaning
that
there
were
2.6
passengers
in
the
van,
in
addition
to
the
driver,
which
is
what
we
wanted,
and
that
was
an
average
on
some
days
we
hit
4
and
4.5
and
then
of
course,
after
covid
ridership
plummeted,
as
did
the
utilization
rate.
Until
we
made
a
decision
to
pause
the
surface,
and
then
you
can
see
that
the
ridership
and
utilization
has
grown
reaching
its
highest
for
since
relaunching.
In
this
last
August,
we
hit
1.6
as
a
ridership
is
really
coming
back
strongly.
L
Now
many
council
members
over
the
years
have
asked
about
the
the
cost
per
trip.
Subsidy
and
I
haven't
had
this
information
in
the
past,
so
I
decided
to
include
it
this
time
as
attachment
D
to
give
a
month,
by
month,
breakdown
of
the
invoices
for
Via
for
this
service,
and
it's
it's
very
interesting
it
it.
It
follows
the
previous
slide.
It's
very
closely
this
period
where
we
performed
at
our
best,
we
had
the
lowest
cost
per
trip.
L
L
L
We've
done
surveys
at
various
stages
of
this
pilot,
and
one
thing
that
we've
learned
is
that
the
the
systems
used
pretty
broadly
across
various
Transportation
use
cases.
We
see
commuters,
Healthcare
visits
a
number
of
different
use
cases
and
we
also
have
received
really
positive
feedback
from
the
community.
These
were
comments
made
in
the
survey
in
the
previous
survey
of
150
individuals.
L
The
only
criticisms
we
really
have
received
through
the
pilot
is
that
we
don't
have
electric
vehicles,
we
don't
go
to
Mountain
View
Caltrain.
We
don't
go
to
the
airport.
We
don't
go
to.
You
know,
set
all
of
these
lists
of
destinations.
We
would
love
to
go
to
and
we
had
not
service
those
areas
because
they're
quite
expensive
or
it
would
be
quite
expensive
to
do
so
fast
forward.
To
last
spring,
we
had
an
opportunity
to
go
after
a
grant
called
the
tircp
grant.
L
L
So
I'll
take
you
through
the
recommended
actions,
one
by
one
tonight,
so
that
you
can
understand
more
about
the
the
grant
expansion
that's
proposed,
so
the
first
action
is
recommended.
Action
is
accepting
the
grant
funds.
What
this
really
is
is
an
opportunity
to
Signal
the
desire
to
continue
this
program,
we're
not
really
receiving
any
funds.
L
L
L
Currently,
the
funds
in
this
program
would
not
last
long
enough
for
that
to
happen,
and
then
the
last
recommended
action
is
to
approve
a
sole
source
contract
with
via,
and
there
are
a
number
of
reasons
that
were
that
we're
recommending
this
or
requesting
this,
the
tircp
application
that
we
submitted
was
for
an
expansion
of
the
existing
via
Cupertino
program.
One
of
the
key
parts
of
that
was
the
conversion
to
electric
vehicles
and
to
expand
into
larger
geographies.
L
L
Okay,
so
as
I
mentioned
there
was,
there
is
still
a
lot
of
work
to
be
done.
We
anticipate
returning
to
Council
next
year
early
in
the
year
with
a
number
of
agreements
which
we
will
need
to
work
through
with
Caltrans,
with
the
city
of
Santa
Clara,
with
via
as
well
or,
and
and
also
what
we
would
return
with
a
funding
request,
and
then
we
would
return
to
council.
A
Okay,
thank
you
very
much
Chris
and
let
us
go
to
any
members
of
the
public
that
have
any
comment
on
this
item
number
14
before
we
turn
this
back
to
council
and
I,
see
one
member
of
the
public
with
the
hands
raised
with
a
hand,
raise
that's
Jennifer
and
so
welcome
Jennifer
to
the
other
members
of
the
public.
Please
have
your
hand
raised
by
the
time.
Jennifer
gets
done.
A
Speaking
and
actually
Jennifer's
hand
is
now
down
and
so
I
take
that
to
mean
that
there
are
now
no
members
of
the
public,
but
I
will
check
in
with
our
city
clerk
Kirsten.
Are
there
any
members
of
the
public
that
have
submitted
a
blue
card
and
then,
after
we
take
this
back
to
council,
we'll
wait
a
few
minutes
and
see
if
anyone
emails
city
clerk
at
cupertino.org
as
well?
No.
A
E
E
That
would
be
an
interesting
alternative
and
is
that
something
that
you
thought
about?
That's
first
question:
well,
actually,
two
questions
I'd
like
to
know
about
the
West
San
Jose
possibility
and
the
I
guess
the
third
would
be
if
we
find
that
Apple
since
they're
having
their
employees
come
back
in
and
they've
got
their
own
shuttle
system
which
the
residents
don't
get
to
use.
But
if
we're
heavily
subsidizing
our
system
and
we
find
that
there
are
a
significant
number
of
Apple
employees.
E
L
I,
we
have
been
in
conversation
with
San
Jose,
actually
San
Jose,
the
city
of
San
Jose,
was
interested
in
joining
in
on
this
application,
but
didn't
have
enough
time
to
really
get
the
documents
together
in
time
for
the
deadline.
However,
Cal
sta,
the
rental,
has
told
us
that
they're
very
interested
in
in
San
Jose,
applying
in
this
next
round,
which
opens
up
this
fall,
so
we're
working
with
them
via
is
also
working
with
them
on
preparing
an
application.
L
So
we're
hopeful
that
we
can
get
a
chunk
of
West,
San,
Jose
included
and
and
they're
working
through
the
mapping
right
now
to
see
what
that
might
look
like
I
believe
they're
interested
in
something
that
extends
as
far
east
as
the
Santa
Clara
portion,
at
least
near
Valley
Fair,
which
would
be
great
for
Cupertino
residents.
To
get
to
your
answer,
your
second
question,
the
airport
we
had
the
discussions
about
the
airport
via
had
some
concerns
about
airport
trips
over
taxing
the
system,
so
as
an
alternative.
L
D
D
D
L
In
in
some
ways
in
some
ways-
yes,
because
it's,
although
the
city
wouldn't
be
committed
for
let's
say
for
some
reason,
if,
if
the
grant,
if
the
grantor
didn't
provide
the
funds,
we
could
there's
nothing
stopping
the
city
from
ending
the
program.
We
just
wouldn't
get
additional
Grant
funds,
but
the
city
will
need
to
allocate
enough
funds
to
make
payments
every
month
before
receiving
reimbursements
from
the
grantor.
L
I
D
D
B
Thank
you,
Maple
I
just
want
to
clarify
a
couple
questions
that
I
asked
the
staff
I
want
to
share
with
everyone.
You
know,
writes
and
writers
are
different,
so
I
was
curious
of
how
many
writers
that
VL
service
served.
For
example,
one
writer
could
write
five
per
week.
That's
considered
five
rights,
so
the
answer
was
about
1500
writers,
so
I
thought
that
was
a
pretty
good
number
to
share
the
second
one
is
the
8
million
465
thousand
dollars.
B
Grant
is
split
between
Santa
Clara
and
Cupertino
our
five
years-
expense
about
50
percent
of
it,
but
to
have
a
10-year
contract,
but
not
committed
to
the
last
five
years
actually
has
the
advantage
of
we
are
able
to
get
another
Grant
or
you
know
ready.
These
are
ready
project
that
can
get
Transportation
grants
or
clean
energy
grants,
especially
if
the
fleet
is
going
to
be
electric
and
also
attract
Sunnyvale
or
other
cities
to
join
us.
B
A
You
great
thanks
councilmember
way
and
well,
let's
go
ahead
and
take
a
take,
a
motion
at
this
time.
I
want
to
thank
you,
know.
Chris
and
public
works
for
your
really
good
efforts
here
and
it
was.
It
was
a
pleasure
to
be
able
to
socialize
this
with
Santa
Clara
City,
Council
Members
and
you
know
they
delivered
on.
A
You
know
their
support
for
our
application,
and
so
I
did
you
know.
I
I
think
I'd
be
a
little
bit
remiss
if
I
didn't
mention
that
I
did
receive
an
email
from
a
from
a
member
of
the
public
who
is
associated
with
a
Transit
private
company
down
in
Los
Angeles.
It
was
called
circuit
and
so
I
think
Chris.
You
kind
of
detailed
the
you
know
reasons
for
doing
a
single
Source.
You
know
process
here,
but
did
you
have
anything
you
know
for
this
particular
entity?
A
A
couple
of
the
points
that
he
made
was
you
know
they
seem
to
be.
You
know
pretty
far
along
in
the
electric.
You
know
kind
of
vehicle
option,
together
with
the
the
the
kind
of
W-2
employee
with
benefits.
So
those
are
the
points
that
were
made.
Did
you
want
to
speak
to
that
at
all,
because
I,
just
I
just
feel
like
it's?
You
know
important
to
kind
of
hash
out.
That
particular
issue
of
you
know
foregoing
an
RFP
process.
L
I
met
with
with
circuit
in
person
and
they're
they're,
a
great
startup
company.
They
they
challenged
with
with
their
product
offering
for
us
is
that
they
tend
to
offer
these
neighborhoods
scale.
Electric
vehicles
that
are
very
small
and
I,
don't
think
most
Riders
would
feel
safe
in
in
Cupertino,
because
our
streets
have
higher
speeds,
they're
more
appropriate
for
like
a
Gas,
Lamp
District
in
San,
Diego
kind
of
thing
and
and
I
don't
think
it
would
be.
You
know
a
vendor
that
we
could
consider
for
this
scale
of
a
program.
A
Yeah
no
I
appreciate
you,
you
know
addressing
that
full-on
and
I.
Think
that
you
know
it's
it's
nice
to
look
at
a
proven
product
that
we've
worked
with
for
I.
Guess
now.
If
you
include
the
Gap
period
a
few
years
and
so
to
be
able
to
have
that
application
that
was
premised
upon.
You
know
this
particular
vendor.
A
I
was
specifically
saying
you
know,
for
you
know
this:
it's
really
a
matter
of
all
hands
on
deck
and
all
the
interoperable
parts.
If
we
are
not
able
to
deliver
microtransit
solution,
necessarily
in
as
extensive
a
manner
as
we
could
be
doing
in
VTA,
we
know
we
might
as
well
try
to
interrelate
with
our
local
agencies.
A
So
it's
so
it's
nice
to
be
able
to
see
this
delivered
and
being
able
to
get
to
San
Jose
International
that
that
would
be
tremendous
and
I
was
really
quite
pleased
by
your
suggestion
of
going
to
the
Santa
Clara
Transit
Center,
that
that
makes
a
lot
of
sense,
actually
I've
taken
that
60
bus
and
it
it
arrives
quite
frequently
so
should
be
a
fairly
convenient
way
to
get
over
to
San
Jose
International.
Unlike
trying
to
take
you
know
the
the
buses
all
the
way
there
from
you
know,
Cupertino
at
the
moment.
A
So
all
right
so
I
you.
Let
me
go
ahead
and
entertain
a
motion.
I
do
see
two
further
hands
raised
from
vice
mayor
Chao
and
council.
Member
Moore
and
I
would
like
to
ask
to
see.
If
anybody
would
like
to
bring
forward
that
motion,
we
can't
have
further
discussion
now
once
it's
on
the
table
and
so
vice
mayor
Chao.
Would
you
like
to
move
the
recommended
action
on
the
agenda
at
this.
E
A
D
Yeah
and
I
think
we
should
take
this
chance
to
do
further
Outreach
for
Via
many
people
still
don't
know
about
it.
For
example,
we
could
have
talked
about
it
at
bobatino
and
though
the
events
we
should
have
a
banner
like
the
bike
fest
over
Stevens
Creek
or
at
the
banner
at
the
corner
of
Memorial,
Park
I,
think
I,
hope
to
stay
in
staff
have
a
better
plan
for
an
advertisement.
This
is
really
a
great
program
and
more
ridership
would
reduce
the
cost,
so
yeah
more
people
need
to
know.
Thank
you.
Thanks.
A
A
Thank
you
very
much.
Thank
you
very
much
everyone,
and
so
we
will
go
on
to
item
number
15
on
our
consent.
Calendar
item
number
15
has
to
do
with
providing
a
statement
of
city
council
support
and
considering
considering
that
for
the
I-280
Wolf
Road
interchange,
project
project
and
authorizing
the
appropriation
of
eight
hundred
thousand
dollars
from
the
general
fund,
Capital
reserves
as
a
10,
non-measure,
B
local
match
for
the
I-280
Wolf
Road,
interchange,
improvements,
project,
and
so
that
was
actually
pulled
by
a
member
of
the
public,
and
so
I
will
go
to
that.
J
Okay,
sorry,
yes,
this
item,
I'm,
certainly
I,
have
followed
the
I've
gone
to
all
the
meetings
kept
up
with
the
interchange,
the
Wolf
Road
280
interchange
update.
It's
been
a
little
while,
since
we
had
visited
this
and
I
just
wanted
to
I
had
a
question
about
what
exactly
is
this
okay,
if
we're
taking
800
million
from
I'm
sorry
800
000
from
the
general
fund?
What
exactly
is
this
matching?
10
20
I,
don't
understand
what
that
is
exactly
because
I've
never
seen
anything
like
this
on
here.
The
other
thing
is
I.
J
Had
the
question
is
all
right:
we're
gonna
have
to
refresh
my
memory
here,
because
I
thought
we
were
doing
this
because
of
the
altitude
campus
implementation.
Apple
II
campus
has
been
here
now
about
what
six
years
since
it
was
built,
seven,
and
what?
How
does
this
involve
the
Valco
build
out
the
potential
for
Hamptons,
and
now
we've
got
potential
that
the
housing
element
goes
through
at
Cupertino
Village,
with
the
rebuilding
with
the
big
housing
unit
at
the
end
of
town
and
the
Hamptons.
J
Of
course,
where
are
we
sitting
with
this
being
a
viable
upgrade
to
this
interchange?
I
I'm?
A
little
bit
confused
about
why
this
item
came
back
where
we
are
in
the
implementation
of
it
I,
it
seemed
to
be
I.
I
think
everybody
was
pretty
happy
with
the
plans
for
the
implementation,
but
now
that
we've
had
the
Valco
situation
happen,
I
just
thought
this
upgrade
was
generated
by
the
Appleton
campus
filled
out.
But
how
does
Falco
fit
into
this?
How
does
the
potential
build
out
of
Cupertino
Village
and
what?
J
A
G
A
I
You
very
much
yeah
I
think
this
is
a
funding
question
and
a
project
status
question.
So
I'll
just
go
over
it
briefly,
so
this
Project's
being
done
in
as
many
Caltrans
projects
are
in
phases.
This
particular
phase
we're
trying
to
get
to
the
sort
of
next
big
step,
and
that
involves
getting
the
project
construction
ready
as
we're
going
through
the
process.
I
There's
identified
additional
utility
relocation
costs
that
were
unidentified
early
on
in
the
project
to
the
tune
of
eight
million
dollars,
measure
bees
covering
a
good
portion
of
those
of
that
up
to
leaving
behind
our
our
10
match.
So
that's
the
800
000
and
that's
why
that
that
number
is
important
for
us
and
that
gets
this
project
to
to
a
design
completion
ready
for
construction.
I
We
will
point
out
that
we
are
looking
for
lots
of
additional
dollars
associated
with
this
project
in
partnership
with
with
VTA,
and
so
hopefully,
there
are,
for
example,
sb1
funds
that
will
supplant
this,
and
these
eight.
This
eight
hundred
thousand
dollars
will
not
actually
be
an
expenditure
to
us.
We
are
actually
meeting
with
VTA
now
and
working
on
our
sb1
application
sort
of
as
we
speak.
F
I
That's
sort
of
the
the
dollars
specific
to
this
recommendation
with
respect
to
the
project
and
additional
funding.
There's
lots
of
funding
that
comes
into
play
with
this
one,
including
development
fees
for
for
neighboring
projects,
there's
still
projects
that
may
develop
in
the
future.
That
would
contribute
through
the
development
agreement
and
projects
that
have
developed
already
that
contributed
to
this
project.
I
A
Great
well,
thank
you
very
much
director
Morley.
Let
me
go
at
this
point
to
members
of
the
public
if
they
have
comments
on
this
presentation
of
information
on
this
item
number
15
before
we
go
to
council
councilmember
I,
see
that
your
hand
is
raised
so
we'll
go
ahead
and
go
to
you
first
with
regard
to
Council,
but
I
see
that
a
member
of
the
public
still
has
a
hand
raise
that's
Jennifer
again
and
so
I'll.
Let
everyone
know.
A
J
Thank
you.
Thank
you
to
Mr
Morley
for
explaining
I,
understand
things
good
things
work
slowly,
especially
with
culture
I,
just
I'm,
glad
that
you
mentioned
the
other
projects
that
may
be
coming
down
the
pipe
because
I,
don't
if
I
remember
correctly,
I
really
think
that
it
was
was
Apple.
The
Apple
campus
build
that
generated
the
potential
for
the
over
Crossing
change
and
upgrade
I.
Don't
think.
Valco
was
a
fat
now
I,
I'm,
sorry,
I
apologize!
It's
been
a
long
time.
J
I
do
not
think
Valco
was
the
generating
factor
of
this
build
out.
Upgrade
change.
I
think
it
was
the
one
of
the
conditions
of
the
building
of
the
apple
tube
campus
because
of
the
supposed
increase
in
amount
of
people
working
there,
and
you
can
see
this
was
way
before
pandemic.
But
if
you
could
bring
me
up
to
date
on
that,
and
then
are
you
looking
down
the
road
at
potential
build-outs
at
Cupertino
Village,
especially
if
we're
putting
in
500
to
a
thousand
housing
units
in
there?
J
E
Okay,
well
I
appreciate
the
question
questions
from
from
Jennifer
about
this
project.
I
was
concerned
about
the
Valco
impact
as
well
and
in
this
report
we're
seeing
that
there's
funding
coming
from
the
Hyatt
Hotel
developer
and
from
Apple,
but
I'm,
not
seeing
any
contribution
from
Valco
and
and
I
believe
they
were
challenging.
E
E
So
what
were
the
calculations
to
design
this
interchange,
taking
the
current
SB
35
project
into
account
and
understanding
that
they
also
changed
their
parking
Supply
by
over
2
000
spaces?
So
they
have
they.
They
decreased
the
number
of
parking
spaces
in
their
most
recent
plan
by
over
2
000,
so
I'm
gonna,
I'm
gonna,
guess
that
if
they
did
design
with
velco
in
mind
that
it's
changed
now,
so
that
they
need
a
TDM
plan
in
order
to
make
their
Project
work.
E
So
what?
What
is
that
going
to
do
to
this?
To
this
design
and
I?
Remember
they
had
like
a
diversion
diamond
and
just
a
simple:
let's,
let's
just
make
everything
wider
on
the
on
the
off
ramps
and
on-ramps,
and
they
pretty
much
the
the
idea
was
that
it
was
going
to
be
too
complicated
to
get
the
residents
to
do
the
Divergent
diamond
that
we'd
have
trouble
with
it
basically
and
then
just
go
with
a
more
conventional
plan.
E
A
Thanks
councilmember
Moore
and
really
good
memory
by
the
way
yeah
I
had
very
similar
questions
with
regard
to
the
data,
as
well
as
the
design,
and
you
know,
being
the
only
one
on
the
dice
I
was
actually
here
when
we
were
going
through
those
designs,
the
the
Diamond
configuration
really
bring
some
memories
there
and
I
know
that
we
looked
at
Cloverleaf
and
partial
Cloverleaf
as
well,
but
maybe
maybe
David
wouldn't
know
with
specificity.
What
was
actually
designed
out.
I
know.
A
I
I
Good
news
is
I
think
we
have
our
eyes
on
other
sources
that
will
fund
the
120
million
dollar
project,
so
ultimate
positive
outcome
in
getting
the
the
project
fully
designed
and
then
I'll.
Let
David
talk
about
the
design
of
the
project.
I
know:
there's
lots
of
design
work
done,
we're
getting
to
the
end
of
design,
so
we'll
be
able
to
bring
you
back.
A
F
Thank
you,
mayor
Paul,
good
evening,
mayor
members
of
the
city
council,
David
Stillman,
Transportation
manager,
going
back
to
address
a
couple
of
the
questions
from
Jennifer
about
the
Catalyst
for
the
project.
This
was
a
project
that
was
initiated
by
VTA
and
sponsored
by
the
city
for
several
reasons:
the
additional
traffic
imposed
by
Apple
being
one
of
them,
but
this
is
a
structure
that
is
nearing
the
end
of
its
useful
life
and
would
need
replacement
regardless
of
traffic
within
the
next
10
or
15
years.
F
It's
also
out
of
standard
in
in
several
respects,
and
it's
very
uncomfortable
to
walk
or
bike
across
for
for
those
of
you
who
have
tried
that,
and
so
in
terms
of
wanting
a
multimodal
transportation
feature
in
the
city,
this
this
interchange
very
much
needed
to
be
upgrade
in
order
to
accommodate
bicycles
and
pedestrians,
with
a
level
of
safety
and
comfort.
So
there's
there's
a
lot
of
reasons
for
this
project
to
happen.
F
It
does
consider
traffic
from
future
velco
development
as
well
as
Apple
traffic,
as
well
as
other
other
development.
In
the
area,
there
were
several
configurations
of
The
Interchange
that
were
looked
at
in
the
initial
stages.
As
you
mentioned
mayor,
a
a
a
diamond,
interchange
and
traffic
analysis
was
done.
F
A
pretty
detailed
traffic
analysis
on
on
a
tight
diamond
on
a
diverging
diamond
on
the
partial
Cloverleaf,
and
what
was
found
was
that
the
the
partial
Cloverleaf
configuration
which
is
what's
there
now
was
the
the
most
efficient
and
had
the
least
traffic
impacts
of
all
of
the
configurations.
So,
as
a
result,
it
was
the
partial
Cloverleaf
design
that
won
and
is
in
the
process
of
being
designed,
nearing
100
design.
F
At
this
point
there
will
be
some
changes
to
the
geometrics
from
what
you've
you
know
what
we
have
out
there
currently
there'll
be
three
lanes:
each
Direction
Over
the
freeway
instead
of
two
there'll,
be
more
standard
grades.
All
around
tighter
turns
to
enter
the
freeway
in
order
to
avoid
the
high-speed
entrances
so
that
bicyclists
and
pedestrians
can
us
safer.
So
a
lot
of
good
geometric
changes
are
going
to
happen
to
make
it
a
safer
facility
than
it.
F
A
Okay,
great
thanks
very
much
David
and
so
and
thanks
director
Marley
councilmember
more
your
hands
still
up.
But
let
me
go
on
to
councilmember
way
and
vice
mayor
Chao,
to
weigh
in
with
questions
or
comments
at
this
time
and
if
your
hand's
still
raised
we'll
go
back
to
you
after
that
councilman
away.
B
Thank
you,
Mia
Paul,
so
as
we're
reading,
the
reports
I
think
it's
very
clear
that
the
funding
is
25
million
dollars
short
and
but
there's
a
possibility
of
applying
for
the
sb1
local
partnership,
competitive
programs
and
since
velcro
the
rice
project
is
being
mentioned.
I
wonder
I
because
I
don't
quite
remember
the
amount.
What
is
the
traffic
impact
fee
that
the
velcro
of
the
rice
will
contribute
to
the
city.
H
B
H
D
Yeah
I'm
curious
to
the
traffic
study
too,
because
I
remember
this
was
initially.
It
was
estimated
that
we
need
one
extra
Lane
just
for
apple,
and
now
we
have
much
bigger
about
local
projects,
I'm
glad
to
hear
that
the
analysis
is
done,
it's
done
with
the
future
vocal
project
in
mind,
but
if
the
staff
can
forward
the
traffic
analysis
or
point
me
to
an
online
source
with
that
analysis,
that
would
be
great.
Thank.
A
You
great
thank
you
Vice
merchao
and
before
we
go
back
to
councilmember
Moore,
let
me
ask
my
question
briefly:
I
I
think
I
know
the
answer
to
this
I
think
it's
no,
but
it
was,
was
purple
pipe
wrapped
into
this
at
all
or
was
I
just
separate
infrastructure
that
we
would
have
been
working
on.
You
know,
apart
from
this
project,.
A
Yeah
I
know
that
I
think
I
think
the
Hamptons
Irvine
Company
was
supposed
to
help,
bring
it
down
to
280
and
then
perhaps
the
Valco
project,
but
but
given
that
this
is
the
infrastructure
right,
I
mean
we
would
be.
You
know
dealing
with
this.
This
stretch
of
things
I
mean:
does
anyone
have
a
specific
reflection
of
what
that
status
was
or
am
I,
just
remembering
something
that
that
wasn't
affiliated
with
this
particular
project?
A
Well,
I
see
you're,
okay,
I,
see,
Chad
turned
his
camera
on,
but
he's
nodding.
So
let's
just
get
a
a
follow-on
status.
I
know
the
status
of
pipe
was
a
little
bit
right.
I
mean
they
were
supposed
to
be
watering.
Some
of
the
Apple.
You
know
kind
of
grounds
for
that,
but
so
some
of
the
water
turned
out
to
be
a
little
bit
too
impure.
I
guess
to
you,
know,
use
for
that
type
of
purpose,
but
anyway,
let's
go
back
to
councilman
Moore.
A
E
E
Okay,
so
so
the
developer
has
protested,
the
fees
the
Valco
developers
protested
the
fees.
So
when
I,
when
I
look
at
this,
this
agenda
item
I
I
see
a
lot
of
taxpayer
dollars
which
are
getting
directed
towards
it.
Right
and
and
the
developer
is
getting
a
huge
benefit
off
of
off
of
us
to
build
a
project
using
a
housing
law
which
is
worsening
the
housing
shortage
and
putting
thousands
of
commuters
on
the
road,
and
they
need
to
have
this
interchanged
improved
in
order
to
accommodate
that
so
I
I
think
we
should.
E
We
should
all
look
at
that
and
and
didn't
have
a
problem
with
it.
So
all
right
so
I
did
I
did
make
the
motion,
but
I
want
to
make
sure
that
that
is
understood
what
what's
happening
here
and
and
to
us,
because
they
chose
to
use
SB
35.
We
don't
have
the
mitigations,
there's
no
discussion.
Okay,
thank
you.
Okay,.
B
H
A
Okay,
great
all
right
so
I'm
going
to
go
ahead
and
ask
for
any
further
comments
at
this
point.
But
if
there
are
none,
I'll
just
go
ahead
and
you
know
indicate
that
it
seems
like
we're
talking
about
eight
hundred
thousand
dollars
to
secure
the
7.2
million.
As
the
rest
of
the
you
know,
percentages
to
bring
us
up
to
the
100
percent.
A
So
as
to
the
rest,
you
know
I
realized
that
we're
talking
about
one
particular
interchange,
but
you
know
it's
all
part
of
a
Transit
and
traffic
equation.
You
know
personally,
I'd
love
to
see
us
to.
You
know
consider
the
fact
that
you
know
we
do
have
a
lot
of
Transit
needs
in
the
area
and
a
long,
long
delayed
plan
that
it
hasn't
been
built
out
in
in
Santa
Clara
County.
So
it's
something
to
think
about
I
and
I
know.
A
This
is
probably
going
a
little
bit
of
field,
but
it
is
over
this
interchange
that
was
that
was
suggested,
and
so
a
number
of
years
ago,
when
I
first
got
into
Council.
There
was
a
former
council
member
monasterino
came
to
me
and
he
had
this
whole
idea
of
a
Transit
Center
over
280
right
right,
where
we're
talking
about
in
fact-
and
it
was
pretty
interesting-
actually
you
know
to
think
about
connecting
with
with
Transit
down
the
median
of
280,
which
some
people
have
actually
suggested
from
our
Council
before,
but
any
event.
A
C
D
D
I
So
we
currently,
as
I,
mentioned,
we're
applying
for
sb1
funds
and
we're
we're
hopeful
that
we'll
be
successful
there.
It's
a
partnership
project,
so
that's
a
positive
for
us,
but
we
won't
know
until
the
scoring
is
out
for
sb1.
That
would
be
the
construction
dollars
that
we
need
to
to
continue
the
project.
If,
if
we're
not
successful
for
us
with
sb1,
there
may
be
other
grant
funding
opportunities
in
the
future
that
we
could
pursue,
but
it
would
likely
mean
a
delay
in
the
project
in
order
to
follow
to
to
pursue
them.
D
Okay,
I
do
yeah,
okay,
I,
do
remember
right
back
in
2016.,
welcome
committed
a
30
million
dollar
donation
for
discretionary
project
because
they
want
the
council's
approval,
but
for
a
streamlined,
SBA
35
project,
they
don't
have
to
provide
anything
yeah
well,
so
the
citizens
will
have
to
try
to
come
up
with
something.
So
thank
you.
The
staff
for
your
continued
effort
to
look
look
for
funding,
really
appreciate
it.
Okay,.
A
Thank
you
vice
mayor,
Chao
and
then
councilman.
Will
you
still
have
your
hand
raised?
Is
that
from
before,
okay
and
I
see
councilman
Moore
has
her
hand
raised
once
again.
So
let
me
before
we
go
to
councilmember
Moore,
put
myself
in
the
queue
here.
So
with
regard
to
the
basic
question
the
vice
mayor
child
had,
are
we
on
the
hook
for
the
25
million
dollars?
A
Don't
remember
this
in
the
design
and
thank
you
David
for
reminding
us
that
it
was
the
partial
Cloverleaf
that
was
selected
in
terms
of
the
walkability
right,
the
The
Pedestrian
and
the
bike
aspects
of
it.
Those
were
covered
right.
Those
were
covered
in
the
design.
I
I
mean
I
know
you
indicated
there
was
a
you
know,
kind
of
a
sharper
turn
to
kind
of
slow
down
the
traffic,
but
where
I'm
going
with
this
is
also
thinking
about
the
280
Trail,
which
council
member
Moore
helped
rename
essentially
right.
So
is
there
that
interconnectivity?
F
A
E
M
E
A
N
H
A
A
A
Thank
you
very
much
Madam
Mr
clerk.
Let's
go
on
to
item
number
16
now
and
we
are
considering
the
street
light
transition
assessment
report
I'm,
assuming
that
this
is
also
public
works.
But
let's
go
to
council
member
Moore
who
pulled
this
item
councilmember
Moore.
Would
you
like
to
provide
a
very
brief,
some
directional
language
as
to
how
to
guide
us
on
this
staff
report?.
E
Well,
I
can
get
get
right
to
the
point.
I
would
actually
want
to
continue
this
particular
item
and
have
a
perhaps
some
site
locations
in
the
city
of
certain
street
lights
so
that
we
can
see
what
the
the
lumens
are
that
they
are
referring
to.
So
we
know
what
what
they
are
like.
The
street
classification
for
the
LED
lumens
that
we
have
in
this
report,
residential
at
3,
000,
collector,
four
thousand
to
five
thousand
in
arterial.
E
E
You
know,
what's
an
eight
to
nine
thousand
dollar,
not
not
dollar,
but
lumens
range.
What's
it
what's
around
three
thousand,
what
does
that
look
like
before
before
we
agreed
to
it
and
I
think
also
that
the
perhaps
we
had
a
lot
of
Audubon
members
speaking
they
I
I,
don't
know
if
they've
weighed
in
on
this
particular
item
or
or
caught
it
I
I
would
like
to
hear
what
they
have
to
say
about
it
as
well.
That's
it
thank.
A
You
okay.
Thank
you,
council
member,
Moore
Let
me.
Let
me
try
to
connect
this
to
the
recommended
action.
So
there
is
a
recommended
action
of
accepting
the
street
light
transition
assessment
report.
There
is
also
a
report.
That's
part
of
our
agenda
packet.
Are
you
suggesting
that
we
defer
the
acceptance
or
the
consideration
of
the
acceptance
of
the
streetlight
transition
assessment
report
until
there
can
be
follow-up
with
regard
to
what
you
were
describing
and
from
what
I
can
glean
of
it?
You're
wanting
more
illustrative
I
guess
examples
of
what
is
being
discussed
here.
E
A
G
It
sure
thank
you.
Mr
Mayor
just
want
to
clarify
that
the
action
before
council
tonight
is
to
accept
a
report.
So
if
we
were
going
to
go
back
to
the
vendor
to
prepare
additional
analysis,
I
would
have
to
talk
to
director
Morley
to
see
how
that
can
be
done,
so
we're
not
asking
for
any
direction
from
Council,
but
simply
just
to
receive
the
report.
You
could
also
receive
the
report
to
say
this
could
have
other
analysis
to
be
included.
H
A
Right
I
mean
I
I've
encountered
this
once
in
in
roughly
eight
years
where
a
report
was
not
actually
accepted,
and
it
was
actually
I
actually
requested
to
be
brought
back
later
in
a
different.
You
know
kind
of
format,
with
additional
information,
so
I
mean
I.
Personally,
I
have
precedence
on
it
on
this.
This
wasn't
on
this
governing
body,
though
it
was
on
in
one
of
the
assignments.
So
so
what
are
your
thoughts
on
that
possibility?
A
I
So
our
intent
on
this
item
was
to
bring
it
to
you
as
a
check-in
to
tell
you
that
we're
continuing
to
progress
on
this
that
we
have
some
some
good
data
that
shows
that
that
will
comply
with
our
dark
sky
requirements
that
will
have
a
cost
effective,
effective
project
when
we
get
through
design
and
that
we're
gonna
that
we,
our
intent,
is
to
move
forward
I'd
like
to
from
a
sense
of
realizing
the
dollar
savings
in
a
timely
manner.
I'd
like
to
continue
on
in
that
in
that
fashion.
A
N
It's
a
CIP
project.
Thank
you,
mayor,
yeah,
Susan,
Michael,
CIP
manager.
Thank
you
for
the
questions.
I
wanted
I
would
reiterate
in
a
way
what
Matt
has
said
that
this
is
a
report
that
we're
bringing
to
council
and
and
also
in
response
to
council's
requests
for
information.
Last
year,
when
we
brought
forward
the
new
CIP
project,
there
is
a
new
CIP
project
for
the
this
fiscal
year.
That
is
the
implementation
of
this
of
the
LED
report,
and
this
item
is
not
related
in
that
direct
fashion
to
that
implementation.
N
This
is
here's
the
report
we'd
like
to
give
you
the
information
that
we
have.
Our
next
stage
is
to
go
to
the
project
and
similar
to
what
councilmember
Moore
has
said
when
I've
gone
through
the
report
I'd
like
to
have
someone
who
knows
more
about
lumen's
outputs
and
the
technical
aspects
of
the
report
to
look
at
the
report
and
make
a
evaluation,
so
that
will
be
part
of
the
process.
The
design
process
before
we
go
into
construction.
N
A
And
and
what
about
the
request
for
essentially
a
what
seems
to
be
a
fairly
modern,
minor
modification
of
the
report
to
include
pictures
of
the
you
know
various
options
here:
I
mean
that's
how
I
read
it
that
that's
how
I
was
hearing
what
councilmember
Moore
was
indicating.
You
know,
because
if
you
look
at
the
report
itself,
it's
very
textual
right
I
mean
there
are
only
a
couple
of
illustrations.
A
There
are
a
couple
of
images
at
the
very
beginning,
but
you
don't
necessarily
get
you
know
that
kind
of
you
know
sense
of
it
without
the
consultant.
Here
we
don't
really.
You
know
necessarily
have
that
direct
expertise,
but
did
you
want
to
speak
to
that
before
I
opened
this
up
to
members
of
the
public,
because
I'm,
assuming
that
we
don't
really
have
a
presentation
on
this
and
so
okay.
M
A
Gonna
I'm
gonna
take
that
yeah.
Okay,
no
worries,
you
know
we
can
get
through
this
process
and
so
I
do
see
a
one.
Member
of
the
public
with
a
hand
raised
Jennifer
welcome.
You'll
have
up
to
three
minutes
on
this.
If
you
wanted
to
speak
on
on
the
item
and
a
reminder
to
the
rest
of
the
public,
please
have
your
hand
raised
or
a
blue
card
filled
out
or
an
email
to
a
city.
Clerk
cupertino.org
before
Jennifer
is
done.
Speaking
welcome,
Jennifer.
J
Thank
you.
You
know
this.
This
is
like
the
fourth
time.
We've
changed
the
street
light
since
I've
been
in
the
area
and
I
I.
You
know
I
really
I,
don't
really
like
the
ones
we
have
now.
The
light
is
very,
very
harsh.
It's
a
bright
white
and
I've,
never
I,
I,
don't
know
I.
Think
I,
like
the
one
that
was
two
times
back,
but
I
would
be
interested
in
seeing
like
you
said.
If
there
was
an
example
around
the
city
of
these
street
lights.
What
color
is
this
light?
J
Is
it
going
to
be
pink,
yellow
bluish
white
I
attended
the
answer
back
in
the
years
ago,
when
we
had
the
pink
lights
sodium
lights,
and
you
know
that
campus,
you
could
walk
around
11
o'clock
at
night.
I,
remember:
I,
dropped
off
a
chemistry
lab
book
at
one
of
my
professors,
slid
it
under
the
door
and
that
campus
was
so
light
at
night.
You
could
walk
around
in
the
middle
of
the
night
and
and
it
was
like
daylight,
so,
whether
that's
good
or
bad-
that's
probably
very
bad,
but
I
will
tell
you.
J
Those
sodium
lights
were
a
lot
easier
on
your
eyes.
These
current
street
lights
that
we
have
now
are
so
harsh
at
night
and
they're,
not
I.
That's
why
I
think
it's
important
that
we
we
have
something
to
look
at
going
around
this,
this
city
at
night
to
see
what
these
things
are
because
I
mean
I
can
see
two
right
now
and
they
are
just
incredibly
they're.
J
A
A
D
Thank
you
yeah.
Thank
you,
I,
wonder
if
the
report
on
estimates,
the
impact
on
the
wildlife,
because
that
was
intent
of
the
dark
sky,
ordinance,
I
believed
on
Audible
society
and
others
who
care
about
the
wildlife
has
concerns
about
straight
LED
light.
This
is
just
one
example
of
comments
that
people
had
LED
string
lights
have
significantly
less
Wildlife,
including
insects
and
mammals.
You
can
Google
this.
There
is
a
lot
of
information
like
that,
so
I
wonder
what
other
options
are
considered
on
whether
impact
to
Wildlife
is
considered
yeah.
Thank
you.
D
A
D
A
I
Start
off
for
us
on
this
one
so
that
the
alternative
for
for
replacing
street
lights
and
the
industry
standard
now
is
moving
to
led.
Many
neighboring
communities
have
done
that
in
recent
years,
including
for,
for
example,
Los
Gatos,
where
there's
significant
concern
with
Wildlife
up
against
the
Foothills.
So
it's
been
done
successfully.
I
I
I
understand
that
there's
sensitivity
to
the
light,
there's
an
adjustment
to
the
to
the
to
the
appearance
of
the
color
of
the
light,
and
those
are
things
that
we
should
consider
as
we're
moving
forward
and
be
be
cognizant
of
the
of
the
locations
that
we're
installing
revisions
to
our
streetlight
plan.
I.
Think,
ultimately,
it's
it's
a
question.
E
So
the
the
city
has,
in
my
opinion,
quite
a
variety
of
of
street
lights,
even
in
my
own
neighborhood,
we
have
some.
We
have
one,
that's
actually
an
LED,
which
is
has
somewhat
of
a
pink
tone
to
it
and
then
the
rest
are
are
cold,
cold
light
and
the
the
sodium
vapor
that
was
mentioned.
Those
ones
are
actually
I
believe
within
the
color
temperature
that
the
the
Dark
Skies
ordinance
was
was
looking
for,
which
is
I'm
around
1700..
E
My
concern
also
with
this
table.
One
of
the
report
is
that
you
could
end
up
with
a
situation
because
residential
is
showing
3
000.
You
could
end
up
with
a
situation
where
you're
actually
making
something
brighter
than
what
was
there
that
that's,
harsher
and
and
I
do
think
that
it's
it's
challenging
because
we
have.
E
We
have
dark
areas
as
well,
and
one
of
the
things
that
we're
trying
to
reduce
was
the
the
harshness
or
abruptness
of
going
from
one
street
light
that
and
then
the
next
one
is
very
far
down
the
street,
and
then
you
you
hit
the
next
one.
So
it's
let's
you're
going
from
Bright
to
dark
to
Bright
to
dark.
They
were.
We
were
trying
to
have
that
effect,
just
moderated,
so
it
wouldn't
be
so
harsh.
Now,
with
regards
to
to
this
report,
all
right
I
do
see
that
it.
E
It
mentions
having
a
dimmable
driver
but
I,
don't
know
what
the
what
the
effect
of
that
would
be
for
color
temperature,
wise,
so
I'm
concerned
about
that,
because
they're
saying
all
light
sources
shall
have
a
maintained,
correlated
color
temperature
of
3000
Kelvin
or
less.
So
that's
not
following
our
Dark
Skies
ordinance
and
anyway,
like
I,
said
before
I'd
like
to
hear
from
Audubon,
because
they
had
really
done
a
lot
of
research
on
this
and
and
provided
some
really
good
advice.
So,
okay,
I'll
leave
it
at
that.
Thank.
B
Okay,
thank
you.
My
brother,
so
I
want
to
ask
a
clarification
question.
This
is
a
report
that
we
are
going
to
accept
and
you
know
understand
a
lot
of
it,
but
the
actions
are
kind
of
still
in
the
making.
So
the
recommendations,
one
two
and
three-
are
the
steps
recommending
we're
doing
all
one
two
three.
So
we
can
get
more
details
of
everything
that's
being
asked
because
I
can
see.
This
is
a
report.
The
implementation
will
be
much
different.
B
I
Are
correct
on
that
council,
member
and
I
think
the
next
steps
outlines
sort
of
what
we
had
planned
for
going
through
a
design
process
and
that
design
process
would
come
back.
It
sounds
like
there's
an
interest
in
in
having
some
additional
Outreach
associated
with
this
and
potentially
seeing
some
installations
either
that
are
already
installed
in
the
neighborhood
or
something
that
we
can
do
a
mock-up
on
or
or
an
install
actual
installation.
A
Okay,
all
right
so
yeah,
let's,
let's
go
ahead
and
entertain
a
motion
and
before
we
do
that,
I
I
would
like
to
put
in
a
request
for
a
little
bit
more
background
information
in
the
report
as
to
what
has
been
done-
let's
say
within
the
last
10
years,
with
regard
to
our
street
lights,
because
I
I
forget
who
made
the
comment,
it
might
have
been
councilman
ruley
saying
that
there
have
been
some
turnovers
with
regard
to
our
street
light.
You
know,
system
and
I
thought.
A
If
we're
considering
a
re,
you
know
design
of
of
our
street
light
strategy
as
well.
As
you
know,
Gathering
more
information
on
what
lights
are
out
there,
because
that's
part
of
the
report
as
well.
Maybe
we
can
be
considering
in
the
report
the
fact
that
we
have
Alternatives
such
as
you
know,
shading
and
directing
the
light
you
know
more
downward
to
you
know
perhaps
save
a
little
bit
in
terms
of
the
the
coverage
and
the
the
ways
in
which
it
would
affect
people
as
they're
kind
of
moving
along.
A
O
A
D
H
A
O
A
O
Yeah,
just
just
briefly
on
the
the
street
lights,
we
did
replace
street
lights
about
a
decade
ago.
Yes,
street
light
fixtures,
especially
the
induction
lights,
have
about
a
decade
life
span
and
we've
seen
an
increase
in
the
need
to
replace
those
fixtures.
So
as
we're
going
along,
we
think
it
it's
important
to
consider
you
know
moving
into
the
future
and
that
in
the
future,
for
street
lights
tends
to
be
LEDs
and
you're.
O
And
additionally,
there
is
a
table
in
the
report
that
talks
about
the
lumens
that
are
being
recommended,
which
they
believe
are
necessary
to
provide
adequate
safety
lighting
within
the
streets.
Those
Lumen
levels
for
the
LEDs
are
either
match
or
are
less
than
the
current
induction
lighting.
So
this
report
does
have
a
reduced
amount
of
lumens
and
what
is
currently
out
there
for
street
lights
and
the
color
temperature
being
recommended
does
comply
with
our
dark
sky
ordinance.
Yeah.
A
O
I
I
apologize,
yes,
PG
e
went
through
a
number
of
years
ago
and
replaced
all
the
fixtures
that
they
owned
with
LED
fixtures.
So
if
you
see
fixtures
out
there,
they're
either
they're
typically
going
to
be
on
PG
or
joint
poles
like
the
wooden
poles,
or
we
have
a
handful
of
P,
Geno,
PG
and
e-owned
metal
fixtures
as
well,
so
that
led
transition
for
some
lights
was
PG.
E's
modification.
A
O
Replaced
light
fixtures
within
parking
lots
with
some
LEDs
and
we
have
replaced
a
handful
of
of
other
induction
lights
with
LEDs
throughout
the
city.
This
has
all
been
kind
of
in
this.
You
know.
Transition
of
trying
to
you
know
what
is
going
to
work.
Are
these
LEDs
gonna
going
to
be
appropriate
for
for
our
uses
and,
and
this
report
is
indicating
that
they
can
be
yeah.
A
I
mean,
and
that
does
jog
some
memory.
I
I
would
just
like
more
detail
on
that
I
mean.
Did
we
approve
a
program
where
the
induction
lights,
when
they
expired,
were
being
replaced
by
the
LEDs?
And,
if
that's
the
case,
you
know
is,
is
perhaps
suggesting
an
expansion
upon
that
program
was
it
you
know
just
in
particular
Parks.
You
know
like
Wilson
or
live
very
field,
or
something
like
that.
Yeah
I
mean
I.
A
I,
know,
I,
know
that
this
topic
has
been
approached
before
and
I'm
not
going
to
step
on
any
kind
of
third
rails
here.
But
you
know,
inventorying
of
our
street
lights
is
actually
interrelated
to
other
topics
as
well.
So
that's
kind
of
getting
my
mind
moving
a
little
bit
as
to
you
know
what
what
other
types
of
you
know
kind
of
uses.
This
might
be.
You
know
implicating
so
anyway
that
those
are
my
comments.
I'll
take
it
back
to
councilmember
Moore,
but
I
would
like
to
ask
for
a
motion
at
this
point.
E
Mayor
Paul,
yes,
is
going
back
to
the
submittal
requirements
so
in
in
their
report.
They
it's
a
PDF
223
of
300.,
they
referenced
the
municipal
code
and
the
the
standards
and-
and
they
say
they
apply
generally
to
private
development,
however,
not
necessarily
to
Street
Lighting
in
the
public
right-of-way.
E
However,
tanko
lighting
found
the
following
requirements
to
be
applicable
to
street
lights,
and
so
then
they
they
provide
their
own
submittal
requirements
and
where
I
get
a
little
concern,
is
we
we
do
have
while
I
see
this
color
temperature
of
3000
Kelvin
or
less.
We
do
mention
in
our
municipal
code
for
security
lighting,
that
that
would
be
1600,
so
I
I
would
want
I.
I
still
actually
would
like
to
hear.
E
Audubon
weigh
in
on
that
and
I'm
concerned
about
the
recommended.
Spacing
area
where
they're
talking
about
light
uniformity
and
coverage
are
the
key
principles
when
it
comes
to
determining
exact
pole
spacing
okay,
so
you
know
I've
I've
worked
with
people
who
do
the
the
photometric
plans,
and
the
idea
with
those
with
that
spacing
is
that
you
don't
have
any
any
missed
coverage
so
that
your
your
street
lights
are
spaced.
E
Only
for
new
streetlight
installations,
a
photometric
plan
prepared
by
a
professional
engineer
or
someone
qualified,
is
recommended
to
determine
the
exact
spacing
so
I'm
I'm
kind
of
wondering
what
are
what
our
guidance
is
are
we?
Are
we
saying
that
we're
trying
to
move
towards
in
the
city
street
lights
that
are
spaced
150
to
200
feet?
Apart
with
this
more
more
uniform
lighting,
because
some
places
they
they
don't
want
to
have
more?
They
don't
want
to
have
more
light.
E
So
I,
don't
know.
You
know
where,
where
in
this
process
is
the
best
time
to
to
have
this
discussion?
But
it
looks
like
this
is:
this
is
how
they're
going
to
be
submitting
their
their
projects?
It
says
submittal
requirements,
and,
and
so
if
somebody
wants
to
jump
in-
and
you
know
where,
where
do
we
get
to
hear
from
from
the
Audubon
Society
about
this,
and
and
and
with
the
spacing
like
what?
E
A
Council
well
I'll,
go
ahead
and
make
a
motion
I'm
going
to
move
that
we
that
we
bring
the
report
back
to
staff
with
with
a
request
for
modifications
based
upon
the
input
and
requests
for
outreach
discussed
by
Council
this
evening.
So
would
anyone
like
to
second
that
motion
I,
see
councilmember
Willie
with
a
hand
raised
and
so
councilmember
Willie?
So
we
have
a
motion
in
a
second
on
the
table,
realizing
that
it
may
Empower
some.
A
A
K
K
Well,
depending
on
how
much
detail
you
want
to
so
basically
requesting
continuation
of
the
report,
acceptance
until
follow-up
of
council
member
modifications
to
provide
photos
or
locations
with
brightness
lumens
receive
Audubon
Society
input
what
has
been
installed
and
where,
in
the
city
in
the
last
five
years,
look
at
shading
directing
and
light
options.
And
what
is
the
plan
for
spacing
between
lights?
A
A
All
right:
well,
thanks
very
much
everyone
I,
don't
want
anyone
to
feel
chagrined
or
you
know
despondent
with
regard
to
you
know
the
fact
that
we're
through
consent
calendar
this
has
been.
You
know
a
group
of
a
really
interesting
items.
To
tell
you
the
truth.
We
do
have
three
more
items
on
the
on
the
calendar.
A
I
think
it's
fairly
safe
to
say
with
about
an
hour
and
10
minutes
left
before
midnight,
we're
probably
not
going
to
get
to
all
of
them,
although
I
would
say,
maybe
we
could
create
an
Omnibus
for
items
18
and
19.
those
seem
you
know
fairly
fairly
boilerplate,
but
but
what
I
will
say
is
that
1049
will
take
a
five
minute
break
and
we'll
reconvene
at
10
55
to
hopefully
get
through
at
least
two
out
of
three
of
the
remaining
items.
We
do
have
a
rather
large
item
them.
I.
A
Think
with
item
number
20,
the
last
enumerated
item
on
our
agenda.
So
let's,
let's
reconvene
at
10
55.
thanks,
we'll
see
you
then
hey
we're
back
and
I'd
like
to
make
a
request
to
my
colleagues
and
the
public.
Let's
go
ahead
and
consider
item
19
first,
since
that
is
one
that
is
time
sensitive
and
I
would
imagine,
wouldn't
take
too
long.
A
We
have
it
estimated
as
being
a
very
brief
consideration
and
so
I'd
like
to
put
forward
a
motion
to
consider
item
19
before
we
consider
item
18,
which
is
scheduled
as
the
next
item,
and
so
would
anyone
be
willing
to
second
that
motion?
Second,
okay,
councilmember
more
seconds,
I
move
and
I.
Don't
see
any
members
of
the
public
to
speak
on
the
item.
The
the
motion
rather
and
vice
mayor
Chao,
has
a
hand
raised
vice
versa.
Did
you
want
to
speak
to
the
motion.
A
G
A
We
can
do
that,
okay.
Well,
let's
do
this.
Are
there
any
members
of
the
public
that
are
here
to
speak
on
item
20?
If
you
could
raise
your
hand,
I
do
see
one
person
with
a
hand
raised,
and
so,
if,
if
people
would
be
willing
to
entertain
that
as
part
of
the
motion
now
now,
we
have
two
people
that
are
hand
raised.
A
E
A
D
A
D
C
Yeah
I
I
share
councilman
Moore's
concern
about
the
community,
have
waited
this
long,
I'd
be
I,
think
kind
of
a
a
little
bit
of
an
incentive
for
them
that
we
then
make
this
our
first
agenda
item
on
the
4th
of
October,
so
they're
not
going
to
be
left,
you
know,
wait
and
see
where
they
fall
in
the
schedule
again
that
we
tell
them.
This
will
be
the
first
item
on
the
fourth
so
that
you
know
they
they
can.
Okay.
A
Well,
why
don't
we
do
this?
Why
don't
we
just
move
it
to
a
special
meeting
at
5
30
on
the
fourth,
and
so
that
would
be
our
sole
agenda
item.
We're
estimating
this
item
number
20
to
take
an
hour,
and
so
we
would
just
put
it
at
5
30
to
accommodate
this.
You
know
sentiment
that,
let's
put
it
in
early
for
the
people
that
have
waited
and.
D
A
Possibly
people
that
have
dropped
off
here.
So
let
me
look
at
my
my
Council
vice
mayor
Chao,
you
were
making
a
noise
of
some
kind,
but
but
let
me
actually
let
me
check
in
with
the
city
manager
first
as
to
the
the
practicality
of
that
is.
Is
there
something
teed
up
for
a
special
meeting
Pamela
on
the
4th
of
October,
not.
A
D
For
the
public,
most
people
can
really
can
make
5
30
for
people
who
work
so
I.
Think
the
first
agenda
item
of
the
meeting
would
be
great,
but
if
possible,
for
the
people
who
stayed
this
late,
I
wonder
if
we
can
briefly
hear
their
comments
and
then
continue
the
item
through
October
4th,
so
at
least
can
speak
there
in
it.
And
so
that's
two
item
21st
your
comments
and
then
continue
and
then
219
and
18
and
19.
G
A
A
If
that's
you
know
something
that
is,
you
know,
met
with
agreement
by
other
people
on
the
dice,
but
for
my
part,
I'd
like
to
have
a
little
bit
of
you
know
kind
of
background
before
we
introduce
to
the
more
general
public
and
five
ten
minutes
is
not
that
long
frankly,
so
so
I'd
be
amenabled
of
it,
but
I
mean
knowing
that
there
are
a
couple
of
times
sensitive.
Well,
let's
do
this.
Let
me
ask
our
members
of
the
public
I
see
there.
A
There
is
a
hand
raised
if
you're
here
for
18
or
19.
Can
you
please
raise
your
hand
from
the
public
and
Carol
Stanek?
Okay,
so
I'm,
assuming
as
part
of
our
Parks
and
Rec
commission
Carol's,
probably
here
for
item
number
18
I
would
assume
so:
okay
yeah,
let's
just
let's
just
do
1918
and
20.
is,
is
my
you
know,
recommendation
and
we'll
you
know
I
hope,
there's
time
to
do
a
five-minute
presentation
for
number
20
and
then
you
know
we
can.
A
K
A
A
Thank
you
very
much
and
so
item
number
19
is
the
consideration
of
amending
the
city
of
Cupertino
conflict
of
interest
code
for
officials
and
designated
employees
per
state
law
requirement
on
a
biennial
basis,
the
2022
local
agency,
biennial
notice
and
Madam
city
clerk.
You
are
the
presenter.
Did
you
want
to
give
a
brief
summary
of
this
item.
K
A
two
and
a
half
minute
presentation
just
to
share
quickly
I,
believe
you
can
see
my
screen.
Yes,
okay,
so
a
conflict
of
interest
code
tells
public
officials,
oops,
tells
public
officials
and
employees
what
to
disclose
on
their
form.
700
statement
of
economic
interest
and
the
amount
of
disclosure
depends
on
their
duties
per
state
law.
We
cities
must
establish
a
list
of
positions
that
are
involved
in
making
or
influencing
this
agency
decisions,
in
which
the
official
may
have
a
private
financial
interest.
K
They
also
ensure
disclosure
of
all
potential
conflict
situations,
narrowly
tailor
the
disclosure
requirements
and
make
amendments
when
necessary.
The
city
manager
reports
whether
the
amendments
are
needed
and
the
council
is
the
reviewing
body
for
code,
submittal
and
directs
review
and
adoption
an
amendment
to
the
city's
conflict
of
interest
code
is
necessary
this
year.
The
draft
resolution
proposes
clarifying
amendments
to
the
code
by
adding
the
economic
development
committee,
which
was
recently
codified
and
adding
and
deleting
positions
to
accurately
reflect
the
current
structure
of
the
organization.
K
The
information
required
to
be
in
a
code
may
change
over
time.
Thus,
agencies
must
review
their
codes,
biannually
and
amend
when
necessary.
The
Amendments
must
be
submitted
to
council
by
October
3rd.
The
draft
biennial
notice,
verifies
review
and
the
changes
and
is
consistent
with
state
regulations.
A
A
E
A
Right
so
we
have
a
motion
in
a
second
and
I
want
to
thank
our
our
city
staff,
and
you
know
the
city
clerk
City
Manager
for
making
sure
that
we
have
you
know
a
good
expansion
actually.
So,
just
very
briefly,
the
economic
development
committee
had
no
Charter
had
no
written
Charter
whatsoever,
and
so
it's
good
to
get
this
written
down
and
a
very
important
role
in
our
city.
So
it's
it's
nice
to
be
able
to
see
that
expansion
of
the
reporting
requirements
very
much
looking
forward
to
that.
A
Thank
you
very
much,
and
so
we're
on
to
item
number
18.
This
is
the
update
on
the
status
of
the
research
from
the
city
council
subcommittee,
meetings
for
the
Cupertino
Community
funding
grant
program
and
the
presenter.
If
I
may
Madam
city
manager
go
over
and
thank
you
much
for
that.
Ascent,
the
acting
director
of
The
Parks
and
Recreation
Department,
or
the
recreation
and
Community
Services
Department
Rachelle
sander
welcome
Rachelle.
P
P
P
and
in
the
past
city
council
has
determined
the
organizations
to
be
awarded
the
funds
through
the
program
and
on
June
5th
2018
city
council
directed
City
staff
to
update
the
policy
and
process
in
which
the
community
funding
updates
were
first
shared
with
the
Parks
and
Recreation
Commission.
Before
presenting
recommendations
from
the
commission
to
city
council
and
the
current
Community
funding
grant
program
process
consists
of
a
January
to
February
application
period
and
the
community
funding.
P
So
the
program
process
after
the
February
1st
application
deadline,
City
staff
reviews
the
received
applications
for
completeness
and
compliance
eligibility.
The
applications
are
then
presented
to
the
Parks
and
Recreation
Commission
in
March
and
April,
and
the
Commissioners
then
evaluate
and
discuss
the
applications
and
then
make
a
recommendation
to
city
council
and
May.
City
Council
considers
the
community
funding
Grant
requests
at
the
budget
study
session
and
then
make
a
final
decision
on
the
grant
amounts
for
each
applicant
as
part
of
the
budget.
Adoption
process,
which
usually
happens
in
June
and
after
the
final
budget
is
adopted.
P
P
Historical
funding,
so,
in
the
last
funding
cycle
fiscal
year,
2223
69
461
was
approved
for
the
community
funding
grant
program,
and
this
chart
depicts
the
city's
previously
awarded
fundings
through
the
program
since
2018.,
so
it's
52,
400
and
1819,
and
then
the
year
after
that
is
109
800
dollars
the
year
after
that
110
000
and
then
the
previous
year.
Before
this
one
is
a
hundred
fifteen
thousand
nine
hundred.
P
P
To
receive
funding
through
the
community
funding
Grant
process,
applicants
need
to
currently
meet
the
following
eligibility
criteria
from
the
policy.
First,
one
is
be
made
or
sponsored
by
a
501c3
nonprofit
organization
and
then
identify
how
the
funds
will
benefit.
The
Cupertino
community
and
the
application
be
awarded
only
once
per
project,
and
the
funds
must
be
used
for
specific
needs
and
not
ongoing
operational
costs
and
have
more
than
75
percent
of
the
requested
funds
set
aside
for
direct
service
costs,
as
opposed
to
administrative
costs
and
the
application
must
be
complete
and
submitted
by
the
application
deadline.
P
Also,
based
on
the
council
subcommittee
Direction
an
option
for
eligibility
eligibility
criteria
may
be
to
require
applicants,
submit
programs
or
projects
and
events
that
fall
under
at
least
one
of
the
general
plan
guiding
principles.
And
by
doing
so,
it
could
make
the
policy
clearer
to
remove
the
most
confusing
eligibility
criteria,
which
is
be
awarded
only
once
per
project.
P
And
the
next
steps
of
council
approves
to
continue
allocating
funding
to
the
Cupertino
community
grant
program.
This
will
be
included
in
the
approved
funding
and
the
annual
budget
for
fiscal
year
23-24
and
moving
forward
upon
city
council
Direction
City
staff
will
update
the
community
funding
Grant
policy
in
addition
to
eligibility
requirements,
evaluation
criteria
and
then
update
information
on
the
city
web
page,
and
this
concludes
the
update.
If
there
are
any
questions
for
shall
and
I
are
available
to
provide
any
additional
information.
Thank
you.
A
A
Okay:
let's
go
ahead
and
utilize
Carol
as
the
first
speaker
on
this
by
the
time
that
the
city
clerk
has
read
up
to
three
minutes
of
Carol's
email
into
the
record.
Please
have
your
hand
raised
on
Zoom
blue
card
filled
out
or
an
email
sent
to
city
clerk.
One
word
at
cupertino.org
in
order
to
be
recognized
as
a
public
speaker
for
this
item.
Madam
city
clerk,
dear.
K
Mayor
and
council
members,
I
am
Carol
Stanek,
a
Parks
and
Recreation.
Commissioner
speaking
for
myself
tonight,
as
a
commissioner,
I've
participated
in
the
evaluation
process
for
multiple
Cycles,
so
my
experience
here
is
up
close
and
personal.
I
will
say
that
I
found
the
Commissioners
to
be
very
respectful
of
the
process
following
the
evaluation
criteria
and
weighing
the
guidelines.
Unfortunately
I.
It
seems
that
the
commission
could
not
anticipate
councils
questions
or
priorities
Council,
sometimes
granted
substantially
more,
sometimes
substantially
less
or
identify
different
recipients
than
recommended
by
the
commission.
K
While
this
is
entirely
council's
prerogative,
it
has
led
to
much
frustration
on
the
part
of
the
applicant.
The
applicants
took
great
efforts
to
present
to
the
commission
and
answer
questions
posed
by
the
Commissioners,
but
they
did
not
get
this
opportunity
with
Council.
It
is
difficult,
if
not
impossible,
for
the
commission
to
know
the
desires
of
the
council
when
there
seems
to
be
many
subjective
aspects
of
this
funding,
giving
council's
desires
to
be
actively
involved
in
the
grant
process.
K
I
recommend
that
parks
and
that
the
Parks
and
Recreation
Commission
be
removed
from
the
process
so
that
Council
can
have
direct
input
and
interaction
with
the
applicants
having
Council
participate
in
the
ratings
prescribed
by
the
process
will
improve
the
consistency
of
the
final
grants.
I
believe
this
change
will
improve
councils
and
the
applicant's
satisfaction
with
the
process
and
funding.
It
will
also
streamline
the
process
by
eliminating
the
duplication
of
work
for
staff
for
multiple
presentations.
K
A
E
E
I
think
that's
really
really
a
good
starting
point,
but
I'd
almost
say
I
would
send
this
subcommittee
back
to
talk
to
some
members
of
parks
and
rec.
If
we
can
say,
go
meet
with
the
chair
in
the
vice
chair
and
have
it
have
a
sit-down
talk
with
with
staff
perhaps
and
and
try
to
work
out.
You
know
how
we
can
perhaps
integrate
some
of
what
we're
seeing
with
the
other
cities
and
then
come
back
again
with
some
recommendations,
but
I
heard
time
sensitive
on
this
one.
E
A
Okay
well,
thank
you
very
much
councilmember
way
and
you
know
the
way
I
read
the
recommended
action
is
to
provide
direction
as
to
next
steps,
and
so
you
know
personally,
I
think
that's
a
fairly
legitimate,
Next,
Step
and
and
quite
a
sensible
one.
Frankly,
so,
let's
go
to
council
member
white
with
a
hand
raised
followed
by
vice
mayor,
Chao
and
councilmember
Willie,
and
then
I'll
make
some
brief
comments.
B
Thank
you,
mayor,
Paul
I
want
to
follow
up
with
Council
Amber
Morris
comments,
because
I
really
like
her
comments.
I
do
have
a
question
on
that
once
per
project
too,
because
if
it's
a
really
good
project
and
the
same
organization
would
like
to
do
it
in
the
city
would
like
to
support
it,
I
thought
we
could
have
some
flexibility
on
it,
so
that
could
be
Revisited.
The
second
one
is
going
through
the
process.
I
did
I.
Remember
I,
made
that
comment.
B
The
Park
and
Recreation
went
through
the
process
and
applicants
made
the
presentations
to
the
park
and
recreation,
and
we
actually
took
off
maybe
be
two
or
three
that
the
parking
Recreation
recommended
without
listening
to
the
whole
presentation.
So
I
did
see
that
Gap
I
can
see
what
Carol
was
mentioned,
because
we
made
decisions
without
really
having
that
presentation.
So
I
think
that
could
be
somewhere.
We
could
be
improved
and
also
to
minimize
staff
time.
So
maybe
it
is
good
to
have
if
the
council
wants
to
make
that
decision.
B
Maybe
the
council
should
take
the
whole
presentation
and
really
hear
from
the
applicants
or
the
product
congregation
can
do
it?
I,
don't
know
the
process,
I
think,
as
Carol
says,
needs
to
be
a
little
bit
of
a
streamlined
and
maybe,
and
also
with
the
mind
of
minimizing
a
staff
time.
Thank
you.
Okay,.
A
M
Sure
can
you
hear
me?
Yes,
welcome.
Thank
you.
Yes,
there
is
a
a
separate
meeting
that
the
commission
has.
That
invites
all
of
the
applicants
to
come
and
make
a
presentation,
so
it
is
really
up
to
the
applicant
in
general.
Every
one
of
them
comes
unless
there's
an
exception
and
and
the
ones
that
have
not
presented
have
generally
not
been
given
any
much
consideration.
M
I,
don't
think
they've
been
given
grants,
but
there
there
is
not
only
a
presentation,
but
there
is
a
back
and
forth
with
questions
and
answers
directly
to
the
applicants,
and
so
they
they
put
a
lot
of
effort
into
that
meeting.
To
present
to
the
commission
expecting
that
our
recommendation
will
really
hold
weight
with
the
council.
M
D
You
so
yeah
I'm,
also
very
I.
Think
the
problem
is
the
guideline.
I
I,
respect
that
the
commission
is
trying
to
respect
and
follow
the
guideline.
However,
I
think
the
incidence
is
when
the
council
did
not
fund.
Those
were
the
instant
incidence.
Is
that
I
feel
it
didn't
really
follow
the
guidelines,
so
I
thought
it
wasn't
fair
for
the
people
who
did
not
apply
because
they
thought
they
didn't
follow
the
deadline.
One
example
is
Yang.
Zing
I
know
that
organization
I
really
like
what
they
do.
D
However,
their
application
initially
was
applying
for
a
grant
to
prepare
curriculum
for
a
summer
camp.
That's
a
paid
summer
camp
that
does
not
seem
to
follow
the
guideline,
and
then
they
I
heard
that
they
changed
it
in
the
middle
to
say:
oh
they'll
get
funding
for
underprivileged
students,
but
that
still
does
not
make
that
event
open
to
all
which
I
thought
is
the
requirement.
D
So
I
am
because
actually
in
the
past,
I
have
proposed.
Maybe
the
city
should
consider
providing
grants
for
underprivileged
students
to
attend
summer
camps
because
they
cannot
afford.
So
if
we
would
like
to
support
that
I
believe
that
should
be
a
separate
Grant
category.
So
everyone
who
would
like
to
take
advantage
of
that
could
apply
rather
than
someone
coming
up
with
their
own
category
and
then
apply,
and
then
somehow
we
give
a
special
exception
because
they
applied.
A
D
Okay
yeah,
so
another
incidence
is
the
high
school
club
that,
if
we
do,
if
we
want
to
allow
that,
that
should
be
made
equally
available
for
all
high
school
clubs
to
apply
and
another
incidents
that
I
think
we
had.
The
disagreement
is:
should
we
from
give
funding
to
a
public
agency
like
cusd,
who
has
hundreds
of
millions
of
dollars
of
budget?
C
Thanks
so
thank
you,
Carol
I
think
your
comments
are
very
meaningful
to
me.
I,
truly
believe
in
the
importance
of
the
commissions
and
historically
on
items
when
they
come
to
the
council.
They
come
without
the
findings
of
the
commissions
and
while
in
this
case
my
memory
is,
is
that
we
do
see
some
of
the
recommendations
from
the
commission
but
I.
My
memory
is
I,
remember
going
through
the
applications
and
then
reading
what
the
applicants
said.
C
A
A
I
I
came
from
the
Parks
and
Recreation
Commission
before
I
was
elected
to
see
councils,
and
so
you
know,
I
I,
think
I,
understand
the
sentiment
of
Carol
and
perhaps
her
colleagues
on
the
Parks
and
Recreation
Commission.
At
the
same
time
you
know
in
you
know
to
to
to
make
no,
you
know
point
at
all
about
it:
it'd
be
a
dollar
or
or
fine
right,
I
mean
it's.
A
It's
it's
an
advisory
role
at
the
end
of
the
day
and
as
vice
mayor
Chow
was
indicating
there
could
well
be
you
know,
good
faith
reasons,
for
you
know
deviating
from
the
advice
of
the
advisory
committee
or
commission.
So
you
know-
and
you
know,
Carol
and
I
have
actually
had
this
conversation
back
and
forth
over
the
course
of
years.
Ever
since
the
grant
funding
program
was
was
formalized,
which
I
think
was
really
good
thing,
because
we
used
to
just
kind
of
do
it
in
a
rather
ad
hoc
manner.
A
So
I
I
don't
know
whether
that
would
be
well
received
by
the
members
of
the
subcommittee
or
the
council,
because
of
course
that
would
entail.
You
know,
probably
a
fairly
significant
amount
of
of
time
and
that
kind
of
a
commitment
so
yeah
I
would
I
would
actually
really
support
the
notion
of
asking
the
subcommittee
to
interface
with
a
couple
of
members
or
perhaps
even
the
Parks
and
Recreation
Commission
itself
in
a
noticed
meeting
as
an
agenda
item.
You
know
perhaps
in
the
next
Parks
and
Recreation
committee,
commission,
meaning
to
talk
about.
A
You
know
I,
I,
I,
don't
really
think
of
any
particular
decision
that
was
made
as
being
in
any
way
shape
or
form
arbitrary,
I
I
think
there
were
always
reasons,
and
you
know,
criteria
our
criteria
because
they're
not
you,
know
hard
and
brightline
rules.
So
you
know
these.
Are
you
know
these
are?
These
are
subjective
judgment
calls
at
the
end
of
the
day,
so
let
me
go
and
ask
since
we've
all
had
an
opportunity
to
speak.
A
The
time
is
a
little
bit
past,
11
30.
At
the
moment,
I
I
would
like
to
ask
for
a
motion
based
upon.
Perhaps
what
we've
heard
in
this
kind
of
first
round
of
comments
and
I
know
that
you
can't
really
rely
upon
the
staff
recommendation,
because
staff
recommendation
is
to
provide
Direction.
So
I
may
suggest
that
we
ask
the
subcommittee
to
you
know,
convene
with
the
Parks
and
Recreation
chair
and
vice
chair,
to
talk
about
further
steps.
That's
that's
a
potential
option.
A
Another
potential
option
is
to
you
know,
as
I
suggested
go
ahead
and
have
the
subcommittee
sit
in
on
the
future.
You
know
you
know,
process
for
the
Parks
and
Recreation
evaluative
process,
and
yet
another
option
is
to
go
ahead
and,
as
the
member
of
the
Parks
and
Recreation
Commission
has
suggested,
just
you
know,
take
it
as
a
as
a
council
process
in
terms
of
develop
as
in
terms
of
evaluating
the
grants.
So
just
some
ideas,
councilmember
boy
I,
noticed
that
you
have
your
hand
raised
first.
B
A
A
C
C
C
Maybe
an
operation
or
or
an
Outreach
type
thing
and
move
it
back
toward
the
specific
task
that
they
wanted.
The
the
funds
for
so
I'm
just
trying
to
say
that
I
I
think
that
there
may
be
some
of
that
in
the
mix
that
they
know
and
we
don't
know,
and
then
we
look
at
the
application
and
see
that
it's
not
really
following
what
we
believe
to
be
the
the
criteria
and
then
they
get
left
out.
Okay,.
D
D
It
seems
we
need
that
before
the
subcommittee
go
and
talk
to
Parks
and
Rec
commission
right,
or
are
you
just
asking
the
process
where
commission
to
propose
the
possible
religion
and
then
bring
it
back
to
the
council
and
I'm
confused
on
that?
And
if
we,
the
council,
is
giving
some
direction.
I
would
like
the
council
to
consider
potentially
creating
a
separate
category
for
student
clubs
to
apply
so
that
the
student
clubs
know
there
is
a
category
for
them
and
then
another
potential
category
for
on
summer
camp
before
on
the
privileged
privileged
students.
D
D
D
E
Okay,
thank
you.
I
think
we
should
probably
be
looking
at
the
eligibility
requirements
that
are
in
in
our
surrounding
cities.
Most
all
are
showing
that
you,
you
need
to
be
a
501c3
non-profit,
I,
like
what
I'm
seeing
from
Sunnyvale
Sunnyvale
actually
with
a
larger
budget,
has
a
much
smaller
amount
that
they're
that
they
Grant
and
for
their
Community
grant
funding
at
34
000,
so
they're
they're
giving
away
a
lot
less,
and
they
do
mention
that
fundraiser
events
are
not
eligible
for
grant
funding.
I.
E
Think
that
that's
interesting
and
all
of
their
proposed
events
must
be
held
within
Sunnyvale
City
Limits,
be
of
a
city-wide
nature,
serve
the
Greater
Community,
be
free
and
open
to
the
public.
Some
of
these
we
have
and
note
priority
may
be
given
to
events
that
demonstrate
capacity
to
serve
at
least
500
people.
The
events
should
encourage
celebrations
of
community
which
focus
on
the
character,
diversity
and
quality
of
Sunnyvale,
and
provide
vitality
and
identity
to
the
community.
30.
A
B
A
A
A
vote
on
this
I'll
remind
everyone
we're
at
11
43
right
now.
There
was
a
desire
to
go
ahead
and
get
to
item
number
20
to
get
the
staff
report
and
perhaps
take
the
member
of
the
public.
That's
still
here
as
to
a
as
to
some
comments
on
20
before
we
continue
it.
So
if
there
is
an
appetite
to
take
a
vote
on
this
motion,
we'll
have
it.
If
there's
not,
then
this
too
will
be
continued
to
likely
the
October
4th
meeting.
So
councilman
Willie
your
hand
is
still
raised.
A
C
Yeah
so
I
appreciate
what
councilman
Moore
said
about
you
know:
wow
sunnyvale's
got
it
really
defined
and
you
know
for
501
C3
type
entity,
but
I
would
like
to
you
know
just
expand
it
a
little
bit
in
the
sense
that
you
know
when
a
group
is
a
501
3C
entity,
they're
more
established.
Yes,
it's
going
to
serve
a
com,
you
know
500
people
or
more
in
the
community,
but
the
the
grant
money
just
like
for
college.
You
know
you're
giving
grants
to
disadvantaged
or
people
with
special
things
you're
trying
to
help
promote.
C
You
know
the
the
entities
that
otherwise
wouldn't
be
moving
forward
and
I
think
that's
an
important
consideration.
So
if
we
wanted
two
categories
great,
we
have
one
for
the
established
ones
and
they
compete
against
each
other
for
those
dollars.
But
then
we
have
the
seed
money.
You
know
if
my
memory
I
know
the
crest
Awards
we
gave
it
to
the
students
that
did
the
stem
project
for
students.
Okay,
let's
wrap.
A
K
A
G
A
D
G
A
Thank
you
thank
you,
madam
city
manager.
So
let's
go
ahead
and
hear
the
staff
presentation.
I,
understand
it
to
be
about
seven
minutes.
Long
on
item
number,
20
and
item
number
20
has
to
do
with
a
crosswalk
affiliated
with
the
Ragnar
Creek
Trail
and
I'm
not
going
to
go
ahead
and
read
the
entire.
You
know
agenda
agenda
description,
but
Madam
city
manager.
Would
you
like
to
introduce
the
presenter
or
I
can
just
do
it
directly?
David
Stillman
Transportation
manager
welcome
David
item
20.
F
F
Okay,
can
everybody
see
my
screen?
Yes,
all
right,
very
good,
so
tonight
I'll
be
discussing
some
topics
related
to
pedestrian
access
to
the
Ragnar
Creek
Trail
and
the
Campo
de
la
Zano
development
adjacent
to
the
trail
along
Rodriguez
Avenue.
First,
a
brief
history.
The
Campo
de
lizano
subdivision,
which
is
on
the
south
side
of
Rodriguez
Avenue,
was
developed
in
the
early
2000s
as
a
condition
of
development.
F
The
city
council
discussed
this
request
at
their
March
1st
meeting
and
ultimately
directed
staff
to
monitor
the
trail
and
pathway
usage
for
a
year
following
the
opening
of
the
trail
and
report
back
to
council.
With
the
recommendation
on
whether
the
pathway,
easement
should
remain,
staff
is
also
directed
to
return
to
council
sooner
with
mid-block
crosswalk
Concepts
and
recommendations
and
suggestions
for
pathway,
signage
and
that's
the
purpose
of
tonight's
presentation.
F
So
here's
an
overview
of
the
site
just
refresh
everybody's
memory-
here's
Rodriguez
Avenue
Regner,
Creek
Trail,
is
along
here
this
part's
under
construction.
This
is
the
400
foot
segment
that
was
constructed
with
this.
The
Campo
de
lasano
development-
and
this
is
the
10-foot
pedestrian
pathway
easement
that
connects
the
trail
to
Rodriguez
Avenue
shown
here
are
several
potential
locations
for
mid-block
crosswalks
across
Rodriguez
that
I'll
go
into
in
a
little
bit
more
detail
very
shortly.
F
So,
as
I
mentioned,
there
are
constraints
at
the
pathway
entrance
that
preclude
installing
a
crosswalk
at
this
location,
so
here's
a
photo
showing
the
situation
at
the
pathway.
Looking
across
Rodriguez,
you
see
the
driveway
across
the
street
fire
hydrants
to
this
side,
there's
also
some
storm
drain
infrastructure
that
precludes
installing
the
necessary
Ada
ramps
to
put
a
crosswalk
at
this
location
and
in
addition,
the
sight
distance
is
below
Highway
design
minimums
at
this
location.
F
Actually,
let
me
back
up
I'm
trying
to
rush
through
this
presentation.
I'll
slow
down
a
little
bit
concept.
A
at
this
location
is
located
at
the
Valley
Water
Access
gate,
which
is
at
the
point
where
the
trail
makes
a
90
degree
turn
to
go
down
the
back
side
of
the
city
hall
and
the
library
parking
lot.
This
is
about
580
feet
from
the
pathway,
so
it's
not
very
useful
for
people
that
are
using
the
pathway,
but
there
is
adequate
sight
distance
at
this
location
for
pedestrians
that
wish
to
cross
there.
J
F
Okay,
location
B:
this
is
as
close
as
you
can
get
the
crosswalk
to
the
pathway.
It's
about
70
feet,
west
of
the
pathway.
This
is
the
prospective
crosswalk
location.
This
is
the
pathway
sight.
Distance
at
this
location
is
about
200
feet,
looking
to
the
west
and
unlimited
looking
to
the
east,
so
we
do
have
the
bare
minimum
sight
distance
for
the
highway
design
manual
at
this
location.
F
Moving
to
the
east
location
C
is
about
70
feet,
east
of
the
pathway
and
again,
there's
minimum
sight
distance
at
this
location,
200
feet
looking
to
the
west
and
unlimited
sight,
distance
looking
to
the
east
and
going
a
little
bit
further
east.
If
we
want
to
really
maximize
our
our
site
distance,
we'll
call
this
C
Prime,
which
is
170
feet
east
of
the
pathway.
This
is
the
next
closest
that
you
can
get
from
the
location
that
I
just
mentioned.
We've
got
about
over
300
feet,
looking
to
the
West
at
this
location
and
unlimited
site
distance.
F
So
in
response
we
have
developed
a
sign
that
you
see
in
front
of
you
here.
This
would
be
placed
one
at
each
end
of
the
pathway,
Trail
rules,
three
rules
that
we've
noted
one
to
be
quiet.
Please
respect
the
neighbors,
the
second
rule,
the
hours
of
operation,
that
being
from
dawn
to
dusk
and
third,
rule
a
concern.
We
heard
a
lot
of
of
people
riding
their
bicyclists
on
the
pathway,
instructions
to
Dismount
the
bicycle
with
a
little
pictorial
here
to
to
further
emphasize
the
point
that
we
want
you
to
walk
your
bike.
A
Thank
you
very
much.
David
and
I
do
see
a
couple
of
members
of
the
public
with
their
hands
raised
and
per
the
motion
that
we
made
prior
to
item
number
19
being
heard,
we'll
go
ahead
and
take
these
members
of
the
public
and
their
comments
before
concluding
our
meeting.
They
are
Christina
Yang
and
John
z.
I
will
just
let
everyone
know
that
we
are
coming
up
against
a
time
constraint,
so
those
will
be
our
comments
that
we
take
prior
to
adjourning
this
meeting
and
and
continuing
the
item.
Q
Hi,
thank
you
mayor.
Thank
you,
members
of
the
city
council.
My
name
is
Christina.
I
live
on
Lozano
Lane
I
continue
to
request
the
city
council
to
approve
the
original
staff
report,
recommendation
in
February
2022
to
vacate
Rodriguez
easement,
since
the
extension
of
the
ragnard
creek
trail
will
provide
an
official
Trailhead
to
the
West
Side.
The
Eastman
should
be
super
should
be
superseded
by
relocation
of
the
Westerly
connection.
Q
Points
on
March
1st,
the
city
council
meeting
I
think
it
was
widely
acknowledged
that
there
is
a
safety
concern
of
people
crossing
Rodriguez
to
enter
the
future
Trail.
The
the
staff
report
we
just
heard
contains
three
possible
options
for
the
crosswalk
and
somehow
linked
the
fate
of
the
easement
to
the
establishment
of
the
new
crosswalk
I
personally.
Do
not
agree
to
such
linkage,
especially
if
you
look
at
the
staff's
current
top
recommendation.
Option
A
the
crosswalk
to
be
established
is
right
in
front
of
the
rignard
trail
access
point
unit
to
City
Hall.
Q
It
is
only
to
prove
our
Point
all
the
law.
You
know
all
the
time
that
directing
traffic
Crossing
Rodriguez
and
entering
the
trail
at
the
official
Trailhead
is
the
correct
way
to
go.
I
know
in
previous
meetings:
The
walkback
Association
members
have
aggressively
expressed
that
they
want
the
easement
to
be
open.
Well,
I
think
the
real
question
here
is
whether
we
need
the
easement.
The
vacation
of
the
public
easement
is
not
unprecedented
as
they
described
in
Cupertino.
We
have
had
many
past
resolutions
for
vacating
Eastman
following
the
staff
reports.
Q
For
example,
like
you
know,
resolution
number
19-037,
19-142
easement
in
Cupertino
has
clearly
been
historically.
You
know
superseded
by
relocation
which
complies
with
the
law.
So
why
is
it
extremely
hard
for
Rodriguez
easement
to
be
vacated
for
the
same
reason,
and
Cupertino
will
continue.
You
know
developing
new
parks
and
trails
for
its
residents,
so
there
will
be
more
new
access
points
built
in
the
future.
Q
What
it
really
makes
sense
to
keep
all
the
old
easements
just
because
it
has
been
there
I'm,
quoting
commissioner
Eric
from
bicycle
pedestrian
committee
meeting
on
June
15th,
which,
by
the
way,
was
a
very
painful
discussion
to
hear
it's
a
meeting
that
made
me
realize
that
our
Lozano
Lane
residents
were
not
really
treated
fairly
and
the
Eastman
vacation
request
is
not
really
being
handled
with
trust
and
fairness.
Eric
was
extremely
biased
when
commenting
on
the
issue
by
refusing
to
acknowledge
our
hoes
legal
right
to
revisit
the
Eastman
based
based
on
this
new
Trail
extension.
Q
By
simply
saying
quote,
the
walkway
is
already
there.
He
refers.
You
know
all
the
data,
collection,
monitoring
and
research
effort,
as
quote
meaningless.
So
if
our
Cupertino
residents
and
developers
know
that
the
easement
vacation
sector
handled
are
handled
with
such
difficulty,
who,
in
the
future
will
ever
Grant
any
easement
to
the
CDL
country,
knowing
that
they
would
never
be
able
to
vacate
it
just
because
it
has
always
been
there.
R
Be
okay
sure
am
I
audible.
Now,
yes,
you
are
okay.
Thank
you
very
much.
Dear
mayor
and
council
members,
thanks
for
the
opportunity
for
me
to
comment.
I
live
in
Los,
Angeles,
I
totally
agree
with
Chris
Christina's
point
specifically
to
today's
meeting
topic.
Here's
my
comment
regarding
the
crosswalk
options
concept.
A
is
obviously
the
best
and
logical
choice
because
it
has
the
best
field
of
view
for
both
drivers
and
pedestrians.
So
it's
safer
for
possession.
It's
also
located
right
next
to
a
chill
head.
So
it's
convenient
for
position.
R
Two
concept
B
is
dangerous
and
will
cause
accident
sooner
or
later.
If
it's
implemented.
In
fact,
it
had
a
traffic
accident
in
that
in
the
past,
just
a
few
yards
away
from
concept,
V
location
involving
a
car
and
a
pedestrian.
If
you
come
down
to
the
location
B,
you
will
know
it
is
a
bad
and
safe
place
to
have
a
crossword.
Drivers
can't
see
pedestrians
Crossing
until
too
late
and
drivers
normally
won't
even
expect
a
classwork
existed
in
a
place
like
a
concept,
the
B
location
concept.
R
She
is
very
close
to
the
driver
driveway
when
we
exit
Los
Angeles
to
the
Rodriguez.
It's
not
good
regarding
the
proposed
percentage.
I
have
issue
with
the
word
Trail
rules
in
the
proposed
signage.
The
easement
is
for
pedestrian
walkway.
It
should
be
for
pedestrian.
Only
the
walkway
is
not
a
true
head.
Instead
for
proposed
the
true
rules,
it
should
be
pedestrian
walkway
rules
or
work
with
rules.
I
also
have
issue
with
the
word
this
among
bicycle.
It
should
be
no
bikes
and
a
no
skateboarding.
R
There
are
serious
safety
and
liability
concerns.
The
walkway
is
not
safe
at
all
for
petition.
When
bicycle
appeared,
cities
should
not
heat
or
encourage
bikers
to
use
The
Pedestrian
walkway
there
are
children
nearby,
which
is
safe
for
bicycle
and
pedestrian,
and
the
city
should
encourage
bikers
to
use
those.
Thank
you
very
much
for
considering
my
feedback
and
have
a
good
night
thanks.
S
Okay,
thank
you
mayor
Paul
and
dear
council
member.
My
name
is
I'm
also
resident
at
Campo
di
Lozano
I
have
three
points
I
want
to
make
tonight.
The
first
point
is
regarding
to
the
easement
and
the
proposed
assignment
Lozano
Eastman
states
that
it
is
a
pedestrian
pathway
for
daytime
use.
Only
the
proposed
signage
should
not
include
Trail,
as
we
alluded
before
it
incorrectly
implies
that
this
pathway
is
a
part
of
the
Ragnar
Trail.
This
one
bicycle
is
also
not
sufficient,
because
nothing
except
pedestrian
use
should
be
allowed.
S
So
no
bike,
no
skateboard,
no
scooter
no
whatsoever
except
pedestrian
use.
We
still
request
that
city
council
to
vacate
this
pathway
portion
of
basements,
as
its
original
purpose
does
no
longer
apply.
Closing
the
pathway
will
remove
safety
and
liability
risks,
for
example,
poor
visibility
of
the
traffic
Rodriguez
and
also
on
the
trail,
and
there's
no
Ada
access
for
this
easement
walkway
and
and
also
reduce
or
remove
maintenance
costs.
If
the
state
of
the
Cupertino
decides
not
to
vacate,
this
is
meant.
S
The
city
of
Cupertino
should
be
responsible
for
all
the
liability
and
maintenance
cost
of
this
pathway.
The
second
point
is
to
our
city,
council,
members,
CD
staff
and
Commissioners.
We
trust
you
that
you
are
elected
to
write
decisions
on
behalf
of
the
kopatino
residents,
not
for
the
group
who
is
allowed
its
voice.
This
responsibility
requires
Integrity
wisdom
and
non-biased
judgment
based
on
facts.
S
Please
upload
your
integrity,
your
best
judgment
and
make
the
right
decisions
of
all
the
good
for
the
good
of
all
populating
your
relevance.
The
third
point
is
to
some
fellow
competition
residents
who
are
on
operated
side.
I
just
want
to
say
we're
a
neighbor's,
not
your
enemy,
we
respectively
respect
respectfully,
ask
you
to
be
respectful
and
be
empathetic.
Please
don't
use
aggressive
language
in
extreme
rhetoric
to
portray
us.
S
A
G
G
G
A
A
H
E
A
A
How
I
would
vote
I
want
to
be
procedurally
correct
here,
so
so
Chris?
What
should
we
do?
Should
we
just
withdraw
the
motion?
Vote
or
you
know,
I
guess
technically
we
could
ask
councilman
Moore
to
withdraw
her
second
and
then
there's
no
motion
on
the
table
and
then
we
could
address
this
point
very
briefly.
D
D
A
A
Right
I
mean
so
so
so
so
yes,
I
I
was
actually
thinking
about
maybe
getting
a
little
bit
creative
with
the
agenda
and
hyperlinking
to
the
presentation
so
that
for
the
benefit
of
the
public
but
but
suffice
it
to
say
you
know
we
we
should
be
able
to.
You
know
satisfy
the
the
concerns
here
so
well.
Thank
you
very
much.